WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Halo, Part 2

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Time to go into the vault for an older episode

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>of the show. It is Let's see what's up today?

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's the Halo Part two. This one originally published

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>on March second, twenty twenty one. We reran the first

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>part of the Halo series last Saturday, so if you

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>miss that, you can go check that out as well.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember this. The series was a lot of fun,

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>so we hope you enjoy it. Welcome to Stuff to

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio. Hey, welcome to Stuff

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with part two of

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>our talk about Halos and the Nimbus and the aureol,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the glory that glows behind the figure, whether that's a

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Christian saying to or who wah wah the Terrible Or

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>did we end up last week actually talking about Lucadors

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>at all? I think we did very briefly, partially because

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>we were in the process of putting together a weird

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>house cinema episode on a El Santo film. But yeah,

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the question came up, are there any halos used with

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>luchador designs, with the idea being that, yeah, they're a

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>number of different Catholicism themed Lucia doors. So after we recorded,

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I did look into it a little bit. I looked

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 1>at some of the usual suspects, and looked on Luca

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Wiki and looked at some photos. I didn't notice any

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>halo motifs in the mass for the most part, like nothing,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing like like actually physically emerging and positioned above the head.

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see a lot of crosses, etc. The

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>best example I did find though, was a luchador named

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Angel Azul, one of at least four different lujadors who's

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>used that name. And this particular mass depicts an entire angel,

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like a like a Christmas top or angel on the

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>front of the mask, and that angel has a halo,

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's positioned so that that the angel's head in

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>halo appear more or less in the center of the forehead.

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So I assume this is a technico, not a ruto,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So I don't know anything about this guy,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like a technico mask. You know, if

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you have an angel like that. Uh, you know, it's

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be. But then again, he could easily

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>turn Ruto and become a fallen angel, especially if he

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>loses that mask. Oh yeah, I mean a bad angel

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>can be really bad. You get angels of death, You've

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>got You've got a remember a particularly haunting mickloshred Nodi

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>poem called The Terrifying Angel, where he an angel appears

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to him and advises him to remove his own skin. Yeah,

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a There are a number of different and Lucia,

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there have been a few different angels of death, Angel

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>de la Monte. There's one I remember seeing on TV

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that did not really have any any kind of angelic

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>themes in his out fit. But I did run across

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on Lucawiki an old photo from a magazine that had

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>showed a guy with a halo motif again on the forehead,

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>almost like a third eye. But that's the only thing

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>I could really find in terms of dudes like this

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with halos. Now another thing that comes to mind, though,

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking a little bit about a halo's

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and angels and certainly an art. But I started thinking

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>more and more about films, and I can't think of

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>a single example of an angelic being presented in say

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a horror film or some sort of supernatural film in

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>which they have a halo. Like I was thinking, like,

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the angel visitation scenes that come

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to mind? And I thought of, well, the I thought

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of Bill Paxton's film Frailty, which has a great angel

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>visitation scene, like a you know, hallucination that emerges in

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>his mind, but there's no halo. Now I might be

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>remembering that wrong. I thought that the angel in that

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have like a ring halo around the head

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>or anything specifically concentrated on the head. But I did

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 1>recall a kind of like full body glow. Am I wrong?

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But definitely definitely has a glow to it, and there

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is there's a lot of like heavenly architecture going on

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>above it, But in terms of something more instantly recognizable

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>as a halo, not so much. Likewise, I was thinking

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>back to the Prophecy films with Christopher Walkin. Uh, you know,

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of a lot of a

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of angels in that, a lot of angel wings.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And you can think of various things that were clearly

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>influenced by that you know, we have angels and fallen

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.119
<v Speaker 1>angels popping up and filmmakers will go nuts given them big,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>big feathery wings, but I don't think they ever really

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>include the halo. And it's kind of interesting because I

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>guess it comes down to the fact that it's easy

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to think of it as such a cliche thing, but

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time it is so weird and and

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>there's so many ways to depict it. You'd think you

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>would you would see more of it. I don't know.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear it from folks out there who

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have encountered really cool halos and genre pictures, because I'd

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>love to I'd love to see it now. In the

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>last episode, did you bring up the idea of a

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>cinobyte from like the Clive Barker verse with the with

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a Halo? I can't remember if we if we did,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but I started looking into it after the podcast, and

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an a comic hell Raiser comic book.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a Cinabyte named Halo, but he doesn't

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>really have a halo. Now, there was a Clive Barker

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>action figure for the Todd McFarlane toys for the Tortured

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>souls line, and this guy, uh, this particular guy agnistis

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>has kind of a has like a surgical halo around

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 1>his head, like a halo, and then he also has

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>what I think is like a human face maybe his

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>own human face position behind him that also seems to

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>mimic halo iconography. So it's a very Cinobyte asked character.

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm this seems to come close. And certainly Clive

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Barker loves toying around with religious imagery, so it makes

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>sense that we would find an example of this and

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>something he designed. Yeah. Fun fact, those those figures that

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>came out, turns out they each had a portion of

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>a novella in them that I think for a long

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>time you could only get if you bought all the figures.

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's subsequently been put out sometimes in the last

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 1>five years or so titled Tortured Souls the Legend of Primordium,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and I read it over the weekend enjoined some time

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>out in the Hammock, and it was pretty fun. You know.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like there's not a relatable human character in

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. It's just like a bunch of like

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of monsters and and so forth. It's in a

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dark fantasy setting, kind of hell razory

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>at times for sure, but but not entirely like it felt.

