WEBVTT - Anonymity

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you hey there, Text Stuff listeners, This

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is Jonathan Strickland and I have got a request for

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>all of you. Now, Chris and I have decided that

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to try and experiment. We're doing our first

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>crowd sourced episode of tech Stuff and we want to

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>know what your pick is for the worst video game

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of all time. Now, nominations you can. You can make

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>one nomination. You nominate one game, and you need to

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>tell us the name of the game and the platform

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>it was on. And it could be any platform. It

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>could be an arcade game, it could be a PC, Mac, Xbox,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>PS three, Nintendo handheld console. It can be web based

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>if you like. But just you let us know what

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the platform is so we can make sure we count

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that as the votes. So you can nominate your game

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>either through email, which is tech Stuff at how stuff

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>works dot com, or you can nominate through Twitter or Facebook.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna put a cut off date on this.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to have the episode go up by the

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>end of September of eleven. So let's say you need

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to get your nominations in by September eleven. So if

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you get those nominations into us, we will make sure

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we include those in the process and we will have

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>an episode where we give you the worst video games

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of all time based upon the votes of our listeners.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot. Can't wait to hear from you. Get

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how stuff

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Hello again, everyone, Welcome to tech Stuff.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>My name is Chris Paulette. I am an editor at

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com and sitting across from me

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>as always a senior writer, Jonathan Strickland. I always feel

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like somebody's watching me and I have no privacy. You know,

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit you rockwell. So, uh, we're gonna

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>talk today about anonymity and the web and its relationship

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>with one another and how things have been changing over time.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And this also ties a lot into a privacy in

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the web. In fact, the two are. These topics are

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>all very closely related. But um it's It's been in

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the news a lot recently, and by recently I mean

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the summer of of two thousand eleven because of a

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of different things. First of all, a couple of

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>years ago, you had um me it was only a

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>year ago, but you had Mark Zuckerberg say that the

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole notion of privacy was falling out of social norms,

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>meaning that people today don't value privacy or don't think

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of privacy is something that's important the way that generations

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier had, you know, thought of the subject. So uh

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that that actually kind of explains a lot about certain

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>things that Facebook has done over the past, where you know,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's all about sharing information, particularly information about yourself and

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the things you like to do and the places you

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like to go. And then you know, the the argument

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think someone at Facebook would make is that the

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>more you share, the more you're going to get out

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of that service. So if you do not share a lot,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you won't really benefit from the service the way you

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>do if you are someone who shares lots of stuff.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Although even that, you know, we could anyone could tell

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you if they have a friend who shares absolutely everything

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that that can get old too. Yes. Sorry, look, I

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a particularly interesting bowl of oatmeal, so

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I shared it. Well, it's always nice to share oatmeal.

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, But all right, anyway, we're getting off track,

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>because I mean I just go back to the Oatmeal

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Party where Josh Clark did that well anyway, So so

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's approach is saying that anonymity and privacy really kind

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of those are old ideas that that we're slowly seeing

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>phase out. And then the other thing that kind of

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>brought this into attention was a Google launching Google Plus,

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and we did that episode on Google Plus, that epic

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus episode. One thing we didn't really talk about

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that much was that Google Plus. You know, in order

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a Google Plus profile, you have to have

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a Google profile. In order to have a Google profile,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it has to be a Google profile that's public because

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they eliminated all private Google profiles, and you had to

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>have a name associated with that profile, and it didn't

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>have to necessarily be your legal name, but it didn't

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have to be the name that you go by the

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>most frequently. And so you would you know, I have

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to put a first name in a last name and

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>make it make it a legitimate name if it were

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>something that was clearly a handle or a nickname or

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just unusual had some odd characters in it, like not

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Alex from Clockwork Orange odd characters, but

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like symbols like at symbols or hashtags or things like that. Um,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that Google would flag it and then Google would suspend

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>your Google Plus account as a darn good thing that

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Prince decided to go back to being prints. Yeah, well

