WEBVTT - Leading Off July 8th, 2024 (Ep.858)

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Bros. MLB.

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 2>This is Leading Off Live, brought to you by Bet

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>three six five Bet fipcuks get one hundred and fifty

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and bonus bets when you use the promo code leading

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Off at Bet three sixty five.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>It is me Joey p That of course is the Welsh,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's you the Peanuts, the Cracker Jacks.

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>On a Monday morning, it's hazy, hot and humid here

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>in New Jersey, and as always it's just plain old

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>hot where the Welsh is.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>But we're gonna have some rain this week, so I

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 2>gotta get the pool in today, Welsh. Today, I told

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the kids, I'm going swimming whither or what out you

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 2>get in that pool because it was like rain the

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 2>rest of the days to come this week. But this

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>weekend was fun for baseball action. Garrett Cole laboring through

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven degree weather here in the New York area.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Don't hunt me because it wasn't great start. He was

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>with Garrett Cole.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 3>How did Louis heal?

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Do Louis yesterday? He did better?

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>You still trust him for the next one hundred and

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 2>fifty from I don't or fifty innings and.

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I trust no one. I trust absolutely no.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, so this is great. You basically got a

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>gift from Louise Heel. So let's start there with the headlines. Welsh,

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>he was good, Raphael Devers two home runs in that

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>same game, nine strikeouts for Heel, six and two thirds,

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>no walks, which is interesting because again he is second

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>only to Tristan mackenzie and walks this year forty eight

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 2>to Mackenzie's forty nine. So in terms of active pitchers,

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>he is the leader. So I think he'll gave everybody

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 2>a gift, which is he gave him a really good

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>start before the All Star break to get out from

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>under Louis Heel. Do you see things differently.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that might be the case. I'm willing to acknowledge that,

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 3>like I took my l already of being like, you know,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 3>screw it, Louise Heel is going to be this and that,

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>like the innings are, they're clearly putting something onto him,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 3>like he is clearly wearing down in some type of capacity.

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>The Yankees haven't given us a full clear path of

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>what they are going to do, which I think that's

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 3>what leaves it the most muddy and those muddy kind

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 3>of ideas are also going to be something we're going

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>to focus on here in a little bit with another guy.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 3>But would I would say, from Luis Hill's standpoint, if

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 3>you get past the like is it going to go

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to bullpen and blah blah blah, this is what we

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 3>wanted to get back. I think we I had mentioned

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 3>the last couple starts it has been just his zone control.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 3>It's it's really like a lot of these guys, and

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I talked about this actually on CBS last week with

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Christopher Sanchez. Christopher Sanchez had been incredible, but he gets

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 3>all of his strikeouts on like one primary off speed

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>pitch and then it's like, you know, a sinker in

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 3>a fastball that doesn't do much. If you don't throw

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the fastballs in the zone, you're not setting anything else

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>up and you won't get the case. And he was

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>just and heel had just been. When he's in the zone,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>it's dead red middle people are slamming it. This was

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 3>a start. He was almost sixty percent zone fastball, forty

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>seven percent slider. And that also really shows you, Okay,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>that slider it's going to give people fits of the

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty four that he ended up throwing, fifteen of them

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 3>were either foul offs or called strikes, which I think

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 3>is pretty impressive. So he ended up having twelve cald

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 3>strikes and whiffs on the slider thirty three percent with

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 3>rate and everything was up in that start fastball a

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 3>full mile per hour, slider a full mile per hour.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's getting set to take that next stage and

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 3>gear up a little bit. Yankees are gonna need him

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>unless they're gonna go make a big move, and I

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 3>don't think they do. So I am still a tiny

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>bit optimistic that the heel is done. Thing might be over.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>But you might need to look. This might be a

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>good opportunity to get out if you are. If you're worried,

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 3>and you kind of should be a little bit, you should.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Be a lot of bit. I will say this way.

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>We disagree on one thing here, which is the Yankees

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>won't go get somebody else. The Yankees will The Yankees

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't move make this move for Sodo here with no

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>guarantees to not push the Chips into the middle.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>I meant big. I don't think they're gonna go make.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>A O I do.

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who it's going to be yet those

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>pieces of yet to follow, those dominoes.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it a bat or is it a bat or

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a picture? To you, I think it's a pitcher first

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and foremost. I think that is really what they have

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to do.

