WEBVTT - TechStuff TechStuff Classic: Tackles Wikipedia

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to text Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I love all things tech. It's time for another tech

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff classic episode, and uh, this time we're gonna look

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>at a topic that was something of a controversial topic

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>within my old work space over at how stuff works

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. It's tech Stuff tackles Wikipedia, and the reason

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it was controversial is that, well, Wikipedia was not considered

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a reliable resource for us to use when we were

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>researching materials for uh, for podcasts, or for articles, because

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly we were writing articles back then. This episode originally

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>published on April twenty nine, two thirteen. Let's listen in.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a matter of some debate among lots and lots

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of people online, and there are good points and bad points.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to cover them all. We are, of course

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about Wikipedia, and you guys who are long time

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>listeners of tech Stuff might remember that Chris and I

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>did an episode about wikis and we touched upon Wikipedia

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But that was many years ago. Other

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff has happened, as things are wont to do on

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the course of time, and we decided we wanted to

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>really look at what made Wikipedia what it was and

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>what it is and how has it changed over the

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>time that it's existed, and and some of the reasons

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>why Wikipedia is a very useful tool and some reasons

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>why people either maybe maybe not dismiss it, but but

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but in some ways that it could perhaps be improved. Yeah,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and and reasons why some people, uh suggest extreme caution

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>before relying too heavily upon it. Um. And and before

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we get really into this at all, you know, I

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>used to write for How Stuff Works dot home a lot.

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I occasionally still do, but I mostly do podcasts now

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. Blogs are about about the writing

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>level juncture, right, But but I used to write these

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>these a long articles. And one of the policies and

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works is that you do not use Wikipedia

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>as a source ever. Yeah. And uh, I used to

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be an editor before I was a podcaster in social

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>media person And yes, that was one of the things

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that we very firmly enforced, right, are still do. And

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>really the reason for that has nothing to do with

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the infant well, it has something to

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>do with whether or not the information you find on

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia is reliable. But more importantly, Wikipedia is a dynamic thing, right.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>It can be written and edited by anybody at any time.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.399
<v Speaker 1>And so when you sit there and cite something from Wikipedia,

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the next time someone visits that particular entry,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the the information has changed, and it may be that

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the information now is more accurate than it was, or

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe less accurate. At any rate, the things that make

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia a useful tool in day to day I need

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to get this information are the same things that make

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it a dangerous tool if you are writing in any

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of academic or professional capacity. Facy. Yeah, thank you

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>editor for giving me the word that I don't have.

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But but really, before we get into all the pros

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and cons that I've already just touched on, uh, let's

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the history. So before there was a Wikipedia,

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>back when there was just barely a web. Yeah, yeah,

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it was more more local networks of computers and some

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of them could you know, key into other local networks. Yeah,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we we did have an internet, uh, and the web

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>was a thing, but it was very young. But back

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in so you know, the web essentially is introduced right three,

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So web has not been around for very long. Rick

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Gates comes up with this idea. He says, Uh, you

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>know what would be really super awesome if if we

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>were to build an encyclopedia that lived on the Internet,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and if you made that encyclopedia something that anyone could

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>contribute to, so that way you could tap into the

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>world's knowledge and people who are really just experts in

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever field that they're in, they can go in and

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>share that knowledge. Right, and and then you have the

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, right, except it's really the

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Hitchhiker's Guide to Earth. Uh. So would be more than

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>mostly harmless Earth in a small amount of the surrounding galaxy. Sure, yeah,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But essentially the sum total of what human knowledge is

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>could go on the Internet and be in a database

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that you could search, and it would be the world's

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>most complete encyclopedia. Uh. A fellow by the name of R. L.

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Samuel came up with an idea to call it Interpedia,

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>and it was kind of this interesting point of discussion,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but it never went beyond that. It was just one

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of those Hey, any cool if Yeah, exactly. Maybe if

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>someone who has more time and resources could do this,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be awesome. Uh. And then in a very

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>important development happened. And I was amazed that it happened

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this early, because this was the development of the wiki platform,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it happened in ninety four amazes

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>me because I was largely unaware of wikis until Wikipedia

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>came along. Yeah as well. So, I mean I had

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>been on the web since the early nineties, but I

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just didn't know about wikis for many years, I mean

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>almost a decade. Uh. And it was and when I

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>finally did start to learn about wikis, they were strange

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and unusual to me because it was a different experience

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>than your average website. Right. Yeah, Usually most websites and

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>most books are based on this idea that there is

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>one expert who is who is this terrific expert and

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is talking to you about this thing. Yeah, and that's

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's where it starts and stops. You know, no

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>one's arguing with them, particularly, right. There might be some

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>form of comment ability on a site where people can

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>contribute into the discussion, but in general, the content of

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the site itself is created by a person or an organization,

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but no one else. It's not like, you know, Bob

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>can just log in and put in Bob's section, and

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>then Joe over here logs in and puts in Joe's section.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Bob and Joe can't do anything because they can

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>just go and view the site. Well, the wiki was

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>based on a completely different idea and it was designed

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>by a guy named Ward Cunningham, and his first one

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was First Software Developers. Yeah, yeah, he was. He worked

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for a software consulting company that he was a partner in.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It was Cunningham and Cunningham also known as C two

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and he was developing this, uh this platform

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for Portland pattern Repository and he called it wiki wiki

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>web right, based on the Hawaiian word wiki or wiki wiki,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>which means um, quick quick, Yeah. There's a the wiki

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>wiki Shuttle in Honolulu, which is an airport shuttle. I've

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>been on the shuttle and I remember my wife being

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>really amused every time she saw the wiki wiki shuttle.

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>She just loved wiki wiki. Obviously I've married the right woman.

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>So uh so, Ward Cunningham comes up with this idea

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for the wiki, and essentially what a wiki is is

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a website that has collaborative editing tools built into

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the site itself, so you you navigate to the site

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>through a browser, and within the browser you can make

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>changes to the site collaboratively. So depending upon the level

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:35.559
<v Speaker 1>of administrative power you have, you can you can edit things,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you can add things, you can delete things. And it's

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>since it's all within the web browser, you're using a

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.559
<v Speaker 1>basic markup language or maybe some sort of rich text editor,

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and it will let people collaborate on projects even if

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they had different machines. Right, So, if Lauren's using a

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Mac and I'm using a PC, not only do we

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>hate each other, but often we can't work on the

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>same thing because our platforms are so different. But this

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is web based, so all we have to do is

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>use whichever browsers web browser we both commune, and then

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we navigate there and we can make these changes and

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>build our collaborative I hate you website together and other

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>people can join in and explain why they hate everybody too.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know why I'm so negative today, but

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently that's how this is going to work. I think.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So Cunningham develops this wiki technology, which is what makes

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia possible. But we're not at Wikipedia yet now, right,

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, well go ahead, Oh, I was just gonna

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>say that's when we start talking about Jimmy Wales, who

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the face of Wikipedia, right right, Yeah,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say that. At the same time around