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he the web's over compared, if you ask Prince. So

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it's immaterial for this discussion. Yeah, irregardless, Um supposedly supposedly,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, anyway, if you if you put these these

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>symbols into your name, or you had some other weird

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>name going in there, Google might flag your account and

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>suspend it. Uh. They then later on kind of adjusted

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit where they would give you a

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 1>warning saying you need to go into your Google profile

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and put in your actual name, and you could add

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in nicknames and stuff in another field called other names,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>but that the name associated with your profile would be

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your real name. Now, that brought up some some questions

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>among a lot of users, and it ranges through the

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>whole actrum. You've got the spectrum that includes people who

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are you know the Their argument is that, hey, I

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>have made a a name for myself under this persona.

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like bran Yeah, a brand exactly. It's like a brand.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.559
<v Speaker 1>So um, the example I used in my blog post

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>was Dr Kiki of Dr Kiki Science. Yeah, she's she's

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a scientist. Um uh, and she is known as Dr Kiki.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Her first name is I believe Kirsten. But but you know,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>she that's not what everyone knows her as. So she

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>created a Google profile using Dr Kiki and um uh, yes,

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten Sandford. That's her name, Dr Kirsten Sandford. So she

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>went she goes as everyone knows her is Dr Kiki,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's what she created a Google profile as. But

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>she her Google Plus profile was suspended because it did

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it violated the rules that Google had set up. And

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Google's argument was that he wanted to create a social

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>network that would let people connect with folks they know

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and folks they know of easily, and that that if

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you start putting in handles and things and you're cloaking

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.119
<v Speaker 1>your identity, that's kind of antithetical to what Google meant

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus two be. The problem is that's not the

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>way people use the web. You know, people use the

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>web in all sorts of different ways. There are people

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>who will use their own names as their handles. For example,

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those people. I use my own name

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>as my handle pretty much everywhere. And uh, the reason

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>for that is so that I keep myself accountable for

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the things I say. It's a personal choice. I don't

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>judge anyone else who goes by a handle. I totally

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>understand that, and I think anonymity is an interesting and

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>important issue. I just, for myself choose to use my

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>own name because one, uh, that's kind of my brand.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's my name at this point, if I had gone

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>by some other weird whacking, might probably be using that everywhere.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But to you know, it's just again, it just keeps

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>me responsible for the things I say. I'm less likely

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to say something really offensive or outrageous or just pigheaded

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's attached to my name, and I'm not gonna

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>go onto some forum and and tell off the person

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>who posted above me that they're a complete jerk and

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>an idiot. And you know, I'm I'm less likely to

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>do that. I still do it, I just don't do

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it as frequently as I would if I had. You know,

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, hamster Man seventy three was my handle, and

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>no one knew that that was me, but we all

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>know now well, I don't post under that handle anymore.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You won't find those YouTube comments coming from me anymore. Buster. Yea,

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>well it's funny. Um, you need to it's weird to

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>put this in perspective. So you know, to some degree,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I think online Mark Zuckerberg has a point. We've gotten

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to the point where we're interested in social networking. Um.

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>We have business profiles on LinkedIn dot com. We've got uh, Facebook, Twitter,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus and all the others for our social fun

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, our our informal networking, in some case business

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>networking too. Um and And it's hard. It's when you've

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>gotten used to the idea of the right to privacy,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which um, you know here in the United States we

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have a certain expectation of personal privacy um and not

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily true everywhere else in the world. But

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>when you've established all these accounts and you say, no,

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be online and have my uh

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>my ten family members and sixty friends and that's it.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>That's all I want on my account. I don't want

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone else to read my post. Why are you making

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>them available? Um. The thing is, Mark has a point

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because if you you do have that right to privacy,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but when you join Facebook, the point is to be

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>social and you know, I don't want I'm of those

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>people that would prefer to socialize with people I know

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in real life and not you know everybody online that

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I that I really don't know that well. But at

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you know, if if I joined Facebook

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have you know, I have to play

