WEBVTT - NFL Pro Quarterly Report

0:00:00.250 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the NFL pros Q1 quarterly report. Thank you

0:00:04.250 --> 0:00:07.380
<v Speaker 1>for listening on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever

0:00:07.420 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys get your podcasts. Be sure to follow and

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:10.780
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the show.

0:00:11.660 --> 0:00:14.660
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the opening bell of NFL pro here on

0:00:14.940 --> 0:00:18.180
<v Speaker 2>NFL media. I'm Trevor Sycamore. That's Brett Coleman.

0:00:27.540 --> 0:00:30.020
<v Speaker 1>That's a stock exchange intro for me. But the reason

0:00:30.060 --> 0:00:31.940
<v Speaker 1>why we're doing the stock exchange intro is because it's

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>time for the quarterly report around the NFL, baby. We're

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.019
<v Speaker 1>doing a little stock watch, a little stock update on

0:00:38.060 --> 0:00:41.420
<v Speaker 1>how these teams and players have done so far this season.

0:00:41.460 --> 0:00:43.300
<v Speaker 3>We're mainly going to be looking at teams that either

0:00:43.700 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 3>beat or.

0:00:44.260 --> 0:00:46.949
<v Speaker 1>Didn't beat expectations that we had for them early in

0:00:46.979 --> 0:00:49.570
<v Speaker 1>the season. We're going to take a look at some takes, Brett,

0:00:49.950 --> 0:00:53.590
<v Speaker 1>that we had in the preseason episode that we already

0:00:53.630 --> 0:00:54.770
<v Speaker 1>have to revisit for good.

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Not so good reasons.

0:00:57.980 --> 0:01:00.770
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of going to identify some really good assets

0:01:00.910 --> 0:01:03.570
<v Speaker 1>and liabilities around the NFL. We're going to have a

0:01:03.590 --> 0:01:06.430
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun here, just really wrapping up what we've

0:01:06.450 --> 0:01:07.650
<v Speaker 1>seen through four weeks of the season.

0:01:07.670 --> 0:01:09.309
<v Speaker 2>Brett, how you doing, my friend? I got a lot

0:01:09.330 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of stuff wrong this summer. I don't know about you,

0:01:11.590 --> 0:01:13.839
<v Speaker 2>but it feels like the first four weeks of this season,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I have been more wrong than ever. I'm not afraid

0:01:17.340 --> 0:01:21.100
<v Speaker 2>to admit that, but this has been a wacky first month.

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>The people love when we're wrong, of course. I hope

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that they come to this show and our expertise for

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.780
<v Speaker 1>when we're right, but they love for us to remind

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ourselves of when we were wrong. And, you know, I

0:01:32.340 --> 0:01:35.060
<v Speaker 1>think that I had some good takes going into the preseason.

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 3>But there's two specifically.

0:01:38.180 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>That I do have to address here on the show, which, Brett,

0:01:41.300 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I think is a great way to intro our first segment,

0:01:43.459 --> 0:01:46.460
<v Speaker 1>which is the earnings report here four weeks into the

0:01:46.459 --> 0:01:49.750
<v Speaker 1>2026 NFL season. Let's take a look at some teams

0:01:49.770 --> 0:01:53.770
<v Speaker 1>that either beat expectations or fell short of the expectations

0:01:54.090 --> 0:01:56.570
<v Speaker 1>that we had for them. Let's start with the teams

0:01:57.050 --> 0:01:59.430
<v Speaker 1>that have beaten expectations. Let's start on a good note.

0:01:59.450 --> 0:02:00.910
<v Speaker 1>We've got four teams that we want to take a

0:02:00.930 --> 0:02:02.350
<v Speaker 1>look at, and the first one that I want to

0:02:02.370 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>look at is the Minnesota Vikings. Now, with all these

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>teams we'll discuss here, we'll talk about and identify why

0:02:08.139 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they have beaten expectations, and then we'll give you a

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:11.779
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a buy or sell. Hey, are we

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:16.100
<v Speaker 1>buying them beating or falling short of expectations, or are

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:16.580
<v Speaker 1>we selling?

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.210
<v Speaker 3>Do we think that it's going to go a different direction?

0:02:19.490 --> 0:02:23.489
<v Speaker 2>And he's sacked by Dallas Turner.

0:02:24.430 --> 0:02:27.340
<v Speaker 1>The Minnesota Vikings are sitting here at 4-0. And this

0:02:27.410 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is my first admission of fault. I said that Kyler

0:02:31.700 --> 0:02:33.620
<v Speaker 1>Murray was in for a career year. I said that

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>if he was fully healthy, we were going to see

0:02:35.380 --> 0:02:38.380
<v Speaker 1>some fireworks here for Kyler Murray. And the Vikings are

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>4-0 on the season. But Kyler is not the main

0:02:43.860 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>catalyst as to why that is the case.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Brett, I just want to ask you.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:54.100
<v Speaker 1>You're buying or selling the Vikings beating expectations and being

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>4-0 here.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.410
<v Speaker 2>I think this is the weirdest one we'll talk about

0:02:57.810 --> 0:03:00.670
<v Speaker 2>in this section because in a way they've met expectations.

0:03:01.669 --> 0:03:04.810
<v Speaker 2>Because we knew going into the season, hey, this was

0:03:04.850 --> 0:03:07.350
<v Speaker 2>a nine-win football team last year with bad quarterback play.

0:03:07.410 --> 0:03:09.299
<v Speaker 2>What happens if they get good quarterback play? And we

0:03:09.340 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 2>thought Kyler Murray was going to give them good quarterback play.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.260
<v Speaker 2>And they're undefeated, even without Kyler playing for all these games.

0:03:16.370 --> 0:03:19.190
<v Speaker 2>And yet it doesn't feel that way. So they met

0:03:19.270 --> 0:03:21.570
<v Speaker 2>expectations in terms of the win loss column. They have

0:03:21.610 --> 0:03:26.510
<v Speaker 2>not met expectations in terms of just how they look

0:03:26.810 --> 0:03:29.410
<v Speaker 2>like using our eyeballs and the eye test.

0:03:29.430 --> 0:03:32.410
<v Speaker 3>Like this is not a good offense using the next

0:03:32.430 --> 0:03:33.090
<v Speaker 3>gen eyeballs.

0:03:34.610 --> 0:03:36.370
<v Speaker 2>I mean, sometimes that's really all it takes. Like you

0:03:36.410 --> 0:03:38.690
<v Speaker 2>don't you don't necessarily need a lot of data to

0:03:38.730 --> 0:03:42.020
<v Speaker 2>look at a Vikings game and be like, they can't score. Like,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.380
<v Speaker 2>Will Reichardt might be MVP front-runner at this point. Customary

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:50.580
<v Speaker 2>5-for-5 on field goals, 31 straight. Will Reichardt! This is

0:03:50.660 --> 0:03:52.780
<v Speaker 2>a team that can't stretch the field. They didn't have

0:03:52.820 --> 0:03:55.620
<v Speaker 2>a single deep pass attempt last week without Justin Jefferson

0:03:55.660 --> 0:03:58.940
<v Speaker 2>because when he's gone, they just don't have any ability

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.100
<v Speaker 2>to be explosive in the passing game. They're not good

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>after the catch either. Fourth fewest yards after catch this year.

0:04:04.380 --> 0:04:07.420
<v Speaker 2>They're down half their offensive line at this point. Donovan

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Jackson's going to miss the year. Darryl Saw's in concussion protocol.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.740
<v Speaker 2>You know, the running backs aren't necessarily dynamic either. The

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:19.420
<v Speaker 2>only reason they have, I guess, met expectations is because

0:04:19.460 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>their defense is incredible. But the offense can't do anything.

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.020
<v Speaker 2>So for me, it's an obvious sell because this is

0:04:27.060 --> 0:04:29.470
<v Speaker 2>a very one-dimensional team that is hanging on by a

0:04:29.550 --> 0:04:32.350
<v Speaker 2>thread and Maybe it's a hold, I guess you could say,

0:04:32.370 --> 0:04:34.550
<v Speaker 2>because there's a possibility Kyler gets better, but are you

0:04:34.610 --> 0:04:38.460
<v Speaker 2>really confident in that at this point? It's possible, but

0:04:39.060 --> 0:04:42.340
<v Speaker 2>I look at the rot at the core of this offense,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.010
<v Speaker 2>and I don't feel confident in that. So for now, sell.

0:04:46.270 --> 0:04:49.270
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I'll buy back in later, but I... I don't

0:04:49.290 --> 0:04:51.910
<v Speaker 2>feel good about it, especially compared to Chicago in their

0:04:51.930 --> 0:04:52.369
<v Speaker 2>own division.

0:04:52.610 --> 0:04:53.190
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with you.

0:04:53.410 --> 0:04:56.219
<v Speaker 1>I'm selling the current version of what the Vikings are, meaning, hey,

0:04:56.330 --> 0:04:59.339
<v Speaker 1>they're 4-0 in this current state. Do I think that

0:04:59.380 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that sustains? No. I mean, when you look at the

0:05:01.339 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation in Kyler Murray, yeah, 45.3% win probability added.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.299
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the lowest marks in the league. 13%

0:05:09.300 --> 0:05:10.790
<v Speaker 1>0.4 sack.

0:05:10.610 --> 0:05:11.390
<v Speaker 3>Percentage for him.

0:05:11.410 --> 0:05:12.750
<v Speaker 1>It's also one of the lower marks in the league.

0:05:12.770 --> 0:05:14.570
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think he sees what he's trusting. Now,

0:05:14.830 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I love what the defense is doing, but Brett, let's

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>be honest. I mean, their 32.8% success rate allowed, that's

0:05:21.060 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the most in the league by 5%. And then when

0:05:24.260 --> 0:05:27.860
<v Speaker 1>you look at their negative 55.7 total EPA allowed, that's

0:05:28.140 --> 0:05:30.730
<v Speaker 1>the best by almost seven. So I want to give

0:05:30.770 --> 0:05:33.530
<v Speaker 1>them their praise for how good they've been playing, but

0:05:33.610 --> 0:05:35.130
<v Speaker 1>you can't sustain that for an entire season.

0:05:35.150 --> 0:05:41.060
<v Speaker 3>So I'm also selling it. Let's go to the 49ers next.

0:05:41.420 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>You buying or selling where the 49ers are beating expectations.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they were the forgotten team in the quote

0:05:48.420 --> 0:05:50.219
<v Speaker 1>unquote best division in football.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm buying. I mean, I don't feel great about it

0:05:53.980 --> 0:05:56.609
<v Speaker 2>just because I'm expecting the injuries to happen for this team.

0:05:56.790 --> 0:05:59.409
<v Speaker 2>They've honestly already kind of happened for this team. They've

0:05:59.470 --> 0:06:03.250
<v Speaker 2>never really gotten healthier as a season has gone on.

0:06:03.660 --> 0:06:06.239
<v Speaker 2>But I'm still buying because what I see on the field,

0:06:06.580 --> 0:06:10.900
<v Speaker 2>specifically out of Purdy and Shanahan, is just impossible to ignore.

0:06:11.380 --> 0:06:13.620
<v Speaker 2>He is playing at an MVP level. I guess it's

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>either him or Will Reichardt at this point. That was

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.330
<v Speaker 2>all Brock Purdy. Even with all of the receiver injuries

0:06:19.650 --> 0:06:21.830
<v Speaker 2>and his top tight end is coming off an Achilles

0:06:21.850 --> 0:06:24.890
<v Speaker 2>injury and somehow already hitting 20 miles per hour. I mean,

0:06:25.089 --> 0:06:26.830
<v Speaker 2>God forbid a white guy has a little bit of motion.

0:06:27.870 --> 0:06:31.770
<v Speaker 2>I am buying them for now. I understand everything. This team,

0:06:32.110 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>they tend to not get healthier as the year goes on,

0:06:34.529 --> 0:06:37.070
<v Speaker 2>and they've already taken on some injuries. But Purdy and

0:06:37.150 --> 0:06:40.130
<v Speaker 2>Shanahan have been so dominant this year that it's impossible

0:06:40.190 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 2>to ignore. And I think if they get over the

0:06:43.650 --> 0:06:47.220
<v Speaker 2>Mike McDonald hump, really the sky is the limit for

0:06:47.260 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 2>this team because I think Seattle is kind of the

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.260
<v Speaker 2>main thing that's standing in their way. If you go

0:06:51.300 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>back to the division round last year, Purdy ran 833

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>yards during that game just because of how much he

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:04.610
<v Speaker 2>had to scramble. and get away from pressure. JSN ran

0:07:04.610 --> 0:07:09.540
<v Speaker 2>728 yards in that game. CMC ran 712 yards in

0:07:09.580 --> 0:07:13.110
<v Speaker 2>that game. You have a quarterback outdoing the two most

0:07:13.250 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>prominent skill position players on the field by over a

0:07:16.900 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards. That is how much pressure.

0:07:19.100 --> 0:07:21.140
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure the tracking chip wasn't, you know, like

0:07:21.460 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Purdy was on the sideline on the bike, you know,

0:07:23.660 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and they were just like counting that as the yards

0:07:25.660 --> 0:07:26.060
<v Speaker 1>on the field.

0:07:26.100 --> 0:07:26.540
<v Speaker 2>Are you sure?

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:27.870
<v Speaker 3>Cause that's a crazy number.

0:07:28.460 --> 0:07:31.490
<v Speaker 2>Again, just using our eyeballs, watching that game, you could

0:07:31.510 --> 0:07:33.350
<v Speaker 2>have told me it was more. That's how much he

0:07:33.390 --> 0:07:35.430
<v Speaker 2>was running. I don't know if he actually had more

0:07:35.470 --> 0:07:39.550
<v Speaker 2>than five clean pockets that entire game. It was, it

0:07:39.590 --> 0:07:42.690
<v Speaker 2>was awful. And even though the Niners are banged up

0:07:42.730 --> 0:07:44.870
<v Speaker 2>right now, it's still nowhere near how banged up they

0:07:44.910 --> 0:07:46.830
<v Speaker 2>were at the end of last season. So they do

0:07:46.870 --> 0:07:49.550
<v Speaker 2>have a better shot of winning this game. Hell, we've

0:07:49.590 --> 0:07:53.630
<v Speaker 2>seen a healthier 49ers team beat the Mike McDonald Seattle

0:07:53.650 --> 0:07:55.730
<v Speaker 2>Seahawks before. They did it early last season.

0:07:56.250 --> 0:07:58.270
<v Speaker 1>Look, if we go back to the preseason again, I

0:07:59.250 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>said that this team would be missing the playoffs. A

0:08:03.010 --> 0:08:05.740
<v Speaker 1>lot of uncertainty there. with that roster overall, and then

0:08:05.780 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you mount the injuries that they were kind of going

0:08:07.540 --> 0:08:09.700
<v Speaker 1>through as well. I thought this team in this division

0:08:09.740 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>were going to miss the playoffs, and yet here I am.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:13.570
<v Speaker 2>They're 4-0.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.060
<v Speaker 1>I have to buy how they are 4-0 because a

0:08:18.300 --> 0:08:20.100
<v Speaker 1>lot of what I talked about, some of the run

0:08:20.140 --> 0:08:22.610
<v Speaker 1>defense inefficiencies, some of the young guys having to get

0:08:22.630 --> 0:08:24.890
<v Speaker 1>in there and play, the injuries that they are going through,

0:08:25.050 --> 0:08:26.530
<v Speaker 1>all of that is still true with the Niners.

0:08:27.110 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 3>And yet Brock Purdy is playing like an MVP.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So as long as Brock Purdy plays like this, very clearly,

0:08:32.820 --> 0:08:35.300
<v Speaker 1>even when they go against better opponents, I think you're

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be all right. So I'm buying the 49ers

0:08:37.340 --> 0:08:39.500
<v Speaker 1>and where they are right now, because how do you

0:08:39.540 --> 0:08:41.980
<v Speaker 1>doubt a quarterback who's playing as good as Brock Purdy?

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.140
<v Speaker 1>What about the Cleveland Browns here? Certainly above what a

0:08:51.179 --> 0:08:53.370
<v Speaker 1>lot of people had as their expectations a quarter of

0:08:53.380 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the way through the season. You're buying or selling the

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.870
<v Speaker 1>Browns at the top of the division.

0:09:00.350 --> 0:09:03.670
<v Speaker 2>I might regret this, but I'm buying it. All right, baby,

0:09:03.730 --> 0:09:07.500
<v Speaker 2>let's go. It's really about the defense. It really is.

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.340
<v Speaker 2>Not that the offense has been horrible, but the defense,

0:09:10.380 --> 0:09:14.940
<v Speaker 2>I think, is playing above expectations in a post-Miles Garrett world, right?

0:09:15.420 --> 0:09:18.089
<v Speaker 2>They are 50% man coverage rate, which is the highest

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. Even by Brown standards, that's high. This

0:09:21.179 --> 0:09:22.260
<v Speaker 2>is a team that likes to play a lot of

0:09:22.300 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 2>man coverage. They're just doing it more than ever right now.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.780
<v Speaker 2>Their pressure rate on defense is 40.4%. That is sixth best.

0:09:29.450 --> 0:09:32.020
<v Speaker 2>Even without Myles Garrett, Jared Versus played really well for them.

0:09:32.070 --> 0:09:34.550
<v Speaker 2>Mason Graham played really well for them before he got injured,

0:09:34.590 --> 0:09:36.710
<v Speaker 2>but he'll be back in a couple weeks. Their yak

0:09:36.809 --> 0:09:39.650
<v Speaker 2>per reception on offense, that's really what's kept them afloat

0:09:39.750 --> 0:09:42.750
<v Speaker 2>on the other side of the ball. 6.6 yards after

0:09:42.809 --> 0:09:46.230
<v Speaker 2>catch per reception. That is sixth best in the NFL.

0:09:46.929 --> 0:09:50.189
<v Speaker 2>If you take a top 10 defense in terms of

0:09:50.270 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>points allowed, Since week two, the Jacksonville game, they got

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.810
<v Speaker 2>absolutely shelled. But since week two, they've been a top

0:09:56.809 --> 0:10:01.530
<v Speaker 2>10 defense, plus a mostly official. offense that's really good

0:10:01.550 --> 0:10:04.300
<v Speaker 2>at getting yards after the catch. This is a relatively

0:10:04.420 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 2>complete team, and they played a lot of good football.

0:10:07.340 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to.

0:10:08.750 --> 0:10:11.030
<v Speaker 1>I'll be the hater and I'm going to sell sort

0:10:11.050 --> 0:10:12.740
<v Speaker 1>of where the Browns are right now. I don't want

0:10:12.750 --> 0:10:15.300
<v Speaker 1>to take anything away from a team that hasn't had

0:10:15.340 --> 0:10:17.420
<v Speaker 1>success in a long time. But Brett, the fact of

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.620
<v Speaker 1>the matter is their offense has a 39.9% rookie snap share,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the highest ever.

0:10:24.700 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 3>In the NFL.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think these young guys are playing well to start,

0:10:28.220 --> 0:10:30.740
<v Speaker 1>which is great to see, but I think once defenses

0:10:30.780 --> 0:10:32.710
<v Speaker 1>now have some tape on a lot of these players,

0:10:32.970 --> 0:10:34.420
<v Speaker 1>they're going to figure out how to neutralize them a

0:10:34.450 --> 0:10:36.970
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. It might not be an instant fix

0:10:37.010 --> 0:10:39.870
<v Speaker 1>for them to, okay, they changed what they're doing against me.

0:10:40.050 --> 0:10:41.890
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm going to change the sort of what's next,

0:10:41.929 --> 0:10:43.990
<v Speaker 1>this evolution. Normally it takes a little bit more time

0:10:44.010 --> 0:10:44.270
<v Speaker 1>than that.

0:10:44.670 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Inside the 40, the 30, the crowd loving it.

0:10:48.490 --> 0:10:49.770
<v Speaker 1>I think the rest of the division is going to

0:10:49.809 --> 0:10:52.450
<v Speaker 1>continue to play really well as well, especially if the

0:10:52.490 --> 0:10:54.590
<v Speaker 1>rest of the division can't stay healthy. You know, Lamar's

0:10:54.610 --> 0:10:56.729
<v Speaker 1>health is sort of an issue short term. But I'm

0:10:56.750 --> 0:10:58.970
<v Speaker 1>going to sell the Browns, although it is nice, obviously,

0:10:58.990 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to see them beat expectations to start the year. The

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>last one that we're talking about, the team that beat

0:11:02.900 --> 0:11:08.579
<v Speaker 1>expectations at 3-1 here, almost 4-0, is the Las Vegas Raiders.

