1 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. I'm Stephen Carol and 2 00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:12,880 Speaker 1: this is Here's Why, where we take one news story 3 00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:14,880 Speaker 1: and explain it in just a few minutes with our 4 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:22,160 Speaker 1: experts here at Bloomberg. It's the lifeblood of the finance world, 5 00:00:22,280 --> 00:00:25,520 Speaker 1: the numbers that tell us about the state of the economy. 6 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:28,840 Speaker 2: The August data was at least what in manufacturing PMI, 7 00:00:28,920 --> 00:00:29,760 Speaker 2: it was disappointing. 8 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:32,640 Speaker 1: Flash PMI survey data for Genie signals a slowing pace 9 00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:37,320 Speaker 1: of economic growth. The latest payrolls report coming in below estimates. 10 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:40,880 Speaker 2: US job's data, new data, data, data, data, data data. 11 00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 1: There's a deluge of data available for major economies. But 12 00:00:44,920 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 1: to misquote George Orwell, some data is more equal than others. 13 00:00:49,360 --> 00:00:51,680 Speaker 1: Think about the many different ways that we measure inflation 14 00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 1: or the labor market, job openings, job creation, unemployment all 15 00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:59,600 Speaker 1: tell you something different. And everything from economic growth to 16 00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:03,880 Speaker 1: part just saying manager index surveys can get significantly revised 17 00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:07,679 Speaker 1: between the first and last versions. So here's why some 18 00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:14,360 Speaker 1: economic data matters more than others. We'll also tell you 19 00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:16,520 Speaker 1: how to separate the signal from the noise. Joining me 20 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:19,200 Speaker 1: now is our Global economy reporter and a current and 21 00:01:19,240 --> 00:01:20,560 Speaker 1: a great to have you with us. You're a man 22 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:23,040 Speaker 1: who knows your numbers. There's always this question of when 23 00:01:23,080 --> 00:01:25,480 Speaker 1: we get data, whether it's telling us what was happening 24 00:01:25,600 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 1: in the past, or what's happening right now, or giving 25 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 1: us a hint as to what's going to potentially happen 26 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 1: in the future. How do we attach different levels of 27 00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:34,959 Speaker 1: importance to those timeframes. 28 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:37,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, so some of the numbers we get are very 29 00:01:37,319 --> 00:01:39,880 Speaker 2: backward looking, like, for example, when you hear people talking 30 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 2: about GDP data on the news headlines, that's typically telling 31 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:47,240 Speaker 2: you where the economy was maybe a quarter ago. So 32 00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:50,840 Speaker 2: in economic terms, that's kind of ancient history. Conditions can 33 00:01:50,920 --> 00:01:54,000 Speaker 2: change quickly. Economists like to talk about what they call 34 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:57,800 Speaker 2: high frequency indicators, data points that are giving more timely 35 00:01:57,840 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 2: read and what's happening and there. For example, you might look, 36 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 2: I've got retail sales, retail spending on Main Street. That's 37 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:06,920 Speaker 2: a good indicator of consumer confidence. You might keep an 38 00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:10,919 Speaker 2: eye also on what's going on with boring fancing at 39 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:13,920 Speaker 2: from banks. If banks are lending lots of money, that 40 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:17,040 Speaker 2: suggests that there's animal spirits and a willingness to invest 41 00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:19,840 Speaker 2: out there. By Cuparts and maybe for would be homeowners 42 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 2: buy a home, that's a good signal. If you're not 43 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:24,680 Speaker 2: lending money, then it suggests that perhaps things are more 44 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:27,120 Speaker 2: subdued them you might have expected. So some of the numbers, 45 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 2: as you say, can be quite backward looking. It's better 46 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:31,480 Speaker 2: just to treat them as such. If you want to 47 00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:34,200 Speaker 2: timely read, keep an eye on the more high frequency indicators. 48 00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:36,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean animal spirits. Depending on what kind of 49 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 1: animal you're thinking about, I suppose tells you different things 50 00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:42,600 Speaker 1: about it. How do we explain the contradictions that we 51 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:46,000 Speaker 1: sometimes see in the numbers? Sometimes they don't make so 52 00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:48,960 Speaker 1: much sense lining up one against another. If we think 53 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:50,720 Speaker 1: about an example of maybe inflation. 54 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 2: So over the past few years, if you want to 55 00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:55,560 Speaker 2: talk about the advanced economy world, there's been the worst 56 00:02:55,560 --> 00:03:00,200 Speaker 2: outbreak of inflation in decades that impacted everyone's living stand 57 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:02,120 Speaker 2: So interest rates go up and the cost of a 58 00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:05,040 Speaker 2: mortgage and alone go through the roof as a result. 59 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:09,400 Speaker 2: Now we're in a phase whereby this inflation is well entrenched. 60 00:03:09,560 --> 00:03:13,160 Speaker 2: So the pacer inflation has slowed dramatically in many economies. 