WEBVTT - Surveillance: Iran Risk Has Gone Down, Eurasia's Rome Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Leie.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. Our

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>top story. I RAN's striking back, firing more than a

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>dozen miss outside the Rocky Air basis hosting US troops.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Minister Muhammed jabats a Reef, tweeting the following around,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>concluded proportionate measures in self defense, adding we do not

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>seek escalation or war, but will defend ourselves against any aggression.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>The focus now assessing the damage done, US official insisting

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>there were no US casualties, and, as Tom points out,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the President expected to address the nation later today. Here's

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to take from Eurasia Group quote it RAN's attacks appear

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>designed for maximum domestic effect with a minimum escalatory risk.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump will likely declined to retaliate militarily. Eurisia joined us now,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Henry rhyme, you write a group global macro analysts joined

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone. Henry, great to catch up with you.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Walk me through what gives you the conviction that Iran

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>has managed to appease the discontent at home and minimize

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of escalatory risk in the region. Hi, good morning,

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Tom and John. I think at this point what our

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>our our biggest question going into last night was what

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump would do once I ran strikes back. We were

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>fairly convinced that Iran would would would do so. The

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>domestic pressure was extreme, and and and and I think

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at what Iran pulled off last night with no

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>US casualties and a clear statement from the leadership that

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that that this round is over, I think gives us

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>confidence that the President can come out today and say

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>mission accomplished, essentially a perhaps a speak a speech version

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of his tweet last night. All as well, the last

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>time we said mission accomplished, that didn't work out so well.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What is going to be the outcome of a president

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>saying in his press conference mission accomplished. How will the

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that be taken by Capitol Hill and far more, how

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>will that be taken by Tehran? Yeah, well, that's perhaps

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad choice of words on my part, but but

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the Iranians will uh take that positively. Frankly, Look,

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we're not out of the wood. Yet

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to emphasize that point the the the Iranians.

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think consider the debt of the Sulimani

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>assassination to be fully paid. And I think we'll see

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a return to the kind of low level attacks, especially

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in the cyber world and in terms of terrorism that

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Iranians have have perfected over the decades. But

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a risk of a direct military clash,

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think assuming the President comes out and says we

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>got the job done, then then then I think that

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>risk has gone down, and let's talk about objective. Secretary

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Pompeio said he wanted to establish an effective deterrence. Question

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>now is whether taking out General Selimony was enough. And

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>after the events of last night, where they feel confident

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that they have established the terrance with that air strike

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>last week, well I think they will. I think the

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the US will be able to point to this moment

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>or quite a few I mean certainly years, if not longer,

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>down down the line, to demonstrate a what it what

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like when the US loses patients uh with

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>with Iranian activity. So so I think that the Iranians

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are are fairly chastened by what happened, and you saw

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that with what they decided to do last night. They

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>launched sophisticated ballistic missiles. Absolutely, but they caused no casualties

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was a single round, if you will, of retaliation.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that demonstrates that the Iranians were were quite spooked.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But Henry, this is so important. I mean, it's like

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a sterile kind of retaliation. Did you say there were

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>no casualties at least based on President's reports? Is there

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>any way to run a war? Well, I mean, uh,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we were we we we were expecting the Iranians to

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>incur some casualties. But but it looks as though there

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>was a good deal of concern about what that um,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>what that would cause. I mean sometimes, I mean with

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>with things like this, you often there is um there's

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>risk in over interpreting actions of a of a kinetic

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>type that we don't know if it was an accident

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or intentional that that nobody was killed here. But I

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>think the totality of the events last night seemed to

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>indicate that the Iranians, uh decided to tone it down

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a notch. Henry. I think what was surprising for many,

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>even experts looking at the country is that this was

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a conventional strike launched from Iran by Iranian forces. It

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>was direct forces to direct forces. This wasn't fire proxies,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't at US allies. And I think that's what

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone was quite surprised by, Henry. Do you really think

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that we can just move on from that as the

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>dice progress, Well, I mean, I think we can move