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>They need insurance here for multiple things, and they needed

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was on air live on Saturday during

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the Garrett Cole start. Joe Vernier and I were doing

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>that game live for Sports Grewed, and you know we

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>were talking about you know, he was up to fifty

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>pitches in the second inning. Basically it was just like geez,

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, just inefficient. But I give a lot of credit.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>He labored through. He did not throw in the towel.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>The Yankees Ben Rice carried him in that game. Two

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>home runs for him in that game. That was a

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>must win. You need to win those games where Garrett Cole, right,

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Cole needs to. You need to win those starts

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>when Cole's on the mound right now, because that's how

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>you stop the bleeding of this losing streak that the

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yankees have been on. Frankly, another streak. Speaking of streaks,

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>all time great Jose Miranda all time record twelve consecutive

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 2>at bats, twelve consecutive hits.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 2>Royce Lewis goes down Byron Bucks didn't picks them up,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 2>and Jose Miranda picking them up. Brooks Lee our guy

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 2>also picking them up too. He's been very good, so

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Lee another guy in this mix.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's okay.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 2>It was just for a minute. It's just a blip

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 2>on the radar. It's hot here. I told you the

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 2>internet it's being weird today. But don't worry. No puppets here,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>No puppets. But what I was saying was, Jose Miranda is, uh,

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, buyer bucks to those guys. Brooks Lee carrying

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the torch here with Royce Lewis being out, but how

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 2>long can this last?

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>For this Twins lineup?

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I was completely caught off guard by that.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't even puppet Joe it because I was like, oh,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that's me, but it was you. So I

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 3>apologize to everybody that was ready for puppet Joe there,

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and I wasn't ready for it. I was looking to

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 3>drop the ball, dropped the ball, he did not. I

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 3>was a year early on Jose Miranda two last year

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 3>the talk up of just what a great hitter this

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>guy was, and nothing came together last year he ended

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>up hitting two to eleven. There was no power to

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>speak up. This is the version of the minor league guy.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if people remember, like Jose Miranda was

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 3>a menas I believe it was in twenty and twenty two,

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 3>an absolute menace in the minor leagues. And he's coming

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 3>back and showing those skills so far this year. Obviously

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>over three years, career high expect A batting averages up

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to two ninety one. He has a forty one percent

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>hard hit rate, which is four percent higher than last year.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 3>His k percentage is down to thirteen percent, and he

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>is barreling the ball again. I tell you all those

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>things because those are great metrics to just hone in

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 3>of the baseline of who this player is. The other

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 3>really incredible thing he is hitting over three hundred against

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 3>every single pitch type. So that's a big thing you

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 3>want to focus on. How pitchers are going to end

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 3>up adjusting to a guy and he's kind of smashing

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 3>everything right now. He just makes really really solid contact.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 3>He's getting the ball up in the air more as well.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Ten degree lunch angle last year, fifteen degree this year.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 3>We talked about him month or so ago and said, hey,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 3>this is a guy that he's going to get more opportunity.

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 3>He is hitting well, we should pick him up, and

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>he's found his I cannot get over though, and I

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know how I'm gonna do this in the offseason.

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll figure something out. But like you know, how we have,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>like you know, the rookies that get hot and then

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you have like the sophomore slumps. There's this new version

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>of like it's of how it's laking three years. It's

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's late bloomers, but it's this three year

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>thing that's starting to happen where guys into their third

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>season who have not clicked start to click. And I'm

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 3>not really sure how we measure that outside of getting

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 3>back to previous prospect pedigree to guys that surprised us,

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>that struggled. Not all of them are doing it, but

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 3>we have seen a handful of players after a couple

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 3>of years. I mean, the league is also adjusting like

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>differently every single year. But either way, Miranda, it's a

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 3>great buy. Everyone's getting hurt. He sticks in, hits the

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 3>absolute crap out of the ball, awesome points league guy

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and a really good categories player Jose Miranda, probably top

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>one hundred player rest this season at this point.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Lee had a home run in that Saturday Game

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>two against Hunter Brown.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah Hunter Brown, by the way, that kind of came

0:07:57.920 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>back to roost after he'd been so good.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It was finally the first bat start has had a

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>long time to reach.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Can It'll be great.

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It can, I'll be great, you know.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>And his home road splits are not the best too,

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>so maybe we'll give him a pass on that. To

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Rescooball incredible thirteen strikeouts, seven innings for him, Jose Burrios

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>ten strikeouts, six innings against Seattle, Seattle, obviously without Julio Reguez.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>More on that later in the show. Grayson Rodriguez eight

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts of his own, three innings, excuse me, three runs

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and six innings for the Orioles against the lowly A's,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 2>And it looks like the Cubs might be selling off.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Apparently it's not just Nico Horner, but Cody Bellinger, as

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned, that would be a big piece. Jameson Tyon

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>could be out there too. Bellinger would be a big

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 2>piece for somebody to add. If on the Mariners, I'm

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>knocking on that door right now. You're the Mariners. You

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 2>got to be first to market here, because you can't

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>wait and then compete with the Orioles prospects or the

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Yankees prospects potentially they can put together, or even the

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 2>maybe even the Dodgers too, So you don't want to

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>compete with the big boys. Now is the time to strike.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>If you are indeed thinking that the Cubs are putting

