WEBVTT - Imagining The New Normal

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:23.916
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:23.956 --> 0:00:27.436
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:27.996 --> 0:00:33.316
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. Throughout the long run of this pandemic,

0:00:33.716 --> 0:00:37.716
<v Speaker 1>we've been running episodes to keep you our listeners informed

0:00:38.156 --> 0:00:42.116
<v Speaker 1>about the latest changes in the emerging science of COVID, nineteen,

0:00:42.796 --> 0:00:47.716
<v Speaker 1>treatments appropriate to it, and public health responses available for

0:00:47.836 --> 0:00:50.596
<v Speaker 1>dealing with it. As the country has gone through a

0:00:50.716 --> 0:00:55.196
<v Speaker 1>substantial third wave of the virus, and as hospitals, especially

0:00:55.276 --> 0:00:59.396
<v Speaker 1>in the Southeastern United States, are coming dangerously close to capacity,

0:00:59.716 --> 0:01:01.836
<v Speaker 1>we thought it was the right time to have another

0:01:01.876 --> 0:01:05.876
<v Speaker 1>conversation about this topic, and particularly on what looks like

0:01:05.956 --> 0:01:08.596
<v Speaker 1>it will emerge as the new normal in the wake

0:01:08.676 --> 0:01:12.556
<v Speaker 1>of the variant. Here to discuss this with me today

0:01:12.796 --> 0:01:16.476
<v Speaker 1>is doctor Susan Philip. She is the health officer for

0:01:16.516 --> 0:01:19.556
<v Speaker 1>the City and County of San Francisco. I wanted to

0:01:19.556 --> 0:01:22.876
<v Speaker 1>talk with her in particular because San Francisco's COVID response

0:01:22.956 --> 0:01:25.996
<v Speaker 1>is in many ways a model for major American cities.

0:01:26.476 --> 0:01:30.716
<v Speaker 1>Nearly eighty percent of the eligible population is fully vaccinated there.

0:01:31.076 --> 0:01:34.276
<v Speaker 1>Just last week, San Francisco made news by becoming the

0:01:34.356 --> 0:01:37.476
<v Speaker 1>first big city in the us to require proof of

0:01:37.596 --> 0:01:44.036
<v Speaker 1>vaccination to get into restaurants, gyms, recreation centers, or any

0:01:44.036 --> 0:01:46.956
<v Speaker 1>event at all with more than a thousand people. Doctor

0:01:46.956 --> 0:01:49.876
<v Speaker 1>Philip wields the power to write health orders for the city.

0:01:50.276 --> 0:01:53.196
<v Speaker 1>She's been at the front lines of determining the right

0:01:53.276 --> 0:01:58.396
<v Speaker 1>policy responses to the challenges of the current moment. Doctor Phillip,

0:01:58.476 --> 0:02:05.156
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here. I'm really looking

0:02:05.196 --> 0:02:09.756
<v Speaker 1>forward to delving deeply into the complex po see questions

0:02:09.756 --> 0:02:12.836
<v Speaker 1>that you're managing every day and your very important job.

0:02:13.756 --> 0:02:15.796
<v Speaker 1>To start the conversation, I thought we should try to

0:02:15.836 --> 0:02:18.636
<v Speaker 1>just do some level setting on the state of play

0:02:18.636 --> 0:02:22.996
<v Speaker 1>of the science, recognizing that this is a moving target

0:02:23.116 --> 0:02:25.236
<v Speaker 1>and that science is not an exact science when it's

0:02:25.316 --> 0:02:28.556
<v Speaker 1>constantly getting data at every given moment. But I want

0:02:28.556 --> 0:02:31.876
<v Speaker 1>to start by asking you about the Israel data that

0:02:31.956 --> 0:02:36.996
<v Speaker 1>seemed to suggest the need for booster shots at least

0:02:36.996 --> 0:02:40.556
<v Speaker 1>for people sixty and over and potentially for more people,

0:02:41.316 --> 0:02:45.316
<v Speaker 1>and how you think about that question of boosters interacting

0:02:46.036 --> 0:02:50.196
<v Speaker 1>with the broader question of the different variants delta and beyond.

0:02:50.716 --> 0:02:52.556
<v Speaker 1>Thank you and thank you very much for having me

0:02:52.716 --> 0:02:56.556
<v Speaker 1>today to speak with you. So you know, the news

0:02:56.596 --> 0:03:00.276
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Israel, and science just recently that shows

0:03:00.316 --> 0:03:04.116
<v Speaker 1>that a proportion of their hospitalized patients are are actually

0:03:04.156 --> 0:03:07.356
<v Speaker 1>fully vaccinated is concerning, and I think that goes along

0:03:07.396 --> 0:03:10.996
<v Speaker 1>with the data that ADC and other agencies in the

0:03:11.076 --> 0:03:14.676
<v Speaker 1>US have shared that really is more of the step

0:03:14.756 --> 0:03:18.876
<v Speaker 1>before that looking at immunologic response and seeing that decline

0:03:18.996 --> 0:03:23.036
<v Speaker 1>over time in some of these post approval studies of

0:03:23.076 --> 0:03:26.316
<v Speaker 1>people that have been vaccinated, and I think those together

0:03:26.516 --> 0:03:30.876
<v Speaker 1>are leading to this conversation about boosters and when we

0:03:30.956 --> 0:03:33.836
<v Speaker 1>do those in the United States and what that looks like,

0:03:33.876 --> 0:03:35.876
<v Speaker 1>and that of course raises a whole set of other

0:03:35.956 --> 0:03:39.556
<v Speaker 1>questions about the timing of doing that as opposed to

0:03:39.716 --> 0:03:42.756
<v Speaker 1>getting first doses to as many people as possible. But

0:03:43.196 --> 0:03:46.876
<v Speaker 1>that data seems to be increasingly clear that over time

0:03:47.476 --> 0:03:51.116
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be a decrease antibody response immune

0:03:51.156 --> 0:03:54.636
<v Speaker 1>response that, at least in Israel, such a very highly

0:03:54.716 --> 0:03:59.276
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated country, we're seeing translate into some cases and certainly

0:03:59.316 --> 0:04:02.876
<v Speaker 1>hospitalizations and some of their population. And the reason I'm

0:04:02.876 --> 0:04:05.796
<v Speaker 1>asking about that is that if it were not for this,

0:04:06.236 --> 0:04:08.516
<v Speaker 1>it would be possible to frame the discussion rightly or

0:04:08.516 --> 0:04:11.476
<v Speaker 1>wrongly by saying, well, look, as soon as we can

0:04:11.476 --> 0:04:14.516
<v Speaker 1>get as large a number of people as possible vaccinated.

0:04:15.196 --> 0:04:18.316
<v Speaker 1>We can take on board that variance aside, we're just

0:04:18.316 --> 0:04:19.836
<v Speaker 1>going to get back to normal, and then what we're

0:04:19.836 --> 0:04:24.196
<v Speaker 1>basically debating is how fast, how slowly, what's the appropriate step.

