1 00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:14,880 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney along 3 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:17,240 Speaker 2: with Tom Keene. Join us each day for insight from 4 00:00:17,239 --> 00:00:20,760 Speaker 2: the best in economics, geopolitics, finance, and investment. You can 5 00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:24,439 Speaker 2: also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the Bloomberg 6 00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 2: Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings 7 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:30,400 Speaker 2: from seven to ten Eastern Remarked Global headquarters in New 8 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:33,720 Speaker 2: York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or 9 00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:36,800 Speaker 2: anywhere else you listen, and as always on Bloomberg Radio, 10 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:39,720 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app. Ken Leone 11 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:45,479 Speaker 2: Research Director CFR joints us here Ken, what do you 12 00:00:45,560 --> 00:00:48,440 Speaker 2: make of the results from Mickey Mouse and Friends. 13 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:52,840 Speaker 3: Great to be with you, and this was a good 14 00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:57,440 Speaker 3: block and Tackle quarter. It showed progression on the broader 15 00:00:57,560 --> 00:01:02,280 Speaker 3: financial metrics of reducing costs and getting to their target 16 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:04,960 Speaker 3: this year of eight billion dollars of free cash flow. 17 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:09,120 Speaker 3: So there's financial discipline at Disney. But of course, as 18 00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:13,040 Speaker 3: you've noted, there's a lot of moving parts, and ultimately 19 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:18,280 Speaker 3: what investors would like to see is growth that can 20 00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:25,480 Speaker 3: get through this transition of linear networks. Declining, streaming businesses increasing, 21 00:01:25,959 --> 00:01:27,640 Speaker 3: but how profitable will they be? 22 00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:29,880 Speaker 4: How profitable do you think they're going to be? 23 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:35,840 Speaker 3: It's going to take time. Streaming is a very competitive business. 24 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:40,360 Speaker 3: Unlike other subscriber businesses of the past, like cable TV 25 00:01:40,600 --> 00:01:44,600 Speaker 3: or even wireless, you have very high churn. Disney at 26 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:49,160 Speaker 3: least is discipline on the programming and content spending, which 27 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:53,520 Speaker 3: has come down significantly and in many cases pivoting their 28 00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 3: spend to sports from general entertainment. But I think the 29 00:01:57,760 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 3: jury is still out there, and what we didn't see 30 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 3: in the release today is yeah, the magic is there, 31 00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:08,400 Speaker 3: but what investors want to see is how is Disney 32 00:02:08,480 --> 00:02:13,079 Speaker 3: executing on a technology platform not just US or Global? 33 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:19,120 Speaker 3: Is there an AI component to their technology plans? And 34 00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 3: you know what, Netflix is doing that and they're there. 35 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:24,800 Speaker 3: So if you're going to be great at streaming, you 36 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 3: have to be like Netflix. 37 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:29,800 Speaker 2: Ken, I guess you know, one of the challenges for 38 00:02:29,919 --> 00:02:33,000 Speaker 2: the Walt Disney Company and pretty much most of the 39 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:36,840 Speaker 2: traditional media companies is just kind of that linear TV 40 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:43,000 Speaker 2: broadcast cable television business. And Disney reported, you know, weaker 41 00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:46,920 Speaker 2: result sales fell about eight percent in the quarter. How 42 00:02:46,919 --> 00:02:49,320 Speaker 2: do you think these traditional media companies kind of manage 43 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 2: the longer term decline of those businesses. 44 00:02:54,120 --> 00:02:56,520 Speaker 3: So what we're seeing, and it's a great question. And 45 00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:58,840 Speaker 3: if we were all in business class, this would be 46 00:02:58,880 --> 00:03:02,280 Speaker 3: a classic where you have a mature to declining business 47 00:03:02,360 --> 00:03:06,200 Speaker 3: but it's still throwing off lots of cash trying to 48 00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:11,680 Speaker 3: reinvest that and new growing businesses that hopefully have good 49 00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:15,320 Speaker 3: business models. And I think what we're seeing is because 50 00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:20,880 Speaker 3: of digitalization of advertising, that shift problem linear or legacy 51 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 3: networks broadcasts to streaming is happening much faster. So that's 52 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:26,680 Speaker 3: a problem. 53 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 4: You know, Paul, you are recovering media investment banker, right, 54 00:03:30,639 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 4: I mean I've heard about the death of linear forever. Yeah, 55 00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 4: So I mean, what do you think makes this time different? 56 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:37,520 Speaker 4: When you look at the outset? 57 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:40,560 Speaker 2: What makes this time different is simply the revenue stream 58 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:44,280 Speaker 2: which really supported television for the last thirty forty years 59 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:47,840 Speaker 2: was subscribers from cable television and satellite TV, and that 60 00:03:47,880 --> 00:03:51,880 Speaker 2: subscription revenue offset to decline in advertising revenue as advertising 61 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:55,360 Speaker 2: revenue went to different places, first cable and then did digital. 62 00:03:55,640 --> 00:03:57,720 Speaker 2: Now that subscriber revenue is going away because of the 63 00:03:57,720 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 2: cord cutting. So now you really have nothing to lean against, 64 00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:03,400 Speaker 2: and that's what I guess most of the media companies 65 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:06,400 Speaker 2: are kind of dealing with with their linear networks. So, Ken, 66 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:09,400 Speaker 2: I mean, if you're the Walt Disney company here, one 67 00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 2: of the things is the studio. I mean, the Walt 68 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 2: Disney Film studio dominated Hollywood for the last fifteen twenty 69 00:04:17,960 --> 00:04:19,880 Speaker 2: years thanks to the Star Wars and the marvel and 70 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:22,599 Speaker 2: all the Pixars and all that kind of stuff. The 71 00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:24,839 Speaker 2: studio kind of stumbled over the last four or five 72 00:04:24,920 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 2: years and maybe people are getting a little bit tired 73 00:04:26,640 --> 00:04:28,240 Speaker 2: of some of the titles in the franchises. 