WEBVTT - What is a particle?

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, what exactly is your job title these days? Well?

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I call myself a particle physicist, all right, so then

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this question should be pretty easy for you. Can you

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>tell me what exactly a particle is? Oh? Boy, I

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>wish I could. What I mean you wish? Aren't you

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a particle physicist? How can you not know what it is? Well?

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's kind of just a made up job title,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I suppose. I mean, you must be smashing something there

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in your large accelerator. Yeah, maybe that's what we should

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have called it, the large something collider, the large something

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>something collider. I mean, I voted for something collider face,

0:00:47.960 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but nobody else wanted that. It's not too late. I

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>am more handmade cartoonist and the creator of PhD comics.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel. I'm a professor of physics at you see ermine,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm also a particle physicist whatever that means. Maybe

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that should be the title should be whatever physicist technically

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that encompasses the whole universe. Or I could just be

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a professor of whatever. What are you teaching this year? Whatever?

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>In your house, you're probably a professor of that. I'm

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>sure you hear from your kids a lot whatever. Yeah,

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I do have two teenagers, so I do get that

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You get a lot of something at home.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Not a whole lot of interests in physics, but a

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>whole lot interest in whatever, dad, or a lot of

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>non interests. I guess in whatever. Sometimes I can trick

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>them into being interested in physics. Oh yeah, how does

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that work? You pay them now? They asked me a

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>question about something else they're honestly curious about, and then

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I turned it into a question about physics. I guess

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>everything at the end is physics sort of, and so

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>basically anything that anything they ask you as a physics question.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>When can I go to sleep? Well, it depends on

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the physics of the chemistry and your brain. Let's explore that.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Sit down, I'll give you a lecture, and that's a

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.399
<v Speaker 1>good way to put them to sleep. It all works out.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the Universe, a production of I Heart Radio in which

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we turn the whole universe into a physics question and

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ask what is it, how does it work? And can

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>we figure it out without putting you to sleep. We

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>take your mind on a journey into the craziest things

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that the universe contains, the craziest things that the universe does,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and the craziest, strangest things that the universe might also

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be made out of. That's right. We take you in

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a journey to the big whatever because the universe is

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>full of what you know, it's full of stuff, and

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>there's also an ever there because the universe is several

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>billion years old and maybe around for trillions of more years.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right. There's not many things that we can say

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>with certainty in physics and philosophy, but we can say

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that there is something out there and we're something, right, also,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are don't we something? I'm something? You're something. The listener

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is something and you're definitely listening to something right now. Well,

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you're more, you're more of a something else, Dan. I'm

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna take that in the entirely positive way that it

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was meant. Definitely not nothing. Something. It stands out you mean,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 1>like a ZiT sort of rises above the skin. That's

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that's something else, Daniel. But I'm happy to be the

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>black head in this universe. But it is a pretty

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>wonderful universal of amazing things to discover, and every day

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we're learning more and more about it. We're looking out

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there into the stars and looking with our microscopes at

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the smallest things in existence, and we're giving names. We're

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not just taking names, we're giving out names to these things.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And we're doing more than just trying to see what's

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>out there in the universe. We're trying to make sense

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. We're trying to describe the crazy bonkers universe

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that we see out there in terms of ideas that

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>makes sense in our It's we have a small mental

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>toolbox of concepts that we are familiar with, and we

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>need to describe the whole crazy universe out there in

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of these simple ideas. Yeah, does that mean we

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have like little tiny hammers inside of our brains and

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>little tiny screwdrivers sort of? I think that as kids

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>grow up, they experienced the universe and they encounter new

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>ideas and they sort of become familiar with them, and

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then that things in your brain is like the set

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of ideas that you are comfortable with. You know, a thing,

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what can the thing do, what can the thing be?

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>What are the rules of a thing? And then lady,

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you try to describe other stuff in terms of that

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. Yeah, it's almost like we sort of

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>experienced two different universes in a way, right, Like, as

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you grow up, the universe seems to be one way.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>It seems to follow sort of like Newtonian physics. Things

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>bouncing around, things are hard, things are soft, things fly

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>through the air. But then as you learn more and

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>more about the universe, as humanity has learned more and

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>more about the universe, things got more complex. They certainly did.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>There are so many things out there in the universe

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that we do not experience in childhood that we do

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not have intuitive concepts for, because they're not the kind

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of thing that our brains involved to understand, and not

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the kind of things that we learned to deal with

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>when we were children. And yet they are out there

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and they are part of the real world, and so

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to somehow extrapolate from the kinds of concepts

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>that we do understand out there into the fuzzy weirdness

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that the universe is. And it makes me wonder how

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>other intelligent species think about the universe, if they have

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>different ways of interacting with the universe, or if they're

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>very very small or very very large or very very fast,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>would they think that our understanding of the universe is

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>strange and alien. The way we might think there's is whoa.

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>You just kind of blew my mind there, right, Like

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>we usually assume aliens are the same size and the

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>same shape as we are. But maybe aliens are you know,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a tiny microscopic of almost quantum size and beings. Yeah,

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>or maybe aliens can like taste photons and smell electrons

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and have weird quantum interactions, and for them, quantum mechanics

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is totally intuitive and they would find you know, classical

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>mechanics is like, wow, that's fantastic and beautiful. What an

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting simplification of big quantum mechanics. It's really fun. And

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of course you know, I can turn any question into

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one about aliens, yes, or maybe the aliens are just

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>going like whatever, that's actually what my kids complain about

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>their Like, dad stopped turning this into something about aliens.

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ask about aliens. Well, all teenagers act like

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>aliens sometimes, or at least they feel alienated or they

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>wonder if their parents are aliens. You just need a

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>cone head, I guess. But it does seem like we're

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of maybe stuck it away in our childhood view

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of the universe sometimes or at least it's hard to

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of think about the real universe because

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>it is sort of complex and not intuitive from a

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>child's perspective. But then our language and our way of

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking is sort of stuck because that's how we grew up.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's a real question whether or not we can

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>comprehend a true, chaotic, buzzing reality that's out there in

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the kinds of ideas that we have, or

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>do we need to somehow invent or discover a completely

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>new kind of concept which previously was alien two our thinking,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, just following the mathematics and then developing inventing

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some new kind of intuition sort of as an adult

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>intellectual species that we need to grapple with the craziness

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of reality. I wonder if even our brains are capable,

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>right or equipped or designed to maybe grasp the true

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>nature of the universe. You know, it could be that,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, like sort of like dogs can't do calculus,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe we really understand the define mathematics at the core

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of reality. And I don't like the way you're talking

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>about my dog there, man, I mean, don't put limits

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on my dog's village. Dog can do calculus or at

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>least algebra. Come on, you can count treats. I'm pretty sure.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>There you go. I'm sure he can calculate the radio

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>treats too, So that's sort of like calculus. Yeah, but

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right, we don't know if the human brain is

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>capable of grasping the true nature of reality. Certainly dogs

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>are not, as much as we love them, and so

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>then there's no guarantee that we are infinitely intelligent and

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>capable of understanding. If super intelligent aliens come to Earth

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and want to explain physics to us, could we even

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>understand it? Could we grocket even if they knew how

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to speak our language and our mathematics and our physics.

