Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Joe Biden declares victory,
Speaker 1: but it isn't over yet, folks. Do Democrats now demand
Speaker 1: unity or a purge? What about those dance parties on
Speaker 1: the streets of major cities. No COVID problems, a fiser
Speaker 1: vaccine that maybe ninety percent effective, and Governor Cuomo doesn't
Speaker 1: want Trump to distribute it. This is the Buck Sexon Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake America great, You're
Speaker 1: a great American. Again, the Buck Sexon Show begins. He's
Speaker 1: a great guy. No, welcome everybody to the Buck Sexton Show. Yes,
Speaker 1: I know. We are now in a country where we're expected,
Speaker 1: according to the media, according the Democrat Party, expected to
Speaker 1: just accept the premature declaration of Joe Biden that he
Speaker 1: is in fact the president of the United States. We're
Speaker 1: supposed to accept this as gospel. And anybody right now
Speaker 1: who speaks out in favor of just checking to make
Speaker 1: sure I have not yet come on this show and
Speaker 1: said the election was stolen. I have my suspicions about
Speaker 1: how for aught occurred and how therefore it is possible
Speaker 1: that there were certainly a state or two or more
Speaker 1: that we're stolen. But I do not know, so I
Speaker 1: will not say I cannot prove, so I will not declare.
Speaker 1: But I want answers. I insist we get answers. And
Speaker 1: this is where it comes comes down to all of
Speaker 1: us asking for process. Here there is a process. The
Speaker 1: courts exist for exactly this kind of a dispute in
Speaker 1: an election, whether it was for local dog catcher or
Speaker 1: presidents of the United States, in a disputed election, you
Speaker 1: take it to the courts. That's what happens. That's every
Speaker 1: bit as much a part of our system as the
Speaker 1: actual process of voting and counting votes and everything else
Speaker 1: that we have seen. Right, So, Democrats that are trying
Speaker 1: to shut this down and shout down those that are
Speaker 1: asking for answers are acting in bad faith, which is
Speaker 1: entirely unsurprising. You should expect a lot more of that.
Speaker 1: There will be nothing but that until Joe Biden takes office.
Speaker 1: If you even raise the agreed upon irregularities, irregularities that
Speaker 1: always somehow seem to favor Joe Biden. If you point
Speaker 1: out those irregularities, you are a conspiracy theorist. But it's reported.
Speaker 1: I mean, we know about what happened in Michigan where
Speaker 1: you had software that changed thousands of votes to Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: That's fact, that's not disputed. And I understand they'll say, well,
Speaker 1: we fix that, Okay. Do we know if that happened
Speaker 1: in dozens of other counties, including in other states that
Speaker 1: use the same software. Has anyone checked the look into this?
Speaker 1: Why do states have automatic recounts? Just think about this.
Speaker 1: If we're really going to speak about our system and
Speaker 1: the process, why do some states have in place an
Speaker 1: automatic recount and it is triggered if the numbers are
Speaker 1: at a certain threshold. Is that because people are conspiracy theorists.
Speaker 1: Is that because they're making unfounded allegations of cheating, or
Speaker 1: is it because anybody who looks at a highly complex
Speaker 1: and ever changing especially this year thanks to Democrats election system,
Speaker 1: both for the voting and the processing of ballots. Anyone
Speaker 1: who looks at this and is honest recognizes that they
Speaker 1: are going to be problems. They're going to be problems
Speaker 1: that are accidental. They are going to be problems that
Speaker 1: are intentional. There will be irregularities, mess ups, and fraud.
Speaker 1: That's why in a really close election, you have a recount.
Speaker 1: It's to account for those things. If you lose by enough,
Speaker 1: it doesn't really matter. That's the way that we've come
Speaker 1: to accept election calls. If you are downed by an
Speaker 1: enormous margin. You'll notice we're not challenging the results in California.
Speaker 1: We're not challenging the results in New York. We understand
Speaker 1: that there are states that Trump lost obviously, but there
Speaker 1: are states where Trump was winning by a very small
Speaker 1: amount and then a day, two, three days later, he
Speaker 1: was losing by a very small amount, and that demands investigation. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: What's the problem with that. There is no problem with
Speaker 1: it other than Democrats want to have victory parties right away.
Speaker 1: They want to jump right to the part where we
Speaker 1: all have to just accept their demands. And anybody who
Speaker 1: has any questions about the legitimacy of this, Biden win
Speaker 1: is a bad person who doesn't believe in math and
Speaker 1: science and whatever else. They're going to say, elections, you're
Speaker 1: undermining our democracy. They have been saying, and I don't
Speaker 1: think the Democrats have really cut onto this. They've been
Speaker 1: saying that Trump and a supporters have been undermining democracy
Speaker 1: for four years now. Really everything we want and do.
Speaker 1: Just casting a vote for Trump, just speaking out in
Speaker 1: support of Trump, they say, is undermining democracy. So that
Speaker 1: charge doesn't have quite the teeth that it used to.
Speaker 1: People aren't saying, oh my gosh, I don't want to
Speaker 1: be somebody who undermines democracy, so I'll do whatever the
Speaker 1: Libs tell me to. There are real legal challenges under way.
Speaker 1: Do I think it is likely at this point that
Speaker 1: they will be willing to flip? Now that's a different
Speaker 1: thing than do I think there was fraud? Yes? Do
Speaker 1: I know how much? No? I don't. Do I think
Speaker 1: that courts will be willing in different states, and you know,
Speaker 1: depending on what the specifics of the allegation may be.
Speaker 1: Do I think the courts will be willing to overturn
Speaker 1: this election. That's a question we all have to really
Speaker 1: think about. Do you believe that a federal judge, let's say,
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania, or a federal judge in Arizona, any federal
Speaker 1: judge is going to be willing to take the heat
Speaker 1: of flipping that state. You could say, well, buck, they'll
Speaker 1: kick it up to the Supreme Court. Well, that all
Speaker 1: depends on how the challenges go through the system. Do
Speaker 1: you really think they'll be willing to do that. I
Speaker 1: am not confident about that, and so at this stage
Speaker 1: I say, we must fight. Of course, we fight, and
Speaker 1: we're happy warriors. We're not bitter, we're not spiteful toward
Speaker 1: the other side. You know, they had a big victory
Speaker 1: celebration all weekend. We'll talk about that, because all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, social distancing isn't really a concern anymore. Isn't
Speaker 1: that interesting? But they had a huge victory weekend, and
Speaker 1: for the first time in a long time, I saw
Speaker 1: New York City happy, and that was I will tell
Speaker 1: you that. It was a nice change from the misery
Speaker 1: and despair largely driven by stupid Democrat policies and a
Speaker 1: media invested in an apocalyptic narrative of constant COVID panic.
Speaker 1: But we were relieved of that burden psychologically for a
Speaker 1: couple of days in the city. But I'm happy to
Speaker 1: see people, my fellow Americans. I'm happy to see that
Speaker 1: they were joyous for a little bit, even if they
Speaker 1: were premature in their celebrations, and if they were making
Speaker 1: a mockery of the very COVID rules that they scream
Speaker 1: at all. The rest of us. A lot of people
Speaker 1: walking around without masks online people not everybody, of course,
Speaker 1: a lot of people were not social distancing. I think
Speaker 1: social distancing and masks outside are largely unnecessary and often absurd,
Speaker 1: But that's always my position. They're the ones that change
Speaker 1: depending on what the political needs of the moment may be.
Speaker 1: And so here we are friends, we make a decision,
Speaker 1: we fight on what are the choices that we're going
Speaker 1: to cave. No, we owe it to ourselves. In fact,
Speaker 1: we owe it to our democracy if we're going to
Speaker 1: start speaking in these grandiose terms. We owe it to
Speaker 1: our system to make sure that people of good faith
Speaker 1: and goodwill who approach these issues with honesty, that those
Speaker 1: people can look look at their fellow Americans who voted
Speaker 1: for Joe Biden and say, Okay, it looks like you
Speaker 1: actually did win this one. Now let's get to the
Speaker 1: business of preventing Biden and they left wing Democrats who
Speaker 1: are going to be controlling him from ruining the country.
Speaker 1: But I'm willing to get to that point. I'm not
Speaker 1: a dead end or I'm not sitting here and saying
Speaker 1: it's not possible that Donald Trump lost. It looks shaky
Speaker 1: to me the way that this happened. But it's a
Speaker 1: reality that I take into account, and we should remember
Speaker 1: that that something the other side has already shown us
Speaker 1: they are not willing to do. They lied about the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen election in calculated and vicious fashion. I mean
Speaker 1: they were willing to not just use the fabrication of
Speaker 1: Russia collusion against the Trump administration to undermine it and
Speaker 1: to try and stifle and in every way it could
Speaker 1: slow the agenda, but also they weaponized it legally. I mean,
Speaker 1: they used it as the basis for a criminal investigation.
Speaker 1: They were trying to prosecute people around a total fabrication,
Speaker 1: and it was all driven by their hatred of Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and their rejection of the will is expressed by
Speaker 1: the American people in twenty sixteen. So we already know
Speaker 1: who they are, We already know what the Democrat mentality
Speaker 1: is around all of this. We also know that there
Speaker 1: were no riots this weekend from Trump supporters, no businesses
Speaker 1: burned to the ground. Morons at the Washington Post, the
Speaker 1: New York Times, other places. They were coming after me
Speaker 1: this weekend. Well look at this person here or that
Speaker 1: person there who said something mean or you know, whatever
Speaker 1: whatever it may be. Oh okay, I didn't say there's
Speaker 1: no such thing as a Trump supporter who steps out
Speaker 1: of line. I said that the Trump movement and the
Speaker 1: overwhelming ninety nine point nine percent of Trump supporters are peaceful,
Speaker 1: law abiding and accept where we are right now in
Speaker 1: this process, and that Democrats would not do that. The barricades,
Speaker 1: the wooden barriers around businesses here in New York City,
Speaker 1: they've started to come down. Why because Democrats aren't going
Speaker 1: to riot. We all know, we all know. That's what
Speaker 1: that's all about. That's what they were preparing for. I
Speaker 1: think weren't worried about Trump supporters. And what does that say?
Speaker 1: You know, whenever you have a moment where you think, gosh,
Speaker 1: it'd be so much easier, and it would. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna lie to you, especially if you live in a
Speaker 1: city so much easier, Biden Harris. Yeah, and all the celebrities,
Speaker 1: and the celebrities will like your tweets, and the fancy
Speaker 1: rich people and the Democrat Party will say, yeah, you're
Speaker 1: one of us. It's so it's so seductive to just
Speaker 1: join this mob of the Democrat Party that thinks that
Speaker 1: all you have to do to be a good person
Speaker 1: is be a part of it. Yeah, man, then you're
Speaker 1: then you're one of the good people. I turn, I said,
Speaker 1: do you just remember that that same political party is
Speaker 1: responsible for rioting and looting and mayhem across the country
Speaker 1: that continues to this day. Just over the weekend, I
Speaker 1: think it out in Portland, but who even knows they
Speaker 1: were going out and demanding people BLM protests. There's demanding
Speaker 1: solidarity from people eating dinner. And that's threatening. When a
Speaker 1: mob demands you pay political obedience to them and you're
Speaker 1: just trying to live your life, that's threatening. That's not okay.
Speaker 1: Those are all democrats doing that. These are all leftists
Speaker 1: and activists who are making these demands, who are inflicting
Speaker 1: themselves upon other people. So at least we should take
Speaker 1: some credit for that. We should have a moment where
Speaker 1: we get to say when it comes to issues of
Speaker 1: being an adult and respecting the process as it is
Speaker 1: and understanding that this isn't about going scorched earth and
Speaker 1: burning down the country. If we can't have control of it,
Speaker 1: that's not our approach. We are better than the other
Speaker 1: side when it comes to that. So just remember that
Speaker 1: they hate it when You'll say that because they know
Speaker 1: that it's true. Not a single business owner, not a
Speaker 1: single person walking down the street peaceably across the country,
Speaker 1: has any fear of a Trump mob coming after them.
Speaker 1: It's not true in the other direction, It's not true
Speaker 1: about Democrats, BLM supporters, Antifa, and we all know it.
Speaker 1: What does that tell you? But just remember, as these
Speaker 1: legal challenges begin to make their way through this process,
Speaker 1: that they are completely legitimate to ask these questions, to
Speaker 1: pose these challenges in the right forum, in the right way,
Speaker 1: and we continue to fight. This is not over yet.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. Well, it is a regional increase that
Speaker 1: we're seeing, we are testing more and frankly, George, I'm
Speaker 1: not going to take advice from Governor Cuomo. He has
Speaker 1: the second worst death rate per one hundred thousand people
Speaker 1: in this name. He's at one hundred and seventy three
Speaker 1: deaths per one hundred thousand kept per capita. South Dakota's
Speaker 1: at fifty four. I appreciated that President Trump gave us
Speaker 1: the flexibility to do the right thing in our state
Speaker 1: and will continue to do that. He let me do
Speaker 1: my job, but The other thing that I think is
Speaker 1: going on here, George, is that this is all premature.
Speaker 1: This is a premature conversation because we have not finished
Speaker 1: counting votes. There are states that have not been called in.
Speaker 1: Back in two thousand, al Gore was given his day
Speaker 1: in court. We should give President Trump his day in court.
Speaker 1: Let the process unfold. Because George, we live in a republic.
