WEBVTT - Is Chet Holmgren A Top Pick? Plus NBA Draft, Gronk’s Retirement & More

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>You missed out us. Oh, just skipped Westminster, Wes. I

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>might go back tonight.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 3>You missed the hound group which involved this guy right here,

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Trumpet the Bloodhound.

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 2>Look at this legend.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>If he doesn't win Best in Show tonight, the whole

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 3>thing's rigged. If they give it to the fucking b

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Shan Freeze, one of these baked dogs instead of this

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>amazing dog.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Is he supposed to be doing like athletics? Ever? Who

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 4>is he finding stuff this position?

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't the agility stuff. It's the beauty competition for dogs.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 5>So you guys went there yesterday and the dogs weren't

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:08.279
<v Speaker 5>like jumping around.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>No, they weren't doing any of them. Well, what what's

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>the problem.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean you said, I've missed out big time.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in. It is another episode of What's Right. We'd

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>nick right.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 3>The podcast and YouTube show a ton of stuff to

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 3>do today. I want to get right to it. Subscribe

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 3>like rate review, do all that cool stuff. Check out

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.199
<v Speaker 3>our series or continuing series, which we are now into

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the top ten of the fifty grades players the last

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 3>fifty years. But before we get to today's show, we

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 3>will do what we always do and briefly discuss what

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 3>is not on today's show.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Reveal it to me if you would.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Our trustee producers out in Los Angeles, Mike D'Antoni meeting

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>with Michael Jordan. I would like to see LaMelo in

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the Dante offense, even if they can't win anything there.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Beyonce releasing a new single. Beyonce also known as the

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Greatest Living American. People get mad when I say that, yeah,

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>great living American. If you're gonna disagree with that, I

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>need you to submit a name and don't take a

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 3>cop out and be like, oh, how about every single

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>member of our armed forces? Stop that you have a

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>real name. Tell me a greater living American than Beyonce

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Noles Carter All. Wait, and then, last, but not least,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the doves drank Lebron's tequila at the parade.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Lobos Tequilla build a bigger table.

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh, I'm not gonna you know, there are rumors, Nick,

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 3>do you bring up Lobo slot Do you have a

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 3>small equity stake in you know, maverickan Lebron's company. I

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 3>can't confirm or deny whether or not I have a

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 3>small piece of Lobos tequila? Do we have a Lobo

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Tequilla bottle downstairs as my name engraved on it?

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 4>That Dewey?

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course, Yeah, of course.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Uh So, as much as I dislike some things, dram

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 3>is done Draymond continuing to promote Lobos tequila, So maybe

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>it can one day overtake Casamigos as the go to

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 3>top shelf tequila in America. Let's be honest. Nineteen forty

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 3>two is so passe. Might as well be from nineteen

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 3>forty two. Okay, there's the unpaid Lobos endorsement. Now to Monday.

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's get right.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 3>You laugh at it, man, A lot of your alleged

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 3>inheritance might be wrapped up in Lobo sequities, so you

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>better hope it goes well.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what are we starting with today?

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 4>A draft is on Thursday night.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 5>Seems like Jabari is gonna go first, Chet second, and

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Bonco third. Yeah, who do you think will be the

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 5>best guy in this draft class?

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>It's important for me, as always to be honest with

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>the audience.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I do not study the NBA draft the way some

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 3>people do. Okay, it's not that I'm unaware of it.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not that I don't watch college basketball, but some

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>people do this full time. I'm not someone that does

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>it full time. So take so any of my college

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 3>basketball opinions and draft opinions.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Take that, build that into it.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, I going into draft season said I thought Jabbari

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 3>should be the first pick, Pallo the second pick, that

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I would take Ivy from Perdue third, and then I

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 3>would start to consider Chet.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And we'll talk more about.

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Chet in the moment now. And it might be a

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 3>little prisoner of the moment. It might be just because

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I most recently have watched a couple of dupe games.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I think Paolo.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Pallo's the guy who I know will be a good

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>NBA player. I think Jabbari is the most likely to

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 3>quickly be up twenty plus point per game score. I

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 3>think Polo is the guy who has the least bust

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 3>potential and can help a winning team immediately. I think

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Jade and Ivy is probably, you know, best case scenario,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Like if you're talking about what would he be on

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a championship team, probably third best guy on a champion

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 3>that's still super valuable.