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Would we fail that class? Yeah? Or maybe they would

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have to like trick us into understanding or liking or

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>asking the right questions about physics. You know, you think

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we'd just be like whatever, aliens, we don't want to

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>hear it. Just give me a headache, man, I would

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sign up for that headache. I would go to that class.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>What if it was a constant headache, like seven headache? Man?

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Have you tried quantum mechanics? That's basically seven headache. I

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's humanity trying to absorb something which is

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>truly alien, which is far from our experience, something we

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have never experienced on the early Savannahs. I mean, we

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to know to be able to hunt mammoth,

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and yet we are somehow beginning to grapple with it.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We are getting a sort of mathematical fluency with a

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>truly alien concept. We'll just need to require the aliens

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to bring espirin at least give us a hand. But

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting to try to, you know, understand these

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>fundamental concepts about the universe. And there is one concept

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>out there that may seem pretty easy to understand, but

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>actually there is a lot of uncertainty about it. Something

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>very basic about the universe, that's right, And if you

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>ask people whose job it is to understand this stuff,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you get lots of very different answers, to my surprise.

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So to be on the podcast, we will be tackling

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the question what is a particle? And just to be clear,

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>then in your official title is particle physicists. So you know,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's shocking that you don't know. And

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>second of all, if we were going to ask somebody

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we should ask you. You know we have one of

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the leading experts in the field here. Yeah. Well, I

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>suppose you could say that a particle physicist is someone

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>who tries to understand what particles are, not somebody who

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>already knows the answers, right, because member science is a journey.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You ask somebody who's an expert in dinosaurs, they don't

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>know everything about dinosaurs. Maybe they know everything that humans

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>know about dinosaurs, but they don't already have all the

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>answers right. Right. When I hire a plumber, I don't

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>really want someone who knows plumbing. I just want someone

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>who comes in to learn about plumbing. Well, that's why

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't hire a physicist to do your plumbing, because

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they'll be like, Oh, I have this great R and

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>D project. I'm curious this new theoretical idea for plumbing

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>will work in your toilet. That's right. I wanna build

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a water collider inside your walls and we'll see what happens. No,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just putting a small black hole under your toilet

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's just gonna suck everything away. That would be

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty green solution. It would conserve water for sure.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Whether dark matter can go into a black hole. Oh man,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that's next level physics, spread there, or lower level physics.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, particle physicists are people who are curious

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>about these questions. What is the universe is made out

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of at its most fundamental level, And it's something we've

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of progress thinking about in the last

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred years or so. But there's a shocking diversity of answers,

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>even among particles physicists. Yeah, something as simple of award

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as a particle can have many different meanings, and in

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>physics it can mean very different things. So it's usually

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>we were wondering how many people out there have thought

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>about this very basic question what is a particle, and

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they have a true answer to it.

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>So thank you very much for everybody who is willing

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to answer random questions for the podcast. It's some great

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>help to us and we love hearing your voice and

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>having you all out there participated makes us feel a

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit like this is a conversation, So please, if

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to participate, don't be shy right to us.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Two questions at Daniel I and Jorge dot com. So

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>think about it for a second, what do you think

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is a particle. Here's what people have to say, Well,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jrrey, I think I learned this one from you.

0:11:55.400 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>At a particle is a certain excitation of a certain field.

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave it at that. To me, a particle is

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the smallest, this great thing that you can poke where

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't yet know how to smash it into smaller bits.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>My understanding is that a particle is just an excitation

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in a quantum field, and when it reaches a certain

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>energy level um our many electron golds in that field.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That causes a particle to just appear as a consequence

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the energy in the field. It's just the basic

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>unit for that has of matter and um and energy.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>We have different definitions based on how we're talking about

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>what a particle is. Maybe talking about a particle from

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of an engineer building a particle collider, you

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>might have a certain definition. If you're talking about it

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in a theoretical physics sort of minded way, you might

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have a slightly different definition. I think it's something that

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we're still grappling with because it's not something that we

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have an intuitive understanding of. So I think there's a

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of different ideas and a lot of different ways

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to try and make analogies that we can understand to

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of encompass this concept of particle. A particle is

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>that portion of the standard model divided into quantized pieces

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which may or may not be fundamental. They may be

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>thought of as the building blocks of the universe, and

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they may be also thought of as perturbations, wiggles, or

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>vibrations of their concommittant field. I generally use the word

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>particle to describe small bits of stuff, and it doesn't

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just mean atom. You can even say, like a cork

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is a particle, and of course are made up of

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>other things. Those two are particles. So I guess the

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>word particle just means a bit of something, the smallest

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>bit of something you could possibly have. All Right, I

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>got a little existential there and a little basic. Some

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>people were, like, a particle, it's just a particle, right,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like the basically unit of stuff. Yeah, it is

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a really fascinating question, and you hear in these answers

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different ideas. Yeah. Yeah, some people say

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like an excitation in a quantum field, and some

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>people say it's just like the smallest thing you can

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>poke at Nobody said it was Daniel job. Nobody said

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>why are you asking me? If you're asking me, we're

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. It's like if your dentist asks you what

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>am I supposed to do next? At least nobody said

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>something or whatever. It's not nothing. Oh, there you go.

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's not nothing. Is that one of the leading theories.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not an explanation though, that's just like ruling out

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>other explanations. Maybe that is the answer, Daniel. That's like

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>when you ask your teenager who didnt to the car

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and they say, I don't know, but it wasn't me.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not an answer. Yeah, so let's dig into this.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's almost almost like a philosophical question, right Daniel,

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like what is a particle? Or maybe more like a

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>semantic question, you know, about the meaning of the word

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>or is this actual? Like physics questions like we don't

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>even have math for it. I think it's all of

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the above. It's definitely an interesting lesson in history how

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we came up with this concept of a particle, what

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it meant to people through time. There's also a philosophical question,

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you could describe the universe in terms

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of particles versus fields, versus something else, which is the

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>true stuff of the universe. But it's also really a

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>physics question. You know, we are trying to understand the universe,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's most basic level, what is the fundamental element

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. Some things are fundamental, they're inherent properties

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, and other things like ice cream cones,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>are emergent. They arise out of the complex interactions of

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>other stuff. So it's really sort of the heart of

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>particle physics is understanding the very nature of the universe.

