WEBVTT - Aphantasia: Blindness of the Mind's Eye

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from House Stop

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>work dot Com. Okay, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. In

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>today's episode, concerns the mind's eye, concerns mental imagery, and

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>so we decided that the best way to kick off

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode is to take you on a little guided

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>mental journey. YEA, so close your eyes unless you're driving

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or doing something that requires your eyes to be open,

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and in that case, don't close your eyes if you

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>If you are able to close your eyes, close your

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>eyes if not. Just imagine you're eight years old and

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you're walking along a beach with your mother, your barefoot.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>The tide is coming in, and you see trails of

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>footprints leading back and forth along the beach where other

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>people have walked the same path today. But the waves

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>are coming higher and higher and slowly smoothing all those

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>footprints away. But then you look up at your mother

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and you notice something strange. She's wearing armor, a steel

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>chest plate and a visored helm with chainmail drooping across

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>her arms and legs, rustling lightly as she walks across

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the front of her chest plate is a painted figure.

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>It's Foghorn, Leghorn. She raises the visor on her helm

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>and smiles at you. A mosquito hovers in front of

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>her face, and she flails one arm to knock it away,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and you both laugh. But then you notice something else.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Your mother has a piece of metal dangling from her

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>hip opposite you. It's a long sword. She puts one

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>hand on the hilt and says, don't worry, only a

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of insurance in case he shows up. A wave

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of seawater rolls up over your feet, washing dry sand

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>from between your toes, and you ask who. Then there's

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a faint rumbling under your feet. It's not just the

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>tickling of the waves. The ground is shaking, and about

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>two out in the water, a dark shape begins to

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>rise up from the waves. At first it's just a green,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>black lump, but then the huge glaring eyes, the cavernous mouth,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>climbing higher and higher as it approaches. It's Godzilla. Not

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the friendly Godzilla who defends Earth against all the heel monsters.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the angry Godzilla who breathes beams of radiation

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and crushes ten story buildings with a single swipe. Your

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>mother puts an arm across your chest. She draws her

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>long sword and says stand back. This could get serious,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And with the flip of a switch, her hover boots engage,

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>her feet lift off the ground, and then she's rocketing

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>towards the head of the monster to defend the realms

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of humankind. Alright, so, uh, we we try to draw

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in a few different types of of imagery. There are

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a few different types of memory memories. Right. We wanted

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to have sort of generic landscape that would be easy

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people to picture, like a beach.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Most people have some kind of image, generically of what

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a beach looks like. We also wanted something familiar. Usually

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they say to picture a relative or familiar family member.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully you've got an image of a mother or

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>family figure there. But then also some pop culture images. Right,

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>most people hopefully know what Godzilla looks like. If you don't,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go back and watch the original Godzilla from

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the fifties and right, uh, and then uh and then

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>fall horn like horn and personal favorite of mine. You know.

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the interesting things with this exercise is to

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>think back on it and think back of the specifics

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and ask yourself questions like who did I have a

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>more vivid memory of what I looked like as a child,

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what my mother looked like, what Godzilla looked like, and

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in these details are not necessarily telling of your relationship

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with your mother versus your relationship with Godzilla. But but

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>but it it kind of raises our awareness of the

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>vast spectrum of visual stimuli that are informing our our

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>inner vision of the world. Yeah, and this is a

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>strange thing because the only person who can experience your

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery is you. You can sort of describe your

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery to other people, but nobody can take a

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>look at it to see what it is you're picturing

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in your mind. So this is something that you largely

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with entirely on your own, and you

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know how similar or how different your own process

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of mental imagery is to that of other people unless

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you really put your heads together and start talking about

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>your mental images and detail and trying to figure out

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if their differences. It's not a standard thing that people do,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>really right, because even to describe it, if I describe

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>my mental images to you, they become your mental images.

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's in a way I'm kind of panting off

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the blueprints, and then you build a different building. It's

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the same building, but a different building. And likewise, maybe

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you paint, maybe you write, and some other artistic medium,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you create music to try and convey these images in

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>your head, but you're still but you're still then limited

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>by your artist artistic ability and then under people's interpretations

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of those works of art. You know, I already realized.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think about this when I was writing this,

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but I did already see a contradiction in what I

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>told people to imagine the original angry Godzilla. But then

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I also said green black, right, Well, Godzilla in color

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>is sort of greenish black, but the original angry Godzilla

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>black and white. He's just you know, you look at

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>him and he just looks like this charred monster. You know.

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is a this is already a mental confabulation

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>on my part. I'm imagining a Godzilla that never existed

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in reality. But anyway, so most of you were

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>with us there on that journey. You were to some

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>extent able to picture some of the things we were

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You could see in your mind's eye the beach,

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the armor, your mother, the sword, the fog Horn, Leghorn,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the Godzilla. But there are some people who probably couldn't

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>see any of that. They were there with us, they

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>were understanding the concepts, they were able to follow the plot,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever plot there was, and they could probably recount a

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>list of the events that happened in the little scene

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we just described, but they couldn't see any of it

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in their imagination. And this is the concept we're gonna

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be talking about today. One study has found that this

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>might be about up to one in fifty people who

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>have this kind of experience where they just don't create

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>pictures inside their mind the way most people do. Uh

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And this condition now hasn't come to be known as

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a fantasia or the blindness of the mind's I So,

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the American biotech leader Craig Venter, you know about him, right.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>He's famous for being a leader in the quest of

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>sequence the human genome, and he's famous for creating a

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>synthetic organisms. Uh So, he has actually described that he

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>has an unusual way of thinking, a way of thinking

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially purely conceptual, like we've been describing, without any

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery. Venter says, quote, it's like having a computer

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>store the information, but you don't have a screen attached

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to the computer. He's describing his own mind. I don't know.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I I have trouble understanding what that would be like.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But maybe maybe to understand it better, we should first

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>look at some facts about what the mind's eye itself

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is before we get into the blindness of the mind's eye.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>What's going on when you create pictures in your head. Well,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of course we're talking about mental imagery here, but also

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some other sensations thrown in as well. It all

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>amounts to a quasi perceptional experience that occurs in the

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>absence of the appropriate external stimuli. Um. So, I can

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>close my eyes, I can see a deceased loved one's face.

