WEBVTT - Jimmy Kimmel Has Found His Calling. Maybe It’s Not Comedy. 

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks. It is Wednesday, September twenty fourth. Jimmy

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Kimball is back and I don't know how he could

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>have nailed that any better. And with that, welcome to

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>this episode of Amy and TJ.

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Robes.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You like them, you don't like them, you love them,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you hate them, you're indifferent. Yeah, you gotta kind of

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>give him credit for what he put together last night, which,

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, Robes made him a national leader and

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a national voice in the midst of all this upheaval.

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, he is the voice of the freedom of speech,

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the one of the basic rights we have here in

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>America that makes us America. I can't imagine the pressure

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that he must have felt to get it right, but man,

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>did he get it right. I was blown away at

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>his ability to navigate all of the different emotions surrounding

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>first of all, what he's said last week, and then

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>what ABC decided to do, and how the Trump administration

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>has literally declared war against him, and he managed to

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>validate how the other side feels while at the same

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>time not apologizing for the joke he made.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And again, everybody, you're up on this by now, you

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 1>know he got suspended. If you will last week after

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he made comments that were deemed insensitive about the assassination

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of Charlie Kirk, under pressure from Brendan Carr, the FCC chairman,

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>who went on a podcast and said, hey, maybe we

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>need to be looking into Kimmel and whatnot. Well, they

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>ended up suspending him. That was a threat. It seemed

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of taking away the broadcast license of ABC. So they,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of people's view, caved to pressure took

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>him off the air, had negotiations, had talked. He comes

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>back last night. Now. The monologue of the opening was

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a little longer than normally, actually had a commercial break

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in there as well. We'll tell you what happened after

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that commercial break. Robert de Niro was involved. It was hilarious,

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but he started out. I wasn't sure Robes what necessarily

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting, but I appreciated how he started it started.

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 1>The show started by showing several video clips of news

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>outlets covering what happened and how serious it was. And

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's about freedom of speech and fights going on in

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the country and politics, and Jimmy Kimmel is a very

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>important monologue. Everybody's gonna be wanting all these news clips

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and then it cut to him and Guermo sitting in

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a chair. He's wearing a banana suit and Jimmy Gimmel's

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>wearing a big bear costume. They look at each other

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that maybe we should.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Change it was a good start. We're not dressed for

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>this kind of like also, like, we're just doing comedy here, folks,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you know. And he even said something to that effect

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that the show is not important, but what it stands for.

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>To be able to make fun of our leaders, to

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>be able to have parody and satire and not fear

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>any sort of retribution, that is what's important. So I mean, yes,

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>in that sense, he was mocking the fact that this

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>is a show about comedy.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Perious he was. I thought that was a nice tone,

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and I even wondered in that moment, Okay, maybe he's

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little sillier and funnier and make

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this lighter. And it actually wasn't. He did have a

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of lines at the beginning. I thought this was

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>good ropes. He just opened with, as I was saying

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>before I was interrupted, that's just well done.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>It is well done.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>He starts that way. The other line, it was very timely.

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>He said, I'm not sure if who had a weird

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>or twenty four hours me or the guy is the

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Todenhall.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Again, very timely, very funny, we talk very effective. That

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>was amazing, but.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't it remarkable to hear he and he listed

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>them by name late night comedians, current past, oh geez.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>He even mentioned Arsenio Hall. He said all of them

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have reached out to him.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And that was really cool to hear because they banned

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>with him immediately. And he talked about the others who

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 2>came to support him from the other side of the aisle.

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>He talked about conservatives who reached out to him who

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily agree with what he has to say or

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>how he says it, but absolutely unequivocally support his right

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>to say it period.

