1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:13,760 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. 3 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:17,079 Speaker 2: We are less than twenty four hours away from the 4 00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:21,240 Speaker 2: announcement on US reciprocal tariffs. They will go into effect immediately, 5 00:00:21,720 --> 00:00:24,599 Speaker 2: and still there are a lot of questions over how 6 00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 2: this is going to roll out, exactly what it will 7 00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:30,200 Speaker 2: look like. Right now, we're seeing markets in Asia behave 8 00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 2: a little skittishly ahead of this announcement, small declines in 9 00:00:33,880 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 2: Japan and South Korea. And in a moment we'll hear 10 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,560 Speaker 2: from Jeff Grills. He is the head of em Debt 11 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 2: at Agon Asset Management. But we begin in the Lion City. 12 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 2: Joining me now is Bloomberg FX and rate strategist David Finnerdi. 13 00:00:47,800 --> 00:00:51,479 Speaker 2: He joins from our radio studio in Singapore. David, it's 14 00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:53,519 Speaker 2: always a pleasure. Thank you so much for joining us. 15 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:56,680 Speaker 2: Give me your sense of what you're looking at, what 16 00:00:56,800 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 2: you're monitoring most closely as you try to gauge the 17 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 2: pack that these tariffs will have on markets. 18 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:05,880 Speaker 3: I think if I had to pick one thing specifically, 19 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:08,560 Speaker 3: it would be the equity market. So let's look at 20 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:10,800 Speaker 3: the benchmarks's to be five hundred or of the Nasdaq, 21 00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:13,480 Speaker 3: which everyone you want ten personally prefer this to be 22 00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 3: five hundred. 23 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 4: But I think. 24 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:19,039 Speaker 3: That's the little blometer of you know, how much risk 25 00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 3: on or risk of sentiment will there be. And I 26 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:24,840 Speaker 3: think that will permeate its way through whichever way it 27 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 3: goes into the country markets and into the rates markets, 28 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:32,200 Speaker 3: so and the markets, you know, the equity markets digest 29 00:01:32,440 --> 00:01:35,319 Speaker 3: information very quickly, indeed, so you know. 30 00:01:35,319 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 4: Where they end up. 31 00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 3: I have to say that we're going to get the 32 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:42,440 Speaker 3: tariffs in your Asia time. It will be Thursday morning 33 00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:44,720 Speaker 3: our time, so are come in. We'll see the reaction. 34 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:46,560 Speaker 3: But I think it's the key thing to remember, and 35 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:49,200 Speaker 3: this is this is sort of a game of I 36 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:49,960 Speaker 3: don't want to say game. 37 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:51,080 Speaker 4: Because obviously it's not really a game. 38 00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:55,840 Speaker 3: But in the tariff theater, shall we say this is 39 00:01:55,880 --> 00:01:59,480 Speaker 3: stage one? And when I mentioned that is because there's 40 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:01,560 Speaker 3: a very good chance you'd have to think that other 41 00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:03,920 Speaker 3: countries maybe or but at least some of them, say 42 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:07,680 Speaker 3: Europe and China will retaliate to some degree. They've done 43 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:09,600 Speaker 3: that historically, so you think they will do it again. 44 00:02:09,760 --> 00:02:12,440 Speaker 3: And then the question becomes, okay, so they retaliated what 45 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:14,720 Speaker 3: does President Trump do next? And his history has been like, 46 00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:16,200 Speaker 3: well I'm going to go and I may even go 47 00:02:16,240 --> 00:02:19,040 Speaker 3: even harder, so and then they go, So you've got 48 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:22,000 Speaker 3: it spiral. So the question, I think, certainly for the 49 00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:25,600 Speaker 3: markets is how high, how long? How high did taris 50 00:02:25,639 --> 00:02:28,680 Speaker 3: end up going? How long are they in place? Because 51 00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:31,360 Speaker 3: we also know historically are they could be in and 52 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,280 