WEBVTT - Robert Koenigsberger on Emerging Markets

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Mesters in Business with very Results on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>His name is Robert Koenigsberger, and he has a fascinating

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>career in emerging market, opportunistic and distressed debt investing. Uh.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>He started at a small boutique before going to Marry

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Lynch and Lehman Brothers and ultimately launching his own shop

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>called Grammarcy Funds Management. UH. If you're interested in what

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like investing in emerging market debt, how that part

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of the investment from it has changed over the decades

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as the world itself has changed. Uh. He began in

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>South America and Latin America UM, before investing in places

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>like Russia and China and Turkey. UM. Fortunately for them,

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they were out of Russia long before the most recent

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine happened. Uh. It's just a fascinating conversation

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about looking at the world from both bottoms up and

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>top down, as well as thinking about what valuations are like,

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>how likely our macro events to impact you getting not

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just a return on capital, but, as his famously said,

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in fixed income, a return of your capital. It really

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is a very, very different approach than what we think

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of as as typical equity investing, and and it not

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>only has the advantages of uh there being inefficiency, so

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a potential to generate alpha, but if you do

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it right, it's pretty non correlated with probably the rest

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of your portfolio. I found it fascinating and I think

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you will also, So, with no further ado, my interview

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with Grammarcy Funds Managements Robert Kohonensberger, let's talk a little

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>bit about your background. You you get an MBA in

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Warton and then a master's in International Studies in Latin America.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Your graduate thesis was on the origins and implications of

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the Latin American debt crises. It seems like you were

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>built to trade distressed em debt built and lucky quite frankly,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um, I actually go back to undergrad where

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I did political science and history of of Latin America,

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was asked to do a similar thesis on

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, to do a thesis, and my parents told

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>me I had to find a job at the same time,

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and so I try to put the thesis and the

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>job searched together. And the only issue in Latin America,

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>which was my major back in eighty seven was the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Latin American debt crisis. So I did my study on that,

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and I got fortunate enough to meet a gentleman who

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>had been the finance minister of Peru. He had been

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the head of Wells Fargo International. He lent it, he

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>borrowed it, he defaulted on it, and had this he

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>had this great boutique out in California. So um, I

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>feel really fortunate to uh to have spent thirty five

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>years doing the same thing in emerging markets. And you know,

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the gentleman I worked with was just a great professional.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So late eighties, early nineties or a VP for an

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>advisory firm that leads some sovereign debt restructurings and transactions

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in both South America and Central America. Tell us what

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that experience was like during that period. Emerging markets in

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the late eighties was very different than the emerging markets

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of two. I think it's fair to say it was

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit of the wild West. Um, you know, go back,

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>you know the entire you know, it was the last decade, right,

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>theties was the last decade. And in Latin America, Mexico

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>defaults in eighty two. Virtually the entire regions in default

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>by by the end of the decade. So what it

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was like was, you know, putting Humpty Dumpty back together

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>again and dealing with countries that had defaulted debt and

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>taking them through what's now known as the Brady debt

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>restructuring and having these bonds that nobody really understood come

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>out of it. And that, quite Frankie, was was the

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the asset class. And I remember, like, you know,

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>even like we were doing, you have countries that that

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>were shared borders, that couldn't talk to each other, that

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the other, and you can get in the

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>middle and do some sort of of debt swap or

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a buy back or what have you. And so one

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of my fond memories was like Guatemala, I think it

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>was in the nine and I didn't know what FX was,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what letters of credit were, and I

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>had to go get a letter of credit. I had

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to go to Guatemala, I had to present it and

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>then we did a buy back. But we got paid

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in cansalis, which was the local currency. And so my

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>job for basically two weeks was to get up, go

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sell as much f X or by as many dollars

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 1>as I could, and then go back to the hotel

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and ship by the pool. That's not a bad gig.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>It was great. So so you go from that onto

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Mother Meryl for three years where you traded distress d M.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Then you're a VP of Lehman Brothers. And this was

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, not the Lehman Brothers we kind of a

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>familiar with from the financial crisis. What was it like

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at those big shops Mery Lynch and Lehman Brothers doing

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>distressed E M debt? Sure? I mean that, first of all,

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>they were They were great experiences because you know, I

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>started in a very small, boutique, boutique environment. And again

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on political science and history major prior to to

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>graduate school. So to actually get experience in finance, to

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>lead the bank's efforts in investing in sovereign debt restructions,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and to bring our clients along was was a great experience. Um.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I got to learn a lot about about

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>how markets function or not UM and I got to

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>get his feel for Wall Street politics, which I found

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>out really weren't for me, and and all the conflicts

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of interest that one finds in Wall Street. You mentioned

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier that the late eighties early nineties were very different

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>than the state of EM debt today. Um, how has

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the industry changed? How is E M distressed debt today

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>different than it was thirty years ago? So distressed as

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>different and EM is is different. You know, i'd start

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>with break it down. You know when when I got

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to Maryland, Um, and you looked at the trade blotder

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of who you were trading with. It was basically banks

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>trading with each other and every so often a client

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>would come by. So it's a tremendous amount of proprietary trading.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, hedge funds in the back book, a little bit,

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a front look. So I would

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>characterize it as a bit of a bazaar, unless of

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a market, because you know, I was at Meryl and

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I would call JP Morgan and I would sell something

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to them, and they would call Chase and they would

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>call Naman. It was just a roundabout and then the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>market would drop five points or what have you. So

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>musical chairs the last one holding got got stuck with it. Yeah,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and um, so you know I tend to have create

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility. You know, if if everyone wanted

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to buy herself the same thing at the same thing,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>same time. Today the markets massively larger. You know, it

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was predominantly a sovereign market back then. You know, um,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>now it's sovereign, quasi sovereign, U S dollar local corporates,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>high yield, etcetera. What's quasi sovereign? Sorry, like state versus

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>national or something and so so usually and I usually

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about quasi sovereign and sovereign adjacent. So sovereign is

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>just the dead obligation of the country. Quasi sovereign is

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>typically an entity owned by the state that issues GSC

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>or like take pan X in Mexico as opposed to

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Mexico right, Um, and then sovereign adjacent are interesting as

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>well because they're not explicitly owned by the state, but

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they're so important that there's some sort of nexus between

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the sovereign and that and that corporate. But you know,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>today the markets, you know, think about now there is

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a buy side e t F S four jacts. The

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>by side is so much larger than the street. It

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>used to be just the street street had a lot

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of balance sheet um. Today, if you take emerging market

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>corporates as an example, there's go back five years, ten years.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Emerging market corporates are five times larger today than they

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>were back then. Go back to right after two thousand

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and eight, every bank made markets, every bank had had

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. Today you have less banks, less balance sheet,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>less market making, and a really big buy side. So

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you have inelastic you know, in elastic supply when people

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>want to buy, Like if you have a dollar there

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there'll be someone in emerging markets that wants to issue

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a bond and take that dollar from you. But when

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>there's outflows, you don't have an elastic demand, and that's

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>where you tend to get this this volatility and dislocations

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen. So let me stick with sovereign adjacent

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>In the US, as we learned during the financial crisis,

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the government sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddy Mack

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and by extension um Sally. May you go down the

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 1>whole list of these things, the U. S. Government's full

