WEBVTT - Richard Thompson

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Richard Thompson is a London born guitar virtuoso whose careers

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>started in nineteen sixty seven as part of the groundbreaking

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>folk band Fairport Convention. The following decade, Richard formed a

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>duo with his former wife, Lynda Thompson, and together they

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>released six albums, including the critically acclaimed I Want to

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>See the Bright Lights Tonight and my personal favorite pour

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Down Like Silver. Richard then struck out on his own,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>writing songs that I've since been covered by artists like

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Robert plant of his Costello and Bonnie Ray. On today's episode,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Helim talks to Richard about his love of traditional

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Scottish music and how he's reworked.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Old folk songs over the years.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Richard also plays examples of his unique playing style on

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the guitar and talks about the time he played alongside

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Hendrix. Is broken record, Real musicians, real conversations. Here's

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Hadlam with Richard Thompson.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You talked in your book about a big event for

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you is when you heard the band's first album. It

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>helped reassure you that you're looking at Scottish music, particularly

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in English and Irish, Yeah made sense. Can you talk

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about what it was like to hear that record?

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, the band's first album came out at a time

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 3>of sort of high psychedelia, you know, the San Francisco band,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>So you know, some of which I thought were great,

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Somemmer which I thought really were not very good, but

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 3>there was a kind of a looseners to it, and

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>I kind of a kind of a drugged noodling anyway,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, that was the provading culture at the time,

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 3>and when the band came along, it was kind of

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 3>a shotgend oft that the short haircuts for you know, wow,

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, gosh, people with short haircutsing. So suddenly Y

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 3>had this music that this seemed very honest, and it

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>seemed very down to that, and it seemed rooted in

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 3>so many American music forms, but successfully rooted, successfully continuing

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>those traditions. I said, Yeah, you had gospel, you had RM,

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 3>but you had blues your country, you had jazz, all

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>perfectly blended and musicians who could play that stuff in

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>their sleep. But that's somehow they'd learned how to play

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>this stuff really really well for a bunch of basically Canadians,

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 3>you know. But plus you know, leave On from Arkansas. Yeah,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 3>you had three great singers in that band, and you

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 3>had a you know, juniors keyboard player and sax player

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>in Garth Gods and God Rest Society just passed away.

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 3>And you had a great guitar player in Robbie Robertson,

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and a great rhythm section, I mean one of the

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>best rhythm sections in the history of rock music anyway

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 3>in Levon and Rick Danko Ridanka is still one of

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 3>my favorite three bass players.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>What interests me when you when you talk about particularly

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that record, is you share something with the band that

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of writers do, which is that you

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>write music that seems both very old and contemporary at

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the same time.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, people always say, well, the band songs sound

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like they could have been written a hundred years ago,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think not quite, because they sound modern too.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I can't think of many writers who really

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>pull that off.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you have to know your history, I

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 3>think first of all, which the band obviously did. I mean,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>they knew their roots. You know, they jammed with Sunny

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Boy Williamson. You know that they really understood certainly, you know,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 3>rock rock and roll music, and as writers, particularly Robbie.

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, it was a history buff you know, so

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 3>perhaps almost to a fault because I think some of

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the lates stuff is a bit more labored. Things like

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the night they drove off Dixie Down. I mean that's

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 3>just a piece of history.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It started in the library. Yeah, okay, So how did

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you go back to investigate Scottish music? You grew up

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>with some, but there's a whole history there. Yeah, and

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this is going to sound like a naive question. Are

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>there great resources that you could go to? Was it

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just old records when you started looking back to research

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? What were you looking at?

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Various sources. You've got a great resource in London called

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the Social Sharp House, which has a big library of

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 3>traditional music and there's what champions of traditional music and

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 3>preservas of traditional music. So you can go there and

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 3>look stuff up, you know. Yeah, you can get the

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 3>Child ballads, you know, the five volumes collected by Francis

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 3>James Child, which has like, you know, four hundred English,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Irish Scottish ballads in there. That's another great resource. There

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 3>are people who seeing this stuff. It's like a living tradition.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you got out to Aberdeenshire in Scotland

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 3>in the nineteen seventies. You could have set in the

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 3>caravan of Lucy Stewart, you know, as many collectors did,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Kenny Goldstein and Shirley Collins. They all went up to

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 3>to to Lucy Stewart because she had an incredible memory

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 3>as a repository of traditional music. And after Kenny Goldstein left,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 3>apparently she said, you know, he didn't he didn't get

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 3>a half of what I know, so a lot of

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 3>stuff might have passed away with her. You know, we

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 3>don't really know. So you've got all those resources. And

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>we learned a lot from people like Alor Lloyd, who

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 3>is who was another great musicologist who specialized in traditional

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 3>music and also a singer. And what we get Burt

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 3>on the end of the phone and say, Bert, we

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 3>got this song in Mattie Groves, you know, and we're

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 3>missing we like a better verse three. You know, well

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 3>what have you got would you know?

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Then?

0:05:58.160 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 3>So he said, oh yeah, well if you take this

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 3>one from this source and that blah blah, you know.

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 3>So in a sense what we were compiling ballads from

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 3>all over the place really to come up with a

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 3>version that we felt really, you really did it, you know,

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>it really told the story. One of the great things

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 3>about some of those old songs it is how colorful

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 3>they are in a sense that they describe things in

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 3>a very colorful way, in a very immediate way that

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>suits you know, a rock band actually could quite well.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 3>It suits an electric treatment quite well.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Were there songs that just resisted it you thought, no,

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this song, it just belongs to another age. We can't.

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Sometimes, yeah, I think sometimes there was a feeling,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, that the song was too pastoral and that

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 3>wasn't really our lives in the twentieth century, you know,

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 3>where we were kind of urban nights or suburban nights and

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 3>a song about you know, you know, I Sow the

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 3>seeds of love. I think we eventually recorded a bit,

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>but I was a bit reluctant to do it because

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I thought it's too you know, it's too soft. You

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>know that there are better songs that there are kind

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of industrial songs, there are work songs that would fit

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>the genre, but it would fit you know, the the

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 3>electric band setting better. But you know, something like like

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Magic Roads. It's just that it's such great language. The

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 3>laghage is fantastic you know, you know, a grave, a grave.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Lord rold cried to put these lovers in but bury

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>my lady at the top. She was of noble kin.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's really beautiful, clever, you know.