Speaker 3: then kick that can down the roads President from they 53 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:38,519 Speaker 3: say or as exceptions blah blah blah. So that's the idea. 54 00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:39,880 Speaker 3: Really at the end of the day we're trying to 55 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:42,520 Speaker 3: grapple with is how high do his tatisk go and 56 00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:45,160 Speaker 3: how long? And obviously but the higher is worse for economy, 57 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,000 Speaker 3: and obviously the longer in place is the worst for 58 00:02:47,280 --> 00:02:51,240 Speaker 3: all economies. So you know, tomorrow is the start, i 59 00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 3: would say, of a process. So whatever market reaction you 60 00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:58,320 Speaker 3: get tomorrow, that may certainly just be the beginning of it, 61 00:02:58,360 --> 00:02:59,400 Speaker 3: depending on how this plays out. 62 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:01,639 Speaker 2: That's a very good point. Up until this point, there 63 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,959 Speaker 2: have been very few details, and what we are being 64 00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:07,200 Speaker 2: told at this point is that there are a number 65 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 2: of proposals under consideration talking about it. Maybe a tiered 66 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:14,679 Speaker 2: tariff system of some type, another option would be some 67 00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:18,560 Speaker 2: sort of plan for customized reciprocal tariffs. But it was 68 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:21,560 Speaker 2: very interesting to me, not really a big surprise, but 69 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:24,000 Speaker 2: one of the FED speakers that we heard from today, 70 00:03:24,040 --> 00:03:27,120 Speaker 2: Tom Barkin of the Richmond FED, was saying these tariffs 71 00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:31,080 Speaker 2: could raise both inflation and unemployment. So this creates an 72 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 2: enormous challenge for the FED. It seems like it's a 73 00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:37,040 Speaker 2: stagflation type scenario. We've talked a little bit about this 74 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:41,360 Speaker 2: in the past. Is that idea penetrating fixed income markets 75 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:43,040 Speaker 2: right now? Are you seeing it play out in the 76 00:03:43,040 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 2: bond space. 77 00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 3: I think that you're seeing generitely some fears of the 78 00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:51,720 Speaker 3: stackfation word. I think it could become more and more prevalent. 79 00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:54,120 Speaker 3: I mean, even if you look at the data IS 80 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:58,560 Speaker 3: data that came out yesterday on manufacturing, it's slightly down ticks, 81 00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:01,440 Speaker 3: you know, and there's more of a services economy with 82 00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:04,240 Speaker 3: a US but still in manufacturing is are a key component, 83 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:08,240 Speaker 3: so the overheadline downtick. But within that that price is 84 00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 3: paid index jumped higher. So there are signs of statflation. 85 00:04:12,800 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 3: I don't think were they yet, but are we on 86 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:16,479 Speaker 3: the path to that? 87 00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:17,200 Speaker 4: Definitely? 88 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:19,920 Speaker 3: And I think you're seeing that to some degree because 89 00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:22,719 Speaker 3: the market's going Because the FED is a dual mandate, 90 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:26,599 Speaker 3: you know, it's based control prices and support growth, and 91 00:04:26,640 --> 00:04:28,839 Speaker 3: the market's going off are two of those. You're going 92 00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:31,120 Speaker 3: for growth. And the reason we say that is if 93 00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 3: you look at the market expectations Fed rate cuts, now 94 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:37,240 Speaker 3: there are price then three this year, even though the 95 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:39,400 Speaker 3: prices you could say inflation has been a bit sticky. 