WEBVTT - Peloton Replaces CEO, Cuts Jobs

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Clovel News check out shows a Peloton

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Charlie was talking about what's going on up up I

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think roughly well more than fifty at its highs over

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days, and we know that there's

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on, a new CEO, and we're still

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>waiting on maybe a possible sale. Well, let's talk about

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it with Ed Ludlow, West Coast correspondent at Bloomberg News.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>He joins us from our San Francisco bureau, and our

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>our investors bullish because they think that the company is

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be bought or they bullish because this new

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all about a turnaround story and Peloton

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to go out it alone. Yeah, it's a

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>great question because you have to read each of the

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of Wall Street cell side notes in isolation for

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>each of the actions that Peloton took. I guess the

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the overall takeaway is that the global Wall Streets kind

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of hopeful that this Lena mina more focused Peloton will

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>be ripe to be acquired. Right. It's more attractive to

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>be acquired because it's not so reliant on the hardware,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>bike in and treadmill business. And I heard you guys

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about in the last block. The talent is so

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>key and if they're more focused on a subscription based

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>company model, which this new CEO has a lot of

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>experience in, then it does make it more attractive takeover target.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't help but feel add that Peloton definitely was

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>onto something. I feel like earlier on it wasn't just

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about giving somebody a bike to cycle on. It's so

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>much about this community. And I know we all use

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the word community throw it around a lot, but it

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>really did create one. And I think there's something really

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>tangible in what they do, so I I agree with you.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>As you know, Carol, I'm a big Peloton user. You

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>know people who asked me over the last twenty four hours.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You know my favorite instructives and a big Alex two

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>song guy. I'm a big Olivia guy. Do I use

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Peloton as much in February of two as I

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>did in the summer of I know they answered to that, No,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter. Does that matter? I mean you're still

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>paying the same amount of money, you still pay the

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>monthly Here's the thing that is true. But we're looking

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>at to the future here. So regardless of a takeover

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>target or not, this new CEO wants to move to

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>shrink the business right because they grew to a scale

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>where they could service demand on the hardware side that

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't there. Do you guys remember the conversation we

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>had in November around their fiscal first quarter earnings. I

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>remember it. It was with you two specifically, and there

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was a chart in there. And the chart in the

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>earnings deck was average monthly workouts per connected fitness sub

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and that that chart is what spookeed investors even back

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in November on that fiscal first quarter. It basically showed

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that the US existing consumers, existing subscribers, just weren't using

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>our products as much as we were in the depths

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. And we have a choice as consumers

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to cancel and go back to the gym. And you know,

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like that's a concern. What is it

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>that Peloton retains that's enough that if consumers faced with

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a choice, do I join my gym that I used

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to go to or do I stick with Peloton? And

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's the leadership that's in focus on this point.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>They didn't feel John Foy could do that. And what

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>would the synergies be if they got taken over by

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon or a Nike? What are the merits of

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>one versus the other? And I guess the question is

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>too I think about my world. You know, here I've

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>been doing I have the ability to do yoga at

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>home virtually right, I've been you know, with an instructor

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that I've known for years, but I don't have to

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the studio. And it actually feels kind of okay,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like it. But you do wonder write

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of this that part of the

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>thing we love is going to a gym, working out

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>with people, right, being part of a class. I do

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to some extent miss that as well. Yeah, and you know,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>without it doesn't really matter what what you and I

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think I think the streets kind of looking at that

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the really painful actions that Peloton took. I

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think BMO said these were kind of painful but prudent.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, two is very much like a new year.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>You me, I've certainly picked back up, you know, the

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>classes that I'm doing at home. I think we we

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of agree, right, guys, the contents there, I think

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>that they, you know, what they're looking for is some execution,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that classic word execution. And the street, based on the

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>notes I read this morning, seems really kind of confident

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that whether we get a takeover or not, they're the

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>right people now in place to kind of make painful decisions,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>including job cuts, although as we know, those job cuts

