WEBVTT - Listener Q's: Talking Mice! 

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Creature Feature production of iHeartRadio. I'm your host

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of Many Parasites, Katie Golden. I studied psychology and evolutionary biology,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and today on the show we're answering your listener questions.

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right. You can write to me and I will

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>try my best to answer your questions about animals, about

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary biology, about psychology, and everything in between. You could

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>write to me at Creature Featurepod at gmail dot com.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's get right into it, Hi, Katie, listening to one

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of your earlier episodes on Rats. I am reminded of

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>this rats news from a few days ago with a

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>link to a YouTube video. Enjoy I guess smiling crying

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>face from jessec Hi Jesse, thank you for the cool video.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>This video is a nicely done summary by Anton Petrov,

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>which is is a recap of the study a humanized

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Nova one splicing factor alters mouse vocal communications published this

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>February in Nature. So let's talk a bit about this study.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So mice were genetically modified to have a gene alteration

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that is unique to humans, targeting a specific gene called

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>NOVA one, which, among other things, is a blueprint for

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the development of neurons in the brain, so all mammals

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have NOVA one, but there is a specific change in

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the amino acid sequence that seems to be specific to humans,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>even setting us apart from our close extinct relatives like

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Neanderthals. So researchers in the study use the Crisper

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gene editing method to introduce this human amino acid sequence

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>change into embryonic minds, and they found that, yeah, these

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>mice started talking and walking and dancing little top hats

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and singing about cheese. Well okay, so not exactly, but

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the findings were pretty interesting. So the mice that were

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>given this humanized NOVA one gene alteration had different vocalizations

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>both as babies and as adults. They had a higher

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>frequency vocalizations as puffs, so higher in the frequency in

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of higher pitched and interestingly, these higher pitched vocalizations

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>lessited less of a response from their mothers. So I

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>find this really important to point out because it really

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>shows how difficult it is for a massive brain changing

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>mutation to actually take hold in an animal, because it's

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not always going to be beneficial in a population. It

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>could just as likely doom this animal that has this mutation.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, right, if these were natural born mice,

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they might have more difficulty communicating to their own parents,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>their own mothers, and so if the mother doesn't properly

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>respond to its calls for food or alarm calls, that

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>might make the baby mouse less prone to survival. And

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so you could have a mutation that could potentially be

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>beneficial down the road, right, creating more intelligent mice. But

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>if in the shorter term it creates a situation in

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>which the mouse offspring are less likely to survive, that

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>mutation is not necessarily going to beneficial. So back to

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the study. As adults, the mice with this humanized nova

0:03:55.280 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one gene had more complex, high frequency vocalizations when attempting

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to communicate, especially when the male mice would attempt to

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>communicate with female mice to convince them to mate. So

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this is another interesting indication about how a mutation, where

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it in natural populations, might either positively or negatively impact

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the organism's chance of successful reproduction. Right. So, in birds,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, some species have evolved to have very complex

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>mating calls, which the females seem to appreciate because it

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>offers some signaling about the male's fitness mental physical fitness.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>The male has the resources, the time, and the intellect

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to memorize really long songs. So in mice,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it could be a situation in which these more complex

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>vocalizations actually elicit a better response from mates, or it

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>could be a worse response. Right the the female mice

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>may have no idea what the males are talking about

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>because they've essentially started speaking a slightly different mousey language.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So the human mutation of the nova one gene did

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not suddenly gift mice the ability to speak, but it

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>did alter their vocalizations, including possibly creating more complex use

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of syllables in adults, which is really interesting and it

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>does offer more evidence that this gene sequence might be

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>at least in part responsible for the development of human speech.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>It might also provide evidence that humans were genetically unique

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>from our Neanderthal relatives, which could mean that Neanderthals did

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not use language in the same way that we did.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>There are multiple theories about this. Some anthropologists and researchers

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and evolutionary cologists thinks that it might be likely that

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Neanderthals had some form of language, whereas others think that

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the human brain probably had a change in it, a

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>structural difference that was so profound that that is what

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>allowed us to form our complex language that probably was

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>different from There was certainly communication among Neanderthals and vocalizations,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but it may have been either a proto language or

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>something more simple than our language. So yeah, this is

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting addition to the evidence about how we

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>developed language. And I do know what you guys are thinking.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You're wondering if you could inject this gene into your

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>dog and get her to talk. So basically the answer

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>is no. First of all, it would need to be

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in an embryo, so you can't inject this gene into