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It was really good. It's one of the I haven't

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>read a lot of Clive Barker recently, but this one

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was new to me and I enjoyed it. So a

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>novella that comes serially within the Action figures that you

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>would buy at Spencer's Gifts in the nineties, Yeah, it was,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and to my shock it was like it was. It

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was actually really enjoyable, So there you go. I wonder

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>if the Insane Clown Posse action figures had a novella

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that came with them. I doubt it. I think this

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was the only I think there was actually another Clive

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Barker line, who is some sort of like Carnival kind

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of a theme, where he did another one like this

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>where he had different different chapters in a novella that

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>all came together if you bought all the figures. But

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>but and that one and that one is also available

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to read now, but I haven't read it. It's interesting though,

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Action figures though, because the whole thing, right

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you don't take them out of the box.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're collecting them. And if that was the case,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't get to read the cool little novella chapters

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that are hidden within there. Well, you wouldn't get to

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>play with them either. I mean, what are you supposed

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with these things? I don't know. They don't

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>look tremendously fun to play with. They kind of they're

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>very grizzly. Have a little tea party with your barbie

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and your cinebites. Yeah, But like I say, the novella

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>was fun. So in the last episode we ended up

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about a lot of the different ways that the

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>halo or the nimbus has been represented or characterized in history.

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes as a glowing disc behind the head,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or even a solid looking kind of gold disc, sometimes

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>even as a square or as a ring around the head.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Other times as a kind of just general emanation of light,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like a glow coming from behind the head, almost as

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>if there's bioluminescent hair or a light bulb behind the

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>head or behind the whole body. A full body glow

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes characterized as a halo or aureole or nimbus.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to the kind that's just like

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a glow or an emanation of divine light from around

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the body. I started to wonder about the idea of

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the aura. Now, I guess there's a general concept of

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>an aura that you could just think of as like,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this is any emanation of color or light from a body,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like in the in the ancient Mesopotamian mythology, where we

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about Humbaba or Hubaba having the seven terrors or

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the radiance, the terrifying radiance that emanated from his body.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Those things could be viewed as an aura. But there's

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>also a more specific definition of an aura, which is

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a sort of standard claim in the modern world of

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>psychics and New Age spirituality and parapsychology. People often claim

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to be able to see some kind of aura around

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>human bodies and sometimes around other objects. So I wonder,

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>could this modern belief in auras in any way be

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>related to the origins of the religious belief in the halo,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the glory, the melom, the sun, disc crown, etc. And

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this sounds perfectly reasonable, right, I mean, a lot of

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it is getting it would seem on the surface at

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>least to get to the same ideas, the idea that

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>there's something either emanating out of you or through you? Right, Yeah, totally.

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And the secondary question if people do really sometimes see

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a glow of color or a cloud of blazing light

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>around someone, what would cause that? So I'm going to

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>transition into this subject for a bit and look at

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>it a few different ways. The first thing I wanted

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to know was, wait a second, is it actually possible,

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>in just a straightforward scientific physical sense that humans do

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>actually sometimes glow? I don't know. I've come across weirder

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>facts on this show before, so I started looking into this.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>The first thing I thought of was, I wonder if

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there's ever been a case where somebody was made to

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>glow by exposure to I don't know, something in the environment.

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that popped in my mind was in

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons when characters who work at the nuclear power

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>plant acquire what mister Burns would call a healthy green glow.

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So I was wondering, does exposure to radiation actually have

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the potential to make people glow? Unfortunately, it seems the

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>answer is no. Ionizing radiation is generally invisible itself, and

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>being exposed to it can of course wreck your body,

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but it won't make you glow. This myth actually probably

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from a combination of facts, the first of which

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.359
<v Speaker 1>would be about radio luminescence. So there are some materials

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that do glow in the presence of ionizing radiation. For example,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the paint that was once commonly used for radium dials

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>on clock faces and is sometimes still used for like

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>instruments that are made to be viewed in the dark,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for example in spacecraft. You know, so you want a

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dial or an instrument that will glow in the dark

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>without having to have any kind of power supply to it,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>or a you know, or an led inside it or

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. This radioluminescent paint actually had to have

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>a combination of two major elements in order to make

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it glow. In the old school kind that was used

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>by like the company Undark or you know that was

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>tragically the cause of the death and sickening of the

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Radium girls. This was a paint that was made with radium,

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the radioactive element that's applied the ionizing radiation.

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>But then it also had to have an element that

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is known as a phosphour, which is a chemical that

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>glows when it's stimulated by alpha and beta particles and

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>gamma rays from the radioactive element, and in the case

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of the radio luminescent paint that was used by undark

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in companies like that in the first half of the

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, the phosphour was usually zinc sulfide that was

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>then laced with a metal like copper to give it

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a green color. And so because of the specific nature

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of this material, this phosphour, when the atoms in it

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are struck by ionizing radiation, they get excited, their electrons

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>jump up to a higher energy level, and then they

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fall back down to their ground state. And when they

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>fall back down to their ground state, they emit a

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>photon of light. As they do that, they release the

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>energy back out and this is the glow we see.

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And of course the color of the glow can be

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>determined by what kind of metal it's laced with. Again,

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>copper tends to give a green color. So I think

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the source of the belief that radiation will

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>cause something to have a green glow. Won't call is

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>anything to have a green glow, It will specifically give

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a green glow. To paint with a phosphour in it,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and something to make that glow the color green, like

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>copper Okay, So, long story short, exposure to ionizing radiation

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>can absolutely kill you, but it will not make you glow,

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess, unless you coat yourself in a phosphour. Okay,

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>so that one episode of The Simpsons where mister Burns

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has been found to be wandering through the woods, Yeah, no,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, and unless yeah, maybe he somehow paints his

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>body in zinc sulfide or something zinc sulfide and copper

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and then just get some plutonium in there. Maybe. Okay.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how long he would survive that though, well,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>As we I think was explained on the show, mister

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Burns is imperil from so many different causes of death

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that they are they're stuck in the door right right,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>three Stooges syndrome. Yeah, so even the ionizing radiation is

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>going whoa. So anyway, you know you're not going to

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have a situation where I don't know, an ancient a

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>person in the ancient world came across a stash of

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>uranium or and then somehow ended up glowing green, so

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody would see him and think, wow, you know, that

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>guy's a god or something. That just wouldn't happen. But

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I came across another fact that is pretty weird, which

