WEBVTT - How Meteorologists Work

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Get technology with tech Stuff from dot Com. Hey there,

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I am your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a senior writer win how Stuff Works dot Com,

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes my voice cracks for no reason. Today we're

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>going to continue our journey into the scary world of

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>weather forecasting. Uh. I say scary because weather is a

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>powerful thing. It can bring with it some pretty intense

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.279
<v Speaker 1>uh storms and and win things like that. I mean,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously you can have nice weather too, but who wants

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that? I mean, you're not gonna have

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>an emergency weather broadcast burst into your favorite viewing time

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of watching ALF and say warning, things are gonna be

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>really nice this afternoon. So we're gonna talk about today

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>about some of the tools that meteorologists use in order

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to get information about what's going on at this very

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>moment as far as the weather is concerned. In our

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>last episode, we covered the basics of how weather works,

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>so that man, it was more of a science based show,

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>less technology, but it was important so that we can

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>build the foundation to understand why meteorology is so incredibly

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>complicated and so process or heavy. Like when you talk

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>about supercomputers. One of the main uses for supercomputers these

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>days is to run weather models. And that's because you're

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about an enormous amount of data that has to

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>be processed running you know, various types of calculations on

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it in order to create the outputs that we use

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for weather forecasts. And as our weather models become more

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and more high resolution, more precise, using more more readings

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>per hour, that demand of processing power increases quite a bit.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about just the stuff that meteorologists used

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to gather that data. This isn't even about the weather models.

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>In our next episode, we will cover how weather models work,

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's fascinating all in its own. Today we're gonna

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>focus on the stuff that meteorologists used to get the

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>data that feeds into those weather models. Uh So, meteorologists

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>do a few different things. They do make observations of

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>current weather conditions, so they're telling you what's happening right now,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I'm focusing on for this episode and

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the next one will look more at the forecasting side.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>How do they actually predict what will happen next. Observations

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>let you know the current conditions. They include data like

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>wind speed, wind direction, air pressure, temperature, humidity, u V,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>radiation numbers, smog fog, all of these things and more.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you need observation stations throughout any given region, the

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>region that you are responsible for, let's say, and you

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>need to have a lot of them in order for

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you to get a more complete picture of what is

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>really actually happening. If you have only a few observation points,

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>then you would have what we would call low resolution.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>You would not have a very accurate accurate view of

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>what was going on within the region, unless your region

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is particularly small. Let's say that you are responsible for

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>gathering the information across an entire county. Well, a county

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>could be lots of square mileage, and depending upon where

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>your observation stations are, you might have information that's very

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>relevant for a specific part of that county, but it

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>might not be so relevant for other parts of the county.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And yet you have to create weather forecasts based on

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>your observations. It means the further out you go from

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>those observation stations, the less reliable that data is going

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to be because it may not reflect what the actual

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>conditions are further away from those observation stations. So having

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a high density of observation stations is critical for having

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>very precise, whether a picture of what's going on with

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the weather and thus making more accurate weather forecasts. So

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it could cause a problem, right Like, you could end

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>up giving a weather forecast that ends up being useless

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>for a significant percentage of the people who are relying

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>upon your weather forecasts if they happen to live far

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 1>away from where your observation stations are. So let's think

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of this in more concrete terms and you'll really understand

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>how this can become a problem. Let's say that you

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have a region that includes some different areas within with

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>different levels of elevation. So let's say that you're at

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the foothills of a mountain range. Well, we'll say this

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the appal Achians. So, uh, I live in Atlanta, Georgia,

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>where on what is called the Piedmont it is h

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>hilly but not mountainous area. If I were further northeast

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of here, or even just further north of here, I

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>would start getting into the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that I'm on Just like that, I'm

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at a region where it's covering the end of

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the Piedmont into the foothills. That's several different areas of

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>different elevation. That means that those different areas are going

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.239
<v Speaker 1>to experience different weather patterns because weather is all about

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric movement and things that are going on within the atmosphere.

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Atmosphere is going to move over the topographical features of

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 1>any given region, the geography, and with hills and mountains,

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that means the weather is going to do different things

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:57.119
<v Speaker 1>in those different areas. So you're going to have folks

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>checking the weather report and wondering why it says there's

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>no chance brain while they're being rained on, and it

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>may be because they live on the opposite side of

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>a mountain from where you are with your observation stations,

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and at the observation stations everything's bone dry because that's

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>what you know, that's what you've based your forecast on,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because that was where the data was coming from. But

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of the mountain, because you've had

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>warm air masses pushed up to higher elevations as they

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>moved over a mountain, They've then cooled down, water has condensed,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and precipitation has begun to fall. People on the other

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>side of the mountain they get rained on, and yet

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they're living in that same region that's being covered by you,

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's the county they are in, or the zip code.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 1>This is why it gets really problematic when you start

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>making weather forecasts, because they depend so heavily upon the

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>geography of the respective regions and the geography and and

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>observation stations within that geography. Now, if you have observation

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>stations throughout your area, you can give much more precise

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>weather forecasts. And say, in this part of the county,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you would expect conditions to be dry, but up here

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>over in the mountains, you're gonna start seeing some rain.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So you start seeing where the complexity comes into play.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is a very small scale example of this problem.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Once you start looking at it from say a statewide

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>or nationwide or global perspective, you begin to realize this

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is really complicated stuff, and this is a big challenge

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for meteorologists. You might notice that many weather apps allow

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you to search for weather forecasts by zip codes, but again,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>zip codes do not necessarily conform to geography, and you

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.679
<v Speaker 1>could have lots of different geographic regions within a single

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>zip code, and that means that the weather forecast for

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those parts of the zip code may not

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>be accurate for all the other parts. So if I

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>check my app and it says hey, it's gonna rain,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and I step outside and it's sunny, I might think, well,

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>what the heck is wrong with this weather forecast app? Again,

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they have to try and give you a forecast that's

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be relevant for the entire zip code, even

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>if different parts of that zip code are in different

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>geographical regions, like different geographical features mountains or streams or

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>lakes or ocean or whatever it may be. So you

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>can't really take all that into account if your criteria

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for generating a forecast is based solely upon zip codes.

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why a lot of different weather apps and services

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are now using geolocation data to give you a more

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>precise weather forecast for your your requests. So, if you're

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>carrying a mobile device and you have a weather app

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on it and it's asking hey, can I have access

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to your GPS or location data? If you say yes,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>then the weather app can look for your location and

0:08:55.840 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>try and base the forecast for you closer to observation

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>stations that are relevant to your your actual location So

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>if I happen to be in a part of the

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>county that is not the main population center and thus

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not the place that the forecast is really gonna cater to,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I might get something more personalized saying, hey, well, based

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>upon where you are, you're gonna be Charlie Brown and

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>have a little cloud follow you all day raining just

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on you, which has never quite happened to me, but

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>some days it feels that way. It's sidesteps that zip

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>code problem, so that the weather forecasting system can consult

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the observation stations really closest to you at that time

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and to project weather based upon that. But even then

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you can still run into issues. So, for example, if

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you happen to be closest to an airport observation station,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean most really all airports have some form of

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>meteorological meteor logical boy man, that's gonna be a lot

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of fun today. Meteorological observation stations. Almost all air airports

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>have at least some element of that, because clearly the

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>weather conditions are very important when it comes to air travel.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>One problem with that is that airports have very big

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>runways and uh tarmax things that absorb a lot of

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>heat and give off a lot of heat, more so

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>than the surrounding area. And as we learned in our

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>last episode, heat is a big important factor when it

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to impacting weather systems. So if you happen to

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be close to an airport, that might end up throwing

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>off some of the readings that you would get because

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it has this island effect right at the airport, But

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that might not extend very far outside of the airport's borders.