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>faith and credit. Even though it wasn't obligated to these

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>quasi publicly traded, quasi private entities, the U. S. Government

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>still ended up standing behind them for systemic reasons. So

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that's here in the United States. Do you have similar

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>situations in Latin America and elsewhere or is it just

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>country by country it's all completely different. First of all,

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>let's unpack that. I mean, emerging markets is not this

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>home much any asasset class. So almost anything and I

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>could talk about it would be different. You know, there'd

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>be dispersion of of of factors. But when you think

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about you know, bailouts of corporates, UH, sovereign at Jason

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or what have you, we've certainly seen it in emerging markets,

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and I would say the most you know, the greatest

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>example right now is in China property. If you've seen

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there. So it started as a crisis

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for ever Ground, right and I think the Chinese government

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to kind of isolate Evergrand and then insulate the

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of the sector. And now what we've seen is

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that it contaminated, you know, the Everground just poured over

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to even the best names like a country garden or

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>what have you. And so right after the Party Congress,

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we've just seen massive amounts of aid. I would argue

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that that what we're witnessing today is the TARP program

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in China for for for the property sector, and you

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can see, you know, assets have gone. We were buying

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>performing bonds at eight cents on the dollar. Wow, that

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you had to pay for a crude right, which is

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a weird concept to pay for a crew.

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So so it's it's a crude interest. So maybe it's

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>got four points of interest on an eight cent bond

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that typically when something trades to eight, people don't think

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to keep paying. Um. And then once the

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>program came out this Chinese tarp, if you will, Um,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, eight cent bonds were trading at

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty two this morning. They're like sixty Wow, just on

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this this this bailout notion. How do we get me

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>some of those? That sounds very attractive and we'll talk later.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So I was going to ask you what trades or

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>deals stand out is especially memorable that seems to be

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>fairly recent memorable Anything from the uh wild West days

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>that sticks out is I mean, I love the idea

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of just going out buying dollars and then sending pool

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>side for the rest of the day. It was, um,

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Margarita's or whatever they the local drink was.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>What else really stands out? You know, if I go

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>back to the to the late eighties or early nineties,

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you're asking about distress then versus distressed today.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think one of the most interesting

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>things in distresses when people are throwing away the keys,

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to be there to catch them. And I

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>remember one one time, and I think it was eighty

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>nine or ninety, We're right at the end of the

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Lost decade and emerging markets, and all

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the banks are basically not all the banks, but a

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>few of the banks are is like just getting out

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of Latin America and one of them just get me out.

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Just that's it, full capitulation, that's right. So one example

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a lot of fun, I think was eighty

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>nine or ninety Bank of America decided they wanted to

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sell their branch in Lima, Peru, and they the price

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tag was a million dollars. I'm like five years old.

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>My boss, as gentleman mentioned, had been the finance Minister

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>pru He's like, I need you to go down to

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Prue and and take a look at the bank due

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to diligence, right, twenty five years old. So I don't

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>know if you've ever been to Lima. But in in

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in the center of Lima and santing Cerro, there was

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a retort, no, like a roundabout, and one big tower.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>On the top of the tower it says Bank of America.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have cell phones or whatever you so I

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>got to run back to the hotel and I said,

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Carlos, is the building included? So yes, I said,

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be worth a million bucks, right, So

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we paid a million dollars for that made three million

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars trading facts before we sold it, and it was

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sold for fifty million dollars three years later, and that

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>became the beginning of one of the largest groups in

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in Prue today. And so fast forward after after graduate school,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm having lunch with a friend from school and Eric

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>says he's working for Bank of America. And I said, Eric,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys? What are you guys doing? Is Oh,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking of opening a branch in Lima, Peru. Oh

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>do I have a building for you? And you know

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>another one real quickly. You know, Russia has been so

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>much in the news these days, and I remember the

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>wild wild West, and Russia was the Yelts era, the nineties,

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the era of default. And I remember going there with

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a group of investors in it was nine June. Their

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>defaulted debt was trading at six cents. And we go

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>into this conference room at Vanessa conam Bank, which was

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the Thebligor, the Export Import Bank of Russia, and this

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>trader walks in and he's completely disheveled and he goes,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to know who's buying back my debt. You

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>guys are getting in my way. I'm trying to buy

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>back my debt. Greatest buy signal that any of us

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen the problems. We don't have cell phones, right,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>so it's like race back to the hotel to see

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>who can call their training death fast enough to buy

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Russian And if you look on your Bloomberg screen today,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>on that day, the asset went from six cents to

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve cents, just on this meeting. That's amazing. I love

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this quote of yours, which now I understand much better.

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing emerging markets since before they emerged. Yeah,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, you know, that's that's oftentimes when I

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>talk with clients about because as you know, if you

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>go back to the nineteen eighties, um, it was. I

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't call it an asset class. It was a bunch

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of bank loans in default. Um it was submerging at

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the time, right, And it was, I guess, you know,

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>unpolitely called the Third World debt crisis lesser Developed country

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>debt crisis. But no one was thinking about putting an

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>index around a bunch of defaulted bonds. So I was

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>fortunate enough to be there as we transformed defaulted loans

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to performing bonds. And then when JP Morgan made the

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>index in part, I think that was really the beginning

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of emerging markets debt as an asset class. Quite fascinating.

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk a little bit about Grammarcy. What

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>led you from big shops to launching your own firm? Um? Well,

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and were you always international debt focused? Yeah? A few things.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Um, I started in a boutique environment, and

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I never really thought that I was gonna stand Wall

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Street for a long period of time. I always wanted

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to do something entrepreneurial. Obviously I wanted to stay invested

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and have a career in emerging market debt UM. But

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the factors behind starting Grammarcy were a few. Um, one,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mentioned conflict of interests on Wall Street,

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and when you are going through a sovereign debt restructuring,

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that's just a negotiation. I'm sitting there representing the bank,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sitting across from the senior debt negotiator from

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Russian Federation or wherever it may be. And I

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>remember at the banks, you know, on my sides would

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>be someone from investment banking, someone from corporate relations. And

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so I'm just pushing to get the bank and our

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>clients paid, and these guys are thinking about the next

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the next trade in Russia or whatever it may be.

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So one is you know, I really, I really wanted

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a conflict free, mission driven firm, and our

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>mission is really simple. All we do is focus on

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>investment management. We want to focus on the well being

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of our clients, our portfolio investments in their communities, and

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>our team members. That's it. And that's hard to do

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at a big, big shop on on Wall Street. Um.

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously, eat what you kill. I wanted a meritocracy,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and Wall Street is quite frankly anything but a meritocracy

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because of all the politics and what have you. Um.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember the day I made up my mind to

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>start Grammarcy was at the end of the ninety seven

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>bonus year early. Now go back to Lehman. They almost

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>blew up in Mexico. We were basically I went to

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>work there right after that. We had had no aspirations

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>for p l in n very little aspirations. Is like,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't lose money, right, that was emerging market debt

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for for for Lehman, and so what is it just

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a service for the banks that and and don't take

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of risk and make a lot of money supposedly, right.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I go into ninety seven. My book, the

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>restruction book has a five million dollar what do you

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>call it? Budget? Then they raised it to ten, then

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they raised it to thirty, and then they raised it

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to forty. So I walked into my bonus discussion in

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>January February and it starts with, well, we almost made it, right.

