WEBVTT - Checking In on Brooks Koepka

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Ball in a fried egg Friday egg, the dreaded Frida egg,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Frida Egg Egg Egg, Frida egg bride egg.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Lie, I'm about ready to run off of the course.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Golf Podcast.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I am your host, Andy Johnson. Today I am excited.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm also apologetic. I had a computer issue and I'm

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on a loaner computer and I cannot get my microphone

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>interface to connect to this loaner, so you've got kind

0:00:59.920 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of of a headphone Mike audio. I'm apology. I get

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the computer back tomorrow, so we'll be back up better

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>at audio quality tomorrow. Other while we're doing announcements next week,

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the show's going to be released instead of first thing

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday morning, mid day Wednesday, so that will be just

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one little intricacy of next week. It's going to be

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just a slightly later release. We're just accommodating, you know,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>our guest who needs to record Wednesday morning, so we'll

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be right after we finished recording Wednesday morning. And today

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I am I'm very excited about this podcast. I think

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just a fun one. I like checking in with

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>these players, big name players who you know might be at,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a moment where you wonder, like where's this go.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've had a lot of moments with

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>brooks Keepka at this point, and you know, he didn't

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have like a I would say it was like necessarily

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>under whelming year in the in the scope of things,

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>but it definitely was a year with high expectations that

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't you know, delivered, And I think there's just a

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions about, like, you know, where's he where's

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>he at? So I am joined by Brentley Roman from

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Golf Channel, Joseph Lamonia from Friday Golf, and we dive

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>into brooks Kepka a little bit on the past, a

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit on his up bringing. This was not meant

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be like a full blown, like you know, detailed

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dig into everything he's done, you know, because there's a

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>lot he's got five majors, a lot of close calls,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but more you know, here's where we've been, here's where

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we are, and where do we think he's going in

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four? Obviously Live season kicks off now and

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're getting you know, it's crazy to say this. I'm

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>always surprised this kind of at this time of year.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not we're not that far away from the Masters.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>We're basically two months two months ay from the Masters.

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>It is going to be kind of the lead in there.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And as we've seen the last couple of years, the

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>pro golf calendar just goes so so quickly. Once you

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hit the Masters, it is just boom, boom boom, and

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>next thing you know, you're like, wait, we don't have

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a Major for eight more months, what's going on? So

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we're getting to that point where we got to start

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to think about the Masters a little bit more, and

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Rory's win a pebble last week is going

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to spark that. So, all right, before we get to

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>our podcast, let's talk about our friends. These are definitely

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>our friends, our friends at golf Genius. We've used golf

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Genius for the last handful of years to administer our events,

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>our Friday golf events, and let me tell you, like honestly,

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>when we started using them, it made our lives so much,

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>so much easier to run events. This is what they do.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>They provide tournament management software. It's a platform for managing

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>golf events in golf tournaments. They work in sixty plus

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>countries and at eleven thousand plus clubs, resorts, and public

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>golf courses. They also are used by PGA sessions, golf associations.

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>They say this these are my notes here saves the

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pro shop hours of prep work and helps deliver a

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>great experience for golfers. I don't think there's any more

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>true as someone who was in the trenches without this

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and trying to deliver a great golfer experience of an event.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>This is, without without a doubt true. This is a

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>company that makes running golf events way, way easier. I

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think you know if this is a no brainer if

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're trying to put together something, They've got

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>mobile scoring, live leader board. It's really fun if you're

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>playing in the event and you're able to follow. So

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>if your golf course doesn't have it, ask for it.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you run a golf course and you

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have it, you should get it. You're gonna run

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>better events with it. You can learn more at golf

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>genius dot com. That's golfgenius dot com. And big thanks

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to Golf Genius for our partnership. We love our partnership

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>with Golf Genius, right, it makes our Friday golf events

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>way better. So all right, let's get to talking about

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a different golf genius and golf genius on the course.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, without a doubt, I it's kind of like amazing.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you think back about brooks Kepka and all

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>these majors, it's like he's just been a force of

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>nature the last ten years. So let's talk about brooks Kepka.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, we are back where I'm excited about this podcast.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>We've done a couple of these player focused podcasts. We

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 1>did one on Jordan Speeth and as well as Justin Thomas.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Kind of it's almost like a state of the Union

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on these on these players. Today we're going to hit

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>on brooks Koepka. This is I think, like since I

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>got into this job, probably you know, the most I

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>think the player with the most high moments in the

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>last eight years. I think he's obviously won five major

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>championships in the last seven years. He's been a absolute

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>force at majors, but also is one of the more

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>unique players in the sense that major success doesn't necessarily

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>equal piling up wins on the PGA Tour or the

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Live Tour. He's been, you know, a a player that

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>rises to the occasion in the big moments when the

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>golf gets really hard, and been a player that you know,

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe he does, maybe he's loafin the other weeks,

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's just not expending his mental energy, but he

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>has been, without a doubt, the player I would say,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last seven years if you focus in on

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>major championship golf. I'm joined by Brentley Romine from Golf

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Channel as well as Joseph Lamannia from Brideay Golf to

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about this guys. I wanted to start it out.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I have so many vivid Brooks memories from his majors

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and all the majors he's won. What are what are

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the what's the memory like the shot or the moment

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or the stretch of golf that you remember the most.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I'll lead it off. So it's it's kind

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>of crazy because I think back in he's won what

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>five major titles now, and I was fortunate enough to

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>be at three of them, and I think the thing

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that sticks out the most to me is the battle

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>with Tiger Woods. It wasn't necessarily with Tiger because Tiger

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>was a couple of groups ahead, but I just remember

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>remember it being it felt like it was like one

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ten degrees. There were so many people there.

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Tiger made eight birdies and I think maybe his best

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>final round in a major ever at Bell Reeve and

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>still couldn't track down Brooks. And toward the end there

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>was a shot on sixteen it was like two hundred

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and forty seven yards and he just rips like this

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 2>towering iron shot to like six feet and that was

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>just the like that was the exclamation point on that win.

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 2>And then like the way it was on eighteen, there

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 2>was like this catwalk that you had to walk. It

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 2>was probably about almost one hundred yards, and there was

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>just the sea of fans, and I just remember like

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the image of him just walking across with Jenna and

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 2>then they like walk right past Tiger like coming out

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>of scoring. And so that's kind of like the image.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of funny out of all the places that

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 2>he's won, it's funny that Belle Reeve kind of sticks

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 2>out the most.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you said, you know, going toe to toe

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>with Tiger. But like I mean of the players of

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>this like kind of late late twenty tens into the twenties.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>He ran into Tiger at the at the nineteen Masters too,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Like that was another like he I don't know if

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there's any player that's like in that, you know, speak

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>justin Thomas, you know, Brooks, Kopka thing that have had

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>two run ins at majors with him, one he won,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>one he lost. Yeah.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, he also was paired with Tiger early at I

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 2>believe it was the twenty nineteen PGA, played the first

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>two rounds and he shot the course record, tying sixty

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>three at beth Page. And then one of his first

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>major rounds was with Tiger as well. He played the

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>final round o Kill in twenty twelve and shot seventy seven.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's funny to see the growth of Brooks from

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 2>a kid off the Challenge or in twenty twelve shooting

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>seventy seven, and it's like this guy doesn't have it

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>to Frankly, he's probably gotten the best out of Tiger

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 2>more often than not.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Tiger, you know asterisk when you got the best

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>out of Tiger, I think. But but yeah, I mean

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten the best out of most people in majors, right.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the resounding thing. Joseph, what's your moment?

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm cheating Andy because I'm not picking a moment,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm picking a quote. And this is probably one of

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 3>my favorite quotes about a golf forever.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 2>This is a quote I come.

