WEBVTT - What Happens If Trump Doesn't Pull Back on His Trade War?

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>The administration is very nimble and flexible, and Trump himself

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>he has a sense of how hard to push the economy,

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 2>and he tends to pull back from the brain if

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>things get really bad. At this moment, the hard data

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>are not causing them to want to pull back.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 3>and welcome to Trump Economics, the podcast that looks at

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 3>the economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the global economy and what on earth is going to

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 3>happen next. And this week, after a lot of discussions

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and conversations with people, I wanted to sort of step

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 3>back and come back to our correspondence and economy to

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 3>ask where are we in Donald Trump's trade war. We're

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 3>taping this on Tuesday, June third, and just this morning,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 3>the OECD, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, released

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>a fresh warning that the US president's trade policies have

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 3>formerly tipped the world economy into a downturn. I thought

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 3>that gave us an excuse if we needed one, to

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 3>consider where things stand in Donald Trump's war on the

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 3>old fashioned global trading system. What impact it's had on

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 3>the real economy so far, particularly in the US, and

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 3>how that court challenged last week to Trump's whole tariff

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 3>strategy has added another layer of uncertainty. With me is

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Anna Wong, chief US economist for Bloomberg Economics, who many

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 3>of you have heard many times before. Before she worked

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>for US, she worked at the Federal Reserve Board, the

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>US Treasury, and the White House Council of Economic Advisors

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>during Donald Trump's first term. Josh Wingrove also a regular

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>senior reporter for Bloomberg who covers the White House. Josh Anna,

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 3>always great to have you. I think the last time

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>we had both of you on it was a very

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>good conversation. Looking forward to it, Josh, we will talk

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>about that sort of bombshell International Trade Court ruling last

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 3>week in a little bit. But taking that to one side,

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>just remind us where we are in the various ceasefire

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 3>pauses negotiations in this trade war.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, as we sit here, we have about a month

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>until the expiration of several deadlines that that court case

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to intersect with. But we also have tariffs

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in place right We've got tariff's on steel, aluminum, autos,

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>auto parts, coming on several other products that are enacted

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>under different authorities that are not touched by that ruling.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>In our scene is much more legally durable. Those are

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not going anywhere. No one really thinks they're going anywhere.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>That they're going up.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, Trump is announced exactly steal and aluminum.

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>The aluminum one in particular, seemed like kind of on

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a whim, will double this week to fifty percent from

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent. Let's assume for a moment that those

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 1>court cases are not successful and those tariffs remain in place.

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are that's a battle over AIPA authorities. That's what

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Trump is used to pain with the broadest brush possible

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and hit every country with tariffs of at least ten percent.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>The deadline of July ninth means those go up from

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>ten if you don't have a deal. So for those

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about five dozen countries including the EU as a block,

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>including China including others, they would snap back up if

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no deal.

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>To those rates that were on the big sort of

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>menu board that he had in them.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Or somewhere in between. It's it's murky, and it's I

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>think deliberately murky. But up not ten is the point.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So they're threatening, saying, hey, make a deal now, or

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a number higher than ten come July.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the other countries, you know, basically all of

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>them are sending signs of you know, fusion, hesitation. Some

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are looking at the court ruling and wondering why they

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>would play their best cards right now when it's just

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so uncertain what authority Trump has.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>We had all those claims about how many countries the

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 3>US would do deals with in that ninety day period

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of went up every time they talked about it,

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 3>but I think it was like seventy or something, seventy

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>two or something. Anyway, just remind us how many of

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 3>those have actually been done.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>One, we've got one deal with the UK group.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, and actually, if you're sitting in the UK now,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>you would say even that has not actually been sorted out.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 3>So Josh has reminded us that this is an unholy mess.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 3>And we could definitely spend another twenty minutes talking about

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the variation. But Anna, obviously a lot of the focus,

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 3>or a lot of the interest is on how all

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>this activity and the tariffs that are already in place

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 3>is affecting the real economy. Talk us through the economic

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 3>impact that we're actually seeing so far.