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>not extending to our favorite instructors. Yeah. Hey, by the way,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's good that you're it's February and you're still sticking

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with it, because the Strata CEO told our own Bloomberg

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Business Week that if you're sticking with your New Year's

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>resolutions by January. You are going to make it. Okay,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good song. Check in with me and

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>August Well. Barry McCarthy is the company's new EO. Before Pelotonni,

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we know him from Spotify where he was CFO. We

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>also know him from Netflix where so as well before that,

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>with some other things in between. What do we know

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about the way that he's going to run this company.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think they're very very very interesting. It's

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting background. Yeah, there seems to be two

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>main parts, and again I'm summarizing Wall Streets response. But

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the first is that he's a known quantity, So Folly

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>stepping down is one thing. Folly founded this company a

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, right, He's a founder CEO, not just the CEO.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So the person that's coming in seems like a capable

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and safe pair of hands. That's one Wall Street read.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>The other is that at his time at Spotify, Netflix,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>he was able to make a subscription rate, subscription revenue

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>based business model work. And if they peloton is going

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to sell fewer bikes and fewer treadmills, irrespective of whether

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's acquired. You know, the Street seems to think that

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.239
<v Speaker 1>he will be able to lead them down a path

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>where they're not just Lena. But of course the subscription

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>revenue is a higher margin revenue than selling hard where

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the other actions they're taking include

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>moving to third party distribution, relying on outsourcing more. They've

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they've scrapped their plans for an Ohio factory, Ohio factory,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Lean Mean and services in subscription. Those all boost bottom

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>line potentially in Wall Street seems to really like that.

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>All I can say is a lot of this is

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>happening quickly, where we're talking about a year ago right there,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't even meet to Manda year ago. Yeah, Yeah, It's

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just pretty remarkable how this story is playing out and

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. Hey, Ed Ludlow, thank you so much. He

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is West Coast correspondent Bloomberg News on camera. For those

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of you been watching on YouTube in our San Francisco bureau,

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio, what the

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>heck is going on at the US Canadian border, including

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>at that land crossing that is so important, a very

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>important link for goods moving between the U, the US

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and a Canta really and it's a crucial artery when

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the auto industry as well. To Brian Platt,

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is Canadian government reporter for bloom News, truns us on

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Ottawa. Brian, take us into what's going

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on here. Get everyone up to speed about what's going

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on right outside of Detroit. I mean, it's a it's

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>been an utterly bizarre situation for a while now in Ottawa,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>where in my office right now, I'm in the middle

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of what's essentially become an occupied zone in this in

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Canada's capital city of this trucker convoy that arrived here

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>about a week and a half ago and became just

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this sort of massive protest um that drew in all

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of other people. I mean, this may have started

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as a trucker protest, that I can tell you, it's

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than just truckers here. And so you know,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this trucker protest has created a crisis in Ottawa, in

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the actual city of Ottawa that the City of Ottawa

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>still trying to deal with because most of downtown is

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>completely shut down. But as as it stayed here for

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>about a week and a half. It sparked all these

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>offshoots in other places. Um there's been a border crossing

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in Alberta between Alberta and Montana that that has been

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>occasionally shut down over the past week. But last night

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ambassador Bridge between Windsor and Detroit was shut down

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>by a sort of parallel protest. Much much smaller than

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what's in Ottawa, but it's only one bridge, so it

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take very many people to shut it down, and

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a massively important bridge. It carries about a

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter of all trade between by land between Canada and

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the US. It's you can't overstate how important this this

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>bridge is uh to um land trade between the two countries.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very very big deal. And I guess

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we will see how quickly they can get traffic flowing again.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Why is this happening? I mean, we know we're all

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>tired of the pandemic and maybe what's being asked of us,

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>But is this much more a political thing? What's going on?

