WEBVTT - China Fights Back, South Korea Declares Martial Law

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.039
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where Innovation of Money and power Collie

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed.

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Ludlove live from New York.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Political anxiety hits tech, China dials up trade tensions with

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 5>the US, and we bring you the latest on South

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 5>Korea's move to martial law. Plus SpaceX weighs a tender

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 5>offer which could boost its valuation to a whopping three

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty billion dollars, and we sit down with

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 5>the CEO of AT and T as the company predicts

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 5>double digit profit games in twenty twenty seven.

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 4>But first we check in on these markets.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 5>We're off just slightly on the NASAQ one hundred on

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 5>a day where Apple is that it had a new

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 5>record high in video and the Green We've got a

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 5>lot tugging us into the red in terms of key

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 5>points moves. On the downside, Intel we'll get to, but

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 5>I also want to shine a light on what's happening

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 5>over in South Korea. Keystocks there from the technology perspective,

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 5>sk Heiniz, Chip Focus, Samsung chip Phones, Everything technology key

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 5>exporter for this particular country, We're off significantly when you're

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 5>looking at those shares that are traded abroad, those in London,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 5>those in Germany for sk Heinex all as we understand

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 5>that the leadership in South Korea moves to martial law,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 5>but of course members of the own party of the

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 5>president are not agreeing with the move that's has been made.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 5>You've got to get up to the moment news with us.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 5>You can also do that if you're lucky enough to

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 5>have a Blomberg terminal.

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Check out top Live.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 5>There's a blog there with the latest on what is

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 5>occurring in South Korea.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Just type in tliv go.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 5>But we want to bring you what is the up

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 5>to the moment reporting from Mike Shepherd, who joins us

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 5>from Washington. So much to be debating when it comes

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 5>to geopolitics today. Mike, can you start with us for

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 5>us in South Korea and just how extraordinary the movements

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 5>are being made?

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, as you said, Carolina, it even caught

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 6>members of President Yun's own party and aids off guard.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 6>They weren't expecting this. It was born of perhaps frustration

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 6>out of a deadlock over the budget between his minority

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 6>party and the majority Democratic party in the nation's parliament,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 6>and that standoff really has bubbled over into the country's

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 6>first declaration of martial law in forty four years. But

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 6>it's uncertain where things are going from here. Troops are

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 6>reported to be in the National Assembly building and some

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 6>members of parliament may be moving.

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 4>To try to block this.

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 6>They have the authority to do so, but they need

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 6>a majority present, which would be at least one hundred

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 6>and fifty lawmakers. And as I said, this is a

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 6>fast moving story, so we will have to keep close

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 6>watch where this standoff between President Yun and his own

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 6>lawmakers ends up.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 5>Heading we have actually got reggy news saying that the

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 5>South Korean Parliament has a request of the marshal law

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 5>to be lifted, and they say that South Korean lawmakers

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 5>are going to vote on the marshal law lift noting

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 5>as you say, and according to the latest blog that

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 5>dozens of lawmakers might have managed to enter the main

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 5>hall of the National Assembly according to footage of KBS

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 5>locally there, and they need, as you say, one hundred

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 5>and fifty law makers to be present. From a constitutional perspective,

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 5>this does have an effect on liquidity. We know that

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 5>they've made a move to ensure that liquidity is there

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 5>for the markets. But we think from a technology perspective

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 5>of Samsung, of sk Heinex, and of these companies that

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 5>are currently worrying about the new US administration and what

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 5>that means for tariffs and their own exports falling.

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 6>There is so much happening for these companies right now

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 6>between the US chip export curbs announced yesterday and then

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 6>the cross currents with the incoming administration where the relationship

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 6>between South Korea and the US and all the rest

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 6>of the world with the President elect threatening tariffs on

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 6>imports to the US. So adding this to the mix

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 6>is just another bit of volatility for key companies like

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 6>sk Heinex and Samsung Electronics. As you highlighted at the.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 5>Intro, YTNTV is currently reporting that some certain whether South

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 5>Korean stock markets will indeed open on Wednesday. Just shifting gears, Mike,

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 5>because we really want to talk to you about what's

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 5>happening with the China US tip for tab as well

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 5>concerns they're limitations on key metals for technology use.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'm glad you brought this up because this is

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 6>something that is not to be overlooked in all the

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 6>global conversation about turmoil here and even in Paris. The

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 6>Chinese took a significant move in the overnight hours to

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 6>counter the Chips curbs that the Biden administration announced yesterday,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 6>and this would limit imports exports to the US from

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 6>China of key minerals. These would include gallium and germanium

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 6>and antimony. And these are look not something that's traded

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 6>very heavily the way you might think of oil with

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 6>a trillion dollar market. These are tiny amounts that are

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 6>exported each year, but they are significant. They end up

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 6>in semiconductors with military use, They end up in satellites,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 6>and these materials also show up in night vision goggles.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 6>So it is hitting the US in a way that

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 6>is aimed at the defense industrial base and the tech

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 6>industrial base as well. Now for the moment, the US

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 6>is taking this and stride. The White House hasn't really

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 6>responded in full to this, and the industry has been

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 6>able to adapt so far to earlier restrictions that China

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 6>had already imposed about a year ago. They've been able

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 6>to find alternate sources of supply from their own inventories,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 6>and there are other places outside China where these minerals

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 6>can be produced and found. It's just that the world

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 6>has grown so dependent on China as the top supplier

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 6>because it could be made so cheaply there and in