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>The that mentioned. I wonder how that's received. There are

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who don't like his views and

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>conservatives and fine, but I wonder how that landed for

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a conservative to say that, I thank you as well,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>because you were pissed about it as well. I just

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>wonder if if it felt like a bridge of any

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>kind between Jimmy Kimmel and any conservatives or not.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would hope it would, because to me, this

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>isn't a Democrat or Republican ideology. To have the ability

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to speak freely, to be able to make fun up,

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to satire the president. That has been a long standing

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>tradition and form of entertainment honestly in this country for

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>as long as I can remember. So how would you

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>be against that? And I also thought it was interesting

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 2>he showed President Trump clips of him talking about how

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 2>important the First Amendment was, how important the freedom of

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>speech is. So for any lawmaker who is a conservative

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>or a Republican, that is the stand I would think

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>you would want to be, or the side you would

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 2>want to be on the side of free speech.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we heard it plenty on Sunday during Charlie Kirk's memorial.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>People outside, people inside, the freedom of speech. He was

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>shot because of something somebody didn't like that. He said,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the argument you're making on that side. It

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>applies to both sides. Yes, that was speech that re

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>bolted and that made some man go crazy and want

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to shoot you. But we're talking about this idea that

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you should not be persecuted, whether it's a bullet or

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a broadcast license. You cannot be threatened like this

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>because of what you say. And the President has made

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it plain as day. I don't like his jokes about

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to take his broadcast license. He says

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that out loud. He's not necessarily trying to hide that fact.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting because Kimmel even spoke to that point

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 2>specifically talking about the SEC chairman. He's like the things

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 2>he said, you would think would have been said in

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 2>a van with a wire tap, with authorities trying to

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>get you on tape, saying something you know you shouldn't,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 2>versus saying it publicly and proudly on a podcast that

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>was that's kind of insane when you think about it.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 2>How can you have an administration who says, and I agree.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>We watched it and we were shaking our heads during

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the Kirk Memorial to Charlie Kirk Memorial where they were

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>touting free speech and the importance of it. We agree

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>with that one hundred percent. And absolutely it is disgusting

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 2>to see people take violent action, or to even take

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 2>action where you are costing folks their paychecks. Either way, yes,

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>they're both egregious, and to say the one is bad

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 2>and the other is okay, doesn't make any sense because

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>we're still talking about the same thing, the right to

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>speak freely.

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is when But Jimmy, I think this was

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the crux. This was the line, I guess, the meat

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of what he was saying. He got to it just

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes in. It didn't take up too

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>long to get to it, but the entire buntal it

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was almost half hour with the commercial break. But he

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.119
<v Speaker 1>said that it was important to me as a human.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about what he was about to say. It

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was important for him to make this point. He said,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it was never my intention to make a light of

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the murder of a young man. At that point, Jimmy

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>did he got choked up, and I think a lot

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of us have. I don't care who you are. I

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think at some point in the past two weeks, every

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>single person watching covering or talking about that story is

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>probably shed a tear. And I don't know how you

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>could watch that memorial service and listen to Erica Kirk

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and listen to some other folks and not shed a

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>tear or be upset or emotional about the death of Charlie.

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And you could see it in that moment. This wasn't performative.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't anything else but a guy who was struggling

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep speaking quite frankly in that moment. He continued.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Then he said, I posted a message on Instagram the

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>day he was killed and sent love to his family,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>asking for compassion, and meant it and I still do.

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It was never my intention to blame a specific group. Obviously,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a deeply disturbed individual. That was really the

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>opposite of the point I was trying to make. But

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I understand to some that that felt either ill timed

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or unclear, or maybe both. And for those who think

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I did point a finger, I get why you're upset.

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>If the situation were reversed, there's a good chance I

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>would have felt the same way. That was that's better

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>than an I'm sorry, I apologize if I upset you.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a nonce.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>That's no good and thank goodness, he didn't say.

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That I apologize, even if he said I apologize for

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>upsetting you. Instead, what he said, I get it. I

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>would be upset to if I were in your shoes.

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>That was meaningful, yes.

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 2>But it was important for him to explain that that

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>wasn't his intention and It didn't feel like some hollow defense.