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So they were trying to trying to basically say, since

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you didn't get to the forty, you know you shouldn't

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>expect to get paid very well. So I said, well,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll wait a minute, just stop right here, this conversation

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is over. I'll come back tomorrow. You put a different

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>number on the piece of paper, and that was the

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>moment that I said I wanted to start the firm.

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we're purely there for our clients, and

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>if our clients do well, we do well, and that's

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>all that matters. I have heard variations of that precise story.

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I've experienced that precise story over and over again. Sometimes

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the short sightedness of upper management on Wall Street is shocking. Um,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you just see all of these super profitable firms with

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the most successful traders. I am genuinely shocked when people say, yeah,

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>then that's just not it's just not worth it. I'll

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you another story. I remember when I when I

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>left Mary Lynch so fed started raising rates ninety four.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got the the tequila crisis in Mexico and I

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>resigned and my boss has Venezuelan and the big boss

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is Cuban, and the Venice one was like, well, you

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta go talk to the to the Cuban. And so

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they start talking in Spanish in front of me, and

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they go, you bi lingual and bilingual. But they didn't

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I speak a little Turkish to it

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>out of my wife. My wife's Turkish as well. But

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>so I go upstairs and meet with the big boss

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and they start chatting in Spanish and they go, you know,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you told me that there were no other jobs out

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>there that we didn't have to pay these guys, right,

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>So then he turns to me, he goes, Robert, you

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>know what can I tell you? And I answered him

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>back in Spanish, I said, I just heard everything. Thank

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you very much. By the way, how can you do

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>emerging market debt? I mean, I know everybody everywhere more

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>or less speaks English, but isn't it an enormous advantage

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to speak in the local language. Absolutely?

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I mean a lot of places we go, UM,

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>English isn't necessarily spoken well um, even at the most

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>senior levels of government. So to be able to um speak,

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>seek information, um persuade others in their language is is

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>very helpful. And I'm not gonna say I do it

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>as well in Spanish as I do in English, but

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that's very helpful to you know, Emerging markets is all

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>about assessing people, right, So we have to think about

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>credit risk like everybody else. But the end of the day,

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets risk is about credit culture people. How do

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they behave in times of durest in the past, predict

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to behave in the future. It's helpful

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to assess that prediction in that in

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that language. So on the equity side, some people say

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't really need boots on the ground and emerging markets.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm I don't know how true that is, but it

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>really sounds like it's not true. On the debtor or

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>credit side, especially a distress circumstance. Now, I mean boots

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on the ground is is essential, and I would say

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>both internal boots and external boots. Right. So we have

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>our own people, we have our own platforms. We have

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>offices in Argentina and Turkey and Mexico and what have you.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And those people are really important for sorcing. Do is

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>doing due diligence on deals, doing due diligence on on people,

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know? Quite frankly, Um, one of our biggest strengths

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is in in our on our website. It's it's all

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the relationships we've had for thirty five years with people

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in different countries that can give you good information on people,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. I remember a story in Thailand a few

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago. We were getting ready to buy the debt

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of a country, of a company that had come out

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of debt restructuring. And you know, we are research guys

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>did their work, the traders did the work. We like

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the value, we like the entry point. Well, then we

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>went out to our network external lawyer who had sat

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in the debt restructuring conversations, and the lawyer says to me, Robert,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>before you invest, let me tell you what the debt

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>restructuring looked like. It's great. So it was a patriarch,

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>former military guy, had the discussions at his house, not

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a law firm. You were escorted into the conference room

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>through three levels of security, and the gentleman starts the negotiations.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>He goes, um, let's have a toast. Here's to my

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>wealth and to your health. You just have to have

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>people on the ground to that's just that's just bad. Now.

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that a local custom or is that a subtle threat? What?

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>What is that? I mean? I think it was. I

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>think it was a subtle threat. And again, you know,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I want I wouldn't We're not so subtle. I wouldn't

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>make that blanket statement, you know, throughout emerging markets. But

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, you know when I see some kid in

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>their twenties or thirties started business and you know there

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are three or four people around their Bloomberg screens and

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't have the internal analysts, and they don't have

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the external network. I don't know how they think they

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can do it. That's really quite quite uh quite fascinating.

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned, um your shop, you have offices around the world, right,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what countries do you have offices in? So we're based

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:44.479
<v Speaker 1>in Grenich, Connecticut, we have offices in Latin America, in Mexico, Peru, Argentina.

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>We have a lending platform and office in Turkey, Brazil.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Done some stuff in Africa as well through a lending platform.

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, getting back to the local presence,

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the having having a platform, having your own

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>team in the market, you know, has all the obvious benefits,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but also it gives you the ability to get depth

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and breadth. And you know, our our business, you know,

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>particularly private credit business. You know where we're doing asset

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>back lending in a country. Um And I remember a

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>friend who does domestic private credit told me once, you know,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert is just as easy to do a four million

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar loan as a forty million dollar loan. And so

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're trying to do with these platforms is get

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>depth and breadth in the different regions. So if I

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Mexico, for example, where we're lending to the

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>suppliers to pemm X, people who lay pipes, people who

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>build build the platforms. If you do it on a

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 1>one off basis, you can't really scale it. But if

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a platform of dedicated people to that too

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and the controls, it gives you the ability to depth

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and breadth in Mexico to look at other industries not

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can look at real estate, but also think

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about the same industry in a place like Columbia or

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever it maybe. So I think I know the answer

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>to this, but I have to ask you are long only?

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And I would imagine there are all sorts of opportunity

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>knees on the short side where you could see something

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>starting to circle the drain and make a bet to

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the down side. I have to ask, why long only

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>when there's so many opportunities on the down side. Yeah,

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and let me clarify. We we have UM. So we

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have four major strategy groups within the firm. One of

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>them is long only UM, and we do you know,

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>four subsets there. The other is alternatives where we can

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>do long short, alpha shorts, what have you. The third

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one is what we call capital solutions or private credit

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or asset back lending. And the last one is special situations.

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with you sometimes, you know, in long only,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the only way you can express negative view

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is to not have any exposure. Sit on your hands, right. Um,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But when we start thinking about our our alternative group,

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we can think about relative value, We can think about

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>long short, we can think about doing things with derivatives

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>that give you kind of you know, a call on

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the left tail, so to speak. So is that more

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of a hedge or what I'm hearing is three of

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>your four strategies seem to be primarily long and one

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>strategy has that opportunity to go short if it you

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>want downside. So our Special Situations group, we do a

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of litigation finance, right. So, and in litigation finance,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most the most difficult thing to predict

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 1>is the outcome of the litigation. Sure, right, we can

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>actually hedge that we can actually buy insurance. Right there's

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies that will you know, offer you insurance for

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know, you know, if it's a eight hundred

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>million dollar claim and you can buy insurance for ten

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollars to insure the ten million dollars litigation, and

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it costs you three million dollars um, that's pretty good

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>asymmetry in terms of you know, if you lose, you

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>lose the three but if you win, you're in free

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>hundred hundred million dollars. So we use hedging, and but

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not the same as you know, just I am

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>making a directional bet that country X is Dad is

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get cut in half. That's right. Um. And look,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there's two different ways to do it and long only,

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's risky to do it long only, right,

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And so it seems like long only is the less risky.