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 6>such great abundance.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 5>Mike Shepherd, we bring this the need to know, Thank you,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 5>and let's just talk about some of the ramifications of

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 5>the US limitations on exports of significant technology to China.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 5>We shine a light on an ASML of course chip

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 5>equipment makeover in Europe. The company is stating that US

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 5>authorities are imposing additional restrictions on suppliers for the export

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 5>of chip manufacturing technology, and the regulations will become effective immediately,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 5>but they stay it doesn't expect long term demand to

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 5>be impacted by these new regulations. Up two and a

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 5>half percent over the last couple of training days. Let's

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 5>stick with all things chips. Let's just take a look

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 5>at Intel shares, actually one of the key drags on

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 5>the benchmarks today. We're off by four percent again after

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 5>yesterday's surprise departure a CEO Pat Gelsinger, opening the door

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>potentially for the troubled company to consider maybe more deal

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 5>options in the future, scenarios that, of course, he rejected

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 5>during his time running the chip maker, Willimberg's Peter Elstrom

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 5>joins us for more we think of m and A

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 5>of course, plenty of reporting around what could be spun

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 5>off and who would be buyers. What are you thinking

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 5>about that being reignited, Peter.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, Intel has been at the heart of deal

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 7>talks for a number of months. At this point, they've

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 7>lost a lot of ground in the chip industry to

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 7>a few of their competitors, notably in Vidia and TSMC

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.559
<v Speaker 7>in particular, and so there have been these discussions of deals.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 7>But Pat Keelsinger had been an advocate for keeping the

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 7>company together, trying to get this money from the chipsack

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 7>in the US, making investments in big companies in big

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 7>fabs that they wanted to build out. And in particular,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 7>he wanted to move into the foundry business, that is,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 7>making bespoke chips for other players in the market like

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 7>in Vidia. That's where TSMC is really excelled. So it

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 7>invested billions of dollars into that initiative. He wanted to

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 7>keep the manufacturing and the product designed together. Now that

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 7>he's gone, you could see some changes in that attitude

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 7>towards deals in particular, you could see them look at

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 7>breaking up the manufacturing and the design. You could look

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 7>at some alternates too. We know that Qualcom looked at

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 7>trying to buy the company in the past. Intel has

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 7>a couple of subsidiaries too that may be ripe for

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 7>spin offs, including Alterra and Mobilize. Those are possible deals

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 7>that you could look at now. But first and foremost,

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 7>the board has to find a new CEO for this company.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Certainly does, and they're paying a lot to the exiting

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 5>CEO as well, at least a golden goodbye, it would

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 5>seem that's right.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Gelsinger is collecting his pay package on the way out.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 7>He departed last weekend after this decision was made. He

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 7>was not going to stick around to help find that

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 7>new CEO or train that new CEO. So now the

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 7>board took a dramatic step here. They pushed out somebody

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 7>who had been well respected when he came in to

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 7>the company, was expected to be the savior of the company.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 7>Now they need to find somebody else that's going to

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 7>take the helm, and then they can set a strategy

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 7>going forward, whether it's going to be deals or whether

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be doubling down in this idea that

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 7>Intel can go back to its roots and really establish

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 7>the industry leading manufacturing that it used to have.

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Peter Alstrom, thanks so much for the latest on Intel. Meanwhile,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 5>coming up more corporate news for you, AT and T

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 5>seeing sustained profit growth for the next three years. We're

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 5>going to be talking with the CEO, John Stankey join us.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloue meg Technology. AT and T trading higher

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 5>today as it says they see sustained profit growth over

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 5>the next three years, including double digit games in twenty

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty seven. This is the company is really doubling down

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 5>on its fiber rollout as well.

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm pleased to say.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 5>For more the AT and T CEO John Stankey joins us.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Now from your own named stadium, John, let's talk a

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 5>little bit about twenty twenty nine. You're expecting to have

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 5>fifty million plus total locations with fiber. Why this big

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 5>fiber focus?

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 4>How do you get there?

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>We look, we've had great success with what we've built

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>thus far, and we see customer first of all, love

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the product, they stay with us longer, they drive better

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 2>value into the business. We're having great success at selling

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 2>multiple products into fiber households. Four out of every ten

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 2>of our fiber subscribers also subscribe to our wireless service

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>today and that's getting higher. And when you think about

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>where technology is going in the future, workloads are only

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>going to go up. We expect data consumption is going

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>to increase about eighty percent over the next five years,

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 2>and fiber is the one that can do that. It's

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the one that has the symmetrical bandwidth characteristics that will

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>facilitate AI and sending more data up into a network

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>than what comes down, which is traditionally how broadband networks

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>are built today. And we think that's a great investment

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>for the long haul.

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 5>John, Just as you speak, we've got some breaking international news.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 5>We've just got to bring our viewers of South Korean

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 5>lawmakers voting to request lifting martial law.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 4>We will bring you up to the moment news.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 5>But at South Korean National Assembly, Speaker Wo is saying

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 5>they will protect democracy. Turn to you and a US

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 5>focus and a business that you are currently wanting to see.

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Really the bandwidth and the broadband and the.

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Infrastructure play that you're offering.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 5>What's interesting is the way that you're fueling investment in

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 5>fiber in particular is by doing innovative partnerships like the

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 5>one with Blackrock. Do you need outside investment to commit

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 5>to this sort of infrastructure rollout.