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think it really is a physical question as well.

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a party, It's right there in the

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>name particle. Well I never made that connection. My whole

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>job is just a party. You're a party animal, professional

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>party animal, professional party. Yeah, and if you have had

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of particle physicists at your party, you know

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Yeah, you know it's not really a party.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, let's dig into this kind of deep question, Daniel,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess how would you even start to tackle this question.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think a good way to begin is to recognize

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that particles are really at the heart of what we

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>mean by the stuff around us. It's a huge inside

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>already to say that the things that are around us,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the ice cream cone, the lava, the kittens, whatever you

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>ate for lunch, all of this stuff is made out

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of smaller pieces. Right, So the fact that you had

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a cheese sandwich for lunch is not because that cheese

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>sandwich is made out of like cheese bits and sandwich bits.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>It's all made out of the same stuff, right. There's

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>no cheese sandwichiness to the universe. There's no lava eatness

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to the universe. That's all made out of the same

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamental pieces. And so when you take the universe apart,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you discover this really deep and fascinating fact that most

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of the qualities of the things around you are determined

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>by the smaller bits they're made out of. And not

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like the identity of those bits, but how those bits

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are arranged. Right. But that that's sort of a modern

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>view of the universe, right, I mean, when we started

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>back in ancient times, you know, we noticed, I think

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we noticed that we can you can break stuff apart,

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>right like you can break a person apart. You can

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>take a rock and smash it into smaller and smaller

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>bits but it probably our limitation was that if you

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>break a rock into smaller bits, eventually just get tiny

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>little rocks or kind of little pieces of people. But

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of no way for us to know, like, oh,

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this rock stuff is different than this plant stuff. Right,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Certainly in ancient times, but there was this concept that

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe there are a few basic elements. You know, they

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>thought it was air, wind, fire, and water initially, but

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this idea that maybe everything around us was made of

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 1>basic ingredients mixed together in different ways. That is an

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.959
<v Speaker 1>ancient idea. Although you know, every time you're giving credit

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Greeks for some ancient idea that sounds very

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>modern and insightful, you gotta remember they had lots of

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>other crazy ancient ideas that we never forget because they're

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so far off that we ignore them. Right right, I'm

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>well aware of your anti Grecian is m. You're kind

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of down on the Greeks. Do you think they were

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just like shooting ideas everywhere and some of them stuck

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>on the wall. I mean, have you read Greek philosophy,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And basically that's exactly what they did. They sent around

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in robes, eating olives and throwing ideas against the wall.

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a great way to do things. It

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is a great way to do things, and it's wonderful

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that people were thinking so deeply a long time ago.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem is they didn't really have ways to test

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>these ideas until very very recently. So for a long

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>time the idea has just sort of floated out there

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in idea space. But more recently we have actually gained

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>insights about the universe by doing experiments. And it was

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 1>something like a hundred and fifty years ago that the

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>concept of a particle really came together and it emerged

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>out of experiments that people were doing. Interesting, So was

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>this before or after the idea of the atom, Like,

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>do we have an idea of what an atom was,

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is the smallest thing you can kind of break stuff

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>apart into, before the idea of a particle? Or did

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we think about particles before atoms? We thought about atoms first.

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean atoms also come from the Greeks, right, Democratus

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>had the idea of atoms, and then later on in

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>chemistry we noticed that there were these integer quantities in

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>chemical equations. So people had this concept that maybe things

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>were made out of atoms. But we didn't really know

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>how those atoms worked, you know, what was inside the atom,

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>what was the structure of the atom itself, what made

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this element different from that element, And that didn't come

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about until the discovery of the electron in the late

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds. This is J. J. Thompson who was playing

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>around with cathode rays, these strange glowing rays in these

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>tubes where they had pumped out most of the gas. Mmm. Interesting,

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that, I guess we tried bringing down

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>rocks as small as we could and at some point,

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>which chemistry, you get to the idea of like maybe

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>there's the smallest possible bit of stuff. And so we

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>knew about atoms, but maybe we thought that, you know,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a carbon atom and that was different than

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a hydrogen atom, and that was different than an oxygen atom, right,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Like that's kind of where we were before we thought

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about things smaller than an atom exactly. And there's a

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>reductive approach, and so we wonder, like, well, what makes

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>a carbon atom different from an oxygen atom? Is that

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>just it is that like the fundamental element of the universe.

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like the carbon genus and the oxygen genus or

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is there some quality to carbon that makes it carbon

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>ey and a different quality that makes it oxygen e? Right,

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And so we wonder like, is that come out of

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the internal structure? Are there the same bits inside are

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>arranged in different ways? Can we explain them in terms

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of another deeper layer of reality? And so that's of

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>course the goal of particle physics to keep tearing things

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>apart and understand in the relationship between these things and

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what explains their nature what makes carbon carbony and what

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>makes oxygen oxygen e? Right? Right? Because I guess it

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>could have been that could have been the answer, right,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Like we could have lived in the universe where carbon

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>was one of the fundamental particles and oxygen was one

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fundamental you know, units of the universe, right, Like,

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it could have been that. But you're saying that once

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we discovered the electron, then we started to take apart

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the atoms in theory, Yes, and it could even have

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>been possible at a higher level, you know, you're talking

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>about elements, but it could have been that. You know,

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>cheese for example, it was made out of some fundamental

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>cheese object and couldn't be divided into smaller things cheese

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is pretty fundamental, at least to my diet. But yeah,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it could have been that carbon was just one thing

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in the universe and oxygen was another thing. But if

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that were true, some physicists would wonder, like, what's the

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship between carbon and oxygen? Why are there two things?

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Why can't I express them in terms of just one

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>fundamental thing? So there will always be people pushing at

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that boundary and wondering if there's a deeper explanation. But

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you're right, we don't know. And that's sort of where

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we are today in particle physics. With a few objects

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we think maybe our fundamental and we wonder about their

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>relationships and if there is a deeper explanation. Right, Because

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>we eventually broke apart the item, we discovered the electrons

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and the protons, and then the protons can be broken

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>into courts, and the courts can be can be broken

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 1>into cheese. Right, I hope that we discover some new

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>quantum property and we call it cheese. We've called them

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>flavor and color, right, it would be just as inappropriate. Yeah,

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but I was just kidding, But really we were down

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to like the court level. Right, as far as we know,

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>when you try to break stuff down to its smallest level,

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we're down to corks and electrons and like their cousins

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>in the periodic table of the standard model. Yeah, and

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all of this is just like a hierarchy of our understanding.

