WEBVTT - Crab Bag, Part 2: It’s Raining Crabs (Hallelujah)

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick, and we're back with part

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 3>two in our twenty twenty six crab Bag series. By

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 3>somewhat popular demand, we are we're doing a sort of

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 3>roundup or maybe a pinch up of crab related subject matter.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 3>This was in part inspired by a listener male that

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 3>we talked about in our most recent listener Mail episode.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 3>And we're always down to talk about some crab stuff.

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>No real organizing principle here, it's just yah assortment of

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>crab topics, a crab buffet. So in the last episode

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 3>we talked about the legend of a miraculous crab associated

0:00:55.360 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 3>with a Catholic figure named Saint Francis Xavier, and how

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>that legend sort of connects to a real decapod species

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 3>in the Western Pacific and Indian oceans. We might revisit

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 3>that topic today. I'll explain more about that later. And

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>then also at the end of the last episode, we

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>talked about an idea known as crab theory or maybe

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>under various names, but that's one way to refer to it.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a metaphor for chaotic, anti cooperative human behaviors in

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>certain situations, based on the supposed behavior of crabs in

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 3>a bucket. And we briefly got into the question of

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>to what extent crabs ever could be said to be

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>socially cooperative, And we're back today to talk about more.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 2>That's right. So for my own part for this episode,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I kind of poked around and I wanted to find

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>something to talk about that's tied directly to some crab species.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>But then also I have some stuff that we'll get

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>into later that involves some crab folklore and indeed like

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 2>a crab demon or crab spece from a particular tradition.

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>But first, yeah, let's talk about frog crabs. So, listeners,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>do you like to dance like a crab? Have you

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>ever danced like a crap? I hope that you have.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I hope that you can. I hope that you're doing

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 2>it right now. Perhaps scuttling side to side on wide legs,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 2>arms out to either side with fingers or hands you

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 2>can sort of choose forming the clacking makeshift pinchers, or

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 2>perhaps you prefer to do a kind of crab walk

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that it's in the sense that you might encounter this

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>in an exercise class or an exercise routine where you

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>move around on all fours and kind of a reverse

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 2>tabletop pose, so belly up, all four limbs on the

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 2>ground walking side to side do I think sometimes people

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>do the crab walk back and forth as well.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 3>All of the above very popular with my three year old.

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>In fact, for a while, part of our standard bedtime

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>routine was that I had to do a crab dance,

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 3>so like she would demand a crab data performance before

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>she would go to bed, and it was really funny

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>for a while, and then I guess the gag wore out.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I have observed that kids can really do the

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>all fours reverse tabletop crab walk like nobody's business. They

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>can really get down there and do it. There also

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>seems to be a standing crab walk exercise that entails

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 2>side to side movement, but with like banded thighs. I

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you've encountered this one. You can find

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>videos and image of this online.

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 3>This is like a like an exercise or it's.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 2>A yeah, it looks like it's popping up in exercise

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>videos and exercise routine where there's some sort of a

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>band that is placed around a human's thighs and then

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 2>they move side.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 3>To side the thigh master crab method.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it seems to be the case.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I always think of when I think of crabs moving

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 2>side to side, I think of Zoidberg from Futurama. I

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>also think of a particular Japanese rest slur by the

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>name of Grand Naniwa, who he's passed now, but for

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>a while he was like a comedy wrestler with a

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>crab like mask, and one of his signature moves was

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>to move side to side whilst making little pinchers with

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>his fingers and then doing an elbow drop off the ropes.

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 3>I actually looked this up. So he's he's not only

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 3>walking side by side and pin doing this, but he's

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>doing it on the rope between the what do you

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 3>call it the turnstile the turn turnbules.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So he's going back and forth on the rope,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 3>I guess, preparing to jump and do the elbow drop, right.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, powering up, summoning the power of the crab. I

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 2>don't know how many winds he picked up with this

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 2>particular maneuver, but it was it was funny to watch.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I found it quite admirable.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and great mass for sure. So you know, generally,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>but not always, when we engage in human crab antics, Yeah,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna move side to side lateral movement, because that's

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>how a great many crabs move around on land. If

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 2>you're out walking on the beach or on the pier

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>and you're looking at sand crabs or rock crabs and

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 2>you're watching them, you know, secretly move about, you're probably

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 2>watching this rapid side stepping action. This is what they're

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 2>known for. And indeed, true crab anatomy is just optimized

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>in general for side stepping. They can do rapid changes

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>in direction. If you've ever tried to chase a crab

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>on the beach, you've found this out. They can easily

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>stop going one way and start going the other way.