74 00:04:28,600 --> 00:04:29,640 Speaker 4: What do you need to be good? 75 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:32,240 Speaker 1: I'll go see it, just be good exactly. Okay, well, 76 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:34,240 Speaker 1: there you go. So what do you think the strategy 77 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: is there? 78 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:39,159 Speaker 3: Ken, So we need to say better performance not only 79 00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:43,080 Speaker 3: from Disney, but also the industry. And really, when you 80 00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:47,719 Speaker 3: look at global box office X China, it's running twenty 81 00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:53,160 Speaker 3: twenty five percent below where we were pre pandemic levels. Additionally, 82 00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:58,320 Speaker 3: when you look at movies, you always go to the sequels, 83 00:04:58,360 --> 00:05:02,440 Speaker 3: the ones that can break in large audiences, but sometimes 84 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:06,680 Speaker 3: they're flops and they're very costly. So I think theatrical 85 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 3: which for Disney feeds not only into film, but it 86 00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,120 Speaker 3: feeds into the genre of their parks. 87 00:05:14,040 --> 00:05:15,239 Speaker 5: You know, it's a big deal. 88 00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 3: And I think when we look at what Bob Iger 89 00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:22,599 Speaker 3: wants to do there, he has talented people now now 90 00:05:22,680 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 3: running those businesses. But even if you've got a big hit, 91 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:29,120 Speaker 3: you know, you look at paramount with top Gun Maverick 92 00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 3: over a year ago, it has not that much impact 93 00:05:33,760 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 3: on the stock or what analysts think in terms of 94 00:05:37,720 --> 00:05:41,039 Speaker 3: the fundamental outlook of a company. So it's important, but 95 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:44,400 Speaker 3: you know, it's kind of stirs the pot, but it's 96 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:46,880 Speaker 3: really you know, let's not forget we haven't had a 97 00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:51,159 Speaker 3: conversation today why where many investors are in Disney is 98 00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:54,800 Speaker 3: for experience or for the parks and having these durable 99 00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:59,520 Speaker 3: businesses where they have less competition versus some of the 100 00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:03,680 Speaker 3: problems they have in entertainment, whether it be filmed or 101 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:07,279 Speaker 3: be streaming. So let's not forget about the parks because 102 00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:09,200 Speaker 3: that's really the core of their stability. 103 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 4: I mean, let's be honest, guys, Maverick had an issue 104 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:15,120 Speaker 4: because Barbie. I mean, that's what really happened. Barbie trumps 105 00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 4: Tom Cruise. Let's call it, as you mentioned something earlier, 106 00:06:19,560 --> 00:06:21,279 Speaker 4: and I wonder how that's going to tie into the 107 00:06:21,279 --> 00:06:23,920 Speaker 4: parks experience. But also you mentioned in terms of streaming, 108 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:27,680 Speaker 4: and that's the AI component. How would AI help Disney 109 00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:28,880 Speaker 4: do all the things you just said? 110 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:34,520 Speaker 3: There is incredible work that I'm sure Disney is doing 111 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 3: to be competitive and on part too great companies, whether 112 00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:47,200 Speaker 3: they be Amazon, Meta, Google, or Netflix. So it's an 113 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:52,520 Speaker 3: enormous effort on the technology side to have intelligence for personalization, 114 00:06:53,000 --> 00:06:56,400 Speaker 3: and I think AI will play a role in personalization 115 00:06:56,680 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 3: of subscriber viewership, but they can't tell that message because 116 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:06,080 Speaker 3: they're playing multi year catch up to the companies I've mentioned. 117 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:08,800 Speaker 3: So it's a big deal right now. It's a competitive 118 00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 3: weakness for the traditional entertainment companies. You have to remember 119 00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:16,760 Speaker 3: Netflix has been at this for well over ten fifteen years, 120 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 3: and of course the names like Amazon with AWS, they're 121 00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:24,160 Speaker 3: in the lynch pin with AI. So that will get 122 00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 3: the stock up more than it's interesting. In my earnings note, 123 00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:31,800 Speaker 3: I said maybe we'll get a profitability in streaming this 124 00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:34,640 Speaker 3: quarter instead of the fourth quarter. We did, but it 125 00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:37,200 Speaker 3: was small, so you know, we have to see what's 126 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:40,120 Speaker 3: next for Disney and coming quarters. 127 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:42,160 Speaker 1: All right, Ken, Thanks so much for joining us. 128 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:45,119 Speaker 2: Really appreciate that as always, Ken Leam, he's a director 129 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 2: of research at c f r A Research. 130 00:07:48,440 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 1: We appreciate it. 131 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:02,440 Speaker 2: Let's check in over our next guest here, Steve Iceman, 132 00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 2: senior portfolio manager at Newburger Berman. 133 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: All right, I'm. 134 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:08,240 Speaker 2: Looking at I guess Steve, you're on the Odd Lots 135 00:08:08,400 --> 00:08:12,560 Speaker 2: podcast recently and you said that you are bullish on 136 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:16,000 Speaker 2: stocks that gain from artificial intelligence power needs. 