1
00:00:01,160 --> 00:00:04,120
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. This is our little

2
00:00:04,160 --> 00:00:07,000
Speaker 1: Saturday episode and we decided that we wanted to do

3
00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,280
Speaker 1: this episode. I have Kyle Olsen with me because earlier

4
00:00:10,360 --> 00:00:12,799
Speaker 1: in the week I was having a conversation with someone

5
00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:16,360
Speaker 1: about what's going on in politics, the whole changeover of

6
00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:20,480
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, and he mentioned the Supreme Court, and I

7
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:23,960
Speaker 1: and Kyle. You know, recently President Biden came out and

8
00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:27,080
Speaker 1: said he wanted Supreme Court reform. And now he's saying

9
00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:29,520
Speaker 1: that there's a few different things. One of them is

10
00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:32,519
Speaker 1: that he wants a constitutional amendment to make sure no

11
00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:36,800
Speaker 1: president has immunity anymore. No one it's called no one

12
00:00:36,880 --> 00:00:39,920
Speaker 1: is above the law. And then this whole eighteen year

13
00:00:40,080 --> 00:00:43,200
Speaker 1: term limit. And it was interesting because this guy who

14
00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:46,920
Speaker 1: was a conservative talking to me said, I actually don't

15
00:00:46,960 --> 00:00:49,680
Speaker 1: have a problem with the term limit, and I think

16
00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:54,320
Speaker 1: this is probably a I guess a little bit naive

17
00:00:54,520 --> 00:00:57,160
Speaker 1: of most people to go, you know what, I think

18
00:00:57,200 --> 00:01:00,400
Speaker 1: that that's okay, why not eighteen years. It's a long time.

19
00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:03,160
Speaker 1: We don't need people on the Supreme Court forever. But

20
00:01:03,280 --> 00:01:04,679
Speaker 1: I was thinking about it. You and I had a

21
00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:07,280
Speaker 1: conversation and I said to him. You know, I got

22
00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:10,040
Speaker 1: to push back a little bit on this, specifically when

23
00:01:10,040 --> 00:01:13,840
Speaker 1: we look at the Supreme Court, because if you have

24
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:17,360
Speaker 1: somebody that is on the Supreme Court for eighteen years

25
00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:19,759
Speaker 1: and they come out in their sixties, which is possible

26
00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,880
Speaker 1: and I think much more possible if Joe Biden gets

27
00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:25,640
Speaker 1: what he wants, because he's saying that he wants every

28
00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:28,640
Speaker 1: president to appoint a new justice every two years, and

29
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,200
Speaker 1: so you're going to start to get younger and younger people, right,

30
00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:33,440
Speaker 1: They're going to be trying to bring in younger and

31
00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:36,520
Speaker 1: younger people. Well, those people have huge influence, and after

32
00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:40,600
Speaker 1: eighteen years, they could very easily be swayed to make

33
00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:43,200
Speaker 1: decisions based on their next job. And I think you

34
00:01:43,319 --> 00:01:45,640
Speaker 1: have to keep in mind that the Supreme Court has

35
00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:48,080
Speaker 1: always been protected by the fact that these people aren't

36
00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:50,280
Speaker 1: going anyplace else. Isn't that, I mean, it isn't that

37
00:01:50,280 --> 00:01:50,960
Speaker 1: how you look at it.

38
00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:54,840
Speaker 2: Yeah, And if you look at a state like Michigan

39
00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:59,760
Speaker 2: that has legislative term limits for the House and sentive

40
00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:04,160
Speaker 2: state House and Senate, they had been relatively short. You

41
00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:07,000
Speaker 2: could be six years in the House, eight years in

42
00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:09,800
Speaker 2: the Senate, and then you're out of government. You can't

43
00:02:09,960 --> 00:02:13,160
Speaker 2: run again. That has since been reformed. But the point

44
00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:16,919
Speaker 2: is you've got legislators who know they have a definitive

45
00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:21,000
Speaker 2: end to their legislative career, and a lot of times