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>It felt authentic, and it felt you could tell. I mean,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I just think you can tell when it comes from

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the heart, and you could tell that he was deeply

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 2>moved by the killing of Charlie Kirk and then by

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 2>being blamed for something he didn't intend.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's good way. But he didn't come across defensive. No,

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I need to come up here with excuses or explain. Well,

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>let me. He didn't feel like that at all. I

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't think about that until this moment.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>No, And it didn't feel like he was patronizing or

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>he was being snarky in any of those moments. It

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>really did feel genuine and that's why it landed. It

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 2>really landed to listen to him.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>He spoke as well, and I know there were good

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>folks on both sides. He spoke about the close friends

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he has that are conservatives, but he went through this,

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>he said, I get threats, My family gets threat staff

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>gets threats, and he said, I know those don't come

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>from people like the ones I know who are conservatives Republicans.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>He used that as a way of saying, I know

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it ain't all of you. And I thought that was

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>an interesting way and gave some insight. I mean, I

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really think about it necessarily, but it makes sense

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that he would get threats.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't considered that at all, but obviously now you

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 2>can see where this happens. It seems to almost all

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>politicians and certainly outspoken ones, but yes, comedians, anyone who

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 2>shares a political belief. Now, at this point it feels

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>like the climate we're in in this country, you are

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>honestly or in some way putting your life on the line.

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a scary thing to get a threat like that,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>and to have real examples of people, certain individuals, carrying

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 2>out those threats, or at least attempting to.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>He continued spoke about I think we missed at the top,

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>said he heard from yes comedians and thinks a lot.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>But he said he heard from a lot of comedians

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and late night comedians all over the world about this.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It was my favorite line, at least of the night

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>last night, when he talked about hearing from a comedian

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of someone in Germany who actually offered him a job.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Can imagine that somebody in Germany robes looking over at

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>us and saying, Wow, things have gotten really authoritarian over there.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you come to Germany? He made that joke.

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>That is a poignant, historical and hilarious Jokey.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I agree, I agree.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>He talked about how comedians and other countries before this

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>happened would reach out to him and say, man, if

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I said what you said, I would be behind bars,

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I would be jailed. And he said he took that

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 2>for granted until now. And here's what I love what

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>he said afterwards. It is un American to pull a

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>show off the air because you've upset the president. He

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't like what you said. It is un American, and

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 2>that is evident when you look at what happens to

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 2>other comedians around the world, and so for us to

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 2>start doing that same thing, that takes away who we

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>are as a country.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>He did. I mean, he made a good point about

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the plan backfiring. You want to do silence Jimmy Kimmel

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>more people, we sweeart, we haven't. We love Jimmy, but

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't stay up and watch Jimmy.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Have we don't wake up and watch Jimmy.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>No, we haven't watched the monologue of hisn't quite some time.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>We did watch this one, yes, And a lot of

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>people did. And so he made the argument, yeah, your

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>plan just backfire.

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of his some of his best jokes and some

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of his hardest hits were directed at Brendan Carr, of course,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the FCC chairman, who really set a lot of this

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>in motion. Stay here, we'll tell you who. He had

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>come in and do a cameo as the FCC chair

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that was absolutely hilarious and what I thought, there was

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>another line that was the funniest. But there's another line

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to share that I believe is possibly the

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>hardest hitting line and the one we need to be

0:12:54.920 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to most. We continue now here on this

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>episode of Amy and TJ. Jimmy is back, and Jimmy

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>is back in a big wage. Jimmy did his thing

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>last night, Jimmy Kimmel in his monologue that went about

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>almost a half hour. He split it into commercial breaks.

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>But one of the he put a commercial break in

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>between us, you'd say, but one of the things he did,

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>he had a lot. He had a lot directed at

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Carr, the FCC chair who set this off. And

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Brodie, you mentioned that line he had about

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like you don't say this stuff out loud, No, do this,

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think Ted Cruz is the one said this

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is mafioso stuff. It's like you you walk into a

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood bar and say, yo, be a shamed something happened

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to this place.

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you make it. You can make We can do

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 2>this the easy way, we can do this the hard way.