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is that, in a qualified sense, the human body actually

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>does just naturally glow, meaning it doesn't only reflect light

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>from external sources, but the body actually does emit electromagnetic

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>radiation in the visible spectrum. Visible light comes out of

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>your body. Huh. But before you get too excited, the

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of light that our bodies put out on average

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is really really tiny. It's roughly a thousand times too

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>dim to see with the naked eye. You need special

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>scientific instruments in a very dark room to pick it up.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But you should know that this is different from the

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>heat that we emit as infrared radiation. If this light

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>were bright enough, it would be light. They would actually

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have a color that you could see with your eyes.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It is that kind of light. And of course it's

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>not just us, most or maybe all other animals would

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>also emit a similar kind of light. Nevertheless, this glow

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is kind of interesting. I was wondering, so what makes

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this glow happen. It appears to be chemical reactions involving

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>free radicals within the body. There was a two thousand

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>nine study that tried to measure this photon emission from

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the human body using special equipment. So this was by

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Misaki Kobayashi, Daisuke Kikuchi, and Hitoshi Okamura, published in PLS

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>one in two thousand and nine called Imaging of ultraweek

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>spontaneous photon emission from human body displaying diurnal rhythm. And

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>so what the researchers did here was they used a

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>cryogenic CCD camera to image five healthy male subjects in

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>their twenties at different times throughout the day. So the

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>subjects would come in, they'd sit in a chair I

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>think they were partially naked or at least bare chested

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in the chair in a dark room for at least

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes. I think there was a period of adjustment

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to the darkness, and then after that they'd be photographed

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for twenty minutes with the special camera. And they do

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this every day for every three hours from ten am

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to ten pm. And the researchers actually found that the

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of light emitted from the body varied significantly over

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the day, so people glowed the most at about four

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>pm and the least at ten am. And they hypothesized

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that this probably has something to do with how energy

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>metabolism changes throughout the day according to our circadian rhythms.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But also interesting, or at least I thought this was interesting, Rob,

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I've attached a picture for you to look at down here.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The body did not glow equally everywhere. In fact, faces

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>tended to glow more than the rest of the body,

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems like. And there were other kinds of different

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>It says like upper shoulders seemed to glow a little

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more than down lower around like the chest or

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the stomach, And different parts of the face glowed more

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>than other parts. So it looks like the area around

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the mouth in particular, was usually glowing more than say,

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>like the forehead or around the eyes or the sides

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of the face. This thing about the mouth especially makes

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>me imagine an alternate history of halo imagery where the

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>glow is not just surrounding the crown of the head,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but emanating from the mouth and jaw a kind of

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>glory beard okay, also kind of a low Pan effect, right, oh, yes,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>when we first encountered low Pan and he has light

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>coming out of his eyes and then out of his mouth.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite line deliveries there is the incredulous

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>way that Kurt Russell says that he had light coming

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>out of his mouth. Yes, it's big Trouble and little

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>China for anyone who's not familiar. But anyway, so I

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>was reading an NBC News report about this study from

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine by Charles Q. Choi, and he

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote that one reason that the face might glow more

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>than the rest of the body is that is that

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>usually faces are more tanned than the rest of the body,

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>since they get it more exposure to sunlight. And that

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he said that the pigment behind that tanning in the skin, melanin,

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>has fluorescent compounds that might might help the skin produce

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>even more light than other skin on the body does. Okay,

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but since this glow is not detectable with the naked eye,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>none of this is going to have anything to do

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>with the origins of halo or nimbus or arial imagery.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Though it is a nice thing to know, nonetheless, But

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to come back to the place we started, people do,

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, sometimes make various paranormal claims that they can

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>see a glow of colored light emanating from human beings. Again,

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>this is sometimes called like an aura or an energy field.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>So I have to be kind of circumspect here, the

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>belief in auras is I have discovered an exceedingly complicated

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>subject with a weird and interesting history. Maybe one will

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>have to come back to and explore more in the future,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>since this is one of those subjects. I'm sure you've

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>had this experience on the show before, Rob where it

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like I was trying to read into it so I

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>could give a brief overview, but it was kind of

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like you go down into a basement and you open

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>an old chest to just like get the things out

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and see what's inside it. But then something in there

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>starts moving and and I'm like, ah, okay, so I

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot I cannot get my brain fully around this subject.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I can only mention some aspects of it.

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>From what I can tell, the New Age belief in

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing auras seems to stem from a kind of reinterpretation

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the medieval Tantric belief in chakras. So chakras would

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>have been a belief original to esoteric Hindu It's all.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of hard to succinctly describe even what

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>these are, but I think you can think of them

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>as sort of a collection of nodes or channels that

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>are positioned at different points inside the body and correspond

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to elements of an imagined subtle body, a second non

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>material energy based body, and the images of these channels

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or nodes throughout the body would be used in some

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>kinds of tantric meditations. So you might focus mental imagery

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on one of these nodes at various points positioned, often

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>along the sort of vertical axis through the middle of

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the body, but also at a few other points. So, Rob,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you probably know more about this world. Is

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that basically your understanding? Yeah? Yeah, I think that's a

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>good basic summary of it. And I've engaged in yoga

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and meditation that uses chakras as well, and I find

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that I guess one way that I like to think

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of it is it is not it is not the

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>way the body actually works, but it is a way

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that the body can be interpreted, uh to aid in

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>meditation or yoga, like thinking about you know, like this

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>energy point moving from chakra to chakra, focusing on say,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like breathing through your third eye. You know, obviously you're

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not really breathing through a hole in your your skull,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>but somehow like focusing on that can be very helpful.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It gives you like a different physical focus to get

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>out of your thoughts and uh and even you know,

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of focus on the on the physicality of that

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>part of your body. Uh So, yeah, I find it

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>very helpful though though again I do not engage with

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it in a way where I think of this is

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like the actual way that the energy in my body

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is working. Right, It might not correspond to like physical