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're you're going up against an index, and

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes these industries have very risky proxies in them. I mean,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Russia and Ukraine this year. R so, um,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we you know, we had the good fortune to have

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>no Russia, no Ukraine in February. Our analysts walked in

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in January said I think there's a fifty percent chance

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that there'll be some sort of invasion and the assets

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>will drop a little like, well, Petar, you got the

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>first part right, but if there's an invasion with the

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>capital I or small eye, Ukraine has gone from eighty

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to twenty and Russia has gone from part of part

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>part of fifty. That's great. We missed February. February, we're out,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but it stayed in an index for two months, right,

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the riskiest things we had to

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>do is sit there and watch Russian debt trade up

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and down while we have zero exposure. So even though

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you can't short it when you don't own

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in the index, um, you actually um, it's it's not riskless, right,

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>um in our alternatives, you know, more traditional hedge funds.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>To your point, we can do alpha shorts. We can

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>say and look, we were long protection against Russia in February.

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That was an alphabet for us. It was like, you

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>know what, we think Russia has asymmetry, asymmetric downside, and

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we can express that um in that vehicle. And I

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>assume that that worked out pretty well, worked out pretty well.

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So so let's stick with Russia for a second. You know,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I look out and I have no idea what the

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 1>endgame is here. Can can Putin ride this out? Can

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Russia survive with Putin? And when will that country become

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>investable again? It seems like they're not. They haven't been

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for a while before the invasion. It's hard to imagine

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>anyone wanting to put up a lot of risk capital

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>with them. Yeah, I think you need to look back

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>at the past, at the last time there was regime

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>change in Russia to be able to trialogy At And

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what I mean is, you know, yelts part of me.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Putin has been around for so long, right that you

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>got to go back to the Yeltsin era. And I've

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>read and heard so many times that you know, if

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>if Putin just leaves, everything will be fine. But I

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's behind Putin in Russia. And I

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>remember being in, you know, in Russia in the late nineties,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I would get a call in the

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>middle of the night. It's like Yeltsin's in the hospital

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and you'd have to triage which hospital one was for cardiac,

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>for heart attack, and the other ones he was just

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>drunk and sanatorium. And it made it and it made

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a big difference, and it mattered because none of us

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>knew what would happen if yelts in past, right, um?

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I'll take that to today. It's like if

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>if Putin weren't here tomorrow, I can't tell you what

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the politics look like there. And I also, how is

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Russia going to be treated on the other side of this, right?

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna be treated like Germany after World War One?

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Or Germany after World War Two? Right? Um? You know,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>will it be? Will will be embraced in that. You know,

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Putin was a bad guy who led good people astray.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And let's have some sort of reconstruction of Ukraine and Russia.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Or is it going to be more like Germany after

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>World War One where that's still a prize state? Huh?

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Really quite fascinating. Let's talk a little bit about the

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>state of em today. Valuations, at least on the equity side,

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>they're the cheapest we've seen in a couple of decades.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you see when you're looking at the debt

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and credit side of emerging markets? Some something similar? And

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think what we have observed, and again

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we're all credit not equity, but um is over the

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years we've been together for a team there's

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>been eleven major dislocations in emerging markets around the world,

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>different countries, eleven times, and I would even call them

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>systemic like we've seen today, and they all have kind

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of looked the same, which is peak to trough. It's

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>taken about five months, they drop about eight months later,

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it's up like seven and twelve to twenty four months

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>later it's up thirty pc. So with that kind of

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>top down historical framework, UM, it's easy to see that

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>there's cheap valuations and emerging markets. But you know, we

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>also have to think about where we came from, you know,

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like really low interest rates, a lot of liquidity, what

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>have you. So we also have to prove out with

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the portfolios that we build that those same type of

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>expected returns are there. And you know, one of the

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 1>beautiful things about fixed income versus equity UM is we

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have contractual coupons. And so if you can pick good

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>credits that pay their coupons that roll roll down the

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>curve to par um, the mathematics work, right. That's why

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>after these big dislocations, if you can pick a subset

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of credit that has coupon, we'll keep paying and roll

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>down the curve towards par, then you're going to get

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 1>these types of extraordinary returns. And I think we're in

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that type of environment today. Now, of course, um there's

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of altility, and I think one needs to

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be you know, respectful of that baltiy today. But you know,

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I continue to think that, you know, the expected returns

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in the destination weren't what maybe a bumpy journey. So

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>given those sorts of numbers, the pullbacks, recoveries, what sort

0:28:55.000 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of correlations are there with other types of of at

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>be it performing or distressed equities and other asset classes.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like this is a fairly non correlated group

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of investments. Yeah, And I think you can create lack

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of correlation depend on about how you construct the portfolio.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you pick one return stream and

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets and stick with that return stream, you're going

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to find a lot more correlation to markets. What I

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>really like is on top of these four return streams

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that we have, we kind of have a multi asset

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>dynamic acid allocation process, and that's where you're able to

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>create alpha, and that's where we're able to have really

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>low UM correlation to to the markets. UM and you know,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>one day markets are you know, at all time highs,

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so not that interesting to want to buy ACCU, SIPs

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>or public debt at that point, and then you have

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a dislocation. Relative value has changed. Now most folks don't

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have the governance, don't have the staff, et cetera to

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to make the I'm going to sell A

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and buy B. I remember like UM during COVID, and

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we wrote at grammar Sy that we expected

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there could be a dislocation in the fourth quarter two

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen. Markets are really tightly wound and people should

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>batten down the hatches, but get ready for the dislocation

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 1>because when it comes, that's when the extraordinary opportunities come.

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So we call everyone in March and April. Remember we

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about this. We didn't know what was going to

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>break the camera's back, but but it's broken, UM, and

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>these we expect a U. You know, we don't sure

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's gonna be a V shaped recovery at W

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>shaped recovery, but we believe they'll be a strong recovery.

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And we would talk to our clients and prospects and

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>they say, well, let's see, it's March or April, um,

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I might be able to get you into the October

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>board meeting, right and so sorry, we don't have that

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>type of I need an answer by five. So that's

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>what with our with our multi asset strategy, we wanted

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to solve for that problem, which is i'll call it

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a governance problem, you know, acid allocation. I think in

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets one being dynamic isn't just convenient, it's necessary.

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's how you create the lack of correlation, and

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that's how you create off of really really quite interesting.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So so where are we in the present emerging market

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>cycle that this seems to be lots of UM different

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>cycles in the space. Should we be optimistic about EM

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>here or should we be worrying about EM here? Look,

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we are cautiously optimistic UM, and we know

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we've had that call for for for a few months.