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the rules, by the rules of Facebook, and if Facebook

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>says on Facebook, you don't have the right to privacy,

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and to the same extent, I mean, you're you're everyone

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>can see you. Now. You don't have to publish your

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff so that the world can read every single post

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you write, but everybody's gonna be able to see that

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a profile. And that's just the way it

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is on Facebook, And um, you know, I I see

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the annoyance, but I don't see why people get so

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>very angry simply because you've you're you're agreeing to the

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of service for joining those accounts. And that's one

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons I wasn't anxious to uh join Google

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Plus right away. It was because I realized that I

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to have to make my profile public and

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody was going to be able to see it was me,

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>And um, you're allowed to use your nickname, because I mean,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>not only is that against the rules, but it also

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>shows up against your account. So if I wanted to

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>be Larry the Wonder Beagle, then all my email on

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Gmail comes from Larry the Wonder Beagle, and I don't

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>want to do that because I keep in touch with you.

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>You would essentially have to create a second Gmail account

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>just for your Google Plus profile. In that case, what

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you could theoretically do, although you're again kind of skirting

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the rules there. Yeah, yeah, so I mean that's and

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be annoying because you'd always have to log

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out of one account and log into the other whenever

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to check your quote unquote real email. Yeah exactly.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a pain in the neck. But the

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is, and again, this has nothing to do with

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the actual law. This has to do with the terms

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of service of the website you're using, and it is.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It is frustrating, I admit, And you know, I think

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think where a lot of the concern comes from

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>is not just like I think there are some people

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>who who agree, like, all right, I get it. If

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to be on blah blah blah, I have

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to play by their rules. Yeah, I think there is

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that the approach to eliminating anonymity entirely. They're they're worried

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>about that being more of a broad approach to the

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>web in general. Yeah, and I worry about that too. Yes,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I'm not interested because because that would

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>be let's let's say that Twitter made that same same

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>decision that your Twitter handle had to be your first

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and last name. Now for me, it happens to be that,

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>but a shortened version of my first name because Jonathan

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Strickland does not fit as a full Twitter handle. Um,

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Johnny Cakes, that's me. No, it's not,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not really me anyway, So cake cake, I prefer

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>pie pie anyway. If Twitter did that, then you know,

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you think about that there there we've seen Twitter being

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>used in things like a political revolutions, you know, political unrest, turmoil, riots,

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, protests, uh, situations where the people

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>who are organizing it definitely would not want their their

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>idea that he shared with the general public because it

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>would put themselves in danger, physical danger, and it would

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it would help prevent them from doing the the political

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>activist work they were trying to do, like if they

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>were to post something and it was traced back to

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>their identity, they could be you know, theoretically by by

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an oppressive government brought in. And then not only do

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a person brought in by the same government

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to protest, but whatever activities they were

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>trying to organize have been, um, you know, have been

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhat well sidetracked, have been have been sabotaged exactly because

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you no longer have that anonymity. And so there is

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a definite place for anonymity on the web. So you

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>here here, like, let's talk about some of the different

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 1>arguments that people make for and against anonymity. Okay, so

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we've already covered one of them, which is that, you know,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be able to connect with people,

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to be able to know who to look for.

0:13:58.280 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of hard to look for someone if

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>every one's using up fake names everywhere. So that's one

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>argument against anonymity. Um another is another argument against anonymity

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is that, uh, making someone use their own name kind

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the way I was explained my own personal approach,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>UH keep some somewhat accountable for their words and actions.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, The idea is that if you

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure that people cannot be anonymous, you really cut

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>back on trolling. That's that's ultimately what we get down to.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So can you imagine what a place YouTube would be

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if everyone had to use their real names and like

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a way of really linking an account to

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>an actual person as opposed to just a handle, because

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at some of the quotes on YouTube,

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and they are some of the meanest, nastiest, mean spirited

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff I've ever read anywhere, and just on a typical

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>video even you know something that a video that has

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>no objectionable material real in it, it's just silly, or

