WEBVTT - Episode 5: Santos Released From Prison

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:23.756
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Hey, it's Jake. Welcome back to deep Cover. I'm

0:00:23.796 --> 0:00:26.356
<v Speaker 1>in your feed today with an update about a story

0:00:26.356 --> 0:00:29.836
<v Speaker 1>that we covered last summer. You might remember it. My

0:00:29.956 --> 0:00:33.796
<v Speaker 1>producer Amy Gains McQuaid and I did a deep dive

0:00:33.876 --> 0:00:37.716
<v Speaker 1>into the world of George Santos, a former Republican congressman

0:00:37.756 --> 0:00:41.636
<v Speaker 1>from New York who pled guilty to wire fraud and

0:00:41.756 --> 0:00:46.876
<v Speaker 1>identity theft. I called up Amy because well, there's been

0:00:46.916 --> 0:01:01.516
<v Speaker 1>quite a development in the last week. Hey, Amy, Hey Jake.

0:01:02.276 --> 0:01:04.436
<v Speaker 2>So I'll just cut you it the news we're here

0:01:04.476 --> 0:01:09.996
<v Speaker 2>to talk about. On Friday, President Trump commuted Georgeantos's sentence,

0:01:10.396 --> 0:01:12.876
<v Speaker 2>sending shockwaves through the political world.

0:01:13.676 --> 0:01:16.196
<v Speaker 1>George Santos is the gift that keeps on giving.

0:01:17.196 --> 0:01:20.356
<v Speaker 2>I did not think we'd be here so many months

0:01:20.396 --> 0:01:23.436
<v Speaker 2>after releasing this series talking about this, but here we are.

0:01:23.996 --> 0:01:26.556
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So just talk us through this. How did we

0:01:26.596 --> 0:01:27.476
<v Speaker 1>get to this point?

0:01:28.756 --> 0:01:33.036
<v Speaker 2>So, if you remember, Santos pled guilty to two charges,

0:01:33.436 --> 0:01:37.636
<v Speaker 2>wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. That was last summer,

0:01:37.756 --> 0:01:41.036
<v Speaker 2>August twenty twenty four. I was actually in the courtroom

0:01:41.076 --> 0:01:44.396
<v Speaker 2>for that plea hearing, and at the time Santos told

0:01:44.396 --> 0:01:48.196
<v Speaker 2>the judge you know, I accept full responsibility for my actions.

0:01:48.636 --> 0:01:50.116
<v Speaker 3>They set his sentencing.

0:01:49.836 --> 0:01:52.796
<v Speaker 2>For April, and at that time he was actually sentenced

0:01:52.836 --> 0:01:57.316
<v Speaker 2>to eighty seven months, a little over seven years. He

0:01:57.436 --> 0:02:00.276
<v Speaker 2>was always going to face at least two years because

0:02:00.636 --> 0:02:02.876
<v Speaker 2>of the identity theft charge that he pled to that

0:02:02.916 --> 0:02:05.956
<v Speaker 2>carries a two year minimum. His lawyers had asked the

0:02:06.036 --> 0:02:08.636
<v Speaker 2>judge if he could be sentenced to the minimum that

0:02:08.676 --> 0:02:12.076
<v Speaker 2>two years, but the judge at sentencing didn't agree with

0:02:12.116 --> 0:02:14.916
<v Speaker 2>that and felt that Santos deserved a sentence on the

0:02:14.996 --> 0:02:18.836
<v Speaker 2>higher end of the guideline. So actually the guideline said

0:02:19.036 --> 0:02:22.556
<v Speaker 2>seventy five to eighty seven, and the judge ultimately.

0:02:22.116 --> 0:02:23.396
<v Speaker 3>Handed down the maximum.

0:02:23.796 --> 0:02:27.476
<v Speaker 2>He reported to prison in July, and then three months

0:02:27.556 --> 0:02:29.276
<v Speaker 2>later he's released.

0:02:29.716 --> 0:02:32.196
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I know, like I heard this on Sunday

0:02:32.596 --> 0:02:35.116
<v Speaker 1>for Saul, I immediately thought of you. I was like,

0:02:35.236 --> 0:02:38.556
<v Speaker 1>what is Amy thinking. I mean, to me, it felt

0:02:38.636 --> 0:02:40.916
<v Speaker 1>like a bombshell. They came out of nowhere. But I'm

0:02:40.956 --> 0:02:45.436
<v Speaker 1>wondering the people that you spoke with who are close

0:02:45.476 --> 0:02:49.036
<v Speaker 1>to the story, were they surprised by this.

0:02:49.996 --> 0:02:52.196
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've heard from a lot of folks that we

0:02:52.236 --> 0:02:55.596
<v Speaker 2>talked to for the original series, and I think across

0:02:55.636 --> 0:02:58.276
<v Speaker 2>the board, there was a lot of shock and surprise.

0:02:58.916 --> 0:03:02.236
<v Speaker 2>I called up Kathy Soref, who, if you remember, was

0:03:02.276 --> 0:03:04.116
<v Speaker 2>one of George Santos's donors.

