WEBVTT - What the Israel-Iran Conflict Means for China

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 2>In a series of posts on truth Social Tuesday morning,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump celebrated the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Presida.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Trump has announced that sees fire agreement between Israel and Iran,

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 4>saying end it's the.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 3>Twelve days of war. He says a truce is scheduled

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 3>to take effect in about five hours time.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>And highlighted what he saw as one of the benefits

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>of peace, China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>After President Trump says that China can buy Iranian oil.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You can see we're trading below sixty eight dollars a barrel.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Now we pop hopefully, Trump added in his post, they

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>will be purchasing plenty from the US. Also, China is

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Iran's biggest trading partner and sources about fourteen percent of

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>its oil from the country. Between China's economic relationship with

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Iran and its ongoing trade and botiations with the US,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>America's strike against Iran has put China in a difficult position.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Beijing, meanwhile, has criticized a US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities,

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>saying again it's willing to join international efforts to restore

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>peace in the Middle East.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>China, like many countries, also buys oil from Iran's neighbors

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>that passes through the Strait of Hormoots, which Iran has

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 2>threatened to shut down. On Sunday, Secretary of State Marco

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Rubio spoke with Fox News and called on China to

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>apply pressure to Iran when it comes to the Strait.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I to encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>him about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or Hormones for their oil. If they do that, it'll

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be another terrible mistake. Its economic suicide for them if

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they do it.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>My Big Take Asia co host Juan Ha spoke with

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>our colleague John Lou who oversees coverage of China from Beijing.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>They talked about what the Israel Iran conflict has revealed

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>about China's influence in the Middle East and where China's

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 2>economic relationship with Iran could go from here.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 4>I would expect China to take advantage of the situation

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 4>in that it will point to the United States and say, look,

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 4>the US is providing arms to Israel and those arms

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 4>are being used to create instability in the Middle East,

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 4>and I think the Chinese will primarily use the situation

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 4>as a way of painting the United States as the

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 4>unreliable global partner.

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Holder with one Ha in Hong Kong today on

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the show What's at Stake for China in Iran and

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>how the conflict could change China's game plan not just

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in the Middle East but on the global stage.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 3>John, thanks so much for joining us.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:50.839
<v Speaker 4>It's a pleasure to be here.

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>John. We're speaking on Tuesday afternoon. What do we know

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>about how the Chinese leadership views this conflict in the

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 3>Middle East and the US involvement in it?

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 4>First and foremost, I think the number one priority on

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 4>chijing pings to do list is the economy. And even

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 4>though China is not as much involved in this conflict

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 4>as many countries in the Middle East and closer to

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East are, it is affected economically. It gets

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 4>a notable amount of energy from Iran, It gets a

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of energy from the Middle East. Chinese companies are

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 4>doing business in the Middle East, the electric car companies

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 4>for example, and so if anything, Beijing would like to

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 4>see everybody get back to business.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 3>China condemned the US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities and

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>pushed a ceasefire proposal at the United Nations. How consistent

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 3>is that with China's foreign policy approach when it comes

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>to conflicts.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that China has tried to do

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 4>over the last couple of years, especially with President Trump's

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 4>return to office, is really portray itself as being this

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 4>champion of the developing world, of the global South, and

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 4>they have used conflicts like the one between Israel and

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Hamas and Gaza and now with Iran to try to

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 4>portray itself as being the responsible player on the global stage,

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 4>and the United States as being less responsible, as being

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 4>the one who is causing chaos, taking actions that are

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>disrupting trade, causing death and destruction in the Middle East.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 3>China and Iran have a long history of cooperation, solidified

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 3>during the Iran Iraq War in the nineteen eighties, and

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 3>China is one of Iran's biggest supplier of arms. In

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 3>recent years, China's invested in Iranian infrastructure, telecommunications, and energy sectors,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 3>and the two countries signed a twenty five year cooperation

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 3>agreement to strengthen their economic and political alliance. John, how

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>important is China to Iran's economy and vice versa.