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Look, we have a great portfolio of options. We primary

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 2>portfolio play is owned and operated where we take one

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent of the economics, We fund it, build it,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and operate it ourselves. But we also realize we're in

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of a constrained window right now. Fiber is needed now.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>There isn't going to be a window that's open for

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 2>a long period of time to do this work. Capital markets,

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of course, private capital markets sometimes provide a little bit

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>of insulation that public markets won't, and in order to

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>make sure we keep our lead, will balance that portfolio

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>out and our relationship with Blackrock and our gigapower work

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 2>has been really effective. What we've proven in the market

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>is that we can operate outside of our traditional operating

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 2>territory just as effectively as we have in our home territory.

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 2>I think Blackrock, as a partner, has viewed it as

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>being a really successful investment. They've been willing to put

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 2>more into it, and we expect we're going to continue

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>to use that as one of the tools to grow

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 2>our footprint over time to get past that fifty million

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 5>And it's really interesting you brought up, of course, AI

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 5>and the demands there. In many ways, everyone's been ringing

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 5>the hands of the energy infrastructure needs and black crocs

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 5>sort of funding that infrastructure build out. But how significant

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 5>is the AI demand and the strains on what you provide.

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting issue. I think actually power consumption is

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be really important moving forward. That's one of

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the things we're talking about today with our analysts and investors,

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 2>which is how do we shut down our century old

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>copper infrastructure and all the electronics and equipment that support

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 2>it that are really power hungry. And that's one of

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the ways that getting more this traffic over to fiber,

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>which is passive and uses a lot less power, that

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>we can actually help to offset some of the increase

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 2>of what data demand and AI will drive moving forward.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 2>And we think that's a really important policy dynamic on

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 2>this look. I think there's going to be a lot

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of issues that the country has to work through on

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 2>getting the power grid to support leadership and AI. It's

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 2>going to happen, maybe it gets slowed down a little bit.

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there's a few bumps in the road, but what

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>we do know is that demand's going to be continuing

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to go up.

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're also talking to analysts and investors about today,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 5>is how you're giving money back big returns invests, whether

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 5>you're doing it through driven in but also through buybacks

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 5>as well. Why have you chosen that angle Now you've

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 5>paid down debt.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a good day when you're giving more back to shareholders. Look,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 2>we feel very comfortable with our debt position that we're

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 2>going to arrive at in the middle of next year,

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's why we're making this announcement today. First of all,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>we did a really nice job of structuring our balance

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 2>sheet properly, so we've got really attractive interest rates on

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>our portfolio of debt. We've got it termed out. That's

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>a really, frankly, a strategic asset. And the way it's

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>set up right now, and given that we're largely investing

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>organically in the business, reinvesting in our business like this

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and getting our leverage structure the way it is, feels

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>very comfortable to us. Because every year we're reinvesting in capital,

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 2>reinvesting in assets that we hold, and Frankly, when you

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of look at some of the m and A

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 2>work we've done as we've restructured the business, we spun

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>out certain non strategic assets. We haven't really gone back

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 2>after the equity structure and reducing the share count outstanding,

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and when the dividend yield is still over five percent,

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>we've got fantastic dividends coverage. This is an opportunity for

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>us to maybe balance that out a little bit and

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 2>bring a little bit of equity back in house.

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's talk about that changing of your own portfolio

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 5>of the assets you hold.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 4>DirecTV moving away mean.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 5>Will we see that being integral to these financial forecasts.

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>No, we've actually today as we sit down and talk

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>with the investment community, we'll be providing restated constructs under

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 2>x direct TV. Assuming that we're going to close up

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>by the middle of next year. We still see great

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 2>improvements in our cash flow. We'll expect that we'll probably

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 2>grow cash flow by about a billion dollars a year

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 2>even without direct TV. As we move through this planning process,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>we see acceleration in our EPs, our ebit is going

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to continue to grow. So you know, Direct TV has

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 2>been really good it's provided us a lot of cash coverage.

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 2>We did a really nice job of managing the asset

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 2>down to this point. It's time to focus on what

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>we're going to do moving forward, which is build a

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>world class connectivity business. And it's the right decision to

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>make at this point.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 5>A lot of analysts are echoing that, and we are,

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 5>of course with John Sanky the AT and TCO to

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 5>our worldwide radio and TV audiences. Many relieve that you're

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 5>getting back to what you do best, which is telecoms.

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Within that though, is you know, some really clear clarity

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 5>being given on the numbers. You're getting forty billion dollar

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 5>plus of an anticipated shareholder returns, fifty billion dollars plus

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 5>of financial capacity over.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 4>The next three years. What are the risks we're.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 5>At this time of a new administration coming in. There

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 5>are macro headwinds, global headwinds.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Are there risks to these numbers?

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think every time there's an administration change, there's

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>usually a discussion about boy could change his negatively impacted business.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean a call four years ago there was a

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit of that narrative going on, and I think

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>we've done just fine for the last four years. And frankly,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>some of the things that I hear right now, tax policy,

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>possibly reinstituting accelerated depreciation, those things could be very very

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 2>good for our business. And in fact, when they were

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 2>in place and they weren't lapsing, we were investing at

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>a higher level. And so I think if this administration,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 2>incoming administration, follows through on what they'd like to do,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>which is to put pro investment policies in place for

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the nations one of the nation's largest capital investors, that's

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 2>going to be a really good thing for us. So

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 2>we watch that carefully, certainly like everybody else. There's other

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 2>policies up in the air around tariffs and a few

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 2>other things that we're all kind of wondering what might

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 2>occur with that. I think sane minds will prevail. I

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>think some of what we're hearing right now is directed

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that we negotiate from a position of strength,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 2>and we make sure that we respect the US market

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 2>as strong and as meaningful as it is, that people

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>should play on a fair and level playing field when

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 2>they gain access to it. And I'm hopeful that we'll

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 2>see good policy comes out that drives good investment and

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 2>good economic returns As.

