WEBVTT - The Refs Hate Us!

0:00:07.690 --> 0:00:11.550
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:11.570 --> 0:00:16.580
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong

0:00:16.660 --> 0:00:17.260
<v Speaker 1>and Getty.

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:29.970
<v Speaker 2>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:30.430 --> 0:00:34.470
<v Speaker 1>Live from Studio C. C, I don't see you, senor.

0:00:35.580 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 3>A dimly lit room deep within the bowels of the

0:00:38.180 --> 0:00:42.340
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty communications compound. And today, toiling under the

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 3>title of the show.

0:00:44.340 --> 0:00:47.580
<v Speaker 1>Welcome the latest socialist, J.D.

0:00:47.700 --> 0:00:48.220
<v Speaker 3>Vance.

0:00:49.460 --> 0:00:52.979
<v Speaker 1>What? That's right. I'm accusing him.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.100
<v Speaker 3>You're going to stir up some ass with that one.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.580
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I love it. Or alternate title, Bad News, Don.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.740
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid you have a case of the Houthis.

0:01:05.170 --> 0:01:05.550
<v Speaker 2>Oh, wow.

0:01:05.770 --> 0:01:06.710
<v Speaker 3>That's a white-hearted look.

0:01:09.190 --> 0:01:14.300
<v Speaker 1>Keeps me from crying. I am just.

0:01:14.180 --> 0:01:15.140
<v Speaker 3>About to pull in. I had a bit of a

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:16.899
<v Speaker 3>ZEP-bound emergency this morning.

0:01:17.540 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.940
<v Speaker 3>Talking to the doctor about that the other day. Those

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>of us on the GLP-1s, about 15% of us have

0:01:25.660 --> 0:01:30.420
<v Speaker 3>a certain reaction to those wonder drugs. I seem to

0:01:30.459 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>be one of them.

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:37.910
<v Speaker 1>I see. Rivaling the humble goose, are you?

0:01:39.490 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't imagine many people want a lot of details

0:01:41.620 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>on that, but it can happen.

0:01:43.900 --> 0:01:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, best to delay for a moment or two before

0:01:46.740 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>one's morning drive, yes.

0:01:50.670 --> 0:01:54.410
<v Speaker 3>Especially if you've had a good four, five-day buildup.

0:01:55.430 --> 0:01:58.610
<v Speaker 1>Oh, now see. No, Katie, am I wrong?

0:01:59.150 --> 0:02:02.169
<v Speaker 4>It was like you were so close to not going

0:02:02.230 --> 0:02:03.490
<v Speaker 4>too far with that.

0:02:03.530 --> 0:02:06.010
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? God, I thought, wow, he's

0:02:06.030 --> 0:02:08.269
<v Speaker 1>turned over a new leaf. He's grown up, but no.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 3>So can we edit that out for the podcast?

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sure we can favor that.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so explain the J.D. Vance title.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll be featuring some actual audio from Mr. Vance later

0:02:24.460 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show, but he has really gone in for

0:02:27.500 --> 0:02:32.820
<v Speaker 1>central planning for the government needs to be making many,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>many more decisions about how the economy works and apply

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:41.070
<v Speaker 1>a heavier hand. We're all socialists now, it would seem.

0:02:41.570 --> 0:02:44.090
<v Speaker 1>The Republicans are in a bidding war with the Democrats

0:02:44.610 --> 0:02:48.190
<v Speaker 1>for who can hand out the most goodies. for the election,

0:02:48.230 --> 0:02:50.330
<v Speaker 1>the most benefits, and that sort of thing. It's just,

0:02:50.370 --> 0:02:53.109
<v Speaker 1>that's the new way. We're becoming Britain bit by bit.

0:02:54.030 --> 0:02:57.550
<v Speaker 3>I remember many years ago, Newt was running for president.

0:02:57.750 --> 0:03:00.850
<v Speaker 3>I think he was running for president. It was a

0:03:00.850 --> 0:03:03.970
<v Speaker 3>long time ago, but when Newt Gingrich said, I don't

0:03:04.070 --> 0:03:08.220
<v Speaker 3>like Republican social engineer, right-wing social engineering, any better than

0:03:08.250 --> 0:03:10.690
<v Speaker 3>I like left-wing social engineering. And it always stuck in

0:03:10.740 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>my head, like right-wing social engineering. But there is more

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and more of that happening, definitely.

0:03:16.550 --> 0:03:22.430
<v Speaker 1>Well said, Newt. Where have you gone, Newt Gringrich? Your

0:03:22.470 --> 0:03:25.549
<v Speaker 1>nation turns its lonely eyes to you. Woo, woo, woo.

0:03:26.310 --> 0:03:28.330
<v Speaker 3>But from what I understand, you did not invent.

0:03:31.370 --> 0:03:34.590
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's Jack. I did not invent what? From what

0:03:34.690 --> 0:03:40.779
<v Speaker 1>I understand, you did not invent the idea of Chay-D-Vance. No,

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.900
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to have the credit for that, but no. No,

0:03:43.940 --> 0:03:48.510
<v Speaker 1>I heard that somewhere else. That's pretty clever. I have

0:03:48.550 --> 0:03:50.270
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that's going to make a number of people very,

0:03:50.310 --> 0:03:52.930
<v Speaker 1>very angry that are big J.D. Vance fans, and he's

0:03:52.970 --> 0:03:55.050
<v Speaker 1>the most likely person by far to be the Republican

0:03:55.090 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>nominee for president. Let me check my pockets. Fresh out

0:03:59.580 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of F.

0:04:01.020 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

0:04:04.370 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I close them as I seize them. You don't like it?

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to tell you. Did you look

0:04:08.500 --> 0:04:12.260
<v Speaker 1>in your man bag? Maybe there's some in there. I

0:04:12.340 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>carry no man bag, sir. Let's start the show officially

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.350
<v Speaker 1>before things get out of hand and then bring it

0:04:17.390 --> 0:04:20.390
<v Speaker 1>back around. I'm Jack Armstrong. He's Joe Getty. On this,

0:04:20.589 --> 0:04:24.900
<v Speaker 1>it is Wednesday already. September the 16th, the year 2026,

0:04:24.900 --> 0:04:28.219
<v Speaker 1>we are Armstrong and Getty and we approve of this program. Okay,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.230
<v Speaker 1>let's start officially then. According to FCC rules and regulations,

0:04:31.290 --> 0:04:33.710
<v Speaker 1>enough with the preliminaries, the show starts at mark.

0:04:34.070 --> 0:04:36.770
<v Speaker 5>Well, some TV news following a massive leadership change. The

0:04:36.810 --> 0:04:39.589
<v Speaker 5>new season of 60 Minutes just premiered to its smallest

0:04:39.730 --> 0:04:41.849
<v Speaker 5>audience in more than 25 years.

0:04:42.810 --> 0:04:43.089
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:04:43.110 --> 0:04:45.469
<v Speaker 5>For some reason, the image of a ticking pocket watch

0:04:45.550 --> 0:04:47.130
<v Speaker 5>isn't resonating with younger viewers.

0:04:50.740 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>What is that?

0:04:52.690 --> 0:04:55.270
<v Speaker 5>To get more viewers, they're changing the show to 3,600 TikToks.