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the Chet question. And I've done as

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>much CHET.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Research as I can do, and I really like the

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 3>kid first of all. I in this profile Tim Keon

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>wrote talked about how where he's from in Minnesota, though

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the George Floyd protests were going on,

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 3>and when it was at its peak, when the cops

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 3>were really cracking down, he went out with the folks

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>in the streets to protest for racial justice. Even though

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 3>he's super recognizable, a local celebrity and seven feet tall,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 3>and I like him. I believe he and his father

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 3>and his coach, that he works out a ton, lips weights,

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>that he eats a ton, and all of that makes

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>me more concerned.

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I would almost be less concerned.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 3>About Chet if it was quietly like he's never put

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>the focus in on his body teenager, he hasn't been

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 3>on the right regimen. His family has money, He's played

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 3>in a big time AAU program, or did for ten years.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 3>It was coached by Jalen Suggs, his high school teammate

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 3>who's now was a top five pick for the Magic

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 3>last year, who also went to Gonzaga by Jalen's dad.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 3>He was with them then he was at Gonzaga. It's

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 3>not if it was for lack of trying or lack

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>of a resources that he was this thin, I would

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 3>be less concerned.

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I just he is so skinny.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it concerns me, and so I do I have

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>deeper analysis than I think Chet is too thin.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't. But my concern about Kyler.

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Murray going into the NFL was I don't care what

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>his college film looks like. I do, but not totally

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 3>because he would be the smallest.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Starting quarterback ever. I don't. I'm gonna need to.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 3>See you go through seasons before I believe someone your

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 3>size can hold up to NFL punishment. And as good

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 3>as Kyler's been, what's been the issue His body breaks

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 3>down he gets hurt. I am concerned about Chet in

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>that regard. So I would I have flipped on this.

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I had been saying Jabbari one again eve of the draft.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>I think I actually right now would go Polo one.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>But how it's going to go? And I would bet

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>on this and maybe have bet on this. Jabbari is

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 3>going one to Orlando, Chet is going to to Oklahoma City,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Polo is going three to the Rockets, and Ivy is

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 3>going four. Maybe not to the Kings. They might trade

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the pick, but whoever's drafting for to either the Kings

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Stan Paton draft Ivy or they trade out of the

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>pick for a team that wants to draft Ivy. So

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>there's there's your quick draft analysis. All right, what's next?

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.239
<v Speaker 5>And Firsti's first, you proposed a wild trade, Yeah, Russ

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 5>and Anthony Davis for Kyrie and Ben Simmons. This must

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 5>be your version of audition for that GM's spott on Bros.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Vegas team.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh sure, yeah it call it yeah, soft opening, Yeah,

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>that's fine, go ahead.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Something like that.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 5>So since we're talking wild trades, are there any actual

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 5>trades that you'd like to see with draft time coming around?

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>I am interested to see if the Knicks try to

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 3>move up from ten and see if they package.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 2>The problem for the Knicks is you're not gonna trade RJ.

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Barrett and a lot of the other guys that you

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 3>would package wouldn't help you move up. It would almost

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>make you move down. Nobody wants Randall's contract. Nobody wants

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 3>forty eighth contract, So that's an issue. I am interested

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 3>if anything moves on Russ. If it does, I don't

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>think it will be surrounding the draft. I suppose it could,

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>but I would doubt it. The Kings are the curious

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the Kings are because the Kings keep drafting point guards

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of people think that the IVY was

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the best guy that's going to be available for But

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 3>would it makes sense for them to draft it. I

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 3>know that if I were a smart team, I would

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 3>want to do business with the Kings. That would be

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the sucker at the poker table that you want to

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 3>be in a hand with.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>That's who the Kings have been for decades. There.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 3>The other interesting thing for me is this, at some

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 3>point Presty and Oklahoma City have to start trying to

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 3>compete and win basketball games, and there is already murmurs

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 3>that they One of the reasons they like chet at

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 3>two so much is they think he's.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 2>The least likely of the top three.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>To make an instant impact, and they want to be

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 3>bad again because they want this French kid, Victor win Bayama,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 3>who is I haven't felt this way about a foreign

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>prospect ever except for Luca. The Victor Win Bayama footage

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 3>is it looks like it was cgi the kids seven

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 3>to two can shoot?

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 2>He is? He I do think is the real deal,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>but he's a year.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 3>Away, and Okac has all these picks and just wants

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 3>to be worse every year. I don't like how they're

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 3>doing business, but I don't I think they're gonna stay

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 3>it too. And I don't think they're gonna package their

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>later picks or future picks to move back in because

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they want to be good. So I

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>don't think there is God. I don't think there's gonna

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 3>be a Bradley Beal or a Damian Lillard or any

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 3>or anything involving the Lakers or anything involving Kyrie on drafted.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I think once free agency opens is when the real

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 3>NBA drafts. I'm sorry the NBA trade stuff is going

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>to get going, all right, what's next?