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 4>There is I would say an alignment of interest between

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 4>these two nations. They both are seek looking alternative paths

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 4>to economic development that may have been shut off or

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 4>stymied by the United States or the West. In general,

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 4>I would say China is far more important to the

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Iranian economy than Iran is to the Chinese economy. China

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 4>is the major buyer of Iranian oil that is a

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 4>crucial source of income for the regime in Tehran. The

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 4>data that we've seen from third party consultants, people who

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 4>track this data, China is buying about one point one

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 4>million barrels of oil from Iran a day in the

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 4>month of May this year. That's down about twenty percent,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 4>but it accounts for about ten percent of how much

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 4>oil China is buying every month. China's buying about eleven

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 4>twelve million barrels of oil a day, and about one

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 4>million plus comes from Tehran, so it is important. Ten

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 4>percent is a lot, but it is not so high

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 4>that Beijing is dependent on that oil as being the

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 4>main driver of its economic growth.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 3>Last November, a Bloomberg investigation detailed how billions of dollars

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of sanctioned Iranian oil is getting into China, even though

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 3>on paper the country hasn't imported a single drop since

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 3>mid twenty twenty two. How does that oil trade play

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 3>into the geopolitical tensions with the US?

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 4>It plays into the geopolitical tensions with the US because

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 4>the United States is trying to cut off income to

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 4>the Iranian regime, and so if there are buyers of

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 4>that oil even though the sanctions are in place, that

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 4>is undermining the purpose of those sanctions being put into place.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 4>And so if Washington could put pressure on Beijing to

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 4>buy less Iranian oil, that would increase the leverage that

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 4>potentially Washington would have with Tehran at the bargaining table.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Now, about twenty percent of global oil goes through the

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Strait of Hormuse every day. The strait is between Iran,

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Oman and the United Arab Emirates. It's one of the

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>world's busiest oil shipping channels. The US asked China to

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 3>urge Iran to not close the straight after the US

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>bombed Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. What does that

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 3>say about China's influence over Iran and its role in

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 3>this conflict.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>China's influence on Iran, I think is very well known

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 4>and pronounced. We have, of course, had China mediating return

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>to normal diplomatic ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia a

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 4>couple of years ago, and China could play that role

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 4>because of the relationship that it has with both Saudi

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 4>and Iran, and so I think there is influence. How

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 4>much of it that Beijing is willing to use or deploy,

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that is hard to know. I think though,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 4>that also Iran knows China needs the oil to keep going,

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think Iran necessarily needs Beijing to remind

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 4>it that the Strait of Hormus is very important to Beijing.

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that's very clear to the Iranian And you know,

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Iran also wants to sell that oil. It needs the

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 4>income to come in, and so there's many many factors

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 4>that Tehran would have to consider before it shut that straight.

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>That seems unlikely at this point. But if China's access

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 3>to Iranian oil was cut off some other way, where

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>would China get its oil?

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the other places that China buys a lot

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 4>of its energy from include Saudi Arabia, include Russia and

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 4>those places. I'm sure, given the current global environment in

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 4>terms of energy supplies, would be more than willing to

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 4>ramp up their provisions to the Chinese market. The other

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 4>thing is China is actually getting to a point where

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 4>it's oil demand may be peaking. The International Energy Agency

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 4>predicted that oil demand from China would peak in twenty

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven, so that's very close. In the broader picture,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 4>China is really investing in solar and wind and alternative

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 4>energies because it sees that as the future, but also

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 4>the economy is not doing that great, which means demand

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 4>is not growing that quickly.

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Now I want to put it into stark terms, John

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>without oil, what use then is Iran to China without oil?

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 4>I think there is a diplomatic advantage in having friends

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 4>in the Middle East for China. China wants to portray

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 4>itself as the champion of the developing world and being

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 4>able to point to Tehran, being able to show that

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 4>it's helped a neighbor develop, being able to show it's

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 4>given support to this country in the Middle East does

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 4>help China in its relationship with other parts of the world,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 4>and so there are additional benefits to China in addition

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 4>to oil with a weekend Iran.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Where does that leave China's influence in the Middle East?