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So did that that in a sense gave you your

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>vocabulary for your own music?

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I think partly?

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, you're known as a very depressing writer.

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, because so many of your songs are about

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>love a band and love scorned being alone.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Well I suppose. I mean, you know thematically, you write

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 3>about what you know, and you write about you know,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 3>human states that have been written about for hundreds of years,

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>so that there are a kind of a tradition. There's

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>an overlap. But I'd be very interested. I'd be very sorry.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm influenced by the language of traditional music.

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Now when you get these songs, they wouldn't come with harmonies.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Were they mostly melodies?

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Did you have to re harmonize a lot of these things?

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes? We did.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, American music, I guess, because so much is influenced

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>by blues. Just it's got such a strong resolution, you know,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just heads towards that final chord, and I find a

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of the music you were playing a lot of

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the folk music, it sort of expands, it doesn't have

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that that same drive towards sort of the final resolution.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I think, well, I think people, you know, people like

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 3>Davey Graham, people like Martin Cathy developed a way of

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 3>accompanying traditional music in a way that reflected more what

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 3>you're hearing a solo vocal performance, so that a lack

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 3>of resolution. And the way you did that is through

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 3>suspensions really you know, through not resolving. So that's the

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 3>tuning that the Davey Graham I think it was the

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 3>first person to come up with. It's not onlike a

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Clarence actually banjo tuning from the Appalachians in the nineteen

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 3>you know, thirties onwards. And what is the it's it's

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 3>basically D A D A D G A D.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So he was the first to use like a dead

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>get suspension.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, it's.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>A suspension because it's a it's a sixth yeah right yeah, okay.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 3>So that some may start that when it may finished

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 3>that way as well, which is good, which is just

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 3>leaves it open. I mean, it doesn't resolve anything, you know,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 3>is it for you know, something like she moves with

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 3>a fair.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 4>My young love said to me, my parents will, Ma,

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 4>my father will like you for your lack a harp.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Come.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And she let her hand on me, and then she did.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Say, what will not long?

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Sorry, kind of rings over. You have a nice

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 3>thing about those kind of open tunings is if you're

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 3>a solo guitarist, you get a bit size, you get

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 3>a bit more volume out of the guitar. But because

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>so many notes are ringing over, gives the illusion that

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 3>you're a best guitar player than you actually are.

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to remember that now. Some of your songs

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>walking on the wires a song, Yeah, I think of that,

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and I know it does resolve in the end, but

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it almost feels like it could end on the fourth,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it could end on other tones. The Great Valerio is

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>another one to me that it feels very much like that.

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>You seem to like these songs that don't have the

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just they just have a different I don't know if

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the form that's different. I don't quite know how

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to describe it.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well know you mean, and I do like that,

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, I like that like a resolution in a sense.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 3>But again, I think it all comes from vocal music.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it comes from hearing somebody sing a song

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 3>unaccompanied and you imply what the harmony is. And if

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you're schooled in you know, you get kind of Mozart

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of harmony or something, then you're going to accompany

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 3>it that way. If you come from a more traditional background,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 3>or if you're Mars and Carthy or Davey Graham, you're

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 3>going to interpret it in a different way. You're going

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 3>to interpret the harmony as something else, or you're just

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 3>going to add a drone to the whole thing and

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and just just leave it floating.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, do you use a lot of drone notes?

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Does that? Does that come from bagpipe?

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Pretty much.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And so when you're doing that, do you do you

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>try and you try and use an open string for

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the drone?

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And is it always the tonic or.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>They're practicularly it's either going to be the G or

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the D.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because in you know, a lot of jazz,

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it'll be the high note will be uh, particularly in

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the piano. Yeah, that's how they'll harmonize a lot of

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like little runs and things like you'd have you'll have

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the high tonic. And then do you ever use like

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the high e for.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 3>The well, yeah you can, you can do do it

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the other way around that exactly.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you also use you use an enormous number

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of like trills on your Is that again the bagpipe influence.

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 3>It's traditionally influence you bagpipes, you know, Scottish, Irish fiddle players,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>accordion players. There's a lot of grace notes, a lot

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 3>of extra notes around the note that that would be

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 3>a big part of the expression or where you're playing.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>In something like a dance tune, that's pretty much sets

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is the tune that, this is how

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>you play it. To make it more interesting, you might

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 3>add more flourishes and bits and pieces, you know that

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of you know that kind of stuff.

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, is there any and I don't even know if

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the harp is a is a Celtic instrument?

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Sure is? You know the original Western European and instrument

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 3>for a companying voice was there was the harp, you know,

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the small harp the ballad hop right, So people like

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Richard the first Richard the Lionheart, who was a singer songwriter,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much. His mother was Eleanor Vakatain, who

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>was a champion of the arts. But if you were

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 3>a king or a courtier or something. Among your accomplishments

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>besides like you know, murdering people, you know, like spiking

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>people through with a sword or was you had to

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>dance and you had to sing, and in some cases

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 3>you could be a songwriter. Henry the eighth was a songwriter.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah. Also I would have accompanied himself on the

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>on the harp. He wrote songs like black is the

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 3>color of my true love's hair, which I'm sure it

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 3>is never off your turntable pastime with good company, and he.

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Would stroke it out and say blonde is the color?

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yes, yeah, so we still got Adde

0:15:54.960 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Bollyn's head anywhere. Yeah, check the hair color. Yeah. Didn't

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 3>write green sleeves, so that came a little late, but

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that was accredited to him for a while. So yeah.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 3>So if you if you're if you're a king, courts

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>you singer songwriter.

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Like all great songwriters, he took credit for things he

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually write. Well, when you're king, very country. Yeah,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're king, you say, oh, I think I wrote

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this one. Of course you did, your majesty. Is there

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>any harp influence in your playing?

