1 00:00:05,600 --> 00:00:09,879 Speaker 1: This is Straight Fire with Jason McIntire. 2 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 2: What is up Fire, Praam HiT's me Jason McIntyre Straight 3 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:24,439 Speaker 2: Foyer for Thursday, January the eighth A football Orgy begins tonight. 4 00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:27,479 Speaker 3: Oh. I'm so fired up Miami Ole Miss and the 5 00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:31,320 Speaker 3: college football Playoff. It's being called the Fiesta Bowl. It 6 00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:33,680 Speaker 3: doesn't really matter what it's called. The games in Arizona. 7 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:38,120 Speaker 3: It's gonna be a banger, hopefully, and it thus kicks 8 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:42,640 Speaker 3: off a just a rock Us Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, 9 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 3: Monday of high level playoff games across college football and 10 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:51,320 Speaker 3: the NFL. Very stroked for that. I'm pumped up about 11 00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:55,640 Speaker 3: our guest clev Ta. You guys who have listened and 12 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:58,080 Speaker 3: followed for the longest time have remember him from my 13 00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:00,680 Speaker 3: radio show. He was a guy on the internet. I 14 00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:02,920 Speaker 3: was like, Hey Jack, what about this, this and this? 15 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:04,880 Speaker 3: And I was like, whoa, who are you? What is that? 16 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 3: And we started talking. He came on my radio show. 17 00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:09,560 Speaker 3: Now he goes on a bunch of podcasts, comes on 18 00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 3: this one and we break down the best bets. Fortunately, 19 00:01:13,240 --> 00:01:16,360 Speaker 3: his best bet is similar to one that I absolutely love. 20 00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:18,880 Speaker 3: We'll get into that, but first we got to start. 21 00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:21,640 Speaker 3: Holy cow, I did not see this coming. 22 00:01:21,880 --> 00:01:22,360 Speaker 4: Just kidding. 23 00:01:22,480 --> 00:01:25,880 Speaker 3: Trey Young has been sent away from Atlanta. He was 24 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:31,000 Speaker 3: shipped to Washington last night. It's so weird because you 25 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 3: hear Trey Young and you're like, Oh, that dude's a star, 26 00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 3: a leader of the Hawks, young guy, four time All Star, 27 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 3: very popular. Oh, who'd he get traded for? What was 28 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:46,120 Speaker 3: the deal? Trey Young is heading to the Washington Wizards, 29 00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:52,880 Speaker 3: essentially in a salary dump for CJ. McCollum and Corey Kispert. Now, 30 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:56,760 Speaker 3: this is the new NBA where the aprons are punitive, 31 00:01:57,040 --> 00:02:01,240 Speaker 3: and if you are making forty fifty million dollars a 32 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:06,600 Speaker 3: year and not bringing much to the table, then you're 33 00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:08,040 Speaker 3: not gonna be getting one of those extensions. 34 00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:08,320 Speaker 4: I mean. 35 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:09,840 Speaker 3: And when I say not much to the table, I 36 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 3: mean you've got to like outperform your contract to get 37 00:02:12,840 --> 00:02:15,000 Speaker 3: one of those. And it's gonna be tough for guys 38 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 3: like Jalen Brown, who are gonna be making like seventy 39 00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:20,959 Speaker 3: million dollars in a few years. I mean, Trey Young, 40 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:23,720 Speaker 3: it's gonna be tough to build a roster around him 41 00:02:23,720 --> 00:02:27,360 Speaker 3: making forty eight million dollars a year. So I don't know, 42 00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:30,720 Speaker 3: and I don't think anybody does. Where do the salaries 43 00:02:30,760 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 3: go from here? So Trey Young obviously will take a haircut. 44 00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 3: But is he now a thirty million dollar guy? Is 45 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:44,160 Speaker 3: he a twenty? Is he fifteen? If Trey Young is 46 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:49,120 Speaker 3: your third best player, are you a title contender? And 47 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:52,799 Speaker 3: the problem is the league is so stacked with point guards. 48 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 3: It's one of the deepest positions in the league. That unfortunately, 49 00:02:57,160 --> 00:02:59,160 Speaker 3: as much as I like Trey Young and his offensive 50 00:02:59,200 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 3: mindedness and he's, you know, one of the leading assist 51 00:03:01,919 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 3: guys in the league, folks, if you just look at 52 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:09,840 Speaker 3: the point guards, I don't know that Trey Young is 53 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:13,120 Speaker 3: one of the best ten point guards in the NBA. 54 00:03:13,919 --> 00:03:17,360 Speaker 3: I don't know that. So we can go Kate Cunningham 55 00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:21,720 Speaker 3: is obviously very good. I mean, hell, Josh Giddy, who's 56 00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:24,920 Speaker 3: not much of a shooter and doesn't defend great, is 57 00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:29,679 Speaker 3: having like a career year. And Josh Giddy, you could 58 00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:33,440 Speaker 3: argue that he belongs in the top ten above Trey Young. Now, 59 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:37,720 Speaker 3: now that might be a stretch to some people, but again, 60 00:03:37,760 --> 00:03:39,320 Speaker 3: it depends on the metric you want to use. So 61 00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:46,920 Speaker 3: I'll just humor you guys and go with per PR rating, 62 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 3: so they will occasionally let you break it down by 63 00:03:51,640 --> 00:03:54,680 Speaker 3: point guards. But like Sga is considered a point guard, 64 00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:57,440 Speaker 3: he's obviously better. If Luca is a point guard, we 65 00:03:57,520 --> 00:04:00,720 Speaker 3: know he's better. I don't know that Donovan Mitchell is 66 00:04:00,760 --> 00:04:04,119 Speaker 3: technically a point guard. You know he's better. Tyrese Max 67 00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:07,320 Speaker 3: he's a point guard. He's way better and has a 68 00:04:07,360 --> 00:04:11,200 Speaker 3: much higher per than Trey Young as Austin reeves. No, well, 69 00:04:11,240 --> 00:04:13,240 Speaker 3: he can't be the point guard, right if Luca is 70 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:16,479 Speaker 3: Steph Curry. I mean you've got to go a long 71 00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:19,920 Speaker 3: way down the list to find I mean TJ McConnell 72 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:23,600 Speaker 3: has a player efficiency rating. He's thirtieth in the league. 73 00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 3: I'm looking, I still don't see Trey Young. I mean, 74 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:30,240 Speaker 3: here we are Denny Avdia, who everybody loves in Portland. 