WEBVTT - The Skype Story: Microsoft Buys Skype. What Now?

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey thereon

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, I'm your host Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeartRadio and how the tech are

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you So? On Monday's episode, I described how Skype came

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>into being, how it grew quickly after launch, which prompted eBay,

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>under the leadership of Meg Whitman, to acquire Skype for

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the princely sum of around two point six billion dollars.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>The actual amount varies depending upon what source you're looking at.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I also talked about how eBay never really found a

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>way to integrate Skype into its business, at least not

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in a way that really worked, and when leadership of

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>eBay changed and John Donaho took over leadership of the company,

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>one of his priorities was to find something to do

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with Skype. Now. Initially, the plan was to spin off

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Skype as its own company in an initial public offering,

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but that fell apart when Skype's original architects threatened to

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>pull the technology that powered the service if they went

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that route without working with those founders. So instead, eBay

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>would actually sell off a majority stake in Skype to

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>an investor group silver Lake and the Skype founders would

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>also get a share of the ownership of Skype, and

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>eBay would hold on to about thirty percent of the

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>steak itself. Now, this is what set up all the

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>parties were a huge windfall when Microsoft expressed interest in

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>acquiring Skype in around twenty ten twenty eleven. And it's

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>also why I cannot call the eBay acquisition of Skype

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst deals of all time, at least

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>not I may have done that once upon a time,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I can really say that. I think

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a bad deal because the companies failed to

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>find a way to integrate with one another. They couldn't

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>find those synergies that they had been planning on. So

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, it was a failure. But unlike some

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of the other deals that tend to make a worst

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Deals of all Time list, eBay did not lose a

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ton of money on this if you're looking just at

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the purchase price versus the sell price. In fact, they

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>actually made money compared to you know, how much they

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>bought versus how much they got when they sold it.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>If you compare that to the time when News Corp.

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Bought MySpace. They bought MySpace for five hundred and eighty

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>million dollars and then they later sold it for thirty

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars. That was a stinker of a deal.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a huge loss. Now, obviously that doesn't actually

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>take into account how much money eBay spent while owning

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Skype on the product, like how much money they poured

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>into development and that sort of stuff. If you take

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>all of those considerations into account, if very well may

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be that ultimately, yes, eBay lost money on the deal,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but they still sold it for more than they bought it,

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>so on the worst deals list, it can't be number one. Anyway.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's set the stage for Microsoft's offer. While eBay and

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Skype did not synergize the way Meg Whitman had hoped,

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it didn't stop Skype from continuing to grow over the years.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>In twenty ten, the service boasted five hundred and sixty

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>million registered users collectively. Those users had used Skype for

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>more than two hundred and seven billion minutes of voice

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and video chats collectively across the entire history of Skype. Now,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>if you actually convert that into years, that means that

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there were more than three hundred ninety three, eight hundred

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five years worth of digital chats that had

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>gone across Skype over its history. Yaosen no wonder Microsoft

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was interested in it. And interested is putting it lightly,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>because Microsoft was ready to offer the largest deal in

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the company's history at that point. Anyway, it was for

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>eight point five six billion dollars in cash, a truly

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>princely sum, and this was at a time when other

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.799
<v Speaker 1>parties were similarly starting to express interest in acquiring Skype.

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Rumor had it that both Google and Facebook, which of

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>course now is Meta, were interested in potentially either partnering

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>with Skype or just outright acquiring it. But Microsoft was

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the party that won the right to acquire Skype. And

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, Skype was actually making money at this point.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It had debt as well, but it was making money.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and eight, the division posted revenue of

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>more than eight hundred and sixty million dollars, but of

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>course revenue is not profit. But the profit was around

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>two hundred six sixty million dollars, so they weren't making money,

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which put that into contrast with tons of startups that

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>come out of Silicon Valley, where you know, some of

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>them just don't even make revenue. But other ones that

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>do make revenue, most of them failed to turn a

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>profit for years, years and years. There are services that,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, for almost the entire history of the service

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>were not profitable. So Skype was kind of a standout

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>in the crowd on that regard. A quarter of a