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was when Jimmy Wales had dropped out of college. He

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he had started um started a couple months are for

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>a finance PhD from Indiana University and wound up instead

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of doing that going to Chicago to be a futures

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>an options trader and supposedly, much like Elon Musk who

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we have previously profile, wild Jimmy Wales noticed that, you know,

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Netscape went public and and what quadrupled in value overnight.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Netscape did well, yes, they did good um and and

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>took note of that and said, hey, this internet thing

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that I've been kind of playing around with for a

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>few years, I think that this could be a thing. Yeah,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>this this might go places. And of course remember this

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>is all before the dot com bubble burst too, so

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>back then it was all opportunity and wild West and

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>no one was really sure and bright shining dreams. Yeah

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was interesting. Uh, you know, the the

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>roads weren't paved with gold, but they were paved with

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>stock options. Jimmy Wales has this thought while he's working

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for a well, he's part owner of a company called

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bomus dot com, which is a search engine. Yeah, and

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he owned that with two other joint owners, Tim Shell

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Davis. Comes up with his version, his idea

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for a free, collaborative encyclopedia, and he taps a guy

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>named Larry Sanger to be the project lead for this

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>new encyclopedia. Now he knew Saner from mailing lists, because

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this isn't that long after the fact that people were

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>just using things like Usenet and mailing lists instead of

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the web and uh, and so he got in touch

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with Saner and and convinced Anger to head up a project,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>this this collaborative encyclopedia, which at that point did not

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have a name, right right, Yeah, And you know that

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>they've been thinking. I've read about open source software and

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and how open source culture could also be a thing

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and and and a beautiful thing and so yeah, and

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of when you look back at Timber's Lee,

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>who's the guy who essentially created what we know of

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>as the Web. That was sort of his approach to

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>He thought that open was the right way to go,

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that the open collaborative way would mean that the Internet

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>becomes the world's tool, not any one a company or

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>government's tool. And so, uh, this was sort of the

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of of let's make an encyclopedia that follows those

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>same kind of philosophies. Yeah, and so, so Wales and

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Saner and a few others start to form a project

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that they call New Pdia in U P E. D

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I A. And this was a peer reviewed encyclopedia that

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they were going to put online. And you know, because

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>they wanted that they wanted that expert opinion to come in,

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted everything to be as factual and reliable

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>as possible, exactly in fact, Singer that was he was

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>passionate about this. He said that, you know, you could

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>create an online encyclopedia where everyone just contributes, but if

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be a reliable resource, you need that

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>peer review step in there. So and it turned it

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be extremely slow to to get people

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to submit anything at all, because it was it was

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>intimidating and be to to you know, find the correct

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>expert to to look it over. And also, yeah, the

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>review process was a Singer would describe later laborious um,

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>so two thousand is when NEWPDIA starts, and it starts

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of two thousand or so. And uh,

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they have an advisory board of a sort of a

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>peer review board made up of PhD volunteers. So these

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are people who are not even being paid. They're volunteering

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>their expertise to review papers to make sure that they

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are they're ready for publications. So this is like if

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you were to submit a paper to an academic journal

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or a scientific journal. You know, it's something that it's

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>not just automatically going to get published. It has to

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be reviewed and pass review. There might be a lengthy

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>revision process before we'll ever be published. So there were

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>seven steps in this review process for Newpedia and they did.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>They didn't think that that it would work. I read

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that that Wales really thought that, you know, it

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>had been conversations with people on the internet and had

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>realized that if it's something that they feel passionate about,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're usually really willing to engage in that conversation

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and to help. Yeah, so the idea was that you know,

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you get people who are really smart. A lot of

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>really smart people enjoy spreading knowledge, not that we wouldn't

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>know anything about. Wanting to show off knowledge. Yeah, I

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm not really smart, but I still like to

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. So, I mean that's why I played trivia

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is really just to show off how smart I am.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But I know that compared to these people, I was

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and still am stupid. But anyway, so, or at least

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>okay different anyway, thank you. Everyone's special and nobody is. Um.

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, the seventh step process to publish to review

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>before you would publish an article. It turned out that

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this was a bit of a bottleneck um And the

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>very first Newpedia article that was ever published was written

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>by Kristoff Hust and it was about a tonality and

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it was published in the summer of two thousands, so

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it was early two thousand when they started working on

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>new Pedia. At that time, the entire submission and review

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>process was all through mailing lists. It was. There wasn't

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a web based version yet, and so the first article

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>publishes in the summer of two thousand. It was either

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>June or July. According to Sanger, who wrote about this

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I found it on slash Dot. He wrote a two

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>part piece that was essentially about the whole beginning of Wikipedia,

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>which started with this new PDIA thing. Well, in January two,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Sanger and Wales meet up with a guy named Ben

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Covitz at the infamous taco stand meeting. Taco stand meeting. Yeah,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>they were in California and they were at a taco stand.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>They started talking and COVID's told Wales and Sanger about

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Cunningham's wiki Wiki web platform, and they thought about this

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as being a tool that would allow for collaborative work

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and make it much easier to get articles and and

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Saner was still thinking about this pure review process right right,

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.479
<v Speaker 1>But they were thinking that in order to get more submissions,

0:14:58.480 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to make it a little bit less intim

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>dating for people to you know, to to submit an

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>article to this crazy peer review thing, yeah, to say like,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>don't worry so much about the quality, just submit stuff.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Because it turned out that, uh, you know that one

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things they were worried about was that they

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>needed to have content. And part of the philosophy was

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that if we can fix content, if the content is

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>not perfect, we can still edit it once we get it.

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But if we never get any content, there's no encyclopedia.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Right Because I think at the time they had they

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>had maybe twenty articles, I mean something, you know, a

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>very low number. Yeah, it wasn't it was. It was

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five articles by the winter of two thousand one.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So summer two thousand their first article publishes. More than

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a year later, they have twenty articles on new Pedia,

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>which is more articles than I write in a year,

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but I mean it was fewer than what I wrote

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in a year. In a year, I would write around

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred articles. So it's it's it's kind of you know,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's that shows you there was this bottleneck process,

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and and you find out that a volunteer might love

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>their field of expertise, but they're still a volunteer, so

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there's still they're still limited by the fact that they

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do other things, most of them, unless they're

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>independently wealthy, they have other responsibilities they have to attend to.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>But while they were thinking about this, they decided to

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>launch a wiki for Newpedia, and they launched that wiki

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on January two thousand one. So Newpedia is still a thing,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but they launch a wiki for it with the idea

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of making it this faster way to contribute articles. And

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it actually goes live on January. If any

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of you know about Wikipedia Day and are going like

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't on the tenth, well that's the here's why

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the wiki goes live on the tenth. The advisory board says,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anything to do with that. Like, essentially,

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened was the peer review board looked at the

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>wiki and said, look, we have these other backlog of

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>articles that we're still reviewing. We cannot deal with this nonsense.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So what upen was the Newpedia wiki split from Newpedia

