WEBVTT - The Patent Wars

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello, everyone,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette and

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I am an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me, as he typically does unless he

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>happens to be standing at the time, is senior writer

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I suited Ben Affleck. Do I even need

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a reason? Identify the source of the quote and you

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>get Okay, you don't get anything, but you know, feel

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>free to write in Yes, it's patently absurd to suggest

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.959
<v Speaker 1>you would get something. See what I did there. Yeah,

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about the patent wars today and actually this, uh,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this topic comes to us courtesy of a little listener mail.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>This listener mail come from Jim, and Jim says, I

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>know you did some podcasts on i P that's intellectual

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>property for everyone out there, but I don't remember if

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you did one on patents exclusively. If not, you may

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>want to consider one. I'm raring this because of the

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>past weeks this American Life on NPR, when patents attack

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's about how patent troll companies that buy up patents

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 1>with broad software coverage such as this patent covers real

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>time backup of files, and then they sue any software

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>company large or small that maybe doing backups. You wouldn't

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>want to retell the whole story, but the idea of

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>patentrolling could be a part of the describing patents were

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you to do a podcast on. So, yeah, we thought

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we'd talked a bit about patents, and before we really

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>jump into it, I wanted to point out that at

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com we have a great article

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on how patents work and it really breaks down what

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>patents are and and their purpose. And we're gonna kind

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of cover some of that first, I think, because that's

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>important to understand before we go on into you know,

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>patent trolls and nonpracticing, into into ease and that kind

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing. So, Chris, are you comfortable in telling everybody

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what a patent is? Of course, patents come off of

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of, uh, the ability for someone to protect

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>their work. It's sort of similar in some ways to copyright, um,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it depends on what it is. Now,

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have a if you've written a novel. You

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>can't patent that, but you can't copyright it. And that's

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a way to protect your work so that you can

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sell it and make some money off of it and

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>reap the rewards with that. Patents apply to those people

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>who are and I always think of them as inventors,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's not necessarily inventors. It could be engineers or

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>other people. Um. In this case, we'll be talking a

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>lot about software patents, which, by the way, before we

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>even jump into it any further, I should point out

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there is no such thing as a software patent as

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>an it's not a separate thing. A software patent is

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a patent. It's just that it's a patent that and

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it covers software. But there's no distinction between a software

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>patent and any other type. No, no, no, it's not

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>shorthand there are people who will get into this. There

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are people who believe that software should not be allowed

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to be patent, should not be you know, fall into

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that category. But that patent, I'm going to be doing

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that too. Yeah, it's it's okay. Yeah. Um, so no,

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a patented piper picked a peck up patents, yeah, pickled

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>patents perhaps, Um, so yeah, patent basically is is a protection.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a registry for a particular type of thing. Um,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a better mousetrap. Perhaps you register with a

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>patent office. Yes, and in the United States that the

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>United States Patent Office. Yes. Yes, And basically somebody reviews

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your application in which you describe what it is, how

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it works, what the parts are, how you know all

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>these things. Um, and there's some really fascinating in the

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>patent files. You can look at all these different diagrams

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>for different inventions. Really kind of cool. But anyway, Um,

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>once a a someone has reviewed that and says, yes,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this does not work like the other ones before, it

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is completely the criteria that is necessary to have a patent. Yes.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Then then it can be patented and on and that

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is on file as part of the public record. And

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>if someone makes something that looks just like the one

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that you invented and works the same way and tries

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>to make money off of it, you can see their

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.559
<v Speaker 1>pantsil right, or you can license the patent to someone

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>else so that they can make something that's not the

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>way people do it is how some people do it.

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, Uh, software patents in particular have an issue

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>with this, but we'll we'll get into that. That's that's

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that you can protect your work so

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that you may make money off of it, and other

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>people cannot take your idea and make money off of

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it without your permission. Exactly. So, if I were to

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>patent a an invention and Chris wanted to be able

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to build that invention, we might be come to an agreement,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a licensing agreement, where he can use my idea and

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>put it into reality. Because here's here's another thing about patents.