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in profit is a mountainous amount of money,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but it is just a drop in the bucket compared

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to eight point five billion dollars. And like I said,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had never made an acquisition offer as large as

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>that before. Now since it has done that, right, Like

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the Activision Blizzard deal which just completed was nearly seventy

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, almost ten times as much. So so yeah,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they have gone bigger since then. An article from Wired

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty eleven put the deal in the context

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of some other acquisitions Microsoft had made, ones with much

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>smaller price tags. But Wired was saying Microsoft had a

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>history of purchasing companies but having very little to show

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for those purchases. That you know, there was clearly a

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>desire to acquire these these companies, but then kind of

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>momentum just died, so that it was sort of a warning,

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and it raised the question what did Microsoft see in

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Skype that would prompt the company to offer what was

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>at that point an unprecedented amount of cash. This was

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a cash deal too. This wasn't one of those deals

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>where it was you know, trades and stock or whatever.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It was actually, no, we will pay you eight point

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars because Microsoft was flush with cash. Now,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>confusing the matter was that Microsoft already had some products that,

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>at least in part art were overlaps or in competition

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with Skype. Windows Live Messaging, for example, offered live chat,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>including video chat, as well as text messaging. So you

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>might say, well, why would you want Skype? You already

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>have a tool that does kind of what Skype is doing.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It also had a bunch of corporate products that did

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>something similar for big companies. Right, a lot of Microsoft's

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses were focused on enterprise clients, not individual customers. But

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>how can we get a customer like an entire company

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy into our systems because that's where the big,

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>big money is. And in fact, Microsoft's owned and operated

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>products already boasted more users and more simultaneous connections than Skype.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, you see a company acquire another one.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Not because they want access to that company's technology, so

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they want access to that company's user base. Right. That

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>was one of the arguments that was made when Facebook

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>acquired WhatsApp was that Facebook was more interested in getting

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>access to WhatsApp's users than WhatsApp itself. I don't think

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that was fully true. I think it was like an

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>equal opportunity thing, like, yes, I want the users and

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I want the technology. Now. Skype did have one thing

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft's products did not have. It had interoperability with

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>landline and cellular telephone services. Right. That was a paid

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>for option in Skype, in that you could use Skype

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to make a computer to telephone phone call. Perhaps more importantly,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>folks had to pay to use that specific service, and

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>around eight million of Skype's registered users were doing that

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>on the rag And that was something that Microsoft did

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>not have access to. And Microsoft was kind of struggling

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in the communications space. It had been pushing variations of

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Windows for mobile phones for years, but the rise of

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone and Android platforms kept the Windows mobile platform

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at a distant third not always at third place, either,

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes there were other operating systems that took third place.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, let's explore for a few minutes Microsoft's history

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>with mobile communications devices, because I think that's an important

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>piece to consider. I think it was one of the

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>motivating factors that led Microsoft to acquire Skype in the

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>first place. So Microsoft had been trying to establish a

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>strong presence in the space at least since the early

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, with Pocket PC and Windows Mobile operating systems. Now,

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that the history goes back even further

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>into the mid nineteen nineties with the introduction of Windows

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>CE in ninety six. Windows CE was intended for handheld PCs,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 1>so think of things like, you know, very mobile computers,

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>almost like tablet style computer systems. Now, before the era

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of the smartphone, there was the personal Digital assistant or PDA,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can kind of think of a PDA as

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone without the phone part. The term was really

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>established with the introduction of the Apple Newton, although the

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Newton itself wasn't the first device that fit the definition,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was the device that introduced the term. And

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a rush to become the company to define

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>mobile computing, and Microsoft was very much interested in being

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in that race. So Microsoft had a long history of

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>catering to enterprises, as I mentioned, you know, to go

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and try and build products specifically for business and business leaders,

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of their business came from licensing or

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>selling Microsoft products to these companies. So it made sense

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>to develop a mobile operating system that could be compatible

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>with the various software packages Microsoft published, right to build

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>an operating system that could run at least some version

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of things like Outlook or a window, you know, Microsoft

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Office products, and Microsoft's mobile operating system would also work

