Speaker 1: Well, they finally did it. The Manhattan District Attorney Alvin
Speaker 1: Bragg is indicting Donald Trump. This is the first time
Speaker 1: in American history this has ever happened. Truly unprecedented move
Speaker 1: from the Manhattan District Attorney's office. And this is just
Speaker 1: one of the four criminal investigations that Donald Trump is facing.
Speaker 1: He's facing another investigation out of Georgia pertaining to the
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election. He's also facing two federal investigations. And
Speaker 1: this just feels like a red line has been crossed,
Speaker 1: that the America that we have always loved, this constitutional republic,
Speaker 1: which made America so different than other countries, that it's dead,
Speaker 1: that the rule of law is over in America, that
Speaker 1: the fabric of this nation has been eroded. So what
Speaker 1: does this mean for the country, What does this mean
Speaker 1: for the former president? And where is the cell going?
Speaker 1: You know, is it now open season for Sorrow's back
Speaker 1: DA's across the country to wage political persecutions against conservatives.
Speaker 1: We turned to Mike Davis. He's been on the show before.
Speaker 1: He's the former Chief Council for Nominations to then Senate
Speaker 1: Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley. He's also the founder and the
Speaker 1: president of the Article three Project. He's worked in all
Speaker 1: three branches of the federal government. Before all that, he
Speaker 1: worked for ten years as a civil litigator in Denver.
Speaker 1: He does a great job breaking all of this down.
Speaker 1: So we turned to him at this dire hour, this
Speaker 1: dire news cycle and what is going to change the
Speaker 1: country forever? Stay tuned for Mike Davis. Mike, thanks so
Speaker 1: much for coming on the show today. I know that
Speaker 1: you've got a busy schedule because you know, they finally
Speaker 1: did it. They indicted Donald Trump. First time in American
Speaker 1: history a former president has been indicted. We don't have
Speaker 1: all the details yet because the indictment has not been unsealed,
Speaker 1: But you know, what do you make of what you've read,
Speaker 1: what you've heard so far about the indictment. The Democrats
Speaker 1: have crossed the rubicon with this indictment by George Soros
Speaker 1: Fundit Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg. These are bogus, trumped up
Speaker 1: charges against President Trump for settling a nuisance claim back
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen. It is very common for wealthy business
Speaker 1: people to settle nuisance claims to make claims go away,
Speaker 1: and that's exactly what their allegend Trump did here this
Speaker 1: Alvin brag when he worked for the New York Attorney General,
Speaker 1: he pushed the prior Manhattan DA to decline these charges.
Speaker 1: The Manhattan US Attorney declined these charges, and the Federal
Speaker 1: Election Commission to decline these charges. But then Alvin Brad
Speaker 1: ran for office as Manhattan DA. He took a million
Speaker 1: dollars from George Soros, and now he's George Soros's puppet prosecutor,
Speaker 1: apparently because I don't know how he goes from pushing
Speaker 1: to decline these charges before to somehow these charges got better.
Speaker 1: And you're going to bring a what is at best
Speaker 1: books and records misdemeanor where the statial limitations would have
Speaker 1: expired after two years in twenty eighteen, and you're going
Speaker 1: to transform this somehow by bootstrapping federal election law with
Speaker 1: New York law and charging the federal charging a state
Speaker 1: fellow the under federal election law in New York and
Speaker 1: somehow for something that happened seven years ago beyond the
Speaker 1: five year statual limitations for a foality. This is a
Speaker 1: pure political hit job on Trump. This is part of
Speaker 1: the Democrats lawfair against Trump. They're doing lawfair with Garland
Speaker 1: Special Council Jack Smith looking at the nine crime of
Speaker 1: a former president having his presidential records in the office
Speaker 1: of former president, which is allowed by the Presidential Records Act.
Speaker 1: You also have the Democrat via in Fulton County Fanny
Speaker 1: Willis looking at the non crime of a president objecting
Speaker 1: to a presidential election and unlabbying others to object that
Speaker 1: is allowed by the Electoral Account of eighteen eighty seven,
Speaker 1: along with the First Amendment at Jack Smiths also looking
Speaker 1: at this objection as part of his federal probe. These
Speaker 1: are all Democrat prosecutions. They fear they can't beat President
Speaker 1: Trump in the polls, so they simply want to indict him.
