WEBVTT - ULTIMATE Week 10 Preview, 11/08/2019, 0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to 0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160 listen live, all you have to do is download the 0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399 I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also, 0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119 if you want to catch this show on video, for 0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040 sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and 0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200 that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network. 0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520 Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and 0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.160 listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends 0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:39.720 Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences, 0:00:37.440 --> 0:01:07.640 do didnit? Yeah? Now as welcome by nine st Trick, 0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:18.720 step Fall co host and five eleven from All Why 0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:27.360 ladies and tnlemen. Welcome inside Studio thirty four. This is 0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.440 the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. I am Frank Stanfeld. No 0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.600 Greg Sussman as he's out gallivanting the streets. Maybe a 0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.919 rehearsal dinner, maybe a last minute tuxedo fitting for his wedding, 0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.480 whatever it might be. Greg Susman is not here. What 0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.400 I am? Frank Stanfeld joined live in studio buy our 0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.480 special guest Nick Ercolano following on Twitter at Nick Underscore 0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.560 Big Dog's Gotta Eat Nick? What's going on in I'm 0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.280 glad to be back here. I haven't been back since 0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.600 the summer, and I usually I would swept my entire 0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.840 way through the show. And now it's about twenty five 0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.080 degrees in uh in New York City, so you're gonna 0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.400 need to have me back in like during a neutral 0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.160 time of the year. I would enjoy that a lot 0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.240 more a neutral time of the year. Yeah, it's gotten 0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.799 cold today, man. I know e y We is joining 0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.960 the show here as well, and he was talking about 0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.760 how out in Nashville it's randomly become winter. So we're 0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.600 all feeling the cold right now. We're really feeling the 0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.560 brunt of it. Ey. I heard you joined the show 0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.400 just as we were getting started here. You also referred 0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.800 to your laptop as something that you quote need to 0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.000 get cleaned out. So I hope that everything is going 0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.639 on well for you technology wise, uh and weatherwise as well. 0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.360 What's going on? Eway? Um? This is not a face 0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.800 of a technical technological mastermind. I can't even say the 0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.040 word apparently, so yeah, I don't know. I did the update, 0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.200 and as usual, now the computer doesn't work properly. What 0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.960 a sweet update. Thank you Apple, Thank you again for 0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.680 your amazing updates. Excellent I know that you've you've had 0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.920 some fun with Apple products as well. Nick tell us 0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.200 a little bit of about what happened last night to you. Okay, Well, 0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.440 first I'd like to touch on the update for the 0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.680 for the MacBook that also ruined my life for about 0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.280 twenty four hours. I got the new AirPod pros, the 0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.240 Max and AirPod Max. I don't know. They just throw 0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.800 a lot of words max, pro, awesome, super, whatever it is. 0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.400 Being a huge tech nerd, I had to get them 0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.640 like immediately, and I got them and they're fantastic. I 0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.800 love the product, except they have a little silicone piece 0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.320 at the end so if they don't fit your ear 0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.600 as well, which the Apple products normally don't for me, 0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:26.800 they made the silicone piece so that it does if 0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.639 it's everybody's ear. Except for when I popped it out 0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.360 last night, the silicone piece stayed all the way in 0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.480 my ear and it was making its way like into 0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.640 my into my brain. So I took a video of 0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.560 it and I posted it on Twitter, UH tagged Apple 0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.200 in it, and I went to their page and realized 0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.040 that they don't follow a single person. They haven't tweeted ever, 0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.080 but they have like three point six million followers. I'm like, 0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:47.920 they're never gonna answer me. But I asked them for 0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.880 a new MacBook Pro. I thought it was Um. I 0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:51.680 thought it was a good deal considering the damage that 0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.000 they did to me. Yeah, I think that's fair to say. 0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.280 And we were talking about this before the show. You're 