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and became its own thing, and on January fifteenth, that

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>became Wikipedia. So Wikipedia began as a branch of Newpedia

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>where it was all going to be peer reviewed, but

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>then became its own thing where the peer review kind

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of went away. The idea was that the community would review,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and so it wouldn't be peer reviewed in the sense

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of an official board of experts. It would be the

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>community of Wikipedia collectively would be able to review and

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>edit the content that was being uploaded, and and that

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 1>that kind of spread of the workload was really important,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>because they had a hundred and fifty entries by the

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>end of February. Yeah, it was, and it went really

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy. The according to Singer. He said, by the

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>end of January two thousand one there were six hundred

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>articles on Wikipedia. But that Singer, and that was from memory,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So you gotta keep in mind, this is Anger writing

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand five about what happened in two thousand one.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So Sander says that by the end of two thousand

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>one there were six d articles, and by March or

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>by the end of January two thoe there six d

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>articles by March, by April and by May. So not

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>only were more articles coming online, but it was the

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>growth rate was increasing over time, not exponentially, but pretty

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty regularly. So it was very quickly becoming popular. And uh.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And April two thousand one, that's when Jimmy Wales decided

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to to to post a thing where he to find

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Wikipedia voice was to be one of neutral

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>point of view or m p o V and uh.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Sancer actually objected to this as well, not that he

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>objected to the idea of neutrality, Sard that was important.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>He objected to the phrase point of view because he

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>said that it still means that the article has a

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>point of view, and it shouldn't Sander in some of

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>his points, I was reading in this if I saw

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and slash doot, I was thinking, this is getting to

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit about semantics, weird and pedantic a

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I respect a lot of what he was saying,

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's something and I think that that. You know,

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>pedantic has its place on the Internet, absolutely, but does

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever I'm in a comment, it's my first weapon of choice. Um. Anyway,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>So by the winter of two thousand one, that's when

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>only articles had published on Newpedia, and the approval process

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>moves so slowly that even when the tools to review

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and approve articles moved from email to web based clients,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it just wasn't doing very well. And because it was

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>such a slow process, more and more of the people

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>involved in it began to neglect it and drop off

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of it. And Wikipedia, but at that same time, was

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more popular. So yeah, so Sanger's responsibilities

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>were starting to shift more towards Wikipedia than new Pedia,

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>simply because that's where all the action was. So by

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one and into two thousand two, new Pedia

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>activity had slow dramatically and uh and also the the bubble.

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>By then, the dot com bubble had burst, which really

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of wiped out a lot of the folks who

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>were contributing in some way, so that kind of also

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>made the funding kind of dry up for new Pedia. Wikipedia,

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was existing at that time and still

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is to this day on donations. Um. So the new

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>pet was trying really hard to redefine the rules that

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>were needed to review submissions so that they could streamline

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the process. But by that time it was it was

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>too little, too late. Uh and and it gets really

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sad in another year. But when I get there, I'll

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>mention it. So um. Even at this early stage of Wikipedia,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Sanger was really saying, let's pay attention to what experts

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>have to say. Let's give them special attention and respect,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that their voices are the ones we

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>pay the most attention to. Not that we won't accept

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>submissions from the general public, but that we should pay

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>more attention to things that are coming from people who

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>are recognized. Because again, this is this is Sanger saying

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that in order to be a credible resource for people,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to have some form of review or or

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to have some way of of

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>saying the information here is from right right, the same

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>way that scientific journals won't just you know, accept accept

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>research that has not been checked over by a peer

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of view system. At least it's ideally an ideally right

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 1>if you ever hear In fact, this is just a

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>little side note. Uh, this is important if you're reading

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>something on Wikipedia and you look at the references. It's

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>something that Lauren and I do a lot. Uh. It's

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 1>important also to pay attention to what the references are

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>because there are scientific quote unquote scientific papers out there

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that are actually logs that aren't scientific papers. So then

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you will quote unquote have a paper published in a

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>scientific journal, but it's not a peer reviewed scientific journal. Correct. Yeah.

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I see this with a lot of free energy papers,

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>where energy is one of those things where like well

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it was published in sessions, like yeah, I check that out.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>That's that guy's personal blog. He called it the Journal

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of Nuclear Physics, but it's just live journal. Yeah. Yeah,

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we we just did an episode about about nuclear power,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>not fusion power, and yeah there was cold fusion and

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>cold fusion and there was a lot of that that

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>that's stuck in my head. Yes, exactly. If you do

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>research on cold fusion, you'll find quote unquote papers, but

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they are posted on online resources. That turn out to

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>be not an actual scientific journal. That doesn't necessarily mean

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that the research is unreliable. It just means that you

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have that peer review to really be sure that

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it's past muster. And also, before I was an editor here,

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I was actually an editor for a medical research journal

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about rheumatism, and so so I am intimately and acquainted

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>with the peer review process. Yeah. Uh, well, moving on

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>talking about the difference between Wikipedia and peer review, Saner

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>actually talked about how he had suggested a rule called

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>ignore all rules, and in his two thousand five recounting

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of the beginning of Wikipedia, he said that the Wikipedia

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>community might be surprised to hear that he was the

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>one who who suggested that, because you know, again Sander

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>was the one who was all about peer review, and

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>here he is saying ignore all rules, and his his

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>philosophy was that again, they wanted to get as much

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>content on Wikipedia as possible, and if the rules intimidated

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>someone so that they did not feel like they were

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>qualified or capable of posting, he wanted to take that

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>barrier away. But he thought of that as a temporary measure,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>something to to get Wikipedia going, to get the ball

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>rolling and then nodded something that would wind up being

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the continuing five pillars, not a central central

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>tenant of the entire of the entire side. Yeah, so

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>ignoral rules. He kind of later on said that I

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I kind of regret saying that now because he felt

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that that was one of the past Yeah, of of him.

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a little bit of a falling out, you know,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>there's Yeah, Saner Singer definitely, Uh, if you read his stuff,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you see and I mean there's there's there's a lot

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of rancor on both parts. Uh. Sander has a lot

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to say about the direction that Wikipedia took and uh,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty clear that he feels that it's not ideal.

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he doesn't outright come out and say that

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this is uh, it's it's useless or anything like that,

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but he has a lot of criticisms. Meanwhile, the Wikipedia community,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>in turn, has a lot of criticisms that they direct

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to Singer, and they both sides have relevant points. So

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>even though I'm talking a lot about Singer, it's mainly

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's the account I went with UH for

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>history years. Yeah, it's not that it's not that I

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily sided with sayer. I'm not that far to that extreme. Uh. Anyway,

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the the policies of Wikipedia actually came

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the community. It became sort of communal decisions

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of how the site should work, which was kind of

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting because they had originally thought of it being sort

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.479
<v Speaker 1>of again an extension of new Pedia, but this became

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>more of the open, communal approach to the Internet, which

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>again is more of the Tim Burners Lee approach, which

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>makes it a lot harder to direct. You know, you

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can't you know, when you've got a group of fifty

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people who have all decided they want to go left,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to make them go right, you know,

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>when you're one guy. Yeah, yeah, and you know, and

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there's there's voting systems in place, there's you know, even

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>back in those days, there were a lot of a

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways for people to communicate with each other.