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on smartphones, though at this point we're still in the

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>era of smartphones being the domain of fancy business people, right,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't get consumer smartphones, at least not truly widely

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>adopted consumer smartphones until two thousand and seven. And Microsoft

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>also was not in the business of making the hardware,

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>so they were just focusing on the software that would

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>run on top of the devices. So then when we

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>do get to two thousand and seven, when Apple rolled

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>out its own smartphone, which was a really sexy device

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that could serve as a computer and a communications device

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and a digital media player and more, Apple made a

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>power move and something Microsoft was not ready to meet. Like,

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they did not have an answer for the iPhone when

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone came out in two thousand and seven. Then

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Google released Android a short time later, and another competing

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>mobile operating system was there on the market, and unlike Apple,

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Google partnered with handset manufacturers to put the Android operating

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>system on devices. Now Apple was doing everything itself, Google

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was working with partners, which was more like Microsoft. Right.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft was doing the same sort of thing with their

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>own mobile operating system. But the important thing is the

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>era of the consumer smartphone was upon us, and the

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>utilitarian smartphones that were meant just for business leaders now

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>were taking second place to these sleek and sexy touch

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>screen interface smartphones that were meant for consumers. In two

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven, Microsoft introduced Windows Mobile six. While there

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>was a version of Windows Mobile six that would work

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>with touch screens, that version was called the Professional version

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of Windows Mobile six, so that kind of indicated that

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft was still looking at smartphones as kind of an

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 1>elite business device, not something for the general consumer. They

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>also offered classic and standard versions of the operating system,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so these were versions of the operating system that were

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>meant for other devices, such as smartphones that did not

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>have a touchscreen but had like physical keyboards and stuff

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and even PDAs. Now, it wasn't until two thousand and

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>nine that Microsoft had a quote unquote finger friendly version

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of its operating system, and by then the iPhone and

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Android phones had been evolving for a couple of years

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and had really established a firm presence in the market.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>In twenty ten, Microsoft would change the name of its

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>mobile operating system, so instead of being called Windows Mobile,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it became Windows Phone, and it changed dramatically like Microsoft

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was finally really ready to meet Android and iOS, and

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the user interface for Windows Phone was obviously meant to

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>compete direct directly with Android and iOS devices. The company

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was already well behind Google and Apple and the consumer market. However,

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and this brings us up to the time of Microsoft's

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>decision to acquire Skype. We will continue our story, but

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break to thank our sponsors.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>We're back. So perhaps Microsoft was viewing Skype as the

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>killer app that would propel Windows Phone into the spotlight.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>That might have at least been part of their decision

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to go after Skype. Maybe the plan was to leverage

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Skype and make Skype the primary method of connecting with

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>other you know, other people instead of using traditional cellular service,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you would use Skype to connect to everybody. Now, if

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that had been the plan, conventional wisdom said that Microsoft

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>embracing Skype would likely tick off the various carriers in

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the phone space. That would be a huge issue now.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>At the time when smartphones were coming out, there were

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>these big deals with carriers, sometimes meaning that a phone

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>might be exclusive to a specific carrier, at least in

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States. So like when the iPhone first came out,

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it was exclusive to AT and T users. If you

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>were on any other carrier, you could not have an

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>iPhone because it wouldn't work on that carrier's service. You

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>had to be an AT and T customer. And part

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of those deals meant that the carriers would offer big

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>discounts on the smartphones in order to get you hooked

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>into the carrier's service. It's like the whole idea of like,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the lure, and once you've taken the lure,

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you're caught, and now you're you're hers for as long

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>as we want you. And it meant that the initial

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>cost of these phones was much much much lower than

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you would find today because those kind of agreements are

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>much more rare today. If you were to go and

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>buy a phone, in a lot of cases, you'd just

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>be paying full price to get the phone and then

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>add it to whatever service you already have. But at

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this point that's not how things were going, and the

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>fear was that if Microsoft chose Skype as the central

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>way of communicating through this phone, it would alienate all

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the carriers and there'd be no way to form that

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of relationship and people would have to pay full