61 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:15,880 Speaker 2: Coming back to the area where central banks like to be, 62 00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:19,200 Speaker 2: that's a good news story. But if you walk into 63 00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:21,639 Speaker 2: the shop having heard it on the news, headlinds, you're 64 00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 2: still paying much higher prices than you wore only a 65 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 2: couple of years ago. So I think, say in the US, 66 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 2: for example, basket of groceries maybe twenty odd percent higher 67 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 2: than what they wore before the inflation crisis struck out. 68 00:03:34,680 --> 00:03:37,200 Speaker 2: And that's where you get into the difference between the 69 00:03:37,280 --> 00:03:40,360 Speaker 2: rate of inflation, which is what the economists measure every month, 70 00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:43,240 Speaker 2: versus the actual price level that you're paying in the store. 71 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:45,120 Speaker 2: And I think there is a disconnected and confusion there 72 00:03:45,160 --> 00:03:47,720 Speaker 2: people here. Inflation is coming off, that doesn't mean prices 73 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 2: are coming down now. To be clear, for prices to 74 00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:54,200 Speaker 2: come down, that would need deflation. And when an economy 75 00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 2: is in deflation, it typically suggests that it has some 76 00:03:56,800 --> 00:03:59,840 Speaker 2: real problems going on. So it's a tricky you want 77 00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 2: it moment. It's a tough pill for households to swallow. 78 00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:05,440 Speaker 2: We're at a point where inflation is slow, but for 79 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:08,960 Speaker 2: prices to start falling that would require something of a 80 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:10,240 Speaker 2: deeper shock to the economy. 81 00:04:10,280 --> 00:04:12,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, and indeed, most of the conversations that you'll have 82 00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 1: with people will be about how expensive things are consistently 83 00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:19,640 Speaker 1: rather necessarily how much they've gone up by. Another quirk 84 00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:23,680 Speaker 1: that we follow very closely here at Bloomberg is data revisions. 85 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:27,479 Speaker 1: So we get sometimes several iterations of the same number. 86 00:04:28,200 --> 00:04:31,719 Speaker 1: Why do we see sometimes very big revisions in the data? 87 00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:34,120 Speaker 2: There can be bigger revisions. We recently had a larger 88 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 2: vision to US employment data, for example. It's mostly because, 89 00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:41,600 Speaker 2: as I say, a lot of these readings are snapshots 90 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:44,599 Speaker 2: in time. They are incomplete. It might be on a 91 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:47,800 Speaker 2: monthly basis, or maybe a quarterly basis, and as the 92 00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:50,440 Speaker 2: months of the year ago goes by, and maybe after 93 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:53,800 Speaker 2: another year or so. The kind of agencies whoutalitates the 94 00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:56,480 Speaker 2: statistic agencies and the government economic agencies pull all the 95 00:04:56,560 --> 00:04:59,320 Speaker 2: numbers together when they have a more complete picture. And 96 00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:01,560 Speaker 2: that's when you were able to say, oh, we overstated 97 00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:04,840 Speaker 2: something there, or we underestimated something there, and they make 98 00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:07,080 Speaker 2: changes to what we're previously now. And so, for example, 99 00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:09,799 Speaker 2: the US employment data, and this is true of employment 100 00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:12,960 Speaker 2: data anywhere, can be subject to material revisions. Which has 101 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:16,520 Speaker 2: had recent revisions to US jobs at it which suggest 102 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:20,599 Speaker 2: over eight hundred thousand less jobs than originally counted in 103 00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:23,760 Speaker 2: the system. That speaks to a weekly labor market than 104 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 2: was broadly expected at a jobs market still low kind 105 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:28,799 Speaker 2: to us. But it goes to show you that revisions 106 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:29,920 Speaker 2: can have a material impact. 107 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:31,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, and look, it also speaks to the idea of 108 00:05:32,279 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 1: getting the right data and data that is accurate, and revisions, 109 00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:38,600 Speaker 1: I suppose, get us closer to what is a better 110 00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:41,400 Speaker 1: picture of what's going on in something like the jobs 111 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:43,600 Speaker 1: market as well. There's an old joke about you put 112 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:45,640 Speaker 1: ten economists in a room and you get eleven opinions. 113 00:05:45,680 --> 00:05:48,480 Speaker 1: How much can numbers be open to interpretation? 114 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:52,520 Speaker 2: There is a degree of interpretation because it could suit 115 00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:55,760 Speaker 2: someone's investment thesis. They will want to read numbers whatever 116 00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:59,040 Speaker 2: way it is to back the argument they're making. Numbers 117 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:03,279 Speaker 2: can be interpreted to meet somebody's political buyas or political outlook. 