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know, at least for humans, I've found

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>that it tends to send a message as well, like

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the crab is saying I'm looking right at you, my

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 2>claws are out, but I'm moving away from you latterly.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 3>At least, you know, I think a lot of gamers

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>might appreciate the metaphor of I don't know a strayfing,

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 3>but whatever it is, it's some kind of like a

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 3>fighting game or first person shooter. You're moving sideways really

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 3>fast to try to confuse your enemy, but you always

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>want to be facing them, and I guess have the

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 3>same idea.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I'm suddenly I didn't have this in my notes,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 2>but I'm reminded now. I think I saw this movie,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 2>or at least I remember seeing trailers for it. But

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>there was a two thousand and six Japanese monster movie

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>slash sports comedy titled Crab Goalkeeper, in which like a

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 2>football or soccer goalkeeper is like a giant or at

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>least man sized crab monster. Yes, because you know that,

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>of course, isn't the optimal situation for somebody with phenomenal

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 2>lateral movement.

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 3>That's brilliant. I love it now.

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 2>In general, it's worth knowing that that side to side

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 2>movements of crabs, this is something that evolves as crabs

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>leave behind their more lobster like evolutionary origins, and there

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>are a number of little explainer articles online about this.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Matt Slater has one for BBC's Discovered Wildlife in twenty

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. You know, look that up if you want

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>some more information about it. But basically, like a lobster

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>like form is only going to be able to more

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>expressly move forward, its tail is going to get in

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the way. And so as it as these organisms took

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 2>on their full crab like form, most of them end

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 2>up having this lateral movement ability.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, yeah, so it's a change that occurs from

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the more lobster morph to the crab morph.

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, and and it gets it gets a little

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>more complicated than that. We'll come back to some examples why.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>But like one extreme example would be the Japanese spider crab.

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I think everyone's seen one of these, you've releast seen pictures,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>but they also pop up in aquariums. They really almost

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 2>don't look real.

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Big long, spindly legs compared to the body.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the largest crabs, and they move quite slow in

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, deep environments, and they can move side to

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>side certainly, and I believe side to side movement is

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little bit faster. But they all also move front

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 2>to back. So you know, car is subject to change

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 2>with evolution if new matters come to light. Plus, as

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>we've touched on before. Not all crabs are true crabs.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 2>The hermit crab, of course, is a great example. We've

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 2>talked about this before. If you watch them on the beach,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>you know they're going to do a lot of forward

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>momentum movements on the beach. You know, they have the

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>ability to move around in other directions as well, but

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>they're full speed ahead for the most part.

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And when it comes to movement, the hermit crabs

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>have a whole other thing to contact with. You know,

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 3>they are moving hardware.

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So most true crabs are going to generally be

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>lateral movers with bodies that are wider than they are long.

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>But we do find some exceptions out there, and one

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 2>of the main exceptions is that of the frog crabs,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>also known as the spanner crabs because their claws look

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit like wrenches or spanners.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 3>I can see it. Yes, So these are crabs.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>In the Rannini day family, with Ranina Ranina being the

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 2>best example of this crab variety. This is not to

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>be confused with the crab eating frog. This is a

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>frog crab, so named because I guess they kind of

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 2>look like frogs when if you find an image of

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>one just like a top down image. I don't know,

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>it's harder to get that sense of a frog. Basically,

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 2>these guys are squatter, They're not wide, They're narrower and

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>longer while still being you know, bulky. They have paddle

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 2>like limbs, and as Jeff Heck pointed out in a

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen article for New Scientists titled the Tasty Crab

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>that looks like an Ugly frog, they sometimes assume frog

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>like poses. And I think this is where the frogness

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 2>of the thing comes into play. If you look up

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 2>an image of one of some of these creatures, look

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>for the images that are not like top down like

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>specimen shots, and more like the ones setting around on

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 2>a rock, and you can see, all right, they have

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of they can take on this kind of squat

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>almost mammalion pose.

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely see it now. So you've got in the

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 3>outline here one image of a side on image of

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>one of these things sitting up against a rock, and

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 3>it looks very much like a frog. It's kind of

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 3>squatting on its back legs. It's got the front legs

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 3>out like you might see a front you know, frog's

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 3>front legs, the long ones pushing it up in the

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 3>sitting posture, and then even on the underside of its

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 3>body there is a paler section than the rest of

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 3>its body, kind of like you often see the paler

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 3>underside of a frog's throat.