137 00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 1: What does that mean? 138 00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:20,640 Speaker 5: Well, good question, Thank you. 139 00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:22,920 Speaker 1: I'm front running Alex because Alex is our energy. 140 00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:28,280 Speaker 5: The current the current GPUs use about three times more 141 00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:32,719 Speaker 5: electricity than your typical CPU. So the grid in the 142 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:37,520 Speaker 5: United States has been under pressure now for years. You know, 143 00:08:37,800 --> 00:08:42,040 Speaker 5: utilities keep increasing their cap bax budgets, and now you've 144 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 5: put an entire new pressure on the on the grid. 145 00:08:44,920 --> 00:08:47,920 Speaker 5: So whatever money is being spent on the grid is 146 00:08:47,960 --> 00:08:50,600 Speaker 5: going to keep going up, probably for the next ten years. 147 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:53,760 Speaker 5: So just to give you just one stock for example, 148 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:56,920 Speaker 5: you know, when utilities announce that they're increasing their cap 149 00:08:56,920 --> 00:09:00,280 Speaker 5: bax budgets, utilities don't actually do anything. You know. What 150 00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:01,920 Speaker 5: they do is they send you electricity and send you 151 00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:05,360 Speaker 5: a build. But in terms of construction, that's sun by 152 00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:09,000 Speaker 5: a company called Quanta, which is the largest engineering construction 153 00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:11,679 Speaker 5: company for utilities. So the only thing I would tell 154 00:09:11,720 --> 00:09:15,480 Speaker 5: you is that every time the CEO gets on the 155 00:09:15,600 --> 00:09:18,040 Speaker 5: quarterly conference call, he just looks happier. 156 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,800 Speaker 4: That's fair. Yes, if you demand's gonna. 157 00:09:22,600 --> 00:09:24,920 Speaker 5: Growup by it has no to do with himself. He 158 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:28,040 Speaker 5: can't satisfy all of the demands. So that's just just 159 00:09:28,120 --> 00:09:30,600 Speaker 5: one example. But there are other companies that benefit as well. 160 00:09:30,600 --> 00:09:32,600 Speaker 5: But that I look, I think there are three major 161 00:09:32,679 --> 00:09:39,000 Speaker 5: themes of our time, AI, infrastructure, and crypto, and I 162 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:40,560 Speaker 5: believe in the first two and I don't believe in 163 00:09:40,559 --> 00:09:40,880 Speaker 5: the third. 164 00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:44,240 Speaker 4: So just for framing here, I mean, you really made 165 00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:47,960 Speaker 4: your name through the housing crisis and betting against housing 166 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:51,200 Speaker 4: dead back in two thousand and eight. You're portrayed in 167 00:09:51,240 --> 00:09:53,079 Speaker 4: the Big short film by Steve Carelling. 168 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 5: You had to bring that up, but okay. 169 00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:57,760 Speaker 4: I did, But just to give context, if our viewers 170 00:09:57,840 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 4: or listeners don't know, like you have a history of betting, 171 00:10:01,080 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 4: having contrarian bets that pay off big time. Yes, what 172 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:07,600 Speaker 4: would be that contrarian bet? Out of the three things 173 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:09,920 Speaker 4: you just said, what's that big contrarian bet? 174 00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:13,080 Speaker 5: I don't have a contrarian bet here. I mean I 175 00:10:13,080 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 5: don't like crypto. 176 00:10:14,000 --> 00:10:15,319 Speaker 4: I like in crypto feels contrarian. 177 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:17,400 Speaker 5: Well, it's contrarian, and that says that I don't believe 178 00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:19,760 Speaker 5: in it. I think the whole thesis behind it is wrong. 179 00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:24,199 Speaker 5: But you know, shortening a cult when there's no when 180 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:27,160 Speaker 5: there's no data to prove that it's wrong, because a 181 00:10:27,200 --> 00:10:29,360 Speaker 5: death wish, you know. So what do I mean by that? 182 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:32,720 Speaker 5: So when you when I bet against subprime mortgages, every 183 00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:38,199 Speaker 5: month securitizations produce data. They give every single credit quality 184 00:10:38,320 --> 00:10:40,559 Speaker 5: data possible, so every month you could check it. 185 00:10:41,400 --> 00:10:42,000 Speaker 4: You could look at it. 186 00:10:42,280 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 5: Every month you looked at the fact and that and 187 00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:47,360 Speaker 5: that fact credit quality was the major determinant of the 188 00:10:47,480 --> 00:10:50,959 Speaker 5: value of subprime mortgage paper. So you had a data 189 00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:56,280 Speaker 5: point every month, a massive data dump. Crypto trades on ether. 190 00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:00,600 Speaker 5: You know what is a trade The thesis that crypto 191 00:11:01,240 --> 00:11:04,079 Speaker 5: of crypto is that it's a hedge against fear currency, 192 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 5: so it's like digital gold. But it doesn't trade like that. 193 00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 5: It trades in perfect correlation with NASDAC, so it trades 194 00:11:11,520 --> 00:11:14,240 Speaker 5: against its own thesis. So what data point is there 195 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:18,480 Speaker 5: to show that crypto is wrong. I mean, if the 196 00:11:18,520 --> 00:11:21,920 Speaker 5: deficit came down, it's not relevant because that's not how 197 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 5: it trades anyway. So there's nothing to do. What's your 198 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:26,600 Speaker 5: macro call here? 199 00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:28,559 Speaker 2: I mean, there's a lot of folks in the marketplace saying, 200 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:32,000 Speaker 2: you know, this Federal Reserve is going to cut rates 201 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:34,360 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty four, maybe not as many times as 202 00:11:34,400 --> 00:11:37,360 Speaker 2: we originally thought, maybe not as much as we originally thought, 203 00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:40,040 Speaker 2: but that this economy is in good shape, but still 204 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:41,319 Speaker 2: there might be some rate cuts here. 205 00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:44,400 Speaker 1: Is that kind of the backdrop that's for you? Or 206 00:11:44,520 --> 00:11:45,199 Speaker 1: how do you think about it? 207 00:11:45,280 --> 00:11:46,600 Speaker 5: I mean, the why I think about it is that 208 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,120 Speaker 5: Powell is a dove. He has always been a dove. 209 00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:53,360 Speaker 5: Raising rates was completely against his nature. He wants to 210 00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:57,000 Speaker 5: cut rates because he always wants to cut rates. The 211 00:11:57,120 --> 00:11:59,760 Speaker 5: data is not completely in his favor. So maybe they 212 00:11:59,760 --> 00:12:03,800 Speaker 5: cut once. Do I think they should cut it all? 213 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 5: I would personally, I would wait, but trust me, nobody 214 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:08,320 Speaker 5: consults me. 215 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:10,559 Speaker 4: No one consults us either. It's very fair. 216 00:12:10,800 --> 00:12:14,440 Speaker 5: So I think they'll probably cut once. It's my guess. 