0:04:55.290 --> 0:05:01.090
<v Speaker 1>Oh. That's pretty good. That's a funny joke. And I'm

0:05:01.190 --> 0:05:03.570
<v Speaker 1>glad he went with that because there is no doubt

0:05:03.670 --> 0:05:06.450
<v Speaker 1>that the younger crowd is not into anything that's on

0:05:06.490 --> 0:05:08.870
<v Speaker 1>the network or an hour long or all those different

0:05:08.890 --> 0:05:12.530
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things. But so that many people that were

0:05:12.690 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>loyal 60 Minutes fans, like I have been since I

0:05:16.270 --> 0:05:21.210
<v Speaker 1>was like 11 years old, Got the news that Barry Weiss,

0:05:21.310 --> 0:05:25.870
<v Speaker 1>the so-called conservative, even though she's a gay pro-choice woman,

0:05:27.730 --> 0:05:30.350
<v Speaker 1>and fired Scott Pelley and is so pro-Trump, I'm not

0:05:30.410 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>watching anymore. So they had their lowest audience ever. That

0:05:33.630 --> 0:05:39.900
<v Speaker 1>is unbelievable. After all those years of just ridiculous liberal

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>bias stories that were just out of bounds in terms

0:05:44.339 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of trying to be journalistic. Wow. That's where we are.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.860
<v Speaker 1>That is the playing field on which we play on

0:05:51.900 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>when we play. I couldn't figure out how that's the playing.

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.630
<v Speaker 1>That's our playing field. That's what I'm trying to say.

0:05:57.070 --> 0:06:00.390
<v Speaker 1>We just, the refs hate us. If the refs are

0:06:00.430 --> 0:06:02.690
<v Speaker 1>the media, which is why new media is so much

0:06:02.730 --> 0:06:06.150
<v Speaker 1>more important. So many people have correctly perceived that. Well,

0:06:06.170 --> 0:06:08.420
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they'll drift back over time, the viewers.

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.540
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter, but. The New York Times had a big,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.420
<v Speaker 1>prominently popular, Placed peace saying, no, it was 60 minutes.

0:06:16.500 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It was good. It was fine. It was good. Yeah,

0:06:19.180 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it was. And even handed their second story was pretty political,

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was great. So AI continues to be in

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.050
<v Speaker 1>the news and maybe for the rest of our lives.

0:06:30.330 --> 0:06:33.990
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell if this is just a blip or

0:06:34.010 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be talking about this. At practically this

0:06:37.900 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>level for a long time, like when COVID hit, I

0:06:41.380 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. But man, there's sure a lot of heavyweight

0:06:44.540 --> 0:06:49.220
<v Speaker 1>chatter among highly placed AI people and highly placed government

0:06:49.260 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>officials and financial people yesterday, just like there has been

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>since last. Was it Thursday or Friday when the big

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>story dropped with the guy saying we're all going to

0:06:57.580 --> 0:07:01.750
<v Speaker 1>be dead in 10 years? Yeah, yeah. You know, speaking

0:07:01.770 --> 0:07:04.050
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Times, the New York Times-Siena poll

0:07:04.089 --> 0:07:09.530
<v Speaker 1>just came out, and it has all sorts of results

0:07:09.610 --> 0:07:12.970
<v Speaker 1>that the paper is featuring having to do with people's

0:07:13.010 --> 0:07:16.810
<v Speaker 1>attitude toward AI and data centers and superintelligence and that

0:07:16.850 --> 0:07:21.150
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. But the poll was taken 10 days ago.

0:07:21.830 --> 0:07:23.670
<v Speaker 1>And they even say in the paper, you know, it's

0:07:23.730 --> 0:07:28.250
<v Speaker 1>possible some people's opinions have evolved somewhat. And I was

0:07:28.290 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking to myself— In the last 10 days, there has

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.500
<v Speaker 1>been an enormous change in people's perception of these things.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And then I thought to myself, I says to myself,

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:43.030
<v Speaker 1>I says, how do we live in a world in

0:07:43.770 --> 0:07:50.450
<v Speaker 1>which people can hear about something, something complicated? I mean,

0:07:50.470 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>like the ultimate example of they're both true. Two seemingly

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.020
<v Speaker 1>opposing ideas. But hear that, try to process it, understand

0:07:59.060 --> 0:08:02.140
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening, and develop a strong take that they

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>won't budge from, probably ever for the rest of their lives,

0:08:06.100 --> 0:08:10.140
<v Speaker 1>in the space of a week. What is that? Tribalism?

0:08:11.020 --> 0:08:14.220
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Oh, I got one more thought on that topic.

0:08:14.580 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I just, I want to express to the good people

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:21.460
<v Speaker 1>listening how much I appreciate that you are here. Not

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.030
<v Speaker 1>just because you're our listeners and customers, I don't need

0:08:25.070 --> 0:08:27.710
<v Speaker 1>the money. I'm very wealthy. I bought 10,000 shares of

0:08:27.790 --> 0:08:34.550
<v Speaker 1>Apple stock in 1994. 1979. Yeah. I couldn't remember when

0:08:34.570 --> 0:08:37.390
<v Speaker 1>they started for my great life. Anyway, no, it's not

0:08:37.470 --> 0:08:40.470
<v Speaker 1>just about commerce. It gives me hope that there are

0:08:40.510 --> 0:08:44.390
<v Speaker 1>at least some people who think, hmm, there are smart

0:08:44.410 --> 0:08:46.569
<v Speaker 1>people who seem to think the other thing. I wonder

0:08:46.610 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>what their ideas are. You know, I hope there's a

0:08:49.410 --> 0:08:53.650
<v Speaker 1>market for that. I really do. Yeah, well, we'll get

0:08:53.700 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>into that coming up. I heard the best realistic description

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of how AI would kill us yesterday, since that's been

0:09:01.980 --> 0:09:04.460
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions for the past week. How exactly

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>would it kill us? You keep talking about it'll kill us,

0:09:06.460 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>will it kill us, it might kill us. In what

0:09:08.179 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>way will it kill us? And it turns out the

0:09:10.260 --> 0:09:14.700
<v Speaker 1>answer is with a club. So that's not good. Barbaric!

0:09:16.420 --> 0:09:22.459
<v Speaker 1>It's gruesome. I'm sorry. That's such a bad joke. Is

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.870
<v Speaker 1>that what I was picturing? Being clubbed to death by AI.

0:09:26.230 --> 0:09:32.030
<v Speaker 1>That's considerably more primal than I expected. That's not high

0:09:32.050 --> 0:09:36.010
<v Speaker 1>tech at all. Okay, we will get to Katie's headlines

0:09:36.090 --> 0:09:37.630
<v Speaker 1>coming up and more news of the day. Hope you

0:09:37.670 --> 0:09:38.189
<v Speaker 1>can stay here.

0:09:38.210 --> 0:09:43.470
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:09:43.490 --> 0:09:45.810
<v Speaker 1>Is Saudi Arabia about to go to war with the Houthis?

0:09:46.010 --> 0:09:48.380
<v Speaker 1>And the Houthis apparently are armed like a, well, like

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.300
<v Speaker 1>a real military, like it could be a real war.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:54.420
<v Speaker 1>So that's exciting. to have out there as a possibility. Also,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.010
<v Speaker 1>we got a story about an AI actress. I can't

0:09:57.030 --> 0:09:59.170
<v Speaker 1>wrap my head around what that means. So I look

0:09:59.190 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 1>forward to that discussion.

0:10:00.100 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Later.