96 00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:41,960 Speaker 3: Look at the core PCEE data from last week. That 97 00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:44,600 Speaker 3: was a bit sticky. The price is paid as worry 98 00:04:45,240 --> 00:04:47,360 Speaker 3: the market's going to We think the Fed's going to 99 00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:50,279 Speaker 3: classical and goes can support growth, which it may well do. 100 00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:53,040 Speaker 3: What's interesting that the Fed, though, if you look at 101 00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 3: it's rhetoric, they're not going jumping out fully in line 102 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:00,520 Speaker 3: with that. They are keep indicating how we are worried 103 00:05:00,520 --> 00:05:03,240 Speaker 3: about inflation. So they are a bit more hawkish in 104 00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:06,159 Speaker 3: the market. It doesn't mean they won't converge towards the market, 105 00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:08,480 Speaker 3: but at the moment it's centually they are more hawkish. 106 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:12,159 Speaker 3: Sorry to fully answer your question, is because those FED 107 00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:15,200 Speaker 3: rate cut expectations, you're seeing those feeding so you're seeing 108 00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:18,479 Speaker 3: pressure on yields. Now, of course, if equities were to 109 00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:21,160 Speaker 3: come under pressure as a result of these tories. Again 110 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:24,280 Speaker 3: that's an if, but if they were or further pressure, 111 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 3: I should say, then obviously you would expect the flows 112 00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:29,000 Speaker 3: into bonds, which again will push yields even lower and lower. 113 00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 3: So those two things combined you are starting to see 114 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 3: play out. Which one is the bigger like fed's gone 115 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:38,480 Speaker 3: slash or it's just worried about growth. It's a bit 116 00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:41,120 Speaker 3: tough to say, but overall, yes, you are seeing some 117 00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:46,000 Speaker 3: worries in the bond market of basically slowing growth moving ahead. 118 00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:47,440 Speaker 2: So I want to get your take on what you're 119 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:51,040 Speaker 2: seeing in terms of currency market action, whether the dollar 120 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:54,360 Speaker 2: is a beneficiary of everything that we've talked about, maybe 121 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:56,800 Speaker 2: there's a little bit of haven buying in the Japanese end. 122 00:05:56,839 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 2: What are you seeing? 123 00:05:57,800 --> 00:05:59,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's a good point actually, because it's 124 00:06:01,080 --> 00:06:03,200 Speaker 3: you would see the dollar and the end and the 125 00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:06,280 Speaker 3: Swiss frank the classic safe havens benefit in these risk 126 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:09,760 Speaker 3: of scenarios. What you have seen is over last week, 127 00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 3: the SMP obviously is weakened, as we all know, but 128 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:16,440 Speaker 3: you haven't seen really a bounce of a dollar that's 129 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:18,880 Speaker 3: been heavily sort of range bound. 130 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:21,280 Speaker 4: So you're not seeing those natural flows. 131 00:06:21,279 --> 00:06:23,360 Speaker 3: Now, again, some of that could be distorted by a 132 00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:26,240 Speaker 3: month end and quarter and positioning, so you've got to. 133 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:26,840 Speaker 4: Factor that in. 134 00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:29,680 Speaker 3: But certainly you're not seeing it as much as you think. 135 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 3: And I think some of the catch could be. One 136 00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:34,919 Speaker 3: of the things is if I'm President Trump and I 137 00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:37,960 Speaker 3: do tarifs on one country, because US is a bigger economy, 138 00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:41,600 Speaker 3: you go okay, And even if the other country reciprocates, 139 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:44,640 Speaker 3: you go, well, US still will growth be less impacted 140 00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:47,760 Speaker 3: because it's a bigger economy. The catch here is we'll 141 00:06:47,800 --> 00:06:50,720 Speaker 3: find out tomorrow, but it looks like that the US 142 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:54,000 Speaker 3: will be doing tariff on numerous countries, if not sort 143 00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:56,000 Speaker 3: of all the countries. Now a question is that of 144 00:06:56,200 --> 00:06:59,360 Speaker 3: all the countries retaliate, then suddenly that's like okay, that's 145 00:06:59,400 --> 00:07:02,479 Speaker 3: a big impact on US growth, And arguably it could 146 00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 3: end up being a bigger impact depending on how this 147 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:08,760 Speaker 3: all plays out. So the growth theory of We've entered 148 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:11,360 Speaker 3: this year with the idea of US was in a 