Speaker 1: We are a government that gets its power from the
Speaker 1: consent of the government, that is, the people. They give
Speaker 1: their consent on election day. Election day needs to be fair, honest,
Speaker 1: and transparent, and we need to be sure that we
Speaker 1: had an honest election before we decide who gets to
Speaker 1: give in the White House. Christy Noma's spot on here,
Speaker 1: I also think she should be talked about more as
Speaker 1: the part of the future really of the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: Just exceptional. I'm I'm a Christy Gnome fan as much
Speaker 1: as I'm a fan of anybody in politics. I always
Speaker 1: try to keep a little bit of a distance from
Speaker 1: politicians in general. But she's she's pretty darn good. And
Speaker 1: what she's saying here she handles two critical points. And
Speaker 1: we'll get to the Cuomo issue later. And this this
Speaker 1: new era of the fight against COVID. Some big news
Speaker 1: today that I will get to as well about vaccines
Speaker 1: and what we can expect now as a country going forward.
Speaker 1: But al Gore did get his day in court. We
Speaker 1: should not be cowed. We should not submit to the
Speaker 1: demands of the Democrats right now, which is that we
Speaker 1: just move on, we just quit. You know, do you
Speaker 1: do you want to see what really happened here? Or
Speaker 1: do you want to listen the bride stouter. I was like,
Speaker 1: really here, excuse me, We're need to be real journalists
Speaker 1: here sit and has a lot of real journalists, and well,
Speaker 1: you know, election denial is the plate ten. I do
Speaker 1: think at the same time, we should all recognize that
Speaker 1: there is election denihalism going on. There are crazy conspiracy
Speaker 1: theories out there being read by millions of people. Tens
Speaker 1: of millions of people are seeing this stuff on Fox
Speaker 1: News about voter fraud, and it is real. An election
Speaker 1: denihilism is real, and it has to be called out.
Speaker 1: Although I understand why the Biden campaign is trying to
Speaker 1: move past it. Yeah, move past it. Being the operative
Speaker 1: part of all this, of course the Biden campaign wants
Speaker 1: to move past it. Let's just as a thought experiment.
Speaker 1: What do you think happens in this country if we
Speaker 1: I'm telling you right now, I want to be very clear.
Speaker 1: We don't have this yet, and I don't know if
Speaker 1: we will. But even if we get one absolutely clear
Speaker 1: case of election fraud, one straight up, they were meaning
Speaker 1: Democrats in one of these pivotal areas were cheating. It
Speaker 1: was intentional. I'm red handed. They were caught. And let's
Speaker 1: say it involved a few thousand votes, okay, which would
Speaker 1: not necessarily although it could change some of these dates,
Speaker 1: but wouldn't necessarily be the margin of victory or defeat.
Speaker 1: But if we find one, trust me when I tell
Speaker 1: you right now, the Democrats they won't even blink, and
Speaker 1: they'll say it's just one, just one bad apple, just
Speaker 1: one instance. Of course, we always knew there was gonna
Speaker 1: be something. They're gonna forget about all the claims that
Speaker 1: there was no fraud, which is what they're saying, or
Speaker 1: there's no fraud, that's a conspiracy, the conspiracy theories. Brian
Speaker 1: Stelter says there's no fraud, and then we moved to Okay,
Speaker 1: we'll find maybe that wasn't true. And I think everyone
Speaker 1: needs to be prepared for the fact that the Democrat
Speaker 1: apparatus and the media, no matter how much fraud is uncovered,
Speaker 1: will claim that Joe Biden won this elect They'll never change.
Speaker 1: I will accept depending on how these court challenges go,
Speaker 1: the possibility that Trump did in fact lose this election.
Speaker 1: But I'm telling you to prepare yourself right now. It
Speaker 1: simply doesn't matter to the Democrats. They will not accept
Speaker 1: it if these court challenges or if absolute clear fraud
Speaker 1: is established, because it's not about what's right, it's about power.
Speaker 1: It's about being in charge. And now they think their
Speaker 1: guy will be in charge and they're not giving that
Speaker 1: up no matter what. So all they're talking now about, oh,
Speaker 1: undermining our democracy. Just remember that because if we uncover
Speaker 1: any fraud, you'll see who they really are. They'll become
Speaker 1: fraud denialists. Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Oh, those of you
Speaker 1: for President Trump, I understand. And the disappointment an I've
Speaker 1: lost a couple of times myself. But now let's give
Speaker 1: each other a chance. It's time to put away the
Speaker 1: harsh rhetoric, lower the temperature, see each other again, listen
Speaker 1: to each other again, and to make progress, we have
Speaker 1: to stop treating our opponents as our enemies. They are
Speaker 1: not our enemies. They're Americans. They're Americans. It's not gonna
Speaker 1: be that easy, Joe. Sorry, not gonna just right now.
Speaker 1: Let bygones be bygones. A lot of US seventy plus
Speaker 1: million of US who voted for Donald Trump, have very
Speaker 1: clear memory of what the Democrats were saying about not
Speaker 1: just Trump but his supporters for the last four years.
Speaker 1: They claimed this president was a traitor. They claimed he
Speaker 1: was a rapist. They claimed he was out literally at
Speaker 1: like crazy right, meaning he'd have to be removed with
Speaker 1: the twenty fifth Amendment, or that he was not of
Speaker 1: sound mind. They've claimed that he is a racist, gives
Speaker 1: aid and comfort to the ku Klux Klan, that he's
Speaker 1: a white nationalist. They said the most horrible things imaginal
Speaker 1: about the president and used those allegations, those baseless, moronic allegations,
Speaker 1: as a club to attack his supporters. How could you
Speaker 1: if you vote for Trump, you're a racist too if
Speaker 1: you've which is so fascinating considering what we saw among
Speaker 1: the surge in Black and Latino voters for Trump after
Speaker 1: he was president for four years, right, so they saw
Speaker 1: who this guy was in office in his actions, never
Speaker 1: mind the rhetoric or in campaign, they said, and more
Speaker 1: Black and Latino voters God bless him said, yeah, I
Speaker 1: want more of this guy. This is actually better, better
Speaker 1: for America, better for our communities. But now you have
Speaker 1: this dichotomy, you have this separation the Democrats between the
Speaker 1: calls for unity and the calls for a purge. Now
Speaker 1: the unity calls are laughable because they still have utter
Speaker 1: disdain for Trump voters. They haven't changed at all. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden didn't run on a platform of I'm going to
Speaker 1: make I'm going to make the country a better place,
Speaker 1: because even if you're not a Democrat, you're going to
Speaker 1: see that everything that I do is on the up
Speaker 1: and off. And I'm no. He ran on Trump is
Speaker 1: the most awful human being ever and killed two hundred
Speaker 1: thousand people with COVID. It's like he coughed on them
Speaker 1: himself and made them all die. That was really the
Speaker 1: thrust of the Biden campaign. I'm not Trump, and Trump
Speaker 1: is almost worse than Hitler, So vote for me. And
Speaker 1: we all remember that, and we remember the Special Council,
Speaker 1: the Russia collusion farce, remember the sham impeachment. Nancy Pelosi, Well,
Speaker 1: you remember all of this, and they want us to
Speaker 1: just pretend none of that happened. They want us to
Speaker 1: act like we're all just friends. Now. Now, remember we're Republicans,
Speaker 1: we're Conservatives. So yeah, we've always viewed our fellow Americans
Speaker 1: as just that there are fellow Americans. We're not We're
Speaker 1: not going out there threatening anybody. We're not burning down
Speaker 1: buildings or rioting in neighborhoods and attacking cops and making
Speaker 1: all kinds of crazy demands. Not gathering with all my
Speaker 1: media allies outnumbering the other side ten to one, as
Speaker 1: the Democrats due to us and demanding they be deep
Speaker 1: platform that we don't do those things. But that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that we're going to forget. These calls for unity
Speaker 1: are going to fade very quickly when we see that
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party of today has no interest whatsoever in
Speaker 1: reaching out to the other side on anything. It's the
Speaker 1: Democrats want what they want on all of this. They
Speaker 1: want they want amnesty. Trust me, they're going to go
Speaker 1: for that. That's going to be the first thing they
Speaker 1: really try to get done. You know, the Biden campaign
Speaker 1: has already said they're assuming, of course, that he's won,
Speaker 1: and they they've already said what his early executive actions
Speaker 1: will be. He's going to repeal the so called Muslim
Speaker 1: travel ban, which is not even in any way an
Speaker 1: accurate description. Now it included North Korea and Venezuela, but anyway,
Speaker 1: they're gonna repeal that, fine whatever, you know, they better hope,
Speaker 1: they better hope that that one doesn't come back to
Speaker 1: a bite them. Who knows, but they're going to repeal that.
Speaker 1: They're going to get rid of the Mexico City rules,
Speaker 1: so they're going to make sure that taxpayer dollars are
Speaker 1: going for abortion. That's like a really big thing for
Speaker 1: Democrats right away. And they're gonna sue nuns, you know,
Speaker 1: under either they want to get that mandate going again
Speaker 1: under Obamacare, so everybody has to pay for all kinds
Speaker 1: of all kinds of drugs, including those that violate their
Speaker 1: sincerely held religious beliefs. And it's just going to be
Speaker 1: a year long effort. If Biden does in fact end
Speaker 1: up as the president, which I'm still saying isn't if
Speaker 1: it'll be years long effort to rub trump supporters faces
Speaker 1: in it. And here's the problem, folks, We're not going away.
Speaker 1: There's a belief among Democrats that anything was justified to
Speaker 1: stop Trump, anything was justified to prevent him from having
Speaker 1: his mark on the country. And that was really the
Speaker 1: central belief of the media throughout the Trump presidency. And
Speaker 1: that's what we saw with not only Russia Russia Special
Speaker 1: Council nonsense and impeachment and everything else they did against Trump,
Speaker 1: but also with the attacks on Brett Kavanaugh. Whatever the
Speaker 1: tactics were that they had that they felt were most effective,
Speaker 1: they would use them. It didn't matter what it did
Speaker 1: to the country, didn't matter how underhanded at all was.
Speaker 1: And we remember that this is the part that I'm
Speaker 1: not sure they really accounted on. And they have radic
Speaker 1: collies conservatives, not in the sense that we're radicals who
Speaker 1: are going to break laws and act act like savages,
Speaker 1: but we have been radicalizing that we understand the nature
Speaker 1: of the political environment. We're in this political battle. We
Speaker 1: lose or they'll make us do stuff that's just wrong.
Speaker 1: They'll make us do stuff that's unconstitutional, that violates moral
Speaker 1: ethical precepts. They'll do things that are contradictory that exceed
Speaker 1: their constitutional mandate, so we win or that happen. And
Speaker 1: that's where we are. This old notion that if only
Speaker 1: Republicans just keep feeding the alligator, it'll we can wait
Speaker 1: until it eats us. Last. I think that's gone away,
Speaker 1: although there is an effort underway right now to try
Speaker 1: to bring it back. You're seeing that. We'll talk about
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney and the other rhino squad later, But so
Speaker 1: the efforts at unity aren't really efforts. It's just a
Speaker 1: self congratulatory demand. Okay, forget about all that stuff we did,
Speaker 1: do you, conservatives? Forget about all this stuff we said
Speaker 1: about Trump and said about Trump supporters. Now we're saying
Speaker 1: we're gonna be nice, so you have to do what
Speaker 1: we say. No, I say no, I do not concede.
Speaker 1: In many ways, I will I will not allow this
Speaker 1: gaslighting to go without response. And then there are the
Speaker 1: people that are demanding a purd And this is this
Speaker 1: is fascinating because while we're hearing, for hearing some Democrats
Speaker 1: with this unity push, you have other prominent voices out
Speaker 1: there puting people like AOC, other voices out there that
Speaker 1: are saying there must be accountability for those who supported Trump.
Speaker 1: So which is it. Are we all friends now and
Speaker 1: we're gonna move together as a move together forward into
Speaker 1: the future as Americans or whatever other you know, boilerplate
Speaker 1: nonsense the Biden campaign spewing right now, or are we
Speaker 1: expected to have punishments doled out for people that supported
Speaker 1: the duly elected president of the United States for four years?
Speaker 1: I'm just wondering which one it's actually going to be.
Speaker 1: I think we should have a right to know. And
Speaker 1: the problem that Democrats have is they can't decide. They
Speaker 1: can't decide because they have their own lunatics, and there
Speaker 1: are there are turncoat fake Republicans out there who are
Speaker 1: also looking to settle scores, which is not exactly a
Speaker 1: great idea when you're calling for unity, is it? You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom mud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I also want to echo something that my friend EJ. Said,
Speaker 1: it's not all that Trump has to lose, but that
Speaker 1: all his enablers have to lose. They have to We
Speaker 1: have to collectively, in essence, burn down the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: We have to level them because if there are survivors.
Speaker 1: If there are people who weather this storm, they will
Speaker 1: do it again. They will take this as confirmation that, hey,
Speaker 1: it just pays to ride the waves. Look at me,
Speaker 1: I've made it through and so up and down the ticket, federal, state,
Speaker 1: local offices. The country has to repudiate this. This has
Speaker 1: become a dysfunctional anti government party that is not what
Speaker 1: the country wants and what it needs. Ah. Yes, the
Speaker 1: Washington Posts in house conservative columnist Jennifer Rubin, who I
Speaker 1: actually think is I think is deeply emotionally and psychologically unstable.
Speaker 1: But that's just an observation based on republic pronouncements and
Speaker 1: her work. Jennifer Rubin letting everybody know that this is
Speaker 1: what you do when you when you drive a paycheck
Speaker 1: from the opposition, when you're part of the control, the
Speaker 1: paid and bought, you know, the bought and paid for
Speaker 1: controlled opposition within the Republican Party, you're not even really opposition.