0:11:08.660 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>We buying or selling the Raiders and how they've beaten

0:11:11.700 --> 0:11:12.610
<v Speaker 1>expectations this year?

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.470
<v Speaker 2>I'm buying it. It's a complete team. If you're looking

0:11:16.510 --> 0:11:20.170
<v Speaker 2>at offensive EPA per play, they are 11th best in

0:11:20.210 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the NFL so far this year. Defensive EPA per play allowed,

0:11:24.270 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>they are 6th best in the NFL this year. Even

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>special teams, their average starting field position, 36.5 yard line.

0:11:32.300 --> 0:11:35.260
<v Speaker 2>That is awesome. They're getting it from all three phases

0:11:35.340 --> 0:11:37.459
<v Speaker 2>so far this year. Were it not for the fumble

0:11:37.500 --> 0:11:39.460
<v Speaker 2>on the kickoff return against Kansas City, I bet their

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>special teams EPA per play would be up there as well. But,

0:11:42.420 --> 0:11:44.260
<v Speaker 2>you know, one play can swing a lot of things.

0:11:45.250 --> 0:11:47.670
<v Speaker 2>I like this team. The fact that they fought back

0:11:47.730 --> 0:11:50.890
<v Speaker 2>the way they did after that two touchdown flurry in

0:11:50.890 --> 0:11:52.949
<v Speaker 2>19 seconds versus the Chiefs, that to me showed a

0:11:52.970 --> 0:11:55.390
<v Speaker 2>lot of heart. I do not see them as a

0:11:55.450 --> 0:11:58.990
<v Speaker 2>fraudulent 3-0. I see them as a formidable 3-1. Yeah,

0:11:59.290 --> 0:11:59.990
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you.

0:12:00.090 --> 0:12:02.739
<v Speaker 1>I would have repeated exactly what you said as reasons

0:12:02.780 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to believe in this team.

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.339
<v Speaker 3>And we've talked about it over the last couple of weeks.

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.099
<v Speaker 1>It feels real. It doesn't feel like fool's gold. It

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like they've got the right coaches in there. The

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>players are playing the way that they need to, not

0:12:11.940 --> 0:12:14.819
<v Speaker 1>just in a way that's fluky, in a way that's consistent,

0:12:14.860 --> 0:12:16.699
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you. And I think that starts

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.590
<v Speaker 1>with Kirk Cousins. How Kirk Cousins is playing at the

0:12:19.630 --> 0:12:22.969
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position is also why I'm buying this for the

0:12:23.010 --> 0:12:26.990
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas Raiders. His 48.0 success rate this season is

0:12:27.030 --> 0:12:30.550
<v Speaker 1>the highest that he has had since 2020. He's turning

0:12:30.570 --> 0:12:35.980
<v Speaker 1>the clock back, baby. 0.16 EPA per dropback. That's his

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>most in a season since 2016. And Brett, a lot

0:12:40.020 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of that confidence that Kirk Cousins is playing with. Remember

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.030
<v Speaker 1>I said that it was his highest success rate since 2020. Well,

0:12:45.050 --> 0:12:47.250
<v Speaker 1>guess who one of his coaches, his quarterback coach and

0:12:47.270 --> 0:12:49.810
<v Speaker 1>then offensive coordinator was with the Minnesota Vikings was during

0:12:49.830 --> 0:12:50.250
<v Speaker 1>that season.

0:12:50.650 --> 0:12:53.790
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it was Clint Kubiak. So clearly... There's a.

0:12:53.770 --> 0:12:55.370
<v Speaker 1>Lot of great chemistry there, and I think that that's

0:12:55.390 --> 0:12:57.819
<v Speaker 1>going to keep rolling. Now let's talk about teams that

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:02.140
<v Speaker 1>have not met expectations here in our quarterly report. And

0:13:02.179 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we start with the Los Angeles Rams. Now the win

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.100
<v Speaker 1>over the Eagles puts them at 2-2, so it's not

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.570
<v Speaker 1>all doom and gloom. The sky is not falling the

0:13:09.590 --> 0:13:11.830
<v Speaker 1>way that it was the previous two weeks with the Rams.

0:13:12.090 --> 0:13:14.189
<v Speaker 1>But are you buying the Rams for where they are

0:13:14.230 --> 0:13:16.709
<v Speaker 1>right now, given that they did not hit expectations a

0:13:16.730 --> 0:13:17.730
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the way through the season?

0:13:17.870 --> 0:13:18.910
<v Speaker 3>Or are you selling this team?

0:13:18.929 --> 0:13:22.340
<v Speaker 2>What do you think? Yeah, I'm buying it. I understand

0:13:22.380 --> 0:13:26.939
<v Speaker 2>there were hiccups. The Australia thing, even Sean McVay said

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 2>that he did not handle it well. They got Miles

0:13:29.710 --> 0:13:32.790
<v Speaker 2>Garrett coming back eventually. Aaron Donald still getting back into

0:13:32.809 --> 0:13:36.010
<v Speaker 2>the swing of things. Stafford, I don't believe, is just

0:13:36.050 --> 0:13:38.390
<v Speaker 2>going to keep throwing the worst pick you've ever seen

0:13:38.790 --> 0:13:42.470
<v Speaker 2>week after week. That's just not Matthew Stafford. So they'll

0:13:42.510 --> 0:13:46.670
<v Speaker 2>be fine. Their talent is kind of overwhelming where eventually,

0:13:46.790 --> 0:13:50.170
<v Speaker 2>once it all starts moving in the same direction... You know,

0:13:50.390 --> 0:13:53.479
<v Speaker 2>it's like a battleship. It turns slowly, but it's hard

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:54.860
<v Speaker 2>to stop once it gets going.

0:13:55.140 --> 0:13:57.220
<v Speaker 1>It is still a battleship. And I agree with you.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.980
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to buy this team as well, especially now

0:14:00.020 --> 0:14:02.010
<v Speaker 1>that they are sitting here at 2-2. If they can

0:14:02.030 --> 0:14:03.949
<v Speaker 1>get a win over the Buffalo Bills, I think that

0:14:03.990 --> 0:14:07.410
<v Speaker 1>really changes things going into a very favorable.

0:14:06.910 --> 0:14:09.490
<v Speaker 3>Part of their schedule over the five weeks that follow.

0:14:09.590 --> 0:14:12.340
<v Speaker 2>Devontae brings it in over the shoulder.

0:14:13.059 --> 0:14:15.140
<v Speaker 1>I think the main reason why I'm buying is because,

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Puka Nakua back out there, you saw

0:14:17.620 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what he was able to do, even as a contested

0:14:19.580 --> 0:14:22.020
<v Speaker 1>catch guy, where I've complained that there's just no easy

0:14:22.060 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>throws in this offense. When you have a player like that,

0:14:24.380 --> 0:14:27.180
<v Speaker 1>and when you have Devontae Adams as well, sometimes that's

0:14:27.220 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>all the difference that you need when you have a

0:14:28.940 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>quarterback like Matthew Stafford. He was playing a little bit better.

0:14:31.620 --> 0:14:33.710
<v Speaker 1>And I think the way that the Rams came back

0:14:33.750 --> 0:14:37.180
<v Speaker 1>against the Eagles... That was reminiscent of what it was

0:14:37.220 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the previous season. So I wonder if that really is,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the belief for the guys in the locker room, like, okay,

0:14:42.060 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it started slow, time to lock in.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:45.740
<v Speaker 3>We got to remember who we are here.

0:14:46.020 --> 0:14:47.900
<v Speaker 2>And all of a sudden, for the first time, really

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 2>all day, the Rams offense has life.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.060
<v Speaker 1>The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are sitting here at 0-4. You're

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>buying or selling this team that some people had as

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.540
<v Speaker 1>the division favorites for the NFC South, myself included.

0:15:02.010 --> 0:15:03.830
<v Speaker 2>So I'm selling them, but let's be honest, the people

0:15:03.890 --> 0:15:05.700
<v Speaker 2>do not care about my opinion on this. They care

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.940
<v Speaker 2>about yours. What you doing, Trev?

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm also selling, brother.

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.630
<v Speaker 1>Man, I just don't really love anything that I'm seeing

0:15:15.670 --> 0:15:17.610
<v Speaker 1>out of Tampa right now. It feels like their star

0:15:17.670 --> 0:15:20.620
<v Speaker 1>players aren't playing up to their potential. the role players

0:15:20.700 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't playing as well as they need to in a

0:15:22.300 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>complimentary way, and some of the young guys and new

0:15:24.660 --> 0:15:26.500
<v Speaker 1>players on the team aren't gelling the way that they

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.660
<v Speaker 1>need to. You throw in the fact that their starting

0:15:28.700 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in Baker Mayfield is down, but even beyond that, Brett,

0:15:31.460 --> 0:15:33.580
<v Speaker 1>I think the big reason why I'm selling right now

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.900
<v Speaker 1>is not only because of some new pieces on defense

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.010
<v Speaker 1>that I think are just going to naturally have it

0:15:38.070 --> 0:15:41.310
<v Speaker 1>be up and down throughout the entire season, specifically up front,

0:15:41.490 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but also on offense. it just doesn't feel like there's

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a real threat. I like Emeka Buka. I like Chris Godwin.

0:15:47.500 --> 0:15:50.060
<v Speaker 1>I like Bucky Irving. I like these players, but it

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.620
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't feel like defenses fear them. And they certainly

0:15:54.660 --> 0:15:57.140
<v Speaker 1>don't fear the way that the Bucks are playing right

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.350
<v Speaker 1>now because their 8.4% explosive rate on offense, that's second

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:02.450
<v Speaker 1>lowest in the NFL.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.350
<v Speaker 2>Baker is smacked by Joshua Metellus.

0:16:05.830 --> 0:16:08.090
<v Speaker 1>The game plan that Zach Robinson has had over the

0:16:08.130 --> 0:16:11.590
<v Speaker 1>last four weeks has been so conservative. It's basically been hey,

0:16:11.630 --> 0:16:13.510
<v Speaker 1>we want to get the ball in our playmakers' hands

0:16:13.590 --> 0:16:16.170
<v Speaker 1>and let them go make plays. Sure, really nice in theory,

0:16:16.390 --> 0:16:18.910
<v Speaker 1>but Tampa doesn't really have those yards after catch type

0:16:18.950 --> 0:16:22.530
<v Speaker 1>of players. So Bucky's not forcing the missed tackles at

0:16:22.550 --> 0:16:25.330
<v Speaker 1>the rate that he was his rookie season. And the receivers,

0:16:25.370 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they're just not really, it's not really their game. They're

0:16:27.980 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>more of win down the field, be contested catch players,

0:16:30.540 --> 0:16:32.940
<v Speaker 1>find the soft spots, be good route runners. So I'm

0:16:32.980 --> 0:16:35.870
<v Speaker 1>selling this team because even though they've been beat up,

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Mayfield coming back whenever he comes

0:16:39.060 --> 0:16:42.830
<v Speaker 1>back is the cavalry riding back in. Because even Mayfield

0:16:42.870 --> 0:16:44.650
<v Speaker 1>going back to last year and the beginning of this year,

0:16:44.890 --> 0:16:48.410
<v Speaker 1>very inconsistent for this team. So 0-4 I think is

0:16:49.350 --> 0:16:52.420
<v Speaker 1>obviously worst case scenario for them. But clearly this team

0:16:52.460 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is just not what we thought that they were going

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.060
<v Speaker 1>to be with the whole makings of it. The roster,

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.450
<v Speaker 1>the coaching staff, the execution, everything. So I'm selling this team.

0:17:01.290 --> 0:17:02.940
<v Speaker 2>And they can't get away with the bad start they

0:17:02.980 --> 0:17:06.780
<v Speaker 2>normally would because Carolina looks good and Atlanta looks good.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.620
<v Speaker 2>And the Saints, I don't really know what the Saints

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 2>are right now. I'm not going to lie.

0:17:10.740 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't say it like that because if you were

0:17:13.530 --> 0:17:16.170
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Falcons after the first two weeks, you'd

0:17:16.210 --> 0:17:18.129
<v Speaker 1>say that they were like the worst team in the NFL.

0:17:18.350 --> 0:17:20.649
<v Speaker 1>And if you were talking about the Saints after the

0:17:20.690 --> 0:17:22.649
<v Speaker 1>first two weeks, you'd be like, oh, this team's easily

0:17:22.690 --> 0:17:23.410
<v Speaker 1>winning the division.

0:17:23.650 --> 0:17:25.260
<v Speaker 3>And now two weeks later, that's the story of the

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:25.900
<v Speaker 3>NFC South.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:27.780
<v Speaker 1>Just wait a couple of weeks and you could totally

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.500
<v Speaker 1>be talking about a different team at the top of

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.830
<v Speaker 1>the division. Four weeks from now, the Bucs are going

0:17:32.850 --> 0:17:35.530
<v Speaker 1>to be 4-4 and somehow at the top of the

0:17:35.590 --> 0:17:37.470
<v Speaker 1>NFC South and it's going to look completely different.

0:17:37.570 --> 0:17:41.050
<v Speaker 3>Everybody say yeah!

0:17:41.790 --> 0:17:44.130
<v Speaker 1>I got to flip the script on you now, my friend,

0:17:44.150 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>because we had to talk about the Buccaneers being short

0:17:47.950 --> 0:17:51.389
<v Speaker 1>of expectations. The Houston Texans are next at that same 0-4.

0:17:51.380 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So are you buying or selling where the Texans are

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sitting here in 0-4 on this season?

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.869
<v Speaker 2>The worst part is is how they're bad. It's everything

0:18:02.930 --> 0:18:05.889
<v Speaker 2>that we wished for this offseason. We wanted C.J. Stroud

0:18:05.930 --> 0:18:08.570
<v Speaker 2>to look like a top-ten quarterback. We wanted this passing

0:18:08.590 --> 0:18:10.910
<v Speaker 2>game to be explosive. We wanted him to look like

0:18:10.950 --> 0:18:14.190
<v Speaker 2>he did, honestly, as a rookie, threading those needles and

0:18:14.450 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 2>hitting tight window throws, not just to Nico Collins, but

0:18:16.780 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 2>to everybody. And he's done that, even with an offensive

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.780
<v Speaker 2>line that, while not as bad as the worst Texans

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.180
<v Speaker 2>offensive line that he's had, I wouldn't say they've been

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.070
<v Speaker 2>amazing so far this year. and he just looks like

0:18:30.470 --> 0:18:34.930
<v Speaker 2>that guy at quarterback. It is everything that Houston fans wanted.

0:18:35.430 --> 0:18:38.820
<v Speaker 2>But for some reason, that monkey paw curled, and we

0:18:38.859 --> 0:18:41.340
<v Speaker 2>got one of the worst defenses that we've had in

0:18:41.380 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 2>recent history in Houston as well. If you're looking at

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.980
<v Speaker 2>explosive play rate allowed, if you're looking at tight window

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:51.540
<v Speaker 2>throw allowed, this secondary has gotten absolutely shelled. I never

0:18:51.580 --> 0:18:55.180
<v Speaker 2>would have imagined CeeDee Lamb even could get 17 catches

0:18:55.380 --> 0:18:56.980
<v Speaker 2>on the Texans, and he did it and made it

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:01.460
<v Speaker 2>look easy. Like Dak Prescott was just getting explosive after explosive.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.180
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen was getting explosive after explosive. Like they couldn't

0:19:05.220 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 2>handle Tee Higgins in the fourth quarter a couple weeks ago.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 2>It's just they can't stop anybody through the air. And

0:19:11.350 --> 0:19:13.369
<v Speaker 2>even though you have Will Anderson who is playing on

0:19:13.410 --> 0:19:16.730
<v Speaker 2>an entirely different planet right now. Like defensive player of

0:19:16.750 --> 0:19:20.230
<v Speaker 2>the year is not close because of how well Will

0:19:20.450 --> 0:19:24.350
<v Speaker 2>Anderson's playing. It doesn't matter if the back end is

0:19:24.410 --> 0:19:26.820
<v Speaker 2>just getting torn to pieces. And I don't know how

0:19:26.859 --> 0:19:29.580
<v Speaker 2>to fix it. Oh, you're going to upgrade corner from

0:19:29.619 --> 0:19:32.180
<v Speaker 2>Derek Stingley and Kamari Lassiter? You're going to get better

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>safeties than Petrie and Bullock? Like, I don't know what

0:19:35.260 --> 0:19:38.180
<v Speaker 2>you're going to do to suddenly fix this unit other

0:19:38.220 --> 0:19:41.750
<v Speaker 2>than just hope they play better. So it's such an

0:19:41.930 --> 0:19:44.230
<v Speaker 2>odd position to be in because they're losing in the

0:19:44.270 --> 0:19:47.170
<v Speaker 2>exact opposite way that they lost last year. And it

0:19:47.270 --> 0:19:49.950
<v Speaker 2>just feels like this team can't get both units together.

0:19:50.130 --> 0:19:52.380
<v Speaker 2>play well at the same time. It's been that way

0:19:52.410 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 2>my entire life. Whether it's 2016 having a great defense

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 2>but a terrible offense. Whether it's the late 2000s Texans

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>having a great offense with Schaub and Andre and Kevin Walter.

0:20:02.619 --> 0:20:05.060
<v Speaker 2>You bring in Aaron Foster a couple years after that.

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you see it in bounds. I

0:20:06.460 --> 0:20:13.030
<v Speaker 2>don't either, man. I had an out-of-body experience. They've always

0:20:13.050 --> 0:20:15.109
<v Speaker 2>had great offenses then, but couldn't get a stop. Like

0:20:15.330 --> 0:20:19.629
<v Speaker 2>this team just can't be complete. It drives me insane.

0:20:19.770 --> 0:20:23.730
<v Speaker 2>And it's yet another year of only being half great.

0:20:23.810 --> 0:20:25.930
<v Speaker 2>And I, I don't, I don't know what to do.

0:20:26.030 --> 0:20:31.530
<v Speaker 2>So I guess I'm buying it. Like, I don't want

0:20:31.590 --> 0:20:36.780
<v Speaker 2>to like, I don't want to, but I'm doing it again.

0:20:38.220 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, if it makes you feel better, I'm also buying

0:20:42.060 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>this team.

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Early and often, baby.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.940
<v Speaker 2>Early and often. Early and often, baby. Let's go.

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.020
<v Speaker 1>I think that beauty is in the eye of the

0:20:48.060 --> 0:20:50.619
<v Speaker 1>beholder with this, right? It can't be this bad forever

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.700
<v Speaker 1>for a Texans defense that was one of the best

0:20:52.740 --> 0:20:55.330
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL last year, that has a defensive player

0:20:55.350 --> 0:20:57.609
<v Speaker 1>of the year candidate, that has a lot of the

0:20:57.650 --> 0:20:59.869
<v Speaker 1>same players that they had the year before. I mean,

0:21:00.230 --> 0:21:02.570
<v Speaker 1>the Texans are giving up the highest explosive.

0:21:02.150 --> 0:21:03.209
<v Speaker 3>Play rate in the NFL right now.

0:21:03.350 --> 0:21:03.590
<v Speaker 2>It's at 21.4%.

0:21:03.590 --> 0:21:08.550
<v Speaker 1>It's just not going to sustain like that. They're forcing

0:21:08.570 --> 0:21:11.970
<v Speaker 1>like zero turnovers right now. That's just not, I can't

0:21:12.070 --> 0:21:15.410
<v Speaker 1>imagine that's going to sustain. So I think the defense

0:21:15.450 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>will naturally get closer to at least middle of.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.020
<v Speaker 3>The pack in the NFL.

0:21:19.340 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And even if the offense gets a little quieter, to me,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.060
<v Speaker 1>I still see a world where they can play complimentary

0:21:25.100 --> 0:21:25.660
<v Speaker 1>with each other.

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to buy the Houston Texans.

0:21:27.780 --> 0:21:30.470
<v Speaker 1>The last team here is the Los Angeles Chargers, also

0:21:30.490 --> 0:21:32.090
<v Speaker 1>0-4 on the season.

0:21:32.109 --> 0:21:41.030
<v Speaker 3>Oh, my God. I'm selling this team.

0:21:41.350 --> 0:21:42.750
<v Speaker 1>Not that I don't think it could get a little

0:21:42.770 --> 0:21:45.710
<v Speaker 1>bit better, but Brett, it's the same issues that they

0:21:45.750 --> 0:21:48.370
<v Speaker 1>had last year, just as much more of an Achilles

0:21:48.410 --> 0:21:49.970
<v Speaker 1>heel because of what is going.