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, so they're they're pretty neat looking. I

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 2>should note that their spanner like claws are not as

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>powerful as that name might imply. So. The crab's limbs

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 2>in general are evolved for superior burling, which they do backwards,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 2>and the front pinchers are mainly for gripping the sandy bottom.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>They also use them for a grasping soft prey. Generally

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>they're scavengers, come out to scavenge things that have fallen down,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 2>but they will also sometimes grab, you know, small marine

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 2>organisms that they can. They're they're good swimmers. But when

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 2>they're walking about, when they're walking on the on the

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 2>seafloor or on the sand uh I have read that

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 2>they cannot walk sideways. I'm always hesitant to be too

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 2>absolute in those kind of rulings because it's kind of

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 2>like saying dogs can't look up right. But generally speaking,

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 2>their body is positioned in such a way that they

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 2>are they are front back movers, as opposed to lateral movers,

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>and we see that in just their basic morphology. Now

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 2>we mentioned already the lobster origins of crabs, and apparently

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>for a long time naturalist thought that frog crabs were

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 2>therefore a more primitive form of the crab, kind of

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>a missing link between lobster and crab. But now we

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>know that this is not the case. So these frog

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 2>crabs evolved and estimated one hundred and twenty five million

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>years ago, with their bodies and movements adapting for this

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 2>burrowing behavior. They burrow in the ocean floor sediment as

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>a place of refuge, and again they emerge at night

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>to scavenge and sometimes use that hiding place as kind

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 2>of a you know, a trap from which to snatch

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>small marine animals and eat them.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but it's not like all modern crabs were descended

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 3>from a frog crab like ancestor.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, It's more like they went back.

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 2>They're like, actually, the something more lobster would be in

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 2>keeping with what we want to do with our lives. Interestingly,

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 2>while frog crabs are now limited to certain tropical and

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>subtropical environments, they were once quite plentiful across Earth's oceans,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 2>especially during times of low marine oxygen levels, and the

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>general theory here seems to be that conditions these conditions

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>might have been better for them because they might have

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 2>been predisposed for low oxygen environments because of adaptations they

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>had for living in burrows and spending a lot of

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>time beneath the sediment.

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 3>This is interesting because it's I think the second example

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 3>we've looked at in just a few days of lineages

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>of animals that are thought to have survived harsh conditions

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>or mass extinction events because they were burrowing and they

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 3>had burrowing behaviors, like we were recently talking about, Oh,

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:37.119
<v Speaker 3>in the Pokemon episode, we were talking about the desygnodont tetrapods,

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, these thrapsid tetrapods that were affected by the

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Permian Triassic extinction event. Of course, like everything was, but

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>some of the lineages of the Desygnodonts survived this extinction event,

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 3>and that is thought to be in part because they

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>were burrowing animals and that gave them a leg up

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 3>in this really really harsh environment after the volcanic conditions

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 3>that caused this extinction. And so this would be another

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 3>example of an animal that's thought to be a survivor

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>of harsh conditions because it burrows.

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, but in a marine situation instead. So

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>humans apparently don't see these crabs as often as other crabs.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are a lot of crabs that don't

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>really want to be seen, especially by birds and other creatures.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Which crabs do want to be seen.

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think any of them. They would prefer

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>you not look at them. They have things, and I

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I guess there's certain maybe a coconut crab

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>is less a very large one, but even then, you know,

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>they don't want no organism wants to be looked at

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>by things that might want to eat them.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I guess, as always the question is seen by who. Yeah,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 3>you got some real show off crabs out there, like

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the fiddler crabs with the big claw, like, yeah, they're

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>shown off to somebody, maybe not to us.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, So yeah, given their habitat, they're feeding habits, they

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 2>may not be seen as much, but they are considered

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 2>a delicacy in parts of the world. I understand they're

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>particularly popular in Australia and in the Philippines. So listeners

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>out there write in if you have tasting notes about

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the frog crab or the spanner crab, how is it different?

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 2>How does a cook up? I don't know. I don't

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 2>think I've ever had one.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>This reminds me that the crucifix crab we talked about

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 3>last time, Caribtis feriata, is also said to be a

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 3>quite delicious crab. So if you've eaten crucifix crab, I

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>want to hear about it now.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Of note the frog crabs here, they're not closely related

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 2>to the decabot crustacean mole crabs. Mole crabs are in

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the superfamily Hippoa day and they have a similar body layout.

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 2>But it's apparently a case of parallel evolution, with each

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>crab evolving for burrowing. So if you're gonna if you're

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>a crab and you want to backtrack a little bit

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 2>in your body form you want to get into the

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>burrowing lifestyle, there's a certain direction your body plan is

0:15:55.360 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 2>going to go in. Another burrowing crab that I ran

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>across is the masked crab or helmet crab of the

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>North Atlantic and North Sea. Let's see this one's scientific

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 2>name is and I may butcher this Carrestius castaveolanis, but

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 2>it's so called helmet crab or mass crab because the

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>markings on its back allegedly resemble a human face. Included

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 2>an image here for you, Joe, you can you can

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>rule on this.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I see human face. I also kind of see a

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 3>feline face, kind of a big cat.

