WEBVTT - What's Wright - Best Of - Thunder ALL-TIME team? Nick reveals Club Superstar, Eagles Top 5 NFL team ever?

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the best of the Week for What's Right

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Right the best takes in moments from this

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>week on the show. Enjoy. All right, let's do one

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>quick NFL thing and then get to some listener questions.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Saquon Barkley told Reid blank and Ship and Cooper Degene

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>on their podcast that the.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Man did you hold on? Did you know this demand

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>before we even get to it? I bad news for us.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>We're now competing with a red Blanken hip Cooper dejen project.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That's that's That's a nice tand I clear my schedule.

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to catch up on the archives there.

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>All right, man, oh man, I bet that's an insightful show.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to listen.

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, go ahead told him that that twenty twenty four

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Eagles team the top five team in NFL history. You're

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously a NFL historian.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>How true is that? Not only is it not true,

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not even you can't even you can't even make

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a credible argument for and by the way, Sakuan said

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they were a top five team of all time and

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>then listed five other teams in his top five, which

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>then would make them. I guess the top six team

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of all time, but one of the teams he listed

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was the two thousand Ravens, which is not a top

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty team of all time. Like, none of this makes sense,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>But the seventy two Dolphins that went undefeated had the

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>number one offense and the number one defense and beat

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>teams by an average fifteen points a game. That's a

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>top five team of all time. The eighty four nine

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Ers that went fifteen to one annihilated their po season

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>opponents start to finish, had a top two offense, top

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>two defense. The eighty five Bears that everyone talks about

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the greatest defense of all time, which it had, but

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it also had the number two offense in the sport

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that year and beat their playoff opponents. De Monse ninety

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>one to ten is a top five team of all time.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>The Bears quarterback ever thrown from more than four thousand yards.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I know because they had.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Defense I guess was amazing.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But okay, the defense was amazing, and they had an

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>amazing running game. They scored the second most points of

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>any team in the league that year. The the who

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are the other teams? I'm leaving out an obvious one

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety two Cowboys pretty good. Seventy eight Steelers which had

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I think eleven Hall of Famers, they're pretty good. The

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>seven Patriots didn't win the Super Bowl. The the greatest team

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen the twenty sixteen Patriots that went fourteen

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and two and ran had a top too offense and defense.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>They were pretty good. Uh, the ninety eight Broncos in

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>route to a back to back championship. Like listen, the

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Eagles had the number eight offense, number two defense, and

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>were in one score playoff games in rounds one in

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>rounds two? Now, did the Eagles have a top five

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl performance because of what they did and who

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they did it to? Sure? All listen to that. You

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>want to say, did they have a top five all

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>time final two games by just dismantling the Commanders and

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>then dismantling the Chiefs. Sure, I'll listen to that. But

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>top five? Yeah, but they still scored fifty five, you

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? Or whatever they scored like the Sure,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but I just again, everyone just leave the list to me.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Your guys lists suck. And again I just and he

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even it was so his top Here were his

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>top five teams of all time for the record, seventy

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>two Dolphins because they're undefeated. Good job, eighty five Bears,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>good job the two thousand Ravens, who it's not even

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a tenable opinion. And then he was like one of

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Brady teams and one of the Mahomes teams, like

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not even like a thing, and so I just

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, all right, let's remember to everyone like rate, subscribe,

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>review if you have time to, you know, when you're

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>not listening to the Read blank and Ship Cooper Degen podcast,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out what's right with Nick right,

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we'd appreciate it. You know you think I'm being rude there, Demansey.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 2>The podcast, It's gonna be very insightful, and you know.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go do a three cone drill after this

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>after our pod.

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 2>So you unveiled your latest rendition of Club Superstar, and

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 2>you took Donovan, you put hot Donovan Mitchell in and

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Hallyan for the first time, you took embiid and a

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>d out. Could you explain to us your process and

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 2>how the club management goes about getting these guys in

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and out?