Speaker 1: You're actually an infiltrator. You are a trojan horse. And
Speaker 1: you see a lot of this throughout media, and what
Speaker 1: it really is is they're a little bit panic because
Speaker 1: what is the future for a Republican who was dancing
Speaker 1: and singing and doing whatever they needed to do for
Speaker 1: MSNBC and for CNN. What's the future of a conservative
Speaker 1: of somebody who had a platform and was supposed to
Speaker 1: be speaking for the right when they just spent the
Speaker 1: entirety of the last at least year or two, maybe
Speaker 1: the last four years doing everything you good at tear
Speaker 1: down Trump and to malign his supporters. Where do they go?
Speaker 1: What's their utility now? Because I gotta tell you, maybe
Speaker 1: the game just continues to be what it is for
Speaker 1: people like Reuben on MSNBC, where all they do you
Speaker 1: is trash republic They're Republicans who advocate for nothing but
Speaker 1: Democrat policies, and now it'll be under a Democrat administration
Speaker 1: and all they do is trash Republicans. I mean, the
Speaker 1: intellectual and ethical, just grotesqueness of this is really beyond words.
Speaker 1: But people are sad and kind of pathetic, especially I mean,
Speaker 1: at anybody that would repudiate what they've stood for for
Speaker 1: decades of their adult lives just because professionally it makes
Speaker 1: a little more sense than them, it's a little bit easier,
Speaker 1: and they still want to get invited to those fancy
Speaker 1: Georgetown cocktail parties which are real by the way, that's
Speaker 1: a real thing. I know, believe it or not. I
Speaker 1: snuck into one or two myself. They exist where the
Speaker 1: fancy journos all gather and you know, they all pat
Speaker 1: each other on the back and make sure that they're
Speaker 1: talking to each other's book agents and everything else. This
Speaker 1: is a This is a whole industry, friends, It's a
Speaker 1: whole business undo itself. But I'm not only talking about
Speaker 1: those in the media. Also the Republicans who were intentionally,
Speaker 1: deeply unhelpful in this last election cycle. And I think
Speaker 1: you would have to work very hard to come up
Speaker 1: with a name more prominent than or somebody who was
Speaker 1: more Obviously this is true about than Mitt Romney. Here
Speaker 1: he is playing nineteen. I'm not going to talk about
Speaker 1: by vote that's in the review mirror. I'm going to
Speaker 1: talk now about how I can work with the new president.
Speaker 1: I know he's on the other side of the aisle,
Speaker 1: but I want to make sure that we Conservatives keep
Speaker 1: on fighting to make sure that we don't have a
Speaker 1: green new Deal, we don't get rid of gas and
Speaker 1: coal and oil, that we don't have a Medicare for
Speaker 1: All plan put in place, so we don't raise taxes
Speaker 1: at American enterprise that would kill the economy. So look,
Speaker 1: I congratulate him, but I'm not going to put aside
Speaker 1: conservative principles. We're going to fight for the things that
Speaker 1: we believe in. Mitt Romney is now the guy who,
Speaker 1: after why watching all of his buddies get absolutely pummeled
Speaker 1: in a bar fight. Once the cops have arrived and
Speaker 1: it's all over, he's yelling, hold me back, hold me
Speaker 1: back from you know, thirty feet away around the police cordon. Yeah, thanks, Mitt,
Speaker 1: Those are those who are conservatives now, Yeah, sure you're
Speaker 1: really gonna do You're really gonna do a lot, really
Speaker 1: gonna do a lot for the country. Would have been
Speaker 1: really helpful if Mitt Romney had just swallowed his pride
Speaker 1: and his personal animosity and done more to help Trump
Speaker 1: in Arizona. But wasn't gonna happen, was it? No? No,
Speaker 1: And this is the same guy who voted for impeachment. Impeachment,
Speaker 1: Now that we understand, let's all be very clear of
Speaker 1: the President asking about what was a completely legitimate investigation
Speaker 1: into Hunter Biden's various scams and corrupt enterprises. That's what
Speaker 1: they impeached him for. Remember when it was all, oh, Hunter, Biden,
Speaker 1: he didn't do anything wrong. Oh right, sure, anyone who
Speaker 1: still believes that Democrats will convince themselves to believe anything
Speaker 1: they want. But Mitt is still very much part of
Speaker 1: that Republican wing that's doing whatever it can to pretend
Speaker 1: that they want to slow down Joe Biden, when really
Speaker 1: they're just they're luxuriating in this Biden declaration of victory.
Speaker 1: They love it. That's how much they care about conservatism.
Speaker 1: That's how much they care about the Republican Party and
Speaker 1: what it stands for, what it's trying to accomplish for people.
Speaker 1: That's how much they care about being pro life. Yep,
Speaker 1: bring in the abortion fanatic Democrats. Let them run things.
Speaker 1: But you know it'll show Trump what a bad man
Speaker 1: he is because he lost. That was the bargain they made.
Speaker 1: You want to talk about a Faustian deal. Here you go. Disgusting, honestly,
Speaker 1: But that's what you're going to continue to hear from
Speaker 1: people who pretend that it was all about principle, when
Speaker 1: really it was all about advanceing themselves. And at a
Speaker 1: time when you know it was it was all hands
Speaker 1: on deck. It's not possible to claim you're a Republican
Speaker 1: who's pro life and who have worked against Donald Trump
Speaker 1: in this election cycle and feel like what you did
Speaker 1: was moral. That's one area where I get ready for it.
Speaker 1: The Democrats they are they are absolutists on this issue.
Speaker 1: They are hardliners, no restrictions whatsoever. So so you can't
Speaker 1: call yourself pro life and have work to help Joe
Speaker 1: Biden win this last election. You can, I mean, if
Speaker 1: you can, but you're a fraud. And speaking of which,
Speaker 1: here's here's Mitt Romney play eleven. I'm more concerned about
Speaker 1: the language that's he used. I think it's fine to
Speaker 1: pursue every legal avenue that one has, but I think
Speaker 1: one has to be careful in the choice of words.
Speaker 1: I think, I think when you say that the election
Speaker 1: was corrupt or stolen or rigged, that that's unfortunately rhetoric
Speaker 1: that gets picked up by authoritarians around the world, and
Speaker 1: I think it also discourages confidence that our democratic process
Speaker 1: us here at home. And with the battle going on
Speaker 1: right now between authoritarianism and freedom, why I think it's
Speaker 1: very important do we not use language which can encourage
Speaker 1: a course in history which would be very, very unfortunate.
Speaker 1: Has Mit not been paying attention to oh the last
Speaker 1: twenty years or so. In America, the authoritarians come from
Speaker 1: the left. The authoritarians are democrats. The people that want
Speaker 1: to tell you what to do constantly in everything you
Speaker 1: do are leftists. And mit is enabling them and has
Speaker 1: been enabling them by opposing Trump in the ways that
Speaker 1: he has. But now he wants to tell us that
Speaker 1: we should be worried about authoritarians around the world. Honestly,
Speaker 1: I don't care what other governments are doing. I care
Speaker 1: about what this government is doing. I can't fight the
Speaker 1: battles for people all over the world. You know, truth
Speaker 1: is some people in some parts of the world want
Speaker 1: different government than us, want different things than us. That's
Speaker 1: actually the truth. What's this appeal to authoritarians around the world.
Speaker 1: This is blather. This is what elites who are looking
Speaker 1: for some excuse for knifing the current administration in the back.
Speaker 1: This is what they reach for. This is what they'll
Speaker 1: bring up. It's nonsense. Thanks for listening to The Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. The Governor
Speaker 1: of the state, Governor Wolf and the state Supreme Court
Speaker 1: flagrantly violated the Constitution of the United States. The power
Speaker 1: to set these rules and regulations is vested in the legislatures.
Speaker 1: They just ignored that, ignoring the Constitution. Now we bring
Speaker 1: it down to the actual counting level, the counting houses
Speaker 1: and outrageously observers who are the essentially the sentineltest of
Speaker 1: integrity and obviously transparency were excluded. The Trump administration of
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign had to go into court in Philadelphia
Speaker 1: to get that basic right that the law allows. So
Speaker 1: at both the statewide level and the local level, Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: has just conducted itself in a horrible lawless way, and
Speaker 1: hopefully this will be corrected at the Supreme Court of
Speaker 1: the United States. Everything Ken Starr said there is just
Speaker 1: a matter of fact. It's all established, it's all true.
Speaker 1: I obviously think it's so funny. The Libs love to say, well,
Speaker 1: the poll watchers were then allowed in, but they were
Speaker 1: only allowed to be within twenty feet or something. You
Speaker 1: think you can see what's going on with ballots from
Speaker 1: twenty feet away. Anybody believe that what we're so worried
Speaker 1: about COVID not according to the block parties, I saw
Speaker 1: in New York, not according to the celebrations all across
Speaker 1: the country of the weekend, all of a sudden COVID
Speaker 1: much much less of worry. We'll talk about that. It's
Speaker 1: not a surprise, I know, but I'm not going to
Speaker 1: stop pointing it out because the disgusting hypocrisy of the
Speaker 1: left with all this stuff, it's just too much to take.
Speaker 1: It really is. But Pennsylvania did something that is contrary
Speaker 1: to law. Shouldn't that matter? Shouldn't we get an answer
Speaker 1: about this? And I can tell you this much if
Speaker 1: this stuff makes its way up to the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: do you think if there's an adverse decision of any
Speaker 1: kind that comes down from this now Supreme Court, with
Speaker 1: the addition of the latest Trump appointee to it, Amy
Speaker 1: Coney Barrett ACB, do you think that there will be
Speaker 1: an acceptance of that decision as that's the process and
Speaker 1: it's legitimate. Right, This is ultimately all about legitimacy, And
Speaker 1: unless we're willing to establish that there are rules that
Speaker 1: we all agree on and those rules are our political
Speaker 1: party neutral and they are universally applicable, there's no such
Speaker 1: thing as legitimate. There's just power there's just the raw
Speaker 1: exercise of power. So if we're going to talk about
Speaker 1: whether or not the vote means that a Biden presidency,
Speaker 1: a legitimate Biden presidency is happening, right now, we also
Speaker 1: talk about whether a legitimate legal challenge should be respected
Speaker 1: by the other side and possibly an adverse decision. The
Speaker 1: same courts that may decide what happened in Philadelphia is
Speaker 1: a problem. I don't know if they're going to throw
Speaker 1: out votes. I don't know what the final disposition of
Speaker 1: that's going to be. But those are the same courts
Speaker 1: that we rely on to help us set up all
Speaker 1: kinds of things in the legal process. Right The courts
Speaker 1: have weighed in on voter id the courts have weighed
Speaker 1: in on moving polling plays. The courts are involved in
Speaker 1: all this all the time. So I want you to
Speaker 1: remember that because the issue of legitimacy, if you rely
Speaker 1: on Democrats, they're just going to tell you that whatever
Speaker 1: they want is what is legitimate. Whatever they think is
Speaker 1: best for them is what is most true and decent
Speaker 1: and good. Now we have to get to now, we
Speaker 1: have to get to what's happening. What was happening over
Speaker 1: the weekend with these parties that were going on everywhere.
Speaker 1: Gail King mentioned this on their play sixteen. I call
Speaker 1: it unbridled exuberance. It's like Nora the country is having
Speaker 1: a nationwide block party. You can go from city to
Speaker 1: city to city and for the most part see people
Speaker 1: just jumping out of their skins. I was just there
Speaker 1: on the corner of forty fourth and eighth talking forty
Speaker 1: fourth and Broadway, asking a police officer, so, how do
Speaker 1: you think, how's it going goes? The night is young,
Speaker 1: but I haven't seen this many people this happy since
Speaker 1: a Yankees championship, which I think sort of two years
Speaker 1: in this time, which I think really sort of sums
Speaker 1: it up. I mean, you talked about civility. Most people
Speaker 1: wearing their masks, some people are not. People are being
Speaker 1: very respectful and just very happy and embracing of one
Speaker 1: another on Time Square, which is huge at this particular time. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and there you feel it. The joy is palpable out there.
Speaker 1: So a few things about this one is, Yeah, of
Speaker 1: course there's there's being civil to each other. They're all Democrats,
Speaker 1: they're all on the same team. Although there was some
Speaker 1: BLM Biden voter or Biden support or friction over the
Speaker 1: weekend in one place. But yeah, they're on the same team.
Speaker 1: Do people at Trump rallies start arguing and punching each other? No,
Speaker 1: of course, not right because they're gathered there in unity
Speaker 1: around that issue. So I just think it's funny. Oh,
Speaker 1: well they're being nice to each other. Yeah, because it's
Speaker 1: all Biden voters. So of course they are, because they're
Speaker 1: all they're all happy about this. But I'm sorry, it's
Speaker 1: it's increasingly impossible for me to hear without wanting to
Speaker 1: scream four letter words that I can't say on the radio.
Speaker 1: It's impossible to look at this stuff and just see
Speaker 1: the difference that the media treats, say, a Trump rally
Speaker 1: from a massive gathering of Democrats right outside the White
Speaker 1: House on this the old book, it's spontaneous. No it's not.