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>those names.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Out there, I'm so likely I'm probad, probably annoying about this.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 3>So over the weekend the fourth, definitely over the holiday weekend,

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I did a couple hits over on CBS, and I

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 3>did this on both of those shows, and I've been

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 3>kind of doing this in general. I'm hyper focused on

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the team that's going to rip the band aid off

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the trade market because there is because you're like, oh,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Yankees are gonna make a big trade. There's only so

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 3>much on the market, and there's only so many teams

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 3>that are willing to consider selling, and there are so

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 3>many teams that have the assets to buy. And you know,

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I brought up the Yankees too, on what side you

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 3>thought they were going to buy because like, not only

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 3>they've been like top ten in ERA on the year,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 3>top ten and hitting, like both sides have been great.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>They have the highest i think our third highest run

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>differential scoring on the season. Blah blah blah. But like

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 3>they could use a rotation piece, and they could use

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>a hitter. They've outside of Judge and Sota, they've got

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 3>so many guys that are lacking and they are set debt,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 3>second to last in MLB and stolen bases. That's why

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm bringing this all back guy like Nico Horner to me,

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>would actually make a ton of sense for a team

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>like the Yankees. Obviously it's gonna make sense for a

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>team like the Mariners as well. But that's the problem

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 3>is all of these teams could use these pieces. I

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 3>think the Cubs would do very well to put some

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 3>of these pieces out of the market. Tie On would

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 3>be a Savale like pitcher that you could put out there.

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>But Bellinger and Horner they could corner the market. While

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 3>these other teams, like the White Sox, there's rumors the

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 3>White Sox might hold Robert till the off season, or

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 3>the Vlad and Bishett stuff. The Cubs could be the

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 3>ones that could set the price, and I agree teams

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 3>should be calling Bellinger's not having as good of a year,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>but matter he would be great in either one of

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 3>those lineups. And Horner specifically, I think would be really great.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 3>Mariners and Yankees stand out to me for his.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Yankees would too.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>That'd be funny they they trade glabor tourists for him

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and they could swap back after all those years.

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 3>That would be funny. Obviously, I was thinking the same thing.

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Back to the Cubs.

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 2>All right, the All Star rosters are complete, basically American League.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 2>You've got the starters, Rutchman, Guerrero out to Ve, Josier, Mirrors, Gunner, Henderson,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Judge Kwan thinks. See Kwan in there made me really excited.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Juan Soto and Alvarez. By the way, our special is

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be airing next week to our fantasy All

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Stars for twenty twenty four. A lot of the same

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 2>names here, maybe a few different. And then on the

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Nation League side, William Contreras, Bryce Harper, hopefully you'll be

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 2>able to play. We'll see fingers crossed, can tell Marte,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Alec Bohm, Trey Turner, Trey Turner, I mean ridiculously even

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>play the first half is so dumb Jackson, Profar Tattis

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Yelich and Ol Tommy. When you roll down to some

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>of the pitchers here, Tyler Anderson his second All Star game,

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Anderson's expected ERA is like seven thousand, his FIP

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 2>is eight thousand.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable.

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>But what else could they have done?

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Nothing like I spoken of Tyler Anderson. But if there

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>isn't a bigger cell high at the break, candidate, I

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know who who is here?

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 3>You know what, here's a tease the trade video. We're

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna do the trade stuff we're gonna do. Here is

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 3>an All Star edition. I started this with Tyler Anderson.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 3>If this was built around.

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Barns, Class Crochet, Gilbert your boy All Star, Clay Holmes, Tanner, Hawick,

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Seth Luga who totally deserves it, leading the league by

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the way tide and wins lean league and lead league

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:15.599
<v Speaker 2>and era unbelievable, Mason Miller, Cole Reagan's, Treik schoobl and

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Kirby Yates. And I see a couple Kansas City Royals

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>pitchers on it. How about that on the National League side?

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Glass now Helsy Hoffman, Imanaga, Lopez Sale, Scott Skeens, which

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 2>is going to be super fun. Hopefully he gets to

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>pitch in that game. Strum Suarez, Ranger and Robert and

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>then Logan Webb and Zach Wheeler so Welsh. I think

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>for me, the fun thing here is Skeens. Can you

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 2>get Skeens an inning in the All Star Game? I

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>hope we do. I don't know how the rotations line

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 2>up or anything. I haven't looked ahead yet, but that's

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>good for baseball. I want Paul Skeens on that mound

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 2>at some point. That's gonna be electricity in that building.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Any thoughts here maybe on Trey Turner being ridiculous as

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the starting shorts.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I can give you two. I can give you two

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 3>snubs Francisco Lindo or someone said in the chat huge

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 3>snub and I think the biggest one and call me

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 3>a home or not. But Christian Walker Pete Alonzo made

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 3>it in over Christian Walker. Christian Walker is literally beating

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 3>him in every single category out there that the Diamondbacks

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Twitter world is losing their mind. Pee Alnzo not deserved

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 3>to take that over Walker. With Harper coming out, that's

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 3>probably either going to open up a spot for Christian

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Walker or Lindor. But I thought those two were like

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 3>the really the biggest snubs of not making it. And

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I will just reiterate one last time. I will talk

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot about how much I hate fan voting in

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 3>All Star Games. I think it's embarrassingly stupid. I think

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 3>more than ever, or just because it's right now, the

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 3>getting one representative of each team is so stupid, Like

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Anderson is an All Star?