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so all right, so tell me. So, here are

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the twelve guys in and we can put the graphic

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>up Halliburton, Brunson, Joker, Shay, Luca, Jannis, braun Steph, Donovan,

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Durant and Tatum. It's a twelve person max, So if

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you want to put someone in, you got to kick

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>someone out. We took out Embiid because of all the

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>injury stuff and ad for similar reasons. You might be like,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>then how does Tatum stay in? Tatum has been so

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:07.679
<v Speaker 1>consistent and so durable that you know, one season long

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>injury does not get him kicked out? Like his spot

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>is secure? Uh, you seem to have I mean the

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>hardest call was Donovan.

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Donovan Mitchell surprised me.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so who would you would you have any of

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>those guys in over him?

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was I was trying to think of.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, uh, yeah, Anthony Davis is the because.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>In line was Wimby, Cad Shingoon and Devin Booker. Wimby

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is the obvious next guy in, but he's got to

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>actually do it, you know what I mean, He's got

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to actually earn his way in. And so I I

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I did a bit job with that had

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all that.

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I understand how Donovan Mitchell slips in.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>There the sorry can you hear me? Sol Demons?

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I've got you.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good, Sorry about that, my I knocked my AirPod

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>out of my ear. I mean, a D is a tough,

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>tough one. And the argument against Donovan is, you know,

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>eight years in the league and the playoffs every year,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>never in round three. It's hard, though, to use that

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>as an argument to put a D n over him,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because do I think Donovan could have you know, made

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a conference finals or an NBA finals alongside Lebron like

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a D. Did I do? Like we when a D

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was the guy he never got past round one. It's

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a tricky spot. Donovan is for a guy who hasn't

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>been deep in the playoffs, he's not a playoff dropper,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like you know what I mean. It's up huge numbers,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and Brew raised the question do we not have twelve superstars? Right?

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the other thing I was kind of thinking, but

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, It's just like no, go ahead. Was just

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>looking around at the teams. I'm like, who can get

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>in over this guy? But it's like it's a little scarce, right.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird because the league is so deep on

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>really good players. But maybe a little thin on great,

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>great players because the other argument was should Kevin Durant

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>be out? And my answer to that question is, he's

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>such an iconic player who still plays at a high

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>enough level. I don't feel comfort He's still twenty seven

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a game, you know what, I don't feel comfortable, yeah,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>taking him out? So to me, those are the twelve

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>What are your follow ups here? Yeah?

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I care to explain how Joki took Lebron's throne.

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That was an editorial choice made by the artist Jack Perkins,

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>who does a great job. You can follow him on

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Pure Hoop and listen. I give him the lists.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>He makes the picture. I gotta tell you, I wasn't

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>thrilled with seeing Lebron out of the throne, but I

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>guess Jokers earned it for now. But yeah, that was

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not I didn't trust me. I didn't I didn't demand

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that now I did hear.

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 3>That.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with Lebron being moved out of the throne

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>because he's no longer in the argument the best player

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in the league. MI Pal Simmons yesterday did a top

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen player pyramid and didn't have Lebron on that. Now

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an outrage, Like, that's just objectively that. Here's the

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thing about the Lebron rankings that is so irritating to

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>me at times, people keep primative surely downgrading him because

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of his age, when we just saw he just finished

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>sixth in MVP voting, sixth. He just finished firmly second

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>team All NBA. So why all of a sudden is

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>he not one of the fifteen best players in the league.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Like you, the Lebron is anywhere you You could fairly

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>argue for Lebron to be as high as fifth and

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>as low as tenth best player in the league. But

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>that's it. And the what is frustrating to me about

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Bill's ranking specifically is the he still has Steph Curry

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>as like the seventh best guy. There's no there's there's

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>no way to look at this NBA season and say

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Steph was better than Lebron, not by stats, not by

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>team record, not by individual accolades, not by any of it.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Now you can say his team made it one round

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>further in the playoffs, so be it that that part

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>is true, But that's it was that, but that team

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>also was and be like, well, how much of Lebron's

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>team success this year was because they traded for Luca.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>STEP's team was sub five hundred when they traded for Jimmy. Like,

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that's a weird one for me. But set that aside.