0:03:04.556 --> 0:03:08.916
<v Speaker 4>The only thing I can say is he was so

0:03:09.356 --> 0:03:14.676
<v Speaker 4>is far too long for what he did. In my opinion,

0:03:14.996 --> 0:03:19.156
<v Speaker 4>Were you expecting this to happen? No, it was a

0:03:19.196 --> 0:03:22.796
<v Speaker 4>complete shock. You know, I cried. I haven't been thinking

0:03:22.836 --> 0:03:26.476
<v Speaker 4>about it, but it was like, what, you know, I

0:03:26.516 --> 0:03:30.316
<v Speaker 4>guess people think that Trump is vengeful. I don't think

0:03:30.316 --> 0:03:33.876
<v Speaker 4>he is vengeful. I think he wants to hold people accountable,

0:03:34.436 --> 0:03:38.036
<v Speaker 4>and I think he is actually you know, has a

0:03:38.196 --> 0:03:41.476
<v Speaker 4>very soft and compassionate side to him. And I think

0:03:41.516 --> 0:03:44.596
<v Speaker 4>he thought that George. I don't. I could be completely

0:03:44.636 --> 0:03:49.876
<v Speaker 4>wrong about this. I'm trying interprojecting what President Trump was thinking.

0:03:50.396 --> 0:03:52.756
<v Speaker 4>But why are we going to finance? I mean, how

0:03:52.796 --> 0:03:54.836
<v Speaker 4>much does it cost to keep a prisoner in prison

0:03:55.036 --> 0:03:57.316
<v Speaker 4>for a year? And do we want to spend that

0:03:57.436 --> 0:03:58.156
<v Speaker 4>on George.

0:03:58.916 --> 0:04:01.796
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to hear like Kathy's basically like a prison

0:04:01.876 --> 0:04:04.276
<v Speaker 1>reform advocate. Did you have any sense that that was

0:04:04.316 --> 0:04:05.596
<v Speaker 1>like part of her deal?

0:04:07.716 --> 0:04:12.036
<v Speaker 2>Kathy sa I wouldn't characterized as a prison reform advocate.

0:04:12.396 --> 0:04:15.556
<v Speaker 2>In particular, Kathy was very careful with me to draw

0:04:15.556 --> 0:04:20.276
<v Speaker 2>a distinction between violent and nonviolent offenders. I think that

0:04:20.356 --> 0:04:23.076
<v Speaker 2>she has a much harder line stance when it comes

0:04:23.076 --> 0:04:25.916
<v Speaker 2>to violent offenders, and in this case, she doesn't think

0:04:25.916 --> 0:04:28.276
<v Speaker 2>that George Santos is a real risk to the community

0:04:28.996 --> 0:04:31.436
<v Speaker 2>non violent criminals.

0:04:31.836 --> 0:04:35.196
<v Speaker 4>You know, humiliation is a pretty potent punishment.

0:04:36.756 --> 0:04:38.836
<v Speaker 5>So do you think that three months was an adequate

0:04:39.076 --> 0:04:40.556
<v Speaker 5>sentence for what he pled to?

0:04:43.116 --> 0:04:46.356
<v Speaker 4>I think that the time of it is not as

0:04:46.396 --> 0:04:50.916
<v Speaker 4>significant as the experience that he probably had. I mean,

0:04:51.196 --> 0:04:53.596
<v Speaker 4>you know, that's one reason why people don't want to

0:04:53.596 --> 0:04:57.076
<v Speaker 4>be in jail. They get there and it's harsh.

0:04:57.356 --> 0:04:59.636
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of questions about Kathy, but I

0:04:59.676 --> 0:05:02.156
<v Speaker 1>wonder if it's actually helpful to just take a step

0:05:02.196 --> 0:05:05.876
<v Speaker 1>back here. President Trump, what is he said about why

0:05:05.916 --> 0:05:07.716
<v Speaker 1>he commuted Santos's sentence.

0:05:08.756 --> 0:05:12.236
<v Speaker 2>So when the news broke it was onwhere Else Truth

0:05:12.316 --> 0:05:17.476
<v Speaker 2>Social Friday night, President Trump had posted quote, George Santos

0:05:17.756 --> 0:05:20.956
<v Speaker 2>was somewhat of a rogue. That's in quotes, But there

0:05:20.956 --> 0:05:23.916
<v Speaker 2>are many rogues throughout our country that aren't forced to

0:05:23.956 --> 0:05:26.356
<v Speaker 2>serve seven years in prison. So you can see they're

0:05:26.356 --> 0:05:30.116
<v Speaker 2>the president kind of indicating he didn't necessarily agree with

0:05:30.156 --> 0:05:33.436
<v Speaker 2>the sentence that had been handed down. He had also

0:05:33.476 --> 0:05:38.116
<v Speaker 2>said at least Santos had the courage, conviction and intelligence

0:05:38.476 --> 0:05:40.876
<v Speaker 2>to always vote Republican.

0:05:41.196 --> 0:05:43.876
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Like, why is he calling out

0:05:43.876 --> 0:05:47.396
<v Speaker 1>that Santos always voted Republican. I feel like with President Trump,

0:05:47.396 --> 0:05:49.356
<v Speaker 1>there's often like a subtext. Do you have a sense

0:05:49.356 --> 0:05:50.636
<v Speaker 1>of what the subtext is there?

0:05:51.276 --> 0:05:51.436
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:05:51.476 --> 0:05:53.836
<v Speaker 2>I think the subtext in this case is pretty It's

0:05:53.836 --> 0:05:57.716
<v Speaker 2>a neon sign, It's George Santos has been a vocal,

0:05:57.916 --> 0:06:00.476
<v Speaker 2>consistent supporter of President Trump.

0:06:00.916 --> 0:06:03.796
<v Speaker 6>Early on, I had been waiting for this to happen.

