WEBVTT - Iran: Don’t Rush To Judge A Dangerous Moment

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:28.964
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:28.964 --> 0:00:31.444
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kannakova and.

0:00:31.524 --> 0:00:35.964
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver. So today in typical high low fashion

0:00:36.244 --> 0:00:38.764
<v Speaker 2>Risky Business, We're going to start out with one of

0:00:38.764 --> 0:00:41.684
<v Speaker 2>the most serious topics in the world right now, Iran.

0:00:42.124 --> 0:00:45.444
<v Speaker 2>We're going to navigate carefully around this, in fact, talking

0:00:45.484 --> 0:00:48.724
<v Speaker 2>about how is an American citizen? Let alone podcast co

0:00:48.804 --> 0:00:51.524
<v Speaker 2>host We're trying to navigate things where we don't know

0:00:52.284 --> 0:00:54.524
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the parameters and think about a little

0:00:54.524 --> 0:00:58.004
<v Speaker 2>bit about the domestic conflicts, but also the the strategy

0:00:58.084 --> 0:01:01.644
<v Speaker 2>that Trump faces and the potential for good and bad

0:01:01.684 --> 0:01:02.364
<v Speaker 2>decision making.

0:01:02.844 --> 0:01:06.164
<v Speaker 1>And after that we're gonna do a one eighty and

0:01:06.564 --> 0:01:09.764
<v Speaker 1>talk about poker and what's been going on at the

0:01:09.804 --> 0:01:12.164
<v Speaker 1>World Series, how Nate and I have been doing, and

0:01:12.604 --> 0:01:16.884
<v Speaker 1>some angle shooting and other controversies that have arisen in

0:01:16.924 --> 0:01:19.124
<v Speaker 1>the past week. Because what would a World Series be

0:01:19.244 --> 0:01:20.644
<v Speaker 1>without a controversy a week.

0:01:20.884 --> 0:01:21.844
<v Speaker 2>Let's get into it, Nate.

0:01:26.204 --> 0:01:30.884
<v Speaker 1>We tape this show on Tuesdays. It's Tuesday, June twenty fourth.

0:01:31.404 --> 0:01:34.364
<v Speaker 1>You won't hear this until Thursday, and we always have

0:01:34.484 --> 0:01:37.084
<v Speaker 1>this caveat. But with the situation in Iran right now,

0:01:37.124 --> 0:01:40.764
<v Speaker 1>I think that caveat is extra important because just's changing

0:01:40.804 --> 0:01:45.924
<v Speaker 1>every second. Right So this happens all the time in

0:01:46.124 --> 0:01:49.764
<v Speaker 1>military conflicts, in wars, but in this particular situation, when

0:01:49.804 --> 0:01:54.924
<v Speaker 1>there's so much unknown, so much uncertainty, so much ambiguity,

0:01:55.204 --> 0:01:57.844
<v Speaker 1>where it's so difficult to make judgments, the fact that

0:01:57.884 --> 0:01:59.524
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know what's going on, and that the

0:01:59.564 --> 0:02:04.084
<v Speaker 1>situation keeps changing hour by hour really makes it difficult.

0:02:04.164 --> 0:02:07.684
<v Speaker 1>But as of now, we have Trump having announced on

0:02:07.764 --> 0:02:11.964
<v Speaker 1>truth social that there's a East fire, having successfully bullied

0:02:12.004 --> 0:02:15.844
<v Speaker 1>both sides, just saying okay, okay, we'll have a ceasefire

0:02:15.884 --> 0:02:18.924
<v Speaker 1>at least as of now Tuesday morning. We'll see how

0:02:19.164 --> 0:02:23.364
<v Speaker 1>how this ages on Thursday, but that's where we currently are.

0:02:23.604 --> 0:02:25.644
<v Speaker 1>So just a little bit of a recap in case

0:02:25.684 --> 0:02:28.084
<v Speaker 1>you haven't been following the news at all. The US

0:02:28.164 --> 0:02:33.284
<v Speaker 1>bombed three strategic nuclear sites in Iran. It was a

0:02:33.404 --> 0:02:37.124
<v Speaker 1>successful mission, but maybe not as successful as Trump initially

0:02:37.444 --> 0:02:40.924
<v Speaker 1>made it out to be. Iran retaliated by hitting a

0:02:41.004 --> 0:02:44.484
<v Speaker 1>base the largest US military base the Middle East, in Qatar,

0:02:44.924 --> 0:02:48.004
<v Speaker 1>gave the US ample warning, and Israel and Aron have

0:02:48.044 --> 0:02:51.604
<v Speaker 1>been exchanging strikes up until Tuesday. Morning, where Trump is like,

0:02:51.724 --> 0:02:55.764
<v Speaker 1>Israel stop and Iran stop, there's a ceasefire, and you're

0:02:55.764 --> 0:02:57.244
<v Speaker 1>going to agree to it. So that's where we are

0:02:57.324 --> 0:02:57.764
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:02:58.324 --> 0:03:02.884
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, for better or worse. Markets are upfices

0:03:02.924 --> 0:03:05.884
<v Speaker 2>again Tuesday morning, Vegas time, Tuesday afternoon East Coast time.

0:03:05.884 --> 0:03:07.844
<v Speaker 2>When we're taping this market sere up. They seem to

0:03:07.844 --> 0:03:11.564
<v Speaker 2>put some credence in the news. Oil prices are back

0:03:11.644 --> 0:03:14.804
<v Speaker 2>down again. I believe it is a little funny because

0:03:14.844 --> 0:03:18.764
<v Speaker 2>like the heuristic had been taco Trump always chickens out,

0:03:18.844 --> 0:03:22.124
<v Speaker 2>which I think was kind of poorly formed. Right, I

0:03:22.124 --> 0:03:26.924
<v Speaker 2>think Trump is Okay, We're already getting into controversial territory.

0:03:27.084 --> 0:03:30.804
<v Speaker 2>I think Trump is more quote unquote rational. We can

0:03:30.844 --> 0:03:32.924
<v Speaker 2>debate what rational means about some of this stuff than

0:03:32.964 --> 0:03:36.524
<v Speaker 2>he's sometimes given credit for. Right, he backs off when

0:03:36.564 --> 0:03:40.044
<v Speaker 2>he has a losing hand. Here, I don't know. I mean,

0:03:40.044 --> 0:03:42.324
<v Speaker 2>there was apparently we're going to talk about like the

0:03:42.324 --> 0:03:44.964
<v Speaker 2>way Americans feel about this and the splits in the

0:03:44.964 --> 0:03:48.044
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party, right, you know, here there was apparently some

0:03:48.964 --> 0:03:53.724
<v Speaker 2>dissent in the cabinet. Tulsa Gabbard was afraid of doing

0:03:53.764 --> 0:03:56.444
<v Speaker 2>anything mean to Iran. Apparently this is not something that

0:03:56.444 --> 0:03:57.444
<v Speaker 2>Putin likes either.

0:03:57.604 --> 0:03:57.764
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:03:59.004 --> 0:04:01.644
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Republican Party also has a very complicated

0:04:01.684 --> 0:04:06.044
<v Speaker 2>relationship with the State of Israel, as does America in general,

0:04:06.444 --> 0:04:09.644
<v Speaker 2>and liberals and Democrats as well in their own way.

0:04:10.044 --> 0:04:14.004
<v Speaker 2>But this does appear to have been a Trump decision.

0:04:14.124 --> 0:04:17.924
<v Speaker 2>This is not a case like our previous president, President Biden,

0:04:18.084 --> 0:04:21.004
<v Speaker 2>who was maybe outsourcing a lot of high level decision

0:04:21.004 --> 0:04:22.644
<v Speaker 2>making to members of his cabinet.

0:04:23.084 --> 0:04:25.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so on risky business, you know, we're all about

0:04:25.964 --> 0:04:29.244
<v Speaker 1>good decision analysis, Right, How do you analyze the risk?

0:04:29.324 --> 0:04:31.924
<v Speaker 1>How do you kind of weigh all the factors to

0:04:31.964 --> 0:04:35.404
<v Speaker 1>decide correctly? And in situations like this, like the simple

0:04:35.444 --> 0:04:38.164
<v Speaker 1>truth is that we don't have the information, right, no

0:04:38.164 --> 0:04:41.124
<v Speaker 1>one has the information when you're reading analyzes, you know,

0:04:41.524 --> 0:04:43.564
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in the New York Times or a Foreign

0:04:43.564 --> 0:04:48.084
<v Speaker 1>Policy BBC wherever it is, nobody has the facts and

0:04:48.124 --> 0:04:50.804
<v Speaker 1>we won't have them until much later on. Right, These

0:04:50.804 --> 0:04:53.444
<v Speaker 1>are the sorts of decisions that are analyzed well in

0:04:53.484 --> 0:04:56.084
<v Speaker 1>retrospect by historians when you know, there are things that

0:04:56.164 --> 0:04:58.724
<v Speaker 1>have become declassified, when we know more about what happens

0:04:58.764 --> 0:05:00.964
<v Speaker 1>when the people who were in the room actually start

0:05:01.044 --> 0:05:03.444
<v Speaker 1>talking and right, now we simply don't know. So all

0:05:03.484 --> 0:05:07.364
<v Speaker 1>of these analyzes we've talked before on the show about biases,

0:05:07.364 --> 0:05:11.204
<v Speaker 1>about motivated reasoning, about you know, availability, heuristics, and all

0:05:11.244 --> 0:05:13.644
<v Speaker 1>of these things, and that's I really don't want to

0:05:14.844 --> 0:05:17.924
<v Speaker 1>add to that because I think that people right now

0:05:17.964 --> 0:05:21.924
<v Speaker 1>are being biased by their political leanings, their presuppositions when

0:05:21.964 --> 0:05:24.524
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Iran, the United States should we get involved,

0:05:24.524 --> 0:05:28.804
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And that is obviously I think tinting their

0:05:28.844 --> 0:05:32.884
<v Speaker 1>analysis in one direction or in another and showing how

0:05:32.884 --> 0:05:36.644
<v Speaker 1>they selectively process information. And so I think that on

0:05:36.684 --> 0:05:39.444
<v Speaker 1>this show, we don't want to do that, right, We're

0:05:39.484 --> 0:05:43.284
<v Speaker 1>not in the business of speculating on people in that

0:05:43.324 --> 0:05:46.324
<v Speaker 1>sort of sense. That's bad decision analysis. And so for now,

0:05:46.404 --> 0:05:48.324
<v Speaker 1>I think what we can focus on is on the

0:05:48.324 --> 0:05:50.604
<v Speaker 1>things that we do now, and as you know, as

0:05:50.644 --> 0:05:52.924
<v Speaker 1>responsible citizens. I think this is what Nate was alluding

0:05:52.964 --> 0:05:56.364
<v Speaker 1>to earlier. You often are in situations, right, this is

0:05:56.444 --> 0:05:59.844
<v Speaker 1>like the extreme of the unknowns because it's a foreign

0:05:59.844 --> 0:06:03.804
<v Speaker 1>policy decision. It was a military strike. Right, everything is classified,

0:06:03.844 --> 0:06:05.844
<v Speaker 1>like we really have no idea what the hell's going on.