0:21:49.790 --> 0:21:50.330
<v Speaker 2>On around him.

0:21:50.910 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>They have had seven different offensive line combinations this season.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the most in the NFL. When I say

0:21:59.300 --> 0:22:03.889
<v Speaker 1>offensive line combinations, our researcher, Callie, basically put the minimum of,

0:22:04.150 --> 0:22:06.830
<v Speaker 1>you have to play at least 10 snaps here together.

0:22:06.869 --> 0:22:09.250
<v Speaker 1>You've got to have at least one or two drives

0:22:09.290 --> 0:22:10.750
<v Speaker 1>where you're playing together as a unit.

0:22:11.109 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Seven of those already. There's only been four weeks this season.

0:22:15.100 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And Brett, if you go back to last year, it's

0:22:18.540 --> 0:22:23.740
<v Speaker 1>crazy because they also led the NFL with 18.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Different O-line combinations.

0:22:26.020 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Brett.

0:22:27.270 --> 0:22:31.989
<v Speaker 1>There's only 17 regular season games. Now, they did make

0:22:32.010 --> 0:22:34.230
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, so they had the extra game. They had

0:22:34.250 --> 0:22:39.169
<v Speaker 1>a different O-line combination for every single game they played

0:22:39.250 --> 0:22:42.510
<v Speaker 1>last season. Now, it didn't add up exactly to that, obviously,

0:22:42.730 --> 0:22:44.310
<v Speaker 1>but that's crazy.

0:22:44.910 --> 0:22:47.770
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy how bad the luck is there for the Chargers.

0:22:47.990 --> 0:22:49.390
<v Speaker 1>So we can sit here and we can talk about

0:22:49.630 --> 0:22:51.830
<v Speaker 1>the inconsistencies in the run game and some of the

0:22:51.869 --> 0:22:54.490
<v Speaker 1>struggles with the receivers downfield and what in the hell

0:22:54.550 --> 0:22:55.869
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert's even looking at.

0:22:56.130 --> 0:22:58.409
<v Speaker 3>But when you have changes.

0:22:57.950 --> 0:23:01.060
<v Speaker 1>And inconsistencies on the offensive line like that, How do

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.979
<v Speaker 1>you realistically think that it's going to get better? It's

0:23:04.020 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get a little bit better with the Chargers,

0:23:06.500 --> 0:23:09.140
<v Speaker 1>but I'm selling this team. I think this ship has

0:23:09.220 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>sailed this season for them because how do you win

0:23:12.700 --> 0:23:16.380
<v Speaker 1>with that much change and uncertainty in the trenches?

0:23:16.540 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you can. I'm selling as well. Highest

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.540
<v Speaker 2>pressure rate allowed in the NFL. One of the worst

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.460
<v Speaker 2>turnover rates in the NFL. I think it's two and

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a half per game. I can't buy that. I just can't.

0:23:28.550 --> 0:23:30.709
<v Speaker 2>I can't do it. So, yeah, put me down for sale.

0:23:30.730 --> 0:23:33.270
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's all for the Aaron Ears report. We'll

0:23:33.290 --> 0:23:35.510
<v Speaker 1>talk about some other teams in similar ways in a

0:23:35.550 --> 0:23:37.550
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But I want to talk about the hottest

0:23:37.730 --> 0:23:40.510
<v Speaker 1>buy four weeks into the season here, Brett. And there's

0:23:40.550 --> 0:23:42.649
<v Speaker 1>nothing fancy about this one. There's no, oh, let me,

0:23:42.820 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, recognize maybe where a team is winning in

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the margins here or there.

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:46.859
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no.

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>What's been the best stock? Who's been the best team?

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.020
<v Speaker 1>Four weeks into the season, if you were doing a

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 1>power ranking of who's been the best, who you got?

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say Chicago. I mean, they've just been

0:24:00.940 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 2>playing with their food, honestly. Last two weeks, not even

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.500
<v Speaker 2>with Caleb on the field. Like, their best defense has

0:24:07.540 --> 0:24:09.820
<v Speaker 2>been their offense. They didn't let the Jets have the ball.

0:24:10.220 --> 0:24:13.350
<v Speaker 2>Case Keenum was consistently getting them out of trouble two

0:24:13.380 --> 0:24:17.369
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago on Monday Night Football. Like, Bajent was great.

0:24:17.470 --> 0:24:20.070
<v Speaker 2>Keenum was great. Caleb, before the injury, I thought was

0:24:20.130 --> 0:24:23.730
<v Speaker 2>playing really well. You have three quarterbacks on this team

0:24:23.890 --> 0:24:26.210
<v Speaker 2>that can start and win you games, plus a dominant

0:24:26.250 --> 0:24:29.619
<v Speaker 2>run game. They're getting 100 yards rushing per game just

0:24:29.670 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to the right side, let alone the runs to the

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.420
<v Speaker 2>left side too. Their ball control offense is the best

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.379
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. They're just unbelievable at it. And the

0:24:38.420 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 2>defense has played better than I thought they would, especially

0:24:42.310 --> 0:24:44.970
<v Speaker 2>after they got lit up by Bryce in the opening week.

0:24:45.310 --> 0:24:48.870
<v Speaker 2>Their fourth fewest EPA per play allowed so far this year,

0:24:48.970 --> 0:24:51.550
<v Speaker 2>and their fifth fewest in terms of total EPA allowed.

0:24:52.030 --> 0:24:55.469
<v Speaker 2>So if the defense is reasonably good and the offense

0:24:55.580 --> 0:24:58.790
<v Speaker 2>looks like that, I feel like there's nothing left to

0:24:58.830 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 2>complain about at that point. This looks like arguably the

0:25:01.540 --> 0:25:02.580
<v Speaker 2>best team in the NFC.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you brought up that Carolina game because

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly how I would talk about and

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe even defend your take for the Bears being one

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.740
<v Speaker 1>of maybe the best team in the NFL is because, yeah, okay,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.090
<v Speaker 1>the defense probably had their worst game against the Carolina

0:25:15.109 --> 0:25:16.609
<v Speaker 1>Panthers in week one so far.

0:25:16.510 --> 0:25:19.350
<v Speaker 3>This season, right? Who won that game?

0:25:20.490 --> 0:25:20.850
<v Speaker 2>Chicago.

0:25:20.890 --> 0:25:21.310
<v Speaker 3>Chicago.

0:25:21.950 --> 0:25:22.130
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:25:22.410 --> 0:25:25.290
<v Speaker 3>Why'd they win it? Because they scored 59 points.

0:25:25.369 --> 0:25:25.570
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:25:28.060 --> 0:25:30.940
<v Speaker 1>And the point of the game of football is to

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.980
<v Speaker 1>simply score more points than the other team. And I'm

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.510
<v Speaker 1>not sure I believe in anybody more than I believe

0:25:37.700 --> 0:25:39.710
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago to be able to do that. But they

0:25:39.869 --> 0:25:42.250
<v Speaker 1>are not my hottest buy to start the season.

0:25:42.290 --> 0:25:43.889
<v Speaker 3>They're one of them for sure. So I think it's

0:25:43.910 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 3>a good call out.

0:25:44.740 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But to me, the hottest buy is the Jacksonville Jaguars.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Because when you want to talk about complete football teams,

0:25:49.580 --> 0:25:52.020
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue there is not a more complete football team

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL than what the Jags have right now. Offense,

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.460
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence has been fantastic. If you're playing heavy zone

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>against him, he has been tearing it up all season long.

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And on those games where, okay, maybe it's not a

0:26:03.500 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>light it up through the air type of a game,

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got explosiveness in the ground game that they can

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>go to. And Tootin's been able to showcase that in flashes.

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:12.859
<v Speaker 1>When they have gotten in the red zone, Lawrence has

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.990
<v Speaker 1>been Excellent when space is at a premium. The defense

0:26:16.330 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is playing really well as well. They are forcing tight

0:26:18.859 --> 0:26:22.020
<v Speaker 1>window throws on a regular basis with how they are playing. Also,

0:26:22.020 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>11.4 missed tackle rate. That's 10th lowest in the NFL.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Fundamentally sound. Then you throw in the fact that they're

0:26:27.820 --> 0:26:30.139
<v Speaker 1>good on special teams. They've got Cam Little as an

0:26:30.260 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>ultimate weapon as a kicker as well. Brett, to me,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.220
<v Speaker 1>this is the most complete team in the NFL. If

0:26:35.260 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I was doing a power ranking in the league right now,

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:38.540
<v Speaker 1>this would be my top team.

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.740
<v Speaker 2>I can't really argue against it as long as you

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>put Chicago number two.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.090
<v Speaker 1>I think it still puts Seattle number two, but Chicago,

0:26:45.130 --> 0:26:47.330
<v Speaker 1>I think, is in that next category there.

0:26:47.410 --> 0:26:48.530
<v Speaker 2>Hell of a job, fellas!

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Man, we talked about this week, man, being a big

0:26:53.020 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>week to find out who we were, and you guys

0:26:55.380 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 3>answered that call, man.

0:26:57.030 --> 0:26:59.930
<v Speaker 1>Now let's take a look at players that are paying

0:27:00.210 --> 0:27:04.270
<v Speaker 1>dividends for you. So let's talk about these safe investments,

0:27:04.310 --> 0:27:07.350
<v Speaker 1>these players that you absolutely want to pour most of

0:27:07.390 --> 0:27:10.629
<v Speaker 1>your resources into because you know they're going to deliver

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:12.699
<v Speaker 1>week in and week out in a big way for

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>these teams. We've each got a couple of these guys

0:27:14.820 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that we want to go to, so I'll let you go.

0:27:17.140 --> 0:27:20.179
<v Speaker 1>Let's go rapid fire here. You sort of list off

0:27:20.220 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your three guys, kind of talk about them a little bit.

0:27:22.420 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give my thoughts, and then I'll move on to

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:24.260
<v Speaker 1>my three.

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll start with Jacob Rodriguez, the linebacker out of Miami,

0:27:27.570 --> 0:27:30.169
<v Speaker 2>which a lot of people might think, what do you

0:27:30.210 --> 0:27:32.490
<v Speaker 2>mean that's a thing that everybody was investing in? Everybody

0:27:32.530 --> 0:27:34.070
<v Speaker 2>knew he was going to be good. I promise you,

0:27:34.170 --> 0:27:36.790
<v Speaker 2>if you watch Texas Tech last year, the tackle numbers

0:27:36.810 --> 0:27:39.260
<v Speaker 2>that he's putting up are not surprising. This was an

0:27:39.300 --> 0:27:43.899
<v Speaker 2>incredibly safe investment before the season. A, because he was

0:27:43.940 --> 0:27:46.260
<v Speaker 2>going to get snaps on this Miami team. Let's be realistic.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 2>And if he was on the field, he was going

0:27:48.100 --> 0:27:51.580
<v Speaker 2>to get tackles. He has 46 in four games, second

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.379
<v Speaker 2>most in the NFL. He has 18 run stops, also

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.070
<v Speaker 2>second most. 27 total defensive stops. Again, this is in

0:27:58.270 --> 0:28:01.510
<v Speaker 2>four games, most in the NFL. His missed tackle percentage

0:28:01.609 --> 0:28:04.190
<v Speaker 2>is just 8%. That's four missed tackles on the year,

0:28:04.290 --> 0:28:07.470
<v Speaker 2>averaging one per game. So if you're only missing one

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.250
<v Speaker 2>tackle a game and you're getting, what, on average, 11.5,

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.100
<v Speaker 2>almost 12 tackles per game, that's pretty good. 16th best

0:28:15.260 --> 0:28:18.380
<v Speaker 2>missed tackle percentage there. He's been everything that we thought

0:28:18.430 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>he would be. Again, anybody that watched the Texas Tech

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.780
<v Speaker 2>Raider defense last year, you know, you go there and

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>you look at David Bailey and you look at Romello

0:28:25.580 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Height and all the pass rushers, but you couldn't watch

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:32.660
<v Speaker 2>that without seeing Jacob Rodriguez be arguably the most impactful

0:28:32.700 --> 0:28:34.719
<v Speaker 2>defensive player on that unit, and he's been that way

0:28:34.740 --> 0:28:37.780
<v Speaker 2>in the pros. As for number two, talked about him already,

0:28:37.900 --> 0:28:41.700
<v Speaker 2>Brock Purdy, best EPA per dropback in the NFL, 10th

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 2>highest completion percentage over expected. It was even higher than

0:28:44.540 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 2>that going into last week. highest passer rating in the

0:28:47.260 --> 0:28:51.050
<v Speaker 2>NFL he's been incredible MVP front runner for me or

0:28:51.090 --> 0:28:54.690
<v Speaker 2>at minimum top three on the ballot I have no

0:28:54.770 --> 0:28:57.270
<v Speaker 2>complaints about Brock Purdy so far this season he is

0:28:57.310 --> 0:28:59.210
<v Speaker 2>the reason why this Niners offense has been so good

0:28:59.670 --> 0:29:01.830
<v Speaker 2>and then of course JSN reigning offensive player of the

0:29:01.850 --> 0:29:05.290
<v Speaker 2>year he's been everything that he was last year but

0:29:05.470 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe even more as impossible as that sounds 4.3 yards

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 2>per route run which if that held the entire year

0:29:13.060 --> 0:29:16.010
<v Speaker 2>by the way would be the most ever In terms

0:29:16.050 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of receptions and yards, he has 32 catches, which is

0:29:18.660 --> 0:29:22.220
<v Speaker 2>fourth in the NFL, 481 yards, third in the NFL,

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 2>six touchdowns, most in the NFL. Six touchdowns in four

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.260
<v Speaker 2>weeks is just insane. He could give Randy's record a

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.170
<v Speaker 2>run for his money if they really, really press that

0:29:33.230 --> 0:29:35.550
<v Speaker 2>JSN button in the red zone more often. He could

0:29:35.590 --> 0:29:38.490
<v Speaker 2>get there. He's just spectacular, and everybody knew it going

0:29:38.530 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 2>into this year, and he's been exactly the same, if

0:29:41.580 --> 0:29:41.940
<v Speaker 2>not better.

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.170
<v Speaker 1>I think that's also what's most impressive about JSN is

0:29:50.210 --> 0:29:52.630
<v Speaker 1>that teams go into it every single week going without

0:29:52.670 --> 0:29:55.010
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Walker there. Like he's the guy, like he's who

0:29:55.050 --> 0:29:56.870
<v Speaker 1>they're going to run the offense through every single week.

0:29:57.190 --> 0:29:58.150
<v Speaker 1>Let's make sure that we stop it.

0:29:58.820 --> 0:29:59.500
<v Speaker 3>And then you can't.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.180
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that showcases how bright of a

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:03.550
<v Speaker 1>star he truly is. Okay, I'm going to get to

0:30:03.610 --> 0:30:06.730
<v Speaker 1>my three here. To me, these are the safest dividends

0:30:06.750 --> 0:30:08.490
<v Speaker 1>that we have had this season and just guys who

0:30:08.510 --> 0:30:10.209
<v Speaker 1>just mean so much to their team. The first one

0:30:10.450 --> 0:30:14.110
<v Speaker 1>is B. John Robinson because, Brett, he is, dare I

0:30:14.210 --> 0:30:17.550
<v Speaker 1>say it, almost O-line proof. Because when the O-line is

0:30:17.570 --> 0:30:19.709
<v Speaker 1>blocking well, oh, we see some special plays from B.

0:30:19.730 --> 0:30:20.270
<v Speaker 2>John Robinson.

0:30:20.650 --> 0:30:22.710
<v Speaker 3>But when the O-line isn't blocking well.

0:30:22.950 --> 0:30:26.180
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like he gets more special and the powers

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.500
<v Speaker 1>show up even more from him Listen to these numbers

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for Bijan so far four weeks into the season. 34

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:35.060
<v Speaker 1>total missed tackles forced. That's second in the NFL. 220

0:30:35.060 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>yards after missed tackles forced. Second in the NFL. 448

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.620
<v Speaker 1>yards after contact, which is sort of that individual ability

0:30:43.660 --> 0:30:45.300
<v Speaker 1>beyond the offensive line.

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>That's the most in the NFL. 376 yards on outside zone.

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:53.710
<v Speaker 3>138 rushing yards over expected. Both of those, most in

0:30:53.730 --> 0:30:54.410
<v Speaker 3>the NFL.

0:30:54.610 --> 0:30:56.470
<v Speaker 1>And his success rate on Outside Zone has just been

0:30:56.590 --> 0:30:58.110
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable as a whole.

0:30:58.370 --> 0:30:59.540
<v Speaker 3>Bijan is phenomenal.

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 1>And I know that I'm not breaking any glass, breaking

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.500
<v Speaker 1>any news, however you want to say it, about saying

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.750
<v Speaker 1>that to people here on this show. but he is

0:31:06.810 --> 0:31:08.390
<v Speaker 1>one of the safest bets that we have because he

0:31:08.450 --> 0:31:11.390
<v Speaker 1>is one of the best players in this sport. Will Anderson,

0:31:11.450 --> 0:31:13.690
<v Speaker 1>you talked about him earlier when we were talking about

0:31:13.710 --> 0:31:17.340
<v Speaker 1>the Texans and being a pillar of why it's hard

0:31:17.380 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to give up on this team. We're four weeks into

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the season. Defensive player of the year is almost wrapped

0:31:22.900 --> 0:31:25.810
<v Speaker 1>up with this dude. He's got 26 pressures, third most

0:31:25.850 --> 0:31:29.030
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. 10 quick pressures, fourth most. He's been

0:31:29.130 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>chipped 29 times because obviously he's Will Anderson. That's fourth

0:31:32.860 --> 0:31:34.820
<v Speaker 1>most in the NFL. So he's got all this production

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>while having all this extra attention on him. He's got

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>12 solo run stops as well. That's tied for most

0:31:40.260 --> 0:31:43.290
<v Speaker 1>amongst edge rushers. He's not just a pass rusher. He's

0:31:43.330 --> 0:31:46.110
<v Speaker 1>a total package as an edge rusher. And dude, they

0:31:46.210 --> 0:31:48.570
<v Speaker 1>play him everywhere. They'll play him on the right side,

0:31:48.630 --> 0:31:50.310
<v Speaker 1>on the left side. There was a play against the

0:31:50.350 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys where their defensive line was Danil Hunter at left end,

0:31:54.740 --> 0:31:58.220
<v Speaker 1>Will Anderson at defensive tackle, and then Jadavion Clowney at

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>right defensive end. That is so much power to deal with.

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.460
<v Speaker 1>And when you have the versatility of Anderson to be

0:32:03.500 --> 0:32:06.070
<v Speaker 1>able to win at any alignment on the defensive line

0:32:06.350 --> 0:32:09.190
<v Speaker 1>and win at this level, well, that's what I would

0:32:09.230 --> 0:32:11.209
<v Speaker 1>call the player who's going to pay dividends for you

0:32:11.250 --> 0:32:12.630
<v Speaker 1>and a pretty safe pick there.

0:32:13.090 --> 0:32:14.310
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned some of those B.

0:32:14.330 --> 0:32:16.850
<v Speaker 1>John Robinson numbers and him being number two in the

0:32:16.910 --> 0:32:19.550
<v Speaker 1>NFL in certain of these categories. It's because this next

0:32:19.590 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>guy and this last guy, Kenneth Walker, is number one

0:32:22.190 --> 0:32:26.180
<v Speaker 1>in some of these categories above him. 44 missed tackles forced.

0:32:26.530 --> 0:32:29.290
<v Speaker 1>most in the NFL. That was right above Bijan Robinson.

0:32:29.290 --> 0:32:33.130
<v Speaker 1>235 yards after missed tackles. Again, you heard me say

0:32:33.170 --> 0:32:36.110
<v Speaker 1>that Bijan's number two. It's because this guy is number one.

0:32:36.430 --> 0:32:39.990
<v Speaker 1>The value that Kenneth Walker brings to this Chiefs offense

0:32:40.230 --> 0:32:42.650
<v Speaker 1>and how it doesn't have to be all on Patrick Mahomes.