Speaker 1: As you mentioned, I mean, he's facing a couple of
Speaker 1: federal investigations as you pointed out, also an investigation in
Speaker 1: Fulton County, Georgia as well. How much money does it
Speaker 1: cost to fight to state federal investigations like this, Well,
Speaker 1: it's millions of dollars. Not only is it, you know,
Speaker 1: millions of dollars, tens of millions of dollars for Trump,
Speaker 1: which you know is unfair, but he's a billionaire. He
Speaker 1: can afford this. Just think about the resources that are
Speaker 1: being diverted from these DA's offices. Where you have the
Speaker 1: Manhattan DA, he has several many of his prosecutors focused
Speaker 1: on this non crime, trumped up charges against President Trump
Speaker 1: instead of the rapists and murderers and carjackers and burglars
Speaker 1: and robbers and the people who are violent criminals destroying
Speaker 1: Manhattan that he has the prosecutors focused on Trump. You
Speaker 1: also have the New York Police Department, the State Police,
Speaker 1: the federal police, including the Secret Service, who have to
Speaker 1: divert so many resources to protect Alvin brad to protect
Speaker 1: his prosecutors, to protect his office, to protect President Trump
Speaker 1: when he comes and goes. This is a major diversion
Speaker 1: of law enforcement resources, limited finding law enforcement resources. This
Speaker 1: shows horrific judgments on the part of Alvin Bragg. Same
Speaker 1: thing Don Fulton County. Same thing with the Special Council
Speaker 1: Jack Smith. This is Democrats are more concerned about going
Speaker 1: after Trump for non crimes than protecting everyday Americans from
Speaker 1: violent crimes. I always say that if President Trump beat
Speaker 1: the hell out of an old Asian woman on the
Speaker 1: subway instead of paying off a stripper to go away,
Speaker 1: Alvin Bragg would not be prosecuting him. Well, yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: Alvin Bragg reduced fifty two percent of all felony charges
Speaker 1: to misdemeanors last year, and now he's trying to elevate
Speaker 1: maybe a misdemeanor to a felony. You had mentioned the
Speaker 1: Statute of limitations. It's been a report that Trump's team
Speaker 1: is potentially preparing to file motions to dismiss based on
Speaker 1: the Statute of limitations a variety of other overreaches that
Speaker 1: we see here. Does he have grounds to do that
Speaker 1: considering the bookkeeping entry and the transaction at issue dates
Speaker 1: back to October twenty sixteen, I mean, yes, these are
Speaker 1: They should file a motion to challenge the sufficiency of
Speaker 1: the indictment on legal grounds that it's that there's not
Speaker 1: a crime here, that this legal theory that Alvin Bragg
Speaker 1: is using here is garbage, it's nonsense. It was rejected
Speaker 1: by Bragg himself, it was rejected by the prior Manhattan DA,
Speaker 1: was rejected by the US Attorney's office in Manhattan, was
Speaker 1: rejected by the FEC, the Federal Election Commission. So they
Speaker 1: should absolutely file a motion to dismiss the indictment on
Speaker 1: those grounds. Also on the stat limitations. Like you said,
Speaker 1: there's a two years secial limitations for mister Meaders. There's
Speaker 1: a five year special limitations in New York for felonies.
Speaker 1: Here's the problem, though, Lisa, is we haven't had a
Speaker 1: Republican governor in New York since what the Tackey I
Speaker 1: can't even remember the last one we had a Republican governor.
Speaker 1: So all of these judges at every level are appointed
Speaker 1: by Democrats. They're left wing, radical judges, right, they're not
Speaker 1: fair judges. Trump is not going to get a fair
Speaker 1: trial anywhere in New York, particularly not in many Well,
Speaker 1: and that's the issue is, you know, objectively, we could
Speaker 1: say this is ridiculous, none of this makes sense. It's
Speaker 1: beyond the statute of limitations. But to your point, you know,
Speaker 1: he's facing these charges in a liberal state like New York,
Speaker 1: which you know, really isn't America anymore. But it speaks
Speaker 1: to sort of the broader concern with the rule of
Speaker 1: law in America. I mean, it has become so politicized
Speaker 1: where you know, the rule of law really doesn't exist anymore. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean that that's the problem. This is all by plan,
Speaker 1: these George Soros funded prosecutors. These leftists, this is all
Speaker 1: working out to plan. They're trying to destroy our country.