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Any any kind of guitar or covered with with

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 3>your finger picking. It's a very hard like and if

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 3>if you use, if you use those kind of strings

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that ring over, you know, those kind.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Of tell me what you mean that when you say

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>strings that are ringing over.

0:16:51.800 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, like like I see, I suppose to

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 3>call straight flat picking more jazz style.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So for people who would be casual listeners, they might

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>think you were born somewhere on a Scottish glen to goatherds.

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, that sounds romantic.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It does, as it turns out. It turns out I'm

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>really from London, suburban London. Suburban London suburbs are a

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>wonderful place. It all comes from the suburbs. The Rolling Stones,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles, inner sense come from the suburbs, you know,

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kings come from the suburbs fairly close to where

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I grew up as well.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, but my father was Scottish, so that's always

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>been a strand in the music, you know, and as

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 3>a kid I was kind of transfixed by Scottish music,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 3>but by things like bagpipes, you know, hearing bagpipes outdoors

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 3>where where you get that that kind of Doppler effect

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 3>or that kind of phasing thing. You know.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh, even as a kid, you like that.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, just one of the first music I

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 3>ever heard was probably going with my parents up to

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 3>Edinburgh Castle. I'm watching the military tattoo, you know, with

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 3>these incredible pipe bands. I suppose I could have been

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 3>attracted to the incredible drumming, but it was it was

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 3>more the you know, Scottish use of melody. I think

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 3>hit me for very young, my melody and drone, which

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's an old It's an old human thing,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>isn't it. You know, in Western European music, you know

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 3>that they developed kind of the chord a compliment, you know,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of cultures didn't go that way though,

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 3>that they just had the drone and the melody and

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of instidments playing in Unison, that kind of thing,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 3>which I also find very attractive. Although I do like

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 3>harmony as well, I like everything.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there something distinctive about Scottish melodies? Are there certain

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>tones they emphasize?

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 3>You know that there's an interesting Scottish use of the

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>pentatonic scale. And you know, if if you think of

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 3>country music where that comes from, a lot of it

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>comes from Scottish music. The Scots were a notable ethnic

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>group in the Appalachians and that you know that that

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 3>that classic country you know, major pentatonic scale do you do?

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 3>You do?

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 4>You do that?

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 3>That's all over country music and it's all over Scottish

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>music as well. And so so that there's that pentatonic scale,

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 3>there's a there's another Scottish pentatonic scale which doesn't have

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>a third in it. There's no major or minor.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I see, So how would you if you were going

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to harmonize that?

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, the classic way to harmonize Scottish music is

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 3>basically to use the the root called and one, so

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I k d you use the sea as well as.

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>There's almost a mixed Ildien sound.

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's kind of I would say it's unique

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to Scottish music, but it's it's it's fairly unusual and

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 3>it's almost a bit lonesome in a sense, you know, Yeah, yeah,

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 3>you get this kind of spaciousness. Well, work with that

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 3>particular scale, I find which it was suitable for the backpipe,

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, which is out there you know playing on yeah,

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>up in the mountains or you know, at the end

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 3>of a loch or something. So you know, it's it's

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a dimension of music that struck me very young, and

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 3>it kind of stayed with me as well, even as

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 3>I learn more about harmony and I learned about you know,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, ponlytonalism and twelve tone and dissonance and uh

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 3>that those basic kind of like drone in the fifth

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 3>or or you know that there's still very compeling.

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back with more from Richard Thompson and Bruce

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Headlam after the break.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>When did you first pick up a guitar?

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I think I was probably ten. Yeah, my father was

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 3>was an amateur guitar player. You know, no, they're not

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 3>actually very good, and one day he bought him a

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 3>guitar one of his old army mates. We worked in

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 3>a guitar shop in at the West End of London,

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and I had this damaged guitar, like the side had

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 3>split open in transit, and my father, being I would work,

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, glued it up and thought this is great,

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to play it. But I grabbed it before

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 3>anybody else could get their hands on it and basically

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 3>commandeered it. And you know, at that time, you know,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of a you know, we're talking about nineteen sixty,

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, rockn roll where it was still around. I

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 3>had an older sister who had Buddy Holly Records and

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Elvis Records and June Vincent and Jerry D Lewis.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 3>So you know, the guitar was a very hip thing.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.959
<v Speaker 3>And also in Britain you had an instrumental bank called

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 3>the Shadows, which they were kind of British Adventures if

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>you like. But actually much better players are much much

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 3>better recorded.

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about the Shadows because they

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.239
<v Speaker 1>loomed so large. Oh they did in England. People here

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>would know their stuff because they associated with surf music.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 3>And Canada as well. Actually, you know, a more local

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 3>hotspot for for the Shadows, was that, right. Neil Younger

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>claims he was a huge Shadows fan, okay, and you

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 3>can hear in his playing actually it's used to that,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, the wammy bar.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And everything, right, yeah, and you like them as well well, yeah.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was a great sound, of very deductive sound,

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 3>and it was something that you could get together with

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 3>with your with your friends and and that was the

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of the beginning of playing in a group, you know,

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 3>of learning from each other, which is what happens when

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 3>you joined a banner. You kind of pick stuff up

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 3>from the other people in the band and you slowly

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 3>spiral upwards. We hope you know as musicians. But yeah,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the Shadows were very influential on every body of a

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 3>certain age. I mean really, you know, if you speak

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 3>to Jimmy Page or somebody, you know, he was like, oh, yeah,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I hate Marvin you know the Shadows.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, could he play a strat well, well.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 3>The story is at that time that there was a

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 3>band on American imports of instruments for some reasons, so

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 3>you couldn't buy a Fender, you couldn't buy Gibson. So

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Cliff Richard, who the Shadows, used to back well when

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 3>I was at the States because he had a hit

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 3>record here and and he brought back the first actual

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Fender stratocaster to go into England and he came to

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 3>Hank so that was a big thing. And then they

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 3>all got kitted out with fenders, you know, so exciting stuff.