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Is Tyler Anderson do?

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 2>However, I will say this Welsh, I think that is

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 2>another one of these pieces from a bygone era where

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you didn't get to see the American League. If you're

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 2>a Nation League fan and you didn't have the Internet,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 2>you didn't have all these things. It was cool to

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 2>see guys from other teams like it was a big deal.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 2>As a kid growing up in the early mid eighties,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 2>it was really cool to see those guys. I gotta

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>watch the Yankee Games too. I was lucky I lived

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 2>in New York, so you would see those American League

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>guys more. But you ever saw him in your ballpark.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 2>You didn't really watch a whole lot of them. So

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>if you're a Mets fan and vice versa of your

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Yankees pants. It was cool to see, you know, a

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>guy from the Angels, a guy from this team.

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, that was neat.

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you. You're an All Star or you're not.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 2>This one representative is kind of dumb at the end

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>of the day. But it's it's all right. I can

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>live with that. That's one of the old guard things

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I can still live with at the end of the day.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not gonna live with all of it because

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't care about the All Star Game, like everyone

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 3>gets and they're like.

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I love how angry You're like, you don't care about

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame, you don't care about All Star Game.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>You're funny.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>You're a funny baseball fight in the sense it's like

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>big ticket items that Welsh's like, I.

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Hate the things that get people work there that they

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 3>want to fight about. I don't care. I don't care

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 3>about Like there's gar.

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to this stuff.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>But no, maybe a little less confrontational, more confrontational when

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 2>it comes to trades. Let's talk trades with Welsh for

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Week sixteen. Welsh, who are the guys you want to

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>get rid of?

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, who are the guys you want to get on

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 2>your roster as soon as you can?

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, this is an All Star edition of the

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Trade Talk. Here, I've got three names. These are all

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 3>players that made the All Star Game. But I am

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 3>going to present I'm gonna do a little bit of

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 3>a phishing and farming for your interactions here with this

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>first one. This is similar to what we talked about

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 3>with Garrett Crochet. So let me present this for a

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>tiny talk, and then I will just give you the

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>three names that I think you can trade four or

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 3>away at the All Star Game. Here is my presentation

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>to you for the All Star Game. Should we and

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 3>can we trade Paul Schemes, trade four or trade away?

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I know it's been a big question all season long.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Now I have a couple scenarios I'm gonna throw at you.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 3>But let me give you some good and some bad

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>of things. You guys already know. The good on Paul Skiing,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>who by the way, absolutely deserves the All Star bid.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 3>The good and ten starts this year two really just

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 3>like a barely over to era, which has been phenomenal.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 3>He's gone six innings in more in eight of his

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 3>ten starts, He's gone six or more innings apologies, in

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 3>eight of his ten starts, which is crazy, crazy for

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 3>any starter at this point, but a rookie. Nonetheless, he

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 3>struck out seven or more in all but one start. Fifth,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>best K percentage in baseball since June first, and a

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 3>million other nice things that you know. Here's the bat

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>on Paul Skins. The Pirates are now ten games back

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 3>in the Division, four and a half games back in

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 3>the wild Card, which isn't horrible, but they're fourth right now.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 3>If they fall out, the second big worry is going

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 3>to be the innings cap starting to stare at us

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 3>in the face. This guy had one, I mean really,

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest storylines when he got drafted was

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 3>his usage in college. We now see a big usage

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 3>happening here. If they're out of it, he's in the

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 3>All Star Game values up. I think it's something to consider. Also,

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 3>a little stat I thought was interesting. Since June first,

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>he has the highest left on base percentage in all

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>of baseball ninety seven percent. A lot of that is

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>to like his skills and his talent, but that's a

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 3>regressional standpoint. There are two players in that period of

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 3>time who had over ninety and number two is ninety

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 3>one percent, So you know he's been incredible. But the

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 3>idea here is, like you've mentioned with Heel, if they're

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 3>out of it, are we going to lose some of

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 3>how aggressive they've been. He's going deep into games. His

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>pitch count is that also.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Is not going to be around for weeks again or days.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be weeks.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess they're saying we're waiting to get him back.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Another thing I'll throw on with Skeins too. First time

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 2>through the batting order forty one percent k rate, second

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>time thirty percent k rate, third time twenty six point