75 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:34,839 Speaker 3: He's forty one. So of the front page is fifty 76 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:37,839 Speaker 3: people deep. Trey Young's not even on the front page. 77 00:04:38,400 --> 00:04:40,920 Speaker 3: He lands at fifty seven now. He has only played 78 00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:44,120 Speaker 3: ten games. To be fair, he has a player efficiency 79 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:48,840 Speaker 3: rating of nineteen point seventy two. That is narrowly ahead 80 00:04:48,839 --> 00:04:52,039 Speaker 3: of Darren Fox, which is interesting because Fox is thriving 81 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 3: in San Antonio and the perception of Young is well, 82 00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:58,359 Speaker 3: he doesn't defend it all, and when he's on the court, 83 00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:02,280 Speaker 3: you know he's a big time target. So, by the way, 84 00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:05,240 Speaker 3: Josh Giddy, who I hyped up in Chicago, sixty two 85 00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:08,719 Speaker 3: in player efficiency rating. He can't really shoot does? He 86 00:05:08,760 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 3: does everything good but nothing exceptional. I don't know. I 87 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:14,520 Speaker 3: like Trey Young. I just I don't know what becomes 88 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:16,279 Speaker 3: of him. Now. If you look at the Washington roster, 89 00:05:16,480 --> 00:05:18,600 Speaker 3: and you know, I'm assuming you guys aren't looking at 90 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:22,080 Speaker 3: the Washington roster, this is their depth chart. Okay, Trey 91 00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:26,120 Speaker 3: Young up point guard, Keishawn George at the shooting guard, 92 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:30,240 Speaker 3: he's twenty two. Billal Kulababi kulabally is your small forward, 93 00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 3: he's twenty one. They they have Chris Middleton at powerful. 94 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:36,040 Speaker 3: We'll just put Trey Johnson there, the rookie out of Texas, 95 00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:38,080 Speaker 3: who I like a lot. He's only nineteen and Alex 96 00:05:38,200 --> 00:05:42,680 Speaker 3: sar is twenty. Essentially, they've got a young core in 97 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:46,920 Speaker 3: nucleus and the move for Trey Young is to kind 98 00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:51,640 Speaker 3: of go there, be a veteran, humble yourself, say hey, 99 00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:55,000 Speaker 3: I'm gonna make us better. I'm gonna carry this team. 100 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:56,919 Speaker 3: And I'm going to be a veteran presence in the 101 00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:00,600 Speaker 3: locker room and he does those things and Washington. You know, 102 00:06:00,680 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 3: currently they're ten and twenty six, and I know it 103 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 3: sounds like the seasons over. Guys, they're in the East. Okay, 104 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:09,479 Speaker 3: they're only seven and a half games out of the 105 00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 3: play in. Is it possible for Trey Young to get 106 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:14,880 Speaker 3: them to the plane you've got over? You probably got 107 00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:19,280 Speaker 3: forty five games left. Maybe forty five to forty eight 108 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 3: games left. Seems unlikely. But it's not all about this year. 109 00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:25,800 Speaker 3: Trey Young, by the way, is dinged up with a 110 00:06:25,880 --> 00:06:28,760 Speaker 3: quad or a hamstring, depending on who you believe. If 111 00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:33,160 Speaker 3: he could just clean it up, show everybody, hey, I'm here, 112 00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:35,919 Speaker 3: I'm here, guys, I'm gonna show out, and then next 113 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:37,920 Speaker 3: year the Wizard's perform in. I don't know, let's just 114 00:06:38,040 --> 00:06:42,200 Speaker 3: best case scenario in the East. They finish sixth, seventh, 115 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:45,240 Speaker 3: six seventh, somewhere around there. You're telling me that Trey 116 00:06:45,279 --> 00:06:46,840 Speaker 3: Young all of a sudden doesn't have value. Will look 117 00:06:46,880 --> 00:06:51,160 Speaker 3: what he can be like around young good players and 118 00:06:51,200 --> 00:06:53,120 Speaker 3: you prove your worth and I think it could be done. 119 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,320 Speaker 3: So I mean, I'm not totally selling all my Trey 120 00:06:55,360 --> 00:06:58,800 Speaker 3: young Stock. But yeah, it's definitely hurt a little bit 121 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:04,240 Speaker 3: in just a tad simply because he's been awful when 122 00:07:04,279 --> 00:07:05,720 Speaker 3: he's been on the court for the Hawks. All Right, 123 00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:08,880 Speaker 3: without further ado, let's get to our guest, the venerable 124 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:10,040 Speaker 3: clef Ta. 125 00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:14,080 Speaker 1: Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in 126 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 1: the nation. Catch all of our shows at foxsports Radio 127 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:21,720 Speaker 1: dot com and within the iHeartRadio app search FSR to 128 00:07:21,840 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 1: listen live. You know a guy, Jason likes to think 129 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:29,720 Speaker 1: he knows everything when it comes to sports. 130 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:32,120 Speaker 4: I know what sports dance wants. 131 00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:34,960 Speaker 1: But for everything he doesn't, he knows a guy who does. 132 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:38,160 Speaker 4: Let's just say I know a guy who knows the 133 00:07:38,200 --> 00:07:40,160 Speaker 4: guy who knows another guy. 134 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:43,040 Speaker 3: All right, let's welcome back to straight fire. You know 135 00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:45,960 Speaker 3: him by now. It's been closed to a decade talking 136 00:07:46,080 --> 00:07:49,800 Speaker 3: NFL chopping up lines. It's Wildcard weekend. I don't think 137 00:07:49,800 --> 00:07:52,840 Speaker 3: they're calling it Super Wildcard weekend anymore, but we're bringing 138 00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 3: in our super guest Ta clev Analytics. How you doing, 139 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:56,920 Speaker 3: my man? 140 00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:00,200 Speaker 4: Good, Jason, I can't believe we're in a playoff time. Uh, 141 00:08:01,080 --> 00:08:03,360 Speaker 4: it's one of those where it just goes by so quick, 142 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 4: and I'm gonna miss the regular season and watching red 143 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 4: Zone and ten games at the same time. But playoffs 144 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 4: should be interesting this year. 145 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 1: Yeah. 146 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 3: Dirty little secret is these Island games, they're hit and miss. 147 00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:17,800 Speaker 3: You know, a lot of commercials. Red Zone is just 148 00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:19,800 Speaker 3: so sweet. But we got we got I think a 149 00:08:19,840 --> 00:08:22,120 Speaker 3: few good games this weekend, so there is some lide 150 00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:26,560 Speaker 3: moooment we record this Wednesday afternoon. Tay, I don't know, 151 00:08:26,600 --> 00:08:28,320 Speaker 3: is there a game on the board that that just 152 00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 3: jumps out at you that you're chomping at the bit 153 00:08:31,200 --> 00:08:32,880 Speaker 3: to talk about like that you already bet? 154 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:36,400 Speaker 4: So I bet two. I bet one side and one 155 00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:39,679 Speaker 4: total and I might actually have a side soon. But 156 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 4: my first bet that a kind of matches just my 157 00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:48,360 Speaker 4: initial thought. It was higher than I expected, just based 158 00:08:48,400 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 4: on my head. And then when I actually plugged in 159 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:54,679 Speaker 4: numbers of my model and everything, it plugged it. You know, 160 00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:56,760 Speaker 4: it was a game that I liked as well. And 161 00:08:56,800 --> 00:09:00,400 Speaker 4: that's the Chargers getting three and a half. Yeah. So, 162 00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:02,400 Speaker 4: and it's funny because I've seen a lot of people 163 00:09:02,400 --> 00:09:04,599 Speaker 4: take New England, which you know, I'm surprised. 