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like an adult, fully developed animal and expect there to

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>be much of a difference. Secondly, our ability to speak

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>requires not just one genetic mutation, but an entire cognitive

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>framework that an animal like a dog most likely lacks.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So who knows exactly what this would do in say

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a dog, It may have no effect. It may have

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>some effect on their ability to bark or produce sort

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of different barking patterns vocalizations. It would not give the

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>dog the ability to speak, because a dog doesn't have

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of cognitive structures that human beings have

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that allow us to speak. So, for instance, our ability

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to nest concepts is really important in our ability to

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>understand language, and that might be something that's a little

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>bit beyond a dog. Could you, though, say, edit the

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>genes of a more cognitively advanced animal, like say an

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>elephant or a chimpanzee and give them more complex vocalizations

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and allow them to maybe eventually be able to speak

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>with each other over man, maybe thousands of years of evolution.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Ah, that's a solid Maybe I would say you

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>would just have to do some wildly unethical experimentation and

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>wait thousands of years. But you know what, never say never.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>All right on to the next listener email. Hi, Katie,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to drop a note after a recent episode

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>which discussed different ways of managing populations of animal shelters

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and possible regional differences in quote unquote no kill versus

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>other animals shelters. My sisters and I have both been

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>involved in animal rescue over the years, and my sister

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>has fostered numerous dogs, including a pregnant mama and assisting

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the birth of her puppies. She kept Mama pick attached

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for the tax. Thank you for that. It was very cute.

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's a consolation to know that there are

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>many rescues in my area, the Northeast, where no kill

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>shelters are more common, who specialize in pulling animals from

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>ones that use euthanasia. There's also lots of rescues that

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>pull from New York City Animal Control as well. These

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>rescues find dogs who are on borrowed time and get

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>foster commitments. Once there's enough, though, they send vans down

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to transport them up here so they can be saved

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and have good homes. Most that pull from far away

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have entire networks of transport drivers that travel in legs.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a small dent, but at least they can save

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>some A lot of the shelters the rescue we work

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>for are in the Carolinas, and we are in New York.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Not sure about other parts of the country, but it

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the area closest to us that has

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a big dog overpopulation issue in their public shelters. And

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this is from Caroline H. Hi. Caroline, I really appreciate

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you writing in and letting me know about these programs.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I love to hear that there's a network of limited

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>intake and general intake shelters, so also known as no

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>kill versus you know, euthanasia shelters. I think that's fantastic,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>especially when different states can work together to get animals

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to the homes that they need. It's you know, I

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>think that both shelters perform very important services, and the

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>fact that they can work together to try to get

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the dogs and cats to the resources that they need

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is wonderful, very beautiful. So just to share some stuff

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that I've learned being in Italy, there's a lot of

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>cooperation between shelters in the South and the North to

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>spread out the number of animals in any given shelter.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>In turn, there are huge numbers of dogs that find

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>their way to people's homes. And this city really loves dogs.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I've never been in a city that loves dogs so much,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which is great for me as a dog owner. Most

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and shops allow you to bring your dog given

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're well behaved. There are tons of pet welfare

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>laws on the books. It does kind of mean, actually

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of dog poop on the streets,

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>even though I'd say about ninety five percent of people

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>clean up after their dogs. There's so many dogs that

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>even the five percent of people who are naughty and

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>don't clean up after their dogs means that there's a

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>good amount of mess for the rest of us. So

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>people here also really love cats, so they're generally not

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>allowed outside here. In turn, there are even requirements from

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>shelters that balconies have to be kept secured so cats

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>don't accidentally fall out of their apartments. I have actually

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>seen cats on leashes on a surprising number of occasions.

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We've even seen a cat that was not on a

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>leash but was following his owner around very very dutifully

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and loyally. I've never seen that before, but that was

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty incredible. There was another one that was sitting on

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>its owner's shoulders while he was writing one of those

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>hoverboard thingies, so like the owner was riding the hoffboard,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>not the cat, the cat was sitting on his owner's shoulders.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>It was incredible to see, and I would be remiss

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't mention one of the most famous cat

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>shelters in Italy, which is in Rome, the Lago di

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Torre Argentina, which is near where Julius Caesar was assassinated.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>These are Roman ruins and the Torre Argentina Cat Sanctuary

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>has about one hundred and fifty feline residents who wander

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>around the ruins and are fed near this shed where

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>archaeologists used to store their tools. It started as an

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>informal arrangement where cats who would congregate there because it