149 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:15,160 Speaker 3: better growth performance, and say Europe, that's all those dynamics 150 00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:17,600 Speaker 3: now changing. And one thing I would definitely keep an 151 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:20,800 Speaker 3: eye on is the Euro and definitely the end because 152 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:22,600 Speaker 3: I think the en will benefit. Event you had to 153 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:24,720 Speaker 3: pick one currency for me, it would be the end 154 00:07:24,840 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 3: because if you've got say favor and foes benefits from that, 155 00:07:27,600 --> 00:07:30,680 Speaker 3: if you've got equities downflow, you know, going down, then 156 00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 3: that will go money into bonds, which uses you were 157 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:36,679 Speaker 3: saying straight. So in a straight differential, you know again 158 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:39,760 Speaker 3: narrows and favors the end. So risks are skewed towards 159 00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:42,480 Speaker 3: yen's strength. I would say in a risk of scenario 160 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:45,440 Speaker 3: by also keep an eye on the Euro because obviously 161 00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 3: it looks like one would guess that President Trump will 162 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:50,680 Speaker 3: announced its on Europe. You'll have a history saying well, 163 00:07:50,720 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 3: let's go for it, we'll play, will reciprocate, and historically 164 00:07:55,200 --> 00:07:57,480 Speaker 3: you're weakened. But in the moment, the sentiment it's more 165 00:07:57,480 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 3: biased towards actually. 166 00:07:58,680 --> 00:07:59,800 Speaker 4: You may win on this. 167 00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:04,000 Speaker 3: Some of there's obviously to do with the German infrastructure 168 00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:07,360 Speaker 3: spending bill that they've announced, but again that takes time 169 00:08:07,400 --> 00:08:09,960 Speaker 3: to fee thro but the again market sentiment will go 170 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:11,960 Speaker 3: we're going to run with it. So I would be 171 00:08:12,040 --> 00:08:15,440 Speaker 3: keeping an eye on how the Euro performs, and I 172 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:19,360 Speaker 3: think that's another barometer of the dollar because and also 173 00:08:19,640 --> 00:08:22,400 Speaker 3: the is the biggest component in the dollar index or 174 00:08:22,440 --> 00:08:26,480 Speaker 3: the Bloomberg Dollar indix. So really where the euro goes, 175 00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 3: you know, that's sort of where the dollar goes in 176 00:08:29,360 --> 00:08:30,160 Speaker 3: the opposite direction. 177 00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:32,600 Speaker 2: Obviously, I got to get your take on what's been 178 00:08:32,640 --> 00:08:35,560 Speaker 2: happening with the Chinese currency offshore, the yuan right now 179 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:38,640 Speaker 2: at around seven twenty seven, seven twenty eight. Do you 180 00:08:38,679 --> 00:08:41,160 Speaker 2: have a sense of where this may go from here, 181 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:45,520 Speaker 2: particularly if there is greater tension between Washington and Beijing 182 00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:47,080 Speaker 2: on the tariff story. 183 00:08:47,440 --> 00:08:49,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, Look, I think the risks have to be towards 184 00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:52,640 Speaker 3: a WEEKI one, I think a slow grinding you one. 185 00:08:52,679 --> 00:08:54,840 Speaker 3: I don't think the PBOC is in any hurry to 186 00:08:54,920 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 3: let that fix loosen. Everyone's looking for seven to twenty 187 00:08:57,360 --> 00:08:59,600 Speaker 3: in the fix as the line, and sand I think 188 00:08:59,600 --> 00:09:02,160 Speaker 3: it's some point it will gradually ease past that because 189 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:05,160 Speaker 3: it is a few methods of valve you can really 190 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:07,360 Speaker 3: steam off and support the economy on. 191 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:09,679 Speaker 4: But I you know, I don't think this would be 192 00:09:09,720 --> 00:09:11,160 Speaker 4: a rapid appreciation at all. 193 00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:14,319 Speaker 3: And I think certainly initially China may stand its ground 194 00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:16,880 Speaker 3: and go, look, we're keeping the fix in a narrow, 195 00:09:17,120 --> 00:09:19,720 Speaker 3: tight range just to show like, hey, we're not going 196 00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:22,240 Speaker 3: to use that cuncy in the end, I think it will, 197 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:24,280 Speaker 3: but certainly in the near term. 198 00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:25,600 Speaker 4: I wouldn't be surprised. 199 00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:27,880 Speaker 3: If I said that wicking that fix stronger than seven 200 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:30,199 Speaker 3: twenty in this seven seventeen seven eighteen range. 