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really define what we're talking about. Like we're

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about an electron, we're talking about quirks we haven't

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>really specified, like what is that thing? You know, it's

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a word, we're saying, it's part of the and but

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what do we mean is going on inside the atom?

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What is the nature of these things? Right? I mean,

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that's basically the question we're asking today is what is

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly an electron and what exactly is a court? Because

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we as far as we know, you can't break those

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>down into smaller little bits, right. And the cool thing

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you can make a lot of progress doing

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>particle physics without knowing the answer to that question. You

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>can talk about the relationships between these things. You can

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>build one thing out of other things without even really

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>understanding what it is you're talking about. And that's sort

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of my job is to try to make progress even

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>though we don't understand like the core fundamentals, the true

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>foundation of the nature of reality right, right, because we've

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>talked about this in the podcast before. How there's this

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of progression, right, like to do engineering at least,

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like to build a building, you don't really need to

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>know chemistry, and to do chemistry, you don't really need

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to know understand quantum particles, and to and to put

0:23:57.520 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>together an atom, you don't really sort of need to

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>know what is exactly a particle in a mathematical sense.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But your job is to like go as deep as

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you can and break that down until like nobody can

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>ever break it down anymore. Yeah, And that's true that

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't need, for example, to understand quantum gravity to

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>predict the path of hurricanes. And I'm grateful that the

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>world works this way and sort of layers of emergent theories,

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so you don't need to know how the universe begin

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>order to make chicken soup, for example. But we're sort

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of clueless at another level more than just like the

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>engineers not understanding how the corks work. We're dealing with

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>corks and we still don't really know what they are,

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and we have these mathematical tools that we can use

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to predict what they're going to do, but they are

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so strange and so counter to our intuition that we

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>can't really answer the question, like, what is this thing

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about? We have the math that describes it,

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but we don't have like an intuitive grasp of it.

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>So then that's what you mean by particle. When we're

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>asking what is a particle, we're really asking what is

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a cork? And what is an electro? Exactly? What is

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this thing we're talking about? What does it mean? What

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>is its fundamental nature? And more than that, like what

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>makes a cork different from an electron? The way you

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, like maybe carbon could just be different

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>from oxygen. It could just be two fundamental elements of

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Why is a cork different from an electron?

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Like what makes them different? One of them has more

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>cheese obviously. All right, let's get into possible ideas for

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>what a particle could be, and as always, we'll talk

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>about what does it all mean? Man, So let's get

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>into that, but first let's take a quick break. All right,

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>we are asking fundamental questions here on the podcast today, Daniel,

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we're asking what exactly is a particle? I mean, we

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>know that matter can be broken down into atoms, and

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>adams can be broken down into electrons and corks. But

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is an electron or a cork. That's a

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult question to answer. It is, and when you'd say particle,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>most people probably imagine like a tiny little dot of matter,

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>like the smallest bit of stuff. And you heard some

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of the listeners answering in that way, and that's very convenient,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of an extrapolation of an intuitive idea

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you had that like, rocks are made out of small rocks,

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and those rocks are mad out of even smaller rocks,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and when you get down to it, the universe is

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>basically a bunch of super tiny little rocks. It does

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>rock the universe the little cheesy sometimes, but it kind

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>of rocks. It rocks my world for sure. But we

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>know that that's not a completely accurate picture because when

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you get down to the quantum level, the rules do change.

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>The rules for rocks are the classical rules. You know,

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the things move through the universe smoothly and continuously, that

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they follow rules of where you used to If something

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is here and then later it's there, it went from

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>here to there. We also know that the quantum particles.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>The super tiniest little rocks in the universe don't follow

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>those rules, so we need like a new concept for

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going on down there. At the very smallest level,

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we just say they're little, tiny rocks, right, because like

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>one kind of physics is good for keeping track of rocks,

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that's Newtonian physics. But at the smallest level and things

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>get quantum, things get kind of fuzzy, and then it's

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they're more accurately represented by waves, right, Yeah, And we

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have these equations, these wave equations, which seem to control

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened to these little objects, these little particles, and

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we can solve those wave equations, and they predict with

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a probability where these particles are likely to go. But

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>already we're presented with a confusion, like, well, are we

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about these things as a wave as a particle? Do?

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I sometimes talk about them as a particle, sometimes talk

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>about them as a wave. And hear lots of people

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>saying that these objects are waves most of the time,

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but then when you look at them, they become particles. Right,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a common picture. But I think that that's not

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>really an accurate way to think about it. I think

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>more accurate is to think that these objects are something

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>new and different. There neither particles nor waves, though they

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes be described in analogy by either of those pictures.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Interesting because I always thought about it them as you know,

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>they're waves that sort of looked like particles from Afar.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>If you get down to the smallest level, they look

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like a wave, but if you used to just kind

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of pull back, they look more like a little bit

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of stuff moving around, except that sometimes they look like waves.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Even from Afar. You know, you can see interference effects,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.479
<v Speaker 1>which are macroscopic effects. A double slit experiment shows you

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that particles passing through those slits interfere with themselves and

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>create these like macroscopic effects. This interference patterns on the screen.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>So these wave like effects can also influence you know,

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>real visible stuff. Okay, so then that's one definition of

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a particle is that it's a collapse wave or like

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a wave that when you that that when you look

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at it becomes a particle kind of. There is a

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>common attempt to sort of weave together this idea that

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe a particle is a wave and sometimes it acts

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like a particle when you look at it. Right. The

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.479
<v Speaker 1>problem of course, is that we don't really know what

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it means to say you look at it. We've had

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a few podcasts on this topic of the quantum mechanics

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>measurement problem, like what does it mean to look at

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>something and collapse its wave function? Why when an electron

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is flying along through the universe does the universe suddenly decide, Okay,

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take on particle like little mini rock

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like properties and decide now where the electron actually is.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Whereas a minute ago we were happy having it being

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a quantum wave and having uncertainty to it. What makes

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe decide to draw from this random probability distribution

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and decide where the electron is so that you can

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>look at it with your experiments. It sounds to me

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like what's in your head is that you're

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking that a particle is something that has like a

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>definite location and boundary and velocity and like you know

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>where it is. It's like a little rock that's just

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting on your desk. But a quantum wave is different

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>than that. Like, a quantum wave is not like a

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>little rock, right, Like it's it's that boundary between uncertainty

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and certainty that maybe you think the definition of a

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>particle is that's a the way to put it, and

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason is that we can't see uncertainty in that way.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We can't measure the quantum wave function directly. We can't

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>see a photon as in two states at the same time.

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't observe that. Ever, our experiments, they count particles.

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why particles are such a compelling concept. It's because

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's what we see in our experiments. We can do

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>single photon experiments when we see a one photon fly

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>across the room and hit a screen. We never see

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a photon like in two possible states at once. That's

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>only like what the universe does when it's calculating what

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>might happen in your experiment. It's nothing we actually observe.