0:10:01.980 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>What the F type of A I S it did. Okay.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:11.250
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. All right, we'll try to figure it out. But first,

0:10:11.270 --> 0:10:13.110
<v Speaker 1>let's figure out who's reporting what. It's the lead story

0:10:13.130 --> 0:10:16.090
<v Speaker 1>with Katie Green. Katie, take it away. All righty. The

0:10:16.150 --> 0:10:17.910
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet Network's ABC.

0:10:18.270 --> 0:10:18.650
<v Speaker 2>U.S.

0:10:18.790 --> 0:10:23.449
<v Speaker 4>Says Americans should, quote, reconsider travel to Saudi Arabia.

0:10:24.130 --> 0:10:24.650
<v Speaker 1>I will.

0:10:24.929 --> 0:10:25.150
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:26.010 --> 0:10:26.590
<v Speaker 1>NBC.

0:10:26.690 --> 0:10:30.020
<v Speaker 4>Saudi Arabia accuses the Houthis of attacking Mecca, warns that

0:10:30.100 --> 0:10:36.370
<v Speaker 4>Holy City is, quote, a red line. And CNN.

0:10:36.850 --> 0:10:41.290
<v Speaker 1>So attacking their oil installations isn't a red line? Well, yeah,

0:10:41.330 --> 0:10:45.210
<v Speaker 1>but attacking Mecca, that sounds to me like they're trying

0:10:45.230 --> 0:10:48.350
<v Speaker 1>to whip up their people. Saudi Arabia is. They know

0:10:48.390 --> 0:10:50.490
<v Speaker 1>they're about to go to war with the Houthis, and

0:10:50.530 --> 0:10:54.770
<v Speaker 1>that's some really useful wartime propaganda. Because, you know, Saudi

0:10:54.809 --> 0:10:58.650
<v Speaker 1>Arabia is an uneasy balance of modernity and, like, the

0:10:58.730 --> 0:11:03.380
<v Speaker 1>year 832. with fundamentalist Muslims ooching about in the desert,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:04.830
<v Speaker 1>and they've got to rally their support.

0:11:06.429 --> 0:11:11.050
<v Speaker 4>And also this one from CNN. Iran's newfound precision in

0:11:11.150 --> 0:11:14.970
<v Speaker 4>hitting United States assets may have had Russian help.

0:11:16.270 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And Chinese help. NPR. Iran's back to building ballistic missiles, too. Goody.

0:11:26.450 --> 0:11:30.410
<v Speaker 4>From NPR, the Fed is expected to raise interest rates

0:11:30.490 --> 0:11:32.429
<v Speaker 4>for the first time in three years.

0:11:34.870 --> 0:11:37.130
<v Speaker 1>Trump is probably going to level a blast at that

0:11:37.210 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>new guy, Kevin Warsh, like he did at the Supreme

0:11:39.390 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Court justices yesterday. Yeah, I'm almost guaranteed. He's not the

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>guy I interviewed. He's a shell of himself. Interest rates

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>going up. Moving up.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 3>CNBC.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:56.429
<v Speaker 4>Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sides with NVIDIA's CEO on AI

0:11:56.510 --> 0:11:58.410
<v Speaker 4>safety and the slowdown debate.

0:11:59.490 --> 0:12:03.530
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got an interesting clip or quote from the

0:12:03.570 --> 0:12:06.970
<v Speaker 1>guy that runs NVIDIA about the whole AI thing. See

0:12:06.990 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>if you agree or disagree with what his take is.

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the most valuable company in the world.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:12.300
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it?

0:12:12.300 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It's damn valuable anyway. They should be proud of themselves.

0:12:18.590 --> 0:12:21.970
<v Speaker 4>This was awful yesterday from the Washington Post. Three dead

0:12:22.130 --> 0:12:26.030
<v Speaker 4>after L.A. news helicopter goes down while covering crash.

0:12:26.910 --> 0:12:31.809
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's a bad story. Yikes. And all the networks.

0:12:32.429 --> 0:12:34.650
<v Speaker 4>I was watching a few of them at the same

0:12:34.690 --> 0:12:36.410
<v Speaker 4>time while this was happening, trying to figure out if

0:12:36.470 --> 0:12:37.390
<v Speaker 4>it was one of their news.

0:12:37.470 --> 0:12:37.950
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:12:38.450 --> 0:12:40.740
<v Speaker 6>Oh, yeah.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.020
<v Speaker 1>And friends of theirs and everything.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:42.179
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:42.220 --> 0:12:43.220
<v Speaker 1>I saw some of those clips.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.449
<v Speaker 1>New York Post, forget your data privacy.

0:12:47.830 --> 0:12:51.390
<v Speaker 4>AI chatbots already know more about you than your own mother.

0:12:53.270 --> 0:12:55.350
<v Speaker 1>Oh, because of the information we give them while we're

0:12:55.390 --> 0:12:59.510
<v Speaker 1>talking to them? Okay. Yeah, that's clearly true. Yeah, that's

0:12:59.590 --> 0:13:01.990
<v Speaker 1>one thing. The new Apple Siri, if you've downloaded the

0:13:02.030 --> 0:13:05.110
<v Speaker 1>new operating system that just came out, the new AI,

0:13:05.350 --> 0:13:07.750
<v Speaker 1>Siri AI, it's supposed to be a leap forward, supposed

0:13:07.770 --> 0:13:10.330
<v Speaker 1>to be on par with like chat GPT and stuff

0:13:10.350 --> 0:13:12.710
<v Speaker 1>like that. I haven't tried it out yet. But it's

0:13:12.750 --> 0:13:14.870
<v Speaker 1>going to keep track of everything you're saying and doing

0:13:14.910 --> 0:13:19.420
<v Speaker 1>in one place, which could be very, very helpful. Hey, Siri,

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that meeting I have on Thursday because Siri

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is looking at your email and your phone and everything

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:25.830
<v Speaker 1>like that and, you know, just bringing it all together.

0:13:25.870 --> 0:13:27.849
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, it's going to have an

0:13:28.010 --> 0:13:31.250
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of info. Yeah, but they're competing with things

0:13:31.590 --> 0:13:34.370
<v Speaker 1>that some of which we've just mentioned that do that

0:13:34.450 --> 0:13:39.010
<v Speaker 1>without Apple's. incredibly strict privacy standards. One of the things

0:13:39.050 --> 0:13:42.750
<v Speaker 1>holding Apple back in AI is that it protects people's

0:13:42.790 --> 0:13:45.030
<v Speaker 1>privacy so much and isn't fast and loose with sending

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.860
<v Speaker 1>data back and forth. But Siri being in your phone

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.580
<v Speaker 1>can grab all that stuff in your phone. Right, right.

0:13:51.620 --> 0:13:53.620
<v Speaker 1>There's a funny joke about that. Go ahead, Katie. I'll

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:58.929
<v Speaker 1>find the joke. Hey Siri, snitches get stitches, huh? From

0:13:58.950 --> 0:14:00.250
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street? Yeah, mine too.

0:14:00.590 --> 0:14:00.890
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy.

0:14:04.670 --> 0:14:07.699
<v Speaker 1>Threat used to describe what will happen if someone informs

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on them or another party yeah i know what it

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:13.700
<v Speaker 1>means all right back to you.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:18.510
<v Speaker 4>Katie from the wall street journal this english village is

0:14:18.590 --> 0:14:22.810
<v Speaker 4>threatening to quit the uk over planned asylum camp.

0:14:24.070 --> 0:14:27.980
<v Speaker 1>Oh is that a thing Can you quit? They're seceding.