164 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:09,240 Speaker 3: I mean, sharp people are just randos both both really no, wait, 165 00:09:09,280 --> 00:09:11,800 Speaker 3: this was it four. I got four minus one twelve, 166 00:09:12,480 --> 00:09:15,120 Speaker 3: okay early in the week. So so you think this 167 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 3: could go up to four or you think I'll stay 168 00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:17,839 Speaker 3: at three and a half. I don't. 169 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:19,760 Speaker 4: I think it's it's been bouncing around three and a half. 170 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 4: There have been some fours and it's been pushing back. 171 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 4: So here here's my case. Like, for one, the Chargers 172 00:09:26,840 --> 00:09:29,560 Speaker 4: are we know who they are, right Like, their offensive 173 00:09:29,600 --> 00:09:34,280 Speaker 4: line is terrible. They are very sensitive to a good 174 00:09:34,280 --> 00:09:36,280 Speaker 4: pass rush, as we saw with the Texans a couple 175 00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:39,720 Speaker 4: of weeks ago. But that's not who New England is 176 00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:42,680 Speaker 4: on defense. They do not have a really good pass rush. 177 00:09:43,120 --> 00:09:45,680 Speaker 4: They don't have a you know, who are their edg 178 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:47,640 Speaker 4: rushers that you're afraid of? You don't really, you know, 179 00:09:47,840 --> 00:09:50,800 Speaker 4: Harold Landry, like, it's not it's not really a pass 180 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 4: rush I'm afraid of. And then you look at the 181 00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:56,480 Speaker 4: schedule they've played. I dare anybody out there to just 182 00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:59,719 Speaker 4: pull up the quarterbacks that they have faces here, you 183 00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:03,400 Speaker 4: would be you would be amazed at just how poor 184 00:10:03,400 --> 00:10:05,000 Speaker 4: it is. And I tweeted about this a couple of 185 00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:07,160 Speaker 4: days ago. I put what I did because I was 186 00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:08,880 Speaker 4: running my numbers here and I was like, I couldn't 187 00:10:08,920 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 4: believe just how poor the quarterback play has been against 188 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:17,240 Speaker 4: New England. It's literally Josh Allen two times and then 189 00:10:17,559 --> 00:10:21,280 Speaker 4: nobody else, Like they faced Lamar, but Lamar only had 190 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 4: twelve dropbacks before he got hurt on that Sunday night. 191 00:10:24,920 --> 00:10:27,720 Speaker 4: Right by the way, they built up a lead that 192 00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:30,240 Speaker 4: New England had to come back from. Outside of that, 193 00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:34,520 Speaker 4: it's been I mean, Baker Mayfield maybe is the next 194 00:10:34,559 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 4: best guy, and even he was playing so poorly towards 195 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:39,640 Speaker 4: the end, I mean, he's not a top half of 196 00:10:39,679 --> 00:10:42,240 Speaker 4: the NFL quarterback towards the end of the year. Like 197 00:10:42,400 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 4: there it was, it was six. I think I went 198 00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:48,240 Speaker 4: and looked up how what percentage of snaps every defense 199 00:10:48,280 --> 00:10:51,920 Speaker 4: faced this year versus a quarterback who was either a backup, 200 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:54,000 Speaker 4: you know, like they faced coenty ors for example in 201 00:10:54,040 --> 00:10:57,320 Speaker 4: Week eighteen, right a backup like that, or it was 202 00:10:57,400 --> 00:11:00,800 Speaker 4: ranked thirtieth or worse by EPA. They led the league 203 00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:03,960 Speaker 4: by a mile. Nearly seventy percent of their snaps have 204 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:07,480 Speaker 4: come this season against those two qualifiers, either a backup 205 00:11:07,559 --> 00:11:10,840 Speaker 4: quarterback or a quarterback who's ranked thirtieth or worse. So 206 00:11:11,320 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 4: they face nobody and so like to me, this is 207 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:18,600 Speaker 4: a big step up. You know, Josh Allen got them twice. 208 00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:20,480 Speaker 4: He had a huge game in the second game. Like, 209 00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:22,480 Speaker 4: they have not faced many good quarterbacks, so I think 210 00:11:22,520 --> 00:11:24,360 Speaker 4: from that perspective and the fact that they don't put 211 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:26,680 Speaker 4: a ton of pressure on the quarterback, I'm not afraid. 212 00:11:26,760 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 4: If I'm a Chargers fan, go look at one thing. 213 00:11:29,240 --> 00:11:30,720 Speaker 4: I do track on my site too, because I do 214 00:11:30,800 --> 00:11:35,520 Speaker 4: some DFS and some some fantasy analysis. I look at 215 00:11:35,960 --> 00:11:42,440 Speaker 4: what from a schedule perspective by position, like what is 216 00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:45,960 Speaker 4: the ranking of the schedule for each position. And they've 217 00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:49,239 Speaker 4: also faced the easiest set of receivers by fantasy perspective, 218 00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:52,160 Speaker 4: but they've only faced I think they faced fourteen wide 219 00:11:52,160 --> 00:11:54,920 Speaker 4: receivers the entire season who average at least forty yards 220 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:57,679 Speaker 4: per game, which is not a big number, and ten 221 00:11:57,720 --> 00:11:59,719 Speaker 4: of them went over their seasonal average. It's one of 222 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:02,000 Speaker 4: the high race in the league. So they have not 223 00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:04,480 Speaker 4: faced a deep wide receiver group. They have not faced 224 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:06,920 Speaker 4: many good quarterbacks at all, so this is a big 225 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:08,679 Speaker 4: step up. So I think some of their defensive numbers 226 00:12:08,679 --> 00:12:10,959 Speaker 4: are very much skewed. I think Justin Herbert's gonna have 227 00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:14,160 Speaker 4: a really good game here. You know, the rush defense 228 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:17,120 Speaker 4: for New England has you know, declined of late, but 229 00:12:17,160 --> 00:12:19,400 Speaker 4: it doesn't really matter against a Chargers team likes to 230 00:12:19,400 --> 00:12:21,520 Speaker 4: throw the ball. I'm not afraid about the cold weather. 231 00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:23,480 Speaker 4: You can say, oh, an LA team going to cold weather, 232 00:12:23,559 --> 00:12:27,079 Speaker 4: but that I mean, this harball team is not. I mean, 233 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:28,680 Speaker 4: this is a tough team. This is a team that 234 00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:31,680 Speaker 4: I'm okay with. This isn't a the Lions, This isn't 235 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:34,000 Speaker 4: a dome team that I don't want to you know, 236 00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:36,600 Speaker 4: I'd be worried about outdoors if it's chilly, So that 237 00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:38,439 Speaker 4: from that perspective, I'm okay. Like the other side of 238 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:40,520 Speaker 4: the ball, Drake May has been awesome. I would vote 239 00:12:40,559 --> 00:12:44,120 Speaker 4: him MVP, but he also has faced a very late schedule. 