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I would probably say after a ten percent rally that

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we've had over the last five six weeks, maybe a

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>little more cautious, but still optimistic in the in the

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>medium term. The reason that you know we have this

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>optimism goes back to the mathematics after these dislocations, right

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that and then this isn't a blanket statement about all

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>emerging market debt. But if you can pick good and

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.479
<v Speaker 1>just like stocks, right, if you pick if you can

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>pick stocks, well, um, you can significantly outperform and an index.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if I showed you a chart of

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the dispersion of the returns within the Jape Morgan Emerging

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Market Bond Index, you wouldn't believe it. I mean, things

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>down fifteen, things up fifteen, oil and gas and on

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hand and you know, importers of energy on on another hand. So, um,

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we're we're cautiously optimistic. We see good returns in the

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>medium term. Uh, one has to think about how do

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you protect capital after a long run like this. So

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we're raising a little bit of cashier thinking about hedge

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>overlays and what have you. But you know, we're somewhere

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>closer to the bottom of the you know, of the

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>cycle than the top. The next question is a bit obvious.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a big uptick in in rates here in

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the US and around the world. How do you look

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>at em based on how the central banks of the

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>developing worlds are postured, like, I mean, I think that's

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an important question because I think historically, you know,

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>when developed markets get sick, developing markets have gone to

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the hospital. And I think that's a big part of

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say what's happened to emerging markets

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in two has been predominantly an exogenous shock coming from

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>raising the rates around around the world. That's that hasn't

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>always been the case in emerging markets. You know, we

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have things called the Kila crisis and the vodka crisis,

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Capoina crisis and the Tangle crisis. Those were

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>indogenous crises created within emerging markets, but this one was

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been about higher rates, less liquidity UM

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and markets. So that being said, you know, I think

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that the FETE has been signaling slower you know, slower

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>pause on rates UM when we think about local rates

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and emerging markets. UM. You know, we felt that once

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the dollar's strength went away, that it might be a

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>good time to start leaning into local rates within within

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. UM. You know, we saw we were looking

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for three things. You know, we have a top down

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>every month, and we said, if the twos go to

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>four fifty, if tens go to four, and the dollar

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Dixie goes to one fifteen, that's a pretty good place

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to think about board in the flight. So check on

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>four fifty, check on four and we hit one fourteen

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and three quarters about six weeks ago. UM. So you know,

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I think over the past couple of months that led

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>us to kind of ad duration even though rates you

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>were still predicted, and particularly low dollar price investment grade

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>securities where you get a lot of convexy that if

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you get a snap back like we've seen in rates,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that you get to enjoy that right back up. Some

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>people have been looking at at the strong dollar of

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the past two quarters is just a wrecking ball, wreaking

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>havoc everywhere. How do you put the strength of king

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>dollar into context? UM? And I could share some interesting

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>stories about some of the crazy things I've seen on

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>my side of the street. How does it impact emerging

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>markets when when the dollar is as just you know,

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>as powerful as it's been this year and again within

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, I think it's a it's a dispersion of

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 1>responses based upon upon where you are. UM. But I

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>think you know, generally, you know, higher rates, stronger dollar

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>has been been a headwind for emerging markets. You know, interestingly, UM,

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets have had a lot less wiggle room than

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the FED and the ECB and what have you. So

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, whether it's Brazil or Columbia, would have they

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>were kind of ahead of the curve in terms of

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>raising rates. And I think that's what made US bottoms

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>up a bit more constructive on emerging market currencies once

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the dollar peaked. And again I think perhaps we we

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>saw that at one fourteen and three quarters, Um, you know,

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>might go back to one town on on Dixie or

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>or what have you, Dixie being sorry the US dollar index, um,

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:23.479
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we were, you know, we were talking

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about potential vacations in Europe and in the summer, would

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have you and I think, you know, with the with

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the euro at at par and a hundred earlier this year,

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty pretty good time to preplay the hotel. Yeah. Absolutely. Um,

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about some specific countries. Um, we we

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>already discussed Russia. How do you look at places in

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>South America like Argentina and Venezuela, both which seemed to

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have a crisis almost on a regular schedule. Yeah, I mean,

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>let's start with Let's let's start with Argentina, and that

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is a country that has been quite cyclical and the

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>returns have been cyclical UM as well. You know, for us,

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at Argentina much more on an opportunistic basis

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to somewhere that you want to be UM

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>all the time. You know, if you go back when

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we started our business in Argentina was eighteen percent of

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the index, and we were talking earlier about about how

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>risky indices can be. Right, So JP Morgan one of

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the stuff eighteen percent of our portfolio in Russia, part

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of me in Argentina right before it defaulted. Fast forward today.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have an election coming up in Argentina

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in October three. We just had a passing of the

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>baton from Martin Guzman to Massa. UM. I think Massa

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is market friendly enough. I think he's done, UM you

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>know what he needs to do with the IMF, and

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we expect that Massa will be able to

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>stabilize the markets before they start to climb the wall.

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>We're going into the presidential elections in October three. So

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>with you know, assets trading at twenty cents performing assets now,

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>they perform with very low coupons, but they're performing. UM.

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't really imagine a debt restructuring scenario. In the

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 1>next regime, it's worth twenty cents. I can imagine training

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>less than because of the liquidity and air pockets of

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of dislocation. But we're starting to focus more on you know,

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we think there's a light at the end of the tunnel.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>We think that's a you know, perhaps a change of regime,

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a new government that comes in with um markedly more

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>market friendly policies that the market will like. And Venezuela.

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela is more complicated. You know, first of all, it's

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>under restrictions today, right, so US Treasury, the O fact restrictions.

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So Venezuela is more of a theoretical conversation. Now we

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Russia and Ukraine before. You know, it's

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting to note that Chevron's back pumping oil. Uh that's

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a direct connection to Russia invading Ukraine. And I think

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>it was within days of not weeks, that the US

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>State Department was already in caraucas after the Russians had

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>had had invaded, Meaning we're out looking for oil wherever

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we can get it to offset curtail and exports around

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the world. I mean, think about two images that came out.

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The first one was the fist pump with with Biden

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and NBS and then it was John Kerry shaking hands

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>with Moduro. Right. So, um, like Venezuela has a lot

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of oil capacity. You know, I think at their peak

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they were doing three million barrels a day. Um, they

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are probably averaged two point four million barrels a day

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>during the Chavez era. Today they're like seven thousand barrels.

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>They could probably easy Yet that's it. Well, you know,

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the bad news is they haven't had the capex. The

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>good news is all they asked that's still under the ground.

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think there's a possibility of a thawing.

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, hopefully, UM, they'll take the path of moving

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>towards a more democratic UM regime in the upcoming elections.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>And I think the U S could live with a

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a regime where the Chavista does win the current government, UM,

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>if it's perceived to be democratic or at least more

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 1>democratic UM. And we've seen that historically in Latin America,

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, where people that were ostracized that came in

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>back through the democrat process. We're able to run. So

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I tried desperately to avoid being a macro tourist. But

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like, man, if there's ever a country that

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>has immense upside, talk about asymmetrical risks, what would it

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>take to make Venezuela really investable and for them to

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 1>become a little more integrated into the global economy. They're

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they're potentially such a success story if they could get

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>out of their own ways. Yeah, I remember, go back

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to the nine seventies, the Concord used to fly to

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Caracas just to just to put it in perspective. Um,

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're right. I mean the they have

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the largest proven oil reserves in the world, not not

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the largest outside of the Middle East, the largest are yeah,

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>so more than Saudi Arabia. So now we know that

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, Saudi Aramco has done an I p O.