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 5>A result, well, returns are up on your shares. You're

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 5>currently training at the highest since twenty twenty one. More broadly,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 5>do you think that you can sustain this sort of growth?

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 2>We do, Otherwise we wouldn't be out giving the three

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 2>year guidance that we're giving. We feel, first of all

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 2>strong and the fundamentals. Consumers need to use more Internet,

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 2>they need to get higher performance networks to support that.

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the business we're in, and we're going to talk

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 2>a little bit this afternoon with our investors about our

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 2>ability to manage the cost structure in dealing with that

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>accelerating and increased growth so that as customers use more

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 2>that we can ultimately drop more cash to the bottom line.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>And that growth dynamic of us getting more efficient people

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 2>using more of the product, We think that's going to

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 2>sustain itself over the next three years, and that's why

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>we gave the guidance that we gave.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 5>We so appreciate you coming live at and T Stadium

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 5>over in Texas, John Stanky at and.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 4>T C Stay WI.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me in.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, let's talk about a whopping valuation going on three

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty billion dollars as how much SpaceX is

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 5>now aiming at the company now in talks to sell

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 5>insider shares that can make you know, Musks Rocket and

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 5>satellite company the most valuable startup if it got that

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 5>valuation to sources, Katie Ruth joins us now and this

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 5>is once again secondary market activity, a tender offer.

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Who will be selling to who? Katie? That's right.

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 8>Well, so insiders such as employees and in theory existing

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 8>venture capitalists can sell their shares to new investors. The

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 8>three hundred and fifty billion dollar valuation is a huge jump.

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 8>Even just last month they were discussing two hundred and

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 8>fifty five billion valuation. But the recent success of the

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:38.479
<v Speaker 8>Saddle Starship launch and then also Elon's ties to Trump

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 8>and Trump's when I guess, created more investor enthusiasm. So

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 8>it's now a record for most valuable startup in the world.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 5>Extraordinary And many then say, well when they exit, when

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 5>might some of these secondary shares be sold on an

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 5>open market in an IPO. Do you think this sort

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 5>of activity in the secondary market puts off such a

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 5>liquidity event, Katie.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 8>Sure, And so you know they wouldn't do this. Most

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 8>likely if they were on the verge of IPO, because

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 8>you wouldn't want to dilute. Uh, you wouldn't want to

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 8>reduce the demand from the institutional investors, and so you

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't do this kind of thing on the eve of

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 8>an IPO. But uh, you know it has been reported

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 8>and it is known that at some point in time

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 8>they want to spin out Starlink, their satellite internet provider,

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 8>and create the whole separate business with that, and that

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 8>Starlink could go public. But nothing immin it.

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 5>Katie, We thank you, Katie Ruth there in La. Meanwhile,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 5>staying in Musk's world, deliveries from Tesla's Shanghai factory fell

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 5>for a second month in November, down four point three

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 5>percent year on year, according to data from the China

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 5>Passenger Car Association. This comes even as the Chinese government

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 5>increased subsidies to entice more consumers to.

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:53.959
<v Speaker 4>Buy an electric vehicle.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 5>But let's stick with all things Elon Musk, because it's

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 5>been denied again. Elon mus record setting Tesla pay package

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 5>was struck down again by a Delaware judge ruling that

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 5>Tesla's board was improperly influenced by Elon Musk when adopting

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 5>his pay package back in twenty eighteen, avoiding the deal.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk reacted.

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 5>To the news on X with a post saying, quote

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 5>absolute corruption.

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Limberg's Bailey Lipschaltz joins us some more so.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 5>Once again the judge is like, no, I don't care

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 5>what your shareholders think.

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 4>This is too much and they plan on appealing again.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 9>According to Tesla on the platform owned by Elon Musk X,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 9>so it does seem like this is going to be

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 9>a dance that we can continue to keep an eye on.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 9>As you mentioned, was worth about fifty six billion dollars

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 9>at the time the last time the judge canceled this

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 9>plan right now based on the closing on Monday, worth

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 9>one hundred and one point five billion dollars. So if

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 9>this does end up being kind of stood by, if

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 9>Tesla is not effectively successful in pushing back on the ruling,

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 9>then the board would kind of be back to the

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 9>drawing board and have to come up with a new proposal.

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 5>That's interesting, Tesla is the biggest points contribute to the

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 5>downside on the NASDAC today. Maybe that's more about the

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 5>sales in China, but also there was this worry that

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 5>if he doesn't get this pay package, Elon Musk is out,

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 5>He's going to focus more on his AI project, maybe

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 5>even more on the government side of things.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Is that still a risk to investors?

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 9>It still is just an unknown, and I think that's

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 9>the big thing when you talk to investors or Tesla bulls.

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 9>The big question is the stock going back to twenty

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 9>eighteen is up almost fourteen hundred percent. This is a

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 9>huge rally. This is a big company and there is

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 9>such a big key man risk in Elon Musk. If

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 9>there even is a thought that he steps away from

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 9>the company, what does that mean for Tesla? What does

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 9>that mean for the self driving ambitions, especially, as you mentioned,

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 9>if he leans into his doze role with the government.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 9>There's so many unknowns, and I think that's been kind

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 9>of the big bullbear debate. Even if you go back

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 9>to again twenty eighteen, when Elon was potentially looking at

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 9>what this company could do and has launched XAI to

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 9>your point, has done what he's doing with SpaceX and

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 9>now is wearing a government hat.