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's so trying to explain what's going on is really

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hard because um it's it gets called trucker protest or

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the trucker convoy, and it did the the spark of

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this was the U, first Canada and then the US

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in mid January, bringing in a requirement that truckers had

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to be vaccinated to cross the border. Until then, truckers

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>had an exemption from the border vaccination rules, so that

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>exemption ended in mid January, large large like made more.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Now of truckers in Canada are vaccinated. So it actually

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>wasn't I mean, it was seen as potentially disruptive, but

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for the most part Canadian truckers are highly vaccinated and

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>still on the job. Um the problem, but it kicked

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>off this convoy, this protest, that this, and so they

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>drove out from Western Canada and picked up more people

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>along the way, and then people also drove in from

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the country. They all converged on Ottawa

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about ten days ago, and there are semis parked all

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>over downtown Ottawa, like the streets are totally blockaded, and

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>on the weekends all these other protests, protesters fled into

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the city. And it is much more now about a

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>backlash against all COVID nineteen restrictions, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, everything.

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not just nobody even really talks about the border

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 1>issue anymore. It's now just like a total backlash movement

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>against COVID nineteam restriction. So go ahead, we only have

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a minute left with you, Brian. How does it get resolved?

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Its police are baffled here. I mean they cannot get

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>these trucks out there. You have to picture what it

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.119
<v Speaker 1>would be like having like five hundred semi trucks vockading

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the streets in the in a fairly major city. I mean,

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Ottawa's about one point five million people, so so you know,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller than a lot of other cities might think of,

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's one of Canada's biggest city, and it's also

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the capital city. Of course, the parliament buildings are all

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>around here, and so police don't know what to do.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So is it okay, thirty seconds left really quick? Is

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it force that ends this or is there some kind

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of agreement conversation that ends this. I think it's very

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.719
<v Speaker 1>unlikely this gets solved through a negotiation. Um, you never know,

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe something will surprise me. I think if the police

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have already asked for federal reinforcements to basically double the

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>size of their police force, I think ultimately this is

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going to get solved through arrests. And towing of the trucks.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's very very difficult, unbelievable, just interesting. Brian, great

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>reporting and really great clear understanding of what's going on there,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>which is not a very clear situation, to put it mildly.

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Brian Platty's Canadian government reporter at Bloomberg News on the

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>phone from Ottawa. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>and The Curnis Show of Bloomberg Business Week. We've got

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a story about the Chinese American born Olympic star. Uh

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>really keeping I guess you could almost say to him

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a game day face and strategy being very careful, especially

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as her brand explodes. Yeah, we're talking about the teenage

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>freestyle skier Eileen gu You might recognized the name now

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't before yesterday, because she's fresh off a

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>gold medal win. Although she was born in San Francisco.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>She's representing China at the Olympic Games. It's a fantastic feature.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Webber is Edirett Bloomberg Business Week. He joins us

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on the access line from Brooklyn. Joel, I gotta tell

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you the crystal ball. It was working really well again

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>last night because you guys have this issue, this story

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the January twenty seven issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of people now who are

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>learning who Eileen you is for the first time. Well,

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're gonna hear more about Eileen gou Um. Not

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>only did she have one gold medal, she could win

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>multiple gold medals, or at least multiple medals um. She's

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>also the face of a lot of brands. Um. And

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>especially after this win, you're going to have to think

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that the that even more brands are are going to

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>line up to have her be the be part of

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>their promotions. Okay, So what I find particularly compelling about

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>her story story since I've learned about her twenty four

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>hours ago, I mean and and it's it's I encourage

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody to go check out this story. I don't know how,

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest with you, I missed it in that

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week. And uh, she was born

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in California, but she somehow got permission to represent China

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and she's become the face of winter sports in China.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>How did she do that? So the story is is

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>really an amazing one because UM, you know, the as

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you described their American born but Chinese athlete. UH, this

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was a decision of hers rooted UM a couple of

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago, UM, and the moment she did that, I

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>think it was actually very tactical on her part of