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the trade war version two genuinely started in February,

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>so now we have basically three months worth of price

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>data and activity data to engage its impact. So in

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>these three months, generally what happened is we see deflation

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>or even disinflation. For example, in the April inflation number,

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Powells prefer inflation gauge is supercore. Actually saw deflation, So

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 2>what's going on there? It turns out that the services

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>categories are particularly discretionary services categories like travel, airfares, hotels,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>car rentals are all going down. So basically the decrease

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 2>income optimism and general pessimism of economy is directly and

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 2>immediately translating to lower demand for these goods and as

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>a result overwhelms whatever tariffs passed through in the goods

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>sector in terms of inflation impact. So on net inflation

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>impact has in disinflation.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 3>So disinflation is when you just have a fall in

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the inflation rate, and deflation is when prices are falling.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the headline from what you're saying is we

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 3>all expected inflation, but actually so far, because this kind

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 3>of supply side shock also affects confidence and activity, that

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 3>effect is actually more visible than the inflation effects.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Sor right correct so far, yes, But.

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 3>In terms of expectations, I think we are seeing people

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>expecting inflation to pick up as a result of tariffs.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>And of course Donald Trump would claim that economics in

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the real world works differently from people expect and he's

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of proven that by doing things that were supposed

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>to be very costly and have actually done all right.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 3>And I'd have to say, listening to you so far,

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, everyone said there was going to be inflation. No,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>inflation's gone down. Everyone said that the economy be really hurt. Well,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 3>if you look through the kind of ups and downs

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 3>of the first two quarters, which are very distorted by

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 3>this import activity, the economy doesn't seem to have been

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 3>very adversely affect And in fact, everyone predicted the dollar

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 3>would go up as a result of tariffs, and in

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>fact it's gone down significantly.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So that was very surprising that.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>So he's right, the colnivists just don't know anything, and

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>he can reinvent the rules.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>And Stephany is too early. It's also too early in

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the game going back to the import front running, so

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>we have until July where nothing happened. Everything can carry

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>on as usual. However, after this front running is over,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the question is will the firms restock at higher prices?

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 2>And if they do, then ultimately the firms will have

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to decide should they pass it through or should they

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 2>just eat those in terms of profit compression. So the

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>firms did not need to have that stark choice right now.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>We are not in that period. And this is why

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>you have FED Governor Chris Waller talking about how it's

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of hard to see what is truly what truly

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 2>how is it impacting inflation until after July.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to signal this banana was But also

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>note that like Trump is bragging about this, right they're

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they're bragging.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Probably it's not Biden's economy anymore.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Right Exactly, they are bragging about low gasoline prices, which

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.559
<v Speaker 1>by the way, are at a rate where US drilling

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is heavily disincentivized. There are signs of uncertainty, if not

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>even pullback that Trump is looking at a political positive.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So they are celebrating these things even if you look

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>at the trade data and think, well this is kind

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of like a crash diet, right if I stop eating

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for a month and might bemidrops. Like, is that is that, like,

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, harbinger of a long term thing or is

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that just me making bold choices? So we'll see how

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this shakes out. But like Trump is and his allies

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are proud of this. They are boasting about this. He

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>loves the tariff revenue. He believes it is driving domestic

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>investment in factories. And I think that people maybe still

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't really wrap their head around how an evangelist he

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>is on this tariff issue. When the question of like

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>legal flights and are these teriffs going to stay or not?

