WEBVTT - Alex Gibney Seeks Truth

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alec Baldwin and you're listening to Here's the Thing

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>from My Heart Radio. Alex Gibney is an old school

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>truth teller. Watching one of his documentaries focused on strong characters,

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a propulsive set of facts that expose malfeasance or

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.639
<v Speaker 1>utter incompetence. Often the victim is the little guy or

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>our highest ideals like democracy. No matter the topic, Gibney's

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>films are always a fascinating, intense, and enlightening ride. Gibney's

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>most recent film, The Crime of the Century, which he wrote, directed, produced,

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and narrated for HBO, tells the origin story about the

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>heart of the opioid crisis poisoning our nation. Big Farmers

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>celebrated its marketing muscle, using parties to lure doctors to

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>write scripts. This was a new drug cartel. There were

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>drug deal was wearing suits and lab coats. Basically, here's

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>some moneys. Yes, I'm looking at this, and I'm gone,

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly we're breaking the law. Alex Gibney has made more

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>than thirty films in the last twenty years. In two

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, he won the Academy Award for Best

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Documentary Feature for Taxi to The Dark Side, his film

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on the CIA's use of torture, whether he's taking on

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>scientology or Russian interference in our elections, or iconic figures

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>like Steve Jobs, Lance Armstrong and Frank Sinatra, give Meey

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>never flinches and his stories stand up. In fact, he

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>can't think of a time when he wanted to reissue

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one of his docs to make a correction. I can't

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think of a time when it did happen. And I

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>think about that a lot, because I try to find

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a moment in time where it feels like we're absolutely right,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes, you know, I'm afraid that things may come

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>out that would cause me to want to redo it.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But I I sort of feel like the films represent

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>a certain wisdom at a moment in time, and it's

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's best to leave them. I am kind of following

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>up in a film I did and doing another film

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of dig a little bit deeper the film

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I did, a Taxi to the Dark Side. I'm doing

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a kind of follow up to it. But I've never

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 1>been motivated to really go back in it's it seems

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like such a painful process. But I usually do think about,

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>like if I'm going to end this film here? Why

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>are we ending it here? And will it stand the

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>test of time? When the film is over, do you

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ever privately follow up about certain aspects of it? Does

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you're caring? Does your curiosity? Does your concern end when

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the film is distributed? No, the ghosts of all my

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>films tend to follow me, and I often keep in

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>touch with sources and interview subjects, and in odd ways,

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they keep coming back two films I make henceforth, so

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they kind of reverberate. It's it's a little bit like

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that moment in in Ghostbusters where they say, don't cross

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the streams. My streams are constantly getting crossed. It seems

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like characters from one film are intruding into another. They

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>all stay with me, which becomes a little bit vexing.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's hard to keep them straight. In your career,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>your fabulous career, You've made thirty films or so in

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years, one an Oscar. But of course

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>documentary films have become content for streamers and major major broadcasters.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>What are your observations about that change during your career.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>What was it like in the beginning, Well, in the

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>beginning was terrible. My wife used to tell me, I

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>want you to go out and get a job, and

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever you do, don't mention that you're interested in documentaries,

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because they'll kick you right out the door. So I

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>had to be very cautious. And then there was that

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible era of cable television where every channel had to

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>be branded, which meant if you were clicking through channels,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you got to a channel, it had

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to look like it was the street channel or whatever,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and which meant that as a creator, you were just

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>cranking out sausages. It was the worst possible thing. But

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>then I discovered, particularly for political documentaries, there was a

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>moment where theatrical films could say things that we're pretty

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>potent so long as you made them entertaining. And that

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>was a huge revelation which changed everything. And because suddenly

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you weren't operating in a commercial environment where it was

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the least common denominator and basically we were trying to

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>sell audiences to advertisers. People were buying the content, that

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is to say, they go to a movie because they

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see the movie, not because they wanted to

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>buy soap. So that was great, and I think that's

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what helped to explode the moment that we're in now.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>My only concern about streaming environment is the extent to

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>which some of the streamers began to start relying too

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>much on their algorithms so that they come to you

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, our algorithm says that at you know,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>minute thirty two, you should really be changing the narrative

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to this so that we'll keep our viewers. We're hearing

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that, and that to be a nightmarish.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that a contractual thing for you? You're an Academy

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Award winning documentary filmmaker. Is it understood that you have

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>final cut or is that all boiler plate in a contract? No?