0:32:42.990 --> 0:32:45.540
<v Speaker 1>We already thought the Chiefs had one of the highest

0:32:45.580 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>ceilings of any team in the NFL. And then we've

0:32:49.060 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>watched what this guy is able to do. And now

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.370
<v Speaker 1>you've got to call up the builder and say, hey, buddy,

0:32:53.590 --> 0:32:55.430
<v Speaker 1>we need a couple of extra stories here on the

0:32:55.450 --> 0:32:57.310
<v Speaker 1>house because the ceiling's got to go a lot higher

0:32:57.350 --> 0:32:59.070
<v Speaker 1>given what they've been able to do on the ground.

0:32:59.250 --> 0:33:02.450
<v Speaker 2>By the way, side note, the entire Chiefs running back

0:33:02.490 --> 0:33:05.890
<v Speaker 2>room last year had 87 missed tackles for us. So

0:33:05.930 --> 0:33:08.230
<v Speaker 2>he's already halfway there. We've only played for a month.

0:33:08.670 --> 0:33:12.090
<v Speaker 2>So he's been that impactful for us.

0:33:12.110 --> 0:33:15.500
<v Speaker 1>60-yard run by Ken Walker III.

0:33:15.820 --> 0:33:17.100
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to the kingdom.

0:33:17.420 --> 0:33:19.300
<v Speaker 2>It's like you've been here all along.

0:33:20.190 --> 0:33:23.180
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's take a look at some penny stocks we're calling, right?

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 1>These guys that you could probably get on the cheap

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>right now because the hype train's not too much, but

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:28.980
<v Speaker 1>you better get in on it now because the hype

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.500
<v Speaker 1>train's about to leave the station here. Who are some

0:33:31.540 --> 0:33:33.729
<v Speaker 1>guys that you've seen play well early on who you

0:33:33.770 --> 0:33:36.970
<v Speaker 1>think could explode and maybe turn into household and headline

0:33:37.030 --> 0:33:38.690
<v Speaker 1>names over the next couple of weeks and for the

0:33:38.730 --> 0:33:39.310
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season?

0:33:40.450 --> 0:33:43.930
<v Speaker 2>How about another young Dolphins defender? Just because I know

0:33:43.970 --> 0:33:45.940
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people haven't got to watch Dolphins games

0:33:45.980 --> 0:33:48.580
<v Speaker 2>so far this year. I would just for the defense.

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.020
<v Speaker 2>These guys are really entertaining. So I'm going to go

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>with Chop Robinson, a year three edge over in Miami.

0:33:54.180 --> 0:33:56.550
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't played every game so far this season. He's

0:33:56.590 --> 0:33:59.770
<v Speaker 2>only got 65 pass rush snaps. And yet, he has

0:33:59.810 --> 0:34:03.970
<v Speaker 2>the highest quarterback pressure percentage per next-gen stats of any edge,

0:34:04.110 --> 0:34:05.670
<v Speaker 2>even over Will Anderson, believe it or not.

0:34:06.930 --> 0:34:10.940
<v Speaker 3>I won't believe it, actually. No, I'm choosing not to.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 2>No, won't do it. 13.8% quick pressure rate.

0:34:13.340 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

0:34:13.780 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 2>That's also incredible. He has a sack and four quarterback hits.

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:22.580
<v Speaker 2>0.78 average getoff. His first step was his calling card

0:34:22.660 --> 0:34:25.700
<v Speaker 2>in college. It is just as good now. He is

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:31.300
<v Speaker 2>incredibly explosive, very productive. Got 10 pressures last week against Minnesota.

0:34:31.340 --> 0:34:33.630
<v Speaker 2>They just could not handle him at all. He is

0:34:33.670 --> 0:34:36.550
<v Speaker 2>an edge rusher on the rise right now and really

0:34:36.590 --> 0:34:40.690
<v Speaker 2>deserves attention. My next pick here, Denzel Boston, which if

0:34:40.710 --> 0:34:43.549
<v Speaker 2>you play fantasy football, obviously you know who Denzel Boston is.

0:34:43.670 --> 0:34:46.330
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of people that maybe haven't watched the

0:34:46.370 --> 0:34:49.090
<v Speaker 2>Browns so far this year don't know about Denzel Boston.

0:34:49.469 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Rookie receiver, ex-receiver, lines up 86.7% of the time outside.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.740
<v Speaker 2>He is not a slot. He is purely an outside

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.500
<v Speaker 2>receiver that goes and boxes with corners every single snap.

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 2>And he is really good at it. 2.3 yards per

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.270
<v Speaker 2>route run, which is 17th among all receivers. That gives

0:35:08.290 --> 0:35:11.230
<v Speaker 2>some context to JSN being over four. He's kind of

0:35:11.270 --> 0:35:14.750
<v Speaker 2>in his own stratosphere where 2.3 is top 17. In

0:35:14.810 --> 0:35:18.780
<v Speaker 2>terms of receptions and yards, the numbers aren't necessarily crazy,

0:35:18.820 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 2>but if you're looking at the last Browns rookie wide

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 2>receiver to be this productive in their first four games,

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.630
<v Speaker 2>it's Corey Coleman, which was a while ago. That was

0:35:28.690 --> 0:35:31.830
<v Speaker 2>a while ago. So it's like, I don't know, a

0:35:31.969 --> 0:35:35.049
<v Speaker 2>decade or so. And as far as just any Browns

0:35:35.110 --> 0:35:37.380
<v Speaker 2>receiver to be this productive in their first four games,

0:35:37.390 --> 0:35:41.100
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about Jarvis Landry, which also was a while ago.

0:35:41.219 --> 0:35:42.419
<v Speaker 3>A while ago, yeah.

0:35:42.620 --> 0:35:44.819
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead and bless him there. Go ahead and bless

0:35:44.860 --> 0:35:46.100
<v Speaker 2>him there. Bless him.

0:35:47.180 --> 0:35:47.540
<v Speaker 4>Bless him.

0:35:48.100 --> 0:35:50.339
<v Speaker 2>God gave us this for a reason. Bless him.

0:35:51.300 --> 0:35:54.380
<v Speaker 1>I'll stay on the rookie train for my first guy because, Brett,

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:58.529
<v Speaker 1>this is the player. that if I had to vote

0:35:58.790 --> 0:36:02.029
<v Speaker 1>for Offensive Rookie of the Year right now, he'd get it.

0:36:02.310 --> 0:36:03.250
<v Speaker 2>I would vote for this player.

0:36:03.630 --> 0:36:07.509
<v Speaker 1>And that is Ravens Interior Offensive Lineman, Vega Ioane. I'm

0:36:07.550 --> 0:36:09.790
<v Speaker 1>giving love to the offensive lineman here, and I would

0:36:09.830 --> 0:36:12.130
<v Speaker 1>genuinely give this guy Offensive Rookie of the Year. He

0:36:12.150 --> 0:36:15.150
<v Speaker 1>has been that impactful to me. He started off as

0:36:15.190 --> 0:36:16.870
<v Speaker 1>the right guard for this team, but he even had

0:36:16.890 --> 0:36:19.750
<v Speaker 1>to play center last week. Went up against Jeffrey Simmons,

0:36:19.850 --> 0:36:21.710
<v Speaker 1>and of course, Jeffrey Simmons got a little bit of his.

0:36:21.730 --> 0:36:23.290
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jeffrey Simmons is one of the best defensive

0:36:23.330 --> 0:36:26.750
<v Speaker 1>tackles in the game. But Vega held up way better

0:36:26.790 --> 0:36:29.370
<v Speaker 1>than you would expect for a rookie player who is

0:36:29.430 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>moving from guard to center for the first time in

0:36:31.940 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a long time because he played guard when he was

0:36:33.820 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>at Penn State.

0:36:34.700 --> 0:36:36.180
<v Speaker 2>Specifically, what Vega.

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.259
<v Speaker 1>Iwane has done for them in the outside zone run

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.950
<v Speaker 1>game has been so impactful. Baltimore's gained 266 yards on

0:36:42.170 --> 0:36:44.790
<v Speaker 1>outside zone plays. That's fourth most in the NFL. And

0:36:44.870 --> 0:36:49.230
<v Speaker 1>specifically to his right side, 149 yards on those plays. Again,

0:36:49.330 --> 0:36:53.029
<v Speaker 1>top five, fourth most in the NFL. 375 yards to

0:36:53.050 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the right side in general, even just not outside zone plays,

0:36:56.300 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>second most in the NFL. And a 51.5% success rate

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 1>running to that side.

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:01.540
<v Speaker 2>Of the ball.

0:37:01.860 --> 0:37:04.980
<v Speaker 3>That, to me, is a Vega-Yawane stat.

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Because when you put a rookie offensive lineman on the

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage, You don't get that kind of success,

0:37:10.100 --> 0:37:11.620
<v Speaker 1>but you do if you are this good. So he

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:13.660
<v Speaker 1>would win Offensive Rookie of the Year, in my opinion.

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:15.620
<v Speaker 1>And then the last guy that I want to shout out, dude,

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.660
<v Speaker 1>Evan Williams, the safety from Green Bay. Not enough people

0:37:19.700 --> 0:37:22.340
<v Speaker 1>are talking about this dude. He is such an all-around

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>playmaker to me.

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:24.180
<v Speaker 2>They put him in the slot.

0:37:24.410 --> 0:37:26.410
<v Speaker 3>He is a box safety. He is a linebacker.

0:37:26.469 --> 0:37:28.830
<v Speaker 1>He is a blitzer. He is a coverage player. He

0:37:28.890 --> 0:37:31.750
<v Speaker 1>is everything for this team. He does so much for them,

0:37:31.950 --> 0:37:35.170
<v Speaker 1>and I think he is super underrated. Seven run stops,

0:37:35.230 --> 0:37:39.310
<v Speaker 1>tied for fifth most among safeties. 19 tackles in run defense,

0:37:39.550 --> 0:37:43.810
<v Speaker 1>second most among safeties. Four passes defended, second most among safeties.

0:37:44.270 --> 0:37:45.230
<v Speaker 3>He's got the whole buffet.

0:37:45.250 --> 0:37:47.230
<v Speaker 2>He's diversifying the portfolio.

0:37:47.570 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Get in on the Evan Williams train before it leaves

0:37:51.260 --> 0:37:52.950
<v Speaker 1>the station because I think it is only a matter

0:37:52.969 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of time before he is recognized as one of the

0:37:55.620 --> 0:37:58.100
<v Speaker 1>versatile and most impactful safeties in the NFL.

0:37:58.140 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 3>So get in on it.

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:00.620
<v Speaker 1>And those are some players that we think that you

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>should keep an eye on four weeks into the season

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:04.420
<v Speaker 1>that you should buy right now because we think they're

0:38:04.460 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>taking off.

0:38:05.610 --> 0:38:07.370
<v Speaker 2>Here's the snap. Blips on.

0:38:07.670 --> 0:38:09.330
<v Speaker 3>And it is Evan Williams again.

0:38:10.370 --> 0:38:15.090
<v Speaker 2>Fires it over the middle. And there is your dagger.

0:38:15.270 --> 0:38:18.250
<v Speaker 3>And they will close this one here today on the

0:38:18.310 --> 0:38:25.009
<v Speaker 3>road in Tampa. Let's get to the hot seat index, Brett.

0:38:25.650 --> 0:38:28.230
<v Speaker 3>Four weeks into the year, no coach had been fired yet.

0:38:30.660 --> 0:38:33.090
<v Speaker 3>But the seat's heating up. It's getting a little hot

0:38:33.110 --> 0:38:34.090
<v Speaker 3>for some of these coaches.

0:38:34.150 --> 0:38:36.589
<v Speaker 1>Who is one of them around the NFL that you

0:38:36.630 --> 0:38:37.969
<v Speaker 1>think that we should point out here on.

0:38:37.930 --> 0:38:40.129
<v Speaker 2>The hot seat index? Not to beat a dead horse,

0:38:40.170 --> 0:38:42.529
<v Speaker 2>but I'm going to go with Nick Sirianni here. I've

0:38:42.570 --> 0:38:45.350
<v Speaker 2>had this take for a while and I have had

0:38:45.850 --> 0:38:48.729
<v Speaker 2>lively discussions with Eagles fans about it over the years.

0:38:49.230 --> 0:38:51.110
<v Speaker 2>I'm not really sure what he brings to the building

0:38:51.950 --> 0:38:54.830
<v Speaker 2>other than, I guess, vibes, but he's not somebody who's

0:38:54.850 --> 0:38:56.770
<v Speaker 2>going to fix the offense. He's never been a great,

0:38:56.969 --> 0:39:00.549
<v Speaker 2>purely offensive coach, right? Like the wonder kids, like the

0:39:00.590 --> 0:39:03.930
<v Speaker 2>Sean McVeigh's and the Ben Johnson's, you know, what we think,

0:39:04.090 --> 0:39:06.609
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe Grant Edinsky, Nate Shieldhouse will be whenever

0:39:06.650 --> 0:39:08.410
<v Speaker 2>they get a job. Like he's never been that kind

0:39:08.430 --> 0:39:10.830
<v Speaker 2>of guy that you think, okay, it's a, it's fine

0:39:10.870 --> 0:39:13.190
<v Speaker 2>if they lose an offensive coordinator because Nick Sirianni is

0:39:13.230 --> 0:39:16.109
<v Speaker 2>still there. Their offenses have been up and down year

0:39:16.150 --> 0:39:18.270
<v Speaker 2>over year, depending on who the offensive coordinator is, because

0:39:18.310 --> 0:39:20.370
<v Speaker 2>Nick Sirianni is not going to fix it if their

0:39:20.390 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>offensive coordinator situation is bad. So what does he actually

0:39:23.700 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 2>bring to the table? Like, does the culture seem great

0:39:27.219 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to you? It doesn't necessarily seem great to me, And

0:39:30.180 --> 0:39:31.859
<v Speaker 2>even when it has been good, I feel like that's

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:36.460
<v Speaker 2>been more because of player leadership than Nick's leadership. I just,

0:39:36.550 --> 0:39:39.230
<v Speaker 2>I feel like when the team is so coordinator dependent

0:39:39.310 --> 0:39:42.450
<v Speaker 2>and it has been coordinator dependent for so long, they're

0:39:42.570 --> 0:39:44.509
<v Speaker 2>great when they have great coordinators, they're bad when they

0:39:44.530 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 2>have bad coordinators. At that point, the pattern is, The

0:39:48.980 --> 0:39:51.899
<v Speaker 2>head coach isn't bringing a lot to the table. So

0:39:52.300 --> 0:39:55.070
<v Speaker 2>what does he do? And I know I'm sounding very

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:57.690
<v Speaker 2>mean here. Believe me, this is the nicest way to

0:39:57.730 --> 0:39:59.770
<v Speaker 2>put it compared to how Eagles fans are talking about him.

0:40:00.150 --> 0:40:04.070
<v Speaker 2>And you cannot blow a game where you have a 96%

0:40:04.070 --> 0:40:05.930
<v Speaker 2>chance to win and you're on the two-yard line. You

0:40:05.989 --> 0:40:07.830
<v Speaker 2>cannot blow that game, and he blew that game. And

0:40:07.870 --> 0:40:11.230
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles squander a golden opportunity after a great drive.

0:40:11.570 --> 0:40:15.710
<v Speaker 2>Fourth down, incomplete. Rams take over, and they're still alive,

0:40:15.750 --> 0:40:19.469
<v Speaker 2>down by 10. So I would say his seat, with

0:40:19.489 --> 0:40:21.029
<v Speaker 2>the exception of maybe two other guys in the league,

0:40:21.050 --> 0:40:24.810
<v Speaker 2>is probably the hottest of any coach right now. Because Philly, historically,

0:40:24.870 --> 0:40:26.450
<v Speaker 2>is not a franchise that is going to give you

0:40:26.469 --> 0:40:28.549
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of grace just because you won a Super Bowl.

0:40:28.770 --> 0:40:30.810
<v Speaker 2>Like Doug Peterson was gone in under three years after

0:40:30.870 --> 0:40:33.149
<v Speaker 2>he won a Super Bowl. So I don't think he's

0:40:33.250 --> 0:40:36.050
<v Speaker 2>safe here. In fact, I'd say it's more the opposite.

0:40:36.510 --> 0:40:38.810
<v Speaker 2>He is on the hot seat. And also, side note,

0:40:39.010 --> 0:40:41.670
<v Speaker 2>here's a stat for you, since this is a stat-based show.

0:40:42.230 --> 0:40:44.730
<v Speaker 2>There have been three head coaches fired on their way

0:40:44.770 --> 0:40:47.130
<v Speaker 2>home from London in the last 12 years. I'm not

0:40:47.170 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 2>saying Nick Sirianni is going to become the fourth, but

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:52.380
<v Speaker 2>London tends to be a trip where if you get

0:40:52.460 --> 0:40:57.219
<v Speaker 2>embarrassed on the road, it really pisses off owners. If

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.060
<v Speaker 2>you're doing it like on the international stage, you're the

0:41:00.300 --> 0:41:04.140
<v Speaker 2>only game on TV. Like everybody's watching that game. If,

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 2>if you get embarrassed in that game, either you get

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.919
<v Speaker 2>fired on the way home or you get fired after

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:15.540
<v Speaker 2>the season, like owner's, I hate looking non-competitive in an

0:41:15.620 --> 0:41:16.460
<v Speaker 2>international game.

0:41:17.050 --> 0:41:19.509
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't have thought there were that many.

0:41:19.630 --> 0:41:20.049
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot.

0:41:20.130 --> 0:41:22.590
<v Speaker 3>It's a pattern. I guess that does make sense.

0:41:22.630 --> 0:41:25.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like you're getting embarrassed on not just national TV,

0:41:26.030 --> 0:41:27.930
<v Speaker 1>quite literally international TV.

0:41:28.010 --> 0:41:29.379
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess so.

0:41:29.739 --> 0:41:32.649
<v Speaker 2>It's never just, hey, it's this. I wouldn't say never.

0:41:32.790 --> 0:41:33.489
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it is.

0:41:33.750 --> 0:41:36.989
<v Speaker 1>My hot seat index coach is Todd Bowles. And I

0:41:37.050 --> 0:41:39.009
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a lot of things that go into this.

0:41:39.070 --> 0:41:43.130
<v Speaker 1>Very obviously, starting 0-4 when you were division favorites, I

0:41:43.150 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think is certainly reason enough to be on this list.

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But also, you just, I think, look at the full

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.380
<v Speaker 1>context with Bowles. Yes, they did win a lot of

0:41:51.420 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>division titles in a row with Todd Bowles. But there's

0:41:54.340 --> 0:41:56.739
<v Speaker 1>only one season where they won double-digit games, and it

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was 10.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.489
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the years, they're winning eight. They went

0:41:59.510 --> 0:42:00.990
<v Speaker 3>in nine. They went eight again.

0:42:01.530 --> 0:42:04.989
<v Speaker 1>This has been a mediocre football team. They've won divisions

0:42:05.050 --> 0:42:07.549
<v Speaker 1>because the rest of the NFC South hasn't been great.

0:42:07.610 --> 0:42:08.730
<v Speaker 3>But let's be honest.

0:42:08.770 --> 0:42:12.779
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've floated around 500 basically the entire time

0:42:12.820 --> 0:42:15.299
<v Speaker 1>that Todd Bowles has been head coach. So it's not like, oh,

0:42:15.340 --> 0:42:17.500
<v Speaker 1>they won all these divisions in a row. Look at

0:42:17.540 --> 0:42:21.940
<v Speaker 1>these 12, 13 win seasons. Look at these NFC Championship runs.

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>They've had a couple of playoff wins here and there.

0:42:24.219 --> 0:42:25.070
<v Speaker 3>This is very true.

0:42:25.130 --> 0:42:27.630
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, especially in the regular season,

0:42:28.190 --> 0:42:31.109
<v Speaker 1>It's been right around 500. And I don't think that

0:42:31.130 --> 0:42:34.089
<v Speaker 1>it helps that Dave Canales is looking really good with

0:42:34.130 --> 0:42:35.129
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Young right now.

0:42:35.469 --> 0:42:38.509
<v Speaker 3>Liam Cohen certainly looks great with the Jacksonville Jaguars. It

0:42:38.550 --> 0:42:39.670
<v Speaker 3>has over the last year.

0:42:39.530 --> 0:42:42.070
<v Speaker 2>And a half. Both of those guys were in the building.