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're up in arms over a proposal to house

0:14:32.260 --> 0:14:36.820
<v Speaker 4>over 1,200, quote, asylum seekers at a former military base.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.700
<v Speaker 4>And this is a town that has a population of 350.

0:14:40.700 --> 0:14:43.740
<v Speaker 1>Good for y'all. Fight it as hard as you possibly can.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Fight it like your lives depend on it and your

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>daughter's lives depend on it. Study finds.

0:14:51.220 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Where Americans want pets out. Doctors' offices, grocery stores, and

0:14:57.500 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 4>anywhere food is served.

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.710
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't particularly want them all the other places either,

0:15:03.770 --> 0:15:06.190
<v Speaker 1>but I suppose that ship has sailed as we've gone

0:15:06.250 --> 0:15:08.510
<v Speaker 1>from a society that has kids to a society that

0:15:08.530 --> 0:15:10.630
<v Speaker 1>has pets. I was telling my kids when we were

0:15:10.650 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>at the hotel, I went to see my mom and dad.

0:15:13.830 --> 0:15:16.930
<v Speaker 1>Dogs everywhere. I said, when I was a kid, if

0:15:17.130 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you walked into a hotel and somebody had a dog

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the elevator, you'd have thought, oh my God, there's

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:24.220
<v Speaker 1>a dog in the elevator.

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:24.900
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:25.100 --> 0:15:28.620
<v Speaker 1>Now it's always, like, more likely than not there's a

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.540
<v Speaker 1>dog in the elevator. My bride and I are planning

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.030
<v Speaker 1>a vacation, and I saw one hotel. we were looking

0:15:34.050 --> 0:15:37.270
<v Speaker 1>at and said, you know, whatever. Jones Hotel is family

0:15:37.310 --> 0:15:41.410
<v Speaker 1>friendly and Jones Hotel is pet friendly. I'm like, oh, great.

0:15:41.670 --> 0:15:45.700
<v Speaker 1>The last hotel I was in, yapping dog right down

0:15:45.740 --> 0:15:48.620
<v Speaker 1>the hallway. Yapped for an hour straight. Then we left.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:50.060
<v Speaker 1>It might have gone for 12 hours straight.

0:15:50.100 --> 0:15:50.420
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:15:50.460 --> 0:15:53.420
<v Speaker 1>We left. Unbelievable. A lot of y'all look miserable to me.

0:15:53.460 --> 0:15:55.700
<v Speaker 1>You're like trying to corral your dog and you're trying

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.460
<v Speaker 1>to get it to find some place to let it pee.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look that fun to me. I love dogs,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.980
<v Speaker 1>but I just don't get it. And finally, the Babylon Bee.

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Sidney Sweeney tries to gain support of liberal women by

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:11.220
<v Speaker 4>murdering multiple children.

0:16:11.740 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, wow. That was a Clancy comment, not a Sidney

0:16:18.100 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney comment, really. I get it. That's good. Is there

0:16:21.460 --> 0:16:24.180
<v Speaker 1>anything I could log into so I don't hear Sidney

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.820
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney's name every again? Is there an opt-out place somewhere

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.690
<v Speaker 1>where she never crosses my path in any way? As

0:16:32.990 --> 0:16:36.270
<v Speaker 1>a heterosexual man, I will concede that Ms. Sweeney is

0:16:36.850 --> 0:16:40.620
<v Speaker 1>of spectacular sexiness, but she has now achieved the level of,

0:16:41.130 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>unless she cures cancer, or we used to say assassinates

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.420
<v Speaker 1>the president, but now people try to do that over

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and over again. So unless she cures cancer or sets

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.420
<v Speaker 1>foot on the moon, I don't want to hear her

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>name again. There's actually a piece in the free press

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about Sidney Sweeney derangement syndrome. Oh, really? Yeah. That's pretty clever.

0:17:04.609 --> 0:17:04.850
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.990
<v Speaker 1>Well, we definitely have more news to get to. A

0:17:08.030 --> 0:17:10.890
<v Speaker 1>lot going on. The whole Middle East thing, I know

0:17:10.930 --> 0:17:15.190
<v Speaker 1>this sounds crazy to say. Oh, boy. Could just explode.

0:17:15.330 --> 0:17:17.869
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if a Saudi Arabian and the Houthis really

0:17:17.910 --> 0:17:20.410
<v Speaker 1>go to war, how's Iran and Israel and the United

0:17:20.430 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>States get sucked into that? I don't know. Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:26.460 --> 0:17:30.460
<v Speaker 8>Saudi Arabia is vowing to take firm measures against Iranian-backed

0:17:30.500 --> 0:17:34.730
<v Speaker 8>Houthi fighters who continue to strike static oil infrastructure and

0:17:34.790 --> 0:17:39.250
<v Speaker 8>threaten multiple cities, including Mecca. A drone attack last week

0:17:39.310 --> 0:17:43.510
<v Speaker 8>hit the 700-mile east-west pipeline, forcing a shutdown that could

0:17:43.550 --> 0:17:47.060
<v Speaker 8>last for weeks and impact the ability to transport four

0:17:47.190 --> 0:17:49.479
<v Speaker 8>million barrels of oil a day to market.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.340
<v Speaker 7>They've learned from Iranian training and Iranian support over the

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 7>years how to be essentially these effective Islamist pirates in

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:57.740
<v Speaker 7>the region.

0:17:59.060 --> 0:18:03.850
<v Speaker 1>So Iran and Saudi Arabia have been avowed enemies forever, right?

0:18:04.310 --> 0:18:07.149
<v Speaker 1>You got the whole Sunni Shia thing going. One of

0:18:07.170 --> 0:18:11.530
<v Speaker 1>them is one of them to Iran, Shia and Saudi Arabia, Sunni.

0:18:11.910 --> 0:18:12.340
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:18:12.859 --> 0:18:13.100
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:18:13.300 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh, correct. Not to mention just the good old, uh,

0:18:15.580 --> 0:18:17.340
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be the power. Who's going to be

0:18:17.380 --> 0:18:19.179
<v Speaker 1>the top dog, right? Which might have more to do

0:18:19.220 --> 0:18:25.070
<v Speaker 1>with it. Certainly among the leadership. Um, This is closer

0:18:25.090 --> 0:18:27.770
<v Speaker 1>to them going to war, definitely, since the Houthis are

0:18:28.330 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>full-on Iranian-created and backed. Although, I was reading a long

0:18:32.340 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>article the other day about how they're way more independent

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.700
<v Speaker 1>than a lot of these other groups at this point,

0:18:37.180 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and very, very well-armed. Interesting, yeah. The fight in Yemen,

0:18:42.300 --> 0:18:46.700
<v Speaker 1>which has been the greatest humanitarian catastrophe in whatever number

0:18:46.740 --> 0:18:49.770
<v Speaker 1>of decades. It's funny that college kids aren't marching about that.

0:18:49.890 --> 0:18:50.690
<v Speaker 1>It's weird.

0:18:50.890 --> 0:18:51.050
<v Speaker 3>Anyway.

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.220
<v Speaker 1>It's long been a proxy fight between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

0:18:56.260 --> 0:18:59.750
<v Speaker 1>Now it could just be a, it's on. No more proxies.

0:18:59.810 --> 0:19:03.260
<v Speaker 1>I want to punch you in the face situation. That

0:19:03.300 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>report from Fox goes on.