Speaker 1: These are I always say this, this is not this
Speaker 1: is not our parents, our grandparents, Democrat Party. These are
Speaker 1: not liberals who love America and just disagree with Conservatives
Speaker 1: on the best way to get there. These are the leftists.
Speaker 1: These are Marxists. They hate America. They hate equality, they
Speaker 1: believe in equity, they hate due process. They believe and
Speaker 1: we too. They hate free speech, they believe in censorship.
Speaker 1: They hate America. They're trying to divide and conquer our country.
Speaker 1: They've crossed the Ribic count here. There's nothing more divisive
Speaker 1: than bringing fogus political charges against your political enemies, and
Speaker 1: that's what they've done with Trump. I don't know how
Speaker 1: we go back from this. I don't know how we
Speaker 1: go back to this. I'll tell you what I think
Speaker 1: needs to happen is and I think Republican state attorneys general,
Speaker 1: Republican DA's, Republican prosecutors need to give Democrats a healthy
Speaker 1: dose of their own medicine. Fine charges against these democrats, charge,
Speaker 1: demignite them, and then this tit for tax should end immediately.
Speaker 1: Give krats uh you know I always say two wrongs
Speaker 1: don't make it right, but it makes it even if
Speaker 1: you don't. Democrats only respect power. If you don't use
Speaker 1: power against them, they're going to run all over us.
Speaker 1: So I hope these Republican attorneys general, maybe in Texas
Speaker 1: or Florida or one of these other states, can find
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's sleazy, illegal, corrupt deals on oil and gas
Speaker 1: that touched their state and go aft a quick commercial
Speaker 1: break more with Mike Davis. Do you think it ends
Speaker 1: it or do you think we just continue to go
Speaker 1: down a road of you know, looking like a Banana
Speaker 1: Republic or some of these countries where political opponents are
Speaker 1: sort of routinely jailed. It's already done. It's done. It's
Speaker 1: done the Democrats across the rubicon right. So if we don't,
Speaker 1: if we don't fight back now and fight back hard
Speaker 1: and make this go away, this will never stop. We
Speaker 1: did this with the Kavanaugh confirmation. Remember they brought six
Speaker 1: fogus allegations against Cavanaugh, essentially that he was a serial
Speaker 1: gang rapist in his teenage years, even though we testified
Speaker 1: before the committee where I was the chief calcil fornominations
Speaker 1: that he was a virgin rolling to his twenties. They
Speaker 1: did the same stupid thing that they did to Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: They're doing that. They brought out Michael Afanati's stupid focus
Speaker 1: allegation first, and that undermines the other five. Alvin Brant
Speaker 1: brought out. It is a stupid indictment first, and it's
Speaker 1: an undermining the other two with Jack Smith and Fanny Willis.
Speaker 1: But again, if you the reason we were able to
Speaker 1: stop that me too nonsense with the Capital fight is
Speaker 1: we punched back hard, right. We gave them those of
Speaker 1: the Row medicine. We fought back. We didn't just roll
Speaker 1: over and play debt because that's what they expect Republicans
Speaker 1: to do, because Republicans traditionally are weak and stupid and
Speaker 1: made his roll over. I would say that they're the
Speaker 1: string orchestra on the Titanic, right, They just they want
Speaker 1: to look majestic as the as the Titanic is going down,
Speaker 1: our country is going to hell. We like you don't
Speaker 1: come back from indicting a political opponent who's running for president,
Speaker 1: a former president and potentially future president. This is this
Speaker 1: is this is unacceptable what the Democrats have done. This
Speaker 1: is a red line and they're going to keep doing
Speaker 1: it until we punch back. I don't disagree. I think
Speaker 1: it's just it's hard to digest sort of the country
Speaker 1: that we love and realizing that it's probably over. You know,
Speaker 1: you mentioned Kavin on me. I went Mortal Kombat on
Speaker 1: TV over that because I just felt it in my
Speaker 1: gut that it was just so fundamentally wrong to try
Speaker 1: to smear an obviously innocent man for purely political reasons.