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>These ideas that they had for the community. They had

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>decided that that Wikipedia content would always remain free for

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>others to read and edit, meaning that there would never

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be a point where there'd be a paywall or subscription

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for Wikipedia. And uh, they also, you know, we're putting

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in those policies that allow people to publish rough drafts

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or rough ideas that could be polished over time, either

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>by themselves or by other people. And then Google started

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to include Wikipedia and its search results for different topics,

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>which meant that there was suddenly a huge rush of people. Yeah,

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and and Sanger noticed like, as more people were coming

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to visit Wikipedia more than we're getting involved as editors

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and contributors. So that meant that even that as the

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia traffic was increasing, so was the content. You were

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>suddenly seeing even faster growth as far as how much

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>information was being contained within Wikipedia. Um and the summer

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of uh, well, one of the before I get to

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the summer two thousand one one thing Singer did note

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>was that even in those early days that he was

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>starting to notice that people who were difficult and who

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>were persistent, uh, we're sometimes irritating very valuable members of

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the Wikipedia community. And the valuable members were like, I

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>don't need this, never mind, I'm a volunteer see and

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they just left and then U. So that meant that

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you started to have more of the persistent difficult type

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and fewer of the valuable expert types. And Singer saw

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that as another kind of downfall of Wikipedia, and there

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>there was there wasn't really any way to counteract that

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>without essentially violating kind of those philosophies that Wikipedia was

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>founded upon, right and you know, you know, one of

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>those philosophies is definitely that the editors and contributors should

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be polite to each other, which happens sometimes, but yeah, exactly,

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know it's human error. Ye, I mean the vast

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>majority and I think I think the vast majority of

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>people who are regular contributor to Wikipedia are in general

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>very courteous. But all it takes are a few trolls

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to really stir things up and U and trolls who

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>are particularly effective can cause huge amounts of frustration in

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a community. Um and in fact, that's that's why they

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>do it. You know, it's right, with a little effort,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>they make a big impact. And uh boy, we did

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole episode on how trolls work. It was a

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>great one. You guys should go back and listen to

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>that one. But in summer of two thousand one, someone

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>ended up using the editing tools to vandalize the front

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>page of Wikipedia because that was one of the ones

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you could edit back in those days and uh, and

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>so they vandalized it, and then someone tried to archive

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the vandalized page. So Sander when end deleted the archive.

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So then they kind of reposted the archives somewhere else

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and Saner when and deleted that, and this became a

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>big kerfuffle between Sander and the community. The community, not

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the entire community, but there were sections of the community

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that said, you are overstepping your balance, right, this is

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>not yours to do this with your using power powers.

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, the fact that you have the ability to

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>do that doesn't mean that you are that you should

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>do that, Like, you are capable of doing that, but

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you should not do it and uh, and Singer was like,

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of silly. The whole point of this

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't want the vandalized version of Wikipedia

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a representation of Wikipedia. We don't want that

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to come up in search because it hurts the community.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't see where the problem is. And others were saying,

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, that's beside the point. It doesn't matter

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what the content is is the matter. The matter is

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that you've deleted it. You've overstep If you start deleting,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>then where does it end right, you've bypassed the whole process,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and by bypassing it, you've rendered the process meaningless. And

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it went from kerfuffle to shenanigans well in UH in

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two, February two thousand two, Singer is laid

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>off of Wikipedia. At that point, the dot com bubble

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bursting had really started to take its effect. New PD

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially was petering out at that point and UH and

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at first Singer was had his had his salary reduced

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times I think, and then he was

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>laid off. He continued to work in a volunteer capacity

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for a little while. Also in February two thousand two,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the Spanish language version of Wikipedia forked off of the

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>main version and became Encyclopedia Libre. And the reason for

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the split was that the the people working on the

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Spanish side were worried that there was going to be

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>problems with censorship, I think, things like Saner deleting stuff.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And also there was worry that Wikipedia would soon start

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to institute advertising on its site to monetize Wikipedia, and

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that there was a worry there that by monetizing Wikipedia,

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you would compromise the site's integrity, which is something that

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Saner was saying didn't exist because of the lack of

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>peer review. So it's kind of this interesting like you're

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to ruin the integrity of the site and

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>saying there's like what integrity. Uh. So that was an

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting discussion, and in August of two thousand two, Jimmy

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Wales said that Wikipedia would never run ads on its site,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, that's also when Wikipedia dot com became

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia dot org as sort of an an example of

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this is this is who we are. We are not

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not a not a company, We're an organization. Uh.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>In December of that year, in two thousand two, they

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>launched wictionary, which is kind of funny because there was

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole page on Wikipedia about how Wikipedia is not

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a dictionary, so they did dictionary. Now, Lauren, let me

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you this, do you think now I can understand

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the value of an open source, crowdsourced encyclopedia because there

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are huge disciplines of knowledge out there. There are people

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>who are experts in it, there are people who have

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>experience with it, their researchers who really know what they're

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>doing when they're looking into that sort of stuff. And

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the more minds you bring into an encyclopedia, the better

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>chance you have of getting a fuller picture of whatever

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it is. Right, do you see the same thing being

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>valuable in the dictionary? Well, okay, The thing about dictionaries

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I think now that you ask me, is that, um,

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are these really terrific, very thorough sources

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like the Oxford English. It's probably the pinnacle of English dictionaries.

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>If if I'm allowed to make that kind of qualitative

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>statement right now, American heritage myself. But you know, well

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I said that about you, John, I support my I

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>support my country. Why do you hate America? Lauren? What

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>do you hate America? Well? Because, okay, so so you

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>know they're they're there are these large resource dictionaries that

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have a terrific wealth of historical information behind them. Um, however,

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they are a little bit slow on the uptake of

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>new words. I say, so, you would see the value

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.239
<v Speaker 1>of dictionary being something that could incorporate words that are

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>entering the lexicon that would maybe take five to ten

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>years to start at at the at the fastest speed possible,

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>five to ten years to be incorporated into a dictionary

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>classic dictionary. Right, And also you know to to do

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that is that is, you know,

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a not branded because because as as much as I

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as I do love very specific dictionaries, there

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>their brands, their companies, they're they're out there to make

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a profit, um at the end of the day. And

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>so so having an open source one is a really

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>terrific idea, and having one that's perhaps better policed than

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, urban dictionary, I think, I think it's a

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>good a good thing to do. Okay, although to be fair,

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still community police. Well it is, but I would

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>say that the quality of policing on dictionary versus urban

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>dictionary is um, that's fair. That's fair. I can I

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>can agree to that because I don't know of any

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>policing that happens on urbans. I don't think that that's

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a thing. So June two thousand three, Whales announces the

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Wikimedia Foundation, which is a nonpro fit that administrates Wikipedia.