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So while you're getting observation data that's close to you,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it may still not be relevant to you. A lot

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of this sounds like I'm apologizing for weather forecasts that

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't entirely accurate, and I guess you could argue that

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I kind of am. But mostly what I want to

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>stress is just, um, what a tough job this is.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting and fascinating thing, and we've learned so

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>much about atmospheric fluid dynamics and just how weather works

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in general as a result of lots and lots of

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>men and women putting their heads together and and making

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>observations and sussing all this out. But it's still really

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>really hard to do, which is why it's one of

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we don't do it perfectly now. Besides resolution,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as in how many observation stations you have within a

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>given region, you have to take those observations frequently. This

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>helps with precision. If you take one observation in the day,

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>early in the day, and that's it, then you can't

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>take into account any changes that happen afterward, which means

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that you can never really update your forecast. And that

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>means that the further away you get in time from

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that initial observation, the less precise and accurate your forecast

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. If you continuously or at least

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>regularly take observations, you can then update your forecast as

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a result when conditions change, and that way you can

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>keep your at least your immediate forecast more accurate. You

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>may notice that the further out you go from the

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>point of forecast from the current time, the less accurate

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>these forecasts tend to tend to be. So if you're

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at a date that's ten days out, it might

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be more or less right on the money, or maybe

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>way off base. Because weather is again very complicated and

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>constantly changing. Uh So you want to make sure that

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the information you're relying on doesn't age so much as

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>to be irrelevant. So you need lots of observation stations.

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You need to take a lot of observations per given

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>unit of time, and the combination of those two requirements

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>means that you are generating an enormous amount of data

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that then has to go someplace and then be processed

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for you to get forecasts. This is why you need

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>those hefty computers like supercomputers to process meteorological data. And

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>more on that in the next episode. But first let's

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the basic instruments these meteorologists are

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>using to gather actual weather data. Then in our next

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>episode will move on to how they use that to

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>create models for weather. And also why are there different models.

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You've probably heard of various weather models. Why do we

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not just have one? Why are there multiples? And why

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>are some quote unquote better than others in very specific scenarios.

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to cover that in the next episode. Now,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, meteorological instruments fall into two broadcat gregories. You

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have direct sensors also called institute sensors. They're inside the

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>situation like a thermometer that is left out to measure

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the temperature of the air. It's institute. It is a

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>direct sensor. It's directly measuring the temperature of the air outside.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Then you have remote sensors that are measuring something that's

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>much further away. The name pretty much gives you the

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>indication of what it does. Now, we're going to talk

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>about both types in this episode. Direct sensors include lots

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that you're familiar with, and we're gonna start

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>off with a good old, easy one to to talk

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about thermometers, the noble thermometer telling us such information like dude,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it's wicked cold out that today, but on your coat,

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>or seriously, buddy, it's boiling out there. Let's play some

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>player unknowns battlegrounds in the air conditioned house. But how

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>do thermommeters actually work? So let's start with your basic

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>mercury thermometer. It's something that is still being used around

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's your basic bulb thermometer. It depends upon

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a simple physical principle, which is that a liquids volume

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>changes relative to the temperature of the liquid. So when

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you heat a liquid up, it's molecules decide to do

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of the guy I'm always seated next to

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on a long distance plane ride. In other words, it

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>spreads out well beyond its normal parameters. You know who

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. Give me my arm rest back. But

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens with liquids. You heat them up, the

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>molecules get more energy, they get excited, they move around more,

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and they spread apart. So as a result, the liquid expands,

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and if, of course you do this long enough, the

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>liquid will end up turning into a gas, which is

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>even more free form than liquid. Obvious asleep. When liquids

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>get cold, those molecules end up huddling together, not so

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>much for warmth, but because they have less energy they

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>don't move around so much, so the liquid actually takes

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>up less space than it normally would. So your basic

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>bulb thermometer consists of a small bulb at the base

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and a narrow, long, closed tube leading up from that

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>bulb base. These physical proportions accentuate the change in volume

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of the liquid, So you want the bulb to be

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>small because you want any changes in temperature in whatever

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>environment you are measuring to rapidly be reflected within the

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>thermometer itself. So, for example, if you're talking about outside.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Any drastic change in the outside temperature, you want that

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to be reflected in an outside thermometer pretty quickly. Typically

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>those temperatures don't increase or drop that fast. But let's

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>say you want to go from room temperature thermometer and

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you're testing someone's temperature. You want to find out they

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have a fever or not. You don't want to have

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>to wait a very long time for that change in

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>temperature to UH to happen within the mercury inside that thermometer.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>So that's why that bulb is small. It's just a

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>small amount of liquid. Doesn't change take very long for

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that change in temperature to move through the liquid, and

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thus the volume increases inside the the thermometer. UH. With weather,

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it means you you'd want something that will remain liquid

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>at temperatures found across most of the planet, which is

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>why we use mercury. Mercury is a metal. It is

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a metal that is liquid at room temperature and a

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of temperatures that you will find on Earth. Very

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>useful in that sense, it's not going to boil away

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>rapidly at high a temperatures, nor does it freeze at

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>your typical low temperatures. When you get two very low,

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>which does happen on Earth, mercury will free So it's

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not perfect, but it's reliable and it's easy to read

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the differences. It's um it shows up well in a

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>glass thermometer, and as it turns out, uh, mercury liquid

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>mercury is is pretty reliable. It remains liquid at temperatures

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that range from six D seventy four degrees fahrenheit, which

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is three D fifty six point seventy three degrees celsius,

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>all the way down to its freezing point of minus

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight fahrenheit or minus thirty eight point eight three celsius.

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But hey, here's a fun fact. The most extreme cold

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>temperatures on Earth get way below minus thirty eight celsius.

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in NASA released satellite data that measured the

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>lowest recorded temperature at minus ninety four point seven celsius,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>which is minus one thirty five point eight fahrenheit. At

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that temperature, mercury itself would freeze. So for very low

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>temperatures you cannot use a mercury thermometer. You just you're

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna it's gonna be as cold as it gets.

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>It's already frozen. It's a solid, so you actually have

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to use a different kind of liquid. If you want

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to use a liquid thermometer, alcohol works. Uh. They call

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>them spirit thermometers in the old days because you're talking

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>about spirits alcohol. Alcohol is a very low freezing point,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's boiling point, however, is much lower than mercury,

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>so you can't use it for very high temperature things,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it works great for low temperature applications.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, this actually leads me to an interesting question

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think is fun to tackle, even though it's

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>not not quite as technical. How did we come up

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 1>with the fahrenheit and celsius scales? Well, it all has

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with the freezing and boiling points of water,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense. Water is very prevalent here on Earth.

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Most of our surface of our planet is covered in water.

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>We depend upon water for our survival, so the temperatures

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at which water will freeze or boil are obviously important

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to us. So fahrenheit will start with that because that

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>scale was proposed first. That came from Daniel Danny Boy

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>fahrenheit in fourteen and as far as I know, no

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>one else called him Danny Boy, but I'm waiting for

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it to catch On fourteen, he decided to use a

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>scale designed actually by a predecessor of his. It was

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>not it was not completely invented by Fahrenheit. He took

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a scale that was made by a man named Olaus Rummer.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Rummer's thermometer listed zero as the lowest point. That was

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.239
<v Speaker 1>not the freezing point, but it was as low as

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the thermometer could register. Was zero and at seven point

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>five on Rumors scale, that's where I would melt into water,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer where water would freeze into ice.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It is the freezing point or melting point, depending upon

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>your perspective. That was seven and a half on or

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>scale at twenty two and a half that was considered

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>body temperature, and sixty was the temperature for boiling water.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So it went from zero to sixty with boiling water

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>being at the top and freezing being at about seven

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half fahrenheit to create a mercury thermometer, and

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it was capable of making more precise measurements than the

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the spirit thermometer that Rumor had been using. And because

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of that precision, since you could measure smaller changes in temperature,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>fair Kneit felt that there needed to be a scale

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that would be broader than than Rumor's scale so that

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you could easily talk about tiny changes in temperature. Right,

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just getting an extra level of precision in there,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and it means that you don't have to subdivide those

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>units into further and further decimal points in order to

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>describe the differences of temperature changes. So Fahrenheit ended up

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 1>first taking rumor scale and he multiplied it by four. Uh.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>He then adjusted the scale. He started doing some research

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and realized that just multiplying it by four it meant

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't as accurate as it needed to be.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>He had more levels of precision, but the accuracy was off.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Multiplying it by four it multiplied not just the scale

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>but also the imprecision of that original scale. So he