201 00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 2: Okay, David, good stuff, We'll leave it there. Thank you 202 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:35,080 Speaker 2: so much. David Finnerdy there. He is Bloomberg FX and 203 00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 2: rate strategist, joining from Singapore here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. 204 00:09:45,600 --> 00:09:48,640 Speaker 2: Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. 205 00:09:49,080 --> 00:09:52,600 Speaker 2: Towards the night before tariffs and all across the globe, 206 00:09:52,840 --> 00:09:55,640 Speaker 2: not a market was stable and the message was simple, 207 00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:59,800 Speaker 2: mind your risk. So much from my poetry. Joining me 208 00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:02,640 Speaker 2: now Jeff Grills. He is head of em Debt at 209 00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:05,480 Speaker 2: Agon Asset Management. Jeff, it's good of you to join us. 210 00:10:05,520 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 2: Thank you so much. There are a lot of issues 211 00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:10,200 Speaker 2: for markets to consider right now, not the least of 212 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:13,719 Speaker 2: which is the uncertainty tied to those tariffs. So how 213 00:10:13,720 --> 00:10:16,960 Speaker 2: do you understand the risk landscape as it stands right now? 214 00:10:17,440 --> 00:10:21,199 Speaker 1: Well, with regard to emerging market debt, we've seen very 215 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 1: balanced flows and very balanced performance. I mean when you 216 00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:27,680 Speaker 1: look at what spreads have done so far yere to date, 217 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:30,679 Speaker 1: they're wider by fifteen to twenty basis points, which in 218 00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:36,319 Speaker 1: the grand scheme of historical emerging market debt volatility or 219 00:10:36,400 --> 00:10:39,160 Speaker 1: uncertainty is pretty benign. And I think a lot of 220 00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:42,000 Speaker 1: that's driven by the fact that there is this uncertainty, 221 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 1: as you mentioned too, what are the tariffs going to be? 222 00:10:44,280 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 1: How bad will they be? There's indications that they're on, 223 00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:49,680 Speaker 1: they're off, and so the market. But the good part 224 00:10:49,720 --> 00:10:52,960 Speaker 1: is that nobody has really reacted irrationally in our market, 225 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:55,559 Speaker 1: or at least had this massive risk off sentiment to 226 00:10:55,679 --> 00:10:56,960 Speaker 1: em markets. 227 00:10:57,280 --> 00:10:59,680 Speaker 2: I was speaking earlier about what we heard today from 228 00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:02,360 Speaker 2: Human Fedbank President Tom Bark, and he was saying that 229 00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:07,040 Speaker 2: tariffs could raise both inflation and unemployment. We're talking about 230 00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:09,960 Speaker 2: a scenario here that feels a lot like stagflation. What 231 00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:12,720 Speaker 2: is the probability in your view of that type of outcome. 232 00:11:13,040 --> 00:11:16,160 Speaker 1: So it's definitely a possibility, and I think that those 233 00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:19,960 Speaker 1: comments were reflective of the recent announcement by Trump to 234 00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,199 Speaker 1: say that he would, instead of doing country by country 235 00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 1: in case by case, just a universal across the board 236 00:11:25,520 --> 00:11:28,480 Speaker 1: twenty percent terra and so that would have I mean, 237 00:11:28,920 --> 00:11:31,320 Speaker 1: that would have from things we've read and the work 238 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:35,040 Speaker 1: we've done, have a pretty reasonable chance of causing unemployment 239 00:11:35,040 --> 00:11:39,320 Speaker 1: to go up, causing inflationary impact, although there is still 240 00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:43,120 Speaker 1: this concept of it being somewhat transitory. But the big 241 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:45,840 Speaker 1: question in terms of your probability is what's the likelihood 242 00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:47,400 Speaker 1: they're going to do that right? And I think you're 243 00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:50,360 Speaker 1: already starting to see some you continue to see toned 244 00:11:50,400 --> 00:11:53,520 Speaker 1: down rhetoric from the administration, from some of the other 245 00:11:53,559 --> 00:11:56,040 Speaker 1: people that work in the White House. The real big 246 00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:58,960 Speaker 1: question is going to be how far do these tariffs go. 247 00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:00,560 Speaker 1: It's not if terriff is to come on, it's going 248 00:12:00,640 --> 00:12:02,480 Speaker 1: to be how far they go. And when you really 249 