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:06.479
<v Speaker 1>And in September two thousand three, Nupedia's servers crash and

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it never comes back. Yeah, it just shuts down. You know,

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the computer failed. So we're just gonna believe it. I

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think it ever really got more than those articles.

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That was I think that was about it kind of

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the peak. Yeah wow, yeah, so nupedia was a failed experiment. Wikipedia,

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the what was originally going to just be a little

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>offshoot of nupedia, was already a rousing success. Yeah. Yeah.

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>There were many other non English sites that were that

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>were launching around that time. I think that not all

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of them had officially split off yet, but there were

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>There were at least seventeen different languages being worked on

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>within Wikipedia. Hey guys, um, we're gonna come right back

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>to this classic episode of tech stuff about Wikipedia. But

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>first I gotta follow this link because I'm learning all

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>about gophers. I'll be right back all right, now back

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to Wikipedia. Okay, so we just talked about two thousand three.

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything between two thousand three and two

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand five, because otherwise I'm just going to skip around ahead. Um.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe that in two thousand four Wikia was founded,

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>which is which is the for profit kind of branch

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of Wikipedia that that maintains a whole bunch of of

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>entertainment mostly related wikis. Um. I think I think that

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the the Wikipedia is among them stuff like that. Okay,

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know those are the wikis that I've recently

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>become more and more familiar with, because you know, pretty

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>much any kind of entertainment thing out there has its

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>own wiki, to the point where I'm like, I can't

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>believe this has a wiki. I can't believe tech stuff

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't anyway, But but yeah, so yeah, so in these

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.919
<v Speaker 1>these are ads supported. Um, however, they're still community run

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh you know, yeah right right, so so similar.

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But again this is following mora along the wiki lines

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of philosophy rather than the Wikipedia one. Because again, one

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of the things Sanger also said in his in his

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>talks or in his writings was that, um, you know,

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>he saw that the wicked philosophy was kind of counter

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to that of an encyclopedia, like the two did not

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>did not move, you know, I didn't mention a very

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>very seamless way, and that that that was a concern

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to him, but that he felt that because Wikipedia was

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically supposed to be an encyclopedia, it helped guide the policies, uh,

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for better or for worse. So it's the community on

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia is not exactly the same as what you would

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>find on your average wiki because the process is slightly

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>different because it has a very specific purpose to be

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>an encyclopedia. Well. Uh. In two thousand five, Wired published

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a report that said that that Jimmy Wales had done

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>something that's generally frowned upon within the Wikipedia community, and

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that is to edit your own page eighteen times apparently,

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly the edits that were made um or removing

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>things like, uh, like Sanger's involvement in the early genesis

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of Wikipedia. Yeah, essentially, there was there was a charge

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>that Wales had removed the sentence that had referred to

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Sander as a co founder of Wikipedia. Um. And then

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>there were other things as well. That's that Wales said

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was it was just an attempt to remove some inaccuracies.

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't. He wasn't trying to watching anything or cleaning

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it out according to why he was saying. Anyway, it

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>still defends this, by the way, right in general, that

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that's considered bad form on Wikipedia. It's not. It's not

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>explicitly against the rules. If you're not you're generally, I

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mean you're you're generally if if you find it an

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>accuracy about something that concerns you due to and they

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have an acrony important and all um. Uh, it is

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the conflict of interest a bit of it that that, Yeah,

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're supposed to submit it to an editor who

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>can then make a non conflict of interest meant call

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not that it needs to be made.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting that particular sequence is going to play an

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>important part towards the end of this timeline conversation, definitely,

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>because it turns out some people have taken advantage of

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that particular approach to the point where they have been

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>able to insertain misleading information or at least leaving out

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>important truths in the process of quote unquote correcting or

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>adding to an article. But we'll get to that in

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Yeah. So Wales ends up and getting some

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>heat for this. Uh, even though to this day he

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 1>says that it wasn't it was not a big deal.

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not that he doesn't even say he didn't do

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>anything wrong. He's like, I don't understand what the big

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>deal is here? Was fixing errors. He's He's like, yeah,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I did it. There was nothing wrong with what I did,

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so calm down. But then you know, other people would say, well,

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>if you had just gone through the regular channels, then

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>it would have been Another story, UH, May of two

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand five was when we had uh an anonymous user

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>who was later identified but I'm not going to say

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the name here, but he posted comments in an article

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about Segon Dollar, John Seingon Dollar, saying that he was

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a suspect in the assassinations of both John and Robert Kennedy.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Segon Dollar as a journalist and was a friend to

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Robert Kennedy actually one of his palmers. So Segon Dollar

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>said that this amounted to Internet character assassination. The comments

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.479
<v Speaker 1>were a hoax. It was supposed to be a joke,

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>although I don't know who would find this particularly Yeah,

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but the hoax it was made in May, but it

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't discovered until September of two thousand five, and then

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media caught hold of the story and began

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to cover it. And this ended up being a big

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>black eye on Wikipedia because everyone ran with the story saying,

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>how can you trust a resource that anyone can go

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>into and change in, vandalist or create a hoax like

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this joke? Yeah, insert completely false information or delete something

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 1>so that whatever is left is not an accurate portrayal

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the actual subject. Crow the entire side is useless. Yeah,

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what's fitialist media is kind of right, right.

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>It definitely escalated to from hey, sometimes you can't trust

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.439
<v Speaker 1>what's on Wikipedia to Wikipedia is bad because people are

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>evil and they will mislead you. Uh. And by the way,

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think either extreme is healthy. While I

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>often will dismiss Wikipedia in any sort of academic approach,

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I am not one to say that fits all. There's

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>some things about Wikipedia that I find genuinely amusing, and

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>there's some things I find genuinely helpful. But but yeah,

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I would never go so far on either side. Get

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to know. So April two thousand six, we have another

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>scandal guy from Glasgow whose name I will not be

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>able to say, Alan mickel Wraith, mickil Wraith. It's gonna

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be mckil writh in front of me. That sounds. That

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds it's got to be Mickilraith m c I l

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>w R A I t H mckilraith. So he created

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a Wikipedia entry about himself that betrayed him as a

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>decorated army officer, something that he was not. And again

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media picked up on this and said, like,

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>here's a guy who was promoting himself, uh, created a

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>false identity for himself and uh, and this shows that

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't trust what's on Wikipedia. Yeah. Meanwhile, all this

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bad press was not particularly affecting the growth of Wikipedia.

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 1>By by mid two thousand six, I think that they

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 1>had five million articles. Yeah, this is they went from

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>uh they had one million in English, but probably five

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>million I think total total. Yeah. So right, right, there's

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of debate about well, yeah, because I

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>got confused. I saw at one point, like in two

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, they hit one million articles, and then I

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>read later like a two thousand and six they hit

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one million articles again, and then I realized, oh wait,

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the first one two thousand four was one million articles

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>total across all languages. Two thousand six was one million

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in English. But it was that the growth was incredible. Uh.