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You might come up with a brilliant idea brilliant invention.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I've all the time, and so you come up with

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant invention, but you lack the resources to make

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that invention. You just you you know how to do it.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got all the ideas in place, but you don't

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have the infrastructure to build this thing. Sad but true.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a manufacturing facility in my backyard, right.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, you would perhaps patent your invention

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>or submit it to the patent office for for approval,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and then once you've got approval, that's your ticket to

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>getting that that idea licensed by a company or organization

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that has the capacity to put it into reality. Right,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>So you license the idea to widget coho goes off

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and makes them and packages them, and in return, you

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>get a cut of the money that they make off

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of it because they hold a license for your patent.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Actually that that works very similar to the way it

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>works for writers and musicians who license their work to

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a publisher and then they get part of the So

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're not completely dissiminar And what's also interesting

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is that you can't you don't just have the option

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to license patents. You can actually sell a patent. Yes

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you can, because a patent is essentially property. Yes you know,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's intellectual property, intellectual property, and just like any other property,

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>you have the right to dispose of it as you wish.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So you can sell that patent to a company. If

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a company wants to make a certain type of product

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and you hold the patent that is, or a patent

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that is instrumental in that product getting made, that company

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>might approach you and say, hey, if we drop a

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>truckload of cash at your front door, will you sell

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>us this patent? And you can choose to sell it,

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or you can choose to hold onto it truckload of

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So so there are companies out there that are just

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in the business of buying and selling patents. That's what

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they do. It's almost like it's almost like trading stocks

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>or some other or real estate. Really it's it's trading

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>property and that's their main purpose. And that's also led

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to some sticky situations and some name calling in various industries,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the technology industry being a good example, because clearly technology

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all about innovation and invention. Yep, you know. And

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought of a of a real life example

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of these two models and they're actually uh in well,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>their their photos are in the room with us because

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Edison tried to He had all these inventions and he

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>actually worked on building a company which is uh, you know,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>there was Edison General Electric. There version of General Electric

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>today is not exactly anywhere. It's complicated. We'll have to

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>do an episode on Edison at some point. Yeah, but

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>um yeah, I mean he he had a company that

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he built his company to make his stuff

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially and to wire people's homes and and do that.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Um where Tesla actually worked with Westinghouse. Westinghouse licensed his

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>patents and together they sort of I mean it was

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>like Tesla was the inventor in Westinghouse was the industrialist

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>who built on that work, but he licensed those those

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>patents from Tesla, and there was I mean, there was

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>some controversy with Tesla and patents. Tesla held some patents

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that he he was issued the patents by the United

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>States Patent Office and then later the Patent Office overturned

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that decision and revoked his patents. Yeah, and so right,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot of discussion about how the

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Patent Office isn't it's it's more than just a regulatory office.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>There's a political element that runs through this as well. Um,

0:08:54.559 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, it's uh, it's complicated. Now, let's talk a

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what you have to prove in order

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to to have a patent, have your your invention considered

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>for a patent, to get patent approval. In order for

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>your for you to get a patent, your invention needs

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>to be sufficiently novel m. That means it has to

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be unlike other things that came before it enough to

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>justify a patent. Now, we should also say a lot

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>of this is subjective. You know, it's That's another part

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of patents that's a little tricky is that you know

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>that there aren't any there's no real quantifiable measurement for

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>how novels something like this is seven percent novel. Therefore

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it meets our threshold. Um, that's not really possible. Yeah, Basically,

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>someone is looking at these patents. It's a human and

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>humans are known to be subjective. And also the you know,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>it's depending on how complex this invention is. Uh, the

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>person who's reviewing the patent may have some difficulty deciding

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>how novel it is compared to something else, if especially

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>depending on the language that's being used. Now, another thing

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that a patent that the invention must be is non

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>obvious to someone. Uh, someone who's knowledgeable in the art,

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is the way we say it. So in other words,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>you can't patent an invention or a process that is

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>patently obvious. You can't do something that you couldn't patent,

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>like a lever, and you're patenting the process of pulling

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the lever, Well, that's obvious. You can't do that. Um.