0:06:06.444 --> 0:06:08.524
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what the intelligence is, we don't know

0:06:08.564 --> 0:06:12.004
<v Speaker 1>anything but we have to make decisions all the time.

0:06:12.524 --> 0:06:15.004
<v Speaker 1>We're in a democracy, so we vote, So we need

0:06:15.044 --> 0:06:17.124
<v Speaker 1>to kind of try to figure out what do we

0:06:17.204 --> 0:06:20.164
<v Speaker 1>do as citizens in situations of uncertainty? How do we

0:06:20.204 --> 0:06:24.204
<v Speaker 1>try to parse this sort of information? Right, Nate, that's

0:06:24.324 --> 0:06:26.324
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what you were getting at, Right, How

0:06:26.364 --> 0:06:28.844
<v Speaker 1>do how do we respond? How do we try to

0:06:28.924 --> 0:06:32.964
<v Speaker 1>get through the fog of all of these different opinions

0:06:33.004 --> 0:06:35.044
<v Speaker 1>that may or may not agree with each other, and

0:06:35.084 --> 0:06:37.484
<v Speaker 1>how do we do that in a way that's actually

0:06:37.524 --> 0:06:40.044
<v Speaker 1>as unbiased as possible because it's so easy for me

0:06:40.804 --> 0:06:42.724
<v Speaker 1>to say, like in advance, oh, I agree that we

0:06:42.724 --> 0:06:44.284
<v Speaker 1>should have bombed around or I don't agree that we

0:06:44.324 --> 0:06:46.284
<v Speaker 1>should have bombed Iran, And so I'm going to look

0:06:46.444 --> 0:06:49.204
<v Speaker 1>at those analyzes only and I'll make up my mind.

0:06:49.404 --> 0:06:52.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like, let's let's enumerate for a minute here, Like

0:06:52.444 --> 0:06:54.684
<v Speaker 2>some of the things that we don't know and in

0:06:54.724 --> 0:06:59.524
<v Speaker 2>fact are deliberately likely to be concealed yep, right or ambiguous? Right?

0:06:59.564 --> 0:07:00.884
<v Speaker 2>You know. Number one thing we don't know is in

0:07:00.924 --> 0:07:05.204
<v Speaker 2>what state was Iran's nuclear program? How close they were

0:07:05.204 --> 0:07:06.764
<v Speaker 2>they developing actual weapons?

0:07:06.804 --> 0:07:06.964
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:07:07.364 --> 0:07:10.644
<v Speaker 2>Number Two we don't know is how much to set

0:07:10.724 --> 0:07:12.644
<v Speaker 2>them back. I mean, you can look at satellite photos.

0:07:12.684 --> 0:07:15.084
<v Speaker 2>There's a big hole in the ground. Right, did that

0:07:15.124 --> 0:07:17.204
<v Speaker 2>hole was supposed to be dug very and deep in

0:07:17.244 --> 0:07:20.204
<v Speaker 2>the ground get penetrated to the point where they've been

0:07:20.204 --> 0:07:23.084
<v Speaker 2>set back by years? Right? Other other facilities that we

0:07:23.124 --> 0:07:26.764
<v Speaker 2>don't know about. That's number two. Right? Number three is

0:07:27.524 --> 0:07:31.004
<v Speaker 2>to what extent so Israel lacked? I believe they're called

0:07:31.164 --> 0:07:35.124
<v Speaker 2>bunker busting bombs to penetrate far enough if they could

0:07:35.164 --> 0:07:37.724
<v Speaker 2>do some things, they could take out you know, Iranian

0:07:37.844 --> 0:07:39.444
<v Speaker 2>nuclear scientists and things like that.

0:07:39.564 --> 0:07:39.724
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:07:39.764 --> 0:07:43.804
<v Speaker 2>You know, as a citizen, I'm I'm somewhat curious about

0:07:43.804 --> 0:07:47.684
<v Speaker 2>how much Trump felt like his hand was forced by that.

0:07:47.884 --> 0:07:53.684
<v Speaker 2>Yahoo That creates a complicated equilibrium, right. You know, Look,

0:07:53.844 --> 0:07:56.364
<v Speaker 2>I will say, I'm not a big BB guy. I

0:07:56.364 --> 0:07:59.564
<v Speaker 2>won't go further than that, Right, but you know, where

0:07:59.564 --> 0:08:02.324
<v Speaker 2>we force into a situation that like it may have

0:08:02.324 --> 0:08:05.164
<v Speaker 2>been the most rational action given that choice. We don't

0:08:05.204 --> 0:08:07.044
<v Speaker 2>know that either, And obviously we don't know like any

0:08:07.084 --> 0:08:11.764
<v Speaker 2>of the long term consequences of this. So far, it

0:08:11.844 --> 0:08:16.284
<v Speaker 2>seems like Iran is maybe more concerned about preserving domestic politics.

0:08:16.324 --> 0:08:20.084
<v Speaker 2>But to what extent does this like provoke for their

0:08:20.084 --> 0:08:22.924
<v Speaker 2>hatred of the United States and Israel. Does it provoke

0:08:22.964 --> 0:08:27.084
<v Speaker 2>future terrorist attacks? Does it make countries more determined to

0:08:27.204 --> 0:08:31.044
<v Speaker 2>develop nuclear programs or you know, biological weapons and things

0:08:31.084 --> 0:08:33.844
<v Speaker 2>like that. How does the rest of the Middle East

0:08:33.844 --> 0:08:37.204
<v Speaker 2>and the Arab world feel about this? I mean, one

0:08:37.204 --> 0:08:39.524
<v Speaker 2>of the good things. I think there were a few

0:08:39.524 --> 0:08:41.484
<v Speaker 2>good things in Trump's first term, right, one of which

0:08:41.524 --> 0:08:43.964
<v Speaker 2>is you kind of had And you can debate the

0:08:44.004 --> 0:08:47.564
<v Speaker 2>reasons for this, but we did see improving relations with

0:08:47.604 --> 0:08:50.684
<v Speaker 2>parts of the Arab world during Trump's first term. Are

0:08:50.684 --> 0:08:52.284
<v Speaker 2>they happy about this or not?

0:08:52.564 --> 0:08:52.764
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:08:53.604 --> 0:08:55.844
<v Speaker 2>We don't know any of that, right, And we also

0:08:55.884 --> 0:08:59.284
<v Speaker 2>don't know to what extent Iran would have used nuclear

0:08:59.324 --> 0:09:03.084
<v Speaker 2>weapons if they had them. I mean, I think they're

0:09:03.124 --> 0:09:05.124
<v Speaker 2>pretty widely regarded as a bad actor. But like also

0:09:05.124 --> 0:09:07.604
<v Speaker 2>that's a question of like stylized facts that we know.

0:09:07.684 --> 0:09:09.644
<v Speaker 2>It's not a case like what's the case, It's like

0:09:09.684 --> 0:09:13.804
<v Speaker 2>much more trivial. Right. It's like congestion pricing in New York. Right,

0:09:14.124 --> 0:09:16.804
<v Speaker 2>if you don't like research the empirical data on that

0:09:16.884 --> 0:09:18.924
<v Speaker 2>and don't look at the mechanism for how it works, right,

0:09:19.084 --> 0:09:20.524
<v Speaker 2>That's something where if you took a day and really

0:09:20.524 --> 0:09:22.684
<v Speaker 2>study it, you might have a valid opinion here, there

0:09:22.684 --> 0:09:25.684
<v Speaker 2>are just things that are unknowable beyond a certain level.

0:09:26.364 --> 0:09:29.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean even even to the point where as

0:09:29.164 --> 0:09:31.564
<v Speaker 1>you said, we have no idea how much the nuclear

0:09:31.604 --> 0:09:34.764
<v Speaker 1>program was damaged. You know, there's speculation that a lot

0:09:34.804 --> 0:09:38.004
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear material was actually moved before the strikes, right,

0:09:38.244 --> 0:09:39.924
<v Speaker 1>And we don't know what the counterfacture would have been,

0:09:40.004 --> 0:09:42.964
<v Speaker 1>right Like, would diplomacy have been successful. We have you know,

0:09:43.164 --> 0:09:45.564
<v Speaker 1>historic data that it hasn't been in the past, but

0:09:45.924 --> 0:09:48.404
<v Speaker 1>who knows, right Like, there are so many things that

0:09:48.804 --> 0:09:50.764
<v Speaker 1>we just have no way of telling, and we don't

0:09:50.844 --> 0:09:55.004
<v Speaker 1>know how Iran is going to react right now kind

0:09:55.004 --> 0:09:57.204
<v Speaker 1>of over the long term. Right now, it seems like

0:09:57.244 --> 0:09:59.004
<v Speaker 1>the ceasefire is going to hold because it is a

0:09:59.004 --> 0:10:02.284
<v Speaker 1>great you know, rationally like it seems to me it's

0:10:02.324 --> 0:10:04.564
<v Speaker 1>a great space saving thing, right Like, if you know

0:10:04.644 --> 0:10:07.604
<v Speaker 1>that you don't really want the US to keep attacking you,

0:10:07.604 --> 0:10:09.844
<v Speaker 1>you can say, look, hey, we launched a at the

0:10:09.844 --> 0:10:13.804
<v Speaker 1>biggest US base in the region. But obviously they warned

0:10:13.924 --> 0:10:15.884
<v Speaker 1>the US ahead of time that this was going to happen,

0:10:16.164 --> 0:10:18.244
<v Speaker 1>so there were no casualties. But you can say, here

0:10:18.524 --> 0:10:21.004
<v Speaker 1>there's a win for all of us. We retaliated. Now

0:10:21.004 --> 0:10:24.444
<v Speaker 1>we're all going to step back. But what's the as

0:10:24.484 --> 0:10:27.524
<v Speaker 1>innate as you kind of alluded to, what's the long

0:10:27.604 --> 0:10:30.084
<v Speaker 1>term plan here? If we kind of saved all our

0:10:30.164 --> 0:10:33.724
<v Speaker 1>nuclear materials, do we just lie low for a few years, right,

0:10:34.204 --> 0:10:37.884
<v Speaker 1>and pretend that everything's fine? But really, like this really

0:10:37.924 --> 0:10:40.964
<v Speaker 1>pissed us off. What's going to happen? And the truth

0:10:41.044 --> 0:10:43.804
<v Speaker 1>is we can speculate, but speculation isn't going to be

0:10:44.044 --> 0:10:47.044
<v Speaker 1>particularly helpful in the absence of this sort of information.