0:42:42.750 --> 0:42:46.270
<v Speaker 1>And amidst the success, you obviously chose to keep Todd

0:42:46.310 --> 0:42:49.290
<v Speaker 1>Bowles over potentially elevating one of those guys. And I'm

0:42:49.310 --> 0:42:51.370
<v Speaker 1>not saying it was an easy situation or an easy

0:42:51.430 --> 0:42:54.020
<v Speaker 1>decision to make. But we sit here and I think

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:58.620
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for Bulls, you have to go, hey man, we

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 1>picked you over making a change. You go back to

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.660
<v Speaker 1>last year and how disappointing last year was after their

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.830
<v Speaker 1>start to the season and how it absolutely fell apart

0:43:08.930 --> 0:43:12.089
<v Speaker 1>in like every way possible for this team last year.

0:43:12.610 --> 0:43:16.649
<v Speaker 1>And the Buccaneers said, nope, we're still going to ride

0:43:16.670 --> 0:43:16.890
<v Speaker 1>with them.

0:43:17.870 --> 0:43:18.420
<v Speaker 3>And now they're 0-4.

0:43:18.410 --> 0:43:23.310
<v Speaker 1>So to me, Bowles' seat was already a little warm

0:43:23.610 --> 0:43:25.810
<v Speaker 1>going into the season because there was at least a

0:43:25.870 --> 0:43:29.950
<v Speaker 1>conversation about replacing him after how last season ended. Now

0:43:30.010 --> 0:43:31.750
<v Speaker 1>you have yet to get a win four weeks into

0:43:31.790 --> 0:43:34.630
<v Speaker 1>the season. You better believe that seat's really hot. I

0:43:34.670 --> 0:43:37.530
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Bowles gets fired during the season, Brett.

0:43:37.590 --> 0:43:38.609
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be honest with you.

0:43:38.969 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Probably not because who would you replace him with?

0:43:43.420 --> 0:43:46.180
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue is that a lot of their struggles

0:43:46.260 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>on the team come from the offensive side of the

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.610
<v Speaker 1>ball anyways. you're not going to elevate Zach Robinson to

0:43:51.650 --> 0:43:54.950
<v Speaker 1>the interim head coach position. So I don't know if

0:43:55.010 --> 0:43:59.730
<v Speaker 1>it's coming soon, but it certainly doesn't look like things

0:43:59.790 --> 0:44:02.030
<v Speaker 1>are going to end well for bowls after this season.

0:44:02.050 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we're getting to the point where if

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.259
<v Speaker 1>they don't turn things around in a major way, Tampa

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:07.500
<v Speaker 1>is going to be making a coaching change.

0:44:08.820 --> 0:44:12.020
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like it's yet another example of, of

0:44:12.140 --> 0:44:17.530
<v Speaker 2>teams that are really afraid to fire a, an on paper,

0:44:17.590 --> 0:44:19.790
<v Speaker 2>very successful head coach who's winning a bunch of division

0:44:19.830 --> 0:44:22.450
<v Speaker 2>titles and everything like that. Even when they know one

0:44:22.489 --> 0:44:25.509
<v Speaker 2>of their coordinators is the guy, like he's going to

0:44:25.550 --> 0:44:28.509
<v Speaker 2>be the guy for some other team. They know they're

0:44:28.530 --> 0:44:29.850
<v Speaker 2>going to lose him. They know he's going to be

0:44:29.910 --> 0:44:34.870
<v Speaker 2>great wherever he goes. It's eerily reminiscent of when the

0:44:34.930 --> 0:44:37.690
<v Speaker 2>Ravens let Mike McDonald walk out the door and every

0:44:37.750 --> 0:44:42.830
<v Speaker 2>Ravens fan knew that might've been a mistake. Not even

0:44:42.870 --> 0:44:44.870
<v Speaker 2>might've was a mistake. He won a Superbowl two years

0:44:44.969 --> 0:44:48.549
<v Speaker 2>in Seattle. And I think a lot of Ravens fans

0:44:48.570 --> 0:44:51.190
<v Speaker 2>were like, hey, we love John Harbaugh, respect John Harbaugh,

0:44:51.210 --> 0:44:53.810
<v Speaker 2>gave us a lot of good years. Mike McDonald's the guy. Like,

0:44:54.070 --> 0:44:56.189
<v Speaker 2>do not let him walk out the building. And they did.

0:44:56.630 --> 0:44:59.170
<v Speaker 2>And I think when they brought in Jesse Minter, it

0:44:59.250 --> 0:45:02.140
<v Speaker 2>was an acknowledgement of like, hey, we had some really

0:45:02.219 --> 0:45:05.980
<v Speaker 2>good homegrown talent here, and we let it go. We're

0:45:06.020 --> 0:45:07.620
<v Speaker 2>not going to make that mistake again. We're going to

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.540
<v Speaker 2>get Jesse Minter before somebody else does. And so far,

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens are looking pretty good. Now, ironically, they have

0:45:13.020 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 2>another one coming up in Declan Doyle who they're going

0:45:15.219 --> 0:45:19.219
<v Speaker 2>to lose, but... I think the Bucs are similar, and

0:45:19.260 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 2>they did it twice, where, okay, Dave Canales, he looked

0:45:22.300 --> 0:45:25.860
<v Speaker 2>like the guy. You have somebody who's young and coming

0:45:25.969 --> 0:45:31.210
<v Speaker 2>up within your ecosystem. We had previously seen him work

0:45:31.250 --> 0:45:34.890
<v Speaker 2>miracles with Chino Smith. Then he worked miracles with Baker Mayfield.

0:45:35.469 --> 0:45:37.110
<v Speaker 2>You let him walk out the door, goes to Carolina,

0:45:37.210 --> 0:45:39.770
<v Speaker 2>working miracles with Bryce Young. And then Liam Cohen, maybe

0:45:39.890 --> 0:45:43.250
<v Speaker 2>even more like everybody knew Liam Cohen could take whatever

0:45:43.290 --> 0:45:44.030
<v Speaker 2>job he wanted.

0:45:44.090 --> 0:45:45.879
<v Speaker 3>That was the big one. Cohen's the big one.

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 2>And there was that ugliness on the exit, right? It

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 2>was really, really ugly. And I think that might've been

0:45:53.660 --> 0:45:57.330
<v Speaker 2>the sign that they should have just hired Liam Cohen

0:45:57.510 --> 0:46:02.020
<v Speaker 2>and like, Whether you do the thing of, okay, we're

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:04.500
<v Speaker 2>going to promote Todd Bowles to president of whatever, or

0:46:04.980 --> 0:46:07.450
<v Speaker 2>you just flat out move on. I think if they

0:46:07.510 --> 0:46:10.250
<v Speaker 2>went back in time, they would have avoided the ugliness

0:46:10.430 --> 0:46:13.670
<v Speaker 2>with Liam and just made Liam the head coach and

0:46:13.930 --> 0:46:21.989
<v Speaker 2>probably been a better football team. All right. Game picks

0:46:22.260 --> 0:46:25.839
<v Speaker 2>for week five. We have 10 games, as always, and

0:46:25.860 --> 0:46:29.020
<v Speaker 2>we are instituting a new rule this week because you guys...

0:46:29.610 --> 0:46:30.370
<v Speaker 2>Have bloodlust.

0:46:30.690 --> 0:46:33.150
<v Speaker 3>I have missed two straight.

0:46:33.250 --> 0:46:36.750
<v Speaker 2>Games in the 10 spot. And you guys wanted punishment.

0:46:37.590 --> 0:46:41.180
<v Speaker 2>So we're instituting punishment. From now on, starting this week,

0:46:42.140 --> 0:46:44.900
<v Speaker 2>if we choose a game for our 10 spot and

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.660
<v Speaker 2>we get it correct, obviously we get 10 points. If

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:52.399
<v Speaker 2>we lose, we get minus 10 for the week. So

0:46:53.020 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 2>luckily I avoided punishment the last couple weeks. Ideally, I

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:58.009
<v Speaker 2>don't miss another 10 spot game, but they don't call

0:46:58.030 --> 0:47:00.830
<v Speaker 2>it the Coleman curse for nothing. Trevor, are you ready

0:47:01.980 --> 0:47:02.610
<v Speaker 2>for your punishment?

0:47:04.110 --> 0:47:04.900
<v Speaker 3>No, not me.

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:08.140
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting punished out here. I'm not missing any

0:47:08.180 --> 0:47:11.460
<v Speaker 1>games in the 10th spot. That's you, my friend. So, look,

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.580
<v Speaker 1>I haven't done that since week one. We're a long

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.140
<v Speaker 1>way removed from that. We've improved, just like a lot

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of teams have improved in the NFL since week one.

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:20.839
<v Speaker 3>So have my game picks.

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into it, of course, we have

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.379
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what our results were last week. You

0:47:25.420 --> 0:47:28.620
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that you missed your most confident game that you picked.

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:30.620
<v Speaker 1>You picked the Buffalo Bills over the New England Patriots.

0:47:31.890 --> 0:47:32.390
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately.

0:47:33.430 --> 0:47:37.350
<v Speaker 1>you got 36 points last week.

0:47:37.989 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how many I got. So we were tied.

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:44.610
<v Speaker 3>We were tied going into last week. So you got 36.

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:46.779
<v Speaker 3>How many did I get from my picks?

0:47:47.300 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, getting 36 while missing the 10 spot isn't terrible.

0:47:50.900 --> 0:47:52.580
<v Speaker 2>I'll just say it is because I missed the 10 spot.

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:55.020
<v Speaker 2>But other than that, not bad. You did hit your

0:47:55.020 --> 0:47:57.730
<v Speaker 2>10 spot last week. You took The Seahawks over the Chargers.

0:47:57.750 --> 0:47:59.330
<v Speaker 3>Never in doubt. Never in doubt.

0:47:59.370 --> 0:48:00.370
<v Speaker 2>Never in doubt.

0:48:00.390 --> 0:48:03.810
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no, no. From the first throw of

0:48:03.870 --> 0:48:05.890
<v Speaker 3>that game, never in doubt, baby.

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:08.740
<v Speaker 2>Buddy, the second throw was also a pick.

0:48:08.860 --> 0:48:12.219
<v Speaker 1>Well, we don't got to talk about that part. The

0:48:12.260 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>cigar's already lit, my friend. We're already off in the

0:48:15.300 --> 0:48:17.860
<v Speaker 1>patio in the next room. We're celebrating.

0:48:19.100 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 2>You got your 10 spot. However, it was a lot

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.549
<v Speaker 2>closer than you think. You got 37 points. On the week,

0:48:25.750 --> 0:48:28.710
<v Speaker 2>bringing your season total 148. So you were up by one.

0:48:29.010 --> 0:48:29.710
<v Speaker 2>Let's go.

0:48:30.390 --> 0:48:30.910
<v Speaker 4>Let's go.

0:48:31.110 --> 0:48:32.330
<v Speaker 2>Narrowly hanging in there.

0:48:32.670 --> 0:48:34.650
<v Speaker 3>That's what you want to see there. By the way,

0:48:34.710 --> 0:48:36.330
<v Speaker 3>we got to shout out some people who are getting

0:48:36.570 --> 0:48:38.150
<v Speaker 3>in on the game with us.

0:48:38.590 --> 0:48:41.009
<v Speaker 1>You guys can go through all of the 10 games

0:48:41.030 --> 0:48:43.089
<v Speaker 1>that we pick here on the show and put them

0:48:43.469 --> 0:48:46.069
<v Speaker 1>in order of confidence in the comments. Because if you

0:48:46.110 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 1>do and you have a really good week, we'll shout

0:48:48.420 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you out on the show like we are right here.

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:55.500
<v Speaker 1>Girls Say had 51 points today. 51 points last week.

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:57.060
<v Speaker 3>That was the top score that we had from anybody

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:00.450
<v Speaker 3>in the comments. Trey, 46 points.

0:49:00.510 --> 0:49:03.170
<v Speaker 1>So dude, if you would have gotten your 10 spot game,

0:49:03.570 --> 0:49:06.469
<v Speaker 1>you would have tied for second place of anybody here.

0:49:06.810 --> 0:49:10.129
<v Speaker 1>Dutch had 45 points as well. For some fun trends here,

0:49:10.130 --> 0:49:14.830
<v Speaker 1>23 of the 106 fans that submitted your confidence picks

0:49:14.870 --> 0:49:16.270
<v Speaker 1>out there, 23 of you beat me, 32 of you

0:49:16.310 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>beat Brett Nguyen. and buffalo that was the top trap

0:49:22.300 --> 0:49:30.720
<v Speaker 1>game 106 out of 106 entries picked the buffalo bills

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:33.980
<v Speaker 1>not a oh so i'm not alone took the new

0:49:34.060 --> 0:49:37.830
<v Speaker 1>england patriots there That single game cost fans a total

0:49:37.850 --> 0:49:40.010
<v Speaker 1>of 915 points.

0:49:40.070 --> 0:49:41.750
<v Speaker 3>So we're having fun. This is a lot of fun.

0:49:41.790 --> 0:49:42.529
<v Speaker 3>I'm enjoying this.

0:49:42.790 --> 0:49:44.250
<v Speaker 1>It's a fun way to go through some of these

0:49:44.590 --> 0:49:46.730
<v Speaker 1>big games every single week and get to pick them

0:49:46.770 --> 0:49:47.170
<v Speaker 1>here with you.

0:49:48.890 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 2>That game just single-handedly ruined my week in more ways

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.380
<v Speaker 2>than one. I'll say that. Are you ready for the

0:49:55.420 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 2>week five slate? Let's do it.

0:49:56.940 --> 0:49:57.660
<v Speaker 3>What game we start with?

0:49:58.480 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 2>We're going to start with, well, we might as well

0:49:59.980 --> 0:50:03.800
<v Speaker 2>start with the Patriots again, to be honest. Patriots, Raiders,

0:50:04.020 --> 0:50:04.420
<v Speaker 2>who you got?

0:50:06.260 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to take the Raiders. I'm going to take

0:50:08.100 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders in this game.

0:50:09.219 --> 0:50:11.780
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to put it in my sixth spot

0:50:11.820 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to confidence here.

0:50:13.380 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, the New England.

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:17.029
<v Speaker 1>Patriots a lot better last week. Drake May looked a

0:50:17.070 --> 0:50:20.310
<v Speaker 1>lot better. The defense looked pretty good trying to rattle

0:50:20.630 --> 0:50:24.189
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen. But then also mitigating what the Buffalo Bills

0:50:24.210 --> 0:50:26.629
<v Speaker 1>were able to counter with on the ground as well.

0:50:26.670 --> 0:50:28.330
<v Speaker 1>And so it was a much better looking Patriots team.

0:50:28.350 --> 0:50:30.210
<v Speaker 1>But man, I've got so much faith in what this

0:50:30.250 --> 0:50:32.990
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas Raiders team is doing. Maybe one special team's

0:50:33.070 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>blunder away from perhaps beating the Kansas City Chiefs last week.

0:50:36.890 --> 0:50:38.590
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the Raiders are on a roll.

0:50:38.830 --> 0:50:40.790
<v Speaker 1>And with that coaching staff and with some of the

0:50:40.850 --> 0:50:44.250
<v Speaker 1>new veteran leadership on that team, I'm not saying that

0:50:44.270 --> 0:50:47.009
<v Speaker 1>this is a letdown that's bound to happen. Give me

0:50:47.030 --> 0:50:48.610
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in this one and give me them at

0:50:48.630 --> 0:50:50.260
<v Speaker 1>the sixth spot when it comes to my confidence.

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:52.860
<v Speaker 2>See, I took the Patriots here, but I put it

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.860
<v Speaker 2>at the one spot. I'm still trying to figure out

0:50:55.900 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 2>exactly what these teams are. I know the Raiders are good.

0:50:58.700 --> 0:51:02.089
<v Speaker 2>I know the Raiders are very well balanced. But this

0:51:02.290 --> 0:51:05.020
<v Speaker 2>one spot is really more, I have No clue how

0:51:05.060 --> 0:51:08.070
<v Speaker 2>to read the Patriots at this point. More specifically, I

0:51:08.070 --> 0:51:10.029
<v Speaker 2>don't really know which Drake May we're going to get

0:51:10.110 --> 0:51:12.470
<v Speaker 2>from week to week. Is it weeks one through three

0:51:12.510 --> 0:51:14.569
<v Speaker 2>Drake May? Is it week four Drake May? Two very

0:51:14.590 --> 0:51:17.250
<v Speaker 2>different quarterbacks, two very different teams as a result.

0:51:17.350 --> 0:51:18.230
<v Speaker 3>Is it 2025 Drake May?

0:51:18.330 --> 0:51:20.089
<v Speaker 1>Is it 2023 Drake May?

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 3>We don't know.

0:51:20.989 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 2>We have no idea. Is it sophomore year North Carolina

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:26.540
<v Speaker 2>Drake May? They might not lose a game if it was.

0:51:26.620 --> 0:51:29.340
<v Speaker 2>Is it sophomore year of high school Drake May? It's

0:51:29.380 --> 0:51:33.569
<v Speaker 2>a mystery every single week. But man, when he is

0:51:33.780 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 2>on He is on. He was exceptional against the Blitz.

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 2>He had three touchdowns against the Blitz last week. They

0:51:39.340 --> 0:51:43.090
<v Speaker 2>blitzed him 14 times. He was awesome. That last touchdown

0:51:43.130 --> 0:51:46.340
<v Speaker 2>to Efton Chisholm, was it a great catch by Efton? Obviously, yes.

0:51:46.450 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 2>But Drake May kind of feeling that pressure, moving away

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:53.359
<v Speaker 2>from it, identifying the one-on-one, throwing a seed. When he's

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:55.740
<v Speaker 2>at his best, it's a very tough team to beat.

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:58.250
<v Speaker 2>So I took the Patriots, but very narrowly because I

0:51:58.290 --> 0:52:01.469
<v Speaker 2>think this is a true toss-up to me.

0:52:02.130 --> 0:52:05.609
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, the fact that they're at the sixth spot talks

0:52:05.650 --> 0:52:08.770
<v Speaker 1>about how close I feel like some of these games

0:52:08.830 --> 0:52:10.569
<v Speaker 1>could be this week. So obviously we'll get to some

0:52:10.610 --> 0:52:12.430
<v Speaker 1>that are lower on my list than number six where

0:52:12.450 --> 0:52:13.270
<v Speaker 1>I have the Raiders winning.

0:52:14.510 --> 0:52:20.410
<v Speaker 2>Next one. Minnesota, New Orleans. Who do we got? So.

0:52:21.469 --> 0:52:24.900
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take the Saints here, and this is

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little bit of a trend that

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:29.900
<v Speaker 1>I have with some of my picks where I'm looking

0:52:29.940 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>at teams who are sort of down on their luck,

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:36.870
<v Speaker 1>backs against the wall, have to come out swinging. And

0:52:36.950 --> 0:52:40.430
<v Speaker 1>when you look at Minnesota, we've talked about how, yes,

0:52:40.590 --> 0:52:44.549
<v Speaker 1>elite defensive performance through four weeks from Brian Flores and

0:52:44.590 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the fellas, but But on the offensive side of things,

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're not playing complimentary football at all whatsoever.

0:52:50.610 --> 0:52:52.509
<v Speaker 1>And even though I think that they are certainly a

0:52:52.610 --> 0:52:55.610
<v Speaker 1>good team with how great their defense is, that offense

0:52:55.750 --> 0:52:58.569
<v Speaker 1>really has to take not just a step, multiple steps

0:52:58.650 --> 0:53:00.330
<v Speaker 1>forward for me to have a lot of confidence in

0:53:00.370 --> 0:53:02.009
<v Speaker 1>them week in and week out to beat some of

0:53:02.030 --> 0:53:04.709
<v Speaker 1>the better teams. Now, New Orleans, they're licking their wounds

0:53:04.770 --> 0:53:07.430
<v Speaker 1>coming off of an absolute shellacking. I don't know if

0:53:07.469 --> 0:53:08.830
<v Speaker 1>that's a word, but I'm using it here on this

0:53:08.870 --> 0:53:11.490
<v Speaker 1>show at the hands of the Atlanta Falcons.

0:53:11.530 --> 0:53:13.290
<v Speaker 3>And it was home nonetheless.