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>anatomical realities, but can serve as a focal point for

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery and in the way of directing the thoughts. Yeah,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>but so that's that's chakras. I think like within the

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the esoteric and do tradition. Then in the late nineteenth

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and early twentieth century, it seems this idea somehow got

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of picked up and reinterpreted by various people associated

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with new religious movements like Theosophy, and a lot of

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century New Age belief in auras as an

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>emanation from the body seems to trace back to a

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>British spiritualist and Theosophist writer named Charles Webster Ledbetter who

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>lived from eighteen fifty four to nineteen thirty four. I

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was just again, I can only give the briefest glance

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>into this world because it seems very It's like looking

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>at gnosticism or something. It's just like you cannot really

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>understand it from the outside. But I was trying to

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>peek in and get some kind of characterization here. So

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I found a couple of quotes from a writing by

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Ledbetter called this was a book called Man Visible and Invisible.

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think this was actually a reproduction of an earlier

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>pamphlet or essay he had done about the leaf in Auras,

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and he writes the following, All members of our society

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>will be familiar with the idea that every human being

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>is surrounded by a sort of luminous cloud, which we

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have agreed to call the aura. And we have heard

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>from those who have succeeded in developing the special sense

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>by which it is cognized, that it has various beautiful colors,

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and that from a study of it much may be

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>learnt as to the disposition, the thoughts, and even the

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>past life of its possessor. And then later he comes

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to a physical description of what this aura is, what

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>it looks like. He writes, we find that it is

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>exceedingly complex in structure. At the first glance, it is

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>seen as a luminous cloud, extending to a distance of

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen inches or two feet from the body in

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>all directions, and therefore approximately oval in shape. Whence it

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes spoken of in occult writings as the auric egg.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>In most cases it has no well defined outline, but

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>its edges fade into invisibility very gradually. And I think

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting because this really does sound like he's

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>describing the halo glow that we see in a lot

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of religious artwork, or here described in a lot of

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>religious poetry, a sort of oval shaped framing or emanation

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of light from the body that sort of gradually dissipates

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>as it gets farther away. Yeah, it also kind of

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>feels like my holy personal space. Ye shout, not intrude upon, right,

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.719
<v Speaker 1>don't put anything in my auric egg. And then he

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>goes on to explain a bunch more stuff like that

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>these are actually composed of a number of layers of

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>underlying auras, one that he calls the health aura, which

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>there's one that has something to do with the Hindu

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>concept of prana or life force. There's one that has

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>something to do with desire and the ability to see

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>These alleged auras in this context is usually ascribed to

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>people either with special powers of sight, some kind of

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>psychic perception, or even more often, it seems, with special

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>training who have worked to harness their ability to see

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the auras of others. Now, as with many other psychic

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and paranormal phenomena, people who claim to be able to

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>see auras as an objective physical phenomenon have repeatedly been

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>put to the test in parapsychology research, which, from what

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I read, usually finds no evidence for any consistency in

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the perception of ouras. It seems to me like it

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is more likely an internal, subjective interpreted experience, not a

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>perception of an objectively verifiable external reality, and these tests

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>can include lots of different things. Like some of them,

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you might look at the auras of different people who

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are obscured by a screen, and then later try to

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>identify the same people again when the screen is removed. Okay,

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so you saw their auras, which person was standing where

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>behind the screen? And usually people who claim to have

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>aura perception abilities cannot perform better than chance at this. Nevertheless,

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be a real perception of the

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>ability to view a glow emanating from people, and so

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that does make you wonder like, okay, well, even if

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>this is not an externally verifiable physical reality, people are

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for some reason believing that they see something. They look

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>at somebody and they think they see a luminous clouds

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>surrounding them. So could that have anything to do with

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the halo or nimbus tradition? One interesting coincidence that this

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>might just be a total coincidence actually not have anything

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to not have any causal link. But one interesting thing

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I come across while I was poking around it, or

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a perception on the internet, is that there is often

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a belief that there are seven layers of auras. There

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>are actually different systems where people say there are different

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>numbers of layers, but a common one is seven layers,

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>which takes me back to the ancient Mesopotamian ogre Huawa

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>or Humbaba, who is said to have seven terrors or

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>seven auras that he could take off one at a time.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, that is that. It's a very good, very

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>good point. Yeah, I wonder if there's an actual connection

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>there or because I mean, we also we also have

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to think again back to the chakra tradition in which

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, you're generally dealing with the seven chakra systems,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so that might be the way it's connected as well, right,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's also worth noting that there are

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>some major differences as far as I can see, between

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>how these different religious concepts like the halo versus the

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>aura are described. For example, in a New Age mysticism,

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the aura is usually said to emanate from every living being. Again,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably some variation there, but it's a

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>common claim that like even insects and plants and even

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>sometimes inanimate objects would have their own aura, whereas the halo,

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>both in Christian iconography and in its predecessors from ancient religion,

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this would be reserved for special beings. It's the divine

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>spotlight like you said last time, or it's the emanation

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of terrifying God power. I mean, he doesn't even think

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>about just the idea of beholding somebody and that person

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>being say particularly beautiful or charismatic, you know, and you know,

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>interpreting that is kind of a holy glow, and in

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a way it does get back to the actual way

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that we would behold someone, you know, in terms of

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>how light or reflecting off of off of people or things,

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>U you know, light entering our eyes, et cetera. Well,

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going to get to this in a minute,

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think there could well be something to the

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that beliefs about things like halos or auras could

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>very well be quite literally in the eye of the beholder. Okay,

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So I came across a study that asks an interesting question. Again,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you remember I was trying to think. Okay, So if

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>people do sometimes look at other people, or at figures

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>or even statues of gods or something and believe they

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>see an emanation of light around them, believe they see

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a nimbus or a holy glow, could people's perceptions of

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>these auras or halos sometimes be blamed by cases of synesthesia.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>This was explored in a paper I was looking at

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that was published in Consciousness and Cognition in the year

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve by Milan at All called auras in mysticism

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and synesthesia a comparison. So the authors here write that

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>synesthesia quote is a condition in which one type of

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stimulation evokes the sensation of another, as when hearing a

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>sound leads to the perception of mental colors or photisms. Photisms,

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a standard term in the synesthesia literature. It's a

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>type of visual stimulation that associates something that is not

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>originally visual in nature or is a different kind of stimulus.