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 2>nine percent k rate. So stamina already within games is

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a bit of an.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Issue for Skiings.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 2>So if he's sorry the thing, the walk rate goes

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 2>up second time through the order from four percent to

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 2>seven point.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>As most do.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the one thing that he has going for him

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 3>is the adjustments of fastball to splinker, and I think

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>that keeps people live. But here, so here's the question,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 3>and I ask you guys in the comments below, whether

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 3>you're watching live or you're watching this after the fact,

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 3>let us know are you a buyer in the sense

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 3>that he's going to be a top ten sp rest

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 3>of season. He is performing at that level, and boy,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna have some great off season questions. Or is

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 3>this the time he made the All Star Game? Pirates

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 3>are still kind of in the hunt a little bit,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 3>and they have said they're not looking to like shut

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>shut him down. Those are a lot of things that

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 3>work into building this value, so real quick, and then

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll present a couple of scenarios, Joe, are you a

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>buyer he will be top ten rest of season? Or

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>are you selling where he is performing as a top

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 3>five spece. So let's say you're trading him away and

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>you're getting the asset of a top five to eight

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 3>type of pitcher. You're trading away or you're selling him

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 3>in the top or you're buying him in the top ten.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 3>So you can buy or sell schemes. And I'm not.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Making fine where the lume is a ten. I mean,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that's just easy for me.

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I have concerned about Again, this is somebody who's played

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>in the More Points League.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 1>There's playoffs world.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 2>That era that's upcoming soon in August into September scares

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 2>me a little bit with Skeens. Now if it's season long.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Rod that's a different story. I'll probably take my lumps

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>with schemes. That's that's where I'll be in.

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 3>And maybe I think it's you know, in those worlds

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of kind of a good way to say it,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Like in Rodo, I think schemes out.

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Strike out in quality peripherals where I don't think it matters,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Like I think you even take some of the dip

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 2>if you need it, or if it get shout down,

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 2>it gets shot down, You'll live with that because he.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Gave you so much already, so you think you take

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it for the next six weeks.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise, if you're in anything that's got head to head

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 2>in it where there's playoffs, to me, that's the one

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>where I'm a little scared. Like if you asked me,

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 2>would rather have like Sureser or Paul Skeins August First,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna hate this answer.

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>For most people, it's probably sures are.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow, see that's not even okay. So I'm gonna

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 3>present a couple to you and then we'll go that's

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 3>actually shocking to me, Yeah, because like I I mean.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 2>The guy who's still got a high strikeout rate. I mean,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I know he's older, but he's gonna be pitching for

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the Rangers or a team that decides they are contending.

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>If the Rangers decide that they're not.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 3>It's more than you said August, like if you would

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 3>have said September. I don't know, maybe, but August first, Like,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I still like Scheme's talent is not my big question here,

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's risky. And that's why I'm bringing

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 3>this up. And I'm dying to get your guys' take,

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 3>So put good takes on the comments. We can talk

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>about it this week. But I'm not making the case

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 3>from a talent perspective. You move off. I'm making a

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 3>case that I think there are some of those.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Worries and there's a lot of griz.

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna still go schemes on the outside, but I

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 3>get close. Okay, So here, So here are the two

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 3>trades I want to give to you real quick. You

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 3>can do this with Skeins. Let's say, who would you

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 3>rather have? Rest of season? You got to get out,

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 3>like what your need is? Would you rather have Paul

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Skins or would you rather have Ellie.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I'll still take Ellie.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that there's always massive swings with Ellie where

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 2>if he gets hot, he carries your whole team, everyday

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 2>player of that ilk first round time.

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree. And if he is at the level

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>of top five right now, that might be something you

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 3>can often would you rather have ski if you could

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 3>trade schemes to get Kirby and Alec Bohm? What would

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you do?

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>What side Kirby and Boem?

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and let's play the head to head take Kirby

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 3>and Boom too.

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Effact? I like that. I think that's a really good value,

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So those are the things I'm thinking of. So

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 3>when I bring this up, not hating think about capitalization.

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.479
<v Speaker 3>Where he is an All Star, he's at the tippy

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 3>top of his game. Everything looks incredible, and the pirates

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>are still kind of in it. This might be absolute

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 3>maximizing in the trade world. But let's see what you

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 3>guys have to say in the comments and we'll bring

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 3>it up later this week. All right, Joe, I got

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 3>three other All Stars we can look at trading four

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 3>or away, trading away Shota Imanagata. Since since Shota, since

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 3>June first, he's got a five RA he's actually been

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 3>better than that. But it's still a three point nine

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 3>to two X fit in that period of time, so

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 3>that high three to four ERA range that I've been

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 3>talking about. Also his batting average against two seventy nine

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 3>in that period of time, which is the twelfth worst

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 3>among qualified starting pitchers, and I talked about that. I

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 3>will say this will this cannot sustain as Paul schemes

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 3>from June first on ninety seven percent left on base

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 3>percentage show, it's a fifty eight point five percent left

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 3>on base percentage, which is sixth worst among all starting pitchers.

