WEBVTT - The Bottom Line Is California Won't Allow PG&E To Fail

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Let's

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about pg n E, the California utility. The shares,

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>as Greg Jarrett just mentioned, higher right now by more

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>than thirty nine percent. Joining us here in the Bloomberg

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Interact of Brokers Studios to lend his expertise is Kit Kneale.

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>He is our senior industry analyst for the world of Utilities. Kit,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being here. Total liabilities for

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>p G and E. What kind of number are we

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Thirty billion? And I think that's the right

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>range from last year plus this year. That's a lot

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of money. That's more money, twice as much money as

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the invested equity in p G n E, twice as

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>much as the annual revenues for pg n E. So

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it you know, when you look at it that way,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you get a sense of just you know how you're

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>between a rock and a hard place when you're saying

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they have to pay all of this if they did well.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's just take a step back. What is p

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>G n e S responsibility in the fires that are

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>currently ravage in California. In California, they have this rule

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>called inverse condemnation, and the courts have held that if

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a utility equipment is in any way involved in a fire,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that the utility is totally responsible for all the damages

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in the fire. They can't argue that somebody else had

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>partial responsibility, or some homeowners should have done this, or

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>some highway department should have done that. They just have

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to pay it all. So that's been the real crunch

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that makes the California situation UH different than a hurricane

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, for example, where there's a long history of

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>people saying, obviously the utility didn't cause this, so you know,

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to help them pay it back. The California

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>legislature has a voice in all of this, right, that's right.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The California legislature, the governor, UH, the regulatory Commission. So

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>all those are really kind of the three major UH

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>state folks that are going to decide how this works out.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And the legislature has already done something where they've indicated

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that the regulators are supposed to consider whether, basically whether

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>utility is going to go bankrupt if it pays all

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of the liabilities that might be assigned to it. So

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the legislature has said, hey, regulators, uh, you know, don't

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to pass off some of the of the

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>liabilities or these guys can't survive financially. And yesterday we

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>saw the head regulator in California re emphasizing that point,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and that gave stockholders a kind of new lease on

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>life and and bond holders as well from Penny. With

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the bonds surging and price, I have to wonder pg

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>NY knows that it has California hostage here. It is

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest utility, biggest energy providers, so you know they're

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to be allowed to fail. The fact that

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>they drew down their entire credit line and basically said

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're at risk of bankruptcy now forced their hands. No. Well,

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, it's a good question whether they're they're

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that tough and cynical to be playing it that way.

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're not. They're not hedge fun guys, right,

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're not necessarily uh, they're kind of hopefully

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>running it for the long term. And also the reality is,

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know there's an example, Well, if if they're running

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it is for the long term, I want to come

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in there, because if they are, they're not doing a

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>very good job. And it's mean in terms of what

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of taxpayers are on the hook for in California,

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna be allowed to fail. They're they're struggling

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for sure, But look at the end of the day,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>even if it's the utility's fault, I mean, even if

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>they did something drastically wrong. There's a couple of realities

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that California has to do with. One is the people

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>got burned out have to get compensated in some way,

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>so that could be in the multiple billions of dollars.

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The other is you have to sooner or later have

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a financially viable utility. So to say, even if you

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>say it's their fault, to say, well, they have to

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>pay twenty or thirty billion dollars doesn't compute because then

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a utility that can continue to operate.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Kit if you just for the sake of argument, put

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>aside all of the inverse condemnation liabilities, the potential fifteen

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>billion whatever it is, what's the financial operation of p

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>g N like Well, aside from that, the financial operation

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is fine. But you know, keep in mind, regulated utilities

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>are entirely the creatures of the regulators, So their profitability,

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>their cash flow is completely dependent on what the regulators say.

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>It is. So if the regulators raise rates, then their

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>earnings and cash flow go up. If they cut rates,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they go down. If the regulators say, you don't have

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay these apparent liabilities, then you don't if you

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>do so. So when people say, well, what's the company

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>really worth? Aside from all of this, it completely you know,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>it completely depends on what happens with the regulators and

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>whether they want to let it go bank rupted or not.