0:06:03.876 --> 0:06:06.716
<v Speaker 6>I think a lot of people had been. Santos himself

0:06:06.796 --> 0:06:10.156
<v Speaker 6>had been kind of begging Trump for connotation apart in

0:06:10.676 --> 0:06:13.036
<v Speaker 6>just kind of any relief at all, and he'd been

0:06:13.036 --> 0:06:14.876
<v Speaker 6>a big support of Trump for a long time. So

0:06:15.036 --> 0:06:15.916
<v Speaker 6>this wasn't surprising.

0:06:16.476 --> 0:06:18.276
<v Speaker 2>When I heard the news, I gave a call to

0:06:18.476 --> 0:06:21.716
<v Speaker 2>Mark Gasanov. He's the author of The Fabulous, who we

0:06:21.756 --> 0:06:24.836
<v Speaker 2>spoke to for the original series. His book is a

0:06:24.876 --> 0:06:27.236
<v Speaker 2>deeply reported biography of Santos.

0:06:27.516 --> 0:06:30.716
<v Speaker 6>Trump had been pardoning or commuting a lot of people's sentences,

0:06:30.796 --> 0:06:34.276
<v Speaker 6>so this wouldn't have been the craziest thing in the world.

0:06:34.316 --> 0:06:36.956
<v Speaker 6>So I and a lot of people had been waiting

0:06:36.996 --> 0:06:39.796
<v Speaker 6>for it to happen. But the months dragged on and

0:06:39.876 --> 0:06:43.636
<v Speaker 6>nothing did. So kind of assumes that maybe Santos was

0:06:43.676 --> 0:06:46.196
<v Speaker 6>going to stay in prison for at least a long time,

0:06:46.756 --> 0:06:49.356
<v Speaker 6>a longer time than he spent. But you know, as

0:06:49.396 --> 0:06:52.436
<v Speaker 6>with everything with Santos, it's your surprise, but nothing, nothing

0:06:52.436 --> 0:06:53.036
<v Speaker 6>can shock you.

0:06:53.116 --> 0:06:55.396
<v Speaker 5>I want to impact that a bit. You had almost

0:06:55.436 --> 0:06:56.356
<v Speaker 5>been expecting this.

0:06:56.556 --> 0:07:00.956
<v Speaker 6>It sounds like, why is that. Well, Santos had been

0:07:01.236 --> 0:07:04.956
<v Speaker 6>a big Trump supporter and booster for years, I mean

0:07:05.476 --> 0:07:08.676
<v Speaker 6>at least since twenty fifteen, and it was one of

0:07:08.716 --> 0:07:12.956
<v Speaker 6>the fews things that he was totally just kind of

0:07:13.156 --> 0:07:17.356
<v Speaker 6>unchangeable about. Right. He would go to rallies, he would

0:07:17.396 --> 0:07:22.076
<v Speaker 6>boost him on social media. He actually spoke on January fifth,

0:07:22.116 --> 0:07:25.596
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty one, right before the January sixth Capitol riot.

0:07:26.916 --> 0:07:31.396
<v Speaker 6>He continued sort of boosting Trump even after, you know,

0:07:31.436 --> 0:07:35.116
<v Speaker 6>his fall from grace. He showed up at Trump's New

0:07:35.116 --> 0:07:38.636
<v Speaker 6>Hampshire victory party, and then once he actually went to prison,

0:07:39.156 --> 0:07:44.236
<v Speaker 6>he kept writing basically kind of op eds for a

0:07:44.276 --> 0:07:47.876
<v Speaker 6>small newspaper on long Island, and in those op eds

0:07:48.236 --> 0:07:51.676
<v Speaker 6>he was sort of bagging Trump for something, to let

0:07:51.756 --> 0:07:53.716
<v Speaker 6>him out, help him out in some ways. So he

0:07:53.796 --> 0:07:55.716
<v Speaker 6>kind of kept it up, and he'd been a sort

0:07:55.716 --> 0:07:58.636
<v Speaker 6>of loyal Trump soldier in a way that you know,

0:07:58.756 --> 0:08:02.556
<v Speaker 6>others haven't been, So you know, it was not so surprising,

0:08:02.716 --> 0:08:05.276
<v Speaker 6>I guess to see Trump react to that, to that

0:08:05.356 --> 0:08:07.596
<v Speaker 6>sort of constant flattery and approval.

0:08:09.316 --> 0:08:12.796
<v Speaker 1>That Mark is like, I'm only surprised it didn't happen sooner,

0:08:12.836 --> 0:08:15.196
<v Speaker 1>and Kathy's like, I'm surprised it happened at all.

0:08:15.636 --> 0:08:17.916
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I think that Marx beide is politics. And

0:08:18.116 --> 0:08:21.556
<v Speaker 2>if you're paying attention, you've noticed that this is not

0:08:21.636 --> 0:08:24.476
<v Speaker 2>the first act of clemency that has happened under the

0:08:24.516 --> 0:08:25.596
<v Speaker 2>new Trump administration.

0:08:25.996 --> 0:08:27.996
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying new, but it's been less than a year.

0:08:28.876 --> 0:08:29.036
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:08:29.116 --> 0:08:33.036
<v Speaker 2>In that time, President Trump has pardoned more than sixteen

0:08:33.196 --> 0:08:38.036
<v Speaker 2>hundred people, which is pretty remarkable, unprecedented for this early

0:08:38.196 --> 0:08:42.196
<v Speaker 2>in the presidential term. You know, fifteen hundred of those

0:08:42.236 --> 0:08:44.996
<v Speaker 2>were people who were involved in the events of January sixth.