0:04:24.796 --> 0:04:28.396
<v Speaker 1>But it may be that this data suggests that it

0:04:28.436 --> 0:04:29.716
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be as simple as that, that

0:04:29.756 --> 0:04:32.036
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to have rolling vaccinations even for

0:04:32.076 --> 0:04:35.716
<v Speaker 1>those who are vaccinated, in order to avoid substantial amounts

0:04:35.716 --> 0:04:40.396
<v Speaker 1>of breakthrough infection. So seen through that lens, now let's

0:04:40.436 --> 0:04:43.156
<v Speaker 1>turn to sort of the incredible complexity that is your

0:04:43.196 --> 0:04:45.996
<v Speaker 1>day to day life with the judgments that you have

0:04:46.076 --> 0:04:50.156
<v Speaker 1>to make. Where do you currently stand in San Francisco

0:04:50.916 --> 0:04:57.996
<v Speaker 1>on public places and access to those public places? Well,

0:04:58.036 --> 0:05:02.156
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco we do know that as everywhere, that

0:05:02.276 --> 0:05:04.996
<v Speaker 1>vaccination is going to be the key, if not to

0:05:05.036 --> 0:05:08.596
<v Speaker 1>getting back to full normalcy, at least to getting to

0:05:08.636 --> 0:05:11.996
<v Speaker 1>a place where fewer people are getting infected and we're

0:05:12.036 --> 0:05:14.716
<v Speaker 1>preserving the ability of our health system to take care

0:05:15.116 --> 0:05:18.556
<v Speaker 1>of people that need care for anything COVID nineteen or otherwise.

0:05:19.036 --> 0:05:22.716
<v Speaker 1>So in San Francisco, as of Friday, we have a

0:05:22.796 --> 0:05:26.196
<v Speaker 1>health order that went into effect that requires that in

0:05:26.276 --> 0:05:29.716
<v Speaker 1>indoor settings where food or drink are served, or in

0:05:29.756 --> 0:05:34.716
<v Speaker 1>any type of fitness establishment, gyms, other recreation facilities, if

0:05:34.756 --> 0:05:38.196
<v Speaker 1>they're indoors, people have to show proof of a full

0:05:38.276 --> 0:05:42.316
<v Speaker 1>vaccination to access those spaces, and we also have that

0:05:42.396 --> 0:05:45.196
<v Speaker 1>in place for any gatherings that are of a thousand

0:05:45.236 --> 0:05:48.356
<v Speaker 1>people or more. So these are some of the ways

0:05:48.356 --> 0:05:51.036
<v Speaker 1>in which we have a very high vaccination rate in

0:05:51.076 --> 0:05:53.676
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, but these are ways in which we want

0:05:53.716 --> 0:05:58.236
<v Speaker 1>to encourage others to get vaccinated in order to access

0:05:58.316 --> 0:06:01.796
<v Speaker 1>these spaces that we know are higher risk. Throughout the

0:06:01.836 --> 0:06:04.596
<v Speaker 1>pandemic in the United States and worldwide, we've seen that

0:06:04.636 --> 0:06:07.396
<v Speaker 1>these indoor spaces are among those that are highest risk

0:06:07.516 --> 0:06:11.116
<v Speaker 1>or transmission led you to the conclusion, and I'm sure

0:06:11.156 --> 0:06:14.236
<v Speaker 1>this is a complex conclusion that includes both scientific elements

0:06:14.276 --> 0:06:18.796
<v Speaker 1>and policy judgments that places that don't primarily serve food

0:06:18.796 --> 0:06:24.156
<v Speaker 1>and drink, like workplaces for example, would not be logically

0:06:24.316 --> 0:06:28.316
<v Speaker 1>included in this current round of orders. You know, early

0:06:28.396 --> 0:06:31.236
<v Speaker 1>on and throughout the pandemic, some of the news that

0:06:31.276 --> 0:06:35.196
<v Speaker 1>came from the CDC, from the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,

0:06:35.556 --> 0:06:39.396
<v Speaker 1>which is their journal CDC puts out, really showed in

0:06:40.076 --> 0:06:43.276
<v Speaker 1>rigorous case control studies where people are interviewed after they

0:06:43.316 --> 0:06:46.876
<v Speaker 1>become positive, what their activities may have been in the

0:06:46.916 --> 0:06:49.796
<v Speaker 1>weeks leading up to their testing positive, and then compared

0:06:49.836 --> 0:06:51.636
<v Speaker 1>to a group of people that tested at the same

0:06:51.676 --> 0:06:55.196
<v Speaker 1>time but tested negative. Really showed that the areas that

0:06:55.236 --> 0:07:00.676
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned restaurants, bars, gyms, were among those most associated

0:07:00.756 --> 0:07:05.196
<v Speaker 1>statistically associated with becoming positive. These sites are places that

0:07:05.276 --> 0:07:08.876
<v Speaker 1>by definition, people are removing their face coverings, they are

0:07:08.916 --> 0:07:12.156
<v Speaker 1>in contact with other people outside of their household, and

0:07:12.196 --> 0:07:15.756
<v Speaker 1>so there are more aerosols, more virus particles in the

0:07:15.796 --> 0:07:19.596
<v Speaker 1>air in restaurants, in bars, and you add into that

0:07:19.676 --> 0:07:23.076
<v Speaker 1>in bars and some other restaurants, it's loud, it's crowded,

0:07:23.156 --> 0:07:26.876
<v Speaker 1>people are leaning in closer to each other, and also

0:07:27.036 --> 0:07:31.196
<v Speaker 1>with the addition of drinking and alcohol, people are talking louder,

0:07:31.316 --> 0:07:36.316
<v Speaker 1>maybe more disinhibited talking to other people. So that explains

0:07:36.316 --> 0:07:38.076
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about why the risk might be there

0:07:38.076 --> 0:07:41.636
<v Speaker 1>in bars and restaurants. For fitness establishments, those have also

0:07:41.676 --> 0:07:45.636
<v Speaker 1>been associated in several studies from across the country in

0:07:46.516 --> 0:07:50.836
<v Speaker 1>outbreaks and increases, and there it's really again recognizing it's

0:07:50.876 --> 0:07:55.916
<v Speaker 1>a respiratory aerosol transmitted virus that people's respiratory rates are up,

0:07:56.116 --> 0:07:58.956
<v Speaker 1>they're breathing heavily, they're in an enclosed room with others,

0:07:59.236 --> 0:08:02.836
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we see that elevated risk. Let's talk

0:08:02.876 --> 0:08:06.476
<v Speaker 1>about the mechanisms that you might use to check that

0:08:06.556 --> 0:08:10.316
<v Speaker 1>people have been vaccinated. As I understand it right now,

0:08:10.676 --> 0:08:15.476
<v Speaker 1>you would accept the physical vaccination card. I'm imagining you