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I, generally speaking have final cut. Their

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>very few instances where I don't have final cut. But

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 1>there are some and and particularly some of the films

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that I produce where I'm not directing them per se.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>That's where we're hearing a little bit more of these notes,

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, in addition to what I do, I

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>have a company that does a lot of other stuff,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and you get a lot of these notes that refer

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to to algorithms, and it becomes a scary process. I mean,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>even the studios trying to make it a science, but

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it's never been a science. It's always been they try

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to widgetize something creative, and that's that's impossible. Well, as

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I often say, all of their algorithms and all of

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>their research and so forth is to achieve the lingering

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>fantasy of the risk free entertainment product. And I often

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>say to them, the pursuit of the risk free entertainment

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>product is absurd. I mean, there's no such thing absurd.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can only rely on our instincts and

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the instincts that got us where we are now. When

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>you talk about your company and you talk about what

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you're producing and not producing, I want you to explain

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the difference between an executive producer and a producer.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of different types of producers. How do

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you function as a producer in your company's work. On

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the projects where I'm named as a producer or an

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>executive producer, I generally have a creative role, and sometimes

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with raising the money, but often

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with having some say or guidance

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the overall creative direction. Though you know,

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we try very hard to empower our directors to do

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>films the way they want to do them. But sometimes

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>on a series in particular, where you're coalescing around something

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like I did a series for Netflix for a couple

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of years called Dirty Money, which I was very proud of.

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It's all about corporate malfeasance, and you know, we purposefully

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>engaged directors to do things their own way. That said,

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it came out of my experience on en Ron,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which was one where you invest in the wild criminality

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of the purpose and it's a kind of colorful, kind

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of heist like vibe that you engage in. So as

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>executive producer, I'm trying to encourage the directors to lean

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>into that kind of thing without being overbearing about it.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes I'm the beard and sometimes, uh, sometimes I

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>come come out a little stronger than that. You now

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>have what like a hundred or a hundred and twenty

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>people working at Jigsaw. So the company itself, that is

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, permanent employees as fairly small. It's like fourteen

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen people, but at times we can have as

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>many as two hundred people working in the in the

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>space on various projects. So that's where things get pretty daunting.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you ever sitting in your office screaming into a

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.119
<v Speaker 1>cushion or you're gonna cry and you're telling your staff

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>please don't bring me any more projects to do, because

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there's the fear you're gonna become the Jeff Coon's of

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>documentary filmmaking, where like you're running from room to room

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and going yes, no, change this brightenness. Yeah, well, I

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>really try. I mean, that would be the stereotype. And

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I do scream into my pillow, but usually not because

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. I mean, if if I can get projects

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>made great, But I purposely tell you know, the other

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>executives at the company, there are many projects here I

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be involved in, not because they're bad projects,

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>but because it's important that they run themselves, because otherwise

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I get spread too thin, and who needs that. Then

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a kind of proxy system. The whole idea

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is to create a company that will run of itself

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and last long after I've left the field. Well, when

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you talked before about these streamers and their algorithms, what

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I found with some of the even in the podcast world,

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what they're basically saying is we need eight episodes because

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't get into the grave until episode six. Episodes

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>one through five we break even six, seven and days

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>when we make money, so we need eight episodes. And

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, I think I got six good ones,

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, we need eight episodes. Do you find

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's challenging for you in terms of when you

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>make films sometimes? And we try, honestly to push back

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>on that, because the last thing you know, you want

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>is to do a story that feels like it's run

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>out of gas and you just keep flogging it. So yeah,

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we do get that, but then sometimes the algorithm changes,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, some of the streamers are like, well

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the way we used to think, and now now

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>it's back to five is the magic number or whatever?

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, haven't you heard? And yeah, exactly, you clearly didn't.

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The website you go to how many episodes this week?

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's far dot com right, Yeah exactly. Now you have

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a great volume of work where you are developing material,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>making films and series and so forth limited series with

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>some great, great writers, so great, I mean to just

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>keep you alone and Larry right, who I worship because

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you worked with Larry before, and going clear Going Clear,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>or in my trip to Al Qaida, and and also

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously Looming Tower. So what was your first connection with Right?