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>price to get a Windows phone, which seems like a

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>barrier to entry now. Before the acquisition deal could even

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>go through, there were a couple of instances where a

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bug in Skype software caused a significant crash in the

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>service for millions of users. Not service wide, but enough

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>users for it to be a problem. Fortunately, a patched

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>client and Skype's own instructions or workarounds would limit the problem,

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>but it did demonstrate that there were some issues here,

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and it prompted Skype to make a change to its

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back end infrastructure that would continue over the course of

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the following years. So way back when Skype was first introduced,

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it was built purely upon peer to peer networks, and

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in a peer to peer network every computer is equal

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to every other computer on the system. But by this

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>point Skype had designated some of its own servers, servers

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that Skype itself owned, as supernodes. These devices would feature

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>open connectivity and would remain online pretty much all the time.

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>This was meant to be kind of like the backbone

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of Skype service that while other computers might go up

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and down, these would be dependable and they would provide

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>additional stability to the overall network. But it would mean

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're kind of moving away from this more democratic

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>peer to peer approach, and you could say things got

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a little or Wellian, not nineteen eighty four, but more

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like animal farm, where you have a peer to peer

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>network in which all computers are equal, but some computers

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>are more equal than others. That's probably being a bit

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>too unfair, because the move was becoming necessary. The way

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we were using computers was changing. Before the smartphone era,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>we were depending on desktops and laptop computers to access

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and a lot of times we would just

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>keep those devices running even if we weren't actively using them.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>These were the computers that, when connected to a peer

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to peer network, would continue to share their resources with

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the overall system. It's what made peer to peer networks work.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But with the proliferation of smartphones, more of our computer

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>activity began to shift to mobile devices. We started to

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>use desktops and laptops less frequently, and we weren't always

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>keeping them online, and that meant that the peer to

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>peer network saw a decline in active nodes across the system.

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So if Skype had remained strictly a peer to peer service,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the actual performance of Skype would have steadily declined because

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fewer computers remained active in the network. There would be

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>fewer resources for Skype to use, and the service would

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>go downhill. So you could argue that this was absolutely

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a necessary move for Skype in order for the service

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to continue to work. Now, this didn't actually slow down

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's deal. They made the eight and a half billion

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar offer. The collection of Skype stakeholders agreed to that,

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and that actually would mean that eBay would get another

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>one point four billion because of its stake in Skype,

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and by my reckoning, that ultimately means eBay sold Skype

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>for somewhere in the neighborhood of seven hundred million dollars

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>more than what it paid for it, so again, not

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly the worst deal in tech history. Though also again

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not factoring in how much money eBay poured into

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Skype while it owned it, so it's not an apples

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to apples thing. But anyway, in this era, Steve Balmer

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>was in charge of Microsoft. Now, if you do not

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>know who Steve Balmer is, there's no shade on that.

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But boy, how do you need to go to YouTube

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and search Microsoft Steve Balmer and look for the greatest

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>hits of that man's performances on various stages at different conferences,

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because the word intense doesn't begin to capture that guy. Anyway,

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Bamber planned to integrate Skype into lots of Microsoft products.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Just like when Meg Whitman was in charge of eBay,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>she had intended to get Skype integrated deeply into eBay's

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>products and services. Balmer planned to do the same thing

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>over at Microsoft. So the plan was to to great

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Skype with things like the Xbox game console, with products

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>like Outlook mail, and potentially with Microsoft's Windows for Phones platform.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Most of that would not pan out, and some critics

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>would end up saying that this was classic Steve Balmer,

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that he was guilty of buying assets and then not

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>really knowing how to leverage them, like how to integrate

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>them or how to otherwise use them in a meaningful way.