Speaker 1: It's organized by people online. Let's stop this. Oh, it's
Speaker 1: all just spontaneous. All the protests, all the ry, it's
Speaker 1: all spontaneous. That that's just another way of saying, no
Speaker 1: one can be held accountable for this. It just happened, man,
Speaker 1: it just sort of happened. Fake Tapper, perhaps best known
Speaker 1: recently for tweeting out a photo of himself with a mask,
Speaker 1: alone in his office, mask on, of course, saying this
Speaker 1: is what adults do. No, it's what people who are
Speaker 1: paranoid and obsessed with virtue signaling. That's really Tapper isn't
Speaker 1: actually as worried about the virus as he is about
Speaker 1: people on the left and the Democrats loving one of
Speaker 1: the last fake journos to still claim the you know,
Speaker 1: just telling the truth, speaking of our mantle, give me
Speaker 1: a break. But here he is in his once a
Speaker 1: month once a month he calls out something that his
Speaker 1: own side's not gonna like. But it's all part of
Speaker 1: the brand enhancement. It's really never more than that. It's
Speaker 1: like once a month he's like, well, maybe I don't
Speaker 1: like this thing that the Democrat did because there's a
Speaker 1: little bit of and it's always blaring hypocrisy. It's always
Speaker 1: something that's so obvious. And then a lot of a
Speaker 1: lot of you know, moderate republican types of the media go,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, look he's saying a nice thing about that's
Speaker 1: the whole game. Don't they see you that? It's not
Speaker 1: that it's not very clever, But here he is fake
Speaker 1: Tapper calling it out. He's he's seeing what we're all
Speaker 1: seeing with these celebrations in this three play seven. I know,
Speaker 1: at least based on what we saw on screen, a
Speaker 1: lot of these people were wearing masks, but not all
Speaker 1: of them are. In CDC guidelines say either, even if
Speaker 1: you're wearing a mask, you should avoid crowds. New coronavirus
Speaker 1: cases are soaring. We've just had some of the worst
Speaker 1: days for new infections of the entire pandemic. Is it
Speaker 1: incumbent upon Presidents Elect Biden to make it clear to
Speaker 1: his supporters that crowds are a bad idea during this pandemic,
Speaker 1: even if people are wearing masks, and he understands that
Speaker 1: they want to celebrate, but they shouldn't be filling the
Speaker 1: streets like that. No, the answers, of course, they're not
Speaker 1: going to say that. They're gonna wait maybe until they've
Speaker 1: had their fill of parties for a couple of like
Speaker 1: a week or two, and then they'll put out some statement, Hey, everybody,
Speaker 1: we take the we believe the science, we take it seriously.
Speaker 1: So well, now that you've had your fun for a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks and you don't really care about having
Speaker 1: street parties anymore, or block parties. You know, don't do that.
Speaker 1: That's what will happen, right, I mean, look, I always
Speaker 1: you know what they're gonna do. You know how they're
Speaker 1: going to play the game. But it was so noticeable
Speaker 1: here in New York where I am. All day Saturday
Speaker 1: was just cars honking everywhere. It was a stunningly beautiful day.
Speaker 1: When it was over, it was like seventy degrees in
Speaker 1: New York City, which in November is rare, absolutely gorgeous day.
Speaker 1: And you know they're they're doing this very festive atmosphere
Speaker 1: out there on the streets, and yeah, people are wearing
Speaker 1: masks mostly, although I saw more people without masks than
Speaker 1: I having a very long time. But they're gathering in
Speaker 1: huge crowds in places, and you know, you're you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to have your kids in school still in a
Speaker 1: lot of cities, you're not allowed to go and sit
Speaker 1: in a restaurant normally. I had to fill out. So
Speaker 1: while all the Biden folks are running around in big
Speaker 1: crowds on the street and they're cheering and they're shouting
Speaker 1: and they're having this great time, I sit down to
Speaker 1: have a coffee with my girlfriend and inside and we
Speaker 1: have to fill out test and trace information. How the
Speaker 1: how the hell is that going to be useful for anything?
Speaker 1: I mean, we are just we are just getting drawn
Speaker 1: deeper and deeper into the tyranny of these morons every day.
Speaker 1: And it's gonna get worse now too. You're gonna have
Speaker 1: two things go on. It's gonna be moving in opposite directions,
Speaker 1: which is it's a cognitive dissonance. But Democrats excel at
Speaker 1: cognitive dissonance. On the one hand, they're gonna be trying
Speaker 1: to tell you that everything's gonna be getting better because
Speaker 1: of Biden, but there's also gonna be this not yet.
Speaker 1: We gotta double down. We gotta triple down. We gotta
Speaker 1: know more masks, more of all this stuff. And they're
Speaker 1: gonna be saying, but don't worry, Biden's got it, but oh,
Speaker 1: we gotta get more severe, more severe. And so he'll
Speaker 1: be both the savior and the task master for us
Speaker 1: on COVID. So he's gonna make things more strict while
Speaker 1: at the same time telling us that everything is getting better,
Speaker 1: but we need to have all these more extreme measures
Speaker 1: because that's how he's gonna fix it. Yeah, it's it's
Speaker 1: gonna really drive me nuts. But I actually was on
Speaker 1: a treadmill yesterday with a mask on, and I'm just
Speaker 1: sitting there and there's two other people in the gym,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, the chance of me having COVID? Are
Speaker 1: these two people around me having COVID is like one
Speaker 1: in I think numerically it's around one in ten thousand
Speaker 1: or something like that. And I've just see it here
Speaker 1: and I can't breathe normally because idiots all across the
Speaker 1: country who who have been fed this nonsense about how, oh,
Speaker 1: the masks is such great protection. You have healthy people,
Speaker 1: You have millions and millions. You have tens of millions
Speaker 1: of entirely healthy people walking around constantly now with masks on, uncomfortable,
Speaker 1: not able to breathe normally, tens of millions of them healthy.
Speaker 1: There's no reason for them to be doing this. But
Speaker 1: you know, oh, we can't know. We can't know because
Speaker 1: our risk tolerance has turned into basically zero. And they
Speaker 1: did it. It was all political manipulation, right, And now
Speaker 1: we've gotten used to doing what we're told to do
Speaker 1: even when it makes no sense, and they're going to
Speaker 1: continue to use that for their own benefit. They're people
Speaker 1: who like control. They like to control others. I want
Speaker 1: to leave people alone and let them just live their
Speaker 1: lives as long as they infringe upon my life and
Speaker 1: you know, obey the law and fulfill their contracts. It's like,
Speaker 1: leave me alone, let me do my thing, you do
Speaker 1: your thing. No libs are the party of schoolmarms and
Speaker 1: home monitors that are always saying you're twenty seconds late
Speaker 1: to class, Go to detention. That's the world we're going
Speaker 1: to be living in with COVID nineteen measures for at
Speaker 1: least the next twelve to eighteen months. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Our
Speaker 1: work begins with getting COVID under control. We cannot repair
Speaker 1: the economy, restore our vitality, or relish life's most precious
Speaker 1: moments hugging our grandchildren, our children, our birthday's wedding, it's graduations,
Speaker 1: all the moments that matter most to us until we
Speaker 1: get it under control. On Monday, I will name a
Speaker 1: group of leading scientists and experts as transition advisors to
Speaker 1: help take the Biden Hires. COVID planning converted into an
Speaker 1: action blueprint that will start on January the twentieth, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one. That plan will be built on bedrock science.
Speaker 1: They'll be constructed out of compassion, empathy, and concern. I
Speaker 1: will spare no effort, none, or any commitment to turn
Speaker 1: around this pandemic. Yeah, notice how they're a little light
Speaker 1: on specifics, aren't they. What are they going to do
Speaker 1: to stop this? We'll get into the vaccine a little bit.
Speaker 1: Biden Harris have had nothing to do with any vaccine
Speaker 1: development of any kind. So that's not that. But what's
Speaker 1: the plan going to be? More testing, more tracing. Tracing
Speaker 1: is a joke. People who bring this up are just
Speaker 1: honestly not very smart or don't know anything about this issue.
Speaker 1: You're you're gonna trace one hundred thousand cases a day? Really,
Speaker 1: how what does that even mean? And then I was
Speaker 1: going to say, well, hold on, if you only test,
Speaker 1: if you only trace cases where somebody was indoors for
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes or more with somebody with a positive case,
Speaker 1: does that mean that we can all stop wearing masks
Speaker 1: for the fifteen second walk from our table in a
Speaker 1: restaurant to the bathroom, like morons? Can we do that? No?
Speaker 1: Bedrock science? Sure? What's the bedrock science? Masks? All of
Speaker 1: a sudden work. You know, when they decided mask work too,
Speaker 1: the influenza pandemic of nineteen eighteen, you know, order did
Speaker 1: to stop that nothing, But okay, sure that's all. It's
Speaker 1: going to be more mask harassment, selective mask harassment, by
Speaker 1: the way, and also social distancing. This was considered by
Speaker 1: the scientific community. And I'm not going to let this
Speaker 1: go because I've read the studies and I know this
Speaker 1: was considered something we would never do. We were not
Speaker 1: going to lock down society over a pandemic. It's counterproductive.
Speaker 1: It's it's too destructive and it doesn't work. But oh no,
Speaker 1: you know they'll tell oh, but the death toll would
Speaker 1: have been so much higher. And look, I'm and say
Speaker 1: I think that this was a This was a mistake
Speaker 1: for the Trump administration to always say, oh, we would
Speaker 1: have had two million die. I understand the politics behind this,
Speaker 1: but the media won this narrative where oh, if only
Speaker 1: Trump had done more, then we could have gotten the
Speaker 1: death rate even lower. What were they going to do?
Speaker 1: What were they going to do? It doesn't make it
Speaker 1: doesn't make any sense. But the test and trace stuff,
Speaker 1: you know what they are going to do. They're going
Speaker 1: to create a massive, a massive health bureaucracy in addition
Speaker 1: to the one we already have for for pandemics. This
Speaker 1: is going to be the big push. You know. We
Speaker 1: already have the CDC, we have the NAH, we have
Speaker 1: I can't even begin to get into all the different
Speaker 1: health agencies we have, state and local health agencies, and
Speaker 1: it's so much money spent on this stuff every year.
Speaker 1: And they're going to create an additional you know, this
Speaker 1: is the Democrat answer to everything. Hire more bureaucrats, make
Speaker 1: more meetings and regulations, and then and then say that
Speaker 1: you've solved the problem. And then when you haven't in
Speaker 1: a few years, say, hold on a second, we got
Speaker 1: an idea. Hire more bureaucrats, make more meetings, create more regulations,
Speaker 1: and then it's just wash, rinse, repeat. They just keep
Speaker 1: going with that. That's what they're gonna do. So I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you, it really just drives me, drives me insane,
Speaker 1: because if I believe that they had plans that were
Speaker 1: really going to be helpful in dealing with the pandemic,
Speaker 1: I'd be all about it. I want my life back.
Speaker 1: I want people to be able to just live their lives.
Speaker 1: This is to me this is all just this is
Speaker 1: all insane. I mean, people have gotten way too used
Speaker 1: to this new existence where we don't we don't intermingle,
Speaker 1: we don't see each other, we're not out there living
Speaker 1: our lives. We don't travel. And the Biden Harris plan
Speaker 1: is to listen to the scientists. Let's listen to the scientists. Okay,
Speaker 1: what are this what are these scientists that wear a mask?
Speaker 1: I know, we get it. We've been told this now
Speaker 1: a million times for the last six months. We're wearing
Speaker 1: masks all the time, all right, people are always they're
Speaker 1: wearing masks. And yet the virus still spreads all over
Speaker 1: the place. But we're wearing masks and it still spreads
Speaker 1: in blue cities, it still spreads in places where you
Speaker 1: know you see everybody walking around the masks all the time.
Speaker 1: Oh but even if it doesn't stop it, which we
Speaker 1: know it doesn't, it limits it by how much they
Speaker 1: don't know. They just say it does. And what they
Speaker 1: were saying at the beginning of this, which was that no,
Speaker 1: you shouldn't wear a mask because it's an imposition and
Speaker 1: it probably doesn't work. You're supposed to and I mean,
Speaker 1: like Fauci people that are supposed to know all about this.
Speaker 1: Just forget that they said that. Now, you're an idiot
Speaker 1: if you don't believe what they're telling you now because
Speaker 1: of what they told you nine months ago. Because what
Speaker 1: the science has changed? What do they know about this
Speaker 1: now that they didn't know then? In fact, they thought
Speaker 1: it was much more lethal then, much more lethal than
Speaker 1: it is, and we had far fewer means of trying
Speaker 1: to treat it and roll it in a clinical setting
Speaker 1: for people that are actually infected. So what has changed.
Speaker 1: The political imperative has changed. The need that people the
Speaker 1: need that people have to think that what they're doing
Speaker 1: is somehow making everything better. That has changed too. But
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure the science has not dramatically changed here.
Speaker 1: And you know, given that we had in H one
Speaker 1: N one break out in the past that you know,
Speaker 1: killed tens of thousands of people, didn't kill quite as
Speaker 1: many as COVID, obviously there was never a mask mandate considered.
Speaker 1: Then why it's no big deal. It's not that big
Speaker 1: a deal to say it's not that much In position
Speaker 1: now I say it is. I say it's dumb in
Speaker 1: the government's making you bend the knee. I don't like it.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus shows. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Let's get some ground truth going here, friends.
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell is with us now. He was one of
Speaker 1: the most hotly contested and most visible congressional battles in
Speaker 1: the whole country. And it's still contested. There's still counting votes.
Speaker 1: But he's got some major concerns about what happened in
Speaker 1: his race in Pennsylvania, in the state of Pennsylvania, and
Speaker 1: then of course if this might have been replicated nationwide.