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 5>All of this, of course sparked by one key shareholder lawsuit,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 5>and those lawyer's got a huge payout the privilege of

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 5>having represented this person. But I'm interested as to the

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 5>future of Delaware as well. Elon on the back of

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 5>this up and left saying and the companies should follow him.

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 5>Is that something that's going to carry on if we

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 5>see these sorts of legal tip for taps.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 9>If you go on X again, it does seem to

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 9>be very much a platform that is pro Elon. But

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 9>you look at a number of investors, prominent investors, prominent vcs,

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 9>prominent executives talking about what this could mean for being

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 9>domiciled in Delaware. What the uncertainty is if a judge

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 9>can push back on something that from a company's perspective,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 9>your shareholders voted by a super majority to back your

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 9>board members stood by. So it does create a bit

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 9>of a cloud if you will over domiciling in Delaware

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 9>and what that can mean. Again, Elon did move out

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 9>of there quite quickly, so it will be interesting to

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 9>see if others think about following suit in the wake

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 9>of this second pushback.

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean not so many have one hundred billion dollars

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 5>on the line in terms of a pay package. Bailey

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Lipsill's great to get him on all things Elon welcome

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 5>back to Bluemog Technology and Karen Hide in New York

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 5>quick check on these markets for you, and the Nasdaq

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 5>had been being pulled a little bit lower, now currently

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 5>up by a tenth four percent Whipsword as we see

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 5>in video, and apples At indeed an a new record

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 5>high today. On the downside, Tesla proving us lower. But

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 5>also we want to dive into some of the individual

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 5>names after they've had some earnings and indeed news coming

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 5>from certain companies. Panenteer once again managing to soar ever higher,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 5>this as they get a particular new deal lifted for

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 5>how they can sell their products. So Palenteer currently up

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 5>five point five percent. Z Scaler, It's currently down by

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 5>five percent as its earnings seem to be underwhelming, shares

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 5>falling at the one point more than seven percent. Morgan

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 5>instantly saying first called results were fine, but the billing

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 5>beat was lighter than expected. In some worries about the

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 5>second quarter forecast meta up to and a half percent.

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 5>Some reports coming from the Financial Times that Mark Zuckerberg

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 5>himself wouldn't mind being part of contributing to tech knowology

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 5>lawmaking under the next administration, of course, having been reports

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 5>that he met with Donald Trump oramar Lago last week.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 5>We're currently trading up by two and a half percent.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 5>But following Donald Trump's election, of course, the social media

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 5>platforms like Threads and blue Sky or an influx of

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 5>new users as people search for alternatives, enol Musk's pretty

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 5>right leaning platform X joining us. How to discuss all

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 5>of this, Rose Wang Blue Sky COO alongside our very

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 5>own Kurt Wagner.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 4>We welcome you to the show.

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Rose and Kirk, thank you, And just first and foremost,

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 5>let's just dig in Rose a little bit as to

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 5>what it's been like since the election. How have you

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 5>found blue Sky, the numbers racking up of people using it,

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 5>how your infrastructure has been slightly taxed?

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 10>Thanks for having me, Caroline. Since the election, we've seen

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 10>more than ten million US users join blue Sky, and

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 10>it's been very exciting for us because up until now

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 10>we've seen global growth from Japan in February, from Brazil

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 10>in April and August, and now we're seeing the growth

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 10>happening in the US, UK, Canada. Because I think people

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 10>are tired of a platform that controls what they see,

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 10>and they don't like a platform that's partisan.

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Don't like partisanship. But let's talk about infrastructure.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 5>And with that sudden growth of users internationally Anahem in

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 5>the US, some of has happen strained a little bit.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 4>How much have you had to boost your own support systems?

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 10>The engineers have been working around the clock to make

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 10>sure that the app stays online. And what we're very

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 10>proud of is that the infrastructure has not had significant

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 10>downtime in the time that we've had all this influx

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 10>of new users because our protocol was built for scale.

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 10>When we first built our protocol, we were actually building

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 10>it for Twitter as our customer, because back then Jack

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 10>wanted to open up Twitter so that others could build

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 10>on it, users could have choice. That was the promise.

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 10>Of course, things changed when X changed hands, and so

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 10>we went and built our own app to showcase what

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 10>we believe that social should look like.

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 11>Ros I'm wondering what all of this influx of new

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 11>users has done for you financially. You just close the

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 11>series A, I believe in October. There was a report

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 11>last month that there's spent a lot of interest in

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 11>maybe more investors coming in to Blue Sky. Have you

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 11>started looking at possibly raising even more money to keep

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 11>up with this growth.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Right now, we're focused on our end user.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 10>We have so many new people coming to the platform

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 10>and what they care about is are we having fun,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 10>are we making friends again? And do we feel safe?

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 10>And so that is what the team is focused on.

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 10>We're also launching subscriptions at the end of this year

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 10>because we see so many people who want to support

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 10>us and we want to give users tools to help

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 10>them self express more. So that's like more custom icons

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 10>and longer video uploads. But we would never put speech

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 10>behind a paywall, so nothing that is a core functionality

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 10>you would have to pay for.