0:08:15.476 --> 0:08:17.916
<v Speaker 1>would also accept someone's picture on their phone or their

0:08:17.996 --> 0:08:21.876
<v Speaker 1>vaccination card or something similar to that. Have you, as

0:08:21.916 --> 0:08:27.276
<v Speaker 1>a city yet flirted with vaccine passports or other mechanisms

0:08:27.316 --> 0:08:31.036
<v Speaker 1>that might potentially be more reliable than a rather flimsy

0:08:31.076 --> 0:08:34.356
<v Speaker 1>piece of cardboard or a photograph of said flimsy piece

0:08:34.356 --> 0:08:37.676
<v Speaker 1>of cardboard. You know, we have not talked about San

0:08:37.676 --> 0:08:41.716
<v Speaker 1>Francisco having its own version of New York's excelsure pass

0:08:42.276 --> 0:08:45.196
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. We do know that there are

0:08:45.476 --> 0:08:49.476
<v Speaker 1>private companies and others who have been working on these,

0:08:49.556 --> 0:08:51.956
<v Speaker 1>and so what we're trying to do is evaluate which

0:08:51.996 --> 0:08:55.836
<v Speaker 1>of those would also be acceptable for businesses to use

0:08:55.876 --> 0:08:59.236
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. For instance, the state also it's not

0:08:59.316 --> 0:09:02.596
<v Speaker 1>a full vaccine passport, but what they have done is

0:09:02.636 --> 0:09:06.636
<v Speaker 1>they allow people to access the state Immunization Registry and

0:09:06.756 --> 0:09:10.076
<v Speaker 1>get on their phone a QR code and so their

0:09:10.196 --> 0:09:13.276
<v Speaker 1>name and their dates of their vaccinations. One of the

0:09:13.316 --> 0:09:16.316
<v Speaker 1>topics that is widely discussed but is not so widely

0:09:16.316 --> 0:09:20.276
<v Speaker 1>discussed in the media, is the possibility of people falsifying

0:09:20.876 --> 0:09:23.876
<v Speaker 1>vaccination records. Right. I mean, in the world of things

0:09:23.876 --> 0:09:26.316
<v Speaker 1>that are hard to copy, and there are many in

0:09:26.356 --> 0:09:29.516
<v Speaker 1>our world, your vaccination proof is not one of them.

0:09:29.916 --> 0:09:33.916
<v Speaker 1>So somebody who wanted to spend ten minutes falsifying proof

0:09:33.916 --> 0:09:38.476
<v Speaker 1>of vaccination presumably could do that extremely easily, and there

0:09:38.476 --> 0:09:42.396
<v Speaker 1>would be absolutely no way for anyone to tell if

0:09:42.476 --> 0:09:44.236
<v Speaker 1>that were the case, or not to say nothing of

0:09:44.876 --> 0:09:47.356
<v Speaker 1>the person that a restaurant puts at the door, you know,

0:09:47.396 --> 0:09:49.956
<v Speaker 1>the greeter whose job is now includes not only being

0:09:50.036 --> 0:09:51.196
<v Speaker 1>nice to you and telling you how long the weight

0:09:51.316 --> 0:09:55.236
<v Speaker 1>is going to be, but also checking your proof of vaccination. So,

0:09:55.716 --> 0:09:58.756
<v Speaker 1>given that how much of what you're doing is sort

0:09:58.756 --> 0:10:01.236
<v Speaker 1>of a signaling function to try to send to the

0:10:01.316 --> 0:10:05.436
<v Speaker 1>public the feeling that you and San Francisco really expect

0:10:05.516 --> 0:10:08.436
<v Speaker 1>people to be vaccinated, how much of it is you

0:10:08.476 --> 0:10:11.196
<v Speaker 1>just calculate people are so moral that they would never

0:10:11.236 --> 0:10:14.436
<v Speaker 1>lie about such a thing. How much you calculated people

0:10:14.476 --> 0:10:16.156
<v Speaker 1>can't be bothered to do that, and it would just

0:10:16.156 --> 0:10:18.316
<v Speaker 1>be easier for them to go and get vaccination than

0:10:18.356 --> 0:10:21.956
<v Speaker 1>it would be to mess with a PDF. What's the

0:10:22.196 --> 0:10:24.516
<v Speaker 1>as it were, actual thinking behind this, if you're willing

0:10:24.596 --> 0:10:28.436
<v Speaker 1>to share it, sure, yes, I think that the way

0:10:28.476 --> 0:10:31.276
<v Speaker 1>I have always thought about it, the health orders themselves

0:10:31.316 --> 0:10:34.316
<v Speaker 1>are not enough to make the full impact. The health

0:10:34.396 --> 0:10:38.316
<v Speaker 1>orders are important, but they're not sufficient. So the way

0:10:38.356 --> 0:10:40.716
<v Speaker 1>we have always addressed this in San Francisco from the

0:10:40.756 --> 0:10:44.356
<v Speaker 1>beginning is to be very visible, to make sure that

0:10:44.396 --> 0:10:47.516
<v Speaker 1>we put out reasoning, that we share the science. And

0:10:47.556 --> 0:10:50.276
<v Speaker 1>I think we're fortunate to work in a city where

0:10:50.276 --> 0:10:53.436
<v Speaker 1>people are responsive to hearing about the science. They don't

0:10:53.516 --> 0:10:55.876
<v Speaker 1>doubt that the virus is real, they don't doubt that

0:10:55.996 --> 0:11:00.156
<v Speaker 1>vaccines work. So addressing really the importance of doing it

0:11:00.196 --> 0:11:03.956
<v Speaker 1>for their own individual health, and then the health orders

0:11:03.996 --> 0:11:08.156
<v Speaker 1>are important in driving up the understanding and the demand

0:11:08.596 --> 0:11:12.036
<v Speaker 1>for vaccine, for people to understand that it's expected, that

0:11:12.076 --> 0:11:14.956
<v Speaker 1>it's required, but this is the most important thing that

0:11:14.996 --> 0:11:16.916
<v Speaker 1>they can do, and that this is going to have

0:11:16.956 --> 0:11:19.676
<v Speaker 1>the most impact over time. So it's using this as

0:11:19.676 --> 0:11:22.196
<v Speaker 1>another opportunity that gets a lot of attention. People are

0:11:22.276 --> 0:11:25.636
<v Speaker 1>very focused on the vaccination mandates. The truth is we

0:11:25.676 --> 0:11:28.916
<v Speaker 1>have the highest rate of full vaccination you know, of

0:11:28.996 --> 0:11:33.236
<v Speaker 1>any city in the US, so the incremental increase in

0:11:33.316 --> 0:11:36.396
<v Speaker 1>this is important. We want every single additional person to

0:11:36.436 --> 0:11:39.596
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated that we can. We have to marry that