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:04,920 Speaker 1: look back at the Project twenty twenty five plan, which 250 00:12:04,960 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 1: has been a lot of the underlying basis for the 251 00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:11,280 Speaker 1: actions that we've seen so far this year, there is 252 00:12:11,320 --> 00:12:13,400 Speaker 1: a clear desire to see the trade balance or the 253 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:16,559 Speaker 1: trade deficit improve. So will that all be done by ferris, 254 00:12:16,559 --> 00:12:19,600 Speaker 1: could be done by other types of activity, that's to 255 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:22,160 Speaker 1: be seen. So I don't think it's a high probability 256 00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:24,160 Speaker 1: at this stage, but it's definitely possible. 257 00:12:24,440 --> 00:12:26,680 Speaker 2: So I'm curious what is the impact that you see 258 00:12:26,720 --> 00:12:28,600 Speaker 2: now for emerging markets. 259 00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:33,120 Speaker 1: Well, again, merging markets has been going through an interesting 260 00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:36,800 Speaker 1: transition for the last five years, right really post COVID 261 00:12:37,400 --> 00:12:40,280 Speaker 1: one where you know, pre COVID, the markets were very 262 00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:43,440 Speaker 1: reliant on China. China was the big driver it was. 263 00:12:43,520 --> 00:12:46,000 Speaker 1: That was true for really the global economy as much 264 00:12:46,040 --> 00:12:49,400 Speaker 1: as it was emerging markets. And since post COVID you've 265 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:53,760 Speaker 1: had a China property sector which has been weak growth, 266 00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:57,719 Speaker 1: which is being stimulus driven but still not but the 267 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,560 Speaker 1: high single digit double digits that we had pass and 268 00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:02,920 Speaker 1: those days are behind us. So I think the emerging 269 00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:06,800 Speaker 1: markets are going to be better insulated, better situated given 270 00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:08,199 Speaker 1: what's going on, and it's going to be on a 271 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:11,520 Speaker 1: case by case basis. So even with Mexico, we've seen 272 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:15,080 Speaker 1: terifts be announced and then be modified so that the 273 00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:18,839 Speaker 1: USMCA rules still are in effect. So I don't anticipate 274 00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:21,400 Speaker 1: it being too big of an impact from a tariff standpoint. 275 00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:23,640 Speaker 1: If we do get to that recession or a very 276 00:13:23,640 --> 00:13:27,040 Speaker 1: severe slowdown, then naturally they're all going to get be impacted, 277 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:29,000 Speaker 1: as they do export a lot of their goods and 278 00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:30,360 Speaker 1: services to the rest of the world. 279 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:32,760 Speaker 2: I'm curious as to whether or not you're seeing any 280 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:36,960 Speaker 2: safe harbors. It was interesting that yesterday a senior lawmaker 281 00:13:37,120 --> 00:13:39,319 Speaker 2: of the ruling party in Japan was warning that these 282 00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:43,400 Speaker 2: tariffs may cause a big economic crisis for Japan, particularly 283 00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:46,720 Speaker 2: when you consider the auto tariffs that would have huge 284 00:13:46,760 --> 00:13:51,200 Speaker 2: implications across many regions in Japan. Are you finding any 285 00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 2: area in global markets right now where you're seeing some 286 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:55,400 Speaker 2: type of haven. 287 00:13:56,240 --> 00:13:58,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, Haven's maybe a little bit of a way that 288 00:13:58,520 --> 00:14:00,520 Speaker 1: I wouldn't quite describe it, but I do think that 289 00:14:00,679 --> 00:14:04,200 Speaker 1: interesting enough there could be safer bond investments in some 290 00:14:04,240 --> 00:14:05,800 Speaker 1: of the emerging markets. Then you get in even the 291 00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:10,400 Speaker 1: developed markets, and with one caveat, we still are tied 292 00:14:10,440 --> 00:14:13,079 Speaker 1: to US treasuries, right, So if you get that inflationary 293 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:16,800 Speaker 1: stagflation type of scenario, rates go higher, which leads to 294 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:20,400 Speaker 1: to negative returns. There's really not gonna be anybody who's immune. 295 00:14:20,680 --> 00:14:24,280 Speaker 1: But from a spread perspective, there are very high quality 296 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:27,000 Speaker 1: names in this universe that you can take advantage of. 297 00:14:27,320 --> 00:14:31,240 Speaker 1: Middle Eastern credits like Cutter Kuwait. They're actually being taken 298 00:14:31,240 --> 00:14:33,080 Speaker 1: out of the index because they're just so high quality. 