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 11>And speaking of those core users, you have benefited, as

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 11>Caroline pointed out from the election from I think a

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 11>lot of people leaving X. They're no longer feeling like

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 11>they are getting what they want from X. It's kind

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 11>of created this label of blue Skies, as you know,

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 11>the anti Elon network or maybe a more left leaning network.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 11>How do you feel about that label? Do you feel

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 11>like that's sort of what you're going for or is

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 11>that just people sort of projecting onto you guys.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 10>I think that there's always a reaction when something happens

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 10>an event, but we'll see the narrative change over time, because,

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 10>like I said beforehand, we've had Japanese users, Brazilian users,

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 10>Korean users, people from all over the world come to

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 10>Blue Skype, So to say that it's a US centric,

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 10>left leaning app is not correct. We're also not building

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 10>an app for one voice or one type of political viewpoint. Well,

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 10>we've built is an open infrastructure for any person who

0:28:55.520 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 10>has interesting viewpoints, who wants to have engaging conversation to

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 10>to Blue Sky and then go build their own space,

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 10>whether that's their own feed or their own political labeler

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 10>that users can subscribe to to either turn off political

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 10>content or to turn it back on, depending on their mood.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Rose.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 5>I know this is really real time, but you mentioned

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 5>Korean newss. Are you seeing an awful lot of activity

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.719
<v Speaker 5>today given the news on martial law, how much she's

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 5>seeing journalists float to the platform and and people wanting

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 5>to know.

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 10>I believe we had our first breaking news happen on

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 10>Blue Sky where one of the reporter, Sarah Jong, is

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 10>reporting live from Korea and she's only posting on Blue Sky,

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 10>and so I think we're starting to see that Blue

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 10>Sky is the place for things that are happening currently,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 10>where do you talk about it on blue Sky because

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 10>people feel safe. There's all sorts of guards against not

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 10>only misinformation but also speculative information because users can go

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 10>and label that piece of post without waiting on the

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 10>central authority or a parent company like US.

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 11>I'm wondering, as you see, you know, state affiliated media

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 11>for example in Russia, North Korea, China start to come

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 11>on to blue Sky. Historically platforms have labeled those media

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 11>right has sort of in some cases cut down on

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 11>their ability to advertise or things like that. Have you

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 11>thought about how you're going to deal with state affiliated

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 11>media organizations in some of these more controversial countries.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 10>The way that we've built social is that we've given

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 10>the toolbox to users to go and decide how they

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 10>want to experience content and how they want to interact

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 10>with other people. And so currently, the way that we

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 10>care about the end user is that they're primary citizens.

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 10>So we're not so worried about heads of states or

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 10>brands in terms of trying to serve them first. We're

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 10>really trying to serve the end user first, which means

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 10>that we're giving end users the tools to go and

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 10>decide how they want to take in the news or

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 10>how they want to interact with different accounts when it

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 10>comes to different heads of states. What we care about

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 10>is that they want to follow the rules of our

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 10>terms of service and community guidelines, and then we also

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 10>have different jurisdictions geo fencing for different countries, much like

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 10>other social media platforms.

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about those rules and the way in which

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 5>you interact on Blue Sky because you're having to think

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 5>about moderation, you're having to think about trust and safety.

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 5>In fact, some of the money the fifteen million dollar

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 5>raises amarked for that rose. How are you managing to

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 5>crack down on content that you don't want to see

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 5>on the platform?

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 10>First of all, I think it's important that you just

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 10>put trust in safety as a priority. Most social media

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 10>platforms put growth ahead of trust and safety, and trust

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 10>and safety is just something that they have to do.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 4>It's a checkbox.

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 10>That's totally different on Blue Sky. When you have a

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 10>network that's run by two women who've been on the

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 10>Internet for decades and experience the Internet as women.

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 4>We've prioritized safety. What does that look like.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 10>It looks like we didn't have invite codes, or we

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 10>had invite codes last year because we weren't ready to

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 10>open up a network, so before we had a modelation team.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 10>The other way that we've thought about moderation is we

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 10>thought about it in terms of stackable moderation, which only

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 10>the parent or the central company only has a certain

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 10>amount of controls that they can go do to help

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 10>diverse communities, and central authorities tend to act very slowly.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 10>And like I said, there's so much information between toxic

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 10>misinformation or hate speech and things that make people unhappy

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 10>on Social and so what we've done is give those

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 10>controls back to users so they can either go label

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 10>root post speculative information, and other users can subscribe to

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 10>those labels and not wait for us to make those decisions.

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 10>And that's what we mean by opening up social and

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 10>making it more democratic, where you don't have to wait

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 10>for us, you can build.

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Rose.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 11>We spent a lot of the conversation talking about how

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 11>global this network is. Right now, I believe you know

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 11>you are in San Francisco, headquarter in San Francisco. Is

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 11>that the long term plan for you? Is there any

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 11>world in which which Blue Sky would actually you know, relocate,

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 11>maybe move to Europe or somewhere else. For headquarters for

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 11>either regulatory reasons or even you know, to avoid a

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 11>confrontation with the Elon Musk or Donald Trump or someone

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 11>like that.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, Blue Sky is actually remote, and so the team

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 10>is quite global. We have people in Europe, in Asia,

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 10>in the US, and so I think it's really important

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 10>that the team looks like the users, and so we

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 10>want to continue to be a remote team and to

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 10>be able to be reactive to the different needs of

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 10>our global audience.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 4>No technical HSQ, then, is that the answer?

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 5>No hqsewin a Bruskay Brimbo's Kat Wagner, thank you for

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 5>helping bring us to that interview.

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 4>A great conversation now coming up.