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Somehow we were put together on my trip to al Qaida,

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which was a play that he had done about a

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>one man play that he started about the writing of

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Looming Tower. And we got together on that and

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I did a doc about it. It's part half of it,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>or a lot of it is the play itself. And

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>then we cut in and out of the play to

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>do various documentary thing and we got on really well,

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and so then we were determined to do other stuff together.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have a kind of a shorthand I

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think with writers because my dad was a journalist, and

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the business I was supposed to go into. It

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>was around me all my life. So in my films,

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>well I make them consciously as films. They also they

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>have what I would call journalistic baggage. That is to say,

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really invested in in a journalistic aspect of them

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that tries to get the facts right. But with somebody

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like Larry Right, it's a similar process in terms of

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the storytelling aspect of it. You know, at greater lengthen

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the new Yorker pieces or in his books, which often

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>come out of his New Yorker pieces. There is at

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>once a kind of fact finding discipline and also a

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>storytelling discipline where you're trying to engage an audience to

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>come along this journey with you, and part of that

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is investing in the propulsion of the narrative, which is

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's storytelling, right. So Larry and I got

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on really well because he's always talking about stuff like

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that and and devices that he uses in his writing

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and and so ongoing. Clear that was maybe the biggest

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>collaboration we had in terms of impact. The Leoming Tower

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>was also, you know, had pretty broad reach. When you

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>do a Crime of the Century. When you do with

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>something with HBO, the budgets pretty high, correct, it is,

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>relatively speaking. Relatively speaking, though, and on this one it

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it got a lot higher than the original budget because

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>our original deal with HBO said we were going to

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>do a two hour film, and then when we showed

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>them the material, they said, well, this is clearly you know,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>going over the bounds of the two hours, you've got

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>much more material than that, and they let us expand

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it to a four hour and in the case of

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Crime of the Century. I mean, to be honest with you.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>We actually started out working with the Washington Post. There

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>were some journalists There's Scott Higham and Lenny Bernstein and

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>others who had first made me kind of aware of

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the breadth of this story. And along the way, you know,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I decided they had were focusing mostly post Sackler, and

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I decided I really needed and wanted to tell the

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Sacular part of the story to get the breadth of it.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's what led me to Patrick, And in fact,

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Patrick and I ended up teaming up on not only this,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but also a scripted version of the Sackler story called

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>pain Killer, which is going to start shooting later this fall.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>When you're working on the Sacular story as well as

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps other stories, is there ever a fear of litigation?

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, talk about a deep pockets opponent off you

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>wind up getting litigated. Were you're afraid that they would

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>suit you? Yes, And that's why the reporting has to

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>be really good. And I give a lot of credit

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to HBO for being really rigorous about that. But once

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you have the facts right, being very brave, I mean

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I learned that on Going Clear. You know, there were

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lawyers attached to that film, but we

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>were very good about getting our facts right. And it's

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>not only the stuff that's in but the reporting that

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>surrounds it. That's what gives you the foundation to put

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the stuff you put in the film. And

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so with Patrick, because we were working in different media,

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>we were able to share things that we might not

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>otherwise have shared. If he was, say, another filmmaker, and

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>he would give me some documents, I would give him

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>some documents. And also we could geek out with each other.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you're deep into a project like this,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>very few people, particularly significant others, want to hear from

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you about the arcana of the opioid crisis. You know,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like okay, Han, that's enough. You know, we've got

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>embedded in your wife's like honey, what's wrong? And like

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the molecular structure of this active ingredient. Look

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>at this molecule. Have you ever seen a molecule? Now?

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But when you're doing these projects you talked about all

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers attached to Going Clear. We were talking before

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about how the early days for you because you work

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so much in unearthing truth and facts and there's a

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>journalistic stripe to what you do that you've got a

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>staff of people doing research and maybe you have a

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>part time lawyer. I'm kind of joking here, and now

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>your company, the difference is you've got a lot more

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>people on the payroll doing research. You have ten lawyers

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>on the payroll. You know what I mean? Like, do

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you need more of everything to get the facts clear?

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we don't operate the company that way. And

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and actually while we started to veer in that direction,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going back to baseline to be a

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more entrepreneurial. What we do is try to

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>set it up more as units, you know, try to

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>function not as a machine or a factory, but more

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like a studio where each film or series has its

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>own people and and it's a small but dedicated group,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and attached to them are are sometimes lawyers we frequently

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>work with, and sometimes journalists we frequently work with, but

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they're attached to that particular project. So each one is bespoke,

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's has its own DNA, and that tends to work

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>out better because sometimes these things take a long time,

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like Crime of the Century took close to three years

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with a small group that really gets intensively

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>into the subject. That's what allows it to happen, rather

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>than a kind of big machine which attempts to crank

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>these things out. They can't be cranked out because the

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>rhythm of them sometimes depends on when you get documents

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or when you get people to talk at the pace

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of their own. But I'm even talking about the creative

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>DNA biology of the project to project. I'm just talking

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>about resources in terms of when you're first starting out,

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you might not have everything you need. And as you

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>become this phenomenally successful filmmaker, one thing it affords you

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to do is to have more people come on and

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>do more research and deepen your research, and have more

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>legal help to protect you. Now, you know, I was

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in Sundance. I saw you there. I went to the screening,

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I'm in that rarefied position where I'm friends

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>with Tom. I mean he's he's a friend in terms

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of my career. You know, we don't see each other

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for long periods of time where we pick up where

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we left off. He had me come into a couple

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of smaller parts and two am I movies and so forth.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And I've often speculated and I even wrote in my memoir,

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So I thought, what was it? What did he need

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this involvement in this organization, in this uh, in this faith,

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you want to call it. What did he

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>need it for? I wasn't quite sure what its purpose was.