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>on in terms of uh that there will be a

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>return to a kind of low level of of conflict

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of pervaded over the past few years, and

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary levels of of tension and a good deal of concern,

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>especially about the Iranian nuclear program, which I think is

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a clear option for the Iranian to continue to escalate

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But but I would say that the

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:38.559
<v Speaker 1>risk and and and and panic about a Iran US

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>military to military confrontation that takes out shipping in the

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Persian Gulf, destroys energy infrastructure in a big way. I

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think that risk has gone way down after last night.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're just joining us, Henry rome with US. Here's

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the Eurasia Group, and of course we've been featuring their

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>top risks of and and we're thrilled the Dector room

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>could be with us here a few days ago and

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>now joins us on this important morning. What I heard

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Uh, Henry, from Rupert Harrison over in London

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>with his government work with the United Kingdom, from Sir

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Tom Beckett with on the ground experience in the Middle East,

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and from Ambassador Hormats was very simple the tone of

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the President. What kind of tone should the President affect

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this morning? Well, I think the most uh productive from

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of trying to deescalate the conflicts would be not

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to go on a victory parade about the killing of

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>General Sulamani, not to kind of rub it in the

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Iranians face, either the the assassination or the ineffectiveness of

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the UH missile launch last night. Unfortunately, I don't think

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the President's style. I mean the I think it

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>would have things would have turned out quite differently if

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the US had actually just not claimed responsibility for the

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Silman on the assassination, as you know, in the kind

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of Israeli practice of just letting it be uh, letting

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it be vague. But but but I think the President

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>will find it hard not to botht uh and and

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps gloat a bit this morning. But I think at

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, as as long as he's

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhat restrained, and I would hope that the past few

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>days have demonstrated to him clearly the risks that going

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>up against Iran can entail, then then then I would

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>expect things to be all right. Henry. By now, we're

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>all familiar with the president's approach, but over the last

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve hours he has been quite restrained. We have had

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a single twite suggesting he'll address the nation later this morning.

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>It made me just wonder what was happening inside the

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>White House last night when the president was so restrained

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the decision making process at the White House? Who is

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>informing the decision making process? Are they providing a menu

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of responses for the President of United States again or

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>strongly counseling for the president to do one thing over

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the other. Your thoughts on what's happening right now as

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States calculates its response, Sure, I would expect

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that that that that the military, as always, will provide

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>him a range of of options. Though I think at

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this stage she will be strongly counseled to take this

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>blow and uh call it a day, if you will.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the risk of retaliating significantly and and having

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>this spiral further is just very high. And I think

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he's at a he's at a point now politically where

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he can claim victory. Will final question for you, Henry

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>China's role expected to be in the United States next

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.599
<v Speaker 1>week on January for a signing ceremony closer to the

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Iranian certainly more so than the United States. What do

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you think that role will be in the coming weeks,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>if they will establish one at all. So, I think

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>from the Chinese point of view, their big objectives here

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with regards to Iran is no war and no nuclear

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>weapon and everything else in between there is negotiable. Think

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as the Iranians continue to escalate on the nuclear program,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are one of the more important countries to

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>watch about how much pressure they are on Iran to

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>try to keep things contained. So, yes, they are closer

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to Iran, but they also have a lot of leverage,

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so I would expect them to play an active, albeit

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>quiet role in trying to tone things down or urge

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Iranian the tone things now. Andry Rome, thank you

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so much. Will you raise your group this morning as

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we move through the morning, with the markets doing better.

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>John Farro now in our studio is an important guests,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>an important guests. Indeed, great to have you with us.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Pop hole mass kissing to associates, Vice Chairman, I'm best

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>always great to catch up with you. The allies have gone,

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>miss Where are they? Where are the Europeans? Why they

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>not more vocal over the last week? Well, I think

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the US has kept Europe more or less out of

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>its diplomacy on a wide range of issues. There are

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously major trade frictions uh and the US did not

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>notify its allies with respect to the strike and the

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>killing of General Solimani, and doesn't seem to have been

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>engaging the Europeans on virtually anything that has to do

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Middle East, which is a major departure from

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the past, when the United States worked hand in glove

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Europeans on a wide range of Middle Eastern issues,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not always convincingly, but at least it worked with them.