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at where the Olympics we're going to be held,

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>realizing that UM to be the face of a country UM,

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and and President g in China has really made her

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the face of it UM that it was going to

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have huge commercial amplications. I mean in the US, I'm

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sure she would have been fine, but there she really

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is the star of of of the national this national

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>symbol UM of hosting the Olympics UM. As we've talked

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about before on the show. Beijing obviously hosted the two

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight ones that had a completely different tone. So

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>so really I think this allowed her to not only

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be the face of these Olympics, but also step into

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>UM a really lucrative commercial role to right, and she's

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>being very careful not to say some anything right about anything.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That is the most amazing part about this story is

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the backdrop of UM and the art did a really

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>good job with our story of showing this. You know,

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>she's basically doing a sixteen twenty. I can't even count

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>how many rotations that is UM as she jumps over

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all of the tension between um, the US and China.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in the Trump world, was the trade war,

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and now it's weaker weak, the weakers, it's the Hong Kong,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Taiwan. It's just endless, right, um. And you're not

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear talk about in any of that. If anything,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody did ask her about paying the tennis star and

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of the weird spectacle that that was UM and

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was as close as she'd gotten. And still

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>she managed to kind of like step in it when

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>she did. But it there is just no incentive to

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about anything that borders on geopolitical UM. And you know,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to her credit, I mean, she is an eighteen year

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>old kid. She hasn't even started college yet. She will

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>go to Stanford beginning in the fall. UM. So clearly

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>like there's a lot of ways that this could go wrong,

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and she is staying firmly on a messaging track that

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that involves nothing that could be misconstrued. Well past these

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks. I wonder what the future looks

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like for her. You have images of her in the

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>story appearing at the met Gala, but also at the

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>same time um appearing as a model for a Chinese

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>dairy brand as well. Uh. She said in the pastoral

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that when she's in China, she's Chinese, when she's in

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the US, she's American. And it was remarkable to watching

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics last night when she landed I think it

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was the second of her three runs of her gold

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>medal three runs. She she put both to the camera

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in English talking about how she wasn't crying, and she

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sounded like an American teenager because she is, you know,

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>she really straddles both sides of of the Pacific. And

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know you mentioned Um, you know, like a Chinese

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>dairy brand there. But like, we have not seen this

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>campaign rollout, but she has thought so highly of by

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>brands and an advertisers. She's going to be one of

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the faces of Victoria's Secret. Victoria's Secret obviously mired in

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this just like you know, a vestige of of everything

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.119
<v Speaker 1>that was wrong a couple of years ago, has completely

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>tried to rebrand itself and Eileen Goo is one of

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the handful of uh young UM models UM that will

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>be basically the face of the brand going forward. So

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to give you a sense of like how big Eileen

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna gonna become and the gold medal is just

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna burnish that. So you're gonna see her a lot.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, she's already backed by by the Red bulls.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And I just think the the sponsors like what they

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>see because they get an athlete who can speak to

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese audience that everyone in China can now you know,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>look up to UM, and in America they basically just

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>get a multinational. So it's a very very interesting story.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>There's not that you know this as um Ellen Hewitt

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>story document. There are a couple other athletes that have

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>done a similar um uh judo kind of positioning where

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they're they're born in America and also represented China. One

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of those other athletes is in the Games and has

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>not nearly faired as well. So I think who's really

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>rising above the noise? Still, yeah, modeling for the other

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>time noise, you know, I think all of these are

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is like such a difficult Olympics UM

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and none of it is real noise, but she's managing

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>to to walk a tight rope that, you know, I

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>think few other athletes could probably do. Attended last year's

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>met Gala modeling for Louisvatan Tiffany. It's so interesting at

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a time when brands are being asked to step up

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of issues, and yet you look at

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the success she has in really staying um about so

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>many important issues that are out there. Joe Weber, editor