0:11:39.596 --> 0:11:42.956
<v Speaker 1>though with explaining why it's important, and then most importantly,

0:11:43.036 --> 0:11:46.916
<v Speaker 1>we have to have highly accessible routes for vaccination in

0:11:46.916 --> 0:11:50.196
<v Speaker 1>the city as well. The health order load is not perfect,

0:11:50.236 --> 0:11:52.396
<v Speaker 1>as you said, but in my mind, the goal is

0:11:52.436 --> 0:11:54.436
<v Speaker 1>not for it to be perfect. It's really to add

0:11:54.516 --> 0:11:57.276
<v Speaker 1>cumulatively to all the work that we've been doing around

0:11:57.316 --> 0:12:01.356
<v Speaker 1>increasing our resilience and our response to COVID nineteen. I

0:12:01.396 --> 0:12:04.516
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, this requirement for vaccination in public

0:12:04.556 --> 0:12:08.396
<v Speaker 1>spaces is the most recent vaccination requirement, but it's not

0:12:08.476 --> 0:12:10.556
<v Speaker 1>the only one. It's not been. The first one that

0:12:10.916 --> 0:12:13.716
<v Speaker 1>we actually put out as a health order was related

0:12:13.756 --> 0:12:17.436
<v Speaker 1>to higher risk settings, settings in which the people that

0:12:17.476 --> 0:12:20.596
<v Speaker 1>are within those settings are at higher risk for either

0:12:20.716 --> 0:12:24.956
<v Speaker 1>severe illness or death. So that includes our acute care hospitals,

0:12:24.956 --> 0:12:28.076
<v Speaker 1>our nursing homes, our jails, and so that was the

0:12:28.156 --> 0:12:31.276
<v Speaker 1>first place where workers were required to be vaccinated. We

0:12:31.356 --> 0:12:35.676
<v Speaker 1>do have an indoor masth mandate as well, So we've

0:12:35.676 --> 0:12:38.396
<v Speaker 1>had that since the beginning of the month, and so

0:12:38.436 --> 0:12:41.156
<v Speaker 1>we have both. Now we just have this newly implemented

0:12:41.396 --> 0:12:45.036
<v Speaker 1>vaccination requirement in these certain public businesses as we talked about,

0:12:45.196 --> 0:12:48.356
<v Speaker 1>but we do have in all indoor spaces a mask

0:12:48.476 --> 0:12:51.676
<v Speaker 1>requirement as well. I think that the delta variant had

0:12:51.836 --> 0:12:57.076
<v Speaker 1>introduced enough level of uncertainty to not be sure, even

0:12:57.076 --> 0:12:59.156
<v Speaker 1>with our highly vaccinated city, what was it going to

0:12:59.236 --> 0:13:01.236
<v Speaker 1>mean for our hospital system, what was it going to

0:13:01.316 --> 0:13:05.036
<v Speaker 1>mean for people that had already been vaccinated. That we

0:13:05.556 --> 0:13:07.836
<v Speaker 1>determined to do the mass mandate first because it could

0:13:07.836 --> 0:13:10.916
<v Speaker 1>be implemented very quick CLEA and we had done it previously,

0:13:11.196 --> 0:13:16.316
<v Speaker 1>and then work on this vaccination requirement. So going forward,

0:13:16.356 --> 0:13:18.076
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to have to see is keep looking

0:13:18.356 --> 0:13:21.516
<v Speaker 1>at our case numbers. They are coming down slowly, and

0:13:21.556 --> 0:13:25.116
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see if that continues and decide how

0:13:25.116 --> 0:13:27.236
<v Speaker 1>we move forward. We are going to have to learn

0:13:27.316 --> 0:13:31.036
<v Speaker 1>to live with COVID nineteen in San Francisco and elsewhere,

0:13:31.356 --> 0:13:33.716
<v Speaker 1>but for now we do have both of those measures

0:13:33.716 --> 0:13:38.116
<v Speaker 1>in place. Let's talk about the formulation that you just used,

0:13:38.156 --> 0:13:40.516
<v Speaker 1>which is one that I think is very important that

0:13:40.636 --> 0:13:42.356
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to learn to live with COVID

0:13:42.436 --> 0:13:46.676
<v Speaker 1>nineteen formulation. And I'd love to hear in more fine

0:13:46.716 --> 0:13:50.596
<v Speaker 1>grain detail what you think that living with is going

0:13:51.116 --> 0:13:53.916
<v Speaker 1>to look like. Let me make the con question concrete

0:13:53.916 --> 0:13:56.476
<v Speaker 1>in the following way. You've got great uptake at eighty

0:13:56.476 --> 0:14:00.636
<v Speaker 1>percent or so of eligible residence getting a vaccine. That's amazing.

0:14:01.196 --> 0:14:04.036
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you got to ninety five, right, which is

0:14:04.036 --> 0:14:06.676
<v Speaker 1>as close to perfect as anyone's going to get. And

0:14:06.756 --> 0:14:09.316
<v Speaker 1>let's say the Delta variant still existed, because it's still

0:14:09.356 --> 0:14:12.396
<v Speaker 1>going to exist, although perhaps it will have burned itself

0:14:12.396 --> 0:14:14.516
<v Speaker 1>out in this latest round, but it or other things

0:14:14.556 --> 0:14:16.996
<v Speaker 1>like it, we'll be back in the future. This doesn't

0:14:16.996 --> 0:14:19.436
<v Speaker 1>seem like it's some outlying evolutionary development. It's a kind

0:14:19.476 --> 0:14:22.396
<v Speaker 1>of to be expected and doubtless will be recurrent in

0:14:22.476 --> 0:14:24.676
<v Speaker 1>various ways. We'll have to learn the names of lots

0:14:24.676 --> 0:14:29.596
<v Speaker 1>of other Greek characters beyond Delta. So in that environment,

0:14:30.316 --> 0:14:32.836
<v Speaker 1>does living with it basically mean that we would move

0:14:32.876 --> 0:14:37.236
<v Speaker 1>towards a world where no mask requirements and we would

0:14:37.276 --> 0:14:39.276
<v Speaker 1>just understand that there was a certain amount of breakthrough

0:14:39.316 --> 0:14:41.636
<v Speaker 1>infection that was going to keep on happening in the

0:14:41.756 --> 0:14:45.516
<v Speaker 1>light of future variants, and we will try to manage

0:14:45.516 --> 0:14:49.196
<v Speaker 1>that and if it requires building more hospital beds to

0:14:49.276 --> 0:14:51.996
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for those potential surges, will do that. Is

0:14:52.036 --> 0:14:54.276
<v Speaker 1>that sort of what you're picturing. Well, I think what

0:14:54.436 --> 0:14:58.876
<v Speaker 1>we'll picture is again continuing to take in any new information.

0:14:58.996 --> 0:15:01.196
<v Speaker 1>You know, and as you pointed out earlier, this virus

0:15:01.236 --> 0:15:04.396
<v Speaker 1>has done nothing if not keep throwing curveballs, and we

0:15:04.476 --> 0:15:07.076
<v Speaker 1>have to adapt to what we might need to do.