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it looks kind of like whiskers maybe along

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the cheek it does.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with the legs certainly add to this effect.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but this is another faceback crab, and we've talked

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 3>about this on the show before.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right. This brings us back to the Japanese Hikagani

0:16:55.080 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>crabs with the shell pattern that famously resembles a human

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>face or a samuraiz face mask, tied to folklore traditions

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 2>about the crabs being reincarnations of these warriors who were

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 2>defeated and drowned beneath the waves of the Nakel Battle

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 2>of Dan No Lura. We talked about this in a

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>previous episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind. I believe

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 2>this is one where we also talked about how it

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 2>was discussed back in the day on Carl Sagan's Cosmos

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 2>TV series.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Actually, I thought this would be a good

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 3>time to revisit that because when we last talked about these,

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>we talked about the idea popularized by Carl Sagan in

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>so this was in the original Cosmos TV series. I

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 3>think this was the year nineteen eighty. Carl Sagan was

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 3>not the originator of this idea, but it was made

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 3>very famous on that show. And the idea was that

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the Hikagani carapace could have been made more face like

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 3>over time by the process of artificial selection. And I'm

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 3>going to critique this idea in a minute, but the

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 3>story goes like this. You've got crab fishures going out

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 3>over the centuries catching these crabs, and they would keep

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the crabs that looked less like faces, but throw back

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the crabs that looked more like faces for fear of

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 3>crossing a taboo or eating a human spirit. So it

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 3>looks to human. Oh, I got to get rid of it.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 3>And the idea was by doing that, you naturally drive

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 3>this species to look more and more like human faces

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 3>over time. It's an interesting idea and in principle could

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 3>be true. Artificial selection like this can and sometimes does happen.

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>But I think especially in the years since we first

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>talked about the Samurai crabs on the show. I've read

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.719
<v Speaker 3>some additional skeptical takes that make it seem pretty unlikely

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 3>to me that artificial selection had a role in shaping

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the carapace of this crab. We may have actually talked

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 3>about some of the Yeah, we talked about some of

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 3>these reasons in the episode, but it now seems to

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 3>me more like a consensus view that there's probably not

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 3>any artificial selection going on here. One of the main

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>reasons is that the Hikagani are not a species significantly

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 3>fished as food anyway, so there is not significant harvesting

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 3>of these crabs in any case, you know, whether they

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 3>look like faces or not. And then the other thing

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 3>is that the patterns on the carapace that we interpret

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 3>as the raised parts of a face, like the nose

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 3>and the cheeks and the depressions of the eyes and

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 3>all that these patterns are not cosmetic in the biological sense.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 3>They're not just random decorations that can be easily moved

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 3>around to look like whatever. In a nineteen ninety three

0:19:55.440 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 3>article for Terra magazine, the invertebrate zoologist Joel Martin explained

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>this by saying, quote. The grooves and ridges on the

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 3>backs of the crabs have specific purposes and are not

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 3>merely decorative. The grooves are external indications of supportive ridges

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 3>called apidemes inside the crab's carapace that service sites for

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>muscle attachment. Elevated areas between these grooves allow for an

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>increase in internal space so that the various parts of

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 3>a crab's viscera, gastric, hepatic, cardiac, brachial, et cetera are

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 3>reflected externally. So I think the implication of that is

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 3>that evolution would not be just free to play around

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 3>with rearrangements of these features to favor a non fished

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 3>face morph because the raised and lowered parts are functional,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>so moving them around would not be impossible. I mean,

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, the functional parts of an animal can move

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 3>through evolution as well, but it would come at a

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 3>high cost of fitness. The pressure to move them around

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 3>would probably have to be very strong. So I was

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 3>thinking about this, and I would wager a guess that

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 3>the resemblance of certain crab shells, like the one you

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 3>were just talking about. What was that called again, the

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 3>mast crab or the helmet crab from the North Atlantic

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 3>and the Samurai crab, that these resemblances to human faces

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 3>are probably going to just be a fairly common coincidence

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 3>because faces and crab bodies have the same primary organizing principle,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>which is bilateral symmetry. So when an animal body region

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 3>is left right symmetrical, you're gonna end up with some

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>structures in mirrored pairs on either side, like eyes and cheeks,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 3>or like lungs and gills, and then you're also going