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 3>And he's not walking guys too, So that's a lot

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 3>of hits that I mean, that's a bad number that

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 3>will positively regress, but I don't know how much. I

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 3>think it might be a decent time to look at

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 3>moving off of Imonaga as the second half goes on.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Two players i'm buying that are all stars. I am

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 3>buying Pittsburgh Pirates Brian Reynolds on the year two eighty

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 3>four average five stolen bases, which is a very Reynolds

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>like season. The sixteen homers he's got those are an outlier.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 3>But since June first, as my marko, I'm using today,

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>he's hitting three forty six with nine homers and a

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>fifty one point one percent hard hit percentage. He has

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 3>been phenomenal. I still think he kind of like falls

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 3>under that line of excitement that people have. Brian Reynolds

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 3>is an All Star that I'm buying, and here's a

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 3>struggling All Star who made it. One of those that

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>you could question, how did they make it? Marcus Simeon

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 3>with the Texas Rangers. I mean, he made the All

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Star Game despite hitting two thirty two. The twelve homers helped,

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>but on the year he has just a two forty

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 3>one babbit. Again, positive aggression is coming in, which is

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 3>about forty points lower than his career, fifty points than

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 3>last year, and since June first, he has the league's

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 3>fourth worst babbit at two oh four. So what I'm

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 3>giving to you here is there's massive positive aggression that

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 3>plays in and he has been traditionally a second half player.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 3>He has hit twenty to thirty points higher in the

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>second half throughout. Rangers have talked about selling. I don't

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>think they will. A lot of the underlying stuff is

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 3>still there. I think you can buy Marcus Simeon on

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the cheap right now and that would be a guy

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 3>that I am looking to pick up two all stars

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>to trade for one to trade away. And what the

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 3>hell you guys doing with skeins, that's what looking at.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>And those are the guys moving and shaking for talking

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.239
<v Speaker 2>trades with the Welsh for a week sixteen. All right,

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 2>let's have a little fun. We'll run through some fun things,

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>some nuggets. Ueno Suarez three for four. Oh, maybe he's

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna be another week or so, is a Diamondback by

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the Diamondbacks can trade him away. Maybe somebody's desperate

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 2>for a bat. They could send him back to Seattle too.

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Corbyn Carroll home run his first since May seventh. Edwin

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Diaz weird day for him. So he pitched an inning

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 2>and a third against the Pirates. He allowed a hit,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>a walk, struck a guy out, blew a save, but

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>end up getting a win. So weird day for him.

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Heston kirsted rookie lookie, three run homer for him. Brooks

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Lee two for four with a run scored after a

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 2>big day of the day before. He's hitting four to

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>seventy four so far as a Major leaguer.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Three up and three down. Christian Yelich three for four

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>with a homer and a double. Bobby Witt got me

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a dinger. D Yeah, I guess head, let's go.

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Witt and Berdy Singer limited the Rockies to one

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>run over seven three down. Dallas Kaikeel no stranger to

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 2>this list. He is not the answer Brewers, he is

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 2>not the answer for I walks at four and a

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 2>third the brew crewe again pick up dial Hall. I

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 2>told you last week. I'm telling you again, you better

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>do it. Ezekiel Tovar hitless for the month of July,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 2>another zero for four with three ks.

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>He was on my cell list just two weeks ago.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's looking like a good one too, because they said, look,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>there's nobody around this guy hitting either. And Tovar's numbers

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>are eventually going to come back down to earth a

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 2>little bit, and they have Cody Bellinger maybe asking for

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 2>an out. He's zero for four yesterday to for a

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 2>second straight game, so not good against the Angels. Injury notes,

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned Jared Jones before when we're having that discussion

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>about Paul Skeins, He's gonna be weeks away still. According

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>to the Pittsburgh Pirates, Carlos Correa who had been red hot.

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 2>He told reporters on Sunday he expects to return for

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the Twins on Monday, so that's a big get for them.

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Nicolodolo throwing a bullpen session this weekend, that's positive. Labor

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Torres was not in the lineup yesterday dealing with that

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 2>groin injury, so he needed a blow for his groin

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 2>injury that he's dealing with. I guess freezing and timing

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 2>is everything, Welsh. Anthony Rendono could be back today. Are

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 2>you excited about that return? Welsh h I'm as excited

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 2>as he is. Jack Flaherty, who could be a piece.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that a lot of teams might go after

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I could see the Yankees going.

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 3>After Flarerty absolutely.