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I can hear their voice. I can imagine myself standing

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on the shore of a distant ocean, past ocean, or

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>even some future sure that I haven't even walked on yet.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this, this is the kind of thing that

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, most of us take for granted. We can,

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we use it, we employ it every day. Um Well,

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as I did with the Angry Godzilla and color,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you can picture things you've never actually seen, right, Yeah,

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you can? Yeah, there are things. If you're like me,

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel there are things in books. For instance, no

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one has ever painted a picture of this character or

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this scene. Uh, and yet you have a very crystal

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>clear vision, Like I have a better visual memory of

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>some things that have occurred in books than things that

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have occurred in real life. You know. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you're talking about. Uh Is isn't

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it so weird to finally see a book you've read

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's never been illustrated or made into a film

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>or anything finally made visual by someone else? It's always

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>people always have the same reaction. That's not what I thought.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So and so looked, like, let's know what it looks like. Yeah. Now,

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the things we perceive in the mind's eye, they're they're

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>products of memory. They're constructed from specific or varied memories.

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>They may be accurate, they may be amalgams of diverse influences. Really,

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this runs the gamut from something you saw yesterday that

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you near perfectly remember, to have you know, a vague

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>site from your childhood that you at least think you remember,

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to an envisioned future scene in your own life, something

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you dreamt, something you daydreamed, landscape, be viewed from the

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>imagined walls of a fictional world, or your own creation

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of a of an author's creation. It's just like pretty

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>much any time we are envisioning something, any time we

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are closing our eyes or even with our eyes open

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>are imagining something, we are seeing something in our mind

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that is, of course the mind's eye, uh, doing its thing. Yeah.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>And I think this has always been a very interesting

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>avenue for philosophy to investigate, because it is something that

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>we recognized was sort of strange about the human experience

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>before we had neuroscience or psychology or or any of

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>these scientific ways of investigating it. Yeah. Yeah, I mean

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because because it it obviously plays such a central role

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in the way we navigate the world and the way

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we think about time and a world of movable objects. Right. Um.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, we've been as long as we've had philosophers,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>as long as we've had people among us with with

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>time to you know, look up from their labors and

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>think about the human condition, we've been thinking about the

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye. Um. On the podcast here, we've talked about

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the method of loki before the the ancient Greek technique

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>in which person utilizes spatial memory to memorize nonspatial information. Uh. Look,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of plays into into some of this. That

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>involves a certain amount of a reflection on what's on

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>how we're using the mind's eye. You know. I I've

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to use the method of LOCAI and I have

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not been very good at it. Yeah, I wonder if

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not doing it right, like I when I'm

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>able to to really get it set in my mind

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as help me remember. By the way, this is so

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a quick version of it is, if you need to

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>make a list of digits of numbers to remember, you're

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to remember those digits. So instead you imagine

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>your house being full of odd characters that each embody

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the digits in that number sequence, and then

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you can remember by picturing the room and where all

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>of the odd characters were in the room, and then

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you just remember what digit they correspond to or something

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah. Like a very simplified version of this

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that I have employed frequently in the past. It's kind

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of like a um uh you know, often called the

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>memory palace because it's an imagined place that you fill

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>with these examples. But oftentimes I only have room in

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>my mind for one example, and that is, uh, that's

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>when I am a swimming lapse and I want to

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>remember what number lap I'm on, because if I forget

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>the lap number, then I'm going to make myself revert

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to the to the lower number. So if I if

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know for sure I'm on four, I'm gonna

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>do three. And I don't want to keep doing one

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>less than I want to do because I'm gonna wear

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>myself out right. But I'm also busy swimming. I'm having

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a hard time necessarily remembering which lap I am currently on.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So instead of trying to remember four, as easy as

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that would seem, I find it easier to just force

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>myself to think of, say, the four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>like think of think of that, and that'll stick in

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>my head just a little better as I'm you know,

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>vigorously of swimming these laps um, you know, So it'll

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>just be some sort of visual association with just a

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>single digit. I don't know, I don't know if anybody

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>else out there has has done something of that that

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that nature, but that is kind of a simplified um, good, creamy,

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your visual image. For eight, I can't think

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of anything for eight. Oh, for eight, I think of

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Alan robe Gerlays the Voyeur, where you have a character

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>who keeps making figure eights out of rope. Yeah, so

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think of him setting by the shore, um, not

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>quite contemplating horrible things and making little figure eights. That's

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a good thing to have in your mind here at

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the gym or the y m c A guess wherever

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>you swim laps. So one of the important things when

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>when thinking about the memory Palace and then ultimately thinking

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about memory and the mind's eye, is just to to

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>refresh here a little bit about human memory itself. Human

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>memory is not just like a tape, real rolling in

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the brain that we just oh, let's go back and

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>look and see what happened yesterday. Human memory in multiple ways.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not multiple certainly not that accurate, right, because human

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>memory consists of several different types of memory that are

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>working in uh kind of an unequal chorus um to

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>create the human experience of memory that we have. So

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we have sensory memory, um, you know what something feels like,

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what it smells, it smells like, that sort of thing.