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, he has everything, you know, wealth and fame

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and legacy and the respect of the community. He has

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>everything you could possibly imagine in a career as as

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>as a movie star. So what did this add to

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>his life? And I I speculated about that in my book.

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I came up with an answer. But when you were

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>doing Going Clear, the scientology community, which is diverse, I

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>mean there's different people. Was not all just Tom incorporated maybe,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but all those people have been able to in some

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>way chew away any real close examination. And when I

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>watched your movie, I was mildly taken aback by how

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>deep you got. Your film was among the first people

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>from a major filmmaker to say that the the institution

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is guilty of certain abuses. I mean they abuse people.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Their attitude to me was always like, hey, man, we're

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>not hurting anybody. You know, we manipulate people, no more

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or no less than U S military recruitment companies, do

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, we have a certain kind of

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing we do to get people to want to

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>join and sign up with us, but no one's being

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>abused or hurt. And you and what was the genesis

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of that movie? Why did you decide you wanted to

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>go further and look into that even further. You know

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting about that is that I had been offered

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to do that movie any number of times, and I

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>had always turned it down because I always felt it

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was too fringed. There weren't that many scientologists in the

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>world as opposed to say, the Roman Catholic Church. I

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>did a film about the church. Coincidentally or not, two

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>weeks after it premiered, the pope resigned. So um, you know,

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I was familiar with deep seated religious organizations and also

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the pushback you can get. But in the

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>case of Going Clear, it was Larry who convinced me.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Larry Wright who convinced me to take it on. There's

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a phrase in his you know, subhead of his book

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>is the prison of belief, And that idea was really

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me because then it was a deep dive

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>into scientology and indeed, the abuses of scientology. I mean

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's the reason to be concerned, is that the

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>prison of belief leads to real human rights abuses. But

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the other reason I was interested in it is because

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>people like to demonize scientologists as crazies, and the prison

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of belief allowed me to put scientologists in a mainstream

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>tradition of how people invest or get lost in a

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>prison of belief, whether it be religious belief or political belief,

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and can't get out even though the bars of the

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>cell are open. So that's what really motivated me to

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>get there. And then as we dug in, we took

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>testimony and checked facts and found out stuff that other

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>people hadn't found out before. And and I actually had

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big impact on the Scientology community itself. There

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people who either left the church

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>or who as ex members of Scientology, suddenly felt empowered

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to speak up in a way that they hadn't been

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>able to do so before. Because because Scientology using its

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>threat of litigation, because they had launched the maybe the

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>most expensive lawsuit ever against the media company when they

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>went after Time Warner, you know, people were afraid. And

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>HBO was incredibly impressive in terms of its ability to

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>back us up once we convinced them that we had

0:19:54.920 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the goods. Filmmaker Alex Gibney. One person who never sought

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>risk free entertainment was Sheila Nevins. As the head of

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>HBO documentary Films from nineteen seventy nine until her retirement

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eighteen, Nevin's laid the groundwork for our

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>current golden age of documentaries. However, when she started in

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the early eighties, HBO wouldn't even use the word documentary.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>When we did promos for films, we would call them docutainment.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>We invented this luetic word because we're afraid that if

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>we said documentary, people would feel that it was for

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the elite and that it was about politics, and that

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it was not going to be about human stories. And

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so we we hid behind this word docutainment. And then

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>slowly but surely it took a good years we began

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, maybe it's not such a dirty word,

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and reality programming sort of said real people can be

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting in a trivial way. So then somehow it went docutainment.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Reality TV yea documentary, go for it, say that real people,

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>people without celebrity, people who are trying to survive in

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a complicated world, saying their own words and say it

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in their own words. To hear more of my two

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen conversation with Sheila Nevans, go to our archives

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and Here's the Thing dot org. After the break, Alex

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Gibney talks about his first job out of film school,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>cutting trailers for exploitation films. I'm Alec Baldwin and you're

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to Here's the Thing. Alex Gibney has said he