Speaker 1: But sort of underscores who we're dealing with from the left.
Speaker 1: So what are the next steps here? So you know,
Speaker 1: Governor to Santis has said that Florida is not going
Speaker 1: to aid in the extradition of Donald Trump. Do you
Speaker 1: expect a fight there or do you think he will
Speaker 1: voluntarily surrender. Look, I am a huge Trump fan. I'm
Speaker 1: supporting Trump for president. I'm also a huge to Santis fan.
Speaker 1: I would love to see a Trump to Santa's ticket.
Speaker 1: I think what the Santis is doing here is hugely important.
Speaker 1: It sends a very strong message that you're not going
Speaker 1: to treat people like this in America, even potentially my
Speaker 1: political enemy and Donald Trump. So I con gratulate to
Speaker 1: Santras for what he did. It's an important message. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's going to get to that. It sounds
Speaker 1: like Trump's going to surrender, so the Manhattan DA's office
Speaker 1: on maybe Monday or Tuesday. I haven't talked to President Trump.
Speaker 1: I haven't talked to his lawyers about this. This has
Speaker 1: just the news reports that I've seen, But it sounds
Speaker 1: like he's an concerner. But I'm I'm very happy and
Speaker 1: proud of Governor to Santras for making that stake. We've
Speaker 1: gone over some of the other criminal probes that he's facing.
Speaker 1: What kind of real legal liability Dizzy face and those
Speaker 1: or they may try to get Trump is obstruction on
Speaker 1: the documents case in moral Lago. They may say, look,
Speaker 1: the president's former president. Presidents have the absolute right to
Speaker 1: classify and take any presidential record they want when they
Speaker 1: leave office. That's why a Congress gives former presidents staff,
Speaker 1: federally funded staff of security clearances, secure office space called skiffs,
Speaker 1: secure compartment, and information facilities to look at classified documents.
Speaker 1: They get secret Service protection that guards the people in
Speaker 1: the records. President Trump did absolutely nothing wrong by having
Speaker 1: those classified records, and the office of the former President
Speaker 1: of Moralogo he actually used that office when he was
Speaker 1: the president of the United States, So they alit even
Speaker 1: know if President Trump took those records when he left
Speaker 1: office where he had him there when he was president,
Speaker 1: when he used the office as president. They just state
Speaker 1: they have no idea, but regardless, he's allowed to have
Speaker 1: those records under the Presidential Records at the Presidential Records
Speaker 1: Act includes any documents created or received by the President
Speaker 1: and his staff, and that includes classified documents. So there's
Speaker 1: it's just a bogus investigation protectional investigation they used to
Speaker 1: go after Trump. And so what they did was when
Speaker 1: when they went down there and did those illegal, unprecedented
Speaker 1: on constitutional home rate on Trump for this non crime
Speaker 1: of patties presidential records classified or not, they stuck at
Speaker 1: affidavit in front of one of Trump's lawyer's paces and
Speaker 1: he signed it. Well, they're going to say that they
Speaker 1: found records after he signed this affidavit and so therefore
Speaker 1: it could be obstruction of justice. That's that's their strongest case.
Speaker 1: But the problems is, we don't know that this attorney
Speaker 1: probably just made a good fief effort in the chaos
Speaker 1: and signed this thing. There's no evidence that he intended
Speaker 1: to lie or to obstruct justice with this thing. And
Speaker 1: the bigger issue is there's an OLC memo Office of
Speaker 1: Legal Council memo in the Justice Department. It's binding on prosecutors,
Speaker 1: it's binding on the Justice Department that generally you cannot
Speaker 1: charge obstruction of justice if the underlying conduct was not
Speaker 1: a crime, so that you can't obstruct an investigation into
Speaker 1: a non crime. And that's exactly what they're looking at
Speaker 1: with this moral lago rad And let's compare what they
Speaker 1: did with Trump versus Biden. The Biden Justice Department learned
Speaker 1: that that then Vice President Joe Biden stole classified records
Speaker 1: from the Obama White House. Clearly SPNI. She didn't have
Speaker 1: the right to have this under the Presidential Records Act.