217 00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:17,640 Speaker 4: So does that affect so the thesis that you have, 218 00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:21,520 Speaker 4: like at the infrastructure, the power demand and AI general 219 00:12:21,679 --> 00:12:24,880 Speaker 4: and AI in general, does what the Fed does. 220 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:27,120 Speaker 5: It's irrelevant, irrelevant. 221 00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:31,880 Speaker 4: Does it change how you play those themes or of timing? 222 00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:35,640 Speaker 5: Okay, I mean this is how what I think credit 223 00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:38,560 Speaker 5: quality in the United States is fine other than office 224 00:12:38,600 --> 00:12:40,920 Speaker 5: real estate, and office real estate is not big enough 225 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:43,640 Speaker 5: to sink the economy. It's a problem. It's a regional problem. 226 00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:49,559 Speaker 5: It's a regional bank problem. It's some investors problem. If 227 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:55,080 Speaker 5: consumers not over levered, the housing market is not in fuego, 228 00:12:56,840 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 5: there's a shortage of housing. So all the all the 229 00:12:59,679 --> 00:13:02,679 Speaker 5: and the financial system of the United States has never 230 00:13:02,679 --> 00:13:07,280 Speaker 5: been this healthy in anyone's lifetime period. So all the 231 00:13:07,320 --> 00:13:10,040 Speaker 5: things that existed prior to two thousand and eight don't 232 00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:13,480 Speaker 5: exist today. You have a very dynamic economy with some 233 00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:19,040 Speaker 5: very very powerful themes. The Fed cutting or not cutting 234 00:13:19,080 --> 00:13:21,600 Speaker 5: rate makes headlines for a couple of days. But when 235 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:23,680 Speaker 5: you think about it, if the FED cuts rates once 236 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,600 Speaker 5: or twice or no, no times, I mean the end 237 00:13:26,600 --> 00:13:29,360 Speaker 5: of the day, who cares. It's it's it's the minimis 238 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:31,800 Speaker 5: it's not. I mean the Fed raising rates five hundred 239 00:13:31,840 --> 00:13:35,560 Speaker 5: bases points Yep, that got that got everybody's attention. The 240 00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:38,200 Speaker 5: FED cutting rates twenty five basis points or fifty basis 241 00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:41,280 Speaker 5: points and then stopping like like everybody get a life. 242 00:13:41,360 --> 00:13:42,719 Speaker 1: Right, all right? 243 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:45,360 Speaker 2: In terms of getting a life on AI, a lot 244 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:47,800 Speaker 2: of well, I'll just speak for myself. I'm trying to 245 00:13:47,800 --> 00:13:50,040 Speaker 2: figure out how much of this AI stuff and I'm 246 00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:53,320 Speaker 2: putting in air quotes here for our listeners. Is incremental 247 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:56,200 Speaker 2: tech spending or is it just taking some money from 248 00:13:56,440 --> 00:13:58,559 Speaker 2: it or other tech budgets and putting it to. 249 00:13:58,520 --> 00:14:01,120 Speaker 5: It depends on which subsector talking. Okay, So if you're 250 00:14:01,120 --> 00:14:04,079 Speaker 5: talking about the semiconductor sector, where it's video or a 251 00:14:04,240 --> 00:14:08,120 Speaker 5: m D, it's it's massively incremental, you know. If you're 252 00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:14,400 Speaker 5: talking about overall tech spending at this point, not clear. 253 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:18,440 Speaker 5: What's what is pretty clear is that companies like some 254 00:14:18,559 --> 00:14:23,040 Speaker 5: of the IT consulting companies have no revenue growth because 255 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:29,600 Speaker 5: it's taking Peter to PayPal. So and software unclear, So 256 00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:31,600 Speaker 5: it's it's only very clear in hardware. 257 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:38,120 Speaker 4: Let's overlay the presidential election with these thesis. 258 00:14:36,880 --> 00:14:39,000 Speaker 5: The thesis. 259 00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:43,480 Speaker 4: Thesis is plural and okay, it's important. I took Latin 260 00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:43,880 Speaker 4: from the. 261 00:14:43,960 --> 00:14:46,440 Speaker 5: CS, but this is a thes THECS. 262 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:50,200 Speaker 4: Okay, So what is your prediction for the election, and 263 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:52,400 Speaker 4: how does that impact because a lot of what you're 264 00:14:52,440 --> 00:14:54,480 Speaker 4: talking about is driven by fiscal policy. 265 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:58,520 Speaker 5: Okay, so let's let's backtrack for a second. So, first 266 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,720 Speaker 5: of all, caveat whatever I'm about to say. I am 267 00:15:01,760 --> 00:15:04,360 Speaker 5: not speaking for Newburger Barman. I'm speaking just for myself 268 00:15:04,360 --> 00:15:07,080 Speaker 5: because I don't want to get into trouble. So it's 269 00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:11,040 Speaker 5: May seventh, We're how many months? Five months? Six months 270 00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:14,160 Speaker 5: from the election, very f and as far as I'm concerned, 271 00:15:14,400 --> 00:15:17,720 Speaker 5: the election is baked. It's done, which is and Trump's 272 00:15:17,720 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 5: gonna win, and I think he'll win every single swing state, 273 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:23,440 Speaker 5: and this is how it's going to play. So at 274 00:15:23,440 --> 00:15:26,840 Speaker 5: this point, the protesters and what I'm about to say 275 00:15:26,880 --> 00:15:28,520 Speaker 5: has nothing to do with who I'm going to vote for, 276 00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:35,800 Speaker 5: what my predilections are. This is just pure analysis. The 277 00:15:35,840 --> 00:15:39,040 Speaker 5: protesters on the college campuses have rapidly become the face 278 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:43,000 Speaker 5: of the Democratic Party, not completely, but that will be 279 00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:46,440 Speaker 5: solidified because I am one hundred percent sure that in 280 00:15:46,520 --> 00:15:51,440 Speaker 5: August at the Democratic Convention in Chicago, Irony, when you 281 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:54,040 Speaker 5: think about nineteen sixty eight, they will all be protesting 282 00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:57,000 Speaker 5: there and they'll be screaming and yelling, and they'll be 283 00:15:57,040 --> 00:15:59,560 Speaker 5: screaming and yelling a lot of things that are anti American, 284 00:16:00,120 --> 00:16:03,360 Speaker 5: and the country is going to be appolled, and at 285 00:16:03,360 --> 00:16:05,240 Speaker 5: that point it will be very very clear that Trump 286 00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:08,440 Speaker 5: will win. But as far as I'm concerned, this reminds 287 00:16:08,440 --> 00:16:10,640 Speaker 5: me a little bit of August two thousand and seven. 