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So one common example in synesthesia is grapheme color synesthesia,

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>where certain letters of the alphabet or numerals are consistently

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>associated with a color sensation. So imagine, like, if you

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>don't experience synesthesia personally, try to imagine if some reason

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in your mind, the letter G was purple and the

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>letter H was yellow, Okay. And there are a bunch

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of different kinds of this. There are people for whom

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading that. One classic attribution of synesthesia was

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that there was an account of a man, I think

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe reported by John Locke, who said that every time

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he heard the sound of a trumpet or a French

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>horn or something, he saw the color red. But there

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>are also some less common types of synaesthesia that have

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically to do with the idea or image of individual people.

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So the authors here right quote. One of the relatively

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>infrequent varieties is the one where photisms are triggered by

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>emotion affect laden stimulis such as emotional words, photographs, human figures,

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and the faces of familiar people. For instance, for are

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a synisthete who participated in this study, the side of

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a familiar person automatically triggers a mental image of a

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>human silhouette filled with color. Different people are typically associated

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>with different color hues depending on our's affective relationship with

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the person in question. Eg. He claims that he has

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>always associated his mother with the color blue. And I

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>looked this up, and I found people online in forums

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>sure enough talking about this exact experience today. Like I

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>recall just one example, I came across one person saying

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that with their person color synesthesia, both of their parents

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>were blue, but different shades of blue. But so anyway,

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>The authors here wanted to tie this to the mystical

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>concept of aura reading or aura perception and ask is

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it possible that the neurological phenomenon of person color synesthesia

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>could be responsible for some of the claims of aura

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>vision in these New age religious experiences? And they tried

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to figure this out by comparing the first person reports

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of four test subjects with person color synesthesia against the

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>perform moments of aura readers, and the reports of auras

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>from the literature. Now, long story short, the authors here

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>actually conclude that these phenomena are described in usually very

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>different ways with different characteristics, and that experiences of person

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.719
<v Speaker 1>color synesthesia are probably not a major cause of belief

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in auras. And they put up a table in their

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>conclusion comparing a lot of the differences between these things

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just to mention what I thought were a couple of

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the most relevant takeaways, and this one seemed maybe the

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>most significant to me. They say that people with person

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>color synesthesia usually report seeing the photism quote in the

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye, so there would be like a strong mental

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>association between a person and a color, But most synaesthetes

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>do not believe that they are literally seeing the color

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>radiating from the person's body directly in and mingled with

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>their actual vision. It's a mental association, whereas the aura

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that the clairvoyant reports is usually said to be a

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>direct visual stimulus, like it's a literal cloud or halo

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 1>around the body that can be directly observed as you

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>observe things with your eyes. Now, again, there's a lot

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of variation in this tradition, so I'm sure there are

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>some counter examples to that, but that seems to be

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the dominant way that it's reported. A couple of other

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>things they report synesthesia is usually a lifelong condition which

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is probably congenital, whereas the reported clairvoyant ability to perceive

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>auras is said to be a learned skill. More often.

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>They also say that person color synesthesia is triggered automatically

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and requires no effort. It's just a natural association, as

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>naturally triggered as if I said, like, hey, you know,

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the color of a banana? Like, you can't help

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but think it. It just comes automatically to your brain

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.479
<v Speaker 1>upon hearing the words that they say. Counter to that,

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>aura reading usually is said to be something that requires

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>concentration and special condition. Now it does make me wonder

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>if now, obviously you would not have to be a

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>synaesthisic person to engage in aura reading. You know, you

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>could easily take on the trappings and the you know,

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the the dramatic aspects of this kind of performance. But

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>if you were a person with synaesthesia, you would be

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>uniquely outfitted to do this kind of work. You know,

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, sure, you know, you know, to not just

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>say oh yeah, you're you're blue you're light blue with that,

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>right you know, you know, to pause and to concentrate

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and to put on the show that people need to see.

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But then you would have an actual color to refer to, right, oh,

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>because you'd have an automatic association in your mind that

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of comes naturally there, like you wouldn't have to

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be straining for something, right. But I guess then you're

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>probably getting into a question. Okay, in the field of

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>aura reading, are there certain color you know? I'm sure

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there are certain colors associated with different things. There's probably

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a system, there's a color code, and that color code

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>might not match up with the way that the synesthesia

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.720
<v Speaker 1>brain is is coding the world right exactly. That's another

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>major difference is that that and they talk about this

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in the paper. For people with person color synesthesia, they

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 1>generally understand their individual pairings of certain colors with certain

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>people to be to be idiopathic, like to come from

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>their own personal associations, whereas usually people who believe that

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>they can read auras say that they're like they're referring

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to some kind of like objectively external thing that other

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>or readers would supposedly see the same thing, and it

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>would have a specific meaning. Yeah, yeah, yeah, you want

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to feel like you're tapping into some sort of cosmic,

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>overarching order when you have your r reat as opposed

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to just like what this guy thinks in his head

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>when he remembers you. Sure, But one thing I did

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 1>want to say is so a couple of things. First

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of all, I did think it was worth noting before

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>relying too heavily on the study I just mentioned. I

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>did find a pretty scathing criticism published in the same

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>journal and Consciousness and Cognition the same year by Cardenia

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>at All that basically like, while lauding the general thrust

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of this study, it also criticized the authors for allegedly

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>being sloppy with a couple of things about like how

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>they represented or presented parapsychology and the aura literature. I

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know that this would necessarily change the main findings,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>but there was some criticism there, so if you're looking