46
00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:25,079
Speaker 2: what will happen is those legislators will start making decisions,

47
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:30,720
Speaker 2: they'll introduce bills, they'll do particular votes, angling towards a

48
00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:35,399
Speaker 2: career after their time in the legislature. And so I'm

49
00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:38,480
Speaker 2: not saying it's corruption. I'm just saying it is the

50
00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:42,600
Speaker 2: by product of a system where people their career is

51
00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:44,919
Speaker 2: not going to end because they're in their fifties or

52
00:02:44,960 --> 00:02:48,200
Speaker 2: maybe early sixties something like that, they want to do

53
00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:52,240
Speaker 2: something after and so they they're influenced.

54
00:02:52,480 --> 00:02:55,320
Speaker 1: It can lead to bias, and that's the one thing

55
00:02:55,360 --> 00:02:58,640
Speaker 1: that we have been protected protected against in the Supreme

56
00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:01,120
Speaker 1: Court is biased. And I know are like, oh, I

57
00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,840
Speaker 1: don't like these. There's two decisions, and that's what it

58
00:03:03,880 --> 00:03:05,840
Speaker 1: comes down to. To me. It blows my mind. There

59
00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:09,440
Speaker 1: are two decisions that have convinced the public that they

60
00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:13,360
Speaker 1: should totally reform the Supreme Court. And I find it

61
00:03:13,440 --> 00:03:18,520
Speaker 1: interesting because I truly believed that it was Democrats who

62
00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:23,040
Speaker 1: pushed these decisions the way they came out because I

63
00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:25,440
Speaker 1: think they knew that if Roe v. Wade went in

64
00:03:25,480 --> 00:03:27,120
Speaker 1: front of the Supreme Court, they would say that it

65
00:03:27,160 --> 00:03:30,560
Speaker 1: was unjustly decided and it's not law and it has

66
00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:32,360
Speaker 1: to go back to the States. And I think that

67
00:03:32,440 --> 00:03:36,160
Speaker 1: they manipulated the situation in Mississippi to take it to

68
00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:39,320
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court knowing that they could ultimately use it

69
00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:41,840
Speaker 1: as a tool of power. And I know people would

70
00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:44,080
Speaker 1: disagree with me there, but look at what they've been

71
00:03:44,120 --> 00:03:46,960
Speaker 1: able to do with the whole Roe v. Wade conversation,

72
00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:51,000
Speaker 1: and they continue to have it today. I mean last week.

73
00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:54,080
Speaker 1: I think I mentioned this a couple days ago. Last week,

74
00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:56,680
Speaker 1: I met with a few girls who are on the

75
00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,600
Speaker 1: Democrat side, and they were like, if Trump gets elected,

76
00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:02,440
Speaker 1: we won't contraception. And somebody in the office was telling

77
00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:05,360
Speaker 1: me that they're one of their family members. It is like,

78
00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:08,160
Speaker 1: if Trump gets elected, I'm just worried about contraception. These

79
00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:13,320
Speaker 1: messages are very valuable and for them for the other side,

80
00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:17,120
Speaker 1: and they've manipulated people into wanting to change an institution

81
00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:20,679
Speaker 1: that has been protected since the beginning of the United

82
00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:25,200
Speaker 1: States of America. And I believe it's a manipulative move

83
00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:28,800
Speaker 1: to change out the term limits for the United States

84
00:04:28,839 --> 00:04:33,080
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. Also, this whole idea of taking away presidential immunity,

85
00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:35,680
Speaker 1: I wonder how the others feel about that, because, let's

86
00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:38,960
Speaker 1: face it, Joe Biden is on his deathbed. He doesn't care.

87
00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:41,320
Speaker 1: It's not going to affect him. This guy is not

88
00:04:41,360 --> 00:04:43,200
Speaker 1: having anybody come back to him and saying, hey, we

89
00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:45,280
Speaker 1: don't like what you did in Afghanistan. We think you

90
00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:48,480
Speaker 1: belong in jail. But I mean, Obama people could come

91
00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:51,440
Speaker 1: back and say, look, you droned civilians. You got to

92
00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:56,360
Speaker 1: go to prison. This presidential immunity ish, Yeah, you're under pressure.