0:53:14.210 --> 0:53:16.230
<v Speaker 1>But I think that was very much a game where,

0:53:17.230 --> 0:53:19.830
<v Speaker 1>Kellen Moore even said it afterwards, they were kind of

0:53:19.870 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>unprepared for that game. And I just don't see that

0:53:24.340 --> 0:53:27.000
<v Speaker 1>happening again this week. I think that they're going to

0:53:27.020 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be ready. I think this is going to be a

0:53:28.620 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>close game. But given the potential of New Orleans offense,

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:35.980
<v Speaker 1>give me the Saints to be able to win this game,

0:53:36.020 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>especially because through two weeks of the season, the early weeks,

0:53:39.710 --> 0:53:42.590
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Shuck had the most passing yards under pressure of

0:53:42.730 --> 0:53:45.009
<v Speaker 1>any quarterback in the NFL, so we know he's going

0:53:45.030 --> 0:53:47.530
<v Speaker 1>to get pressured and blitzed, but he's actually been pretty

0:53:47.610 --> 0:53:49.340
<v Speaker 1>decent at it, or at least was at the beginning

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:50.819
<v Speaker 1>of the year. So give me New Orleans, and I'm

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>going to take this one in the.

0:53:51.540 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Four spot here. So they said they weren't prepared for

0:53:54.540 --> 0:53:57.020
<v Speaker 2>that game, but how prepared can you be for Brian

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:01.060
<v Speaker 2>Flores one less day? Right, because it was a Monday game,

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:02.660
<v Speaker 2>and you've got to come back in six days and

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 2>play Brian Flores. I am really worried about the Saints

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 2>in this one, and I know Saints fans are upset

0:54:08.580 --> 0:54:12.020
<v Speaker 2>with me because I– just showed the passing chart of

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Shuck and was like, Hey, we should probably work

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:15.779
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the field more. Like he's been very

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:17.839
<v Speaker 2>effective when he did it. We should, we should probably

0:54:17.860 --> 0:54:21.390
<v Speaker 2>do that more. And the response was, well, they didn't

0:54:21.430 --> 0:54:23.050
<v Speaker 2>have a run game. So there was no play action.

0:54:23.930 --> 0:54:26.370
<v Speaker 2>Historically speaking, you actually don't have to have a good

0:54:26.430 --> 0:54:29.589
<v Speaker 2>run game to do play action. You just do it, right?

0:54:29.610 --> 0:54:31.750
<v Speaker 2>You have to commit to it. But this team has

0:54:31.810 --> 0:54:34.740
<v Speaker 2>been reluctant to go under center, reluctant to use play

0:54:34.840 --> 0:54:37.690
<v Speaker 2>action and, And when the run game doesn't work, their

0:54:37.850 --> 0:54:41.049
<v Speaker 2>answer has been, okay, we're going to throw quick and

0:54:41.170 --> 0:54:44.750
<v Speaker 2>outside the numbers and basically just turn our quick passing

0:54:44.770 --> 0:54:48.890
<v Speaker 2>game into our running game. And against this specific defense

0:54:48.910 --> 0:54:53.750
<v Speaker 2>from Minnesota where they love to eat quarterbacks alive who

0:54:53.810 --> 0:54:55.489
<v Speaker 2>work or at least try to work that area of

0:54:55.530 --> 0:54:59.250
<v Speaker 2>the field, I'm really worried about it. The Minnesota defense

0:54:59.310 --> 0:55:02.069
<v Speaker 2>is structured in a way where they force you to

0:55:02.110 --> 0:55:05.090
<v Speaker 2>be good at working the intermediate middle. And while Tyler

0:55:05.110 --> 0:55:07.299
<v Speaker 2>Shuck has been good at doing it, at least from

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 2>an analytics perspective, they haven't done it a lot, at

0:55:12.040 --> 0:55:13.580
<v Speaker 2>least to the degree that I think they're going to

0:55:13.660 --> 0:55:16.320
<v Speaker 2>have to do it in this game. So there's a

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit of an unknown here. It's kind of a

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:20.700
<v Speaker 2>chicken or the egg. Have they not been doing it

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 2>because they're just not doing it? Or are they not

0:55:24.100 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 2>doing it because they aren't sure if Shuck can do

0:55:25.780 --> 0:55:28.259
<v Speaker 2>it seven, eight times in a game?

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:28.460
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:55:28.810 --> 0:55:30.509
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll find out, but we're going to have

0:55:30.530 --> 0:55:32.810
<v Speaker 2>to find out in this game. So give me Minnesota.

0:55:32.930 --> 0:55:34.609
<v Speaker 2>I put them at the two spot. I think it's

0:55:34.670 --> 0:55:38.350
<v Speaker 2>very close either way, but I am worried about the

0:55:38.370 --> 0:55:39.049
<v Speaker 2>Saints matchup here.

0:55:39.450 --> 0:55:42.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, so you're getting your one and two least

0:55:42.360 --> 0:55:44.739
<v Speaker 1>confident games out of the way here to start.

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:45.460
<v Speaker 3>What's the next game?

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's just rip the Band-Aid off. Seattle, San Francisco. I

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:54.500
<v Speaker 2>struggle in this one, man. I know San Francisco is

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:57.129
<v Speaker 2>banged up, but they're always banged up. and I know

0:55:57.350 --> 0:56:01.150
<v Speaker 2>McDonald has had Brock Purdy's number in the past, but

0:56:01.190 --> 0:56:05.390
<v Speaker 2>just the way that he's playing right now, I mean,

0:56:06.830 --> 0:56:11.220
<v Speaker 2>it's really, really hard to pick against the Niners. Denver

0:56:11.260 --> 0:56:13.819
<v Speaker 2>threw everything they could at them. They held them down

0:56:13.860 --> 0:56:16.540
<v Speaker 2>for a long time. It was 3-3 deep into the

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 2>third quarter, and eventually they got frustrated. They called zero

0:56:20.700 --> 0:56:23.049
<v Speaker 2>a few times, and Purdy Like he ate it up.

0:56:23.050 --> 0:56:24.650
<v Speaker 2>He had a perfect passer rating and getting zero. And

0:56:24.670 --> 0:56:27.450
<v Speaker 2>they only called it three times. He averaged like 20

0:56:27.450 --> 0:56:31.989
<v Speaker 2>yards per attempt against zero. And that's the thing against

0:56:32.010 --> 0:56:35.509
<v Speaker 2>the Niners. Like it's a, it's a battle of patience.

0:56:35.650 --> 0:56:37.950
<v Speaker 2>And the second you get frustrated and try to get

0:56:37.989 --> 0:56:42.430
<v Speaker 2>more aggressive against them, Purdy and Shanahan just got you.

0:56:42.790 --> 0:56:48.810
<v Speaker 2>And I, I worry about, about Seattle trying to get

0:56:48.850 --> 0:56:51.450
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too aggressive here just to make something happen.

0:56:51.940 --> 0:56:54.819
<v Speaker 2>and opening the door for San Francisco to do that.

0:56:55.180 --> 0:56:59.049
<v Speaker 2>Seattle's red zone defense this year weirdly has been really

0:56:59.110 --> 0:57:02.830
<v Speaker 2>bad compared to their defense in between the 20s. And

0:57:02.910 --> 0:57:04.370
<v Speaker 2>if the Niners can just get down to the red zone,

0:57:04.410 --> 0:57:07.670
<v Speaker 2>I think they can score on them. And I still

0:57:08.210 --> 0:57:12.770
<v Speaker 2>have some reservations about the Seattle offense. Are they too JSN-centric? Sure.

0:57:13.070 --> 0:57:13.290
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:57:13.330 --> 0:57:16.190
<v Speaker 2>You know, they had a bunch of drives against the Chargers.

0:57:16.250 --> 0:57:19.790
<v Speaker 2>Two of them started inside the Charger 25-yard line. If

0:57:19.830 --> 0:57:23.450
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at drive-to-drive efficiency outside of that, it wasn't

0:57:23.470 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 2>a very good performance by them. So I'm reluctantly taking

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Seattle here. I'm putting it at the five spot.

0:57:32.620 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Wait, so you are taking Seattle?

0:57:35.140 --> 0:57:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I know. After all of that? I know. I know.

0:57:39.180 --> 0:57:42.540
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel good about it. I'm not saying I

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:47.010
<v Speaker 2>feel good about it. But I am doing it. I'm

0:57:47.030 --> 0:57:48.990
<v Speaker 2>going to regret it, but I'm doing it. Where were

0:57:49.010 --> 0:57:51.150
<v Speaker 2>they on the list for you? Five.

0:57:51.790 --> 0:57:52.090
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:57:52.130 --> 0:57:52.910
<v Speaker 2>Like dead in the middle.

0:57:53.430 --> 0:57:56.850
<v Speaker 1>They're three for me. So I've got Seattle winning as

0:57:56.910 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>well at the three spot. But I think them being

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:01.860
<v Speaker 1>so low on the confidence meter sort of gives respect

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:04.300
<v Speaker 1>to what I think about the 49ers and how good

0:58:04.340 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they are this season. I think there's only two teams

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:08.900
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL that I would take to beat the

0:58:08.980 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 1>49ers right now.

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:11.660
<v Speaker 3>And they happen to be playing one of them.

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:14.470
<v Speaker 1>Seattle and then Jacksonville is the other one those two

0:58:14.510 --> 0:58:16.370
<v Speaker 1>teams are the one and two teams in my opinion

0:58:16.450 --> 0:58:18.510
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL and then I put the Niners number

0:58:18.530 --> 0:58:21.310
<v Speaker 1>three Brock Purdy is truly playing at an MVP level

0:58:21.410 --> 0:58:23.350
<v Speaker 1>however if you look at the last couple of years

0:58:23.770 --> 0:58:29.060
<v Speaker 1>the two worst passing performances for Brock Purdy have come

0:58:29.380 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Seattle Seahawks and Mike McDonnell's defense and I

0:58:31.920 --> 0:58:33.300
<v Speaker 1>think if you go back even further if you go

0:58:33.340 --> 0:58:35.220
<v Speaker 1>back to when Mike McDonnell was on the Baltimore Ravens

0:58:35.280 --> 0:58:39.270
<v Speaker 1>as well that was also one of Brock Purdy's worst

0:58:39.950 --> 0:58:44.140
<v Speaker 1>um quarterback rating performances as well. Mike McDonald just has

0:58:44.200 --> 0:58:46.860
<v Speaker 1>Brock Purdy's number, or at least he has in the past.

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:51.220
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean he will 100% this upcoming game, but I

0:58:51.260 --> 0:58:52.940
<v Speaker 1>got to go with the history here, and I just

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:56.140
<v Speaker 1>got to go with one of the few coaches that

0:58:56.260 --> 0:59:00.830
<v Speaker 1>seems to get the better of Brock Purdy and Kyle Shanahan.

0:59:01.250 --> 0:59:03.050
<v Speaker 1>Give me Seattle here. I got them in the three spot.

0:59:03.930 --> 0:59:05.710
<v Speaker 1>It's very much picking with your head over picking with

0:59:05.750 --> 0:59:07.430
<v Speaker 1>your heart. My heart is telling.

0:59:07.150 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Me this is a wonky one for Seattle. My head

0:59:10.580 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 2>is telling me the history is the history. So I

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:14.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to be very close either way.

0:59:14.860 --> 0:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought we were going to be different for the

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:20.420
<v Speaker 1>first three games there. That would have made this pretty exciting. Well,

0:59:20.460 --> 0:59:22.110
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think this week is already exciting because

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:24.750
<v Speaker 1>we're starting off with picking different games already and we're

0:59:24.770 --> 0:59:25.730
<v Speaker 1>only three games in.

0:59:25.770 --> 0:59:29.030
<v Speaker 2>We've got two different ones. Let's go with one that

0:59:29.070 --> 0:59:38.050
<v Speaker 2>I think Maybe we'll be the same on Chargers-Broncos? I

0:59:38.070 --> 0:59:38.730
<v Speaker 2>have the Chargers.

0:59:39.580 --> 0:59:40.860
<v Speaker 3>Over the Broncos. Okay.

0:59:40.900 --> 0:59:44.450
<v Speaker 2>I did too. So we're actually really, come on, man.

0:59:44.510 --> 0:59:46.430
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to get one up on you.

0:59:46.770 --> 0:59:49.550
<v Speaker 1>So this is again, going back to the theme that

0:59:49.570 --> 0:59:51.350
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about a couple of minutes ago, where

0:59:52.070 --> 0:59:54.530
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at some of these teams, especially some of

0:59:54.570 --> 0:59:57.070
<v Speaker 1>these teams that maybe we had higher hopes for going

0:59:57.090 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>into the season. And I look at them as this,

0:59:59.390 --> 1:00:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a back against the wall type of a moment.

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand that like Denver's a good football team. Bo

1:00:05.040 --> 1:00:09.510
<v Speaker 1>Nix hasn't been great for good stretches of the early

1:00:09.550 --> 1:00:12.450
<v Speaker 1>part of this season, and last week, just simply, he

1:00:12.590 --> 1:00:15.710
<v Speaker 1>did not play quarterback well enough for them to win

1:00:15.750 --> 1:00:18.490
<v Speaker 1>that game. All of that to say, Denver's still a

1:00:18.530 --> 1:00:23.540
<v Speaker 1>really good and talented football team. However, if the Chargers

1:00:23.580 --> 1:00:30.669
<v Speaker 1>go 0-5, brother, we're... I mean, if you're 0-4, you're

1:00:30.810 --> 1:00:33.130
<v Speaker 1>on the cusp of just packing it in mentally. You

1:00:33.150 --> 1:00:35.970
<v Speaker 1>go 0-5, the wheels are going to fall off. And

1:00:36.010 --> 1:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I just, again, going back to sort of what I

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was talking about a little bit with the New Orleans Saints,

1:00:42.760 --> 1:00:46.790
<v Speaker 1>you've basically got to punch back here. or you won't

1:00:46.810 --> 1:00:49.570
<v Speaker 1>at all for the rest of the season. So I'll

1:00:49.710 --> 1:00:52.870
<v Speaker 1>take the more desperate team. There's not a lot that

1:00:52.930 --> 1:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I can say analysis-wise that would actually point me to

1:00:56.420 --> 1:00:57.380
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers winning this.

1:00:57.320 --> 1:00:58.820
<v Speaker 3>Game other than.

1:01:00.320 --> 1:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Bo Nix continuing to look reserved in how he is

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>scanning the field, where he is choosing to get rid

1:01:06.500 --> 1:01:09.860
<v Speaker 1>of the football, and how inexplosive it feels like that

1:01:09.960 --> 1:01:12.939
<v Speaker 1>offense is overall right now, especially in the early parts

1:01:12.980 --> 1:01:15.230
<v Speaker 1>of the game, first half, and then somehow Sometimes it

1:01:15.270 --> 1:01:17.290
<v Speaker 1>even bleeds into that second half and that third quarter

1:01:17.330 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as well with how conservative they are. You could look

1:01:20.380 --> 1:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>at that and then you could say, hey, if this

1:01:22.440 --> 1:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>is the game where Justin Herbert's deep completion percentage and

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:28.740
<v Speaker 1>deep passes turns around, yeah, then I could see a

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>path for the Chargers to win this one. But I

1:01:31.180 --> 1:01:33.930
<v Speaker 1>don't know how it's exactly going to happen. But I

1:01:34.010 --> 1:01:37.390
<v Speaker 1>do think that the Chargers are an extremely desperate football team.

1:01:37.730 --> 1:01:40.770
<v Speaker 1>And whatever the best version of this team is, given

1:01:40.810 --> 1:01:43.700
<v Speaker 1>the injuries that they have, I think we see it

1:01:43.760 --> 1:01:47.060
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday against Denver. And if we don't, oh boy,

1:01:48.300 --> 1:01:50.990
<v Speaker 1>this season's going to get ugly when it comes to

1:01:51.010 --> 1:01:52.350
<v Speaker 1>win-loss record for the Chargers.

1:01:53.550 --> 1:01:57.050
<v Speaker 2>What spot did you put it in? Oh, five.

1:01:57.530 --> 1:01:58.710
<v Speaker 3>I got this in a five spot right.

1:01:58.630 --> 1:02:03.110
<v Speaker 2>In the middle. I put it at seven. I'm actually

1:02:03.350 --> 1:02:04.890
<v Speaker 2>pretty confident in this one.

1:02:05.430 --> 1:02:06.150
<v Speaker 3>You madman.

1:02:06.830 --> 1:02:11.130
<v Speaker 2>So before we started recording this, it came out Patrick Sertan,

1:02:11.350 --> 1:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Pat Bryant, obviously both injured, potential IR candidates. So it

1:02:16.560 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>could get late early in Denver if things keep going

1:02:19.060 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>this way. Not to mention their running backs, like their

1:02:22.940 --> 1:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>backfield sans Jonah Coleman is just bad.

1:02:27.200 --> 1:02:29.930
<v Speaker 1>Hey, respect RJ Harvey getting 10 targets and 10 catches

1:02:29.970 --> 1:02:30.330
<v Speaker 1>last week.

1:02:30.390 --> 1:02:33.950
<v Speaker 2>Respect RJ Harvey. But he's a receiver out of the backfield.

1:02:34.090 --> 1:02:35.650
<v Speaker 2>As far as just having a consistent.

1:02:35.690 --> 1:02:37.630
<v Speaker 3>I said respect him. I said respect him.

1:02:37.690 --> 1:02:38.930
<v Speaker 2>I'm respecting.

1:02:40.350 --> 1:02:40.890
<v Speaker 3>The role.

1:02:41.690 --> 1:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>But as a team, they were negative 19 rushing yards

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:48.300
<v Speaker 2>over expected. They only averaged 3.7 per carry, and even

1:02:48.340 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 2>that was generous. J.K. Dobbins specifically struggled to fight through contact,

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:58.460
<v Speaker 2>averaging 3.7, I believe, just against light boxes, let alone

1:02:58.560 --> 1:03:02.470
<v Speaker 2>heavier boxes. plus the Bo Nix stuff, plus the injuries.

1:03:05.290 --> 1:03:08.050
<v Speaker 2>If the Chargers could stop turning it over two and

1:03:08.070 --> 1:03:10.970
<v Speaker 2>a half times per game on average, last week it

1:03:11.010 --> 1:03:13.490
<v Speaker 2>was four, the week before that they fumbled, or two

1:03:13.510 --> 1:03:15.260
<v Speaker 2>weeks before that they fumbled six times in one game.

1:03:15.540 --> 1:03:17.300
<v Speaker 2>If they could just hold on to the ball, this

1:03:17.360 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 2>team could not even just beat Denver, I think capably

1:03:21.800 --> 1:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>beat Denver because of everything going on with the Broncos.

1:03:25.170 --> 1:03:27.570
<v Speaker 2>But that is the great equalizer here, is just the

1:03:27.590 --> 1:03:30.310
<v Speaker 2>Chargers turnover issue. So we'll see what happens, but I

1:03:30.330 --> 1:03:31.730
<v Speaker 2>think the Chargers win, and I put it in the

1:03:31.830 --> 1:03:34.190
<v Speaker 2>7th spot. Ooh, the 7th spot.

1:03:34.290 --> 1:03:35.130
<v Speaker 3>All right, which one's next?

1:03:36.450 --> 1:03:40.430
<v Speaker 2>Chicago Green Bay. I imagine you're going Bears here.

1:03:41.710 --> 1:03:44.250
<v Speaker 1>This one is in the 7th spot for me, and

1:03:44.350 --> 1:03:46.610
<v Speaker 1>I am indeed going the Chicago Bears over the Green

1:03:46.630 --> 1:03:49.780
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers. I will say that it was nice to

1:03:49.860 --> 1:03:53.790
<v Speaker 1>see Jordan Love... play well in the area where I

1:03:53.870 --> 1:03:56.790
<v Speaker 1>think he really needs to moving forward. And that is

1:03:56.910 --> 1:03:59.210
<v Speaker 1>in the short passing game. Remember, we've talked over the

1:03:59.250 --> 1:04:01.850
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks of if the offensive line is

1:04:01.890 --> 1:04:04.590
<v Speaker 1>going to be this bad, Jordan Love has to be

1:04:04.610 --> 1:04:08.430
<v Speaker 1>a lot better in the air yards of zero to

1:04:08.430 --> 1:04:10.790
<v Speaker 1>10 yards, right? The quick game, getting it out of

1:04:10.810 --> 1:04:13.210
<v Speaker 1>your hand pretty quickly, because that's not the brand of

1:04:13.310 --> 1:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ball Jordan Love wants to play. Jordan Love wants to

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:20.300
<v Speaker 1>play backyard football. He wants to snap the football. He

1:04:20.340 --> 1:04:22.300
<v Speaker 1>wants to hold onto it. He wants to scan the

1:04:22.340 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>field and he wants to.

1:04:23.260 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Make the big play.

1:04:24.180 --> 1:04:26.740
<v Speaker 1>Now, obviously that has its pros and cons, but I

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:29.550
<v Speaker 1>genuinely think that a lot of times that's a good thing.