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why we use the word particle when we talk

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>about things we actually observe, because that's all we can observe.

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>We can't see those waves directly. Oh, I see what

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. You're saying that maybe one possible definition of

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the word particle is it's what happens when you sample

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a quantum wavefunction, right, it starts after the particle is

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>seen or interact with something else before that it's not

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a particle. That's a common idea and it's compelling, but

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it's deeply, deeply flawed, right, because you don't have a

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>clear definition for what it means to look at it

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or to sample it. You know, like we talked about before,

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna poke this electron with your finger, then

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it has a wave function. Maybe it's here

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and gets poked by your finger, or maybe it's over

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>there and it doesn't get poked. But when you touch

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it with your finger, the universe has to decide. But

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>how does that happen? Because in the end, your finger

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is also made out of quantum particles, right, It's just

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>made out of other electrons and quirks. So why can't

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it just interact in an uncertain way with that electron

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and leave things uncertain? At what point does your finger

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>become a classical object that forces the universe to collapse

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the wave function? And what point can it stay uncollapsed?

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not defined, it's not specified, and that's what makes

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that picture totally unsatisfactory. And it also kind of leads

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you to the problem of like, what is it before

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>before it collapsed or what is it before you measured it? Right,

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like a pre particle almost, which that doesn't help you. Yeah,

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what is that thing that's going through the universe? Like?

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the wave functioning a real physical thing? Is it

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>just a calculation that's in our minds that we used

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to predict these things? Is the universe doing that calculation

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in its internal computer? Like? What's going on? What's

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>going on? Man? All right? So that's kind of one idea.

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>What you're saying. It's kind of flawed because they kind

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of doesn't help you. But then maybe what if I

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just think of a particle as that wave? Right? Like,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what if I think of the particle as just an

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>excitation of a quantum field. So the way the history

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>went was that Schereninger develops his wave equation as a

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>way to describe what's going on with these particles, and

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it worked amazingly. I loved you know, he just wrote

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this thing down and he had no real justification for it,

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it might have worked, and then it

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just kind of did, like wow, and predicted experiments. That's cool,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But it turned out to be very hard to use

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because it really just describes one particle flying through the universe,

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the universe is filled with particles, and

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so as soon as you have like multiple particles, three

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or four, ten seven particles, it's basically hopeless. You know,

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't use the short in your equation to solve

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>any realistic problem. So then the mathematical and physical geniuses

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in the first part of the last century developed this

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>new idea of a field. Right, they have this idea

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of a field from classical physics. You know, electromagnetic field

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>already existed, and they say, well, what if there are

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>these quantum fields, and instead of describing one electron over

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>here is one short in or wave, and that electron

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>over there is another shorting of wave, we unify it

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>into a big picture of an electron field, and both

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>electrons are just wiggles in that field. And then we

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>could just like you know, think about the motion of

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that field rather than the motion of individual electrons. I see,

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like before we thought of maybe electrons as like separate magnets,

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like there's one magnet over here, there's another magnet over there.

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But another way to think about them together, it's like

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they're all part of the same magnet, right, or they're

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>all part of the same magnetic field of the universe. Yeah,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's a really powerful idea, not just because it's helpful,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like it lets you do calculations you otherwise couldn't do.

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>The Shorting equation, for example, describes how a particle moves

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to the universe. It's very difficult to describe the creation

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 1>or the annihilation of particles, but we know that happens

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time when you use fields. However, it's no

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>big deal, Like you can create a particle, just excite

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the field another step. It's just like take the string

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and strum it harder. Or you can describe the destruction

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of particles when the field relaxes and releases that energy

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>into like another field. So things that were hard now

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>become natural. Right, And so in this view, the universe

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>is filled with a field, and a particle is really

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>just like a little like excitation in that field, like

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a little like a blip in it almost, And so

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we're all just made out of blips. Yeah, and don't

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>underestimate the physical implications of that. It means that particles

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>are not the fundamental element of the universe we're talking

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>before about like fundamental versus emergent. Right, like ice cream

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>cones are not fundamental property of the universe. You could

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>expect there to be a universe where there are no

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>ice cream cones, and maybe there won't be in the future,

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>sorry to say. In that same sense, this means that

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>particle holes in this view are not fundamental to the universe.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>They just like sort of are a description of how

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fields wiggle. The fields are the real fundamental building blocks

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. That what the universe is is space

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>filled with quantum fields, and those fields wiggle in certain

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>ways that we call particles. Yeah, like you, it's almost

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like we were looking at the tale of an elephant

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't know that. Really what's important is that

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole elephant and from us. Yeah, and it's

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>really beautiful. As you get into the mathematics of quantum fields,

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you see so many symmetries and patterns emerge that just

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>strike you as like, wow, I'm reading the truth about

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe. We talked in a recent podcast episode about

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a really subtle concept, gauge symmetry, which talks about like

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>how these fields are related to each other. You can

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like rotate these fields so that one turns into another one,

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and you see these symmetries exist in our universe, and

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there are the reasons for things like why is electric

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>charge conserved because there's a symmetry in the photons field

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it were wires photons to exist and acquires electromagnetism. So

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it really like feels like you're reading the deep truth

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.959
<v Speaker 1>of the universe when you get immersed in quantum field theory.

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the basic idea is to define a

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 1>particle is just a little blip in the field, right,

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's really the field that kind of puts together

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the things in the universe. Yeah, you can have fields

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that exist without having any particles in them. And then

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a particle, as you say, is like you start with

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum and you put energy into it and it excites,

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's what a particle is. And it's not just

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's much more mathematically handy to do these calculation

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it also sort of solves a really deep problem which

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to earlier. Somebody asked Freemandeyson, the famous physicist,

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>once what he thought was the greatest accomplishment in physics

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and the last fifty years, and he said that it

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was quantum field theory being able to explain why all

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>electrons are the same. And you were saying earlier, like

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you can think of electrons is like just different magnets.

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about that, why I are all

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>electrons the same? If electrons are just different particles, why

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>do they all have the same mass? And quantum field

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>theory it answers that because it says, well, there aren't

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different electrons. There's just really one electron.

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just all the same excitation in the same field.

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>There's only just one electron field in the universe. But

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>how does that ans really question? Like why is this

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>blip in this field the same as the blip in

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the field over there? Because the field only knows how

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to blip in a certain way. It's a quantum field, right,

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it can blip once or twice or three times. It

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>can't blimp like one point to five times, right, that's

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>just what the field knows how to do. The field

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>itself has a mass. It gets that mass from the

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson, and it gets the same mass over here

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>as it gets over there, and it gets an alpha centauri.