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Lebron obviously still superstar. Steph's obviously still a superstar, and

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's where we're at all, right.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Next, do you think that Halliburton still would you still

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>given him a spot if he would have lost in

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 2>round one?

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>No? Now, I submitted this list before round one was over.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I submitted this list. I took a screenshot of it

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>yesterday to send to Gianna of when I submitted this list.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I submitted this list May seventh. So let's see where

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we were in the playoffs on May seventh. I've got

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to I can pull that up quickly. So when I

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>submitted this list, we were the games that had just

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>been played. Is the Pacers had just taken a two

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to zero lead on the Caves. Oh, so that's interesting.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even realize that I submitted this list the

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>morning after Halliburton executed that insane comeback on the Calves.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe I, you know, maybe I was kind

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of in the afterglow of that. But he's proven me

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>right by his performances throughout. And the other thing is

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so no losing in round one? No, But had they

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing in round two to still been comfortable

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>with it?

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>All?

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Right? The NBA Finals almost here and every play could

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be the one that changes everything. To the NBA Playoffs,

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>where heroes rise, legacies are built, and the action never

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>lets up them. With DraftKings Sportsbook, an official sports betting

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>partner of the NBA, you don't just watch the madness,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you live it back your favorite team, Ride with your

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>clutch time killer. Bet on the buzzer beaters, the breakout performances,

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the game winning threes, from player props to same game parlays.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>This is how you take your fandom to the next level. Tonight,

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Pacers Knicks game four, Pacers slight favorites. They win, you

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>gotta feel like they are in great shape to make

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>their first NBA Finals in a quarter century. Then Nicks win,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you feel like they take back control of the series.

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The my pick for the series, as you guys know,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was the Knicks. For that to look good, they're going

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to need to win tonight. If you're new to the game,

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>no sweat. Download the DraftKings sports book app. Bet just

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>five dollars and if your bet wins, you'll score three

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars in bonus bets. It's truly that easy. Download

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the DraftKings sports Book app. Use code right, Wright, that's

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>code right for new customers to get three hundred dollars

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets if your bet wins. When you bet

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>just five bucks on DraftKings, the Crown is yours. Gambling

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>problem call one eight hundred gambler in New York call

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>eight seven seven eight hope in why, or text hope

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in why, which is four six seven three six nine.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling Call eight

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit.

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 3>C DCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas twenty one plus age

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 3>in eligibility varies by jurisdiction void in Ontario. Bonus bets

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 3>expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 3>additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot co.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Slash b Ball.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma City dominated Minnesota. Last night, the defense was humming

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>all of OKC stars were looking good. People want to

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>talk about the probability of this being a dynasty. You

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>think they should hold the brakes on it. What is

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 2>OKC gunning for here historically?

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, they are four wins away demons from one

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the single greatest seasons in NBA history. Like that

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>part is that has to be There's two real metrics

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for two hard metrics for how good your seaton, like

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>how good your season was, and then some softer metrics.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But the first one is how many games did you win?

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>What was your record? And they have now become the

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth team ever to enter the finals with eighty victories.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And now, when we go long to long term history,

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you got to recognize that the playoffs have expanded a

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>bit and changed but a shorthand. You know, the ninety

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>six Bulls who won seventy two regular season games did it.

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>The ninety seven Bulls who won sixty nine regular season

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>games did it. And the seventy three win Warriors who

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>won seventy three regular season games but did not win

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the championship. They all did it. They all got to

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>eighty wins before the start of the NBA Finals. So

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>check off that box. As far as you know, that's

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>really a regular season stat. It means how many regular

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>season wins did you get? But we already knew sixty

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>eight wins. The list of teams to win more than

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight games in a single season are those two seventy,

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the seventy two win Balls, the sixty nine win Balls

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that I mentioned, the seventy three win Warriors, and then

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>one other team, the sixty nine Lakers that they went