0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:57.800 there like trying to get it out, but at the 0:03:57.840 --> 0:03:59.880 same time you're jamming it further into your ear. And 0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.120 you know, when I saw your video on Twitter, I 0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.240 was thinking the same exact thing, like that would likely 0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:05.800 happen to me. I would be one of those guys 0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:07.920 where you know, I don't like when the headphones go 0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.760 all the way into your ear. Like the normal air 0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.040 pods and and Apple headphones are find the way that 0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:14.720 they are, they don't have to go all the way 0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.120 into your ear, So I too would also be freaking out. 0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.719 So I feel your pain. Uh, And we're we're all 0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.600 feeling the pain of our Apple products right now. Um, 0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.560 But we also have Apple products, so I guess it 0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.880 doesn't really matter overall. Last night, the Autumn Wind is 0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:32.159 a pirate. The Oakland Raiders pull off the Wind twenty four. 0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.320 Before we get into all the Week ten matchups, I 0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.159 did just want to talk about this game real quick 0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.640 and what we saw last night. So Nick will start 0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.960 off with the Chargers side of things. We got bad 0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.480 Philip Rivers last night. We got the bad shot put 0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.440 last night. Two touchdowns, seventeen thirty one, three interceptions. I 0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.120 had the over on the receiving prop for Keenan Allen, 0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.560 which was sixty seven and a half. He had sixty 0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.440 eight receiving yards, so I feel pretty good about that. 0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.640 Mike Williams fifty nine and a half. Really, it can 0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.880 give you one more catch against this secondary. I don't 0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.440 know what happened last night, Nick, but for whatever reason, 0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.919 Philip Rivers, maybe he was seeing ghosts, I don't know 0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.440 what it was, but ultimately he did not look like himself. 0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.160 Three turnovers in this game. He fumbled another time, and ultimately, 0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.240 outside of Hunter Henry, you were let down once again, 0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.760 why by their past catchers. Yeah, Philip Rivers is a problem, 0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.920 it seems like for the Chargers long term, and they 0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.280 mentioned it during the broadcast last night. How you know 0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.640 those quarterbacks came into the league together. It was Eli 0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.919 who is now benched. You have Big Ben who is 0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.440 out for the year with his injury. We don't know 0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.320 what we're gonna see come next year. Rivers is the 0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.720 last remaining guy, uh, and I don't know that he 0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.760 should be. I mean, they're not gonna bench him, obviously, 0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.880 but there's a problem with his with his passing game. 0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.000 The whole shop with thing is is not working anymore. 0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.159 And maybe when he was a little younger and he 0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.120 had some more strength behind it, but that hurts a 0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.000 guy like Mike Williams whose main um you know, his 0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.640 main form of attact, especially for fantasy purposes, is those 0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.479 deep balls. And Mike Williams is the guy who people 0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.919 get excited about because he's got the air yards and whatnot. 0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:57.840 But if you can't put it together consistently and you're 0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.440 not getting those accurate deep throws from River his weekend 0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.159 and week out, then he's not going to have a 0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:03.680 lot of value for you, because you have to have 0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.640 consistency from those mid round wide receivers like Mike Williams 0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.800 in order to return some value. Uh. And it's hurting 0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.240 Keenan Allen of course too, because they are so heavily 0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.280 involving their running backs, which I think is a good 0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.120 game plan. Considering the tandem of Gordon and Ekeler is 0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:18.800 really talented. They give you everything you need. They give 0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.040 you the strength of receiving, the ability, all everything in between. 0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.640 And we're starting starting to see Melvin Gordon kind of 0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.640 come into his form. So if you drafted him late, 0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.560 you looks like you gotta steely. Looks like a guy 0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.720 who's gonna be a twenty touch guy that we're kind 0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.039 of used to. UM. I will say a lot of 0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.520 the a lot of the calls that they had were questionable. 