118 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:05,720 Speaker 2: For example, so when we had the recent interest rate 119 00:06:05,760 --> 00:06:08,160 Speaker 2: cut in the US, for example, you had one side 120 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:11,680 Speaker 2: of politics here saying it shows that the inflation story 121 00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:14,200 Speaker 2: is under control and the Fed is at a point 122 00:06:14,200 --> 00:06:16,120 Speaker 2: that work and bring down interest rates. That's good for 123 00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:17,880 Speaker 2: costs of living. But of course you had the other 124 00:06:17,920 --> 00:06:20,520 Speaker 2: side of the political avide here making the point that 125 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:24,320 Speaker 2: interest rates coming down because the economy is losing jobs 126 00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:26,880 Speaker 2: and the jobs market is weakning, So everything can be 127 00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:29,360 Speaker 2: interpreted in different ways, but ultimately, one of the good 128 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,080 Speaker 2: things about economics is the numbers and the data and 129 00:06:32,480 --> 00:06:34,000 Speaker 2: the statistics do not lie. 130 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 1: So if you're looking for the most quality data or 131 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:40,160 Speaker 1: the best things to look out for when you're trying 132 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:43,240 Speaker 1: to assess numbers as they're being published, what are the 133 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:45,160 Speaker 1: sort of things that you think about when you're trying 134 00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:47,640 Speaker 1: to parse what a certain number means for the economy. 135 00:06:47,880 --> 00:06:49,479 Speaker 2: You have to look for the numbers that really speak 136 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:53,040 Speaker 2: to what's happening in both people's lives and in companies' lives. 137 00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:56,919 Speaker 2: So that would be figures around corporate investment, business investment. 138 00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,679 Speaker 2: What's happening there with companies? Have they got the confidence 139 00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:03,200 Speaker 2: of God and expand and hire new staff. Then obviously 140 00:07:03,279 --> 00:07:04,640 Speaker 2: you have to keep an eye on what's happening with 141 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 2: household credit. Are people taking out mortgages to buy a 142 00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:09,680 Speaker 2: house or those who have a mortgage taking out a 143 00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 2: loan to renovate the house. That speaks to, of course 144 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 2: confidence in terms of consumer confidence that those all around us. 145 00:07:16,480 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 2: And then of course you have the very timely, monthly 146 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 2: or even quarterly readings in terms of inflation, what is 147 00:07:23,720 --> 00:07:25,520 Speaker 2: going on with the price that we're paying for goods 148 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 2: and services. I mentioned the jobs out earlier. That's obviously 149 00:07:28,560 --> 00:07:30,560 Speaker 2: a very critical one, and then all of that creates 150 00:07:30,560 --> 00:07:33,160 Speaker 2: the jigsaw that is known as a GDPGIC. So that's 151 00:07:33,200 --> 00:07:35,560 Speaker 2: backward looking, but it's a health check and it tells 152 00:07:35,560 --> 00:07:37,320 Speaker 2: you worth economy has been And. 153 00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:40,320 Speaker 1: You've covered economies all over the world for Bloomberg. I 154 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:42,640 Speaker 1: wonder do you have a favorite piece of data? Is 155 00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 1: the one that still you get excited about trying to 156 00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:46,560 Speaker 1: read into the details of well. 157 00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:48,239 Speaker 2: I used to get excited about. There was a phase 158 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:51,320 Speaker 2: when satellite data on China was a big thing, especially 159 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:53,320 Speaker 2: among hedge funds. It was popular that someone had the 160 00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:57,680 Speaker 2: latest satellite footage of some industrial expansion or development somewhere, 161 00:07:57,720 --> 00:08:01,000 Speaker 2: maybe some housing property site being developed, and they were 162 00:08:01,120 --> 00:08:02,960 Speaker 2: claiming that they were getting an early read and what's 163 00:08:03,000 --> 00:08:05,520 Speaker 2: happening in China's economy. But I think we've passed that 164 00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:09,200 Speaker 2: phase now. During the pandemic, there was a huge rush 165 00:08:09,640 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 2: on high frequency indicators, so people wanted to know what's 166 00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:15,680 Speaker 2: happening with cinema tickets and what's happening with eating out 167 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:16,760 Speaker 2: and what's happening. 168 00:08:16,440 --> 00:08:17,880 Speaker 1: With Samwiches from Press. 169 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:19,880 Speaker 2: I remember that one. All of this and usage of 170 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:22,680 Speaker 2: the subways and truth, we're back to where we started. 171 00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:24,720 Speaker 2: We're looking at the official data that comes out of 172 00:08:24,720 --> 00:08:26,960 Speaker 2: the agencies, and people are keeping an eye on as 173 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 2: I mentioned earlier, spending data, keeping an eye lending data, 174 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:34,560 Speaker 2: jobs data, inflation data. I think the satellites and SANDWIDG 175 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 2: indexes were all very interesting, but we've come back to 176 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:37,640 Speaker 2: what we know and trust. 177 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 1: Most, return to the classics and the current our Global 178 00:08:39,880 --> 00:08:42,839 Speaker 1: Economy reporter. Thanks very much for joining us for more 179 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 1: explanations like this from our team of twenty seven hundred 180 00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:48,040 Speaker 1: journalists and analysts around the world. Search for Quick Take 181 00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:53,160 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg website or Bloomberg Business app. I'm Stephen Caroll. 182 00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:56,000 Speaker 1: This is here's why. I'll be back next week with more. 183 00:08:56,240 --> 00:09:00,280 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening, Z