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And in two thousand seven we have another scandal. This

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is when it was discovered that a Wikipedia editor who

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was using a handle called s J E. S. S

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>J A Y was discovered to have also created a

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>false identity. In this case, s J had been uh

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>posing as someone who held a PhD uh in uh

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in theology. I assume because he was saying that he

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>was a tenured professor with an expertise in Kennon law,

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and in reality he was a twenty four year old

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who had been to several colleges in Kentucky. Did

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>not all the less of an expert, perhaps, but objectively speaking,

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>he was saying that he had created this identity in

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 1>order to give himself a buffer so that people who

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with him would not be able to attack him personally. So,

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in other words, he was just creating a handle. It's

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more more involved than just a handle.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But here's the problem. He was also using his fake

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:26.839
<v Speaker 1>credentials to back up his arguments whenever he was making edits. Yeah,

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that, that's going beyond. He's saying, like, because

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of my expertise in this field, I know that this

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>particular thing should be worded this way rather than that way.

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't hold those credentials. So the New Yorker

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 1>writes about Wikipedia, and they write about s J before

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:47.280
<v Speaker 1>finding out that s J is not who he claims

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to be. Then the information breaks that s J is

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>actually someone else, and the New Yorker ends up writing

0:43:55.160 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strongly worded response to that, and again mainstream

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>media blows up, and online it blows up. The community

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>begins to sift through all the edits that s J

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>made on Wikipedia, particularly in the places where he was

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 1>using his false credentials to bolster his arguments, because now

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.479
<v Speaker 1>the community has the responsibility to fix this or if

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if in fact needs to be fixed, they have to

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>address it so that they can again show that Wikipedia

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 1>is something you can rely upon at least, or that

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it's at least useful and not just shouldn't just be

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>raised to the ground. Yeah, it's not just a database

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of information you cannot really be sure is accurate or not. Uh,

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it was, you know, it was fighting a powerful perception problem,

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>right right right? That was also, did did you? That

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was also the year two thousand and seven that Virgil

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>griff Griffith released wicket Scanner. I don't know about this one, okay,

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so so so wicket Scanner was this, you know, terrific

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>little program that he wrote that whenever an unregistered anonymous

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>user edits a Wikipedia entry, the site logs the user's

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 1>IP address and and this can come in terrifically handy

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 1>because you know, it's not not all the problems are

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with people pretending to be who they aren't when an

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 1>anonymous user can log in and talk about anything that

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to, you know, for the kind of things

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're coming out of this wicker scanner business were

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the facts like people from Apple I p addresses had

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been editing Microsoft pages on Wikipedia and vice versa, which

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is another reason why we find Wikipedia. It's it's one

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of those reasons why it's hard to trust stuff because

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes people with an agenda will go in and adjust

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a uh AN entry either to make one party and

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it look better than it than it would otherwise have

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>looked or look worse, depending upon the person's agenda. Sure, yeah,

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>yeah member, you know. And and Democratic Party member's IP

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>address was traced to edits about Rush Limbaugh that we're

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely unflattering. Yeah, this is this is happened any election year.

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>This stuff runs rampant to the point where sometimes Wikipedia

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>will lock down a particular page about a subject in

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 1>order to avoid the crazy number of edits that different

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sides of a debate will will put onto a page

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to support their side. I mean, think about it.

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of crazy, right. It's like if I

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if I have a disagreement with Lauren about a particular subject,

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and then I go to Wikipedia and edit a page

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>so it supports my argument, and then I cite Wikipedia

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as a support for my argument. That's it's pretty insidious.

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That's dirty pool, That's what that is. And I don't

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>want to say that all anonymous Wikipedia editors are are

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>bad or doing nefarious things at all. For example, a

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of the other things came out of this is

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that they found out that am someone from the CIA

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>contributed a really long entry about lightsaber combat um some

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 1>someone from DARPA had written fairly extensively about Schila booth.

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's it's just stuff. You know,

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not always bad, right, Yeah, But and we don't

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>mean to suggest that it's always bad or that this

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 1>happens all the time. It's the fact that it happens

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. And you don't, you know, unless you

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 1>are actually adept at looking at the edits page and

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding what that means, you may not be aware of

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:20.959
<v Speaker 1>something that's going on that's not quite right. And so, uh,

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 1>while while the odds of that actually happening on any

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>given page on any given day maybe low because you're

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about lots and lots of people using this resource

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and lots of opportunities to fiddle with it, it does happen.

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>That's that's why you're like, you know, the odds are

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>with you that you're going to be fine whenever you

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 1>use Wikipedia. There are like eight thousand regular contributors and

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven thousand regular editors on Wikipedia as so, and

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>after that whole uh, the whole problem with Segenthaler where

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the the quote unquote the joke about him being a

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>suspect in the assassination of the Kennedy's uh, Wales had

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>instituted a new policy saying that unregistered users can no

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>longer post new articles at all, because that was he

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>wanted to head off that problem, and then by registering

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>he hoped that that would create more accountability. Now, of course,

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the s j issue showed that there were other problems,

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and Wales came down pretty hard on that to Once

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:21.319
<v Speaker 1>all the facts came out in two thousand nine, the

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Arbitration Committee had to restrict access to its site from

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Church of Scientology IP addresses and also banned several

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:35.879
<v Speaker 1>anti Scientologist editors because the two sides were both manipulating

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the same articles to either post scientology and a positive

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or a negative light. Obviously when that was around when

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>uh Anonymous I believe was really involved in in their

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>crash campaign, so that the thing that was coming up

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>into question was the neutral point of view here and

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>both sides were trying to use Wikipedia to bolster their

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>own arguments. Uh, and whether you side with one or

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the other or it was clear that both sides had

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>agendas and uh, you know, some of those people may

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have been trying very hard to create an objective post,

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but there were a lot of people who really weren't.

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the banning and the and IP address

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>blocking came in. And that same year, Wikipedia became licensed

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 1>under Creative Commons right yeah, yeah, UM, which which basically

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>just means that it's it's licensed under their um share

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and share like yeah. So in other words, you don't

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about uh getting chased down by lawyers

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're reusing this material and another and you cannot,

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like a person who contributes to Wikipedia cannot claim that

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>work to be their own at all. They have they

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>have essentially signed off right right, you know, it's the

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 1>content UM is still technically owned by the contributors, but

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it is freely reproducible and distributable. Yeah, and when anyone

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>can go in and edit it. Actually, that was one

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 1>of those things that people worried about early on in

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia's have Wait a minute, I'm an awesome writer. I

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>write awesome things. My awes credit for my awesome thing

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 1>or or I even if I don't get credit, I

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 1>certainly shouldn't be subjected to seeing other plebeians coming in

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and editing my awesome prose where I wrote this amazing

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:18.280
<v Speaker 1>piece on Optimist Prime and his importance to Western culture.