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>on to win the championship. That's every team that won

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>more regular season games than these Thunder The teams to

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>win sixty eight games are also at least well, one

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of them is an all time team. The other one

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>came up short to the Knicks in the conference finals.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You have the eighty three Sixers, who I'm sorry, not

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the eighty three sixers, the sixty seven sixers, the eighty

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>three sixers that were I put them there because I

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're one of the greatest teams ever, the faux

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Fox Fox Sixers, but that was not they were not

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the dominant regular season team. These teams were. And then

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the seventy three Celtics, which came up short, and then

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this Thunder team. If we lower the threshold to sixty

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>seven wins. Then it gets a little fuzzier because you

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>have some great teams and some not so great teams.

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Sixty seven wins, the eighty six Celtics in the short

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>on the short list of greatest team of all time, Like,

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty undeniable that you've got to at least include

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>them when you are discussing who are the greatest teams

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of all time? The eighty six Celtics have to be

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on that list. The ninety two Bowls, who I actually

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think might be maybe the best of the Bulls teams

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that finished off the first three peat. There's at least

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>an argument there. The two thousand Lakers, the first championship

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 1>with Shaq and Kobe, the twenty fifteen Warriors, which is

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the first championship with Steph, the twenty seventeen Warriors, the

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>first championship with Stephan Durant, and then a couple teams.

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>One that gets kind of is a punchline, and the

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>other is an all time great team that ran up

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>against another all time great team. The punchline is the

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>seven MAVs, who lost in Round one after winning sixty

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>seven games to the We Believe Warriors. And the other

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>one is the twenty sixteen Spurs who just happened to

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>be it. I mean, that team was unbelievable. They got

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>clipped in round two by the twenty sixteen Thunder, who

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>then ran into the twenty sixteen Warriors, who then ran

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>into Pete Lebron James. But so to do this quickly,

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>teams to win sixty seven plus you have first year

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Steph won a title, first year Stephan Kde won a

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>title together. You have the first year Shaq and Kobe

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>won a title. You have Jordan's Bulls the third time

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>they won a title, and the best Celtics team of

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>all time, the eighty six Celtics. Those are the sixty

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>seven win teams plus the two with that I just

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that didn't win the title. The sixty eight win

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>teams are this year's Thunder. And then you add to

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it the seventy three Celtics not you know, at a

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>disappointing playoffs, and then sixty seven six Ers with Wilt

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>won the title, and then sixty nine win teams Jordan's Bowls,

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the fifth championship, the Laker team that had the thirty

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>three game winning streak in seventy two, the ninety six

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Bulls won seventy two, and then the Warriors the seventy

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>three win Warriors. So that's the company they keep. So

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>there's one kind of hard piece of data, how many

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>games did you win? The other one is were you

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>blowing people out? And teams that finished the year with

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a ten plus point differential? Eighties last year's Celtics and

0:21:53.320 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>then the eight Celtics, Kareem's Bucks in seventy one, the

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Durant first year Durant Warriors, that other Warriors team the

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>first year they won the title, the Bowls a couple times,

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Lakers in seventy two. The Thunder beaten teams

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this year by almost thirteen points per game. So they

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>check both of the hard metric boxes. You then add

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the kind of softer factors. How good was the league

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in that time? I think the league's as talented as

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>it's ever been. What was their path to the finals

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and to a championship? That one probably cuts against them

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit. They are not going through legendary opponents en route,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and they won't face a legendary opponent in the finals.

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They did, however, go through a legendary player in Joker

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and that was a classic set game series. Another kind

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of soft factor. Did they have an all time player

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>on their team all time? I don't know yet, but

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>the guy who had the best season this year and Shae,

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they did. I mean, Shay was unbelievable in the

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>regular season, has been almost as good in the playoffs.