93
00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:58,039
Speaker 1: You have to be able to make these decisions. So

94
00:04:58,160 --> 00:05:00,559
Speaker 1: both of these, in my opinion, both both of these

95
00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:04,200
Speaker 1: go to you are skewing the ability of the person

96
00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:08,039
Speaker 1: to make clear headed decisions. Same Supreme Court. If you

97
00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:10,400
Speaker 1: start to tell them you have to work at another

98
00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:13,800
Speaker 1: job in a few years, you skew their ability to

99
00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:16,760
Speaker 1: make clear headed decisions. The president, if you say you

100
00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:19,800
Speaker 1: don't have immunity, you skew their ability to make clear

101
00:05:19,880 --> 00:05:20,960
Speaker 1: headed decisions.

102
00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:23,880
Speaker 2: Yeah. And in a place like Washington, d C. And

103
00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:31,719
Speaker 2: State capital's access influence and experience from our currency, but

104
00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:35,240
Speaker 2: they're but their currency. And so if there is a

105
00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:39,440
Speaker 2: sitting U Supreme Court justice whose term, whose term is

106
00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:42,839
Speaker 2: going to be done in two or four years, those

107
00:05:42,920 --> 00:05:46,840
Speaker 2: there's lobbying firms, there are legal firms that want that

108
00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:52,320
Speaker 2: person because they have experience and access and and uh

109
00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:56,800
Speaker 2: and connections, and so what does that do for the

110
00:05:56,839 --> 00:06:00,520
Speaker 2: integrity of the court. And I just think it opens

111
00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:04,840
Speaker 2: up so many questions. And really, this what Biden came

112
00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:08,040
Speaker 2: out with, you know, sort of breaking the ice with

113
00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:12,400
Speaker 2: this sort of proposal. It's an extension, it's a continuation

114
00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:14,640
Speaker 2: of what they have been doing to the court. And

115
00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:20,240
Speaker 2: if you go back for months now, the Democrats and

116
00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:24,080
Speaker 2: Progressives have been attacking the integrity of the court, specifically,

117
00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:26,560
Speaker 2: if you want to boil it all down, specifically the

118
00:06:26,600 --> 00:06:29,560
Speaker 2: integrity of Clarence Thomas, right. And they're saying, well, he's

119
00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:32,679
Speaker 2: gone on these trips and he's had donors and somehow

120
00:06:32,680 --> 00:06:37,600
Speaker 2: he's being influenced, even though they're implying that and they're

121
00:06:37,640 --> 00:06:40,760
Speaker 2: saying it, but they cannot point to a single case

122
00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:44,359
Speaker 2: where they can't draw a line to a single case.

123
00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:47,200
Speaker 2: And so but what they're doing is they're attacking the

124
00:06:47,240 --> 00:06:52,080
Speaker 2: integrity of the court. You mentioned that the two specific cases,

125
00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:55,520
Speaker 2: How do we know if these sorts of reforms that

126
00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:59,240
Speaker 2: Biden wants, the outcome of those cases would have been

127
00:06:59,279 --> 00:06:59,760
Speaker 2: any different.

128
00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:04,040
Speaker 1: Let me argue. Let me argue. I actually think it's

129
00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:06,640
Speaker 1: incredibly dangerous because I think that the fact that they

130
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:13,000
Speaker 1: have created such a control over elections means that they

131
00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:16,280
Speaker 1: have figured out They had the Colorado motto model. They

132
00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:20,720
Speaker 1: figured out Colorado. They brought Colorado's model to Michigan. They

133
00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:23,520
Speaker 1: and this is all public record. This is not like

134
00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:25,920
Speaker 1: you don't have to be a sleuth to find this stuff.