0:15:07.396 --> 0:15:10.436
<v Speaker 1>We were not talking about masks early on in the pandemic,

0:15:10.476 --> 0:15:13.836
<v Speaker 1>and that was not in our culture as a country before,

0:15:13.876 --> 0:15:16.676
<v Speaker 1>as it was in some other Asian countries, but it

0:15:16.876 --> 0:15:19.796
<v Speaker 1>is something now. Are we going to have to mask

0:15:19.876 --> 0:15:23.116
<v Speaker 1>completely going forward? I don't think that that's likely, but

0:15:23.236 --> 0:15:25.556
<v Speaker 1>I do think that people may choose during cold and

0:15:25.596 --> 0:15:28.676
<v Speaker 1>flu season in coming years to wear a mask. Hopefully

0:15:28.716 --> 0:15:31.036
<v Speaker 1>people have a sense that if they're sick, they stay home.

0:15:31.356 --> 0:15:34.196
<v Speaker 1>So there are some lessons I think from COVID nineteen

0:15:34.196 --> 0:15:37.756
<v Speaker 1>that I hope do continue pass this current time. And

0:15:37.836 --> 0:15:40.956
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there will be other challenges potentially,

0:15:40.996 --> 0:15:44.036
<v Speaker 1>as you said, other Greek letters maybe coming at us,

0:15:44.076 --> 0:15:47.196
<v Speaker 1>and then we will have to adapt over time. So

0:15:47.236 --> 0:15:48.916
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hopeful is that we will get a high

0:15:48.956 --> 0:15:52.756
<v Speaker 1>level of vaccination that that will continue. We'll understand if

0:15:52.756 --> 0:15:56.556
<v Speaker 1>and when we need to continue having boosters of these vaccinations,

0:15:56.556 --> 0:15:58.796
<v Speaker 1>and then if we need to adjust further, we will

0:15:58.796 --> 0:16:02.036
<v Speaker 1>have to adjust. But I do think that we will

0:16:02.076 --> 0:16:04.196
<v Speaker 1>eventually be able to peel away some of these other

0:16:04.316 --> 0:16:08.836
<v Speaker 1>non pharmaceutical interventions like masking, and we've already peeled distancing

0:16:08.876 --> 0:16:12.876
<v Speaker 1>away and have the vaccine really really hold the bulk

0:16:13.036 --> 0:16:17.236
<v Speaker 1>of the work for keeping population safe. And you know,

0:16:17.276 --> 0:16:20.196
<v Speaker 1>as a health officer, we're working at a population level,

0:16:20.396 --> 0:16:22.756
<v Speaker 1>so we do know unfortunately that there still will be

0:16:22.796 --> 0:16:25.796
<v Speaker 1>people that get infections and get sick. But what we're

0:16:25.836 --> 0:16:28.076
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is really make sure that the bulk

0:16:28.116 --> 0:16:31.316
<v Speaker 1>of the population is protected and that everyone has as

0:16:31.396 --> 0:16:33.876
<v Speaker 1>much information as they might need to make decisions. But

0:16:33.996 --> 0:16:36.756
<v Speaker 1>for right now, as we are working to get all

0:16:36.796 --> 0:16:39.596
<v Speaker 1>of our populations as vaccinated as we possibly can, and

0:16:39.636 --> 0:16:42.036
<v Speaker 1>we don't know where we'll end up with that, these

0:16:42.076 --> 0:16:44.036
<v Speaker 1>are the additional protections that we want to have in

0:16:44.076 --> 0:16:47.396
<v Speaker 1>place using the power of state law, the health officer

0:16:47.436 --> 0:16:49.436
<v Speaker 1>authority to be able to do that. For the moment,

0:16:50.556 --> 0:17:03.596
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back where does rapid antigen testing, in

0:17:03.636 --> 0:17:06.716
<v Speaker 1>your view, fit into this series of different measures that

0:17:06.756 --> 0:17:10.836
<v Speaker 1>you're engaged in. I got my first wedding invitation post

0:17:10.916 --> 0:17:14.596
<v Speaker 1>COVID today that noted not only that they wanted people

0:17:14.636 --> 0:17:18.116
<v Speaker 1>to prove vaccination to attend the wedding, but also that

0:17:18.156 --> 0:17:21.156
<v Speaker 1>they wanted people to get a rapid antigen test that day,

0:17:21.716 --> 0:17:23.876
<v Speaker 1>not even a PCR test, you know, in the previous

0:17:23.916 --> 0:17:26.916
<v Speaker 1>thirty six hours. And I, you know, thought maybe this

0:17:26.956 --> 0:17:29.356
<v Speaker 1>is the new normal. There's an expense question, of course,

0:17:30.036 --> 0:17:33.836
<v Speaker 1>but when you think about the various components of a

0:17:33.956 --> 0:17:39.276
<v Speaker 1>preventive plan, testing surely is one of them. Prices have

0:17:39.356 --> 0:17:41.436
<v Speaker 1>come down, although not as much as one would have

0:17:42.156 --> 0:17:44.836
<v Speaker 1>hoped thus far. So how does testing fit into the picture?

0:17:44.876 --> 0:17:46.636
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, to put another way, how we

0:17:46.716 --> 0:17:48.636
<v Speaker 1>been discussing this at the beginning of the pandemic, before

0:17:48.716 --> 0:17:51.396
<v Speaker 1>vaccines were available. A lot of our conversation would have

0:17:51.396 --> 0:17:54.716
<v Speaker 1>been and we did these conversations on deep background, you know,

0:17:54.996 --> 0:17:58.156
<v Speaker 1>the centrality of testing to a successful regime and the

0:17:58.276 --> 0:18:01.156
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms that can be undertaken to make testing more efficient

0:18:01.196 --> 0:18:03.076
<v Speaker 1>at scale. And yet now it doesn't seem to be

0:18:03.156 --> 0:18:06.076
<v Speaker 1>as central to the at least to the Public Health Conversation.

0:18:07.396 --> 0:18:10.356
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. You're absolutely right. The testing remains

0:18:10.356 --> 0:18:14.076
<v Speaker 1>really important when you think about schools which are opening

0:18:14.116 --> 0:18:17.676
<v Speaker 1>soon in a matter of days. We still don't have

0:18:17.956 --> 0:18:21.796
<v Speaker 1>authorization for vaccination for under twelve, but for twelve and over.

0:18:22.636 --> 0:18:26.556
<v Speaker 1>Is San Francisco in its public schools requiring vaccination universally?

0:18:26.956 --> 0:18:29.596
<v Speaker 1>You know, in San Francisco our schools opened last week.