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 5>Sequoia Capital partner Kasatin Bula is going to be joining

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 5>us to discuss where AI investment is heading at the moment.

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 4>What he actually deems to be AI.

0:33:51.040 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 5>This is bring my technology, technological advances in AI expecting

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.719
<v Speaker 5>to boom in the next year, drawing significant interest and

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 5>of course investment. And the forefront is to que A

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Capital partner, Constantine Vula, who's been involved in AI investment

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 5>for more than a decade, joining us now to just

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 5>talk about well, where we are in the AI hype cycle.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Where we are in terms of identifying what artificial intelligence

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 5>really is?

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Are we still hyped Constantine.

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 12>Good morning, Caroline, and great to see you. We are

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 12>definitely in an AI hype cycle, and yet we're not

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 12>really focused on the twenty twenty four hype cycle or

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 12>even twenty twenty five. We're focused on the very long term,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 12>and artificial intelligence is a very big and very important

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 12>macro trend akin really to the Industrial Revolution. And so

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 12>that's the trend we have been investing in for decades

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 12>and are going to continue investing in for decades to come,

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 12>regardless of where hype lands.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 5>We wrote a piece a year or so ago really

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 5>identifying how Gartner, for example, these hype cycles and this

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 5>wild enthusiasm, and then suddenly you get into this disappointment,

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 5>sort of a trough of disillusionment. Where are we in

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 5>terms of consumer adoption, in terms of people actually putting

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 5>return on investment AI investment?

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 4>First, you're exactly right.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 12>Let me give a couple examples AI changes over time.

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 12>When I was an AI researcher a long time ago,

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 12>we were barely scratching the surface of natural language processing

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 12>and natural language understanding, and the beginnings of computer vision

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty two twenty twenty three were really about large

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 12>language models and answering questions, and really the advent of

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 12>modern AI twenty twenty four has been the year of agents.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 12>And what an agent is an AI that actually completes

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 12>a task. You ask it to do something, and it

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 12>doesn't just tell you how to do it, It does

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 12>it for you. An example of an AI agent company

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 12>is our own portfolio company Expo.

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Xpo was founded by the.

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 12>Creator of GitHub copilot, and they set out to create

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 12>an agent for cybersecurity, extremely challenging an important space, and

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 12>in a few months they were able to develop an

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 12>AI that can actually outperform some of the best penetration

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 12>testers in the world. So this AI goes in and

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 12>it attacks a website with the permission of the website provider,

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 12>finds vulnerabilities and actually reports it back and says, we

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 12>have found these vulnerabilities. We've completed this entire task. That

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.720
<v Speaker 12>was twenty twenty four for AI. It was all about

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 12>agents twenty twenty five and beyond likely will be about

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 12>swarms of AI agents, networks of AI agents, them working

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 12>together and maybe even against each other. To some result.

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Kazantin the swarm of AI agents, I feel there's a

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 5>swarm of companies talking about AI agents that we're about

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 5>to have salesforce numbers after the bell today, and they're

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 5>all about agent force. At the same time, we recently

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 5>had one of your port fodio companies on Rocks for example,

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 5>which is also all about agents. How are we going

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 5>to see them cross contaminate, work against each other, or

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 5>and see some win and some lose.

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.320
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely the reason why people are so excited about agents

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 12>is because the promise of AI completing tasks, not every task,

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 12>but many tasks is so impactful. We really want AI

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 12>to be able to do the work you just mentioned.

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 12>Rocks and Rocks is a great example of a company

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 12>that is an AI agent, but an AI agent that

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 12>actually includes the human in the loop. Rocks is not

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 12>trying to cut the person out. They're actually trying to say, Okay,

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 12>you are a really good seller, you have really good

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 12>human relationships with your buyers. Instead of trying to disintermediate that,

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 12>we're going to empower you with an agent. This agent's

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 12>going to do all the work and research for you.

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 12>It's going to get you prepared for that next meeting.

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 12>And an example of them actually putting that theory into

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 12>practice is they originally developed a technology that would auto

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 12>draft emails, and they actually had the ability to auto

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 12>send those emails, but they took that out and they

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 12>found that when they actually kept the human seller in

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 12>the loop, performance was triple three times as high. So

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 12>there are companies where the agent's going to do the

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 12>entire task, likely in the cybersecurity space, like with Expo.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 12>There are companies where their AI agent's going to do

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 12>work for the person in order to augment them, like

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 12>in the case of Rocks.

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Constantine, you're a big thinker, and you put out of

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 5>trends and forecasts, trend for us, how many agent offerings

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 5>we really need? How many public and private companies, how

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 5>many horses such as Rocks can you back?

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 12>Well, it's just the beginning in early days for artificial intelligence.

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 12>And look, the constraint is really our creativity. The amount

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 12>of opportunity for artificial intelligence is huge. And I'll give

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 12>an example. Two areas that are critical to all of

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 12>us are healthcare and education. They have been areas where

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 12>cost has gone up and up and up for decades

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 12>and a lot of reason for that cost increase is

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 12>because of the cost of services right now that AI

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.919
<v Speaker 12>can actually complete some tasks. I really think that AI

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 12>can come in and in the coming decades, not just

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 12>the coming year, but in the coming decades be a

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 12>hero for those industries, drive down costs and actually help

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 12>us have a better educated, healthier population. So really, the

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 12>sky is the limit for artificial intelligence and for AI

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 12>agents and for networks of AI.

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.439
<v Speaker 4>That's the team. Sky's the limit.