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And so the single field that fills the universe, that

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>controls all of the electrons. So then I guess what's

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong with this picture of a particle? Is there anything

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong with this of looking at particles? It's just excitations

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in the field. So if you ask particle physicists what's

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>more fundamental a field or a particle, A lot of

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>them say the fields are that this is sort of

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>prevailing view. But there's sort of a stubborn minority that

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>say no, no no, no, no. Fields are just the thing

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we used to calculate. Mima or Kannie Hahmed, who is

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a famous physicist at the Institute for Advanced Study in

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Princeton and widely considered like one of the smartest dues around,

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>he said, the fields are just a convenient fiction. And

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing is that we don't see fields directly. Right.

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Particles are the things that we see. They are the

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>things that we observe in our experiments and the things

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we smashed together in our colliders. Fields are what we

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>used to do calculations. But like, are they real? The

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>particles themselves are the things that we see that we

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>can count, that we can interact with, right, Like, like,

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is it a thing or is it? Just? Like? I

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>guess the consequence of how the universe works, like the

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>math of the universe. Just because we have a mathematical

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>description of how things work doesn't mean that it's real, right,

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>what's real is what we see in our experiments, and

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>those are particles, and we see how particles bounce off

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>each other, and we see how particles interact with each other.

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And you can view the whole system of the universe

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>mathematically without using fields, like you can say there are

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>no fields, There are just particles and particles when they

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>interact with each other, they don't use fields. They use

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>virtual particles. So like when electrons push against each other,

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what's happening is they're exchanging photons. So you can replace fields,

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>which just like sums over infinite virtual particles, and it's

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.919
<v Speaker 1>mathematically totally equivalent. You can do like all the same

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>calculations using virtual particles. So like our fields just a

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>way to express zillions of virtual particles all flying around

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:44.879
<v Speaker 1>or are particles just like vibrations in these fields. They're

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally mathematically equivalent. And it's a bit of a philosophical question,

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the right picture of the universe. I see

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, like maybe thinking of a particle or defining

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a particles and excitation in the field may not be

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 1>accurate because maybe fields don't exist. So and so maybe

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make sense for something to be of an

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 1>expectation of something that doesn't exist, and that maybe particles

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>are just their own thing and fields are just like

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 1>this mathematical convenience that ties all the particles together. Yeah,

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we have this expectation that if we come up with

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a mathematical description of the universe that works, it must

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow be true. But it's not necessarily the case, and

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>it's possible potentially to have multiple distinct mathematical descriptions of

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the universe that all work. And so you can't claim that, oh, like,

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I need fields to do my calculations, so therefore field

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>must be out there and reel in the universe. They

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 1>could just be a way that we do the calculations,

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>all right. So you're saying kind of maybe um math

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is wrong or the math doesn't exist. We're saying maybe

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>fields don't exist. Right. Math definitely exists, but we don't

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know necessarily if it's fundamental to the universe or just

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the way that we think. All right, So

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>then that's another view of what a particle is. What's

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>another way we can look at particles. Another way we

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>can look at particles is maybe they are not fundamental.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're just like zoomed out, wiggling other things. You know,

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>take like the field perspective to the extreme and say, like, well,

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what makes an electron different from a cork If you

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>say that the electron is a vibration the electron field,

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and the cork is a vibration the cork field, why

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>do we have these two fields, the cork field and

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the electron field. Are they somehow related? Is there a

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>deeper relationship? And so string theory, for example, is a

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 1>view that those two different fields, the electron field in

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the cork field are actually just one. Is some deeper

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 1>field that like can vibrate in these other dimensions, and

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks like an electron field if it's vibrating one way,

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like a cork field if it's vibrating

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in another way. And so this of course is string theory,

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the whole universe is built on these

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>super tiny vibrating strings. Interesting, like, there's only one field

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in the universe and it can vibrate in different ways. Yeah,

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>one basic universe stuff, And that would be really satisfying

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.479
<v Speaker 1>because it would be a very simple answer, like what's

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>fundamental universe? While you got this one thing and you

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>can vibrate this way and it looks like a cork field,

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and to con vibrate the other way and it looks

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like an electron field. Like you were saying earlier, when

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you zoom out, they look different. When you zoom in,

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you can tell, Oh, it's the same old thing, just

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>acting differently. All right, let's get into this with a

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit more detail, and let's drink people along on

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what strength theory is. And let's take another quick break.

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're talking about deep questions today. We are

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>questioning what does it mean to be a particle? What

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is the definition of that, and what does it mean

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how it matches up with reality and

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>how things really are. And so we talked about different

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>ideas for what a particle could be, and the late

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 1>one we talked about was about string theory, like maybe

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 1>particles are just little vibrations in some kind of universal

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>field that's just out there in the universe. Yeah, and

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you can take this as like an extrapolation of our

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 1>current ideas of particles as excitations in a bunch of

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>different quantum fields. Maybe we can unify all those fields

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>together into the one universe field, and then electrons are

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of wiggle than quirks, and different kind

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.919
<v Speaker 1>of wiggle than neutrinos, And that would answer a whole

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of really fascinating questions. You know, why are electrons

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>different from neutrinos. It turns out it's just because they're

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>wiggling and these other dimensions differently than neutrinos are. It

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>would be super cool. So in strength theory, that that

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>is what's kind of being assumed that is happening is

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's one field, you know, and is there a

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>name for this field? The field? Not really, I guess

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 1>if there's just one field, you don't have to give

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it names, right, the answer to distinguish things, it's the

0:43:56.360 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>capital F field. Yeah. But you have string that are

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>like one dimensional vibrations. You have brains which are like

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:07.399
<v Speaker 1>two dimensional surfaces brains B R, A, n E as

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in membrane, not as in brains like the thing in

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>inside your skull. Right, But these are just that's like

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a mathematical concept. It's not really something that vibrates. It's

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like the dimensions of it, right, or

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the space of it. Well, you can have one dimensional objects,

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which are the strings, and you can also have two

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>dimensional objects, which would be the brains, and these strings

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes vibrate between the brains. You can have all

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>sorts of complicated things, but the fundamental elements of the universe,

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the particles that we're familiar with, would be made out

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of these one dimensional vibrating strings that vibrate differently. And again,

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is all speculative. We have no evidence

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for string theory. We don't even know if string theory

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is the right theory to do this. But as an

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>example of how you could go deeper and you could

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 1>get at some of these really interesting questions about like,

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, what makes quarks and electrons different the same

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we we were wondering, like what makes carbon different from oxygen? Right?

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It is that made be Electrons and corks are not

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>actually particles, They're just like things put together from a

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>smaller particle, right Yeah, Or maybe they are fields that

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>vibrate in different ways and that's why they look different.