0:10:47.644 --> 0:10:50.324
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of those times when I would

0:10:50.404 --> 0:10:55.404
<v Speaker 1>really really caution everyone to really try to understand what

0:10:55.444 --> 0:10:58.324
<v Speaker 1>your biases are, because those are really going to affect

0:10:58.364 --> 0:11:02.564
<v Speaker 1>how you're interpreting information, what information you're seeing as legitimate

0:11:02.924 --> 0:11:05.604
<v Speaker 1>or not legitimate. And that's true by the way of

0:11:06.124 --> 0:11:09.404
<v Speaker 1>policymakers as well. Right, this is one of those situations

0:11:09.604 --> 0:11:14.124
<v Speaker 1>where like, because of all of the uncertainty, actually are

0:11:15.484 --> 0:11:20.124
<v Speaker 1>reaching for heuristics and our brains kind of reliance on

0:11:20.204 --> 0:11:23.684
<v Speaker 1>biases becomes greater. So it's one of those things where

0:11:23.724 --> 0:11:26.404
<v Speaker 1>like there's an inverse relationship where well, actually no, it's

0:11:26.404 --> 0:11:27.244
<v Speaker 1>a direct relationship.

0:11:27.324 --> 0:11:27.484
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:27.604 --> 0:11:30.644
<v Speaker 1>The greater the uncertainty the greater our use of heuristics

0:11:30.644 --> 0:11:33.084
<v Speaker 1>and biases, because we don't actually have a lot of

0:11:33.084 --> 0:11:37.524
<v Speaker 1>information to go on, and so we go on what

0:11:37.604 --> 0:11:39.804
<v Speaker 1>we want to be true and gut feeling, and it's

0:11:39.884 --> 0:11:42.324
<v Speaker 1>much easier than to support that point of view. That's

0:11:42.324 --> 0:11:46.684
<v Speaker 1>a relationship that's very, very tricky and something that we

0:11:46.764 --> 0:11:49.204
<v Speaker 1>really need to avoid, including you and me, Nate right like,

0:11:49.244 --> 0:11:53.404
<v Speaker 1>we do it too, We're human. It's really difficult to

0:11:53.764 --> 0:11:57.844
<v Speaker 1>think clearly when you have all of this uncertainty. I

0:11:57.844 --> 0:11:59.764
<v Speaker 1>do want to go back to a point you made,

0:11:59.804 --> 0:12:02.204
<v Speaker 1>because I do think it's really interesting. And I was like,

0:12:02.284 --> 0:12:05.644
<v Speaker 1>what the hell, especially initially, like when you see that

0:12:06.604 --> 0:12:09.004
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, you know, and crypto and all these

0:12:09.004 --> 0:12:13.004
<v Speaker 1>things were not like they weren't really reacting right. Even

0:12:13.044 --> 0:12:15.844
<v Speaker 1>before the ceasefire when there was news of the bombing,

0:12:15.924 --> 0:12:17.924
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Oh, this is probably not going to

0:12:17.924 --> 0:12:20.644
<v Speaker 1>be that bad, right. We saw a much bigger fall

0:12:20.764 --> 0:12:24.044
<v Speaker 1>in both the last time that there was potential for

0:12:24.164 --> 0:12:27.044
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty and Iran a little over a year ago, and

0:12:27.084 --> 0:12:30.004
<v Speaker 1>this time everything was very muted, and I wonder if

0:12:30.004 --> 0:12:32.724
<v Speaker 1>that's just over correction saying, oh, well, last time nothing

0:12:32.764 --> 0:12:34.524
<v Speaker 1>bad happened, so we're just going to assume that it's

0:12:34.564 --> 0:12:37.204
<v Speaker 1>going to be just like last time, or if it's

0:12:37.244 --> 0:12:40.124
<v Speaker 1>wishful thinking, you know, oh well, we don't want anything

0:12:40.164 --> 0:12:42.924
<v Speaker 1>bad to happen, so we're just going to kind of

0:12:43.084 --> 0:12:44.844
<v Speaker 1>pretend nothing bad's going to happen.

0:12:44.924 --> 0:12:47.244
<v Speaker 2>What is it, Well, yeah, this famous thing where like

0:12:47.724 --> 0:12:50.604
<v Speaker 2>the stock market doesn't really discount for the price of

0:12:50.644 --> 0:12:53.124
<v Speaker 2>nuclear war because if we're all dead, then nobody cares

0:12:53.124 --> 0:12:57.164
<v Speaker 2>what you're for. One k is worth. I do think

0:12:57.164 --> 0:13:01.524
<v Speaker 2>it's worth saying that. Like, Iran's a big country in

0:13:02.044 --> 0:13:05.724
<v Speaker 2>various senses of that term, right, it has ninety million people.

0:13:05.724 --> 0:13:08.444
<v Speaker 2>I think Ted Cruz got that wrong in some interview.

0:13:08.484 --> 0:13:11.004
<v Speaker 2>It's ninety million people. It's a lot of people. It's

0:13:11.044 --> 0:13:13.724
<v Speaker 2>GDP per capita it is not very high as four

0:13:13.804 --> 0:13:17.284
<v Speaker 2>ero point five thousand per head. That's down. I don't

0:13:17.244 --> 0:13:20.124
<v Speaker 2>know what, except it's oil price fluctuations versus regime change

0:13:20.204 --> 0:13:22.204
<v Speaker 2>versus everything else. As of twenty as we say, as

0:13:22.204 --> 0:13:26.484
<v Speaker 2>twenty twelve, it had a higher per capita GDP than China,

0:13:26.564 --> 0:13:29.844
<v Speaker 2>so the world changes a lot. It occupies a very

0:13:30.684 --> 0:13:35.084
<v Speaker 2>important strategic location in terms of the way that oil

0:13:35.204 --> 0:13:37.564
<v Speaker 2>is moving and other goods are moving around. The Middle

0:13:37.604 --> 0:13:40.844
<v Speaker 2>East and around the world. So this is a high

0:13:40.924 --> 0:13:42.844
<v Speaker 2>leverage decision point. And by the way, it's like not

0:13:43.004 --> 0:13:49.084
<v Speaker 2>really invadable. Even foolish Americans I think would not be

0:13:49.164 --> 0:13:51.924
<v Speaker 2>inclined to invade. This country's much more populous and much

0:13:51.924 --> 0:13:55.964
<v Speaker 2>more mountainous than say Iraq. Right, maybe in some ways

0:13:55.964 --> 0:13:59.524
<v Speaker 2>it's better. I don't think there's any risk of like

0:14:01.244 --> 0:14:03.484
<v Speaker 2>turning this into a ground world, Like I do want

0:14:03.484 --> 0:14:07.204
<v Speaker 2>to say a couple of things here, right, you know,

0:14:07.284 --> 0:14:11.804
<v Speaker 2>One is that more countries having nuclear weapons is probably

0:14:12.404 --> 0:14:17.684
<v Speaker 2>probably bad. Right, you know, I think people on balance

0:14:17.764 --> 0:14:21.364
<v Speaker 2>understate the risk of a nuclear conflict. It hasn't been

0:14:21.364 --> 0:14:23.164
<v Speaker 2>that long, just a couple of generations since the world

0:14:23.164 --> 0:14:28.044
<v Speaker 2>has had weapons these powerful, right, So you know, other

0:14:28.084 --> 0:14:30.604
<v Speaker 2>things be equal, and things are not equal international law

0:14:30.684 --> 0:14:34.204
<v Speaker 2>and precedents and norms and things like that. And you know,

0:14:34.244 --> 0:14:36.964
<v Speaker 2>why does Israel get to have Unofficially it's a strategic

0:14:37.044 --> 0:14:39.604
<v Speaker 2>mbig explicient. Everyone believes that Israel has nuclear weapons, right,

0:14:40.044 --> 0:14:42.884
<v Speaker 2>you know who deserves them and who doesn't. I don't

0:14:42.884 --> 0:14:45.844
<v Speaker 2>know about that paternalism or whatever else, right, but some

0:14:45.844 --> 0:14:48.004
<v Speaker 2>people think we want regime change in a random like

0:14:49.204 --> 0:14:53.684
<v Speaker 2>the one thing I'll say about Trump because obviously we've

0:14:53.684 --> 0:14:56.004
<v Speaker 2>talked about Okay, you don't know all the facts, really

0:14:56.044 --> 0:14:58.084
<v Speaker 2>don't know any of the important facts, right, so you

0:14:58.124 --> 0:15:01.804
<v Speaker 2>default to priors, and what's a prior versus a bias?

0:15:01.884 --> 0:15:02.084
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:15:02.684 --> 0:15:04.684
<v Speaker 2>You know, I would feel better if Trump had people

0:15:04.764 --> 0:15:08.524
<v Speaker 2>obsessions of power that he had in his first term. Right,

0:15:08.564 --> 0:15:11.524
<v Speaker 2>if Pete Hegseth or Chelsea Gabberd don't like this, I

0:15:11.564 --> 0:15:13.884
<v Speaker 2>actually feel better about it, right, I believe it or not,

0:15:14.004 --> 0:15:18.924
<v Speaker 2>Trump trust Trump's judgment more than them frankly. But that's

0:15:18.924 --> 0:15:21.124
<v Speaker 2>the why we've come to it. That's the point we've

0:15:21.164 --> 0:15:26.124
<v Speaker 2>come to. But he has not been particularly hawkish, right.

0:15:26.524 --> 0:15:29.404
<v Speaker 2>He's been trying, I think not terribly effectively to be

0:15:29.484 --> 0:15:35.084
<v Speaker 2>negotiating a ceasefire with in Ukraine. Right, He's been all

0:15:35.084 --> 0:15:38.524
<v Speaker 2>over the place on China. Right, but you know, we

0:15:38.564 --> 0:15:41.764
<v Speaker 2>didn't have any new wars in Trump's first term. And

0:15:41.804 --> 0:15:45.164
<v Speaker 2>so so okay, you can clip this and criticize me.

0:15:45.364 --> 0:15:48.444
<v Speaker 2>You know the fact that like he's not doesn't have

0:15:48.484 --> 0:15:55.484
<v Speaker 2>this bushy and default toward intervention, I think is a

0:15:55.524 --> 0:15:57.924
<v Speaker 2>meaningful affects the priors a little bit.