299 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 1: But those are very safe investments. Even some of the 300 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:39,280 Speaker 1: other Middle Eastern higher qualities. But in Latin America, you 301 00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:43,000 Speaker 1: have Chile, which you know trades at reasonably tight spreads 302 00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:45,280 Speaker 1: and probably will continue to be pretty really low insulated. 303 00:14:45,560 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 1: And then you go all the way to even the 304 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:50,320 Speaker 1: Asia credits. Right, Philippines has done very well. Indonesia's starting 305 00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:53,720 Speaker 1: to show some cracks, but likely much safer than other 306 00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:57,360 Speaker 1: high yields double B single B type of investments that 307 00:14:57,400 --> 00:15:00,240 Speaker 1: will take the brunt of a negative shock to to 308 00:15:00,280 --> 00:15:01,000 Speaker 1: the global market. 309 00:15:01,200 --> 00:15:05,280 Speaker 2: So, Jeff Geography aside for a moment, what industries would 310 00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:08,920 Speaker 2: you be avoiding under the curtain regime? I mean, obviously 311 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:11,640 Speaker 2: something like an industrial or an auto you want to 312 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:14,360 Speaker 2: probably try to avoid. But I'm wondering whether or not 313 00:15:14,400 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 2: we need to be talking about a broader group of 314 00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:20,520 Speaker 2: industries that are vulnerable right now, and for that reason, 315 00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:23,160 Speaker 2: you want to take a look at perhaps the risk 316 00:15:23,240 --> 00:15:25,040 Speaker 2: of maybe greater defaults. 317 00:15:25,480 --> 00:15:27,440 Speaker 1: So the way I would answer that is two fold. 318 00:15:27,480 --> 00:15:31,280 Speaker 1: One is do you definitely need to be somewhat cognizant 319 00:15:31,280 --> 00:15:33,920 Speaker 1: of the exporters versus the importers, Right, So the exporters 320 00:15:33,920 --> 00:15:37,160 Speaker 1: are where you're going to see both the any slowdown 321 00:15:37,160 --> 00:15:41,560 Speaker 1: in growth or other types of terrorists potentially hit them. 322 00:15:41,640 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 1: So Brazil, Mexico, China probably come to top of mind. 323 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:48,080 Speaker 1: There as ones that are going to be impacted. The 324 00:15:48,120 --> 00:15:50,840 Speaker 1: other one that's been a sort of cautious theme for US, 325 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:53,760 Speaker 1: which has worked reasonally well, but a lot of the 326 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 1: energy related countries and companies have done very well for 327 00:15:58,080 --> 00:16:01,320 Speaker 1: the last four to five years. Oil prices are starting 328 00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:03,640 Speaker 1: to come off. You have a slow down and growth 329 00:16:03,680 --> 00:16:07,680 Speaker 1: coupled with likely at some point in the US more 330 00:16:07,760 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 1: actions to increase the oil production and other things that 331 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:13,920 Speaker 1: you didn't see under the Biden administration. So I would 332 00:16:13,960 --> 00:16:16,880 Speaker 1: say things tied to the oil industry are probably more 333 00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 1: at risk. On ac counter that, I do think metals mining, 334 00:16:20,840 --> 00:16:24,560 Speaker 1: those sectors are going to be reasonably well supported. Copper 335 00:16:24,600 --> 00:16:27,360 Speaker 1: maybe a little bit more daunting, but you are seeing 336 00:16:27,440 --> 00:16:31,600 Speaker 1: sort of the general support to that type of market. Otherwise, 337 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:34,920 Speaker 1: it's going to be very strong balance sheets. It's really 338 00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 1: going to be those that are higher credit quality. So 339 00:16:36,800 --> 00:16:39,480 Speaker 1: instead of an industry, I would think focus on triple 340 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:42,920 Speaker 1: B sweet spots, some double b's, and try to keep 341 00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:46,120 Speaker 1: your credit quality as clean as possible as we go 342 00:16:46,160 --> 00:16:46,440 Speaker 1: through this. 343 00:16:46,760 --> 00:16:49,720 Speaker 2: When the administration took office in January, there was a 344 00:16:49,760 --> 00:16:52,520 Speaker 2: lot of anticipation about a flurry of m and a 345 00:16:52,520 --> 00:16:55,240 Speaker 2: activity that really hasn't played out. Do you expect that 346 00:16:55,400 --> 00:16:57,560 Speaker 2: to be delayed as a result of these tariffs or 347 00:16:57,600 --> 00:17:01,400 Speaker 2: will that be an eventuality been pushed out a little bit. 348 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:03,880 Speaker 1: I think it's been pushed out. You're seeing that again 349 00:17:03,920 --> 00:17:07,480 Speaker 1: across the board for emerging markets, both from the issue inside. 