1:04:29.700 --> 1:04:31.590
<v Speaker 3>I like the way that Jordan Love plays.

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:35.130
<v Speaker 1>He plays a brand of football that attacks the field

1:04:35.530 --> 1:04:38.530
<v Speaker 1>and he's not afraid to attempt the passes that you

1:04:38.590 --> 1:04:42.150
<v Speaker 1>need to, to win games in this league. But this year,

1:04:42.410 --> 1:04:44.610
<v Speaker 1>with that offensive line the way that it is, you've

1:04:44.650 --> 1:04:46.870
<v Speaker 1>got to adapt. And through the first couple of weeks

1:04:46.930 --> 1:04:49.890
<v Speaker 1>of the season, he wasn't ready to adapt. Against the Buccaneers,

1:04:50.130 --> 1:04:54.110
<v Speaker 1>he was. Now, the Bucs, not a great football team.

1:04:54.230 --> 1:04:55.910
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk a little bit more about that when we

1:04:55.950 --> 1:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>get to another game that's a little bit higher on

1:04:58.000 --> 1:04:59.140
<v Speaker 1>my confidence meter here.

1:04:59.860 --> 1:05:02.380
<v Speaker 2>A little? Yeah.

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But can't give it away, Brett. The people have got

1:05:05.380 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to continue to watch. You can't give it away quite yet.

1:05:08.310 --> 1:05:09.870
<v Speaker 1>But I think that it was nice to at least

1:05:09.970 --> 1:05:12.710
<v Speaker 1>see him really succeed in that short area type of

1:05:12.750 --> 1:05:14.450
<v Speaker 1>passing game because that's what you're going to need. Now,

1:05:14.550 --> 1:05:17.390
<v Speaker 1>all of that to say, is it going to be

1:05:17.410 --> 1:05:18.510
<v Speaker 1>enough to keep up with the Bears?

1:05:19.890 --> 1:05:21.940
<v Speaker 3>Sure doesn't feel like it. So I got Chicago in

1:05:21.960 --> 1:05:22.919
<v Speaker 3>this one at the seventh spot.

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:27.020
<v Speaker 2>We had mentioned in the show earlier this week that

1:05:27.060 --> 1:05:32.300
<v Speaker 2>the Bears had more first downs than the Jets had plays. Yes.

1:05:34.100 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>They were basically toying with them. in a respectful kind

1:05:37.900 --> 1:05:39.740
<v Speaker 2>of way. Cause I don't think Ben Johnson wanted to

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 2>embarrass Aaron Glenn. Obviously they're close. They have a history together,

1:05:43.370 --> 1:05:45.830
<v Speaker 2>but they were doing everything they can to show that

1:05:45.910 --> 1:05:48.550
<v Speaker 2>this was a very easy football game for them just

1:05:48.590 --> 1:05:49.610
<v Speaker 2>without running up the score.

1:05:50.250 --> 1:05:50.410
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:05:50.990 --> 1:05:53.390
<v Speaker 2>And I, I don't expect them to do the same

1:05:53.410 --> 1:05:56.510
<v Speaker 2>thing against green Bay, but Chicago looks like a true

1:05:56.550 --> 1:06:00.380
<v Speaker 2>juggernaut and green Bay is just banged up in all

1:06:00.410 --> 1:06:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the worst ways. I think they still have great elements

1:06:03.220 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>to them. I think Jordan love is a very good quarterback. Um, Obviously,

1:06:06.700 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Christian Watson is dynamic. Tucker Kraft, one of the best

1:06:09.500 --> 1:06:13.160
<v Speaker 2>yards after catch weapons at the tight end position. Evan Williams,

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about a couple times. He's playing out of

1:06:15.660 --> 1:06:21.570
<v Speaker 2>his mind. The cupboard isn't completely bare, but when you

1:06:21.650 --> 1:06:27.470
<v Speaker 2>compare it to what the Bears have, I just don't

1:06:27.530 --> 1:06:29.310
<v Speaker 2>think it's close. I really don't. So I put them

1:06:29.350 --> 1:06:30.770
<v Speaker 2>at the eight spot, Bears over Packers.

1:06:30.790 --> 1:06:30.990
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1:06:31.470 --> 1:06:31.740
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:06:31.820 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>About the same.

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>About the same for that one then. It's close. It's close.

1:06:35.200 --> 1:06:37.490
<v Speaker 2>I do want you to talk about Dallas-Tampa, though. Let's

1:06:37.510 --> 1:06:38.169
<v Speaker 2>just do that now.

1:06:39.350 --> 1:06:40.950
<v Speaker 3>Ten spot, not even close.

1:06:41.310 --> 1:06:42.450
<v Speaker 2>Barely even thought about it.

1:06:42.970 --> 1:06:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Barely even thought about it.

1:06:44.630 --> 1:06:44.850
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:06:45.350 --> 1:06:47.330
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, I'm taking the Bucs to beat the Cowboys in

1:06:47.370 --> 1:06:47.910
<v Speaker 3>the ten spot.

1:06:47.950 --> 1:06:48.410
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm kidding.

1:06:48.810 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Cowboys to beat the Buccaneers in the

1:06:51.520 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>ten spot on Thursday Night Football. There's just nothing about

1:06:57.220 --> 1:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this Buccaneers offense that tells me it's going to keep

1:06:59.880 --> 1:07:00.580
<v Speaker 1>pace with Dallas.

1:07:01.260 --> 1:07:01.940
<v Speaker 3>Even if you.

1:07:01.820 --> 1:07:04.750
<v Speaker 1>Tell me, hey, we're going to get the best– game

1:07:04.790 --> 1:07:08.410
<v Speaker 1>that the Bucs defense has played yet this season which

1:07:08.450 --> 1:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think would be a stretch in and of itself

1:07:12.440 --> 1:07:15.460
<v Speaker 1>this Cowboys offense has so many answers to so many

1:07:15.500 --> 1:07:18.500
<v Speaker 1>different problems whether it's in the passing game running game

1:07:18.580 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>okay it hasn't always been there but like there have

1:07:20.220 --> 1:07:22.580
<v Speaker 1>been moments where they've been good with the ground game

1:07:22.820 --> 1:07:24.820
<v Speaker 1>so we know it's possible for them some of their

1:07:24.860 --> 1:07:27.190
<v Speaker 1>offensive linemen man I mean like Tyler Guyton's really kicking

1:07:27.270 --> 1:07:29.210
<v Speaker 1>ass I mean like a lot of their offensive linemen

1:07:29.230 --> 1:07:30.930
<v Speaker 1>are playing really well as a unit even with some

1:07:30.950 --> 1:07:33.950
<v Speaker 1>guys in and out of the lineup I feel really

1:07:34.010 --> 1:07:38.090
<v Speaker 1>confident about the offense on Dallas' side of things and

1:07:38.130 --> 1:07:41.380
<v Speaker 1>specifically their quarterback and how they're handling things post-week one.

1:07:41.410 --> 1:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Week one was a flub for sure for this entire team,

1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but they've looked good and Dak has looked good since.

1:07:48.140 --> 1:07:49.780
<v Speaker 1>So I've got a lot of confidence in the points

1:07:49.800 --> 1:07:51.180
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys are going to be able to put up.

1:07:51.420 --> 1:07:53.340
<v Speaker 1>And for the Buccaneers, I just don't have that faith

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:55.540
<v Speaker 1>in Zach Robinson's offense right now for them. And I

1:07:55.560 --> 1:07:57.900
<v Speaker 1>don't even think that's mainly a Jalen Daniels problem. Jalen

1:07:57.920 --> 1:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Daniels looked okay for an undrafted free agent making his

1:08:00.680 --> 1:08:03.590
<v Speaker 1>first start. But even when Baker Mayfield is out there, Brett,

1:08:05.030 --> 1:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>who do you fear on this Bucs team? I mean,

1:08:08.060 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Emeka Igbuka a lot. I think Igbuka's a

1:08:12.060 --> 1:08:15.450
<v Speaker 1>really nice player. Do you fear him? This team uses

1:08:15.530 --> 1:08:17.870
<v Speaker 1>motion all the time, and Igbuka's the motion man, and

1:08:17.890 --> 1:08:19.990
<v Speaker 1>they're going to him all the time. Teams don't fear

1:08:20.050 --> 1:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>him right now. Chris Godwin, love him. He's not the

1:08:23.260 --> 1:08:27.620
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin from 2017, 2018, 2019. Teams don't fear Chris Godwin.

1:08:27.960 --> 1:08:31.420
<v Speaker 1>They don't fear Cade Otten. They certainly don't fear Bucky

1:08:31.500 --> 1:08:34.550
<v Speaker 1>Irving right now, who is just not forcing the missed

1:08:34.610 --> 1:08:37.290
<v Speaker 1>tackles that he did in his rookie season that made

1:08:37.330 --> 1:08:39.450
<v Speaker 1>him such a dangerous runner out of the backfield.

1:08:39.910 --> 1:08:41.150
<v Speaker 3>There's just not a threat.

1:08:41.650 --> 1:08:46.019
<v Speaker 1>There's no threats there. that can really strike fear in defenses.

1:08:46.479 --> 1:08:50.860
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why you're seeing the Bucs struggle

1:08:50.900 --> 1:08:53.310
<v Speaker 1>to move the ball against teams. It's not just an

1:08:53.410 --> 1:08:57.309
<v Speaker 1>execution thing. I think defenses believe they can be pretty

1:08:57.410 --> 1:09:00.300
<v Speaker 1>aggressive in how they play the Bucs because they don't

1:09:00.400 --> 1:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>fear they're getting beat. They fear that, okay, maybe you'll

1:09:03.960 --> 1:09:07.300
<v Speaker 1>give up a one or two decent chunk plays here

1:09:07.320 --> 1:09:09.809
<v Speaker 1>and there, but it's not going to be catastrophic stuff.

1:09:09.850 --> 1:09:12.050
<v Speaker 1>That's the way that I feel like they're playing right now.

1:09:13.050 --> 1:09:15.229
<v Speaker 1>And so I just, I feel the total opposite about

1:09:15.250 --> 1:09:20.710
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys offense. And the game is about Who has

1:09:20.729 --> 1:09:24.269
<v Speaker 1>the most points when the clock hits zero? Well, I

1:09:24.270 --> 1:09:25.710
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of faith that that's going to be Dallas,

1:09:25.729 --> 1:09:27.250
<v Speaker 1>so I got them in the 10 spot here this week.

1:09:28.110 --> 1:09:30.780
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to have more points than the Dallas Cowboys

1:09:30.800 --> 1:09:33.339
<v Speaker 2>every single week. And I would say the key difference,

1:09:33.479 --> 1:09:39.440
<v Speaker 2>to your point about the Bucs' talent, they have good players, right?

1:09:39.680 --> 1:09:44.210
<v Speaker 2>Emeka Ibuka is good. Bucky Irving is good. I think

1:09:44.250 --> 1:09:47.730
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield, when he was healthy, sacks notwithstanding, I don't

1:09:47.760 --> 1:09:49.900
<v Speaker 2>even really think that was entirely his fault, but we've

1:09:49.920 --> 1:09:52.820
<v Speaker 2>seen Baker be good before. He's not even in this game.

1:09:54.040 --> 1:10:00.300
<v Speaker 2>On defense, they have good players. They don't necessarily have

1:10:00.320 --> 1:10:04.220
<v Speaker 2>the star power that Dallas does, no pun intended, that

1:10:04.280 --> 1:10:07.099
<v Speaker 2>can make your offense right even when the play call

1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>is wrong. Right, right, yes. Dak Prescott could just look

1:10:10.300 --> 1:10:13.300
<v Speaker 2>at your defense and say, you got to schematically, but

1:10:13.320 --> 1:10:15.990
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to make this throw anyway. And CD can

1:10:16.010 --> 1:10:17.950
<v Speaker 2>look at whatever corners out there. He looked at the

1:10:17.970 --> 1:10:20.849
<v Speaker 2>Texans secondary last week. It was like Derek Stingley, Kamari Laster,

1:10:20.970 --> 1:10:24.050
<v Speaker 2>I don't care, 17 catches. George Pickens, he didn't catch

1:10:24.070 --> 1:10:26.110
<v Speaker 2>that many balls last week, but one of the catches

1:10:26.130 --> 1:10:30.220
<v Speaker 2>he made deep down the field was just inconscionable. I

1:10:30.300 --> 1:10:32.440
<v Speaker 2>cannot believe he's able to make some of those tight

1:10:32.479 --> 1:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>window catches. Not to mention the Cowboys offensive line was

1:10:37.800 --> 1:10:41.180
<v Speaker 2>beating up the Texans front. Like Javante Williams looks... like

1:10:41.360 --> 1:10:44.750
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina, Javonta Williams this year. Yeah, they're a shade

1:10:44.830 --> 1:10:49.210
<v Speaker 2>in it for sure. They just have dudes that tilt

1:10:49.270 --> 1:10:52.889
<v Speaker 2>the field. And even if I would say the Bucs

1:10:52.950 --> 1:10:56.210
<v Speaker 2>have more good talent on the roster over the Cowboys,

1:10:56.510 --> 1:10:59.270
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys have more great talent than the Bucs do.

1:11:00.250 --> 1:11:02.990
<v Speaker 2>And in a league that kind of you get wins

1:11:03.030 --> 1:11:05.210
<v Speaker 2>and losses based on how much great talent you have,

1:11:05.910 --> 1:11:08.060
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to have more than Dallas. So I'm taking

1:11:08.070 --> 1:11:09.340
<v Speaker 2>them as well. But I did put them in the

1:11:09.460 --> 1:11:11.900
<v Speaker 2>nine spot. They were not my tenner for the week.

1:11:11.979 --> 1:11:13.889
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now I got to know just who's a ten.

1:11:14.229 --> 1:11:15.389
<v Speaker 1>Now I got to, what's a ten?

1:11:16.550 --> 1:11:18.510
<v Speaker 2>How about we just go to that game? Yeah, yeah.

1:11:18.630 --> 1:11:22.890
<v Speaker 2>I got to hear it. It's the first one of Sunday. Overseas,

1:11:23.150 --> 1:11:26.390
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville over the Eagles. That is my ten spot for

1:11:26.410 --> 1:11:26.650
<v Speaker 2>the week.

1:11:27.450 --> 1:11:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I have them at the nine. Okay, so we're just

1:11:29.900 --> 1:11:31.700
<v Speaker 3>flip-flopped on both. We're just flip-flopping it.

1:11:31.840 --> 1:11:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yep.

1:11:32.920 --> 1:11:36.780
<v Speaker 1>I have more self-deprecation in my number ten overall team

1:11:36.820 --> 1:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this week. And you have the team who I would

1:11:39.360 --> 1:11:42.910
<v Speaker 1>believe I would take the Jags. If I was doing

1:11:42.950 --> 1:11:44.890
<v Speaker 1>a power ranking, we don't do power rankings, but if

1:11:44.950 --> 1:11:46.430
<v Speaker 1>I was doing them, I'd have the Jags as my

1:11:46.450 --> 1:11:47.510
<v Speaker 1>number one team in the NFL.

1:11:47.530 --> 1:11:48.730
<v Speaker 3>So I totally get it here with you.

1:11:49.689 --> 1:11:55.430
<v Speaker 2>They're at worst third. Like, at worst. And even that's

1:11:55.470 --> 1:11:56.049
<v Speaker 2>like a hard.

1:11:57.930 --> 1:12:00.070
<v Speaker 2>I don't even think they're three. I agree with you there.

1:12:00.630 --> 1:12:04.090
<v Speaker 2>And the Eagles right now are a mess. You know,

1:12:04.390 --> 1:12:08.370
<v Speaker 2>who's their... Is it Shipley? Is RB1 this week against

1:12:08.410 --> 1:12:11.110
<v Speaker 2>a very good Jags front? I think it is Shipley.

1:12:11.150 --> 1:12:13.770
<v Speaker 3>The better question is, Brett, who's RB2?

1:12:15.689 --> 1:12:18.420
<v Speaker 1>Do they have one at this point? That's what I'm saying.

1:12:19.120 --> 1:12:20.860
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's got to be RB2.

1:12:21.840 --> 1:12:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Who is it? I literally have no idea because we're

1:12:25.660 --> 1:12:28.870
<v Speaker 2>down to our fourth running back. I only see Will

1:12:28.950 --> 1:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Shipley on the depth chart. So they're going to have

1:12:32.020 --> 1:12:34.750
<v Speaker 2>to call somebody from the practice squad, I guess. You know,

1:12:34.770 --> 1:12:36.930
<v Speaker 2>we should get notice of that. I mean, they have

1:12:36.950 --> 1:12:39.950
<v Speaker 2>to travel in a couple days. I think they have

1:12:40.050 --> 1:12:43.750
<v Speaker 2>Jaden Blue. Okay, so I think on the practice squad

1:12:43.770 --> 1:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>they have Jaden Blue, Damian Pierce, and Carson Steele. Okay.

1:12:51.900 --> 1:12:55.339
<v Speaker 1>One of these young men is going to be taking

1:12:55.500 --> 1:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>spell carries. Behind Will Shipley in that backfield.

1:12:59.140 --> 1:13:01.140
<v Speaker 2>For this game. They'll be telling stories about them in

1:13:01.180 --> 1:13:06.700
<v Speaker 2>Delco for generations if they win this game. My God.

1:13:07.300 --> 1:13:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:13:08.240 --> 1:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention, the offensive line hasn't exactly been opening

1:13:11.920 --> 1:13:14.660
<v Speaker 2>holes for Saquon as it is. That's Saquon.

1:13:15.220 --> 1:13:19.729
<v Speaker 1>Right. To me, there's too many issues for Philly's offense.

1:13:20.370 --> 1:13:23.850
<v Speaker 1>And there's just too many things going the Jags' way.

1:13:23.990 --> 1:13:24.750
<v Speaker 3>Even in a game.

1:13:25.150 --> 1:13:29.269
<v Speaker 1>like last week where Trevor Lawrence isn't spectacular. He's not

1:13:29.400 --> 1:13:31.340
<v Speaker 1>lighting the world on fire, but he was doing what

1:13:31.380 --> 1:13:34.020
<v Speaker 1>he needed to do against that Bengals team to continue

1:13:34.040 --> 1:13:36.220
<v Speaker 1>to move the ball, score more than 20 points. The

1:13:36.260 --> 1:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>reason why I have the Jags at number one is

1:13:37.900 --> 1:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>because pass game on offense, rush game on offense, and

1:13:43.640 --> 1:13:47.589
<v Speaker 1>then overall defensive performance, I think they're the most complimentary

1:13:47.650 --> 1:13:50.330
<v Speaker 1>team in the NFL with what they're able to do.

1:13:50.710 --> 1:13:53.010
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I got full faith in them to take

1:13:53.030 --> 1:13:56.910
<v Speaker 1>down a team Like Philadelphia, who is inefficient, to say

1:13:56.950 --> 1:13:57.309
<v Speaker 1>the least.

1:13:57.729 --> 1:14:02.820
<v Speaker 2>All right, next game here, the other side of Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh, Indy,

1:14:03.479 --> 1:14:09.590
<v Speaker 2>what you got? Steelers. Steelers.

1:14:11.200 --> 1:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>At the one spot?

1:14:12.580 --> 1:14:16.430
<v Speaker 1>So you're just as reluctant about it?

1:14:16.650 --> 1:14:19.290
<v Speaker 3>I mean, at the one spot. Dude, the Steelers and

1:14:19.310 --> 1:14:21.490
<v Speaker 3>the Colts are, to me, the most.

1:14:21.850 --> 1:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>We play to this level of football every single week.

1:14:25.960 --> 1:14:28.580
<v Speaker 1>If you happen to play at this level, guess what?

1:14:28.640 --> 1:14:31.220
<v Speaker 1>Congrats on the dub. If you happen to play at

1:14:31.300 --> 1:14:34.910
<v Speaker 1>this level... We got the better of you. They both

1:14:35.020 --> 1:14:38.419
<v Speaker 1>play right here. If this game ends in a tie,

1:14:38.439 --> 1:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I would be not surprised at all whatsoever.

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:44.900
<v Speaker 2>Do we get points if they tie?

1:14:44.939 --> 1:14:45.860
<v Speaker 3>That's how I feel.