0:15:58.804 --> 0:16:01.724
<v Speaker 1>It actually does, it makes you and like I said,

0:16:01.924 --> 0:16:04.764
<v Speaker 1>we want to try to avoid speculation, but you know,

0:16:04.964 --> 0:16:10.324
<v Speaker 1>with these priors, it does seem like a potential thing

0:16:10.364 --> 0:16:13.124
<v Speaker 1>that he was thinking was not like I want the

0:16:13.204 --> 0:16:16.844
<v Speaker 1>US to be involved in Iran, but rather, oh, like

0:16:16.924 --> 0:16:21.244
<v Speaker 1>I think that I can just bomb them and they'll

0:16:21.284 --> 0:16:24.084
<v Speaker 1>do what I say, and we'll be one and done,

0:16:24.164 --> 0:16:26.724
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll be this beautiful peace broker, right, because

0:16:26.724 --> 0:16:29.204
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what he like. That's always that's what

0:16:29.244 --> 0:16:31.604
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to do in Ukraine, not bombing Ukraine, but

0:16:31.684 --> 0:16:35.044
<v Speaker 1>he wants like, he wants to be seen as the peacemaker, right,

0:16:35.044 --> 0:16:37.084
<v Speaker 1>and he wants it to be done quickly. When he

0:16:37.124 --> 0:16:40.404
<v Speaker 1>took office, this we know, so this isn't speculation. You know,

0:16:40.444 --> 0:16:42.284
<v Speaker 1>he said, oh, I'll end the war in Ukraine in

0:16:42.364 --> 0:16:45.604
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours. Obviously that didn't happen, but in his head,

0:16:46.164 --> 0:16:49.844
<v Speaker 1>you know, he can end everything in twenty four hours,

0:16:49.964 --> 0:16:52.724
<v Speaker 1>just you know, Trump shows up and he makes peace,

0:16:52.764 --> 0:16:54.684
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that this might have been a

0:16:54.724 --> 0:16:57.524
<v Speaker 1>bid too. Okay, well we'll just bomb them and then

0:16:57.604 --> 0:16:59.884
<v Speaker 1>everything will be fine and I can make peace and

0:17:00.044 --> 0:17:03.644
<v Speaker 1>we'll end this situation in twenty four hours or forty

0:17:03.684 --> 0:17:06.164
<v Speaker 1>eight hours or whatever it is. And that might seem

0:17:06.204 --> 0:17:09.764
<v Speaker 1>like insane thinking from the outside, but it is the

0:17:09.804 --> 0:17:12.004
<v Speaker 1>type of thinking that he's engaged in over and over

0:17:12.044 --> 0:17:15.084
<v Speaker 1>and over, so that seems like that might have been

0:17:15.084 --> 0:17:17.204
<v Speaker 1>what was going on in his head. Rather than oh,

0:17:17.204 --> 0:17:20.044
<v Speaker 1>we want another protected conflict, it was more of a

0:17:20.404 --> 0:17:22.644
<v Speaker 1>one and done. Right. If I do this, then I

0:17:22.644 --> 0:17:25.044
<v Speaker 1>can be Trump the Great. I can get a Nobel

0:17:25.044 --> 0:17:29.164
<v Speaker 1>piece price for a broker in piece between Iran and Israel.

0:17:30.204 --> 0:17:33.004
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, Trump won the Republican nomination in twenty sixteen

0:17:33.124 --> 0:17:37.404
<v Speaker 2>in part because he explicitly campaigned against Bushism in various forms, right,

0:17:37.484 --> 0:17:41.244
<v Speaker 2>and against foreign entanglements, especially in the Middle East. I mean,

0:17:41.284 --> 0:17:45.324
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the domestic politics, this policy or this

0:17:45.364 --> 0:17:48.524
<v Speaker 2>decision to bomb Iran depends on how the question is phrased. Right,

0:17:49.204 --> 0:17:53.764
<v Speaker 2>appears to be actually slightly unpopular on Trump's net approo

0:17:53.764 --> 0:17:56.804
<v Speaker 2>writting in the silver boltipulling average is a negative six

0:17:56.844 --> 0:18:00.684
<v Speaker 2>point eight. It's been fluctuating. It's actually fallen over the

0:18:00.724 --> 0:18:03.844
<v Speaker 2>past couple of days, whether it's an Iran effect or

0:18:03.884 --> 0:18:06.084
<v Speaker 2>just sistical noise. I think we'll need more data to show.

0:18:06.124 --> 0:18:08.284
<v Speaker 2>Maybe by Thursday you're looking at that, you'll have more.

0:18:08.964 --> 0:18:11.844
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Maerica books, very skeptical of foreign intervention in

0:18:11.884 --> 0:18:14.644
<v Speaker 2>general in the Middle East in particular, has grown more

0:18:14.644 --> 0:18:17.524
<v Speaker 2>skeptical of Israel to the extent that we are are.

0:18:18.764 --> 0:18:22.724
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't think it's a helpful factor necessarily. So,

0:18:22.964 --> 0:18:25.444
<v Speaker 2>you know, Trump, it's not a it's not a move.

0:18:25.524 --> 0:18:28.404
<v Speaker 2>It may be a cynical move to you know, Pollymark

0:18:28.444 --> 0:18:30.084
<v Speaker 2>has a ten percent chance that he wins a Nobel

0:18:30.084 --> 0:18:33.044
<v Speaker 2>Peace Prize or something. Right, But it's like, I don't

0:18:33.084 --> 0:18:36.084
<v Speaker 2>think it's a cynical Bush era move of Oh my

0:18:36.204 --> 0:18:39.244
<v Speaker 2>proval writing is falling, let's bomb somewhere, right. I don't

0:18:39.244 --> 0:18:43.484
<v Speaker 2>think that quote unquote trick works very well anymore. People

0:18:43.524 --> 0:18:47.484
<v Speaker 2>are very wary before and wars. Often what happens historically

0:18:47.604 --> 0:18:50.124
<v Speaker 2>is that you get an approval rating bump and then

0:18:50.204 --> 0:18:52.564
<v Speaker 2>things turn into a quagmire and then the president becomes

0:18:52.604 --> 0:18:55.764
<v Speaker 2>deeply unpopular. Here Trump, I don't way, whether it's a

0:18:55.764 --> 0:18:57.684
<v Speaker 2>decline or it's steady, does not appear to be a

0:18:57.684 --> 0:19:00.964
<v Speaker 2>bump coming at least from this right, So that historical

0:19:01.084 --> 0:19:05.964
<v Speaker 2>reward not being there I think might affect your your

0:19:05.964 --> 0:19:08.404
<v Speaker 2>priors too. That I don't know. I mean, there are

0:19:08.444 --> 0:19:11.124
<v Speaker 2>lots of cynical reasons to do this, I guess. But like,

0:19:11.564 --> 0:19:15.724
<v Speaker 2>but having lived through Iraq in Afghanistan, you know, and Trump,

0:19:15.764 --> 0:19:20.404
<v Speaker 2>I think again has good instincts for why the previous

0:19:20.444 --> 0:19:23.444
<v Speaker 2>Republicans became unpopular. I don't think he's doing this as

0:19:23.484 --> 0:19:26.684
<v Speaker 2>a way to like boose his popularity. And he's enough

0:19:26.724 --> 0:19:30.964
<v Speaker 2>other ways to have little cheap tricks to like to

0:19:31.044 --> 0:19:33.244
<v Speaker 2>do that. And like, you know, I'm not sure particularly

0:19:33.284 --> 0:19:36.564
<v Speaker 2>cares about foreign policy. Right he said recently, oh, there

0:19:36.564 --> 0:19:39.484
<v Speaker 2>are no permanent enemies. Was in the context of China

0:19:39.844 --> 0:19:43.964
<v Speaker 2>or Russia or whatever else, Right, But like he's transactional,

0:19:44.484 --> 0:19:51.524
<v Speaker 2>he's a deal maker, and maybe in some ways I

0:19:51.564 --> 0:19:56.524
<v Speaker 2>prefer that to the grandiosity of Bush era foreign policy.

0:19:56.644 --> 0:19:58.404
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm I'm not sure.

0:19:59.404 --> 0:20:01.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a it's a tough one. I don't think

0:20:01.844 --> 0:20:03.924
<v Speaker 1>I can go as far as to say I prefer

0:20:03.964 --> 0:20:04.804
<v Speaker 1>those because.

0:20:04.564 --> 0:20:09.044
<v Speaker 2>We just have you know, it's not I mean, yeah, it's.

0:20:08.844 --> 0:20:11.964
<v Speaker 1>Not a particular high bar. But it's just in the

0:20:12.004 --> 0:20:14.764
<v Speaker 1>sense that I think that there's a kind of Trump's

0:20:14.844 --> 0:20:18.484
<v Speaker 1>vision and then there's kind of the reality. Right. He

0:20:18.524 --> 0:20:21.124
<v Speaker 1>sees himself as, oh, I can be this peacemaker, but

0:20:21.684 --> 0:20:24.444
<v Speaker 1>the reality of it is that he might do things

0:20:24.484 --> 0:20:28.444
<v Speaker 1>that have unforeseen or they could have been foreseen by

0:20:28.484 --> 0:20:32.044
<v Speaker 1>good advisors, but unforeseen by him, long term consequences that

0:20:32.084 --> 0:20:36.484
<v Speaker 1>really fuck the world over. So it's kind of it's

0:20:36.564 --> 0:20:39.724
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of these one of these situations where, yes,

0:20:39.764 --> 0:20:42.324
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want to entangle us. However, and I will

0:20:42.364 --> 0:20:44.764
<v Speaker 1>also say, in terms of his approval ratings, we've just

0:20:44.804 --> 0:20:48.524
<v Speaker 1>seen historically over and over and over that the Trump coalition,

0:20:48.724 --> 0:20:52.324
<v Speaker 1>kind of the MAGA coalition, is able to stomach complete

0:20:52.564 --> 0:20:55.484
<v Speaker 1>changes of policy when they come from Trump right, Like

0:20:55.524 --> 0:20:58.364
<v Speaker 1>he's just so good at persuading his base that what

0:20:58.444 --> 0:21:00.764
<v Speaker 1>he's doing is the right thing. So I would not

0:21:00.804 --> 0:21:03.164
<v Speaker 1>be at all surprised that if we do end up

0:21:03.244 --> 0:21:05.764
<v Speaker 1>kind of becoming more entangled in the Middle East, that

0:21:05.844 --> 0:21:08.044
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the same people who were saying

0:21:08.044 --> 0:21:10.844
<v Speaker 1>no foreign entanglements will be like, yeah, America first, like

0:21:10.924 --> 0:21:13.604
<v Speaker 1>we're we're gonna show them what's happening. And we were

0:21:13.644 --> 0:21:16.524
<v Speaker 1>for this all along. So I can definitely I don't

0:21:16.524 --> 0:21:19.604
<v Speaker 1>see that this is going to actually do lasting damage

0:21:19.644 --> 0:21:22.044
<v Speaker 1>to him, because he has shown himself to be just

0:21:22.284 --> 0:21:26.444
<v Speaker 1>phenomenally good at being able to turn any sentiment in

0:21:26.524 --> 0:21:29.924
<v Speaker 1>his favor that's his superpower, right, Like, he is so

0:21:29.964 --> 0:21:32.524
<v Speaker 1>good at convincing his base that whatever he decided to

0:21:32.564 --> 0:21:35.124
<v Speaker 1>do was the right thing, even if it was the

0:21:35.124 --> 0:21:37.084
<v Speaker 1>total opposite of what he had campaigned on.