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>inherited some of his anti authoritarian ways from his family.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>His father was a journalist who specialized in the culture

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and policy of postwar Japan. His mother founded the health

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>education department at Boston's Children's Hospital. His parents divorced when

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Alex was young, and when he was a teenager, his

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>mother remarried a champion of civil disobedience. My mom in

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight fell in love with William Sloane Coffin Jr.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>He was at the time being tried for conspiracy with

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Dr Spott and Austin, and she had known him from before,

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and he was a very charming and charismatic guy, and

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he wooed her and they ended up getting married and

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we moved to New Haven when I was I think

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a junior in high school, and ultimately I did go

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to Yale from And was it filmmaking? I mean, what

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>was the first time you picked up a camera as

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a child. Were you interested in filmmaking as a child.

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Were you a huge filmgoer. I was into it as

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a kid, and I was always into cinema. But the

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think really changed me or turned me

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>around were these great film societies at Yale, and there

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was there was always an interesting film on every night.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is pre video, so you you go

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to these film societies and sit and watch and and

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>at the time, documentaries and fiction films were distinctions, weren't made.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like one was up and one was down.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>They were all interesting. And I can remember you know

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>too in particular that really floored me. One was Gimme

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Shelter by the Mazel's Brothers, you know about the Rolling Stones,

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And the other was Exterminating Angel by Louis Bunuel, and

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought, wow, you know, the possibility for expression in

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>this medium is so enormous. So that's when I started

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to veer away from what my dad had in mind.

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>For me, which was to be a print journalist. Did

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you seriously? I did? I did. But he lived in

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Japan for a lot of his life, and I was

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>studying Japanese literature at the time, which meant I was

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>like head buried in these endless character dictionaries. I started

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>to veer away and and found my own direction. But

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he really wanted me after college to go and take

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the interviews at Time Life Newsweek, you know, and and

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and go into family business, which is what he had done.

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>What did you study of Yale Japanese literature? Yeah, and

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm impressed because of all the Japanese documentaries you've made.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible. Well, I did study under Donald Ritchie, the

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>great Japanese film critic who knew so much about court Sawa.

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'll give you one. I'll give you. I can

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>do one film quote in Japanese, which is Chiotto's it.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's uh, that's the end of your Jimbo. He says,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll wait for you at the gates of hell. Oh

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>my god, my god. Now when you know when you

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>make it. So you're studying Japanese literature, and yeah, you're not.

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You're making films at the same time I did, Uh,

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was studying film with a famous documentary

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>named Murray Learner. He did a lot of those docs

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about the Newport jazz and folk festivals and that in

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>store from now teaches at Colombia, and so she was

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>she was one of my advisors. I mean she was

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>very young then, as as we all were. So I

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>was studying film and and ultimately towards the end of

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>my sojourn there, I was starting to to to move

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>into that territory. And then I went to u c

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>l A Film School. So so you go to graduate

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>school and and how many years you were you in

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>l A. Well, I ended up staying in l A

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for a good many years, like twelve thirteen years. But

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and I never actually finished u c l A. That

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>they're happy to claim you cling me to their bosom now,

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But I loved it there. I just I got a

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>job with the Samuel Goldwyn Company at the time, and

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I started doing things like cutting exploitation trailers. What exploitation

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>trailers did you cut? Oh? There was one called my

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite was one called shock Waves. It was a film

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>about mutant Nazis who come up from the ocean floor

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that's where they went to a secret cat underwater cavern.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>They manufactured a group of mutant Nazis that couldn't be killed,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and their ships sank somewhere in the Caribbean, and then

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one day a fishing boat happened to dislodge it, and

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>up they came out out from the water that I

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>thought they were in Buenos Aires. Peter Cushing. Peter Cushing

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was in it. Peter Cushing was in it. Brooke Adams

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was in it. There's a there's a line that caused

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>them as a TOTN call death call creatures, small horrible

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>sent any you can imagine. Oh god. That was a

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>documentary about that. Well. The other trailer I did was

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for it was for a TV trailer I think for

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the First Assault on Precinct thirteen. And there was one

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Nicholas Meyer Rock called Invasion of the b Girls.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>These were women who were half human, half b and

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>when they'd have sex with you, they'd sting you to death.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that woman, I know her. Yeah. I went

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>out with her a few times. Yeah I got I

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>got out on stage, but she tried and tried her best.