Speaker 1: He didn't have lifetime Secret Service protection to protect these documents.
Speaker 1: He didn't get federally fun as stas secure office space.
Speaker 1: They Biden had several different classified sets of classified documents
Speaker 1: in several different locations, and there's evidence he actually used
Speaker 1: those records. Hunter Biden used those records, those classified records
Speaker 1: to get to secure his illegal deals in Ukraine and China.
Speaker 1: We're in the divine reported on that from the New
Speaker 1: York Post. Right, what did the Biden Justice Department, Dude,
Speaker 1: they didn't send in a home raid. They covered this
Speaker 1: up for two months, right, And they didn't even have
Speaker 1: the FBI go look for these documents. They let Biden's
Speaker 1: attorneys do the search for these documents. And Biden's attorney's
Speaker 1: represented to the Biden Justice Department that they turned over
Speaker 1: these records. Right, And then the FBI went in after
Speaker 1: Garlan got hell over, there's an appointed a special council,
Speaker 1: Robert Kerr. The FBI went into the search, they found
Speaker 1: classified documents after Biden's attorneys represented they did a diligent search.
Speaker 1: How is that different from Trump's attorneys signed in the affidavia?
Speaker 1: How is that not obstruction of justice? So if they
Speaker 1: go after Trump for obstruction of justice for documents he
Speaker 1: was allowed to have, how did they not go after
Speaker 1: Biden for espionage and obstruction and obstruction of justice for
Speaker 1: documents he was not allowed to have. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: and allegedly documents from his or classified documents from his
Speaker 1: time in the Senate, which would take some serious effort
Speaker 1: to try to remove from a skiff where you have
Speaker 1: to you know, sign in, you have to review the documents,
Speaker 1: you know, in a secure area. You sign out, you're
Speaker 1: supposed to turn in your phone, you know, like there's
Speaker 1: multiple layers of security, So I mean you would have
Speaker 1: to actually, like legitimately try to steal them versus just
Speaker 1: some sort of accidental, you know, mistake. But you know,
Speaker 1: how concerned are you about you know, what's happening in
Speaker 1: the special grand jury probe in Fulton County. I think
Speaker 1: that's a complete joke. I think this potent. I do
Speaker 1: think that this is all orchestrated, and they're going to
Speaker 1: try to invite with all three investigations. I think they're
Speaker 1: gonna try to, but I just didn't think it would
Speaker 1: come in this order. I thought that they would come
Speaker 1: with their strongest case first and then bring the weakest
Speaker 1: case to Manhattan DA case loss. But what they've done
Speaker 1: is this buffoon Manhattan DA album Bragg brought his case
Speaker 1: force and it's going to undermine the credibility of all
Speaker 1: the structure point investigations. Again, like Michael Apati did with
Speaker 1: Julie Sweatnick during the Capital Think, he came forward with
Speaker 1: his buffoonery and undermine the credibility of the five other
Speaker 1: people who came forward they were all not telling the truth,
Speaker 1: but Michael Aponatti's allegations with the most profoned but most buffoonery,
Speaker 1: just like Albun Brack. So you know, I expect indictments
Speaker 1: of all three thems. I think the Democrats are helping
Speaker 1: by getting Trump that they in Brax's case, this is
Speaker 1: good for him politically in Manhattan. The left wing lunatics,
Speaker 1: the limousine liberals in Manhattan will be very happy. They'll
Speaker 1: be in their coffee shops with their COVID masks on.
Speaker 1: You'll build it. You know, they'll be smiling under their
Speaker 1: COVID masks from ear to ear as they're sick in
Speaker 1: their lattes. But it's very bad for the Democrat Party nationwide,
Speaker 1: and we're most importantly it's bad for our country. It's
Speaker 1: really bad for our republic. This is very damaging when
Speaker 1: you have a politicized and recognized justice system. This is
Speaker 1: third world marks's hellhole, financial republic level stuff. I totally agree.