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>This is has such a distinct, beautiful sound.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, it's all about tone, and you used you know,

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 3>like these so fairly primitive these days, but but you know,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to tape eco device it's for portable tapeco machines to

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 3>give him a bit of extra reverb.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>There are other players that you've talked about, and one

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and again not someone people over here have listened to

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is Davey Graham.

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's kind of the first guy through the door,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 3>you know. But maybe mid mid fifties. Davy was acoustic

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 3>guitar pler, and I should stress that first of all.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 3>And he was playing kind of a blended style. He

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 3>was playing something that had Scottish re roots and he

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 3>was part Scottish West Indian roots here he was got

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 3>part Guyanese and you know, throwing in jazz kind of

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 3>throneous monk and stuff, you know, and kind of blending

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 3>it all together with a bit of you maybe Morocco

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 3>music into Morocco and kind of soaked up a bit

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 3>of music down there, and it kind of blended into

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 3>this style that that kind of stayed in a sense.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 3>You know that that influenced Bert Jansch. So Bert jan

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 3>had a kind of you know, Scottish English traditional style

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 3>with a bit of blues thrown in. You know who

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>was Martin Carthy, you know, influenced but by by David Graham.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 3>He was just kind of pioneer and in a sense

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>he was kind of all over the place, you know.

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, you know you had to kind of discipline

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>him to to make sense of his music, you know,

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 3>because he just sit down and say, oh this is

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 3>you heard this tune from Marks, you know, blah blah

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>blah blah blah. And I said, oh, this is a

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>this is yeah, this is Miles Davis. You know, he

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 3>just be you know, all over the place. So to

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 3>sit him down and and and have him more disciplined

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 3>but was quite a thing, you know. And you know

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>he was junkie, you know. Yeah, he had a lot

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 3>of issues and it's life. But but you know I

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 3>saw him from time to time. I mean, he's a

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 3>good man, good man.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me that that you're a more disciplined player

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that like when you talk about chance putting sort of

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>blues in Scottish, you don't do that as much like

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing a more bluesy style, which is a

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>more rock style for you, not you don't really do blues.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You tend to play a little more formally. Is that true?

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Or is that unfair?

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 3>I think not so much. Formally it's different. You know.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 3>I think I realized in about nineteen sixty seven that

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of competition in London for blues guitar players,

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>you know. You know, but in my school back yet

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 3>we were playing blues r and be all that kind

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 3>of stuff. But at a certain point, I thought, you know,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, yeah, you've got a piece of green out.

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 3>You've got Rick Klatton, You've got Mick Taylor. You know,

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>you've got all all these blues players and it is

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 3>a crowded field and I'm just naming, like, you know,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 3>three of them, but there's like twenty, you know, just

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 3>just in life.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I think there's twenty named Jimmy yeah alone.

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So so I thought, well, you know, I'm really

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be different. You know, the the you know,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 3>the blues and I says that they don't have a

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 3>place in my vocabulary, but but Kelsey music does. And

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 3>you're in Kelsey music. You also you have you have

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 3>bent notes, you know, you have a kind of soulful

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of phrasing, you know. So I thought, well, I'll

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 3>I'll exploit that more than the blues. Inevitably, I've got

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 3>technique that probably comes from BB King. I mean that's

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 3>just something I learned at school. You know, there is

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you're brato, you know kind is your

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 3>vibrato like his? No, But everybody's just different. But yeah, so.

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You made you mentioned you mentioned bent notes in Scottish music,

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Well what tones are you bending to and from?

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Then? From Scottish Irish music, there's more bends in Irish

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 3>music for sure, mostly going up to the but bending

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 3>up to the seventh, right, bending up to the octave,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 3>bending up to this to a second, I.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>See, And that's more Scottish, that's more Irish and more

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Irish pardan me is that is that because the instruments

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they were using.

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, Scottish pipers now under the influencer of

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Irish pipers bend notes they're they never used to. But

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the bending is it's more of a vocal tradition in Scotland.

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Like work songs in the Hebridies, you know, you have

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 3>you have more notes that get the kind of bend

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 3>up to the note that not much going down, but

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of times bending up to the note. You know. So,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 3>so I tried to develop a different vocabulary. Really, I

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to sound like all these other blues players.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I've always thought it was kind of cultural exploitation and somehow,

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, all these white guitar players in London, you know,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 3>but but buying chess records. Never been to Chicago, you know,

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 3>never been to Mississippi. But you know they love the music,

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 3>absoutely love the me is it? But I thought, well

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>is that enough? You know? Is it enough to love it?

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 3>At what point? Are you just like like a kind

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>of a slavish imitator, you know, a dilet hands, you know,

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 3>a colonial exploit. This is all go through my head

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 3>when I'm like, you know, eighteen years old, you know,

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 3>I thought, well, well, you know, you know, the interesting

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 3>stuff for me, like when you know, when the Yardbirds

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 3>were playing, I'm a man, you know, I thought that

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 3>this is you know, pathetic. You know when you think

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 3>of the nobility of the original version, you know than

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 3>the Muddy Waters version, It's like it's just got sexual authority.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 3>It's such a nobility to it.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 3>The yard Bud's just sounded like little boys, you know,

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 3>and they couldn't do the feel, you know that the

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 3>feel of the rhythm section, it was all wrong. But

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, but I thought when the yardbirds did original songs,

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 3>it was far more interesting when they did for Your

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Love or something. Thought well, this is actually a really

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 3>good pop song and the blues influences coming in, and

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 3>that's fine, you know, I thought that was a more

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 3>interesting use of influences.

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>In your book, you mentioned being on stage I think

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just once with Jimmy Hendrix.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh but probably three times.

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And what was that like.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 3>We used to play this late night club called the

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Speakeasy in London, and you know, birds would roll in,

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, usually after midnight from playing out of town.

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, they come back from Birmingham, my magister, and

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 3>they'd be hungry so that they come in and to

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 3>eat really but there was always a live band on

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and there was a dance floor. We used to play there,

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, a couple of times a month at least,

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, and Jimmy would, you know, about one o'clock,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 3>two o'clock in the morning, after a few drinks, would

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 3>want to get up and play. So you just sit

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>in with us, which was fantastic. Bit intimidating, of course,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 3>but it was a nice experience and he was a

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 3>very sweet man in my.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Experience, did he because he played a left guitar, right.