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 3>to have some structures masked around or near the middle

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 3>near the meridian, like nose, mouth, heart, gut, to that

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing. So it's I think just not that

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 3>surprising that some surfaces reflecting the arrangement of underlying organs

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and the muscles that support them will look like faces,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 3>because both faces and internal organs in a crab are

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 3>left right symmetrical, so it's a left right symmetrical Rorschach test.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 3>You're just gonna get some faces. But on the other hand,

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to make clear again that while I think

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 3>this is probably not a case of artificial selection on

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 3>a wild animal population, that absolutely does happen sometimes, so

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not like the principle is invalidated. You can have

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 3>artificial selection on wild populations by aggressive hunting of certain

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 3>types of animals. You know, if there is an animal

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 3>that has a certain body part that is prized by

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 3>hunters over time, you know, if that's aggressively harvested and hunted,

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 3>you will see that animal population often shift to basically

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 3>not have that trade anymore. So this can happen, and

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>we can see an extreme form of artificial selection in

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>domesticated animals and in plants and other organisms of course.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, domestic dogs or bread for extreme

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 3>with extreme selective pressures on desired traits.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, So the mechanism absolutely exists, but in this

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>particular case, it's probably not a factor. Right, And as

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 2>always we have to stress that as humans, we would

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 2>we look for these faces. We see faces if they're

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 2>just barely there. So it doesn't take much for us

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to look at a crab or any other organism and say, oh,

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 2>my goodness, that is clearly a human face. That is

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 2>clearly a human skull, and in factor our own stories

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 2>into why it is there.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let me paradolia please.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right. In the last episode, you know, we

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 2>talked a little bit about how there may be weren't

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 2>as many crabs in folklore mythology as we would like,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 2>but we did reference that. You know, there are some

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 2>great examples, and I was looking around for something new

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>on this front and I found one. I didn't find

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 2>as many sources, and I didn't find much in the

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 2>way of recent sources. So I do want a flag

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 2>that I'm working from sources here that are from like

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the forties and the twenties in a couple of cases,

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 2>so they're always caveats with that sort of information. But

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 2>what i'd sounded really fascinating. So it is another example

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 2>of a supernatural crab, and it is called the Nakalla,

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 2>and it is a familiar of a male sorcerer that

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 2>takes the form of a kind of demon crab in

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the traditions of Zambia. According to Witchcraft, Divination and Magic

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>among the Balival Tribes by cmn Wit nineteen forty eight,

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 2>these are one of several types of familiars said to

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>be either inherited in the case of female practitioners of

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 2>dark magic, or quote prepared by matt recipes in the

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 2>case of male practitioners. And this seems to be specific

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 2>to the Lundon people. This is a Boundtu ethnic group. So,

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 2>according to this text, some of these familiars, because there

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 2>seem to be a vast array of familiars that may

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>be manifested by these individuals. According to these folk tale

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 2>traditions as related in these texts, some of them, especially

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>a snake familiar form, often take on the face of

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 2>their master, and their life force is tied to their master,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 2>so when the master dies, they die as well. And

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 2>it seems possible from the context here that the Nakala

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>crab demon or crab spirit also possesses the face of

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 2>its master. White gives us this description in the text quote.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>The animal spirit known as Nakala also lives in rivers

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and is supposed to resemble a large crab with big

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 2>claws and nose like projections. Describes how it is destroyed

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 2>by the diviner calling it from its hiding place by

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 2>whistling on a horn. This horn contains a preparation made

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 2>from the body of other nicala which he has destroyed.

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 2>The nicala is shot when it makes its appearance, and

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the diviner removes certain parts of it to use for

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>future medicine required for calling forth others of its kind.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh Okay.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Now the Miland here he is referring to is Frank H. Miland,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>who wrote about this spirit crab in an older text

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty three is which bound Africa, and he has

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>these are some other details from that text. So Milan

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 2>shares that the Nicala is said to be about four

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>feet long and kills people by eating their shadow.

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh. Interesting.

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. He also adds, I'm going to read a section

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>here that contains some more details about this quote. It

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 2>is about four feet from head to head, for it

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 2>has a head at either end, oh, and is nearly

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>as broad as it is long. Each head resembles the

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 2>head of a hippo, having the same lumps on it

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 2>by the eyes. When it is eating a person's shadow,

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>it eats with both heads simultaneously.

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. There are more details about the killing of the Nkala,

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 2>like what sort of horn is used and so forth,

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 2>like a more complete recipe for how the Nakala slayer

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 2>carries out his business, and I want to mention that elsewhere.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Seemingly unrelated, He also mentions a Lunda tradition by which

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>one's life energy could be magically stored inside a shell

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 2>of some sort. Sometimes a crab shell so that one's

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 2>enemies cannot destroy it with witchcraft, which is interesting. So

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>it's like I will take on the crabs protection for

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 2>my own life force or soul.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a spiritual exoskeleton.