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>It's worth a trillion dollars um. You know, could Pettibasa

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>or viny A Ramco be worth a quarter of a

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars? Should be quarter billion doll hours a go

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>long ways to being able to create capax a trillion

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 1>excuse quarter of a trillion. So there's a lot of

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of potential there um and hopefully you know,

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the chevron is the first step towards a thawing of

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.879
<v Speaker 1>relations between Venezuela and the West, the US, and that

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>UM that will have the ability to buy. You know,

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me of I Rack quite frankly, so, UM,

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>before the Marines invaded Iraq, they were doing about a

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 1>million barrels a day of production. Today they're doing five million.

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Their GDP was twenty five billion a year. It's two

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty billion a year, ten x. That's just amazing.

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 1>And we can't say that it's because it was such

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a politically stable place, right. So you know, we could

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine a Venezuela on the other side where the seven

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand barrels goes back to two to three, and

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that would make a difference today, and it would make

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a difference not only to the market, but quite frankly, UM,

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the Venezuelan people who have suffered immensely under this administration

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and under the current UM. So. So, so let's talk

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about China. UM, how do you approach China?

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I look at equity there. It's essentially flat since

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the early If you're an outsider, it seems like the

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Central Party has taken all of those gains for themselves. Um,

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is China investable? How do you even approach a country

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>like that? So I think, Uh, when we think about investability,

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>one has to think about price right, initial conditions. And

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>so I'll start with historically in China, and for a

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>long period of time, we've been massively underweight or no

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>exposure because it's been asymmetric in your face. And what

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is we're we're we're debt, we're

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>debt investors, right, So debt is a contract, right, And

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the contracts that Chinese companies had and the off shore

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 1>was basically a piece of paper, no assets, and you

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 1>had to rely upon the good faith and the willingness

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 1>and a bill of this corporate to pay you and

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>then and then to pay you to first to make

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a dividend offshore and maybe get China to approve that dividend,

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and then and then to pay you. So that that

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a terrible setup for investment. Yeah, So for

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a dead investor thinking about China at par, trying to

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate a par made no sense to us. Now China

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>property has gone from par. The home builders too, We

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about eight cents, ten cents five cents. So now

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>now you start to think about option value. And when

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I look at the China property sector today, it reminds

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>me of a lot of emerging market UM corporates and

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>sovereigns historically, where one has to tease out distress isn't

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>something that's just cheaper than it used to be. It's

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>cheap relative to an outcome that we think that we

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can catalyze. So when we look at an eight cents security,

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not hearing from the company we're not going to

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.359
<v Speaker 1>pay you, and we're not seeing insolvency. We're seeing bandit center.

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing people FAMBI sent people frozen in in the headlight.

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 1>And I remember one one CFO and China that we're talking.

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I remember there in lockdown, right, And so this poor

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>um CFO is doing the conference code with us in

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>his bathroom and the screen saver is a shower screen, right,

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And so what what what you're seeing as someone who

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know how to do a debt restruction? And I,

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, go back to I remember Argentina two thousand

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and nine and meeting with the finance minister who not

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>only didn't know finance, but didn't know how to do

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a debt restruction. So when we look at China property

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>at five eight ten cents today, um, and we see

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>these people who are expressing willingness to restructure, but a

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>lack of understanding of how to do it, the option

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>value seems pretty cheap. That that's really really quite intriguing.

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We talked earlier about Russia. I've always looked askance at

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Russia because there's no respect for private property, for contract rights,

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for rule of law. Do you have the same challenges

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>in China or are they a little more westernized in

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of if you cut a deal, they will honor it.

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Look at it. I don't want to talk in in

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>large generalities or stereotypes, but you know, I think we

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>saw the Chinese government plank as it relates to the

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>most important sector, that the property sector. And prior to

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the Party Congress, you know, if you read the risk

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in China was that they were going to take it

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all that the government. You know, they were just gonna

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like say you forget you to the to the offshore

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 1>bond holders, what have you. But I think they blinked

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>right that this is the GDP of the country, right. Um,

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So to just think that you can, um, have a

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Lehman moment and just you know, let them go. They

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>tried that with every grand quite frankly, like, let's just

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work. So, Um, I think it's a lot

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 1>less risky today than it was eight weeks ago because

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the new government, the third has come in

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen that they kind of blinked as it

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>related to this, and it's just massive support going to

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that sector. So does that mean I want to buy

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a part security in China anytime soon? No? But do

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we get more comfortable at ten cents with a Chinese

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>tarp and CFOs and CEOs telling us that they want

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to restructure. They just want to extend. They don't want

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to wipe us out, they don't want to equitize, they

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to toss the keys. I think it's a

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty good bet. What do you make at the we're

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 1>recording this in the beginning of December, What do you

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>make of the changes in the COVID policy over there

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and what might that mean for their economy and their

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>DAT issues. Yeah, I mean, so there's there's a you know,

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a social element to to to that response, which is,

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can see that the population has been

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>fed up. I mean I go back to you know,

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>my kids thought, you know, three months of being locked

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>up in the house in the second quarter was worst

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that ever happened. I mean, this has been going

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>on China now for for nearly three years. So, um,

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you have large numbers of people that have been very unhappy.

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not surprised again to see after the Party

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Congress them tact or pivot, which is everybody's favorite word

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>these days, um, and start to open up the economy.

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that back to you know, I think that's

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna create more what happened here, right, we had we

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:02.239
<v Speaker 1>had the big closure and then when the reopening and

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the reopening was slow and spotty, and now we're seeing

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:06.839
<v Speaker 1>that it's you know, the demands there and we're having

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>difficulty with the supply side. I would expect something similar

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:12.319
<v Speaker 1>in China, but I think demand for housing is going

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to be there, the supports there, and that's a major,

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a major part of their economy. Really quite fascinating. So

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about market efficiency and debt.

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems that e M is more complicated, less transparent,

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>less efficient than developed markets. Is that part of the

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>source from whence alpha is derived. Yeah, for sure. I mean,

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the the information asymmetry means that if you

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>can organize yourselves in order to be able to capture information,

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and again that's outside the firm and inside the firm.

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked a little bit about having platforms

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that can suck up that information from the regions, but

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 1>also the way that we are organized an investment team

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for different strategy groups, all collaborating, all meeting every morning,

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting on an investment committee, sharing like what's going on

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in public debt matters to private debt. You know, we

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about Venezuela earlier, like what our special situations team

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:12.919
<v Speaker 1>knows about litigation, litigation finance in Venezuela and O fact restrictions.

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Was helping our long onlymaging market debt team think about

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what it meant for Russia when those when those things

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>came on. So a lot of opportunities in the way

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>that we're organized to to be able to uh, to

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>create alpha. Um. You know, the other way to pick

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to really create alpha and take advantage of the information

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>asymmetry is through the dynamic acid allocation that that that

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we talked about UM. You know my pet peeve as

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>an investor who picks a return stream for ten years.

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned before that you know, um inequities. You

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>could argue with Chinese equities whatever it may be that

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe it's been lackluster returns. Well, UM, if

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you stick with something, whether it trades in a hundred,

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty or two, UM, you're just gonna get the average,

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. But if you're able to move around between

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>value and relative value, I think there's a way to

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the information asymmetry UM and create alpha.