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Would not have would not have an all time player

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 2>make it a better feat.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It might make it more impressive, but it's hard to

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Speaker 1>argue when you're talking about the best single seasons in

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA history, it's and I left out some of the

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>sixty six win teams and some of the best teams

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>ever were sixty six win teams. Lebron's Heat that had

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the twenty seven game winning streak I mentioned earlier, the

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>eight Celtics, which were awesome. Those were the margin of victories.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Kareem's Bucks that you know there are some

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple Lakers teams, one with Magic, one with Kobe.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh those were sixty five, not sixty six. But it

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>would make it more impressive. Maybe demands, But when we're

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about who the greatest teams of all time are,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and if we're trying to do the hypothetical, if they

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>were to match up against each other, right, you want

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to be able to say, our guy can at least

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of look eye to eye with your guy. And

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>if your guy is peak Wilt Chamberlain or peak Michael

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Jordan or peak Larry Bird, and my guy is yeah,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Chauncey Billips and again. And I'm just picking a team

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that won the title, even though they're not in the

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>all time team discussion. That's gonna be a harder argument

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to make. Shay is making an argument that he's building

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>an all time resume. It's a weird one because of

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>how he started, and it was a slow progression, but

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he's just got better and better and better every single year.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I so I am okay with saying this is an

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all time single season. I am not okay with saying

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this is an all time team because what the other

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:24.959
<v Speaker 1>all time teams had was stacked accomplishments, you know, multiple finals, appearances,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple championships, and the teams kind of bleed together. But

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>single season it's that. But that then gets us to

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the point you were making. And I understand Pacer fans maybe,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>or Nick fans even or like, my god, you're acting

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like they won the championship yesterday, and to that I

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>would say, no, I'm not. I actually acted like they

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>won the championship on Monday night, because to me, they did.

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That was the That was the end of the competitive

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 1>portion of this year's NBA season. And that's not to

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>say the Pacers or the Knicks can't beat them in

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a game. But when a team has home court and

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that team beats people in the playoffs at home by

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty one, nineteen, forty three, seven, thirty two, twenty six,

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and thirty with one loss coming on a buzzer beater,

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna win the championship when they also are a

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>team that can, if it were to happen, Demons deal

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>with injury better than any other team in the now.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They can't deal with an injury to Shay, but nobody

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>can lose their best player. They could, but they they

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>could lose JDub or Chet and still win the championship

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>much less lose what I mean, go ahead?

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, yeah, I don't know. I feel like Cheed

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 2>is such a presence. Chet losing Check probably put them.

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think it would change them, but I wouldn't like,

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't write them off any of these other teams,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>if they lost one of their three best guys, you

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>would basically just write them off. You couldn't do it

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>with this team because of how deep they are. So

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I have and I'm not trying to give myself credit here,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I am trying to remind the audience. I guess I

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>was not one of the loud Thunder skeptics. Now. I

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick them to win the championship because I thought

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers could beat them. After I saw the Lakers

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>beat them in a game the Thunder wanted and then

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers play them to a tie until Luca got

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>kicked out, and I was like, Okay, I think the

0:27:57.720 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Lakers are the one team that can give them real

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>prime problems. Maybe Boston. But I thought the Thunder were

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate championship caliber team all year, and the moment

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers went out, I said, I think they're gonna

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>win the title. With all that said, I think the

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>dynasty talk is so silly, and I understand folks argument

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is they are set up so well. And I will

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just make the point that I made on Tuesday again.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>We think every team almost is set up so well

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>when they're in the midst of winning, and to which

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>some people will reply, yeah, but those teams weren't as young.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>That's true that the Bucks in twenty twenty one, or

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the Nuggets in twenty twenty three, or even the Celtics

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>last year weren't as young. However, with the Bucks and

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the Nuggets, we did feel like their best player was

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in already in once they won the title, the historically

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>great conversation, and Shay isn't quite in that yet. Like

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we thought, yes, this Thunder team's younger, but we thought

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that Giannis and Joker in that moment were a tick

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>above where Shay is in this moment. And the other

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>argument people are going to make is yes, but the

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>nugget it's the for the Thunder, it's all that draft

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>capital that they have, And that is true, but it's