0:19:06.490 --> 0:19:11.109
<v Speaker 8>Houthi fighters are overrunning Yemen government forces, leaving chaos and

0:19:11.190 --> 0:19:14.290
<v Speaker 8>death in their wake, vowing to take control of one

0:19:14.310 --> 0:19:17.699
<v Speaker 8>of the most strategic waterways in the world, the Bab

0:19:17.820 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 8>al-Mandeb Strait, an 18-mile strip of water at the mouth

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 8>of the Red Sea.

0:19:23.170 --> 0:19:25.010
<v Speaker 1>More than $ 1 trillion.

0:19:24.970 --> 0:19:29.780
<v Speaker 8>Worth of cargo passes through the Strait each year, including 12%

0:19:29.780 --> 0:19:30.780
<v Speaker 8>of the world's oil.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:35.379
<v Speaker 5>We are capable of closing Bab el-Mandab Strait and the

0:19:35.420 --> 0:19:38.900
<v Speaker 5>Red Sea maritime navigation due to advances in our missile

0:19:38.940 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 5>and aerial capabilities.

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.310
<v Speaker 1>Well, that seems like a big deal. It's a huge

0:19:43.350 --> 0:19:45.570
<v Speaker 1>deal in a lot of different ways. The war part,

0:19:45.630 --> 0:19:48.950
<v Speaker 1>which you've outlined, and also energy-wise, that was one of

0:19:48.970 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the main... bypasses the Saudis were using to get their

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>oil out because the Strait of Hormuz is a tad

0:19:54.660 --> 0:19:57.780
<v Speaker 1>clogged up, you may have heard. So, yeah, this is

0:19:57.900 --> 0:20:03.899
<v Speaker 1>a development. So then we go to Trey Yankstofox, who's

0:20:03.940 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>got our involvement in some of the violence that's going

0:20:08.020 --> 0:20:08.419
<v Speaker 1>on over there.

0:20:09.030 --> 0:20:11.950
<v Speaker 7>Tension remains high around the Strait of Hormuz as reports

0:20:12.140 --> 0:20:14.740
<v Speaker 7>indicate multiple explosions.

0:20:14.100 --> 0:20:15.420
<v Speaker 1>Were heard there overnight.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 7>The Iranians claim they shot down an MQ-1 Predator drone

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.050
<v Speaker 7>belonging to the United States.

0:20:21.390 --> 0:20:22.330
<v Speaker 1>And we do know that U.S.

0:20:22.410 --> 0:20:25.890
<v Speaker 7>Forces targeted a number of small Iranian boats that were

0:20:26.150 --> 0:20:28.310
<v Speaker 7>reportedly trying to steal a U.S.

0:20:28.390 --> 0:20:32.419
<v Speaker 1>Sea drone earlier this week. We fired off a ton

0:20:32.500 --> 0:20:36.740
<v Speaker 1>of our best, we're running low on munitions yesterday. I

0:20:36.780 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was just going to jump in and say before we

0:20:38.460 --> 0:20:42.030
<v Speaker 1>continue with Trey, yeah, we fired 70 or more of

0:20:42.130 --> 0:20:47.900
<v Speaker 1>our high-end munitions. defense interceptors when Iran launched that brief-ish

0:20:47.980 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>missile attack on Jordan, not to mention, so it was

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>60 to 70 Patriot interceptors and also a dozen or

0:20:54.820 --> 0:20:59.290
<v Speaker 1>so THAAD interceptors. And that expenditure is what we've used

0:20:59.330 --> 0:21:02.010
<v Speaker 1>in a full week at other times in the war.

0:21:02.869 --> 0:21:09.450
<v Speaker 1>Iran is changing its tactics, including firing these rockets, munitions, missiles,

0:21:09.490 --> 0:21:11.830
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure the proper term, that as they get

0:21:11.869 --> 0:21:16.590
<v Speaker 1>close to the target, they split into multiple munitions. They

0:21:16.670 --> 0:21:19.469
<v Speaker 1>multiply like the Hydra, right? And then so you have

0:21:19.490 --> 0:21:22.109
<v Speaker 1>to use lots and lots of Patriots and Thads to

0:21:22.130 --> 0:21:24.730
<v Speaker 1>shoot them down, and we are burning through our supply.

0:21:25.390 --> 0:21:30.940
<v Speaker 1>Which is a strategy from the bad guys to have

0:21:30.980 --> 0:21:33.170
<v Speaker 1>us run out of those, I think. Oh, yeah.

0:21:33.450 --> 0:21:33.870
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah.

0:21:33.930 --> 0:21:39.379
<v Speaker 1>I think you're absolutely right. And here's the 30,000-foot view

0:21:39.460 --> 0:21:44.180
<v Speaker 1>of that situation. The really good missile defense stuff we've developed,

0:21:44.220 --> 0:21:48.580
<v Speaker 1>and it's amazing. It's a tribute to American scientific imagination,

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.909
<v Speaker 1>hard work, and genius in manufacturing. Anyway, that is— Oh,

0:21:52.990 --> 0:21:57.669
<v Speaker 1>my God. Good point. But that's enabled— the sort of

0:21:57.710 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>warfare we've seen, you know, we're going to punch you

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:01.379
<v Speaker 1>good and hard in the face and see if you

0:22:01.420 --> 0:22:04.810
<v Speaker 1>come around and you'll retaliate, but we'll shoot down your rockets.

0:22:04.850 --> 0:22:08.220
<v Speaker 1>So then we'll, We'll have more negotiations than, I don't know,

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe kick you a couple of times, and you'll shoot back,

0:22:10.540 --> 0:22:12.980
<v Speaker 1>and we'll shoot those down, and, you know, we'll go

0:22:13.020 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>back to the table, blah, blah, blah. As opposed to,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.180
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the past, your soldiers were vulnerable to attacks,

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:25.580
<v Speaker 1>and especially now the weapons are so sophisticated. So could

0:22:25.619 --> 0:22:28.310
<v Speaker 1>we be returning to we're going to win it, and

0:22:28.330 --> 0:22:30.109
<v Speaker 1>we're going to win it fast because our guys are

0:22:30.150 --> 0:22:32.149
<v Speaker 1>getting killed, and there's nothing we can do to protect

0:22:32.170 --> 0:22:34.730
<v Speaker 1>them style of warfare? That's what I'm thinking about.

0:22:34.750 --> 0:22:35.190
<v Speaker 2>Hmm.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:43.550
<v Speaker 1>And now bringing the two reports together, the whole Yemen, Houthis,

0:22:43.770 --> 0:22:46.900
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia, Iran, United States thing is this.

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 7>With a focus on Iran, one of the country's largest proxies,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.580
<v Speaker 7>the Houthis in Yemen, are ramping up their attacks on

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.430
<v Speaker 7>Yemeni government forces and neighboring Saudi Arabia. The Saudis intercepted

0:22:56.450 --> 0:22:59.010
<v Speaker 7>a Houthi drone overnight near the holy city of Mecca

0:22:59.310 --> 0:23:02.010
<v Speaker 7>as these attacks expand in range. Now, the key thing

0:23:02.030 --> 0:23:04.350
<v Speaker 7>to remember here is that the escalation is linked to

0:23:04.369 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 7>the situation with Iran, and the Houthis are receiving direct

0:23:07.430 --> 0:23:09.619
<v Speaker 7>orders and support from the regime in Tehran.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.180
<v Speaker 6>Why are the Houthis doing it? Because Iran is paying

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 6>them cash? and offering them material and operational support. But

0:23:16.580 --> 0:23:20.850
<v Speaker 6>this Iranian escalation is evidence of the pain that they

0:23:20.900 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 6>are going through economically.