135
00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:28,520
Speaker 1: It's pretty much out there. If you're looking, you can

136
00:07:28,560 --> 00:07:32,080
Speaker 1: find out what they've done to organize. And I've said

137
00:07:32,120 --> 00:07:36,120
Speaker 1: before the Democrats campaign like it's a business, and I

138
00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:38,560
Speaker 1: give them credit for that. They win elections because they

139
00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:41,200
Speaker 1: are very focused, they are very targeted. They run it

140
00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:46,360
Speaker 1: like it is a business. They campaign on emotion. They

141
00:07:46,440 --> 00:07:50,360
Speaker 1: run elections like a business. We run elections on emotion,

142
00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:54,680
Speaker 1: We campaign like it's business. It's a disaster for Republicans

143
00:07:54,920 --> 00:07:57,560
Speaker 1: and it has been proving to be a disaster. So

144
00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:01,800
Speaker 1: wait a minute. If now they can manipulate or organize

145
00:08:01,840 --> 00:08:05,960
Speaker 1: their way into office every single time, then you suddenly

146
00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:09,400
Speaker 1: in just a few short years you have a very

147
00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:13,240
Speaker 1: radical Supreme Court. If you are switching out of justice

148
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:16,720
Speaker 1: every two years, then if you control elections, if you

149
00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:20,120
Speaker 1: control the Supreme Court, the country's gone well.

150
00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:23,000
Speaker 2: And we hear from both sides, this is the most

151
00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:25,440
Speaker 2: important election of our lifetime. It seems like we hear

152
00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:29,840
Speaker 2: that every election now. And what this would do because

153
00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:34,559
Speaker 2: let's just say there's a Ruth Bader Ginsburg type of ideology,

154
00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:40,319
Speaker 2: or a Clarence Thomas type of ideologies or Samuel Alito whoever,

155
00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:43,640
Speaker 2: where you know pretty much one hundred percent of the

156
00:08:43,640 --> 00:08:45,360
Speaker 2: time where they're going to come down on a case

157
00:08:46,040 --> 00:08:48,520
Speaker 2: and that person is going to be cycled off of

158
00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:52,320
Speaker 2: the court and the next president is going to be

159
00:08:52,360 --> 00:08:56,440
Speaker 2: able to appoint someone new and you know, potentially tip

160
00:08:56,520 --> 00:09:00,880
Speaker 2: the balance of the court. It just heightens, it just

161
00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:06,320
Speaker 2: heightens the intensity and the stakes of election after election.

162
00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:09,720
Speaker 2: And is this really the direction that we should be heading,

163
00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:12,960
Speaker 2: because take a step back, I mean, what is Biden

164
00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:16,200
Speaker 2: really trying to do here? It's it's a solution in

165
00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:18,880
Speaker 2: search of a problem. If we had a situation where

166
00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:23,920
Speaker 2: we had justices who were feeble mentally or they it

167
00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:30,320
Speaker 2: was it was demonstrable that they were correct, yes, exactly,

168
00:09:31,640 --> 00:09:34,080
Speaker 2: then there could be a case to be made that

169
00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:36,280
Speaker 2: there needs to be some sort of reform. But that's

170
00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:38,360
Speaker 2: not what they're trying to do. They're trying to use

171
00:09:38,440 --> 00:09:42,160
Speaker 2: these cases that they didn't agree with, which you know,

172
00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:44,960
Speaker 2: a lot of experts would say the court that that

173
00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:51,120
Speaker 2: originally issued Roll versus Wade incorrectly issued that, and and

174
00:09:51,200 --> 00:09:53,040
Speaker 2: so we can go back and forth about all of

175
00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:55,120
Speaker 2: this all the time, but the fact that they're doing

176
00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:59,360
Speaker 2: this now, I think between from from you know, attacking

177
00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:02,000
Speaker 2: the integrity the court for the last several months and

178
00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:06,079
Speaker 2: now Biden is, you know, proposing this, and he's obviously

179
00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:10,360
Speaker 2: going to be leaving office sooner rather than later, certainly

180
00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:15,640
Speaker 2: in January, if not before. They're This is a very

181
00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:19,240
Speaker 2: long process because a constitutional amendment, which is what he's

182
00:10:19,240 --> 00:10:23,520
Speaker 2: proposed proposing, the Congress has to pass it and then

183
00:10:23,559 --> 00:10:26,480
Speaker 2: it has to go to the states, and states have

184
00:10:26,559 --> 00:10:29,679
Speaker 2: to pass it. That's a very long process. There are

185
00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:33,360
Speaker 2: some constitutional amendments that were passed in the seventies. You

186
00:10:33,400 --> 00:10:36,240
Speaker 2: take the Equal Rights Amendment for example, that was passed

187
00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:39,880
Speaker 2: in the seventies that has still not been ratified by States.