240 00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:46,320 Speaker 4: And one thing that he does really well more than 241 00:12:46,320 --> 00:12:48,120 Speaker 4: anybody else in the league is he's been able to 242 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:50,880 Speaker 4: create explosive plays down the field most in the NFL. 243 00:12:51,720 --> 00:12:55,200 Speaker 4: Chargers are fourth best at limiting explosive plays. They have 244 00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:59,120 Speaker 4: only Drake May has only faced one defense one the 245 00:12:59,280 --> 00:13:02,320 Speaker 4: entire season. Who is top ten in terms of limiting 246 00:13:02,360 --> 00:13:05,240 Speaker 4: explosive plays and who is that? The Raiders. If you 247 00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:09,200 Speaker 4: could believe that, oh, Raiders are like six that game. 248 00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:11,600 Speaker 4: Who lost to the Raiders at the opener? Who only 249 00:13:11,600 --> 00:13:14,320 Speaker 4: scored thirteen points against the Raiders with Drake May and 250 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:15,520 Speaker 4: the Patriots. 251 00:13:15,040 --> 00:13:17,360 Speaker 3: That's crazy. Do you think that's because the Raiders have 252 00:13:17,480 --> 00:13:19,600 Speaker 3: always just they lose every game and teams are just 253 00:13:19,679 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 3: running the football? Well, like that doesn't make any sense, 254 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:22,079 Speaker 3: isn't no? 255 00:13:22,320 --> 00:13:25,280 Speaker 4: Because this is efficiency. So this is percentage of play. 256 00:13:25,360 --> 00:13:27,679 Speaker 4: So even if you don't throw a lot, it's percentage 257 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:30,840 Speaker 4: of passes. Patrick Grant, by the way, who's who should 258 00:13:30,880 --> 00:13:33,839 Speaker 4: be a good defensive coordinator name by the way, he's 259 00:13:34,120 --> 00:13:37,640 Speaker 4: a good defensive cordat very underrated. Pete Carroll inherited him. 260 00:13:37,679 --> 00:13:40,120 Speaker 4: He stayed on because he was so well thought of. 261 00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:43,320 Speaker 4: I mean, he's done actually a pretty good job from 262 00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:46,120 Speaker 4: a defensive standpoint compared to the talent there. What he 263 00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:47,960 Speaker 4: does is he keeps everything in front. And that's what 264 00:13:48,040 --> 00:13:51,000 Speaker 4: Jesse Minter does. You know, the Charger secondary isn't loaded 265 00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:53,320 Speaker 4: with talent, but they keep everything in front. They play 266 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:56,160 Speaker 4: a shell defense, and that's what you know. Drake May 267 00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:58,679 Speaker 4: is gonna have to, you know, defeat and he's good 268 00:13:58,720 --> 00:14:00,719 Speaker 4: enough quarterback to do that. But I think limiting the 269 00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:04,280 Speaker 4: explosive plays really reduces some of the offensive output and 270 00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:07,360 Speaker 4: some of the kind of the superman capabilities of this 271 00:14:07,640 --> 00:14:09,920 Speaker 4: Patriots team. So kind of all in, I think I've 272 00:14:09,960 --> 00:14:12,120 Speaker 4: got the I think I've got the better overall coach, 273 00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:14,199 Speaker 4: to be honest and coaching staff. You know, it's good. 274 00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:16,200 Speaker 4: I mean, vraybel is good. But I do like Harball, 275 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:19,720 Speaker 4: I like Jesse Minter, you know, step up in class 276 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 4: at quarterback for you know, this Patriots defense. I don't 277 00:14:22,920 --> 00:14:26,760 Speaker 4: think there's that much difference from a you know, rating standpoint, 278 00:14:26,840 --> 00:14:29,000 Speaker 4: I mean a minor difference. I don't think it should 279 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,480 Speaker 4: be north of three personally, and I think that's Oh. 280 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:33,760 Speaker 4: One thing I didn't mention, and something that you've probably 281 00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:37,040 Speaker 4: heard you will hear a lot is quarterbacks playing their 282 00:14:37,040 --> 00:14:42,000 Speaker 4: first playoffs. Oh yeah, yep, every playoffs. Now, look, this 283 00:14:42,360 --> 00:14:46,120 Speaker 4: is not like this is not a you know, ironclad 284 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:49,400 Speaker 4: you know, every quarterback struggles, but it is a thing 285 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 4: like it's not something too you know, in my opinion, 286 00:14:52,840 --> 00:14:55,920 Speaker 4: to ignore when you find a quarterback like Drake Mayo's, 287 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:58,720 Speaker 4: you know, playing his first playoffs start versus a quarterback 288 00:14:58,800 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 4: like Herbert who is not you know, he's been in 289 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:06,280 Speaker 4: the playoffs before multiple times and that team is favored. 290 00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:09,120 Speaker 4: It's very rare in the wildcard round only it's only 291 00:15:09,160 --> 00:15:13,720 Speaker 4: happened thirteen times since two thousand. That team is one 292 00:15:13,760 --> 00:15:17,960 Speaker 4: in twelve against the Swallow, been eleven straight up as 293 00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:21,920 Speaker 4: a favorite to eleven straight up. Like, these are horrible numbers. Like, 294 00:15:22,080 --> 00:15:23,880 Speaker 4: I just think that you're getting over a field goal 295 00:15:25,080 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 4: with a first time quarterback with a team that hasn't 296 00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:30,800 Speaker 4: been tested much at all, especially a defense that hasn't 297 00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:33,560 Speaker 4: been tested. Chargers don't have to face a tough pass 298 00:15:33,640 --> 00:15:36,200 Speaker 4: rush with that O line. I think this is a 299 00:15:36,200 --> 00:15:40,760 Speaker 4: clear Chargers under. 300 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:41,120 Speaker 3: As well for you there or no, No, I'm not. 301 00:15:41,080 --> 00:15:43,440 Speaker 4: Touching the total, but I think because I do think 302 00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:45,080 Speaker 4: the Chargers can move the ball, so I think they'll 303 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:47,360 Speaker 4: put up points. And I do think. I do think 304 00:15:47,400 --> 00:15:48,880 Speaker 4: Drake May will put up some points. It's not like 305 00:15:48,920 --> 00:15:52,320 Speaker 4: he's gonna get shut down. Yeah, I just like the Chargers. 306 00:15:52,440 --> 00:15:54,120 Speaker 4: I'm not messing with the total here, So. 307 00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:56,600 Speaker 3: I was looking at you know, it doesn't mean a 308 00:15:56,640 --> 00:15:58,760 Speaker 3: whole hell of a lot, but teams that faced other 309 00:15:58,800 --> 00:16:01,360 Speaker 3: playoff teams, and the Patriots faced the fewest there two 310 00:16:01,360 --> 00:16:04,840 Speaker 3: and two this season, but unbelievably, three of those matchups. 311 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:06,680 Speaker 3: Three of the four matchups came in the first five 312 00:16:06,680 --> 00:16:09,480 Speaker 3: weeks of the season, so essentially they're going here the 313 00:16:09,560 --> 00:16:10,680 Speaker 3: last and they. 314 00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:12,840 Speaker 4: Lost their they lost to Buffalo, they win and win 315 00:16:12,840 --> 00:16:14,400 Speaker 4: a Buffalo and Steelers. 316 00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:17,840 Speaker 3: Right, well, they beat Buffalo, they lost to the Steelers 317 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:20,960 Speaker 3: in they split with Yeah. 318 00:16:20,760 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 4: They speak, Yeah, they split with buffal I mean Carolina 319 00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:23,640 Speaker 4: does not even count. 320 00:16:24,680 --> 00:16:26,840 Speaker 3: I mean, especially in the first five weeks. So essentially 321 00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:29,080 Speaker 3: they've played one good team. I mean, you could toss 322 00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:30,440 Speaker 3: the Ravens in there if you want, in the last 323 00:16:30,480 --> 00:16:31,200 Speaker 3: thirteen weeks. 324 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:33,120 Speaker 4: And by the way, that Ravens game, they were down 325 00:16:33,160 --> 00:16:34,880 Speaker 4: with double digits in the fourth quarter and had to 326 00:16:34,920 --> 00:16:35,320 Speaker 4: come back. 327 00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:38,320 Speaker 3: That killed me in the contest. Anyways, I'm with you 328 00:16:38,360 --> 00:16:42,040 Speaker 3: on that, totally like it a lot. So that was 329 00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:45,120 Speaker 3: your number one game that you circled, I'm in agreement. 330 00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:48,840 Speaker 3: I'm wondering if you said there's a total that you like, 331 00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:51,560 Speaker 3: can I guess it's got to be Steelers Texans? Right? 332 00:16:52,040 --> 00:16:54,800 Speaker 4: No, no, no, no, that's kind of the obvious one. 333 00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:57,640 Speaker 4: I like the under in the highest total of the week, 334 00:16:57,640 --> 00:17:00,440 Speaker 4: and that is Jacksonville Buffalo. You can get fIF two's 335 00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:01,120 Speaker 4: out there. 336 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:02,240 Speaker 3: So. 337 00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 4: Yeah, that's a big number, and I'll go through it. 338 00:17:06,320 --> 00:17:09,240 Speaker 4: So the reason it's so high, Jacksonville's offense has been 339 00:17:09,240 --> 00:17:12,080 Speaker 4: really humming. Trevor Lawrence has been awesome of late. Once 340 00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:15,359 Speaker 4: they traded for Jacobe Myers, the offense clicked. They've been 341 00:17:15,400 --> 00:17:18,120 Speaker 4: throwing at a really high rate, like they've really up 342 00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:21,400 Speaker 4: their their pass rate over expectation. They haven't been able 343 00:17:21,400 --> 00:17:24,080 Speaker 4: to run the ball at all, amazingly against some bad 344 00:17:24,119 --> 00:17:27,000 Speaker 4: defenses of late, but they're they're throwing the ball all 345 00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:30,639 Speaker 4: over the yard and they're they're going fast, and so 346 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:32,800 Speaker 4: you know, I understand from that perspective. You know, that 347 00:17:32,840 --> 00:17:34,879 Speaker 4: makes Jags kind of a good over team. You know, 348 00:17:34,920 --> 00:17:38,240 Speaker 4: Buffalo obviously with Josh Allen and I'll poor run defense, 349 00:17:38,359 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 4: like okay, you know outdoors it's warm, great like this 350 00:17:41,600 --> 00:17:45,040 Speaker 4: is this this kind of profiles as a shootout. First 351 00:17:45,040 --> 00:17:46,919 Speaker 4: of all, that's a big number in this day and 352 00:17:46,960 --> 00:17:49,560 Speaker 4: age in the NFL. But you know, just from a 353 00:17:49,600 --> 00:17:52,200 Speaker 4: stylistic standpoint, when you dig into the numbers, I mean, yeah, 354 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:54,160 Speaker 4: Jacksonville's offense has been really good, and I've been throwing 355 00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:55,920 Speaker 4: the ball, But look who they've played in the last 356 00:17:55,960 --> 00:17:58,399 Speaker 4: month and a half. They played the Titans twice, they 357 00:17:58,480 --> 00:18:01,959 Speaker 4: played the Jets. You know, they played the Colts twice 358 00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:05,080 Speaker 4: without Daniel Jones, right, and then you get you know, 359 00:18:05,119 --> 00:18:07,080 Speaker 4: they played they play a good game against the Broncos, who, 360 00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:09,000 Speaker 4: by the way, I think their defense is overrated. People 361 00:18:09,040 --> 00:18:11,800 Speaker 4: would be surprised their defense from an EPA standpoint, it's 362 00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:14,000 Speaker 4: only ninth. It's not like number one or two like 363 00:18:14,080 --> 00:18:17,640 Speaker 4: most would suspect. So you know, good but not great defense. 364 00:18:17,880 --> 00:18:20,880 Speaker 4: So they haven't faced that much of a stellar set 365 00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:23,199 Speaker 4: of opponents to say the least. But like from a 366 00:18:23,200 --> 00:18:26,720 Speaker 4: stylistic standpoint, Buffalo's defense struggles, but it's the run game 367 00:18:26,800 --> 00:18:29,320 Speaker 4: that really struggles. The pass defense is actually top ten 368 00:18:29,359 --> 00:18:32,080 Speaker 4: in the league. So you if you're gonna throw the 369 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:35,280 Speaker 4: ball a lot, you're actually playing into the Buffalo strength. 370 00:18:35,280 --> 00:18:37,200 Speaker 4: So I'll be curious to see if Liam Cohne leans 371 00:18:37,240 --> 00:18:40,200 Speaker 4: into that or does he say, look, Buffalo can't stop 372 00:18:40,240 --> 00:18:43,560 Speaker 4: the run. They're thirty thirty first in rush EPA, so 373 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:45,399 Speaker 4: maybe we should run the ball a little bit more. 374 00:18:45,440 --> 00:18:47,439 Speaker 4: And if that's the case, then that's good for an 375 00:18:47,480 --> 00:18:49,520 Speaker 4: under right, Like you want teams to run the ball, 376 00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:51,360 Speaker 4: you don't want teams to throw the ball. So they're 377 00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:53,320 Speaker 4: either gonna throw a lot and you know they're gonna 378 00:18:53,320 --> 00:18:55,480 Speaker 4: be stopped more often than I think the market believes 379 00:18:55,560 --> 00:18:58,480 Speaker 4: because of Buffalo's pass defense is pretty good, or they're 380 00:18:58,480 --> 00:19:00,879 Speaker 4: gonna try to run the ball because flows run defense 381 00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:03,080 Speaker 4: isn't great, which is great for an under Like if 382 00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:05,080 Speaker 4: I if I have over fifty two, I don't I 383 00:19:05,080 --> 00:19:06,840 Speaker 4: don't want a lot of runs the other side of 384 00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:09,600 Speaker 4: the ball. You look at Buffalo, Josh Allen, this is, 385 00:19:09,680 --> 00:19:11,200 Speaker 4: you know, one of the most run heavy teams in 386 00:19:11,240 --> 00:19:14,240 Speaker 4: the NFL. It's gotten more run heavy as the season 387 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:17,000 Speaker 4: has gone on. They don't have weapons on the outside. 388 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:18,720 Speaker 4: They can't push the ball through the air as much 389 00:19:18,760 --> 00:19:22,240 Speaker 4: as they used to. Jacksonville struggles through the air, and 390 00:19:22,240 --> 00:19:25,360 Speaker 4: they're really good run defense, so but it doesn't matter. 391 00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:27,920 Speaker 4: Buffalo doesn't care, like against the Browns, against other really 392 00:19:27,920 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 4: good run defenses, they try to run the ball. They 393 00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:32,320 Speaker 4: don't care, so they'll force the run no matter what, 394 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 4: which is good because Jacksonville's run defense is pretty good. 395 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:35,120 Speaker 3: Right. 396 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:38,159 Speaker 4: So it's kind of like from a stylistic standpoint, the 397 00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:42,320 Speaker 4: strengths on each offense is the strengths on the opponent's defense. 398 00:19:42,359 --> 00:19:45,720 Speaker 4: So I think that's gonna steinmy some of the scoring 399 00:19:45,760 --> 00:19:48,080 Speaker 4: a little bit. Again, the fact that Jacksonville is stepping 400 00:19:48,119 --> 00:19:51,119 Speaker 4: up in class and not not facing Tennessee or the 401 00:19:51,200 --> 00:19:53,960 Speaker 4: Colts or the Jets, Like, I don't think it's going 402 00:19:54,040 --> 00:19:55,479 Speaker 4: to be as easy as it has been. And then 403 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:58,919 Speaker 4: you just talk about generally in the playoffs, high you know, 404 00:19:59,480 --> 00:20:03,000 Speaker 4: high toll in wildcard games have been a poor bet 405 00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:07,600 Speaker 4: to the over. So since two thousand, only forty percent 406 00:20:07,640 --> 00:20:10,080 Speaker 4: of Wildcard games with a line of fifty or higher 407 00:20:10,080 --> 00:20:12,800 Speaker 4: have gone over. But when you isolate, if you exclude 408 00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:15,480 Speaker 4: dome games, like dome games are a different animal, right 409 00:20:15,520 --> 00:20:17,919 Speaker 4: like the indoor track, no weather, no nothing. If you 410 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:21,359 Speaker 4: just look at outdoor games, there's been seventeen wildcard games 411 00:20:21,400 --> 00:20:23,639 Speaker 4: in the last twenty five years with a total that 412 00:20:23,680 --> 00:20:26,040 Speaker 4: I consider high and to me highs like forty seven 413 00:20:26,040 --> 00:20:29,399 Speaker 4: and a half or higher. Only two of seventeen have 414 00:20:29,520 --> 00:20:32,679 Speaker 4: gone over the total, and they've gone under by an 415 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:35,399 Speaker 4: average of six points per game. So you have a 416 00:20:35,480 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 4: lot of these kind of everyone expects shootouts, so what 417 00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:41,320 Speaker 4: they did in the regular season. Then it gets to 418 00:20:41,840 --> 00:20:45,600 Speaker 4: the playoffs, things tighten up and defenses tighten up. It's 419 00:20:45,600 --> 00:20:47,359 Speaker 4: harder in the red zone, all those sorts of things, 420 00:20:47,359 --> 00:20:51,080 Speaker 4: and they under underachieved from a point perspective, so to me, 421 00:20:51,200 --> 00:20:52,879 Speaker 4: I think from a style of six standpoint, and then 422 00:20:52,920 --> 00:20:56,520 Speaker 4: from just overall history the types of games in the 423 00:20:56,520 --> 00:20:59,560 Speaker 4: wildcard round. I think this profiles isn't under. 424 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:02,879 Speaker 1: Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in 425 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:06,280 Speaker 1: the nation. Catch all of our shows at foxsports Radio 426 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:10,520 Speaker 1: dot com and within the iHeartRadio app search FSR to 427 00:21:10,600 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 1: listen live. 428 00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:15,560 Speaker 3: I like that. And plus, Jacksonville has that huge weapon 429 00:21:15,600 --> 00:21:18,680 Speaker 3: in Cam Little, So it feels like, if it's a 430 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:21,000 Speaker 3: low scoring game, mate, just just take the points with Cam. 431 00:21:21,040 --> 00:21:24,920 Speaker 3: He's dangerous from inside sixty essentially inside sixty five maybe. 432 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:28,560 Speaker 3: And Buffalo's kicker is not great. Their situation is kind 433 00:21:28,560 --> 00:21:31,960 Speaker 3: of ugly. I'm on the first half Jags here. Have 434 00:21:32,040 --> 00:21:35,080 Speaker 3: you noticed the bill slow starts starting in November? I mean, 435 00:21:35,280 --> 00:21:40,200 Speaker 3: so Putrid didn't score an offensive touchdown against Houston, scored 436 00:21:40,280 --> 00:21:42,560 Speaker 3: one against the Patriots, and that they needed a huge 437 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:46,560 Speaker 3: comeback zero against the Eagles. They just, for whatever reason, 438 00:21:46,880 --> 00:21:48,639 Speaker 3: they start slow and then Josh Allen puts them on 439 00:21:48,680 --> 00:21:50,359 Speaker 3: their back. Do you think Buffalo wins this? 440 00:21:50,440 --> 00:21:52,679 Speaker 4: By the way, By the way, if you exclude the 441 00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:54,400 Speaker 4: Browns and the two Jets games, so. 442 00:21:54,400 --> 00:21:56,120 Speaker 3: You know, the three take out the crap games. 443 00:21:56,200 --> 00:21:58,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, those those are like the only games that covered 444 00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:00,600 Speaker 4: in the first half. I don't think they've got cover 445 00:22:00,680 --> 00:22:03,160 Speaker 4: another game in the first half all year. So against 446 00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:06,480 Speaker 4: anybody with a pulse, you know they're undefeated or not. 447 00:22:06,600 --> 00:22:09,159 Speaker 4: The other way, they're they're kind of over I I 448 00:22:09,240 --> 00:22:11,560 Speaker 4: don't have an opinion on the side. I can make 449 00:22:11,560 --> 00:22:14,280 Speaker 4: a case for both. I think, you know, on one end, 450 00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:16,680 Speaker 4: you've got I think the better overall team is Jacksonville. 451 00:22:17,040 --> 00:22:19,480 Speaker 4: I think the more the more well rounded team is Jacksonville. 452 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:20,919 Speaker 4: But then the other side of the wall, you've got 453 00:22:20,960 --> 00:22:23,399 Speaker 4: Josh Allen. Like it's it's such a it's almost like 454 00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:26,240 Speaker 4: the Mahomes effect from prior years that you know, Casey 455 00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:28,520 Speaker 4: was maybe not as good as some of their opponents, 456 00:22:28,520 --> 00:22:31,200 Speaker 4: but you always have Mahomes to lean on, especially in these, 457 00:22:31,280 --> 00:22:34,480 Speaker 4: you know, clutch moments. So it's just really hard for me. 458 00:22:34,600 --> 00:22:37,160 Speaker 4: I think, if you know, if you if you did 459 00:22:37,160 --> 00:22:40,600 Speaker 4: blind resume, you'd easily take Jacksonville here. But you know, 460 00:22:40,640 --> 00:22:42,720 Speaker 4: once I know who the quarterback is and the fact 461 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:45,320 Speaker 4: that like if it's tight late, I will say, the 462 00:22:45,359 --> 00:22:47,720 Speaker 4: fact that the special teams is such an advantage for 463 00:22:47,840 --> 00:22:50,720 Speaker 4: Jacksonville with their kicker versus you know, I think Matt 464 00:22:50,720 --> 00:22:52,600 Speaker 4: Prater's out. They had to like sign a kicker off 465 00:22:52,600 --> 00:22:54,479 Speaker 4: the street, so that's that's gonna be a big deal. 466 00:22:54,520 --> 00:22:56,440 Speaker 4: I think they'll go for it more often, by the way, 467 00:22:57,080 --> 00:22:59,639 Speaker 4: which again with Josh Allen it was just fine. But 468 00:22:59,800 --> 00:23:01,720 Speaker 4: I think it's going to be a really interesting game. 469 00:23:01,760 --> 00:23:03,560 Speaker 4: I think it's a toss up and I don't really 470 00:23:03,600 --> 00:23:06,160 Speaker 4: have a strong opinion either way, but I can make 471 00:23:06,160 --> 00:23:07,400 Speaker 4: a strong case for both. 472 00:23:07,720 --> 00:23:09,920 Speaker 3: I don't know if you remember last year. I think 473 00:23:09,920 --> 00:23:11,879 Speaker 3: it was either you or churn Off. But I in 474 00:23:12,280 --> 00:23:15,600 Speaker 3: before the season started, you were like you Chiefs Eagles 475 00:23:15,640 --> 00:23:18,159 Speaker 3: super Bowl, and I think that was okay, and it 476 00:23:18,240 --> 00:23:20,280 Speaker 3: was just an incredible it was awesome. So I'm trying 477 00:23:20,280 --> 00:23:23,159 Speaker 3: to duplicate it, and I've got some still alive. But 478 00:23:23,200 --> 00:23:25,720 Speaker 3: I have like no I had back in August, no Seahawks, 479 00:23:25,720 --> 00:23:30,080 Speaker 3: no Broncos in the Super Bowl exactly. So I'm just curious, 480 00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:33,520 Speaker 3: do you have a matchup that you hadn't having value. 481 00:23:33,560 --> 00:23:36,480 Speaker 3: I know these are kind of a dart throw more 482 00:23:36,480 --> 00:23:38,720 Speaker 3: so than like first touchdown or what have you, But 483 00:23:38,840 --> 00:23:41,600 Speaker 3: I just wonder, do you do you think the Seahawks 484 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:42,879 Speaker 3: can really are really going to get to the. 485 00:23:42,840 --> 00:23:45,320 Speaker 4: Super Bowl or the Broncos. So here's the thing, So 486 00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:47,879 Speaker 4: I was asked this earlier. I mean, this is the 487 00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:50,320 Speaker 4: most why. I mean, it's not a controversial take. This 488 00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:52,760 Speaker 4: is the most wide open playoffs I've ever seen, especially 489 00:23:52,760 --> 00:23:56,760 Speaker 4: in the AFC and to me the NFC. I just 490 00:23:56,760 --> 00:23:58,760 Speaker 4: think it's Rams. They're the best team. Now they have 491 00:23:58,800 --> 00:24:00,280 Speaker 4: to face it, they have to play an extra they'll 492 00:24:00,280 --> 00:24:02,240 Speaker 4: probably have to play back to back road games here. 493 00:24:02,840 --> 00:24:05,400 Speaker 4: But I just think if you just check, they check 494 00:24:05,480 --> 00:24:08,679 Speaker 4: all the boxes. They have the fewest flaws they I mean, 495 00:24:08,720 --> 00:24:11,840 Speaker 4: all of their losses have been close games. You know, 496 00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:13,600 Speaker 4: they haven't been blown out at all. You could say 497 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:16,280 Speaker 4: the same thing pretty much about Seattle too, But I 498 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:18,919 Speaker 4: just think the Rams are the better overall teams, especially 499 00:24:18,920 --> 00:24:21,480 Speaker 4: when you you know you need Donold to win three games, 500 00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:24,280 Speaker 4: three tough games. I just can't can't get there. As 501 00:24:24,359 --> 00:24:26,679 Speaker 4: great as their defense is, and we've already seen McVeigh 502 00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:30,040 Speaker 4: in that offense dice right through Mike McDonald's defense on 503 00:24:30,080 --> 00:24:33,080 Speaker 4: that Thursday night without Devonte Adams. So they get him back. 504 00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:35,400 Speaker 4: I just think it's it's Rams on the NFC side 505 00:24:35,400 --> 00:24:38,640 Speaker 4: and the AFC. You know, I mapped out I think 506 00:24:38,680 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 4: each team has has flaws. Obviously we talked about the 507 00:24:41,760 --> 00:24:44,960 Speaker 4: Patriots flaws. I don't see them getting I don't see 508 00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:47,679 Speaker 4: them getting the super Bowl with a new quarterback second 509 00:24:47,760 --> 00:24:50,840 Speaker 4: year without having to face these You know, they haven't 510 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:52,280 Speaker 4: faced good teams all year. All of a sudden, you're 511 00:24:52,280 --> 00:24:54,520 Speaker 4: gonna beat three good teams. It's really hard to do that. 512 00:24:55,160 --> 00:24:58,000 Speaker 4: I don't buy bone Nicks and this Denver team at all. 513 00:24:58,160 --> 00:24:59,680 Speaker 4: Like I think they're losing a round two no matter 514 00:24:59,680 --> 00:25:03,600 Speaker 4: who they' play. Give me the Chargers, right, you know? 515 00:25:03,640 --> 00:25:06,920 Speaker 4: So the Chargers, if they somehow were able to avoid 516 00:25:07,200 --> 00:25:11,000 Speaker 4: Houston and maybe even Denver, I think they would have 517 00:25:11,040 --> 00:25:13,560 Speaker 4: a chance. I mapped it out as much as I can. 518 00:25:13,640 --> 00:25:15,840 Speaker 4: You know what I ended up coming up with the most? 519 00:25:16,040 --> 00:25:17,479 Speaker 3: Hold on? Let me let me guess one for you? 520 00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 3: Is it? 521 00:25:18,160 --> 00:25:23,399 Speaker 5: Texans Seahawks Texans Rams thirty to one is not a 522 00:25:23,440 --> 00:25:25,560 Speaker 5: bad is like a fund. I wanted to have a 523 00:25:25,600 --> 00:25:28,320 Speaker 5: flyer prior to the playoffs, and normally I wouldn't do 524 00:25:28,359 --> 00:25:31,520 Speaker 5: that because it's like you usually get the one or 525 00:25:31,520 --> 00:25:33,440 Speaker 5: two seed is kind of obvious and it's very hard 526 00:25:33,520 --> 00:25:33,840 Speaker 5: to beat. 527 00:25:34,240 --> 00:25:35,840 Speaker 4: I just think it's so wide open, and I wanted 528 00:25:35,880 --> 00:25:38,080 Speaker 4: to have like a fun flyer. The Texans. To me, 529 00:25:38,160 --> 00:25:39,840 Speaker 4: first of all, I think they win again. Whether they 530 00:25:39,920 --> 00:25:41,919 Speaker 4: cover or not, I don't know, but I think they 531 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:47,119 Speaker 4: win this week against the Steelers. Well, it depends on 532 00:25:47,160 --> 00:25:50,159 Speaker 4: the other side, but I believe it would be I 533 00:25:50,200 --> 00:25:52,560 Speaker 4: believe it would be Denver and. 534 00:25:52,680 --> 00:25:55,800 Speaker 3: No, no, no, I thought the lowest seed goes Let's say the. 535 00:25:55,800 --> 00:25:58,600 Speaker 4: Charger, it's Buffalo. Like let's say Buffalo wins, it would 536 00:25:58,600 --> 00:26:01,080 Speaker 4: be Buffalo. Then, yeah, it would be it would be 537 00:26:01,480 --> 00:26:06,920 Speaker 4: you're right, if it's Jacksonville. If Jacksonville wins, then Jacksonville 538 00:26:07,200 --> 00:26:10,200 Speaker 4: would face the two seed, which would be New England. 539 00:26:10,560 --> 00:26:14,040 Speaker 4: And then it would be one seed Denver would face Houston, 540 00:26:14,359 --> 00:26:17,879 Speaker 4: because I believe Jacksonville's higher than Houston. Right, they won 541 00:26:17,920 --> 00:26:22,439 Speaker 4: the division. Jacksonville's three yeah, one fourth, you know, and 542 00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:25,640 Speaker 4: then or sorry, one six, three four, So one six 543 00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:31,000 Speaker 4: would be Buffalo, Denver. Three four would be uh Jacksonville, 544 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:34,760 Speaker 4: You're right, Jacksonville, or sorry, Houston, New England. Sorry again, 545 00:26:34,840 --> 00:26:35,240 Speaker 4: I don't think. 546 00:26:35,280 --> 00:26:37,760 Speaker 3: I think Houston did a great spot facing Aaron Rodgers. 547 00:26:37,840 --> 00:26:38,399 Speaker 1: By the way. 548 00:26:38,800 --> 00:26:40,880 Speaker 4: By the way, it wouldn't matter to me whether it's 549 00:26:40,880 --> 00:26:42,720 Speaker 4: New England or Denver. I guess that's the moral of 550 00:26:42,760 --> 00:26:44,920 Speaker 4: the story. I'm perfectly Yeah. 551 00:26:44,800 --> 00:26:46,840 Speaker 3: Neither of those teams scare you, but the NFC is 552 00:26:46,840 --> 00:26:49,760 Speaker 3: the tougher one. So if the Rams win, I mean, 553 00:26:49,760 --> 00:26:52,280 Speaker 3: I don't see the Niners winning. I don't do you. 554 00:26:52,320 --> 00:26:54,800 Speaker 4: No, no, no, the Niners. It's a terrible matchup, looks like, 555 00:26:54,840 --> 00:26:56,080 Speaker 4: and they're injured. I'll play. 556 00:26:56,640 --> 00:26:59,240 Speaker 3: So then the other team, who's the other team, Carolina 557 00:26:59,280 --> 00:27:01,760 Speaker 3: is not it would be the Rams. The Rams are 558 00:27:01,760 --> 00:27:04,400 Speaker 3: going to be Carolina. Oh, oh, Packers, I guess could 559 00:27:04,400 --> 00:27:05,800 Speaker 3: win and then they'd go to Seattle. 560 00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:08,200 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean there's also yeah Packers. 561 00:27:09,040 --> 00:27:10,200 Speaker 3: I don't know what to do with that game. 562 00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:12,000 Speaker 4: Yeah, so let's talk about the game, because that might 563 00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:13,919 Speaker 4: be another one. I'm gonna bet I have to look 564 00:27:13,960 --> 00:27:15,920 Speaker 4: at some of the weather issues. I think green Bay 565 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:17,480 Speaker 4: is in a good spot. I think green Bay is 566 00:27:17,480 --> 00:27:19,679 Speaker 4: a better team Chicago. When you look at some of 567 00:27:19,680 --> 00:27:21,879 Speaker 4: my numbers, I know you subscribe to my site. So 568 00:27:21,880 --> 00:27:24,399 Speaker 4: I've talked about what a stat that I've used for 569 00:27:24,440 --> 00:27:26,560 Speaker 4: a number of years. It's a fourth quarter. It called 570 00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:30,120 Speaker 4: blended fourth quarter win percentage versus expected It's similar to 571 00:27:30,119 --> 00:27:33,720 Speaker 4: the Pythagorean point differential, So essentially looking at point differential 572 00:27:33,720 --> 00:27:36,520 Speaker 4: and comparing it to actual win loss record, and if 573 00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:40,000 Speaker 4: you see a gap there, that's like potential for you know, 574 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:44,240 Speaker 4: a team that's overachieving underachieving. Similar similar idea here, but 575 00:27:44,359 --> 00:27:46,600 Speaker 4: essentially like if you're if you're winning a bunch of 576 00:27:46,600 --> 00:27:50,560 Speaker 4: games late in the fourth quarter, you know you're overachieving, 577 00:27:50,600 --> 00:27:53,840 Speaker 4: and vice versa. In Chicago's is I think the second 578 00:27:53,920 --> 00:27:58,119 Speaker 4: biggest overachiever behind Denver in this playoffs. Green Bay is 579 00:27:58,160 --> 00:28:00,720 Speaker 4: one of the biggest underachievers. They you know, they blew 580 00:28:00,720 --> 00:28:02,719 Speaker 4: that game against Chicago right a few weeks ago on 581 00:28:02,760 --> 00:28:05,320 Speaker 4: the road, Like that's a perfect example. I think now 582 00:28:05,320 --> 00:28:08,359 Speaker 4: that that you know, Love's back, Josh Jacob said, today 583 00:28:08,400 --> 00:28:10,920 Speaker 4: is the healthiest has been all year. They get back 584 00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:13,840 Speaker 4: Zach thom at tackle. You know, the defense has some holes. 