0:08:45.076 --> 0:08:48.116
<v Speaker 2>So he's also commuted many sentences, and we should talk

0:08:48.116 --> 0:08:50.036
<v Speaker 2>about that a little bit, because a pardon is different

0:08:50.036 --> 0:08:51.076
<v Speaker 2>than a commutation.

0:08:52.156 --> 0:08:55.116
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this was a commutation, right.

0:08:55.676 --> 0:08:57.436
<v Speaker 3>This was a commutation, not a pardon.

0:08:57.796 --> 0:09:00.476
<v Speaker 1>So what is that like in plainspeak, what does that mean?

0:09:01.516 --> 0:09:05.116
<v Speaker 2>Pardon is a full It basically wipes your slate clean.

0:09:06.076 --> 0:09:10.756
<v Speaker 2>The crime is forgiven. A commutation just means we're wrapping

0:09:10.836 --> 0:09:14.076
<v Speaker 2>up your time spent in incarceration. So George Santos was

0:09:14.116 --> 0:09:18.316
<v Speaker 2>released from prison late Friday night after this commutation was announced.

0:09:18.716 --> 0:09:21.316
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't change the fact that he was still charged

0:09:21.316 --> 0:09:23.796
<v Speaker 2>with these crimes. He still pled guilty to these crimes,

0:09:23.836 --> 0:09:26.236
<v Speaker 2>and he still served time for these crimes, and that

0:09:26.316 --> 0:09:28.356
<v Speaker 2>will follow him for the rest of his life. This

0:09:28.476 --> 0:09:31.236
<v Speaker 2>is something that actually Kathy Sorif stressed to me when

0:09:31.276 --> 0:09:32.036
<v Speaker 2>I talked to her.

0:09:32.516 --> 0:09:33.676
<v Speaker 5>He wasn't pardoned.

0:09:34.516 --> 0:09:39.276
<v Speaker 4>His sentence was commuted. So he will have to live

0:09:39.556 --> 0:09:45.396
<v Speaker 4>with the dishonor that he caused himself. That will not

0:09:45.556 --> 0:09:49.596
<v Speaker 4>go away, and hopefully he will find some way to

0:09:49.756 --> 0:09:52.156
<v Speaker 4>redeem himself by good work.

0:09:53.276 --> 0:09:57.596
<v Speaker 1>Any sense for why President Trump would have opted to

0:09:57.636 --> 0:09:59.916
<v Speaker 1>commute his sentence rather than just give him a pardon.

0:10:00.276 --> 0:10:02.076
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that would have Maybe that would have upset the

0:10:02.476 --> 0:10:05.116
<v Speaker 1>party in some way that they could It almost feels

0:10:05.156 --> 0:10:06.236
<v Speaker 1>like it could be a compromise.

0:10:06.356 --> 0:10:08.076
<v Speaker 2>Well, and this was really the question that I had

0:10:08.076 --> 0:10:11.796
<v Speaker 2>for Kathy what we're talking about here, because Kathy sores

0:10:12.676 --> 0:10:16.156
<v Speaker 2>she is a Republican and she is a big backer

0:10:16.196 --> 0:10:17.076
<v Speaker 2>of President Trump.

0:10:17.956 --> 0:10:21.116
<v Speaker 5>I know you to be a you know, a vocal

0:10:21.156 --> 0:10:24.556
<v Speaker 5>supporter of President Trump, but also someone who has no

0:10:24.916 --> 0:10:25.876
<v Speaker 5>love lost.

0:10:25.756 --> 0:10:27.556
<v Speaker 6>For George Santos.

0:10:27.596 --> 0:10:29.796
<v Speaker 5>So I'm just curious how you square those two things

0:10:29.836 --> 0:10:30.676
<v Speaker 5>in a moment like this.

0:10:31.196 --> 0:10:33.436
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't really know. I don't know what Trump

0:10:33.556 --> 0:10:37.076
<v Speaker 4>was thinking. I don't I don't know other than just

0:10:37.076 --> 0:10:41.556
<v Speaker 4>saying that he thought the long prison sentence was unfair

0:10:41.956 --> 0:10:45.076
<v Speaker 4>and why are we He's not a danger to society.

0:10:45.556 --> 0:10:50.156
<v Speaker 4>His humiliation will carry with him for a long time,

0:10:50.516 --> 0:10:56.116
<v Speaker 4>and that is quite a punishment. I didn't understand what

0:10:56.396 --> 0:10:59.676
<v Speaker 4>benefit it would be. Certainly it's not a political benefit

0:10:59.796 --> 0:11:03.676
<v Speaker 4>for Trump to pardon George Santos. George Santos isn't going

0:11:03.756 --> 0:11:07.156
<v Speaker 4>to do a good darn thing for Trump, and by

0:11:07.236 --> 0:11:11.356
<v Speaker 4>doing it, actually I thought it might have been harmful.

0:11:11.396 --> 0:11:15.156
<v Speaker 4>So I didn't understand the source other than Trump thinking

0:11:15.196 --> 0:11:19.396
<v Speaker 4>it just not fair that he had been sentenced really

0:11:19.476 --> 0:11:20.196
<v Speaker 4>too harshly.

0:11:20.916 --> 0:11:23.556
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little skeptical about I mean, like, I mean,

0:11:23.836 --> 0:11:26.076
<v Speaker 1>the question is a fair one, like why would he

0:11:26.196 --> 0:11:29.796
<v Speaker 1>do this? I'm somewhat dubious this is just done out

0:11:29.796 --> 0:11:33.556
<v Speaker 1>of a sense of justice. I think that that doesn't

0:11:33.636 --> 0:11:35.116
<v Speaker 1>ring true to me. I could think of a few

0:11:35.156 --> 0:11:37.076
<v Speaker 1>reasons why this would be good for him to do.

0:11:37.556 --> 0:11:40.636
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it reinforces the idea that if you're loyal

0:11:40.716 --> 0:11:43.036
<v Speaker 1>to me, I will look out for you down the road.

0:11:43.356 --> 0:11:45.636
<v Speaker 1>It's another day where he's in charge of the news cycle.

0:11:45.836 --> 0:11:48.396
<v Speaker 1>It also casts further doubt on a justice system that

0:11:48.476 --> 0:11:51.876
<v Speaker 1>he's run into before. But I always think that, like

0:11:52.276 --> 0:11:55.756
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is a really smart strategist about the way

0:11:55.796 --> 0:11:57.676
<v Speaker 1>he does things. I don't think he does things just

0:11:57.756 --> 0:11:59.716
<v Speaker 1>He may do things on a whim, but it's following

0:11:59.716 --> 0:12:04.916
<v Speaker 1>an instinct. And I'm just I'm just wondering what you

0:12:05.036 --> 0:12:09.316
<v Speaker 1>think his strategy was here or why he did this.

0:12:09.556 --> 0:12:11.876
<v Speaker 1>Is it just like a Is this just thank you

0:12:11.916 --> 0:12:13.636
<v Speaker 1>for being loyal and if you're loyal to me, no

0:12:13.676 --> 0:12:16.356
<v Speaker 1>matter what you've done, you get redeemed Or do you

0:12:16.396 --> 0:12:17.876
<v Speaker 1>think there's more to it than that.

0:12:19.556 --> 0:12:21.276
<v Speaker 2>I think that there's an argument to be made that

0:12:21.516 --> 0:12:25.316
<v Speaker 2>Santos's loyalty is a huge factor in why we're talking

0:12:25.396 --> 0:12:27.996
<v Speaker 2>right now and why Santos has been released. I think

0:12:28.036 --> 0:12:30.636
<v Speaker 2>the other factor that we have to discuss is that

0:12:30.676 --> 0:12:34.356
<v Speaker 2>he was held in solitary confinement, and from what we know,

0:12:34.476 --> 0:12:37.556
<v Speaker 2>it seems like that's something that caught the president's attention.

0:12:38.276 --> 0:12:42.316
<v Speaker 2>You heard Mark reference earlier. George Santos has been writing

0:12:42.356 --> 0:12:45.796
<v Speaker 2>this sort of regular column for a newspaper on Long

0:12:45.796 --> 0:12:47.196
<v Speaker 2>Island called The Soushore Press.

0:12:47.756 --> 0:12:47.956
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:12:48.116 --> 0:12:51.716
<v Speaker 2>His most recent column came out just about a week ago,

0:12:51.876 --> 0:12:55.996
<v Speaker 2>and he seems to be speaking to the president almost directly.

0:12:56.556 --> 0:12:59.356
<v Speaker 2>He says, quote, I renew my plea to President Trump.

0:12:59.796 --> 0:13:03.476
<v Speaker 2>Intervene helped me escape this daily torment and let me

0:13:03.556 --> 0:13:07.196
<v Speaker 2>return to my family. So this really like heartfelt plea

0:13:07.316 --> 0:13:07.956
<v Speaker 2>for release.

0:13:08.596 --> 0:13:08.836
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:13:08.916 --> 0:13:12.156
<v Speaker 2>He he talks about his experience in solitary confinement.

0:13:12.556 --> 0:13:15.436
<v Speaker 1>Remind us why is he in solitary confinement?

0:13:15.636 --> 0:13:19.036
<v Speaker 2>George Santos found himself in solitary confinement. From the reporting

0:13:19.036 --> 0:13:21.316
<v Speaker 2>that's out there, it seems he was not placed in

0:13:21.356 --> 0:13:24.876
<v Speaker 2>solitary for any disciplinary reasons. He was placed in solitary

0:13:25.236 --> 0:13:27.916
<v Speaker 2>because of an actual threat to his life. Then, so

0:13:28.036 --> 0:13:32.236
<v Speaker 2>sometimes they might segregate an inmate for their own safety,

0:13:32.556 --> 0:13:35.516
<v Speaker 2>but what George Santos maintains is that the conditions that

0:13:35.596 --> 0:13:38.476
<v Speaker 2>he was held in were far from humane. He asked

0:13:38.476 --> 0:13:41.556
<v Speaker 2>for his inhaler, and it took him hours, if not days,

0:13:41.596 --> 0:13:44.756
<v Speaker 2>to receive it. He had panic attacks. So, I mean,

0:13:45.516 --> 0:13:48.876
<v Speaker 2>solitary confinement is a real thing that this country has

0:13:48.916 --> 0:13:53.516
<v Speaker 2>to grapple with. There are over forty thousand estimated inmates

0:13:53.556 --> 0:13:56.036
<v Speaker 2>being held in solitary at any given time in this country.

0:13:56.516 --> 0:13:58.996
<v Speaker 2>It is considered a form of torture according to you

0:13:59.076 --> 0:14:03.956
<v Speaker 2>and guidelines, and you know, the psychological effects. You know,

0:14:04.036 --> 0:14:06.156
<v Speaker 2>the actual conditions you're held in are one thing, but

0:14:06.476 --> 0:14:09.396
<v Speaker 2>kind of what you carry with you after you leave

0:14:09.516 --> 0:14:12.676
<v Speaker 2>is an entirely different conversation. This was clearly on the

0:14:12.676 --> 0:14:15.916
<v Speaker 2>president's radar, right, So in that initial truth Social post,

0:14:16.156 --> 0:14:20.276
<v Speaker 2>he called it out explicitly saying, quote, George has been

0:14:20.316 --> 0:14:23.716
<v Speaker 2>in solitary confinement for long stretches of time and by

0:14:23.756 --> 0:14:27.516
<v Speaker 2>all accounts, has been horribly mistreated. Therefore, I just signed

0:14:27.516 --> 0:14:29.476
<v Speaker 2>a commutation releasing him from prison.

0:14:30.236 --> 0:14:31.996
<v Speaker 3>Good luck, George, have a great life.

0:14:33.396 --> 0:14:40.676
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's interesting because you know, if you imagine

0:14:40.716 --> 0:14:43.676
<v Speaker 1>a world where George Santos was only sentenced to three

0:14:43.756 --> 0:14:47.796
<v Speaker 1>months and he served his time and get out today,

0:14:49.276 --> 0:14:53.316
<v Speaker 1>versus a storyline where George Santos had been sentenced to

0:14:53.396 --> 0:14:57.476
<v Speaker 1>seven years was being held in solitary confinement and Donald

0:14:57.516 --> 0:15:02.076
<v Speaker 1>Trump gives him this commutation and tells him good luck.

0:15:02.156 --> 0:15:05.236
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it feels like for a man who likes

0:15:05.316 --> 0:15:08.756
<v Speaker 1>dramatic storylines, it feels like a much more dramatic storyline. Plus,

0:15:08.756 --> 0:15:11.316
<v Speaker 1>you've been kind of what you call it communtation, call

0:15:11.356 --> 0:15:14.716
<v Speaker 1>it pardon. You've been blessed by President Trump, which is

0:15:14.836 --> 0:15:17.316
<v Speaker 1>very meaningful in many circles in this country.

0:15:17.716 --> 0:15:17.836
<v Speaker 6>Oh.

0:15:17.916 --> 0:15:21.756
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I will say it's interesting. The story of George

0:15:21.756 --> 0:15:26.716
<v Speaker 2>Santos remains really fascinating to me in its many evolutions,

0:15:26.796 --> 0:15:29.756
<v Speaker 2>because I think, you know, it's easy to dismiss him.

0:15:30.196 --> 0:15:32.636
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's a con artist, and why are we

0:15:32.676 --> 0:15:36.116
<v Speaker 2>even still talking about this guy? But I think throughout

0:15:36.156 --> 0:15:39.436
<v Speaker 2>this saga, you know, George Santos has been a really

0:15:39.596 --> 0:15:43.876
<v Speaker 2>interesting window into the realities of the systems of the

0:15:43.916 --> 0:15:48.276
<v Speaker 2>criminal legal system. There are millions of people who interact

0:15:48.316 --> 0:15:51.396
<v Speaker 2>with our court system and our prison system every day,

0:15:52.036 --> 0:15:54.636
<v Speaker 2>but they are not famous, they do not have names

0:15:54.636 --> 0:16:00.236
<v Speaker 2>that you recognize. But here we are talking about solitary confinement,

0:16:00.676 --> 0:16:05.836
<v Speaker 2>talking about mandatory minimums, talking about what it means to

0:16:05.916 --> 0:16:08.636
<v Speaker 2>have a felony on your record because it's in the

0:16:08.676 --> 0:16:10.956
<v Speaker 2>news because of George Santos.

0:16:14.036 --> 0:16:28.476
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. Have we heard from George since

0:16:28.516 --> 0:16:29.516
<v Speaker 1>he's been released?

0:16:30.676 --> 0:16:30.836
<v Speaker 7>So?

0:16:31.116 --> 0:16:36.556
<v Speaker 2>George Santos posted on Saturday, the day after he was released, saying, quote,

0:16:36.876 --> 0:16:40.116
<v Speaker 2>yesterday I was given something I never thought i'd have again,

0:16:40.636 --> 0:16:43.676
<v Speaker 2>a true second chance at life, a chance to grow,

0:16:44.116 --> 0:16:49.476
<v Speaker 2>to change, and to walk a better path. He goes

0:16:49.516 --> 0:16:52.316
<v Speaker 2>on to say, my goal now is to turn my

0:16:52.436 --> 0:16:56.436
<v Speaker 2>past into something meaningful, to help create a justice system

0:16:56.796 --> 0:17:01.836
<v Speaker 2>that truly believes in rehabilitation and second chances. Yes, I

0:17:01.876 --> 0:17:04.076
<v Speaker 2>am back, but I am back as a new man,

0:17:04.636 --> 0:17:06.276
<v Speaker 2>ready to work and do good.

0:17:08.396 --> 0:17:11.716
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's what's so interesting about this to me

0:17:12.996 --> 0:17:16.316
<v Speaker 1>is Sando's as many things, dumb is clearly not one

0:17:16.356 --> 0:17:21.116
<v Speaker 1>of them. Whether he's sincere or there's a hustle here

0:17:22.356 --> 0:17:26.156
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen. But I think that what he

0:17:26.276 --> 0:17:30.476
<v Speaker 1>does is he's picking up He's using something that's real,

0:17:30.716 --> 0:17:33.796
<v Speaker 1>which is his own experience. He's using something that's real,

0:17:33.836 --> 0:17:37.516
<v Speaker 1>which is solitary confinement. It's like an organic storyline. It's

0:17:37.596 --> 0:17:41.676
<v Speaker 1>just the given who this guy is. It's damn hard

0:17:41.716 --> 0:17:44.356
<v Speaker 1>to take anything he says at face value. Let me

0:17:44.396 --> 0:17:46.796
<v Speaker 1>ask you this because this is what I'm also wondering about,

0:17:46.996 --> 0:17:50.756
<v Speaker 1>is restitution, right, So what about that? Like, is he

0:17:50.836 --> 0:17:51.716
<v Speaker 1>still on the hook for that?

0:17:52.636 --> 0:17:53.636
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a good question.

0:17:53.916 --> 0:17:58.236
<v Speaker 2>So over the weekend, one of the US Parton attorneys

0:17:58.236 --> 0:18:02.156
<v Speaker 2>who handled the commutation actually tweeted out what appears to

0:18:02.196 --> 0:18:06.676
<v Speaker 2>be the actual document that Trump signed, and it's in

0:18:06.716 --> 0:18:10.276
<v Speaker 2>black and white, pretty clear language that this is an

0:18:10.316 --> 0:18:15.396
<v Speaker 2>immediate commutation of his entire sentence time served with no

0:18:15.596 --> 0:18:20.676
<v Speaker 2>further fines, restitution, probation, supervis release, etc.

0:18:20.956 --> 0:18:21.396
<v Speaker 3>Etca.

0:18:21.556 --> 0:18:25.636
<v Speaker 2>So it seems on paper he is not on the

0:18:25.676 --> 0:18:28.836
<v Speaker 2>hook for this. Santos appeared on CNN over the weekend,

0:18:29.196 --> 0:18:32.116
<v Speaker 2>interviewed by Dana Bash and she actually asked him this

0:18:32.156 --> 0:18:32.796
<v Speaker 2>exact question.

0:18:33.396 --> 0:18:36.476
<v Speaker 7>You were ordered to by the court to pay three

0:18:36.516 --> 0:18:39.516
<v Speaker 7>hundred and seventy thousand dollars in restitution to the people

0:18:39.716 --> 0:18:41.996
<v Speaker 7>you defrauded. Will you still pay that back?

0:18:42.996 --> 0:18:45.676
<v Speaker 8>Well, if you really say the people, I just want

0:18:45.716 --> 0:18:47.676
<v Speaker 8>to be clear with your audience so that we're not

0:18:47.836 --> 0:18:51.836
<v Speaker 8>misleading them. Eighty five percent of that really goes into

0:18:51.876 --> 0:18:57.396
<v Speaker 8>the investment made into my campaign for polling and TV

0:18:57.556 --> 0:19:01.396
<v Speaker 8>ads and literature by the National Republican Congressional Committee. The

0:19:01.476 --> 0:19:04.436
<v Speaker 8>investment was made to win a race. I won that race.

0:19:04.716 --> 0:19:06.876
<v Speaker 8>There was no fraud there. This is a case we

0:19:07.036 --> 0:19:09.716
<v Speaker 8>argued with the prosecution, but they needed to inflate the

0:19:09.796 --> 0:19:13.916
<v Speaker 8>numbers in order to make it a more appealing case

0:19:14.156 --> 0:19:17.356
<v Speaker 8>for them in federal court instead of just going after

0:19:17.796 --> 0:19:21.516
<v Speaker 8>the mishandling of finances, which, by the way, most members

0:19:21.556 --> 0:19:25.196
<v Speaker 8>of Congress currently who are still serving in both parties,

0:19:25.436 --> 0:19:29.196
<v Speaker 8>whoever have had issues with FEC filings, they pay fines.

0:19:29.276 --> 0:19:34.556
<v Speaker 8>Nobody actually goes to prison. So it's inequitable in its nature.

0:19:34.756 --> 0:19:37.676
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is about a fine, and this is about

0:19:37.676 --> 0:19:41.396
<v Speaker 7>paying money back. And whether you describe them as victims

0:19:41.596 --> 0:19:45.876
<v Speaker 7>or just donors to the NRCC, what the court said

0:19:45.996 --> 0:19:48.036
<v Speaker 7>is that they should get their money back. Will you

0:19:48.076 --> 0:19:48.876
<v Speaker 7>work to try.

0:19:48.676 --> 0:19:49.036
<v Speaker 3>To do that?

0:19:49.836 --> 0:19:52.476
<v Speaker 8>Well, look, I can do my best to do whatever

0:19:52.516 --> 0:19:55.756
<v Speaker 8>the law requires of me, So I don't know what

0:19:55.756 --> 0:19:58.396
<v Speaker 8>that is. I've been out of prison for two days.

0:19:58.396 --> 0:20:00.996
<v Speaker 8>I agree to come here to speak with you candidly

0:20:01.036 --> 0:20:04.316
<v Speaker 8>and openly, and not to offuscate. If it's required of

0:20:04.356 --> 0:20:06.596
<v Speaker 8>me by the law. Yes, if it's not, then no,

0:20:06.836 --> 0:20:09.196
<v Speaker 8>I will do whatever the law it requires.

0:20:08.716 --> 0:20:09.076
<v Speaker 6>Me to do.

0:20:10.036 --> 0:20:13.636
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting he's not really answering the question. He's saying, well,

0:20:13.636 --> 0:20:15.596
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it the law requires of me. But as

0:20:15.716 --> 0:20:17.476
<v Speaker 1>we understand that the law is saying that he doesn't

0:20:17.516 --> 0:20:19.876
<v Speaker 1>have to pay the money back, I would almost respect

0:20:19.916 --> 0:20:22.236
<v Speaker 1>him more if he's like, hey, President Trump, SAI didn't

0:20:22.236 --> 0:20:23.876
<v Speaker 1>have to pay it back. Why would I pay it back?

0:20:24.196 --> 0:20:28.036
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like, but no, it has to be well,

0:20:28.396 --> 0:20:31.116
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't really taking from people. I was taking from

0:20:31.236 --> 0:20:33.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, these funds as if that money was what

0:20:33.996 --> 0:20:36.556
<v Speaker 1>printed by the Republican National Party, like those were the

0:20:36.756 --> 0:20:37.556
<v Speaker 1>donor's money.

0:20:37.836 --> 0:20:41.396
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, somebody's money that he took. Look, this is another

0:20:41.436 --> 0:20:45.476
<v Speaker 2>example of Santos being well versed in political spin.

0:20:45.756 --> 0:20:50.916
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, I wonder, I mean, do you have a

0:20:50.956 --> 0:20:54.676
<v Speaker 1>sense for where you think? I mean, apparently he's going

0:20:54.716 --> 0:20:58.636
<v Speaker 1>to become an outspoken voice for prison reform. Besides that,

0:20:58.796 --> 0:21:00.956
<v Speaker 1>do you have a sense for where we might see

0:21:00.996 --> 0:21:02.356
<v Speaker 1>him next?

0:21:02.916 --> 0:21:06.516
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I've also been thinking about that, and I asked

0:21:06.596 --> 0:21:10.196
<v Speaker 2>Mark Gasano, the journalist who has looked to Santos and

0:21:10.316 --> 0:21:14.876
<v Speaker 2>his life more than anyone else, Really this exact question.

0:21:15.516 --> 0:21:17.836
<v Speaker 5>I guess the question now is what happens next with

0:21:17.916 --> 0:21:18.476
<v Speaker 5>a guy like this.

0:21:18.876 --> 0:21:20.916
<v Speaker 6>That's sort of the open question with Santos, and sort

0:21:20.916 --> 0:21:24.516
<v Speaker 6>of always has been. People always wonder was he going

0:21:24.596 --> 0:21:26.836
<v Speaker 6>to change? Is this kind of the end with him?

0:21:27.596 --> 0:21:31.436
<v Speaker 6>Or is he just going to move to another scam?

0:21:31.756 --> 0:21:34.276
<v Speaker 6>Who knows? With him? He sort of said different things

0:21:34.316 --> 0:21:37.276
<v Speaker 6>at different times that he is repentance that he isn't.

0:21:38.396 --> 0:21:42.756
<v Speaker 6>I'll note though, that he did reactivate his cameo account,

0:21:42.916 --> 0:21:46.196
<v Speaker 6>so there's that he's at least trying that again. I

0:21:46.236 --> 0:21:47.796
<v Speaker 6>definitely don't think we've heard the last of him.

0:21:49.876 --> 0:21:52.316
<v Speaker 1>The cameo account is the one where he gives like

0:21:52.356 --> 0:21:53.236
<v Speaker 1>the birthday wishes.

0:21:53.836 --> 0:21:56.756
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you could pay George Santos. I'm curious, Actually, I'll

0:21:56.796 --> 0:22:00.356
<v Speaker 2>look how much? How much the going rate is right now?

0:22:00.396 --> 0:22:02.956
<v Speaker 2>But you could pay him to record a birthday message?

0:22:03.236 --> 0:22:05.116
<v Speaker 1>Or Yeah, what is what is the going rate?

0:22:05.436 --> 0:22:08.796
<v Speaker 2>Book a personal video? One fifty plus? Oh it's a

0:22:08.796 --> 0:22:09.796
<v Speaker 2>flash sale.

0:22:12.036 --> 0:22:15.196
<v Speaker 3>One that's half off right now.

0:22:15.316 --> 0:22:18.196
<v Speaker 2>We're catching it on a on.

0:22:18.196 --> 0:22:18.956
<v Speaker 3>A flash sail.

0:22:19.356 --> 0:22:22.836
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness. Yeah, we're not seeing to lest this guy.

0:22:23.036 --> 0:22:25.876
<v Speaker 1>My spidy sense tells me that in the not too

0:22:25.876 --> 0:22:29.276
<v Speaker 1>distant future will be back because George Santaus will have

0:22:29.396 --> 0:22:41.876
<v Speaker 1>once again found his way back into the headlines. This

0:22:41.956 --> 0:22:45.796
<v Speaker 1>episode was produced by Amy Gains McQuaid and Isaac Carter.

0:22:46.316 --> 0:22:50.516
<v Speaker 1>It was edited by Karen Chakerjee. Our executive producer is

0:22:50.596 --> 0:22:55.876
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Smith, mastering by Jake Gorsky. Original scoring and our

0:22:55.996 --> 0:23:00.636
<v Speaker 1>theme were composed by Luis Gara. Special thanks to Morgan Ratner,

0:23:00.836 --> 0:23:18.516
<v Speaker 1>Owen Miller, and Greta Cone. I'm Jake Halpern.