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the end of the the end of the

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>day what you have, and right now regulators are saying,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't want you to go bankrupt. Kit Connolledge, thank

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Kit Connolledge's senior

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Industrials and Utilities analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence PG and E

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>has more than twenty two billion dollars of debt. Their

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>prices on those bonds are rising today, although PAM I

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>do have to wonder going forward if perhaps bond investors

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>are not going to be as forgiving with some of

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>these companies that can whip them around with different proclamations,

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>if there is a situation like this that occurs. Brexit

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>has been on the brink for a long time, but

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>things seem to be heating up with the potential deal collapsing.

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Theresa May now Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, trying

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to retain her control over Parliament and get this sort

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of deal through before the deadline. Joining us now, Brandon Brown,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>chief economist and head of economic research at Mitsubishi UFJ Securities,

0:06:57.920 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our eleven three oh Studios Brunday,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Can we just talk about what the pound is currently

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>pricing in what scenario our markets saying seems most likely

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>right now? There are two scenarios, and I think the

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>main scenario it's being priced in is that somehow this

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>appeasement deal is going to get through, and most likely

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it'll get through because there will be some cross of

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>crossing of our support from the Labor Party um to

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>support the deal despite for Brexit opposition, with Brexiteer opposition

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>within the Conservative Party, and why Labor would support the

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>deal is that if the Conservatives go along with this,

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they are a major risk of losing a lot of

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>our nationalists working class support and this will probably sink

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for Conservative Party for the next generation. So Labor would

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>really do well out of it. And in many ways

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think what the pound is pricing in it is

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>suspecter of a far left government under Mr Corbin. Now

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>there is a there is a better scenario, scenario number two,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>where Churchillian type figure maybe that an exaggeration emerges in

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of leadership challenge in the next few weeks,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>says that enough is enough. The Europeans have treated us terribly.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>They haven't ready sat down in good faith and negotiated,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and the best we can do is reach some interim

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and deal for the next year and then we're away,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>out out and under w t O rules, and that

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>would salvage a Conservative party possibly or rarely a lot

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of nationalists support, and they may even win a general

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>election one year down the road. Well, the French Finance

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>minister said earlier today that well, he said that British

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>politicians who campaigned for Brexit, he described them quote as liars.

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Does that help May actually reach an agreement with her

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 1>own party as well as with Parliament. Absolutely not. But

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me what the main failure in the

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>homemade strategy has been, it has been right from a start,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not doing everything possible to get a US deal, because

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>once they realize that the Europeans were going to be

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>totally obdurate, as they have been in Germany and France,

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the obvious strategy was to take the advantage of an

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>anti German president of the United States, anti EU, pro

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>British to do a deal and fundamentally aligned Britain with

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>all American interests and policies in the Middle East and

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else. And May has totally failed to do that instead,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in fact, she's gone for the opposite. She's been backing

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.599
<v Speaker 1>m mercle on Iran and all these other issues that

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>purposely to annoy President Trump. So I want to shift

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>focus from Europe to the United States because what's moving

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>markets today in in large part is FED Vice chair

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Rich Clarida his comments about getting to neutral and the

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>possibility of perhaps raising rates less frequently than previously thought

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>because of some of the head winds to growth and

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you are seeing a little bit of

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>slowing given that you just wrote this book, the Case

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>against two percent inflation, Do you think that the FED

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>needs to slow down now and not hike very much

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>at all to get to neutral in order to sort

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of normalize, or do you think that there's still room

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to run. We'll let me say one or two things.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows what neutral interest rates, let alone Federal Reserve officials.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, nobody knows where we are in the business cycle.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>If you study any fifty or hundred year period or

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty year period, the record of Federal Reserve fine tuning

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and knowing exactly where we are in the business cycle

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is appalling, and probably at the moment, with a cheerlead

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>leader for Trump Economics as the chief of the FED,

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he's probably tending to exaggerate the strength of the economy.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my view is that the growth cycle upturn,

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>which started in the early two thousand and sixteen in

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the US and globally under the influence of radically easy

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, has become tired, and most likely the global

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>growth slow down out iv United States has now been

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>joined by the United States. That is a dangerous period

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>because growth cycle slowdowns do sometimes go into recessions and

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes do bring about asset inflation. So we are at

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous moment. I just want to note that your

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>new book is entitled The Case Against two percent Inflation

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>From negative Interest Rates to a twenty one century gold Standard.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Do you see that happening? Well, A century is a

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>long time in twenty one century? What what I what

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think is that the two percent inflation standard

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to blow apart sooner than most people think,

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>even although there's not any effective political opposition to it.

