Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcastle make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the Buck Brief.
Speaker 1: Trump will win even if he is found guilty. Now
Speaker 1: there's a lot to unpack there, but let's just start
Speaker 1: with this. I do believe that Donald Trump is going
Speaker 1: to be found guilty in this sham, preposterous trial in
Speaker 1: New York City. I could be wrong, and you will
Speaker 1: know probably in a little over a week if I
Speaker 1: am wrong. But I think that the jury, the fix
Speaker 1: is in. I think the judge has made it as
Speaker 1: easy as he can for this show trial to proceed.
Speaker 1: But I do think that the politics of this are
Speaker 1: blowing back on the Democrats in ways that they just
Speaker 1: frankly didn't anticipate at all. I do think the Democrats
Speaker 1: are in a bit of a frenzy right now. What
Speaker 1: are they going to do? What are they going to
Speaker 1: do with Donald Trump is found guilty of thirty four
Speaker 1: felonies and then they see the poll numbers go up.
Speaker 1: Because every American who does not suffer from Trump arrangement
Speaker 1: syndrome understands what's going on here. What is their next play.
Speaker 1: They're going to try another trial, probably the J six trial.
Speaker 1: I just don't think that any of this is going
Speaker 1: to change in terms of where the American people come
Speaker 1: down on it. I think that there's a recognition that
Speaker 1: this is the dirtiest of politics, using the machinery of
Speaker 1: our judiciary to try to destroy Donald Trump. It's outrageous
Speaker 1: on so many levels. The judge merchand should have thrown
Speaker 1: this whole thing out in the beginning. He still could
Speaker 1: say the government hasn't proven this case at all, and
Speaker 1: he could throw it out at this stage. He could
Speaker 1: set aside a jury verdict if it were guilty, and
Speaker 1: say Donald Trump is free to go. This jury verdict
Speaker 1: is going to be put aside. Now. He won't do that,
Speaker 1: I understand this, But there are plenty of ways where
Speaker 1: he could do the right thing. He is just choosing
Speaker 1: not to do. So what exactly is the crime that
Speaker 1: they claim Trump committed here? That he by having Michael
Speaker 1: Cohen pay Stormy Daniels and listing it as a legal expense,
Speaker 1: he changed the views that people would have had of him,
Speaker 1: so much so that it might have altered the election.
Speaker 1: But the payments were made in twenty seventeen, after the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election, So that makes no sense. This is absurd.
Speaker 1: The whole premise of this is a falsehood. It doesn't
Speaker 1: hold up. And if it did hold up, as they
Speaker 1: lay it out, that would mean that if he had
Speaker 1: to list it as a campaign expenditure, which is what
Speaker 1: they are saying, because otherwise it wouldn't You don't to
Speaker 1: tell you don't have to listen in a campaign if
Speaker 1: you buy yourself a slice of pizza, right, they are
Speaker 1: personal expenditures and campaign expenditures. If this is a campaign expenditure,
Speaker 1: he could have used campaign money for it and they
Speaker 1: definitely would have prosecuted him for that. So this is
Speaker 1: a truly damned if he does, damned if he doesn't situation.
Speaker 1: They know it. But that's why it's the perfect case
Speaker 1: for them, because it's not about fair, it's not about justice.
Speaker 1: It's about they hate this guy. They hate Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and so anything that will work for them as a
Speaker 1: means of trying to take him down is what they
Speaker 1: will leap toward. I mean, that's what they will do.
Speaker 1: They'll find a way to justify to themselves at every
Speaker 1: stage as they have They're saving democracy or whatever. But
Speaker 1: I think it could be any more clear at this point.
Speaker 1: I mean, Michael Cohen is their star witness, and everybody
Speaker 1: had to admit that this guy is among the scummiest
Speaker 1: people you've ever seen at this level of public life
Speaker 1: and involved in a try island this way, who had
Speaker 1: formerly been a lawyer. I mean, Michael Cohen is a
Speaker 1: really bad guy. Now that much is obvious. You can't
Speaker 1: trust him. He's a man who turns on his clients.
Speaker 1: He's a man who steals from his clients. He's a
Speaker 1: man for whom loyalty means absolutely nothing. And now he's
Speaker 1: you know, it's funny because he cashed in on his
Speaker 1: relationship with Trump. Now he's cashed in on bashing Trump,
Speaker 1: writing books and going on MSNBC and all the rest
Speaker 1: of it. What a sorry state of affairs it is
Speaker 1: in New York that this prosecution has gone forward. I mean,
Speaker 1: Alvin Bragg is a truly disgraceful person. What he has
Speaker 1: done here is grotesque. It is an abuse of the law.