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>We have short term memory, and we have long term

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>term memory. We have and then we divide long term

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>memory out. We have explicit memories of consciousness, we have

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>implicit memories of unconsciousness. We have declarative memories of facts

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and events. We have procedural memories involved that involves skills

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and tasks. We have episodic memory that deals with events

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and experiences, and we have semantic memory that concerns facts

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and concepts. So we have all these different types of memories,

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>each one dealing with in a way certain you know,

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>different types of skills, different types of ways of utilizing

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>memory when we engage with the world. And studies have

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>shown in the past that, uh, if you have a

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain associated with the one type of

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>memory is injured, sometimes you see those other types of

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>memory compensating. So it's like a a in a way,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like a staff. It's like a staff of different

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>memory drones, and they all have their jobs to do.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But if somebody is slacking, then it may fall to

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>another employee to uh to to you know, to step

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up and and cover for their shortcomings. Yeah. I think

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a good metaphor that the brain is more like

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a workforce than a machine. If one part of a

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>machine and breaks, the whole machine probably isn't gonna work.

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But if one part of a workforce is slacking or

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>calls in sick today, the others can often find a

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>way to cover for them, right, And they might cover

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone does their job a little bit differently,

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>so their their skill set might allow them to cover

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in a slightly different way. But back to philosophers. So

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>philosophers have continue to argue about the minds, and we're

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly not gonna be able to do an exhausted journey

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>through all of their their takes. But you go back

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as far as Plato, for example, when Plato brought us

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous examples of this. Uh, he

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>utilizes mental images in his famous allegory of the Cave. Yeah,

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's sort of the idea that the world that

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we perceive is not the true reality, you know. But

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Plato had this whole belief in ideal forms, you know,

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>things that were the more true version of the thing

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>than the thing we're familiar with. Right, there's a realm

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of forms out there, and in that realm of forms,

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there's such thing as a perfect chair. But in this

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>world that we can only build in perfect chairs that

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>inch maybe a little closer and closer towards that unobtainable ideal. Yeah,

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And so his metaphor for explaining this was that of

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the cave, where there are people who are chained up

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in a cave and they don't even really realize that

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they're in a cave, and uh, and there's an opening

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to the cave through which light comes through and figures

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>pass in front of the opening to the cave, casting

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>shadows on the wall of the cave, and all we

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>see we're facing the back of the cave of the wall,

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and we see the shadows, and we think the shadows

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are the real things, but they're not there. They're only

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the the sort of like the vague outlines of the

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>things that that are the true forms. If anyone out

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>there is watching The Path on Hulu, there's actually a

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>scene um in the first episode where they roll out

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>this this allegory and it's it's pretty entertaining, but but

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly it's an it's an allegory. You can

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of fun with either trying to contrast

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>your worldview to another individual's worldview, to try and win

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>someone over with your true version of reality versus there

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, their illusion based understanding of reality. But

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it also gets down to like what is our perception

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of reality itself? These mental images that fill our mind

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>when we close our eyes, those are imperfect. But also

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the mental images when we have our eyes open, we're

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>still just in a sense, we are still just seeing

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>those shadows on the walls of the cave. Yeah. So

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Aristotle also referred to mental imagery and his work referred

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to it as a as a fantasia with an A

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with a P, not an APR, not the Disney movie. Uh.

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And this was central to his theory of memory. Yeah,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>though you know, I can see why the Disney movie

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>would be called that, I mean they it evokes the

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>concept of fantasy, even though he didn't I think directly

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>mean fantasy and the way we do, like somebody coming

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>up with a with a fantasy to escape from life. Yeah,

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it was the idea of being able to to imagine

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>things in your mind. Now. Reneed I Carts also thought

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot about mental imagery and how they form in

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the mind. Uh. The view that an idea is a

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>quasi perceptual thing, perhaps even pictorial formed in the imagination,

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and he did distinguish between images formed in the brain

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and ideas in the mind. Because he was a duelist.

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>He saw uh, he saw the mind and the body

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>as separate. The essence of mind is thought, and the

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>body is an extension of it. Thoughts are not extended

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in space, but the body is. Now, that's where in

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>philosophy you have. You have like idealism, which states that

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>reality is equivalent to mental images, and the mental images

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>are reality itself. Well, yeah, I mean, if you want

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to take this very far, the people who believe in

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>hard core idealism would probably say that there is no

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like that reality is merely the mental image of a

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>higher being or something like that. Yeah. So, as you

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>can see, you can really go down the deep end,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>into the deep end contemplating mental imagery and what are

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the philosophical ramifications of it. Um, there's a you know,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot, There's a great deal more we can

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>discuss this kind of the philosophical groundwork. I guess you

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>could say. Um. For instance, though in the nineteen eighties

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a great deal of debate over the over the

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>connection from between mental images and language. So one side

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>argued that representations underlying the experience of mental imagery are

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the same type as those used in the language. And

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>then there was the other camp, and they held that

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that these representations served to depict, not describe objects. Okay,

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so what does that mean in practice? Well, my understanding

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>is that basically comes down to, you know, to what

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>extent is mental imagery like the the the groundwork of

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>language itself. Um Well, like I said earlier, at times,

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's it's very difficult to um to

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>overstate the importance of mental imagery in our perceptions of reality.

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Um So, just how deep does that go? Does it

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>underlie just about everything in cognition? Does an underlie language?

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Does it underlie um, just every little detail of our experience? Yeah, well,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this does seem to sort of tie into us stuff

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the Tip of the Tongue episode,

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>where you can you can perhaps you can have the

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>face in your mind, you know, oh, I know this

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>actor's face, and you can picture it, and you can

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>know the actor's name well enough that if somebody said it,

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, yeah, that's it. You'd immediately recognize it.