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's probably going to blow apart because in risk

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>global slow that global slow slow down, inflation everywhere is

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be well below target, including in the United States.

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I think the next phase of monetary development is going

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to be currency war. It's going to be monetary a

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>new period of monetary chaos in the way of the

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>US will react to a global slowed down global slow

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>down is going to be stepping up quite justifiably action

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>against current its manipulators in Europe, Japan, and China. We

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>look forward to you in the future guiding US through

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>those issues. Thank you very much. Dr Brendan Brown. He

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>is the chief economist and head of economic research for

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Mitsubishi UFJ Securities. He's also the author of the case

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>against two percent inflation from negative interest rates to a

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>one century gold standard. We have an expert in the

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>world of food, Adnan Durrani. He is the founder and

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of Saffron Road and he has a

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>diverse and storied list of experiences in the food industry.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.599
<v Speaker 1>For example, he managed to sell what was at the

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>time the second largest bottled water company in the Northeast.

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>It was acquired by cot Averages. I'm speaking about Vermont

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Pure and Crystal Rock. And he joins us here in studio.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for being here. Thank you very

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>much for having me. It's honor to be on your show.

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about halal food and Saffron

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>foods and how this all came together. Give us a

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>little of your history. Sure so, uh, I'm kind of,

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess, both a serial immigrant and a serial entrepreneur.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And this started with the idea of the Silk Road,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>which was you know, went all the way from Italy

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to Asia and celebrated a hundred different cultures on that road,

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and so we thought, let's create a journey. Let's create

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a brand around Royal cuisines where they can be used

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as an enlightenment tool to bring together people of different faiths,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>different ethnicities, different cultures and celebrate their cuisines. And so

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the zafron was the main spice used on the Fron Road.

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's how it really came together as kind of

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a social model. And halal food, you know, is is

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge business outside US. It's a two trillion dollar

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>industry outside US. And halal has to do with not

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>only how was it harvested, but how the animals treated

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>while they were living. It's very similar to kosher. But

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we knew that there was a very strong demographic in

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>US for that, and that's why we launched that. That's

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not our core consumer necessarily, it's one of the elements

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of our brand. Well, yeah, that's what I was gonna say.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>When I think of Saffron Road, I think of major supermarkets,

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think of whole foods, I think of you know,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>aisles where it's not just people who are looking for

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>halal food, but they're looking for Middle Eastern food. They're

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>looking for Indian food. So can you talk a little

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bit about your distribution, your expansion, especially now as there's

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a more nationalistic tone in the United States. Very good question, Lisa. Yes,

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we started out obviously serving the Helala community, which is

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>around six or eight million American Muslims. Very educated. It's

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not like you have in Europe sent higher education than

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the average American as well as very high income. So

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really when you think about your technology engineers

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and all of that, that's really the demographic that's here.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's a marketer's dream, right, But our consumers are

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not even ha consumers. There are consumers that are part

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of the natural organic movement or what we call NASH

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>natural Organic, sustainable, healthy living lifestyle today. Food in our opinion,

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>especially millennials who are about sixty or seventy pc of

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>our demographic, look at food tribes and so we're part

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of this natural organic food tribe. And this is my

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth food company in the natural organic sector. One of

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>them was Stony Field Farms yogurt I mean I for

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty years have been devoted to businesses that are social

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>responsible to the environment, and so we say journey to

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>better and what we mean by that is journey to

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>better ethical values around food. Journey that's a better for

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the farmer's journey that's better for the the animals of livestock,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and journey that's better for the food system that brings

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you really healthy food. So since that's our starting point,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we were able to distribute nationally. We're in twenty thousand

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>stores all over the country, all fifty states. We're the

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>only national hall band as well. But that's because of

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>our standards. Uh. You know, Whole Foods was our initial partner.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>We were the first uh non JEMO verified TROS and

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>nottre in the world. We're the first certified humane entree

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world. So what we were doing was really

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to lift and elevate the ethical values around food

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that's offered in the supermarkets today. There are many legacy

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>brands that are having trouble in the food aisle and

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in the what I would call the frozen case, the

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>frozen aisle, because frozen food it doesn't it gets a

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>bad rap. But you've been very successful in that line

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>with your entrees, with your balls, you make it very

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>clear no antibiotics. Ever, how is that business doing and

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us how yours is different than many of the

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>well known legacy brands. Sure, that's a very good point, Biman.