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Now I had a small part in Looming Tower I

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>was very grateful to come and work with you guys,

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and I understand you're doing more of that. Correct, You're

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be doing more narrative work. Yes, with luck, that's

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm doing a feature this coming year, and this

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is one that's a real passion project. It's a story

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about for a long time and it

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>took a long time to get the script right. But

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm really looking forward to doing it. And a guy

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>named Matt Cook he wrote a Patriots Day which was

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>directed by Peteburgh, but interesting to me, he was a

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in the infantry in Iraq and this is ah, this

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is very much of a war story. It's actually Vietnam War,

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's what it's really about is how hard it

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is to be a hero. And with Looming Tower, what

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was your input into that? I mean, you know, Larry

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Danny Futterman and I were um, you know, co conspirators

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>early on in terms of coming up with the kind

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of the overall concept because Looming Tower is a vast book,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and so how to contain it and how to focus it,

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And we decided to focus it on this battle between

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the FBI and the CIA in the run up to

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, and to focus on to Harraheem's character. Uh,

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, Ali Soufan is the guy in which he

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>was based in and Jeff Daniels character John O'Neill, and

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know, I mean you played George Tennant, who

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>was a critical character in this battle between the FBI

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and the CIA. In terms of the overall conceit, I

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of input. I think that it's fair

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to say that Danny and I had some creative differences

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on it, and I want some and lost others, but

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the way things go. Now. There was some talk

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about another season of that then that didn't happen. Did

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you realize that that was the right thing to come

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>about or were you disappointed that there wasn't another season

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of that? I was hugely disappointed. I really think there

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>could have been a great one. And in fact, out

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of that, I'm now doing a dock which tells part

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of that story that I really wanted to tell in

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>season two, because you know, when we originally came up

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with the concept, we had a notion for season two

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and then season three, and for a lot of reason,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seasons who didn't happen, So so I'm I'm just in

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the process of finishing because it's the twentieth anniversary of

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, so I'm just in the process of finishing

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>something that leans in to sort of the next chapter

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>because Ali Soufan goes on and he ends up interrogating

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the first high value detainee as a member of the FBI.

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's that detainee ends up being the for the

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>patient zero, the CIA's Torture Program filmmaker Alex Gibney. If

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you're enjoying this conversation, tell a friend and be sure

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to follow Here's the Thing on the I Heart Radio app,

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. When we

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>come back, Alex Gibney talks about what he learned early

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in his career from working on a series about the

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Blues with Martin Scorsese. I'm Alec Baldwin and you're listening

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to Here's the Thing. Alex Gibney is known for his

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>films that challenge trenched power, but he also has a

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>deep catalog of work featuring musicians from an early blues

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>series with Martin Scorsese to Jimmy Hendricks, James Brown, The Eagles,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The Rolling Stones, and Frank Sinatra. When Gibney is working

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>with a subject as lionized as Sinatra, I wondered, is

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>there an expectation he'll put a shine on their legacy?

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, as the Sinatra family will tell you about

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the conversations we had. They weren't always pretty.

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>They were of the opinion that I didn't shine the

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>statue enough, though I think I think Tina over time

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>came to to become a much bigger believer in in

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in what we had done, even though she was that

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>skeptic going in. So you know, I had editorial control

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so I could do what I wanted. I was focused

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in this film, though a little bit more on Sinatra

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the musician and as kind of Gatsps character who kind

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of represented both the American dream him in the American Nightmare.

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And that to me was was interesting because because I

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be honest, I mean, Frank Marshall was the

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>one who who encouraged me to take this project on,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and I was not a big Sinatra fan. I knew

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>him as kind of the guy who you know, hung

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>around with Spiro Agnew and I wasn't that interested, but

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I became, you know, in doing the film, which is

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the great things about doing docs. You become

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>curious and you learn about a subject. I became a

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>huge admirer of his in terms of his ability to

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>tell stories in three minutes through his voice, but also

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the tension, the rough and tumble tension between where he

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>came from and and where he was ending up. And

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could have we've gone deeper into the

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Mabvia's up probably, and but I think that there was

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>enough there to give you a sense of what was

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>going on, and that it wasn't like we skipped it.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think also the other thing that was tricky

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>about him was his romantic life, which I think we

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we did a pretty good job of dealing with. The

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one woman who completely flummoxed him. Um av A Gardner.

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So Ava Gardner, I mean, I'm a fool to want you?