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 3>He just take my guitar and then turn it upside

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 3>down and play with great facility either way, you know really.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, did he string his guitar that way or did he?

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure he strung it.

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean for a left handed guitar player. Yeah, but

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 3>he could play mine basically upside you know, he turned

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 3>it upside down and figure out everything in the reverse

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 3>genius will or will.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Out he gave it back to you. Did you just

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>smash it and leave? That's quite something.

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>No, he didn't set fire to it. He didn't smash it.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But no, I was thinking, maybe you did. Well, I

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>can't do that anymore.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, think with Hendrix. I mean you could kind of

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 3>figure out what he was doing, you know, harmonically, it

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 3>wasn't that that uh, you know, it was sophisticated. There

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 3>was basically a blues play. But he could always up

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the game. You know, he could always play with his teeth,

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 3>you could have sex with the guitar, you know, he

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 3>could you know, play behind his back. You know, he

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 3>had all the tricks that he'd learned, you know, playing

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 3>on the chitpland circuit in America. But yeah, it was

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 3>an interesting presence on the on the London music scene,

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 3>and I think he intimidated all those guitar players, the

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Claptains of Jeff Becks, so that they were totally intimidated

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 3>because in a sense, you know that they've been learning

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 3>off records and they developed this way of playing the

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 3>blues and R and B. And then this guy turns up.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of the real thing, you know, and he

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 3>can take it to another level. You know, they're all,

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're utterly intimidated. That's a great story of

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I think one of Jimmy's first bigger performances in London,

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 3>and it was the week that Sergeant Pepper came out

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 3>and all the guitar players turned up, Pete Townsend, Jeff Beck,

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Eric Clapton, I think Paul McCartney was there as well.

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 3>There was sitting in the audience, you know. And of

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 3>course Jimmy's opening song is Sergeant Pepper's Learning Hearts Club,

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 3>but which he learned knowing that that there'll be a

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 3>beatle in the in the audience, so of course he

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 3>like destroys it. You know. He plays it pretty straight

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 3>for about a chorus and then and all hell, let's

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 3>loosen and he goes into his stratophoric Jimmy and at

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the end of the song, you know, these guitars can

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.719
<v Speaker 3>pretty out of churning. He's just destroyed the tuning. So

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 3>he says, Hey, Eric, are you out there? Meany Clapton

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 3>And it's a little sort of puny for yes, and

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 3>he says, could you come and tune this for me? Oh? Yeah? Anyway? Yeah,

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, he was He was the presence on the scene.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>What was it about London? I guess England at that point.

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Beatles and the Stones are sort of

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they broke the ice. Yeah, but there seemed

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to be so many You were playing all the time.

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>There were clubs, there were colleges, and there was John Peel,

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>who's this huge influential figure who was recording guys like

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you before anybody else.

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 3>What to start with it with John Peel? John Peel,

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 3>what was a British DJ? You kind of emerged about

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 3>sixty seven, you know, with the rise of psychedelia, flower power,

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 3>and he had a show on the BBC. They had

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>a couple of sho he had a late night show

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 3>and he had a show where bands would come into

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 3>the studio and record, especially for that show. So you

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 3>come in and if you had a new record out,

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 3>you'd record, especially for the BBC, four songs and they'd

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 3>be broadcast and anybody and everybody. It was on that show.

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, Pink Floyd had come in and spent hours

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 3>trying to reproduce their latest record, which they spent you know,

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 3>months on. But they manage it, you know. And his

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.399
<v Speaker 3>producer was a great guy, Bernie Andrews did just a white,

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 3>wonderful character. The engineers were great, you know, and the

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 3>BBC somehow allowed this to happen in a sense that

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, the BBC, we was very conservative, but let

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 3>things slip through sometimes, you know, like Munty Python's flying

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 3>cycle or something. I mean, they just allowed it all

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 3>to up and because they weren't really paying attention. Yes,

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 3>so that's the radio. In terms of places to play,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 3>there were a lot of places to play. There were

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 3>clubs first of all, you know in London you had

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 3>half a dozen clubs where everybody would play. So that

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 3>was great because that was a kind of a fallback,

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 3>you know that that's income. And also at that time

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 3>every university in London I was basically free. There was

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 3>no fees for tuition, and also they all had entertainment

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 3>budgets from the then socialist government in Britain, so they'd be booking,

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, these incredibly anti establishment bands like Soft Machine

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and Pink Floyd, The Crazy World of Arthur Brown, you know,

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 3>and fairpoorl Convention Thank you very much. So in a sense,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 3>you know that this whole countercultural thing about was subsidized

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 3>by the British labor government. So Pink Floyd you had

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 3>probably owe their existence to Harold Wilson more than anybody else.

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>They should thank him on the sleeve.

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I think I should have a special album dedicated to Horrid.

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, there's an argument in the United States

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>now but protectionism and tariffs and all these things. It's

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting to think back at a time that the government

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>said no, you know, BBC had to use live performances.

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want taped music because they're very strong unions

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>colleges needed to hire live musicians.

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's extruding. It was a thing that didn't last forever,

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 3>you know. Again, I mean that kind of changed. I

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 3>think the other good thing about that time was that

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 3>the record companies hadn't figured out what was going on.

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 3>You get these moments in music where the business is

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 3>lagging behind the creativity, and that's when things really pop,

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's when stuff is exciting. And it took

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 3>them a while to catch up. The same thing happen

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 3>with punk, you know, but basically it took about two

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 3>years to figure out what the sex Pistoles were up to,

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, but by which time a lot of stuff

0:36:54.920 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 3>had slipped through. So you had record companies scrambling to

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 3>sign everybody, and they pretty much did, I mean, any

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 3>any band you know, of any shape or size was

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 3>basically signed just in case, you know, in case they

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 3>were the next big thing. So that was good, you know.