0:21:39.124 --> 0:21:56.324
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break. Trump's other advantage,

0:21:56.564 --> 0:21:59.324
<v Speaker 2>I think your relative to Biden is that, like, he

0:21:59.444 --> 0:22:02.284
<v Speaker 2>is seen, I think as being a little bit unpredictable,

0:22:02.324 --> 0:22:04.244
<v Speaker 2>and that probably helps. I don't know if we want

0:22:04.244 --> 0:22:06.204
<v Speaker 2>to go too far in the game theory, but like,

0:22:06.204 --> 0:22:08.044
<v Speaker 2>but like, no, we've talked about that before.

0:22:08.164 --> 0:22:11.884
<v Speaker 1>I mean the kind of the irrational rationality, right, the

0:22:11.924 --> 0:22:16.524
<v Speaker 1>irrational actor, the kind of the Thomas Shelling model of

0:22:16.564 --> 0:22:20.684
<v Speaker 1>you know your famous chicken problem where you have two

0:22:20.804 --> 0:22:24.484
<v Speaker 1>cars going towards each other right head on collision course

0:22:24.804 --> 0:22:28.244
<v Speaker 1>and one of the drivers pulls out the steering wheel

0:22:28.244 --> 0:22:31.924
<v Speaker 1>and throws it out the window, signaling I can't swerve right,

0:22:32.124 --> 0:22:34.324
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to win this, And that's kind of

0:22:34.324 --> 0:22:37.444
<v Speaker 1>the rational irrationality. Of course, the problem comes in what

0:22:37.524 --> 0:22:39.404
<v Speaker 1>happens if both of them pull out their steering wheel

0:22:39.444 --> 0:22:43.084
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Then you're kind of screwed. What

0:22:43.204 --> 0:22:45.724
<v Speaker 1>happens if one person doesn't actually see you throwing the

0:22:45.764 --> 0:22:49.164
<v Speaker 1>steering wheel out the window, which is possible even though

0:22:49.204 --> 0:22:52.004
<v Speaker 1>you try to be blatant about it. You know, maybe

0:22:52.004 --> 0:22:54.164
<v Speaker 1>they were looking away at that moment. Maybe they were

0:22:54.164 --> 0:22:56.724
<v Speaker 1>so focused on your car that they didn't see that.

0:22:57.004 --> 0:22:59.764
<v Speaker 1>So there are issues with that scenario. But yes, there

0:22:59.844 --> 0:23:03.524
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the madman theory that if I'm unpredictable,

0:23:03.564 --> 0:23:06.564
<v Speaker 1>if I'm the one who is capable of ripping out

0:23:06.564 --> 0:23:08.684
<v Speaker 1>my steering wheel, and people know that, then they're going

0:23:08.724 --> 0:23:10.364
<v Speaker 1>to tread much more carefully around me.

0:23:11.084 --> 0:23:12.484
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or at least one would, or at least one

0:23:12.524 --> 0:23:12.924
<v Speaker 2>would hope.

0:23:12.924 --> 0:23:13.004
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:23:13.204 --> 0:23:16.844
<v Speaker 2>Right to the point earlier about like, Iran's a populist

0:23:16.884 --> 0:23:22.684
<v Speaker 2>country at times, it has flirted with becoming a developing,

0:23:23.204 --> 0:23:27.324
<v Speaker 2>wealthier country before the revolution in I guess seventy nine

0:23:27.404 --> 0:23:31.004
<v Speaker 2>and then and then more recently it's GDP had been increasing, right,

0:23:31.564 --> 0:23:33.604
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's not a I don't think it'd classified

0:23:33.644 --> 0:23:35.884
<v Speaker 2>as like a failed state that kind of has nothing

0:23:37.284 --> 0:23:42.084
<v Speaker 2>to lose, right, And it's always hard to gauge public

0:23:42.124 --> 0:23:46.244
<v Speaker 2>sentiment in authoritarian countries. I don't know, you know, I

0:23:46.244 --> 0:23:49.764
<v Speaker 2>think the conventional wisdom is that, like, the regime is

0:23:49.764 --> 0:23:53.804
<v Speaker 2>not especially popular in Iran. It's a sophisticated country with

0:23:53.844 --> 0:23:56.084
<v Speaker 2>a lot of history, and people may have ambiguous feelings

0:23:56.044 --> 0:23:58.964
<v Speaker 2>about about its current status, right, a lot of different

0:23:58.964 --> 0:24:03.084
<v Speaker 2>ethnic groups also within Iran, again a big, complex country, right,

0:24:03.124 --> 0:24:06.964
<v Speaker 2>and so like, look, all of this seems better to

0:24:07.004 --> 0:24:10.604
<v Speaker 2>me than like trying and failiate regime change in Iraq. Right,

0:24:10.644 --> 0:24:15.044
<v Speaker 2>But it's also higher stakes in some ways, involving you know,

0:24:15.204 --> 0:24:18.804
<v Speaker 2>one unofficial nuclear power will two the United States and Israel, right,

0:24:19.324 --> 0:24:25.084
<v Speaker 2>one perhaps aspiring nuclear power right, a state that where

0:24:25.084 --> 0:24:28.164
<v Speaker 2>a lot of oil and commerce turns on and so yeah,

0:24:28.204 --> 0:24:30.884
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry to use a cliched metaphor, it is risky business, right.

0:24:31.724 --> 0:24:33.324
<v Speaker 2>You know. One of the things you learn in poker

0:24:33.444 --> 0:24:38.484
<v Speaker 2>is that, like, the biggest confrontations often arise from cases

0:24:38.564 --> 0:24:44.204
<v Speaker 2>where it becomes one decision escalates after another, and in

0:24:44.244 --> 0:24:47.204
<v Speaker 2>any isolated circumstance, it may be correct to take the

0:24:47.324 --> 0:24:52.044
<v Speaker 2>escalatory move. However, the a cumult of effective that can

0:24:52.084 --> 0:24:56.764
<v Speaker 2>be quite profoundly high stakes and profoundly negative in some cases.

0:24:57.764 --> 0:25:03.404
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, effects are not just what you see in the moment, right,

0:25:03.484 --> 0:25:06.684
<v Speaker 1>they can be exponential, And so you have kind of

0:25:06.764 --> 0:25:11.044
<v Speaker 1>the immediate stakes and it doesn't seem p regularly like oh,

0:25:11.164 --> 0:25:13.844
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is just a tiny, tiny blip, but

0:25:13.884 --> 0:25:16.844
<v Speaker 1>then it can really spiral out of control. I mean,

0:25:16.964 --> 0:25:19.564
<v Speaker 1>I know people it's to stay in the poker realm

0:25:19.764 --> 0:25:22.884
<v Speaker 1>who end up going bust in level one. I know

0:25:22.964 --> 0:25:25.004
<v Speaker 1>multiple people on level one of the main event of

0:25:25.044 --> 0:25:27.484
<v Speaker 1>the World Series, which Nate and I will both be

0:25:27.524 --> 0:25:30.604
<v Speaker 1>playing in just over a week. But in level one

0:25:30.644 --> 0:25:33.324
<v Speaker 1>of the main event, you have two hour long levels

0:25:33.364 --> 0:25:35.204
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember how many big lines you start with,

0:25:35.284 --> 0:25:38.804
<v Speaker 1>but an insane amount, right, just totally crazy. And then

0:25:38.804 --> 0:25:41.204
<v Speaker 1>people just lose their minds and they end up in

0:25:41.244 --> 0:25:44.004
<v Speaker 1>these situations where they really do not need to bust,

0:25:44.244 --> 0:25:46.524
<v Speaker 1>but they do anyway, and they're like, oh, I couldn't

0:25:46.564 --> 0:25:48.284
<v Speaker 1>avoid it, And I was like, no, you could have

0:25:48.364 --> 0:25:51.524
<v Speaker 1>avoided it, right, Like, let's look at all of the mistakes,

0:25:51.604 --> 0:25:53.764
<v Speaker 1>all of the decision errors that led you to this

0:25:53.924 --> 0:25:57.124
<v Speaker 1>point where you felt like you couldn't avoid it, right,

0:25:57.524 --> 0:26:00.564
<v Speaker 1>there are so many mistakes that keep compounding and compounding,

0:26:00.564 --> 0:26:02.324
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden you're out of this tournament

0:26:02.684 --> 0:26:05.284
<v Speaker 1>where like you didn't need to be in that situation

0:26:05.404 --> 0:26:05.764
<v Speaker 1>at all.

0:26:06.004 --> 0:26:08.284
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sometimes there can kind of be so what happens

0:26:08.284 --> 0:26:10.884
<v Speaker 2>a lot in these big world series events where there

0:26:10.884 --> 0:26:13.804
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of amateur recreational players, right, is like,

0:26:15.084 --> 0:26:19.404
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you'll have implicit agreement between the better players at

0:26:19.444 --> 0:26:22.244
<v Speaker 2>the table that we don't want to go to war

0:26:22.324 --> 0:26:25.084
<v Speaker 2>with one another. We both have an incentive to as

0:26:25.124 --> 0:26:28.404
<v Speaker 2>the superpowers. It's table to like preserve our chip stacks

0:26:28.444 --> 0:26:32.244
<v Speaker 2>and make easy profit from the fish as they're called. However,

0:26:33.324 --> 0:26:35.604
<v Speaker 2>when there's a lack of trust and there's no intrinsic

0:26:35.684 --> 0:26:39.004
<v Speaker 2>reason to trust opponents in poker, that regime can break

0:26:39.044 --> 0:26:41.604
<v Speaker 2>down right where you feel like I'm being taking advantage

0:26:41.604 --> 0:26:45.004
<v Speaker 2>of now, right, But the point is that, like you know,

0:26:45.124 --> 0:26:50.204
<v Speaker 2>when you have better global norms, there is more potential

0:26:50.284 --> 0:26:51.764
<v Speaker 2>for de escalation. And if you kind of look at

0:26:51.804 --> 0:26:53.804
<v Speaker 2>it as like an exponential right, So if you look

0:26:53.804 --> 0:26:57.964
<v Speaker 2>at like, how does nuclear war start when there's not

0:26:58.884 --> 0:27:01.644
<v Speaker 2>at the moment where you can argue there's a NATO

0:27:01.764 --> 0:27:05.244
<v Speaker 2>versus Russia proxy conflict obviously in Ukraine. Right at the moment,

0:27:05.284 --> 0:27:09.804
<v Speaker 2>there's not a hot war between nuclear superpowers, right, So

0:27:10.244 --> 0:27:11.924
<v Speaker 2>you know, has nuclear war starting, it happens through a

0:27:11.964 --> 0:27:16.164
<v Speaker 2>series of accidents probably, right, you know, we do, I

0:27:16.164 --> 0:27:20.444
<v Speaker 2>think have enough precedent in the eighty whatever one years