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Is the one song Frank Sinatra wrote, Uh, maybe he

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote two, but that was the most famous one. And

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and she kicked his ass, Ava Gardner did. And and

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>then he turns around and does this terrible thing to

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>me a pharaoh, which we chronicle in the film, where

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he basically serves divorce papers honor or has his lawyer

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>served divorce papers on her while she's on the set

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of Rosemary's Baby, and then she went on to point

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>out that Rosemary's Baby out grossed his film that was

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>released at the same time, that she made sure he

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>knew that, so anyway, that that was a great experience though,

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and and a lot of people have come to me

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.719
<v Speaker 1>about that film, and it's become one of the films

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of mine that people like an awful lot. I loved it,

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>loved it, and and only highlighted my point that him

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in this work that I've done, I mean, I did

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a podcast. We've done this for now nine or ten years,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and I love doing this because of my just my curiosity.

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And if there's one person, I mean, I'd probably write

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>him a check for a million dollars to sit down

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and do the show with me, it would have been Sinatra.

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing that's always so agonizing about the

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>world we live in now, where people are not not

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so much expected, but they're allowed in a way. People

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have much more of an expectation of you being more

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>forthcoming about the challenges and the struggles of that kind

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of work. And I thought to myself, God, wouldn't have

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>been great to get Sinatra on film and do a

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>real interview that wasn't Larry King or some of that

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>other crap, you know, to really make him sit down.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever seen I did you ever

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>see an in depth interview with Sinatra where he really

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>even touched on his pain, and I think he was

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy in a lot of pain. He was. And

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we got that was so valuable.

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not only did we get this sixteen millimeter

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>film of his first retirement concert in which we kind

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of used as a structure to tell the story of

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>his life, but the more important thing we got were

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of audio taped in reviews that were done

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>at great length because part of the problem with most

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>TV interviews, particularly back in the day, they were either

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>rolling these huge video cameras where you're having to sit

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>under these massive lights and everyone's sweating, or their film

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>cameras and you're changing the magazine, you know, every twelve minutes.

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>With audio, you could really have a conversation, which is what,

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of course I try to do when I'm doing my interviews,

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to just have a conversation rather than ask questions, and

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it was those interviews with Sinatra, the audio taped interviews,

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>which I think he was doing to explore whether or

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>not he might want to do, you know, an autobiography.

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are the gold for us because they were very candid,

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as a few sort of off the cuff

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of Q and A sessions he did, including one

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>he did at Yale, which was wildly fun, you know

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>because when you got him in a moment where he

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't feel he wasn't kind of prethinking his answers, he

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was gold and you could feel his pain, his ambition,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>his passions. It was. It was great and and he's

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>his sort of profane reactions to everything around him. Now,

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I want to imagine, as silly as this is, that

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Alex Gibney is collaborating with Marty Scorsese and they're on

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the set together shooting something and Alex Gibney says, don't

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>put the camera there, Marty, Why would you put the camera? How?

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>What's that collaboration? Like? It was a producer on a

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>series called The Blues, which he was the executive producer on,

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and that was Marty Show. So he's a genius, and

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 1>so my job on that series was to lay out

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the bats and balls so that players could play. That

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>was my job, and the glory of that was that

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it really started my career in a way because it

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was like watching men at work. Now in that case,

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they were all men. There were no women. But you know,

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>between Marty who directed a film, Clint Eastwood of Invendor's

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Antoine Fuqua, Charles Burnett, I got an up close seat

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to watch them all work in this nonfiction arena, but

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>nevertheless giving it a personal take, so that these were

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>authored works in nonfiction. It changed my life and my career. Now,

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>for you, do you tend to be with the same

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>group of people shooting, you have a you have a

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>crew that you prefer, or have you mixed it up

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>with the people you've used for your cinematic crew. Well

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I mixed it up a lot. But there's one woman,

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Marie's Alberti, who shot. She shot the wrestler, she shot Creed,

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 1>but she also shot Enron Taxi to the dark Side

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and others and Armstrong laws. She was a key collaborator

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>for me early on because she took a weakness of mind,

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>which was cinematography and visualizing the frame. I came up

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>as an editor and really expanded my horizons in that area.

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>She's an extraordinary talent because you bridged the worlds of

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>documentary and fiction. So Marie's the key collaborator for me

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for a long period. She was also did a bunch

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of Going Clear as well. But then the editors have

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>been I've been just blessed. I mean, and those people

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I tend to go back to over and over and

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>over again, Alison Lwood, Andy Grieve, Sloan Clevin, Mikey Palmer.