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>into this, look up the critical review as well. But

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>also I wanted to hand over my nothing to see

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 1>here award to the authors on this one, because it's

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>always nice to see a full write up of a

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis that does not pan out. Yeah, but the authors

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in their conclusion do refer to something else that I

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>thought was interesting. They say, Okay, it doesn't look like

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>there's all that strong of a link between the phenomenology

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of synesthesia and the phenomenology reported by people who do

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>aura readings. It looks like they're reporting different kinds of experiences,

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's probably not a strong causal link. But they

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>also say quote claims made by people claiming to be

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>psychic or aura readers can be alternatively explained by proven science,

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And they refer to a paper by Durdan from two

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four which they say, quote shows how phenomena

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>which arise as a consequence of the normal functioning of

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the human visual system can explain the purported direct experience

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>of the aura. For instance, the complementary color effect, which

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>results from a temporary exhaustion of the color sensitive cells

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in the retina, could account for the presence of auric

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 1>colors seen by a sensitive viewer when staring at a person.

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And they also say staring at a darker object a

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>human figure against a bright background may induce the perception

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of a bright halo around the object. This is due

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to a contrast amplification mechanism built into the human visual

0:37:56.160 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>system which allows for an efficient detection of edges, and

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>so I thought this was interesting that, Okay, maybe this

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>would apply even more directly to the halo or the

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>nimbus than it would to the aura perception, because you

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>can imagine a certain number of optical effects, one of which,

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, is is the afterimage. You know, so if

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you do you ever do that thing when you're a kid,

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>where like you look at a picture, a certain sort

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of like negative image of a face on a page,

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and then they say, Okay, stare at this for twenty seconds,

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and then close your eyes and turn your head up,

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see a face staring at you from behind

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>your eyelids. That's a natural optical effect, the afterimage effect,

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with the latent activation of retinal

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>cells when you've been concentrating on an image. I think

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's quite easy to see how something like that could

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>create optical effects that seem quite mystical in nature, and

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>could allow you to believe you're perceiving either an aura

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of color in the shape of a person or surrounding

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a person, or imagining that you're seeing light emanating from

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a person yeah, absolutely. I mean they're a whole host

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of of optical effects like that. Oftentimes you'll see them

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>utilized at like a hands on science center where you'll

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 1>you'll have a number of them you can do where

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like stare at this spinning thing and then look

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>over here, or you know, look at these lines and

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>then look at these lines, and it's it's all really

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. I mean, so sometimes something you do when

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you're a kid maybe forget how how interesting it can be,

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it goes to show just how how

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>how our visual system, how it can be tricked into

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 1>seeing things that are not quite there or enhanced to

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>degrees that that you know, don't seem to line up

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with our normal day to day sensory world. One of

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things actually about our visual systems is that,

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 1>like you can prove to people through direct experience that

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>their visual perception of reality is an illusion. Now, it's

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>not an illusion as in it's like a totally imagined hallucination.

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously based on real objects and light coming in

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>around you, but the perception that you see an unbroken

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>visual field of full color all around you, it really

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>feels like you might see that but you don't. And

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of great examples for that that you can

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>show people are if you hold up like colored flags

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>at the very periphery of somebody's vision, you can immediately

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>people immediately realize like, oh, I think I perceive color

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>in every direction, but I'm colorblind in my peripheral vision.

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>That's like to try it sometime if you never have before,

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 1>get like different colored markers or flags or something, hold

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>them up at the very edge of where you can see.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't tell the difference in the colors. Another one is,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if you ever want to look up how to do this,

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a way where you can find the blind spot

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>caused by your optic nerve as it routes information away

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>from the retina in the back of your eye. There

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is a blind spot just right in the middle of

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>your vision wherever you're looking stuff, where you can't see anything.

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>And you can actually do experiments to bring this out,

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's totally invisible to you. You can't see the

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 1>fact that you can't see this area. I think we uh,

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about something like this one time

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.399
<v Speaker 1>with our Scott Baker about the fact that he had

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>like an injury to his eye or something that caused

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>him to have an illusion of this kind where in

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 1>fact he had a large blind spot in the center

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of his vision, but it didn't register as a blind

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>spot as in what you might imagine like a like

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a field of black or white or something where there

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.959
<v Speaker 1>was no vision. Instead, the brain just tricked him into

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking he had total vision, but there were just places

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>where he actually couldn't see anything. Right, So he would

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>look at his dog and the dog would just have

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>no face, right's that recall. But still the brains saying like, no,

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing fine, Yeah, this is a this is every dog. Yeah,

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>everything's fine. Well, I want to go from here to

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to talk about halo's as a as a purely

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>optical phenomenon. So these there are examples of halos that

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>cannot not only are visible to the naked eye, but

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they can be they can be captured via photography and

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>frequently are you know I've mentioned in the previous episode

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:13.760
<v Speaker 1>there are at least a couple of solar and lunar

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>optical phenomena, you know, broad categories of them that are

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>worth singling out. And these phenomena have been observed for

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years. Yeah, this is a really good point,

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and we sort of alluded to this in the last episode,

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to emphasize again that I wouldn't

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 1>suggest that a person needed to have a direct vision

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of light emanating from another person's body at some point

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to imagine something like a halo or nimbus.

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 1>It could be it could be just pure imagination that

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:45.280
<v Speaker 1>brings out this imagery, or it could well be basic

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>associative thinking mapping the properties of celestial objects or interesting

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>optical phenomena in the skies or on the Earth, and

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 1>then associating that with a person, you know, with with

0:42:56.440 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>godhood or transcending power, and then putting that on the

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>body of somebody who is feared or revered. Right, And

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in the previous episode we mentioned some Roman and Greek

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>examples of these being observed and recorded. But I do

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>want to drive home that, you know, the sun has

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>always been of importance to cultures throughout time and around

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. So anyone looking around looking up at the

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sun or the moon, we're likely to encounter these things.