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft did continue the trend of porting more of Skype's

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>back end operations onto Microsoft's owned and operated supernotes, So

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this was again kind of changing the nature of how

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Skype worked, like removing that whole peer to peer aspect.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>It was a very slow transition, however, this was not

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 1>something that was like one day they flipped a switch

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and everything went from peer to peer to kind of

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a cloud based system. It would actually take several years

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to complete, but it did mean that Skype would change

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>from peer to peer to cloud based ultimately. Now, one

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>semi scandal that kind of broke out around this time

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was that Microsoft was potentially making this change in order

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>to garner approval from US authorities. So you got to remember,

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>this is around the time that there were all these

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers coming forward showing that various authorities, primarily the NSA,

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>were using technologies to tap into different communications channels throughout

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States and were actively spying on US citizens.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is a huge, huge story and it involved

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>dozens of companies in the telecommunications and information services spaces.

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So the fringe theory was that Microsoft wanted to migrate

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>away from peer to peer networks because those systems would

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>make it impossible for folks to trace phone calls or

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to intercept calls, and that Microsoft was instead moving to

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>their own cloud based system because then they could comply

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>with law enforcement if there were in order to share

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>information about users. Now, the truth of the matter is

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Skype was never immune to tracking, at least not on

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:22.479
<v Speaker 1>a technical level, like it was possible. That doesn't mean

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>it happened, but it was technically possible. So the move

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.479
<v Speaker 1>toward a more cloud based infrastructure didn't mean that it

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>was suddenly more susceptible to that. It was just a

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>different approach. It also was a move that happened before

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had even acquired Skype, right, because when Skype was

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>still with the investor Group, they were already transitioning toward

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>a semi cloud based kind of infrastructure. So it's not

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft made that decision. They just continued that decision.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>But folks love a good conspiracy theory, and trust me,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like a flag waiver for Microsoft, but I

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>don't want to throw the company under the bus for

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>something that it really didn't do. The transition to cloud,

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>like I said, took years, It kind of wrapped up

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>around twenty sixteen. The change actually meant that Skype users

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>had to update the client that they were using to

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>access the service because the peer to peer based Skype

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>clients would not work with the new cloud based infrastructure.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>So Microsoft rolled out some new clients for folks to

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>download and use so they could continue to utilize the

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Skype service. Under Microsoft's ownership, Skype did get more complicated,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of analysts, at least in hindsight, say

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that Skype was bloated with features that did not really

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>contribute to the prime purpose for Skype. We see this

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot with different products, especially products that have a

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>very long lifespan, where over the course of a product's

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>life cycle, the developers will start to add in that

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really make a whole lot of sense. And part

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of it is just because you might reach a level

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of maturity with an app or service where there's not

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>really any further you can go with like the primary functions,

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like a word processor, you can always improve it, but

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>tends to be very incremental improvement, Right, So, how do

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you create a product that's different enough from the predecessor

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to convince people to buy it? You know, how do

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you get people to come out and buy a new

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>word processing program if they already have one. Well, you've

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>got to add in some features, and often that can

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that features that don't actually really incorporate into the

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>main purpose of the software get thrown in there, and

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that could just make things more messy. It could mean

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 1>that your performance will take a hit as well, and

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that apparently happened with Skype. At this point. I wasn't

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>even using Skype, so it's hard for me to say

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>from a personal level, but from what I've read, Skype

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>performance was taking a hit, and it was getting so

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>feature heavy. You know, the audio quality, the video quality

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>weren't really measuring up toward to what competitors were able

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to offer. So the one thing that Skype was really

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>important for, which was for voice and video calls, it

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doing as well as competitors. I Meanwhile, you had

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>all these other superfluous features being thrown in there, and

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there were still concerns about privacy and security with Skype.

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Part of the issue was that Skype's operations were proprietary.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were under wraps. Microsoft was not talking

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>too much about what actually was going on under the

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hood with Skype, and that included what part did encryption

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>play in Skype communications? Was it fully encrypted? But you

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>had other communications services that boasted end to end encryption,

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning that if someone were to intercept communications between point

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>point B, they probably wouldn't be able to tell what

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was being said because the encryption would prevent them from

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>doing so. But Microsoft wasn't even saying to what extent,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>if any, did encryption play with Skype Communications. And you

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>then had the opportunity for competing services to kind of

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>step and serve a community that was perhaps a bit

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about privacy and security. WhatsApp is a great

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>example of that. So WhatsApp was proving to be a