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>What about music score? Music score, I've used a bunch

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of different people, but I keep coming back to the

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>same ones. And I kind of cast composers depending on

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the project. I've a guest and Robert Logan, you know,

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I used them on Taxi to the Dark Side, but

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>also Robert has kind of Eastern European background, so on

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Citizen K this one about Russia, I used them and

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he was magnificent. And then Will Bates I've used quite

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit, who's really an extraordinary talent. And also Pete

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Michelle who did Client nine. So I do like using

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the same person, but it feels almost like casting for

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>some of these films. I know composers all like to

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like they can do anything, and they're probably right,

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I kind of cast them depending on

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what the film is about. Will Bates did a magnificently

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>creepy score with the theorem in that wonderful weird instrument

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for Going Clear, which I found tremendously useful. Now people

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>view you, I mean, you're heading off, it seems like

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>into a more dedicated period of making narrative films. But

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>people view you as a great truth seeker. You know,

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to go out and I don't want to

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>say catch the bad guy. I don't want to make

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it like as a prosecutorial, but exposing abuses of power

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a really in my mind, that obviously

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>potent theme in the work you do. Does it have

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a fade or are you like you describing the chemical

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>molochist or what right as you see? Are you still

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>walking on the beach of vacation and you're looking at

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>phone going God, damn it, I can't believe these people?

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you know? Is outrage and indignation follow you everywhere

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you go? I'm afraid so uh, and I wish it

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't And you outline my vacation. I'm about to go

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on a vacation for two and a half weeks, and

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'll be consumed with the issue of torture

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>when I should just be keeping my lobster claw and butter. Right,

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>give me three docks that you wish you made. You

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 1>mentioned give me shelter, which I love. That's one when

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we were kings and waltz withold The sheer stories we

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tell would be another one. It's not really my style,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but I love it, absolutely love it. I turned to

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>some people from the Hampton's Film Festival and I said,

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>let's show a doc I found out that Albert Mazls

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>was visiting his daughter in sag Harbord that weekend, and

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I said, I want to screen a film in the

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>dead of winter. And they said, no one's gonna want

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to come and watch a documentary film at Bay Street

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in February. I said, you watched. I said, everybody's looking

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>for an excuse to get the f out of their house.

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We showed gimme shelter. Brian Cosgrove, my friend who's a

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>DJ out here at the local radio station, Big Rock

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and Roll of the Nut Uh, and we contact Mazel's

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and he comes and does the Q and a afterward,

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we packed the whole place. Two people came and we

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>showed this movie, and people literally got a contact high

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>watching Altamont, and it was like, what a great vibe,

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so fantastic. And two things I always stunned me when

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I watched the film. First of all, it's a cinema

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>verite murder mystery, and one of the directors is less heralded,

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte's Wearing, who's the editor, and she put the structure

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>together magnificently, so it plays like a murder mystery. The

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>other thing that's interesting is a lot of that film

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 1>is about listening and watching, and you wouldn't think that

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be important, but that scene where they're all

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to wild horses is just an exquisite scene. And

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>then the scenes where they're watching the footage at altamount

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and realizing their complicity and the violence, those are magnificent scenes,

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and you they're just so counterintuitive and and testify to

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the kind of poetry that the Mazal's brothers and in

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 1>this case Charlotte's Wearing, we're really into, and that that

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>film just deserves to be seen over and over and over.

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I love that moment where like you said, they're listening

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to Wild Horses, and they're listening to their radio show.

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And Charlie Watts says, after Sonny Barger is yapping about

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the angels and their mantle and what they need to do,

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and Charlie, Charlie watsays, right on, Sonny, you know they're

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>all they're all just so overwhelmed wondering how much how

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>much gas did they throw on the fire. Well, let

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>me just say this. I mean, I'm obviously a boundless

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>admirer of yours. You're one of the great filmmakers of

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the last fifty years. You've made so many great, great,

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and significant and important and entertaining documentary films. So

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope when you go on your trip you'll put

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the phone in a drawer and and but take it

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>out for the last couple of days, because I want

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you to be tortured and haunted for just the last

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of days of the of the trip. I'm gonna

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to get you back in the zone. I'm

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>with you, and and there's a woman who's very much

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on your side who would agree. So I'm going to

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>do the very best I can to to hide the

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 1>phone under a rock for at least part of the trip. Yes, definitely,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.720
<v Speaker 1>my very best to you on all things. I loved

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Crime of the Century. It was the idea that you

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>could see how much the government is for sale, is

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 1>to watch these people change laws and change legislation to

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>suit the purposes of these people in this industry. It

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely numbing to me. That's one of the most

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>numbing parts of the film. Thank you, Alex. A great

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>pleasure talking to you, Alex Gibney. His latest film, The

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Crime of the Century, about the opioid epidemic, is available

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on HBO Max h I'm Alec Baldwin. Here's the thing

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by My Heart Radio. We're produced

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>by Kathleen Russo, Carrie Donny Hue and Zach McNeice. Our

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>engineer is Frank Imperial.