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So again I wish I had more information about

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>this Nakala creature, but what is available does sound very tantalizing.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 2>So again, a kind of two faced crab monster that

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 2>may exist sort of wild as a magical creature, but

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 2>then also can but also can be created via magic

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>to serve a sorcerer, and it eats men's souls, and

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 2>it does so like from both ends at the same time,

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>so two mouths simultaneously crunching down the soul or not

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the shadow, but in eating the shadow like destroys the body.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it's interesting that it's also said to have head.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>The two heads are like the heads of a hippo,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 3>which is you can actually think of some similarities between

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 3>the hippo and the crab. They are both aquatic or

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>semi aquatic creatures that walk, so they're like not fish.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 3>They're not swimming creatures with tails. They have legs, but

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 3>they live in the water, making them a kind of

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, in between type creature, and these in

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>between creatures in our environments are often thought of to

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 3>have kind of special or magical properties because they span

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 3>the division between worlds.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, and this does seem like a world rim

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 2>walker for sure. So yeah, like I said, I wish

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 2>there were more sources on this particular folk tradition, but

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>what I was able to find sounded really really interesting.

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 3>That is really cool. All right, are you ready to

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 3>do a bit of follow up on the Francis Xavier crab?

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, the crab with a cross? Yeah, what do

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 2>we have this time?

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, in the last episode when we talked about it,

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 3>we said we might come back to the idea of

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>how plausible it is that a crab would carry a

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 3>cross a crucifix dropped in the ocean around in its

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 3>claws over its head like it's described in the story.

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 3>So maybe we should actually start a brief refresher on

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 3>the story. So the story is a legend of the

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Catholic missionary and co founder of the Jesuits, Saint Francis Xavier,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and a crab. There are different versions of this story,

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 3>but the best known goes like this, Xavier and his

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 3>companions are sailing in the Molucca Islands when a terrible

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 3>storm comes on and threatens direct the ship. Xavier prays

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 3>for deliverance, and while doing so, he dips his crucifix

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 3>over the side of the boat into the waves. In

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 3>some versions of the story, he accidentally loses it it

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 3>slips from his hand into the stormy see. In later

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 3>versions of the story, he sort of like throws the

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 3>crucifix into the sea as a weather control bomb to

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 3>still the waves. Whichever version you get, the crucifix is

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>lost in the water. The ship survives the storm and

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 3>reaches shore many miles away. And then the legend goes

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 3>that while Xavier and his party are walking on the beach,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 3>a crab comes out of the water and approaches them,

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 3>and when it draws near, they see something amazing. Gripped

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 3>tight in the crab's two claws, held aloft over its

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 3>body is Xavier's crucifix, the one he lost in the storm.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 3>And then Xavier takes the crucifix and prays, and the

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 3>crab goes back home scuttles into the waves. So, based

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 3>on what we covered last time about the development in

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 3>general of the Xavier miracle stories, I don't think there's

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 3>a strong reason to believe this anecdote actually happened, And

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 3>there's also a chance, based on some scholarship we talked about,

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 3>that it was inspired by a Buddhist legend, an older

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Buddhist legend of a ninth century Buddhist priest named Jakaku

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 3>who uses an icon of a god of wisdom to

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 3>calm the waves and then gets that icon returned to

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 3>him three years later by an octopus. We actually did

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 3>discuss the relative likelihood of an octopus versus a crab

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 3>bringing a trink it back to you from the water.

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess we still can't fully rule on which ones

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 3>more likely, but I was leaning toward the octopus. However,

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I was wondering, would a crab potentially do something like this?

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 3>So we're not asking is the story true. I think

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 3>there are just outside of the coreplausibility of the miracle,

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 3>there are things about the story that make it unlikely

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 3>to be true. But would a crab potentially do something

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 3>like this, i e. Find a discarded crucifix on the

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 3>ocean floor and carry it around overhead in its claws.

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 3>So to answer this, I was like, well, what kinds

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 3>of object manipulation and carrying do we see among crabs?