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell as a former Army ranger and he's running
Speaker 1: for a seat in Pennsylvania's seventeenth congressional district. He's with
Speaker 1: us now. Shan, thanks so much, Hey Buck, thanks for
Speaker 1: having me. All right, man, let's get right into it.
Speaker 1: What happened in Pennsylvania. I mean, you have your slice
Speaker 1: of it from Pennsylvania seventeenth Congressional district. But what are
Speaker 1: we seeing that gives you a lot of concerns in
Speaker 1: your race and then of course across the state for Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: so I'll just tell you, I'll give you the timeline
Speaker 1: on election night as I experienced it, you know, the poles,
Speaker 1: the poles closed, people started voting. By the end of
Speaker 1: the night, I had over a forty three thousand vote
Speaker 1: League was up seventeen points. Connor Lamb had a press
Speaker 1: conference scheduled early because I think that he thought he
Speaker 1: was going to be a clearing victory early. He had
Speaker 1: to cancel it. And so we started doing all of
Speaker 1: our mathematical projections. Knowing what we knew about the mail
Speaker 1: in ballots that were going to be coming in on
Speaker 1: the Democrats side of the House, on the Republican side
Speaker 1: of the House, and the Independence we figured out that
Speaker 1: on election night there was no honest mathematical path for
Speaker 1: Connor Lamb to win this race. In fact, we were
Speaker 1: projecting that we would have over a thirteen thousand vote
Speaker 1: victory after all the mail in votes came in. Then
Speaker 1: Allegheny County inexplicably said that they were going to stop counting.
Speaker 1: This was not part of the plan. We thought they
Speaker 1: were going to count all night, but they stopped, and
Speaker 1: they were supposed to resume counting at ten am the
Speaker 1: next day. They did not. In fact, the ranking member
Speaker 1: of the Board of Election, A. Lamb, surrogate and Democrat
Speaker 1: and entrenched Democrat started doing a media blitz instead of
Speaker 1: counting the votes. He's doing a media blitz saying when
Speaker 1: all the votes are counted, we're confident that Congressman Lamb
Speaker 1: will have a two percentage point lead. And I'm thinking, well,
Speaker 1: that's kind of a brazen thing to say for your boy,
Speaker 1: who's down by over forty three thousand votes. And so
Speaker 1: they started counting votes on the day after election day
Speaker 1: at about two thirty and the race Titan and we
Speaker 1: expected it too, because Connor had more mail ins than
Speaker 1: we did. So we watched the race Titan. We were
Speaker 1: still confident that at the end of the day thirteen thousand,
Speaker 1: two hundred plus vote victory for US. But then at
Speaker 1: about eight thirty at night, there were two successive ballot dumps,
Speaker 1: one for four thousand ballots, one for nine thousand ballots
Speaker 1: that put him over the top, literally buck twenty five
Speaker 1: minutes after that, Connor already had a press conference scheduled
Speaker 1: like out there, declared victory despite their being military apps
Speaker 1: and tea ballots left. Provisional ballots left both in Allegheny
Speaker 1: but also in Butler and Beaver and I'd just like
Speaker 1: to say that that four thousand ballot dump and nine
Speaker 1: thousand ballot dump was not part of the calculation at all.
Speaker 1: We have no idea where they came from. And that
Speaker 1: number added up to thirteen thousand people, so we have
Speaker 1: no idea what's going on. We're trying to get answers
Speaker 1: right now. You know, we're combing through the voter rolls
Speaker 1: and the and those who would request an end returned
Speaker 1: to apps and tee ballot. We're finding all sorts of
Speaker 1: crazy stuff. You know, just in a one hour search,
Speaker 1: we found probably like one hundred dead people who have voted.
Speaker 1: And yeah, I appreciate the service of Civil war generals,
Speaker 1: but maybe they shouldn't be voting in the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: There are problems here. And my concern is that, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm fighting for the two hundred plus thousand people who
Speaker 1: voted for me, but also the two hundred plus thousand
Speaker 1: people who did not buck because right now, you know,
Speaker 1: I've gotten thousands of messages over the last couple of
Speaker 1: days saying you have to fight this. I'm never going
Speaker 1: to trust another election in my life. You know, elections
Speaker 1: have to mean something in this country. Buck and and
Speaker 1: for Connor, over fifty six percent of the people that
Speaker 1: voted for him mailed in a ballot, over one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand people mailed in a ballot. How can we possibly
Speaker 1: know that that those who mailed in a ballot are alive,
Speaker 1: are resident, are not an illegal immigrant, are not a
Speaker 1: felon unless we audit the vote, you know, because every
Speaker 1: single person that casts an illegal ballot cancels out somebody
Speaker 1: who cast one legally. So we have just to meet.
Speaker 1: We don't have a choice. We have to audit the
Speaker 1: vose and so so ever, understand, Sean, we're speaking of
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell, former Army ranger, and he's running in a
Speaker 1: still very heated contest for Pennsylvania seventeenth congressional district. Votes
Speaker 1: are still being counted. Sean. The change that were made
Speaker 1: to voting in Pennsylvania, just tell us, I mean, we're
Speaker 1: doing universe you know, universal mail in ballots. We're talking
Speaker 1: about a three day lag from the election to count them.
Speaker 1: The you know, what are the shifts that were made? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so you know, if you're looking at a mail in system,
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania's mail in system that was developed in the PA
Speaker 1: state legislature by Democrats and Republicans was supposed to mere Florida, right,
Speaker 1: and Florida does a pretty good job of implementing their
Speaker 1: mail in system. The results in Florida, in fact, we're
Speaker 1: tabulated on election night, which is in keeping with federal law.
Speaker 1: But the problem in Pennsylvania, and while I support mail
Speaker 1: in voting and certainly the system that Florida hasn't placed,
Speaker 1: is that Governor Wolf and Josh Shapiro and the PA
Speaker 1: Secretary of State removed all of the safeguards from mail
Speaker 1: in voting that we would have to verify that a
Speaker 1: vote is actually accurate. They removed the signature requirement, they
Speaker 1: removed the deadline. In fact, they extended it. You could
Speaker 1: drop a mail a mail in ballot up to three
Speaker 1: days after the election with no postage. There's no signature
Speaker 1: matching requirement. In fact, in this election, you don't even
Speaker 1: have to prove residents in the state of Pennsylvania to vote.
Speaker 1: With the provisional it, so all of the safeguards that
Speaker 1: would protect the mail and system on both sides of
Speaker 1: the aisle have been removed. And because of that, it
Speaker 1: chaos has ensued over the last couple of days, and
Speaker 1: you know a lot of folks are out there talking
Speaker 1: about the Supreme Court ruling that you know, ballots that
Speaker 1: come in and after election day have to be segregated,
Speaker 1: and yeah, that's certainly a good thing. But guess what,
Speaker 1: ballots that were delivered after election day because of the
Speaker 1: governor's ruling don't have to have postage. So how can
Speaker 1: you tell Sean what are the irregularities? I won't say
Speaker 1: fraud yet, but the irregularities And for example, you said
Speaker 1: dead people voted. I've seen some efforts to try to
Speaker 1: explain this away as this is under protect the victims
Speaker 1: of domestic abuse or something that their their birth date
Speaker 1: will be shown as something that's not their real birth
Speaker 1: I mean, is there is there any merit to that?
Speaker 1: What are the actual problems that have been established so
Speaker 1: far that you've seen in your district in Pennsylvania, Because
Speaker 1: I think people, if we find fraud in Pennsylvania, first
Speaker 1: we have to find issues, right, irregularities. I guess that
Speaker 1: the world we'll use if we find actual clear fraud
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania, that enormously opens up the playing field for
Speaker 1: people to look and feel like they actually have a
Speaker 1: little bit of leeway now a wind at their back
Speaker 1: to look for fraud in Michigan, in Arizona, in these
Speaker 1: states that were so so tight and just seem fishy.
Speaker 1: So what can you tell us that you've seen so
Speaker 1: far that's off about the way these ballots were counted
Speaker 1: or sent in? Well, well, I mean dead people voting
Speaker 1: for one? I mean right, but is there any do
Speaker 1: they have any because that seems like it's you know,
Speaker 1: as leaders can be. Do they have some explanation for that?
Speaker 1: As in, is it a glitch in the computer system? Right?
Speaker 1: I mean, is you know, is are there real? I'm
Speaker 1: just wondering, I get it. Yeah, Yeah, we're looking into that.
Speaker 1: We have seen some irregularities in nursing home facilities, several
Speaker 1: in Beaver County, all of Beaver Counties in PA seventeen.
Speaker 1: We're looking in. We've got the sheriff in Beaver County
Speaker 1: looking into irregularities there where you know, something like seventy
Speaker 1: percent of the nursing home patients in that facility both
Speaker 1: requested and returned to ballot on the same day. There
Speaker 1: were nineteen thousand mail in ballots in Beaver County that
Speaker 1: we're submitted. It looks like Buck. Now this is staggering.
Speaker 1: One hundred percent of them went straight party ticket. Now,
Speaker 1: the reason why that's significant is because in Beaver County,
Speaker 1: I won Beaver County by like seventy five twenty five
Speaker 1: on election day, Democrats in Beaver County were coming out
Speaker 1: in droves for me on election day. Now we're supposed
Speaker 1: to believe that nineteen thousand mail in ballots and Beaver
Speaker 1: County all went straight party ticket. Now, of course, probably
Speaker 1: some of them would be party loyalists, those that would
Speaker 1: be inclined to mail in a ballot might vote s
Speaker 1: trade party, but all of them, I mean, that's certainly,
Speaker 1: that's certainly unbelievable. But you're looking at you so saying
Speaker 1: in Alleghany County, certainly those two ballot dumps that went
Speaker 1: almost exclusively for LAMB that weren't a part of our
Speaker 1: initial projections is something that I would say is anomaly,
Speaker 1: an anomaly. But also think about this. The Secretary of
Speaker 1: State's website, you know, as we were watching on election night,
Speaker 1: was updating ballot information right before the county was right
Speaker 1: that process should be reversed. So, look, this is the
Speaker 1: first time that we've ever implemented a mail in early
Speaker 1: vote or no excuse absence hee voting here in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: I feel like we should be making sure that these
Speaker 1: votes are audited and actually coming from real people, just
Speaker 1: to make sure because if we I mean honestly, buck,
Speaker 1: if we don't, seventy million people in this country are
Speaker 1: never going to trust an election again. Are we able
Speaker 1: to do that? Is the auditing process you think strong
Speaker 1: enough for Let's just focus in again on Pennsylvania, where
Speaker 1: you think we can at least get some answers. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I mean, look, my race is a razor thin margin, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, what's going to be relatively simple, and we're
Speaker 1: doing this now is checking as we already talked about,
Speaker 1: you know, for people that have passed away, but also
Speaker 1: people that are non residents, also people that maybe have
Speaker 1: a felony or or a potential LEO immigrant. None of
Speaker 1: those people should be voting. And in that number, the
Speaker 1: total number of that of that group of people exceeds
Speaker 1: the margin, which is this case, in this case is
Speaker 1: razor thin. I think that brings into question the integrity
Speaker 1: of the entire election. Even if we we don't know,
Speaker 1: we won't be able to tell who voted for who right,
Speaker 1: But if that number exceeds the margin, then how can
Speaker 1: anybody trust the results? Right? So these are the things
Speaker 1: that we're looking at now. And of course you know
Speaker 1: the auditing process, it does, it does cost money. And
Speaker 1: of course you know we've we've we've started an election
Speaker 1: defense fund for that reason, just to make sure that
Speaker 1: we're defending free and fair election and that every legal
Speaker 1: vote counts. And if you go to my website, Sean
Speaker 1: for Congress dot coo, you can contribute and help us
Speaker 1: do that. But yeah, but we're trying to do it.
Speaker 1: We're trying to defend the election because again, Republican, Democrat,
Speaker 1: independent doesn't really matter to me. I want to make
Speaker 1: sure people have trust and confidence in our in our
Speaker 1: system right moving forward, and right now, half the people,
Speaker 1: I mean, seriously, two hundred plus thousand people voters for me,
Speaker 1: they don't. Sean, before we let you go, you're a
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania guy. I know that this wasn't your district, your area.
Speaker 1: How confident are you that there was intentional fraud going
Speaker 1: on in Philadelphia? I'm confident. I mean, gosh, I don't,
Speaker 1: I don't. I have to be careful, I have to
Speaker 1: be careful. With how I say this, but I mean
Speaker 1: they're at there. There's absolutely there, absolutely was misconduct. Absolutely
Speaker 1: like there's there's no And look, the media is going
Speaker 1: to say, oh, Parnell is pushing unfounded allegations. It's like, well, look,
Speaker 1: there are two ways to prosecute a crime with a
Speaker 1: confession and in a body or you have to build
Speaker 1: the case and present the case to the jury. Right now,
Speaker 1: we're in the process of building the case, right and
Speaker 1: there is clear evidence of fraud in Philadelphia, fraud here
Speaker 1: in western Pennsylvania, I would say, And right now we're
Speaker 1: we're collecting affidavits from people who would swear under oath
Speaker 1: to that fact. As to whether as to whether or
Speaker 1: not it's going to be enough this way the election
Speaker 1: in either way, I don't know, but I think we
Speaker 1: have a duty and responsibility to look into it any
Speaker 1: way to make sure that this stuff doesn't happen going forward.
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell, everybody, former Army ranger and still congressional candidate
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania. J'all you're a man who stays in the fight.