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 3>So you have people making records that maybe wouldn't have

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 3>ever made records peep, like the Incredible String Band, and

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 3>they made, to my mind, fantastic records, but they might

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 3>never have been signed.

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>How important was live performing for you back then? In

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>learning what it was?

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Everything? You know, I think it was and it still is.

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:37.399
<v Speaker 3>The light Live performance is always the focus because it's

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 3>that thing that happens, is that transaction that happens between

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 3>a performer and the audience in which the performer is

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 3>almost just like like the conduit for creativity.

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that how it feels when you're up there?

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a good day. Yeah.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned in your autobiography that I guess just because

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of clubs you were playing in the demands,

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you get pretty good at doing long solo.

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you watch the Get Back documentary,

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but there's a scene that always sticks out to me,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 1>which is George Harrison is talking about Eric Clapton. He said,

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he can just play and play and play,

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and Harrison says, I can't do that. Yeah, he can

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>solo within the confines of a song.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely, And George would kind of figure out a

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 3>solo as well. He wouldn't be improvising a solid necessarily,

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 3>but for use improvisations. Oh yeah. But that's as the

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 3>school that I came out of. That that was what

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 3>was not only permitted at the time, but expected at

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the time. So if you're a band and you had

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 3>a guitar player in the band, the guitar player will

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 3>be expected to stretch out. Yeah. I mean that's the

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 3>same thing in the States, you know, with the psychedelic

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 3>bands from San Francisco, you know the quick Silver Messenger

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Service or something. You know, there was no real restriction

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.439
<v Speaker 3>on how long a solo it would be. It could

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 3>be two minutes, it could be half an hour. You know,

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 3>it depended on you know, probably the you know, the

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 3>drug balance of the band, and you know, how people

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 3>were feeling and how the audience were responding. You know.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's just the school I came out of. So,

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, I go and watch bands and I'd see,

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:10.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's a sep of people like Jeff Beck

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 3>and playing a ten minute solo, and I think, okay,

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:13.959
<v Speaker 3>fair enough.

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And it never that was never intimidating. You always had

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not the charms.

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it was something that we did because maybe

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 3>we hadn't rehearsed, you know, more than an hour of music.

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes you'd be playing three sets at the aforementioned speakeasy

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and you think, well, okay, third set, we'll just do

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 3>a longer solo and on this particular song, you know,

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 3>that'll be that'll be half a set. So that was

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 3>another consideration. But and I just got used to it,

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, and in a sense, you know, into the seventies,

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm still doing the same thing. Sometimes I'm hoping the

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 3>audience isn't falling asleep, of course, But but it just

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 3>became a thing, and after a while, you know, the

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 3>audience expects it. You know that the guitar nerds and

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the audience are waiting for the guitar solos. You know.

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's hard for me to think of you

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in that way because you are such a your songwriting

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.919
<v Speaker 1>is so strong and your songs are so well constructed

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as forms, and I tend to think of those players

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 1>not being great songwriters.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Understand, Yeah, but I wouldn't do it in every song.

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And some songs you almost want to have a surah

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 3>that's pretty much written, you know that you refer back to.

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 3>You might do little variations on it, but it's kind

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 3>of part of the structure. But then maybe a couple

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 3>of songs in an evening you might just let go

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 3>and figure that the emotion of the song will carry

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 3>you into the instrumental passage. You know, you start off

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 3>with a lyric and the lyric has a certain emotion

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 3>to it, and you think, well, I'm you know, maybe

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 3>you don't even think about it. You just go instrumentally

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and if the band goes with you, that's great, And

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, you might play for another ten minutes, and

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 3>it's still it's still musical. You know, you're not being

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 3>self indulgent necessarily. You know you're just being carried on

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 3>the way of whatever the song is. You know the

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 3>emotion of the song, and you kind of know when

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 3>you get to the end.

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 2>One last break and we're back with Richard Thompson.

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about your playing. When did the

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>writing start for you?

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, writing can be inspired by anything. It should be

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:27.359
<v Speaker 3>inspired by anything. So it's good if you can have

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the flexibility to start with a melody, or start with lyrics,

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 3>or start with a riff, start with a hook line,

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:35.720
<v Speaker 3>just to get you started.

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, some people are collectors of folk music, but

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>some people you learn to sort of transform it. When

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>did you know? Was there a song a time you

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>thought I found my voice? I know this is mine now?

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, probably in the sixties. I'm playing with Fatball Convention

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 3>when we started to play traditional music with electric instruments,

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 3>and at that point I thought, okay that this is

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 3>this is where I begin in a sense, this is

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>this is a vocabulary I need to learn, and somehow

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to stay with this and I'll add to

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 3>it and I subtract from it. But basically this is

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be my musical vocabulary, and at

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 3>some point I think it gets more influenced by jazz

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 3>and by classical music harmonically. I'm not afraid to kind

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 3>of extend that vocabrary pretty much anywhere. But I think

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 3>if you've got a strong route, if you've got a

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 3>strong basis, yeah, then you're free to bring other things

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 3>into it and it's still your music. So you can

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 3>say that's a great idea in that Jamaican song, I'm

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 3>just gonna I'm going to grab that. I'm going to

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 3>incorporate it into what I do, and it won't sound Jamaican.

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 3>It I sound like what would I do. Yeah, I

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 3>think at a certain point you have a distinctive vocabulary

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 3>and songwriting as well. I mean, I mean, it's the

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 3>same point I figured out, like this, this is the

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of song I want to write. This is a

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 3>song that has roots in where I come from and

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not going to lose that. But I can

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 3>also I can change the rhythm sometimes, you know, I

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 3>can import a rhythm from somewhere else. I can use,

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, this Indonesian something or other. You know, that's

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 3>an inspirational idea, you know, but you can kind of

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 3>make it yours. I think people have always done that.

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you had this just explosion of great

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>songs for Fairport, and then later when you're playing with

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>your then wife Linda, you were writing for two really

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>great singers. You're writing for Sandy Danny, and then Linda

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>tell me about how you went about that.