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>But you can't make the connection but of course, in

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>recent years we've seen the study of mental imagery make

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a more scientific transition. I think we we've started to

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>look at it from a neuroscientific point of view, where

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, Okay, well, let's identify what brain regions

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>are actually being used and activated when people are in

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the process of coming up with mental pictures. And one

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of the sources we used for this episode, it was

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>a paper by Adams Zalman and colleagues, and and uh,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>these authors identify that essentially in the brain voluntary imagery

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>that the mental images you come up with have been

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>associated in previous research with the brains frontal parietal executive

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>systems or of the executive control you know, the president

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of your brain sitting there directing traffic, and with the

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>posterior brain regions, which you know in the back of

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the brain that's often the identified with visual processing. And

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>together you sort of put these things, uh into a

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>teamwork relationship, and they are what allows you to come

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>up with mental pictures. That's right. And uh, we've also

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>seen studies where taking f M R I, we've done

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>p and we've done pet scans on individuals summoning mental images.

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're asked to summon a mental image, and

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>then we look at the brain see what it's doing

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in real time, and uh reveals that activation in brain

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>areas that are used in visual perception, which doesn't sound

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that surprising. Uh, this is pretty cool. Visual and mental

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>imaging share roughly two thirds of the same active activated

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>brain regions. So there's a lot of a lot of

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>cross over there between the visual and mental imaging systems,

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shared mechanics. Yeah, Like if, for example,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>if you show somebody a picture of somebody's face and

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>then you ask the same test subject imagine this person's face,

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their brain activity is going to be

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>roughly similar. Right. In fact, study found that when the

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>same task is performed in perception and then with eyes

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>closed using mental images, you get overlaps. So so again,

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same mechanisms, a lot of the

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>same brain equipment is being used, whether you're dealing with

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just visual perception or mental perception. Of course, that's funny

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>because the phenomenal experience is completely different, right, Like you, uh,

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody to somebody who has a fantasia. This might be

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>new information, but it's obviously not going to be new

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>information to most people out there. Uh, when you picture

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>something in your mind's eye, it is extremely different than

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing it in front of you. But it's hard to

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>explain how it's different. Yeah, you know, Yeah, you know.

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a two thousand fIF BBC article titled

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasia A Life without Mental Images by James Gallagher,

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be sure to include a link to that

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>article on the landing page for this episode Stuff to

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com because in addition to running

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>through some examples of uh, some accounts of individuals who

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have this blindness of the mind's eye, which we're going

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to discuss more here, there's also a quiz you can take, uh,

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's just an eight question quiz about asking you

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like the level of detail that you experience when you

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>are asked to mentally envision uh, you know someone you

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>see every day? Uh, A sunrise, I believe, clouds in

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the sky, the clouds clearing in the sky, a thunderstorm,

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the the these sort of images some of the same

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff that we ask you to summon at

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this episode. Yeah, but it doesn't just

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you can you picture it? It asks you to

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>rank level of details. So, for example, it might say, picture,

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>get someone in mind, and maybe a close friend or

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>spouse or close family member, and picture that person, and

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>then on a scale of not very well at all,

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>too extremely well, how well can you see in your

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye the contours of their face and the shape

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of their body, and what color their eyes are, and

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and so it's asking for specific details of the image

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to get at the vividness of the picture in your mind.

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And that suggests to me, and I think their findings

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>do suggest so far that it's not just an on

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>off switch. It's not like you can make pictures with

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>your mind or you can't. There seems to be a spectrum.

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Some people seem to have very intense, very lucid, vivid

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>mental images. Other people have kind of hazier, blurrier or

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>more generic mental images. And some people have almost no

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery at all, or even report having none. And

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.239
<v Speaker 1>it's so at the opposite into the scale of the

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>main topic today. You know, we're talking about these a fantasiacs,

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's also what's come to be known as hyper fantasia, right,

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And these would be people who I think would experience

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>visions of the mind ie with just extreme lucidity is

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>far compared to most of us. So they're not just

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>vague pictures, but they have bright colors and vivid details.

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So if I tell you imagine a beach, you might

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>picture sand and waves and maybe some umbrellas. But I

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>bet you wouldn't naturally say, Okay, I can tell you

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>there are seven umbrellas in the picture in my mind,

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>and these are the colors of stripes on the umbrellas.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But somebody might actually be able to have that level

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of vividness in their mind's eye. Yeah. This idea of

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a spectrum of of of mental detail and visual imagery,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it uh, it really makes you reanalyze just how you're

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>painting the picture in your head of these memories, you know,

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I get. I think we both scored around the same

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on this where we had kind of like typical image.

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I was in the typical range. Yeah, But even even

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>then I was I found myself asking questions like, well,

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>how when I think about these people that I see

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>every day in my life and they are very important

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, Uh, you know, what does it mean that

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have like just a picture perfect vision of them?

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>What Does it mean that when I think back on

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a beach, I find my like a sunrise on a beach,

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I keep thinking of, you know, images of sunrises from

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>paintings and films more so than actual beach sunrises that

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I've witnessed. Do you think about the final scene of

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors? Yeah, that sort of thing. Like I end

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>up like putting a fictional Instagram filter over all of

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 1>these these memories, and I'm not really remembering. I'm not

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>really summoning a mental image of a thing I actually saw.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm summoning this mental image that's composed of these varying elements.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You know. One thing I read when we were doing

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>our research for this episode was a first person essay

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that I came across the software designer Blake Ross, who

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>was involved in Mozilla Firefox on Facebook, and he's also

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>done some screenwriting, and he found out after reading an

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>article I think in either in the New York Times

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or in Discover magazine by Carl Zimmer about a fantasia

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that he he had this experience, and he also was

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just shocked to find out that other people weren't like him.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>His discovery was that, oh, I never realized other people

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>could see pictures in their minds. His whole life, he

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>thought when people said stuff like picture this, they were

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just being metaphorical. He didn't realize other people could actually

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>hold these pictures in their brains. And in this essay

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>he starts he recounts how when he found out about this,

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he was asking all his friends, what's it like to

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>picture something in your mind? And asking all these questions

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I've never really thought to ask myself about my process

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of mental imagery that we're very interesting, like he was

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>asking his friends, Okay, when you see a picture in

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>your mind, like you picture a beach, is it still?