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So everyone you talk to around Donald Trump, he loves tariffs.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be tariffs. If it's not this authority,

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it'll be another. It's going to be bumpy, but they're

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be there.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. On the trade thing, it reminds me there was

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that old learn about I. I've been training my donkey

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to not need any food, just as I'd trained him

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 3>to not need any food Adoly died. So we might

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 3>see that on the trade front. But Anna Josh is mentioning,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 3>I guess there's a sort of macro micro thing because

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 3>macro we're still not seeing some of the impacts that

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 3>we might have expected to see. And you've said too

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 3>early to say, but you know, micro, we also have

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of stories and we have a lot of

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 3>reports from companies who are doing their sort of earnings

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 3>forecasts and things saying this is really affecting our ability

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 3>to get components, or at least we're having to really

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 3>think about rethink how we make stuff. I mean, how

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 3>much are we seeing that in terms of changing the

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 3>way companies are operating.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's the surprising part to me personally.

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>So ISM Manufacturing just release their semi annual survey that

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>asks manufacturing firms what are their plans in the next

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 2>six months, And interestingly, there are a pretty substantial list

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of US industries that's reporting they're going to increase the

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>operation capacity in the US. And some of those industries

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>would surprise you because it's for example, it's things like Apparels.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, why would one think that US would be

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 2>bringing back Apparels. And we also know that Apparels was

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the most hardest hit by these terraffs on

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>China and Vietnam.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 3>So that would be the answer, but you wouldn't necessarily

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 3>expect the US to do it. But it has been

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>the sector that's been hit particularly.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Hard, exactly exactly, and the metals industries where seeing some

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>increase in employment in the metals industry, which is consistent

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 2>with what we saw in twenty nineteen and twenty eighteen too.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just one of my questions for you was,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 3>are the administration worried about the economic impacts we're seeing

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>as you've just said, they're actually quite excited so far

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 3>about some of the positive impacts.

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that for them it is always sort of

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>two steps forward, one step back. They're excited until they

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have to have, for instance, a somewhat hasty cease fire

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>with China in Geneva, right like, everything's going great until

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we have these hastily arranged and deals to claw everything

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>back and take the pressure off the market. So I

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's sort of where they're at. They continue to

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>project sort of a Trumpian confidence, if you will, but

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>constantly the pressures to come back from it are just

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. So I think the question is

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like with the EU with Japan, with South Korea, with

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>major trading partners on which there really has not been

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of progress locations of progress. What happens if

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no deal, like how high does Trump go to snap?

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, we had a lot of noise

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 3>about China's going back on its side of the bargain

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>with this deal, and we had the sort of very

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>rapid fire thing around doubling the steel and anominum tariffs.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 3>So how did you read any of that? Insofar as

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 3>there is an underlying strategy.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>On the China thing, I think it is teeing up well.

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>As we sit here, we expect to be or at

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>least the Americans expect to be a call between President

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and She and President Trump at some point this week.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>All they've said is this week, a couple of officials

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have said it publicly. We just don't know when that

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>will be. Those complaints appear to be heavily linked to

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>export controls around critical minerals that the Americans said publicly

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>would be like, you know, flowing freely, and China just

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>had a different view on that. So, whether it is

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>China renegging or an outcome that is different than the

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>publicly stated desired outcome of the Americans, is that open question.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I think on the steel aluminum, I mean, I don't

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult not to see it as like a reaction

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to the court ruling. He almost felt like he wanted

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to flex his muscle and you know, enact Terris where

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he could. And we should note, of course that they

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>renounced at US steel in the context of him celebrating

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the sale of US steel to Japanese, the Japanese company

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Nipon Steel, which he's not framing as a sale, but

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially he's flipped his view on it. He used to

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>oppose it, he campaigned against it. Now he's blessing it

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with certain you know, strings attached. So he's he's sort

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of like washing down the reversal with oh, by the way,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you more tariffs, which for Nipon Steel is

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>probably not bad because now they've got a great foothold

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in the American industry and they will be terror free

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for stuff made at US steel.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Anna. You know, Josh has mentioned that at least it

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 3>may have an impact on other countries that you've now

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 3>got this legal uncertainty around a lot of the tariffs

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 3>that we're using. The AIPA legislation. The idea of an

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 3>emergency that gives the president exceptional power. They push back

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 3>on that, but how significant do you think that ruling is?