585 00:28:13,840 --> 00:28:15,480 Speaker 4: They're gonna have to stop the run. But I think 586 00:28:15,480 --> 00:28:17,400 Speaker 4: when it comes down to it, I think green Bay 587 00:28:17,480 --> 00:28:19,439 Speaker 4: is the better team. So I do think green Bay 588 00:28:19,520 --> 00:28:21,399 Speaker 4: is gonna win. My only concern is it looks like 589 00:28:21,400 --> 00:28:23,920 Speaker 4: there's gonna be a good amount of wind in Chicago 590 00:28:24,320 --> 00:28:28,399 Speaker 4: on Sunday night or set Saturday night. And you know, 591 00:28:28,440 --> 00:28:30,760 Speaker 4: green Bay relies a lot on the deep ball, so 592 00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:33,160 Speaker 4: if that is limited, that's gonna hurt them a bit. 593 00:28:34,119 --> 00:28:36,080 Speaker 4: But I do think green Bay is the better team. 594 00:28:36,119 --> 00:28:38,720 Speaker 4: So I personally am looking to take Green Bay. And 595 00:28:38,760 --> 00:28:40,800 Speaker 4: one thing that I look at, I went back historically 596 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 4: over twenty years and said, in the wildcard round, when 597 00:28:43,400 --> 00:28:48,160 Speaker 4: I have such a substantial difference in again you got 598 00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:50,560 Speaker 4: the Caleb Williams first start, by the way, just similar 599 00:28:50,600 --> 00:28:53,240 Speaker 4: to Jake by No, you have when you have a 600 00:28:53,240 --> 00:28:56,800 Speaker 4: substantial gap between you know, the win percentage versus expected, 601 00:28:56,840 --> 00:28:59,800 Speaker 4: that that fourth quarter win percentage versus expected and Green 602 00:28:59,800 --> 00:29:04,000 Speaker 4: Bay is well underachieved versus Chicago. When you have that 603 00:29:04,240 --> 00:29:06,560 Speaker 4: and you have the fact that the opponent is starting 604 00:29:06,600 --> 00:29:09,320 Speaker 4: a quarterback who's never started a playoff game, it significantly 605 00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 4: tilts in the favor of the team like green Bay. 606 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:14,080 Speaker 4: On top of like my model like in green Bay 607 00:29:14,120 --> 00:29:16,080 Speaker 4: and just me thinking they're a better team overall. So 608 00:29:16,560 --> 00:29:18,480 Speaker 4: I'm probably gonna end up taking green Bay. I just 609 00:29:18,520 --> 00:29:20,880 Speaker 4: want to make sure that it's not like crazy Wind, 610 00:29:21,280 --> 00:29:23,400 Speaker 4: because I think from a run game perspective, I do 611 00:29:23,400 --> 00:29:25,680 Speaker 4: think Chicago does have a little bit of advantage there. 612 00:29:25,720 --> 00:29:29,200 Speaker 3: Howard was saying that snow is expected now in Chicago, 613 00:29:29,320 --> 00:29:31,720 Speaker 3: so this game it could be a little wacky. The 614 00:29:31,760 --> 00:29:33,160 Speaker 3: only thing I don't like for what you said is 615 00:29:33,640 --> 00:29:36,440 Speaker 3: Packers win means they then go to Seattle. I don't 616 00:29:36,440 --> 00:29:38,280 Speaker 3: know that they have the offense to beat Seattle. 617 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:41,720 Speaker 4: I actually, I mean they're a hit or miss team. 618 00:29:41,760 --> 00:29:43,840 Speaker 4: They're not like a team that you're gonna get five 619 00:29:43,920 --> 00:29:45,800 Speaker 4: yards at a time and feel comfortable like they're going 620 00:29:45,840 --> 00:29:48,040 Speaker 4: to hit a couple of explosives and that's how they 621 00:29:48,080 --> 00:29:50,560 Speaker 4: beat you. But yeah, I mean it's not going to 622 00:29:50,600 --> 00:29:52,440 Speaker 4: be an easy game. And not saying I would pick 623 00:29:52,480 --> 00:29:55,280 Speaker 4: Green Bay, but I think if you're a Rams backer, 624 00:29:56,120 --> 00:29:59,560 Speaker 4: you know, and you don't have to go go to 625 00:29:59,600 --> 00:30:03,360 Speaker 4: seatt until you do you absolutely have to, then I 626 00:30:03,400 --> 00:30:05,840 Speaker 4: feel I feel a lot better about it. But you know, 627 00:30:05,880 --> 00:30:08,320 Speaker 4: I'd rather play Philly. Like if the Rams play Philly, 628 00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:11,040 Speaker 4: rams are gonna be favored. It might surprise some people, 629 00:30:11,040 --> 00:30:13,280 Speaker 4: but they're probably gonna be one and a half two 630 00:30:13,280 --> 00:30:14,440 Speaker 4: point favorites in Philly. 631 00:30:14,760 --> 00:30:17,480 Speaker 3: I don't think crushing Philly in that matchup before it 632 00:30:17,880 --> 00:30:18,200 Speaker 3: come back. 633 00:30:18,480 --> 00:30:21,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, and then obviously a block field go for a touchdown, 634 00:30:21,720 --> 00:30:23,720 Speaker 4: but I would I would back I would back the 635 00:30:23,800 --> 00:30:25,520 Speaker 4: Rams there for sure. And then you know, look, then 636 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:27,320 Speaker 4: it's either Seattle green Bay and if you if it's 637 00:30:27,360 --> 00:30:28,959 Speaker 4: green Bay, then you get them at home. And if 638 00:30:28,960 --> 00:30:31,240 Speaker 4: it's Seattle, then that they can beat them on the road. 639 00:30:31,280 --> 00:30:33,680 Speaker 4: I don't have a problem with that. So anyway, yeah, 640 00:30:33,720 --> 00:30:36,640 Speaker 4: I think for fun long shot like matchup ticket, I 641 00:30:36,640 --> 00:30:40,480 Speaker 4: do think Houston versus Rams is an interesting matchup. 642 00:30:40,800 --> 00:30:44,760 Speaker 3: All right. The site is Cleve Analytics. He's great, he's fun. 643 00:30:45,480 --> 00:30:47,320 Speaker 3: By the way, Can I quickly ask you who do 644 00:30:47,320 --> 00:30:48,320 Speaker 3: you want to coach a Browns? 645 00:30:49,520 --> 00:30:51,360 Speaker 4: Who do I want? Or who do I think they'll get? 646 00:30:51,480 --> 00:30:54,280 Speaker 3: Okay, find want and then realistic. I mean, I'm sure 647 00:30:54,280 --> 00:30:55,360 Speaker 3: you want someone awesome. 648 00:30:55,400 --> 00:30:57,720 Speaker 4: But well, I mean John Harball would be great, right, 649 00:30:57,800 --> 00:31:01,000 Speaker 4: And and I just think they need like culture kind 650 00:31:01,040 --> 00:31:03,080 Speaker 4: of culture reset. They need an adult in the room. 651 00:31:03,280 --> 00:31:05,640 Speaker 4: They've never had a quarterback or a coach like him 652 00:31:05,640 --> 00:31:08,600 Speaker 4: who demands respect. I do think the game's passed by 653 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:10,880 Speaker 4: a tad ye like. I think some of the decisions 654 00:31:10,880 --> 00:31:12,840 Speaker 4: he made, like not running the ball with twelve seconds 655 00:31:12,920 --> 00:31:15,720 Speaker 4: left with Derrick Henry and instead going backwards three yards 656 00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:18,720 Speaker 4: for that field goal was a major mistake. But generally speaking, 657 00:31:18,800 --> 00:31:20,840 Speaker 4: I think he can really reset the culture in the 658 00:31:20,880 --> 00:31:23,240 Speaker 4: locker room. And by the way, he does have Cleveland 659 00:31:23,320 --> 00:31:24,920 Speaker 4: tis his parents were born in Cleveland. 660 00:31:25,040 --> 00:31:26,560 Speaker 3: He's not staying in the division broke. 661 00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:27,000 Speaker 5: I know. 662 00:31:27,080 --> 00:31:29,680 Speaker 4: I'm just saying, like, you know, it's not impossible, like 663 00:31:29,720 --> 00:31:33,120 Speaker 4: it's not a complete pipe dream. But otherwise I don't know, man, 664 00:31:33,160 --> 00:31:35,840 Speaker 4: Like I'm not in these interviews. I've learned a long 665 00:31:35,880 --> 00:31:39,520 Speaker 4: time ago that I think the best coaches these days, 666 00:31:39,600 --> 00:31:42,240 Speaker 4: unless you're just an elite play caller like a Shanahan 667 00:31:42,360 --> 00:31:46,080 Speaker 4: or McVeigh, is really just a good like a CEO 668 00:31:46,200 --> 00:31:48,520 Speaker 4: type like Tomlin. I don't think is a great quote 669 00:31:48,600 --> 00:31:52,120 Speaker 4: unquote coach, but he's such a good CEO. He's such 670 00:31:52,160 --> 00:31:54,840 Speaker 4: a good leader of men. He lets his coordinators do 671 00:31:54,920 --> 00:31:57,400 Speaker 4: their jobs if you hire the right staff, I just 672 00:31:57,480 --> 00:32:00,920 Speaker 4: want a good CEO, so you know, I'm open to 673 00:32:01,280 --> 00:32:03,360 Speaker 4: the best CEO type. And then if you're talking about 674 00:32:03,400 --> 00:32:05,720 Speaker 4: just pure coordinator like Clint Kubiak, I think is a 675 00:32:05,720 --> 00:32:08,520 Speaker 4: good coordinator, so maybe he's worth a look. And then 676 00:32:08,800 --> 00:32:10,760 Speaker 4: I do think that Chris Shula and Jesse Mint are 677 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:15,000 Speaker 4: really smart defensive minds, young defensive minds who you know, 678 00:32:15,080 --> 00:32:17,080 Speaker 4: come with a good pedigree. So those are guys that 679 00:32:17,160 --> 00:32:18,480 Speaker 4: I think are all interesting for the books. 680 00:32:18,480 --> 00:32:20,959 Speaker 3: So they cannot wait to coach Door Sanders. All right, 681 00:32:21,000 --> 00:32:23,880 Speaker 3: cleve Ta, he's the guy. Well, I'm sure we'll bring 682 00:32:23,880 --> 00:32:25,680 Speaker 3: you on in the office. He's good luck this weekend, buddy, 683 00:32:25,880 --> 00:32:26,440 Speaker 3: Thanks you too,