Speaker 1: We appreciate it. Thanks, Buck, You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Big news
Speaker 1: out today about vaccine development seems Fiser is claiming that
Speaker 1: it's data so far on a vaccine, and you know,
Speaker 1: Fiser probably the best known or one of the biggest
Speaker 1: and best known drug companies in the world. Fiser saying
Speaker 1: that their vaccine is ninety percent effective, sixty to seventy
Speaker 1: percent effective, something of that range would be considered a really,
Speaker 1: really solid vaccine. They're saying, there's this ninety percent effective.
Speaker 1: If that's correct, and we get this thing distributed, the
Speaker 1: pandemic at least this strain of COVID nineteen is going
Speaker 1: to come to a screeching halt pretty quickly, right, or
Speaker 1: maybe it's going to come to a halt pretty fast,
Speaker 1: screeching halt. I guess to be all once, but it's
Speaker 1: gonna go away. It is gonna go away, and this
Speaker 1: should be caused for universal jubilation. In fact, it would
Speaker 1: be much more understandable in my mind, not a surprise
Speaker 1: if people were outside cheering and dancing in the streets
Speaker 1: about the imminent vaccine approval and how we can have
Speaker 1: our lives back then instead of old out of it.
Speaker 1: Just clown Joe Biden. I can't believe that this guy
Speaker 1: they think is going to be the president. It's still
Speaker 1: still amazing. Joe Joe Biden is a is a third
Speaker 1: tier mind than a fourth tier politician is about to
Speaker 1: be president United States. What a remarkable thing. This is.
Speaker 1: Got it done where Hillary couldn't. At least that's what
Speaker 1: they're saying. I know where it's not over yet, but
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. Anyway, the vaccine should be
Speaker 1: caused for universal celebration. But here's what I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you right now, this becomes the narrative. And you're not
Speaker 1: gonna want to hear this, but you need to hear this.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and Kamala beat the pandemic. They're going to
Speaker 1: be in office. This is the narrative. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: this is going to happen. But if they're in office,
Speaker 1: and if they take office as they're currently planning to,
Speaker 1: there will be distribution of a vaccine that is part
Speaker 1: of Operation Warp Speed one. There's several vaccines, any one
Speaker 1: of them part of Operation Warp Speed, and they will
Speaker 1: they will claim that it's because of how great Kamala
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden are that the vaccine is out there
Speaker 1: and now and you're going to start to see deaths
Speaker 1: go down dramatically. I mean, once you get this stuff
Speaker 1: out to seniors. I mean, if you just get COVID
Speaker 1: vaccines to every nursing home in the country, for example,
Speaker 1: and everyone over sixty five with a comorbidity or a
Speaker 1: comorbid health issue, You're gonna see the death rate just
Speaker 1: start getting chopped. I mean, the day to day deaths
Speaker 1: from this are gonna start getting choped down, which is fantastic. Look,
Speaker 1: it's great. I just want us to not have COVID anymore.
Speaker 1: It's not it's not political for me. I just don't
Speaker 1: want COVID anymore. I want this's gone. I want us
Speaker 1: to have normal life back, and I want as many
Speaker 1: lives saved as possible between now and when we can
Speaker 1: finally stop thinking about this stupid China virus. It's ruined
Speaker 1: the world for a year. But the Democrats are going
Speaker 1: to take full full credit for this if Biden take
Speaker 1: you guys understand, I don't know I think that Biden.
Speaker 1: There's still a fight here and it's not a done deal,
Speaker 1: but I'm gonna be talking about this sometimes, like well,
Speaker 1: right now, the expectation is Biden is going to be
Speaker 1: taking taking the presidency. If they're in that position, you're
Speaker 1: gonna see Joe Biden talking about how it'll be like
Speaker 1: he was in a lab coat in the basement the
Speaker 1: whole time developing the vaccine himself. Just get ready for it.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus ess in show by
Speaker 1: I Guess. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. We've all known that
Speaker 1: COVID was going to be used as a political weapon.
Speaker 1: That much has been clear, and it was I think,
Speaker 1: if anything, the Biden campaign has COVID to thank for
Speaker 1: even being at this point where they think that they've
Speaker 1: already won this thing without a pandemic. Trump has done
Speaker 1: such a good job in office that I think it's
Speaker 1: very unlikely any Democrat candidate would have even had a shot.
Speaker 1: But you know, the situation is what it is. This
Speaker 1: is how it all came down. But the good news
Speaker 1: is it's going to end soon. The good news is
Speaker 1: we're going to see that COVID nineteen is not in
Speaker 1: our future forever. We're going to figure this out and
Speaker 1: it's I think going to happen in a matter of
Speaker 1: just months. Here we're going to see the results, so
Speaker 1: it's not just going to be theoretical because of the vaccine.
Speaker 1: Now Fiser saying they've got a ninety percent and there
Speaker 1: are other vaccines based along similar You know, this is
Speaker 1: where there's actual science and the people doing vaccine research,
Speaker 1: and they know stuff that the public doesn't know. I
Speaker 1: think it's so funny because listen to the experts they
Speaker 1: say what I can hear. The experts tell me to
Speaker 1: wash my hands or cover my mouth or whatever. I
Speaker 1: already know that, thanks. But when you're talking about Fiser's
Speaker 1: vaccine research team, these guys are doing some pretty incredible stuff.
Speaker 1: Guys and gals. Of course, this is an enormous achievement.
Speaker 1: Assuming that it continues on this path, that we'd have
Speaker 1: a vaccine in less than a year at ninety percent effectiveness,
Speaker 1: that's really important. Here's what the Governor of New York,
Speaker 1: just to take one guy, is saying about this at
Speaker 1: this point. Play three. It's good news, bad news, George.
Speaker 1: The good news is the viser tests look good and
Speaker 1: we'll have a vaccine shortly. The bad news is that
Speaker 1: it's about two months before Joe Biden takes over, and
Speaker 1: that means this administration is going to be implementing a
Speaker 1: vaccine plan. The vaccine plan is very important and it's
Speaker 1: probably the most ambitious undertaking undertaking since COVID began. Just
Speaker 1: to put it in focus, we did one hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty million COVID tests in this nation over seven months,
Speaker 1: scrambling doing everything we can. We now have to do
Speaker 1: three hundred and thirty million vaccinations, maybe twice. My state
Speaker 1: does more testing than any state in the United States.
Speaker 1: We did twelve million tests. We have to do twenty
Speaker 1: million vaccines. And the Trump administration is rolling out the
Speaker 1: vaccination plan, and I believe it's flawed. I believe it
Speaker 1: learns nothing from the past. They're basically going to have
Speaker 1: the private providers do it, and that's going to leave
Speaker 1: out all sorts of communities that were left out the
Speaker 1: first time when COVID ravaged them. He can't even give
Speaker 1: credit to the outgoing possibly from administration. Can't even give
Speaker 1: them credit for this period of time we're finding out
Speaker 1: who the next president is going to be for the
Speaker 1: incredible achievement of getting you helping to get a vaccine. Now, look, Fiser,
Speaker 1: it's the scientists in the private sector mind you, it's
Speaker 1: not the CDC that found the vaccine, it's not the
Speaker 1: nih that's got to cure it's private sector. I think
Speaker 1: that's worth noting. But the government stepped in and said
Speaker 1: that they would essentially financially guarantee any company that went
Speaker 1: forward and created vaccine. If they did not get approval,
Speaker 1: they wouldn't be on the hook for whatever it is,
Speaker 1: you know, a billion dollars or I have no idea
Speaker 1: what the inventory costs would be of that. But they
Speaker 1: created vaccine as they went so that there was already
Speaker 1: a stockpile of it, instead of waiting to see if
Speaker 1: it's approved and then start creating a stockpile, which is
Speaker 1: going to save months and months and therefore save lives.
Speaker 1: Thousands of lives minimum will be saved by this. But
Speaker 1: Cuomo won't even give them, won't even give them a
Speaker 1: moment of recognition here. In fact, he takes it in
Speaker 1: the opposite direction and says that it's a bad thing
Speaker 1: that Trump is gonna be rolling this out because of
Speaker 1: the focus on the private sector. What are these areas
Speaker 1: where no one has access to a pharmacy? Is this
Speaker 1: really the new the new claim? And no one who
Speaker 1: wants the vaccine is gonna be able to get to it.
Speaker 1: Does he thinks the government's gonna do a better job.
Speaker 1: Cuomo is a case study in how horrifically incompetent and
Speaker 1: ridiculously just dumb government can be when it comes to
Speaker 1: dealing with a serious problem. Cuomo's the guy who has
Speaker 1: the worst per capita outcome. I think maybe maybe New
Speaker 1: Jersey is technically worst per capita, but in many ways,
Speaker 1: I mean New York is the prime example. It is
Speaker 1: the epitome of poor government action that led to thousands
Speaker 1: and thousands of additional deaths from COVID, and the Nursing
Speaker 1: Home Order will go down in history. Despite Cuomo's efforts
Speaker 1: to rewrite history, the Nursing Home Order will be viewed
Speaker 1: as the single dumbest, most reckless, most lethal, an incompetent
Speaker 1: decision made during the entire pandemic. Dwarfs anything else that
Speaker 1: we've seen from anyone else in all this. And yet
Speaker 1: you notice that the Democrats keep going to this guy,
Speaker 1: I mean ABC News, George Stefan Ubulupulus. They keep going
Speaker 1: to these guys like Cuomo as the exemplars. They are
Speaker 1: the people to be held up as heros for how
Speaker 1: well they did in dealing with this disease. And I'm
Speaker 1: just here to remindy that's crazy. Cuomo's leadership on COVID
Speaker 1: is a case study in failure. But now he's supposed
Speaker 1: to be held up as some kind of a some
Speaker 1: kind of a hero. He's going to be held up
Speaker 1: as a guy that knew how to get it all done.
Speaker 1: It's it's absurd. And and just the fact that he's
Speaker 1: already saying that the Trump team somehow they help get
Speaker 1: the vaccine to a place in record time. And also
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm gonna note we're just hearing now about
Speaker 1: the ninety percent plus effective vaccine. Trust me, Fiser is
Speaker 1: not going to come out and say our vaccine is
Speaker 1: nine plus effective unless they're pretty damn sure of it.
Speaker 1: You know, these these things, they have massive trials, a
Speaker 1: ton of data. They're not going to say that unless
Speaker 1: that's unless they really believe that's true. You don't want
Speaker 1: to be the uh, the Fiser pr flactist got to say, actually,
Speaker 1: it's more like forty percent right, They're they're correct here,
Speaker 1: I'd be willing to bet. And yet the federal government's
Speaker 1: role in helping bring this to this point is ignored,
Speaker 1: and they're going to say that Trump doesn't know how
Speaker 1: to get this part of it done. Who do you
Speaker 1: trust to run logistics more Trump, who's been involved in
Speaker 1: business and had deadlines and private sector competition to deal with.
Speaker 1: Or Cuomo who's the governor because his dad was a
Speaker 1: Cuomo who was the governor? Who do you think is smarter?
Speaker 1: Who do you think is better at this stuff? But no,
Speaker 1: Cuomo's out there saying not only does he view it
Speaker 1: as a bad thing that Trump and his team are
Speaker 1: in charge going to this phase, but that he wants
Speaker 1: to stop distribution of this before it does damage. Play four,
Speaker 1: and that's what happened the first time with COVID. Why
Speaker 1: do we have such a disparity in the infection rate
Speaker 1: and the mortality rate in COVID because some communities don't
Speaker 1: have the same axis to healthcare. I'm sure the Biden
Speaker 1: administration is going to address that. I think his first
Speaker 1: step saying, let's focus on the science, let's depoliticize testing data,
Speaker 1: listen to the sciences, exact opposite of Trump. But you
Speaker 1: have two months, and we can't let this vaccination plan
Speaker 1: go forward. The way the Trump administration is designing it
Speaker 1: because Biden can't undo it. Two months later, we'll be
Speaker 1: in the midst of it, and I'm going I've been
Speaker 1: talking to governors across the nation about that. How can
Speaker 1: we shape the Trump administration vaccine plan to fix it
Speaker 1: or stop it before it does damage. Stop the distribution
Speaker 1: of a life saving vaccine because they don't like the
Speaker 1: way the Trump administration is going to distribute it. Remember,
Speaker 1: it's going to be free for everybody, no cost. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be in it's gonna be in drug stores all
Speaker 1: over the country. They've already prepared, They've gotten to this point.
Speaker 1: And here you have the government New York saying, not
Speaker 1: only does he want to do this in his state,
Speaker 1: if you live in a state with a Democrat governor, friends,
Speaker 1: wherever you are, guess what you're going to be affected
Speaker 1: by this too, because they're all going to have this
Speaker 1: whole Oh, we have to you know what this is
Speaker 1: really about. They want Trump and Kamala, I'm sorry, they
Speaker 1: want Biden and Kamala to be the ones who distribute
Speaker 1: the vaccine. They want them to get the credit. So
Speaker 1: they're going to argue that this is a flawed system.