0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.240 Some of the picks were a little bit unlucky, guys 0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.280 falling on the ground whatever, um. But when they got 0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:40.960 to the goal line man, some of the play calling 0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.440 was so suspect. They kept were throwing it to Lance 0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.960 Kendricks and they're they're fullback. Lance Kendricks are fullback and 0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.520 when they're trying to run the ball, they did the 0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.880 same play three times. They would motion one of the 0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.479 wide receivers right into the middle of the box. All 0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.080 that does is throw more defenders right into the box. 0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:57.520 And it's like when you're just trying to power a 0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.760 guy up the middle, get the defenders out of the box. 0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.719 Goal four wide, go go from shotgun and then get 0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.919 your best matchup numbers wise, but they kept running awful 0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.800 play calls, so that was terrible. On the flip side, 0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.400 I mean, we gotta give Gruden some credit. He's looked 0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.040 like a really, really, really good coach despite all the 0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.920 you know, the buffoonery that we saw in the preseason. 0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.280 He was I don't know, moving players that shouldn't have 0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.560 been moved. He couldn't get anything going. Um from the 0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.080 outside world, we all looked like it was a joke, 0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.520 but they're putting things together. Josh Acup looks fantastic, a 0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.600 guy that I was not on whatsoever, but he looks 0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.040 like a beast um And I don't know, I mean, 0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.000 you can't really trust too many pieces outside of their 0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.000 Waller has been very good but has shown that he 0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.120 has somewhat of a low floor. I still like him 0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.040 as a clear cut, tight on one going forward. But 0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.200 the game altogether was it was an exciting one down 0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.239 to the wire. It seems like this the Oakland Raiders 0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.960 are starting to spread the ball out a ball around 0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.960 a little bit more here with Tyrelle Williams five targets. 0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.200 You see onto renfro with his five targets, Darren Waller 0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:52.800 the same thing, So we're starting to see some of 0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.640 that floor of Darren Waller. Josh Jacobs, as you mentioned, 0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.080 has been awesome at least fifteen carries in every game 0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.840 since Week four season high five targets last night. That's 0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.160 what I love to see from Josh Jacobs. But when 0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.360 we get back we jump into week ten, we're doing 0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.880 an entire preview of the entire slate. It's Frank, Nick 0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.640 and e Y right here on the Fantasy best Friends Forever. 0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.720 I want to light the lamp on draft kings and 0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.080 fan duel this NHL DFS season. Then joined Daily roado 0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.239 dot com and learned from the best daily fantasy sports players. 0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.600 Get updated fantasy hockey projections for NHL DFS, blind combinations, 0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.319 and build stacks for tournaments in the Daily Rodo NHL 0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.760 DFS Lineup Optimizer. If you are playing daily Fantasy hockey 0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.520 without using Daily Rodo, you are doing it wrong. Enter 0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.360 the Promo Code action for a ten percent discount. That's 0:08:44.400 --> 0:09:08.000 Promo Code Action for a ten percent discount. Welcome back 0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.559 to the Fantasy best Friends Forever. I am Frank Stanfeld, 0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.080 joined live in studio by Nick Lano. Make sure you 0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.599 follow him on Twitter at Nick underscore B D G 0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.280 E Big Dog's gotta eat E y as well at 0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.000 the Eric Young. Let's jump right in, guys, because there's 0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.360 a lot of talk about this week, this upcoming slate. 0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.720 It's the bye bye bye bye bye bye. Six teams 0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.520 on a bye this week. So let's start it off 0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:35.720 with the Cardinals at the Bucks, a likely bonanza this week. 0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.200 Tampa Bay laying forty four four and a half points, 0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.040 not forty five points. They're laying four and a half 0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.199 points at home. We've got the big total in this game, 0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.199 and Nick, I'll let you start things off with the 0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.480 Cardinals side of the ball. Here. Look, Kyler Murray looks 0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.840 like he's in a really good spot, uh, coming off 0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.559 one of his better games of the season, twenty three 0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.920 Fantasy points against the San Francisco forty Niners. I assume 0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.160 you gotta like Kyler Murray obviously here in the spot 0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.360 against Tampa Bay, which means you've got to like some 0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.880 of his