0:18:29.676 --> 0:18:32.756
<v Speaker 1>It was very exciting because we had not had all

0:18:32.796 --> 0:18:36.276
<v Speaker 1>of our schools opened during the last year, and so

0:18:36.956 --> 0:18:40.276
<v Speaker 1>we're encouraging them for twelve to seventeen. But they're not mandated,

0:18:40.636 --> 0:18:43.836
<v Speaker 1>and the San Francisco Unified School District has a different

0:18:43.916 --> 0:18:47.396
<v Speaker 1>governing entity. They don't fall under the mayor and the

0:18:47.436 --> 0:18:49.876
<v Speaker 1>rest of the city department, so we work very closely

0:18:49.876 --> 0:18:52.036
<v Speaker 1>with them, but they have a different decision making and

0:18:52.596 --> 0:18:56.236
<v Speaker 1>policy approach and independent of the rest of the rest

0:18:56.276 --> 0:18:59.796
<v Speaker 1>of us and independent of health officer or orders as well.

0:18:59.876 --> 0:19:03.836
<v Speaker 1>They make decisions there, so they are supporting twelve to

0:19:03.876 --> 0:19:05.676
<v Speaker 1>seventeen year olds and the rest of the city. Our

0:19:05.716 --> 0:19:08.516
<v Speaker 1>Health Department is working closely with the Unified School District

0:19:08.556 --> 0:19:10.796
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do that and have there be

0:19:10.916 --> 0:19:15.636
<v Speaker 1>events where entire families can come where we facilitate vaccine,

0:19:15.636 --> 0:19:19.156
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have increasing sites numbers of sites on school

0:19:19.196 --> 0:19:22.276
<v Speaker 1>property to be able to get vaccination, but we're not

0:19:22.516 --> 0:19:27.236
<v Speaker 1>requiring it yet. That was such a beautifully diplomatic answer

0:19:27.396 --> 0:19:29.156
<v Speaker 1>that I almost don't want to draw attention to how

0:19:29.156 --> 0:19:32.156
<v Speaker 1>diplomatic it was. It's a reminder that being public health

0:19:32.156 --> 0:19:34.956
<v Speaker 1>officer of a city is not dissimilar from being, you know,

0:19:34.956 --> 0:19:36.796
<v Speaker 1>an abassador with United Nations or something. You have to

0:19:36.836 --> 0:19:39.356
<v Speaker 1>be careful in what you say. Let me try to

0:19:39.396 --> 0:19:41.076
<v Speaker 1>parse it. I mean, what I heard you say is

0:19:41.076 --> 0:19:43.796
<v Speaker 1>that the schools don't answer to you and they have

0:19:43.836 --> 0:19:47.636
<v Speaker 1>a different policy. Without stating it. The natural implication I

0:19:47.716 --> 0:19:49.276
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you to confirm this or deny this,

0:19:49.396 --> 0:19:51.756
<v Speaker 1>but the natural implication when it might have been that

0:19:51.836 --> 0:19:53.916
<v Speaker 1>you might have reached different decision if they were within

0:19:53.996 --> 0:19:56.636
<v Speaker 1>your decision making authority. Let me use that to ask

0:19:56.676 --> 0:20:00.156
<v Speaker 1>a further question. You know, across the country, this is

0:20:00.196 --> 0:20:03.116
<v Speaker 1>going to be replicated a much greater scale, right, I mean,

0:20:03.516 --> 0:20:07.356
<v Speaker 1>even within a progressive city like San Francisco, it's clear

0:20:07.396 --> 0:20:10.836
<v Speaker 1>that there's some nuanced difference between different agencies at the county,

0:20:10.836 --> 0:20:13.836
<v Speaker 1>at the city level, at the level of the education system,

0:20:14.956 --> 0:20:18.356
<v Speaker 1>and nationally, we've got a huge range of variation all

0:20:18.396 --> 0:20:20.916
<v Speaker 1>the way from where you guys are to you know,

0:20:20.916 --> 0:20:23.996
<v Speaker 1>the governors who prohibited even not just as governors, but

0:20:24.036 --> 0:20:27.396
<v Speaker 1>there were state laws passed signed by governors that prohibited

0:20:27.436 --> 0:20:32.996
<v Speaker 1>mandatory masking. So the other very very grave extreme. When

0:20:33.076 --> 0:20:35.476
<v Speaker 1>you think of this, not just in your role in

0:20:35.516 --> 0:20:37.876
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, but you know, your role as a national

0:20:37.996 --> 0:20:43.476
<v Speaker 1>leader on questions of public health, are you worried about

0:20:43.516 --> 0:20:47.756
<v Speaker 1>just the range, just the huge disparity of viewpoints that

0:20:47.796 --> 0:20:52.316
<v Speaker 1>we're getting from governmental elected officials on these matters of

0:20:52.476 --> 0:20:56.156
<v Speaker 1>life and death. You know, are these are matters, as

0:20:56.156 --> 0:20:59.356
<v Speaker 1>you said, of life and death, these are public health matters,

0:20:59.396 --> 0:21:02.396
<v Speaker 1>these are scientific matters. And it really has been troubling

0:21:02.436 --> 0:21:06.796
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning of this pandemic how there had initially

0:21:06.796 --> 0:21:10.276
<v Speaker 1>not been a national response. You would think that when

0:21:10.316 --> 0:21:13.396
<v Speaker 1>there was a pandemic that there would be a coordinated

0:21:13.436 --> 0:21:15.476
<v Speaker 1>response at CDC, would be at the forefront, and that

0:21:15.556 --> 0:21:20.356
<v Speaker 1>we as local health department leaders would be responding to

0:21:20.396 --> 0:21:23.916
<v Speaker 1>the same stimuli and not not really trying to do

0:21:23.996 --> 0:21:25.916
<v Speaker 1>our own thing and come up with how we were

0:21:25.916 --> 0:21:27.556
<v Speaker 1>going to get PPE and how are we going to

0:21:27.636 --> 0:21:30.436
<v Speaker 1>do testing, and what was our approach going to be there.

0:21:30.756 --> 0:21:33.396
<v Speaker 1>It's been better more recently, but I think that that

0:21:33.596 --> 0:21:36.876
<v Speaker 1>set the precedent for there being such a diversity of opinion,

0:21:37.236 --> 0:21:41.116
<v Speaker 1>and then this whole way of thinking that masks were

0:21:41.596 --> 0:21:44.716
<v Speaker 1>a sham, that the virus itself was a sham, and

0:21:45.276 --> 0:21:50.516
<v Speaker 1>the splittization of the response of the science of the

0:21:50.516 --> 0:21:54.076
<v Speaker 1>health officials, many of whom my colleagues in California have

0:21:54.156 --> 0:21:58.476
<v Speaker 1>received threats, have really been unduly harassed for just trying

0:21:58.476 --> 0:22:01.116
<v Speaker 1>to do their jobs and save lives. So there is

0:22:01.156 --> 0:22:05.196
<v Speaker 1>a lot there. It is really concerning last question. We

0:22:05.276 --> 0:22:07.996
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the terrific rate of a vaccine uptake that the

0:22:08.036 --> 0:22:12.036
<v Speaker 1>city has. Are there measures that you have of what

0:22:12.076 --> 0:22:14.676
<v Speaker 1>those numbers look like for people who are not just

0:22:14.716 --> 0:22:17.636
<v Speaker 1>poor but are actively homeless in the city, and do

0:22:17.716 --> 0:22:21.276
<v Speaker 1>their numbers look comparable to the general population in terms

0:22:21.316 --> 0:22:25.396
<v Speaker 1>of vaccine uptick. I don't know if we can pinpoint

0:22:25.436 --> 0:22:28.876
<v Speaker 1>the exact numbers. We do know that they are generally

0:22:28.916 --> 0:22:31.836
<v Speaker 1>lower than the general population. But what we've tried to

0:22:31.876 --> 0:22:36.556
<v Speaker 1>do is make mobile vaccination available, allow people to drop

0:22:36.636 --> 0:22:38.716
<v Speaker 1>in and get them at the sites where they get

0:22:38.756 --> 0:22:41.916
<v Speaker 1>their usual services or care and we right now have

0:22:42.076 --> 0:22:45.196
<v Speaker 1>mobile vaccination teams that are going out to work with

0:22:45.236 --> 0:22:48.716
<v Speaker 1>persons experiencing homelessness, so they are a priority, and we

0:22:48.756 --> 0:22:50.556
<v Speaker 1>do recognize that we're going to have to try different

0:22:50.596 --> 0:22:54.676
<v Speaker 1>strategies to increase those rates among those populations in San Francisco.

0:22:55.036 --> 0:22:59.756
<v Speaker 1>And have you gotten broadly speaking yet, the criticism from

0:22:59.876 --> 0:23:03.276
<v Speaker 1>the civil rights community that would be might be worried

0:23:03.396 --> 0:23:09.076
<v Speaker 1>that given differential vaccination rates when measured by socioeconomic state

0:23:09.436 --> 0:23:14.276
<v Speaker 1>or by race, that a public vaccine mandate could look

0:23:14.356 --> 0:23:17.316
<v Speaker 1>like it involves the turning away of a disproportionate number

0:23:17.356 --> 0:23:21.236
<v Speaker 1>of people of color. Because that's obviously, from a straightforwardly

0:23:21.276 --> 0:23:27.756
<v Speaker 1>ethical and legal perspective, that's a grave concern. I agree

0:23:27.756 --> 0:23:29.836
<v Speaker 1>with you that that is a concern from a moral

0:23:29.836 --> 0:23:32.796
<v Speaker 1>and an ethical standpoint, let alone the legal risk. And

0:23:32.916 --> 0:23:36.436
<v Speaker 1>we have again worked with community leaders and ask them

0:23:36.836 --> 0:23:40.836
<v Speaker 1>to help us really reinforce the importance again make the

0:23:40.916 --> 0:23:45.036
<v Speaker 1>vaccine accessible. We wouldn't have done a mandate without a

0:23:45.076 --> 0:23:48.996
<v Speaker 1>feeling confident that we have worked with informed community really

0:23:49.036 --> 0:23:51.196
<v Speaker 1>tried to do that from the beginning. So it's an

0:23:51.236 --> 0:23:54.716
<v Speaker 1>ongoing it's got to be an ongoing communication effort has

0:23:54.716 --> 0:23:57.876
<v Speaker 1>got to be an ongoing support effort with community, and

0:23:58.116 --> 0:24:01.996
<v Speaker 1>relative to other cities, San Francisco's populations of color are

0:24:02.116 --> 0:24:05.556
<v Speaker 1>more highly vaccinated than other areas. So are black African

0:24:05.596 --> 0:24:09.956
<v Speaker 1>American population Sixty five percent vaccinated right now, that's not

0:24:10.036 --> 0:24:13.556
<v Speaker 1>as good as our overall percent of seventy nine percent

0:24:13.596 --> 0:24:16.596
<v Speaker 1>of eligible, but we are working on getting there. That

0:24:16.676 --> 0:24:18.276
<v Speaker 1>number is higher than it used to be, and we're

0:24:18.276 --> 0:24:20.476
<v Speaker 1>going to keep working until it can get higher. Yet

0:24:21.156 --> 0:24:24.436
<v Speaker 1>it's a fascinating problem. I mean, the law professor in

0:24:24.516 --> 0:24:28.876
<v Speaker 1>me immediately pictures the scenario of a disparate impact civil

0:24:28.996 --> 0:24:32.836
<v Speaker 1>rights lawsuit that says, you know that sixty five percent

0:24:32.836 --> 0:24:35.116
<v Speaker 1>of African Americans are vaccinated in the city relative to

0:24:35.156 --> 0:24:39.716
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine percent of the general population. Therefore, you know

0:24:39.956 --> 0:24:43.116
<v Speaker 1>that this band will have a disparate impact on access

0:24:43.156 --> 0:24:46.596
<v Speaker 1>to restaurants, fitness centers, and so forth on the basis

0:24:46.676 --> 0:24:50.036
<v Speaker 1>of race and in other contexts. The progressive position in

0:24:50.076 --> 0:24:56.356
<v Speaker 1>general favors looking at disparate impact independent of discriminatory intent.

0:24:56.516 --> 0:24:59.076
<v Speaker 1>Right the standard progressive position is, we don't care how

0:24:59.076 --> 0:25:03.116
<v Speaker 1>good your intent is. If the law has a disparate impact,

0:25:03.196 --> 0:25:06.956
<v Speaker 1>that's a prima facial reason to treat it as unlawful

0:25:07.036 --> 0:25:09.076
<v Speaker 1>unless a really good justification can be offered, and you're

0:25:09.156 --> 0:25:11.756
<v Speaker 1>case may well be that. And the conservative position is

0:25:11.756 --> 0:25:15.236
<v Speaker 1>typically no, we're only interested in intent when it comes

0:25:15.276 --> 0:25:18.196
<v Speaker 1>to discrimination. We ought not to look at disparate impact.