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it is possible to write with somebody

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 3>else in mind. So you can say, I'm going to

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 3>tailor this song to someone else's voice, someone like Genesis Hall,

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, with tailored to Sandy's key and to Sandy's

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 3>wonderful wide ranging abilities as a singer, you know, like

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 3>she could really do justice to it. So the whole

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 3>way the chorus goes and moves off to sing anything.

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 3>So I'd be quite comfortable doing something which would really

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 3>use all of our range. And for Linda, you know,

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd write songs and then we would discuss them and

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 3>we say, okay, you should sing this one. Uh, you

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 3>know this one is it's more of a kind of

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 3>a male song where but perhaps I should be singing

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:25.919
<v Speaker 3>this one. You know, it's it's more what we could

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 3>emotionally identify with.

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Really, you know, you are considered the two of you

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are considered the authors of one of the great breakup

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>albums of all time. But you say that's actually not

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the case. That wasn't the shootout the lights was coincidental.

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's a it's a journalistic lazy cliche evenstance.

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, I'm a lazy journalist. That's why I

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>use it.

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't aiming at that's you. But I'll take it

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 3>a previous you know, written reviews and stuff, and people

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 3>will like a bit of scandal anyway that don't exit,

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 3>so that they'll play that up. Plus, you know, the

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.720
<v Speaker 3>songs were written, you know, a year, two years earlier

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 3>in some cases, so we've been living with the songs

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.400
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. And I'm sure you know the

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 3>songs kind of subconsciously reflect on what's going on in

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 3>your lives. But you know, to me, it's just an

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 3>album of songs, some of which I still enjoy and

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>some of which I still perform. Yeah, it's funny when

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 3>you've got albums that are sort of you know, forty

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 3>five years old and fifty five years old and you're thinking,

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 3>oh gosh, I'm still playing this song, so it must

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 3>be a good song if you're still if you're still there.

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you always relate to them at the time, because

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you've also written story songs, You've written songs about different

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>people other people. Yeah, in a sense, one of you know,

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 1>your big hits, fifty two Vincent black Lightning. It's not

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about you, but in some sense it must have been

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about you.

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, the envy is about me. When I

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:57.240
<v Speaker 3>was a kid, one of the neighbors had a vincent

0:45:57.800 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 3>black shadow which I thought was just the most beautiful

0:45:59.880 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 3>thing I've ever seen, this, absolutely incredible. So I remember

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 3>that when I started writing the song. No, you know,

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 3>I make things up and make up stories. That's a

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 3>valid thing to do, I think as a songwriter.

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you about a few individual songs from

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>your solo career Waltson for Dreamers, which is just futiful?

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember writing that?

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, started with the title, you know, I think just

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 3>as sometimes I just wrote right down titles, you know,

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 3>just for fun and preferably as you know, as streamer

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 3>consciously as I can. And again I think I'm making

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 3>something up, but maybe it's about me. I don't know.

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about persuasion? Which saying with your son Teddy.

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I read that an instrumental for a film, Oh yeah,

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 3>with a slightly different melody, and it's an Australian film.

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:57.760
<v Speaker 3>And my friend Tim Finn, who was actually from New Zealand,

0:46:57.800 --> 0:46:59.399
<v Speaker 3>but I think he was living Australia at the time,

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:02.919
<v Speaker 3>said I like that tune. Can I put some words

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 3>to it? So so we kind of sat down and,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, tried to co write a lyric, which is

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 3>a very difficult thing to do. So I said, Tim,

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 3>take it away and just run with it, because you know,

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm struggling here to to to find some mutual experience,

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 3>so we can we can really write about So he

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:26.760
<v Speaker 3>went away and wrote the lyric and he recorded it first,

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 3>and then I thought, well, I like this song, so

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll do a version, And then I did a version

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 3>with Teddy and that those are very popular kind of

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 3>radio here actually, and whatever. Whenever I sit in with

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 3>with with Teddy or he sits same way with me

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and we sing a few songs together, that's when the

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 3>audience wants to hear.

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>You reminded me of your relationship with Tim Finn that

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you've done a few songs with Crowded House, and you

0:47:55.280 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 1>did a very famous guitar solo on Sister Madly. It's

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>just so different from everything else on that album. Unexpected.

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I did a lot of tours, were opening for

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Credit House in Europe and in North America, and we

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 3>became good, good friends, you know, and I would usually

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 3>sit in on their set and we play System Madly

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 3>or something else you know at the time, and credits

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:24.800
<v Speaker 3>are great because they'll they'll kind of do anything on stage.

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they'll mess around that, they'll mess up their

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 3>set list, they don't really care, and it was always

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 3>great fun to play with them. So, you know, I

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 3>got to do the you know, the record, the System

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Madly record. In fact, last May, I did a seventy

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 3>fifth birthday I just give my age away, Good Heavens

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 3>seventy fifth birthday constantly in London at the album Hall London,

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and and Credit House came and played on that, so

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, I just I just sat in with them

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 3>for a few songs, which was great, you know. So

0:48:56.320 --> 0:49:00.239
<v Speaker 3>we got to do Weather with you and Don't Dream

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 3>It's Over and Lovely, one of my favorite bands. I

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 3>think I think Neil is one of my favorite songwriters

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:09.879
<v Speaker 3>without Squeeze on the on the bill as well, which

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 3>is my favorite British band.

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>You did a great solo version of Tempted Yeah, which

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I would think a song that there's no way you

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>could do that solo, but you was.

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I think we had somebody on percussion and when we

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 3>did it and I think Judith I was singing harmony.

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 3>He said so, so it can't be done. It's not

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.280
<v Speaker 3>an easy song because that the harmony is really tricky.

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:35.239
<v Speaker 3>Glenn till Brooker, who writes the melodies, you know that

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 3>he loves. He's kind of moving basslines and it's sort

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 3>of unexpected jazz. Course it could sneaking into a pop song.

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>The very the very complex songs it is yeah yeah,

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and his guitar playing is very.