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 3>So I went digging into the scientific literature on different

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 3>types of carrying behaviors, and I absolutely cannot provide an

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 3>exhaustive list of every crab that's ever picked up and

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 3>carried an object. But on the whole, I think you

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 3>get a few major categories, and I'm going to run

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 3>through them here. So one is decorator crabs. We've talked

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 3>about these on the show before. This category includes several

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 3>different species of crabs, all belonging to the superfamily Majoitia.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 3>They pick up and carry thing. They pick up objects

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 3>and carry them around, and these objects are not food,

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 3>but they don't carry these objects in their claws. Decorator

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 3>crabs mount objects to their backs, to their carapaces, often

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:39.719
<v Speaker 3>living sedentary organisms, though sometimes inanimate objects as well. So

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 3>they decorate their carapaces with things like algae and soft

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>coral anemonies and sponges, and they carry these things around.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Those things, again, most often are living organisms, but they

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 3>don't carry them in their claws. So I think this

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 3>is not really a relevant example.

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Did we I'm trying to remember if we were talking

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 2>about these crabs and discussed how in artificial laboratory environments

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>they will end up picking things that don't make it

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 2>seem to make less sense, like hamburger meat whatnot putting

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 2>that on there.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Yet I think we did we maybe talked about that

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 3>in our Bone Collector's episode, that they were they were

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 3>just putting dead, dead stuff on their backs.

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that would seem to me. This is not

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a not backing this up with any research, but based

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 2>on what we've covered in the past, you could imagine

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 2>an artificial scenario in which a crab, one of these crabs,

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is put in an aquarium without access to its preferred

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 2>decorator selections, and instead is given various religious iconography. It

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 2>might conceivably decorate itself with at least one of those

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 2>icons possibly.

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, there are cases where these will they

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 3>will put inanimate objects on their backs, like maybe shells

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 3>or things like that. Yeah, so it's possible. Yeah, might

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 3>might try to mount a crucifix on there. Now, the

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 3>decorator crabs require they've got these almost velcrow like kind

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 3>of hooks on there that are called I think ct

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 3>on their carapaces, which are what they used to fix

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 3>objects to them. I have questions about whether that would

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 3>actually attach correctly to whatever material the crucifix was made of.

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the story doesn't say what the crucifix was

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>made of, but we had been assuming metal because if

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 3>it was wooden, I like, would it sink? Though I guess. Also,

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 3>I guess the story doesn't require that it sinks, just

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 3>that it gets lost. So maybe it's a wooden crucifix

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 3>that gets lost and then floats away, or maybe it's

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.399
<v Speaker 3>a metal one that sinks and then a.

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Beef jerky or bacon strips.

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess unlikely there, but attach the story doesn't say.

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I had been I'd been thinking metal because

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 3>I'd been picturing its sinking, but the story doesn't actually

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 3>say it sames.

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, and also there's the iconography where we see it

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 2>metal like silvery, so that kind of forces you to

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 2>think about the story like that as well.

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, So later they would make silver crosses of

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Saint Xavier Francis Xavior, where a crab is holding the

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 3>silver cross in its claws, which is beautiful, holding it

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 3>like Luke Skywalker holds the lightsaber. So okay, so you've

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 3>got decorator crabs that doesn't really fit doesn't exactly fit

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 3>the legend. You've got palm palm or boxer crabs. We've

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 3>also talked about these on the show in the past.

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 3>So crabs in the genus Libya do hold something other

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 3>than food in their claws, but in this case it

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 3>is another living organism. This is another example of crabs symbiosis.

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 3>The boxer crabs will hold usually stinging invertebrates like cea anemones,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 3>in their claws, and they use these for fence, for fighting,

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 3>and sometimes for feeding. So they're sort of weapons. Yeah,

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 3>they've got weapons of stinging stinging invertebrates on their claws.

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 3>Then you've got the carrier type crabs. These exist in

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 3>at least four families I was reading about. A big

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 3>example is the family Deripidy. These carrier crabs exhibit a

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 3>behavior known as carrying. I was reading about it in

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 3>a paper from nineteen eighty six published in the Journal

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 3>of Crustacean Biology by Mary Kay Wixton called carrying behavior

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 3>in brachiurine crabs. In this paper, Wixton documents crabs carrying

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 3>objects around actually holding them up over their backs, but

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of the wrong orientation. So these objects include

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 3>quote shells, pieces of sponge, tunicates, algae, branches of Gorgonians

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 3>or antipathians, or chips of rock. So we're starting to

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 3>get closed. This is some times picking up inanimate objects

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 3>like shells or rocks, holding them up over their backs.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 3>But it's a little bit different than the imagery we

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 3>see in the paintings and as described in the story,

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 3>because again the Francis Xavier one it says it's got

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the cross in its claws, the clause meaning the killy

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the front claws. These carrier crabs do not use their

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 3>claws the front claws as wixton documents. They carry things

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 3>with their back legs, so like the fifth or fourth periopods,