Speaker 1: And I will say this. You have Yes, Trump is
Speaker 1: a better president than Biden. Yes, the economy would be better. Yes,
Speaker 1: people had a major increase in wealth under Trump, and
Speaker 1: they've had a loss in wealth, average average family, average household,
Speaker 1: loss of wealth under Biden. Oh that's true. But we
Speaker 1: really are at the point where a vote for Donald
Speaker 1: Trump this fall as a nullification of the law fair
Speaker 1: against him, would be entirely justified. A vote for Donald
Speaker 1: Trump that is meant to just say, we are not
Speaker 1: going to abide by this nonsense. We're not going to
Speaker 1: let this happen. That makes perfect sense to me. Even
Speaker 1: if you were a mediocre to kind of weak leader
Speaker 1: and Republican, I would say, we have to send a message.
Speaker 1: And that's where we are with this. We have to
Speaker 1: send a message that this cannot result in victory for
Speaker 1: the side that has engaged in it, because if it does,
Speaker 1: this is now our new reality. You're going to have
Speaker 1: prosecutions like this. We're going to have law fair against
Speaker 1: conservative voices. And people say, well, why can't we do
Speaker 1: the same thing to them, because they have no ethics
Speaker 1: and they don't care. And we try not to destroy
Speaker 1: everything that we touch and try to live by a code.
Speaker 1: And I know that that sounds trite to people, and
Speaker 1: sometimes it sounds trite when I say it out loud.
Speaker 1: I mean to myself. I'm just like, that's just preposterous.
Speaker 1: But you know why. The way that you you know,
Speaker 1: fix a communist society is not by trying to I
Speaker 1: miserate all of your political enemies and put them in
Speaker 1: the gulag. It's freedom, fighting for human dignity, individual rights,
Speaker 1: you know, a constitution like what we have. I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: you know, it's not it can't just be do unto
Speaker 1: them what they do unto us, because then we're and
Speaker 1: we're heading off into a really bleak future in this country.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's where we're heading. I'm not naive about this.
Speaker 1: I wish I could tell you I thought things were
Speaker 1: going to go better than they are. But my white
Speaker 1: pill moment, if you will, you know, for the uh,
Speaker 1: there's red pill, which is learn about reality. The blue
Speaker 1: pill stay in the reality you're in. White pill is
Speaker 1: the future is going to be great, right, or there's
Speaker 1: something great to look forward to. There's hope. White pill
Speaker 1: is about hope. I think that even if Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is convicted in this New York trial, he is still
Speaker 1: likely to win this election, and he certainly will win
Speaker 1: in the court of public opinion. I think you're going
Speaker 1: to see and this is what I mean by win.
Speaker 1: I can't tell you he'll definitely win the election. I
Speaker 1: think he will, but I'm very confident that his poll
Speaker 1: numbers will go up after a conviction in New York
Speaker 1: because it's such a sham. I also have some upbates
Speaker 1: for you on the situation in the Florida trial, which
Speaker 1: we shall discuss here in just a moment. You know,
Speaker 1: now is a great time to own gold. You know
Speaker 1: that inflation is just going to keep on chipping away
Speaker 1: at your savings, and tangible assets that have proven to
Speaker 1: hold value over time, like precious metals, are a good
Speaker 1: way to diversify your portfolio. You can use it as
Speaker 1: an edge against inflation, a store of value, and it's
Speaker 1: something that you hold that's solid, that you know is
Speaker 1: going to be worth you know a lot, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, gold is how many thousands of years back?
Speaker 1: Can you can you say that gold was a medium
Speaker 1: of exchange and the gold held value. You can't say
Speaker 1: that about a lot of other things these days. So
Speaker 1: nobody can predict the future, but I think you should
Speaker 1: prepare for it. You can call the Oxford Gold Group
Speaker 1: right now. You may qualify for up to ten thousand
Speaker 1: dollars in free precious metals call eight three three nine
Speaker 1: nine five gold eight three three nine nine five go
Speaker 1: o LD. That's a three three nine nine five gold.
Speaker 1: Let's switch to our Florida case here with Trump. As
Speaker 1: you know, he's got another criminal case. There's four criminal
Speaker 1: cases against him, but the Florida case, which seems to
Speaker 1: be in a state of delay right now because all
Speaker 1: the classified information stuff is UH has to be dealt
Speaker 1: with still. So that's something that we're looking into. We're
Speaker 1: trying to figure out what's going to happen with But
Speaker 1: when you see this, this is crazy. Okay, this is crazy.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump has responded to it. Julie Kelly, full credit
Speaker 1: to her, is the one who unearthed this in the
Speaker 1: court documents, said, I just came out of the Biden
Speaker 1: witch hunt trial in Manhattan. This is Trump on truth
Speaker 1: social the ice box, and we've shown reports that Crooked
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's DOJ and their illegal and unconstitutional rate of
Speaker 1: mar A Lago authorized the FBI to use deadly lethal force.