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>We just have, you know, certain recorded records that are

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that stand out, that are a little older. I was

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 1>looking around and I found a paper titled the Sun

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Recorded Throughout History by M. Vasquez from two thousand and nine,

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and they point to bone inscriptions from the Shang dynasty

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in ancient China, where we where they recorded solar phenomena

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 1>during the second millennium BC. They reported at least four phenomena,

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>including a dark and gloomy sun, solar eclipses, and the

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>solar halo, which I believe was a reyun Interestingly enough,

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>there's another one that there's no translation of, so it

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>does make me wonder what that particular solar phenomenon might

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>have been. Oh boy, but people have a lot of

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>fun with that one. Yeah, that's when the Sun turns

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>inside out and becomes the black hole Sun. I mean,

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's just another, you know, commonly scene occurrence

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with the sun. But anyway, broadly speaking, a halo can

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.399
<v Speaker 1>occur anytime the Sun or the Moon shines through thin

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>clouds composed of ice crystals, and the effect can be

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 1>caused by one of two or a combination of refraction

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and or reflection via these crystals. So the refractions are

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>going to cause color separations, meaning the final results may

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:45.439
<v Speaker 1>be colored while reflected light remains uncolored. The twenty two

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>degree halo is the most common form of this, consisting

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of either a series of colored arcs or even complete

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>circles of twenty two degree angular radiuses around the Sun

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>or the moon and the coloration. If there's coloration, it

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>SEMs to be red on the on the on the

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>inside and a blur on the outside with the moon.

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:10.399
<v Speaker 1>These are sometimes called lunar halos or winter halos. And

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I was lucky enough to see one of these the

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>last time I was at the beach. I was out

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 1>walking on a beach at night, and you know, looking

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>up at the moon and everything was, you know, beautiful

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>but normal, and then all of a sudden, Uh, there's

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this tremendous halo effect, which if you don't know what

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you're you're looking at, it can look like a portal

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>has opened up, like a great circular portal has opened

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>up around the moon between you and the moon, like

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of a connection or a cylindrical highway

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>between you and the lunar surface. It's pretty pretty interesting. Yeah.

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>It makes me think about images and the paradiso of

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>like rings or wheels of angels running about in concentric

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>circles around the heavenly bodies. Yeah, and I you know again,

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>people throughout time would have witnessed these, and so you

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 1>can you can imagine this having an impact on our

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:05.919
<v Speaker 1>our perception of the worlds beyond and of the higher cosmos. Now,

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 1>these are just the most common halo effects, these twenty

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>two degrees, but there are many others, including the forty

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>six degree halo. It's similar, but at twice the distance,

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 1>roughly sometimes occurring in conjunction with twenty two degree halos,

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and even other optical effects. So you might encounter, say,

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a sun dog with a double halo. Now, what are

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:32.439
<v Speaker 1>sun dogs. That's a different optical phenomenon caused by the sunlight. Yeah,

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a sun dog, also known as a mock sun. This

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is caused by refraction of sunlight in atmospheric ice crystals.

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>These are generally colored patches of light to either side

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Sun at the same altitude as the Sun itself,

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So to a certain extent, it can look like three

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>suns dawning over the Earth, or at least like one

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>major sun and like two sort of weirdly shaped mini

0:46:56.560 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>suns out on either side the Sun's two sons. Yeah,

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and of course this instantly brings to mind the Chinese

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>myth of the ten surplus suns that Ho Yee had

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to shoot down out of the sky, and I've not

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>actually seen a connection. I couldn't find a connection drawn

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 1>between those two, though it wouldn't surprise me if there was.

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But there does seem to be a connection in Norse

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>mythology the two wolves hunting the sun in the moon,

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>so these would be Fineer's Sun's skull and Haiti horor Vintinson.

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I got that second one wolf's

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>name right, So cosmic wolves go easy on me. But

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.359
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously an eclipse connection as well here, because these

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to be like sun and moon consumers. But

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I did run across direct connections between the sun dogs

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that are sometimes seen to either side of the Sun

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and these these supernatural beasts. Well, coming back to the

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>version of the halo that is either a ring around

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the head or an emanation of light as if from

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>behind the head, I mean, obviously, if you have never

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 1>witnessed a solar eclipse before and seen the corona of

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the Sun around the moon, I mean that that is

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a probably the most awe inspiring physical real thing I've

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>ever witnessed like it. Yeah, well, it is a life

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>changing thing to see with your eyes, and but be

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>very careful of your eyes when when observing one. Oh yeah,

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and that will come back to that in a second.

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So their whole host of rare optical effects related to

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 1>these examples I've shared that produce various halos, and these

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have again been observed throughout time and depicted in art.

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Two of the earlier Western examples of their recording are

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>off cited are Aristotle's writings on them, as well as

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen thirty five SunDog painting, often held up as

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the oldest example of a clear atmospheric halo in art.

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.879
<v Speaker 1>To quote Aristotle, though in Meteorology from three fifty BC

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the Webster translation quote. The halo often appears

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:01.879
<v Speaker 1>as a complete circle. It is seen around the sun

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and the moon and bright stars by night as well

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 1>as by day and at midday or even in the afternoon,

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>more rarely about sunrise or sunset. Now, it's obvious that

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing things like this in the sky can be awe inspiring,

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but is there a reason to suspect connections naturally in

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>history between seeing things like this and religious concepts. Yeah, absolutely,

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be the case. And I think one

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of the best examples of this is to look at

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the Miracle of the Sun or the Miracle of Fatima

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on October thirteenth, nineteen seventeen and Fatima, Portugal the number

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>if you've probably run across this before you read an

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:44.879
<v Speaker 1>article about it. It involved a variety of reports of

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>colored lights in the daytime sky, of a dancing sun

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to move around in the sky, and even

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>angelic apparitions. And there are various interpretations of this, none

0:49:57.400 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of which, or you can be held up as the

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>definite of ants. There's some have pointed to the possibility