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a hope this morning that we avoid escalation risk,

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>underlined by the fact that we're just hearing from a

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>US official that there were no US casualties in those

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>strikes overnight. But the question remains America's future in a rock?

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Bob Well? I think for the moment,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>now we understand that we need to do what we can.

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope we understand least to help stabilized a very

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>unstable Iraqi situation. If Iraq continues to deteriorate and become

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>more unstable, They're two beneficiaries. One is Iran. Iran's already

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>extremely influential in Iraq because Iraq is predominantly a Sunni

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a Shia country, although Saddam was Sunny, the government now

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and most of the leaders are Shia. And the other

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>is that the Russians, now having made major steps forward

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and increasing their influence in Syria, will now be aiming

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to increase their influence in Iraq as well. Putin's visit

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>to Syria, I'm sure it was not an accident and

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>probably was planned before the killing of Sulimani, but um

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>now he is playing a major role in Syria and

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>will probably attempt to do so to a greater degree

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in Iraq. The Russians and the Iranians don't always get along,

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but they both want to defeat Isis, and they both

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll be competing for influence but also trying

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate to the extent they can and and and

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Ron wants to get the US out of the region,

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>so does Russia. They work together to do it or

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>will they also have conflict between them. And that's the

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>final point, is perhaps the most important point. When you

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>try and illuminate the path forward, what the future looks like,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at individual objectives and quite clearly

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians making it clear right at night their objective

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is not war, but their objective is to get the

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>United States out of the region. How do they come

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>about doing that, Well, that's a complicated thing. First of all,

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>they have increased their influence in Baghdad as as we've seen.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And second now they're going to portray the us UH

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in an adverse light as a result of all this

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and demonstrate that they UH have backed off and try

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to deescalate and I want to play a greater role.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't want more tensions in the region. They're going

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to advertise that point as well. But the other is

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that they still want to demonstrate they're going to be

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>tough on ISIS that ISIS is not defeated, and Iraq

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>needs them to defeat ISIS. And if the US is

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>an uncertain ally and an uncertain presence, then the Iraqi

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>government will have to call on them to a greater

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>degree to make sure ISSIS doesn't undergo a resurgence and

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>visitor homs. You served the nation under both Republicans and

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats over the years, the last tour of duty with

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Clinton and with President Obama. What do we most

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>get wrong about the day of a given secretary of state?

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we see Secretary of State Pompeo come out

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and make comments and that what's the behind the scenes

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>reality for any secretary of state, particularly given this moment.

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Rule one for the secretary of State is make sure

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of two things. One that you have influence over the president,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that the president listens to you, that you have access

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to the president, that you are heard uh not only

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>by the President by but by his national security apparatus

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in the White House. But the second is that you

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>understand what the president wants. Because the most confusing thing

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to other countries is if the Secretary of State says

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing or thinks one thing, and the president says

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>or thinks something else. It's very confusing to both our

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>allies because they don't know who to listen to and

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to our adversaries since they're not sure what to do,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and therefore they tend to take advantage of those gaps.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And John we saw that, of course with this question

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>about the cultural targets within Iran, and that had to

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be when it's a final question, let's ask it. How

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>much dayline is the between what Secretary Pompeio would like

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to do and what the President of United States ultimately wants.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Hard to say at this point, but Secretary Pompeio has

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>taken in general a much tougher line on Iran. The

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>President ran for office on the ground, so pulling the

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>US back from the Middle East in general, So there

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly are differences in emphasis. In the end, the President,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of course prevails in these things. He's the commander in chief. Ambassador,

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. Ambassador Robert

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Hormess's with Kissinger Associates, joining us now in studio as

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman who's truly expert on this. Greg Ferrell was

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a distinguished career in journalism looking at process of courts,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not criminality, not civil issues, but just simply the making

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of the process what is the process of this press conference?