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.799
<v Speaker 3>Guitar playing is complex. The lyric is complex, and the

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 3>usual rule of thumb which Squeeze ignore all the time,

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:59.280
<v Speaker 3>but get away with it is you know, complex lyric,

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 3>simple melody, complex melody, simple lyric. That's the sort of

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.360
<v Speaker 3>standard you know from the Brial building days or before

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, but squeeze get it, get away with it

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 3>with the complex lyric complex melody. They just somehow they

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:41.840
<v Speaker 3>do it, you know. So that's really nice kind of

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 3>shifts and lots of majors of mine minus the major stuff.

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I was going to mention you did a it was

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>a Kennedy Center honor or something for Joni Mitchell, and

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you played Woodstock. Now the rumor was you weren't supposed

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to play Woodstock that night.

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Stone Temple pilots Withdrew at the last minute.

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if someone was ill or you know,

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 3>whatever reason. So I had now, which in a sense

0:51:11.239 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 3>is good. But because I didn't have time to think

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 3>about it, I thought I was, okay, well, you know,

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 3>let me pick a key. I'll do it in d

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 3>you know. And I tuned it to a modal tuning

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 3>as well. And I thought, well, I don't really know

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the tune. You know, the lyrics are going to be

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:30.359
<v Speaker 3>on the auto que, so I'll I'll get the lyrics

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:32.240
<v Speaker 3>from there, but I kind of know them. But sometimes

0:51:32.280 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 3>you think think you know something and you don't. And

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I just went went out cold, and you know, I

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 3>didn't have time to get nervous. I didn't have time

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 3>time to think about what I was doing, you know,

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have time to think there's journey out there

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 3>on the balcony, So you know, sometimes you just had

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:51.319
<v Speaker 3>to shut stuff out and concentrate. So that was good

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and people seem to respond to that very well. But

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.880
<v Speaker 3>basically I was just making it up, you know, honestly.

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So tell me, for steners, you say it's a modal tuning,

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:02.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean by that?

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 3>That look like a dad gut down d D.

0:52:08.080 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean it relates to a particular mode or

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:12.959
<v Speaker 1>when you say modal.

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 3>It's called a modal chuning. I think because you have

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:18.839
<v Speaker 3>suspensions in it. You know, yeah, you could, you'd have

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 3>a modal tuning with a second in it, but this

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 3>one keeps saif keep that going, that's right. But for yeah,

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 3>for whatsuck, I just.

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 4>Charted. God, you was walking a lot, that's me.

0:52:53.360 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Where are you going? You're telling me? So, you know,

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the open tuning gave me a lot of leeway in

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 3>terms of whatever the hell I was going to sing

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 3>us a melody and how I was going to fit

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the words. But I got away with it. You know,

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:13.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not nice sometimes. Yeah, we're professional musicians here, We're

0:53:13.680 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be able to do this. Kind of stuff

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 3>we're supposed to able to rise to the moment.

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I did want to ask you about a couple more songs.

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>First of all, fifty two vincent black Lightning, which is

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>always a great moment in your concerts. What did what

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 1>went into that? We talked about the lyrics. It was

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just envy what went into the well? It sounds like

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a traditional rock and roll song in some ways, but

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's got a very different feel.

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so it's I mean the tune is very very simple,

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 3>nacial melody.

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Just a little bit of it. So we can tell

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:57.839
<v Speaker 1>me what your Meandian.

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Read to James, that's a fun motor by could feel

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 3>special in his social.

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:15.240
<v Speaker 5>Life, says James, too, red boy, what's up to you?

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 4>It's an some black light in nineteen fifty two, and

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:22.880
<v Speaker 4>I've seen you in the corners.

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm cafes.

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 4>It seems red hair and black leather my favorite color scheme.

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:37.399
<v Speaker 3>And they put him off behind and down to box.

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 4>Here that.

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I see, so seize the base note. But

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:03.799
<v Speaker 1>you're now you're using uh capo as well. But but

0:55:03.840 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the tune is in G.

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's it's a nominal G well, that's it's not

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 3>B flat. Yeah. Yeah, it's just kind of c G tuning.

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 3>So it works well for you know, the key of uh,

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:24.399
<v Speaker 3>you know where am I? Okay? The brief like Cad

0:55:24.960 --> 0:55:30.760
<v Speaker 3>and the Beef, And I thought I'd invented this tuning,

0:55:30.840 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 3>of course, and I've discovered that they've been using it

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 3>in Hawaii for you know, the last hundred years.

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, they didn't write that song, but.

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:41.800
<v Speaker 3>But in Hawaii there's something like two hundred guitar tunings.

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 3>You know that they basically explored everything. So so it's

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:47.919
<v Speaker 3>it's easy to be late to the game.

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>There's so much more I want to ask you, but

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's you've been very, very generous.

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I have been incredibly generous.

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you have been incredibly generous, very English, which I appreciate.

0:55:57.000 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:55:57.520 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And what's what's next? You did a great album last

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Ship to Shore.

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I keep writing stuff. I don't know where it

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 3>comes from, but I'm still writing songs, and I'm excited

0:56:08.440 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 3>about about the songs I'm writing, and I'm thinking I

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 3>want to get back in the studio and put on

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 3>another record as soon as possible.

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>What an absolute treat.

0:56:15.760 --> 0:56:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. To date.

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 2>An episode description, you'll find a link to a playlist

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>of our favorite Richard Thompson tracks. Be sure to check

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 2>out YouTube dot com slash Broken Record podcast to see

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 2>all of our video interviewers, and be sure to follow

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:33.879
<v Speaker 2>us on Instagram at the Broken Record Pod. You can

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:37.200
<v Speaker 2>follow us on Twitter at broken Record. Broken Record is

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:40.319
<v Speaker 2>produced and edited by Leah Rose, with marketing help from

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Eric Sandler and Jordan McMillan. Our engineer is Ben Tolliday.

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Broken Record is a production of Pushkin Industries and if

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 2>you like this show, please remember to share, rate, and

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:53.960
<v Speaker 2>review us on your podcast app. Our theme music's back

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:55.800
<v Speaker 2>any beats. I'm justin Richmond.