past catchers. You gotta like somebody. I have 0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.360 Christian Kirk Crank inside of my top twelve this week. 0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.960 I might be crazy, I probably am, but I think 0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.360 he is the guy that they're gonna look at here. 0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.000 He is leading the team in target share in are 0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.480 yards since he has returned from injury. I think Christian 0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.280 Kirk has a big game. Do you have any interest 0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.760 in any other past catchers for the Arizona Cardinals. Tell 0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.360 me what you think about Kyler Murray as well. I 0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.320 think I think you're getting a little cute there with 0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.840 top twelve, although it wouldn't surprise me if he did 0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.440 finish in the top twelve. I mean, you look at 0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.800 this Bucks defense, and if you're not trying to attack 0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.240 them weekend a week out, you're doing fantasy football wrong. 0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.760 They I believe I've allowed the single most fantasy points 0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.880 to wide receivers on the year. So you're looking at 0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.640 a game where you have the Cardinals and the Bucks 0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.679 and all they do is pass the ball. They're both 0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:48.640 very fast paced teams, so they're gonna get a lot 0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.599 of snaps, a lot of plays, tons and tons and 0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.200 tons of past attempts. So you're you're firing up pretty 0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.520 much everyone in the passing game, at least from the 0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.839 Tampa Bay side of things. When I'm looking at Arizona, Yeah, 0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.560 you got you have to love Kyler Murray just because 0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.800 he'll have passing success obviously has the rushing ability to 0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.280 This is not a team that could slow you down whatsoever, 0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.040 So they want to have that fast paced offense running 0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.280 that's like their main goal weekend and week out. A 0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.160 lot of the times it gets stopped because you know, 0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:13.880 for one reason or another, they take away the deep 0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.080 passes and they have trouble running the ball sometimes. But 0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.160 this is a game where they will not have trouble 0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.000 getting the ball downfield. So I love Kirk this week. 0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.559 I love Kyler Murray this week. Uh, and he love 0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.640 for fits No, I mean he's been so bad. I agree. 0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.720 I'm just starting out there because someone's gonna see this 0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.640 matchup and say, oh, well, I could jump back into 0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.640 Larry Fitzgerald here, and you say to that, no you can't. 0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.000 It's just like, why why do you feel that way? Other? 0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.400 I mean, I understand the matchup, but he's done absolutely 0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.040 nothing to prove it. I agree with you. I think 0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:40.679 we're gonna see DJ come back, and I think he's 0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.160 gonna run a lot of um routes from the slot, 0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.000 so he's going to be the guy that they're probably 0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:46.960 targeting over the middle of the field. So I would 0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.040 rather not that you're gonna have a choice Bee DJ 0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.160 and Fits. But if I'm gonna say why Fits, it 0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:52.680 will probably not have a good game over the middle 0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.240 of the field. It's probably because DJ is coming back 0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.199 and we'll take a lot of those targets away. Speaking 0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.360 of DJ, David Johnson, why I'll throw it to you. 0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.160 You get the aizure of breaking down the Cardinals backfield 0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.520 here in this one. I said on the Fantasy Football 0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.840 Frenzy that I think we see close to a fifty 0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.559 fifty split here with David Johnson and Kenyan Drake, And 0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.960 like Nick is saying, I think that we see both 0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.280 Kenyan Drake and David Johnson used as wide receivers here 0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.480 in this game. How are you breaking down this Cardinals 0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:23.439 backfield way? I mean, look, it's gonna gonna be confusing, um, 0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.920 but but I think it's going to be a nightmare 0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.800 for whether you're a Drake owner or David Johnson owner. 