0:23:23.070 --> 0:23:23.390
<v Speaker 8>I hope.

0:23:25.830 --> 0:23:28.550
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is it enough? Is it enough for the reasons

0:23:28.570 --> 0:23:31.470
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed many times? Well, is it an indication of

0:23:31.670 --> 0:23:35.369
<v Speaker 1>how desperate they are, or is it just them fighting

0:23:35.410 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a war and doing well? Wow, that's an interesting take.

0:23:39.540 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess I've accepted that conventional wisdom, but I know

0:23:42.660 --> 0:23:46.420
<v Speaker 1>the people are hurting, but the people could be starving

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:51.050
<v Speaker 1>like the godforsaken people you see in those anti-hunger ads,

0:23:51.609 --> 0:23:56.490
<v Speaker 1>and the IRGC will be fat, happy, and well-supplied. Man,

0:23:56.540 --> 0:23:59.899
<v Speaker 1>shooting a drone over Mecca, over Mecca's kind of a vague...

0:24:00.740 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Over over in the area. Yeah. Yeah.

0:24:03.940 --> 0:24:04.420
<v Speaker 3>OK.

0:24:04.460 --> 0:24:06.330
<v Speaker 1>May not have been headed there in any way. It

0:24:06.380 --> 0:24:09.410
<v Speaker 1>just was like what? Like South Mecca, Mecca Heights. So

0:24:09.510 --> 0:24:11.210
<v Speaker 1>you could be right that they're trying to build up

0:24:11.290 --> 0:24:15.550
<v Speaker 1>public will of they shot a drone at Mecca. Surely

0:24:15.609 --> 0:24:19.540
<v Speaker 1>they realize that's a. If I was MBS, I would

0:24:19.630 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>absolutely say that whether it was true or not. But

0:24:23.980 --> 0:24:26.139
<v Speaker 1>surely Iran and the Houthis know that wouldn't be a

0:24:26.180 --> 0:24:30.450
<v Speaker 1>good strategy. I can't imagine them doing it. Maybe there's

0:24:30.490 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a reason they would, but I can't come up with it.

0:24:32.650 --> 0:24:35.550
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be an insane thing to do.

0:24:36.030 --> 0:24:39.150
<v Speaker 1>But that's what happened. MBS, I mean, it was like

0:24:39.150 --> 0:24:42.790
<v Speaker 1>14 miles outside of Mecca heading toward an oil terminal.

0:24:43.109 --> 0:24:46.889
<v Speaker 1>They shot it down. MBS thinks to himself, hmm, and

0:24:46.930 --> 0:24:50.130
<v Speaker 1>announces they shot down a drone looking right at Mecca. Well,

0:24:50.170 --> 0:24:52.370
<v Speaker 1>I get Mecca and Medina messed up. I'm not Muslim.

0:24:52.830 --> 0:24:59.420
<v Speaker 1>Is that where... Where he got the word, Muhammad got

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the word from God and wrote down all the stuff

0:25:01.740 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>or memorized it for the Koran. Did that happen at

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Mecca or was he born there? Well, there's Mecca and Medina.

0:25:06.500 --> 0:25:10.430
<v Speaker 1>There's two. There's Funky Cold Medina or the other one. Sorry,

0:25:10.470 --> 0:25:15.950
<v Speaker 1>that is a really outdated reference. That's got to be sacrilegious.

0:25:16.090 --> 0:25:20.869
<v Speaker 1>Tone Loke? Yeah, using Tone Loke to talk about, yeah.

0:25:21.710 --> 0:25:22.430
<v Speaker 1>I apologize.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:22.970
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't.

0:25:23.020 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, it would be a really big deal to

0:25:24.740 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>their religion, I would think, for all people. Muslims. I

0:25:29.220 --> 0:25:32.139
<v Speaker 1>don't know how that split works between the Sunnis and

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Shiites. I don't know either. Okay. Might have to look.

0:25:36.460 --> 0:25:39.270
<v Speaker 1>I'll do a quick research on that. Okay. But the

0:25:39.290 --> 0:25:42.189
<v Speaker 1>Obama and Rebecca thing, jeez, they would go badass crazy,

0:25:42.230 --> 0:25:45.670
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't they? Saudi Arabia? Again, yeah, that'd be an insane

0:25:45.710 --> 0:25:47.330
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. I can't imagine why they would do

0:25:47.369 --> 0:25:51.270
<v Speaker 1>it intentionally. More analysis in a moment afterward from our

0:25:51.290 --> 0:25:54.669
<v Speaker 1>friends at SimpliSafe Home Security. They're celebrating their 20th anniversary,

0:25:54.730 --> 0:25:58.609
<v Speaker 1>growing and growing and growing. We both love SimpliSafe You know,

0:25:58.670 --> 0:26:01.230
<v Speaker 1>not only does it protect your place and the people

0:26:01.270 --> 0:26:03.750
<v Speaker 1>you love, but it can lower your insurance costs, partly

0:26:03.790 --> 0:26:09.530
<v Speaker 1>because with the AI-powered smart outdoor cameras, they detect suspicious

0:26:09.590 --> 0:26:12.570
<v Speaker 1>activity at the perimeter and alert live U.S.-based agents to

0:26:12.590 --> 0:26:15.669
<v Speaker 1>step in. So they stop the breaking before it happens,

0:26:15.730 --> 0:26:16.580
<v Speaker 1>unlike other systems.

0:26:17.020 --> 0:26:17.170
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I went on the SimpliSafe website. I customized it for

0:26:20.619 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>my home like you can do. It comes very quickly.

0:26:23.140 --> 0:26:25.929
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to set up. And you stick with it

0:26:25.990 --> 0:26:28.430
<v Speaker 1>because you like it, not because you're locked into a contract.

0:26:28.530 --> 0:26:31.419
<v Speaker 1>That is SimpliSafe. And right now you can get 50%

0:26:31.420 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>off new SimpliSafe system. Just go to SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong. 60%

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.540
<v Speaker 1>off SimpliSafe.com slash Armstrong. And when you order, write in

0:26:40.580 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>our show name and the how did you hear about

0:26:41.980 --> 0:26:44.900
<v Speaker 1>us survey. Please, if you can take a minute, SimpliSafe.com

0:26:44.940 --> 0:26:49.590
<v Speaker 1>slash Armstrong. Don't forget there's no safe like SimpliSafe. And

0:26:49.609 --> 0:26:52.090
<v Speaker 1>then maybe we'll touch on Ukraine-Russia a little bit later,

0:26:52.109 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 1>but why? With those two wars going the way they're going,

0:26:56.980 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no end in sight. Really, either one of them.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:00.820
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:27:01.660 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:27:02.050 --> 0:27:06.830
<v Speaker 1>Russia is like... Iran ramped up its production of the

0:27:06.890 --> 0:27:12.030
<v Speaker 1>next generation of devastating weapons, and Ukraine is catastrophically low

0:27:12.070 --> 0:27:14.990
<v Speaker 1>in interceptors at this point. So you remember that moment

0:27:15.090 --> 0:27:19.030
<v Speaker 1>when Ukraine's drone technology was just amazing and they were

0:27:19.150 --> 0:27:23.340
<v Speaker 1>really making progress and holding the Russians off? That phase

0:27:23.380 --> 0:27:25.460
<v Speaker 1>may be over. Yeah.