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's or it's even you know, even if it's boring.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you get the nastiest responses. And so the argument

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is that, well, if you made sure that people could

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not be anonymous, couldn't hide behind a pseudonym or a handle,

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that they would be nicer. And that's probably true for

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>most people, they would probably be nicer. I don't think

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that it would magically make the web a shiny, happy

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>place and no one would ever disagree with anyone, and

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you would never have anyone call anyone else a hurtful

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>name or anything that's naive that would still happen, but

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it would cut down quite a bit on

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the trollish behavior. But I don't know that the trade

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>off is worth that, you know, So anyway, those are

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>those are two arguments against anonymity. But one that we've

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned already is what if you want to be able

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to protest something or to bring attention to an issue

0:15:55.640 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that could get yourself in trouble, um, just because of

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>your circumstances. That's true, um, And there's a difference to

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we could take, uh, we could take specifically

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the the example of Google itself. So on the one hand,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got Google Plus, which is a social networking service

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that is optional for you to join. You if you

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to join the service. Currently as of

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the time we're recording this, you have to use your

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>real name and that's up to you. You do not

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>have to join Google Plus. Then you have Google street

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>View on the other hand, and this um again, long

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>term listeners will know that we've talked about this before

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on the on previous podcasts. So Google street View, the

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of being that Google is sending cars on driving

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>around neighborhoods driving on city streets. Um. And basically they

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>take pan panoramic photos of the streets so you can

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>see I personally find it really helpful when I'm looking

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for a business that I've never seen before. I'm trying

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to get there and you can go look it up

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>online and see a picture of what it looks like. Oh,

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the green building, and you can pan around and

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>see what the surrounding buildings are and you you get

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>an idea for the landmarks. Yes, it's it's it's really

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a neat idea. The concept on the table right there

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is a neat idea, especially when you apply to things

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>like I want to take a virtual tour of a

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>city I've never been in, and you could literally do

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that if you have a fast enough connection to the

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>internet and a good processor, then yeah you can. You

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>can you know, navigate through street view and go down

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>streets in cities just as if you were there, um,

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>without the like, you know, you can stroll down New

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>York City at night without worrying about getting bugged. So

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think would be at night, well no, but

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it would it would be kind of hard to see,

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but um, yeah, and there are. There are many funny

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>stories about Google street View, the cameras getting knocked off

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>by low bridges, and people doing crazy things. People hearing

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>that street view was coming through, so they arrange for

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>some sort of bizarre demonstration or sword fights, mooning, you know,

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff. But the thing is to people

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>complain that they're taking photos of their houses without any permission.

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It's an invasion of privacy. As the argument, yes, um,

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and so there you go. You you you know, suddenly

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>your house is there and you can't opt out of it. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know. Plus there are many many phone directories

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>with with information in there. Uh they scrape phone books

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>and you know, their of course legitimate phone books as

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>well phone directories online. So if you put two and

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>two together, you can figure out where somebody lives and

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>what their house looks like. Yeah. Now, if you've if

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you've managed to stay unlisted and everything, then there may

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not be a connection between you the person and your

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>wherever you call home. So but for the majority of people,

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, you know, with a little snooping, you

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>could easily figure out where someone lives. And then through

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>street view you can see you can actually see their

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>their house, which I mean, you know you can argue,

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>well that let's let's uh potential thieves case the joint

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>without ever leaving, um, leaving wherever they are. You know

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>they can they can look it up and then get

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a real good view at least to the front of

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the house, maybe even the back of the house, depending

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on how your neighborhoods laid out. And you could use

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the satellite view in in one of the mapping services

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or in Google Earth to get an idea of the

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>lay of the land. So it's yeah, it's one of

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>those arguments where you make well, this this can make

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>us less safe and and there that is a good

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>argument for anonymity, saying that well, I understand that there

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are uses for this technology and that um that it

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can come in handy and it's a fun technology, but

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>there are also some serious consequences or there can be

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>serious consequences to enabling this technology and immediately opting everyone in.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not like you had a choice as far as

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>street view is concerned. I mean, there are some very

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>famous cases of towns that the essentially told Google to

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>go uh google themselves and get the heck out of Dodge,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>although Dodge was not one of those towns. M. Well, yeah,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and some gated communities places like that. And course in

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, there have been many cases, um, in different

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>countries in Europe where uh, you know, they they've taken

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Google to court and said, you do not have the

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>authority to do this, um, you know, because it violates

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>our country's privacy laws. So um, you know, it's it's

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult, you know, on on, but it's there is

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a definite difference in um, you know, things like being

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>signing up to be unlisted from your phone company and

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>deciding to opt out of social networking services versus um,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, what other people post about you online. And

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing too. You you can't control what other

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>people do, um not yet, but I'm working on it.

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Why That's why I brought a crown in today. Yeah

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he did, right on the table right between us, right now. UM.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, you know, I've had pictures tagged

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, um and you know, with my name on them,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've kind to the point where I try to

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>avoid having that done and I go and remove the

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>tags simply because I'm less comfortable being public than other people,

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>but I can't. I think there's this, Well I'm pretty

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>sure actually that Facebook has in its privacy settings a

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>setting where you can go in and make sure that

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>if someone wants to tag you in a photo, that

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>it has that requests your permission before the tag goes public.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So you can actually tweet that setting, although like all

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook privacy settings, it's not the easiest thing to find.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>You have to kind of do a little digging. Um.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus is is kind of the same way. In

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>a sense, it's a lot easier to control who sees

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>your information when you use Google Plus because you can

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>just at every stage you can determine which bits of

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>information are visible to others and which ones aren't and

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>uh and you can specify you know, which users can

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>see it, like a circle or just a specific user.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But even so, it's it's still a lot of stuff

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to wade through, right, So another thing about well, another

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>argument you can make against anonymity. We we've already touched

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on this about the trolling, but if you really want

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to see and I don't recommend you do this, but

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if you if you want to see what the power

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>of anonymity, you can go to a uh community like

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>community like four Chan. Yes, Now, four chan is we've

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about before. It's a it's a message board that

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>allows you to post things anonymously. You don't have to

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>create an account. You can create a handle and you

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>can either use the same handle or you can use

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a different handle every time you log in if you

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>want to. UM. Actually, that would probably make you less

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>likely to be traced because you're using a different one.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You're not creating an identity for yourself. Is there a

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>spout to or just a handle? It's just a handle.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>It's actually two handles. I'm a sugar dish. Um. So

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the the idea here, but four chan is that you

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>can share stuff without ever having to to link it

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>back to yourself personally. And they actually have a couple

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of channing and not everything on four chan is is

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of objectionable material, right. Uh. There's a lot of stuff

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on Fortune it's all about uh, you know, a lot

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>of its Japanese pop culture stuff, especially um manga and anime.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>But there are some channels in four chan, the random

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:33.959
<v Speaker 1>channel being the most famous channel where anything goes and

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>people are using um anonymous handles in order to post stuff,

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>usually in order to get a reaction out of other people, um,

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>either to make them laugh or to shock them, or

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to discuss them or whatever. But it's it's kind of

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>um about, it's about as close to chaos as I

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>can think of really. Um. Not that it's not interesting

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>or entertaining at times, but it's often very uh disturbing

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to look at. So you look at that and you say, well,

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>if if maintaining anonymity on the web means getting this

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of reaction where you get the sort of of

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>people trying to do whatever they can to get a

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>reaction of other folks, that's an easy thing to point

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out and say, well, this is why we don't want anonymity, right.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's misleading because it's it's

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>stating that just because you want to be anonymous, you

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>want to cause trouble. And I think that's you know,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can draw that conclusion, but I

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>think that that's something that a lot of people who

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>argue against anonymity, Um, they will they will point their

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>finger at places like or or sites like four chan

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and say well that's why. And I think that's shortsighted.

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I just point to the political unrest

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and in places like Egypt or uh Libya, or Iran

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>or Iraq, where you know, we've seen social networking come

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>into play and help people, and say, well, this is

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>where anonymity is really important. And without it, uh, it's

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>possible that these people would have suffered more. It's possible

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that the world would have remained ignorant of what was

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>going on for the most part because we would just

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>get mainstream media coverage of whatever those events were. And either,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can be cynical. You could say that

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media just doesn't do a good job of covering

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that kind of information, and you know, that's that's an

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 1>argument for a different podcast. Or you could say that

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media does an okay job, we just have become

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>very good at ignoring it, cynical in a different way.

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Or it could be a combination of the two. Um,

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not arguing any of those things, of just saying

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that without that, you know, if we had had the

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>social media, without the social media, we all we'd have

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is the mainstream media approach. With the social media, it

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>tends to put up even when it's anonymous, it puts

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a personal spin on these stories that tend to hook

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>us as human beings into them. Yeah, and and I

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's also important for us to touch on enforcement

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know, although Facebook and Google Plus are are

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>currently requiring people to use, you know, a real name

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least the name they go by, um, no,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I nobody's requiring a birth certificate. And even then, you know,

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a birth certificate could be faked. Um, let's not get

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>into that. But I mean, yeah, I mean you could.

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>You could doctor a document and send it into Facebook

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, so nope, see that's r real name. Um,

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there there, nobody's actually doing that. And

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I know people who don't use their real names on Facebook.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>And for a while there they were removing people. I

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>assume they probably still are. But I remember it being

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a big thing a while back, a few months ago,

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe a year ago, and I thought, oh, well, you know,

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>my friend is going to have his profile removed. It

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>never happened when it's clearly you know, he goes by

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>a a band name, you know, the name of a

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>character creative for the for a band that he's in.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, uh, like the remote stage person. It's

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a stage persona and it's clearly not a name. Well,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>but you could clearly you could do that for a

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>fan paget without any issue at all, But for a

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>personal page that does tend to get a little like

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if people notice, they get or if people if if

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the company that is providing the service notices, you might

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have some issues. But some people with particularly unusual names

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading about Google Plus have had their profiles

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>removed and actually it's their real name. Yeah, let's happened.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are some there's some fun names out there.

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of my my my sister's vet Dr Stacy Stacy.

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Seriously yep, Stacy Stacy. Interesting. Yeah, she says everything twice twice.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Check the papers, check the papers. Um she's uh at

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>any rate. Yeah, there there are issues where we see

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are legitimately following the rules, who being punished

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for not following the rules just because they happen to

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have an unusual name. Um, you're gonna fall find that

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much in any kind of environment where they are

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>requiring people to use real names. Just because you know,

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we're human beings. We come up with some interesting combinations

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.959
<v Speaker 1>for names. Sometimes we marry into them. Sometimes we just

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>luck out and are born into them. Sometimes our parents

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have a cruel sence of humor. Moxi crime Fighter being

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Yeah, pen Gillette's daughter Moxi crime Fighter, Gilette,

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I'm not making that. I don't I don't

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>have any doubts. And I remember some of the countries

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>around the web Moon unit Moon unitz that. But that's

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>what I meant. Yes, um, yeah, they yeah, they were.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing legislation in several countries where people were

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to name their kids things like Superman. Wow. Really

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>um but but yeah, I mean, and it's very difficult

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to enforce that without requiring any kind proof, and so

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of going through and going, well, I'm that

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like a real name, so you can go ahead.

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of guesswork. So yeah, yeah, I'm sure that

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus I Google seems like one of those companies

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that's really eager to please, and I think I think

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>there are cases like this is this is also an

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>issue Google Plus runs into when it opens up a

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>private beta and the there's a disproportionate number of people

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the private beta who are public personas, especially in

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the tech world. Because you have people who are known

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>by their brand. So Google Plus kind of brought in

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on themselves in this case. But at least they're learning

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this lesson very early on. Before it the recording of

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. They haven't gone open, they haven't opened up

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the social network yet, so hopefully this stuff will get

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>ironed out so that, UM, if you do want to

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>use a nickname or a brand or something as your persona,

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to. UM. There's been discussion at

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Google about finding ways of making that happen, although it

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>may not. It may mean that you have to create

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a sort of profile that's not same as a personal profile,

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like on Facebook where you have fan pages

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>or group pages and then you have your personal pages. UM.

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I think yes, I think. The concern really I have

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is not um whether or not you could be anonymous

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on Google Plus or on Facebook or whatever. My concern

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you start to see the generation of movers

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and shakers in the web space, like the Mark Zuckerberg's

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the web, who say that they think that privacy

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is no longer a social norm. That concerns me, And

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the reason that concerns me is because that means that

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if that if that attitude becomes prevalent throughout the web,

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>then anonymity will become a thing in the past in

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all but the smallest niche communities. So that's really where

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned, not so much in the specific cases of

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Google and Facebook, but in a more general web wide case.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And will we see an anonymity get stamped out? I don't.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that will ever happen across the board,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but I can certainly see privacy and anonymity taking kind

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of a uh diminished role in the future. Well, I, um,

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I personally like to retain a great deal

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of my privacy. Um. But at the same time, I

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>do think that anonymity can breed a sense of, um

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>recklessness when when people are willing to say whatever they

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like they can get away with without any kinds

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of repercussion. And I don't I don't particularly approve of that. Um.

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, at the same time too, I think, uh,

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea that we have all given up

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>our privacy and this is just the way things are

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be also encourages people to share too much information.

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, Hey, I'm going out of town for two weeks.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Look at this here, here are pictures of my trip

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, and then two posts later, oh,

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the police just called. Someone broke into my house. You know.

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean if if if you go, well, you know,

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's all public anyway, who cares? Then you know you're

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I I think I don't think there's as much to

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>discourage you from over sharing things that you shouldn't share. Well, yeah,

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and and the Internet has made it so easy to

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>share things as soon as you think of them that

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's also an issue. Like the Google Plus setting

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>for your phone that instantly uploads any photo you take. Yes,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have to have those shared publicly. You

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. But if you don't, yes, um yeah,

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the yes is getting easier and easier for you to

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to upload your thoughts immediately to the Internet without filtering

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>them first, which is why whenever I make my social network,

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have a little window pup ups that do

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you really want to post that? And when you click yes,

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>do you really really want to post that? And then

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>when you click yes, it it posts, and then at

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the very end it says if this is stupid, it's

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>not because I didn't tell him, so well, that's that's

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>why I started my own anti social network and I

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>am I am the only member, right uh, and that

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely to change, right, It's just it's just it's

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>just me. It's just a black web page. You go

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to the web page, there's nothing on it. It's just

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just black. Well, it saves me a lot of

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>time because they don't have to check it very often. Yeah,

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. There is at the very bomb if you

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.959
<v Speaker 1>scroll all the way down and it's long, there's an

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>under construction, the shovel digging with the hard hat. Because

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna bring geo cities back one web page at

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a time. Alright, So we're gonna wrap up this discussion

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on anonymity privacy in the web. Um, we want to

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>hear what your thoughts are. What do you think do

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you think privacy and anonymity is that? Is that even

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at all important to you? Do you even think about it?

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Or is it just doesn't just sound like something that

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>old people like like Chris and myself talk about, because

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it might very well be because we're old. Let us know.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on Facebook and Twitter are handled.

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>There is text stuff hs W or you can see

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this email that addresses tex Stuff how stuff works dot com.

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I will talk to you again really soon.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to check out our new video podcast, Stuff

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>from the Future. Join how Stuff Work staff as we

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>explore the most promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow. The

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works iPhone app has arrived. Download it today

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, brought to you by the reinvented two thousand

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>twelve camera. It's ready, are you