288 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:13,520 Speaker 5: If you look back at the financial crisis, the crisis 289 00:16:13,560 --> 00:16:16,720 Speaker 5: took place in the fall of eight, but in August 290 00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:20,040 Speaker 5: of seven, subprime paper had collapsed. The crisis was baked 291 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:24,040 Speaker 5: in August of seven. The rest was just an inevitable play. 292 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:27,240 Speaker 5: So I kind of feel about like that about the 293 00:16:27,240 --> 00:16:29,520 Speaker 5: presidential lecture right now. It's baked, but the only people 294 00:16:29,560 --> 00:16:30,480 Speaker 5: who don't know the voters. 295 00:16:30,720 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 2: All right, We'll see how that plays out in the 296 00:16:32,560 --> 00:16:34,360 Speaker 2: market life. Steve Iisman, thank you so much for joining. 297 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:38,040 Speaker 2: Steve Heisman is a senior portfolio manager at Newburger Berman. 298 00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:39,040 Speaker 1: Joining us live here in our. 299 00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:46,400 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. Let's see where this economy is 300 00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:49,120 Speaker 2: going here. Francis Donald's going to help us out with that. 301 00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:52,200 Speaker 2: Chief econmerce at Manual Life Investment Management. Francis, thanks so 302 00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:55,040 Speaker 2: much for joining us here. I know I'm not really 303 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:57,000 Speaker 2: sure where the market is here in terms of this 304 00:16:57,040 --> 00:16:59,560 Speaker 2: Federal reserve for a while there, we started out with 305 00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:02,760 Speaker 2: a lot of cuts factored into the market, then fewer 306 00:17:02,800 --> 00:17:05,040 Speaker 2: and fewer and fewer, and then there's even talk of 307 00:17:05,080 --> 00:17:08,399 Speaker 2: a rate hike. Maybe that seems to be off the 308 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:10,440 Speaker 2: table here. I'd love to get a sense of how 309 00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:12,560 Speaker 2: you folks at Manual Life are thinking about our feder 310 00:17:12,640 --> 00:17:15,320 Speaker 2: reserve and kind of how they're thinking about this economy. 311 00:17:16,760 --> 00:17:19,280 Speaker 6: You mentioned two words earlier. We have two words too. 312 00:17:19,480 --> 00:17:24,200 Speaker 6: FED cuts are gonna come later, but then much faster 313 00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:27,800 Speaker 6: than this market has been pricing in now. We've already 314 00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:31,000 Speaker 6: been seeing that later to a certain extent. And let's 315 00:17:31,040 --> 00:17:34,119 Speaker 6: just simply because we do expect the labor market in 316 00:17:34,160 --> 00:17:37,879 Speaker 6: particular to decline, we do expect inflation to decline. But 317 00:17:37,920 --> 00:17:41,160 Speaker 6: we have a few more months before the data we'll 318 00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:44,800 Speaker 6: give the FED permission to begin this easing cycle. What 319 00:17:44,840 --> 00:17:47,720 Speaker 6: we haven't bought into is that this would be like 320 00:17:47,760 --> 00:17:50,680 Speaker 6: a two or three or done situation, that these would 321 00:17:50,680 --> 00:17:53,600 Speaker 6: be insurance cuts. We believe we are heading into a 322 00:17:53,640 --> 00:17:58,000 Speaker 6: proper downturn that will require a proper easing cycle, and frankly, 323 00:17:58,080 --> 00:18:00,879 Speaker 6: that call is this just you know, some insurance cuts 324 00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:03,720 Speaker 6: on the margin or are we going to see a 325 00:18:03,720 --> 00:18:07,520 Speaker 6: average historical easing cycle is far more important than do 326 00:18:07,560 --> 00:18:10,720 Speaker 6: they go in June, September, or even December in our. 327 00:18:10,720 --> 00:18:13,480 Speaker 4: View, So your two words are later and faster. Basically, 328 00:18:13,880 --> 00:18:16,199 Speaker 4: what gives you the confidence that we will see a 329 00:18:16,240 --> 00:18:17,800 Speaker 4: material downturn. 330 00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 6: Leading economic indicators, So just about everything in the labor 331 00:18:22,840 --> 00:18:25,959 Speaker 6: market that explains where we are in the labor cycle 332 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:28,560 Speaker 6: is pointing to a deterioration. Now, we're not calling for 333 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:30,080 Speaker 6: the end of the world. We're not saying it's a 334 00:18:30,080 --> 00:18:33,520 Speaker 6: big crisis, calling for two quarters of negative GDP. Q 335 00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:36,360 Speaker 6: three and Q four could be Q four and Q one. 336 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:39,200 Speaker 6: Well know, as we get closer to it, we've got 337 00:18:39,960 --> 00:18:43,479 Speaker 6: business Employment Development data, nine million companies telling us there 338 00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:46,440 Speaker 6: were job losses last year. Household employment has been flat, 339 00:18:46,800 --> 00:18:51,600 Speaker 6: Temporary employment really good, leading indicator flashing recessions. Average weekly 340 00:18:51,640 --> 00:18:53,639 Speaker 6: hours worked in the economy, just how many hours are 341 00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:56,240 Speaker 6: people working comes back to pre COVID levels. Quit rates 342 00:18:56,280 --> 00:19:00,400 Speaker 6: are dropping. Surveys from PMIS to small businesses say we're 343 00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:03,120 Speaker 6: just not hiring as much anymore. I mean, I tell 344 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:05,840 Speaker 6: my team, you know, we've been calling for a recession 345 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:08,200 Speaker 6: for a while. It's been later than we expected. But 346 00:19:08,240 --> 00:19:10,159 Speaker 6: I say, every day, come in to work, look at 347 00:19:10,160 --> 00:19:12,600 Speaker 6: the data, and just ignore your past call. What does 348 00:19:12,640 --> 00:19:15,199 Speaker 6: it tell you? Tells you re late cycle, and the 349 00:19:15,200 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 6: odds of a downturn are much higher than the odds 350 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:18,720 Speaker 6: of a reacceleration. 