0:27:20.524 --> 0:27:23.604
<v Speaker 2>since Hiroshima Nagasaki to say that, like, probably you don't

0:27:24.044 --> 0:27:28.444
<v Speaker 2>have nuclear wars start easily or nuclear accidents start easily,

0:27:28.524 --> 0:27:32.644
<v Speaker 2>but in the fog of war, in these escalatory scenarios, right,

0:27:32.684 --> 0:27:35.964
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is a little frightening in the sense of, like, Okay, well,

0:27:36.004 --> 0:27:37.764
<v Speaker 2>we actually have to take this rather dramatic action that

0:27:37.764 --> 0:27:41.204
<v Speaker 2>has some particular consequence because it's so bad preemptively if Iran,

0:27:41.324 --> 0:27:43.924
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, what if our man already has

0:27:45.484 --> 0:27:48.284
<v Speaker 2>nuclear weapons, right, and or you know, or some failed

0:27:48.324 --> 0:27:50.524
<v Speaker 2>dirty bombers. You know, there's a lot we don't know

0:27:50.684 --> 0:27:53.364
<v Speaker 2>and like and like, when you have less cooperation around

0:27:53.364 --> 0:27:56.484
<v Speaker 2>the world, then every step is more likely to escalate. Right, Like,

0:27:56.564 --> 0:27:59.404
<v Speaker 2>let's say you need you know, three things that have

0:27:59.444 --> 0:28:01.844
<v Speaker 2>a ten percent probability of happening to happen in sequence

0:28:01.884 --> 0:28:05.964
<v Speaker 2>to have a nuclear detonation somewhere. Right, that's a one

0:28:06.244 --> 0:28:09.564
<v Speaker 2>in one thousand chants. What if the chances go up

0:28:09.564 --> 0:28:12.524
<v Speaker 2>just because there's less cooperation in the world to fifteen

0:28:12.564 --> 0:28:17.204
<v Speaker 2>percent times three, Right, that's actually six times higher if

0:28:17.204 --> 0:28:19.204
<v Speaker 2>you do the math, or four times higher if you

0:28:19.244 --> 0:28:21.124
<v Speaker 2>do the math. I'm I'm trying to get my spreadsheet

0:28:21.164 --> 0:28:24.804
<v Speaker 2>out right, because the exponential increase of all these steps

0:28:24.844 --> 0:28:26.164
<v Speaker 2>you have to pass when things are a little bit

0:28:26.244 --> 0:28:29.444
<v Speaker 2>less cooperative, is more is quite a bit more dangerous

0:28:29.444 --> 0:28:30.484
<v Speaker 2>when they combine together.

0:28:31.444 --> 0:28:33.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's a really really important point that

0:28:33.924 --> 0:28:36.444
<v Speaker 1>we are actually in a global moment where I do

0:28:36.524 --> 0:28:39.124
<v Speaker 1>think that kind of global norms have been eroding for

0:28:39.164 --> 0:28:41.564
<v Speaker 1>a while and kind of we are in a less

0:28:41.564 --> 0:28:45.164
<v Speaker 1>cooperative moment than we were in even during the Cold War,

0:28:45.444 --> 0:28:47.644
<v Speaker 1>right like that That seems crazy to say, but I

0:28:47.684 --> 0:28:51.604
<v Speaker 1>think that norms have shifted in the last decade, in

0:28:51.644 --> 0:28:55.164
<v Speaker 1>the last two decades, to a point where these sorts

0:28:55.164 --> 0:28:58.684
<v Speaker 1>of percentage just probably have gone up, and you know,

0:28:58.764 --> 0:29:02.444
<v Speaker 1>and shit happens. Like we've I think we've talked on

0:29:02.484 --> 0:29:05.764
<v Speaker 1>the show before, Nate, correct me if we haven't about

0:29:05.804 --> 0:29:11.044
<v Speaker 1>Stanislav Petrov, who was a lieutenant colonel in the Soviet

0:29:11.084 --> 0:29:15.204
<v Speaker 1>Air Force and he basically prevented World War three back

0:29:15.244 --> 0:29:18.884
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty three unilaterally, back when there was a

0:29:18.924 --> 0:29:23.044
<v Speaker 1>false alarm basically right, the Soviet nuclear system malfunctioned and

0:29:23.284 --> 0:29:27.244
<v Speaker 1>it looked like the United States had launched a nuclear missile,

0:29:27.764 --> 0:29:30.884
<v Speaker 1>and he just made he made the decision that this

0:29:31.044 --> 0:29:33.324
<v Speaker 1>was a false alarm and that they were not going

0:29:33.364 --> 0:29:37.444
<v Speaker 1>to counterstrike, and that decision was absolutely pivotal. Now, imagine

0:29:37.484 --> 0:29:41.364
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't him. Imagine if we've outsourced to AI, right,

0:29:41.444 --> 0:29:45.164
<v Speaker 1>Imagine so many different things that could have happened, where

0:29:45.644 --> 0:29:48.004
<v Speaker 1>instead of this being something that we only that we

0:29:48.164 --> 0:29:51.044
<v Speaker 1>now know happened back then, no one knew right that

0:29:51.084 --> 0:29:55.084
<v Speaker 1>we almost had a nuclear confrontation. Like imagine if those

0:29:55.084 --> 0:29:57.524
<v Speaker 1>percentages shift a little bit of you know, different person

0:29:57.644 --> 0:30:02.324
<v Speaker 1>like those types of situations, if the risk of them

0:30:02.404 --> 0:30:05.444
<v Speaker 1>goes up even a tiny tiny bit, then it's a

0:30:05.484 --> 0:30:08.684
<v Speaker 1>really scary proposition. Even back in nineteen eighty three, it

0:30:08.724 --> 0:30:11.164
<v Speaker 1>was terrifying, And I don't even want to know what

0:30:11.204 --> 0:30:13.524
<v Speaker 1>would have happened had someone else had have been at

0:30:13.564 --> 0:30:17.284
<v Speaker 1>the helm and decided not decided that this was the

0:30:17.364 --> 0:30:20.964
<v Speaker 1>right thing to do. So that's why these these decisions

0:30:21.004 --> 0:30:23.684
<v Speaker 1>are good to analyze in retrospect, because then we know

0:30:23.724 --> 0:30:25.964
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of things that could have that were avoided

0:30:26.004 --> 0:30:30.284
<v Speaker 1>that were unknown at the time. But yeah, it's someone

0:30:30.324 --> 0:30:34.444
<v Speaker 1>disobeyed orders, right, Somebody went against the military protocol and

0:30:34.524 --> 0:30:38.724
<v Speaker 1>decided not to launch a counterattack, and that prevented the

0:30:38.844 --> 0:30:41.884
<v Speaker 1>Soviets from actually launching a nuclear missile when the US

0:30:41.924 --> 0:30:44.524
<v Speaker 1>did not. So these sorts of things are really important,

0:30:44.724 --> 0:30:47.044
<v Speaker 1>and we've talked you know, you've you've mentioned it, I've

0:30:47.044 --> 0:30:52.044
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it. Exponential effects are really important, and human brains

0:30:52.044 --> 0:30:55.284
<v Speaker 1>don't usually think about kind of exponential growth. That's very

0:30:55.284 --> 0:30:58.804
<v Speaker 1>difficult to think about. But you know, tiny shifts can

0:30:58.844 --> 0:31:01.764
<v Speaker 1>actually have outsized effects because exponential growth is a thing.

0:31:02.484 --> 0:31:08.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's both exponential and existential potentially, right, you

0:31:08.804 --> 0:31:10.604
<v Speaker 2>can to meet this and antics ever where their climate

0:31:10.684 --> 0:31:14.084
<v Speaker 2>change is quote an existential threat, right, it's a bit

0:31:14.124 --> 0:31:18.324
<v Speaker 2>more linear generally speaking, where it's like not like well,

0:31:18.404 --> 0:31:20.164
<v Speaker 2>I mean there are like feedback loops and this gets

0:31:20.164 --> 0:31:22.524
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, but like it's not like, you know,

0:31:22.604 --> 0:31:27.444
<v Speaker 2>there is some chance that next week a situation grows

0:31:27.484 --> 0:31:32.284
<v Speaker 2>out of control and there's a massive nuclear attack somewhere. Right,

0:31:32.284 --> 0:31:36.004
<v Speaker 2>There's no chance that, like we all burn despite the

0:31:36.044 --> 0:31:37.684
<v Speaker 2>heat wave on the East Coast. There's no chance that

0:31:37.764 --> 0:31:40.884
<v Speaker 2>like the world ends because of climate change tomorrow. It's

0:31:40.964 --> 0:31:45.484
<v Speaker 2>longer term and nuclear war is not is not like that, right, Look,

0:31:45.484 --> 0:31:51.244
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Americans lived in fear for many years

0:31:51.324 --> 0:31:54.084
<v Speaker 2>of nuclear war, right, I can remember just faintly from

0:31:54.124 --> 0:31:56.604
<v Speaker 2>growing up in forty seven, like the presence of like

0:31:56.684 --> 0:32:01.324
<v Speaker 2>fallout shelters by the time I was in school, they're

0:32:01.364 --> 0:32:04.044
<v Speaker 2>no longer like fallout drills, but you know, some number

0:32:04.084 --> 0:32:06.244
<v Speaker 2>of years earlier there might have been. Right. Trump is

0:32:06.244 --> 0:32:09.604
<v Speaker 2>obviously old enough to remember the Cold War, you know,

0:32:09.724 --> 0:32:11.404
<v Speaker 2>sooner or later we're gonna have a younger generation of

0:32:11.484 --> 0:32:14.364
<v Speaker 2>leaders that are not and that didn't live with nuclear

0:32:14.484 --> 0:32:18.164
<v Speaker 2>risk as this like persistent existential threat and the way

0:32:18.164 --> 0:32:20.724
<v Speaker 2>that people feel about climate change or increasingly even like

0:32:20.764 --> 0:32:21.524
<v Speaker 2>AI today.

0:32:22.164 --> 0:32:25.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think that that's another very important point.

0:32:26.004 --> 0:32:28.564
<v Speaker 1>So we have the compounding effects of changing social norms,

0:32:28.604 --> 0:32:32.964
<v Speaker 1>changing international norms, less cooperation, and the loss of historical memory,

0:32:33.284 --> 0:32:39.004
<v Speaker 1>right of people who actually have that visceral knowledge of

0:32:39.324 --> 0:32:41.524
<v Speaker 1>what these things felt like, which we talk about a

0:32:41.564 --> 0:32:44.324
<v Speaker 1>lot on the show. This is like direct risky business. Right.

0:32:44.364 --> 0:32:47.004
<v Speaker 1>The way that we understand risk the best is by

0:32:47.124 --> 0:32:51.404
<v Speaker 1>actually experiencing, and that's why people understand risks so poorly.