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>What's happened in the food industry, And having been in

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this industry thirty years, I never thought I'd see this

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>happen in my entire lifetime. But last year, Boston Consulting

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Group in IRI but out of study that said that

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>forty of the growth of the eight hundred billion dollar

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>food and beverage industry is coming from small brands. That

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was a shocker. That was a wake up call. It

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was a wow moment. I think for the big CP Geese,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not succeeding because they haven't pivoted into this category

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in a mindful, authentic way. What we do is we

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>don't just you know, we don't just come up with

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>these certifications as a marketing element, although it's a smart

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>marketing element if you're authentic to it, it's because that's

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that's our value system. And so millennials today are very viral.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>They go online, they check out everything about the brand,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>they check out everything about the products. So you have

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to be bulletproof in terms of transparency, which a lot

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of big CPGs aren't. We've been able to disrupt and

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>become a modern challenger brand. We single handedly lifted whole

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>food sales in frozen National Organic for the last four

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 1>years about a year um and most of the other

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>brands were suffering terribly. Now a lot of the big brands,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the CPGs have started to pivot into this category and

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they're getting zoomer. Package goods companies have started to really

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>pivot into this category in a in a good way,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and they are cleaning up their products. That's part of

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>our mission right is to really it's also to bring

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>them along, you know, to really change the foods system

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of what they're looking at us through

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the river view mirror. We keep looking forward how to

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>completely lift our standards every year. You know, when you

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about being sustainable, I think about some of the

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>effects of climate change that we've seen recently. Has there

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>been anything yet that has forced you to change your

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>supply chains as a result to UH as a result

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of change in weather. Absolutely, we're always looking for partners,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the farms resourced from or whether it's a

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>particular vendors that we choose that are dedicated to the

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>same values that we're dedicated to so for example, UH,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we we have a line of very successful organic snacks,

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>chickpie snacks. We're the only ones that are fair trade certified.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>We have a dark chocolate and dark chocolate chai. I

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>brought them for you and him to try to sample. UH.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We also look very carefully at what are their standards

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>around UH labor, what are their standards and their facilities,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and we do audits on them. So we're very careful

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>with that. We also think that you know, we we've

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>been changing our packaging and there's a big movement towards

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>more environmental packaging as well. Is the is the halal

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>food more expensive? Because we talk about organic food being

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>more expensive than non organic food. Is there a real

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>price point difference? Halal is not quite there yet because

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>kosher is um because when the Kosher certifiers and the

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Ruth scholars came here, they did a wise thing for

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago, they set some standards. Right now, there's a

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of different standards. I think halala still in early stages,

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a pretty huge market. UM. So I

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>think once they set those standards will start to see

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the price movement upward. But right now there's a slight premium.

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not really that significant. The more significant is really

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the natural organic sustainability. Thank you so much for being

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with us. Really a pleasure having you at Non Drani,

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>founder in chief executive of Saffron Road, long time entrepreneur

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh and traveler, and and really the flavor is

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>getting into stores around the country and around the world.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Paym Definitely interesting to sort of see how even if

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 1>there is sort of more protectionist rhetoric, there is an

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>ex more expansive taste for different cultural foods. So that's

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>something that is sort of a uniting factor topic Brexit.

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>UK Prime Minister Theresa May has just named the pro

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Brexit Stephen Barkley as her new Brexit secretary. He his

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>remit will be to concentrate on preparing legislation, while talks

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>between the European Union and the United Kingdom will be

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:37.719
<v Speaker 1>handled by May's team in her Downing Street office. Now,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>this basically strips the Brexit Department of a key part

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of its job. Here to tell us more about what's

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>going on with Brexit is Terres Raphael Bloomberg Opinion editor. Terres,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to have you with us. Coming to us

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>from London. Your most recent column about Brexit says, the

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>problem isn't Theresa May, it's Brexit. What do you mean, Well,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not to say that Theresa May hasn't made a

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of mistakes in the last two years since

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>triggering uh, well year and a half since since triggering

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Article fifty. But you know, the the key problem here

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is that Britain has to make some pretty big compromises

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>if it wants both access to EU markets and the

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>um you know, freedom from EU rules and institutions. It

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>really can't have both. Now, May's mistake was sort of

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>telling both remainders and levers that they could have mostly

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted, and not quite being clear with them

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that that there would be some tough decisions to be made.