351 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:21,200 Speaker 2: From this point, we're hearing a similar type of commentary 352 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:22,760 Speaker 2: coming out of the Walt Disney Company. I'm reading the 353 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:27,480 Speaker 2: research react from Bloomberg Intelligence Keith wrong Anathen Disney commentary 354 00:19:27,560 --> 00:19:30,520 Speaker 2: on a normalization of demand that the theme parks will 355 00:19:30,560 --> 00:19:32,880 Speaker 2: weigh on sentiment. Even after the segment posted a solid 356 00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:35,399 Speaker 2: twelve percent operating income in fiscal Q two, guidance for 357 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:39,199 Speaker 2: the parks in Q three is weak with no growth, 358 00:19:39,920 --> 00:19:42,880 Speaker 2: suggesting for your estimates might be at risk. 359 00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:43,760 Speaker 1: So there's an. 360 00:19:43,720 --> 00:19:47,480 Speaker 2: Example, Francis of you know, at data point suggesting maybe 361 00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:51,280 Speaker 2: the consumer's strength is kind of waning. Here is that 362 00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:53,600 Speaker 2: where you think you might see it from the consumer 363 00:19:53,840 --> 00:19:55,760 Speaker 2: per se, you're likely. 364 00:19:55,600 --> 00:19:58,280 Speaker 6: To see it across businesses and consumers, because that's how 365 00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:01,880 Speaker 6: raid hikes work. The average time between the first rate 366 00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:05,280 Speaker 6: hike and its impact on businesses and consumers is two years, 367 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:08,119 Speaker 6: so we're not exiting the period in which rate hikes 368 00:20:08,160 --> 00:20:12,080 Speaker 6: become really impactful in the economy. We are entering that period. 369 00:20:12,200 --> 00:20:14,919 Speaker 6: The mistake was in thinking that we'd see the impact 370 00:20:15,000 --> 00:20:18,080 Speaker 6: earlier because of how fast and intense the rate hikes came. 371 00:20:18,400 --> 00:20:20,960 Speaker 6: We're just entering that period. This is old fashioned economics. 372 00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:24,119 Speaker 6: When money costs more to borrow, you borrow less of 373 00:20:24,119 --> 00:20:28,040 Speaker 6: it and you invest less of it. Consumers can borrow less, 374 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:29,960 Speaker 6: they can spend less. Now we'll say there's a really 375 00:20:29,960 --> 00:20:32,040 Speaker 6: important component here, which is that we are seeing a 376 00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:36,320 Speaker 6: big bifurcation amongst both businesses and consumers. The spread between 377 00:20:36,320 --> 00:20:39,920 Speaker 6: CEO confidence and small business confidence largest that we've seen 378 00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:43,320 Speaker 6: in this data history. And for consumers, high income consumers 379 00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:45,959 Speaker 6: they feel everything is fine. Why because they're benefiting from 380 00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:48,920 Speaker 6: higher rates and a good stock market. Low end consumers 381 00:20:49,160 --> 00:20:51,960 Speaker 6: telling a different story. So I love a good quality 382 00:20:52,040 --> 00:20:54,480 Speaker 6: stock picker, even as a macro strategist. In this type 383 00:20:54,520 --> 00:20:57,080 Speaker 6: of environment, it's going to be a little bit trickier 384 00:20:57,080 --> 00:20:59,640 Speaker 6: than just looking at the aggregate. There's some elements underneath 385 00:20:59,680 --> 00:21:01,640 Speaker 6: the surface that are telling slightly different stories. 386 00:21:01,720 --> 00:21:03,919 Speaker 4: Well, I think that's such an interesting point too, especially 387 00:21:04,000 --> 00:21:07,000 Speaker 4: as the high income consumers also have those low mortgage 388 00:21:07,080 --> 00:21:09,399 Speaker 4: rates right, so they're also benefiting from that lower end 389 00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:13,040 Speaker 4: consumers may not be owners at all. So I guess 390 00:21:13,040 --> 00:21:14,480 Speaker 4: my question is, and this where it kind of ties 391 00:21:14,520 --> 00:21:18,639 Speaker 4: to Disney also, is this a real retrenchment or just 392 00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 4: we had so much spending, we had so much safe 393 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:24,720 Speaker 4: theme park attendants. If we use Disney as the example 394 00:21:24,920 --> 00:21:28,000 Speaker 4: and we're just moving off that high level, is there 395 00:21:28,000 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 4: a distinction to be made? 396 00:21:29,960 --> 00:21:33,040 Speaker 6: So I love this question. Are we just heading towards 397 00:21:33,080 --> 00:21:36,159 Speaker 6: a normalization? Is effectively what I think about. If you 398 00:21:36,200 --> 00:21:39,000 Speaker 6: look at the year over year charts, most of them 399 00:21:39,040 --> 00:21:42,080 Speaker 6: signal this is a really strong contraction. Things like the 400 00:21:42,119 --> 00:21:44,639 Speaker 6: Sam rule or a lot of things showing the unemployment 401 00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:47,200 Speaker 6: rate is ten percent higher. Does that work when we've 402 00:21:47,200 --> 00:21:50,040 Speaker 6: just come off of really low bases or really high highs. 403 00:21:50,480 --> 00:21:53,199 Speaker 6: I'm a second derivative gal. I gotta say most of 404 00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:57,159 Speaker 6: the time, momentum in year over year is the powerful indicator. 405 00:21:57,400 --> 00:21:59,640 Speaker 6: But there is a chance that we are simply normalizing 406 00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 6: down for regular levels. And this is why we're not 407 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:04,840 Speaker 6: calling for a huge crisis. We're just saying that your 408 00:22:04,840 --> 00:22:08,080 Speaker 6: GDP can be negative for two consecutive quarters, and the 409 00:22:08,119 --> 00:22:11,400 Speaker 6: FED may want to begin an easing cycle in response 410 00:22:11,440 --> 00:22:14,600 Speaker 6: to it. But this is a post COVID completely no 411 00:22:14,800 --> 00:22:17,840 Speaker 6: precedent type of economy, and so I think there's a 412 00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:20,760 Speaker 6: fraction of this that has to be old fashioned economics 413 00:22:20,840 --> 00:22:23,280 Speaker 6: and what are standard relationships? And then we have to 414 00:22:23,359 --> 00:22:26,800 Speaker 6: overlay the more subjective what could be different this time? 415 00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 6: You need a little bit of that science, a little 416 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:29,640 Speaker 6: bit of that art. 417 00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:33,360 Speaker 1: Francis, what do you think about the labor market here? 418 00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:34,280 Speaker 5: Again? 419 00:22:34,320 --> 00:22:38,240 Speaker 2: It seems to be so resilient for so long here. 420 00:22:38,320 --> 00:22:40,480 Speaker 2: Are you concerned that there may be some cracksness labor 421 00:22:40,520 --> 00:22:42,600 Speaker 2: market or do you think this economy can continue to 422 00:22:42,600 --> 00:22:45,800 Speaker 2: support a maybe a sub four percent unemployment rate. 423 00:22:46,640 --> 00:22:49,119 Speaker 6: We're pretty close to four. We'd have to stay at 424 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:51,359 Speaker 6: three point nine percent now through the rest of the year. 425 00:22:51,359 --> 00:22:54,159 Speaker 6: WHI seems a little tricky. So I think again, you 426 00:22:54,240 --> 00:22:57,159 Speaker 6: have some old fashioned components here. If you look at 427 00:22:57,160 --> 00:23:01,720 Speaker 6: temporary employment average, weekly quit rates, hiring rates, even conference 428 00:23:01,760 --> 00:23:05,440 Speaker 6: board confidence data on jobs hard to find minus plentiful. 