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Is it a still photograph? Or is it more like

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>video where things are moving? And that distinction just hit

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>me like a wrecking ball. I was like, I don't know.

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>When I picture something in my mind, I can make

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it move consciously if I need to. But when I

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just picture a beach, it is almost neither still nor moving.

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It is it exists in super position between these two things.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>It's kept for me, I guess when I think about it,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like the old music video for What

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Was It? Where the people go into the painting or

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>into the drawing on take on Me. Yeah, yeah, I

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like my my mental imagery is kind of like

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the take on Me video. It's stuff is moving, but

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's all kind of station are as. Well. Yeah, well,

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I certainly can imagine something moving on purpose,

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But when I just picture a thing and I don't

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine it moving on purpose, I don't think it's still

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not moving either. It's very strange. It reminds

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>me of two of the experience of reading a book,

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>especially a book that is set more or less in

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the real world, And at times I'll find myself stopping

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about, like, oh, I'm picturing this in this

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>living room from that I that I visited or lived

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in at some point in my life, Like that, for

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>some reason, is the living room that my brain is

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>drawing in for this setting where I'm picturing this character. Sometimes,

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes the character just is that character and

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that and there's not really like a firm mental image

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in your head exactly what they look like. Other times

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't shake their um their appearance as being that

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of someone you know or or you know a character

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>actor from a movie, etcetera. But I do find myself

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like analyzing, like where are all these elements coming from Like,

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>some of them are obviously coming from the author. The

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>author is providing the blueprint, the author is providing the scaffolding.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But then that scaffolding is kind of like magnetically drawing

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in elements from my own visual memory. Yeah, definitely, I

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what you're talking about. There. Uh. An interesting

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>thing about fiction that that Blake Ross says in his

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>first person essay about this is he He reports that,

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>so he's always read books, you know, he's enjoyed fiction,

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's written fiction. But when he writes fiction, he

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>has almost no visual description because he just doesn't picture

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>things in his head. And when he reads, he skips

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>visual description. He just kind of jumps over it. That's

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>not it has no meaning to him. Really. Huh, yeah,

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's fascinating. Okay, now it's time to take

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a quick break to hear from our sponsor. But when

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we come back, more on the mind's eye and a fantasia.

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, just how common is a fantasia? Um,

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult question because this is something that hasn't

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>really been uh in the public mind set. It hasn't

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>been out there. It hasn't been something you could a

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>pamphle it on until very recently. There was one interesting

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>study on this from before it had a name. Before this,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a fantasia term came out that was studying sort of

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the lack of generative power and mental imagery. And that

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that was in two thousand nine, right, study by Fall, yeah,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Fall, psychologists. And what did it find? He found

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that between two point one percent and two point seven

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of participants in his study claimed to have no

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>visual imagination. So that's where we got that number up

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning that it might be around one in

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty of you who just didn't see any pictures when

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you were following along in the story with us. Yeah, Now,

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of course we have to that that number is not

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>coming from like a you know, large scale study, so

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the results aren't really fully supported, but it gives us

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of at least a ballpark. I think, yeah, it's

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>something to work with. But but a lot of this

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:55.479
<v Speaker 1>recent research has popped up because of an interesting I'm

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>about to use a great word here, synergy between between

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>actual medical research and some writing in the popular press. Actually,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think like Carl Zimmer's articles had something to do

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with people coming out of the woodwork to say, Hey,

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>now I have this experience of a fantasia. I can't

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>make mental pictures. But it started with the research of

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Adam Zaman, right. Yeah, he's a professor of cognitive and

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>behavioral neurology of the University of Exeter and Medical School,

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and along with co authors uh Um MICHELLEA. De Wira,

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and Surio Della Sala, they coined the term a fantasia

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in their two thousand fifteen paper Lives Without Imagery congenital

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasia that was published in the journal Cortex. Now,

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>people had, as we said, previously described things along these

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>lines like it had always been kind of noted that, well,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>there's some people out there who say that they can't

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>create any mental pictures. But nobody really looked very deeply

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>into this, and I think some of the earth I

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think the earliest example that the office we were looking

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>at were able to draw on was just the nineteenth century. Now,

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this condition and the condition had in these earlier works

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of condition had previously been referred to as a defective

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>revisualization or visual ear reminiscence. What a great word, ear reminiscence.

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Somebody was trying to make us say that, yeah, sorry,

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna work. It's a fantasia. Uh. And there are

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>skeptics actually out there who say that that what we're

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about here does not exist at all. I think

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating because how would you prove them wrong? Yeah?

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And why why would you make that argument? I don't know. Well,

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, arguing about the existence of somebody else's internal experience.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just it's crazy. Yeah, I mean it

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>almost seems seems like you'd have to be making the

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>counter argument of saying, oh, you don't have any fantasia,

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You just have a lazy mind, right, your imagination is

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just a bit stunted. But I can understand why people

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>might be tempted to this direction because I, as I

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we've said before, I think you probably would agree with this.

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine what this is like. Yeah, I have

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>no ability to you whatsoever, to put myself in a

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:05.479
<v Speaker 1>position of not being able to make mental pictures that

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even understand what that means really, Right, It's

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like if most of us are more or

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>less the same computer hardware with differing software. You know,

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we can talk all day about I don't understand how

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>your software works, and this is how my software works.