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week magazine. Catch this in the January issue. Yeah,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet you let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no no,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>oh please, I'll do the ride gravel. I want to drive.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>It's good question. Drive is the drive to the clothes

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Oh my god, it's confusing day. Uh.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We are just about ten minutes away from the closing bell,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and we have definitely seen stocks um higher for most

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of the day. We did see kind of a turnover

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and just coming off the highs. But here we are

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>once again and we're just kind of bouncing around. You.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Our best office of the day, our performers heard from

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Charlie really the nastac up more than one percent. Let's

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Ryan Dietrich chief market strategist at LPL

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Financially joins us on the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina. Ryan,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I love when you join us because you have so

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>many technicals that you're looking at here we are, uh,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the beginning of February. Still give us

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>an idea technically how you're analyzing the market right now? Yeah,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Tim and Carol, thanks for having me back. But you know,

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the way we're putting it as this what we're telling

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>our advisors, this is a mid term year. We all

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>know that, right. Historically when you look at the four

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>year presidential cycle, guys, you know, the most of volt

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the four the mid term years. You see

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>almost a seven team percent peak to trough correction during

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the midterm year. Did we expect to be like you know,

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the temperson correction to start this year in the SMP

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and even more in small caps in other areas well,

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably that soon at the start of the year. But

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't be shocking to people that we're having more

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>volatility right now. Now. The truth is we you know,

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a couple of mondays ago, was that below right, we

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>had the record volume all to put the call ratio

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>spiked a lot of fear. We think we're carving out

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a bottom. We had about a ten percent correction in

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the smp here um. You know, we can maybe go

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>back down and tested from technical point of view. But

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the truth again is this market just kind of seems

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>like it's choppy and wants to kind of just bide

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>its time here. It's not necessarily bearish, maybe not super

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>bowlish either, but if not the end of the world

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>after the rally we saw last year. So wait, so

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you're blaming mid terms historically technically, well, we wouldn't say

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're blaming them. We're just pointing out, Carol, that historically

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>midterm years are vault. Let's not forget twenty eighteen. Right,

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw a bear market in pretty much in late

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>in the year. At the same time, other reasons expect

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a little more volatility to fit. It's starting to high rates.

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>We've seen volatility. Can the technician talk fundamentals? Can the

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>technician talk fundamentals? I'm just wondering, Yeah, you know, I

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>use the efforts sometimes. Whoa okay, technician, it's a technician joke.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, I can tell. So we talked

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to a little bit more about though, how are you

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>thinking you must look like you said you have to

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>roll in it all? M yeah, I mean, you know,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>let's just look back the last time the Fed hike rates, right,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we remember December we started the high rates. I should

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>say December fifteen, had a pretty big sell off in

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the February of sixteen as you recalibrate kind of the

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>expectations of those hikes. You know, everyone's sawing, oh, four hikes,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>five hikes, and we're not minimizing it. But the truth is,

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>when we've looked in history, Carol, when you do that

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>first rate hike in a new cycle, you know, sp

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>does because thirty six more months on average and gains

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>like sevent So just because the Fed is hiking, you're

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>probably more mid cycle and there could be you know,

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a good amount of time left. Investors need to remember

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that as we start to see some rate hikes. So

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you've got mid terms increasing volatility. You've also had a correction.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Stocks to well after correction, stocks do well in a

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>rising rate environment. Having said that, Ryan, you know, I

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>love looking at technicals and I love looking at historical patterns,

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but this is a pattern to we're coming out of

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. Most of us have never seen this before

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>h and have lived through it. So there's still a

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of questions. Absolutely, Carroll, I mean you're talking

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about questions. I mean, just look at those sentiment polls

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen, right, We've seen a lot of people

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>are questioning what exactly is going on in that fear

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes. But again, you know what patents say when

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, if everyone's thinking, like somebody isn't thinking, we

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are optimistic that again we've had all these bearishness coming

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in because so many people have been hit hard by

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>by this vicious, vicious correction to start the year, and

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>there's still opportunities. I mean, you know, if all you

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>look at we're financials and energy, and I know there's

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>more stocks than that, but I mean energy is unwell.