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Partner at Sequa Capital, thanks so much for joining us.

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:47.439
<v Speaker 5>Amazon's cloud unit AWS, well, it's rolling out components. It says,

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.720
<v Speaker 5>we'll make data centers run more efficiently, more efficient cooling

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.919
<v Speaker 5>to renewable diesel, for example, to back up generators. These

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 5>new designs could help address the growing strain on the

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 5>electrical grid from power hungry server farms. Tend to another

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 5>key company salesforce. With the company scheduling to report third

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 5>quarter earnings later today, investors, of course, they're watching the

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 5>company's new AI agent strategy. I'm waiting to see if

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 5>actually this pivot that they're talking about is paying off

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 5>in real time. Body Ford joins us, and look, the

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 5>share price is very exuberant.

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Will the numbers bear it out.

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 13>We will see last earnings, many investors of Salesforce hadn't

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 13>heard the word AI agent, then the company said it

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 13>one hundred times on the earnings call. Essentially, application software

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 13>companies haven't made a bunch of money from AI yet.

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 13>It's been the hardware companies or the software infrastructure companies.

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 13>And so the Agent's pivot is all about kind of

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 13>testing out a new generative AI type product that for

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 13>now a lot of folks are much more optimistic about.

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 13>We don't expect it to boost numbers tonight, but all

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 13>attention is on what the company tells us about what

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 13>agents can make money wise when it look at the

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 13>six twelve month time horizon.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Okay, going to get updated figures on adoption of this

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 5>agent force. Are we going to see actual real time

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 5>sales optick on the back of this push?

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 13>If you ask me, it's gonna be a bit squishy.

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 13>I expect to hear about a lot of proof of concepts.

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 13>I expect to hear some big name customers that are

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 13>using the agents. But remember agents are a kind of

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 13>consumption based product. You're not gonna sign a massive billion

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 13>dollar deal. You're gonna kind of pay as you go,

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 13>meaning it's gonna take time for this revenue to ramp up.

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 13>But right now, as we see in the share price,

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 13>investors believe that it will.

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 4>Ramp What about cost base as well.

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 13>That's a really interesting question, right because every time you

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 13>serve the product, you serve the LM. Yeah, that's an

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 13>expense at Salesforce pays their initial cost here is about

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 13>two dollars per use. You have to assume that their

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 13>cost on that is, you know, quite a bit less

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 13>than the two dollars they're charging.

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 5>All eyes on four PM and what comes out after

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 5>the bell boting forward? Thank you, We appreciate it. On

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 5>all things CRM. Now let's get to the key geopolitical story.

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 5>South Korea's president declaring martial law in an emergency national

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 5>address earlier today. President Yun said the decision was made

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 5>to protect freedom and constitutional order. He accused the opposition

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 5>of trying to paralyze the administration with impeachment moves. Now,

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 5>opposition lawmakers raced into parliament voted to request that the

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:25.359
<v Speaker 5>president withdraw martial law. Now the market waits to see

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 5>if the president complies. Joining us now for more on

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 5>the market reaction. Writ large Bloomberg's Maria Elena Vesquino and

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 5>Maria what we're wandering, I mean, as technology show, we

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 5>look at what's happening Samsung and sk Heinez, the share

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 5>prices drop from FX perspective, South Korean one down a lot.

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 4>What do we wait and wish for?

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 3>At least?

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the market right now is just waiting

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for the next announcements from authorities, whether it's a finance ministry,

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the Central Bank.

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 4>A few minutes ago they put out a.

0:42:55.520 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Statement saying that they would provide unlimitedlyquidity if they need

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to write, and that was a big comfort for investors.

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a ton of assets, as you've said, that do

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>trade during the US hours. Samsung shares listening London lost

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as much as seven point five percent after the headlines

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Marshall.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Law came out. Then you know there's.

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>An ETF listed in the US with South Korean stocks

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.959
<v Speaker 1>that also felt as much as seven percent. The one

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the ETFs the shares of Korean companies listed in London

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to have lost so much, but they've paired some of

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>those losses in the last couple of hours since the

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>statement came out, So I think they're just looking for details.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just hoping for a lot of support

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>because that's what you can expect in those in those situations, right.

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, meanwhile, the mix of s k Heiinix, Samsung

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 5>Electronics have been there's been this added concern about these

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 5>are key exphoters for a nation very dependent on these

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 5>technology companies and exports are going to be on the

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.760
<v Speaker 5>risk potentially of new tariffs coming from the United States.

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 5>This is awful a lot for us for the Korean

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 5>government to be trying to navigate.

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Is this what sparked it all?

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 5>And ultimately is tarifs what you're hearing is a key

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 5>concern for investors.

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it has been.

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the one has been part of the so

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>called Trump trade, right, Like you're bullish the US dollar

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and bearish Asian currencies, and of course the one is

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>part of that. So even if it's not a direct

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>thread off tariffs for Korea, because you know, we hear

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump mentioning China or Mexico more often than he does Korea.

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 4>It would just cause the region to slow down economically

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 4>and eventually hit the currency.

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely, I mean, obviously, the current political environment in

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the US foreign policy coming up with the next administration

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a big part of what happens

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in Korean markets.

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:49.359
<v Speaker 5>Blimberg's Maria Elena Viscano up to the moment on what's

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 5>happening in South Korea across the markets that does it

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 5>for this additional blue bag technology, do not forget to

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 5>check out the podcast you can find on the terminal

0:44:56.480 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 5>Apple Spotify, iHeart this is Bluemant and he