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Back to every time Brooks is at the top of

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 3>a major championship leader board, which fairly often, which is

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 3>a quote from Steve Williams in twenty fifteen to Golf Digest,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 3>in which Steve Williams, who's seen some good golf, says,

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 3>once in a great while, a player comes along who

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 3>hits a golf ball the way it was meant to

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>be hit, powerful, piercing the perfect trajectory of the young

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 3>players out there. One I've seen has that special ballflight,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Brooks Koepka. He goes on, says a couple more lines,

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 3>and he says, obviously he's searching to find the other

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 3>parts of the puzzle. But I haven't seen a ball

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 3>flight like that since Tiger and before that Johnny Miller.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's twenty fifteen before Brooks is even won a major.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a really cool quote, and going back

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 3>preparing for this pod, watching some major championship final rounds

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 3>again some highlights from Brooks. I think that's what stands

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 3>out to me the most about Brooks is that ballflight.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.599
<v Speaker 3>That he's just striking it differently than other guys in

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 3>the field. See that at Aaron Hills, see that at Shinnacock.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 3>Just these unbelievable piercing stock fades, but also a lot

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 3>of draws with his long irons. There just aren't many

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>players in the modern era who can hit an iron

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 3>like Brooks.

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Kopkas a heavy ballflight, right, it feels like when he

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>hits the ball, it just everything like the sound. There

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is a distinct sound with his interaction with the ball

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the turf.

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the few guys who you can feel

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the shot. And I hate to compare him to like

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a player who hasn't really done much, But the only

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 2>other guy that I've kind of been around that is

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of known for that is Jack Maguire, another Florida

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 2>State guy. I know it's it's almost blasphemous to compare Kopka,

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's very similar and it's I don't know, maybe

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Florida State likes recruiting the same guys. I had another

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 2>quote that is my favorite Brooks quote. Since Joseph is

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 2>sharing quotes, this is the best Brooks Kopka quote from

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 2>his entire life. So he basically is has just been born.

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 2>He's laying in his bassinet. It's in the hospital, and

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the pediatrician comes in or the doctor comes in, and

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>he's he's looking at at Brooks the baby, and he

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>turns around to his mom Denise, and he says, quote,

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>this is the most serious child I've ever seen in

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 2>my life. End quote. And that to me, that quote

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>just sets the tone for Brooks Keopka. I mean, it's

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a perfect description of him.

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. I if we're talking about quotes, one of my

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite things he said where You're Going was the I'm

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>only playing against a couple guys in a major. I

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>think about that all the time because I it's legitimately

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>how I used to think about State Am qualifiers, and

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Brooks like like to me that it's wild that Brooks

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>took the same philosophy that I would about like trying

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to qualify for State Am to a major championship, and

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the theory is like half the guys shouldn't be there. Yeah,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>half the guys that should be there aren't going to

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>play well. And then with Brooks, he took it to

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like a whole, like I'm better than the half the

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>guys that should be there that are playing well. And

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>then it comes down to like I only have to

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>beat a couple guys that are a major. They're easier

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. And I I mean, I find it

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing because like it's it kind of speaks to like

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>that supreme supreme talent, supreme confidence, but also like this

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this understanding of really how tournament golf works. You know,

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I think like him and DJ got cast into this

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>like kind of bombers, like they're these the Bash brothers,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and like DJ given each other a needle the quotes

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>from DJ. But I think like when you get down

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>deep rooted into each of them, they are like golf

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>savants in terms of like the understanding of golf and

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>competitive golf. And there is like there's a layer to

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Kopka of like physicality. I think that also you know

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>comes through in and and Tim and he intimidates other players.

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Andy you talk about golf intelligence and going to moments

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 3>from Brooks's career that stand out one that hadn't stood

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 3>out to me that I went back and watched and

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>was struck by. And I'm curious if either of you

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 3>guys remember this, but the final round at Shinnakock Brooks'

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 3>is Bogie on eleven is really interesting to go back

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 3>and watch where he pulls this iron shot long left

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 3>and he's he's in jail, and he's.

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Isn't he playing with DJ? I think he's paired with

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>DJ too. I believe you're I believe you're correct. I

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 2>believe you're correct.

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Brooks knows he can't leave that chip shot short, and

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 3>that's another thing that I think Dustin Johnson has spoken

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 3>to before, like when he's short sighted, he's not going

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 3>to go for the hero shot and potentially leave himself

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>in jail. So Brooks like hits it over and into

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the bunker and it's not in a good spot, but

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't going to leave it short and makes an

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 3>incredible up and down for Bogey that he makes like

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 3>a fifteen footer just to save that. Boguey goes on

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 3>to win the tournament, obviously by one. I'd kind of

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 3>forgotten about that moment, but for as good of a

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>ball striker as Brooks is. When you go back and

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 3>watch a lot of these majors. He also puts incredibly

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 3>well and holds so many crucial putts that kind of

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>look nonchalant, But it's this relentless ball striking paired with

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 3>an ability to get up and down when it counts

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>and to make a lot of clutch putts, So that

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 3>that Bogue in particular stood out to me. And I

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>was curious if either of you even remembered that, because

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 3>I had not.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember that. I like my moment is the back

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>nine at Shancock, Really the entire back nine. I thought

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that was. You know, that was a day where where

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>players were just like tapping out and it was like

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a total like succession of like, oh maybe this guy

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>could win. Oh he's gone, you know. And at the

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, the man left standing was Brooks Kopka.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And it was because of the way, like he astutely

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>calling out eleven. One that I always will never forget

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>is fourteen, the long par four where he had to

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>chip out because he drove it into the tall stuff.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>He chips out and he's got I think it was,

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I didn't rewatch this but as I remember,

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he had like about sixty yard wedge to front pin,

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>not an easy shot downwind, and he bounces that wedge

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>up to like, you know, fourteen feet or so and

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>makes the putt. And I think like the through line

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of all Brooks's majors is like just like he never

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>gives stuff away, you know, and it is like the

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>constant momentum whenever he needed the momentum putt to make

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the par or in the case of the eleventh hole

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of bogie, like he never gave away that extra shot

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of kept kept the train on the tracks.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And going in Shinnakok to me is like the tournament

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that magnifies and like shows off everything because every guy

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of bailed out of that tournament.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Well he was kind of forgotten too going into that

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>tournament because remember he had that risk entry at the

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>end of the previous year. He missed the Masters that year,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think it was one of those things where

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>it was one of those a long list of Brooks

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 2>being slided examples where he wasn't a he may not

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 2>have been mentioned on like a Golf Channel notables list

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>or something, and so that was the chip on his

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>shoulder that week, and I think he almost I say almost,

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 2>but he got off to a really bad start that

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 2>tournament too. He was something like seven over through his

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>first twenty one or twenty two holes and then played

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 2>the rest in six under which that was of course,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 2>the we lost the golf course Saturday. Phil was, you know,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 2>putting around on the green and one of my favorite

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>moments too from that tournament, and this doesn't have much

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to do with Brooks, but do you remember Phil and

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the kid with the Donald Duck hat in the final

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 2>round on Sunday? There was a kid who had a

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Duck hat and Phil every hole would go over

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>and rub it, and there was there's a video online

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>but for some reason that just kind of sticks out,

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>but not to get on a huge tangent. But yeah, no,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that was a crazy week. That was I don't know,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>seeing like mentioning that shot on fourteen Andy where he

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 2>was like hitting out of the like cabbage, like, I

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I feel like people were so surprised that

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 2>he was able to come back from that injury so quickly,

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>and that just sets the table for all of these

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>injuries pretty much like with the knee surgery and the Masters,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 2>and I think it just boils down to the fact

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 2>that Brooks is just tougher than everybody else, and it's

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 2>always kind of been that way.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean that parlays a little bit into coming up.

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think like he he took obviously this is very

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>well pubblic size, but he took a different path to

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour. He went up through the Challenge Tour.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>He played in Europe, and his coming out party was

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>really like the Pinehurst US Open is where everybody he

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>became a household name, the Martin Kaimer Pinehurst US Open.

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's this Brooks Kepka, this young big American player

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>who you know, had been playing in Europe, that that

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of burst on the scene there. Obviously, the Waste

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Management win was his first one. But Brentley Near, you've

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>covered amateur and college and you know, pro golf for

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of years now, what was kind of Brooks

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>as an amateur and what was he thought of as

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>as a you know, heading into college and then turning professional.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>What was he considered he was.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 2>Along the lines of a player that that was a

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 2>very regional player, like we've seen some of those in

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 2>the past. Decade or so with maybe a Maverick McNeil

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 2>or Justin So and a lot of it was necessity,

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Like the Kopkaz didn't have a lot of money growing up.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 2>They obviously had two, you know, budding golf talents to

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 2>fund their careers. So Brooks played a lot a lot

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 2>of fjt's in Florida and he really wasn't He was

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 2>a good player. He won an AJGA, he had a

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 2>bunch of top tens. He would play in their invitationals,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>but he wasn't a I'm trying to think of the

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 2>guys in his recruiting class, but he wasn't a blame barber.

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Or there was a kid named Wesley Graham who was

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 2>also really good who didn't quite pan out. But I

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 2>think when he went to Florida State he was kind

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of known as this hotthead like he had a lot

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 2>of talent, had these broad shoulders, had the ball striking,

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 2>had the sound all that, like, he had everything he wanted.

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 2>But he was an absolute like head case. And Chris Malloy,

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 2>who's the head coach at Ole Miss now, he was

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the assistant at Florida State under Trey Jones, And I

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>mean there's stories where Molloy would, you know, be making

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Kopka run stadiums and he'd be at the bottom with

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 2>the trash can and Kopka would like puke into the

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 2>trash can and then head right back up the stairs

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 2>to do it like another stadium. And there was a

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 2>five second roll too in college where Brooks like because

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 2>he would break clubs and so he basically had to

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 2>put the club in the bag within five seconds otherwise

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 2>he'd get you know, he'd have to run stadiums or

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>do extra gym time. But then after a while, like

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>none of that would work because Brooks just thought of

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the stadiums as, oh, that's just my cardio for the day.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Like he just you couldn't quite crack him. And it's

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>funny because I talked to Maloy the other day and

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I was asking him, like, when was the turning point?

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Because Brooks now is known as this what like this uncrackable,

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 2>like just mental force. But I'm like, when did it?

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>When was the turning point for him? And I think

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>it was really it was a sophomore year. His mom

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 2>had had just been diagnosed with cancer towards the end

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 2>of that previous year and you know, so Brooks was

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>dealing with that, but then also he was he was

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>contending at their home tournament and he blew a shot

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 2>out of bounds and he just started f bombing and

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 2>just really making a scene of himself, and he lost

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 2>so much focus that he gets in signs his card

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 2>and he signs for the wrong score, and so he

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 2>decuses himself and the team goes from beating I forget

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 2>who they were playing. It might have been like Georgia

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Tech or something, but or Virginia beating them by nine

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 2>by only beating them by one. And that moment, like

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>he felt like he almost left his teammates down, was

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 2>the moment where he kind of realized, all right, I

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 2>have to grow up. And it obviously wasn't a complete

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 2>one eighty after that, but that was kind of the

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.959
<v Speaker 2>moment where he went from being a good college player

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 2>with a hot head to actually putting together turn and

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 2>being a first team All American and leading them to

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 2>the n C Double A championship in twenty twelve and

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 2>really being the reason why they even had a chance

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>at match play. That's another interesting story, uh that twenty twelve,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Like we talked about shots for for the longest time.

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 2>He said, the most clutch situation that he's ever been

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 2>in was at Riviera in twenty twelve. He's on the

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 2>eighteenth green, Daniel Berger is just throwing up all over himself.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Three pet of the green.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Just a drive vibe.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 2>Well this this, this is a worthy drive by, just

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 2>a drive by. Well, I think Daniel Berger signed where.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna sign up for a Burger drive by here Bentley.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 2>No, so I mean Burger. I've talked to Berger about this.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 2>It's in my oral history of this n Cuba Championship.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 2>But so Brooks had like a seven foot ver par

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 2>slider on on eighteen at riv and it was he

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 2>was in the last group, so he knew what it meant,

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and it was to send his team into a playoff

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 2>with Kent State UH for the final spot and match plays.

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 2>So he makes it and he called that the most

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 2>high pressure putt for gosh for years, and you know,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 2>to button up this story. The next morning they go

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 2>out and it's a playoff. They play five two five

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 2>SS in its best aggregate score. In the final group

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that Brooks is in is is Koepka. Dani old Berger,

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 2>who's a freshman and then Corey Connors Pendy and Matthwes.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 2>So you have five tour players. Yeah, five players, all

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 2>tour players, all in this playoff. And Daniel Berger makes

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>a double bogie basically from from the fairway. He hit

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 2>it like forty yards short of the green and then

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 2>flubbed the chip and missed a pie. It was awful,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and Kopka made the only par I think ford on

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Forida State, But yeah, Kent State ended up winning that

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 2>playoff without making a par which was pretty crazy. But yeah,

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 2>I talked to Brooks about that in a few years back,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and the only thing he said was the only thing

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 2>he remembers from that NCAA championship is that Burger choked,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 2>like to this day. Just he's like, yeah, I remember

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Burger choking Bridley. I mean, hopefully this isn't I don't

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>think this is jumping ahead too much. Brooks comes out

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to the Challenge Tour right a little bit of an

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 2>unconventional route, Like I think, now this is generalizing, but

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 2>each year there's a couple of college players where it's like,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 2>all right, that might be a tour player. How ha

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>was Brooks thought of when he left college? Because I

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like It's hard to go back in time and

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 2>remember exactly unless you followed college golf super closely what

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 2>you thought of Brooks kept as a prospect at the time, Like, yeah,

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 2>how are people thinking about him? I mean he was

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>probably I mean he won three times in college. He

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>had a really consistent you know, last couple of seasons

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 2>too to where he was. I mean he was finishing

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>T seven and T eleven things like that. He was

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 2>really solid. I would say he was probably a top

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 2>ten guy coming out, But back then it was it

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 2>was weird. It seemed like you had to be, you know,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the top three guys in wagger to get starts,

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 2>like to get sponsor exemptions. And that was the big

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 2>thing and the big reason why he went to the

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Challenge Tour. And I believe I forget who even recommended it.

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>It might have been Rocky Hambricks, his agent recommended him

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 2>go to the Challenge Tour, but it was because he

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>didn't get any sponsor exemptions.

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like this through line with Brooks of like

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>never really being respected, like the big name, like and

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>he becomes through his play a force in the game,

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>but like, I mean, you know it, he never was

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the blue like effective golf blue bloods like

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about. He was never the Speeth or Justin Thomas,

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know in terms of like the fanfare and accolades

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything, and didn't get the exemptions, and it created

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this other path. But then that continues with like when

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he is talking about these these beat like these slights.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it like became a fabric of who he

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>was as a competitor or who he is as a competitor.

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that that was the That was like a

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 2>golden age of college golf too. I mean, right in

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that kind of three year period between like twenty eleven

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 2>and twenty thirteen, you had Patrick Cantley turning pro, you

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>had speech turning pro, you had Justin Thomas turning pro.

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean obviously Kopka. So I mean it was just

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 2>all these Thomas Peters. I mean, we can't forget Thomas Peters,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the NC doublea individual champion that year at riv.

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Where did he go to school?

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>He went to Illinois? Yeah, oh there, Hey, Illinois is

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>really good at making match play. I'll give you that.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, no, that that challenge to our like excursion.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it was maybe late last year that video

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of Brooks riding around in that little car in India,

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>like while he was on the Challenge Store and he's

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 2>doing like a vlog and he's just loving it. It's

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 2>so weird because I feel like Brooks loves the team

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>aspect and like he'll tell you that, but then there's

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>times where he'd also say, like I don't want to

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>be friends with any of these guys, like I don't

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 2>have any of their phone numbers saved. And so I've

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 2>always kind of treaded lightly with kind of what comes

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>out of Brooks's mouth, just because I think sometimes he

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 2>tries to say things, you know, to kind of trick

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 2>his mind into believing something, and maybe sometimes he contradicts himself.

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>But but yeah, I think deep down, Brooks has always

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of liked, maybe not so much the team aspect

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 2>of the Challenge Tour, but I think he's always liked

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 2>this kind of self torture that that's sort of like

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>running the stadiums in college, or you know, cramming, you know,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 2>four guys in a car riding around Kazakhstan and you know,

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>sleeping in his car and things like that. I think

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>he enjoys that. I think he enjoys it being tough,

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and he enjoys the grind and it's kind of almost

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Navy Seal type where you kind of performed the best

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 2>when you're in pain, and you know, in these high

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 2>pressure situations, and it's.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also something like I you know, he

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously he's made many comments through the years about how

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>golf is in real sport, and you know, he wanted

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a baseball player and stuff, and I imagine

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that when he was playing the Challenge Tour, there was

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>an aspect of it that probably in his mind made

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it feel like minor league baseball, you know, and the

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>things that minor league baseball players go through to you know,

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to the to the you know, to the

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>big leagues.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>His first win on the Challenge Tour was fifty four

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>holes too, so everything kind of comes back around again. Hey,

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>he beat your guy up the van and one of

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>those Challenge story events.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it depends on what you say you beat.

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>He won that event, but he finished third on the

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Order of Merit that year, and you know, finished number

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>one is Pavan, so you know who really won. So

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he goes to the Challenge Tour, he wins his first

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>year on Challenge Tour, he didn't get like in the

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Chilge Tour, you have to finish in the top five.

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for people that don't know what the Challenge

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Tour is, it is it is like the It's the

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>European Tours version of the corn Faery Tour, which is

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like a way more thrifty corn ferry Tour, way

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>less money and way more obscure venues. I mean you're

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you're traveled. Yeah, you're going all over the world and

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like to really random places such as Kazakhstown.

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So, anyways, he wins in his first year, and then

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the next year he won three times on the Challenge Tour,

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 1>which got him a third place spot on the Order Merit,

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>which then earned his European Tour card. So year is

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, and he's a European Tour player at this point,

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>so kind of just give everybody an idea of where

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we're at on the Kopka, you know train. So twenty fourteen,

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>he's got his European Tour card, He's played in a

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of majors, and this is where the big kind

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of breakout comes at the US Open, where he finishes fourth.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>He goes on later in the year to win on

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the on the European Tour. He won late in the season,

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>which you know catapulted him up into where he got

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he got his PGA Tour card through World

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>ranking correct, Well.

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>No, so, so he got it through his PGA Tour card. Yeah,

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 2>he actually got it through like the not the special

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>temporary but like with through non member points. And I

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>think it was at Pinehurst that he actually locked up

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>his card when he was t four there in twenty fourteen.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned how that was kind of his breakound Andy,

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 2>there was one golf legend who that was not the

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 2>moment where he realized too brooks Keptka won because there's

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 2>a moment at Valhalla at the PGA later that year

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 2>where Tom Watson is he's looking for Harris English for

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>something and he comes across brooks Kepka's group and Kepka

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 2>hits a drive and he's walking down the fairway and

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Tom Watson is talking to him and he says, what

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>club are you ahead? Pro at So he mistook brooks

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Kopka for aal at the twenty fourteen PGA. It just

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 2>it never ends with.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Them Hey, can we go a little on that, Like,

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 3>as we're talking about the slights, I do feel like

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 3>that's a massive part of brooks Kepka's journey and just

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 3>looking through like it wasn't on the Walker Cup, right,

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Brentley revisiting the twenty fifteen President's Cup when you go

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 3>back and look at him not being a Captain's pick

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 3>and them going with Bill Haas and JB. Holmes instead,

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 3>despite Brooks won that year in Phoenix, as I believe

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 3>both JB. Holmes and Bill Haas also won that year,

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 3>but Brooks's results in majors put theirs to shame in

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifteen. In twenty fifteen, Brooks made the cut in

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 3>all four majors, finished tenth at the Open, fifth at

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 3>the PGA, eighteenth at the US Opened, thirty third at

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the Masters. Like he made the cut in all four,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 3>he's playing very well, has a win, and doesn't get

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 3>picked for the President's Cup team. When you just pile

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that on him being his name being mispronounced at the

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 3>US Open at Aaron Hills, I believe in his winning.

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's during the trophy ceremony, not being listed as

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 3>a notable as Brentley already has alluded to, and I

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 3>believe that was maybe the twenty eighteen US opened, despite

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.359
<v Speaker 3>being the defending champion. I think golf channels showed the

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 3>notables during the first round and Brooks was not mentioned,

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and he might have even tweeted about that, like the

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Boys Club, and Brook's not really feeling a part of it,

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 3>always being slighted, like it's not all a figment of

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 3>his imagination. It feels like there are a lot of

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 3>slights along his journey, which probably informs the person he is.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that's necessarily why he went to

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 3>live There's there's a lot of reasons for that, but

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 3>it is kind of interesting to think about him always

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 3>being overlooked, maybe never taken quite as seriously as some

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 3>of his peers.

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Well remember Brandle. The Brandle stuff when when Brandal was

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 2>doing the podcast with HYMI man, that was a great podcast.

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:35.919
<v Speaker 2>I wish that was still going on, But he said

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>something like himI asked him, and this was after Tiger

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 2>won the twenty nineteen Masters, and he said something like,

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>when Tiger plays Brandle and he's healthy, like, is he

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the best player still? And Brandal said yes, basically in

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a roundabout way, and then and then he said the

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 2>only two players who can come close to him are

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 2>DJ and Rory, and then he mentioned Ram and then

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 2>he mentioned Speed. He didn't even Kopka, and that was

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 2>when Keopka tweeted the brandle with the clown nose. And

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 2>then that's same because that was right around that was

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 2>in May, right before Beth Page and that same championship.

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 2>The pre tournament presser. Brooks's I remember it was right

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 2>after Tigers, and Tigers is jam packed. It's you know,

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 2>it's standing room only, and as soon as Tiger's done,

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Brooks is walking in. In the media, it's just a

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 2>mass exodus. And you know, some people stayed, but Brooks

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 2>definitely noticed half the room just getting up and leaving

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 2>once Tiger was done speaking. And Brooks's I mean, Brooks is,

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, the defending champion and already a three time

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 2>major winner at the time, So I mean, it's just

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>it's crazy. And I feel like I feel like I

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 2>sided with Brooks on this too, because I feel like,

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe you know, us as journalists kind of

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 2>were off put by the by the kacky, by the

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.919
<v Speaker 2>attitude and maybe didn't give him quite the do that

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 2>he may have deserved.

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can get. I get both sides. And I

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>think like one of the things is like great competitors.

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I you watch the last dance and he get it.

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>You watch some of the things that Michael Jordan used

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to do to get up for the random Tuesday night,

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, Wizards game and or bullets then game, and

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like, this is what crazy competitors do. And I

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think like Brooks absolutely used all this fuel for the

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>betterment of his golf game, right, Like he is someone

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that like that it helps provide an edge. I think

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>like it shows when he doesn't have an edge, he

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really perform. And that's the explanation I think on

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour stuff is that the majors provided that

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>heightened important and pressure that he kind of needs to

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>play his best level of golf.

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 3>What was it that he said before the final round

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 3>at Harding Park. Didn't he say something like all these guys,

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 3>like none of them have win won a major, DJ

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 3>only has one. I don't even know a lot of

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:20.959
<v Speaker 3>the other guys.

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 2>He basically called a shot on the eve of the

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 2>final round, right, and said that he was going to win.

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 3>Basically just feels like to your point, Andy, like he

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 3>has always tried to find those ways to motivate himself,

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 3>whether he's making them up or not, and probably often not,

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 3>like he was just straight up overlooked in a lot

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 3>of situations.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 1>So the story of Brooks is obviously majors, and as

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to, twenty fifteen's when it starts to percolate.

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>This is where things are starting to happen in majors

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>with Brooks. He goes thirty third at the Masters, first

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Masters he ever played in eighteenth of the US Opened.

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 1>This was after last year's T four. Then he goes

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:02.439
<v Speaker 1>T ten, T five. The next year he plays three

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the four. He goes T twenty one, T thirteen,

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>misses the Open and plays the PGA, finishes fourth there,

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it gets us to twenty seventeen. He finishes

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>eleventh in the Masters. He wins the US Open. So

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he wins the twenty seventeen US Open. That's his first

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>US Open. That is at Aaron Hills. You know, I

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>honestly think like people didn't count this as a major

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>because of the scoring at Aaron Hills. There was like, again,

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>he wins a major and people. I think there are

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 1>people that were upset that JT didn't win, you know

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that about how the golf course set up, But it's

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of treated like it wasn't a major, Like

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>there are people all of this shouldn't count because it

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>was Aaron Hills and so on and so forth, and

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think this is just like another thing

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that Brooks can turn into us, Like I love this Major.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I joined it too. When I look back, I really

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>loved it.

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 3>If you go back and watch it, how his ball

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 3>striking is absolutely insane. He missed like ten greens the

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 3>entire tournament and only made like he didn't make a

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 3>double bogie and he and he only made one bogie

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 3>on the back nine the entire week.

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 2>It was just insane. It's a stripe show.

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>He was so good. And it's like I think, like

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the discourse got so bad that week with the width

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of Aaron Hills, because I think, honestly, why the discourse

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>went so south on the weekend was that people didn't

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>want Brooks Kopka to win, and they wanted something from

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the golf course to stand in the way of him winning.

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is probably is if you made it

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a narrow golf course, he would have won by even more.

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that that was a really cool mat. I mean,

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Scotty was the low am that week, Brian, and that

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 2>was that was Xanders Xander's kind of coming out party.

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Two in majors.

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 3>JT got a nuclear on Saturday, right, And I think

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 3>that's to your point Andy, people wanted him to.

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Win HYDECKI was right there too.

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 2>That might have been big Stews first US Open too.

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That's yeah. I mean well, and at that time, it's

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>also important to think I was I walked a practice

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>round with Jordan Speith and at this time Jordan Speith

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and Cameron McCormick were talking about how to get to

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen Majors, like what had to happen, and you just

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>think about like the sliding doors the moment, like I

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:40.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think they knew that the the major championship player

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>from that era was going to play the event, and

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't them, you know.

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that that was interesting because Brooks came into

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 2>that that major not playing that well. You think he

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 2>was like T thirty seven in Memphis the week before,

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>he had missed forrest six cuts to start that year

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 2>had been like outside the top thirty for a month

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 2>at that time, and there's like a really famous story

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 2>about him and Pete Cowen that week and basically Pete

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Cowen just lit into him, and it kind of even

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 2>goes back to college golf, like I feel like Brooks's dad,

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Bob basically gave the keys to like Brooks's coaches, like

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 2>whoever was coaching. I mean, I think it continued to

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the pros. You basically had to almost physically beat Brooks

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Kepka up to get him to listen. And I think

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 2>this is like a really famous story with Pete Cowen

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 2>that week. He just ripped into him and Brooks ended

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 2>up signing a flag for him afterwards and said thanks

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 2>for getting on my ass or something like that. And

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 2>there's been I think some moments where Brooks has kind

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 2>of asked Pete to do the same thing, and I

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 2>think after this year's Masters was another moment like that.

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, going back and kind of researching this, that

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 2>was something that came up was this this moment with

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Pete where he basically just said you need to have

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 2>an attitude of a champion and stop being like a

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 2>petulant child, and he did.

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I'll just say, I mean talk about the major championship performances,

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 3>and there are a bunch of have some stats pulled

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 3>on that. I think what was enlightening and going through

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 3>this deep dive on Kopka is how many majors he

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 3>almost won. And I think it's easy to overlook that

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 3>sometimes and correct me if I'm missing one. But he

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.439
<v Speaker 3>almost won at Pebble twenty nineteen, almost won the twenty

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.919
<v Speaker 3>nineteen Masters. He's in the mix with Tiger, almost wins

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 3>a Harding Park right that. We just referenced that quote

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 3>from the night before almost wins Kiowa with Phil, where

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Phil Slow plays him almost won the twenty twenty three Masters.

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 3>It looked like he was going to win the twenty

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 3>twenty three Masters before he kind of starts to fall

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 3>apart and rom overtakes him. But that's five more right there.

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 3>That he won five, and he could still win a

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 3>couple more.

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 2>We could.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to say that all five of those

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 3>could have gone his way, but he easily could be

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 3>standing here with seven right now.

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 2>He said that too, Like he said, I think the

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 2>quote was I should have eight majors.

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I The other thing about it is like it's so

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>different than like a Faldo who won six and it's

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like wait, like he won basically every time he had

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win, he won, you know.

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think that Brooks Brooks has this crazy conversion

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 2>rate too. I think Brooks has converted like four or

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 2>five fifty four hole leads as well, the only one

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 2>not being maybe Tiger.

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 3>One stat I found really interesting that just speaks to

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 3>how often Brooks has been in the mix. He puts

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 3>together a bunch of top fives essentially over an eight

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 3>year period, right, twenty seventeen to twenty twenty three or

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:57.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty yeah, twenty's I think twenty fifteen to twenty twenty

0:44:57.840 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 3>three is like really when he does a lot of

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 3>his damage. The stat I wanted to poll is like,

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 3>who has put together the most top fives in an

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 3>eight year period in the twenty first century?

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think Brooks here that his max is like

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 3>twenty either twenty fifteen through twenty twenty two. That's that's

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 3>eight years or twenty sixteen to twenty twenty three. I

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 3>can't remember, Tiger. This is major nineteen. Sorry that this

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 3>is Major's only right, Major's only right, most top fives

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 3>in an eight year period. Tiger had nineteen, Ernie Els

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 3>had fourteen, Brooks and Phil both had twelve, and Spif

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 3>had eleven and then it drops off after there. It's

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.479
<v Speaker 3>pretty incredible those names that Brooks is surrounded by. And

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:42.839
<v Speaker 3>credit to the Spif for being up there too as

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 3>one of the other players who's more of a younger generation.

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, you're talking about Brooks, Phil, Ernie and Tiger.

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I the major stuff's crazy. It's like and I think

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>like the other thing that people like have a hard

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>time with Brooks and like the love of Brooks is

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he's just not rolling up and winning at and uh

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know other non major events, right, Like I think

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there's like we just saw it with Rory winning at Pebble,

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Like how big of a deal it is and how

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>much like love, how love love love people have for

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>him winning there, and it's like Brooks would just go

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>finish like T thirty two for a month.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah he show he he.

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 2>I think people didn't like the fact that he not

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 2>only did he not care, but he told you that

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 2>he didn't care about him And I think that really

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 2>rubbed people the wrong way because it's like, well, if

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 2>you play on the PGA Tour, bro like like no

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 2>one wants to Like I don't know. I feel like

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 2>he's he's been so negative to the point of maybe

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 2>making an effort to try to be like like Michael

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Jordan or be like one of those guys, and and

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 2>it's just not himself because as we've talked about, like

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Brooks really cares what people think about him, and he

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 2>really cares about his standing in the game, but mentally

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 2>like he wants to be the other guy. And so

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I think he's done a lot of things in his

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 2>career that being one of them, to where he's maybe

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 2>sabotaged himself because he's trying to be someone that he's not.

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I think it's all it's been

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like all part of the the aura, right, and I

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>think like part of the I think there has to

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be something with the players too, where they have to

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder how this guy does it where he just doesn't.

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 1>He shuts off seemingly for most of the year and

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>then comes every major comes out and kicks our ass,

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like how's he doing this? You know?

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 2>So I was talking with Luke Clanton last year and

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>this was right around the time, he was winning the

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 2>three straight college events in the spring, and he won

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the Vast Bar, which is down at the Floridian where

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Brooks practices, and Brooks spent some time with the team,

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and and that's another thing about Brooks too, is I

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 2>think he did he does a lot of things behind

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the scenes too, Like he he sent the private jet

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:17.959
<v Speaker 2>for Florida State like his own jet, and had flew

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 2>him down, spent like a day with him. But he

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 2>was practicing with with Luke, and Luke asked him like

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty much that thought, Andy, like how does he how

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 2>does he do it? And I think the quote was

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Brooks told Luke he basically just goes brain dead, like

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 2>he tries to play golf brain dead to where he's

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 2>not thinking about anything. And that's what he said, that's

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 2>very hard to do.

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 3>In the Full Swing Netflix documentary, right is the episode

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 3>that profiles Brooks and Scottie, and Brooks says that that

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 3>when Scotty's playing well, he's not thinking about a single thing.

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:54.879
<v Speaker 3>And Brooks wasn't in that place mentally at the time

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 3>of that interview. So I think that only just reinforces

0:48:57.400 --> 0:48:58.720
<v Speaker 3>that Clinton advice.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was one tournament one major too. It might

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 2>have been twenty twenty three or twenty nineteen against Tiger,

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 2>where Ricky Elliott talked about Brooks not being able to

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 2>turn off the outside noise, like he could hear everything

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 2>that everyone was saying in the gallery and like it

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 2>really messed with him. It might have been twenty twenty

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 2>three because that was also when Brooks afterwards he wouldn't

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 2>and spent like all night with his buddy when he

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 2>got home, and they went like shot by shot and

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 2>they went through like what was going through his head,

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 2>and he was basically he like diagnosed it and was

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 2>like I just wanted it way too much and I

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:41.839
<v Speaker 2>kept thinking about like too much stuff. And so yeah,

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean I've always like I know, I say, like,

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, Brooks kind of talks out both of them

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 2>into his mouth. But he's always been one of my

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 2>favorite players, just because obviously of the major like the

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 2>major record, but I don't know, just like the toughness too,

0:49:56.800 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 2>and kind of the ability to do things that not

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 2>a lot of guys could do.

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I he's so on his career, He's got eighteen top

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tens and majors and thirty seven starts, roughly like a

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent top ten percentage at you know, he's got

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:21.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty or I guess he's in forty two eighteen forty two,

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 1>so he's a little below fifty percent. Twenty five top

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty fives in forty two events. Then the top fives

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is so impressive. Fourteen you know, fourteen top top fives

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and forty two events, it's nuts. And then you obviously

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have the five wins. It's I feel like we're having

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this discussion because it feels like kind of another moment.

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been a few moments of Brooks, you know,

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the injuries, the knee in particular. I think there's a

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:59.320
<v Speaker 1>moment where he himself, along with the hip, thought it

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 1>might be over, you know, and obviously that he had

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the resurgent twenty three, which you know he saw he

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:10.879
<v Speaker 1>almost won the Masters. John Rahm ended up winning that one,

0:51:11.120 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and he wins okill. And I think like a lot

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of people had pretty high expectations of Brooks in twenty

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>four and it was met with barely lackluster play. He

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>won twice on the Live Tour, whatever that means, and

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 1>in the majors he made the cut at all of them.

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:33.319
<v Speaker 1>But he wasn't really a factor in any of them,

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:35.879
<v Speaker 1>which was you know, I think when when we've had

0:51:35.960 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>healthy Brooks Keopka, you you expect him to be there

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 1>late on the weekend, and that just wasn't the case

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. So it kind of I think leaves us

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with are we are we on the Are we at

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the kep geyer? Are we on the backside?

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Are Is there a few more years of really high

0:51:54.160 --> 0:51:54.760
<v Speaker 1>level play?

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 2>I think so, And I don't think this past year

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 2>was necessary really as much to do with health in

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the body as you know, maybe you know the injuries

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 2>before that, like like you mentioned the knee cap and

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the knee that also kind of led to the hip injury,

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 2>which we see so often with these guys. They try

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to play hurt and they end up doing something to

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 2>injure another part of their body. But I think the

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.359
<v Speaker 2>big thing last year, which was just the putting. And

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I've always thought amongst the you know, the the elite

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 2>major players in the game the last decade, you know,

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 2>your your Rory's, your Speece, your your DJs, I've always

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.319
<v Speaker 2>thought like Brooks was the best putter out of all

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 2>the guys who could ball strike you to death, Like

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:45.440
<v Speaker 2>he was also the best putter, and he was as

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 2>high as like fifth strokes game putting back in sixteen seventeen,

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:52.120
<v Speaker 2>back when he won that first one, And he was

0:52:52.160 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 2>always kind of around that twenty to forty range on

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.879
<v Speaker 2>tour and even better in the majors, and this year

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 2>clearly uncomfortable on the greens, Like if you extrapolate kind

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 2>of his strokes gained, and you know, and correct me

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.399
<v Speaker 2>if I'm wrong, Joseph too, because you're a lot better

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 2>with the stats than me. But basically, just looking at

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:14.440
<v Speaker 2>those four majors that he played, he lost something around

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 2>like zero point three four or five strokes on the greens,

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 2>and that would have ranked like one hundred and sixtieth

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 2>on tour last year. And I know that he'd switch

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 2>putters before the US Open, so he was clearly like

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 2>that was the part of his game that really let

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.879
<v Speaker 2>him down. And Tita Green stats like if you would

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 2>have just taken those four major tournaments, he would have

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 2>ranked all behind only Scotty for the year. So like,

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the putting is might be the I

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:44.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I feel like putting's always kind of the

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 2>easiest thing to get back sometimes, especially if you have

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 2>been a good putter.

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you feel, andy, Like I know,

0:53:51.800 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 3>at moments i've felt like Brooks is probably or towards

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:57.879
<v Speaker 3>the end, I feel a lot.

0:53:58.280 --> 0:53:59.400
<v Speaker 1>He's thirty four.

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, important to call that. I feel less that

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 3>way now. I think we just see that the true

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:10.479
<v Speaker 3>greats can do it at thirty eight, like we've seen

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Justin Rose and Adam Scott and Sergio Garcia play into

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 3>their forties. I don't know that Brooks Kopka is gonna

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 3>have that same longevity, but I think even if it's

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 3>two years from now, like we could see underwhelming results

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:26.240
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty five from Brooks and majors and then

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.319
<v Speaker 3>him get a little healthier and put a couple good

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 3>majors together when he's thirty six thirty seven. Like, it's

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 3>not like he's only been involved in the five majors

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:38.239
<v Speaker 3>that he's won. Like, as we've already mentioned, he's been

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:40.879
<v Speaker 3>in the top five so often that I think it'd

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 3>be a little crazy to discount him in general. But

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of this, there's so much variance, Like he

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:50.840
<v Speaker 3>could show up and miss the CUD. It'll never surprise me,

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 3>but he also could show up and win. I think

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 3>what I would love to see from Brooks, and I'm

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a little skeptical love is like, could he put together

0:54:56.760 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 3>another year where he's in the top fifteen and all

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 3>four majors, or like in the top eight and three

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 3>of them, Like, I think that's probably pretty unlikely, but

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised to see him win another one.

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Where are you Andy?

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's tricky now with Brooks because you just

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see him very much, right, and he just kind

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of pops up. And I think this has been an issue,

0:55:21.560 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and obviously it wasn't in twenty twenty three for him

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>when he won and finished almost won the Masters. But like,

0:55:29.239 --> 0:55:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think that lives the best place to

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:36.839
<v Speaker 1>prepare for majors, right, you had the Eugenio Chichara, Like,

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not the best place for young players tour. I

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's the best place to prepare for majors

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>tour either. You know, like you already see these guys

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are starting by playing an event under the lights in

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia this week, and it's like, look at the

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>head start that a guy like Rory has on the

0:55:58.080 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>season as he's played with them playing, you know, and

0:56:01.200 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I know these guys play some of the like the

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 1>DP World Tour. The consistency of having to play on

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>tour was a good thing for him.

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean to your point, I also think it gives

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:14.839
<v Speaker 3>you a little bit of a better idea of where

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 3>you stack up. Yes, I think that's a big part

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 3>of it. Did some of the live guys, frankly are

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 3>just a little delusional about the quality of play on

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 3>their tour and finished tied for ninth and think that

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 3>their game is in a better spot than it is

0:56:28.040 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 3>when if you're playing against the stacked field, like Rory

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 3>just was like, I think it gives you a little

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:34.800
<v Speaker 3>bit of a better feel for what you need to

0:56:34.840 --> 0:56:37.399
<v Speaker 3>work on, even more so than just the golf course

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:39.280
<v Speaker 3>argument the courses that you're playing.

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:43.399
<v Speaker 2>I think it's maybe a little bit deeper than that.

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:47.400
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think, yeah, I mean, John rom Bryson,

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's necessarily even the competition. I

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.960
<v Speaker 2>think it's the biggest thing for me is just the

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 2>fifty four holes because and also shotguns start and it's

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 2>so much different actually at a major if you're in

0:57:02.160 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the lead or you're in contention in a major, and

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 2>you don't tee off until three pm on a Sunday afternoon,

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 2>like the mental like fortitude, you have to have that

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.759
<v Speaker 2>entire morning from the time you wake up to the

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 2>time you tee off, and then like you haven't even

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 2>done the hard part yet. I just feel you can't

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:25.920
<v Speaker 2>simulate that on on live like you're not You're not

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 2>having to watch a guy go out an hour an

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 2>hour and a half ahead of you and post a

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 2>number like you don't you basically just tee off and

0:57:33.200 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you all meet back at the clubhouse and sign your scorecards.

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's just a total different dynamic. And

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:42.560
<v Speaker 2>with Brooks specifically, like we just talked about his entire career,

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 2>like he gets up for the majors and like he

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:48.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get up for anything else. I'm surprised that that

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 2>he's won five times on Lift, just because I don't

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that he still thinks the majors are above

0:57:55.640 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 2>everything else and that he's kind of just I don't know,

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's just playing golf. I don't know if

0:58:01.400 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 2>this really means that much to him, to be honest

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 2>with you, like these these whip tournaments, so.

0:58:06.120 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Hoing five times on living four times on the PGA

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Tour pretty wild.

0:58:10.920 --> 0:58:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe we're missing something. I mean maybe. I

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 2>mean I haven't been to a live event, so I

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 2>can't really judge, but it just doesn't seem I don't

0:58:18.400 --> 0:58:20.720
<v Speaker 2>know the thing that the only things that concerned me

0:58:20.760 --> 0:58:22.880
<v Speaker 2>with Brooks as far as longevity and what we're going

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to see from because I don't think he had a

0:58:24.960 --> 0:58:26.920
<v Speaker 2>bad Major year. I mean he didn't miss it. He

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't have a terrible Major last year. I think the

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 2>things with him or health, I mean, the guys had,

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, a severe wrist injury, severe two severe knee injuries,

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 2>a severe hip injury, you know, so that that stuff

0:58:42.760 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't it goes away like maybe specific injuries, but if

0:58:46.760 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 2>you're prone to stuff like that, maybe it doesn't. So

0:58:49.360 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a big thing. And then he also

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a swing coach right now, like he has

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Pete Cowen, who you know, has mainly just been short

0:58:57.680 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 2>game kind of slash mental coach for him. He's had

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Pierce who's been his putting coach forever, who's a really

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 2>great coach, but he doesn't work with Claude anymore, and

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 2>so who knows, Like could that be a good thing,

0:59:10.000 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 2>taking ownership of his own swing and kind of moving

0:59:12.840 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 2>forward like we've seen from some other guys in the past,

0:59:15.400 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 2>or you know, like.

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 1>That's such a mid thirties PGA tour or professional golfer

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>move mid thirties, you take ownership of your swing.

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and who knows. I mean, like I said, maybe

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that's the best thing for him, but I know I'm

0:59:30.960 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 2>pretty optimistic, and who knows, like professional golf could look

0:59:34.760 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot different in two years to where we see

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 2>brook Brooks Koepka a lot more. And yeah, he's like

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 2>you say, he's thirty four. I mean, I'm thirty four.

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel that old. I think he still got

0:59:46.640 --> 0:59:49.760
<v Speaker 2>a good decade of solid major play ahead of him.

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't maybe go decade. I think like we could

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:57.120
<v Speaker 1>build in a year or two of injury just with

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>his past I think he to forty. And it's kind

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of like crapshoot. So you know, in my calculation, in

1:00:07.520 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>my you know, this is just he's got about sixteen

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>majors left at his current clip. That gets him to

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight more or seven or eight for total

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>if he kept the percentage he was at right now,

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>which seems like you're saying.

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, you're saying, strap lad, And if you were

1:00:25.000 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 3>to win at the same rate as he has in

1:00:26.440 --> 1:00:28.960
<v Speaker 3>the past over the next sixteen he would get two

1:00:28.960 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>to three more. You're saying, yeah, it feels like a stretch.

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean that's like just like the math, right,

1:00:35.120 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you would get like two more. So he gets to seven.

1:00:38.760 --> 1:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of unrealistic, probably, you know. I

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably one more left in there. If

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I if I had a gun to my head, I

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>think he gets one more. I don't know. If he

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>gets one more, I think, like, what'll be interesting Him

1:00:56.840 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and Rory are effectively the same age is who's up

1:01:00.400 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with more majors at the end of the day, Brooks

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>having a one major league is And I think this

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is like a interesting underguard card that has a lot

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of Like I guarantee when Brooks won his fifth that

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have made Rory happy because it's like there's a

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>badge of honor of being like the you know, if

1:01:23.640 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you take Tiger out of active and fill out of

1:01:26.120 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>active player, the active player with the most majors right, absolutely.

1:01:31.000 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Rory has said it.

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 3>He said it in the in the Netflix Full Swing thing, Like,

1:01:34.240 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I know Brooks has more majors than I have now,

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:37.880
<v Speaker 3>like they're obviously all aware of it.

1:01:38.280 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who'd you pick to have more majors at

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of their career? No, you get one one

1:01:43.120 --> 1:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>major lead with Brooks?

1:01:45.360 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Brandlely, Curious what you think I would take Rory. I

1:01:47.280 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 3>believe that the.

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>From now until the end.

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think this calendar year is such a good

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:56.320
<v Speaker 3>opportunity for Rory in the level he's playing, in the

1:01:56.360 --> 1:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>longevity he's shown that. I believe he'll get one over

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the next two to three years, and as soon as

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>he ties it up, I think the odds get way

1:02:05.680 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 3>in his way in his favor, just giving Brooks his

1:02:08.360 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 3>injury history. But if they finish their careers and Brooks

1:02:10.960 --> 1:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>finishes with six and Rory ends on four, it's not

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>going to shock me. I wouldn't be running to the

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:18.720
<v Speaker 3>bank to go take out a huge loan and make

1:02:18.760 --> 1:02:21.479
<v Speaker 3>a bet against Brooks's future compared to Rory. Like Rory

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:22.439
<v Speaker 3>may not win another one.

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:24.480
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. I think I would take Rory.

1:02:24.520 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>But curious what you think Brentley it's kind of recently biased.

1:02:27.920 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he may have found something with this TP

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>five boss witch, you know, the degree lower, similar amount

1:02:34.480 --> 1:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of spin. I don't know. I feel like Rory like

1:02:37.680 --> 1:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Brooks's if you look at all the different aspects of

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the game, Like Brooks has never been a great chip

1:02:45.080 --> 1:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>or the golf ball, like great around the green, so

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>he's always kind of consistently been right around the top,

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, one hundredth to outside the top one hundred

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>in strop scans around the green. I feel like Rory

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>has been more consistent across the board then then Brooks has.

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if Brooks isn't gonna if he's not

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>going to figure out the putting anytime soon, like he could,

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>he could waste another year or two of majors. And

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Rory right now is playing some of the best golf

1:03:14.680 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that he's playing. So I could see Rory winning two

1:03:18.360 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>majors this year, and if Brooks doesn't get it, going

1:03:20.760 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>it for another couple of years, like that's a pretty

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 2>big head start. So yeah, I'd I'd go Rory. Probably

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:30.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of recency bias, but I do think

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Brooks wins at least one more.

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Still on the Pebble Beach high.

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm always on the Pebble Beach High. Well, I

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>mean you said six years of Brooks twenty thirty one.

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Kiowa potentially for the PGA.

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:49.520
<v Speaker 3>We're not protecting up, We're not protecting.

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>We're not doing that Riviera for the US Open in

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty one, and then I don't know where the

1:03:57.520 --> 1:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Open it. It might it might be a is that

1:04:01.440 --> 1:04:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that's not a saying that's not an old course you're

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>not doing I mean.

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the crazy things with Brooks is

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>he's had close calls at Augusta. I mean we're like

1:04:11.560 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>very close to him being a like he was close

1:04:15.160 --> 1:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>support Rush too. You know, it's I think like every

1:04:19.920 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>year fits well for Brooks. I think one of the

1:04:22.120 --> 1:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>things with Brooks is the utter other aspect of it,

1:04:27.280 --> 1:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Like twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen Brooks versus today. I don't

1:04:32.200 --> 1:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>think he's as much of a force with the driver

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as he used to be.

1:04:35.600 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I also just think that's a really interesting point, Andy,

1:04:37.600 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 3>for how much we harp on Rory and great players

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>who haven't won the Masters yet. I mean, how do

1:04:42.840 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 3>we not talk about Brooks the same way when you

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:48.800
<v Speaker 3>think about who's at that champion's dinner and who has

1:04:48.840 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 3>won ed Augusta. Brooks deserves as much of that conversation

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>right now as Rory does.

1:04:54.480 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I think his.

1:04:55.320 --> 1:04:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Chances of winning the Masters are arguably higher than Rory's,

1:04:58.040 --> 1:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>just given how Rory tends to get little loose out there.

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating that after okill, I feel like the discourse

1:05:05.920 --> 1:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, ken Brooks get to eight or nine, and

1:05:09.560 --> 1:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>now you know, we're a year, a year and a

1:05:13.640 --> 1:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>half later, a year, a year almost two years later,

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess, And now it's like, can he get to six?

1:05:21.960 --> 1:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>What would you put the over under on on? Is

1:05:24.520 --> 1:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>six and a half the right over under? Or is

1:05:27.960 --> 1:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it five and a half?

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:32.240
<v Speaker 2>It's five and a half. Yeah, it's got The over

1:05:32.320 --> 1:05:35.480
<v Speaker 2>unders are always very conservative because it's so hard. I mean,

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 2>you've got so many, I mean, so many guys who

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>can win majors now, I mean, Ludwig's already a force

1:05:43.680 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 2>in majors.

1:05:46.800 --> 1:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>He had won good major so far.

1:05:49.000 --> 1:05:54.480
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean I believe I mean, yeah, yeah, Colin,

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>but no, but like as far as like his game

1:05:57.520 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>is built for majors, and he hasn't really led me

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to believe otherwise. So yeah, I mean, heck, I throw.

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I threw Luke Clanton in there. Luke Clinton's gonna win

1:06:06.880 --> 1:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>like four majors. We're gonna be.

1:06:08.480 --> 1:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Doing a special exemption into the Masters.

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, he's not gonna get that. He's he's

1:06:13.800 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>got to play a college tournament at some point. You know,

1:06:16.440 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>he's hope.

1:06:18.040 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>All right though, all right, this was fun. Anybody got

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>any last Brooks thoughts to get off their chest? Anything? Yeah? One?

1:06:25.400 --> 1:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>All right? I figured no.

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>One moment we did not touch on that. I just

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>think is funny and illustrative of Brooks Kopka and his

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:37.600
<v Speaker 3>major alpha energy. The twenty fifteen Open when when the

1:06:37.640 --> 1:06:41.080
<v Speaker 3>ball is oscillating on the green and Brooks kept is

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:44.480
<v Speaker 3>a complete unproven entity at this point, he hasn't even

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>played ten major championships, and some rules official comes up

1:06:47.480 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 3>to him, I guess makes it clear that he's a

1:06:50.760 --> 1:06:55.080
<v Speaker 3>sir the rules official referring to himself, and Brooks says allegedly,

1:06:55.440 --> 1:06:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't care. I don't give an f who you are.

1:06:58.560 --> 1:07:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not playing until my all stops oscillating. And then

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>shortly thereafter they halt play. Do you think that's a

1:07:05.480 --> 1:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty uh. It fits in with a lot of Brentley's

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:11.920
<v Speaker 3>characterizations of a young Brooks. The brash like some of

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the arrogance kind of maybe was a sign that he

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>did not feel uncomfortable in that environment. I think it's

1:07:19.240 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 3>pretty interesting moment in the Kopka. If we're gonna do

1:07:21.160 --> 1:07:22.760
<v Speaker 3>the Keopka pod, we got to mention.

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That this this is not meant to be like a

1:07:25.960 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>full blown Kopka, you know, because if we if we

1:07:29.360 --> 1:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do that, the there needs to be lots

1:07:31.520 --> 1:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of discourse about you know, the move to live, the

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bryson Beef, Keila and near miss, you know, getting

1:07:42.240 --> 1:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>just getting steamrolled by Phil on Sunday. There's so manything

1:07:47.560 --> 1:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>layers to that. This is kind of more of a

1:07:50.080 --> 1:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>check in of where are we, what are we doing,

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and where do we think he goes? And I think

1:07:56.320 --> 1:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody's pretty positive on Brooks and and where

1:08:00.400 --> 1:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think, you know, generally believe that we

1:08:03.920 --> 1:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>are we are going to see more high level major

1:08:07.000 --> 1:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>play from him in the calendar year.

1:08:10.680 --> 1:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I got one more thing that would be perfect to

1:08:13.920 --> 1:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>sign off with and all right. My all time favorite

1:08:17.439 --> 1:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Brooks Kopka moment was a exchange that he had with

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Smarten and I believe a tour championship a few years back.

1:08:26.000 --> 1:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>And basically this is when Brooks had the the off

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>white zip tie on a shoe and so smart and

1:08:33.400 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 2>being the intrepid reporter that he is said, people were asking,

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 2>what's on your shoes? Oasis question Mark Brooks goes the

1:08:40.880 --> 1:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>off whites. It's fashion bro No, no, no, the other Brooks.

1:08:45.280 --> 1:08:48.080
<v Speaker 2>This is like such a typical golfer, like forty year

1:08:48.120 --> 1:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>old white man, like and smart and goes, I have

1:08:50.840 --> 1:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>two kids. It was like the best exchange ever and

1:08:56.200 --> 1:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>one that I will file away from me for the

1:08:58.680 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>rest of my life.

1:09:00.040 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazing, amazing. All right, well that does it. Big thanks

1:09:15.560 --> 1:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to Brentley. You can read his work at Golf Channel.

1:09:20.320 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You can see him on Golf Channel. Joseph, I've loved

1:09:24.040 --> 1:09:28.519
<v Speaker 1>your Your Wednesday article every week on on on our website,

1:09:28.560 --> 1:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>The Friday dot Com. And big thanks to p. J.

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Clark for producing and editing this podcast. This is the

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>start of the Johnnies game. Big big night for the

1:09:39.280 --> 1:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Johnny's against Marquette. But he's he's he's producing this podcast instead.