0:25:18.796 --> 0:25:21.076
<v Speaker 1>Presumably in this case the positions would end up being

0:25:21.076 --> 0:25:24.276
<v Speaker 1>something reversed, right. I mean, it's very clear from everything

0:25:24.276 --> 0:25:27.436
<v Speaker 1>you've said that your overarching goal is public health, that

0:25:27.516 --> 0:25:29.676
<v Speaker 1>you have no interest in any disparate impact. In fact,

0:25:29.676 --> 0:25:31.836
<v Speaker 1>you wish you didn't have a disparate impact on the

0:25:31.876 --> 0:25:34.916
<v Speaker 1>basis of race. But it's a really tricky situation when

0:25:34.996 --> 0:25:38.516
<v Speaker 1>conceptualize in those terms. Yes, I agree with you, and

0:25:38.596 --> 0:25:41.556
<v Speaker 1>I think you. In public health, like in all public policy,

0:25:41.436 --> 0:25:44.436
<v Speaker 1>there's no absolute right or wrong answer. Most of the time,

0:25:44.436 --> 0:25:47.196
<v Speaker 1>there's just trade offs. And so again, what we have

0:25:47.276 --> 0:25:49.276
<v Speaker 1>committed to doing, what I've committed to doing as health

0:25:49.316 --> 0:25:53.276
<v Speaker 1>officer is really to work with populations and try and

0:25:53.276 --> 0:25:57.356
<v Speaker 1>communicate the reasoning, communicate what's coming, to make sure that

0:25:57.396 --> 0:25:59.996
<v Speaker 1>all the stakeholders are aware, and then trying as much

0:25:59.996 --> 0:26:02.356
<v Speaker 1>as we can to say, look, this is also to

0:26:02.356 --> 0:26:06.156
<v Speaker 1>protect the communities of color that are working as weight staff,

0:26:06.436 --> 0:26:09.756
<v Speaker 1>as barbacks as other people who are in them to

0:26:09.876 --> 0:26:12.116
<v Speaker 1>increase the safety at their place of work as well,

0:26:12.276 --> 0:26:14.236
<v Speaker 1>because they have to have that income, they have to

0:26:14.316 --> 0:26:16.916
<v Speaker 1>keep going to work, So there are multiple ways at

0:26:16.916 --> 0:26:20.556
<v Speaker 1>looking at this. As you said complex, Susan, I really

0:26:20.556 --> 0:26:23.876
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you for your time in describing and

0:26:24.036 --> 0:26:27.036
<v Speaker 1>engaging with me about these policies and how you're thinking

0:26:27.076 --> 0:26:29.956
<v Speaker 1>about them. I really value insights into what the new

0:26:29.996 --> 0:26:32.116
<v Speaker 1>normal might come to look like. And I also want

0:26:32.116 --> 0:26:34.916
<v Speaker 1>to thank you for your very intense work over the

0:26:34.956 --> 0:26:38.236
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years in an extraordinarily important and influential position.

0:26:38.276 --> 0:26:40.196
<v Speaker 1>So thank you very much. Thank you very much for

0:26:40.276 --> 0:26:43.676
<v Speaker 1>having me. I've enjoyed talking with you. We'll be right

0:26:43.676 --> 0:26:56.756
<v Speaker 1>back listening to doctor Susan Phillip. It struck me that

0:26:56.956 --> 0:26:59.676
<v Speaker 1>we may be closer than we think to ascertaining what

0:26:59.756 --> 0:27:02.196
<v Speaker 1>a new normal is going to look like, even in

0:27:02.236 --> 0:27:06.756
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of the delta variant. That is, requirements for

0:27:06.956 --> 0:27:10.436
<v Speaker 1>vaccination at least in place is across the country where

0:27:10.516 --> 0:27:14.876
<v Speaker 1>large numbers of people are vaccinated. Not every place is

0:27:14.916 --> 0:27:17.876
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, and many places would lack the political will

0:27:18.036 --> 0:27:20.676
<v Speaker 1>or the number of people who are vaccinated for vaccination

0:27:20.716 --> 0:27:24.236
<v Speaker 1>proof requirements to be implemented. Nevertheless, if they work in

0:27:24.276 --> 0:27:29.156
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, they have the chance of becoming a gold standard. Simultaneously,

0:27:29.636 --> 0:27:33.316
<v Speaker 1>masking requirements which San Francisco, like other big cities, has

0:27:33.476 --> 0:27:39.316
<v Speaker 1>reinstated for unvaccinated people may become an ongoing thing in

0:27:39.436 --> 0:27:43.036
<v Speaker 1>places where vaccination numbers are lower and where there is

0:27:43.316 --> 0:27:48.156
<v Speaker 1>a public health will to protect people. San Francisco represents

0:27:48.236 --> 0:27:51.276
<v Speaker 1>only one possible direction that we might end up going.

0:27:51.756 --> 0:27:54.996
<v Speaker 1>Across the country. There are lots of locations where we

0:27:55.076 --> 0:27:59.276
<v Speaker 1>don't have mandatory vaccination rules, where we don't have mask mandates,

0:27:59.476 --> 0:28:02.836
<v Speaker 1>and indeed, we have plenty of places where state legislatures

0:28:02.836 --> 0:28:08.796
<v Speaker 1>and governors have outlawed mandatory masking. So it emerges that

0:28:08.836 --> 0:28:13.236
<v Speaker 1>our new normal may be highly bipolarized, with very different

0:28:13.276 --> 0:28:17.476
<v Speaker 1>practices in the most progressive places than in more conservative locations.

0:28:18.516 --> 0:28:22.396
<v Speaker 1>As this new reality continues to emerge, we here on

0:28:22.516 --> 0:28:26.076
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background will continue to cover the question, returning to

0:28:26.116 --> 0:28:30.076
<v Speaker 1>COVID as always when there are new developments, new norms,

0:28:30.156 --> 0:28:34.436
<v Speaker 1>and new practices that deserve your attention until the next

0:28:34.476 --> 0:28:37.876
<v Speaker 1>time I speak to you. Breathe, deep, think, deep thoughts,

0:28:38.476 --> 0:28:41.356
<v Speaker 1>and at least if you can provide proof of vaccination,

0:28:42.076 --> 0:28:46.116
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and have a little fun. Deep Background is

0:28:46.116 --> 0:28:49.596
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Mola Board,

0:28:49.836 --> 0:28:52.796
<v Speaker 1>our engineer is Ben Talliday, and our shore runner is

0:28:52.796 --> 0:28:57.916
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Crane mckibbon. Editorial support from noahm Osband. Theme music

0:28:57.956 --> 0:29:02.276
<v Speaker 1>by Luis Gara at Pushkin. Thanks to Mia Lobell, Julia Barton, Lydia,

0:29:02.316 --> 0:29:06.516
<v Speaker 1>Jean Coott, Heather Fain, Carlie Migliori, Maggie Taylor, Eric Sandler,

0:29:06.716 --> 0:29:10.036
<v Speaker 1>and Jacob Weissberg. You can find me on Twitter at

0:29:10.036 --> 0:29:13.316
<v Speaker 1>Noah R. Feldman. I also write a column for Bloomberg Opinion,

0:29:13.436 --> 0:29:16.356
<v Speaker 1>which you can find at Bloomberg dot com slash Feldman.

0:29:16.876 --> 0:29:20.316
<v Speaker 1>To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go to Bloomberg

0:29:20.356 --> 0:29:23.196
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcasts and if you like what you

0:29:23.316 --> 0:29:26.236
<v Speaker 1>heard today, please write a review or tell a friend.

0:29:26.796 --> 0:29:28.556
<v Speaker 1>This is Deep Background.