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 4>One?

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 6>Uh?

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 5>The Warrior's fraide was cool and all and I'm I'm

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 5>genuinely happy for him.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 2>No, you're not.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm not happy. No, no, no, I'm not happy. No I am.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 5>I am happy for Steph Curry. Okay, I'm not happy

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 5>for Draymond Green.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, don't.

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to go as far as say that

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm not happy for him.

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 3>But well, you just did literally just it's a little

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>damper and that's okay to you don't have to be

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 3>happy for everybody.

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Draymond's being a pain in the ass right now.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Is the way he acts on Twitter is kind of

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 5>crazy given what his performance was in the postseason.

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Listen, they won, so he gets to talk shit, But

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 3>let's not act like.

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Draymond is has acquitted himself. What's the way to put it.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 5>He got off the hook for what he for for

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 5>what his his finals performance was, and he played.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Really well in Game six, and I will give him credit,

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 3>but Draymond being the loudest of all the Warriors in

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 3>this title is a little off.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Putting, but go ahead.

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, But the story is obviously the Celtics in the

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 4>playoffs the story for you?

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Sure, yeah, Brad Stevens says Tatum. Tatum is great, but

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 5>he just needs rest. At this point, it seems like

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 5>he's gonna run back with the same squad.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>What would you do?

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Would you give Brown and Tatum more time, develop your

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 5>role players more at an another star?

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they can add another star.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>The roster is basically set, and I would run it back.

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>If I were Boston, I would say, hey, you know

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>how we get better?

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Jason Tatum takes another mini league.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't have to take the full leaf to Oh

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 3>my god, he's the league MVP. He's got to clean

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 3>some stuff up. He's got a good body, but maybe

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>add a little bit of muscle, so he's a little

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 3>more confident going into the rim. And Jalen Brown needs

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 3>to get better. Jalen Brown, it is good enough to

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 3>be the second best player on a champion if you

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 3>have a Durant Lebron Steph Giannis level super superstar.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Tatum isn't that.

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 3>So even if Tatum is gonna get a little bit better,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 3>If if Jalen Brown is going to be the second

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 3>best player on a champion, he he's going have to

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>get better than where he currently is. So that's where

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 3>right now, I'm trying to think of a good comp

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 3>for it. When the Raptors won the title, Kawhi was

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 3>really sensational.

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Tatum can get not in the same type

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 2>of player, but to the level Kawhi was at.

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Tatum's ever gonna get to where Giannis

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 3>is now, where Durant's been, where Lebron resided for fifteen years,

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>But I think Tatum can get to the level that

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>ish that Kawhi was at in twenty nineteen.

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>The question then is can Brown get to the level

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Lowry was at?

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 3>And he's not there yet, and so those two guys

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 3>need to get better. You gotta hope Robert Williams is healthy.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 3>You gotta hope Mark his smart maintains, and then you

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 3>do have nice young pieces and the only old guy's Horford.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 3>So I wouldn't do anything drastic. You guys from January

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 3>one on were as good as any team in basketball.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I think a lot of us think

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 3>that the fourth quarter of Game four flipped the NBA Finals.

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 3>You guys were in position to go off three to one.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 3>You scored five points in the final six minutes and

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 3>that was it. So I wouldn't I wouldn't overreact. And

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 3>the other thing is this was excellent. Dka will be

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>better with a year of experience, won't make some of

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 3>the playoff rotation mistakes, sticking with your depth as much

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 3>as he did. He'll be better about that.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>What's last?

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 5>So this one, this is a tough one. Bear with me, folks. Okay,

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 5>got some some good golf stuff coming up. Brooks Coca Kopka, Kopka, Yeah, Coka,

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 5>all right, Brooks Brooks k Keka is the latest PGA

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 5>golfer to join the l IV Tour.

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it cool to say live or I think yeah,

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 4>that's a lot more comfortable.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 5>PGA is reacting to try and keep their golfers happy,

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 5>adding more tournaments with no cuts. Uh, bigger purses and

0:14:58.560 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 5>more breaks in the season.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I was real quick, what do you think they mean

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>by bigger purses?

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Bigger like like the money they.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good job, all right, good, all right, good job.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm talking about literal persons.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>There might be a part in your brain.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 3>You're like man golf so weird jackets for certain things

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 3>they give out like Louis Baton bags, Like what a

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 3>weird sport?

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>But good job, Okay, go ahead.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Uh, this this all obviously benefits the golfers and uh

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 5>would not have happened.

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Without the element, without the live Tour. Yeah. Could you

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>see something like this happening with another sport.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, like a rival league popping up exactly? I would.

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I would never say never, obviously, but it could.

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>The thing that would be most likely is if something

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 3>like this were to happen in tennis, another sport where

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>you don't need the infrastructure of full teams. The problem

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 3>is for a rival NBA or a true NFL is

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 3>you need the infrastructure of teams, stadiums, you need full rosters.

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 3>As opposed to what the Live tours done is they

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>convinced eight to ten big names just they just need

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 3>eight to ten human beings to defect. The golf courses

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 3>are there for anybody to use that will pay the money,

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 3>The infrastructures already built in.

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I do think Kopka leaving is a huge deal.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Brooks Kopka prior to COVID, the pandemic, you know, kind

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 3>of pausing of the sport, and then his own injury

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 3>issues last year. Kepka in twenty eighteen and nineteen, he

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 3>was the best golfer in the world. Kepka would just

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>show up in kick asset Majors.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he won.

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to say four of the eight majors in

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen and nineteen finished second.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 2>A couple other times. Kepka's awesome.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 3>He, in my opinion, is far and away the most

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>important guy to defect the Live Tour, and so there

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 3>is real momentum to this becoming a thing, and the PGA.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Tour absolutely needs to be concerned.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't think baseball, basketball, or football need to be

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 3>concerned now as far as college sports do. I think

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>it's there's a possibility, as has been floated for a

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 3>long time, that at one point, when it comes to

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 3>college football, the Power five conferences tell the NCAA, go

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 3>to hell, we don't need you.

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 2>We're going to create our own.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Sixty team college football league, Big ten, ACC Pack ten

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>or Pack twelve at this point, Big twelve and SEC. Yeah,

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 3>I do think that could happen and maybe will happen

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 3>one day. For pro sports, tennis is the only thing

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 3>that I would be concerned about.

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 2>I NFL, NBA, and Major League Baseball have nothing to

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>be worried about it, Can I correct?

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 3>Can I tell you though quickly we're late again starting

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 3>next week, We're putting sixteen minutes on the clock for

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 3>a second, twelve minutes just never happening.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>H an idea that I've had for a long time.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So why has UFC gained so much ground in

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 3>past boxing? There's a lot of reasons. I don't think

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 3>the reasons are it's a better sport. I think for

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 3>the majority of people, there is still something naturally and

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>inherently and almost primal about watching.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Two men box. I feel like.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 3>It's the oldest sport in the world for a reason,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and it is far easier to understand for the layman

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 3>than UFC. Right, So why did the UFC pass it?

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 3>The consistency of the events, one major UFC pay per

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 3>view per month, and the simplicity of there is this

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 3>champion in this weight class, this champion in that week class.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 3>What ruined boxing was no, because there's different governing bodies,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 3>So somebody can be the WB light heavyweight champion and

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 3>somebody else can be a different like you can have

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 3>three different champions.

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>In the same weight class, okay, and they.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Have some guys have contracts with showtimes, some guys have

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>cots with HBO. Some guys a fight we've wanted to

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 3>see for a year, we don't see for five years

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 3>or ever. So if the if we're trying to, you know,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 3>have big time money come into sports as a way

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 3>to launder itself, essentially launder's reputation. I have had this

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 3>idea forever and no one has done it. If you

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 3>get a few billionaires together and they take the top

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty boxers.

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 2>In every weight class and simply.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Say, how much does it cost to buy you out

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 3>of your current deals, to buy you out of the

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 3>agreements you have with your promoter, with your organizations, whatever,

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna buy you all out, and you're all gonna

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 3>be signed up to play an hour boxing league where

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>there are standings one through twelve. There are monthly events.

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 3>To participate in the league, you must fight three times

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 3>per year. Every four months you fight, and here's how

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 3>it works. The champion fights the number one contender, the

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 3>number two guy fights the number eight guy, you know

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 3>what I mean, And then you move up. There are standings.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>There is a set schedule there are pay per views people.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>It would bring boxing back immediately.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>People would be into it.

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 3>But it's the initial cost of you've got to buy

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 3>all all the important boxers out of their current deals.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, if the Saudi's.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Have eight hundred million dollars to offer Tiger Woods to

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 3>join their tour, and hundreds of millions offer these other guys,

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 3>the money is out there. So I would love to

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>see this happen in boxing. Boxing follow the UFC model

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of one governing body, monthly events of clear cut standings.

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 3>The UFC doesn't really have the clear cut standings. I

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 3>would suggest boxing ad to that. I think it could

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 3>become a major sport. Again, that's my idea. I think

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 3>it's a great idea, one of my many free great

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 3>ideas like NFL International Week that everyone ignores, but eventually

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 3>it'll app and you're like, god, damn, that was a

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 3>great idea, Nick, so smart.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 6>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 6>inspiring true story about Anthony Robliss, who defined every expectation

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 6>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 6>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 6>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 6>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 6>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tania, and

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 6>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait to show you this dog what I'm

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna try to get. I cannot you really.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 5>Think about another A yeah, yeah.

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 4>Like the next three hundred and sixty five days.

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I figure we need a little more space in

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the house, and so I would anticipate that.

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 4>In the next couple two or three years.

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Sixteen months, I would think this house is.

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Going to go from five people to three people because

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 3>your will be gone.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 2>My guess is you're going.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 3>To be gone, and then all of a sudden your

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 3>room can get turned into.

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>My Chinese shar pays a Chinese sharp. Oh, don't judge,

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna show you in this.

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I know, I know. Oh you don't know what.

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 3>Oh you don't know about this guy. You don't know

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 3>about this guy. It's all Westminster got the number of

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 3>the breeder. This is a champion dog, a champion bloodline.

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 5>On walking your Chinese shar Pei in the rainy streets

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 5>in New York.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you know what. We'll discuss the dog in a moment.

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Are you ready for the be all right, let's do it?

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>All right? What I think?

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 3>We have a new gamer again? We played once before?

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Whatever it is, welcome back in What's right with Nick? Right?

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Demonse? What are we doing here?

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 5>This is our new game. We've previewed it once, I think, Yeah,

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 5>Nick Right? Public defender?

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh I love it?

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yes, because if I weren't doing this, I'd probably

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 3>start as a public defender and then become a high

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 3>priced criminal defense attorney. There's no question, as my buddy

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 3>Loaslow says, everybody knows you're either a prosecutor or you're

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 3>a defensive attorney.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm a defense attorney.

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not working for the state. I'm not trying to

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>put people in jail. But I will defend you to

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 3>the best of my abilities, no matter what I think

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 3>of your guilt or innocence, as per my duty to

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the American Bar Association in the United States Constitution. Now

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 3>you might say, Nick, are you a credited member of

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the us of the American Bar Association.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 2>I am not.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 3>But you know why, you want to know before we

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 3>get to the game. I'm gold clut starting. You want

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 3>to know what's bullshit? What they don't let you take.

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 2>The bar if you haven't gone to law school. So

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the bar exam is how you become a lawyer.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel like And the argument is, oh, you

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be able to pass, says who.

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, I think in Louisiana they might let.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 3>You, at least they seem to. And catch me if

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>you can. With Leonardo DiCaprio, he didn't go to law school.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 3>He took the bar and he passed it.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 4>And you're basing this off.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Well that was a true story. Okay, that was a

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 2>true story.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 3>So maybe in Louisiana you can. But I my sister

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 3>went to law school, and my sister went to Columbia.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Law Law Review.

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 3>And then was getting ready to take the bar, and

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 3>so I bet my dad.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I can do better than her on

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the bar exam.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's wild, And she was angry and my dad,

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>I bet you can't.

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But I then researched. I'm like, man, yes I can't.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I'll study for a little bit. Most of it's probably

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 3>common sense. And then they were like, you're not eligible.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I'll pay the fees. They're like ineligible. I'm like,

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 3>it's one thing for you to say I'm not eligible

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 3>to be a lawyer without going to law school. Getting

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 3>not sure about that, but to say I'm not eligible

0:24:58.800 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 3>to take the exam.

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Let me take the test.

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 3>See if I crushed the test, maybe I'm more motivated.

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Motivated sign it for law school, which, by the way,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 3>before you.

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Turn thirty five years old, I will have a law degree.

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna do it at some point. It's gonna be

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>night school.

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 4>You said thirty five, right, So I got twelve years.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I got twelve years to get the law degree.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 3>But this is good practice, Nick right, public defender, what

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 3>are we doing?

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, all right, Rob, You're in good hands. Rob

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 5>Gronkowski retired allegedly. This this was huge news. But seconds

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 5>later after, or seconds after, his agent said that he'd returned.

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 5>If Tom Brady called him defend, Rob Gronkowski is not

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 5>an intention sinking intention sinking guy with another with another

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 5>sham retired.

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so here, you're fine, all right, So listen everyone,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 3>attacking my client, mister Grenkowski, let me tell you something

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I would ask you as a did you have heroes?

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 3>As an adult, did you have people in your field

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 3>or in fields adjacent tours that you looked up to?

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 3>And did you ever say to yourself, you know what,

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 3>in order to be the greatest, I must model myself

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 3>after the greatest.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess she did.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 3>And So, if you're an athlete in America and you're saying,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 3>what is the goat path?

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 2>Who are you know?

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Two guys, basically you know, one unanimously considered and one

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>considered by most of you. The goat well in basketball

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 3>would be Michael Jordan, and football would be Tom Brady.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 3>So Michael Jordan, once upon a time retired allegedly to

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 3>go play baseball, came back eighteen months later, nobody judged

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 3>him for it. He then retired once again, came back

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 3>three years later, and then the third and final time,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 3>retired but still seem to want to come out and

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 3>practice with the team. He then saw Tom Brady, someone

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 3>that my client not only you know has great affection for,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 3>but it you know knows quite well, has played with him,

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 3>retire and come back less than six weeks later.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>And was he criticized for it?

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 2>Was he did he pay any penalty for it?

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, he seemed to get more power from.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 3>It as they as you know, they fired the coach

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 3>that he moved on from the coach that he allegedly

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 3>had issues with. So I would ask you, what else

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 3>do you expect my client, Rob Gronkowski to do?

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 5>And he actually did it in much better fashion than

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 5>Tom Bradley.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, one, he didn't hijack Super Bowl Week, thank you,

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 3>co counsel. And so yeah, and if you are going

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 3>to convict my client for attention seeking, I hope you

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 3>are checking the Statute of limitations and see if we've

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 3>got have some retroactive convictions against your goats, Michael Jordan

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 3>and Tom Brady. We rest our case.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Next.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Remember once upon a time football players or athletes, should

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 5>I say, we're opting in to get paid in crypto care?

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well that hasn't seemed the age too. Well, Okay,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Sequan lost, Yes, I apologize.

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 5>Saquon lost thirty three of his contract value Odell for

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 5>and Trevor Lawrence I'm assuming.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sixty Yeah, that was almost sixty million bucks.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Really, by the way.

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 3>We're basing these numbers off one tweet that I'm not

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 3>sure we actually verified, but it sounds right.

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead, yeah, defend these guys for betting their livelihoods

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 5>on crypto.

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, listen, ladies and gentlemen of the jury.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 3>There are multiple ways to invest money and to try

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 3>to grow money.

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Or to do none of the above. It is in you.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 3>It is your right in this country to ask to

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>be paid via direct deposit, Go to the bank, take

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the money out of your bank, and bury it in

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 3>your backyard. You can take the money and buy gold bars,

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 3>that's allowed. You could buy t bills from the US

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 3>government and get one percent return.

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 2>If then you can leave it in a in a

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 2>checking account these.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Days and get maybe half a percent and have no

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 3>chance whatsoever of that money decreasing in value. Though that

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 3>is available to you, however, if you would like to

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>grow your money. And I don't know if you my

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 3>fellow Americans have checked the price of milk or the

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 3>price of gas lately, but it seems like things are

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 3>going up. Seems like inflation is hitting the country quite hard.

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you do, just bury your money in the backyard.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 3>If you do, just put it in a checking account,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 3>getting half a percent, and your one million dollars a

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 3>year later is one million, fifty thousand dollars. It's act

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 3>probably more like eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars, because

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 3>that one million dollars doesn't go as far as it

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>did a year ago, as inflation ravages this country. So

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 3>my clients decided, I'm I'm gonna invest it. Nobody would

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 3>beat an eye if they invested. They said, you know what,

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna buy stock with it. But if folks checked

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 3>over the same timeline, would some of the hottest, trendiest

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 3>stocks have done. How's Peloton doing these days?

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 2>What about AMC?

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Remember the stocks thing? Oh, those kids on Reddit are

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna make everyone rich? How's that one doing? What about

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those tech stocks? You'all seen a Snapchat

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 3>stock lately? Yeah, exactly that that charged straight down. So, yes,

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 3>my clients knew they were taking a risk. With any

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 3>great return, there must be great risk, or else it

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be investing. It would be scheming. You can't say

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 3>we're hey, you might be able to double your money

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 3>within a year without a risk. But however, it feels

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>to me this is preying on people's own biases in

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 3>pointing out my three clients lost money in a certain

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 3>type of investment and just leaving alone all the folks

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that have lost money investing in blue chip tech stocks

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 3>or have lost money by simply keeping the same amount

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 3>of money that has less spending power. So I ask you,

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 3>is this really about a fear? Is this really about

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 3>these my clients losing money? Or is this actually about

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the fear of the unknown and the fear of what's next?