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So instead of thinking about the electron is made up

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of smaller things. Think of it like as a version

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of one larger thing, like the way we think about

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>like the electron and the positron has two sides of

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the same coin, rather than two separate particles. We can

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>think about the electron and the corks and the neutrinos

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and all these different particles as different kinds of wiggles

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that this one field can do. And so the electron

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>field wouldn't exist really, even though we currently have a

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>mathematical description for it. It would actually just be like

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a sub field of the the field. In the same

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>way that like, does ice cream really exist? It's useful

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about ice cream when you're doing physics at

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>one level, it's not really useful to talk about like

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the fields it's made out of. Ice cream does exist,

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>even if it's actually just a bunch of vibrating fields.

0:45:57.560 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So in that same sense, like, yes, the electron feel

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is a useful thing to talk about if you're like

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>doing experiments with electrons, even if deep down it's just

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like a particular flavor of this universal string field. Well,

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the ice cream is definitely real. In my waistline.

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>It tastes really good, that's right. Yeah, as real flavor.

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of one idea for a particle. But

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>then you don't you run into the same problem you

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 1>did before, which is like, is a particle of vibration

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and excitation of this field or is the field itself?

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The field really the fundamental thing about the universe? Yeah,

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't answer that philosophical questions, just sort of like

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>goes deeper down. The fields are fundamental route to try

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to unify all the fields into one field. It doesn't

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:45.959
<v Speaker 1>answer the fundamental question of our the fields actually real

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.959
<v Speaker 1>or is this just a mathematical picture? And that's something

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we might not ever be able to probe because in

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the end of fields are not something we see in

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the same way that early on in quantum mechanics, we

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>had this idea of a wave function. But you can't

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>see the wave function directly. You just see the particles

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and you do calculations about how the wave function influences

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the particles, but you never see the wave function. You

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>can't see things in a quantum superposition, for example, And

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't answer that philosophical question. All right, So

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 1>another alternative, but maybe not a great definition of a particle.

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>What is maybe another definition of a particle. Well, there

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>are some folks that take a completely different view and

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to build a completely different idea for what a

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:29.359
<v Speaker 1>particle is. And I love these kinds of approaches because

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they like overthrow everything we've been working on for our

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred years and start from scratch. These are the folks

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that look at the universe as built out of little

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>bits of space, you know, instead of looking at spaces

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like smooth and continuous. They say, well, what if space

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is made out of pixels and all those pixels are

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>woven together using quantum entanglement. So you have this new

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>view of the universe as like a bunch of little

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 1>quantum pixels that are woven together into a fabric that

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 1>we call space. Right there is the thedea of like

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we space is kind of like a foam almost right,

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not a thing, and it's not like a

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>big emptyiness. It's actually like basically like a giant um,

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>like a giant massive of bubbles right sort of adjacent

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to each other. So you start with that idea, and

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>then you take it one step further and you make

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>analogies to ideas we've discovered in quantum computers. Quantum computers

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:24.720
<v Speaker 1>are this different way to do calculations. By using quantum

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:28.720
<v Speaker 1>mechanical objects instead of classical objects like transistors or switches,

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you can do all sorts of weird different calculations. And

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if you aren't familiar with quantum computers, with the whole

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast episode on what that is. But some of the

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>ideas from quantum computers people think might be applicable to

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like quantum space time. And so you

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>can think of sort of like this quantum spacetime, this

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>quantum foam. It's sort of like a huge array of cubits,

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>these like fundamental elements of a quantum computer. You're started

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about maybe like reducing the physical universe down to

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>just like information ation, Right, that's kind of one view

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the universe is that it's not like real, it's

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not something tangible or spacious. It's actually just all kind

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of information ones and zeros. Yes, it's all about information,

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and quantum computing is about how you manipulate information. In fact,

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:17.879
<v Speaker 1>all computing is about manipulating information to try to get

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the answer to a question that you have, and quantum

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>computers manipulate information in a different way than classical computers,

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and one of the issues they have when they're dealing

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.839
<v Speaker 1>with information and quantum computers is how to do things

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like error correction because quantum computers are a bit fuzzy,

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:34.280
<v Speaker 1>are a bit messy, and so they're trying to recover

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>information sometimes when it's been fuzzed up and lost from

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:40.320
<v Speaker 1>quantum computers. And people have found that this actually is

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>very similar to questions of like trying to get information

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.359
<v Speaker 1>out of a black hole. Another topic we've talked about

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast a lot is like what happens to

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:51.919
<v Speaker 1>information when it goes into a black hole? Particles fall

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>into black hole, they contain information. If that black hole

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually evaporates due to Hawking creation, where is that information gone?

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And is this potential solution to this quantum information black

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:07.240
<v Speaker 1>hole problem that says maybe there's like quantum entanglements between

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the inside and the outside of the black hole. And

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>people have restruction this now in terms of quantum computing

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and seeing connections between solutions to quantum computing error correction

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>problems and black hole information problems and all that just

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to say like maybe it makes sense to look at

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe is like one massive quantum computer whoa.

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like maybe it makes sense, like you found

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:35.920
<v Speaker 1>connections between the physical world and this information world, and

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>so maybe the whole universe is just information. Maybe the

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.839
<v Speaker 1>whole universe is just information. And then the connection back

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to the question of the episode what is a particle?

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that in some of these space times that arise

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>from looking at the whole universe as a bunch of

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>quantum bits that are all entangled, there are these entanglement

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>patterns that sort of emerge, and they correspond to like

0:50:57.560 --> 0:51:01.800
<v Speaker 1>localized bits of energy floating in our three D world.

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And so what you see in these quantum computers are

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>like these packets of information that like to stick together

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and float through that quantum world. And is this what

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a particle is? You know? Do we have particles in

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>our actual universe? Because underneath we have this quantum phone

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that likes to entangle in certain ways, so that information

0:51:23.800 --> 0:51:27.919
<v Speaker 1>propagates and these like discrete blobs through the spacetime. It's

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 1>very tentative and it's very speculative, but it's a fun,

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of brand new idea for what like a particle

0:51:34.080 --> 0:51:36.440
<v Speaker 1>might be. Well, yeah, I think I need to smoke

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:39.840
<v Speaker 1>some more bid and wrap my head around this, But

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you're saying like maybe the nature of

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe isn't the way we experience it. It's maybe

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>just all abstract information, like you know, my the fact

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>that I'm here. I'm not really here next to you

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>or next to this my desk. I'm really just like

0:51:55.040 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 1>one quantum bit clump of information in a represent in

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>some universal computer. And this desk is also a clump

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of information. And some of we're all sort of related

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>by quantum entanglement, and that we interpret that entanglement as

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:12.359
<v Speaker 1>like me being next to it. Yeah, and there are

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>these rules these quantum bits like to follow, and that

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>these behaviors that emerge from the way they interact, and

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those behaviors are what we would describe as particles.