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>started to try and refine it. Fahrenheit ended up after

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>he passed away, people took his scale and began to

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>refine it more, and they began to establish the freezing

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>point and boiling point of water, and decided to set

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the freezing point and boiling point apart by one eighty degrees,

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>which is important in math, but not so great for

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>just casual conversation, So some people would say it was

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of an arbitrary decision to make it a one

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>degree difference between freezing and boiling. The temperature of freezing

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>water was eventually established as thirty two degrees, which means

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>boiling water would be two hundred twelve degrees. One benefit

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the scale was that the units would allow for

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>subtle descriptions of temperature changes without the need for decimals.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you were to describe the temperature as rising

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>from eighty six to eighty seven in fahrenheit, that's easy.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you wanted to say the same thing in celsius,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to take those same two temperatures and talk about that increase,

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd say it went from thirty degrees celsius to thirty

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>point six degrees celsius, or so if you said thirty

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>one celsius, you're not being as precise because that's a

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>greater change in temperature than what you're actually referring to.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Now that being at having the temperature for freezing water

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>set at thirty two degrees is a bit frustrating, but

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I have an explanation for this. This is

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan's supposition corner. I kind of wish I could get

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Dylan to make a musical sting for this. That just

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>sounds confusing. All right, here's here's my pitch. Why is

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>water freezing at thirty two degrees? Why is it thirty

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>two degrees? Why is it not zero? Why would you

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not start at zero for the freezing point of water?

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>If water is the really important part on your scale,

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it's because it can get colder than freezing here on Earth.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And so you've got fahrenheit saying, well, I want a

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>scale that I can measure the temperature even when it's

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>colder than freezing, because some days it is colder than freezing,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 1>so I need my scale to be able to reflect that.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But how do I measure that? If I've set freezing

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>as zero? Where do I go from there? I mean,

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I can't have the mercury go further down. I've got it.

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll set freezing higher up on the scale, And that

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>way you can still describe stuff that's colder than freezing water,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but not colder than what I can measure. So, uh,

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you set the bottom of your scale lower than the

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>temperature for freezing. In that way, every measurement you take

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is a positive unit, you don't have to create negative units,

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So you just set your scales based at the temperature

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lower than what it tends to get down to. Right.

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So Fair Knight, say as well, doesn't often get colder

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>than today, So today is gonna be zero, and everything

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>above that will be fine, because how could it get

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>colder than today? That's Jonathan's supposition, corner, y'all? All right,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>but what about Celsius. Celsius was the brainchild of Andres

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Celsius in seventy two, so a few decades after Fair

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and Height, he had the clever idea of creating a

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>temperature scale where the freezing and boiling points of water

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>would be separated by one hundred degrees, making it much

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>easier to talk about, especially for mathematic uh purposes. So

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>zero to one, taking that simple decimal scale, it makes sense, uh,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Although originally he intended to make one hundred the freezing

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>point of water and zero the boiling point of water,

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.959
<v Speaker 1>so in other words, the scale was inverted. The higher

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the unit number, the lower the temperature would be. So

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>really he was creating a scale to measure cold, not heat.

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So a one hundred degrees Celsius in the original implementation

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>would be freezing temperatures, whereas a zero degrees celsius in

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the original implementation would be boiling water. Guests arguing that

0:26:56.000 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>why would you ever get hotter than boiling water? Maybe Uh,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>this did not stick obviously. His contemporaries ended up deciding

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that that was not logical and perhaps a bit whacka noodle,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and so they flipped it so that zero is freezing

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>on is boiling. Uh. Celsius did not live to see

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>his his his standard became a standard. It was not

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a standard during his lifetime. He actually passed away only

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years after proposing it, so he did

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not get to see how it was adopted by almost

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the entire world, with the exception of some notable places

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>such as the United States of America, where we still

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>use fahrenheit and not celsius. Although I still like fahrenheit

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>because it is easier to talk about more subtle changes

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in temperature than it is with celsius. Also, I just

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>grew up with it, so at this point it's hard

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>for me to sit there and think, like, if someone

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>tells me it's twenty five degrees celsius, I have no real,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>no real correlation of that in my brain. Like I

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>couldn't tell you how warm or cold twenty five degrees

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>celsius is um but if you tell me that it's

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine degrees fahrenheit, I know how hot you're talking.

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know fun times. But what if you wanted

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to convert fare kneit to celsius and you don't have

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>access to Google, which makes it really easy to do

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and how I did it whenever I needed to make conversions.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you want to do a conversion of

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>fahrenheit to celsius, but you don't have access to a

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>temperature calculator. Well, you just follow this handy dandy guide.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You take your fahreneit temperature, you subtract thirty two from

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that temperature. Then you multiply your new number by the

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>number five. Then you divide that new number by the

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>number nine. Now you know what temperature it was half

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>an hour ago before you had to deal with all

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that math. It's a joke. I'm a liberal arts major,

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>so make a lot of jokes about being bad at math.

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>They're mostly jokes, there's some truth to them. Honestly, I

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone really knows how math works. That's also

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a joke. These days, more thermometers are actually electronic. They're

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>not based upon some liquid moving up or down a tube.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Based on changes in temperature, they end up using thermo resistors,

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes they're just called thermistors. That's also not a joke.

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>They really are called that. These are materials they experience

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a change in electrical resistance due to temperature fluctuation. So remember,

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>electrical resistance is the tendency of a material to resist

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>or impede the flow of electrons through that material. If

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you have a material that has a very low resistance

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like copper, those are good conductors. Metals that have our

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>materials rather that have a very high resistance like rubber

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are really good insulators. And temperature turns out can affect

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>some materials with their electrical resistance, which means that at

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>certain temperatures electricity may pass more easily through that material

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>than at other temperatures. So that is the basis for

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>electronic thermometers. The most common thermistors have a resistance that

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>decreases as temperatures increase. In other words, they become more

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>conductive the warmer it gets. This is called a negative

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>temperature coefficient or NTC thermistor because it's this uh see

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>saw kind of relationship, right, the temperature increases, resistance decreases.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>There are also some that have a resistance that increases

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>with temperature. These are called positive temperature coefficient or PTC

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>therm mists. So with these, as the temperature goes up

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in the material, so does its electrical resistance. But most

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>electronic thermometers use NTC therm mists. The relationship between temperature

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>change and variation resistance is not a constant, so you

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot say that resistance changes by the same amount of ohms.

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Those are the units we use to measure electrical resistance.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>But you can't say that it's gonna change by the

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>same number of ohm's per degree of celsius. So if

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you go from twenty three to twenty four degrees celsius

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and then twenty four to twenty five degrees celsius and

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to twenty six degrees celsius, the difference in

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:27.239
<v Speaker 1>resistance by ohms is not going to be linear in

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>relation to those changes in temperature. Typically, thermistor resistance varies

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in a nonlinear way, but in a way that you

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>can still factor by using a formula, So you have

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to design a formula that takes all of this into

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>account in order for you to relay a change in

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>resistance as being a change in temperature. So an electronic

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>thermometers microprocessor detects and measures these changes in resistance, takes

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that formula into account, converts those measurements into temperature units.

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Their mists are also used in other applications as well,

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so you might use one to protect a circuit from

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>electrical overload. You've got electricity running through a circuit. A

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>current is running through the circuit. Let's say that the

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>current increases uh to a point where it's going to

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>cause issues with the circuit if it continues on this path.

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>If you have a thermistor positive a PTC thermistor in

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that circuit, then as it warms up, its resistance will increase.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So current runs through the thermistor that makes it generate

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>heat that ends up changing its electrical resistance, and eventually

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it ends up becoming a barrier to current, so that

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the current cannot continue to flow through the circuit, and

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>thus the thermistor will end up protecting the rest of

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the circuit from electrical overload. So that's one potential application

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of a thermistor outside of electronic thermometers. I thought it

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was pretty nifty. Well, I've got more nifty things to say,

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to move away from temperature. But before

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I do that, let's take a quick break to thank

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>our sponsor. All Right, so we've covered temperature. Now let's

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>tackle our next sensor, the barometer. Barometers measure air pressure,

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and as I mentioned in that last episode about whether

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>air pressure plays an enormous role in how weather behaves.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So knowing the current air pressure conditions helps meteorologists understand

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what might happen next. So, for example, if your area

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>happens to be under high air pressure, that's an indicator

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're not likely to see very much rain that day.