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.319
<v Speaker 1>And some idiot came in and said that he turned

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 1>into this model of of of a Semitruck when clearly

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 1>it was this other model of Yeah, that's that was

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:31.399
<v Speaker 1>like an actual argument that happened on Wikipedia, early, early, early,

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>early on. But people have to let go because that's

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way Wikipedia works. And as a writer,

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I can completely understand what the people who get really

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 1>antsy about that. Although I would often turn my writing

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 1>assignments into Chris and then never see them again until

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they were published on the page, and I was all

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 1>right with it. Uh, you learned to let go here

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and how stuff. I learned to leg go, and I

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>learned that this way, I don't have to look at

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>those red marks all over my paper, because Chris just

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>fixed it himself. It was awesome. It made me feel

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like I was a better writer than I actually was.

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we've got a little bit more to talk

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:07.320
<v Speaker 1>about with Wikipedia, but before we dive into the next link,

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break in two thousand and twelve.

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything between Actually, we're going to wrap

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up the timeline pretty soon. The two thousand and twelve

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>The big story I have was, of course, that Wikipedia

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>took place in the blackout day on Janua and Pipa. Yeah, Pippa. Sorry,

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, you haven't. You haven't been through the whole

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>ordeal of talking about Sopa and Pippa. I called it

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Pipa for about three weeks until everyone else in technology

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>just consistently called it Pippa and a. Final I've been

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:50.439
<v Speaker 1>wrong this whole time, But yeah, Sopa and Pippa. Those were,

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, the online Piracy Acts that were in consideration

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.839
<v Speaker 1>in Congress in the United States, and several sites ended

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>up doing blackouts to protest this proposed legislation. UH to

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 1>bring more attention to it and say these the way

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:08.360
<v Speaker 1>these these laws or these these potential laws are worded,

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they could seriously harm the operation of the Internet and

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and cause trouble to lots of people and lots of organizations,

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and they should not be turned into law. Uh. And

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:22.359
<v Speaker 1>then in two thousand thirteen, oh but but before before

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we leave too important cultural note, that is the year

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that Encyclopedia Britannica ceased publishing on paper after two hundred

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and forty four years of doing so, you know, there's

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>also kind of interesting there was I remember, and I

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't write this down in my my research because it

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually it didn't occur to me while I was

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:41.760
<v Speaker 1>researching it. But I remember specifically, there was a time

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>when Wikipedia was starting to consider looking for experts to

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 1>send in articles, just like the old New Pedia days.

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:54.240
<v Speaker 1>They were they were actually thinking about going to experts

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 1>to get expert subject matter experts to write information for Wikipedia.

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, Britannica was looking at the possibility

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of crowdsourcing articles. So it looked like for a moment

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that these two models were about the flip flop that

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually happen that way, But I remember hearing about

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that or my brain just invented one of the two.

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Also interesting cultural point. In between two thousand eight and

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve, this kind of dead space that that

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we have created, first of on our timeline here, um,

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the Wikimedia Foundation total assets went from five point six

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:28.360
<v Speaker 1>million to about forty nine point three million. And again

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's existing on donations donations only, and and so, and

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fabulous for the concept of shared knowledge, I think, right,

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and also really interesting to see what kind of I

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 1>mean to know exactly what they mean when they when

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they have those giant banners every year to beg for money, right, Yeah,

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>when you see Jimmy Wells face on their saying on

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 1>every page, yeah, give money so that this can continue

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to exist. I mean, and not that you shouldn't donate.

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I just you know, I just think that it's it's

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 1>an interestingly, it's it's a really cool number. Yeah, And

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's it's cool that he took that approach.

0:54:01.040 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it definitely gives them the benefit of saying, look,

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:07.799
<v Speaker 1>we're not beholden to any organization or company. We are

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>accepting the nation crowd crowd source and this is this

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is really meant to be a tool to enrich the

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:18.720
<v Speaker 1>human race. Really, it's it's meant to really make things

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>better for everybody, and it's not meant to be the

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>platform for one company to say, hey, by our stuff

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and some of that other guy's stuff. One two their

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>teams speaking about companies. So that's this year. Earlier this year,

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a story broke that British Petroleum or BP, I should

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>say BP is better now. The Brits hate it when

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I say British Petroleum because they said, look, you don't

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 1>bring us into this fault. The story was that BP

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:52.759
<v Speaker 1>had edited its own Wikipedia page, maybe rewriting up to

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the content in order to make the environmental impact at

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the oil spell yeah, the deep water horizon and the Gulf,

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to make that seem less bad. Maybe it's kind of

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to word this properly, but essentially that they have

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of whitewashed the disaster and the follow up to it. Uh.

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And here here I'm quoting this directly from c NET,

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 1>which reported on this. BP is not directly editing its page,

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but instead has apparently inserted a BP representative into the

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:34.720
<v Speaker 1>editing community who provides Wikipedia editors with text. The text

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is then copied as is onto the page by Wikipedia editors,

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>while readers are none the wiser that sections pretending to

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:46.799
<v Speaker 1>be unbiased information are in fact vetted by higher ups

0:55:46.800 --> 0:55:51.279
<v Speaker 1>at BP before hitting the page. BP's image clean up

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 1>cleverly skirts Wikipedia's editorial rules, wherein Wikipedia editors are using

0:55:56.719 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>text that VP posts on Wikipedia itself as the course,

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:04.720
<v Speaker 1>although the text is not published on BP's website. This way,

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the significant involvement of BP in its own entry is

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:12.240
<v Speaker 1>completely hidden from Wikipedia readers. While Wikipedia editors, as usual

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>argue and attack each other over editorial policy, while BPS

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 1>favorable pr editing continues. Right and uh, alright, so so

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there there's really one person who was submitting these changes,

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:28.279
<v Speaker 1>someone by the name of Arturo silver Silva. Pardon me, um.

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:31.359
<v Speaker 1>He was from the corporate Communications department in Houston and

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:34.720
<v Speaker 1>um and he was actually going through the correct channels

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to submit these changes. He he suggested the changes to editors.

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:42.240
<v Speaker 1>He identified himself as a BP employee to those editors.

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So essentially what was happening was that he was playing

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 1>by the rules. Uh, it was technically in good faith,

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>aside from the part that that you know, it was

0:56:51.320 --> 0:56:55.879
<v Speaker 1>still whitewashing, whitewashing the whole situation. Right, So so these

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:58.239
<v Speaker 1>are like when we were talking about earlier about how

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jimmy Whale had edited his own his own

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>article and that he should have gone through the proper channels.

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>These are those channels that we were talking about. This

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is what the VP person was doing, but it was

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:14.800
<v Speaker 1>still putting in possibly you know, you might say biased

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>information is clearly clearly biased. It's from the company that

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the page is about, so you can't you know, there's

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 1>no way it could be unbiased. If I write my

0:57:24.160 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>own Wikipedia page, that's going to be biased. Even if

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm being objective, I'm still going to talk

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>about how freaking awesome I am. You know, so right,

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't know, like like at that point,

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I would personally, and this is speaking as an editor,

0:57:35.440 --> 0:57:37.560
<v Speaker 1>so I might be a little bit upity about it.