0:32:51.764 --> 0:32:54.484
<v Speaker 1>But the kind of the historical memory, the people who

0:32:54.484 --> 0:32:57.644
<v Speaker 1>lived through this, who understand just how important this is,

0:32:57.764 --> 0:33:00.684
<v Speaker 1>just how scary it is, that's going away, and the

0:33:01.004 --> 0:33:03.324
<v Speaker 1>people who've lived through the world war is like, that's

0:33:03.324 --> 0:33:08.084
<v Speaker 1>going away. All sorts of these major moments in memory

0:33:08.324 --> 0:33:12.724
<v Speaker 1>are going away, and that has scary implications for the

0:33:12.764 --> 0:33:16.004
<v Speaker 1>next generation for us as well. I'm just saying for

0:33:16.044 --> 0:33:18.964
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of leaders. That has scary implications for

0:33:19.044 --> 0:33:19.444
<v Speaker 1>the world.

0:33:19.644 --> 0:33:24.004
<v Speaker 2>So so, yeah, we're out here playing poker. Well, I

0:33:24.044 --> 0:33:25.524
<v Speaker 2>don't think the world's on the verge of a World

0:33:25.524 --> 0:33:28.804
<v Speaker 2>War three. That's kind of like an internet meme, but

0:33:28.924 --> 0:33:32.204
<v Speaker 2>clearly this is, you know, one of the most conspecial

0:33:32.244 --> 0:33:33.724
<v Speaker 2>things happening in the world right now.

0:33:34.444 --> 0:33:36.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Nate, I think I think that's a good way

0:33:36.644 --> 0:33:39.644
<v Speaker 1>of putting it. So with that, let's take a quick

0:33:39.644 --> 0:33:42.644
<v Speaker 1>break and let's lighten it up a little bit and

0:33:42.924 --> 0:34:02.844
<v Speaker 1>talk a little poker. Last week on the show, we

0:34:03.004 --> 0:34:05.844
<v Speaker 1>promised you that if we were not going to give

0:34:05.844 --> 0:34:08.724
<v Speaker 1>you a poker update, that meant that things were not

0:34:08.884 --> 0:34:13.804
<v Speaker 1>going well. So no news, bad news, and for me,

0:34:14.004 --> 0:34:16.724
<v Speaker 1>for me, that's actually mostly the case. I had one

0:34:16.844 --> 0:34:19.884
<v Speaker 1>or two cashes in online bracelet events. I don't remember

0:34:20.164 --> 0:34:21.884
<v Speaker 1>it was one or two because I don't quite remember

0:34:21.924 --> 0:34:25.884
<v Speaker 1>the timing, But my live events have not gone well, Nate.

0:34:25.964 --> 0:34:27.684
<v Speaker 1>For you, they've gone slightly better.

0:34:27.724 --> 0:34:30.244
<v Speaker 2>A little better I'm going to have four cashes and

0:34:30.284 --> 0:34:32.644
<v Speaker 2>online events, which was at the win not the World Series.

0:34:32.724 --> 0:34:35.764
<v Speaker 2>One online cash I succumbed and played one online. I

0:34:35.804 --> 0:34:39.764
<v Speaker 2>don't really love the online stuff as much. But like

0:34:39.804 --> 0:34:41.884
<v Speaker 2>I was talked about last week, the way to actually

0:34:42.084 --> 0:34:43.684
<v Speaker 2>end the trip with more than you lose is making

0:34:43.724 --> 0:34:45.884
<v Speaker 2>a very deep run top two percent, or to cash

0:34:46.004 --> 0:34:49.044
<v Speaker 2>in your higher buying events. And I've done neither. Plenty

0:34:49.044 --> 0:34:51.644
<v Speaker 2>of cashes in these smaller events that are medium deep,

0:34:51.684 --> 0:34:54.364
<v Speaker 2>but not deep enough to to really make good money,

0:34:54.364 --> 0:34:57.004
<v Speaker 2>and so we're still searching for that. You know, that

0:34:57.004 --> 0:35:00.324
<v Speaker 2>big win. I think it feels better to know it's

0:35:00.324 --> 0:35:01.884
<v Speaker 2>better or worse. I've played a lot of poker, right,

0:35:01.884 --> 0:35:04.004
<v Speaker 2>I've been making it to the end of nights and

0:35:04.004 --> 0:35:05.404
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that. I don't know if it's better or

0:35:05.484 --> 0:35:08.404
<v Speaker 2>worse then to maybe you have one big cash and

0:35:08.404 --> 0:35:11.284
<v Speaker 2>then a bunch of bus early. Then you have more

0:35:11.284 --> 0:35:13.244
<v Speaker 2>dinners with friends and things like that. But it's been

0:35:13.724 --> 0:35:17.524
<v Speaker 2>a grindy kind of World series. We've played a lot.

0:35:17.884 --> 0:35:21.204
<v Speaker 2>Get our name on the topeboard sometimes but but nothing

0:35:21.884 --> 0:35:25.644
<v Speaker 2>no lasting memories yet, and then about halfway through. That's

0:35:25.644 --> 0:35:26.924
<v Speaker 2>how it goes often.

0:35:26.644 --> 0:35:29.564
<v Speaker 1>Though, but it is how it goes often, and Nate,

0:35:29.884 --> 0:35:32.084
<v Speaker 1>you know, we still have a number of weeks left,

0:35:32.124 --> 0:35:34.444
<v Speaker 1>so we're just saving up our run good for the

0:35:34.484 --> 0:35:36.724
<v Speaker 1>main event and other events. And Nate, you and I

0:35:36.804 --> 0:35:39.524
<v Speaker 1>are going to tag team together, so there's there's a

0:35:39.724 --> 0:35:43.084
<v Speaker 1>there's a fun event called the tag Team where you

0:35:43.124 --> 0:35:45.884
<v Speaker 1>get to play with a partner and you tag in

0:35:45.964 --> 0:35:49.284
<v Speaker 1>and out, and so it would be really fun. You know,

0:35:49.364 --> 0:35:51.444
<v Speaker 1>we are taping this again on Tuesday, which is when

0:35:51.444 --> 0:35:54.844
<v Speaker 1>Tag Team starts, So by Thursday you'll know if we're

0:35:54.884 --> 0:35:58.084
<v Speaker 1>still in or not. We don't know right now, but

0:35:58.524 --> 0:36:01.084
<v Speaker 1>let's let's be optimistic, Nate and say that we're still

0:36:01.084 --> 0:36:03.884
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, which means we made the final table. That

0:36:03.884 --> 0:36:04.644
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty.

0:36:04.444 --> 0:36:07.164
<v Speaker 2>Cool'd be amazing, That would be great for the fucking show.

0:36:07.364 --> 0:36:10.284
<v Speaker 1>So so there are some fun things there been, you know,

0:36:10.444 --> 0:36:13.444
<v Speaker 1>every World Series, and we've talked about some of the

0:36:13.484 --> 0:36:17.164
<v Speaker 1>controversies so far. There have been more controversies. Not going

0:36:17.204 --> 0:36:19.124
<v Speaker 1>to talk through all of them, but there have been

0:36:19.164 --> 0:36:23.404
<v Speaker 1>more accusations of both angle shooting, which, as we've talked about,

0:36:23.844 --> 0:36:27.124
<v Speaker 1>is when you basically bend the rules but don't break

0:36:27.164 --> 0:36:30.204
<v Speaker 1>them right where you go to the limit of what's

0:36:30.324 --> 0:36:35.044
<v Speaker 1>technically allowed, but don't cross the line. And so there

0:36:35.084 --> 0:36:38.084
<v Speaker 1>have been accusations against multiple players of angle shooting. And

0:36:38.244 --> 0:36:42.124
<v Speaker 1>there was accusations of collusion at the final table of

0:36:42.364 --> 0:36:46.484
<v Speaker 1>the fifty KPLO, which is a which is a huge event,

0:36:46.684 --> 0:36:49.604
<v Speaker 1>some chip dumping might have happened, And Nate, you know,

0:36:49.684 --> 0:36:52.404
<v Speaker 1>this is something that I actually was thinking about as

0:36:52.484 --> 0:36:56.284
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about, you know, soft collusion with other

0:36:56.284 --> 0:36:58.404
<v Speaker 1>players at the table, where you think, oh, you know,

0:36:58.404 --> 0:37:00.804
<v Speaker 1>we're the better players, we're gonna we're going to stay

0:37:00.804 --> 0:37:03.804
<v Speaker 1>out of each other's way. But there's also kind of

0:37:04.244 --> 0:37:07.244
<v Speaker 1>there's also this phenomenon which is not angle shooting. It

0:37:07.364 --> 0:37:11.444
<v Speaker 1>actually is illegal, but it's incredibly difficult to police. Where

0:37:11.604 --> 0:37:13.684
<v Speaker 1>say you you and I and ate, Like, I'm not

0:37:13.724 --> 0:37:16.924
<v Speaker 1>saying we would ever do this, but like, let's imagine

0:37:16.924 --> 0:37:19.164
<v Speaker 1>that we're in an event together at the same table.

0:37:19.284 --> 0:37:21.644
<v Speaker 1>I have lots of chips, you don't have very many chips,

0:37:22.004 --> 0:37:25.164
<v Speaker 1>and we both decided that we really need you to cash,

0:37:25.204 --> 0:37:28.324
<v Speaker 1>and so I raise you go all in and doesn't

0:37:28.324 --> 0:37:30.364
<v Speaker 1>matter what hand I have, you know, I just fold

0:37:30.724 --> 0:37:33.564
<v Speaker 1>right so that you can take my chips. That's chip dumping.

0:37:34.044 --> 0:37:37.404
<v Speaker 1>That's incredibly bad. Don't ever do something like that. There's

0:37:37.444 --> 0:37:40.564
<v Speaker 1>a reason that there's a rule in poker where if

0:37:40.644 --> 0:37:42.484
<v Speaker 1>everyone is all in, you have to share your hand.

0:37:42.524 --> 0:37:45.244
<v Speaker 1>It's to prevent collusion. It's to prevent stuff like this.