188
00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:43,200
Speaker 1: So he's so'sl likely just another part of the show

189
00:10:43,240 --> 00:10:46,360
Speaker 1: government that we're watching. This is everything that we're seeing

190
00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:48,520
Speaker 1: right now as show. Although I do think you make

191
00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:50,960
Speaker 1: a really good point that once it's out there, there's

192
00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:53,640
Speaker 1: an appetite for it. They're wedding the appetite for the

193
00:10:53,679 --> 00:10:58,079
Speaker 1: future of having the entire public say yes. And this

194
00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:02,199
Speaker 1: is something that I think that someone was saying to

195
00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:06,000
Speaker 1: me recently, that all of these things start on a

196
00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:09,360
Speaker 1: moral lie, like it's okay, the environment is in such

197
00:11:09,440 --> 00:11:13,720
Speaker 1: danger if you don't do something morally, if you don't

198
00:11:13,720 --> 00:11:16,679
Speaker 1: do something, everybody will die in ten years. Well, that

199
00:11:16,760 --> 00:11:19,240
Speaker 1: didn't happen. I mean, it's the same thing with this.

200
00:11:19,360 --> 00:11:21,760
Speaker 1: My gosh, this court is corrupt. If we don't have

201
00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:25,840
Speaker 1: some ability to change it over time, then you're going

202
00:11:25,880 --> 00:11:28,360
Speaker 1: to end up with a very horrible that you'll lose

203
00:11:28,400 --> 00:11:30,560
Speaker 1: the country that way. I mean, these are all lies

204
00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:33,480
Speaker 1: that become bigger and bigger and bigger. And that's why

205
00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:36,680
Speaker 1: I think it's very important for us as citizens to

206
00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:39,839
Speaker 1: get involved and understand pay attention. I know people don't

207
00:11:39,840 --> 00:11:41,560
Speaker 1: want to pay attention to news. I can't tell you

208
00:11:41,600 --> 00:11:43,080
Speaker 1: how many friends I had that are like I don't

209
00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:46,079
Speaker 1: even watch the news. Pay attention to what bills are passing,

210
00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:49,000
Speaker 1: pay attention to what your state government and your federal

211
00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:52,600
Speaker 1: government are doing. I mean, we had just last week

212
00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:56,120
Speaker 1: the governor wasn't even even the governor someone because the

213
00:11:56,120 --> 00:11:58,880
Speaker 1: governor's not here anymore. Our governor has left town to

214
00:11:58,920 --> 00:12:01,880
Speaker 1: go on a book tour. We had the Attorney General

215
00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:05,640
Speaker 1: signing bills and signed a bill into log giving our

216
00:12:05,960 --> 00:12:12,199
Speaker 1: environmental agency emergency powers. Now, morally people can go, wow,

217
00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:15,600
Speaker 1: that's great. They can make sure there's no environmental disaster.

218
00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:19,560
Speaker 1: Reality of that is a bunch of young kids that

219
00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:24,199
Speaker 1: come out of a liberal university that have no concept

220
00:12:24,240 --> 00:12:27,400
Speaker 1: of business and no concept of how a state is

221
00:12:27,480 --> 00:12:30,679
Speaker 1: run or how the inner workings of business and state run.