0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.760 I'm an owner of both guys in separate leagues, and 0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.400 I think Drake's kind of coming out party last week 0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.200 is going to to rain on David Johnson's return. Look 0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.360 at but I think everybody, uh, we've definitely talked about 0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.600 Kenny and Drake on the show a whole bunch, and 0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.800 we could never understand why this guy wasn't getting used 0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.240 in Miami. He was never considered the number one back. 0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.280 Kellen Bolage started over him. No one could figure that out. 0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.679 Anytime we saw Kenyan Drake used or or given an opportunity, 0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:03.440 he usually sean even on a bad team. I believe 0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.880 that the Arizona Cargos are a better team than the 0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.920 Miami Dolphins, specially offensively. UM David Johnson coming back off 0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:11.760 an injury, they're gonna want to like, you know, they're 0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:13.800 not going to want them to touch the ball five times. 0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.280 So I believe it is probably a fifty fifty split, 0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.079 and Kenyan Drake could be used as as the running 0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.240 back in the running back role and David Johnson as 0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.160 the pass catcher. That wouldn't be UH, wouldn't be sad 0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.240 at that this is a weird offense. Uh. Early in 0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.480 the year, I think game three or four, they had 0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.000 lined up with four wide receivers more time than all 0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:34.960 of the rest of the teams in the NFL combined. 0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.079 So there's just no way to predict this. What what 0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.480 uh They're going to do? And and it's it's cool 0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.000 to see, but it can be frustrating for the fantasy owner. Absolutely. 0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.080 I mean that's the difference, right, real life football versus 0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.400 fantasy football. It's gonna be fun to watch, but it's 0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.480 hard for fantasy owners to figure out which way this 0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.480 one's gonna break down. Personally, I think we get twelve 0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.000 to thirteen touches each for David Johnson and Kenyan Drake, 0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.360 which makes them flex options again. Tampa Bay has been 0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.600 really good against the run, but they are a past 0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.719 funnel defense, so that's why their run numbers look a 0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.000 little bit better than they are on the other side. 0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.080 I know Jameis Winston turns the ball over a lot. 0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.000 He's actually been really good for fantasy this season. Um 0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:16.440 and the Arizona Cardinals are allowing three plus passing touchdowns 0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.680 in three of their last four games. So I'm in 0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:20.600 on Jamis and Kyler. I have them both inside my 0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.880 top six this week. At the quarterback position, Nick tell 0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.880 me about Ronald Jones because he's been named the starter. 0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.080 He played a career high fifty three percent of the snaps. 0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.200 It's a good matchup here, going up against the Arizona Cardinals. Yeah, 0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:32.800 I think you have to like Ronald Jones. I think 0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.840 he'll be super chalky this week, especially in DFS touch game. Right, 0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.240 he finally played over fifty of the snaps, which is 0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.760 the first time that he's done that all year. Uh, 0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.360 and they don't like to use one back, which still 0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.480 makes me skeptical. I do like to hear that Bruce 0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.520 Arian says, you know, he earns the starting role and 0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.280 he's going to be the guy there. Bay and Barber 0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.080 has been absolutely nothing so far in terms of you know, 0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.360 successful on the on the ground, and Ronald Jones is 0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.640 finally giving them a little bit of a spark. The 0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.720 problem is, though, I just think they're always going to 0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:01.840 go back to the passing game, and Jon Jones is 0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.760 not someone that you could trust in the passing game. 0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:05.680 He's not anyone that was successful in college at the 0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.240 passing level. Yeah, he catches one or two Polls balls 0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.680 a game. Sometimes he takes him four big games. You get, oh, 0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.560 you know, he can't catch the ball, But like, realistically, 0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.760 we've never seen him historically do it before, so that 0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.920 troubles me a little bit. I mean, would anyone really 0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.000 be surprised if Ronald Jones gets fourteen carries and paint 0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.840 Barbara gets ten paint Barbara gets the goal line carry. 0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.760 That's that's my concern. Um. If you have Ronald Jones, 0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.680 I think he is a very very good flex play 0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.760 Given that, I think he's probably established afore like twelve 0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.240 to fifteen touches for the game. What that will surmount to, 0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.480 I don't know. I'm assuming Jamis is going to continue 0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.800 to throw the ball upwards of forty five times a 0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.280 game like he's done in the last three four games consecutively. 