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 2>It's your choice. I mean literally, it was like a

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>mob boss or a Snoop.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Dogg album, you remember that from Doggy Style. He said,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we can handleist like some gentlemen, and we can get

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>into some gangster shit that is a very mine from Snoop.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what he sounded like. This is the yes, yes,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>take this out back. Oh you just want to what

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the hell?

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>We can do things New York style if you'd like.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So he went after Brendon Carry actually called what was

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the line? He called him, uh, this idiot genius? Okay,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>sorry sorry sorry.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Well yes, because it was a sarcastic genius. This genius

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>said it on a podcast.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>But he had someone come in so they had an

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>appearance by the FCC chairman last night on the show.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Jemmy said, hey, joining us now, and sure enough, it

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>cuts and he's doing an interview with the new FCC chairman,

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>who happens to be the guy Robes, who he might

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>be the most famous television or movie mobster. He's just

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>known for being this guy. I thought it was a

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>good Joe.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 2>It was amazing because at first you're like, wait, what

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 2>are we watching here? But yes, Robert Gennaro says, I

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I am the new chairman of the FCC. Oh, and

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 2>he just goes on dropping all sorts of expletives F bombs,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>and Jimmy Kimmel's like you can't say this, Like, yes

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I can. I'm the f ing FCC chairman.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>He went on and on, and they bleeped and bleeped,

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that obviously, uh, the Niro is great

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>at this, but the idea that the FCC having a

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>new slogan was my favorite part of this. He said,

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>here at the FCC, the Niro is saying this, here

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at the FCC, we have a new slogan is sticks

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and stones may break my bones. And then you just stopped.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy's like, what's the rest of it? That's just it

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sticks and stones break bone.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I thought that I thought that words can ever hurt you.

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>He's like, that's not happening anymore. And then he went

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>in to give examples about what jokes would be acceptable

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>and what jokes would not be acceptable, which I thought

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>was very funny. He said, if you want to talk

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>about how the president's hair, you know, is thick and beautiful,

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 2>If you want to talk about how no one can

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 2>do his makeup any better than him, yes, you free

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>to do that.

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>He could do his makeup better than any broad.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, fine, I didn't want to say broad, but

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you're right, yes, he worse. And and then he said,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>but if you want to do a joke about how

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 2>he's so fat that he needs two seats on an

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Epstein chet, well, then Kimmel said what would that cost me?

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>And did he say a couple of fingers and he

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>named some body parts, Yes he did.

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But de Niro did his thing still robes the the moment,

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's a special moment when he did acknowledge

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Erica Kirk and that he had watched what she did

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday really a remarkable speech and eulogy to her husband,

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and he said that's an example we should all follow.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But he I think he was I think you couldn't

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>help but be stirred. But he talked about how that

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really affected him deeply hearing her.

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he said that Erica Kirk is and showed herself

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to be an example that we can all follow. He said,

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>if you believe in the teachings of Jesus like I do,

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>then it was a selfless act of grace. And he

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 2>said it touched me deeply. And when he said it

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>touched me deeply, his voice cracked. He did begin to

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 2>start to cry. So he said, if there's anything we

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 2>can take away from this tragedy, I hope it's that,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.719
<v Speaker 2>and that is we want. You know, you said yesterday

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>you were hoping he would find some way to bring

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>some sort of unity, to bring us together. He can

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 2>still have some fun, still have some laughs, he can

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 2>still be upset about what happened to him and Trump's

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>influence over ABC News, and yet at the same time,

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 2>can we find some common ground? And he did it.

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>He did it with Erica Kirk. He did it by

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>sharing his his concern and his emotions surrounding the death

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>of Charlie Kirk. That's something we can all feel together

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 2>as humans. And he really brought it home with that.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think the bringing home he did for

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>me with the line about the silver lining in all

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this is that we find something we can all agree on.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's rare that we do that here in this country.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Oftentimes tragedy brings us together. It seems like the Kirk

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>tragedy tore us apart to a certain degree. But when

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>there are moments of national tragedy, we come together, Democrats

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans. You see them on the steps of Capol

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Hills saying kumba y'ah on those bs. But we found

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>something in this country, freedom of speech we all agree on.