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But here we're talking about essentially a difference in hardware. Um.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that analogy completely holds up, but

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially this is something a little more, uh, you know,

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>base level is different and and how do we even

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>begin to describe that to each other? Yeah? So Zaman

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>first started studying this, I think in two thousand ten, right,

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>because of the story of this. So there was a

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>patient who reported having contracted, like acquired a fantasia after

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a medical procedure, right, right, So there was a sixty

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 1>five year old man who had coronary angioplasty and that's

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>where they So if you have pockage in one of

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>your arteries or something like that, they'll open up one

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of your arteries and stick a catheter in it, and

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>somewhere along your body wherever the blockage is occurring, they'll

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>inflate a small balloon or something inside your artery to

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>widen it, essentially and allow easier passage of blood. It's

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>not the kind of thing that you would initially imagine

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>altering your brain functioning. Yeah, and it's generally not considered

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>a major surgical procedure. It's like it's you. I think

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you're typically left awake for it. They don't even necessarily

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>put you under, though they might need to give you

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some drugs to calm you down. But yeah, it's this

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is this is not like a gigantic big deal. So

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>it's coronary angioplasty. And after the procedure, this patient was

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.760
<v Speaker 1>unable to form mental pictures and he had not had

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this problem before, and so yeah, and that's where this

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>study comes in. And afterwards, after there were some pieces

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>published about this, Zaman started to hear from people who said, Hey,

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I have this condition. And not only do I have it,

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get it from I didn't have an angioplastic

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>or any you know, injury or or surgery. I've always

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>had it. This is just how I am. So Zaman

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and his co author's day they looked at twenty one

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of these self reporting cases and then they discovered most

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of these individuals um kind of discovered their condition, their

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>own condition in their twenties when through conversations or or readings,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they found a discrepancy between how other people described the

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>use of the mind's eye and their own experiences. Can

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you imagine. I just have a hard time imagining how

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>you get that far in life without realizing. Now, this

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is another thing that's addressed yet again in that that

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>essay I mentioned by Blake Ross where he just talks

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about how whenever he heard people using the language of

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the mind's eye were talking about, you know, picturing something,

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>imagining something, he thought it was all metaphorical. He thought

0:36:56.200 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they were just talking about conceptually meditating on the idea

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:03.959
<v Speaker 1>of a beach or something. So you're sitting there thinking

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about the concepts of sand and water and sunshine and umbrellas.

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't realize that other people were literally seeing

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 1>something in their mind. Yeah. I mean, it's like we

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, when one when you have all these different

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>types of memory, and if one is taking you know,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a back seat, the other ones are going to compensate.

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like if you have a fantasia, you're

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to function in society at all.

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems like quite the contrary. Uh, individuals find a

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>way to function. They find they just end up utilizing

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>these different modes of memory. Okay, but of these twenty

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>one self reporting cases, what did Zamon find about them? Well,

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 1>so I found that nineteen of the twenty one were male.

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's worth noting that this might have more to

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>do with the readership of Discover magazine. This is not

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a randomized, self selective right. This is where people would

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>have read that Carl Zimmer article and they were the

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>ones who said, hey, so yeah, I just might have

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to do with the male readership Discover. On the to hand,

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>they found it. Five of the twenty one reported that

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it affected relatives as well. This is something I've read

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of people's experiences online. Some of them say, one of

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>my parents has this. Yeah, so this leads us to

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>believe it might be hereditary. And then ten of the

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one said, uh, said that all all versions of

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the imagery were affected. Now, now, like I alluded to earlier,

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this does seem to me, based on what I've read

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so far, to be sort of a um it's not

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>necessarily an all or nothing. It's sort of a spectrum condition.

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Because one of the things that these people reported is

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's not like they've never ever in their entire

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>live seni mental image. They just generally don't see them.

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Like some of them sometimes reported that they might have

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>had very brief involuntary mental images like they they might involuntarily,

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>quote flash an image of somebody's face. But it's just

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is rare and they can't do it on command. Right,

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It's something that just might occur during while they're awake.

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It might occur during dreams some of them. This is

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>another thing, the interesting variation on dream experience. Some report

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that they don't have dreams at all or don't remember

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>having them if they do have them, and some report

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that they do have dreams and can experience visual content

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and dreams, but just can't do it while they're awake

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or on command. Yeah. Zeman is a big believer that

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this is essentially a variant of neuropsychological functioning and kind

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of like synesthesia in a sense, and again kind of

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>on on a spectrum as well. So, so again, don't

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>think of it as a uh you know, as a

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>as a as a brain injury. Don't think of it

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as a as as an ailment. It is just a different, uh,

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a different way that the mental chorus is coming together

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to receive reality. Yeah. Another thing that I thought was

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting is, uh, so we've been talking about images being

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>visual as in like what you know, light, photons, and

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the eyes. But this does seem to extend to varying

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>degrees to other senses as well. Right, some of the

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>people who report that they have a fantasia for visual

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>images also can't imagine the feelings of other senses, if

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. And then some report that

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they sort of can, again, making it seem like a

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of spectrum issue, like can you hear a piece

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of music that you're not currently listening to? Yeah? Yeah,

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's That's another good one. I certainly can. Like

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the ones I wanted to think was the

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars theme. I can just play the whole Star

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Wars theme in my mind from beginning to end. Yeah,

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And certainly we've all experienced earworms, so that's kind of

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a variant of that now. Um. Also in this uh

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>the Zaman paper, they said of the individuals, a number

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of them reported modest effects on their relationships, which I

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>guess one can imagine if you and your um, your

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>significant other are ultimately engaging with mental imagery and drastically

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>different ways. And also, fourteen of the twenty one participants

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>reported difficulties with autobiographical memory. So here's a quick quote

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>from the paper. The same number identified h compensatory strengths

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in verbal, mathematical, and logical domains. They their successful performance

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in a task that would normally elicit imagery count how

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>many windows there are in your house or apartment, etcetera,

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was achieved by drawing on what participants described as knowledge, memory,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and sub visual models. Yeah, this is interesting. So this

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>again gets back into the idea that you end up

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>just utilizing different modes of memory the workforce of the brain. Yeah, right,

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>because I can't imagine. So if somebody said how many

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>windows are there in your house? I would do that

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>with a picture. I would picture my house and sort

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of picture walking around the sides of my house and

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing how many windows are there. But they can do

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>this without the picture. It's not like they're unable to

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. So there's something else kicking in. Must be

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>conceptual facts logged about the house. Okay, so we need

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to take one more quick break and then we'll be

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>right back with more or a fantasia. Now that BBC

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:11.360
<v Speaker 1>paper that we mentioned earlier by James Gallagher. In that paper,

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Gallagher spoke with one Neil kin Mure of Lancaster. Uh,

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a self reporting individual with blindness in the

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>mind's eye, and he provided some interesting insight on the condition.