0:09:50.320 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 3>That's after the break after the US bombed Iran's nuclear facilities,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 3>you had Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Persian Gulf countries

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 3>express dismay over the attack. Given that China has been

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 3>a supporter of Iran and Iran is now on the

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 3>back foot because of this conflict, does this in any

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>way dent China's influence?

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I think it does put in some questions about some

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 4>of these organizations that China has been a part of.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 4>So I'm thinking of the Shahai Cooperation Organization, which Iran

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 4>is a member of. It includes China, includes Russia, and

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 4>these are meant to be groupings that are supposed to

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 4>help country members with creating an alliance of like minded states.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 4>I think the fact that these groupings have not been

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 4>able to step in and help Iran as it was

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 4>under attack from foreign forces will make them less compelling

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 4>of a grouping for other countries to join. Where do

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 4>we secure our security if we cannot secure it by

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 4>aligning ourselves with China or aligning ourselves with Russia. I

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 4>think that ultimately underlines the idea that it is really

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 4>the United States alone that is a global power with

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 4>reach anywhere around the world.

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>And of course, in this conflict, we've seen that the

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 3>US is willing to insert itself into Israel's war against Iran.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 3>How might China be viewing this in relation to Taiwan

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>right in its own backyard, which the US, through a

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 3>congressional act provides defensive arms to.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 4>The focus of Chinese military planners has always been what

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 4>to do in case of a conflict over Taiwan. I

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 4>don't think the US bombing of the nuclear sites in

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Iran changes Chinese calculation about how to respond to some

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 4>sort of provocation about Taiwan, or how to respond if

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 4>there was a conflict in the United State it did

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 4>intervene in that conflict. The United States does sail warships

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 4>through the Taiwan Straight on a regular basis in the

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 4>South China Sea. There are American bases in Japan, in Korea,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 4>in the Philippines, on Guam, and so I would expect

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 4>that Chinese military planners have considered all potential possibilities and

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 4>are planning for them. But I don't think this changes

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 4>the view that China has of Taiwan in any substantial way.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Iran will likely need help rebuilding. Will China step up

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and consolidate its relationship with Iran and its presence in

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East? Or do you think it's more likely

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 3>that it would step back and see what happens in

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 3>the region.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 4>I think immediately China will wait and see how things

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of unfold. I think in a median term, there

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 4>would be definite interests not only by the Chinese government

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.359
<v Speaker 4>but lots of Chinese companies and helping to invest and rebuild.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 4>There will obviously be American sanctions. There are already on

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 4>what businesses can do in Iran. There may be more

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 4>to come, and so this will depend on how discussions

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 4>between the US and Tehran go. But if those sanctions

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 4>were to loosen it all, I think you would see

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:25.359
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Chinese interests in helping to rebuild Iranian infrastructure.

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Probably not in nuclear nuclear especially as it relates to

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 4>defense or weapons related technologies. That that would be I imagine

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 4>something Beijing would be extremely careful about touching.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 3>It was President Donald Trump who first announced the ceasefire

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>between Israel and Iran. China has been largely on the

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>sidelines of this conflict. What does the US involvement in

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 3>China's response tell us about their rivalry to influence and

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>shape world geopolitics.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, the narrative we've had for many years has

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 4>been about how quickly China is catching up to the

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 4>United States. And we hear that when it comes to GDP,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to trade, when it comes to manufacturing,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to AI and technology and chips. What

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 4>this episode I think shows is actually how big the

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 4>gap remains when it comes to the thing that matters

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 4>the most when it comes to geopolitics on the global stage,

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 4>which is military capability. There is nowhere in the world

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 4>that the US cannot touch if it's so desired. And

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 4>the United States has also shown that when its interests

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 4>are infringed, when its interests are at staked, is willing

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 4>to take those actions. Those are things that cannot be

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 4>said about China, and I think it underlines how big

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 4>the power differential remains between these two countries.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 3>This is the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>wanha to get more from the Big Take and unlimited

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>access to all of bloomberg dot com. Subscribe today at

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 3>bloomberg dot com Slash podcast offer. If you liked the episode,

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 3>make sure to subscribe and review The Big Take Asia

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Wherever you listen to podcasts. It helps people find the show.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening, See you next time.