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 1>of mass hallucination or mass hysteria. You know, you would

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have been dealing with a you know, a pretty religious

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch observing this, and in some cases you're dealing with

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the observations and you know, and recollections of children. But

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:18.439
<v Speaker 1>it does sound increasingly likely that it's more a matter

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of their having been first of all, a variety of

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 1>alleged reports, you know, different stories people seeing different things

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sky and some seeing nothing at all out

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of the ordinary. So it's not like everybody looked up

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and saw something interesting. Some people looked up and didn't

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>see what anybody was talking about. But it's the most outrageous,

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the most extreme accounts. They're the ones that survive and

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>then evolve in retellings and in recordings. So again, skeptics

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of ovor a host of possible explanations for this particular incident,

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's it has been proposed that the whole thing

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>might have started with some manner of a halo or

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.240
<v Speaker 1>sun dog sighting, or some sort of unique combination of these,

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the sun dogs with a couple of

0:51:01.040 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>halos around the Sun. And then here's the thing. As

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>various folks start staring at the sun in all of

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>these phenomena or trying to see what the in person

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 1>next to them is looking at, they end up staring

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Sun too long and they experience temporary retinal

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>distortion due to prolonged solar staring. Don't stare at the sun, folks, Yeah,

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, remember when we had that solar eclipse in

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. You know, that was everybody had

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to drive that home, like even though the Sun is

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>doing something really interesting or and it is even being

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, is even darkening do not stare at it,

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>because you can you can seriously damage your eyes and

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, yeah, you could experience temporary retinal distortion,

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which could have just just add to these interpretations of

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>like crazy things going on in the sky. Well, if

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you pair this with what I was saying earlier about

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the possible like the known effects of vision and optical

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>effects within the eye and within the brain that are

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>caused by, say, staring for a long time I'm at

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a bright light source, Like, you could get effects that

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even necessarily have to be something in the sky,

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but would also not just be people using their imaginations.

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:11.399
<v Speaker 1>They'd be real perceptions for the people, but they could

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>be based on things like retinal effects afterimage things, or

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:20.320
<v Speaker 1>over perceiving the edges of outlines due to intense strain

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 1>on the eyes. Yeah. And then once something like this

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is observed and thought about, and then once you've had

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a chance to ask other people about it, then you

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>can often turn to pre existing scripts to explain what

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that might have been, such as, uh, you know, angelic

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>beings such as aliens and unidentified flying objects, that sort

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing. I just thought of a really great opening

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for a movie Okay, so it's it's Fatima Portugal. Everybody's

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 1>staring at the sun. They think they see angelic beings

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>or a vision of the Virgin Mary or something like that,

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>apparitions in the sky, and then it slowly resolves and

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's coming in and it's coming in and what is it?

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's the predators drop ship and this is Predator Portugal,

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and so all of the yacht ja hop out and

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they begin they begin their hunt. Is that in bad

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>taste enough to be a Predator movie? Maybe? I just

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they'd get a lot of good sport, Like,

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're they're drawn to the really rough

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, right. Oh, I guess there's not

0:53:23.600 --> 0:53:25.359
<v Speaker 1>enough conflict here. There's got to be like a war

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>going on or something. Yeah, like futuristic la And what

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:30.359
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven was that one of I'm supposed to take

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>place Danny Glover one? Yeah, yeah, what if they arrived

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the Predators were to arrive and they're like, okay, we

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have detected there's a lot of conflict right now. And

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>then they get to their location and then they find

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>out all the conflict is online, like in social media

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>streams and they're like, ah, we brought all these weapons

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and now we just have to get we have to

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>get Twitter accounts instead and learn English. Oh no, no no.

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So they show up because they're like, okay, the heat

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 1>signature is we've detected on this place and the surface

0:53:57.080 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of the earth indicate ongoing thermonuclear warfare. But then when

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:05.919
<v Speaker 1>they arrive, it's just a bitcoin mining facility. Uh. They're like, well,

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we got to go all in on bitcoin. Now, I

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>guess we can travel all the way here. But then

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they get to launch the new predator cryptocurrency, right, assuming

0:54:13.560 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there's not already one. I'm sure there's already one. Is

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that there? There's probably there's already like a Garfield cryptocurrency,

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't there? And I don't know, but I would not

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>remembering that they could day, I wouldn't. I wouldn't put

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>money against you od coin. Well, I guess we'll close

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:33.959
<v Speaker 1>this one out right here. But you know we're gonna

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:37.399
<v Speaker 1>keep going with this, this line of thinking though, this

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:42.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of optical effects that then get interpreted in various

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:45.800
<v Speaker 1>ways unless plans change. I think the next episode of

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind will continue on a similar topic. Yeah,

0:54:50.080 --> 0:54:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited about that. We're going to be sort

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of moving on from Halo's mostly I don't know, it

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>might come back up, but but but yeah, it's gonna

0:54:56.800 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of fun. Yeah, all right. Well, in

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, if you want to catch up on episodes

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow your Mind, you know where to

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:06.280
<v Speaker 1>find them. They're in the Stuff to Blow Your Mind Fee.

0:55:06.280 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>These are our core episodes, you know, mostly science and

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 1>culture and so forth. They published on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesdays we throw out our short form artifact episodes.

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>On Mondays you got your listener mail, and on Friday,

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 1>we know, we leave the most of the science up

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:24.279
<v Speaker 1>on the shelf and we take a little time to

0:55:24.280 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 1>discuss a weird movie with our Weird House Cinema episodes.

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, again, wherever you get your podcasts, wherever you

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>find that podcast stream, just rate, review and subscribe. You know,

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if you have the ability to do those things, that

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>helps us out huge thanks as always to our excellent

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 1>audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with us with feedback on this episode

0:55:45.520 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 1>or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hello. You can email us at

0:55:49.800 --> 0:56:00.359
<v Speaker 1>contact at Stuff to Blow Your mindt dot com. Stuff

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For more

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, thissit, the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.