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it really sort of casts a question

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 3>mark over all of these things.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.599
<v Speaker 2>No, So, first of all, they're going through all the

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 2>appeal options, and I think that the odds for a

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>successful appeal is pretty high given that there is a

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>president with Nixon's case. So in the nineteen seventies, Nixon

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>also invoked the predecessor of IEPA's power, also presidential powers

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 2>to impose a ten percent tariff, and he was also

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>challenged by the Trade Court, but then he won the

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>appeal because citing that the Trading with Enemy Act grants

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the president emergency powers. Odds are decent for him to

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 2>win an appeal. In second even if he doesn't win,

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>all he needs is to buy some time until he

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>can switch over to these other options such as section

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 2>three three eight, one, two to two, which allow him

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>to immediately impose fifteen to fifty percent on anything immediately,

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and then he could use Section two thirty two and

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 2>three or one, which takes longer, and all those are

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>already in motion. So basically, I just think that ultimately

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the equal abround tariff, the endgame terroriff is still about

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent in our baseline.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Josh, is there actually an expectation that this could put

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>an end to at least a chunk of the terriffs.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're not popping champagne yet. I think the

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>most powerful sort of counterforce to Trump's tariffs have been

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the people that have done it sort of out of

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the public eye and have fought it in court rather

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>than on the airwaves. So I think the silence is conspicuous.

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And I agree with Anna about the other powers here.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But if I can offer the sort of contrarian take here,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean Section one twenty two is capped at fifteen

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>percent for one hundred and fifty days, so lower, much

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>lower than he wants to go with some of these countries.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Section three thirty eight, that's the fifty percent power that

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Anna referenced. It's never been enacted, it's been threatened, been used,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>So like the legal footing of that is by definition untested.

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Section two thirty two. They're already doing several investigations. There

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>are only so many people you can fit in the

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>tiny USTR buildings across from the eo B Friction three

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>oh one, those take a long time as well. There

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>are trade offs to this. There's a reason they used

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>AIPA in the first place, or tried to use it

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. If they do pivot to these

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>other authorities, they all come with sort of caveats that

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>will either limit the height or term, or be unlegally

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>questionable or untested in their own authority, or just simply,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, pile more straws onto the camel's back at

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>USTR and force all these investigations which, if not done properly,

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>will be legally vulnerable. The whole point of view of

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>two three two is that you've got to dot your

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>eyes and cross your t's and then you get a

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty iron cloud terraff authority. If they start fast tracking it,

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they risk not doing that. So there's there's there's clouds

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 3>One thing that I thought was just worth mentioning, although

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>that really deserves its own episode, is various clauses in

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the tax bill which seem to kind of extend the

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 3>trade war or at least open a new front for

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Trumpian attax on the global trading and financial system, which

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 3>is these clauses which would impose sort of punitive or

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 3>much higher taxes on individuals and companies investing in or

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 3>holding US assets, but who come from countries that are

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 3>considered to have discriminatory or unfair tax regimes, regimes that

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 3>are unfair to the US. You know, it's just another

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 3>stick to beat other countries with, using the leverage of

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 3>other countries' desire to invest in the US in various ways. Anna,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 3>There's been a lot of chatter about this, a lot

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 3>of discussion and analysis on Wall Street. Does this constitute

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 3>a sort of new front in Donald Trump's trade war?

0:17:58.119 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you take it seriously?

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Read to me that it's very much targeting EU. And

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 2>we have known for a while that the Trump administration

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>sees EU's non tear of trade barriers as almost as

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 2>severe as China's barriers. So I think this is in

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 2>part a way to get at the Digital services tax

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and the tax on intangibles, because even in the first

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration was very much against this, and yet OECD

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>also has been supporting these DST and taxes on intangible

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and these taxes have been collected for almost like at

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>least six years now. So I think it will be

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 2>very hard to negotiate with EU on reducing these DST taxes,

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>which disproportionately affect US tech firms. I mean, there's a

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>reason why many of these tech firms are supporting the

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration this time around. So I just think that

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 2>this is a very specific country targeting bill as opposed

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to a very broad range taxing on international inflows.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's a chilling effect. I mean, we've talked

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in the past about how investors were so overexposed to

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 3>some extent or sort of disproportionately invested in the US

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 3>after years and years of the US doing better than

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 3>other people other countries, that it doesn't take much for

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 3>them to think, oh, I should tilt in the other direction.

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 3>It should take some money out or reallocate. If that

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 3>brings down the dollar, then made the administrations happy about that.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 3>But at some level, it's also going to constitute a

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 3>decline in investment flows into the US, which he's supposed

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 3>to you know, he wants to see more investments. Josh,

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 3>do you think this clause is going to go through

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and do you think that it could be potentially quite damaging.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>All indications are that it will go through, but you know,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're still waiting to see what the final PI looks

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like once they rebake it in the Senate and send

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it back to the House. They're still working with pretty

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>skinny margins here, but there's not been a lot about

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>cry about it. The Republican outcry has been focused on

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>other things. And so yeah, I think that ultimately Congress

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to start trying to hand Trump more tools,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>which is a change in tune from you in a

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago when Republican senators were objecting implicitly

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>or explicitly to Trump's sort of capturing of teriff authorities

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that had historically rested more with Congress. So we'll see,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>remember the clock sticking in Congress, right, They want to

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sign this thing on July fourth, Independence Day, of course,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so we can go from Liberation Day to Independence Day,

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>which is fined for the tariff deadline. So I think

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see rhetorically a lot of continued sort

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of chest beating from the President and from the Republican administration.

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 3>And I guess that's a positive for the President if

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 3>he actually gets some tools that are not sort of

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 3>questioned in the court and are legislated. And people have

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>said all along, if you really want to do these things,

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>you need to get Congress to legislate and give you

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 3>the power explicitly. But is it also a reflection that

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 3>the administration's not managing to do what it wanted to

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 3>do with the tools it had. Do you think they

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 3>feel like they're winning?

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 2>So? I think that the administration is very nimble and flexible,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and Trump himself be as a sense of how hard

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>to push the economy, and he tends to pull back

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 2>from the brink if things get really bad, as we

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>could see in April, because the administration, the nec Kevin

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 2>has it and stuff, doesn't do talk to CEOs of

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 2>companies in the real economy.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think that.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 2>They know that there's danger in there in their moments

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 2>of diceiness. But right now, at this moment, and I

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 2>do think it's reasonable to talk in moments because these

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 2>things change day by day. At this moment, the hard

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>data are not causing them to want pulled back. And

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 2>this view may change this Friday with the non farm payrolls.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>If non farm payrolls, for example, shows really steep drop,

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 2>then you would see Trump pouting a call of presidency immediately.

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 2>And personally, I think there has been the whole taco trade.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump always chickens out. I think Wall Street is too

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 2>complacent on peak tariff. Having passed, my own interpretation of

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.959
<v Speaker 2>why there was a Geneva agreement between you Os and

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>China is that the CEOs, Walmart and Target were very convinsing.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 2>The fear of empty shelves caused Trump to want to

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 2>continue this trade for now until August, which is the

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 2>end of this ninety day pause, to fill the shelf

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of the US to make sure that we get past

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the holiday season. And I think China would easily agree

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 2>to because when you think about a game theoretic way

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 2>of having a war, when both sides can agree the

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>stakes are too high, it's very easy to find a

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>low hanging fruit. Okay, we agree, but after this peak

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 2>shipping season is over, stakes are down again. They could

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 2>have another tariff for until all the way until next

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>March and then settle down once they're about to get

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 2>into peak shipping season.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 3>And when you say peak, you mean that's Christmas season.

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 3>So you need to get all the toys on the shelves.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because empty shells are politically very unpopular, and so

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I do not interpret the de escalation so far as

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 2>a taco trade. I actually would interpret as one of

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the ebbs and tides of Trump's negotiation style. And what

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 2>we saw in Geneva is very uncharacteristic of him. It

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 2>is very uncharacteristic of him to immediately cave so soon.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 2>I think what we saw is that he was pushed

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to the brink, he pulled back, and then once things

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 2>settle in a couple of months, I think there's a

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>good chance that we'll see these China tariffs rise that again,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 2>increase again.

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Josh, it's interesting because you've got Anna's I think will

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 3>we talked about how the economic impact so far was

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily as negative as people are thought, and that

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>has produced a sort of feeling in the administration potentially

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>that at least on the domestic front, things are not

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 3>going too badly, but internationally, you'd have to say the

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world seems to be doing pretty well

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 3>so far. I mean, and we talked at the beginning,

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 3>there's no very few deals done, and that sort of

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 3>back and forth with the Chinese over whether or not

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 3>there would even be a call between President she and

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump seems to me kind of symbolic of the

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 3>fact that China seems to have the upper hand in

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that particular conversation, and my colleagues in Beijing and Hong

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Kong are absolutely convinced that she will not want to

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 3>do a call or be very reluctant to do a

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 3>call this week, because that's not the way the Chinese work.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 3>They want to have everything nailed down before or they

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 3>do a call, So the optics of that can't be

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 3>comfortable for the administration.

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Chinese have calculated that they have the luxury

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of patients here and the Americans are betting that the

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>American market is enough of a carrot on the stick

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>that eventually those strategies will converge. But I agree with that,

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and right now we're not primed for a long time

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>truce anytime soon. I think we'll see sort of fits

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and starts on this. And remember we all had a

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>panic about a month ago when Trump exampted a bunch

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of consumer electronics from those Chinese tariffs. That's only because

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>he wants to hit them with another tariff, and so

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime he could announce his two three to

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>two tariff on iPhones, on computer monitors, on everything. With

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor chip in it that hits China in a

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>different way. So you know, there are multiple fronts on

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this trade war, where each settles on an e given month,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think remains unclear. I totally agree that the view

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of the retailers and the political impact that empty shelves

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>would have on it. And Trump got a lot of

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>blowback for saying like, maybe kids will have two dollars

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>instead of fifteen dollars, and you know, you can have

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>one pencil instead of fifty pencils. It's kind of that

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>he did instick Landing on that one, and he's got

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>blowback on it, so I think he will be sensitive

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to that. But I also think that when it comes

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to appetite among lawmakers, who have of course been very

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>deferential to Trump, to say the least, lawmakers in Washington

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are keen to reset the relationship with China on both

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>sides of the aisle, Trump has a lot more leash

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to a fight with China that he

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>does with the rest of the world. So I think

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see China on a separate track from

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the rest of his trade front.

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 3>So I can't help thinking that we will have to

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 3>take stock of the trade more many more times before

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 3>we're done. But I feel like we have some interesting

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 3>takeaways on just where the economy is, even if we

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 3>do think there's a lot more coming down the track.

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Josh Waen Grove, Ana Wong, thank you so much, thank you,

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 3>thank you, thank you for listening to Trumpanomics from Bloomberg.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 3>It was hosted by me Stephanie Flanders, and I was

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 3>joined this week by our chief US economist, Anna Wong

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 3>and senior White House reporter Josh Wingrove. Trumpomics is produced

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 3>by Summer Sadi and Moses and Dam with help from

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Chris mart Lou and Amy Keene. Special thanks to Rachel

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Lewis Chrisky. Sound design is by Blake Maples and Brendan Francis.

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Newnham is our executive producer. To help others find Trumpomics,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 3>please rate it and review it wherever you listen.