222
00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:32,720
Speaker 1: And they go in and they shut down our farms,

223
00:12:32,800 --> 00:12:35,560
Speaker 1: and they shut down our manufacturing, and the constant the

224
00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:39,600
Speaker 1: unintended consequences are great, and which is why you have

225
00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:43,240
Speaker 1: to look at something like this and instead of like

226
00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:46,880
Speaker 1: what happened to me the other night, a conservative guy going,

227
00:12:46,920 --> 00:12:49,600
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm not really that upset about an

228
00:12:49,640 --> 00:12:53,240
Speaker 1: eighteen year term. I guess that's a long time. Wait, wait, wait,

229
00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:57,200
Speaker 1: don't just stop at that think through the whole thing,

230
00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:00,959
Speaker 1: think about how that works, talk to people, think about

231
00:13:00,960 --> 00:13:03,880
Speaker 1: how government, how corrupt government can be. I mean, I

232
00:13:03,880 --> 00:13:08,360
Speaker 1: think you make a phenomenal point in this. The currency

233
00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:12,920
Speaker 1: that goes around d C and power and information and

234
00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:17,080
Speaker 1: prestigeous currency is currency and people are constantly exchanging it.

235
00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:21,920
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I would just question why is why are

236
00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:24,560
Speaker 2: they doing this now? So they've been attacking the integrity

237
00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:27,680
Speaker 2: of the court, which you know they previously told us

238
00:13:27,920 --> 00:13:31,080
Speaker 2: you're not supposed to do, but they've been doing that

239
00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:34,080
Speaker 2: for months now, and now suddenly they come out with

240
00:13:34,120 --> 00:13:39,240
Speaker 2: this proposal which is very difficult to pass, And so

241
00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:40,880
Speaker 2: why are they doing this now?

242
00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:41,120
Speaker 1: You know?

243
00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:43,600
Speaker 2: I think I would suspect part of the reason is

244
00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:47,760
Speaker 2: because they want to change the subject. I think also

245
00:13:48,160 --> 00:13:51,560
Speaker 2: is they want to perpetuate this narrative that you know,

246
00:13:51,640 --> 00:13:55,040
Speaker 2: they've built up what they think is a case that

247
00:13:55,200 --> 00:13:58,880
Speaker 2: the court is corrupt and therefore this is the solution.

248
00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:02,640
Speaker 2: But I just think people need to look at this

249
00:14:02,760 --> 00:14:07,199
Speaker 2: and say why what is really going on here and

250
00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:09,640
Speaker 2: why are they doing this and why are they doing

251
00:14:09,679 --> 00:14:10,040
Speaker 2: it now?

252
00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:15,160
Speaker 1: Oh? I think right now they are campaigning on lies,

253
00:14:15,559 --> 00:14:19,520
Speaker 1: They're campaigning on issues that are meaningless in they can't

254
00:14:19,560 --> 00:14:22,600
Speaker 1: have an effect right now because they have nothing to

255
00:14:22,680 --> 00:14:25,640
Speaker 1: campaign on. And so this gives Kamala the chance to say,

256
00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:27,600
Speaker 1: I support Joe. Look at the great work that he's

257
00:14:27,640 --> 00:14:30,760
Speaker 1: doing from his bed, and he's working so hard for

258
00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:35,240
Speaker 1: the American people, protecting democracy. She's gonna say, not only

259
00:14:35,320 --> 00:14:38,440
Speaker 1: am I protecting democracy by talking about the court, but

260
00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,560
Speaker 1: we're also going to protect women's health, you know, because

261
00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:43,560
Speaker 1: it doesn't have anything to do with anything other than

262
00:14:43,600 --> 00:14:45,920
Speaker 1: women's health. My gosh, if you listen to them, women

263
00:14:45,960 --> 00:14:49,480
Speaker 1: can't even have their I mean, you can't even have

264
00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:52,520
Speaker 1: your annual exam. Good grief, you can't have anything done.

265
00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,320
Speaker 1: You have no women's health care whatsoever. It's just a

266
00:14:55,360 --> 00:14:59,200
Speaker 1: total lie. But you can only if you're the Democrats.