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Thursday.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>He is back to start apparently against the Guardian, so

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>close eye on that. That's gonna be a huge start

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 2>here for the Tigers and for Flaherty. If Flowerty looks good,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 2>goes six innings, gives up two runs or something like that,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 2>you better get on the horn and put him out

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 2>there on the block and see what you can get.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Now at the time to strike, you don't want a

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 2>setback with that back issue. Devin Williams remember him. He's

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna throw a live bullpen session on Tuesday. We'll let

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 2>you know how that goes. Clayton Kershaw with a shoulder

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 2>two simulated innings on Sunday. So far, so good, no

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 2>ill effects. The MRI on Julio Rodriguez Is quad showed

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>no structural damage and Blake Snell back on Tuesday against

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the Blue Jays. He's been doing with a groin two

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 2>but that quad issue. The whole Julio season has been

0:26:59.040 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>just misery.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Welsh.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a guy who had thirty homers and one

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred RBI last year. That Seattle's got to do something soon.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>But I look at Julio as a fascinating by low

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>in keeper and Dynasty leagues too, because it's been so wretched,

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 2>so bad. This might be your window, and I'm buying

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 2>he's still so young, with so much upside.

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Welsh.

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I think this is your this twenty twenty four window,

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and Julio might be shutting soon.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>At some point. I want to buy him in those

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>keeper leagues. What do you think about that?

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think this might be one of the better

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 3>times to buy big talent in Dynasty because you know,

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 3>Kunya's hurt you. You're mentioning Julio has been down ticking

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Corbyn Carroll has kind of fallen apart. I do think

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 3>a bigger question is going to be about, like what

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 3>does this mean to the long term. Here's what I

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 3>will say, and what I mean by that is like

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I think Corbyn Carl's changed. I don't know if this

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 3>is going to fix. I don't know if it's a

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 3>shoulder which everybody keeps going about. We saw the one

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 3>swing he had this weekend which looked vintage Carol, that

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 3>was taking a high pitch up and out and showing

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 3>that power won awaight off. That bat looked beautiful, but

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 3>he still can't be consistent. I don't think we are

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 3>gonna get huge, big power output Corbyn Carroll again. I

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 3>think he's gonna have to maybe change a little bit

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 3>as a player, where I don't think Julio has changed.

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 3>So I'm bringing this back to say, like I'm actually

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 3>a buyer still on Carol because it's so ridiculously low.

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I need Julio to be lower, but I don't think

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 3>there's a ton in the profile that is like freaking

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>me out that I like he's hitting breaking pitches worse

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 3>this year, but a lot of the underlying stuff is

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 3>still there, so I think the talent can bounce back.

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Not a lot of lineup support. Been a weird year,

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 3>but yes, I completely agree. I'm buying on.

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't get a talent this young, this good that's hit

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>rock bottom like this, Carol.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know if he's out of the top

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 3>ten for anybody though, that's the problem.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I you know what, I don't know, man, I it

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>was pretty bad this year. You're probably right, most people

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 2>will have discipline. But if somebody doesn't, or if somebody's

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 2>got him and is about to make a run for

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 2>a championship too, maybe you can offer them, you know,

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 2>an overpay to get him on your roster for the

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 2>future and say, hey, go in a championship.

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Give me Julio. I think this is time to do it.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 2>It's also time for the best bets of the day

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 2>with Joey p and the Welsh. Make sure you place

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>your bets at Bet three six five, Bet five bucks

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 2>get one hundred and fifty and bonus bets when you

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 2>use the promo code leading off only at Bet three

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 2>six five, And of course, if you have a gambling

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>problem called one hundred gambler or one hundred bets off

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 2>in Iowa terms, and the conditions apply Welsh. Kind of

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a weird day on the slate, so I'm gonna hyper

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 2>focus Chrissale on the mound for the Atlanta Braves minus

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 2>one and a half on the run line.

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Are those Braves at minus.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 2>One ten, Joey like, even though it's on the road

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 2>against Arizona. Chrsale has been absolutely fantastic. The sale props

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.239
<v Speaker 2>were a little juice today, So I'm staying away from

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the individual stuff with him. But in that same game,

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I am gonna look to matt Olsen over on the

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>RBI point five at plus one point thirty. That's a

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>big number there for matt Olsen. Give that to me,

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>let him drive in a run today, and then I'm

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna look at Ellie de la Cruz. I like, two

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 2>bets on Ellie today. You got even money on the

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>over one and a half total bases against the Rockies

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>today and over point five steals over the half steal

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>there at plus one point fifty five. He's got more

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>than thirteen steals than anybody else in Major League Baseball.

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So give me.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Ellie to get those total bases, get the stolen bases,

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>doubling down on those two at good money too. Those

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>are my best bets of the day. But Welsh, what

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>are yours?

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you, it's a weird day and there's

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 3>not a lot. We actually have some similar things. It's

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 3>been a great week though. It has been a phenomenal

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>week from my downtick back up bettingpros dot com slash

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Welsh if you want to check some of them out.