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Financials are still strong. Look at these bank stocks. A

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of bank stocks are just now breaking out above

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>where they were in two thousand seven, two thousand eight.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for us to be bearished a global economy

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to see that leadership. And we've I've called you guys

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>for a while. So we like cyclical value financials and

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>an energy have done well this year, and we still

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think cyclical value this point in the cycle makes a

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense to a continue to outperform a little

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>bit here. Okay, back to fundamental speach. Just because we

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have you, we cannot ignore the inflation print that we're

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>getting Thursday morning. Seven point is what economist survey by

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg anticipate. How should investors read a potential upside or

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>downside surprise? Yeah, well it's gonna be a big number, tim,

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's obvious. I think the way the investors

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>should look at it as a reaction, Right, what's the

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>tenure yield do on it? What is stocks do on it?

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But the truth is this, the tenure yield is still

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.959
<v Speaker 1>not above two percent. Maybe since we started talking it is.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the market was truly worried about massive inflation.

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I think gold would be way above eighteen hundred. I

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think the tenure yield be way above two percent. It's

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not um I think we're more optimistic that how strong

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this earning season has been. Let's corporate Americas say, right,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the CEO GM just say we could go He said, hey, listen,

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we see full production the second half of this year

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and improvement in supply chain. To me, that matters more

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for the average investor than the scary headline we're going

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to see on Thursday, which the politicians are going to

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>play up. That's how it works. But investors need to

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>focus on earnings. Are still strong. Global earnings, my goodness, grow.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Global earnings are really strong. That's a that's a positive

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>thing for investors to rem right. Watch that bottom line. Um.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting too is we've got to watch margins

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and margin compression because that's certainly something that investors are

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>keeping an eye on. Hey, I think one of the

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>indicators as a technician that you're really leaving out is

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl indicator. Yeah, I don't invest in this, right,

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>I've gotta bet disclaimer, But historically, guys, the winner of

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl fice from the NFC, the stock markets

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>up for the year like seventy nine percent of the

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>time a f C when the FC wins only two

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thirds of a time. Now I am, I'm from Cincinnati.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Bengals fan. That's what I like to hear you.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Now listen to this. Ten of the last eleven times

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>an a f C team has won the Super Bowl,

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the SMP was higher. So go Bengals. And that should

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>be good for stocks. Don't invest in that. But I

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>hope the Bengals win. Leave it at that too. That's

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>one thing we can all agree on. I think, Well,

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it just speaks to the moment

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.239
<v Speaker 1>in time. Right. There's so many things that we can

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of point to to maybe kind of get an

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>idea of what comes next. But I mean, ultimately it

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>will be down to what the Fed does, whether they

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of get it right um massaging those calls, and

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how earnings react ultimately and what kind of economic growth

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or do we ultimately fall into some kind of recession,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>even if it's a quick one, and what that can

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>do certainly to the financial markets. No, you're right, let's

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not forget this economic cycle of growth is almost two

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>years old, will be two years old here in a

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. Your average cycle of growth usually last

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>five years. So I'm not saying this one couldn't fall

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>into recessions soon. We just don't see it. With the

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>consumer this strong se GDP, the consumer is still pretty

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>healthy out there, spending out there, getting jobs. I mean

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they're quitting their jobs. I think it's hard to think

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>millions of people to quit their jobs if they were

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>comfortable about the state of the economy to go find

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a new job or create a new job. And likely,

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, usually small businesses and and the consumers are

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>right about the economy more than the economists are, so

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to trust them. And then that should still

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>mean the cycle has probably a couple more years left,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the growth left to in our opinion, we shall see.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Dietrich, thank you so much, chief markets strategist at

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>LPL Financial, on the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina, giving

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>us certainly a lot to think about. Thanks for listening

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News