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And then he said, maybe we can find the next thing,

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is the way to go. There's

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>some stuff. If you are pro abortion rights, you're probably

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>never going to agree with somebody who is against abortion rights. Fine,

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>what are the things though? YouTube do agree on? Freedom

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>of speech? Let's work make sure we protect that. Also,

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned just I think pediatric cancer right, pediatric cancer research.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't we all agree on that. I like the idea

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.239
<v Speaker 1>of him saying that we found something we agree on,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>let's keep doing that thing instead of keep fighting over

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>things or finding things to argue about don't you if

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you put on social media right now a beautiful Wednesday morning,

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody's gonna respond it's not beautiful for some of us,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or somebody's gonna respond it's not beautiful for these people

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>who are struggling on that. Like people are always looking

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>for a way to argue. He made an argument for

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>finding things we agree on and work for those, uh right.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 2>And shouldn't that be the way forward? And you know,

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I do think he summed up though what happened here,

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and I do think he said it as plainly and

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 2>as perfectly as he could, and I God, I would

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 2>hope this would resonate with everyone as well. He said

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that our president has celebrated people losing their livelihoods and

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 2>people on his staff. He's called for the firing of

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty much all late night comedians, he said, because he

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>can't take a joke. And that is what this all

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 2>boils down to. This isn't about hate speech with what

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Kimmel said, this is about being able to laugh at yourself,

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 2>and clearly we've seen the president has a difficult time

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>doing that.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of us might and that's okay, right,

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you gotta have thick skin. If you're in politics, and.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 2>If you dish it out, you certainly should be able

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 2>to take it.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Wee does I mean obviously go through the list of

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>nicknames he has for people, God newscom I mean you

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>should sleepy Joe, will you just keep going?

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Or just his favorite loser whatever.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>He calls folks. I thought and again before we came,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>before we took that commercial here, that was the most

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>important line I think from last night because of perspective,

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you stop and think for a second, I

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want There are things there are there are There

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>are coaches of favorite teams you might wish wasn't coaching

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>your favorite team anymore. But I would never root for

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>someone to lose their livelihood. I would never root for

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>someone to lose a job. I would never be happy, happy,

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and gleeful about that thing. When you he put it

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>this way, there is someone who is celebrating, not me,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are hundreds of people on these staffs you

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>actually celebrate and joyful and promoting and pushing the idea

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that people are losing jobs.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 2>And these aren't millionaires. These are staff writers, These are

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>production assistants. These are folks who make you know the

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 2>bare minimum.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So you hate Jimmy, that's fine. But to have someone

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>gleefully celebrate what is a painful time, a hurtful time

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>for people who are doing nothing other than their jobs.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>When he said that, that hit in a way that Wow,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>he's celebrating people losing their livelihoods, they got kids at home,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they got mortgages.

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all because what he can't take a joke like

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a joke. I loved one of This is probably one

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite lines that he delivered. He said, let's

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 2>stop letting these politicians tell us what they want, and

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>let's tell them what we want. Isn't that what the

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 2>United States is founded on. We elect the leaders because

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 2>we are telling them what we want. It's not the

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 2>other way around. And that is what we have seen happen.

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, folks, looking forward to hearing what Jimmy has to

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>say is a night. Still. We have to wait to

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>see what Sinclair next our are going to do. They

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>had made some demands Sinclair, at least, that he needed

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to apologize and make a significant contribution to the Kirk

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>family or at least Kirk's foundations. Don't know if that's

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ever going to happen or if that still stands, we

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but Jimmy is back, and at least from

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>our perch, he did it. He did what the country needed.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Last time, agreed, and we can't wait to hear what

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 2>he has to say tonight. But in the meantime, thank

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you for listening to us. I'm Amy Robach alongside TJ. Holmes.

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk to you soon.