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I've found a good stride on some stuff that I like.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Right now is the year changes, but today if so,

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.719
<v Speaker 3>back to what you said, we're kind of hyper focused

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 3>in some similar games. I'm also going to back the

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Braves against my Diamondbacks. Gilbert Diaz is going to be

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 3>making his major league debut for the Diamondbacks. I will

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 3>say he is a fascinating arm to pay attention to.

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 3>He was one of the leaders in double A strikeouts.

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 3>He's got a big, old nasty curveball. Might be deceptive

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 3>early on, but I'm a little bit worried about like

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 3>young control issues. He's also like really like rocketed up

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the system. He's going against Sale. I'm gonna back the

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Braves and Chris Sail through the first five innings. To

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 3>be up by a run money line is not in

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 3>play here. But if they are up by one run

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 3>through the first five, it's minus one twenty five. That

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 3>is a play.

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I love my first fives as well. I'm gonna play

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 3>a first five money line bet. We are going to

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Abbott and the Cincinnati Reds first five money line,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 3>pairing it with Gavin Williams in Cleveland through the first

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 3>five money line. They're both doable solo, it's just a

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 3>little too juiced. But if I pair them together, I

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.239
<v Speaker 3>get almost two to one plus one ninety four. So

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing both of those first fives first fives a

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit easier than the money line, of course. And

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I laughed when I saw this on the sheet because

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't believe, you know how, Like I don't go

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 3>nuts into like the individual hitter player props. I went

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 3>straight to Ellie Daily Cruz today and I was like,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna play some Ellie. I like the matchup. I

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 3>like what we can get out of Elle. I actually

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 3>looked straight at the stolen base numbers. It's really juice

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 3>though for a stolen base. I don't hate it, but

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with you on the total bases. It's plus money.

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 3>It's even plus one hundred for one point five over

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 3>total bases, and that is what I am playing with Ellie,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 3>not a lot else. I'm probably gonna add to the

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 3>weird slate here, and I want to be careful starting

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 3>out the week because I've been on a good run.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 3>But you guys can always check it all out betting

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 3>pros dot com slash Welsh, Bettingpros dot com slash Joe

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 3>and download the Betting Pros app to check out all

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 3>of our bets.

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>On what we got.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, Welsh, why Langford thing we talked

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 2>about a couple of weeks ago, or it was plus

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty five hundred, it's two to one now it's two

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 2>to one.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Last I look, he was tied with It was him

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and him and Heel were like the exact same odds.

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I think I haven't looked today. I wouldn't be surprised

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 3>if Langford maybe took that over.

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you bought in at twenty five hundred and

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 2>you bought in again at six hundred, like we told you,

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 2>you're a very happy camper right now. And that's why

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you follow us, and that's why you watch, and that's

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 2>why you subscribe to the Betting Pros channel, and of

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>course to this channel as well, Fans Pros MLB.

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And those are the best bets.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Of the day for Monday. All right, Well, sh let's

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 2>take a look at the home run board over the weekends.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>See if I'm still hanging on.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I am.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm right there there, twenty four still alive. Thank you,

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Wit. You had to wait till Sunday to hit

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 2>a home run in Colorado. I told you it's a

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 2>weird day, Welsh. So again, not gonna try to go

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 2>too many places here, Ellie de la Cruz, I'm already invested,

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 2>so let's just go with Ellie.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Where are you going for your home run call today?

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna go Ellie too, but you took him,

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 3>and I don't want to ride with you because it's

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>not gonna I ride with you. Yeah, So I'm gonna

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 3>jump back over and I'm gonna go h Jose Ramirez

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 3>for the day. I'm tempted to go with a brave

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 3>you know what, No, I'm switching it now. Jmerez is

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 3>guarantee he's gonna hit one. Guaranteed he's gonna hit one.

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna go with Austin Riley. Austin Riley on the

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Homer today.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Here you go, and don't forget. Everybody do something good.

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Go to fantasypros dot com slash MLB review.

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen so many reviews.

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 2>And one of them again five star review. Somewhere fantasypros

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash MLB review. One of you is gonna

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>win this Orlando Cabrera jersey from the old school Montreal

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Expos Man. I wish the Expos were still a team.

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to expand and go back to Montreal. That's

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna go. If you're gonna expand bring baseball back

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to weird ass Olympic Stadium, that would be fantastic.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Welsh.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back tomorrow, but we got a meeting to

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 2>go to, so we're gonna go work for a little bit.

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is play. We hope you're having fun here on

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 2>the channel again. Subscribe drop your comments below. We all

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 2>have to hear from you. A great conversation today about

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Paul Schiens and a lot of other things too.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us. But the story of the

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>game goes on. For the Welsh, I'm Joey P. We'll

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kids, All Star games coming. Welsh

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:46.720
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB