WEBVTT - NFL Week 15 Predictions: Chargers-Chiefs, Bills-Patriots, Packers-Broncos, Lions-Rams | Nick Wright

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Driving Nick Right? Episode four oh three,

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>our red hot gambling show. All year long, we have

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>said the Gambling Show would turn things around, right when

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs did. Turns out, the Gambling Show turned things

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>around and the Chiefs have not. But such is life.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>And here's the deal. This episode of what Nick Wright

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by boost Mobile. Reminder to everybody

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like rate subscribe review it helps us out a lot.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And reminder also, all lines are from hard rock bet

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>all right. Last week demonse just three and two, but

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>such a sturdy three and two that could have so

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>easily been four and one. I feel great about it.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>So if we show you the picks. Last week, we

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>had Jacksonville getting two against Indy. They won by three scores.

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>We had Pittsburgh getting six against Baltimore, they won the

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>game outright. We had Seattle laying seven out of Atlanta,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they won by one hundred. Now we had one of

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the worst picks of the year, Washington getting two at

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and they got shut out, and really the whole

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>thing was a total embarrassment, but still just a loss.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And then Philly minus three at the Chargers. I'm still

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bitter about it, A little bitter about it.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 2>I was about to say that they never really looked

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>good to cover that game. I get they had the

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 2>lead and stuff, but it was just like.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>No, you're you're right, but it looked like I was

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna steal one at the end.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when they have.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Person ten from the seventeen in overtime score a touchdown

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to cover. But that's three and two, which puts us

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on the year thirty five thirty three and two, which

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is fifty one point four percent winning, but not yet profitable.

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But this week I do some quick math real here,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll call out the calculator for this one to see

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>if we go four and one this week, demonse, and

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we're thirty nine and thirty four and two and the

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>two pushes don't matter, that would put us into profitability.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Four and one would put us into profitability for the year.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>We are very proud of the fact that four of

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the five years we've publicly done picks, we not only

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>were winners, we were profitable, including the big We want

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep that going. We have a big week in

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>front of us with some massive point spreads, a lot

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of huge favorites this weekend, so we'll get to that

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in just a moment. First, I had to remind you

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>today's show is brought to you by our presenting sponsor,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. The holidays are here, and the sports

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 1>schedule is packed tighter than Santa's gift bag. Pro Football

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Bowl games, NBA college hoops, hockey, whole sports lay is loaded,

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and on hard rock Bet, there's always something to unwrap

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and bet on. New customers can sign up and bet

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>five dollars on any game if it wins, you'll find

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets on top

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of your winnings stuffed in your stocking. That is holiday magic.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Not sure what to place your first bet on? Hard

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet just launched a brand new for you page,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>making it easy to find all your favorite teams, players,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and leagues all in one place. The hard Rock Bet

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Sportsbook app is the only legal sportsbook for whenever you're

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, and it's also live in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan. Coming soon to more states as well. Plus,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>hard rock Bet offers new promos daily, so whenever you're listening.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Just open the app and check out what you've got.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Any day of the week, download the hard Rock Bet

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>app and make your first deposit, payble and bonus bets.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Not a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>In Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC. In

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>all other states. Must be twenty one plus and physically

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concern about

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one eight eight eight Admit it.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>In Indiana. If you are someone you know as a

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>gambling problem wants help, call one eight hundred and nine

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with it. Gambling problem Call one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois,

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia. There are no byes,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>so there are sixteen games this weekend. We are obviously

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to be discussing Bucks Falcons which is tonight,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>but you guys will be hearing this tomorrow. I'm just

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>going on the record. I think the Bucks are going

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to win and cover, but that is of course not

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>one of our picks. I'm just letting you guys know

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that is what I think is going to happen in

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a game that by the time you hear or see

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this has already taken place, you can see if I'm

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong. All right, demanse, what are we staying

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>away from?

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh? First off, we're staying away from Chargers at Kansas City.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>With Kansas City being five and a half point favorites.

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Are we staying away from this one?

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm obviously not betting against the Chiefs, but

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>five and a half is an outrageous one, like the

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have not earned the right and it's four and

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a half in some point, it's five and a half

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>here that the Chiefs have not earned the right to

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>be five and a half point favorites against a nine

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and four Charger. I mean, this is Vegas. Vegas is

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>having a harder time coming to the realization of where

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are right now than I am. So I

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ain't the sharp side of this is the Chargers, but

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I would never so I'm just staying away.

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Next next to go Washington at the Giants. Giants two

0:05:58.680 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and a half point favorites.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, just an ugly game with a rookie

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback against a backup quarterback. Washington showed real fight against

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos, and then none whatsoever last week when I

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thought they would pardon me against Minnesota. The Giants, though

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>also a weird season, keeps getting weirder. They just fired

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>one of their assistant coaches because of a dispute overseating

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on the team plane, which means, yeah, the reporting is

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like he was pissed about where like I. It just

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>this is two bad teams, two teams looking for next

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>season to one team that's fired their coach, another team

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that feels terrible about where they're at. In Washington, We're

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>staying away next.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland at Chicago. Chicago seven and a half way favorites.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I looked long and hard at Chicago, uh, because I

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>do not think Shadoor is going to have back to

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>back excellent games. And that's not a knock on Shador.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the I just think, even if the the

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he is on the right trajectory, which he pretty clearly is,

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and even if that game last week was awesome, which

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it pretty clearly was. Asking any rookie quarterback to string

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>together consecutive good games, particularly this one coming against a

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>desperate Chicago team, is really dangerous. With that said, Chicago's

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>offense has not been quite consistent enough for me to

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable laying seven and a half against Cleveland. As

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>good as the running game's been, Caleb's been hit and

0:07:55.600 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>miss and Chicago's defense has lived and died by forcing turnovers.

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So maybe Shador can you know, there's some backdoor cover potential.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Like last week, they're down fourteen with three minutes left,

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Sharudor led two awesome late drives. But so I'm just

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just staying away. I'm just staying away. Also, we're

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about it more on the show today. Bruce's

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>take yesterday that he just fully believes Shador is going

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to outplay Caleb, I thought was one of the wildest

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>sports takes of the week, and Brew didn't even think

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it was like a controversial opinion. I am again, I'm

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>happy Shador had that game, and we talked about it

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot on Tuesday. I don't think all of a sudden,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like, Okay, well, Sharro Xanders established quality NFL quarterback,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Like he is still at a point where him playing well,

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>should be surprising the way it is for any rookie quarterback,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>much less a fifth round rookie making his fourth or

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>fifth career start. All right, do you do you want

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to say something there? Yeah?

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, he did just have a he just

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>had a good game. And if they do have something there,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 2>then maybe he does have another good game. And it's

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 2>not wise to take Chicago minus seven and a half.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, yeah, fair enough? All right.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Next, next, you got Arizona at Houston. Houston's nine and

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a half pint favorites.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I had Arizona plus nine and a half in the

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>picks initially, and I took him out. And the reason

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I had him in was because Houston's offense is just

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>so oh unreliable. I'll say that laying ten points with

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>them feels ambitious. Yeah, but Arizona, when Arizona has Arizona

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the year, when they lost these heartbreakers.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So Arizona lost to the Niners by one, to the

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks by three, to the Titans in that outrageous game,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>by one, the call by four, the Packers by four.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>They they were losing heartbreakers. Since then, they lost to

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks by twenty two, to the Niners by nineteen,

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Rams by twenty eight. What's that number? Twenty eight? Now?

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>They also did have close games against the Jags and Bucks,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>but they were losses. I worry the Cardinals have just

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>packed it in. So I liked the Cardinals plus nine

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and a half, but the fact that they all of

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a sudden are getting blown out and Houston Stevens is

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>playing that well and CJ I thought was good in

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the first half against the Chiefs, I'm gonna stay away

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>from it.

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Next next to got Jets aid Jags. Jags are thirteen

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 2>point favorites.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, sorry, guys, took a lot of self control

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to not bet the Jags. I mean, right, but it's

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>such a big number and could be a little inclement weather,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a little rain, not not. It's Jacksonville, so not a

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of cold. That worries me a bit. The Jets

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation is such a mess that I really thought

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>about laying the thirteen with Jacksonville. But that is thirteen

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Fields is Fields is hurt. No, Fields is hurt, and

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>benched Tyrod got hurt. Brady Cook. No, it's not the

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>worst in the league. We'll get to the worst in

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the league shortly. Thirteen is just too many points to

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>lay with Jacksonville. I'm staying away.

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Next green Bay at Denver, Denver's two and a half

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>way dogs.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a great game and one we haven't talked about.

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the best games of the weekend.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Huge for both teams. Green Bay trying to stay alive

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for the one seed, Denver trying to keep control of

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the one seed. A little insulting to the Broncos where

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>they're getting nearly a field goal at home. But I

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>also think this is a green Bay win by a

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>field goal game. But Denver, I've lost, you know. Betting

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Chiefs and betting against the Broncos is what's

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>cost me more than anything so far this year. I'm

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>staying away from it because I was leaning green Bay.

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the sharp side would be Denver getting points

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>at home on a ten game winning streak.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Next Lions at Rams. Rams are six point favorites.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>If I was gonna bet this game, demande. I bet

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the Rams because I'm very confident in the Rams are

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>going to win. But Detroit and Dan Campbell have had

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of success against the Rams, and though they've

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>been come down to the wire games, so that's a

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>mark in favor of taking Detroit plus the six. But

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is probably a Rams twenty eight to

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four win. But it's a stay away because I

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams. I don't want to lay the points.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't love betting underdogs if I don't think they

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>can win outright unless they're getting more than a touchdown.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>So I'm staying away.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Next here, Carolina at New Orleans New Orleans two and

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a half point dogs.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:19.479
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans was good last week against the Bucks. Carolina

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>has not been a great road team, so I thought

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>long and hard about New Orleans plus the two and

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a half and then and I probably shouldn't do this

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'm really I am trying to just pick the

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>best bets. But if I have six bets, I like

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>tie sometimes goes to game I want or don't want

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to watch, and I don't really want to have a

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>vested interest in Carolina New Orleans. Too many other good

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>games this weekend, but the side I'm leaning is New

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Orleans plus two and a half.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Next, all right, Minnesota at Dallas Dallas six point favorites, So.

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I like Dallas here. I got burned though last week

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>by thinking Minnesota was dead, and so I'm just staying away.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is another one. There were four

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>games this week, Demonse that I really considered as my

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>final game. Arizona plus nine and a half, New Orleans

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>plus two and a half, Dallas minus six. I thought

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>long and hard about. I think Dallas wins. Oh in

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rams minus six, but it was two of them.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Like man, I think they win. I don't know if

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they win by margin. I'm staying away from it, but

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I would be shocked if Minnesota wins this game.

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Next Yeah, Miami at Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh's three and a half

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 2>point favorites.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand they just beat the Jets and they're on

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a nice little winning streak. Tough to rely on tuh

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in the cold. Also, don't love laying more than a

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>field goal. Ever with Pittsburgh a true definitional stay away. Reminder, everybody,

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>all our lines are from hard rock bets, so that

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>gets us through. All of our game are all of

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>our stayaways. Let's go to our five actual picks.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 2>All right? First off, in the Drake and Josh Bull,

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>we got Buffalo minus one. At New England.

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I understand that this is a is that

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a Drake and Josh.

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a Drake and Josh Bull to shoot the Treos

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>episode Drake side there.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Wow, great great knowledge the it's gread, reason to watch

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. Listen. I understand rabel Off a Bye has

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>been really, really good. I don't really look at this

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>as betting a divisional road favorite because this is a

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>pick them think minus one's to pick them, essentially, and

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this line's been bouncing back and forth from minus one

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>plus one depending on the day and depending on the book.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think Buffalo is better. Right, let me rephrase it.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I think Buffalo is better, but

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Buffalo. I think it's close enough that the

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that Buffalo desperately needs this game to stay or

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>else they're eliminated from the division that Buffalo I think

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>understands the opportunity in front of them with the Ravens

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and Chiefs and Bengals in such disarray, and I think

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that Buffalo is going to be able to run the

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>ball on New England, and where Buffalo's biggest weakness is

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>running run defense New England. The only thing New England

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do really well on either side of the ball

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is run the ball. So I will take the Bills

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to win the game. Bills minus one in New England.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Next Seattle minus thirteen and a half versus Indy.

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The Colts might be playing Philip Rivers in twenty twenty

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>five as their starting quarterback against this Mike McDonald ferocious defense.

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.719
<v Speaker 1>All lay the two touchdowns and deal with it.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Have we learned nothing from Joe Flacco? Have we learned nothing?

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Flacco was an active player. Bro that Philip Demonse Philip Rivers,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>who was the last time.

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Flacco had played, though since then, like when the Browns

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 2>called him up, it was like three years ago or

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>something like that, Like I can't remember if I go playing.

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Reasons, I don't let me hold on, let me look Flacco. No,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Flacco never demands, he would never stopped being on rosters.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So Flacco hadn't been a full time starter since like

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. But in twenty twenty he started four games

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets. In twenty twenty one, he started one

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>game for the Jets. In twenty twenty two, he started

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>four games for the Jets, and then in twenty twenty three.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>He started five games for the Browns. So here you

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>understand what I mean. Like, yeah, even if he hadn't

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>been on a roster that year, he had played the

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>previous year. Philip Rivers last game Demons and last day

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on an NFL roster was three weeks before Tom Brady

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>won the Super Bowl with the Bucks. Think about that.

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers last game played was three weeks before the

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Bucks Super Bowl. Like that is, so I just

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lay the two touchdowns. Also, nobody loves being an a regional.

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>No one's going to watch it window as a big

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite like Sam Darnold. Donald is eleven to zero as

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a seven plus point favorite. Now that's straight up obviously,

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>But nine and two against the spread. I've been riding Seattle.

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep riding them next.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you got Vegas plus eleven and a half at Philly.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So here's the deal on that. Vegas is terrible. Everybody

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>knows it. Everybody knew it before the year except for me.

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Hand up that that was as bad as it gets.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't trust Phillies offense right now to win by

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>two scores, and Vegas showed us this past week they

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>will fight for a backdoor cover up to an including

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>kicking a field goal with one second left down ten,

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm getting eleven and a half. And I teams

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that played an overtime game the previous week against a

0:19:55.520 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>team that didn't are twenty four and forty nine against

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the spread in the last seventy or so. You then

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>add to it it was an overtime Monday night game

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>for Philadelphia. I'll take my eleven and a half points

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Raiders next.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Now San Francisco minus twelve and a half for his Tennessee. Yeah,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 2>this is probably one of the crazier betting weeks I've

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:24.199
<v Speaker 2>seen from you.

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah favorites, Yeah, it's like college football. But here's the deal.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>The Titans got their win of the you know, of

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the month last week, and Big Bob Sala against rookie

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>cam Ward. I'll lay the twelve and a half. I

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>think that the Niners need. Can the Niners get to

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>If they can get to twenty four, I feel like

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm guarantee heed to cover. I do not think that

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Titans can get to thirteen points against this Niners defense.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And the flip side who it is if Kevin Stefanski

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and Shador Sanders can rack up four hundred yards of

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 1>offense essentially against this Titans defense. What is Kyle Shanahan

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>and that and Christian McCaffrey and Purty and Kittle and

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that Niners team gonna do off a by no less

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>all lay the twelve and a half with San Francisco

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and then finally one small.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Spread Cincinnati plus two and a half versus Baltimore.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 2>It's fair.

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Lamar's over it in Baltimore not being a raven,

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but this regime. And I think Joe Burrow, while he's

0:21:54.480 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about being sad, does understand. Yes, that's true, that

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is true. But Joe Burrow also understands I think he

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cost him that game against the Bills. He was great

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and then those back to back picks just killed them.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>And so I think you're gonna get a and since

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the offense that is able to move the ball, I

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>don't love that. I assume t Higgins is gonna miss

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the game. But Baltimore right now is just not to

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be trusted. And the other thing is this, I'm getting

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>two and a half points at home in a divisional

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>game with Burrow playing, I'll take it. So my five

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>picks this week are Buffalo laying one at New England,

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Seattle laying thirteen and a half against Indy at home,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders getting ten and a half at Philadelphia, the

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Niners laying twelve and a half at home against Tennessee,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and Cincinnati getting two and a half against Baltimore. Before

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>we get to Demons's red hot teasers, you ever notice

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>how everything keeps going up? Rents going up, streaming service

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>is going up. Your favorite burrito spot suddenly thinks sulza

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>should cost extra. But with boost Mobile, you and your

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>phone bill don't have to play though? Will this go

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>up soon? Game? Why? Because boost Mobile is and a

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>limited talk, text, and data plan at a price that

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>will never go up. In fact, it's the same price

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll pay for life. So switch now for unlimited wireless

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>at a price that will never go up. Only at

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile. After thirty gigs, customers may experience lower speeds.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Customers will pay twenty dollars per month as long as

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they remain active on the boost Unlimited plan. All right, Demons,

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you went big game hunting last week. Instead of a

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.719
<v Speaker 1>three teamer, you went with a four teamer. How to do?

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh? So? Yeah, Jacks covered, Jacks plus ten that covered

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 2>very well, Seattle plus one cover, Pittsburgh plus fourteen covered crazy,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 2>and then Cleveland plus four by the skin of my teeth.

0:23:58.280 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 2>You told me your.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Teeth with the that's why you get those points. Oh yeah,

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I did tell you to take that one out. What

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>did I tell you?

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Told me to put the Bucks in there as a

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>pick them?

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I would have gusted you. That did not work out,

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I would have cost you your teaser.

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable. I'm really glad I'm still my ground there. This

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>week Week fifteen, three team eight point teaser at plus

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>one hundred gonna tease. Since Cincinnati up to plus ten

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and a half and my thought process earlier, the super

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Bowl take that I had was if the Ravens managed

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to blow this for me and the Cincinnati doesn't cover

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 2>ten and a half, we're Super Bowl A bound. I

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>know there's a lot of other dominoes that need to fall,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 2>but us beating the Bengals by more than ten points

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 2>divisional game, I'd feel pretty good about what we're going forward.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, love that.

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 2>So since Cincinnati up to plus ten and a half

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 2>and then the Chargers up to plus thirteen, and a

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 2>half and then Chicago basically to a pick them at

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>plus point five or plus a half. Yeah, that's my

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 2>week fifteen. O what is it shown?

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>No, here's the thing. I just don't love. I don't

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're getting enough value with the Chargers and

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>that you're not getting it through fourteen. That's all like

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>THEE but I like the but I'm just gonna keep doing.

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>If it ain't broke, don't fix it. B minus. Every

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>time I give you a B minus.

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>You win, I'll take it. I'll take you. H.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Do I have a touchdown Genie this week? You guys

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>want to know?

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Yep?

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey?

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh what the all one?

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>It's down on himself. He's sad. Mahomes wants to you know,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have potentially that many home games left. Kelsey, Yeah,

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>plus two twenty five? All right, what about the offer

0:25:59.560 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to Mons?

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 2>So our offer didn't hit For our four four hundredth

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 2>episodes special Shador Sanders ended up being the best candidate

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 2>for the quarterback, throwing over four hundred. So this week

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 2>we have a cross sport parlay. We're gonna do a

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>tie up Chiefs money line plush SGA to win the Cup.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 2>MVP for plus one fourteen love it.

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking that offer. Cheeves money line Shay to win

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Cup MVP. Oh my goodness. You know I

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's free money, except for the Chiefs might

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>break my heart again. Like rate, subscribe, review, Appreciate you

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>guys listening. Good luck to Demons's teasers. We're looking for

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a four and one week to get the profitability for

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. Thank you to Blue Dock, thank you to Volume,

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you to hard Rock, bet Boost and Zen. Talk

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to you guys soon. What's right