429 00:23:05,760 --> 00:23:09,440 Speaker 6: Check the service employment index under the services PMI, that's 430 00:23:09,480 --> 00:23:12,320 Speaker 6: deteriory to levels that we've only really seen in really 431 00:23:12,359 --> 00:23:15,679 Speaker 6: serious recessions. These are not signaling that the employment is 432 00:23:15,680 --> 00:23:19,880 Speaker 6: going to get better, they're signaling a further deterioration. At 433 00:23:19,880 --> 00:23:22,960 Speaker 6: the same time, we have a very pronounced labor shortage. 434 00:23:23,320 --> 00:23:25,480 Speaker 6: We are in an environment where businesses it was a 435 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:27,240 Speaker 6: heck of a hard time to hire people. In the 436 00:23:27,280 --> 00:23:29,400 Speaker 6: past few years. They've said, if it's only a short 437 00:23:29,480 --> 00:23:31,720 Speaker 6: term receession, we're going to hold on as long as possible. 438 00:23:32,200 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 6: So I think you have a mix of Yes, things 439 00:23:34,119 --> 00:23:35,480 Speaker 6: are going to get worse. Are they going to be 440 00:23:35,480 --> 00:23:38,760 Speaker 6: a really standard massive deterioration. I don't think so. You 441 00:23:38,840 --> 00:23:41,360 Speaker 6: got to overlay that structural post COVID economy as well. 442 00:23:41,720 --> 00:23:43,840 Speaker 2: Francis, thank you so much for joining us again. We 443 00:23:43,880 --> 00:23:47,000 Speaker 2: always appreciate getting your thoughts and commentary. Francis Donald, Chief 444 00:23:47,000 --> 00:23:49,320 Speaker 2: Economists and Manual Life Investment management. 445 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:00,280 Speaker 5: Folks. 446 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:02,560 Speaker 2: Your daily look at the front pages around the world, 447 00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:06,800 Speaker 2: mister John Tucker. Newspapers A lot of them out there, Not. 448 00:24:06,760 --> 00:24:08,400 Speaker 1: As many as there used to be, but a lot 449 00:24:08,400 --> 00:24:09,400 Speaker 1: of newspapers out there. 450 00:24:09,440 --> 00:24:12,360 Speaker 2: Although you go to a you go to an office 451 00:24:12,400 --> 00:24:14,639 Speaker 2: in London, let's say just you have a meeting in 452 00:24:14,680 --> 00:24:16,480 Speaker 2: an office on money. You go into the waiting room, 453 00:24:17,240 --> 00:24:19,639 Speaker 2: dozens of newspapers on the table. 454 00:24:19,960 --> 00:24:21,040 Speaker 1: There's it's still big. 455 00:24:20,840 --> 00:24:22,920 Speaker 7: In one it's an interest. You go down a city hall, 456 00:24:23,040 --> 00:24:26,080 Speaker 7: Room nine is the press press room, and outside is 457 00:24:26,119 --> 00:24:29,400 Speaker 7: a plaque of all the newspapers that have gone out 458 00:24:29,440 --> 00:24:32,960 Speaker 7: of business in New York City. It's it's a big list, 459 00:24:33,080 --> 00:24:33,960 Speaker 7: and it's kind of sad. 460 00:24:34,080 --> 00:24:35,080 Speaker 4: I don't know if you guys know that. But you 461 00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:36,720 Speaker 4: can also get papers on the interweb. 462 00:24:36,760 --> 00:24:39,359 Speaker 1: Now really, really, it's amazing. 463 00:24:39,440 --> 00:24:41,159 Speaker 2: I'm going to tell Caro Massa that she doesn't have 464 00:24:41,200 --> 00:24:44,320 Speaker 2: to print out every single piece of information that you 465 00:24:44,359 --> 00:24:45,640 Speaker 2: can have it like maybe on Ruth. 466 00:24:45,920 --> 00:24:49,840 Speaker 7: Okay, well let's start here. If from the Bloomberry cause morning, 467 00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:53,040 Speaker 7: if if you if you want to get somebody's attention 468 00:24:53,160 --> 00:24:54,640 Speaker 7: on Wall Street, what do you say? 469 00:24:56,760 --> 00:24:58,399 Speaker 1: Or everyone clicks on the Bloomberg terminal. 470 00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:02,000 Speaker 7: Oh I can imagine after after two pretty lackluster years, 471 00:25:02,560 --> 00:25:05,840 Speaker 7: they are set to jump, especially on desks that help 472 00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:09,920 Speaker 7: companies tap markets or trade their bonds. According to report 473 00:25:09,960 --> 00:25:14,280 Speaker 7: today from the compensation consultant Johnson Associates, bankers who underwrite 474 00:25:14,359 --> 00:25:18,240 Speaker 7: debts may see payouts swell as much as twenty five percent, 475 00:25:18,280 --> 00:25:22,119 Speaker 7: deals picking up this year. For bond traders. In equity underwriters, 476 00:25:22,119 --> 00:25:25,720 Speaker 7: the incentives may rise twenty percent. Alan Johnson is the 477 00:25:26,040 --> 00:25:29,440 Speaker 7: managing director of this firm. He says, in general, employees 478 00:25:29,760 --> 00:25:32,840 Speaker 7: in financial services should be pretty pleased. 479 00:25:33,600 --> 00:25:36,560 Speaker 2: This is way, way, way, way too early to be 480 00:25:36,560 --> 00:25:38,959 Speaker 2: even talking about bonuses. I've had managers come in when 481 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:41,119 Speaker 2: I sit in my bonus meeting and we ripped it 482 00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:44,160 Speaker 2: the entire year. Some knucklehead lost a couple hundred million 483 00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:46,240 Speaker 2: dollars in like the last week of the year, and 484 00:25:46,280 --> 00:25:48,040 Speaker 2: that is the excuse. My boss is like, we're not 485 00:25:48,040 --> 00:25:48,680 Speaker 2: going to pay you. 486 00:25:48,720 --> 00:25:51,360 Speaker 1: Like what so, I mean, yeah. 487 00:25:51,280 --> 00:25:56,320 Speaker 7: See average cash bonus that declined two percent last year? 488 00:25:56,440 --> 00:25:59,160 Speaker 7: What was one hundred and seventy six five hundred dollars. 489 00:25:59,320 --> 00:26:01,000 Speaker 4: Maybe they're like, please don't go to a hedge fund 490 00:26:01,080 --> 00:26:02,520 Speaker 4: or something, right, Yeah. 491 00:26:02,320 --> 00:26:05,320 Speaker 7: But it's explain to everybody you live on your bonus. 492 00:26:05,560 --> 00:26:06,560 Speaker 1: You used to, it used to. 493 00:26:06,880 --> 00:26:08,720 Speaker 2: I mean back in my day it was ninety to 494 00:26:08,760 --> 00:26:12,159 Speaker 2: ninety five percent. My annual compensation was my bonus. That's 495 00:26:12,320 --> 00:26:15,360 Speaker 2: changed now they make it much more your salary versus 496 00:26:15,440 --> 00:26:17,640 Speaker 2: your bonus, but still the bonus is material. 497 00:26:17,720 --> 00:26:22,320 Speaker 4: Ninety nine percent was your bonus. Yes, yeah, holy mollypaans yep. 498 00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:24,200 Speaker 7: All right, let's do this one from the wall Street 499 00:26:24,280 --> 00:26:27,520 Speaker 7: Journal kind of skipping around here. Men happier at work 500 00:26:27,680 --> 00:26:31,199 Speaker 7: than women. That's how they feel overall about their jobs. 501 00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:33,879 Speaker 7: Most workers are positive. You dig deeper, though, you find 502 00:26:34,160 --> 00:26:36,439 Speaker 7: about sixty five percent of men say they're happy with 503 00:26:36,480 --> 00:26:40,120 Speaker 7: their jumps compared to sixty percent of women. The largest 504 00:26:40,119 --> 00:26:44,560 Speaker 7: gaps and satisfaction between men and women related to financial benefits. 505 00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:49,239 Speaker 7: Despite many companies introducing more family friendly policies such as 506 00:26:49,320 --> 00:26:52,800 Speaker 7: daycare at work mental health services, the women surveyed were 507 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:55,360 Speaker 7: less satisfied with their jobs than men for the sixth 508 00:26:55,480 --> 00:26:58,639 Speaker 7: year in a row. Women in particular might sense a 509 00:26:58,720 --> 00:27:02,560 Speaker 7: more profound loss of remote work benefits as employers continue 510 00:27:02,600 --> 00:27:04,919 Speaker 7: to push for their employees to show up more. And 511 00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:07,720 Speaker 7: of course I'm gonna harp on this because I always do. 512 00:27:07,880 --> 00:27:12,680 Speaker 7: Child care for moms is especially especially tough, and when 513 00:27:12,680 --> 00:27:16,200 Speaker 7: you're a single mom, it can be like devastating, right. 