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And this this is a tough concept as well, and

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's one that we see brought up in courts a

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>lot where the the one side will accuse another side

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of you know, let's say that Company A is suing

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Company B for patent infringement, and Company B is contesting

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the patents in the first place, saying that they are

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>patenting obvious procedures, and it's it can be really difficult

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to prove whether or not something is obvious, because if

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that particular procedure didn't exist before Company A patent did it,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>then there's an argument there that, hey, the reason why

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it didn't exist before is because it wasn't obvious. It's

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>obvious now because we invented it, you know, And that's

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a circular argument thing. I blame the boogie woogie bogle

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>boy of Company B. But I mean, for example, to

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>swiped unlock, that's a good one to say swiped to unlock,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>which is I believe Apple has that patent for swiping

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to unlock on a on a touch screen device like

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone or a tablet. Uh. There have been companies

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and lawyers who have argued that swiped unlock is not

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't meet the criteria of being non obvious. But

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>then Apple would say, well, where was it before? Then

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>who if if it was? If it if it was obvious,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>then why were we the first to do it? Um

0:11:55.200 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>at least that that's that's oversimplifying the argument by many

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>leaps and bounds, but essentially that's what they're saying, Yeah,

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I did. Working on issues like this makes me glad

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>that I am not one of the people who has

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to decide whether patents get approved or not, because it

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 1>in some cases, I imagine that pardon my use of

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this word in the context, it's not the same, uh.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think for some inventions or concepts, it would be

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>more obvious that this is something that is completely different

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>than other things, and then just having to educate yourself

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about what goes on with this particular thing or the

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 1>software or the functionality. I'm glad I don't have to

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>make those decisions. See here at how Stuff Works. We

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>write about how stuff works, But if you were to

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>be the ideal patent regulator, you'd have to know how

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>everything works, because you would have to know if the

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>invention that's coming towards you, if it's just replicating something

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that's already out there you know, or or you would

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>look at and say that truly is novel, hasn't happened before.

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So other criteria that the invention must meet. Now we've

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>said it has to be new, it has to be

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>non obvious. It also has to be useful. That the

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>invention has to have a use. It means that it

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>serves some sort of purpose and it actually works. You

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>can't patent something that does not work, that can't be

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated to work. You also, you cannot patent any sort

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of um element that occurs in nature, like you couldn't

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>patent copper. It has to be man made. And then uh,

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to you can't use unproven ideas two in

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>your patent. So anything that is contested by science, anything

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that that isn't proven by science theoret that you should

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>not be able to get a patent on. So, for example,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a perpetual motion machine should in theory not get a

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>patent because science, uh tells us that such a thing

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>is not possible, even though we still have people who

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>pursue the dream of creating a perpetual motion machine. Leonardo

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>da Vinci himself tried to do this with a weighted

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>wheel and it didn't work out for him. And he

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>actually said back that back in the day, which I

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think was a Thursday, that perpetual motion was an impossibility. Uh.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And ever since we've been you know, still trying to

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>do it, no one, no one has proven him wrong,

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way. Uh. So these are the criteria that

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>your invention must meet in order to get a patent,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and it can take years from the time you apply

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for a patent to the time you're issued a patent.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And UH that raises the question, Okay, well what happens

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>during that that span. What if someone else comes up

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with an invention that uses your idea and you haven't

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>received a patent yet. Uh, that can get tricky. Sometimes

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>when you get the patent, you can then pursue legal

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>threats against whomever is using that that particular idea within

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>an invention. Um. Oh. And also if there is something

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>called prior art, then you may not be able to

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>get a patent. And prior art just means that there's

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>an example of the idea you have, the invention you

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have that already exists out in the wild and it

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, it has to have existed for a

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>while and it has to have been publicized for it too.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>For this account, So what you're saying is that if

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there were, um, someone who filed for a patent, and

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody comes along and says, no, I came up with

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that idea two months before before you did, and they

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>had sketched it out on a napkin and published it somewhere,

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>were published maybe, and it would have to be more