350 00:17:07,640 --> 00:17:10,360 Speaker 1: We saw a flurry of on the fixed income side 351 00:17:10,400 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 1: of flurry of activity in January into February, and now 352 00:17:13,600 --> 00:17:16,719 Speaker 1: you've seen that start to slow down. Actually enough, the 353 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:20,399 Speaker 1: sort of green sustainable deals has definitely declined, and I 354 00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:21,840 Speaker 1: think there is a little bit of a link both 355 00:17:21,880 --> 00:17:26,080 Speaker 1: from an investor appetite, but just some caution for people 356 00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:28,520 Speaker 1: to issue those around the changes that we're seeing with 357 00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:32,639 Speaker 1: the objectives and what's going to be rewarded. But I 358 00:17:32,680 --> 00:17:36,680 Speaker 1: don't Again, we are not currently forecasting a recession. We're 359 00:17:36,720 --> 00:17:39,479 Speaker 1: not anticipating that, so I don't think that that. I 360 00:17:39,560 --> 00:17:42,440 Speaker 1: think that anything that's happening is a delay. And once 361 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:45,040 Speaker 1: we get the key is getting back to clarity, and 362 00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:46,719 Speaker 1: I don't know when that's going to happen. That may 363 00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:49,119 Speaker 1: take some time, but once we get back to some clarity, 364 00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:52,440 Speaker 1: I think you'll start to see a renormalization of markets 365 00:17:52,480 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 1: probably in the second half of this year. 366 00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:56,119 Speaker 2: So what I'm hearing underneath the surface there is that 367 00:17:56,160 --> 00:17:59,120 Speaker 2: you don't think there's going to be an appreciable increase 368 00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:00,440 Speaker 2: in default risk right now? 369 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:00,960 Speaker 4: Is that right? 370 00:18:01,680 --> 00:18:04,640 Speaker 1: No? And and for emerging markets, we've actually gone through 371 00:18:04,640 --> 00:18:07,960 Speaker 1: a period where a number of credits restructured over the 372 00:18:08,040 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 1: last two to three years, right So Sri Lanka was 373 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:14,560 Speaker 1: one of the restructures we've set. We've had Ghana, Ethiopia 374 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:17,160 Speaker 1: and just to name a few. So we've actually got 375 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:21,119 Speaker 1: them into better places. There's still concerns. The big concern 376 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:25,200 Speaker 1: for emerging markets today is the large size of fiscal deficits. 377 00:18:25,240 --> 00:18:28,120 Speaker 1: I mean, frankly, that's the that's the concern for developed 378 00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:33,440 Speaker 1: economies quite frankly. But as long as rates remain relatively 379 00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:36,760 Speaker 1: low or stable, and you know, through all of this, 380 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:38,720 Speaker 1: the ten year treasury has come down from four to 381 00:18:38,720 --> 00:18:43,720 Speaker 1: eighty to four today, fiscal deficits are not a concern 382 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:45,240 Speaker 1: when you have rates at are low. Where it will 383 00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:47,520 Speaker 1: become a major concern is if we get that inflationary 384 00:18:47,560 --> 00:18:51,640 Speaker 1: shock rates go up and you get starting those financing 385 00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:56,200 Speaker 1: costs ballooning. Then you could have some countries that can't stimulate, 386 00:18:56,320 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 1: can't adjust, and have too high of a deficit. But 387 00:18:59,040 --> 00:19:01,920 Speaker 1: right now most of the markets are generally in cleaner 388 00:19:01,960 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 1: spots than they have been over the last couple years. 389 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:05,560 Speaker 2: All right, great stuff, Jeff, Thank you so much for 390 00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:07,920 Speaker 2: joining us. Jeff Grills there. He is head of em 391 00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:12,120 Speaker 2: Debt at Agon Asset Management, joining from Greenwich, Connecticut. Here 392 00:19:12,119 --> 00:19:17,360 Speaker 2: on the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Thanks for listening to today's 393 00:19:17,400 --> 00:19:21,880 Speaker 2: episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, 394 00:19:21,920 --> 00:19:25,840 Speaker 2: we look at the story shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics 395 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:29,160 Speaker 2: in the Asia Pacific. You can find us on Apple, Spotify, 396 00:19:29,280 --> 00:19:32,800 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen. 397 00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:36,080 Speaker 2: Join us again tomorrow for insight on the market moves 398 00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:40,720 Speaker 2: from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia. I'm Doug Chrisner, 399 00:19:40,840 --> 00:19:42,240 Speaker 2: and this is Bloomberg