Speaker 1: And even though Trump's not going to wait for them
Speaker 1: to try to distribute this, once it gets approved, they're
Speaker 1: gonna say we shouldn't distribute it now, it's being done
Speaker 1: the wrong way. And then all of a sudden, when
Speaker 1: Biden and Kamala commit it will be Oh, now they're
Speaker 1: doing it the right way. You know, It's funny. They
Speaker 1: always said that Trump inherited the Obama economy. Meanwhile, the
Speaker 1: Trump economy was much better than the Obama economy, So
Speaker 1: how he inherited something that The point is he dramatically
Speaker 1: improved on what was going on before him, which is
Speaker 1: just a fact. But here we have a true inheritance
Speaker 1: of a vaccine. If Biden and Harass are the incoming administration,
Speaker 1: and they will do everything they can to just write
Speaker 1: them out in the history books, right out the Trump
Speaker 1: Pence hand in all of this. And I'm sorry, but
Speaker 1: I can't help but feel like the absence of talk
Speaker 1: of a vaccine, you know, in the days leading up
Speaker 1: to the election was intentional. Was intentional from the media.
Speaker 1: They didn't want people to feel hopeful, They didn't want
Speaker 1: people to feel like Trump had seen us through this
Speaker 1: storm and he's a much better guy once we get
Speaker 1: through this, to be running the economy than Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: We all know it. So no, it was, oh, Trump
Speaker 1: won't listen to the science. Look at how terrible everything is.
Speaker 1: Look at how we're all just going to keep dying
Speaker 1: from this virus forever. It's never ever gonna stop. You're
Speaker 1: never gonna get your life back. That's what they wanted
Speaker 1: people to believe. And so there was a relative silence
Speaker 1: around this in the days before. The stock market had
Speaker 1: a big jump airline stock, a Delta Airline stock as
Speaker 1: of this morning, at least when I looked at it
Speaker 1: jumped up what fifteen percent? I mean, people realize, oh,
Speaker 1: guess what looks like maybe Trump was telling the truth
Speaker 1: this whole time. It was the people saying that Trump
Speaker 1: was lying about the vaccine and the speed with which
Speaker 1: it could be developed and distributed. They were the ones lying.
Speaker 1: And I think it's worth noting that. I think it's
Speaker 1: worth remembering that as we all as we all go
Speaker 1: forward here. As much as the Biden team wants to
Speaker 1: walk around pretending like they've got some brilliant new strategy,
Speaker 1: some some amazing new way that they are developing, none
Speaker 1: that they're, you know, creating a system to destroy the
Speaker 1: virus once and for all. It's all nonsense. What exactly
Speaker 1: are they saying about this? What what's supposed to be new?
Speaker 1: What's supposed to be new with all of this? There's
Speaker 1: The answer is very very little. But it doesn't matter, friends,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. Just recall that it was the Trump
Speaker 1: Biden battle of twenty twenty has played out with the
Speaker 1: media that showed us you can never trust the media again.
Speaker 1: Don't let them play this game. Now where they where?
Speaker 1: They all across the country have gotten away with this,
Speaker 1: all right, Don't don't let them do it. Remember who
Speaker 1: they were, Remember the dishonesty and the media coverage. No
Speaker 1: matter what the future is in terms of who actually
Speaker 1: ends up being president for four more years, you're in
Speaker 1: the freedom. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. This
Speaker 1: is a contested election. The media doesn't decide who becomes president.
Speaker 1: If they did, you would never have a Republican president forever.
Speaker 1: So we're discounting them. So what happened? The Trump team
Speaker 1: has canvassed all early voters and absent team mill in
Speaker 1: ballots in Pennsylvania and they've found over one hundred people
Speaker 1: they think we're dead, But fifteen people that we've verified
Speaker 1: to have been dead who voted. But here's the one
Speaker 1: that gets me. Six people restored after they died and
Speaker 1: voted in Pennsylvania. I guess you're never out of it.
Speaker 1: If Republicans don't challenge and change the US election system,
Speaker 1: there'll never be another Republican president elected again. President Trump
Speaker 1: should not concede. We're down to ten thousand votes in Georgia.
Speaker 1: He's going to win North Carolina. We've gone from ninety
Speaker 1: three thousand votes to less than twenty thousand votes in Arizona.
Speaker 1: Were more votes to be counted. Their allegations of system failure, fraud,
Speaker 1: John James, do not concede. These computers in Michigan do
Speaker 1: not pass the smell tests. Keep fighting for every legal
Speaker 1: and live vote. Lindsey Graham is absolutely correct. I meant
Speaker 1: to play this for you at the top of the show. Actually,
Speaker 1: so I'm glad I got an inner near the beginning
Speaker 1: of the show. What Lindsey Graham is saying here is
Speaker 1: absolutely true. There are irregularities, there are problems with this vote.
Speaker 1: We know there are problems, So let's see how many problems.
Speaker 1: Let's see how deep it runs. Let's see we can
Speaker 1: fix it. And this is about even more than than Trump.
Speaker 1: If they can pull this off and there are there's
Speaker 1: no transparency, there's no consequences for any possible fraud, and
Speaker 1: they can continue to leave future elections up for this
Speaker 1: kind of fraud. You're going to have a huge challenge
Speaker 1: ever winning another national election because Democrats, we were able
Speaker 1: to pull it off this time. Guess what the next time,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be the same thing, run the exact same playbook.
Speaker 1: So I do think it is it is essential. It
Speaker 1: is essential that we continue to see this thing through.
Speaker 1: And I think it's so funny that that the left
Speaker 1: is already claiming that they know the outcome of all
Speaker 1: these legal challenges, when how can they know. Have they
Speaker 1: already done the audit so they know. Of course, they
Speaker 1: just don't want it to happen because they're gonna have
Speaker 1: to go with a very there's gonna be a very challenging,
Speaker 1: a very challenging switch they're gonna have to pull off
Speaker 1: where they say there's no fraud and then give it time.
Speaker 1: They're gonna say, well, there wasn't that much fraud. And
Speaker 1: I think they're recognizing right now that saying there was
Speaker 1: no fraud at all is going to be a difficult
Speaker 1: position to defend. Here's a Simone Sanders, Democrat talking head
Speaker 1: strategist whatever play thirteen. Has anyone from the Trump White
Speaker 1: House or anyone from House or Senate Republican leadership reached
Speaker 1: out two Presidents ELEC Biden in any way? I do
Speaker 1: think there have been a number of Republicans who have
Speaker 1: reached out. I don't believe that President elect Biden has
Speaker 1: connected with those folks, but a number of Republicans from
Speaker 1: the Hill have reached out. I don't believe anyone from
Speaker 1: the White House has. I think the White House has
Speaker 1: made clear what their strategy is here and that they
Speaker 1: are going to continue to participate and push forward these
Speaker 1: flailing and in many in many respects baseless legal strategies.
Speaker 1: But the people, Jake, are the folks that decide elections
Speaker 1: in this country, and the people have spoken baseless legal strategies.
Speaker 1: Checking to see if there are a legal votescasts is
Speaker 1: a baseless legal strategy. We're told, okay, sure, sure, yeah.
Speaker 1: Not allowed to pushback from fake Tapper on that one,
Speaker 1: is there, no, of course not. I think he also
Speaker 1: He also interviewed Stacy Abrams over the weekend on his
Speaker 1: CNN show. I saw a clip of this. Didn't ask
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrams, who's never conceded that she lost the Georgia election,
Speaker 1: never conceded. She's always claimed that she won even though
Speaker 1: she lost. But that's okay. If your Stacey Abrams, you're
Speaker 1: allowed You're allowed to do that, that's not a surprise.
Speaker 1: If you're Hillary Clinton, you're allowed to do that. Right,
Speaker 1: never really considered it was it was always the Russians.
Speaker 1: So the left, we see that they're the kings and
Speaker 1: queens of never ever ever admitting that they lost Barren Square.
Speaker 1: And then the one time they think they've won, they're like,
Speaker 1: why won't you just why won't you just admit defeat
Speaker 1: right away? Oh gee, I don't know, because we pay
Speaker 1: attention because we see what has happened in the past,
Speaker 1: and we also, I mean, there are dead voters, which
Speaker 1: means that there are people that voted that should not
Speaker 1: have been voting. Now, maybe there's some explanation for this
Speaker 1: that's supposed to be legitimate and clear up any confusion
Speaker 1: or doubt. Maybe I would really like to know what
Speaker 1: that's supposed to be I just want answers. I am
Speaker 1: asking questions about the selection for which I want there
Speaker 1: to be answers. And I think we're all we're all
Speaker 1: starting to see right now that the left is opposed
Speaker 1: not just to rhetoric from Trump. If they think is
Speaker 1: undermining Biden's victory, they are straight up a post to
Speaker 1: getting answers and finding out what really happened here. They
Speaker 1: do not want transparency. They want to move on. They
Speaker 1: want to shut it down. That's what's contested right now.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Buses Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple Podcast at the iHeartRadio app or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Ain't no party. Look a Team
Speaker 1: Buck party, because a Team Buck party. Don't stop. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we got buck turned up to eleven. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll Call. Roll Call Facebook dot com, slash Bucks exton
Speaker 1: Team Buck at Ihearts Media dot com. So please do
Speaker 1: join for all of that goodness and just send us
Speaker 1: your thoughts. Very very easy to do. We always appreciate it.
Speaker 1: And alrighty, let's get to it. Um producer, Mark, how
Speaker 1: is your weekend? Pretty good? Attended a friends giving? Story?
Speaker 1: Is fun? Did you see there there's already this circulating
Speaker 1: out there of most popular Thanksgiving side by state and
Speaker 1: New York and the whole northeastern sort of New York
Speaker 1: New Jersey area is stuffing because we are a civilized
Speaker 1: people who appreciate the deliciousness of stuffing. And yes, I
Speaker 1: will tell you there's gluten free stuffing that tastes every
Speaker 1: bit as good as the real thing. Now does your
Speaker 1: family just make gluten free stuffing or is there two
Speaker 1: separate stuff We do two separate. We do two separate
Speaker 1: because my sister loves that she wants the real deal,
Speaker 1: the original. But my brother is gluten free too, so
Speaker 1: there's two of us, so we do the gluten free.
Speaker 1: But but I bring this up one I want to
Speaker 1: know producer Mark's favorite side. But also very interesting, how
Speaker 1: many states, including Texas, green bean casserole was the favorite
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving side, which I mean green beans good, it's healthy.
Speaker 1: Is green bean casserole like exciting to eat? I never
Speaker 1: I thought we think of green beans as a thing
Speaker 1: that you put on the plate so you feel like
Speaker 1: you're getting veggies. Yeah, I mean you can make really
Speaker 1: good green beans, but it's not something I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: to Thanksgiving dinner looking forward to that's for sure. Total
Speaker 1: respect for the South on this one. States like North Carolina,
Speaker 1: South Carolina, Georgia their favorite Thanksgiving side is mac and cheese,
Speaker 1: which respect, mac and cheese is amazing, So mac and
Speaker 1: cheese stuffing. The West Coast comes in with mashed potatoes,
Speaker 1: which I also think is completely acceptable. I love mashed potatoes,
Speaker 1: and gravy is amazing. So you know, people, most Americans
Speaker 1: get Thanksgiving. Then there's a Maine showed up with green salad,
Speaker 1: which I just don't. I think that must be that
Speaker 1: must be a computer glitch. I'm not believing that. Yeah too, Yeah,
Speaker 1: salad basically salad with thanks Does anyone does anyone need
Speaker 1: salad at Thanksgiving? What are we communists? Yea absurd? I
Speaker 1: mean sure, maybe you want to start to me with
Speaker 1: a salad, fine, but to call it your favorite side,
Speaker 1: yeah exactly if you want that option, so you feel
Speaker 1: like you're being a little healthy while you eat three
Speaker 1: thousand calories of turkey, cranberry sauce, gravy, mashed potatoes. You know,
Speaker 1: if you want to fool yourself into thinking the three
Speaker 1: pieces of lettuce that you put on your plate makes it,
Speaker 1: you know, a total healthy meal. Fine, but yeah, I
Speaker 1: know your favorite side. I thought that was very very strange. Indeed. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's mac and cheese, mashed potatoes, stuffing. The thing about
Speaker 1: the thing that I understand is why is stuffing really
Speaker 1: only a Thanksgiving side? It doesn't You don't see it otherwise.
Speaker 1: Stuffing is delicious. Yeah, and you most people don't make
Speaker 1: it where you actually off the turkey, so the beginning,
Speaker 1: but now you can. You can make it any time.
Speaker 1: I don't get it either. Yeah, So what what's what's
Speaker 1: your favorite side? I guess if we're just talking Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: since we only have it once a year, it's got
Speaker 1: to be stuffing. Yeah, though they did have I think
Speaker 1: Florida had sweet potato casserole, which I also like very much.
Speaker 1: You know that I had never had that before yet
Speaker 1: two days ago. It's actually really good. Yeah, bake sweet potatoes.
Speaker 1: Some people put a little marshmallow topping on. I'm getting
Speaker 1: hungry just thinking about this right now. It's good stuff. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm absolutely starving now, thank you? Do you do? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I know we're both getting hungry. Do you do? Uh?
Speaker 1: Do you do the turkey? Or does that like a
Speaker 1: family or how does that work? My wife's family, that's
Speaker 1: their favorite holiday, so her parents always take care of that.
Speaker 1: They have a very nice spread every year, and usually
Speaker 1: this year they will probably only be five or six people.
Speaker 1: Usually there's like fifty in their house, so it'll be
Speaker 1: different this year. Oh yeah, wow, check it out? Cool?
Speaker 1: All right, Well, we'll talk more about Thanksgivings to get closer.
Speaker 1: Only a few weeks away though, folks gonna be gonna
Speaker 1: be here pretty soon. Where did that come from? Um?
Speaker 1: You said you had friends giving? No, I mean, like,
Speaker 1: where did that come from? Like? How is it almost Thanksgiving?