0:57:37.600 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I would blame the editors at that because because if

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not if they're not going like, yeah, this is

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:44.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the right source to trust. This information from

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:48.640
<v Speaker 1>UM and this is going beyond a a factual a

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly factual change, they're not showing good editorial judgment, correct yeah,

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. And uh and so you know,

0:57:56.840 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Wales actually came down again and said that while

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>BP is saying essentially that they totally played by the rules,

0:58:03.800 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 1>he said, that's not what the rules are there to protect.

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 1>The rules are there to protect against the kind of

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff that this this company is pulling. It's just this

0:58:11.240 --> 0:58:14.920
<v Speaker 1>company is pulling the tricks within the context of the rules,

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which either means that the rules themselves are faulty or

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the people who are who are in charge, like the editors,

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 1>like you were saying, Lauren, are faulty. At any rate,

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this is something that if you know, I don't want

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to put words into wales his mouth, but I assume

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>from what he has said he would not want this

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to have happened. Um. So, anyway, all of that being said,

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 1>there's an awful lot of information on Wikipedia, and a

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:44.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of that over two million articles in two languages

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in fact, and then there's stuff on there that's incredibly useful.

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I use Wikipedia casually all the time,

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:59.400
<v Speaker 1>probably every day. It is incredibly useful. Um. But because

0:58:59.440 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of what we've about, that's why a lot of teachers

0:59:02.320 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and and publications like how stuff works. Say you cannot

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:09.440
<v Speaker 1>use Wikipedia as a source, and it's because of the

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons we've listed. It's not that it's a bad thing.

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that Wikipedia is an amazing idea and

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it's actually phenomenal to me that's worked as well as

0:59:18.760 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it has right, right, you know, considering that that certain

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 1>certain portions the Internet can definitely be a wretched hive

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of scammon villainy. Right If you look at YouTube comments

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you think, this is the same this is

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the same world that we live in where we can

0:59:32.080 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>go to Wikipedia and read an article about something, you know,

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>something really technically advanced, and get a really good understanding

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. Uh, and it's this is a collaborative effort

0:59:41.840 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>on the part of possibly hundreds of people. And then

0:59:45.480 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you go to YouTube and you read the comments and

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you think, how is this the same world? How what happened? Uh?

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know it's amazing. But there are also some

0:59:54.360 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 1>things that you can poke some fun at, like, uh,

0:59:56.720 --> 0:59:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a I wish I could remember what which

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>web comic this was, and listeners, if you happen to

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm referring to, if you've been reading web

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>comics forever, and the strikes a chord. Let me know.

1:00:06.440 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But I remember reading a web comic ages ago where

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was a whole series about Wikipedia, and one of the

1:00:12.120 --> 1:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>things they pointed out, very snarkily, was if you were

1:00:15.880 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to assume that the the the entries that have the

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>most words are the most important to the human race,

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>then Optimist Prime would be way more important than Neighbraham Lincoln.

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like those Penny Arcade Somebody, somebody, please please

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>write in and tell me that. I can tell you

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it was not Penny Arcade. Well, I mean, Penny Arcade

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>very well may have made that same joke, but I

1:00:39.000 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>don't read Penning Penny Arcade, so I know it wasn't

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Penning Arcade. All right, Well that's fair, I'm not I'm

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not criticizing. Look, I don't read any web comics anymore.

1:00:49.200 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I just don't have the time. But I used to

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>read a lot of them. I recall. I recall seeing

1:00:54.000 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that that as well. At any rate, whoever created it,

1:00:57.040 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody somebody writing and tell us, because it's gonna bug otherwise.

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I used to You know what's worse, I used to

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>have these pinned up in my cubicle. They're not up

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there anymore, but I used to Ye, I can't even remember,

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but I used to have them. There's a whole bunch

1:01:09.200 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of them. Um. But anyway, that's one of those things.

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That's one of those things that you could joke about,

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is that that seemingly irrelevant things would get a huge

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of attention because they were. They were interesting that

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially stuffing geek culture that people are really

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>really passionately uh interested in, like you know, which again

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>shows you why they're these wikis now that exist all

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>around these properties, right right, and that's a perfect format

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for that kind of level of minutia of interstory detail.

1:01:43.440 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's ridiculous when I can look up a

1:01:45.360 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>comic book character and see every single iteration of that

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>comic book character, and then I look up and someone

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>who was fundamentally important in some huge moment in history

1:01:56.000 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and they have a fraction of That's not that you

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>not that you couldn't cover the important contributions of that

1:02:02.560 --> 1:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>person in that amount of space. You might be able to,

1:02:05.400 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but it just gives you this weird feeling like if

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I were to put these in scales as this one

1:02:10.120 --> 1:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so heavy. Any but yeah, and you know, Wikipedia is

1:02:15.240 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>as as of January, fifth most popular website in the world,

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>behind only Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and Facebook, and in fact

1:02:23.880 --> 1:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Amazon, Apple, and eBay. So I yeah, I

1:02:28.600 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>mean they're doing and again there's a lot of valuable

1:02:31.640 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff on there. So I know that we definitely kind

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of criticize Wikipedia quite a bit in this this podcast.

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But keep in mind we're talking about specifically in the

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>use for things like academic like academic research. And I

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>do want to say what we do, what Jonathan and

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I both do, I think, is um, we'll did we

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>say this already? We we we we go to Wikipedia and

1:02:50.600 --> 1:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we go straight to the resource section. You look at

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the references and you take a look to take a

1:02:54.720 --> 1:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>look and see like because there you can learn more

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about you know, go to the the places where the

1:03:01.440 --> 1:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>people who have written the article on Wikipedia where they

1:03:03.680 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>got their information from. Because I mean, that also allows

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you to remove the interpreter as well, right, because anytime

1:03:10.400 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you're reading an article on Wikipedia, you're reading an interpretation

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of someone else's stuff. Because you know, that's another thing

1:03:15.800 --> 1:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we didn't mention on Wikipedia. You do not publish primary information.

1:03:20.480 --> 1:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't publish information for the first time, specifically against

1:03:23.960 --> 1:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the rules. Yeah, you have to. You have to. If

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to present a fact that someone could look

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:33.439
<v Speaker 1>up and verify or reject, you have to be able

1:03:33.480 --> 1:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to cite it. And that wraps up another classic episode

1:03:36.720 --> 1:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff. Hope you guys enjoyed it. If you

1:03:39.320 --> 1:03:43.439
<v Speaker 1>have any suggestions for future tech Stuff topics, no matter

1:03:43.520 --> 1:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what it may be, if it's a company or a technology,

1:03:46.360 --> 1:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a trend in tech, maybe it's a great innovator you

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>would like to have sort of a biography of that person,

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>let me know. You can reach out to me on

1:03:54.520 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or on Facebook. We use the handled text stuff

1:03:58.320 --> 1:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>hs W A both and I'll talk to you again

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

1:04:09.720 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i

1:04:12.680 --> 1:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.