0:37:45.764 --> 0:37:47.844
<v Speaker 1>But in situations like the one that happened at the

0:37:47.844 --> 0:37:51.564
<v Speaker 1>final table of the of the fifty KPLO, it was

0:37:51.764 --> 0:37:55.164
<v Speaker 1>impossible to tell what happened because the first person who

0:37:55.284 --> 0:37:57.644
<v Speaker 1>raised didn't scan their cards, and it was not an

0:37:57.684 --> 0:38:00.084
<v Speaker 1>all in situation where there was a call, there was

0:38:00.124 --> 0:38:01.484
<v Speaker 1>a raise, there was an all in, and there was

0:38:01.524 --> 0:38:05.524
<v Speaker 1>a fold, and so it's incredibly difficult to understand what

0:38:05.724 --> 0:38:08.524
<v Speaker 1>happened in situations like this. I don't know in that

0:38:08.564 --> 0:38:12.764
<v Speaker 1>particular situation. Other players have been accused of angle shooting

0:38:12.804 --> 0:38:15.764
<v Speaker 1>by we've talked about this before, by saying the wrong

0:38:15.844 --> 0:38:21.004
<v Speaker 1>raise size right with really strong hands, where they say, oh,

0:38:21.084 --> 0:38:22.604
<v Speaker 1>you know, I didn't mean to raise, or I didn't

0:38:22.604 --> 0:38:24.804
<v Speaker 1>mean to I meant to raise, not to call, and

0:38:25.204 --> 0:38:29.404
<v Speaker 1>they just pretend that they're confused, and maybe they really

0:38:29.444 --> 0:38:32.564
<v Speaker 1>are confused, maybe they aren't, And it's very difficult to

0:38:33.164 --> 0:38:36.524
<v Speaker 1>know what happened in situations like that. That's happened a

0:38:36.524 --> 0:38:39.604
<v Speaker 1>few times already at the World series, And you know,

0:38:39.804 --> 0:38:43.764
<v Speaker 1>I'm of mixed, so you know, I'm working on a

0:38:43.764 --> 0:38:46.444
<v Speaker 1>book about shooting. You know, I really care about angle shooting.

0:38:46.724 --> 0:38:49.404
<v Speaker 1>You know, I really care about keeping the game. You know,

0:38:49.484 --> 0:38:51.844
<v Speaker 1>at a high level, I do think that we need

0:38:51.884 --> 0:38:55.204
<v Speaker 1>to be careful of just starting to call everything angle shooting. Right.

0:38:55.964 --> 0:38:58.044
<v Speaker 1>People have become a little trigger happy. I think this

0:38:58.084 --> 0:39:02.884
<v Speaker 1>World series with their accusations just whenever anyone does something

0:39:02.884 --> 0:39:04.764
<v Speaker 1>that they don't like and takes their chips or like, oh,

0:39:04.764 --> 0:39:08.004
<v Speaker 1>you're angle shooting. Like, no, it's not always angle shooting, right, Like,

0:39:08.044 --> 0:39:10.844
<v Speaker 1>you need to be very very careful and reserve. That's

0:39:11.004 --> 0:39:15.204
<v Speaker 1>that terminology for moments that really are suspect, and I

0:39:15.204 --> 0:39:17.044
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the moments people have called out

0:39:17.084 --> 0:39:20.684
<v Speaker 1>are not. They're just people really do get confused.

0:39:20.364 --> 0:39:22.284
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of people. One of the things that

0:39:22.324 --> 0:39:25.804
<v Speaker 2>comes with like having more experience than poker is you

0:39:25.844 --> 0:39:29.404
<v Speaker 2>see more situations like this number one, and you're able

0:39:29.404 --> 0:39:32.724
<v Speaker 2>to play poker without all of your bandwidth being devoted

0:39:32.724 --> 0:39:34.844
<v Speaker 2>to what's the right play in this hand? Right, You're

0:39:34.884 --> 0:39:37.644
<v Speaker 2>able to take be more aware of the setting and

0:39:37.684 --> 0:39:40.444
<v Speaker 2>the situation and so and look for potential angle shoots

0:39:40.484 --> 0:39:45.204
<v Speaker 2>are weird shit, right. You know, sometimes if someone makes

0:39:45.204 --> 0:39:47.924
<v Speaker 2>a weird bet size, right, and I'll ask them for

0:39:48.084 --> 0:39:52.964
<v Speaker 2>clarification on that right to get information from my own self.

0:39:53.044 --> 0:39:54.724
<v Speaker 2>Or sometimes it's kind of like not an angle but

0:39:54.844 --> 0:39:58.364
<v Speaker 2>like speech play right where I'm trying to like confuse

0:39:58.444 --> 0:40:02.284
<v Speaker 2>or intimidate somebody, but like being having more awareness in

0:40:02.404 --> 0:40:06.924
<v Speaker 2>a poker game like the World Series where you have

0:40:06.964 --> 0:40:10.004
<v Speaker 2>a very wide range of players from the best in

0:40:10.044 --> 0:40:12.204
<v Speaker 2>the world to the worst players in the world kind

0:40:12.204 --> 0:40:14.204
<v Speaker 2>of almost literally, right, and you have a lot of

0:40:14.244 --> 0:40:17.924
<v Speaker 2>dealers who are making let's be honest, you are making mistakes, right, then,

0:40:17.964 --> 0:40:21.444
<v Speaker 2>like just being aware of a situation over the course,

0:40:21.484 --> 0:40:23.084
<v Speaker 2>if you play seven weeks of the World Series, it's

0:40:23.084 --> 0:40:26.684
<v Speaker 2>going to probably save you big mistakes two or three

0:40:26.724 --> 0:40:29.084
<v Speaker 2>times in seven weeks. That could be for a lot

0:40:29.084 --> 0:40:32.964
<v Speaker 2>of chips, right, Like that's a lot, right, So don't

0:40:32.964 --> 0:40:36.164
<v Speaker 2>be on your headphones, don't be on your phone in

0:40:36.244 --> 0:40:39.924
<v Speaker 2>higher stakes moments, or you're gonna risk things like like

0:40:40.044 --> 0:40:42.964
<v Speaker 2>stupid decisions, tilting yourself or also just being a good

0:40:43.004 --> 0:40:45.484
<v Speaker 2>poker citizen and like when other players are fucking up,

0:40:45.604 --> 0:40:47.324
<v Speaker 2>protecting his other players too, that you have, I think

0:40:47.484 --> 0:40:49.644
<v Speaker 2>is an obligation to do as a good poker citizen.

0:40:50.284 --> 0:40:50.924
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a.

0:40:50.884 --> 0:40:53.844
<v Speaker 1>Really good note to end on. Just really really pay attention.

0:40:54.204 --> 0:40:57.924
<v Speaker 1>There was a situation that happened this past week where

0:40:58.044 --> 0:41:01.644
<v Speaker 1>with one of you know, Poker's characters that people really like,

0:41:01.724 --> 0:41:05.604
<v Speaker 1>I think he's great, Texas Mike, and he talked about

0:41:05.604 --> 0:41:08.884
<v Speaker 1>a situation where a player had raised, he went all

0:41:08.924 --> 0:41:14.004
<v Speaker 1>in and the dealer pushed the blinds and antis to him.

0:41:14.604 --> 0:41:17.204
<v Speaker 1>Texas Mic was also playing on the phone at the

0:41:17.204 --> 0:41:19.684
<v Speaker 1>same time and mucked his cards like assuming that it

0:41:19.724 --> 0:41:22.284
<v Speaker 1>was the whole pot. The other player had never folded

0:41:22.644 --> 0:41:26.124
<v Speaker 1>and still had his cards, and the dealer fucked up,

0:41:26.404 --> 0:41:29.244
<v Speaker 1>and Texas Mike ended up losing the pot. He had

0:41:29.284 --> 0:41:31.524
<v Speaker 1>to put in the amount of the rays and it

0:41:31.564 --> 0:41:33.604
<v Speaker 1>was just it was just a nightmare. He had had

0:41:33.644 --> 0:41:36.764
<v Speaker 1>pocket Queen's But yeah, it was a really bad situation

0:41:36.964 --> 0:41:39.364
<v Speaker 1>just because the dealer messed up and he was on

0:41:39.364 --> 0:41:41.324
<v Speaker 1>his phone. This was not even an angle shoot. So

0:41:41.644 --> 0:41:45.964
<v Speaker 1>bottom line, pay attention. There's nothing that's more important to

0:41:46.044 --> 0:41:49.924
<v Speaker 1>your bottom line, to your end results of anything in life,

0:41:49.964 --> 0:41:53.124
<v Speaker 1>but especially you know at poker in the World series,

0:41:53.164 --> 0:41:54.124
<v Speaker 1>just pay attention.

0:41:53.884 --> 0:41:56.484
<v Speaker 2>And if you believe you won the pot. Where there's

0:41:56.524 --> 0:41:59.204
<v Speaker 2>anything ambiguous, you might be misreading the boord. That can

0:41:59.244 --> 0:42:01.844
<v Speaker 2>happen in Omaha games and you might have won the pot.

0:42:02.044 --> 0:42:04.284
<v Speaker 2>Do not fold, Do not muck your hand.

0:42:04.404 --> 0:42:05.404
<v Speaker 1>Never muck your hand.

0:42:05.364 --> 0:42:09.324
<v Speaker 2>Until the chips are pushed your way.

0:42:08.204 --> 0:42:10.644
<v Speaker 1>Or even when they are being pushed your way. Because

0:42:10.644 --> 0:42:13.364
<v Speaker 1>the dealer was pushing the chips towards Mike, right, she

0:42:13.484 --> 0:42:15.724
<v Speaker 1>just didn't understand that there was someone else in the

0:42:16.164 --> 0:42:20.044
<v Speaker 1>in the handstill, so just be hyper hyper aware. Always

0:42:20.364 --> 0:42:23.924
<v Speaker 1>on that note, Nate, good luck today in the five

0:42:24.004 --> 0:42:26.044
<v Speaker 1>K six Max and to both of us in the

0:42:26.084 --> 0:42:28.204
<v Speaker 1>tag team. I hope that by the time our listeners

0:42:28.244 --> 0:42:36.004
<v Speaker 1>hear this, we will be at the final table. Let

0:42:36.084 --> 0:42:38.044
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think of the show. Reach out

0:42:38.044 --> 0:42:42.164
<v Speaker 1>to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot fm. And

0:42:42.284 --> 0:42:44.404
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if you're a Pushkin Plus subscriber, we

0:42:44.484 --> 0:42:47.204
<v Speaker 1>have some bonus content for you that's coming up right

0:42:47.204 --> 0:42:48.164
<v Speaker 1>after the credits.

0:42:48.364 --> 0:42:51.604
<v Speaker 2>And if you're not subscribing yet, consider signing up for

0:42:51.804 --> 0:42:53.964
<v Speaker 2>just six ninety nine a month. What a nice price

0:42:54.324 --> 0:42:57.124
<v Speaker 2>you get access to all that premium content and ad

0:42:57.124 --> 0:42:59.924
<v Speaker 2>for listening across Pushkin's entire network of shows.

0:43:00.164 --> 0:43:03.724
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanikova.

0:43:03.044 --> 0:43:05.404
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show is a co

0:43:05.444 --> 0:43:09.204
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia. So this episode was

0:43:09.484 --> 0:43:12.884
<v Speaker 2>used by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer is Sonia Gerwit.

0:43:13.044 --> 0:43:15.524
<v Speaker 2>Sally Helm is our editor, and our executive producer is

0:43:15.604 --> 0:43:18.164
<v Speaker 2>Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruguer.

0:43:18.444 --> 0:43:19.644
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for tuning in.