514 00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:17,560 Speaker 1: And we know, I'm shocked. 515 00:27:17,560 --> 00:27:18,840 Speaker 4: I'm shocked by this survey. 516 00:27:19,040 --> 00:27:22,400 Speaker 7: Well, I think I think a lot of people at 517 00:27:22,400 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 7: the top might be shocked or maybe on informed. 518 00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:28,080 Speaker 4: Really you should talk to people and they wouldn't be 519 00:27:28,119 --> 00:27:28,640 Speaker 4: so shocking. 520 00:27:28,680 --> 00:27:30,720 Speaker 2: I mean, I remember, you know, when Matt Miller came 521 00:27:30,760 --> 00:27:35,000 Speaker 2: back from Germany for Bloomer, he worked and he was 522 00:27:35,240 --> 00:27:37,800 Speaker 2: again kind of it just shocked and to come back 523 00:27:37,840 --> 00:27:40,359 Speaker 2: here and to say, oh, in Germany we had just 524 00:27:40,440 --> 00:27:43,320 Speaker 2: wonderful health care is free of chargela. Now he's paying 525 00:27:43,320 --> 00:27:47,080 Speaker 2: a jillion dollars and his daughter is in like the 526 00:27:47,119 --> 00:27:49,840 Speaker 2: basement of some church in Westchester, you know, paying a 527 00:27:49,880 --> 00:27:50,720 Speaker 2: million dollars. 528 00:27:51,440 --> 00:27:52,800 Speaker 7: And that's that's a good slot. 529 00:27:53,000 --> 00:27:54,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a good slot. And that's a good slot 530 00:27:54,960 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 1: for a good slot. Yes, so very tough. 531 00:27:56,960 --> 00:27:59,320 Speaker 7: All right, let's do this one. Also, Uh, what happened 532 00:27:59,359 --> 00:28:03,280 Speaker 7: to the tax crew. It's more governments are slapping fees 533 00:28:03,640 --> 00:28:07,159 Speaker 7: on electric vehicles. Reporting for Bloomberg this morning. You know, 534 00:28:07,200 --> 00:28:09,720 Speaker 7: we also thought governments were trying to encourage the use 535 00:28:09,720 --> 00:28:14,000 Speaker 7: of evs, but the shift away from combustion engines that 536 00:28:14,119 --> 00:28:16,640 Speaker 7: is actually leaving one hundred and ten billion dollars hole 537 00:28:16,640 --> 00:28:19,600 Speaker 7: in government revenues owing to a drop and receipts from 538 00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:22,560 Speaker 7: fuel taxes. So you'll have a lot of states and 539 00:28:22,640 --> 00:28:27,440 Speaker 7: governments across the world, among jurisdictions, introducing tax changes and 540 00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:32,000 Speaker 7: charges on evs and hybrid vehicles designed to raise funds 541 00:28:32,080 --> 00:28:36,920 Speaker 7: and compensate for the declines and gasoline and diesel excise. 542 00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:38,800 Speaker 4: Taxes, so to this point. Actually, I think there was 543 00:28:38,800 --> 00:28:40,720 Speaker 4: an article on the Ft yesterday that talked about in 544 00:28:40,760 --> 00:28:43,120 Speaker 4: Germany in particular, they're rolling back some of the substus 545 00:28:43,120 --> 00:28:45,680 Speaker 4: that they gave, not just for things like evs for example, 546 00:28:45,680 --> 00:28:49,000 Speaker 4: but like heat pumps and stuff like that. So consumers 547 00:28:49,000 --> 00:28:51,640 Speaker 4: spent a lot of money to then get a rebate, 548 00:28:51,680 --> 00:28:53,000 Speaker 4: and then all of a sudden the rebate goes away. 549 00:28:53,000 --> 00:28:54,320 Speaker 4: They don't know if they're going to get it or not. 550 00:28:54,360 --> 00:28:57,880 Speaker 4: They wouldn't have done it otherwise. It gets complicated, and 551 00:28:57,920 --> 00:29:00,200 Speaker 4: the idea that you're you know, the government will have 552 00:29:00,240 --> 00:29:02,800 Speaker 4: to spend money to make all this work, full stop period. 553 00:29:02,920 --> 00:29:03,120 Speaker 5: Yep. 554 00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:06,560 Speaker 7: And we'll conclude with this one from Bloomberg. Oh my gosh, 555 00:29:06,600 --> 00:29:12,000 Speaker 7: Oh my gosh. Taylor News. Apparently the Paris Olympics is 556 00:29:12,120 --> 00:29:15,640 Speaker 7: drawing luxury travel demand. But guess who is the bigger 557 00:29:15,720 --> 00:29:20,480 Speaker 7: draw this week? The Superstar playing four shows at led 558 00:29:20,520 --> 00:29:24,000 Speaker 7: Defense Arena. This is just outside the capitol, so kicks 559 00:29:24,000 --> 00:29:27,280 Speaker 7: off the aristour of the European part of it. Total 560 00:29:27,360 --> 00:29:31,400 Speaker 7: seating capacity forty thousand per show, So this event is 561 00:29:32,000 --> 00:29:34,000 Speaker 7: just a fraction of the size of the Olympic Games, 562 00:29:34,320 --> 00:29:38,040 Speaker 7: and yet the concert's drawing five times as many Americans 563 00:29:38,560 --> 00:29:42,480 Speaker 7: as the Paris Olympics. This according to the luxury travel 564 00:29:42,520 --> 00:29:46,800 Speaker 7: agency Embark Beyond. Bark's co founder, Jack Hasen tells us 565 00:29:46,800 --> 00:29:50,640 Speaker 7: that she's overshadowing the Olympics. That among the more than 566 00:29:50,680 --> 00:29:54,560 Speaker 7: two hundred Paris trips that his company has planned for swifties, 567 00:29:54,600 --> 00:29:58,520 Speaker 7: the average length three nights, clients usually staying at luxury hotels. 568 00:29:58,960 --> 00:30:01,840 Speaker 7: Around a third of groups of mother daughter pears want 569 00:30:01,880 --> 00:30:04,840 Speaker 7: to schedule shopping sprees around the concert. 570 00:30:05,200 --> 00:30:07,080 Speaker 4: I looked to us selling Tucker earlier. I looked into 571 00:30:07,080 --> 00:30:10,520 Speaker 4: this just for fun, and it would be cheaper to 572 00:30:10,560 --> 00:30:12,520 Speaker 4: go to like Sweden and see the concert, or even 573 00:30:12,600 --> 00:30:14,960 Speaker 4: Paris or the UK and see her concert than to 574 00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:17,640 Speaker 4: go to Miami. Yep, in terms of the ticket prices. 575 00:30:17,640 --> 00:30:18,200 Speaker 4: Just putting that up. 576 00:30:18,200 --> 00:30:20,280 Speaker 2: But I'll note over the weekend, who drew like a 577 00:30:20,280 --> 00:30:23,000 Speaker 2: gajillionah one fans down in Madonna? 578 00:30:23,000 --> 00:30:23,479 Speaker 1: Where was she? 579 00:30:24,320 --> 00:30:25,120 Speaker 4: Oh, Brazil. 580 00:30:26,680 --> 00:30:30,560 Speaker 2: That question, Yeah exactly, but I mean Madonna still, I 581 00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:33,440 Speaker 2: mean like hundreds of thousands of yeah, came to see 582 00:30:33,480 --> 00:30:36,840 Speaker 2: her concert down in real She's Madonna, she is, I 583 00:30:36,880 --> 00:30:38,800 Speaker 2: mean Madonna, all right, And I was John Tucker with 584 00:30:38,840 --> 00:30:42,280 Speaker 2: our newspaper segment. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing 585 00:30:42,320 --> 00:30:45,440 Speaker 2: you the best in economics, geopolitics, finance, and investment. You 586 00:30:45,480 --> 00:30:48,680 Speaker 2: can also watch the show live on YouTube. Visit the 587 00:30:48,720 --> 00:30:52,080 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday 588 00:30:52,160 --> 00:30:54,880 Speaker 2: mornings from seven to ten Eastern from our global headquarters 589 00:30:54,880 --> 00:30:58,160 Speaker 2: at New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, 590 00:30:58,320 --> 00:31:01,520 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen, and is always on Bloomberg Radio, 591 00:31:01,600 --> 00:31:03,720 Speaker 2: the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app. 592 00:31:11,120 --> 00:31:11,320 Speaker 1: Hmm