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>So I have just a couple of quotes here from

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that that piece that I found were interesting. He said, quote,

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>my stepfather, when I couldn't sleep, told me to count sheep,

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and he explained what he meant. I tried to do it,

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't see any sheep jumping over fences. There

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was nothing to count. No, that's uh, that's that's an

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I guess that might be one of the

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>earliest examples of of here mentally mentally imagined this. Like

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with my own uh son, I had a similar situation.

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I distinctly remember the first time I told him

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to close his eyes and encouraged him to imagine an

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>elephant because he was really obsessed with with elephants at

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the time. And um, I saw the delight on his

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>face as he imagined the elephant. Um. But you know,

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>after doing this research, I realized, well, there's equally a

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>possibility that we wouldn't be able to see the elephant,

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there wouldn't be anything we're go wrong

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>with him if he couldn't see it. In the BBC

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 1>piece um the the The interviewed individual, Neil kim Miller,

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>also said that he had a terrible memory, but he

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was good with facts and and then there's an additional quote.

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the hardest thing to describe what happens in

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 1>my head when I think about things. When I think

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about my fiancee, there is no image, but I am

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely thinking about her. I know today she has her

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>hair up at the back, she's brunette. But I'm not

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>describing an image I am looking at I'm remembering features

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>about her. That's the strangest thing, and maybe that is

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a source of some regret. Yeah, I mean, this is

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the thing because typically these people report that they it's

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>not like they can't they don't know what somebody looks like, right.

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>They's not like that scene in like Hannibal where they

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>show face blindness as just seeing people with like smooth

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>skin over their face. Yeah. What's that condition called a

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>congenital prosopagnosia? Is that it where you you have a

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>born condition where you just can't recognize faces people. You

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>see people who are familiar to you, but you just

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they just don't look like anybody, uh you know, whoever

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that is and and it's not like that you, or

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at least not for everybody. Like we said, there seems

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a wide variation in how this applies to

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>people's lives. But I haven't read that it's like that

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for most people. It seems like they report, yeah, they

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>recognize people. Once they see a picture of of a

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>close family member or of the president or whoever it is,

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>they know who it is. They just can't make the

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>picture without looking at it. It's almost kind of like

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the P versus NP episode, like

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of problems that once a solution is presented,

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you can easily check to see if it's correct, but

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>you can't come up with a solution and a reasonable

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of time by yourself. Uh. It sounds like a

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>version of that. You can't make the picture, but when

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>somebody shows you the picture you can say, oh, yeah,

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Yeah definitely. But anyway, I I just find

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>this condition really fascinating. And so if you yourself are

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody who thinks you may be experiencing a fantasia, or

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>if you just want to learn more about it, one

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting resource I think would be to go and look

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at some of the message boards online that have recently

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>been created by people who claimed to have this experience,

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>because there's one I found that was a fant dot asia. Nice. Yeah,

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's just like a forum online people talking

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>about their experiences. Uh, and it seems to be a

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of people having this kind of uh, this awakening

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of experience. They're like, oh, man, I didn't even

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>realize that this was what was causing all this confusion

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>between me and other people all these years, or I

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize I was the I wasn't the only one

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.959
<v Speaker 1>who was like this, or you know, people really seem

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to be having a lot of fun coming together with

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:02.439
<v Speaker 1>a community of other people who have the same issue. Well,

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like it reminds one of the whole you know, the

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>old example of hey, what if when I think of

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>purple and you think of purple? What if we what

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>if we're each seeing different colors? But there's never a

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 1>way to prove that out. But but this is kind

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of like a case where what it's kind of like

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if you were one day able to say, oh, yeah,

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the purple I see is different from the purple these

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>people see. I'm gonna I'm gonna go hang out now

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>with individuals who see purple the way I see. People

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>never understood what the deal with Barney was, but now

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Uh No. But so I have all

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 1>these questions about a fantasia, like what it means, and

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>again just emphasize it does seem like we haven't nailed

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 1>down that there's a specific cause and a very specific

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 1>effect yet, because there seemed to be a range of

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>different ways this manifests in people's minds. It's associated with

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>different things. Some people dream, some people don't. Some people

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>have memory problems, some people don't. Um. But one of

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the things I was wondering about was can fantasiacs hallucinate? Yeah?

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So what if an a fantasiac takes a drug that

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>often causes visual hallucinations? Do they see anything different? Yeah?

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Are they just going to get the non visual hallucinatory effects? Uh?

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Or is it going to sort of ignite a type

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of visual imagery that isn't normally there sort of heighten

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the flashes that some of the you know, the the

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the occasional flashes that some of these individuals experience. Yeah,

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I looked this up actually on the on

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the forum boards, and they had actually addressed it. So

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>one member of a message board said they typed a

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.879
<v Speaker 1>question that struck me as intriguing. This person said they

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>were confused. Essentially, they said, how is hallucinating different from

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:48.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing things in your mind? Again, that question is hard

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to answer, but to somebody who has, uh, you know,

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>a mind's eye, it's very clearly different. I don't feel

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like I'm hallucinating when I imagine something, but try to

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.360
<v Speaker 1>describe the difference. Well, you're seeing something in your mind

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 1>that's not there. Okay, that sounds like hallucination, but yeah,

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>but then it's also yeah, then it's also just like

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing Yeah. So yeah, we come back again to the

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>cave and we're all still lined up staring at the

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>play of shadows on the wall. Yeah. Some of us

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe just have a slightly different view of the shadows

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:26.839
<v Speaker 1>and others. Okay, Robert, I've got a question for you. Okay,

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hit me. Do you think you could try to simulate

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this in you're in your own mind? Like? Could you try?