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>High air pressure systems tend to keep rain systems out. Typically,

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if the pressure is starting to drop, so you're seeing

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a change in air pressure, that could indicate that it's

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get windy. It might possibly indicate that there's

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>some wet weather on the way because a low pressure

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>system is moving into what was a high pressure system.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But you have to have something to measure that air

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>pressure changes. An air pressure at any given altitude are

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>typically too subtle for humans to really pick up on. Right, Like,

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'm at sea level, I'm not likely to detect

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 1>very subtle changes in air pressure, but I would notice

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the difference if I were to go from say, Death

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Valley to Mount Everest. Those changes in altitude are so

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>dramatic that the differences an air pressure would be noticeable

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and actually a fatal problem. On Mount Everest, I wouldn't

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to adjust to that remarkable drop an air pressure,

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>not to mention temperature, uh that rapidly. I would need

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to acclimate to it to avoid getting sick and potentially

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>having a really fatal problems. So, yes, you can detect

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>differences an air pressure, but typically if you're at a

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>single altitude, you're not moving up or down. You're just

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>experiencing changes in air pressure due to pressure systems. You

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>probably aren't going to be conscious of that change in

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>air pressure because it's it tends to be fairly subtle,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>even though it can mean some major changes in weather.

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Barometers measure air pressure. They detect how much air is

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>pressing down on them, so in a way, it's kind

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of like a set of scales for the atmosphere. So

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you do that? How do you make something

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that can actually detect how much air is pushing down

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on them? Well, the simplest type really is called a

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Tori Chilian barometer, and it's named after its inventor, Evangelista Barometer. No,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, wait, Evangelista Toricelli. He was an Italian physicist

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and a mathematician of the seventeen century. Torchelli is one

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the mathematicians who laid the groundwork for integral calculus,

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to hold that against him. Toward

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Chelli worked with Galileo who gave tor Chelly the idea

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that he should experiment with glass tubes and mercury to

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>study things like vacuums as well as other physical properties.

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And this was in sixteen three. So tore Chelly took

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a tube that was four ft long or about one

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>point two meters. It was sealed at one end, so

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>think of like a test tube. He filled it with

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>liquid mercury, and then he overtook, turned the tube and

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>put the end of it in a dish that had

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>raised sides. So at first mercury started to come out

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of the tube and into the dish, but eventually the

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>mercury settled and it was at a level above the dish.

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>It was, you know, like several inches above where the

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>base of the dish was above the level of the

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>rest of the mercury. And he thought, uh, that's kind

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. The mercury did not sink all the way

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>down to the level of the dish. It actually remained

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>up quite a bit. And the area behind the mercury

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the tube, so near the sealed end,

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that was a vacuum. He had created a vacuum in

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>this way. There was nothing, no air in that part

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of the tube. Then he noted that the mercury's level

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would change day to day, and some days the mercury

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>would actually end up being higher in the tube than

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>it was the day before. So this meant the mercury

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just leaking out. Right. If you kept coming out

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>day after day and the mercury level is getting gradually

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>lower every single day, your conclusion might be this mercury

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is very gradually leaking out of the tube into the dish.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you come back one day and the mercury

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually higher up in the tube than it was

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the day before, something else has to be happening. It

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>can't just be leaking out. So towards Shelly figured that

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric pressure was the reason for the changes in the

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>height of the mercury in the tube. On high pressure days,

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>when the air is pressing down harder because there's essentially

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>more dense air above you, then it ends up pressing

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>down on the mercury in the dish, which forces mercury

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>up the tube. Because again, the mercury that's in the

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>tube with the vacuum in it, it's not being affected

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>by the changes in air pressure. It's only the mercury

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 1>that's in the dish that gets that effect. On low

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure days, there's not as much air pressing down against

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the mercury in the dish, and so more of it

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>starts to come out of the tube into the dish itself.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So he never actually published his findings on this. Despite

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this was a really remarkable discovery, he

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really concerned with it. He didn't think of it

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>as being particularly important, particularly in regards with his interest

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in advancing mathematics toward Chilian barometers tend to use mercury

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of other liquids, but it's not because of temperature.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Way thermometers are you don't necessarily worry about your barometer

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>overheating or freezing. It's because mercury is more dense than

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>water is, so you could create a barometer using water.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there were barometers that used water that predate

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the tour Chilian barometers. But the problem is that water's

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 1>density is so much less that you need a much

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>longer tube to be able to see that the changes.

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you're gonna max out very early on because water

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is less dense, right, it doesn't take as much pressure

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to force water up a tube, so you have to

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have much longer tube in order to be able to

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to see these changes. Uh and it means that it

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>would be very difficult to take measurements, so mercury being

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>more dense made more sense. Also, it was very easy

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to read it inside the barometer because again you're using

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>clear glass. Mercury is a silvery liquid, so it was

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>very easy to read the changes in the levels in

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:05.879
<v Speaker 1>uh torre Chelian barometer. Now, at at sea level under

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 1>normal circumstances, under one atmosphere of pressure, mercury would rise

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>up to about the seventy six centimeter or thirty mark

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in a torrey Chellian barometer, and while changes in air

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 1>pressure will be measurable with such a barometer, you wouldn't

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>see dramatic differences in the height of the mercury unless

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you were to take the whole thing to a mountaintop

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>or something. So in other words, you could watch the

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>mercury in the barometer and it could very accurately and

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with great precision, show you the changes in barometric pressure.

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>But those changes wouldn't necessarily be really dramatic because you're

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about again the same altitude. Were you to take

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a mercury barometer at Death Valley and then magically transport

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself to Mount Everest, you would see a very dramatic

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:57.919
<v Speaker 1>change in the height of the mercury in that barometer. Now,

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe you've seen barometers that haven't entical dial that either

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:05.720
<v Speaker 1>turns left or right along a semicircular scale that tells

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you what the barometric pressure is. So how did those work? Well,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>these are called aneroid barometers, and they're pretty clever. Inside

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of these, there's a sealed, air tight metal box, and

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>attached to that metal box is a spring. Now, when

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the air pressure is high, it compresses this metal box,

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that ends up pulling on the string on the

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 1>spring rather, which then creates the force necessary to move

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the dial, so it indicates a high pressure system is

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>moved in and low pressure the little metal box. The

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 1>air type metal metal box expands and this ends up

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>pushing against the spring, which means that the dial will

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>move toward the other side, showing a low pressure uh

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>system has moved in. So the dial turning to the

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>left or right is all dependent upon whether or not

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this metal box is compressed or expanded. It's actually incredibly

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>simple when you think about it, and thus I think

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty elegant way of measuring air pressure. Mercury barometers

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>are more accurate than aneroid barometers, but there's a disadvantage

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to mercury barometers, which is that stuff's poison. Y'all, mercury

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is toxic, so aneroid barometers are safer to have around.

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>They also are more portable, so you could put them

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on stuff like sailing ships and not have to worry

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about mercury spilling out all over the place because they

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>were mechanical didn't depend upon mercury at all. But if

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you wanted something that had more precision and accuracy. You

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted a mercury barometer, not an aneroid barometer. Uh. However,

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we can go with microelectronics too. We don't have to

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>use mercury or anneroid, although the microelectronics version uses a

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>very similar approach to aneroid barometers. So we do have

0:42:56.440 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>barometric pressure sensors which rely on the piezo resistant of effect. Now,

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of similar to what we were talking

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 1>about with thermistors, only in this case we're not talking

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>about temperature. We're talking about stuff that's under pressure. Do

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you remember that has that same baseline as ice ice baby? Anyway,

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you may have heard about the piezo electric effect, right.