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts after observing an hour? In five minutes?

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg Um, First of all, this is an extraordinary thing

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to have a chief executive fighting allegations in a different country.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>This the whole saga that's gotten to to this point.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So good question. I was thinking about this. What's his

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>point today? A Um, this should be. I think, like

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors, he needs to make a case that the

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Japanese authorities are wrong, that there's something wrong with the system.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a legitimate, you know, platform to take. I think

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he's getting into too much detail too soon. Um that

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a twenty minute summary of this is what's wrong. I'm

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>happy to play this out over time. But he's like

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>he's trying a case right now this morning and in

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in the study of this that you have done and

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you're truly expert in this. Does he hire Sullivan and

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Cromweller name another law firm to go out and represent

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>him in Japan or with the Japanese legal system? Is

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>he is outside of Japan? Can he do that? I

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I do know he's been handled by a

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>number of major law firms, including Paul weiss Um where

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>his primary U S firm over there. But I think

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that bridge has been burned. I think any like attempt

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>by a firm to at least it too soon right now.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And he's he's getting personal. He mentioned Pearl Harbor like

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's going ballistic right off. Ballistic is a

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>professional legal phrase of journalists ues. We would not want

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to use it. Actually after thought went ballistic last night.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Now that I think Greg, seriously here, what's the next

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>step for him after this lengthy press conference in Q

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and A, Um, this continues to be a public relations battle. Um,

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he needs to radio. You gotta keep talking. Okay, sorry,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>except you're so thoughtful. You always got me to be slower.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>But he needs to keep up the public relations battle.

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs to bring other people in. He

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>has to do a better job or at least continue

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>with trying to demonstrate the the what he described as

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the patent unfairness of how he was treated in Japan.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is going to go on for some time.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think ideally, if you could find a neutral third

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>country like the US where something like this could be adjudicated, uh,

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be a you know, there must be a

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>face saving way. I think that's what he's going to

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>look for in the Japanese eventually might look for a

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>face saving way without them backing down completely. Can he

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>leave and go somewhere? Can he go very quickly here?

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Can he go to Paris? Can he come to New York? No?

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>He can go to Paris, yes, New York no. Because

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>because strangely, the United States signed an extradition treaty with Japan,

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just along with South Korea. I'm not I didn't. I'm

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>not sure why this happened, but the fact that it

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>does have it means that it doesn't mean US will

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to turn him over, but it just you know,

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>creates a legal mechanism for that to happen. Greg, thank

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us on a short notice.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Mr Ferrell truly expert on the travails of Mr Gone.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>The scope and scale of Africa is extraordinary and any

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>time we could get a vision into it, it is

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>quite important. There's a gentleman in Nigeria who, through family

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and his grandfather and great grandfather were quite successful in

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>West African business. There is a gentleman in Nigeria who

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>has done better than good David Rubinstein with a peer

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to peer conversation with Mr Dan Gotti of Nigeria. Here

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is Mr Rubenstein and the scope of Africa. Okay, so

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Africa itself generally, are you bullish on

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Africa's prospects as a place to in which people can

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 1>invest private equity firms or industrial companies to invest. I

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think I'm very, very bullish when it comes to Africa,

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>and it is the main reason David to they we

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>have twenty billion dollars though I invest in all you

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>know what tele which will finish by the end of

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>next day. First quota of you, I mean in the

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>next two years. Listen in the next two years, David

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Rubinstein speaking with Elko. Then go to Mr Rubinstein joins us. Now, David,

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what an interesting individual. Give our American audience a little

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>scope and scale of who this gentleman is. Okay. Aliko

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Dante is the wealthiest man in Africa. So it's a

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>continent of a billion plus people and he is by

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>far the wealthiest person. Range. His net worth ranges from

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty to thirty billion, depending on the stock market by

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the time. Um he's a Nigerian. His he was from

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a very wealthy family, but he was not given money

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>when he started, and he basically built the largest cement

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>business in Nigeria and then the largest cement business in Africa.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And he's used that to build into other areas petro chemicals,

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly building a large refinery, the largest refinery now in Nigeria. UM.