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>massive competitor to Skype, and it's funny because it didn't

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have the video and audio capabilities of Skype. Facebook actually

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>purchased WhatsApp in twenty fourteen for the princely sum of

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>around nineteen billion dollars. Again, the estimations of how much

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this deal went for it they changed from source to source,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>so somewhere in the neighborhood of nineteen billion dollars. Some

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of it have it actually significantly more than that when

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you add in all the different considerations, but let's just

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>say it was a boatload of money, and even more

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>money than what Microsoft paid for Skype right while by

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the following year, by twenty fifteen, wsapp was cited as

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the world's most popular messaging application. And while WhatsApp was

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>only text based, it did allow users to send messages

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to anyone all over the world without having to deal

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with text messaging fees or international fees, so it was

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a very affordable way to have communications. It wasn't even

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ads supported. The acquisition gave an enormous boost to Facebook's

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>daily active user numbers, and you know those were spread

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>out across all the Facebook platforms, which included Facebook itself, Wasapp,

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram. But Facebook had plans to integrate these like

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 1>there were. The big plan was, let's make an integrated

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>messaging service where it works on Instagram and Facebook and WhatsApp.

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>It would turn out that would be a lot more

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated than what Zuckerberg initially thought back in twenty fourteen,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but that was the plan. Kind of similar to how

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and even eBay had planned to incorporate Skype into

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>their own operations. Now, one big advantage WhatsApp had was

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that it sported a simple user interface, It worked, it

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was easy to understand, and it made everything work fairly smoothly. Meanwhile,

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Skype was continuing to get cluttered under Microsoft's ownership. While

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>WhatsApp was seeing adoption and use grow year over year,

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Skype couldn't quite boast the same. Now, overall number of

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>registered users on Skype kept going up, like it was

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>getting up to like two billion. By the time you're

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>getting to twenty twenty, However, the number of folks who

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>were actively using the service on any given day was

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in decl line. Okay, we're gonna take another quick break.

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, I'll talk about another complicating factor

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Microsoft's ownership of Skype. But first let's take another

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Okay. In twenty sixteen, Microsoft announced a new product,

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>one that would end up ultimately having overlap with Skype,

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and this product was Microsoft Teams. So initially, the Team

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>service wasn't intended to compete against Skype, because that wouldn't

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>make sense. Microsoft already owns Skype, there's no reason to

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>make a product that cannibalizes another of your products. Instead,

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Teams was intended to be a competitor against another service,

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that of Slack. See there was a time where Microsoft

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was considered making an acquisition move on Slack and offering

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a similar amount of money to buy Slack as it

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>did Skype, but Bill Gates was not in favor of that.

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>He was chairman of the board at this point. He

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was not CEO or anything, but he did not like

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea of Microsoft making yet another acquisition and potentially

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>finding itself in the same situation as it had been

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past, which is that it now owns another

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>company but is incapable of integrating that company's technologies into

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft services. Instead, he said, no, what the company should

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>do is develop its alternative to Slack and go into

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>direct competition. So the plan for Teams was to create

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a tool that facilitated internal communications within an organization. So

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it be Microsoft's approach to project management, communication and collaboration.

0:31:55.720 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>In twenty seventeen, Microsoft pulled the plug on Windows Phone.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>The company just could not make a dent in the

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dominant market presence of Android and iOS. They could not

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>gain market share. They were always in like the single

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>digit percentages when it came to the overall market share

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for smartphone operating systems on that were active on the market,

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and because they were having trouble getting adoption, it also

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>meant they were having real trouble convincing third party developers

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to make apps for the Windows Phone platform. And that

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes a cyclical issue. Right, you don't have people buying

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Windows Phone devices, which means you don't have developers making

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>apps for Windows Phone devices, which means you can't attract

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>people to buy Windows Phone devices because their favorite apps

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't available on it. So it just wasn't going anywhere,

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft made the painful decision to kill the platform

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and they bowed out of the space. There was tons

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of news about it in the tech circles when Microsoft

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>finally said, Okay, you know, we did our best, it's

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not working. We have to walk away. But this also