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was a pleasant place for them to sun themselves or

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>sleep in the shade, would get fed by the locals

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and by the groundskeepers, and now it's become a more

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>formal situation. They work with vets to make sure that

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the cats are spayed and neutered, and visitors can come

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>donate to the shelter, buy little chotchkeys, and all the

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>proceeds go to benefit the cats. They can even go

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and meet a cat and adopt ones, so it's really

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>really cool. I actually I have been to Rome. I

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>have not been to this cat sanctuary, but I have

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 1>been to other ruins, and there are cats that like

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to hang out there as well. So they are just

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>rolling around sun bathing themselves, probably right on the spot

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>where Julius Caesar was assessed. If they fits, they sits,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>even if it's the side of a historical assassination. Hi Katie,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you for answering my questions and responding even when

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a question. Today, I do have a question,

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's about emperor penguin chicks. They are so adorable,

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but why, specifically, what is the evolutionary advantage for them

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to look the way they do, spinning their chick hood

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in the dead of an Antarctica with no natural predators. They

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have no need for camouflage, so why I certainly wouldn't

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>mind if they have evolved simply to be so darn cute.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>A side note, I had a similar question about pandas

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>in general until a recent documentary revealed that wild panda

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mothers would leave their babies on tree branches that perfectly

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>camouflage them to keep them away from male pandas. It's

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>uncanny and satisfying to see at the same time. Cheers Jesse,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Hi Jesse, this is a great question. So emperor penguin

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>chicks do actually have to worry a bit about predators,

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>though they might not be who you would expect. So

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>other seabirds do like to eat young chicks, like giant

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>petrels and skuas, so most likely the young penguins feathers

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>are designed primarily for warmth rather than swimming, so the

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>young penguins do not need to swim. Little babies don't

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>swim out, they don't go fishing. It's that's all their parents.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So their feathers are very downy. They're really fluffy, fluffy,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they're very fluffy. It's designed for warmth rather than being

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>able to swim, so that's their sort of baby down coat.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>In terms of coloration, the grayish white of their coats

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>probably helps the grayish white of their plumage probably helps

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>them blend in somewhat with their environment, while the black

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>on their heads and beaks and the little patch under

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>their chins give their parents a good target for where

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to deposit food and helps them identify them as a chick.

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>So the features that we find cute about the baby penguins,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like how their cheeks and eyes are surrounded by white feathers,

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that little black patch under their chin allowing their faces

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to be more recognizable, may also be in a way

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>cute so to speak, to the adult penguins, eliciting a

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>maternal or paternal response, helping them to recognize the chicks

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and making them want to care for them, so similar

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to how we find human babies cute and animals because

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>animals proportions can be similar to human babies and elicit

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that same sort of care taking response, that may be

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>achieving the same thing with the adult penguins. In a way,

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>evolving for cuteness is not a bad idea. That may

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be part of the reason they look this way. As adults,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they do need to change because they need to grow

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in feathers that are more that are more ideal for

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>swimming rather than for simply one they do have a

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>nice downy layer underneath their sleeker swimming feathers. They also

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>need to advertise their sexual maturity to mates, so they

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>lose their baby feathers that down and they molt, and

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>then they develop that striking black, white and orange coloration

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that emperor penguins are so well known for, which advertises

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that they are also now sexually mature. Their little tuxedo

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>suits might help them evade predation in the water as

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>well through the lightness of their bellies and the darkness

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of their backs, because there's this phenomenon where when you're

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>below something in the ocean and looking up, light is

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>coming down from the top, so if you're looking up,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>things are light, and so if something has a light belly,

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it'll blend in better with looking up through the light

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>filtering in through the top of the ocean, whereas if

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you're looking down, it's further away from the source of light,

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so it gets darker the further down you go. So

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you're looking down something has a dark back, it's more

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to blend in with the darkness of the ocean.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why things like penguins and orcas have that coloration

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>where it's dark on the top and then light white underbelly.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It's very striking looking to us, but it actually acts

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>as camouflage. The orange coloration, like along their beaks and

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>on their chests, is likely for sexual selection purposes. As

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, they want to advertise that they're sexually mature,

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they're ready to mate, and both males and females have

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>this coloration, which is typical for birds, especially who both

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>invest a lot in childcare. So, which is the case

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for emperor penguins, both the males and the females have

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>to tend the eggs take turns getting fish sitting on

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the eggs, so they both need to impress one another

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in order to mate, whereas in other species of penguin

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or in birds, where it's the female who primarily does

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>the care tape, then she needs to be choosier in

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of her mate, and that's usually where you get

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>this larger sexual dimorphism, meaning differences between the male and

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the female, where maybe the female is more optimized for

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>camouflage and the male's more optimized for showing off as

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>plumage and impressing a female. So in this case and

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>inmper penguins, they're both trying to impress each other while

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>also retaining some of that camouflage, and that's why they

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have both the stunning orange bands near their mouths and

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>on their chests. But they also have the black and

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>white coloration that helps them camouflage while swimming, which is

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>where adult inmper penguins are going to find most of

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>their predators while they're swimming. All right, last listener question,

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>plaid frogs. These pictures look fake. The lighting is too

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>perfect for the wild, and they are all taken at

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the same angle and distance. Are these AI generated or

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>are there actually a species of classy dapper frogs out there?

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And then this was followed up by a quick email

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>that said, disregard that last email plaid frogs. I'm ninety

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>eight point four six seven percent sure that was an

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>April fool's joke. This is from JR. S. I won't

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>disregard this email because I see this all the time

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>where there's I mean, obviously this was an April fool's joke,

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's so many AI images out there now of

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>animals that are meant to deceive rather than just be

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>a fun April fool's prank, and I find it frustrating

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>because real frogs that actually exist have incredible skin textures

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and colorations that don't look like they should exist. So

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>now it feels like people may see something really incredible

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>or real frog and go like, ah, that might be AI.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So let me give you some examples of some frogs

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that might look like they are AI creations, but they

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>absolutely exist. One of them is the glass frog, which

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is found in Central America. There's a few different species

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of glass frogs, but in general, they have skin that's

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>so transparent you can actually see their organs. The translucency

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is so that they can camouflage against the leaves that

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>they sit on, so basically, you know, they have a

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>invisible camouflage mode, which is incredible. When they're asleep, most

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of their blood is concentrated in the liver, leaving them

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>mostly colorless and translucent, so they can be safe from

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>predators while they're at rest. When they're awake and their

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>blood is flowing, they're a little more not I would.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They're still translucent there, but there's more color to them

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can see them a little more clearly. Of course,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there's poisoned dart frogs that are absolutely beautiful, have amazing colorations.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>You've probably seen these before. They're the frogs that have

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the really bright coloration. Most of them are very very toxic.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are mimics of the toxic and dart

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>frogs so they can get some advantage. So some of

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>my favorites just by looks are Zimmerman's poison frog found

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in Peru, which has these beautiful black spots and mint

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>green and yellow sort of reticulations. It's really really pretty.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Also in Peru is the red headed poison frog, and

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I like this one not just out of solidarity as

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a fellow redhead, but because it looks like half of

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>its body got dunked in sort of an orange glaze,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>while the bottom half is reticulated blue and black. So

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely stunning. And something that's not a poisoned dart

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>frog but is really really pretty, at least during certain

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>periods of the season is the Indian bullfrog. The males

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>turn bright yellow during mating season, and their vocal sacs

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>are this bright blue, so when they're inflated, they look

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:56.479
<v Speaker 1>like these bright blue balloons attached to this lemon yellow frog.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>It's really really pretty, really cool to look at. And

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>then if you ever if you want to look at

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>online for Indian bullfrogs, you can usually find videos of

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>these guys in huge clusters, a bunch of them loudly

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>making their call and trying to find a mate, so

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>really amazing. So there are some really cool frogs out there,

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're not AI generated, which can be frustrating, but hey,

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what, if you ever see something and you're

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>because AI is getting better and better and it gets

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>easier and easier to be fooled bite, especially because there

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are genuinely really cool animals out there that do look

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like they might have been generated by AI and you

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>can't tell the difference and you want my help with it,

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>just go ahead and email me. You can email me

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>at Creature feature Pod at gmail dot com and I'll

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>help you figure out whether an image is real or not,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>or a hoax or whatever it is. And if you

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have any questions, you can also email me and I

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>will do my best to answer them. Thank you guys

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening. And if you're enjoying the show

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and you leave a rating or a review, you know

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that that helps me in that does improve the metrics

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the show. I don't know algorithms. We're all ruled

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>by computers. Now. Soon the AI frogs will take over,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and I, for one, I don't know if I welcome

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>them because they look too smooth. It's creepy. I don't

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like it. Anyways, guys, thank you again for listening and

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll see you next Wednesday.