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>than two months. I think. I think the minimum is

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>at least a year. But let's say that Let's say

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that that I patent an invention, and or I tried

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a patent and invention, but it's discovered that there was

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a magazine article that had a prototype divid ice uh

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>detailed in that magazine, and that prototype device closely resembles

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>my patent, the the application, the invention that I'm applying

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for a patent. The two things are very similar. That

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>would could be an example of prior art. And if

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I were to try and get a patent, then someone

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>could prove that this other device essentially does the same

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that my idea does, my patent might be invalid.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So do you happen to know just can you guess

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>who in human history holds the most patents in at

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>least in the United States? M hmm, it's not Steve Jobs.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>No older, go go further back I think a lot

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of people would would be sitting here going no Edison.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Edison would be who I would guess. Yes, one patents, Yeah,

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>second place goes to someone else. So tell me if

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me who is in second place, and

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a hint. It can be found in

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>how patents work. But if you can let me know,

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that'd be awesome because it proves that you're actually paying

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>attention and not just falling asleep to text stuff. We

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>love you guys, by the way. We hope you have

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>pleasant dreams anyway. Yeah, but you, however, are not allowed

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>to go back to sleep. So now we've covered the

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>basics of what a patent is, what it does, and

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>why you would want one, and and patents secure your uh,

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>your rights to that idea for a limited amount of time.

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Right you You can't hold the idea, Yeah, you don't

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>hold a patent in perpetuity. It doesn't last forever. It

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>will last for a certain number of years, and it

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>all depends on where you live in the world. Like

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the different patent laws are have different amounts of time

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>where your patent is protected um and ideally during that time,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>no one would be able to infringe upon your patent

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>without the the threat of a loss. Not keep in mind,

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a patent doesn't automatically protect you from someone infringing on

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>your idea. The patent just gives you a recourse if

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>someone does infringe on your idea. And patent lawsuits are

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>really expensive. So if you are an independent inventor and

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you do not license your idea out, and you don't

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of resources at your disposal, and someone

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>starts to infringe upon your idea, you you might be

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>at luck because you might not have the money to

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>pursue a lawsuit. And uh, some whould argue, well, this

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>helps license out ideas and it means that those ideas

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>will actually propagate through society because you know, you've got

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>an incentive to share your idea. Now you're sharing it

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for money, You're you're licensing it, and it means that,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>uh that we all benefit as a result because this

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>idea gets actually put into use as opposed to let's

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>say I never patent my idea. Let's say I never

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>share my idea, Well, then no one benefits from it.

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>That so the idea the patent office is really to

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to share their ideas. It's just that it

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>hasn't always worked out that way, and that's what leads

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>us to the patent wars. Yeah, and this has come

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>up a lot recently, especially with UM Google's acquisition of

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Motorola and the battles going on between Apple and HTC

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft and some of the others. And We've had

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>several people mentioned this to us, and I've seen comments

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on on our Facebook page um about one company or

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>another being a brat. Basically, this isn't, by any stretch

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of the imagination, something that just started happening. No, No,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's getting a lot more publicity now because the

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>companies are that are involved are big consumer companies in

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>one way or another. They may not directly create consumer products,

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>because you would say that, all right, well, Google doesn't

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>yet make anything specific for consumers, really, but they do

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>provide the operating system that gets used in a lot

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of consumer products, so you would say, well, this is

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>still kind of a consumer issue that that's probably why

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the publicity is so big. But these sort of things

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have been going on in behind the scenes for for decades.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just that now it's really coming to a head

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>as companies fight over each other to try and and

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>buy up other companies just not just too, but primarily

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to get hold of the patent portfolio that that company

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>might have. And the reason to get patent port portfolios

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>there they're too. Two main reasons that a a company

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a practicing entity might want to get hold of

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a patent portfolio. The main one is defense, which is

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>you get as many patents as you can so that

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>if another company comes after you claiming that you're infringing

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>upon their intellectual property, you can return fire and say, well,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the intellectual property we own and you are

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:07.239
<v Speaker 1>in turn infringing upon that. And hopefully what happens as

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a result of this is the two companies, through arbitration

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and probably litigation, come to an agreement where both sides say,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm totally stealing ideas A through G and

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you're totally stealing ideas H through our and we will

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>exchange this amount of money and then say we're all cool. Truce. Right.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you if now, if you have one major

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>company that doesn't hold a lot of patents and another

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>company that does hold patents, then the what's going to

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>happen is you just the company that holds a lot

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of patents, it's going to sue the other major company

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for money, and you don't. If you don't have your

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>own large patent portfolio to fall back on. As a

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a mutually assured destruction kind of approach, you

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you get run over. You know, you you essentially unless

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the the courts decide otherwise, who essentially have to cough

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>up money and you may or may not have to

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>even discontinue the production of certain products. Yep. And so

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of why we see these big companies scooping

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>up uh, smaller companies in order to get patents. Sometimes

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's for protection. Sometimes it's with an eye to go

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>after a competitor and perhaps put that competitor in a

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a bad position. It's it's almost anti competitive when you

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>get down to it. And as a result, you have

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people saying, well, this is really stifling

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>innovation because by going after another company and saying that

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't make any of this because this part of

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it infringes upon our patents. Uh, you you're taking away

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>things that are actually valuable in the marketplace. And it

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>may very well be true that let's say that we

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have an operating system, that's a good one to go with. Okay,

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get into the software patents anyway. So

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you have an operating system where one aspect of that

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>operating system appears to infringe upon a patent. Well, depending

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>on how the lawsuit is worded and the decision of

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the courts, that operating system might end up having to

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be completely scrapped or rewritten or taken off the market,

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>which means you lose everything. You don't just lose that

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>one element that was infringing upon the patent, you lose

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>all the other elements of that operating system. So you're

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>losing out on innovation. This is why we're getting a

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of criticism directed at these patent wars. And another

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>related element is that there are companies that some people

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>refer to as patent trolls, which is a it's a

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>complicated that's a complicated term as well, because it means

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>more than one thing. Yeah, and I think of that

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I um, and this is again just one concept of UM.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>When I think of a patentrol, I think of a

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>company that has purchased patents from someone else. Basically, they

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had some money up front, they bought patent rights. They

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything, but why since patents and they are

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>basically hoping somebody will infringe upon them so that they

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>can sue the living daylights out of them and make

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>money that way. But they don't. It's it's not like

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>where they are making in an iPhone and they are

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>doing that and somebody else infringes on the patent. This

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.479
<v Speaker 1>is somebody in my head. The classical patentrol is literally

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>just waiting for somebody to infringe on their patents so

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they can take a shot at them. Right. That's that's

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>usually called a nonpracticing entity, and that means that this

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is a company, uh that does not have any intent

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on acting upon a patent other than to sue the

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>pants off anyone who infringes on it. So they have

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>no plans on actually making anything, just the plan on

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on suing someone who tries to make something similar to it.

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And they may not even have plans to license that

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>idea out because they could potentially make more money through

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>suing a company than they could through licen and sing

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the patent the patented invention. This is why there's an

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing article called the Broken Patent System. How we got

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>here and how to fix It? By niel I Patel,

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>formerly of Engadget Now of this is my next I

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend you read this article. It is a long article,

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's very comprehensive and Kneeli makes a great

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>case for He actually says, you know, the patent system

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>isn't broken. We're the ones who just kind of are

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>broken because we're not using it the way it was

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>designed to be used. People are gaming the system, and

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that uh that really, you know, you have to ask

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the right questions and see how things are being used

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in order to understand why we are where we're at.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Kneeli suggests that perhaps one thing we could look at

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>is maybe we do breakout software patents so they're a

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>little different from the traditional patents in that software patents

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>might last uh there there time span might be shorter

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for a software patent, like you couldn't sit on it

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>as long as you would a patent for and and

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a physical invention. And because the nature of software changes

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so rapidly that by the time a patent expires, and

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that idea becomes essentially free for anyone to use, uh

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to implement in their own inventions. Once you reach that

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>point while software has evolved so far that it's almost

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>obsolete anyway. So that's one thing that Kneeli suggests, But

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he also suggests looking at a way so that people

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who use patents to sue other companies can only get

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>a limited amount of money and damages, you know, So

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>putting limits on how much money you can get through

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>suing someone for a patent, and that, in Nili's argument,

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>would mean that companies would have more of an incentive

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to license that invention than they would to sit on

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the patents and just sue people. And that's what we want.

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>We want people to be able to license things. You know.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to get rid of patents because it

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>does protect people, um so that they can profit from

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>their work. What we do want to do is make

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sure that we create incentives so that people will license

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>those ideas, so that we actually get to see them

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>and put into place and we get to benefit from

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>those ideas instead of using those ideas just as a

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.239
<v Speaker 1>weapon to beat other companies over the head. Because then

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if even if the idea is brilliant, no one gets

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from it, because no one can make anything

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that incorporates that idea. So I think neelis really nailed it.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was a it's a great article. And

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>uh he also brings up something else that's really interesting. Um,

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm dropping this on Chris without him knowing, so uh,

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I apologize ahead of time. But do you are you

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>aware of of Jefferson's past with the patent Office? Yes? Oh, okay, excellent, excellent,

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So we can have a conversation about this as well.

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>You may not be aware, all right. Thomas Jefferson had

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>some pretty strong ideas about patents. The patent system predates

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the founding of the United States. There was a patent

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>system in place in the UK, right right, Well, it's

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like I guess I should say, right well, that there's

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>some protection written into the Constitution. And of course Jefferson

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>himself was an inventor, so he, you know, sort of

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>sympathizes with with people who are creating things. So here's

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>something that Jefferson said about the idea of patents. If

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>others of exclusive property, it is the action of the

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>possess as long as he keeps it to himself, but

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossit s himself

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of it. It's peculiar character, too, is that no one

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>possesses the less because every other possesses the whole of it.

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>He who receives an idea from me receives instruction himself

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>without lessening mind, as he who lights his taper and

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>mind receives light without darkening me. So what he's saying

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is that if you keep an idea to yourself, that's

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the only way to really protect it, because once you

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>tell your idea to someone else, it's out there in

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the open. Jefferson was essentially saying information wants to be free,

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>which is what we argued today too, that information wants

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.959
<v Speaker 1>to be free, and that it wants to be available,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily free of charge. So Jefferson's idea about patents

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was that they might stifle innovation, that it would keep

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>people from actually putting to use these devices. However, he

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>became the Secretary of State and was therefore part of

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a a three man board that created the First Patent Act,

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and he eventually it came round to the idea that

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>patents are actually very helpful. Now, in Jefferson's Patent Act,

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>he had, uh, he had set up some of the

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>criteria that we use today and some of it we

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>don't use to the extent that Jefferson saw. So he

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.239
<v Speaker 1>he had said that the invention must prove to be useful. Uh,

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't. You wouldn't grant a patent to someone who

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>had just come up with another use for something that

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>already existed. So let's say I invent a tool that

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>allows me to I don't know, climb mountains faster and safer.

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And then Chris takes that tool and he realizes, hey,

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this tool is great as a penguin pacifier, and so

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he's using it in a totally different way than I was. Well,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>by Jefferson's measurement, his penguin pacification system would not would

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not uh be legitimate for a patent because it was

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>just a different application of something that I had already made. Uh,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not exactly the way it's done. Now. That was

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the ideas that kind of got shifted around

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And then it would you also would

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not give an invention a patent if the invention was

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>just a different version of something that came before but

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was made with different materials. So if I made my

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>mountain climbing apparatus out of um would And then Chris

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>decided to make his own mountain climbing apparas that's identical

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to mine, except it's made out of metal. That would

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>not receive a patent either under Jefferson's rules, because again

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing, it's just made out of different stuff.

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't like the idea of frivolous patents anything

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the obvious or something that couldn't really be used.

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>He didn't like any of that, so he made provisions

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to protect the Patent office from issuing patents for stuff

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that just was not useful. And uh, he ended up

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>his ideas were implemented for a while, but they were

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>revised in the eighteen hundreds, so and the revisions from

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundreds or pretty much what we use now.

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh, that's also part of why it's complicated when

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you talk about software, because of course, back in the

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:10.479
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred, software was pretty limited. I think Candy might

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have had something in um no. So yeah, you didn't

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have software back then, So trying to apply software the

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>ideas of behind software to the patent office and the

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>actual patent system is a little tricky. We've made some

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tweaks here and there, but it's still not a perfect fit.

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And part of that is that there's an argument about

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>software should not be eligible for patents because it's essentially math,

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and math is something that's not patentable. So if you

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>were to try and patent software, you can't use the

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>word algorithm because algorithms are not patentable. Yeah, so you

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have to actually dance around that. You can't, you know,

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>instead of calling it, uh uh an algorithm, you'd call

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it something else, like a system, you know, a system,

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and method is what you would call it as opposed

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to an algorithm. Uh. And that's where it really does

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>get tricky because arguably you'd say, well, if it's basically

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>just math, then how do you call it non obvious?

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, you just manipulate the math until it

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>does what you needed to do. Of Course, other people

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>could argue, well, any invention if you if you were

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a software application and create a physical object

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that does that same process, whatever that process might be

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>then you would argue that that invention could be patentable,

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that physical thing you could get a patent for that,

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>why can't you get a patent for the digital version

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of that idea? And so these are questions that still

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>get brought up in legal cases all the time. It's

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>generally accepted that software, if presented properly, is patentable UM.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 1>But that's also where we're starting to see these issues

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 1>come between these major companies where there's so many software

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>patents that have been issued that you know, that's why

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing like a company A, Sho's company B, Company

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>B counter SEUs company A, and then they come to

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an agreement. It's a huge mess, and you know, it

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>may be that we eventually catch up and and and

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>fix some of these problems. Part of the issue also

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is that software patents are really complex things, and it's

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine what it's like being a person working

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>in the patent office and having to review software patents um.

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And some some would argue that software patents are just

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a technology that's more sophisticated than the general

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>level of sophistication of the patent office, and that the

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>patent office will constantly be trying to play catch up

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and never catch up to actually the the state of

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the art for software because technological innovation is happening so rapidly.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So there are definitely some some some big barriers that

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to get over in order to

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>really address patent wars and make it a system that

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>uh that doesn't harm innovation, it doesn't hurt the end consumer. Um.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're we're kind of looking at the those possibilities.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing some of that today, but it's going to

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>take some years before we The government does not move quickly. No,

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and these these issues are to some degree pretty complex

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 1>surely the concepts behind them, So you can't just throw

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>it out the door. I mean if you did, then

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>no one's ideas would be protected. And why would anyone

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.919
<v Speaker 1>bother to try and innovate if they knew that immediately

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they that they're hard work would be uh co opted

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>by someone else and they wouldn't see it, dine. So

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to have that patent system in place because

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you want you want people to come up with ideas.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at you, would it yep? Oh? I ought

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to let me tell you, I AcBe has tons of patents,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 1>especially for roadrunner captures uh materials, although they're not proven

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to be useful, so it's kind of questionable why they

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>got the pats in the first place, not for use

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.439
<v Speaker 1>by coyotes. There you go, Well, do you have anything

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>else to add before we wrap up? All right? So

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that concludes our episode on the patent wars. I hope

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys enjoyed it. That was an interesting conversation. If

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys have any topics you would like us to tackle,

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you can let us know on Facebook or Twitter or

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>handle at both of those is text stuff h s W.

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Or you can send us an email and that address

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is text stuff at how Stuff Works dot com and

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I will talk to you again really soon.

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to check out our new video podcast, Stuff

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>from the Future. Join how Stuff Work staff as we

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>explore the most promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow. The

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 1>House Stuff Works iPhone app has arrived. Download it today

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, brought to you by the reinvented two thousand

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve Camray. It's ready, are you