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>meant that one of the potential applications for Skype kind

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of faded away as well. One of the reasons why

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft bought Skype in the first place just never panned out.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got Zoom. While Watsapp was becoming the most

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>popular text based communications service Zoom was becoming a much

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>more useful tool for group calls, conference calls, that sort

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Microsoft had been building out Skype to serve

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as an enterprise tool for remote meetings. They actually had

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a Skype for Business tool, but Zoom was doing the

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And the difference was Zoom was staying relatively

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>slim compared to the bloat of Skype. Zoom had launched

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty eleven, and while it had a late

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>star compared to Skype, the service boasted better audio and

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>better video quality, and that the things that Zoom was

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>investing in were in support of that of audio and

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>video quality and connectivity. Those were like the things that

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Zoom was focusing on. Meanwhile, again Microsoft was Skype was

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of adding bloatwear to the service. This kind of

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>starts to bring us up to twenty twenty. Now, going

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.240
<v Speaker 1>into twenty twenty, Skype had around forty million active users,

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 1>but by the end of it it was down to

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty six million. Number. Go down is not what companies

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>want to see, so this was bad news for Microsoft. Now, Zoom,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, was pushed into the spotlight. The

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>service saw an unprecedented surge in adoption as various companies

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>had to jump on the platform in order to make

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>remote work a possibility. Remember, with the pandemic, companies all

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>around the world were to go remote, not everyone, but

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them, and to do that they had

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to rely on tools that would allow for communication between

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>teams and to let managers have those overbearing conversations with

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>folks that you feel could have been better expressed in

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>an email. Not that I'm speaking from personal experience, but

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>analysts would say that because Zoom was prioritizing features that

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>supported the very primary purpose of the tool, to facilitate

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>audio and video conferencing, it was winning out because Skype

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have a bunch of cruff built around it

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that not only didn't contribute to the main purpose of

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the tool, but actually seemed to detract from it. Then

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you had Microsoft Teams, their division were actually taking lessons

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>from Zoom and putting them to heart. They built in

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>video and chat features into teams, but they were doing

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it in a way where they were emphasizing video and

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>audio quality, and that was something that Skype just wasn't

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>really doing at the time. So Microsoft then pulled the

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>plug on Skype for business actually they did that in

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, and the decision was, let's focus on Microsoft

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Teams to fill that role for our enterprise customers, and

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Skype would be positioned to be more for one on

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>one personal communication between users. So it almost was like

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Teams is the corporate version of this tool and

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Skype is for the personal communications version. And the decline

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in that user base has led lots of people to

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>say Skype is essentially on the road to being obsolete,

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that it'll just be a matter of time before Microsoft

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>ends support for Skype, but that for the moment, enough

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>people are using it to justify keeping it around for

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a while. But who knows. It is possible that Microsoft

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>will find a new way to inject life into Skype.

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That could happen, or maybe Microsoft could spin off Skype

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the way that the plan had been back in two

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, but we'll have to see right now.

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe they'll even look to sell it to a

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>different owner. That's another possibility. But that's pretty much where

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Skype is today. Just kind of a crazy journey from

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a peer to peer network to a cloud based communications service,

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 1>one that could have been the pivotal communications service during

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, but because of various poor decisions, which is

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>easy to say in hindsight. I mean, at the time,

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they didn't feel like they were poor decisions,

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but in hindsight they are. It just means that Skype

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>was a communication service that some people used and most

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 1>people didn't. But I think it's still very important company.

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's actually on the road to

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>slow obsolescence and death. I hope it's not. I hope

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're able to find ways to make better use

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of it, because I think that there's a there's a

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>good story there, and it does play a very important

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>part for people who need to be able to communicate

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>with each other across the world and can't afford to

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>do that through more traditional telecommunications routes. So yeah, that's it.

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 1>That's the full full story on Skype so far. I

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoyed this pair of episodes, and I've got

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more stuff coming in the very near future.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>On next week, we've got an interview with a neuroscientist

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go up, and we've got another entry

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Ignobel Prize series, and of course tech News.

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So I hope you are all well, and I'll talk

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production.

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.