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And so we're part of this system and we look around,

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we observe it, we describe these things. Doesn't mean that

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:31.320
<v Speaker 1>what we see is fundamental. What we see is emergent.

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It's more like ice creams and hurricanes than the actual

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>units of the universe. And you can refashion these particles

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, some sort of like weird

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:43.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum bits as part of the universal computer. You know, again,

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this is like a speculative idea that is like ten

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 1>years from being even a tentative idea, but it's already

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 1>got a cool name. They call it it from cubit

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning like the whole universe comes from quantum computers. WHOA, Like,

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like something in the universe Earth is actually just

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of information kind of right, yeah, like for

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:07.439
<v Speaker 1>something to be defined as something, it's all just information. Yeah. Yeah.

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The deeper idea is, if you assemble information in this

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of self organizing way, self perpetuating way, does that

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>create a reality? Can reality just be like a projection

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of this informational arrangement? And so like you need several

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:26.439
<v Speaker 1>more layers of an appeals to really understand the meaning

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of that. But it's kind of like how you know

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if I play a video game on my PlayStation that

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>there's this whole world, but it's really just writing on

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:35.759
<v Speaker 1>top of a bunch of you know, transistors, and it's

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>all writing and as information as ones and zeros zipping about.

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:42.959
<v Speaker 1>You're saying like maybe an electron is not really a thing.

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a bit of information sort of writing

0:53:46.320 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on top of this quantum foam computer that is actually

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Yeah, or maybe that's what a thing is.

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:54.799
<v Speaker 1>That's what it means to be a thing is to

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>be part of this quantum information in the universe computer

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>those all the things we've her experience are just that,

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's what a thing is. And so it's a

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>super fun idea because it gives you this like glimpse

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:10.240
<v Speaker 1>into an alternative view of the workings of the universe

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at like the deepest level. But you know, it could

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 1>also just be bunk or clue, or it could all

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:20.439
<v Speaker 1>just be in an aliens PlayStation quantum PlayStation PlayStation qute.

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Why don't they just press the cheek codes already so

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I can get to the next level? Yeah, when am

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I going to upgrade? That's what I'm waiting for. But

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess, you know, maybe I wonder if it could

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 1>be all all be Like all of these ideas about particles,

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they could all be true. You know,

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>like maybe an electron is a bit of information on

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a quantum computer, and it's also a vibration in a

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:45.239
<v Speaker 1>one unifying field, and it's also collapse wavefunction, you know,

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 1>do you know what I mean? Like, maybe these all

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 1>these ideas are just different ways of looking at what's

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>actually true, just like sort of Raschumn style, we might

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>all have different stories to describe the same series of events.

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>There might be multiple ways to describe reality that are

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:06.240
<v Speaker 1>self consistent and predict experiments and yet fundamentally at their hearts,

0:55:06.320 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like conceptionally very different. And that's a little scary because

0:55:10.200 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it means that maybe there isn't a single truth about

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Maybe there are multiple truths, or maybe there

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is no truth. There are just those stories, those mathematical

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>stories we tell ourselves about the way the universe out

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 1>there works. And so to you know, bring it back

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to aliens again. I think it would be really exciting

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk to alien physicists and discover, like, do they

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have a completely different way of thinking about the universe?

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Is a particle even a concept for them? Or have

0:55:37.160 --> 0:55:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they discovered the same structures as we have and what

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>does that mean about their universality? Right? Or like we

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier, maybe there is a truth like there

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is such a thing as a particle, but our brains

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and our way of doing or you know, limitations and

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>math and thinking only allow us to look at it

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in these different ways. But really, there is a truth

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that which but we just don't get it or can't

0:55:58.440 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get it, or we get it as much as our

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 1>dogs understand hurricanes or maybe your dogs of view of

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe is the correct one, right, May we're just

0:56:07.480 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 1>overthinking things, Daniel's what I'm saying. Maybe the universe is

0:56:10.920 --> 0:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>really just all about treats and not treats. Yeah, and naps.

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Really that's the fundamental element of the universe, the knaps. Certainly,

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:20.160
<v Speaker 1>your dog seems happier than most particle physicists. True, I

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think my dog is having a better life than I am.

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 1>That we should all be dogs. We should. I'll be

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:31.239
<v Speaker 1>my dog. But I guess again, just another interesting, you know,

0:56:31.719 --> 0:56:34.879
<v Speaker 1>exploration into what it means for things to be real

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in this universe and what's at the heart of reality.

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it seems like we we still don't know

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and may never know. We still don't know, and we

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 1>may never know. But we're gonna have fun along the

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 1>way and make a lot of friends. And you know,

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:49.480
<v Speaker 1>even if you answer this question, you know, what is

0:56:49.480 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 1>a particle? And you decided when you did some experiment

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:56.120
<v Speaker 1>or some philosophical argument to persuade yourself that fields where

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental element of the universe. You could still ask,

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, but why why does space have fields in it?

0:57:02.719 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Where these deals come from? Right? Do you have to

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:08.879
<v Speaker 1>have fields? Could you have space without fields? So even

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if you answered all these questions, you would still have

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 1>plenty of stuff to dig into. Or you can say

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the alternative, which is um, whatever, time to take a nap. Yeah,

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to eat a treat, take a nap. That

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is something actually that professors and dogs have in common,

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is taking afternoon naps. You're a little rougher. Well, my

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:32.840
<v Speaker 1>bark's not as bad as my bite. All right, Well,

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed that trip into asking questions about

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 1>reality and what does it all mean to be something

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in the universe? And this is a question for me

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of particular interest. We'd like to send you off today

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with a song sent in by a listener, Ben Kelly.

0:57:49.040 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 1>This song captures the spirit of wonder we feel when

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we think about the amazing strangeness of reality. So this

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is Ben Kelly and his band The Amber Bugs. We

0:57:59.240 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 1>took a used at nature and saw there's nothing No

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 1>bad rocks build from a floor on the feet that

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>pture of the house I'm plants around the sun that

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:26.840
<v Speaker 1>ain't put it of th stuff juice way. Everything is

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:34.480
<v Speaker 1>made up like this, Everything is just made up. Everything

0:58:34.680 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is made up. You're gonna have to base office. It's

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not just made up. Thanks for joining us, See you

0:58:42.880 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that. Daniel and

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of I Heart Radio.

0:58:56.960 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 1>For more podcast from My Heart Radio, visit the I

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Aren't Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:59:03.600 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.