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 2>What is next going?

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Chase Claypole says he's top three receivers in the NFL

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 5>right now, He's not even top three in the AFC

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 5>North defend his take, What do you.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Want my guy to say? I'm just curious, hey, Chase,

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 3>big season coming up for you and the Steelers. How

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 3>do you think you stack up against other receivers in

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 3>the NFL?

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Would you like him to say, Well.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Be very honest, I'm not nearly as good as a

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of it. I know the Steelers are relying on

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 3>me and counting on me, and I have had moments

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 3>where people say I have the talent to be one

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 3>of the best receivers in football, but I've crunched the

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 3>PFF rankings and it looks like I'm like the sixth

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 3>best guy in the AFC North.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I've just got to be honest with you. Is that

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 2>what you'd like him to say?

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Or do you want him to exhibit the confidence that

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 3>got him here? How do you think Chase Claypool was

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 3>good enough to be a starter in high school varsity

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 3>and then good enough to get a Division one scholarship,

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 3>and then good enough to make the NFL and good

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 3>enough to have some great NFL moments obscene confidence, confidence

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 3>that has carried him, and now you want him to

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 3>add some false humility because his yards per route run

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't match up to Jamar. Chase, you don't even believe

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 3>what you're asking me. What's next?

0:32:57.640 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Steph had a cigar in his mouth for the parade

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 5>this but didn't have it lit and was proceeding to

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 5>hit it and take puffs.

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 4>It sounds like he's joining the Russell Wilson club, by.

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>The way, but let's not do that.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, defend the use of cigars and champagne and

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 4>championship celebrations when no one actually likes them.

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, when no one actually likes them, It.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Might he actually might have had it lit there.

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure. I'm not I'm not certain. Make sure

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 2>what I'm supposed to defend here.

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not necessarily supposed to defend if Steph was or

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 3>was not smoking.

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm supposed to defend.

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 3>The generic use of champagne and cigars exactly when quote

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 3>no one actually likes either like both, So well, that's

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 3>good to know.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm joking, no doubt you are.

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 3>And if you like champagne, if you do like champagne,

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna really like champagne once you can buy champagne.

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't like cardboard jug when you can.

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Buy like some actual champagne. I, on the other hand,

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 3>not a big champagne guy. The executive producer of the show,

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 3>Gave Goodwin, had a tweet about how everyone's pretending to

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 3>like cigars in champagne, and to which I would say,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 3>to ladies and gentlemen of the journey, I don't even

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 3>need to defend this because the question is so flawed.

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 3>When the question assumes that everyone else's tastes are the

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 3>same as the questionners that defend the use of something

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 3>that no one likes when quite clearly many people do

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 3>like it now.

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I am a cigar guy. I am not a champagne person.

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 3>But I am not so arrogant, egotistical, self absorbed and

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 3>delusional to assume my tastes are everyone's. To just assume that,

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 3>because I believe Kaream Soda is the greatest soda ever exists,

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 3>that other folks who are saying, no, I'm not a

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 3>the Kaream Soda fan, that they're lying, just that they're just,

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, trying to fit in with the crowd.

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I would ask you this, ladies and gentlemen of the jury.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Is there anything that you deeply passionately like that some

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 3>folks have said, I don't. Maybe you're a person that

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 3>likes bananas with peanut butter, not my thing, but you

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 3>love it. Maybe you're someone that says, sardines sardines. Maybe

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 3>you go to a steakhouse and you order the chicken

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 3>because you're just not a red meat person. Are you

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 3>faking it or are you being true to yourself? That's

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 3>my question, And this is not really about Steph Curry

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 3>or championship parades. It's about the insecurities of the question.

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 3>If we'll be we rest our case and.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back. All right, welcome back.

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 3>In final segment, what's right with the great podcast and

0:35:58.520 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 3>YouTube show?

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I like that Nick Public Defender game.

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's a game.

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 3>That's a fun game. And you guys start the clock

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 3>here because we went late on the other side. We'll

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 3>get to the Chinese sharpay in just a moment. It

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 3>reminds me of when I first got hired in radio.

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 3>The guy who hired me, Alan Davis, who I'll forever

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 3>be indebted to because he gave me a shot and

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 3>it turned into it was the it was the single

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 3>biggest domino that fell in my career. He called me

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 3>into his office one day and said, I want to

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 3>do it. I want to play a game with you.