Speaker 1: That's what I meant. Oh, it feels like we snapped
Speaker 1: our fingers. I know, from March November we were were
Speaker 1: I feel like we were in summertime and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, we gotta think about Christmas gifts. You know,
Speaker 1: I'll talk more about this too my family. I know
Speaker 1: you do Hanukah, but in my family for adults, now,
Speaker 1: now that I have a little nephew, as soon as you,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get him, get the kids, get presents. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not a grinch, but I'm a big believer in
Speaker 1: for adults Christmas gifts. You know, a lot of pressure,
Speaker 1: a lot a lot of I don't know. We we
Speaker 1: all decided we went no gifts for the among adults,
Speaker 1: and that our gift to each other is taking time
Speaker 1: off and spending time together. And I might send a
Speaker 1: little corny way better, way better. We go to church
Speaker 1: together as a family. We spend time together. That's what
Speaker 1: we do instead of like getting the fifth sweater in
Speaker 1: a row for my dad and having be like wh
Speaker 1: a thread? No gifts at all? Really, yeah, we don't
Speaker 1: do gifts. I know, I know it's not very capitalist
Speaker 1: of us, but for some business. Look I'm not. I
Speaker 1: think gifts for employees and for friends and the show
Speaker 1: appreciation people, I think that's greman. I I do gifts
Speaker 1: for anybody who works in the building where I live,
Speaker 1: the staff, you know, I hook them up with gifts.
Speaker 1: So I'm not against gifts for Christmas, but for your
Speaker 1: immediate family, everybody but producer Mark that buck knows gets
Speaker 1: a gift. I mean, what's it was? Hotaka? Do you do? Oh?
Speaker 1: I guess you do gifts for Hotaka too? Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: we'll take we'll take care of that. This year. You'll
Speaker 1: see you're gonna be princess gifts. Um, she's she's a
Speaker 1: constant gift. Uh no, I mean we we probably will
Speaker 1: do that. Yeah, it's a good point. Actually, I gotta
Speaker 1: get her. I feel like, fine if you want to
Speaker 1: say no family gifts, because you can. Yeah you got
Speaker 1: you gotta get your significant other gifts. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: yeah that's true. Alrighty, let's get into it. Christopher writes
Speaker 1: in Buck You're killing me. The Beach was a terrible movie.
Speaker 1: I don't know which is worse, Leonardo's performance in Romeo
Speaker 1: and Juliet or The Beach. Otherwise, great show regarding the
Speaker 1: Beautiful State regards rather from the Beautiful State of Utah,
Speaker 1: home of Senator Mike Lee Chris, I didn't say The
Speaker 1: Beach was a good movie. I think I said it
Speaker 1: was pretty entertaining for what it is, and at the
Speaker 1: beginning it goes I'll tell you this, the first hour
Speaker 1: that movie is very watchable. It's very escapist, you know,
Speaker 1: and then and then it goes off a cliff. There's
Speaker 1: no question about it. But it's pretty good for what
Speaker 1: I did not see the Romeo and Juliet that you're
Speaker 1: talking about, which was like the MTV remake Romeo and
Speaker 1: Juliet with Claire Danes, whose acting career has always been
Speaker 1: a total mystery to me, Like, I don't understand how
Speaker 1: this person has been in anything, but she's you know,
Speaker 1: she was in Homeland now and she's in all the stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't get it at all. I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: understand the appeal. I'm just saying. But I did watch
Speaker 1: for the first time with the Snowbridge. I did watch
Speaker 1: The Talented Mister Ripley over the weekend, which is very good.
Speaker 1: It also goes off the rails a little bit, i'd say,
Speaker 1: and it's about thirty minutes too long. This is my
Speaker 1: big complaint about movies. Ninety minutes is the sweet spot.
Speaker 1: A great movie like Braveheart can be three hours, but
Speaker 1: ninety minutes is the sweet spot for a movie. Two
Speaker 1: hour movies, I'm usually looking at my watch, san is
Speaker 1: this almost over? It's just too long. I think you
Speaker 1: just have to watch better movies, buck even good movies,
Speaker 1: though I'll say I think this was a little I
Speaker 1: think it was a little bit too long. I think
Speaker 1: between ninety minutes and two hours is the sweet spot.
Speaker 1: I think you're right there. Okay, yeah, I mean I'll
Speaker 1: say this above two hours, I'm definitely like. When it
Speaker 1: gets the two fifteen to twenty mark, I'm like, why
Speaker 1: are they? Why are they doing this? There are very
Speaker 1: few exceptions, The Godfather, Braveheart. You know, some of those
Speaker 1: movies can be longer. It even Dances with Wolves, I
Speaker 1: mean that movie. I think I aged three years watching
Speaker 1: that movie. Movie goes on forever, and you know it
Speaker 1: has it's pretty watchable for what I actually kind of
Speaker 1: enjoy Dances with Wolves of the movie. You know. Anyway,
Speaker 1: you've seen that one, right, I don't think so. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's that's a classic. I think it won Best Picture
Speaker 1: many years ago. Pretty it's pretty solid anyway, talented mister Ripley,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe gets a B plus, maybe gets it had
Speaker 1: been on my list of movies that I had meant
Speaker 1: to see that I hadn't seen, so you know, maybe
Speaker 1: i'd go B plus with it, all right, Brian, it
Speaker 1: probably actually a B. Brian Buck and broducer Mark longtime listener,
Speaker 1: first time writer. I love the show, listen daily on
Speaker 1: podcast and I pass the buck. Well, Brian, You're amazing
Speaker 1: and we appreciate you very much. My friend. I'm writing
Speaker 1: from the formerly and hopefully still read state of Arizona.
Speaker 1: It sickens me what's going on with the election shenanigans.
Speaker 1: I'm praying for President Trump to win, but at a minimum,
Speaker 1: we need a free, fair and transparent election. Is there
Speaker 1: an official site where freed freedom loving patriots can help
Speaker 1: the campaign with legal as I say, I saw Lindsey
Speaker 1: Graham pledge five hundred thousand dollars. I'd love to do
Speaker 1: my part to help President Trump, after all he's done
Speaker 1: for our country. Brian, I'm sure there is. I don't
Speaker 1: know offhand. I know we had our friend Sean Parnell
Speaker 1: talk about his legal challenges and how he's raising money
Speaker 1: for those for PA seventeen. But at the national level,
Speaker 1: I'm sure if you just go to the if you
Speaker 1: go to the you know, National Republican Congressional Committee site,
Speaker 1: if you go to the Trump can't just go to
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign site, forget they just go to the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign site. That's the way to do it. And
Speaker 1: I'm sure they have that there for you, so, Brian,
Speaker 1: I hear you, though it's it's kind of crazy. Can't
Speaker 1: confirm it is right on the Donald J. Trump dot
Speaker 1: com website. There we go Donald J. Trump dot com.
Speaker 1: Go to that I want to donate. That's where you go, Maureen,
Speaker 1: Hey bucket producer Mark. Why didn't the r NC have
Speaker 1: pole watchers and every polling place twenty four to seven?
Speaker 1: I'm sure they'd have had a million willing volunteers. And
Speaker 1: why aren't there standardized voting rules election day only in
Speaker 1: person only, with the acceptions for the military and the elderly,
Speaker 1: who can turn in absentee ballots, No votes sooner than
Speaker 1: five days before, no votes allowed after seven pm, an
Speaker 1: election day period that offsets unprovable cheating. My question, if
Speaker 1: Biden steals this from the people, shouldn't we on the
Speaker 1: right go after everything we've got on Hunter, on Joe's
Speaker 1: criminal behavior, on anything and everything, and treat him as
Speaker 1: badly as Trump has been treated and how to him.
Speaker 1: I'm crushed and disgusted, very sad. Love you guys Trump
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. Maureen, you ask so many good questions.
Speaker 1: You ask about, for example, the standardization of these different
Speaker 1: election rules and guidelines, and I would agree with you
Speaker 1: that that would be a good idea that we should
Speaker 1: have that. I would just say that, unfortunately we're not there,
Speaker 1: and Democrats are going to fight that now they feel
Speaker 1: like this is their pathway to future victories. That Democrats
Speaker 1: in their minds, they think that this is what this
Speaker 1: is how they keep winning election after election at the
Speaker 1: national level going forward, and they're gonna also try to
Speaker 1: replicate this at the smaller scale in the mid terms
Speaker 1: and congressional seats. So don't don't think this is going away.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be a big fight and their position is
Speaker 1: going to be what it always has been. Or does
Speaker 1: Democrats oppose any common sense you could say very I
Speaker 1: think that's a good way of putting it. Common sense
Speaker 1: voter integrity measures. They oppose them. They do not want
Speaker 1: them to happen, you know, whether it's voter id whether
Speaker 1: you know anything. They always want to make it easier
Speaker 1: for votes that should not count to be counted. And look,
Speaker 1: I think it's they always assume that we just want
Speaker 1: to suppress voters. That's always their thing. Everything we do
Speaker 1: is the suppress voters. Well, everything they do is to
Speaker 1: make it easier for voters to cheat. So that's our
Speaker 1: that's our response that they're always trying to make it
Speaker 1: so that we can't find out if there's cheating. They
Speaker 1: make it easier for people to cheat, and that's how
Speaker 1: Democrats think they're going to keep winning elections unless we
Speaker 1: stop them. You're in the freedom hunting. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast more roll Call the Close Things
Speaker 1: out Today, Jay Rights, Hey Buck and Brucing Mark. We
Speaker 1: love everything you guys do. Got a question. Can it
Speaker 1: be argued that when the election officials in Georgia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Michigan,
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania stopped counting for evening for the evening, that at
Speaker 1: the end of the official counting process and nothing counted
Speaker 1: after that should be valid? Also, I love the Dracula podcast.
Speaker 1: Awesome to hear the weird, the real story without all
Speaker 1: the weird craps shields high Well, Jay, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. And as for as for where we
Speaker 1: are on getting the no, I don't think you're gonna
Speaker 1: be able to get any vote after the official counting
Speaker 1: process stopped thrown out. This is election laws. Look at
Speaker 1: there's a there's a federal component, but there's also the
Speaker 1: state by state specifics of it. So you really got
Speaker 1: to get into individual cases. What happened, what state, what's
Speaker 1: the law say? So I don't think you're going to
Speaker 1: be able to get that kind of a sweeping declaration
Speaker 1: that anything that came out after a certain point is
Speaker 1: going to be not counted. But I do think that
Speaker 1: there are valid challenges under way and that you might
Speaker 1: see a state or to shift. I for my part,
Speaker 1: think that Pennsylvania and Arizona, if we just see this through,
Speaker 1: we're gonna are gonna flip red. I think that can
Speaker 1: really happen, Cindy, whether Trump wins or not. Do you
Speaker 1: who do you see as picking up the mantel in
Speaker 1: the Republican Party to run and win in twenty twenty four?
Speaker 1: Is there anyone that can garner the following an enthusiasm
Speaker 1: that Trump has established. Well, Cindy, it's a great question,
Speaker 1: and I think honestly your guest at this point is
Speaker 1: as good as mine. There are certainly some names that
Speaker 1: come to mind. I mean, I don't think Ted Cruz's
Speaker 1: presidential aspirations are over with. I don't think. I don't
Speaker 1: think that Josh Holly is just content with where he is.
Speaker 1: I think that he wants to maybe make a run.
Speaker 1: I think Christy Nome is great and I would really
Speaker 1: like to see her or maybe have aspirations of even
Speaker 1: higher office. So you know that's those are names that
Speaker 1: come to mind. I know people are gonna say Trump's children,
Speaker 1: depends on which one, and you know, we gotta get
Speaker 1: into the specifics there. So yeah, I think that there's
Speaker 1: a deep Republican bench and there are a lot of
Speaker 1: people that are going to want to get in the
Speaker 1: mix here. But let's see if it's really gonna be Trump.
Speaker 1: Oh and Trump himself. I shouldn't forget that. I do
Speaker 1: believe the President of United States is a very decent
Speaker 1: chance that he may decide that he wants to run
Speaker 1: again if he doesn't win this challenge. So that's what
Speaker 1: I would all put it. And you know, well I run, Cindy.
Speaker 1: You're not asking me that, But I don't know. We
Speaker 1: see if producer Mark wants to be a campaign manager.
Speaker 1: I think he likes his gig right now though. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm cool with where I am. Let's stress. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I was gonna see your campaign manager, dude, We gotta
Speaker 1: you gotta fly a lot, you gotta travel a lot,
Speaker 1: raise money, long, long, late, late late hours. You know,
Speaker 1: by the time the campaign comes around, I'm gonna have kids.
Speaker 1: Probably it's gonna be yeah, exact, exactly exactly, and it's
Speaker 1: a lot. It's a lot. So I don't think I
Speaker 1: don't think that's in our future. Bill, Right, Biden talked
Speaker 1: about every vote representing a person tonight. With that being true,
Speaker 1: he understands why it's important to investigate the regularities and
Speaker 1: the ensure the validity of his statement. Right well, no, Bill,
Speaker 1: unfortunate leg I mean, you're raising a good point. Unfortunately.
Speaker 1: What matters to Bide and what matters the Democrats right
Speaker 1: now is that they win and everything else is going
Speaker 1: to be secondary to that. What they want is victory.
Speaker 1: They want to win, and whatever they have to do
Speaker 1: to get to that point is what they what they're
Speaker 1: going to do. So we'll continue, friends in this fight.
Speaker 1: The fight is not over, and I think in so
Speaker 1: many ways now more than ever, we understand why this
Speaker 1: is the motto of this show. Shields High