Speaker 1: Now we know for sure that Joe Biden is a
Speaker 1: serious threat to democracy. He is unfit to hold office.
Speaker 1: Twenty fifth Amendment so Trump is not pleased at all
Speaker 1: to find out what Julie Kelly has unearthed. Here. Let
Speaker 1: me read to you, uh what exactly it's. I mean,
Speaker 1: the stuff that they've gone for here is outrageous. Here
Speaker 1: you go. This is for the raid. This is Julie
Speaker 1: Kelly's reporting. She has a declassified substack. According to operations
Speaker 1: order produced in discovery, the FBI believed its objective for
Speaker 1: the mar A Lago raid was to seize classified information NDI,
Speaker 1: which is national defense information and US government records, as
Speaker 1: described in the search warrant. The order contained a policy
Speaker 1: statement regarding use of deadly force, which stated, for example,
Speaker 1: law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use
Speaker 1: deadly force when necessary. The agents plan to bring standard
Speaker 1: issue weapons AMMO, handcuffs, and medium and large sized bolt cutters,
Speaker 1: but they were instructed to wear unmarked polo or collared
Speaker 1: shirts to keep law enforcement equipment concealed. Why is this
Speaker 1: in here, all right? Why would they include that? I
Speaker 1: sent it to a couple of law enforcement friends of
Speaker 1: mine and they said, that's not normal. It's bizarre, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, I've never worked in the FBI, worked in
Speaker 1: the CIA, but I could tell you that we didn't
Speaker 1: just throw random lethal force disclaimers into CIA. Stuff that
Speaker 1: would have raised a lot of eyebrows, right, I don't know,
Speaker 1: you know, if you're late to work, maybe you get droned.
Speaker 1: I don't know, you know, lethal force. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: pretty crazy, and I wonder. I'm assuming their explanation is
Speaker 1: just going to be, oh, you know, it's just standard
Speaker 1: to have this, and it means nothing. It's not standard
Speaker 1: to have this. It's grotesque. And the whole raid on
Speaker 1: mar A Lago was appalling for what for documents that
Speaker 1: nobody was reading, that nobody had access to that the
Speaker 1: president says that he de classified when he was president.
Speaker 1: That's really what this is all about. I mean, what
Speaker 1: are the chances that old classified stuff that Trump has
Speaker 1: or formally classified the stuff that Trump has is really
Speaker 1: a national security threat. I'll tell you the answer. The
Speaker 1: chance this is almost zero. But they act like it's
Speaker 1: some urgent matter. I mean, if it was so urgent,
Speaker 1: why do they wait for months of back and forth
Speaker 1: with the lawyers on this back and forth with the lawyers?
Speaker 1: If it was urgent, if it was nuclear secrets, and
Speaker 1: you know, Russians are going to get it and dogs
Speaker 1: and cats living together mass hysteria. They wouldn't have been
Speaker 1: able to wait on it. Right, this is ugly what
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and his thugs in the DOJ and the
Speaker 1: FBI and the various court systems that are being used
Speaker 1: to attack Trump. It's ugly what's going on, and it
Speaker 1: is very concerning for all of us who love this
Speaker 1: country and who believe still in America. But I'm not
Speaker 1: sure what's going to happen. And in fact, I just
Speaker 1: watched a new documentary called America's Last Election, and you've
Speaker 1: got to go watch it. It's produced by my friend,
Speaker 1: the legendary economist Porter Stansbury. It details a new financial
Speaker 1: crisis that could be brewing in America and the dangers
Speaker 1: it poses to millions of Americans. How you work, where
Speaker 1: you live, how you plan for retirement. Nothing may ever
Speaker 1: be the same. So make sure you watch this new
Speaker 1: documentary while it's still online. Go to Last Election Documentary
Speaker 1: dot com. That's Last Election documentary dot com. I went,
Speaker 1: I watched the whole thing. I mean, Porter's a brilliant guy,
Speaker 1: and he is He's got vision. I mean, he sees
Speaker 1: what's coming, he sees what's coming for the markets and
Speaker 1: politics you think about this Last election, right, that's the
Speaker 1: documentary title, go to Last Election Documentary dot com paid
Speaker 1: for by Porter and Company. So, like I said before,
Speaker 1: stay stay focused and stay four out. Like I say
Speaker 1: all the time, I should say, stay focused and stay frosty.
Speaker 1: I think the good guys can still win here. I
Speaker 1: think Trump is going to be able to battle through
Speaker 1: all of this craziness with these trials, but it's going
Speaker 1: to be it's going to be a dogfight to the
Speaker 1: end for this election. Shield time. Oh yeah, sorry by
Speaker 1: the way about my cold, But you know I talk
Speaker 1: too much every day as it is.