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 3>And I said okay. He said, I'm going to point

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 3>at something in this office and I need you to

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:40.439
<v Speaker 3>give me six minutes on and it would and I'd

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 3>come in and he would just be like that picture

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 3>on the wall of me with such and such, and

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 3>I would just have to have a take and a

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 3>rant about that, which I really think was like great

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 3>training for my brain to figure out, like how to

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 3>you want to be fully prepped on things, right? But

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know what those questions were gonna be and

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I and I didn't know what he was gonna ask

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 3>me those days. It's good to kind of like practice

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 3>that mental agility of when you're not prepped, can you

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.919
<v Speaker 3>still make a compelling argument. So I enjoy that game

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot, almost as much as I enjoyed going to

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 3>the Westminster Dog Show Tuesday night and seeing I can't

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.240
<v Speaker 3>believe the Chinese Sharpai didn't even make the semi finals

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 3>of its category.

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>But Demanse look at these dogs, look at them as

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 2>puppies and then as grown ups.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know if we have the ability in

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 3>post production to add pictures of Chinese shar pais, but

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 3>that is the goodest of the good boys ever. And

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting one. I am absolutely getting one. They are

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I read all about him this morning. Incredibly loyal, great

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 3>with children. Yeah, well that's a big thing with dogs.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:54.760
<v Speaker 3>You gotta be fiercely loyal.

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 2>You might have to protect you one day.

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I just feel like I don't see dogs that

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 4>aren't well.

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 3>That's a good point. That's a good point. That is

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 3>really but even by a dog standards, loyal. He's very chill,

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 3>which could be a nice So here's the thing. I

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 3>was reading this American Kennel Club thing about his breed,

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 3>like the full rating about it, and then I was.

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Like, how accurate are these ratings?

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 3>And so then I read the rating about Portuguese water dogs,

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 3>which Dexter is, Oh, it's spot on. Yeah, he's like

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 3>a six out of six on activity, a six out

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 3>of six on affection, a five out of six.

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 2>On drool, like all of it.

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, oh my god, they nailed they nailed Dexter,

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, I think I want I think I

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 3>want another dog I want and I want the son

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 3>of the dog I saw at Westminster. Now that's probably

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 3>going to be expensive now that I think about it,

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 3>like one of his scions what it's going to be,

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 3>but because he didn't win, maybe not quite as expensive.

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 3>But I just it's such I really liked the bloodhound,

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 3>but a bloodhound.

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Needs a ton of space. I can't get the bloodhound.

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 5>There was also also I feel like, would not let

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 5>you get a bloodhouse. I don't know, some reason, like

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 5>I just don't think that.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Uh there.

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I also gotta show you this dog, oh gosh, official

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 3>dog of Mexico.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 2>It was, yeah, this thing, this.

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Beautiful dog it's it's spelled xolo something.

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how to pronounce it.

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 3>But this dog, they say he's a hairless dog, but

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 3>he is a beautiful dog. I think I want like

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 3>five dogs. I don't think it works really well in

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.399
<v Speaker 3>New York City. I got you, but I think at

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 3>some point I want to own a bunch of land

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and have like a giant stable of dogs. I've become

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 3>a dog guy my whole childhood. My parents told me

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I was allergic when I am not allergic. My sister

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 3>was allergic, so we weren't allowed to have dogs, and

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 3>they said we're both allergic.

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 2>It was bullshit, and I'm still a little bitter about it.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 3>And then I when me and your mom got together,

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 3>your mom already had Mo, who became my first ever dog,

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and I loved him with all my heart. He passed,

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:14.720
<v Speaker 3>We got but I went around. Mo was a puppy.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Then we got Dexter, who's my first puppy ever. Dexter's

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 3>my guy, even though he's totally insane and I think has.

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Some mental issues. I think he's got I think he's

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 2>a what do you call that? Neuro divergent. I think

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 2>we have a neuro divergent dog. But that's fine. I

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 2>still love him.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 3>But now I'm gonna get one of these fancy We

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 3>already got a semi fancy dog Portuguese water dog. I'm

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.879
<v Speaker 3>gonna start getting fancy fancy dogs and in along within

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the next decade, going to law school, maybe getting the

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 3>dog the show, you know, not breathing, showing.

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, become a dog shower, professional dog shower. Yeah, you

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:52.919
<v Speaker 2>don't seem to believe me. I'll be honest.

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't even become a professional dog shower. I just

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 3>want to get show dog quality and walk him around

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and play with That's what I want to do. We'll

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 3>talk to you guys next week.