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Piezo electric effect refers to the tendency of certain materials

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>um certain types of crystals in particular like quartz, that

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>when you put a mechanical stress on those materials, such

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>as you mush mush mushed them up in some way,

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>these materials would generate an electric charge or there's a

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>reverse piece of electric effect. If you were to subject

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 1>these materials to an applied electric field, they would produce

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a mechanical force like they vibrate and stuff. The crystal

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 1>courts are the quartz crystals. I guess I should say

0:43:56.280 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>in old watches. That's why they're used. It's has this

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>piezo electric effect. Piezo resistive materials are similar to that,

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>except that, as you would expect, their electrical resistance changes

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>as mechanical force applied to them changes. So typically you'd

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>put this piezo resistive material around a hermetically sealed cavity

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>similar to what you'd find in an aneroid barometer. So

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you have this little area that you have hermetically sealed

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's lined with this piezo resistive material, and as

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the cavity reacts to changes in the air pressure, it

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>places mechanical stresses on the piezo resistive material inside, and

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that again changes its electrical resistance. A microprocessor will measure

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations in current passing through this piezo resistive material and

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 1>then convert those changes in current into a digital signal

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that can be used to approximate pressure. All right, So

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>now we've got temperature and air pressure out of the way,

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 1>two of the big ones. But man, there's so much more.

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna try and summarize some of the other

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>many sensors that are used by meteorological observation stations UH

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>today in order to gather information about the weather. But

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I am going to summarize because otherwise this episode is

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna last six hours long, and I got stuff to do, y'all.

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.879
<v Speaker 1>So let's get another basic measurement out of the way,

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 1>and that would be wind, something I generate a lot

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of from multiple ends. As it turns out, you want

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to know where wind is coming from, and you want

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>to know how strong the wind is because this will

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>inform lots of other stuff like incoming changes to weather

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>such as storms, et cetera. For wind direction, we use

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 1>something that's been around for hundreds of years, weather vain.

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>We have lots of fancy ones today, but they all

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are still working on the same general principle. I mean,

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you can use more high tech ways to detect wind direction,

0:45:56.960 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's really not necessary. So whether veins typically consist

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of a counterweight on one end of a rotating UH

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>peace on the weather vein. On the other end, you

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:14.879
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of thin that is covering a much

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.240
<v Speaker 1>larger area than the counterweight is. So when wind blows,

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it hits against the fin the weather vein because this

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>part of it can rotate freely along its axis. UH.

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>In the horizontal plane, it will rotate so that the

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>area being hit by the wind is facing away from

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the wind. The counterweight will point into the wind. Often

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the counterweight is in the form of an arrow, so

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>it might be the point of an arrow, and the

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>back may look like the fletching of an arrow, and

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this tells you where the wind is coming from. So

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 1>if you have a traditional weather vein and the arrow

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is pointing northeast, that tells you wind is coming from

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the northeast. It is not blowing to the northeast. It

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's coming from the northeast. The counterweight is needed so

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that there's equal mass on either ends of this rotating

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the weather vein. But you also want to

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure that there is an unequal area. In other words,

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the back half of the weather vein of that rotating

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>piece needs to have more area to it so that

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the wind pushes it in the right way. You want

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>more area on one side so that you can get

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that into the right position, and that indicates where the

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>wind is coming from. UH. Once you look at where

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the counterweight is, wind direction can give you a general

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>idea of what sort of weather you might encounter based

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>upon what's going on in that direction. So let's say

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that you are in Georgia, the state that's where I'm in,

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and you are in the winter, and you see that

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the wind is coming from the northwest. You're looking at

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a weather vein, it's pointing to the northwest. That's where

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>winds are coming from. And you happen to know that

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a cold air mass that was moving down from

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Canada through the United States. So you would say, well,

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>based upon the fact that wind is coming from the northwest,

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that's the direction where if you were to go that way,

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you hit Canada. And I happen to know that there's

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.479
<v Speaker 1>a cold air mass moving down. I suspect that means

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that pretty soon our temperatures are going to drop further

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to get what is called the Devil's

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:27.439
<v Speaker 1>dan droff down here in Georgia. Thank you, Saturday Night Live.

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Most people know it as snow. We know it as

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 1>the stuff what shuts down our entire infrastructure at a

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:42.240
<v Speaker 1>given heartbeat. Anyway, that's why wind direction is important, because

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if you know what's going on elsewhere, then you can

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know that the wind is coming from that

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>direction you, you can expect to get some of it yourself.

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you hear that winds are let's say, northeasterly,

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that tells you where the winds are coming from, that

0:48:57.520 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they're coming from the northeast. But if you hear the

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 1>suffix ward ended at the end of a direction, that

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>tells you the direction the winds are blowing toward, So

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>an eastward wind or eastward wind if you prefer, I

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>don't eastward wind that means winds are blowing to the east,

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and easterly wind means winds are blowing from the east,

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.399
<v Speaker 1>clear as mud, right. But wind direction is just one thing.

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It's also useful to know wind speed. Now. Traditionally wind

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>speed was measured in knots or nautical miles per hour.

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But was it not? I'll tell you, but not right now.

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you after we take another quick break to

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>thank our sponsors. So you want to measure wind speed

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>wind speed, you would measure and knots. Knots stands for

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a nautical mile, although it's spelled like a knot like

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you would tie and a thread. A nautical mile is

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>equal to one point one five miles per hour or

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:10.399
<v Speaker 1>one point nine kilometers per hour. So if you hear

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:14.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a northeasterly wind blowing at fifteen knots, you know

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that the wind is coming from the northeast, and you

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 1>know that it's blowing at seventeen point to five miles

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>per hour or twenty eight and a half kilometers per hour.

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>But how do you determine wind speed? How do you

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 1>know how fast the wind is blowing? Well, meteorologists use

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:36.240
<v Speaker 1>an instrument called an anemometer. The old anemometers had moving

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>parts in them that made them sort of look like

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:42.720
<v Speaker 1>pin wheels. Uh. They had arms extending out from a hub,

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with each arm ending in a little cup to catch

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the wind, and then they would rotate along their axis

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>on the horizontal plane. So think of like a windmill,

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 1>but on its side, so it's the fans are not

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>standing up vertically, they're spread out horizontally and instead of

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.319
<v Speaker 1>it being ends or fins, some some of them were,

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but most of them ended with these cups that would

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 1>catch the wind. So the wind would blow and force

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the hub to rotate along its axis in that horizontal plane.

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>And then it just depended on the type of anemometer

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at. A lot of them worked in a

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>very similar way to an electric generator. So you might

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>remember this from our discussion about the history of electricity.

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's based on electro magnetism. If you have a magnet

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and you turn it and it's surrounded by a conductive material,

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:39.120
<v Speaker 1>or it's itself around a conductive material like a coil

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of insulated copper wire, it will induce current to flow

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>through that conductor. Right. That's the basis of the electric generator.

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:53.879
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you've got this spinning anemometer and it's

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>turning a magnet around a conductive material, and this creates

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a current flowing through that duct of material. You have

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 1>then a electronic circuit that's specifically designed to measure how

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>much current has been produced and then converts that to

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a digital readout that indicates wind speed. So you calibrate it.

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 1>You first have to calibrate this device so that it

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote knows how much current relates to which you

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>know what the wind speed is. But once you've calibrated it,

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that's how you can measure wind speed. You just look

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 1>at how much electric current is generated in one of

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>these devices. And now there are also other anemometers that

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>do not use this approach, they don't resemble an electric

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>generator in that way. They instead will count the number

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of rotations of the cups within a given amount of

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>time in order to convert that to a wind speed.

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So you might look at how many times per minute

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 1>did this rotate based upon the you know, the speed

0:52:56.520 --> 0:52:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the wind, we're going to say that that means

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's blah blah blah. Typically these anemometers have a simple

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:06.360
<v Speaker 1>switch that gets activated upon each rotation, and the switch

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>makes a notation, and you just look at the number

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>of notations per minute or per whatever unit of time

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:16.919
<v Speaker 1>you're using to measure, and you convert that information over

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to create the figure for miles per hour or knots

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of wind speed. Or you could have a light sensor,

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>so imagine an anemometer. It still is one of these

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>pinwheel like devices. It's still spinning in the horizontal plane,

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but it has a little disc that can cover up

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a hole that otherwise leads down to a light sensor.

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>When the anemometer rotates, this disc ends up being pulled

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 1>away from the sensor so light can hit it, and

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.880
<v Speaker 1>then as it continues to rotate, it covers the sensor. Again,

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it just does the circular path where it is covering

0:53:57.000 --> 0:54:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and uncovering the sensor. Doing this, the sensor counts the

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>number of times that light is hitting the sensor. It's

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>very similar to that other electronic switch I was just

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And again it makes a notation. And again

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you just look at the number of notations per unit

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of time and you use that to convert it over

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:21.280
<v Speaker 1>two miles per hour for wind speed. But that's not all.

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have to have a rotating element at

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>all to calculate wind speed these days, because you can

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 1>use what are called sonic anemometers. Now these are more

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>or less the standard for a lot of observation uh

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>points these days. For meteorological observations, they use ultrasonic signal

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:45.279
<v Speaker 1>emitters and receivers mounted at right angles to each other.

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So from the top it might look like a square.

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You have receivers and transmitters that are mounted in a

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>square in relation to one another. And it's it's important

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to remember sound as physical phenomenon, right. Sound is all

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 1>about molecules bashing into each other, vibrations spreading across a medium.

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So when we're hearing things, we're hearing the sense of

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hearing is all based upon air moving, vibrating at oscillating

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at the speed of whatever caused it to move in

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the first place, and it continues to make other air

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 1>molecules do this same thing until some of them end

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>up hitting the ear drums in our ears, which transfers

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this uh this vibration to some very tiny bones in

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>our ears in our ears, which then transmit that vibration

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:52.759
<v Speaker 1>to the cochlea, which ultimately interprets this as sound. That's

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>how how we perceive it. But that means that sound

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:59.400
<v Speaker 1>itself is a physical thing, and you can affect it

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>by changing things in the air, like if wind is blowing,

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it affects how sound travels. And if you've ever tried

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to talk to someone on a windy day, then you've

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 1>probably experienced this at least a little bit. So the

0:56:13.400 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 1>way these ultrasonic wind anemometers work is that they transmit

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:22.720
<v Speaker 1>signals at an ultrasonic frequency. It's too high for humans

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to hear, but the receivers can pick up on it.

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>When wind is blowing, it's going to affect the timing

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of when a transmission is sent out and when it

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:38.239
<v Speaker 1>gets received by the other side this timing. It's super

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>super subtle. Uh, It's not like it's something that we

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>humans could detect, but these instruments can detect it, and

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:48.919
<v Speaker 1>by detecting those changes, it can convert that into an

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of how fast the wind is blowing. It's really

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the difference that the it took for the sound to

0:56:55.760 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>get from its point of origin to its destination impaired

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:04.799
<v Speaker 1>against what it normally would take under still conditions with

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 1>no wind present. If you ever look at technical readouts

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 1>of wind speed and direction, you might notice that there's

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:15.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of symbols that are used. Typically, you would

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 1>see what's called wind barbs. So first you start with

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 1>two lines representing north, south and east west in a

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 1>crosshair layout, you know, your typical north southeast west compass

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>rose sort of thing. And from the center, you would

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have a line that would extend out towards the direction

0:57:33.200 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 1>where wind is coming from. So let's say it's coming

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>from the northwest. This line would extend out halfway between

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 1>north and west. If it was truly coming from the northwest.

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 1>From that line, you might notice one or more short barbs,

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 1>or even what is called a pennant. It looks like

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a little flag at the end of it. Those barbs

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>actually represent wind speed, and the number of barbs on

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>there tell you how strong the wind is blowing. So

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a line that has in short barb extending from it

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:07.439
<v Speaker 1>indicates calm winds that approximately five knots. If you have

0:58:08.080 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, If you have a line with has a

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 1>pennant on the end of it and two barbs extending

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>from it out to the side, that would indicate very

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>strong winds at like sixty five knots now. One of

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the simpler tools in the meteorological tool kit is the

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 1>precipitation gauge. This is telling you how much precipitation has

0:58:28.480 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 1>fallen over a given amount of time. Essentially, this comes

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>down to a container designed to catch precipitation, so you

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>can see how much has fallen in that area. Now,

0:58:38.680 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 1>your basic rain gage consists of a funnel which can

0:58:43.920 --> 0:58:50.560
<v Speaker 1>capture precipitation falling precipitation. It has a measuring tube that

0:58:50.680 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the funnel feeds into, and the measuring tube itself tends

0:58:55.360 --> 0:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to be fairly you know, not like maybe like an

0:58:57.400 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>inch in diameter, maybe about eight inches long. Typically, um,

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a tube, it's open at the top and

0:59:04.200 --> 0:59:08.280
<v Speaker 1>close at the bottom. Then that itself is inside a

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 1>larger collecting vessel, and the collecting vessel's mouth is the

0:59:13.200 --> 0:59:16.200
<v Speaker 1>same diameter as the funnel that's at the very top,

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>so the funnel prevents water from falling directly into the

0:59:20.680 --> 0:59:26.080
<v Speaker 1>containment vessel. Instead it funnels the water into the tube

0:59:26.160 --> 0:59:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that's inside the collecting vessel. The tubes are calibrated to

0:59:31.120 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>measure the amount of rainfall based upon the diameter of

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that collecting vessel's mouth, so each one is very specific

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to the collecting vessel, and the scale that you will

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 1>see on these tubes has been written out to reflect

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that collecting vessel. That's why if you pick up one

0:59:50.760 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of these measuring tubes that's using the big funnels, and

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you look on it and it looks like there's maybe

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>six inches of water inside the tube, but the tube

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>breeds that as b being uh, three quarters of an

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>inch of rain. You're like, well, why is that? I mean,

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's there's six inches of water inside the tube. How

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:10.439
<v Speaker 1>can it be three quarters of an inch of rain?

1:00:10.880 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>It's because the funnel that's catching all that rain and

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>funneling it down into the tube. It's a larger diameter,

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it's got more surface area, so more rain is hitting

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that funnel than would have hit the tube just on

1:00:21.720 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>its own. Now, the reason why you have the collecting

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>vessel there is that sometimes you get more rain than

1:00:28.280 --> 1:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>what the tube can handle. If the tube is calibrated

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so that it can hold up to one inch of

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>rain compared based upon the size of the collecting vessel,

1:00:37.160 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it is in what happens if you get more than

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>an inch of rain, well, water will start to overflow

1:00:42.240 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>from the top of the tube and pour into the

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>collecting vessel. When rain is done and you're wanting to

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>see how much rain has fallen, you go out, you

1:00:49.760 --> 1:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>remove the funnel, you remove the tube, and you say,

1:00:52.800 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, we start with one inch of rain. Because

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this tube is full, that means that it rained at

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>least an inch. You pour that out it. Then you

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>take the water from the collecting vessel, you pour that

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>back into the tube, and you use that to measure

1:01:06.400 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>how much in addition to one inch has fallen. So

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason for the collecting vessel and for the calibration.

1:01:12.360 --> 1:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you would just have to keep building tubes that

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are taller and taller and taller, and you know, if

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they're narrow enough, it can give you an unrealistic account

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for how much rain has fallen. That's your basic rain gage.

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Um there there are other types of rain gages beyond

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the basic one. There's one called the tipping bucket rain gage.

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I love these. If you've ever seen fountains where there's

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a small container that gradually fills up with water and

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>when it fills up to the top, it tips over,

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>dumping all the water out into the base of the fountain,

1:01:47.160 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it tips back up again because now the

1:01:49.080 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>water's gone, that that counterweight has gone, so the bucket

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>returns to its normal, uh normal orientation. That's exactly the

1:01:56.960 --> 1:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>way these tipping bucket rain gage is work. They work

1:02:01.600 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as they have two buckets, typically on a see saw

1:02:04.600 --> 1:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like device, so they swivel on the seesaw device as

1:02:09.360 --> 1:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>one fills up. It gets heavy enough once it reaches

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain point for it to tip, pouring its water

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>out into a containment vessel below. The other bucket is

1:02:20.400 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>then tilted upward to catch the water from that point

1:02:23.600 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>forward until it fills up, and then it tilts again

1:02:27.240 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and dumps its water. These buckets hold a very small

1:02:30.360 --> 1:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of water, typically one an inch of rain essentially,

1:02:35.640 --> 1:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and you have a switch that is connected to this

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>see saw like device, and every time it tilts, the

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>switches registers it. And because it registers that, it makes

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a mark on the device, makes a mark on a

1:02:51.640 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper or otherwise activates a counter, and that

1:02:56.120 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>tells you that an inch of rain has just been

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>uh registered counted. And then you just add up all

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the different one one hundreds of an inch, and you

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>can tell within a hundredth of an inch how much

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>rain has fallen in that given area. There are even

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>versions of this that are heated, where they have little

1:03:17.760 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>heating elements, typically coils of wire that will heat up

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>as current passes through them, and the purpose of that

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is so that they can measure frozen precipitation. As frozen

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>precipitation hits the buckets, that heats up, it converts into water,

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and also it prevents the gauge itself from freezing over

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in cold weather, something that we don't get a whole

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of in my neck of the woods, but I

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's a pretty cool way of measuring rainfall. There

1:03:46.240 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are other types of rain gages. They are weighing gauges.

1:03:49.400 --> 1:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Weight gauges you could say that estimate the amount of

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>rain based upon the weight change. And UH, those are

1:03:57.600 --> 1:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the major types of precipitation gauges. Then you have various

1:04:02.920 --> 1:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>devices that can detect electrical storms. UH. Basically what you

1:04:07.000 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>need is an antenna. Meteorologists use thunderstorm detectors. That our

1:04:11.480 --> 1:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>antenna that registers spikes of electro magnetic radiation or lightning strikes.

1:04:17.080 --> 1:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you've ever listened to a m radio during

1:04:19.760 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a thunderstorm, you may have noticed that there's this burst

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of static whenever there's a lightning strike somewhere in the area.

1:04:29.080 --> 1:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Thunderstorm detectors pick up electrical discharges, typically within a couple

1:04:32.960 --> 1:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of hundred miles of the detectors, so it doesn't have

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to be that close in order to pick up on it.

1:04:39.280 --> 1:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>It just is this little spike of electric discharge that

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the antenna can pick up on. Your basic system is

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a simple receiver. There's no transmitter, it just records it

1:04:49.560 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and using several of those sensors across the region will

1:04:52.520 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>help you determine where and not just when lightning strikes.

1:04:56.400 --> 1:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You can use triangulation using three or well really three

1:05:00.200 --> 1:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>points to figure out where did the lightning strike These

1:05:03.600 --> 1:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>three different detectors picked it up. Based on the timing

1:05:06.800 --> 1:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the three detections, we can say the lightning strike

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>must have happened at these coordinates. It's a very simple

1:05:13.920 --> 1:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>way of doing it. But there are also mobile lightning

1:05:17.000 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>detectors that you are typically would put in an aircraft.

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You fly a plane around a weather plane and look

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for these electra electric discharges. These will use attenuation signal

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>attenuation to determine the location of lightning strikes, but that

1:05:35.880 --> 1:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is not um not always accurate because it is dependent

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>upon some other factors that can confound the device. But yeah,

1:05:45.160 --> 1:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of different ways of doing it. Other

1:05:48.200 --> 1:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>devices that meteorologists might use might include paranometers or pyranometers

1:05:53.520 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>if you prefer um pyra to indicate heat that measures

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a solar radiation actually or how much sun exposure a

1:06:02.280 --> 1:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>place will receive over a given amount of time. These

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>are also used not just for weather forecasts, but also

1:06:08.120 --> 1:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>when you want to figure out the best place to locate,

1:06:10.360 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>say a solar panel farm, you might use a pyranometer

1:06:14.720 --> 1:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to see how much solar radiation that area actually receives.

1:06:19.040 --> 1:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Does it make sense to put a solar panel farm

1:06:21.120 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there or are you not going to maximize your efficiency

1:06:24.560 --> 1:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>if you place it there. Typically, they measure sun exposure

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>by using thermopiles, which are sensors that generate electricity as

1:06:31.480 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they heat up from absorbing light. So these things absorb

1:06:36.640 --> 1:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of light. They're very dark, they tend to be black.

1:06:39.520 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Absorbed light, they generate electricity, and then by measuring the

1:06:42.040 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>electricity you understand how much sun exposure you got. Then

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>there are devices called celo meters which are used to

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>measure clouds, like the ceiling spelled like that. Celo meters

1:06:54.440 --> 1:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they can measure cloud height and thickness. And the one

1:06:57.360 --> 1:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at specifically does this in a pretty

1:07:00.040 --> 1:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>cool way. It shoots lasers at clouds. So the lasers

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>hit the clouds, and then the laser lights starts to

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>scatter as it encounters the various particles that are in

1:07:12.120 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>clouds like water, vapor, and that kind of stuff. And

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>then you use backscatter technology to measure that dispersal of

1:07:21.200 --> 1:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>light within the clouds. So you fire laser into the cloud.

1:07:25.080 --> 1:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>The particles in the cloud cause the laser light to

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>scatter at different levels depending upon the density and composition

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of those particles, and you measure that backscattered light to

1:07:33.720 --> 1:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>allow you to define the parameters of the cloud and

1:07:36.240 --> 1:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it's density, and even be able to tell whether or

1:07:38.240 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not precipitation is likely to fall because of those clouds.

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You've also got visibility sensors that can measure how transparent

1:07:45.480 --> 1:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the air is, which might sound kind of silly until

1:07:48.880 --> 1:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you remember that fog is totally a thing. Uh So

1:07:52.600 --> 1:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>these devices measure light attenuation and use backscatter technologies similar

1:07:56.680 --> 1:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to the cealimeters I just talked about in order to

1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>measure visibility. So you can use optical sensors to measure

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of visibility as well, in other words, like cameras and stuff,

1:08:07.120 --> 1:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can get a firsthand look at visibility, but

1:08:09.640 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>these are looking at it on a more precise level

1:08:12.280 --> 1:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>than just does it look clear out there. Oh and

1:08:17.720 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Doppler radar. I can't finish this episode without talking about

1:08:20.600 --> 1:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Doppler radar. If you've watched a weather report, you've likely

1:08:23.280 --> 1:08:25.519
<v Speaker 1>heard this term bandied about when it comes to measuring

1:08:25.600 --> 1:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>rainstorm systems and their movements. So Doppler radar measures not

1:08:29.120 --> 1:08:32.799
<v Speaker 1>just the presence of something but it's movement either toward

1:08:33.000 --> 1:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>or away from the radar station. So your basic radar

1:08:36.520 --> 1:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>is pretty simple. You beam out a signal in a direction.

1:08:39.840 --> 1:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That signal encounters other stuff and bounces off of it,

1:08:43.120 --> 1:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>some of it coming back to you, and it gets

1:08:45.920 --> 1:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>to the starting location. If you look at the time

1:08:48.840 --> 1:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>between when you sent the signal out and when the

1:08:51.640 --> 1:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>signal came back, you can then use that to extrapolate

1:08:55.160 --> 1:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>how far away that thing is. And if it's stationary,

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>then you're not going to see any difference in the

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:05.519
<v Speaker 1>frequency of the signal coming back as the one you

1:09:05.600 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>sent out. Right, it should be pretty much identical, and

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you'd say, all right, there's a stationary object that's ten

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>miles away. Godzilla is taking a nap now. Uh. You

1:09:18.680 --> 1:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>can do this, by the way, because those radio waves,

1:09:20.840 --> 1:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the radar waves, are traveling at the speed of light

1:09:24.080 --> 1:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>right there. It's a constant speed, so you don't have

1:09:26.880 --> 1:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to worry about anything else. You just say, well, I

1:09:30.000 --> 1:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>know how fast light travels. I know how long it

1:09:32.960 --> 1:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>took the returning wave to get back to me. Because

1:09:37.280 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I've got a timer. It tells me that this much

1:09:40.439 --> 1:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>time passed between transmission and receiving the echo. Then I

1:09:45.320 --> 1:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>can say, well, how far away, how far did the

1:09:48.080 --> 1:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>signal have to travel in order to get there and back? Um,

1:09:52.479 --> 1:09:54.479
<v Speaker 1>And that will tell you how far away the object is.