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I've always wondered about the difference

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>between emerging market and frontier markets. At first, do you

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 1>look at frontier markets? And second, how do you really

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.600
<v Speaker 1>distinguish between the two. We really try and put the

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.400
<v Speaker 1>labels aside, and frontier markets a bit more of a

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of an equity label than a debt label. To begin

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>with that being set up, I would say that you know,

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 1>most any country that was frontier we've invested in, traded,

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and traveled at some point in our careers, and things

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>often go from frontier to emerging markets, sometimes they go back.

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>We're much more interested in kind of the bottoms up

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 1>analysis and what it means. But you know, Bulgaria was frontier,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>it became investment grade shortly thereafter. Poland wasn't you know

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. It was frontier UM. So for us

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the debt side, it doesn't really matter. Some frontiers

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of debts, some don't have any debt.

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about China? Are they still an

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>emerging market or have they emerged again? I think it

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.040
<v Speaker 1>depends on how you define emerging markets. You know, in

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the in the textbook, you know, per capita GDP, it's

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:08.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly still classified as an emerging market. UM country UM,

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>second second largest economy in the world. Do they really

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>an emerging market anymore? Exactly? UM? And again it depends

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on whether you're talking about UM from a from a

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>political economic perspective, from a GDP perspective. UM. But you know,

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly hard to just compare to all other emerging markets.

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, on the equity side, it's not

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>only is it. You know, it's such a big component

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Emerging Market index, right, It's like when you

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>buy when you buy the the e M equity index,

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 1>you're basically buying China and a few others. Um, I'm

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>not sure that makes a lot of sense going forward. No,

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree. More. Let's talk a little bit about

0:49:43.640 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>your team. You're the chairman of Grammarcy is the former

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>CEO of PIMCO, Muhammadalarian. What's it like to work with

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>him every day? How did he end up as chairman

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of Grammarcy. Look, it's been Uh, it's been been phenomenal. Um.

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed started with us as an investor first. UM, and

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:03.919
<v Speaker 1>as he got to know us, he kind of leaned

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 1>in and and and and met the team, and UM,

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 1>we had a conversation about him helping us think about

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:12.839
<v Speaker 1>how do we institutionalize the top down? How do we

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've been very much a bottoms up you know,

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:17.479
<v Speaker 1>stock picking shop and credit if you will, credit picking shop,

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and we wanted to make sure that we had a

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>good institutional framework. And quite frankly, myself as the as

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the c IO, I lacked the confidence to to go

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to other portfolio manage and say, look, my view is

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 1>so strong and so right that you should get out

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>of that country or what have you. So now with

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mohammed moved from an investor to an investor

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that UM was an advisor. He helped us really institutionalize

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the top down and then when COVID hit, he realized,

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I can have a real impact on

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the business. I don't have to be there every day

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:48.280
<v Speaker 1>right in person. I can be there every day on Zoom.

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And so he's with us most every morning on on

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:53.840
<v Speaker 1>our daily call we have this top down call. And

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:57.799
<v Speaker 1>full full credit to him. He's been a whole lot

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>more right than wrong on everything for UM, from emerging

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 1>markets to inflation to rates. He seems to be on

0:51:06.080 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a hot streak these days. Look, he he is a

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>brilliant top down decoder. He's an investor, right. A lot

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of economists can can talk to talk, but they can't

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily walk thetis they're not putting money. So he's brilliant

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>as a top down decoder. He understands the investment implications

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of what he's just decoded, and he shares a passion

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>for emerging markets with us. So it's it's a perfect fit.

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And and to your point, he was well ahead of

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the curve on COVID. Like I didn't know what he

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>said to me one day, like you know, this is

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a sudden stop and you can't have a sudden start.

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Never really thought about that, right, but what are the

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 1>implications of a sudden stop and a slow start? Um?

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Supply bottlenecks? Right, Um, still waiting for semiconductors to get

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to new cars, so people didn't what are something in

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that weight? Eighteen months? Yeah? You know he I think

0:51:56.320 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he's well ahead of the curve on on inflation, right,

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 1>And so it's been great. It's given us a lot

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of confidence on the top down. Um. You know what

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think differentiates us is we can take the top

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>down that he's really helped us institutionalize and marry it

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>with our strong bottoms up and be able to uh

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to differentiate. And you know, lastly, he's just he's just

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>become a great friend. Yeah, he's really a fascinating, charming Um, gentlemen,

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm a big fan. Before I get to

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>my favorite questions, let me throw a curved bowl at

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit. Um, tell us about Turkey. What

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:32.440
<v Speaker 1>what's your relationship to the country. How often are you there? So? Um,

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Turkey is a place. My my wife is Turkish. We've

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 1>been married for almost thirty years now. So I've been

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 1>traveling to Turkey for for that long. Um My daughters

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>both speak Turkish, so we spent a lot of time

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 1>there in the summers and so, um, you know it's

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:48.799
<v Speaker 1>in the summers, you mean every summer for the past

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, pretty much every summer for the last thirty years.

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>We wanted our our daughters to learn Turkish, so we

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>got an apartment there every summer. Uh. We love going

0:52:57.520 --> 0:52:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to the beach down there, down in in in bodroom.

0:52:59.840 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Is beautiful water. Is that the medranean or the Asians.

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>It's on the Agean side, so so that's spectacular, beautiful water,

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>beautiful of great people, great hospitality, awesome food. So you know,

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm really enjoyed it. And you know, it's become an

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>important part of our our business over the years too

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>because I spent so much time there. Although I'm a

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Latin Americanist by training, I've become very comfortable in Turkey

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. Huh, really really very interesting. Let's jump to

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>our favorite questions that we ask all our guests. And

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to retire this question one of these

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:35.800
<v Speaker 1>days now that we're mostly reopened, but during the lockdown,

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>tell us what you were doing to stay entertained. What

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 1>were you streaming when we were all stuck in the house,

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So we were just talking about Turkey UM. And Netflix

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 1>happens to have a great catalog of Turkish shows really

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>so they're in Turkish with English English subtitles, really really good, UM,

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:56.560
<v Speaker 1>really good plots in drama and what have you. So

0:53:56.920 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it gave me the ability to learn Turkish language but

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>also learned Turkish culture UM, and be really entertained in

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the process. Give us the name of the show. One

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:07.839
<v Speaker 1>of them that I just finished is called a tier

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Turkish, which means the gift um. And it has

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of h I think about twenty four episodes

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's about um kind of archaeology and Turkey and

0:54:17.480 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh, really fascinating, really good act really good actors UM,

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:26.320
<v Speaker 1>really good scripts, UM, and really good cinematography. Sounds interesting.

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some of your early mentors who helped

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>shape your career. So, in terms of mentors, I mentioned

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>my my first boss, Carlos Arriguez Pasteur, the boutique I

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>worked with in California. What was the name of the

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>boutique CRP associates for for his initials um and I

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 1>was very fortunate to work with Carlos. It was a

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>very small boutique. Spent a lot of time with him

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on a one on one basis. Um, he had a

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:53.319
<v Speaker 1>great mind. He understood the intersection of politics and and markets. Um.

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, English was his second language, but I think

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he taught me English in terms of written English and

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.839
<v Speaker 1>business English and and what have you. Um. And I'd

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:03.719
<v Speaker 1>say the other one, quite frankly, was my stepfather, who

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>was a pilot for United Airlines for thirty five years.