0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.840 I'm on Ronald Jones as a low wind RB two 0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.200 this week, just coming off that game where you had 0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.280 eighteen carries. I think it's a good spot here going 0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.000 up against Arizona. When it comes to Mike Evans and 0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.640 Chris Godman, you're gonna continue to roll these guys out there. Understand, 0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.880 Mike Evans upside has been considerably higher than Chris Godwin 0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.440 over the past month, and I met in this before. 0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.040 There's only been two games all season where both Chris 0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.080 Godwin and Mike Evans have gone off together. So one 0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.120 of these guys is likely going to I'll use the 0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.120 word disappoint you. But again, it's a good matchup, so 0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.000 I think both guys are still gonna be really good. 0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.360 It's probably one guy is going to be much better 0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.840 than the other. And when it comes to the tight ends, 0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.320 I mean, I'm just not getting involved. I'm not doing 0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.640 it anymore. O. J. Howard, Cameron Bright. It's a great 0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.720 matchup going up against Arizona, but good luck trying to 0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.160 figure out which which Tampa Bay tight end to use 0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:32.720 in this game. Let's move over to the Atlanta Falcons 0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.400 going up against the New Orleans Saints. The Saints big 0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.440 favorites in this game, the total up over fifty points 0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:42.160 here in the super Dome. Nick Matt Ryan coming back 0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.160 off of the ankle injury. Can you trust him in 0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.600 the spot? I mean, you could trust Matt Roy. You're 0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.200 playing Matt Ryan if you own him. But this game 0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.320 is going to be a disaster. I'm a Falcons fan, 0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.760 and I was not optimistic about them going into the year. 0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.440 I didn't think they'd be this bad. But I imagine 0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.600 the Saints are going to just washed the Falcons. It's 0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.680 gonna be embarrassing. They're gonna dominate times of possession, which 0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.359 is what makes me nervous about Matt Ryan. I think 0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.600 he will be like almost like a Jameis Winston light 0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.800 where they forced a bunch of turnovers on Matt Ryany 0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.000 there's a couple of picks, but at the end of 0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.240 the day, hands up with Renger plus passing yard's a 0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.000 touchdown or two with some turnovers. So on the Falcon 0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.720 side of the ball, I'm not optimistic if Um someone 0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:23.240 who owns any other the skill players besides Matt Ryan, 0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.960 Julio Jones, not even like Austin Hooper I'm too happy about. 0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.080 I think he presents probably a lower floor than people realize, 0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.000 but the same team is just so much better than 0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.199 the Falcons. I think they just dominate on the offensive 0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.600 side of the ball and don't give them Um too 0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.159 much time. Vonta Freeman, it's a tough match up here 0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:40.960 in the New Orleans States, allowing just three points seven 0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.040 eight yards per carried to opposing running backs, but he 0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:44.760 is being used in the past game, so I think 0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.960 in PPR leagues you're still looking at him as a 0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.320 low end RB two. But in standard leagues, this guy 0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.719 has not scored a rushing touchdown all season long, so 0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.919 it's a tough spot here for Devonte freeman Julio Jones 0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.200 four game average against Marshall Lattimore in his career seven 0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.600 for one, three has not already touchdown against him. Obviously, 0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.240 you're still using Julio Jones, e y. When it comes 0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:08.199 to Calvin Ridley, we saw before the bye he had 0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.800 seven targets, which was tied for fourth on the team. 0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.520 They started using Russell Gage Moore as well. Do you 0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.200 trust Calvin Ridley in the spot as let's say a 0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.880 high end wide receiver three thirty seconds, real quick way. 0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.560 A lot of it's gonna depend on on Matt Ryan 0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.280 and his health, and you know, I think he's going 0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.880 to start. Kelvin Readley as a guy that was drafted 0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.239 very high, a person that I was relatively high on. 0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.959 But the Saints, I mean, their defense has been up 0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:34.639 and down, but I think it's pretty solid. It's going 0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.480 to be tough for them to throw the ball and 0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.720 do much of anything without offensive line. So if you 0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.760