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>He is a very honest person, very philanthropic. He's very

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>involved with Bill Gates and philanthropic things in Africa and

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>around the world. So he's quite pressive individual, very modest

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on assuming in Nigeria. He drives his own car around

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>without security guards. UM. He's very accessible to people, so

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he's quite a likable person in addition to being very successful.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And David, what's so extraordinary and I'd love for you

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>to comment on this with your expertise at Carlyle. He

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>did what's so hard to do. He didn't sell out

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to Lafarge years ago, did he? He did not. Um.

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Lafarge wanted to buy him and at the time he

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>probably could have used Lafarge because he was struggling at

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. But he uh built this big business and

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>it's by far the biggest cement business now. He was

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>probably aided by the fact though he wasn't responsible for it.

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not easy to import cement into Nigeria, and

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>so by building the biggest cement company in Nigeria, he

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>had a very large market uh in which to work.

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But he's built cement businesses in other countries in Africa

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. So very impressive, very smart, low key. If

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you were to have dinner with him, you wouldn't realize

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.120
<v Speaker 1>he's fabulously wealthy or fabulously successful. Were very well known

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in Africa, very modest and unassuming David. It's interesting. This

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is a fascinating interview from my perspective because I just

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I was not aware of Mr Dante. Is he have

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>any sense that he would like to raise his profile

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the West. Well, you may know that from time

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to time you'll see ads on CNN, dan Gote Industries

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, and those are probably raising his profile

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But most of his investments, I would say,

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>far as I know, of his investments are really in Africa.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't really diversified out of Africa yet. He might

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>do that at some point. Um. He has a number

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of daughters and they will ultimately be involved in investing

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>some of his money. No sons and he's uh, you know,

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a well respected person. He doesn't use politics to get ahead. Uh.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>He knows all the political figures, but he basically built

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>a very big business and that's the source of his strength.

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>One time for one more question, David Rubinsteter, And of

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>course this goes to something John Farrell said to me.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Farrell emailed and said, you've got to ask, do you

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>have an up to eight on his desire for the

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>number one Arsenal fan in the world to take out

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Arsenal give us the Rubenstein update. He is fascinated by,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>uh by what we what is called football, we call soccer,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that, uh um, it's something that

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>has an appeal to people in certain parts of the

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>world that Americans probably can't understand. But it's much bigger

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to people in Africa or in Europe than football American

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>football is to us, or to baseball is to us.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>And so he is a gigantic football fan. There's no

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it, exactly. David Rubenstein, thank you so much

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. David Rubinstein show Peer to Peer Conversations

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>airs tonight on Bloomberg Television at nine pm. Wall Street Times.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaking with the Dan got a Group founder president CEO

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Aliko dan Gote uh is interesting, richest man in Africa

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and twenty billion dollars. I didn't know about this guy

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's just extraordinary. You know. Some of the

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>moves be created in Africa. Yeah, in a major shoutout

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to France and Laque was really driven for the Bloomberg

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>study of what he has done for Nigeria. Paul. This

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:06.959
<v Speaker 1>hearkens back to when you and I were starting out

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in international investment. Your only option in most countries was

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>by shares in the phone company for by shares in

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the cement company. That was really yet exactly without exaggeration,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly and that you know, I kind of got an

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the cement business, the construction business when you

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>started looking at Latin America years ago, and that was

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways to play the growth in developing

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>markets such as Latin American. Of course, uh, that would

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously apply to Africa as well. So UM, I'm not surprising.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you think about developing markets, developing economies,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what do they need to build? Maybe that's what Jim

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>O'Neal meant when he said brick right, the brick countries

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, anyways, David Rubinstein tonight and through the week

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>when Mr Dangote on Africa. Thanks for listening to the

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you refer. I'm on Twitter at

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.