1:09:54.760 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>But you can also tell if the object is moving

1:09:58.320 --> 1:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>toward you or away from you, because the signals coming

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>back to you will be affected by this. Uh. It

1:10:04.160 --> 1:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is the Doppler effect, something that is pretty easy to

1:10:07.320 --> 1:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>encounter out in the real world, just on your own.

1:10:09.880 --> 1:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever heard a like a police car blaring

1:10:13.240 --> 1:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a siren and the police cars coming toward you and

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>then it passes you, you've probably noticed that the sound

1:10:19.760 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the siren changed as the police car passed you.

1:10:23.920 --> 1:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>So when the cars coming towards you, it's actually compressing

1:10:27.680 --> 1:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>those sound waves that are emitted by the siren. Uh.

1:10:32.240 --> 1:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And because it's compressing the sound waves, UH, it means

1:10:36.920 --> 1:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's increasing the frequency. It's like physically compressing, not

1:10:40.800 --> 1:10:44.479
<v Speaker 1>digitally compressing. We're talking about physically compressing those waves so

1:10:44.520 --> 1:10:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that the frequency is increased. That means the pitch goes up,

1:10:47.800 --> 1:10:50.479
<v Speaker 1>so you hear a higher pitch noise as the cars

1:10:50.520 --> 1:10:54.919
<v Speaker 1>moving away. It's along gating those sound waves, it's stretching

1:10:54.960 --> 1:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>them out which means decreasing the frequency and us decreasing

1:10:59.640 --> 1:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the pitch, making it a lower pitch. Well, radar has

1:11:03.439 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the same shifts with its signals if it hits something

1:11:07.400 --> 1:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that's moving toward it. So you've got a radar station

1:11:10.479 --> 1:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>shoots out a little radar beam. The radar beam comes

1:11:13.760 --> 1:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>back and the frequency is shorter like it's it's the

1:11:18.560 --> 1:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>or the frequency has been increased. The wavelength is shorter.

1:11:22.400 --> 1:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>That tells you that the objects moving towards you. It

1:11:25.560 --> 1:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>is compressed the length the wavelength of that of that signal.

1:11:33.320 --> 1:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>If the wavelength is longer, tells you that the object

1:11:36.320 --> 1:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is moving away from you. That the frequency has hit

1:11:39.840 --> 1:11:42.599
<v Speaker 1>the object, but the objects moving away and thus the

1:11:42.680 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>returning waves have an elongated wavelength. So Doppler radar is

1:11:47.240 --> 1:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>very cool and that it can tell you where a

1:11:50.680 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>storm system is and whether or not it's moving toward

1:11:53.280 --> 1:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you or away from you. Um and you use multiple

1:11:56.280 --> 1:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>observation stations with Doppler radar to get a full picture

1:12:00.680 --> 1:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>where is the system going. You can even detect things

1:12:03.160 --> 1:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>like precipitation using Doppler radar. The cool thing about Dopper

1:12:07.800 --> 1:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>radar in my mind is that it is a lazy,

1:12:10.520 --> 1:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>lazy worker. And by that I mean in a typical hour,

1:12:15.360 --> 1:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Doppler radar is actively sending out signals for about

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>seven seconds total out of the entire hour, not all

1:12:22.960 --> 1:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>at once, but if you look at an entire hour

1:12:25.840 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and you measure the amount of time that the Dopper

1:12:27.960 --> 1:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>radar was sending signals out, it averages to about seven seconds.

1:12:32.880 --> 1:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>It's spending the other fifty nine minutes and fifty three

1:12:36.479 --> 1:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>seconds listening, Which seems like a great job to me

1:12:42.280 --> 1:12:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to work for seven seconds and then just listen for

1:12:44.479 --> 1:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine three seconds, But I guess it depends on

1:12:46.720 --> 1:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're listening to. In this case, it's listening for

1:12:50.160 --> 1:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>those echoes, those returning frequencies for the rest of the hour.

1:12:53.920 --> 1:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And again not all in one batch, it's spread throughout

1:12:57.360 --> 1:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the hour, but collectively we're talking fifty nine minutes fifty

1:13:01.080 --> 1:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>three seconds of listening. Uh. It is scanning the sky

1:13:06.760 --> 1:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in a series of angles. So think of a Doppler

1:13:09.080 --> 1:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>radar like a think of like a little satellite dish,

1:13:11.840 --> 1:13:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and you start off at say forty five degree angle

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>pointed at the sky, and then you move it up

1:13:19.200 --> 1:13:22.519
<v Speaker 1>to seven degrees for the next scan and so on

1:13:22.560 --> 1:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, and it's also rotating, so it's taking

1:13:25.560 --> 1:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>scans of different levels of elevation. In fact, they call

1:13:29.120 --> 1:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>these elevation slices in the Doppler radar gang and UH

1:13:34.960 --> 1:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it gives the system a volume coverage pattern or VCP. Now,

1:13:40.080 --> 1:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>once it goes through all of its elevation slices and

1:13:42.479 --> 1:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>all of its rotations, it completes one volume scan, and

1:13:46.640 --> 1:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it does this every five minutes or so during precipitation

1:13:50.400 --> 1:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>mode scans. The data that comes back can then be

1:13:53.960 --> 1:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>interpreted to build out a picture of weather systems where

1:13:57.280 --> 1:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they are moving and how quickly they are moving. And

1:14:00.439 --> 1:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that even includes active precipitation, which is pretty cool stuff.

1:14:04.040 --> 1:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think now that wraps up the basic tools and

1:14:08.479 --> 1:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>sensors that meteorologists used. Not keep in mind, there are

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>other ones I didn't talk about, satellites, which are very important.

1:14:15.000 --> 1:14:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Satellites also gather a lot of data about active weather

1:14:18.560 --> 1:14:21.439
<v Speaker 1>systems on the Earth, and that data gets fed into

1:14:21.479 --> 1:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>computer models or weather forecasts. UH. There are other sensors

1:14:26.040 --> 1:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and tools as well, but I wanted to cover the

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:30.639
<v Speaker 1>ones that you would find at your typical observation station

1:14:30.760 --> 1:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. Keeping in mind there are others, So

1:14:35.720 --> 1:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope I've given you an indication of how complex

1:14:39.880 --> 1:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>this is just from the types of information alone that

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:47.559
<v Speaker 1>have to be gathered and poured into these computer models

1:14:47.920 --> 1:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so that we can get accurate weather forecasts. In our

1:14:52.000 --> 1:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>next episode, I'll talk specifically about how those weather models

1:14:56.040 --> 1:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>are constructed and how they generate forecasts, and the different

1:15:00.560 --> 1:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>models that are out there, and why are there different models,

1:15:03.840 --> 1:15:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and what are the computer systems that are actually running

1:15:07.760 --> 1:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>these simulations, why are we using supercomputers? And will we

1:15:11.880 --> 1:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>ever get a computer model so comprehensive that we'll never

1:15:16.400 --> 1:15:19.439
<v Speaker 1>be surprised by the weather again. Well, we'll talk about

1:15:19.439 --> 1:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that in our next episode. Guys, if you have suggestions

1:15:22.400 --> 1:15:25.519
<v Speaker 1>for future episodes of tech Stuff, let me know, would you.

1:15:25.520 --> 1:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You can send me an email. The address is tech

1:15:28.240 --> 1:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff at how stuff works dot com, or you can

1:15:31.760 --> 1:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>drop me a line using Twitter or Facebook. The handle

1:15:34.960 --> 1:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of both of those is text stuff h s W.

1:15:38.640 --> 1:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You can also drop by Twitch dot tv slash tech stuff,

1:15:42.000 --> 1:15:45.439
<v Speaker 1>and you can watch me record these shows live like

1:15:45.520 --> 1:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the audience I have watching me right now. I record

1:15:49.160 --> 1:15:52.639
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays and Friday's. Just go to Twitch dot tv

1:15:52.840 --> 1:15:55.439
<v Speaker 1>slash tech Stuff and you can see the schedule there

1:15:55.840 --> 1:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you guys again really soon for

1:16:04.160 --> 1:16:06.479
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics, because it

1:16:06.560 --> 1:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>how staff works. Dot com