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And Trump is demanding the Ukrainians not attack Russia's oil capacity,

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:39.530
<v Speaker 1>which is like the only weapon they have. So we

0:27:39.570 --> 0:27:41.350
<v Speaker 1>got a lot to get to today. We will get

0:27:41.369 --> 0:27:44.550
<v Speaker 1>into AI at some point because there's some good new stuff.

0:27:44.609 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But just before we take a break, Mark Halpern on

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>his afternoon news show that I watch, he put out

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:57.540
<v Speaker 1>his 8 for 28 list for this week. That's the

0:27:58.150 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>He ranks the people that he thinks are going to

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.260
<v Speaker 1>run for president as a Democrat and where they currently

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.540
<v Speaker 1>are in terms of the likelihood of them running and

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:11.220
<v Speaker 1>getting the nomination. And they've moved a lot over recent months.

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:18.949
<v Speaker 1>He interviews donors and, you know, off the record conversations

0:28:18.970 --> 0:28:21.030
<v Speaker 1>with people in campaigns and all that sort of stuff.

0:28:21.190 --> 0:28:25.179
<v Speaker 1>And he doesn't usually divulge what he knows. Because it's

0:28:25.220 --> 0:28:27.830
<v Speaker 1>off the record. But I was pretty surprised to see

0:28:27.890 --> 0:28:30.730
<v Speaker 1>that he's got at number one now. Because he had

0:28:30.770 --> 0:28:33.270
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris at number one several months back, thinking she

0:28:33.290 --> 0:28:35.230
<v Speaker 1>was going to run, thinking she would get the nomination.

0:28:35.270 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know what changed. But she's down to six.

0:28:38.860 --> 0:28:43.740
<v Speaker 1>He currently has number one to be the nominee, Gavin Newsom. Yeah.

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.570
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a big poll out of people, just

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.690
<v Speaker 1>normal schlubs like ourselves, for the 2028 Democratic nomination, which

0:28:51.750 --> 0:28:54.990
<v Speaker 1>is the most useless pile of garbage you can imagine.

0:28:55.010 --> 0:28:58.830
<v Speaker 1>It means nothing, tells you nothing, informs you of nothing,

0:28:59.070 --> 0:29:02.500
<v Speaker 1>just a waste of time. Halpern talking to the real

0:29:02.540 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>movers and shakers behind the scenes, that is interesting. Well, right,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:10.250
<v Speaker 1>who they're going to support. Because that's when you don't run.

0:29:10.290 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That's when you stop running, when you lose your financial support,

0:29:13.430 --> 0:29:15.220
<v Speaker 1>and then you can't run.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:16.940 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're a billionaire. So we were talking about how

0:29:20.340 --> 0:29:23.420
<v Speaker 1>the tit-for-tat phase of the Iran war may be ending,

0:29:23.460 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>which reminds me, we need to talk about Sidney Sweeney

0:29:26.740 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>derangement syndrome.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:29:28.660 --> 0:29:32.630
<v Speaker 1>So stay with us for that. Wow. You were excited

0:29:32.670 --> 0:29:36.350
<v Speaker 1>about that, weren't you? What? Particularly. You were excited about

0:29:36.390 --> 0:29:42.140
<v Speaker 1>that tease transition. I don't follow you at all. And

0:29:42.180 --> 0:29:44.260
<v Speaker 1>as long as you say four tat, you can get

0:29:44.300 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>away with it. I don't know why. Weird, these rules.

0:29:48.140 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was thinking that as I grew my

0:29:50.300 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>shih tzu the other day.

0:29:52.420 --> 0:29:52.820
<v Speaker 3>It's true.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:30:00.250
<v Speaker 1>Be like if there was an expression of For fac.

0:30:00.530 --> 0:30:03.790
<v Speaker 1>Or something like that. As long as you said for fac,

0:30:03.990 --> 0:30:07.250
<v Speaker 1>you could use it as a different expression. SNL brought

0:30:07.270 --> 0:30:09.410
<v Speaker 1>us so brilliantly a number of years back. It's Sofa

0:30:09.470 --> 0:30:14.060
<v Speaker 1>King Comfortable. The name of this store was Sofa King.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.340
<v Speaker 1>I got to turn off your mics. It's probably a

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.330
<v Speaker 1>good idea, Michael. Speaking of which, a shocking upsetting of

0:30:23.370 --> 0:30:28.050
<v Speaker 1>the format. Next segment. I have made a command decision. Okay, cool.

0:30:28.630 --> 0:30:34.050
<v Speaker 1>And somebody had to apologize for laughing at a TikTok

0:30:34.090 --> 0:30:40.530
<v Speaker 1>joke that somebody was Arch Manning of the Texas Longhorns quarterback.

0:30:40.670 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he should have apologized. What was he

0:30:42.620 --> 0:30:45.780
<v Speaker 1>forced to apologize for by the woke mob? We'll get

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.460
<v Speaker 1>to that and all kinds of stuff coming up. Stay here.

0:30:53.130 --> 0:30:58.070
<v Speaker 1>According to ChatGPT, Mecca is enormously important to both Sunnis

0:30:58.330 --> 0:31:01.510
<v Speaker 1>and Shias. It is the holiest city for both groups.

0:31:02.470 --> 0:31:06.230
<v Speaker 1>So it's hard to imagine the Houthis bombing it?

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 3>No, no.

0:31:08.060 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't seem like it's on the table. Yeah, again,

0:31:10.700 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just to whip up populace. It's good water's time propaganda, though.

0:31:14.450 --> 0:31:18.270
<v Speaker 1>So the command decision I've made is to skip mailbag

0:31:18.310 --> 0:31:21.090
<v Speaker 1>today to give more time for the freedom-loving quote of

0:31:21.130 --> 0:31:25.630
<v Speaker 1>the day because it is so unbelievably brilliant. It comes

0:31:25.690 --> 0:31:31.590
<v Speaker 1>from my favorite Frenchman, Breville Lepagom. I thought you were

0:31:31.610 --> 0:31:35.030
<v Speaker 1>going to say Jacques Cousteau. Nope. Actually, my favorite Frenchman

0:31:35.130 --> 0:31:40.670
<v Speaker 1>for a long time was Lebeau from Hogan's Heroes. But

0:31:40.710 --> 0:31:46.670
<v Speaker 1>now it is Breville Lepagom. Not Lafayette, LeBou from Hogan Zeroes.

0:31:46.770 --> 0:31:50.210
<v Speaker 1>Lafayette would have been a good one, yeah. Anyway, so

0:31:50.370 --> 0:31:53.370
<v Speaker 1>here's what my favorite Frenchman writes. And part of the

0:31:53.390 --> 0:31:56.210
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm fired up about this is I see J.D. Vance,

0:31:56.230 --> 0:32:00.650
<v Speaker 1>sometimes referred to these days as J.D. Vance, performing the

0:32:00.730 --> 0:32:04.610
<v Speaker 1>horseshoe theory maneuver. And it's on the young right in particular,

0:32:04.650 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about central planning and how we really

0:32:06.890 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>need to do that. The government needs to take more power.

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.310
<v Speaker 1>And so this is what Le Pogam writes. There's truth

0:32:14.350 --> 0:32:17.410
<v Speaker 1>in almost everything. The problem is the test. In physics,

0:32:17.470 --> 0:32:20.290
<v Speaker 1>it's simple. If your plane flies, you're right. If your

0:32:20.330 --> 0:32:23.810
<v Speaker 1>computer calculates, you're right. If your vacuum cleaner sucks, you're right.