1:14:47.860 --> 1:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I get points because I'm calling it out here if

1:14:51.439 --> 1:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they tie. I'm saying I get points if they tie

1:14:55.380 --> 1:14:59.220
<v Speaker 1>this game. But yeah, I'll take the Steelers. I think

1:14:59.240 --> 1:15:03.639
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen at moments, right, like The Steelers' passing

1:15:03.680 --> 1:15:06.740
<v Speaker 1>attack at times has been a little bit more explosive,

1:15:07.080 --> 1:15:10.530
<v Speaker 1>certainly without Alec Pierce than the Colts' passing attack has been.

1:15:11.090 --> 1:15:15.730
<v Speaker 1>They struggled with play action. They struggled just with passing

1:15:15.750 --> 1:15:20.139
<v Speaker 1>yards that were... beyond five yards down the field last

1:15:20.200 --> 1:15:23.470
<v Speaker 1>week honestly the ground game can always be a decent

1:15:23.530 --> 1:15:26.010
<v Speaker 1>factor for them but these are two teams Brett that

1:15:26.070 --> 1:15:27.630
<v Speaker 1>just honestly the reason why I have it at the

1:15:27.689 --> 1:15:31.150
<v Speaker 1>one spot is because I see these teams so similarly

1:15:31.470 --> 1:15:35.610
<v Speaker 1>they just play their same brand of football every single

1:15:35.670 --> 1:15:38.530
<v Speaker 1>week but I also have more faith in the Steelers

1:15:38.570 --> 1:15:40.590
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the ball especially from those guys up

1:15:40.630 --> 1:15:42.479
<v Speaker 1>front that they have so give me the Steelers in

1:15:42.520 --> 1:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this one but I only have it at the one spot.

1:15:45.800 --> 1:15:49.210
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the way the Colts can win right now,

1:15:49.290 --> 1:15:52.230
<v Speaker 2>just based on how they looked is like to win

1:15:52.370 --> 1:15:56.730
<v Speaker 2>in a rationally chaotic slop fest. And they're getting into

1:15:56.770 --> 1:16:00.060
<v Speaker 2>an irrationally chaotic slop fest with the Kings of the

1:16:00.100 --> 1:16:04.259
<v Speaker 2>irrationally chaotic slop fest. So I'm going to go Pittsburgh

1:16:04.300 --> 1:16:07.380
<v Speaker 2>here because they love that kind of game. And I

1:16:07.400 --> 1:16:08.540
<v Speaker 2>put it, they do six spot.

1:16:09.280 --> 1:16:10.050
<v Speaker 3>Whoa.

1:16:10.850 --> 1:16:11.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:16:11.430 --> 1:16:12.030
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

1:16:12.430 --> 1:16:14.790
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Cause this is the exact kind of game where

1:16:14.850 --> 1:16:18.840
<v Speaker 2>it's like, Oh, welcome to hell, buddy. Like, this is

1:16:18.960 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>our apartment. You're staying here. Like, we're leasing it out

1:16:22.340 --> 1:16:26.660
<v Speaker 2>to you. But this is our building. Welcome.

1:16:26.720 --> 1:16:29.070
<v Speaker 1>The landlords of slop games.

1:16:29.210 --> 1:16:32.010
<v Speaker 2>That's what you just called the Pittsburgh Steelers. Slumlords of

1:16:32.090 --> 1:16:34.929
<v Speaker 2>slop town. That's what the Steelers are. They are so

1:16:35.030 --> 1:16:38.210
<v Speaker 2>good at winning those kind of games. And I don't

1:16:38.229 --> 1:16:40.650
<v Speaker 2>think the Colts. It's like an amateur going up against

1:16:40.689 --> 1:16:46.729
<v Speaker 2>a professional. Okay. All right. Can't do it. Can't do it. Um, Baltimore, Atlanta,

1:16:46.810 --> 1:16:52.009
<v Speaker 2>this game was super fascinating to me before the Lamar

1:16:52.090 --> 1:16:54.310
<v Speaker 2>ankle injury in the second half, because based on what

1:16:54.340 --> 1:16:56.640
<v Speaker 2>we saw from Atlanta in week four, and then obviously

1:16:56.720 --> 1:16:59.559
<v Speaker 2>in week five, I kind of had this one circled

1:16:59.600 --> 1:17:02.540
<v Speaker 2>on the calendar, um, for, for this coming week. And

1:17:02.560 --> 1:17:06.920
<v Speaker 2>then Lamar got injured. Uh, Atlanta still looked like what

1:17:06.960 --> 1:17:09.710
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta did a week ago. And so there's like a

1:17:09.870 --> 1:17:11.790
<v Speaker 2>little bit of shine off this game because I was

1:17:11.890 --> 1:17:16.490
<v Speaker 2>so fascinated to see one of the four best offenses

1:17:16.550 --> 1:17:20.809
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL go up against a very plucky. Isn't

1:17:20.990 --> 1:17:26.450
<v Speaker 2>the right word? Uh, underrated, unheralded Falcons deep. Like even

1:17:26.520 --> 1:17:28.270
<v Speaker 2>for what we've seen in the last couple of weeks

1:17:28.310 --> 1:17:30.640
<v Speaker 2>in primetime, I still feel like people aren't realizing like

1:17:30.900 --> 1:17:35.540
<v Speaker 2>how good this Falcons defense has been. Um, so go,

1:17:35.580 --> 1:17:37.380
<v Speaker 2>you know, as far as strength on strength, I thought

1:17:37.400 --> 1:17:40.790
<v Speaker 2>that was a fascinating matchup. Not to mention Bijan, uh, uh,

1:17:40.890 --> 1:17:43.700
<v Speaker 2>and panics and Drake London against, you know, this Jesse

1:17:43.720 --> 1:17:46.940
<v Speaker 2>Minner defense. I, there were so many elements of this

1:17:46.979 --> 1:17:48.679
<v Speaker 2>matchup that I was really excited for. And then Lamar

1:17:48.700 --> 1:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>got injured. So there's a little bit of shine off

1:17:50.700 --> 1:17:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of it. I still think it'll be an entertaining game,

1:17:52.780 --> 1:17:56.910
<v Speaker 2>but overall, because it's Snoop and not Lamar, give me

1:17:56.950 --> 1:17:59.770
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons. And I put that at the four spot. Okay.

1:18:00.150 --> 1:18:03.790
<v Speaker 1>Um, Full transparency, I filled out these games before I

1:18:03.890 --> 1:18:06.729
<v Speaker 1>really saw that Lamar was going to have an outside

1:18:06.810 --> 1:18:11.010
<v Speaker 1>chance to start in this game. And because you've chosen

1:18:11.090 --> 1:18:14.210
<v Speaker 1>to mention this game at near the end of the

1:18:14.290 --> 1:18:17.050
<v Speaker 1>episode here, I don't have a lot of flexibility to

1:18:17.130 --> 1:18:21.549
<v Speaker 1>change it up or down. So give me the Baltimore Ravens.

1:18:22.760 --> 1:18:29.660
<v Speaker 1>Give me Snoop Huntley, Pro Bowl quarterback, over the Atlanta Falcons.

1:18:31.439 --> 1:18:34.620
<v Speaker 1>at the eight spot baby oh god give me.

1:18:34.420 --> 1:18:41.070
<v Speaker 4>The Baltimore Ravens at the eight spot oh no I'm

1:18:41.130 --> 1:18:46.830
<v Speaker 4>taking it look listen listen the Baltimore Ravens one of

1:18:46.850 --> 1:18:49.810
<v Speaker 4>the better outside zone rushing teams in the NFL even

1:18:49.850 --> 1:18:51.840
<v Speaker 4>with the injuries that they have on their offensive line.

1:18:51.880 --> 1:18:55.260
<v Speaker 4>King Henry's been fantastic at it. They got Zay Flowers back.

1:18:55.280 --> 1:18:57.820
<v Speaker 4>He's a yards after catch monster.

1:18:58.320 --> 1:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Snoop Huntley, may I say again, a pro ball quarterback.

1:19:02.550 --> 1:19:03.670
<v Speaker 3>Respect the name.

1:19:03.750 --> 1:19:06.849
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Oh, my God.

1:19:07.270 --> 1:19:10.389
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just having to believe that everything we saw

1:19:10.430 --> 1:19:13.590
<v Speaker 1>from the Falcons over the last two weeks has been

1:19:13.729 --> 1:19:20.090
<v Speaker 1>utter fabricated garbage and a fugazi at the highest level.

1:19:21.290 --> 1:19:26.710
<v Speaker 2>So give me the Ravens at the eighth spot. Buddy,

1:19:26.750 --> 1:19:33.790
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doubling down. I'm tripling down. Oh, man, this

1:19:33.850 --> 1:19:36.259
<v Speaker 2>is going to go really awful for one of us.

1:19:36.310 --> 1:19:37.309
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who yet.

1:19:37.830 --> 1:19:41.210
<v Speaker 1>You know the scene in Casino Royale where he's just like, hey,

1:19:41.250 --> 1:19:41.950
<v Speaker 1>I'm out of chips.

1:19:42.030 --> 1:19:43.950
<v Speaker 3>And he's like, oh, can I buy in more? He's like, no,

1:19:43.990 --> 1:19:46.010
<v Speaker 3>you can't. And he just pulls out his car keys

1:19:46.030 --> 1:19:48.420
<v Speaker 3>and he just puts the car keys in the pot.

1:19:48.700 --> 1:19:49.880
<v Speaker 3>That's basically what.

1:19:49.800 --> 1:19:51.460
<v Speaker 2>I did with the Ravens there.

1:19:51.479 --> 1:19:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I was just like, oh, I don't have any more money.

1:19:53.700 --> 1:19:57.620
<v Speaker 2>Here's my car keys on the table. See, I thought

1:19:57.660 --> 1:19:59.680
<v Speaker 2>it was going to be the other scene from Casino

1:19:59.740 --> 1:20:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Royale where you're dying and suffocating to death in the car,

1:20:03.300 --> 1:20:08.900
<v Speaker 2>grasping for the defibrillator, hoping somebody can come save you. Oh,

1:20:09.060 --> 1:20:10.550
<v Speaker 2>my Lord, Trevor.

1:20:11.030 --> 1:20:12.810
<v Speaker 3>Where do you have them? We are not going to

1:20:12.850 --> 1:20:13.970
<v Speaker 3>be tied next week.

1:20:14.610 --> 1:20:16.370
<v Speaker 1>Wait, you have the Falcons where?

1:20:17.490 --> 1:20:20.550
<v Speaker 2>The four? I have the Falcons at the four spot.

1:20:20.870 --> 1:20:23.389
<v Speaker 2>The four spot, okay. So that's a 12-point swing.

1:20:24.670 --> 1:20:26.670
<v Speaker 3>We have a lot of swings in this season.

1:20:28.150 --> 1:20:31.610
<v Speaker 1>This is where the game is getting for real because

1:20:31.670 --> 1:20:34.549
<v Speaker 1>we have, I don't even know, like five different games

1:20:34.870 --> 1:20:37.270
<v Speaker 1>of we're just picking different opponents, but then we also

1:20:37.330 --> 1:20:38.910
<v Speaker 1>are sort of all over the place.

1:20:39.130 --> 1:20:42.650
<v Speaker 2>Zero shot we're anywhere near each other after this one.

1:20:42.850 --> 1:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Zero shot.

1:20:43.979 --> 1:20:45.310
<v Speaker 3>That's what this game's all about, baby.

1:20:45.800 --> 1:20:51.460
<v Speaker 2>Let's go. Well, the last game I thought was fairly close,

1:20:52.260 --> 1:20:55.080
<v Speaker 2>but after today so far, maybe it's not. Buffalo, L.A.

1:20:57.450 --> 1:20:58.670
<v Speaker 3>I have this at the two spot.

1:20:59.380 --> 1:21:04.660
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose I could have switched this with the

1:21:04.760 --> 1:21:08.060
<v Speaker 1>eight spot if I wanted to. But I have the

1:21:08.140 --> 1:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams winning this game over Buffalo. But to be honest,

1:21:11.140 --> 1:21:13.670
<v Speaker 1>it's just a coin flip type of a game. And

1:21:13.729 --> 1:21:15.769
<v Speaker 1>to me, the answer is very simple on who wins

1:21:15.790 --> 1:21:19.750
<v Speaker 1>this game. Does Josh Allen turn the ball over? If

1:21:19.790 --> 1:21:22.050
<v Speaker 1>he does, Rams probably win.

1:21:22.790 --> 1:21:23.429
<v Speaker 2>Very high chance.

1:21:24.150 --> 1:21:26.820
<v Speaker 3>If Josh Allen doesn't have turnovers, Bills win.

1:21:28.330 --> 1:21:32.349
<v Speaker 1>And that's basically my oversimplified Bills script every single time.

1:21:32.680 --> 1:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I think the Bills have the ability to play

1:21:34.560 --> 1:21:36.780
<v Speaker 1>really well up front. I think they have a good

1:21:36.820 --> 1:21:39.939
<v Speaker 1>run game. Keon Coleman's coming alive in that offense. And

1:21:39.979 --> 1:21:41.460
<v Speaker 1>it's just, do they turn the ball over? And if

1:21:41.479 --> 1:21:43.540
<v Speaker 1>they don't, I think they've got a lot on both

1:21:43.580 --> 1:21:45.460
<v Speaker 1>sides of the ball to beat you. And I'm still

1:21:45.520 --> 1:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>worried about the Rams.

1:21:46.479 --> 1:21:49.260
<v Speaker 3>I am. I know that, hey, it's a comeback win

1:21:49.300 --> 1:21:51.380
<v Speaker 3>against the Eagles. They're sitting here at 2-2. It looks

1:21:51.400 --> 1:21:52.060
<v Speaker 3>a lot better than 1-3.

1:21:52.060 --> 1:21:52.280
<v Speaker 2>But Brett.

1:21:55.490 --> 1:21:57.630
<v Speaker 3>It took a team botching a.

1:21:57.640 --> 1:22:02.780
<v Speaker 1>Goal line series and going 0 for 12 on third

1:22:02.840 --> 1:22:04.900
<v Speaker 1>down for you to just win at the end?

1:22:06.700 --> 1:22:09.059
<v Speaker 2>I still don't love that. It's the turnovers, man. It's

1:22:09.090 --> 1:22:09.450
<v Speaker 2>the turnovers.

1:22:09.470 --> 1:22:10.630
<v Speaker 3>I still don't love that.

1:22:10.990 --> 1:22:13.430
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, I'm taking the Rams, but I got to

1:22:13.450 --> 1:22:14.370
<v Speaker 1>end my two spot this week.

1:22:15.670 --> 1:22:20.030
<v Speaker 2>So I took Buffalo. Okay. We are so different. We

1:22:20.070 --> 1:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>are so different.

1:22:20.939 --> 1:22:22.599
<v Speaker 3>One of us is getting 40 points and the other

1:22:22.610 --> 1:22:25.480
<v Speaker 3>is getting 10. Yeah, 100%.

1:22:25.479 --> 1:22:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, yeah, yeah. Especially if one of us misses

1:22:30.479 --> 1:22:30.780
<v Speaker 2>the game.

1:22:30.979 --> 1:22:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Or both of us are getting like 18.

1:22:36.260 --> 1:22:39.740
<v Speaker 2>Here's my reasoning for that, though. And I accept all

1:22:39.780 --> 1:22:42.520
<v Speaker 2>of your points. It's kind of the same thing for Buffalo.

1:22:42.600 --> 1:22:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It comes down to turnovers. I guarantee the people watching

1:22:47.280 --> 1:22:49.680
<v Speaker 2>this game at home are going to see four of

1:22:49.760 --> 1:22:53.519
<v Speaker 2>the most ridiculous throws of the entire season in this game.

1:22:53.900 --> 1:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>No question. It's going to be unbelievable cinema watching these

1:22:59.780 --> 1:23:04.500
<v Speaker 2>guys go toe-to-toe. You're also going to see, at minimum,

1:23:05.080 --> 1:23:08.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the dumbest turnovers you've ever seen because they

1:23:08.590 --> 1:23:11.550
<v Speaker 2>just can't stop doing it. The fact that Josh Allen

1:23:11.590 --> 1:23:16.570
<v Speaker 2>got away with that flip to save the safety, which

1:23:16.630 --> 1:23:20.170
<v Speaker 2>I'm still not sure why that wasn't intentional grounding, That

1:23:20.210 --> 1:23:23.330
<v Speaker 2>was classic Josh Allen of like, oh, the devil on

1:23:23.370 --> 1:23:26.870
<v Speaker 2>his shoulder is still there, and he's getting louder. And

1:23:27.130 --> 1:23:30.180
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Stafford also throwing like two bad picks in the

1:23:30.189 --> 1:23:33.700
<v Speaker 2>first half of that Eagles game. One of them is

1:23:33.720 --> 1:23:35.559
<v Speaker 2>going to have a really bad turnover, and that's probably

1:23:35.580 --> 1:23:37.740
<v Speaker 2>going to determine who wins and who loses. I just

1:23:37.820 --> 1:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know which one is going to do it, or

1:23:40.260 --> 1:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe they're both going to do it, which one's going

1:23:42.020 --> 1:23:44.979
<v Speaker 2>to do it twice, but it's going to happen. I

1:23:45.020 --> 1:23:49.450
<v Speaker 2>chose Buffalo, but... Honestly, I flipped a coin, if I'm

1:23:49.470 --> 1:23:52.070
<v Speaker 2>being real about it. I literally flipped a coin for

1:23:52.110 --> 1:23:55.370
<v Speaker 2>this one. I don't have a great reason, because both

1:23:55.430 --> 1:23:57.370
<v Speaker 2>these teams are very similar in terms of their strengths

1:23:57.390 --> 1:24:00.550
<v Speaker 2>and of their weaknesses. I put it in the three

1:24:00.590 --> 1:24:04.880
<v Speaker 2>spot just because I felt even less confident about New

1:24:04.939 --> 1:24:08.200
<v Speaker 2>England and Minnesota, but I... it's about as close to

1:24:08.240 --> 1:24:10.050
<v Speaker 2>a toss-up as it gets. There we go.

1:24:10.050 --> 1:24:14.870
<v Speaker 1>10 games in very different orders with very different winners,

1:24:14.930 --> 1:24:16.950
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, at least compared to the last couple

1:24:16.970 --> 1:24:18.170
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. So this is going to be a fun

1:24:18.210 --> 1:24:20.030
<v Speaker 1>one to monitor. I hope you guys enjoy all of

1:24:20.090 --> 1:24:22.050
<v Speaker 1>these games and some of the ones that we didn't

1:24:22.110 --> 1:24:24.189
<v Speaker 1>mention as well. As we said at the top of

1:24:24.210 --> 1:24:26.550
<v Speaker 1>the show, get in on the action as well. Give

1:24:26.630 --> 1:24:30.229
<v Speaker 1>us your 10 game picks here. Give us the confidence

1:24:30.270 --> 1:24:32.670
<v Speaker 1>in which you have with these games. We'll keep score

1:24:32.750 --> 1:24:34.230
<v Speaker 1>and we'll shout you out. If you have a really

1:24:34.270 --> 1:24:35.490
<v Speaker 1>good week, we'll shout you out at the top of

1:24:35.510 --> 1:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the show. We went through a ton of stuff here

1:24:38.040 --> 1:24:40.740
<v Speaker 1>on NFL Pro. We went through the entire quarterly report.

1:24:40.800 --> 1:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>We took a look at some players that are under

1:24:43.200 --> 1:24:45.900
<v Speaker 1>the radar, some teams that have been shining, and obviously

1:24:45.920 --> 1:24:47.979
<v Speaker 1>brought it to some game picks as well. We appreciate

1:24:48.000 --> 1:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys watching. We know this was a beast of

1:24:49.900 --> 1:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a show. Shout out to everybody behind the scenes who

1:24:52.100 --> 1:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>puts it on for us. Everybody at NextGenStats who powers

1:24:55.220 --> 1:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>everything that we talk about here. Total team effort every

1:24:57.820 --> 1:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>single week, but man, for all the information that we

1:25:00.060 --> 1:25:02.439
<v Speaker 1>threw at you guys, certainly this week as well.

1:25:02.500 --> 1:25:04.400
<v Speaker 3>So we appreciate all the help on this one. Appreciate

1:25:04.430 --> 1:25:06.120
<v Speaker 3>you guys watching. We'll see you guys next time.

1:25:06.760 --> 1:25:09.500
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to our Q1 quarterly report. Listen

1:25:09.520 --> 1:25:12.650
<v Speaker 2>to NFL Pro on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

1:25:12.689 --> 1:25:14.130
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts.