WEBVTT - How ‘Black Mirror’ Reveals Our Bleak Digital Future w/ Creator Charlie Brooker

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Ready to go. All right, agree to you one Happy Thursday,

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Happy may Day. It is what this really is. It's

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the one month anniversary of the Chuck podcast. So you

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>know when you in content creator years one month, that's

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of five years of service these days, I

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have kid, but I'm having a blast. I hope you're

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>enjoying the content we're creating. I'm an amazing team around

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.599
<v Speaker 1>me that has been able to get me into some

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>social spaces that I had not been to before, including

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>my new and growing audience on YouTube like and subscribe.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Do I say that enough?

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that Apple podcasts Spotify. By the way, I

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out, we know some of you who get Apple

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>or you know, we're fixing that and feed issue and

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that should be. That should be up and running

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>without any problems, without you having to manually refresh very soon.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But before I get to my guest, and I tell

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you this is going to be a fantastic interview, You're

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>going to love it. It's Charlie Brooker. He is the

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>creator of Black Mirror, the amazing Netflix series that's sort

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of you know, near term, the futuristic. Some people think

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all dystopian. What's interesting is, I will tell you this,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of thoughts of what I thought

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>motivated Charlie Brooker on various shows. I bet you, as

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Black Mirror fans, you will assume some things that you

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>will find out are not true. What motivated him, what

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>were his what were his creative mentors? If you will,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>both individuals and of different movies and shows. Just trust me,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you're going to love this interview. You're going to love him,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to learn a lot about what it

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>takes to create Black Mirror. In the mind of Charlie Brooker,

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it is just I am. I would have him on

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>weekly if he had the time to do it, and

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt, as you'll find out in this interview,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this dude would be a lot of fun to be

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in a writer's room with, that's for sure. But before

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I get to there, I spent a lot of time

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>this week talking about the first hundred days of Donald Trump.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>But there is an opposition party that's out there, and

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would be worth doing the first hundred

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>days report card, if you will, for the Democrats, because

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>as bad as things have gone for Donald Trump, this

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has not been a seesaw as Trump goes down, Democrats

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>go up. That has not been the case. In fact,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the hallmark of all of the polling you've seen is,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>even as Donald Trump's going down, the brand of the

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party has yet to improve in the minds of voters.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And arguably that's a pretty honest assessment. Right what have

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats had done to improve their brand? They really

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't done anything yet. If anything, they're still trying to

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. It isn't clear where this party is headed.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>What is universally clear, though, is that the DC leadership

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party is not very popular at all.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's aking Jeffries Chuck Schumer, they're feeling some pressure.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to some donors who are very frustrated with Jeffries.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Don't understand why Nancy Pelosi is still sort of lingering

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>over the leadership of the House as much. I had

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>one prominent donor say to me over the weekend, I'm

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>glad Nancy Pelosi was there to do what was needed

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to be done with Joe Biden's candidacy, but her shadow

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>over the party is only hurting Jeffries in the long run,

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and is only hurting the party's brand in the long run.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>If the party is going to try to gear itself

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to the future, it's leadership of the previous twenty years

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>probably needs to step aside completely so that you certainly

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>hear that. Obviously, Chuck Schumer has been feeling the heat.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>He's probably getting more of the arrows than most, considering

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>he had to make a tough decision, which was whether

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the government or sort of let Donald

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump have a situation that wasn't going to be popular

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with the base of his party. I do think politically

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he made the right call. He just communicated the idea

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily poorly, since he spent one day talking up the

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>idea of orchestrating a shutdown and then immediately backtracking on

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that front. But his political calculus about what the right

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>call was I think has turned out to be right,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>which is, don't get in Donald Trump's way if he's

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of hurting himself politically. That's been the

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>James Carvel strategy. So I would say, if you were

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to give grades, the DC leadership is not getting

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>good grades. I don't think they're getting passing grades yet.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Now the question is who individually has had a good

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>first hundred days in the Democratic Party. Well, probably the

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>best way to judge that as you look at it

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>through the prism of future elections and the prism of

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to position yourself as a leader or a player

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>at the table, trying to figure out what is the

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party going to look like, what is the Democratic

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>brand going to be? So immediately when you look at

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>people who have made an early effort to make an impression,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Corey Booker, he certainly has decided to take matters more

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>into his own hands. He did the twenty five hour Philipbuster,

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>which got a reasonable amount of tension. In fact when

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>he timed it. If you recall, I thought it was

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>fascinating when he timed it. He timed it during the

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 1>election and day of that first special election in April,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which had the Wisconsin election and those two specials in Florida.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So it was sort of feeding the Democratic base as

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they were getting excited about winning some of these special elections,

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>over performing in some of these special elections, and here

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he was jacking the DC message machine for a day,

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think, and over the weekend, Corey Booker and

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Akim Jefferies did a live stream from the Capitol steps.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>So I think Booker is trying to become one of,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to find his voices as a Trump resistor,

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>another sort of DC insider that's trying that same thing

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as Chris Murphy, the Democratic Senator from Connecticut. He's been

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>trying to get on more socials, trying to sort of

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>also become more of an outside voice in pushing the party,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, clearly is probably somebody at least thinking

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>about running for president. I think Corey Booker fair to

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>say that he's thinking about running for president other Democrats

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in the first hundred days. So I think for the

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>most part, both Corey Booker and Chris Murphy, as far

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>as their own standing, I've made progress. And what they're

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>where they're trying to get to. I don't know if

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they're the right answer. We're going to find out. Right.

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Corey Booker was not could not get traction when he

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ran for president in twenty twenty. Maybe that'll change this time.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>But some of the efforts he's making, you can see

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing, and it makes sense. Chris Murphy same thing,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>gets a little less attention than Corey Booker, but you

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>see what he's trying to do. It may be just

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Washington baggage. You know, I'm convinced that the Democratic

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>primary electorate come twenty twenty seven to twenty twenty eight

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is just going to care about two things new and electable. Now,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>electable is going to be a debate, right, everybody has

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a different version of who's electable and what's electable. But new,

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be a big deal. Right

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>on the other first hundred days, Bernie Sanders and AOC obviously,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Alexandria Cassio Cortez has probably had a for

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>her personal politics, a very strong first one hundred days. Right,

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>She's already in line. There's no question anymore of who's

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the heir apparent to the Bernie movement. It is her.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>It is not going to be Rocanna, It is not

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be anybody else. It is going to be her.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>It is hers, unless somehow she decides not to run

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for president. Now she's got two options sitting in front

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of her in twenty twenty eight. If she chooses not

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to run for president, she could run for a Chuck

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Schumer Senate seat. I'd be as I told you in

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a previous during the Dan Goldman preview there when I

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>said keep an eye on him for the future, I believe,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't believe Schumer ends up running for

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>reelection by twenty twenty eight. Right, that just you sort

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of see where you kind of see where that's going.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think he could be vulnerable in a primary

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if he's not careful on twenty twenty eight. I don't

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's the way he would want to go out. So,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know this, Nobody knows this. He's

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly been a very successful New York politician. So I'm

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to sit here and say that he should

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>know when the time to go is. But I would

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>be I certainly if I were a betting man, and

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as many of you know, I do enjoy a FanDuel

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a FanDuel app every now and then, I certainly would

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be betting against him running for re election in twenty eight.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So the question is does she want to be a constant,

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>long term player in DC or does she want to

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>go for it and seeing if she can win the nomination.

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical she can win the nomination. I'm not sure.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I go back to electability, will she be able to

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pass the electability test, which is again very subjective, but

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the perception and there's going to be we'll

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>see what the evidence shows, but I think she starts

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>with a perception that she's going to have a hard

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>time winning in places like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. But

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to just always be careful to under I'm

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to undersell her. She is what I like

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to describe as a very talented political athlete. And sometimes,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the NFL draft and you'll

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>see certain, oh, somebody's got his arms are too short,

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or he doesn't have big enough hands and all this stuff,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're just so good at being a football player.

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>They overcome whatever physical trait that that that they should

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have that they don't have. And so I feel the

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>same way about politicians is that you know, they can

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>be such a good campaigners. They can overcome maybe it's

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>a character flaw, maybe they overcome an ideological issue, whatever

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. That you can overcome these things if you're

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>talented enough. So I'm hesitant to assume AOC can overcome

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>these things. I think she's proven to be a very talented,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>talented politician, and I'm just watching her go from activist

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to elected activist to start trying to have more say,

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, both figuring out how to balance inside game

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>versus outside game. But overall, I think you could SAYOC

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>has had a very strong first hundred days because she

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>now is certainly the one getting in front of crowds,

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>whether they're Bernie generated, whether how much she's in charge

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, how much it's Bernie's operation. That's still a

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong first hundred days. Then there's Pete Footage, his

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>decision not to seek any office in Michigan, and he

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was contemplating there are two open seats in Michigan, a

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat and in a governor seat. Of course, he's

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a new resident there. He moved the changes residency to

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Michigan from Indiana, and his husband moved there. His husband's

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>from Michigan. So the question was going to be whether

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>whether he would seek state wide office in twenty six,

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think if he did, he was taking himself

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>out of twenty eight. You're not if you're running for

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a new office in twenty six. I think it's hard

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to run in twenty eight if you're running for reelection

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>in twenty six to set up a run in twenty eight.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a different story.

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 2>JB.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, appears to be on that track.

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Although it's interesting to me that David Axelrod, who's an

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Illinois guy through and through, is a little skeptical about whether,

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if he wants to run for president, whether it's a

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>good idea to also seek reelection because Illinois might not

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be as easy of a win for him as it

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>has been in the past. But remember, he is a billionaire,

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the heir to the Higatt fortune, so there is plenty

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of money there for JB. Pritzker. So I don't you know,

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>is he somebody that's had a good first hundred days.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He's also somebody that wants to become the resistor on

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the gubernatorial side of things, more so than a Gretchen Whitmer,

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>who's been seen working with Trumps. She gotten too close

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to Trump. I think she certainly had the worst photo

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>op moment of any Democrat in the first under days,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>with the infamous folder over her face, and then she

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's look, if she wants to rise above partisanship,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>she can't keep apologizing for showing up at events with Republicans.

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a habit. She's got a break if she really

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to rise above and say and be willing to

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>go to places other Democrats aren't going to go so far. Essentially,

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>she's done that twice now with Trump, but she's apologized.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't plan to speak right coming across as if, like,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>please don't be mad at me democratic base that I'm

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this, but hey, swing voters, look what I'm doing, right,

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>You got to sort of project more confidence in that.

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>So I think that how I think the idea is

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>she's pursuing are good. How she's gone about him right now,

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I think could use some work. There's Gavin Newsom,

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who started a podcast in the first hundred days to

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>try to break out of the stereotype San Francisco liberal

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>narrative that I do think is going to haunt him

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for however long he wants to be in the national spotlight.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt he has ambition to run for president.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm somebody who believes his best shot was primary ing

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden when that talk was active and he decided not to.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I think my guess is, you know, if he ever

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I always say this. The later in life, the more

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you age, you start you do start not thinking and

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>worrying about the things that you did. You start wondering

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and regretting the things that you didn't do. I have

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a feeling gavenusom forever is going to regret not primarying

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Biden in twenty four, that that is that road not

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>traveled will be one that he wonders what would have

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>happened had he did? Would the entire party be in

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 1>better shape? Would he be seen as a hero even

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>if he didn't win? Who knows? But the extreme effort

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he's making to try to sort of left wing of

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>eyes himself right deeper resivise them. But I don't know

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>what you want to call it that he's trying to do.

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But he's sort of like, I'm not sure how comfortable

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I am being a Democrat that you know, he's sort

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of acknowledging the elephant in the room with people who

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. But is he also gone a little bit?

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it a little too manufactured? Right? Is it going

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to be? He's got to pass whatever. Authenticity is another

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>subjective word. You got to be authentic, well, authentic to

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>whom right? But I get I get the overall idea,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>if it looks like you're trying too hard, voters will

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>punish that as well. So I give him a mixed grade.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>A for effort, but I don't know, if you know,

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>just like I would with Qretchen Wimer. A for effort,

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not quite sure if the execution's been as

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>good as it could be. And then there's the people

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that I expect to be players in twenty eight that

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>have no have decided not yet to raise their profile.

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland, Andy Basheer, Governor of Kentucky,

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Rafael Warnock, Senator from Georgia, Mark Kelly, Senator from Arizona,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Ruben guy Diego Center from Arizona. I was talking to

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a polster earlier this week who said to me, you know,

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>when we were talking about the Wes More candidacy, because

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be assuming he runs in

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. I think he will be the biggest, the

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest establishment organization on the democratic side. I think he'll

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>have some of the biggest donors. He'll have, you know,

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>big some of the big names around Hi, him and Buddhajic.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I expect to be sort of the biggest traditional sort

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of campaign operations you have out there. But I had

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody ask me, it's like, if you're going to try

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to rerun Obama, be careful, right it may be especially

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>now that Latino voters are the new swing voters of

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>American politics, you know, should the Democrats be looking for

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a Latino leader? And so to keep an eye on

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Ruben Diego. He was pretty pretty liberal as a member

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the House, but he really has been trying to

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of recenter himself with the with a statewide Arizona

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>electorate he did. You know, he got a little room

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to run because of who his opponent was in the

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Senate race, so that helped him a little bit. But

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he's still probably you know, he's been viewing very close

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Kelly here. I just keep an eye on him.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I just think that that there isn't a lot of

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Latino leaders that feel like they're on the cusp of

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>putting together national campaigns that are not associated with an

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>ideology of AOC. But I think she, you know, I

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if she would have an automatic appeal to

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that swing voting, working class Latino voter that may be

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>voting more on some cultural issues that they're uncomfortable with

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on the progressive side. So it's going to be it's

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>something to watch there, and it's something that I'm curious about.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So look, I think the Democratic brand is in the

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>toilet and all the polling, even if the first hundred

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>day shows you that it still is, voters can believe

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>two things. At the same time, Trump's presidency is going

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>off is going horribly, and they haven't yet seen anything

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the Democrats that's appetizing. It's pretty clear that

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>DC leadership is getting a failing grade. The DNC is

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>mired in its own intra party feud over David Hogg

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and primary individuals, all of those things. The new DNC

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>chair I thinks had a hard time sort of sort

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of establishing himself frankly, yet I think bogged down a

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>bit by this David hog controversy and the fact that

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>both Schumer and Jeffries have their own challenges being the

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>official leadership of the Washington class of Democrats. And it's

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>been fascinating. You do get this sense that a lot

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats have decided to take this branding issue and

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>try to deal with it themselves. And I expect more

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of this. This is what happened to the Democrats after

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty eight, and this is what happened to the

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to a lesser extent after two thousand and five,

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four, So I expect more of this.

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>And this is something about every you know, when we're

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>going to check in on the status of Trump and

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the MAGA, we're going to do this with the Democrats

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. So with that, I'm gonna pause there again.

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>You are gonna love this conversation with Charlie Brooker. Uh,

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>please enjoy it. If you're I'm an obsessive Black Mirror fan.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I can't watch back to back episodes though and

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and and get a good night's sleep, so I do

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of limit my exposure to Black Mirror about one

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>or two episodes a week as I digest the dystopian

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>nature of our future. Uh, enjoy the interview and enjoy

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>this break. Charlie Brooker, you are a guest that my

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>wife is probably more excited about than anybody that I've

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>booked so far. I'm excited to don't get me wrong, Okay,

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>but you know you've made the missus really happy that

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>you're a You're going to be a guest in the

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast here.

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>That's nice tonight.

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>So let me start with this before we get into

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>black mirror. Do you feel like you are the twenty

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>first century George Orwell?

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 2>No, I would never. No, I mean I think that,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that would be nice if somebody wants to

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>make that comparison. I'm not going to spend four hours

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 2>trying to desperately talk them out of it. But no,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I think he was. He was probably a more astute

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>political writer than in many. I mean, I could list

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>all his qualities that I'd be very British about it,

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 2>aren't I I mean very British and self deprematic. No,

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I've not felt a.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Ful humility, right, you know, I'm kidding. I'm kidding, you know,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>please please don't tell me you know? No, no, no

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>more more.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I suppose it depends what do you mean in terms

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>of what do you mean? What do you mean by that?

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>In that he wrote nineteen eighty four and it was.

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Well when you look at when you look at Orwell,

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's probably the most prominent. Right here's somebody who

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>wrote about a futuristic dystopia. Obviously his was political satire.

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Yours is cultural as well as societal and politically, I

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>would say, but in many ways. I you know, when

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I try to separate those two, how many people say, well,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>everything's politics now, everything is all fused together, right, everything is?

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And I hate accepting that premise, but I understand why

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>people think that. So that's why I mean, I look

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>at it. If George orwell Will reincarded today, he wouldn't

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be writing novels. He'd probably making episodic series like you're doing.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess probably, I suppose probably. And then and I've

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 2>probably been moaning that his show was doing better than

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>mine or something. Yes, maybe maybe I suppose it's interesting

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 2>because I do. It's it's an odde, it's an odd

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 2>BLACKMR is a weird show in that I I don't

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 2>see it as the job of the show to like

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 2>be a sort of warning about nineteen eighty four. Was

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 2>probably more felt like a warning, more overtly a wow.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people watch you, I think, watch these

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>episodes and view it as a warning. You don't view

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting.

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't. I suppose maybe I don't explicitly set

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>out to be a warning because I'm I may what

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>it probably is, and a psychologist could probably it would

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 2>probably word out what it is better than me. It's

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 2>probably I'm a worrier. I'm quite an anxious and neurotic person.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>But I've also got a background in comedy. Why often

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 2>it's me kind of worrying out loud. Sometimes the episodes

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 2>are kind of me worrying out loud. Sometimes I'm trying

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to Sometimes it's actually coming from a sort of really

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>darkly comic place that we then play straight if you're

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.719
<v Speaker 2>saying in the shirt itself. So I'm sort of but

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 2>predominantly I'm trying to entertain more than i'm trying to warn.

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>And if I'm trying to warn it, I'm not always

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't necessarily boil it down to a specific warning.

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 2>But one thing that frustrates me is when people say

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a warning about technology, which I really don't think

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that the show is.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's start beating around the bush. What's the show?

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 2>What is it? You did say it's a cookery show. No,

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>it's a am I talking about it? No it's no,

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it's well, okay, so it definitely it's it's more about people.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 2>I think. I think because I think while these show

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually impressed by technology in my everyday life. I

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 2>think technology is amazing. And I used to be a

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 2>video games journalist.

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>One quiet, So you're not, you don't you don't have

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a phobia.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a phobia about I'm impressed and amazed

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 2>by technology, and I tend to be an early adopter

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 2>of well certainly like video game consoles and things like that.

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>So I'm sort of like a tech enthusiast in many ways.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think but I but like I said, I

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 2>am a warrior, and I think that I am often

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 2>awestruck by what technology can do. And then that naturally

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>leads you to worry about the implications of a powerful

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 2>because it's a mawful tool. And we're we're amazing creatures

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 2>because we create created these tools. But we're also there's

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 2>loads of us, and we can be clumsy, we can

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 2>be we've got faults, we've got flaws, and so we

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 2>can So it's sort of so if there's any sort

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>of parable going on, it's really usually in our stories,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>it's usually a sort of active human clumsiness or an

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 2>active human impulsiveness or greed or jealousy or something like

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 2>that actually is the downfall of the character.

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, it's interesting I watch Black Mirror with

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the following thought in mind, is that you're doing the

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>due diligence on the impact on human beings that the

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>tech companies themselves don't do. Right, You're sort of like,

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I feel. In some ways, you're the

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>test kitchen for where there's is headed and I sit

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>there and i'm you know, because we talk like there

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.959
<v Speaker 1>are no ethics boards with any of these you know,

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>they all every once in a while open AI claims, oh,

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we haven't we have ethicists on staff, or we're trying

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>to have an ethics board, but really they don't. In

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>many ways, you're the human umbudsman for technology right now.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>In that I feel like you're you're the human test kitchen, Like, Okay, yes,

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>here's this amazing tool. Like take your first episode. I

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like we can spoil episode one. I hope everybody's

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.959
<v Speaker 1>already seen episode one, so you take that episode. In

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>some ways, you're optimistic, look at this, We're going to

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 1>be able to cure, We're going to be able to

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be essentially replace pieces of the brain. That's exciting and

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and and in fact, that's that is the story.

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>In the story, it's absolutely life saving.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It's transferred then and then but then you sort of

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you go, okay, but what if it has to do

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>what if you're sort of stuck always having to be

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>connected to the cloud, you know.

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Subscription model totally they're totally crush.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I can see your your comedian side in

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't that be hilarious, right, You're like, uh no, yeah, upgrade,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>you got to be on you know plus, you know,

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>or premium or whatever it is. But I could watch

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that episode and say, you're an optimist about where we're

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going and to be able to like be you know,

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with the brain, and you're a cynic because you assume

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody is going to want to profit off of people's

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>pain and suffering.

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean you could argue that that cynical or

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately true. Yeah, it's realistic. And it's it's interesting that

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>where that story came about. That came about from me

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 2>listening to a podcast.

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Story. I'm glad you're telling it. I find it fascinating.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Explained so well, So I was listening to a podcast,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, I listened to a lot of podcasts, and

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>when the host has to do an immediate pivot into

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 2>a sales pitch, it always it strikes me as it's

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 2>really quite weird when they go for talking very naturally

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 2>into a slightly more robotic kind of sales.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>This is, of course, is when my producers are going

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to when our salespeople will insert the ad that's going

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to do right here, right here.

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think I'd listened to like a crime true

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>crime podcast and the guy was sort of recounting some

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 2>grizzly like terrible, terrible incident and then sort of had

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 2>to suddenly pivot into pitching a sort of food delivery company,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 2>like kind of seamlessly. And this struck me as darkly hilarious,

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and so going into that story, I thought, Okay, here's

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a here's a that's a very black merrory idea, because

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 2>I've been thinking about, well, what if you had a

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 2>service that could kind of stream part of your brain

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 2>like you do me if you you lose part of

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 2>your brain that was a backup and it can streame

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 2>it to but you've got all these issues to do

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 2>with coverage, cell coverage, and then the idea of adverts

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>that became a funny and quite dystopian thought, and and

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 2>so I approached that story thinking this is going to

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 2>be a comedy, and it is a comedy until it isn't.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's why it's quite I think obviously

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>in that episode. I think it's a very powerful episode.

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 2>I think Chris and Rashida and Tracy who are starring it,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and Ali Panku the director, I think everybody did an

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>amazing job. And it's like slightly wrong footsoe because it

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>looks like it's going to be a comedic story, and

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 2>then the logic of the cold logic of it gets

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>more and more inescapable, and I think that's quite quite

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>often that's my that's not my happy place, but that's

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 2>my natural I'm trying not to say wheelhouse I don't

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 2>like that phrase, but well, wheelhouse is what is a wheelhouse.

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Where they housed wheels? You're right, I love it. By

0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the way, It's like it's like you know, when you're

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>when when what is it? Uh? What is it? You

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>know when people use undaunted and un daunted, you know

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? There was something like that. We have

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>these weird expressions where we never use other parts of

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the word so I don't know, do we go to

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the house to put wheels in it? Right?

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>What is it?

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Right? You know it's where Michelin's are made. Right, You're right,

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>we've all.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Been saying, none of us know. It's like uh so

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 2>so so so I quite like taking a premise that's

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of comic and then you find the sort of

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 2>sometimes the horror angle. Sometimes we've done episodes that are

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 2>more optimistic. But I suppose there what am I saying

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 2>that I I you realize then that you've got a

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 2>story that is actually commenting on on lots of things,

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the healthcare, health care and healthcare, general cost of living and.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Of healthcare. Right, like we we all know we come

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>up with these amazing cures or there's medicine out there,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but only for those that can afford it.

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>From perspective, I'm in the UK and I can't imagine,

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>so I have you know, we have the NHS here,

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 2>which is for the point of view, so all of that,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 2>so Breaking Bad wouldn't have really worked here as a show,

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 2>like if you said it in the UK, because he

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Walter White would go and get treatment with like he'd

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>now the NHS has also faults, but you would go

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and get life saving treatment very quickly, and you wouldn't

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 2>be bankrupted for that here so so so so so

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you did you realize, oh, I'm commenting on that.

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. I didn't realize when I when I walked

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 2>into this sort of room narratively, I didn't realize that

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 2>it was also full of all of this stuff. And

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 2>so you kind of realize you're in quite a rich

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>environment in a way, so you can and you can

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 2>comment on lots of things. And also that episode is

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>am I had to what what's the language like on

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>this on this pod?

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't.

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 2>We don't, but it's not it's not a massively offensive word.

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>If you heard the word in shtification, in.

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Shita plication, I have, yeah, yes, So it's not my.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Cory doctor Rose, this writer who coined this phrase in citification.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>And I was thinking all some of that, which is

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the process by which platforms or services the experience for

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the user degrades over time to cause well that's been

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 2>it has to make a profit, it's the story.

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's well, all these tech companies right they sit

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>there with the big tech, whether it's Facebook or let's

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>take Facebook and X two really fun experiences when they

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>first were rolled out and then they went became public companies,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly they had to they had to convince

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>shareholders that they could keep people on the site longer,

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and they were staying up the platform longer, and then

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they were putting more ads to them. Now, how did

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>they do that? They cranked up the algorithms of anger

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and grievance and hey, right, like it is and then

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you have and then we then you look at what

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon must did and he took all the whatever guardrails

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.239
<v Speaker 1>there were on X, he took them off. And I

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think that guy was writing about the gentrification of Twitter

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm mistaken, like that was one of examples.

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, kind of, and well I'm kind of sort of everything,

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of everything, and it's hard to leave, as you either,

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to leave. So actually it's a bit like.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Because you remember, you're right, because you also remember when

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it was good.

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when it's like being trapped in a loveless marriage,

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of like it's like you're trapped in this

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 2>you you you entered into it. It was fun and

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 2>now and then.

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>My wife is listening to this one very closely. I

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that is, Charlie, I don't know what

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't know what I'm talking know what you're talking about.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>My wife doesn't know what I'm talking about. No, But

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>as a metaphor, it's it's like a not what you

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>thought you were getting into at the start. And you

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 2>can't see social media all sorts of platforms, you can't

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 2>see away. You're addicted to it now as well. I'm

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 2>smoking smoking, That's what it's like. Yeah, and it's it's Moorish. Yeah.

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.719
<v Speaker 1>So so so take me back to the to the creation,

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>because what I love about the background you give a

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope to all of us recovering journalists who

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>think that these creative ideas that we're all going to become.

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're all going to make some incredible effort

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that helps it. Yeah, but you know, how long did

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you have this in your head as an idea for

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a TV series before you actually could get it to fruition?

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Actually not so. I My my career path is weird,

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and again it sort of slightly makes sense in retrospect.

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So I was a I was a cartoonist. First of all,

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I was a cartoonist. Then I was a video games journalist.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Then I was sort of doing a website. Then I

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>was working in comedy and I was writing for The Guardian,

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 2>but I was doing like TV reviews, and I never

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 2>considered myself a journalist. I would write columns and I

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 2>would write TV reviews, but I always considered myself a

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>bit of a bound really like I was a or

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I was. I was attempting to do comedy bits. I

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 2>was always okay right comedy. And then I had an

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 2>idea for we did a show. I had an idea

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>for a show in the UK which took a comic

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>premise and then played it straight. It was a zombie show,

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>and the premise was that there was a series of

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the TV show, the season of Big Brother, the reality show,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 2>which at the time was absolutely massive in the UK.

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 2>And the premise was there was a season of Big Brother,

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and what if there was a zombie apocalypse broke out

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 2>during this and the people in the Big Brother house,

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 2>who had been chosen by producers to argue and fight

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 2>and not get along are sort of the only people

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>left alive in the whole of written. And then I

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 2>thought the other funds that was a fan of sort

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>of horror and zombie things. I thought, well, what if

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>we and then what if we play it's straight? Was

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 2>the other sort of the idea, and we did that

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and it went down really well. It was like really successful.

0:33:57.840 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 2>And then so THEA it was Channel four in the UK,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 2>said well what else would you like to do? And

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd always been an admirer of the Twilight Zone, and

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 2>we had a show in the UK Tales to the Unexpected,

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 2>which was short Rob Dahl stories. The BBC often used

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to when I was growing up. They put out these

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 2>really bizarre sort of one off plays, sometimes about that

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't kind of you'd go into school the next

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 2>day and did you see that thing? Wore? A man

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 2>fell in love with a tree or whatever. You know.

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like a crazy sort of avant garde place. And

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 2>then really terrifying films about nuclear war and stuff like this,

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 2>and so I so I sort of that was what

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I pitched, and it was originally the idea. It didn't

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 2>have the technological focus so much the original pitch. It

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 2>was more I was interested in I read about Rod Serling,

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 2>who created the Twilight Zone, and I read so I

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 2>read a sort of biography of about him, and I didn't.

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't appreciated the trial Zone was away niche in

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the UK. You had to see it was like on

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>late at night, I sort of like ten thirty pm

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 2>or eleven pm, like tucked away on a channel and

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 2>at random times, but it would still really stand up

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 2>and speak to me. And I hadn't appreciated that Rod

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Serling was a I'd only known him was the guy

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 2>from The Twilight so that he was. When the Twilight

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Zen was first announced, people were going, why on earth

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 2>is he debasing himself doing the show. He's a serious playwright,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 2>he's a serious writer. Why is he doing a silly

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 2>show about it looks like this is going to be

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 2>about UFOs and little Green men and aliens and different dimensions.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 2>And of course it was because it meant he could

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about the issues of the day without being censored,

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 2>because he could he could address things as metaphor. But

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>also to a kid watching it, it was just that's cool,

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 2>a chilling sort of story, or it's got a mind

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 2>mangling twist, and that's just really cool. And I kind

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of and so that that was the impetus was to

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 2>do something that was a bit like that. But about

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 2>now and then I kind of the more I thought

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 2>about it, I thought, well, what would Rod be writing

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 2>about now? What it would be technology? And it would

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 2>be it would But again, at the time, at the time,

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 2>it was so at the time the show first, at

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the time the show was first conceived, the view of

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 2>technology was very, very positive, very positive. I think generally

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 2>we thought these were these iPhones and smartphones were brilliant,

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 2>and social media had helped bring about the Arab Spring,

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 2>and it was going to rusher in a new era

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 2>of diplomacy and democracy, and we're all going to talk

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 2>to each other. And the biggest complaint anyone had about

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.280
<v Speaker 2>social media was that it was full of people posting

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>photos of their breakfast and talking about my nature in

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 2>their life and being a little narcissistic, not unhinged. So

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't this sort of unhinged vortex of anger and hatred.

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 2>But because it seemed so rosy, the portrayal of it

0:36:56.320 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 2>seemed so rosy, and that it made me that the anxious,

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 2>neurotic person in me was immediately distrustful and scared, right

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 2>if because you kind of think.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, now we've all flipped, right now, everybody's now everybody's

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>negative on tech, right, there's a general this is you know,

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a general concern right there. Immediately just look at

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just look at how I think we're all approaching AI.

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>There's this immediate art. Yeah, sure, you know, because there's

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>always a lot of we don't want to do what

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we did with social media, where we were sort of yay,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this is awesome, right, like you know this we're taking

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>down dictators and only to find out whoa dictators figured

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out how to use this themselves. Oh oh do you

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>now do you think you're going to find yourself if

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you're a zagger and it sounds like you're a zagger, right,

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if everybody's going one way, you're like, okay, this is

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>probably the time we need to show people what the

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>what the other path might look like. Are you going

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to go optimist on us?

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably more of a boring centrist in a way

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in terms of like, so I can worry again, I can.

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I have a natural ability to worry about anything. I

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 2>can leap over five linipads over to immediate destruction and

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the apocalypse very quickly. You could show me a spoon

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 2>and I would worry about terrible things that someone could

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 2>do with that spoon, and so I can totally sit

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 2>with AI. It's I can absolutely understand all the terrifying

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 2>implications and it's the unknown, isn't it really is?

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't know.

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 2>But you can also see, Okay, there are there's meread opportunities.

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 2>That is an amazing tool, and we're not going to

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 2>we can't really put the genie back in the bottle.

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 2>We've invented this. Yes, I worry. I worry about you know,

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 2>if you've got if you're in a kind of AI

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 2>arms race, then obviously there's a an impetus to like

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and and people start thinking that guardrails are slowing them down,

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 2>then there's a this is the reason to you know,

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 2>dismantle any guard rounds that there are. I think, kind

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 2>of like anything, the printing press was an amazing, like

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the most amazing inventions in history. Caused all

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 2>sorts of people because suddenly you had this way that

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 2>ideas could be disseminated. Obviously, no one would say the

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 2>printing press was a bad invention.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, my favorite you know what the second you know,

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>if if the printing press was the single greatest invention

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to expand literacy to civilization. The number two most important

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>invention were eyeglasses. So and I it's not my idea.

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>This was a fellow journalist who I was at this.

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were talking about all these technological transformations,

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, somebody was mentioned the printing press, and

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>then somebody mentioned the internet and computers and all this stuff.

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:58.879
<v Speaker 1>And it turned out like if you if you look back,

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the second most hot invention for essentially literacy, right eye glasses,

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, was the people would actually see Yeah, I

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was in front of you could read right, you know,

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and it was one of those moments you were like,

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>well duh, but you don't think sometimes we don't think

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of a No.

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Actually, that's a good example of a extremely in a way,

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 2>very positively disruptive technology but probably obviously clearly did a

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 2>lot more harmor good. Unless you can bet somebody put

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 2>on a pair of eyeglasses and went right, I don't

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 2>like that guy over there.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Man, I didn't realize how much I didn't like. It

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>ended a lot.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't like my neighbors. Yeah so so, But like

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess, with any of these, with AI, you can

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 2>see that the potential is incredible. The potential for it

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 2>as a tool is incredible. The obvious worry I think

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 2>that we all have is is that guy going to

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 2>take my job? Is that that? Is that guy going

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to take my job? And then is that guy going

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to run things from that? Is that guy going to

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 2>be my boss? Not just take my job, but going

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 2>to be my boss? And how how do we manage that?

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 2>If that's the case. And I don't know, Jim, I don't.

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I think like any writer, you you look at like

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 2>something like chat GPT and you are it's worrisome. It's

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a it's a it's a worry, and you worry

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 2>about replacing any if we end up replacing I mean

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I could I'm talking creatively if you end up replacing

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>if any creative work is is one human attempting to

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 2>communicate with other humans. If you take the cuman out

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 2>of one end of that hype, I don't know what,

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 2>You've got a different I think you've got a different form.

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 2>You've got a different thing that I asked you.

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 1>That is, have you used any Have you used AI

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to workshop or road test any of your ideas? Have

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you used a chat GBT as sort of like a

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>tenth writer in your writer room.

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I think if you start replacing writers in your well, weirdly,

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 2>we don't have a we don't actually have a writing

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 2>room or black mirror.

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We say, what do you do? Like, tell me about

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 1>like the pitch meetings, Like how does that work?

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, now it's just I'm walking around occasionally. So I've

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 2>collaborated with right, so we've done there's there's two of

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the episodes this season are co written. But we don't

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 2>have like a formal writing room where people are sort

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 2>of pitching ideas and stuff. Usually what's happening is I'm

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 2>wandering around thinking I've got nuggets of idea, and then

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 2>they'll sort of coalesce at some point if that makes

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 2>it like a sudden nature, I'll think, Oh, I know,

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to do a story about this, and I

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 2>want to do a story with and here's a cool scene.

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I've got this. Well, here's a moment I want to do,

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>but I don't. I don't know what the story is.

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 2>And then I'll see something else or I'll think of

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 2>something and that will bause me to knit those ideas together. Now,

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 2>whether I could regurgitate all those ideas into an AI

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 2>and go can you see connections between them. I probably

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 2>could do that.

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Would it? Would it?

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 2>That's a scary Again, there was a good roll dull

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 2>story about that, about an automatous writing machine with pedals

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 2>for that's a scary Are you hatening your own demise

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 2>by doing that? Certainly? I can see obviously when when

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 2>chat gpt first launched, the first thing I did was

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.439
<v Speaker 2>you say to it, com then tell me a black

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 2>mirror a type idea, and it started coming out with

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 2>something that initially you go, oh god, that's that's okay.

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 2>That sounds plausible. It's sounded plausible, but it was also

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 2>the more so you get the immediate as just watching

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:55.919
<v Speaker 2>the sentences come in. You haven't a media like Jesus Chris.

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, oh my god, this is I'm watching myself

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 2>get dismantled. I'm watching the death of my career in

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 2>real And then you go, actually, oh, actually, now this

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 2>isn't that good. This is very this is generic, and

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 2>it's for me like, oh, when I see this feels

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 2>like a lukewarm, right, not very interesting pitch that actually

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 2>is just bubbled together from fragments of because it's a.

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Bit like the it's it doesn't and I think it

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work if there's not a human creative elopment. I

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we're going to learn.

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I think so, but I hope so. And I think

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that we'll always want it. That's the other thing. I

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 2>think we'll always want that.

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, I'm convinced we're going to have to

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 1>start paying extra for human customer service, like I've been.

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I hate AI customer service, right. You feel like they

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You get the automated chats or the automated this,

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like representative or ah, you know, you

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>hit your zero whatever it is, and you have to

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>wait longer to get a human being. I actually think

0:44:57.600 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>some business is going to say, hey, why don't we

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>charge people as a human to talk to a human?

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:06.399
<v Speaker 2>But how will you know you're talking to a human?

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem, then, rates because you get well at

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 2>the moment, it's because you get the equivalent of a

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of novelty be fob that impresses, that makes four

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:19.919
<v Speaker 2>sound effects. That's your like when they're rubbish and you're

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 2>talking to one and it's just going I'm sorry to

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:24.919
<v Speaker 2>hear that. You feel that you're cross. Have you tried

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 2>looking up on our website. It's sort of chatbot that's

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 2>frustrating when you've got one, but you're within By next year,

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you'll probably have one that within six minutes you'll be

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 2>telling it your deepest, darkest secrets and confiding in it,

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, they're basically like Eliza, which was the

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:45.319
<v Speaker 2>that was the first sort of AI chatbot. Was this

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.240
<v Speaker 2>thing Eliza, wasn't it? That was the sixties, late sixties

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.279
<v Speaker 2>something of that, and it was designed to be a

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of to just do what a basic psychologist would do,

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 2>and it would just mirror back what you said to it.

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 2>And there's a sort of famous anecdote about the guy

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 2>who created Eliza asked his secretary to test it out,

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 2>and within about twenty minutes she asked him to leave

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the room because she was telling it things that were private.

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 2>And all that was was a very basic bit of

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 2>code that would go hello, what's your name and you'd

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 2>say my name is Charlie, So how are you feeling today?

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 2>And you go quite sad and would go, oh, Charlie,

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 2>why are you feeling quite sad? And then before you

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 2>know it, you're regurgitating yourself. And so they'll probably get

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 2>to that point where you'll pay it not to speak

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to a human and you'll you're being speaking to her.

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 2>You'll be you'll be being psycho. You'll be sharing your

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 2>deepest secrets with an AI therapist who's available twenty four

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 2>hours a day.

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 1>So if I didn't know you, I would assume you

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>were a privacy nut, like you're obsessed with privacy, because

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot I would argue a lot of your episodes

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>deal with the issue.

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right, but also, like people get shocked

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 2>when I say I've like we've got like an Amazon

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 2>Alexa device in the house.

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>No, you're right, I am already shocked at how much

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of a tech advocate you are. Because you're right. If

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know you, you're this is what you do, and

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you be like, well, this guy is probably off the grid.

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>He probably has the aluminum foil on the doors.

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 2>You know. Oh, I'm like that. I'm not the unibomber. No,

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>people often think it's like me in a yes, in

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 2>a wooden shack with foil. Yeah, like you say, foil around.

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Always spoil, there's always boil always.

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 2>But that would if I was sitting there, my computers

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't work, I'd be so sad and so I mean,

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say. I mean the problem is I don't

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 2>think that I really do worry. I really worry about

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously in the creative industries, I massively worry about what

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 2>AI could do as in terms of it's already a

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 2>tight time, it's already a you know, challenging environment, you

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 2>might say, and it could wreak real human habit very quickly.

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I can also see why, why why it's going to be.

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, someone's going to do a movie that's using

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 2>this generator, Like like when Toy Story came out and

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.760
<v Speaker 2>it was the first CGI animated cartoon, and everyone went, oh,

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you can do that, Wow, okay, and it sort of,

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, we didn't lose the art of hand drawn animation,

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 2>but it meant that, you know, the default the animated

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 2>films became.

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't it? In fairness, doesn't every technological advancement put somebody's

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>career get rid of some sort of you know, refrigeration.

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:34.959
<v Speaker 1>We used to have people that worked in the ice

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>block industry, right, you know, literally blocks of ice. Right,

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we had refrigeration, and you didn't need the block of

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 1>ice people anymore. Now there was probably a lot of

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:46.439
<v Speaker 1>people lamenting that those jobs were gone. Oh my god,

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:48.479
<v Speaker 1>where we automation is replacing jobs?

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm being a I mean, I would argue this is

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of a repetitive cycle when it comes to any

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 1>technological advancement.

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 2>It is, I supposed to the why he comes when

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 2>it's when it's when it's it's all jobs, that's the problem.

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 2>But it's basically when it's when it's all careers or

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 2>jobs or not not all careers or jobs, because again

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't I have no idea how this stuff will

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 2>pan out. Do you know what I mean? I don't

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 2>actually know. But it's how we find It's beyond even

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the financial obviously, the financial impact on how you run,

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Like purpose, just what's our how we find purpose and

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 2>meaning in what we do. If a lot of what

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 2>we do is replicated tirelessly by a system, I don't

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 2>really know what that does to us psychologically. So it's

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 2>so I think it's it's it's it's And again you

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 2>could argue, well, maybe I only I am worrying about it

0:49:57.200 --> 0:49:59.320
<v Speaker 2>now because you know, I'm a writer, and I feel

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 2>like that's under three. And again I can see the

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 2>value in it as a like you say, as a tool.

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:08.799
<v Speaker 2>I can see the value in as a tool. You know,

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:10.800
<v Speaker 2>we don't take an artist. We don't think we teach,

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 2>we don't.

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't teach spelling anymore, you know. And I was

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>like spelling test. I was, I loved and I was

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>obsessed as a kid. I'm in my fifties now. Of

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>course spell check happened probably after college, and then all

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, now we don't care about you can't

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:30.759
<v Speaker 1>miss spell words anymore because of autocorrect, like people, and

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know what to make of that, but

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that is something now longer is relevant.

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, is not an American thing because that in Britain.

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 2>My kids, my kids, I remember them, they talked so

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 2>much about spelling and like phrases. I didn't know what

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 2>that like. They come home and go, I've got to

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 2>do this work about try grass again.

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Everybody thinks a British are smarter than we are. There

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you go, guys are still being todd spelling.

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that we are. I think we're probably

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.879
<v Speaker 2>not being taught all all sorts of other things from

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 2>British history or whatever.

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But you get my boy, like spelling is no longer.

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:08.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was a time right if you weren't

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a good speller, you were uncomfortable even writing a letter

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you would get you know, you would worry that it

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>would create a judgment of you, and and people would, oh,

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not a good speller, you're not educated. And now

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we got the tools. You don't worry about it, right,

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And is that a have we taken away something from society?

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And again seems like a.

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:35.359
<v Speaker 2>No no, because you're probably it means that you can

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 2>you're not. There'll be people who were held back by

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they were dyslexic, or they were just

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 2>weren't good at one thing and they were excelled at

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 2>something else. And now it levels the playing field a

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 2>little more. So that's a good thing. But again, I

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 2>think the problem is that we we're sort of trained,

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 2>were naturally sort of analyze everything and think is this

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 2>good or bad? And the answer is it's kind of both,

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 2>isn't it?

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's so again, hands right, it turns out it's neutral. Right,

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what we don't think of it now? All technology is neutral.

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It's the humans that use it. Are they using using.

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 2>It's a powerful, very useful tool. It can also be.

0:52:10.960 --> 0:52:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Terrifying of death or a name in life.

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean we could list you could you can list

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 2>every tool in the tools in that wheelhouse and the

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 2>wheel you know, someone can drive around their house and

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 2>pick the door in so so it is it's just

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 2>that it's the pace of it, The dizzying speed with

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 2>which these things are coming along, I think is the

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 2>thing that makes people rightly anxious. But it's also it

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 2>is exciting, but it's also terrifying.

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I'd say another theme. Let me ask you about another

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>theme that does seem to come through consumer You know,

0:52:52.160 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 1>consumerism is something you seem to enjoy. Is that more

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of a of a comedic element to you or.

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:02.279
<v Speaker 2>It's often a darkly committed because one of the I

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 2>think I mentioned the Twilight Zone, I mentioned sort of

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 2>weird British TV shows, and I think one of the

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 2>things that and I've realized recently how much it influenced

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 2>blackmir RoboCop thee eighty eighty seven. Was it like RoboCop

0:53:18.239 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the original?

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm so glad you about that is a weirdly

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>brilliant movie. People simpully appreciate it. It's a brilliant brilliant

0:53:26.080 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 1>movie ahead of.

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 2>Its time, way ahead of its time. It's a brilliant

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 2>comedy as well. It's like a really dark comedy in

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a way that when I loved it, when I was

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 2>like a teenager, I saw it and wore the VHS

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:40.959
<v Speaker 2>out watching it over and over again. And I think

0:53:41.000 --> 0:53:43.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the actually a lot of the comedy

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:47.359
<v Speaker 2>sailed over my head. But what I really be sort

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of the dystopian commodification of everything that was going on,

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and that was excellently done. I have to say. As

0:53:54.160 --> 0:53:58.359
<v Speaker 2>a brit it was fairly, very heavily influenced by Judge Dread,

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:01.839
<v Speaker 2>which was Aish British.

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Coblis, which what do you mean? And they made into

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a movie a couple years later because of the robotcarp.

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so so. But but but the there's there's always

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:17.520
<v Speaker 2>been something I think at heart and again this isn't

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't. This is not what I sit down thinking

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 2>when coming up with a Black Mirror story. I don't

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:25.920
<v Speaker 2>think this is what I want to write about it.

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Actually it's looking back, you go, Oh, that's what it's about.

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Almost every episode is about what's real and authentic in

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:36.840
<v Speaker 2>some way. You could argue almost every episode we do ultimately,

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that's it. Whether it's a story where it's people passed

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:44.400
<v Speaker 2>into a sort of VR simulation of something, or it's

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, a character who is suddenly having to spout

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:49.879
<v Speaker 2>sales pictures in their every day life. It's it's kind

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:52.799
<v Speaker 2>of always about what's authentic, and that's something that's kind

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of under assault all the time.

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I think one of the other brilliant things

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you do is here you're dealing with a bunch of

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:05.359
<v Speaker 1>feu futuristic ideas, but the setting always feels right now right.

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't. You're always I feel like you're basically saying, hey,

0:55:09.520 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a little bit in the future, but it's

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>very but we're going to make sure everything else is

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>as familiar as possible. So you have the beaten up

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Volvo right in episode one, and things in some ways

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>things were the same, you know, the open place you

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 1>go get a crappy burger and things like this, But

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>then you have these little grace notes like the honeybees,

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 1>which I know is a theme, and a few other things.

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It seemed very intentional. This is a seasonal you've always

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:42.399
<v Speaker 1>wanted to keep. You don't ever put people. You don't

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:46.279
<v Speaker 1>try to create futuristic landscapes. I've noticed, No, we don't.

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I suppose it's because again, it's usually even when we've

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 2>done we've done stories where there's a hugely you know,

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 2>we're taking huge liberties with what is. You know, we're

0:55:57.000 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 2>showing things that probably will never quite be possible, showing

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 2>people kind of uploading their stoles or you know. But

0:56:04.920 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 2>but you kind of always want to keep one foot

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 2>on the ground. I think that's just my personal taste

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 2>is more the RoboCop end of sci fi than it

0:56:15.960 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 2>is the Star Wars end of sci fi, which is

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 2>more space opera in a far flung future, and it's

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 2>it's more like it more into fantasy. So I'm more

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of that kind of, oh, this could happen at

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the end of my street if things go badly wrong.

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I tend to respond more to that, I think as

0:56:36.600 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 2>a viewer, and so that's probably why that's where we

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 2>probably operate most strongly.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you take a Do you try to

0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 1>meet with innovators in in in Silicon Valley and tech

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:57.720
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs to try to find out what's coming in heaving?

0:56:58.719 --> 0:57:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Or are you is? Are you just sort of saying,

0:57:02.960 --> 0:57:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's possible, we'll start replacing the pieces of

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the brain and this is probably how we how we'll

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to stop you know, geoblastoma or whatever it is.

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll pack it out and be able to replace this.

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that just you guessing or do you just meek

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to experts that give you well, this could be what

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we do.

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 2>It's predominantly me guessing. Basically, it's me guessing or extrapolating,

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 2>or usually you just you're not even thinking of technology

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 2>when you start thinking about it, you know, you're thinking

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 2>of something else, and then you realize that you can

0:57:37.240 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 2>use you can give It would almost be a supernatural story,

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 2>except you can give it a sort of technological explanation.

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 2>We did an episode last season. We did an episode

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 2>called Joanie's Awful where it's a woman called Joan play

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 2>by Annie Murphy, switches on the TV and season of

0:57:55.320 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the streaming platform that's showing a drama, a dramatization of

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 2>her life starring Salma Hayak, And that's a very Twilight

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Zone story in many ways. In the Twilight Zone it

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 2>would have been like magic, or it would have been

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the uncanny. We can sort of say, it's AI deep

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:16.480
<v Speaker 2>fake videos, it's that, So you're sort of coming at

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 2>it from that angle. I probably should go and speak

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to more sort of tech because sometimes there's things like

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 2>sometimes there's things where I've put it in the episode,

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 2>thinking I'm being very clever here, and then you realize

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that it's actually like the honey bees. We did an

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 2>episode in season three called Hated in the Nation, which

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:38.840
<v Speaker 2>is where we first have these grown autonomous drone miniature

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 2>honey bees that were going around replaced because I'd read

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:45.760
<v Speaker 2>something about honeybees dying out and colony collapse and then

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:48.160
<v Speaker 2>and then I thought, oh, well, what if you had

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 2>little miniature drone ones that could fly around and pollinate flowers?

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And I thought I was being very clever and then

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 2>discovered that I think that experiment had been running for.

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I would just say, are there stuff that you've done?

0:59:01.880 --> 0:59:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You're like, oh wow, I didn't you know that. You

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:08.640
<v Speaker 1>just either that or you foreshadowed something.

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 2>But well, the most unusual one, there's definitely okay. So

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 2>we did. There's an episode we did back in season

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:22.240
<v Speaker 2>two called be Right Back, where it's Hailey Atwell and

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Donald Gleason and and Hailey plays this woman called Martha

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 2>whose husband dies in an accident. This is it's almost

0:59:29.440 --> 0:59:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it's almost a companion piece to common people this season.

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 2>And anyway she is off the day she's missing him,

0:59:35.160 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 2>she's discovers she's pregnant. She's desperate to just be able

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to if only he knew this, only she could talk

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to him. She's offered this service which allows her to

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 2>communicate with him from and it's an AI that's based

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 2>on his social media output. I didn't realize at the

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:55.480
<v Speaker 2>time that that was It felt to me like something

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that would become possible. I didn't realize how closely that

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:00.040
<v Speaker 2>mimics what.

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Logic and that's you know, oh, not only that, I

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>happen to be very involved in various ways to how

1:00:11.960 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do we educate people about the Holocaust and things like that,

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's a take there. What they're going to do

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is they've taken all of these historical oral histories and

1:00:21.800 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Holocaust survivors have done and they're essentially going to generate

1:00:25.680 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>even though they've passed on, they're still going to tell

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you their story and then you're going to be able

1:00:30.280 --> 1:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to interact with them and have a conversation literally speak

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and respond, and it's going to be a large where

1:00:38.080 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a back and forth with a Holocaust survivor,

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you ask questions and the AI based on I mean,

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's one of those At first you think it's dystopient,

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, that's an interesting you know, are

1:00:49.200 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we going to well Albert Einstein, Well, forget Albert Einstein,

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>how about this because this is probably more recent because

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>there's well, Steve Jobs teach a computer science class AI

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Steve teacher, computer science class in twenty thirty five.

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>That's difficult, isn't it? Because what you're describing that, that's what,

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:11.959
<v Speaker 2>that's the that's the that sounds like the high tech

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 2>equivalent of it's almost saying. It's like when you you know,

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>you could read the diaries of Samuel Peeps in the

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>sort of whatever century and you get and suddenly that

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 2>period of history becomes alive and you feel because you're

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>hearing somebody's and then.

1:01:27.880 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What you think his voice might have looked like, and

1:01:29.680 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you have his image and then all of a sudden,

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>there you go.

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I can see that that he's recounting what happened to him.

1:01:36.440 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>If you're talking about rebuilt like Steve jobs. Would you

1:01:41.440 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>would would he have left enough information behind for you

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>to get his how he would innovate ideas and how

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>he would create things. I don't know God really thought

1:01:55.400 --> 1:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>about the educational uses uh of that as a platform.

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's quite mean, I guess I look at the

1:02:03.240 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Holocaust survivors telling their story to children who can ask questions.

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>That feels like, Okay, that's a good thing. You could

1:02:10.560 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>see that tool, you know where does you know?

1:02:13.120 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Where?

1:02:13.360 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Where do you say okay, that's where we use it

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's it right? Like or where does that become weird? Right?

1:02:19.240 --> 1:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Where does especially if you actually know that person, if

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that's your grandmother, are you having a different reaction?

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>How do how does it work in terms of like

1:02:27.520 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 2>if somebody how does it? What's the parameters for the conversation?

1:02:31.000 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>What happens if somebody is just sort of talking about it?

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>If for advice in your own life? And then because

1:02:38.520 --> 1:02:40.920
<v Speaker 2>what you see very quickly when the people talk to

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>like you know, chat mots effectively, is they get attached

1:02:47.440 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>very quickly. You mean they can become confident very quickly.

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we wonder why why these By the way,

1:02:55.720 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we wonder why these Nigerian princes are so successful at

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>getting money out of people, right, I mean it is

1:03:00.680 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it is amazing. We human beings are oddly trusting ah

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in isolated settings.

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>But isn't that a good thing that we trust? Isn't

1:03:09.360 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>that nice? Amound us?

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Isn't ye a take advantage of ye?

1:03:14.800 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the it's that you don't want to become

1:03:17.240 --> 1:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Why am I saying? You don't want to become too cynical?

1:03:19.600 --> 1:03:26.360
<v Speaker 2>But it's not so so I can Again, it's it's

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting that you can. That's interesting. That's not that's the

1:03:29.680 --> 1:03:35.520
<v Speaker 2>use I haven't really thought about. But it's bringing history alive,

1:03:36.040 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 2>bringing history live and bringing and making it personal in

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:42.959
<v Speaker 2>a way that that feels to me like that's yeah,

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 2>that's that's interesting. But again, how do there's so many

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>things to navigate there and so many ways that could

1:03:53.160 --> 1:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of vary into places you didn't anticipate. That's that's

1:03:57.600 --> 1:03:59.439
<v Speaker 2>the sort of you see. That's this is why tech

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>companies I think, like what you were saying. Sometimes when

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:07.880
<v Speaker 2>occasionally when I've like spoken at sort of events where

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a bit like my advice whenever I'm asked or

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 2>what should tech companies do? I think employ comedy writers.

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:19.439
<v Speaker 2>It's my advice. Employ neurotic comedy writers who are going

1:04:19.480 --> 1:04:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to horror writers or just dramatic writers. Employ them to

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:26.840
<v Speaker 2>sit in a room and work out the worst way

1:04:26.960 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>what are.

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The worst ways that people?

1:04:29.920 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 2>What was the worst that could happen? Because I think

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>often people who people who just people who innovate in

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>a different way, they probably have to blank that out

1:04:43.680 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 2>when they're like on. Some inventors probably have to not

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:48.360
<v Speaker 2>think about that too.

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think in order to push forward right the good,

1:04:51.720 --> 1:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I always worry about this with Silicon Valley. I think

1:04:54.040 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>right now there is a movement in Silicon Valley where

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>they think we humans are standing in the way of

1:05:00.200 --> 1:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>their progress, right right where we as human beings simply

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we just get out of the way, right,

1:05:06.680 --> 1:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>democracy awkward.

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Breaks on the wonderful digital utopia that they will lusher in.

1:05:13.320 --> 1:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>If we could just shut up and lie down right,

1:05:16.080 --> 1:05:20.600
<v Speaker 2>let the computery steam roller just plow all over us.

1:05:20.800 --> 1:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>That's the losing side of what the point of it

1:05:22.920 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 2>all is, isn't it correct?

1:05:24.520 --> 1:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Most of it makes us our lives better rather than

1:05:27.760 --> 1:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>essentially replacing us. But let me get one more thing,

1:05:29.920 --> 1:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>let me get you out of here. We brought back

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the dire Wolf, and I'll be honest with you, and

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like that story came out just when

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>your season hit and there was a minute I'm like,

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>are we making this up? Is this like sometimes like

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>where we're headed with our abilities here and it's like, granted,

1:05:48.080 --> 1:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this is Jurassic Park, right, this is Michael Crichton. Michael

1:05:51.040 --> 1:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Crichton was thinking about this stuff, who I also think,

1:05:54.800 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>weirdly is sort of underappreciated in his sort of ability

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to sort of see some dystopian things down there.

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Again, it's really yes, it's really great speculative like do

1:06:05.760 --> 1:06:08.600
<v Speaker 2>me like just some great sort of yeah and tied

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>to really actually stories.

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But here we are with the dire warmf and you're

1:06:13.800 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>just said there going, yeah, there's not going to be

1:06:16.400 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>an unintended consequence to this.

1:06:19.880 --> 1:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Geesus. I do, I think so, But it's it's you

1:06:24.560 --> 1:06:29.120
<v Speaker 2>can't again. It's like I am not a Lowe. I

1:06:29.160 --> 1:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>can't embrace the I'm not the like I said, I'm

1:06:33.680 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 2>probably in a worried centrist when it comes to the

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>tech in the future, and that I am an admirer

1:06:42.720 --> 1:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>of technology, I'm a I appreciate it, I'm awestruck by it.

1:06:47.120 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I like it, I stear it, and I fear the

1:06:50.600 --> 1:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>consequences of us clumsily misusing it. But that's not a

1:06:55.480 --> 1:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>reason to not It's it's just really and the problem

1:07:00.800 --> 1:07:02.960
<v Speaker 2>is we are we're living in it again. It's we're

1:07:03.000 --> 1:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>living through if the printing press cause all sorts of ruptures,

1:07:08.960 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>we're living through a sort of accelerated process of that.

1:07:14.680 --> 1:07:18.959
<v Speaker 2>But again, it will feel normal, is it like it's felt?

1:07:19.120 --> 1:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>How long would you say things have felt dizzyingly futuristic?

1:07:23.360 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>On other lines, on your age, I think we're in

1:07:25.640 --> 1:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>addle age, and I think when you're yes, I would

1:07:27.680 --> 1:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>say middle age is weirdly peak wisdom, both good and bad.

1:07:30.880 --> 1:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Right you sort of you've learned enough life lessons to

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>know what you shouldn't be doing. But you're not yet.

1:07:37.000 --> 1:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You haven't lost it, like you know, at some point

1:07:39.480 --> 1:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I always want to know what age it is. Is

1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's seventy two? Is it seventy where you start to

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you no longer are sort of grounded, right, You're.

1:07:48.360 --> 1:07:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Lost that you've lost that you're not have you not?

1:07:50.000 --> 1:07:52.439
<v Speaker 2>Haven't got the benefit of findsight and well you haven't

1:07:52.440 --> 1:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>got the benefit of wisdom. You're you're just you're just

1:07:55.800 --> 1:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of setting your ways up and.

1:07:57.920 --> 1:08:00.439
<v Speaker 1>And you because you know you're you're I know you're

1:08:01.160 --> 1:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>If you were an animal, you'd already be put up

1:08:04.120 --> 1:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to pasture. I think that's what happens, right, That's something,

1:08:07.200 --> 1:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it's something there you get.

1:08:10.200 --> 1:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a day you wake up one day.

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's like you right, like you know, because you

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>know it's.

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Like mirror con sense, you're outlining here, it's one day,

1:08:19.040 --> 1:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>it's like you you get. But if you actually know

1:08:21.800 --> 1:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>what day you.

1:08:23.960 --> 1:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you know the day, like I always say,

1:08:26.479 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>at what point am I going to want to go

1:08:27.960 --> 1:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to the airport four hours in advance? Like my mother

1:08:31.080 --> 1:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>never was that person and then suddenly she's she's listening. Now,

1:08:34.800 --> 1:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, Mom, I love you, but you always want

1:08:36.720 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to be at the airport way too long. Why you

1:08:39.360 --> 1:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>want to sit there so long? But I assume when

1:08:42.479 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm seventy or so, I'm going to be worried about

1:08:44.920 --> 1:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that too.

1:08:46.240 --> 1:08:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I you know what, I've always been. I am that person,

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 2>and I've always been that. I'm the person who has

1:08:50.960 --> 1:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to get to the airport really really early.

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm like, I'm afraid of having any downtime at

1:08:56.680 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the airport. I think I'm wasting time.

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>No you're not, No, because no, because well, I think

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>it's because I used to be a really nervous flyer

1:09:04.080 --> 1:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and it was the one to me. So I think

1:09:06.000 --> 1:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it's that it's a control.

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>The acclimator. You needed to get acclimated.

1:09:09.800 --> 1:09:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one, I wanted to, yes, exactly, so I needed

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>to feel like it wasn't suddenly sprung on me that

1:09:16.160 --> 1:09:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I had to run and catch a plane. But no,

1:09:19.880 --> 1:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>So I again, I think that it's things. It feels

1:09:24.960 --> 1:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>like they're sort of Disney and pace of change, and

1:09:26.840 --> 1:09:30.519
<v Speaker 2>that's incredibly destabilizing that I have no idea how it's

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>going to pan out. But yes, my kids, I've got

1:09:32.960 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>a thirteen year old and an eleven year old, both boys,

1:09:35.120 --> 1:09:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and they it's all normal to all of this in

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>their stride. Yeah, they totally like.

1:09:39.760 --> 1:09:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Minor eighteen and twenty one, and it's you know, it's

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>all very normal. And I look at some of this stuff, going, boy,

1:09:45.840 --> 1:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>this is abnormal. But they don't know my normal. You know,

1:09:49.360 --> 1:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know this stuff. You know, they didn't know

1:09:52.040 --> 1:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the fax machine. You know whatever it is, you know, yeah.

1:09:54.840 --> 1:09:58.120
<v Speaker 2>So they'll be much better at you hope. Well, those

1:09:58.120 --> 1:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>are the things so obviously, because the next is that

1:10:00.280 --> 1:10:03.479
<v Speaker 2>the next thing, apart from AI coming to take all

1:10:03.479 --> 1:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>odd jobs or make a super bad like, is you know,

1:10:08.760 --> 1:10:12.479
<v Speaker 2>a sort of huge wave of sort of misinformation in

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:17.639
<v Speaker 2>video just dividing us even more than we are already

1:10:17.720 --> 1:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>where there's already competing versions of reality and those are

1:10:20.800 --> 1:10:24.320
<v Speaker 2>both now going to have twenty four hour visuals to

1:10:24.840 --> 1:10:27.240
<v Speaker 2>go with them. That would you blame places?

1:10:27.720 --> 1:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Who's who that actor here? Is it political? Is it

1:10:30.840 --> 1:10:34.479
<v Speaker 1>political leaders? Or textieos? Like? Who's who's to blame for

1:10:34.560 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this moment we're living in where it's been exploited like

1:10:37.040 --> 1:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>this the exploiters or the ones that make the tool

1:10:39.960 --> 1:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>for the exploitation.

1:10:41.680 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Is it all right to blame everyone? Or bug?

1:10:44.120 --> 1:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it is?

1:10:44.960 --> 1:10:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's it's not, because again it wouldn't it's

1:10:48.200 --> 1:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>it's But again, will that mean that the next generation?

1:10:52.160 --> 1:10:54.559
<v Speaker 2>Will it mean just that? What happens when? Because at

1:10:54.560 --> 1:10:57.479
<v Speaker 2>the same time, also you're seeing videos where you know,

1:10:57.640 --> 1:11:00.320
<v Speaker 2>someone could you could see a video where somebody turned

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:02.680
<v Speaker 2>into as to get your maples sort of thing, So

1:11:02.720 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 2>you know that things can be like it can be

1:11:05.479 --> 1:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>surreal and strange but completely photographically convincing. But you know

1:11:09.160 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>it couldn't have so. Well, the next generation just learned

1:11:12.880 --> 1:11:14.559
<v Speaker 2>to not trust anything at all.

1:11:14.600 --> 1:11:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's my great fear, is that everybody's going to

1:11:16.520 --> 1:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>turn it. You know, if you ever talk to a

1:11:18.200 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Russian in Moscow, they'll say, I don't know what to believe.

1:11:22.240 --> 1:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>People that live in Moscow don't believe anything, right, because

1:11:24.880 --> 1:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been so and in some ways they know this

1:11:27.320 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>though they're educated to know enough to know, Oh yeah,

1:11:30.760 --> 1:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't trust anything I read. So I

1:11:33.200 --> 1:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>get that, and I worry a I don't know. And

1:11:38.840 --> 1:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>my great fear of AI is that we can actually

1:11:41.000 --> 1:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>erase history. Now you know, there was there was supposedly

1:11:44.880 --> 1:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of Russian propagandas who were trying to infiltrate

1:11:48.680 --> 1:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>these chatbots to sort of uh uh replace Ukrainian to

1:11:55.360 --> 1:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>try to essentially alter the history of Russia's relationship with

1:11:58.320 --> 1:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine in history, and then you create it over time.

1:12:02.920 --> 1:12:06.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you right, is it right? Is it right?

1:12:07.080 --> 1:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>You can actually erase historical events, right, And it's whether

1:12:10.720 --> 1:12:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that you know, that's the Holocaust whether that's something something

1:12:14.760 --> 1:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>else that that that distill. Yeah, that's terrifying.

1:12:19.760 --> 1:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>That's terrifying. And I don't know, I don't know how

1:12:25.120 --> 1:12:28.479
<v Speaker 2>that isn't I hate to say lightly, but I don't

1:12:28.520 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 2>know how that.

1:12:29.840 --> 1:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you have the Chinese government controls information, so

1:12:33.120 --> 1:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know there, you know, there's no Tanum and Square,

1:12:36.200 --> 1:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no history of what happened to Tianam and Square.

1:12:38.040 --> 1:12:40.479
<v Speaker 1>If you live in China, well, and there's already a lot.

1:12:40.360 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Of people who believe we're already there and then everything

1:12:43.000 --> 1:12:45.639
<v Speaker 2>is a lie and then every like so so yeah,

1:12:45.720 --> 1:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't uh no, that worries me. If there's no

1:12:49.880 --> 1:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>consensus on what is real or has been real, how

1:12:55.800 --> 1:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>do we cope with giant cinmate problems that are going

1:12:59.920 --> 1:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>to them all the way? How do we cope with

1:13:01.760 --> 1:13:06.519
<v Speaker 2>when there's a big when a big problem. You know, I'm,

1:13:07.120 --> 1:13:09.280
<v Speaker 2>like I said, I'm an anxious sort of I could

1:13:09.280 --> 1:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>be an anxious apocalyptic warrior. When the pandemic happened, I

1:13:12.880 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>was sort of comparatively calm because I thought we were

1:13:18.960 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 2>handling it quite well well.

1:13:21.120 --> 1:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I thank you for saying that. I think that too.

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I know we all look back and there was lots

1:13:25.800 --> 1:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. It wasn't it wasn't like it was a laugh,

1:13:28.680 --> 1:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but it was. Yeah, but the globe, I mean, here's this,

1:13:32.720 --> 1:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>here's this event that all nine billion people on this

1:13:36.880 --> 1:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>planet experienced together. And that's something that's unusual if you

1:13:42.360 --> 1:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think about where we all, you know, everybody had had

1:13:46.080 --> 1:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>experienced this in some way, whether you live in a

1:13:49.000 --> 1:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>very uh in a very sort of uh frankly urban life,

1:13:55.680 --> 1:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>rural life, reclusive life, it didn't matter, right, everybody had

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this.

1:14:01.680 --> 1:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, we may we all had a reclusive life, right

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>we you.

1:14:05.240 --> 1:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Know, we proved it could have been total breakdown of

1:14:09.520 --> 1:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>society and we didn't have that, and exact we should

1:14:12.680 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>be happy with ourselves for that.

1:14:14.320 --> 1:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>It was. It was that side of things, was that

1:14:17.760 --> 1:14:21.800
<v Speaker 2>we were we were all worried and we all you know,

1:14:21.960 --> 1:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you generally speaking, people were it felt looking out for

1:14:27.760 --> 1:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>each other. You had the young staying indoors to protect

1:14:30.400 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the elderly. You had sort of you know, you had

1:14:32.200 --> 1:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>actually more.

1:14:33.400 --> 1:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And there was some creaky thus all about it, and yeah,

1:14:36.040 --> 1:14:38.839
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't like take matters into their own hands.

1:14:39.439 --> 1:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, Yes, we had bad arguments and stuff, but

1:14:42.960 --> 1:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>within a civilized guardrail.

1:14:44.920 --> 1:14:48.519
<v Speaker 2>There's more arguments about it now, it's it's it's but

1:14:48.560 --> 1:14:50.839
<v Speaker 2>it's it's, it's it's.

1:14:50.800 --> 1:14:53.479
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, you're right, it's hopeful that it

1:14:53.600 --> 1:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>was a hopeful response.

1:14:54.560 --> 1:14:56.240
<v Speaker 2>In a way, it was sort of like it wasn't

1:14:56.280 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that it wasn't you know what I mean, We we

1:14:59.080 --> 1:15:04.200
<v Speaker 2>we So you sort of hope that we when faced

1:15:04.320 --> 1:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>because we are result Again, I'm not the voice of optimism,

1:15:06.800 --> 1:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>but you know, we are pretty incredible creatures. We do.

1:15:12.080 --> 1:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're so resilient, were good, and so so you.

1:15:17.240 --> 1:15:21.799
<v Speaker 2>So we're just going to have to navigate that wild

1:15:21.920 --> 1:15:26.759
<v Speaker 2>and so so how we I don't know how we counter,

1:15:28.560 --> 1:15:31.160
<v Speaker 2>how we counter a sort of cynical destruction of all

1:15:31.280 --> 1:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of consensus on what reality is. I don't I

1:15:34.640 --> 1:15:36.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know. You sort of have to hope that we

1:15:36.800 --> 1:15:41.280
<v Speaker 2>won't just end up tearing each other's flesh and fighting

1:15:41.280 --> 1:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>in the streets sort of thing. You have to hope

1:15:42.960 --> 1:15:46.679
<v Speaker 2>that And again, we did we didn't do we could

1:15:46.680 --> 1:15:49.439
<v Speaker 2>have done. The pandemic could have been a get load

1:15:49.560 --> 1:15:53.719
<v Speaker 2>worse than we could have behaved in a much more

1:15:54.360 --> 1:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>venal way.

1:15:55.920 --> 1:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Charlie, I have to say, I'm so happy you have

1:15:59.439 --> 1:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this uptim stick streaking you. I was worried or I

1:16:04.200 --> 1:16:04.639
<v Speaker 1>just got.

1:16:04.520 --> 1:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>To no, I think we don't get me wrong. I like,

1:16:08.680 --> 1:16:14.439
<v Speaker 2>I can absolutely have total moments of complete and utter

1:16:14.520 --> 1:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>staring into the abyss sort of two and wait awake

1:16:16.920 --> 1:16:19.840
<v Speaker 2>at four am, you know, the sort of carnival of

1:16:19.920 --> 1:16:22.520
<v Speaker 2>horrible thoughts going through your head, and you worry desperately

1:16:22.560 --> 1:16:25.160
<v Speaker 2>about your children, and you worry desperately about the future

1:16:25.160 --> 1:16:28.439
<v Speaker 2>and where are things going. So I can absolutely do

1:16:28.520 --> 1:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>all of that. And and oddly the more of us

1:16:32.360 --> 1:16:34.200
<v Speaker 2>who are worried, the better.

1:16:35.080 --> 1:16:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I agree. That was agree.

1:16:36.920 --> 1:16:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I think. I think that was the thing with the

1:16:38.320 --> 1:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>pandemic that really struck me was I was. I was.

1:16:41.960 --> 1:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm one of these people who as soon as the

1:16:43.680 --> 1:16:46.439
<v Speaker 2>first reports I remember I was on holiday over Christmas

1:16:46.479 --> 1:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>when that happened. There were reports of like the system, there's.

1:16:49.160 --> 1:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>There's something going around, something.

1:16:50.840 --> 1:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>On as a virus, something respiratory illness in China and

1:16:54.320 --> 1:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. And I thought, that's going to come in,

1:16:56.760 --> 1:16:58.519
<v Speaker 2>that's going to sweep. That's good, We're going to get there.

1:16:58.600 --> 1:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't like the look at that, and I was

1:17:01.280 --> 1:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>really worried about it. At the point when everyone was

1:17:03.960 --> 1:17:08.360
<v Speaker 2>worried about it, I can kind of the dread in

1:17:08.479 --> 1:17:11.479
<v Speaker 2>me drops a little, because there's nothing more scary than

1:17:11.520 --> 1:17:14.360
<v Speaker 2>thinking everyone else is being blather and complacent about something

1:17:14.840 --> 1:17:17.439
<v Speaker 2>that's worrying you. It's the wasp, but the picnic that

1:17:17.560 --> 1:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>no one else is. I'm the one who can't relax.

1:17:20.080 --> 1:17:22.439
<v Speaker 2>If there's one wasp of the picnic, and if everyone's

1:17:22.479 --> 1:17:25.200
<v Speaker 2>worried about the wasp, you move the bloody picnic blanket

1:17:25.280 --> 1:17:29.360
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else, or or or someone catches it in a glass,

1:17:30.800 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>And so you kind of have to hope that its

1:17:34.000 --> 1:17:38.080
<v Speaker 2>survival instinct will realize that we need more of us,

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>really as many of us as possible to survive, and

1:17:41.640 --> 1:17:44.040
<v Speaker 2>that I don't know, don't I don't know, I don't know.

1:17:45.640 --> 1:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you Are you going to say? Is this is

1:17:48.760 --> 1:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this ever stop in your head? Do you think you'll always.

1:17:51.280 --> 1:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Be the show or the I would I'd like to

1:17:57.240 --> 1:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>think it's something that can keep going, can keep morphing,

1:18:01.040 --> 1:18:05.120
<v Speaker 2>can keep We've done we keep you know, I keep changing.

1:18:06.360 --> 1:18:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I keep doing different types of episodes. We've done a

1:18:08.960 --> 1:18:11.559
<v Speaker 2>sequel for the first time, we've done an interactive one.

1:18:11.600 --> 1:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>A few years ago. You can do a feature length

1:18:15.120 --> 1:18:18.200
<v Speaker 2>ones and short ones. So I kind of think it's

1:18:18.200 --> 1:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>something that can be oddly, that can be very reactive

1:18:22.439 --> 1:18:28.639
<v Speaker 2>to what's going on. It's hopefully it's a weird It's

1:18:28.880 --> 1:18:30.639
<v Speaker 2>like I said, it's a very odd show to do.

1:18:30.800 --> 1:18:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm aware that also. It's a bit like being in

1:18:32.640 --> 1:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>a band where we did a load of punk singles

1:18:35.080 --> 1:18:37.479
<v Speaker 2>early on, and so you get some sort of fans

1:18:37.479 --> 1:18:39.519
<v Speaker 2>who just want you to do punk singles, but we

1:18:39.600 --> 1:18:41.880
<v Speaker 2>also did some that are a bit more like big

1:18:42.000 --> 1:18:44.400
<v Speaker 2>love ballads or something that we're also really popular, and

1:18:44.439 --> 1:18:47.880
<v Speaker 2>so now you're kind of trying to so I have

1:18:47.960 --> 1:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to not I think my mental trick is to not

1:18:50.920 --> 1:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>think too much about what fans of the show expect

1:18:54.040 --> 1:18:55.920
<v Speaker 2>and just write and write one.

1:18:56.560 --> 1:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>That audience audience capture. Right, you have to be worried

1:19:00.080 --> 1:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that you're worried that are you making something to please

1:19:02.360 --> 1:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the audience versus or you making something to advalance your mind,

1:19:05.960 --> 1:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>your thought.

1:19:06.520 --> 1:19:09.080
<v Speaker 2>We have we have because we because it's we don't

1:19:09.080 --> 1:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>tend to have the same characters from episode to episode.

1:19:11.320 --> 1:19:13.360
<v Speaker 2>We have less of that and that people don't like.

1:19:13.640 --> 1:19:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Usually our characters are absolutely broken by the time the

1:19:17.479 --> 1:19:22.519
<v Speaker 2>credits roll, so people don't quite it's a different dynamic,

1:19:22.560 --> 1:19:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess from on a big you know, like Game

1:19:24.360 --> 1:19:28.559
<v Speaker 2>of Thrones or or you know, like some huge show.

1:19:28.680 --> 1:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>So it just sounds like you'll always have an ambition

1:19:30.720 --> 1:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep this going, and they'll always be and certainly.

1:19:33.320 --> 1:19:35.640
<v Speaker 2>As long as people well, as long as that I

1:19:35.680 --> 1:19:37.880
<v Speaker 2>can keep coming up with ideas and people keep wanting

1:19:37.880 --> 1:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>to look at them, and as long as I don't

1:19:41.280 --> 1:19:44.120
<v Speaker 2>get out competed by some AI, as long as they're

1:19:44.120 --> 1:19:47.759
<v Speaker 2>not just staring into some folographic box in a few years,

1:19:47.800 --> 1:19:50.640
<v Speaker 2>like just shouting and it's just staring at them and

1:19:50.640 --> 1:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>looking at their facial expression and thinking, here's an image

1:19:54.040 --> 1:19:55.720
<v Speaker 2>you'll like to see for the next two seconds. And

1:19:55.760 --> 1:19:59.679
<v Speaker 2>they're just sort of seeing some kind of constant, deep fake,

1:20:00.040 --> 1:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>three dimensional TikTok that's being blasted at them, which is

1:20:04.040 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 2>probably ninety five percent certain to happen. As long as.

1:20:08.680 --> 1:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried, you're just created. I'm worried somebody is going

1:20:11.280 --> 1:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to start dumb dumbs really soon. I mean, in some ways,

1:20:14.680 --> 1:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>only fans is kind of like that.

1:20:17.720 --> 1:20:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Again, we did this thing. We did this thing, yeah,

1:20:20.000 --> 1:20:23.440
<v Speaker 2>in the in the Common People episode, like Chris O'Dowd's

1:20:23.479 --> 1:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>character Mike has to pay He just to try and

1:20:26.080 --> 1:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>pay for the subscription by kind of debasing himself on

1:20:29.160 --> 1:20:32.920
<v Speaker 2>this online platform. Within Again, I didn't realize that there

1:20:32.960 --> 1:20:35.439
<v Speaker 2>was as soon as the episode came out at a

1:20:35.479 --> 1:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>bunch of people went, oh, that's this. Yeah, I can't

1:20:38.320 --> 1:20:39.920
<v Speaker 2>remember what it was called. That's this thing where people

1:20:39.920 --> 1:20:42.840
<v Speaker 2>were doing that for sort of bitcoin or something. And

1:20:43.560 --> 1:20:45.120
<v Speaker 2>so nothing new under the sun.

1:20:46.840 --> 1:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>There's no new ideas. There's just better packaged ones. Right.

1:20:50.520 --> 1:20:52.839
<v Speaker 2>That's very cynical but probably accurate.

1:20:54.200 --> 1:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what chat TPT will eventually tease it. Hey,

1:20:57.120 --> 1:21:00.479
<v Speaker 1>without the pandemic, we don't specialize in doing these credible

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>zoom telecast now oh yeah, half of what it is

1:21:04.560 --> 1:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>right like, we will look back at this moment it

1:21:07.000 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>actually created.

1:21:08.160 --> 1:21:10.759
<v Speaker 2>It was a moonshot. Yes, it was like a moonshot,

1:21:10.880 --> 1:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>but it was like having to come up with ballpoint pains.

1:21:13.560 --> 1:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And everybody had a come up.

1:21:14.840 --> 1:21:19.439
<v Speaker 2>They astaurants need to be right in space. So yeah,

1:21:19.600 --> 1:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and it made Yeah, it made all sorts of things.

1:21:23.360 --> 1:21:25.439
<v Speaker 2>It was a big but also I don't think we

1:21:25.520 --> 1:21:28.719
<v Speaker 2>still unpacked actually psychologically what it did to us all, oh.

1:21:28.880 --> 1:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I you know when we see we're seeing

1:21:33.360 --> 1:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in schools with kids. I mean, look, there's no one

1:21:36.040 --> 1:21:39.599
<v Speaker 1>saying we're saying it was great. No, no, I don't

1:21:39.640 --> 1:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. I know there was bad, but it was

1:21:41.280 --> 1:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, hey, the more important thing is we

1:21:44.360 --> 1:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>adapt it.

1:21:45.640 --> 1:21:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:21:45.960 --> 1:21:48.799
<v Speaker 1>We adapted, we survived, and we ought to at least

1:21:49.400 --> 1:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not sell ourselves short on that.

1:21:52.240 --> 1:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>No, we're a bit better than again. It's like the

1:21:57.000 --> 1:22:01.600
<v Speaker 2>thing that struck me it was how the number of

1:22:01.600 --> 1:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>times you'd see it. And I've written a zombie movie

1:22:04.040 --> 1:22:07.160
<v Speaker 2>where it's like, you know, within society collapses within twenty

1:22:07.200 --> 1:22:12.000
<v Speaker 2>minutes of this sort of calarity, and that isn't what happened,

1:22:12.479 --> 1:22:15.839
<v Speaker 2>like in that in the pandemic scenario, that isn't what happened.

1:22:16.200 --> 1:22:19.640
<v Speaker 2>We were out in Britain, we were out banging saucepans

1:22:20.160 --> 1:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>every Thursday in support of the NHS, although I did

1:22:24.280 --> 1:22:26.599
<v Speaker 2>read somebody was saying I think that was actually us

1:22:26.640 --> 1:22:28.920
<v Speaker 2>banging the saucepans to sort of let other people know

1:22:28.960 --> 1:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>we were still there, which made me quite sad what

1:22:32.720 --> 1:22:34.679
<v Speaker 2>I read that it was probably a more accurate read.

1:22:35.360 --> 1:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Charlie, I will have You've been very generous with your time.

1:22:39.040 --> 1:22:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Black Mirror is just a you know, it's I don't

1:22:42.600 --> 1:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's any aid could have come up with. This

1:22:44.760 --> 1:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is a reminder that it takes, yes, it takes a

1:22:47.040 --> 1:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>creative brain to come up with ideas.

1:22:49.200 --> 1:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I hope, So, I hope we'll always want messy humans

1:22:52.040 --> 1:22:55.640
<v Speaker 2>in our yes creative soup. I know if that analogy

1:22:55.760 --> 1:22:57.360
<v Speaker 2>makes sense, but that's what I've said.

1:22:57.880 --> 1:23:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's brilliant and you mean to Whether you mean

1:23:02.600 --> 1:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to have us think in dystopian ways or not, the

1:23:05.360 --> 1:23:08.599
<v Speaker 1>point is you make everybody think, and that's awesome. That matters.

1:23:08.840 --> 1:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all to me. That matters. You're making us think.

1:23:11.920 --> 1:23:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Good. Thank you very much, Thank you sir. That's very kind.

1:23:15.640 --> 1:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Well there you go. We got to end on an

1:23:17.360 --> 1:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>upbeat note. Little hope in an anas all right, thank you,

1:23:21.400 --> 1:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, a pleasure, great to talk with you. Thank you.

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Trouble So. I told you you'd enjoy that interview with

1:23:34.000 --> 1:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Brooker. He is fascinating. That mind is racing. And

1:23:39.520 --> 1:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you had RoboCop and twilight Zone.

1:23:43.080 --> 1:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure many of you assumed twilight Zone and rob

1:23:45.200 --> 1:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Serling Rod Sterling was Serling was one of his one

1:23:48.640 --> 1:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of his inspirations. But you bet you didn't see RoboCop coming,

1:23:53.160 --> 1:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And the minute he said it, I knew exactly what

1:23:55.320 --> 1:23:58.799
<v Speaker 1>he meant. Go check it out. The first RoboCop was

1:23:58.800 --> 1:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>was sort of more innovative than I think people gave

1:24:01.479 --> 1:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it credit for at the time. So anyway, it was

1:24:03.439 --> 1:24:06.559
<v Speaker 1>just I learned a lot, and frankly, it only makes

1:24:06.560 --> 1:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>me enjoy the show even more. I hope you got

1:24:09.960 --> 1:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot out of it too. All right, let's do

1:24:12.720 --> 1:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a little last Chuck as Chuck. All right, here's my

1:24:19.760 --> 1:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>first question. This one comes from Chaz Latore and he

1:24:24.200 --> 1:24:26.959
<v Speaker 1>writes this, You advocate news in every small town community.

1:24:27.280 --> 1:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting, But if news was generated locally, wouldn't it

1:24:29.960 --> 1:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>just turned into an echo chamber for the local community.

1:24:32.040 --> 1:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, I come from a very left leaning town

1:24:34.040 --> 1:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania. Wouldn't their news cast just be an echo

1:24:37.160 --> 1:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>chamber where the word Trump would never even make it

1:24:39.439 --> 1:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to a news broadcast. It seems like it would just

1:24:41.280 --> 1:24:43.519
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of local Fox news channels that echo

1:24:43.560 --> 1:24:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what the local community wants to hear. I would think

1:24:45.680 --> 1:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a broader national broadcast would be more balanced. What am

1:24:48.040 --> 1:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I missing here? Well, there is no broad cast balance

1:24:51.720 --> 1:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>right as we know. If you're looking for national news,

1:24:55.760 --> 1:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go and you're looking for news, you're

1:24:59.040 --> 1:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>going to go where you have a where you share

1:25:01.320 --> 1:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>some intellectual whether it's some intellectual agreement. What I'm advocating

1:25:07.040 --> 1:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is not local versions of Fox or MSNBC. That is

1:25:11.200 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not what I'm advocating. What I'm advocating is that we

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>basically need a different you know, what local news was

1:25:17.920 --> 1:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>at its best, and I understand that some people probably

1:25:22.080 --> 1:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's been twenty five years since we've

1:25:24.760 --> 1:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>had a healthy local news ecosystem. Arguably, so some of

1:25:28.160 --> 1:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you may not have been around or didn't fully appreciate it.

1:25:30.840 --> 1:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But what I would say is we need more service journalism,

1:25:37.320 --> 1:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and local journalism was more in service of the community

1:25:42.160 --> 1:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>than national journalism. National journalism is about essentially, you know,

1:25:45.880 --> 1:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>helping you be a citizen, your civics, but local journalism

1:25:49.600 --> 1:25:51.799
<v Speaker 1>at its best is about helping you live your life.

1:25:51.880 --> 1:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I mean. What we need is revitalize

1:25:55.080 --> 1:26:00.559
<v Speaker 1>community journalism that is focused more on helping you live

1:26:00.560 --> 1:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>your life, focused on how to save you money at

1:26:02.479 --> 1:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store, how to save you money at very

1:26:06.360 --> 1:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, to take your kids out to eat,

1:26:09.479 --> 1:26:11.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there's a better night of the week.

1:26:12.920 --> 1:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's being essentially almost like a community liaison. My

1:26:19.400 --> 1:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>vision for these small town and all of these community

1:26:22.400 --> 1:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>information systems is that you become the information helped ask

1:26:25.680 --> 1:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>for your community. And that could mean helping people find

1:26:29.120 --> 1:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>out when the high school game, when the high school

1:26:31.120 --> 1:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>lacrosse game starts this afternoon, helping people where to find it.

1:26:34.360 --> 1:26:36.559
<v Speaker 1>I think all I want these places to be the

1:26:36.600 --> 1:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>streaming home for all of youth sports and in high

1:26:40.400 --> 1:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>school sports. This is what I believe can be the

1:26:42.920 --> 1:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>glue to bring a community together. I also see sports

1:26:46.160 --> 1:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>as a way that you can sort of cut through

1:26:48.240 --> 1:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>red and blue because most you know, a pothole isn't

1:26:52.160 --> 1:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Republican or Democrat. It's a pothole, you know. So that's

1:26:57.160 --> 1:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what I'm that's my belief here. That's what

1:27:02.120 --> 1:27:05.519
<v Speaker 1>I know people tell me that they want whenever you ask,

1:27:05.800 --> 1:27:09.519
<v Speaker 1>this is what people feel like is missing. So I

1:27:09.560 --> 1:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>am a believer a little bit in the field of

1:27:11.200 --> 1:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>dreams here. If we build it, they will come. But

1:27:14.120 --> 1:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be Journalism that is focused on helping

1:27:17.160 --> 1:27:19.519
<v Speaker 1>people live their life and as always say where's the

1:27:19.640 --> 1:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>cheap food? Give me some micro forecasting for my community

1:27:24.120 --> 1:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>versus the one right next door when it comes to

1:27:26.000 --> 1:27:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the weather, access to all the important youth and local

1:27:29.520 --> 1:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>sports that I that I care about, and oh, by

1:27:33.680 --> 1:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the way, who's corrupted my city council? And so. But

1:27:37.560 --> 1:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's actually that part is the end part of things, right.

1:27:41.360 --> 1:27:43.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, people who want to be informed are always

1:27:43.600 --> 1:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going to get informed. It's about everybody else in the community.

1:27:46.840 --> 1:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Those are folks that are just trying to get by,

1:27:48.560 --> 1:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>get live their life. Either they're not news junkies, or

1:27:52.439 --> 1:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they've got other things in their life that take priority,

1:27:54.960 --> 1:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like making a living, educating their kids, et cetera. How

1:27:58.960 --> 1:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>about coverage for that? Right, that's the missing piece of

1:28:03.120 --> 1:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>this is that it's not about creating more local political news,

1:28:06.960 --> 1:28:10.519
<v Speaker 1>although I hope we get that too, but I'm starting

1:28:11.720 --> 1:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in the places where I know there's collective agreement and

1:28:14.080 --> 1:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>when I know there's collective need. Jack, I appreciate the

1:28:17.120 --> 1:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>question and love the skepticism because it gave me a

1:28:22.200 --> 1:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>chance to push back. This comes from Josh in Ohio

1:28:27.360 --> 1:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and Josh Wrights You've talked a lot about the possibility

1:28:31.240 --> 1:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican Party splitting between more traditional Republicans and

1:28:33.720 --> 1:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>mega Republicans. If that were to happen, who would be

1:28:36.000 --> 1:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in the traditional wing? It seems like MAGA is completely

1:28:37.960 --> 1:28:40.519
<v Speaker 1>taken over the party, So name some names. Look, I

1:28:40.560 --> 1:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>think MAGA has taken over the sort of the organizational

1:28:43.320 --> 1:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>structure of the party, There's no doubt about it. But

1:28:46.160 --> 1:28:48.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the people that are an elective office

1:28:48.800 --> 1:28:52.479
<v Speaker 1>who are clearly not MAGA Republicans but essentially are trying

1:28:52.520 --> 1:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to be MAGA adjacent, right, And I think many of

1:28:55.360 --> 1:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the MAGA adjacent folks would prefer to be in the

1:28:57.880 --> 1:29:01.759
<v Speaker 1>pre Donald Trump party, people like Tom Cotton. That's people

1:29:01.760 --> 1:29:06.679
<v Speaker 1>like Tom Tillis, Bill Cassidy, Lisa Murkowski for sure, right, Romney,

1:29:07.920 --> 1:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sununu. So I think it, you know, to me,

1:29:12.320 --> 1:29:16.559
<v Speaker 1>you you know, I might even say Lindsay Graham, you know,

1:29:16.640 --> 1:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>although I think he's a little more finger in the

1:29:18.400 --> 1:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>wind of where our South Carolina Republican's going to go

1:29:22.040 --> 1:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is where he's going to go. But and I think

1:29:24.760 --> 1:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these Republicans that have sort of gone back

1:29:27.320 --> 1:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and forth with that, But I think there really is

1:29:29.600 --> 1:29:33.639
<v Speaker 1>a question about is MAGA bigger than Trump? Right? That's

1:29:33.720 --> 1:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>still the basic question. Is it bigger than Trump or not?

1:29:37.200 --> 1:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And does a Trump junior brand hold MAGA together and

1:29:42.280 --> 1:29:45.639
<v Speaker 1>keep it on its I don't know, right, I think

1:29:45.680 --> 1:29:48.479
<v Speaker 1>that's an open question and one we're going to find

1:29:48.520 --> 1:29:52.599
<v Speaker 1>out sooner rather than later. But I think it's I think,

1:29:52.800 --> 1:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, really it does split along the you know,

1:29:56.880 --> 1:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>do you believe in the in a sort of internationalist

1:30:01.520 --> 1:30:05.519
<v Speaker 1>view that ultimately America is an example to set that

1:30:05.520 --> 1:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we ought to spread our ideals of freedom, free trade, democracy,

1:30:10.120 --> 1:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>things like that, a free market, that that is something

1:30:13.400 --> 1:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we should spread around the world, which I think is

1:30:16.640 --> 1:30:19.519
<v Speaker 1>in part some of the free market intellectual thinking in

1:30:19.560 --> 1:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this sort of more traditional sense of the Republican Party.

1:30:23.760 --> 1:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think that where there is alignment is in

1:30:26.200 --> 1:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>cultural conservatism. So I think that that will continue to

1:30:29.080 --> 1:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be the through line that keeps this coalition together. But

1:30:34.160 --> 1:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're asking me to name names, those are the

1:30:35.760 --> 1:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>names I would go to, all right. This one comes

1:30:38.960 --> 1:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>from Judith Workman. Her question, is it possible that the

1:30:42.240 --> 1:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster that we have been on for the last

1:30:43.840 --> 1:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>few days, meaning the stock market, be simply a way

1:30:46.800 --> 1:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate the economy for Trump and others in the

1:30:48.840 --> 1:30:50.839
<v Speaker 1>regime to bring the market down so they can purchase

1:30:50.840 --> 1:30:53.439
<v Speaker 1>more stocks, etc. And then bring the market back up

1:30:53.479 --> 1:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to increase their personal Well, well, Judith, look, you're not

1:30:57.760 --> 1:31:00.519
<v Speaker 1>the only person who thinks this. There's no doubt there

1:31:00.520 --> 1:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are people that are making money manipulating you know, who

1:31:04.400 --> 1:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>know who may have an insider knowledge of where things

1:31:09.000 --> 1:31:12.479
<v Speaker 1>are going. But no, I don't think there is a

1:31:12.560 --> 1:31:15.559
<v Speaker 1>large chunk of people trying to do that, you know.

1:31:15.640 --> 1:31:18.479
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's the crypto community, particularly in the

1:31:18.560 --> 1:31:21.479
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty four election. I think there's quite a

1:31:21.479 --> 1:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>few people that are invest that are long on some

1:31:23.840 --> 1:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>crypto investments, that are desperately hoping that they have value

1:31:28.600 --> 1:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're worried that it won't have value and are

1:31:31.200 --> 1:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>counting on Donald Trump to give them value. But I'm

1:31:34.840 --> 1:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not sure I'm there on the full fledged stock market

1:31:38.320 --> 1:31:44.879
<v Speaker 1>manipulation because you know it, perhaps there's some short term traders,

1:31:45.120 --> 1:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and if we had a more functioning SEC, maybe there'd

1:31:47.880 --> 1:31:51.519
<v Speaker 1>be some legitimate investigations into this, But sadly, we don't

1:31:51.560 --> 1:31:54.639
<v Speaker 1>have a an SEC that is truly independent right now

1:31:55.040 --> 1:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that I think should be looking at these things, you know,

1:31:59.400 --> 1:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>especially in the world of Donald Trump, who you know,

1:32:02.960 --> 1:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>he everybody, everybody sort of has the combination. I always

1:32:06.360 --> 1:32:11.639
<v Speaker 1>joke Donald Trump is kind of like that Elaine character

1:32:11.680 --> 1:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in Seinfeld when it comes to the vault. If you

1:32:14.040 --> 1:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>remember that, and Jerry Seinfeld used to say, Oh, everybody's

1:32:17.000 --> 1:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>got the combination. It was Hennessy, you know. I think

1:32:19.120 --> 1:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that was the brand of liquor that all of a

1:32:21.880 --> 1:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>sudden she'd tell you everything she had. You know, Donald Trump,

1:32:25.240 --> 1:32:27.759
<v Speaker 1>he's made it clear if you want inside her access,

1:32:27.760 --> 1:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>pay two hundred and fifty thousand dollars and come be

1:32:29.840 --> 1:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a member of mar Lago or come do this with

1:32:32.160 --> 1:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto like, there is always access to him, and you

1:32:35.439 --> 1:32:38.559
<v Speaker 1>might accidentally get a tip that can help you. But

1:32:38.680 --> 1:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes Trump's saying stuff that he wants to happen and

1:32:42.360 --> 1:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't happen. And sometimes he says stuff that does

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>happen and you could have made money on it. But

1:32:47.720 --> 1:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>there are so many people that get that have bought

1:32:50.240 --> 1:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>access to get close to him at his clubs in particular,

1:32:54.320 --> 1:32:57.639
<v Speaker 1>that you can't rule out that possibility. I just don't

1:32:57.680 --> 1:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a full organized barras for what it's worth

1:33:01.520 --> 1:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. So with that, I think I'm gonna wrap

1:33:05.080 --> 1:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>up this this episode. Hope you enjoy the enjoyed the week.

1:33:09.120 --> 1:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't caught up on previous episodes, please do

1:33:11.760 --> 1:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>because I know we've had some issues with the automatic

1:33:14.120 --> 1:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>updating among those that subscribe to the podcast on Apple obviously,

1:33:19.840 --> 1:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>even if you subscribe on Apple, come over to the

1:33:22.240 --> 1:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel like and subscribe there. The check podcast has

1:33:25.280 --> 1:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a YouTube channel. You can check us out on Spotify

1:33:28.200 --> 1:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>or wherever else serves up podcasts. So with that, I'll

1:33:31.920 --> 1:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>see you next week until we upload again