0:32:24.230 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I found myself wondering, does that translate in the same

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.510
<v Speaker 1>ironic way in French as it does in English? Anyway,

0:32:30.710 --> 0:32:34.750
<v Speaker 1>reality doesn't negotiate. It doesn't form committees. Music and live performance,

0:32:34.790 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that's more subtle. There's taste and colors. You can prefer

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>an adagio to a sax solo, but no serious person

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.900
<v Speaker 1>can say that Mozart or Beethoven is bad. An out-of-tune piano,

0:32:44.940 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>someone singing off-key, it shows. It's not an opinion. It's

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.430
<v Speaker 1>an ear. Economics, we treat it as if it were

0:32:51.470 --> 0:32:52.350
<v Speaker 1>a matter of taste.

0:32:52.770 --> 0:32:53.190
<v Speaker 4>It isn't.

0:32:53.870 --> 0:32:57.130
<v Speaker 1>Marxism is a symphony for a hundred instruments where no

0:32:57.190 --> 0:32:59.690
<v Speaker 1>one has ever rehearsed, where all the instruments are out

0:32:59.730 --> 0:33:01.710
<v Speaker 1>of tune, and where the conductor wrote the score in

0:33:01.750 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>his head based on a theory. Then they close the

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>doors of the hall and they demand the ovation. What

0:33:07.540 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>happens on a large scale? Famine, gulags, death, misery, madness.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.140
<v Speaker 1>Not because the musicians were monsters, because the piece is unplayable.

0:33:17.610 --> 0:33:21.370
<v Speaker 1>Without prices, you no longer have an ear. Without property,

0:33:21.430 --> 0:33:24.530
<v Speaker 1>you no longer have tuned instruments. Without profit and loss,

0:33:24.830 --> 0:33:28.250
<v Speaker 1>no one hears the off note anymore. That's an especially

0:33:28.310 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>astute observation. And if you point it out, they explain

0:33:31.420 --> 0:33:35.390
<v Speaker 1>that you're the problem. Mize wrote about it in 1920.

0:33:35.390 --> 0:33:39.650
<v Speaker 1>Without market prices, economic calculation is impossible. The conductor doesn't

0:33:39.670 --> 0:33:44.810
<v Speaker 1>have the knowledge. Hayek added the rest. The knowledge is local, dispersed,

0:33:45.010 --> 0:33:48.310
<v Speaker 1>sometimes silent. It doesn't fit into a ministry. It doesn't

0:33:48.390 --> 0:33:52.580
<v Speaker 1>fit into a slogan. The moral globalism that followed, wokeism,

0:33:52.670 --> 0:33:57.140
<v Speaker 1>institutional feminism, identity theater, is another score written against the ear.

0:33:57.500 --> 0:34:00.820
<v Speaker 1>They replace the test with the narrative. They tune the

0:34:00.860 --> 0:34:04.210
<v Speaker 1>instruments to the right word, not to reality. And you

0:34:04.270 --> 0:34:07.729
<v Speaker 1>end up with completely detached characters capable of speaking for

0:34:07.750 --> 0:34:10.570
<v Speaker 1>an hour without ever touching the ground. It's not a

0:34:10.630 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>casting accident. It's what a hall produces that has stopped

0:34:13.860 --> 0:34:17.660
<v Speaker 1>listening to whether it's right. The Austrian school is Mozart

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.620
<v Speaker 1>applied to economics, not because it would be elegant, because

0:34:20.660 --> 0:34:24.770
<v Speaker 1>it refuses to play off-key. Prices are the tuning, a

0:34:24.850 --> 0:34:28.690
<v Speaker 1>number that condenses what millions of people know without anyone

0:34:28.750 --> 0:34:32.100
<v Speaker 1>having to know everything. Property is the instrument that holds

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the tuning over time. The entrepreneur is the musician who

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.870
<v Speaker 1>risks his skin on a phrase no one has played before.

0:34:38.370 --> 0:34:41.870
<v Speaker 1>Profit isn't vulgarity. It's the silence after the right note,

0:34:41.969 --> 0:34:45.500
<v Speaker 1>the proof that you've created value for someone else. Mozart

0:34:45.739 --> 0:34:48.380
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need you to believe in him. Your ear is enough.

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.060
<v Speaker 1>A healthy economy doesn't either. Full shelves, planes that fly,

0:34:52.140 --> 0:34:56.410
<v Speaker 1>people escaping poverty. It rings true. Bad ideas kill first

0:34:56.489 --> 0:34:59.830
<v Speaker 1>those who believe in them. Reconversion is possible. You just

0:34:59.890 --> 0:35:04.060
<v Speaker 1>need to retune the strings. Then we build. I thought

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:05.739
<v Speaker 1>that was brilliant. Yeah, that's pretty good.

0:35:06.860 --> 0:35:07.220
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.350
<v Speaker 1>God, I could go on for an hour about... how

0:35:10.390 --> 0:35:12.210
<v Speaker 1>much I hate central planning and why it's such a

0:35:12.230 --> 0:35:15.060
<v Speaker 1>terrible idea. And I think it's one of those truths

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be retaught over and over again. I

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.110
<v Speaker 1>came across this thread about Chairman Mao running China and

0:35:21.140 --> 0:35:24.620
<v Speaker 1>some of his worst ideas that killed the 40 million people.

0:35:24.780 --> 0:35:27.230
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that goes unnoticed by history for

0:35:27.270 --> 0:35:32.170
<v Speaker 1>most people. It's not convenient. One of his most hilariously

0:35:32.230 --> 0:35:34.900
<v Speaker 1>bad ideas that killed millions of people, I'll have to

0:35:34.940 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>get to a little bit later. I don't know if

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.299
<v Speaker 1>I'd ever heard it before. The central planning thing, though.

0:35:39.860 --> 0:35:41.779
<v Speaker 1>Still trying to come up with my favorite Frenchman. It's

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:46.450
<v Speaker 1>either Wembiana... The center for the Spurs or Robespierre? I'm

0:35:46.469 --> 0:35:48.230
<v Speaker 1>going to go with one of those two. I'll have

0:35:48.250 --> 0:35:50.390
<v Speaker 1>to think it over, though. I'd go with the Spurs center.

0:35:51.130 --> 0:35:58.010
<v Speaker 1>Sacre bleu. Terrible choices. C'est terrible or something. I don't know.

0:35:58.150 --> 0:36:00.530
<v Speaker 1>I got six weeks of French in high school. I thought,

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.180
<v Speaker 1>the wires, there's so many silent letters. You know me

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in silent letters. You know, oh, I hate them. Too many.

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:13.100
<v Speaker 1>So I went with German, yeah. There you go. That's fantastic.

0:36:13.969 --> 0:36:15.620
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot more to come. If you miss

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.380
<v Speaker 1>a segment, get the podcast Armstrong and Getty On Demand.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.140
<v Speaker 1>You should subscribe. That example from Chairman Malin Central Planning

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>would have sounded crazy 10 years ago. Now that I've

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.850
<v Speaker 1>lived through the whole apocalypse, I can believe that sort

0:36:27.890 --> 0:36:30.830
<v Speaker 1>of thing happening. So lots on the way. Again, stay here.

0:36:33.590 --> 0:36:34.690
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.