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And now you know that time has run out. She's

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>got a deal back from Brussels. Everyone is upset about it. Yes,

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody is upset about it. Does that mean it's a

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>good deal? Um, I don't think. I don't think anyone

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can really call it a good deal. What what we

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>could say about is it's probably the best she's going

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to get and it is far preferable UH to have

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this deal than to have no deal at all, because

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>no deal at all, um is you know, it's a

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>disaster for the UK economy. It literally means, you know,

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>planes don't take off unless um, there are some very

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>last you know, minute agreement's made. It means you know,

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>stockpiling medicines. Um. It's a whole lot of uncertainty and

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a and a whole lot of grief. So you know,

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a deal that you use offering. Uh,

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to talk any further about it. There

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>may be some very marginal concessions left to be wrung out.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Some in May's cabinet are now working to see if

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they can go and try to salvage this in a

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>way they could sell it to Parliament. But this is

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty much as good as it gets for her now.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And the question is can she sell it to her parliament.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Based on your reporting and your conversations with people close

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to the whole Brexit negotiations, do you believe that Brexit

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is being used as a political weapon against the Prime

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>minister and that, as you said earlier, this is as

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>good as it gets and she was handed a pretty

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>lousy hand of cards to play. She did not call

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the Brexit referendum. Did she know? And in fact she

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>was a Remained supporter. She wasn't an enthusiastic Remains supporter.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>But once that vote, um, you know, was decided, it

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>went for Leave and she became Prime Minister. She said,

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to deliver the best Brexit I can. I mean,

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt this is political Dominique rob her Brexit secretary, resigned,

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>having taken the job to negotiate the deal, having stayed

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on while that deal was being negotiated, having accepted while

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.239
<v Speaker 1>she presented it to cabinet, And you know, there are

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people out there think, well, you know,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he he resigned thinking that it's not going to go

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>through Parliament and he wants to be party leaders. So

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>they're political machinations mixing with this huge generational, historical, uh

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>decision change that Britain is going through. So it's it's

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>very hard to separate the two. And it's, you know,

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of what complicates the whole thing. British public opinion.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Give us a window onto what the British population thinks. Okay,

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so the public opinion seems to have been shifting recently,

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and there was a poll out recently that showed an

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>eight point shift towards remaining. So if you were to

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have a straight in out vote right now, uh, many

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people think that it would go the opposite way, and

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe by a larger margin than eight. The problem with

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that is you don't really know what people are going

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to do until you call a vote and you have

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a campaign and a lot there's a growing sort of

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>chorus of voices saying, let's have a second vote. But

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you ask? Do you put a remain option

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot, and that would be you know, completely

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>unacceptable to brexitters, who said, well, you know, the people

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have already told us what they want, they want out.

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>We can't then ignore the first vote. So do you

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>put a deal or no deal option on the ballot,

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in which case Parliament and says, well, what if they

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>vote no deal? It's always possible because you don't know

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>how this is going to play out in campaign, So

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a tricky question. I think it's not impossible it

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>will get to another referendum, but I don't really see

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the way through now, given the difficulty and figuring out

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>what's on that ballot. Just give you about twenty seconds

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>terres Tony Blair coming out today talking about Brexit. He

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>says it's the worst of both worlds. Does that help

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Theresa May at all? PIM Tony Blair would get a

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>standing ovation if he was on Capitol Hill right now.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He has not loved in Britain. Um, it's there's actually

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a real it's almost when he speaks out, Um, it

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>really hurts his cause. Uh, maybe that's mellowing a little

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of a Former Prime Minister John Major has also

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>been speaking out, but I'm not sure it helps that much.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for being with us as always,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Terres Raphael Bloomberg Opinion Editor. Once again, the news is

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that Prime Minister Theresa May will be taking direct control

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of Rexit negotiations. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa abramowits one before the podcast. You

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.