267
00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:00,800
Speaker 1: Right now, you can only ca pain on lies. The

268
00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:03,160
Speaker 1: jobs report just came out last week. It was a

269
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:07,320
Speaker 1: total nightmare. So far, they haven't been able to reduce

270
00:15:07,440 --> 00:15:12,000
Speaker 1: the rate from the Fed. They cannot ease the pain

271
00:15:12,200 --> 00:15:14,960
Speaker 1: on the American people right now. They know that they

272
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:17,960
Speaker 1: know that crime they say crime is down, they know

273
00:15:18,040 --> 00:15:20,720
Speaker 1: that in areas where crime has never reduced, it's higher

274
00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:22,760
Speaker 1: than ever and it's hurting those people more than ever,

275
00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:26,360
Speaker 1: and those are their voters. They know that the state

276
00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:29,480
Speaker 1: of the country is a disaster, and so they're throwing

277
00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:31,920
Speaker 1: out these things. It's just like the student loan relief.

278
00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:34,920
Speaker 1: They can't do it. This is the third time they're

279
00:15:34,960 --> 00:15:37,680
Speaker 1: trying to do it. They can't do it. They're campaigning

280
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:41,880
Speaker 1: on buying your vote and buying your heart. That's it. Oh,

281
00:15:41,960 --> 00:15:44,800
Speaker 1: we're going to protect you. You are under constant threat.

282
00:15:45,040 --> 00:15:47,960
Speaker 1: You need us. That's all this is. And I think

283
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:50,640
Speaker 1: it's pathetic and I think it's disgusting, but I think

284
00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:54,200
Speaker 1: that's the state of campaigning today. It'll be interesting to

285
00:15:54,240 --> 00:15:57,680
Speaker 1: see as we move through this weekend and we see

286
00:15:57,720 --> 00:15:59,880
Speaker 1: what Harris is doing with the running mate, and we

287
00:16:00,560 --> 00:16:03,960
Speaker 1: are finding out how this campaign actually shapes up, because

288
00:16:04,040 --> 00:16:06,240
Speaker 1: let's remember, we have no idea what her campaign is.

289
00:16:06,480 --> 00:16:10,040
Speaker 1: She's had no primary, she's had no vetting. She has

290
00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:13,360
Speaker 1: been in the shadows the entire time she's been vice president.

291
00:16:13,840 --> 00:16:16,240
Speaker 1: She's still I mean, the funny thing about the Supreme

292
00:16:16,280 --> 00:16:18,960
Speaker 1: Court thing is that it is still common a lot

293
00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:21,960
Speaker 1: in the shadows because she is still saying when Joe's

294
00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:25,080
Speaker 1: doing this. So it's kind of the perfect situation where

295
00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:28,120
Speaker 1: you are kind of the incumbent, but you're not the incumbent,

296
00:16:28,160 --> 00:16:31,640
Speaker 1: and you let the incumbent. He's actually testing the waters,

297
00:16:31,640 --> 00:16:34,320
Speaker 1: he's throwing things out there and seeing if he's getting

298
00:16:34,320 --> 00:16:36,840
Speaker 1: any bites, and then if he does get bites, she

299
00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:39,560
Speaker 1: can come along and say I'm with him, I'm with him.

300
00:16:39,840 --> 00:16:43,000
Speaker 1: I love that. It's a it's a bizarre scenario, but

301
00:16:43,040 --> 00:16:45,640
Speaker 1: I just I wanted to bring you on today to

302
00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:47,680
Speaker 1: talk about this because I feel like it's so important

303
00:16:47,680 --> 00:16:51,400
Speaker 1: for us to tell people. Don't be romanced by these

304
00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:54,720
Speaker 1: things that they manipulate you with the moral lie. Do

305
00:16:54,880 --> 00:16:57,720
Speaker 1: not let yourself not be able to see past what

306
00:16:57,760 --> 00:17:01,640
Speaker 1: that means and what this act actually would cause in

307
00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:05,719
Speaker 1: the future. Because the integrity of the court is something

308
00:17:05,800 --> 00:17:10,200
Speaker 1: we've never wavered on. This completely destroys the integrity court.