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he had this checklist mentality which looks

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot like risk management, right, like always thinking about

0:55:12.560 --> 0:55:15.839
<v Speaker 1>what can go wrong and how to avoid the the

0:55:15.840 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the catastrophic mistake, um in the nonrecoverable mistake. And so

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I put those two together and say they were great mentors.

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea of checklist. It's it's pilots and

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:28.759
<v Speaker 1>surgeons want to make sure, um, that there aren't these

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:32.719
<v Speaker 1>silly little errors. It's avoiding mistakes more important than hitting

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the bull's eye. And maybe pilots more than surgeons because

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they're on the plane. That's that's the difference of pilot. UM.

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>When a surgeon loses a patient they're sad. When a

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>pilot loses a plane, he's dead. So it's a very

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>different thing. Uh, tell us about some of your favorite books.

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>What are you reading right now? Went back to Turkey.

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we've got an election coming up in

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Turkey this year as well, so I've been doing some

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:57.719
<v Speaker 1>uh some some reading on Turkey and one in particular

0:55:58.080 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 1>book called Turkey under Ardwang, and it kind of just

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:02.399
<v Speaker 1>gives you sense of what Turkey has been like over

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years with there to on and maybe

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think about, um, some of the factors that might influence

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the potential regime change in Turkey and later this year,

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what are the odds of that regime change happening? You know,

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they change every day and we all know that polls

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't as reliable as they never were. But when I

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 1>was in Turkey this summer, I would have told you

0:56:23.960 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that the odds for him winning were quite low. And

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's because if you spoke with you know, there's a

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of a misery index. You know, older retired people

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that were getting squeezed by high inflation um and and

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the currency devaluation, but then also young kids right that,

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:43.879
<v Speaker 1>um that just felt kind of hopeless. And so when

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I left there and in August, I'm like, it's going

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to be really difficult for him to win. Um. Now

0:56:49.480 --> 0:56:51.839
<v Speaker 1>we were there, you know, we had a team there

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:55.879
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago. You know, their calls, it's like, UM,

0:56:55.920 --> 0:56:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, there's a there's a real

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:00.720
<v Speaker 1>dispersion of outcomes that could come from whether he stays

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>or goes. How he stays, how he goes. So it's

0:57:03.560 --> 0:57:06.000
<v Speaker 1>been interesting to to to read on that. And then

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, UM, I like the David Rubinstein books, the

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>interviews you know, with the investors and and and and

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:15.160
<v Speaker 1>UM leadership. Yeah, he's he's a fascinating guy as well.

0:57:15.239 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So those are the two books you you just finished.

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Most recently, what sort of advice would you give to

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a recent college grad who was interested in a career

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in emerging markets? Opportunistic or distress that what's funny in

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the post COVID era. I would start with saying that

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that presence matters and that they should go to the office.

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of young kids who, you know,

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just think they're as as efficient at home as productive

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:41.920
<v Speaker 1>at home, but they forget that you know, God invented

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:45.800
<v Speaker 1>trading desk for a reason. They're open architectures, there's information flowing,

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's great training and great mentorship. So one, I'd

0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 1>say go to the office, um, and two i would say,

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, try and make your career more linear and

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:58.439
<v Speaker 1>fashion and logical. And I see a lot of young

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kids stays like, well, I'm gonna try and US banking

0:58:00.720 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna try tech. You know, whatever's hot. But

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're really interested in emerging markets or whatever it

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 1>may be, then stick to it and evolve around that

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>asset class. But don't hop but but but don't hop around.

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And then last thing I'd say with with young kids

0:58:16.000 --> 0:58:19.080
<v Speaker 1>today is we don't really care where your degree is from.

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't care about pedigree. We care about who you are,

0:58:21.960 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what you've done, and and how you compliment the team.

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to emulate the team. You can. You

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 1>can be different, you know, and with you know, with

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:33.360
<v Speaker 1>diversity comes you know better outcomes. So don't don't just

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:35.960
<v Speaker 1>try and be like everybody else. And our final question,

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the world of emerging markets,

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 1>distressed debt and investing today that you wish you knew

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty years or so ago when you were really first

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>getting your legs under you. So when I left Lehman

0:58:48.440 --> 0:58:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in uh in early you know, when you started an

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:55.320
<v Speaker 1>investment management in the emerging market debt, you know, it

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was basically you did a hedgephone, and you did a

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 1>credit hedgephone and that and that's what we did. You know,

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 1>if I could go back to today when we started gramacy,

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think real long and hard about maybe we want

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to do private equity structures as opposed to hedge fund structures,

0:59:10.160 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have long locked capital as opposed to short locked capital,

0:59:14.360 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and be able to think about multiples of capital over

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the long period as opposed to volatility and I r

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 1>R in the short short run meaning meaning forced the

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>clients to be longer term investors than Yeah, And I

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to use force, but partner with the clients

0:59:30.320 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and vehicles that are more. You know, over the years,

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we've even in our credit vehicles, we're having longer locked vehicles.

0:59:37.000 --> 0:59:38.640
<v Speaker 1>That allows one. You know, if you're gonna make an

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:42.080
<v Speaker 1>asset back loan and capital solutions, you can't give ninety

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 1>day liquidity, right, so it's got to be more like

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a quasi pe structure where you make a loan, you

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have three years to make the loan, you have three

0:59:49.560 --> 0:59:51.440
<v Speaker 1>years to get it back and then return the capital

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and in six or seven years. That makes a lot

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more sense than you know, how do you build a

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>portfolio not knowing where that portfolio is going to still

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>be with you in thirty days. That's challenging. Hey, an

1:00:01.360 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>ink cole the a liquidity premium for nothing, right. The

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>whole idea of tying up capital for X number of

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>years means the short term either gates or liquiditly demands

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't relevant to the investment thesis. You know, the illiquidity

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>premium in emerging market debt. It's a really important concept

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>because I see ce iOS, pension phones, whatever it may be,

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, we're gonna be three percent six percent

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>emerging market debt forever. That's our that's our asset allocation.

1:00:28.920 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>But they stick in liquid liquid in quotations T plus three.

1:00:33.760 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, get your money back in three days. And

1:00:35.800 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll go back to the Mexico example. You know a

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>year ago you could get three percent for a security

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for pemm X, or we could lend a pemic suppliers

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't that a liquid it was nine to

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, So if you're gonna be there for ten,

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>why not pick up that extra thousand plus basis points?

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like it's worth it. Thank you, Robert for

1:00:55.280 --> 1:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>being so generous with your time. We have been speaking

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>with Robert Koenigsberger. He is the chief investment Officer and

1:01:01.920 --> 1:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at Grammercy Funds Management. If you enjoy this conversation, well,

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>be sure and check out any of our prior four

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty interviews. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube,

1:01:16.160 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your favorite podcast from. Sign up for

1:01:20.360 --> 1:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>my daily reads at Rid Halts dot com. You can

1:01:23.080 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at rid Halts. I would be

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>remiss if I did not thank the crack team that

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>helps put these conversations together each week. Justin Milner is

1:01:32.640 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>my audio engineer. Paris Wold is my producer. Sean Russo

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is my head of research. Atika val Bront is my

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>project manager. I'm Barry Hults. You've been listening to Masters

1:01:43.760 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in Business n Bloomberg Radio.