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the furthest back legs which tend to be modified and

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 3>specialized for this job. And it's worth noting the biological

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 3>function of this, both in the decorator crabs and the

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 3>carrier crabs. The most supported explanation for why the crabs

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 3>do this is for camouflage and defense. So they're basically

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 3>hiding under these external objects and this may help them

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 3>lend in with the environment. It might camouflage them, but

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 3>it also sometimes provides protection because they can take advantage

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 3>of the defenses of a living animal mounted above like

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 3>a stinging invertebrate again and then finally, Another possibly relevant

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>example is crabs that build nests. There are various types

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 3>of crabs that do this. Fiddler crabs, I think ghost

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 3>crabs build nests in the mud or in the sand,

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and as such they might sometimes carry or push, at

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.720
<v Speaker 3>least push around materials used in the construction of nests.

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 3>This would be maybe things like mud balls or clumps

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 3>of sand, though there's some blurring into the food manipulation

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 3>category here because fiddler crabs will also use their front

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.800
<v Speaker 3>claws for when they're dealing with mud. That is sometimes

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 3>a feeding behavior, but none of the sources I was

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 3>looking at described behaviors like clutching an inanimate object with

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 3>both claws and holding it a So when thinking about

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 3>crab behavior, we may be led astray by unconsciously comparing

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 3>crab kili or crab claws to human hands, because we

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 3>use our hands to carry objects all the time, but

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 3>for crabs the claws are mostly used as tools, weapons,

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 3>and for display, not for carrying objects from one place

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 3>to another, and most species of crab that carry objects

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 3>do not use their claws to do it. So the

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 3>closest I could get that really seems plausible to me

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 3>is actually is some kind of carrier crab actually, but

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 3>it would not be like the pictures we see where

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 3>it's up in the front claws. It would be holding

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the crucifix over the back of its carapace with its

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 3>back legs, and that is kind of an interesting image

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Possibly blasphemous though, holding the crucifer picks up with your feet. Well,

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's fine if a crab does it, it's

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 3>Have we issued a Papa bull on this yet? Like?

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Are the are crabs holy? Or are they? Are they unholy?

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I think crabs are absolutely holy, Okay, I think pretty

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 2>much anyway you you take it apart, crabs are the

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 2>children of God or the gods, and they do important

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 2>work out there. I think the exception would be any

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of say black magic crab, demon or spirit that's

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 2>summoned to, you know, for nefarious purposes. That I think

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 2>would be more clearly some sort of artificial being.

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>The crabs, in attack of the crab monsters, are not holy.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 3>They have been rendered unholy by radioactive contamination and by

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 3>becoming psychic mind stealers that eat you and steal your thoughts, right,

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 3>so that it's hard to say that they're holy, but

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 3>just regular crabs in the environment. Yeah, that's about that's

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 3>got to be whole, right.

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Likewise, alien crabs or alien crab like beings from

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 2>another world, well that's a whole theological discussion. To planets

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 2>have individual gods or is there like one god that

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 2>rules over all the planets? You know, that's not for

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 2>us to decide. That's a much larger question.

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, I think we need to call it

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 3>there for part two of our crab Bag series, but

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 3>there will be more. We will be back with a

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.720
<v Speaker 3>crab Bag Part three at least on the following Tuesday.

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Is this going to be on a Thursday?

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, so look forward to more crab based action. Again,

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 2>there's no shortage of crabs out there, real or imagined. Well,

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 2>at this point, we just want to remind everyone. Stuff

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 2>to Blow Your Mind is primarily a science and culture podcast.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 2>We've been around for years. You can find all of

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 2>these past episodes in audio form wherever you get your

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 2>audio podcasts. On Tuesdays and Thursdays, that's when we air

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.479
<v Speaker 2>our core episodes, but on Wednesdays we do a short

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 2>form episode and on Fridays we set aside most serious

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 2>concerns to just talk about a week film on Weird

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>House Cinema.

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 3>And hey, if you are watching on Netflix and you

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 3>would like to do the equivalent of subscribing to our show, there,

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 3>you can click the remind me button so that you

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 3>get access to new episodes when they appear on Netflix.

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 3>And just a reminder if there's any confusion, the video

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 3>version of our show on Netflix is the same content

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 3>you would get in the audio feed. It's just with

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 3>the cameras turned on so you can see our heads

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 3>while we're talking. If you want to listen to an

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 3>audio version of the podcast, you can get that wherever

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 3>you get your podcasts. Stuff to Blow your Mind all right, huge,

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 3>thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, or to

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 3>suggest a topic for the future, or just to say hi,

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:48.479
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts to my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio, app,

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.