309
00:17:10,320 --> 00:17:14,720
Speaker 1: No question, the court is completely there. The potential for

310
00:17:14,840 --> 00:17:20,080
Speaker 1: corruption is it's completely unprotected. So you really limit the

311
00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:22,280
Speaker 1: integrity of the court if you do this, And so

312
00:17:22,280 --> 00:17:25,240
Speaker 1: I appreciate you coming on today, Kyle. Tell people where

313
00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:26,840
Speaker 1: they can find more of your stories.

314
00:17:27,560 --> 00:17:31,000
Speaker 2: Sure, they can go to The Midwesterner dot news, you

315
00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:34,720
Speaker 2: can follow us on Twitter. It's just look up The

316
00:17:34,760 --> 00:17:39,200
Speaker 2: Midwesterner but we're covering these sorts of stories what's happening

317
00:17:39,240 --> 00:17:44,520
Speaker 2: in Michigan, the Midwest, because there's so much going on

318
00:17:44,600 --> 00:17:48,400
Speaker 2: that I think people aren't hearing about, they aren't thinking,

319
00:17:49,160 --> 00:17:53,119
Speaker 2: you know, critically about, and there's just a lot that

320
00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:54,640
Speaker 2: people need to consider, I think.

321
00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:58,439
Speaker 1: And that's the beauty of this when we have these podcasts,

322
00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:00,760
Speaker 1: when you go on to the Midwestern I think, you

323
00:18:00,800 --> 00:18:04,200
Speaker 1: get to see that other side, the truth, the true

324
00:18:04,240 --> 00:18:06,359
Speaker 1: side of the moral lie, you know, because you're being

325
00:18:06,440 --> 00:18:09,000
Speaker 1: fed that constantly by the mainstream media. And that was

326
00:18:09,080 --> 00:18:11,480
Speaker 1: kind of the idea behind both of these things. It's like, Okay,

327
00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:14,560
Speaker 1: we're going to contrast that and tell people both sides

328
00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:16,680
Speaker 1: of the story, so it's not just one side. You're

329
00:18:16,680 --> 00:18:18,520
Speaker 1: going to see the whole picture. Right now, you're not

330
00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:21,600
Speaker 1: seeing the whole picture. I mean, even I had friends saying,

331
00:18:21,760 --> 00:18:24,399
Speaker 1: how could you support Trump? He was convicted on thirty

332
00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:27,679
Speaker 1: four counts. I'm like, this is why the integrity of

333
00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:30,359
Speaker 1: the court is so important, because when you have a

334
00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:35,440
Speaker 1: bias judge who has a captive jury and only presents

335
00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:38,560
Speaker 1: half of the case, of course you get a conviction.

336
00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:42,920
Speaker 1: It is total corruption. Those people don't see the other side.

337
00:18:42,960 --> 00:18:45,239
Speaker 1: He wouldn't allow the other side of the case to

338
00:18:45,240 --> 00:18:48,160
Speaker 1: be to be told. That's what we deal with every

339
00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:50,200
Speaker 1: day with the media, and that's why the Midwestern is

340
00:18:50,240 --> 00:18:52,560
Speaker 1: so important, because we're rounding out that story. You get

341
00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:55,080
Speaker 1: to see both sides, and so I appreciate that, and Kyle,

342
00:18:55,119 --> 00:18:57,760
Speaker 1: I appreciate you coming on, and I appreciate all of

343
00:18:57,800 --> 00:19:00,880
Speaker 1: you for listening to us on a Saturday for our

344
00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:03,760
Speaker 1: quick episode. We'll be back on Monday, so make sure

345
00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:07,040
Speaker 1: you come back and you download the next episode anywhere

346
00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:10,560
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever

347
00:19:10,600 --> 00:19:13,919
Speaker 1: you can go to Tutor dixonpodcast dot com too. But

348
00:19:14,080 --> 00:19:16,040
Speaker 1: we'll see you back here on Monday, and we thank

349
00:19:16,040 --> 00:19:18,800
Speaker 1: you so much for listening today. Have a great weekend.