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>also a little misleading. So the the Thunder's draft capital

0:29:55.400 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is more quantity than quality. So I'm I'm going to

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>go through it just too. And this is courtesy of

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>real GM to remind people what they have, because what

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see is it's a ton of stuff, and

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a ton of stuff that theoretically they could use

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in trades, but it's not like oh Man, that could

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be the third pick of the draft. Okay, so this

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>year they have the fifteenth pick from Miami and the

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourth pick from the Clippers, at least I think

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>fact checked me in the because I don't have this

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>year's pulled up. Fact check me in the doc if

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong about this year. But they the then next year,

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what they have. They have Houston's pick next season protected

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>one through four, So Houston, we think Houston's going to

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be quite good next year, so a late pick next year.

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And then they have I want to make sure I

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>get this right, the Clippers pick next year. So I

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think the Clippers showed us this year that they are

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be at least a credible team, and so

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are those are fine picks, but none of those appear

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or feel like those are going to be, you know,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I lottery top ten picks, right. And then they have

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Phillies pick next year potentially, and again they only get

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 1>two of these, So these are the best ones they

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>could get. Phillies pick if it falls outside of the

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>top four, and Utah's pick if it falls outside of

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the top eight. The moral of the story is next

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>year they are going to have a bunch of extra picks,

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and they all look like they are not going to

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>be lottery picks because Utah is the only team on

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that list that is likely going to be in the lottery,

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and Utah likely is going to be able to keep

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>their pick because it'll be in the top eight. In

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty seven, they again they get the Clippers pick,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's unprotected. Maybe that could be good. Maybe, and

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Denver's pick, which, assuming Joker doesn't retire, is not going

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to be that good. And in twenty twenty eight they

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>can swap with Dallas. Again, do we think Dallas, now

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that they have Cooper Flag and Anthony Davis is there,

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to be a top five pick? No,

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And then that's really I think they have one more

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Denver pick later, but again, unless we think Joker is

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>going to retire. So the point I'm making in a

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>somewhat convoluted fashion is it's a lot of stuff, but

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not great stuff. Now the argument there would be demons. Yeah,

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but they can package that stuff for a star. And

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that then gets to to me the next interesting domino

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Thunder, which is, yeah, are they going to

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>want to be expensive? Are they going to want to

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in franchise history be a big

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>luxury tax butt up against the apron type of team.

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And my answer to that question is I don't see

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>why they would now. And you can say, well, they

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>want to check right, correct, right, They didn't want to

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>pay it then, And you can be like, well, but

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>now they won a championship. That could cut either way.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you would be like, they want a championship now

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they just want to win, win, win. They also want

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to be like, we want a championship without having a

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>super expensive team, so why do we need one? And

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so it is a different NBA guys, and it's a

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>different NBA. Also in this regard the onl like the

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>guys who have reeled off a bunch are guys who

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>are top ten all time players. The one guy who

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is pretty consensus outside of the top ten who reeled

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>off even two is Isaiah Thomas, and he's firmly in

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty, but outside the top ten. So Joker

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>would have checked those boxes. Little Unlucky some Jamal Murray's injuries,

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jannis could have potentially little Unlucky, uh didn't

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have you know, this type of pick Bounty though, to

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>be fair in Milwaukee, to make up for some of

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>those mistakes. And I'm not saying Shay is not Shaye.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I said all year was the MVP. But it is

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>surprising to me how many people who a month ago

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>were quite convinced the Celtics were about to reel off

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of championships are now convinced the Thunder are

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>about to reel off a bunch of championships. And so

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I you know too long, didn't listen all time single

0:35:55.800 --> 0:36:02.479
<v Speaker 1>season team. Yes, set up pretty well for the future. Yes,

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>going to win this championship without a doubt. Yes, ready

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to pencil them in for multiple titles. No, So that's

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>where I land on Oklahoma City. They will be in

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the mix for years to come, but as a lot

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:30.439
<v Speaker 1>of teams can attest, in the mix doesn't really buy

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you anything in the modern NBA