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>I know you it would be impossible for us to

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>really fully be able to do it, But can you

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>try to go through a standard day to day process

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>something you would do all the time without using any

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>mental pictures. I was trying this morning, and I couldn't

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. Just trying. Yeah, trying not to think of

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>mental images immediately calls to mind mental images. It's like,

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, telling somebody like, think of a rhinoceros wearing

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a jet pack. You just did it. Uh. And even

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it works in the in the general sense, just saying,

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 1>try not to think of mental images, and immediately my

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>mind is filled with rhinoceroses and jet packs. Yeah. I mean,

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if anything, I have to try and keep from daydreaming

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and keep from or keep from you know, pummeling myself

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with with different mental images. Uh, and and actually focus

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 1>in on a task, you know. Yeah. I mean the

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 1>way this really seems like it would come through is like,

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>how does if you can't have mental images, how do

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you have fantasies about things you would like to do?

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So you imagine, you know, your boss makes you furious

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and you wish you could punch him in the nose.

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't actually do it, but you at least have

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that image for a moment, right. Uh. I think that's

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>probably a nearly universal experience for people, and of having

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>thought of it. But what happens if you can't have

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that image in your mind, do you do you think

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>about it conceptually? It's like I I just thinking about

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the concept of punching my boss in the face. Well,

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and then also even if like I was just thinking

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>to myself, like, what are some of the times when

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually able to to not, you know, mentally imagine

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>anything and have these mental visualizations in my mind, I think, well, okay,

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:15.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe when I'm doing yoga because I'm able to sort

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of shut out a lot of stuff. I'm able to

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 1>shut off the default mode network to a large extent.

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But even then, if I'm focusing on a pose, I

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>am also focusing on a mental image of what I

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>must look like in that pose, which may or may

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>not have match up to how I'm actually doing the pose.

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So what is it like then to engage in a

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in a physical activity like that with a fantasia? I mean,

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously you can do it, but it just

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of drives home just how much mental visualizations, um,

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>how big a role they play and just everything we do. Okay,

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>another question fiction writing. This is something again from the

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:04.399
<v Speaker 1>from the Blake cross Piece. So he's he is, He's

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:07.760
<v Speaker 1>done some screenwriting, and he describes his process for fiction

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>writing without having mental images, which he described in terms

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of words and parts of speech. I thought this was interesting.

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So he said, like, when I'm imagining something, I imagine

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a noun, the word, and then I imagine a verb

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that follows it, the word um. And so there's something

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 1>very different about his process for writing than I would have.

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>So when I'm imagining a scene, there's there's translation going on.

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think of a picture, and then I have to

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 1>put the picture into words. But could it be possible

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that this allows people to do creative writing without any translation.

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>The original creative thing that's happening is words. That's interesting. Yeah,

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Like they're not having They're not in that situation that

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, where as an artist or a creator

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of any kind, you are stuck trying to translate the

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>mental image into who something another person can share in.

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, there's no translation going there. Well, it

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder if the maybe the ultimate form of

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>direct written communication with almost nothing lost in between, would

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:19.280
<v Speaker 1>be an a fantasiac writing to another a fantasiac somebody,

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>because there you're not translating it into pictures on both

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 1>sides or on either side. I will say that something

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that does remind me of is like in my own

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.799
<v Speaker 1>writing process. There there's definitely the point where I have

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>an image in my mind or seen in my mind,

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>characters in my mind, and I'm trying to bring that

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to life on the page. But then if I'll get

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:44.240
<v Speaker 1>into these situations where I'm writing and in a way

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>what I'm writing is coming before the mental image, so

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of create the point. Not to say it's

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a fantasia at all, but I'm kind of writing

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:57.239
<v Speaker 1>before the mental visualization. I'm kind of reading what I've

0:52:57.239 --> 0:53:00.879
<v Speaker 1>writen I've written and an experienced it more or less

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in real time as a reader would. Oh yeah, well,

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I bet you've had the experience I know I have

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of writing something before you get the picture, and then

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>getting the picture and then going back and revising what

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you've written based on the picture. Yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure.

0:53:15.480 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 1>This so this is yeah, the writing is definitely a

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 1>fascinating area to think about, this because it is this

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of it's the mental image, but in this stripping

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>down of the mental image, the translating it into into

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:31.360
<v Speaker 1>another form. Uh yeah, yeah, well it's fascinating to be

0:53:31.440 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 1>coming into this topic and it's such an interesting time

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for it, you know, when when it seems we're on

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the cusp of a lot of new learning about what

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>this condition is, how many people have it, what it's

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>like for them, and Hey, if you out there actually

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>experience this, if you have some level of a fantasia

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or you're toward that end of the mental image re spectrum,

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be great to hear about your experience,

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to write in and tell us what

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like. Yeah, and if you're on the other end

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum, if you're a hyper visualizer, let us

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>know about that as well. Uh. In the meantime, head

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on over to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:07.919
<v Speaker 1>That is the mothership. That is where you will find

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 1>all the podcast episodes. You will find videos, blog post

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>links up to social media accounts such as Facebook and Twitter.

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 1>We are blow the Mind on both of those. We

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>also have accounts on Tumbler and Instagram. And if you

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get in touch with us with your experience

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of mental imagery or with feedback on this episode or

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:26.360
<v Speaker 1>any other, you can email us at blow the Mind

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com. Well more on this

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff works?

0:54:40.719 --> 0:55:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Dot com not my boy,