Speaker 1: You know, whatever people think about Trump, this is the
Speaker 1: end of the republic type stuff. Is he going to
Speaker 1: face jail time or are we you know, is this
Speaker 1: just going to be you know, sort of what kind
Speaker 1: of legal liability is you truly facing here with all
Speaker 1: this stuff. Well, I mean, if you had a crazy judge,
Speaker 1: which he may have, you have a crazy jury in Manhattan,
Speaker 1: which you'll likely have, and they convict him, it will
Speaker 1: take a long time for this to get through the
Speaker 1: appellate process. And you have all these democrat appointed trial
Speaker 1: court judges and appelic court judges, and then New York
Speaker 1: they're Supreme Court's called the New York Court of Appeals.
Speaker 1: All these judges are Democrat appointed, right, So it's going
Speaker 1: to be a long slot. Here's the issue. Under federal statutes,
Speaker 1: the Secret Service has the Congress commands that the Secret
Speaker 1: Service protect former presidents for the rest of their lives.
Speaker 1: And that's that's that's by statutes. So they're going to
Speaker 1: have an issue where if you want to try to
Speaker 1: jail a former president, that's going to run right into
Speaker 1: this federal statute saying Secret Service has to protect him.
Speaker 1: So what are they going to do? Put put the
Speaker 1: Secret Service agents in his jail cell with them is
Speaker 1: and is New York you know, cell block. That's just
Speaker 1: that's just not feasible that they can do that. I
Speaker 1: don't I mean, this is this is why it's so reckless.
Speaker 1: The Democrats are doing here what Alvin Bragg is doing here.
Speaker 1: They're creating a constitutional crisis. They're creating an unnecessary crisis
Speaker 1: because they are so Trump to arrange. They're so power hungry,
Speaker 1: they want to do whatever it takes to get Trump,
Speaker 1: and they don't care about their country. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: very obvious they don't care about their country. When you're
Speaker 1: taking a million dollars from George Soros, who hates America,
Speaker 1: this Marxist who hates America, who's been funding BLM and
Speaker 1: Antifa and chaos and division for the last four or
Speaker 1: five years. Why why would you think that George Soros
Speaker 1: is a good man. He's not. He's clearly an American.
Speaker 1: He clearly does not believe in American ideals. He clearly
Speaker 1: doesn't want to follow the Constitution. He's a scumback and
Speaker 1: he just proved that by inviting President Trump. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think he's evil. I mean I think that the
Speaker 1: left is evil in this country, as evidenced by you know,
Speaker 1: everything we've laid out throughout this conversation. And it also
Speaker 1: keeps good people out of politics because you're you're gonna
Speaker 1: have a lot of people that might consider running for
Speaker 1: office saying what's happened to Donald Trump? Saying I don't
Speaker 1: need this in my life. And I truly think that,
Speaker 1: you know, Donald Trump ran in twenty sixteen because I
Speaker 1: do believe that he loves his country. I believes he's
Speaker 1: a patriot. He didn't have to. He's probably, I mean
Speaker 1: most definitely, you know, probably the only guy who left
Speaker 1: the office who's worse off than he was before going
Speaker 1: into it. You know, all these guys go into being
Speaker 1: president go on to you know, make all this money.
Speaker 1: If you look at Bush, if you look at Obama.
Speaker 1: So you know, it's sadly going to keep a lot
Speaker 1: of good potential conservative candidates saying, you know, the hell
Speaker 1: of this, I don't want to deal with this nonsense
Speaker 1: and that and that's the plan. I mean, that's that's
Speaker 1: they look, this is all this is again. These are Marxists,
Speaker 1: These are leftist, These are not liberals, these are not democrats.
Speaker 1: This is these are these people are so destructive. Their
Speaker 1: goal of their God is power because they don't believe
Speaker 1: in God, so their goal of their God is power
Speaker 1: on earth. Their religion or their strategy for their goal
Speaker 1: of their god of power on earth is Marxism. They
Speaker 1: can't talk about their Marxism because that's not very popular,
Speaker 1: so they use these subversive tactics or religious sex and
Speaker 1: that's racial division with DLM, that's gender chaos with me too,
Speaker 1: and with Pronouns and Franche gender ideology. It's the Clavidians
Speaker 1: trying to destroy our country, destroy our bonds. They don't
Speaker 1: want us to have any faith in our country. They
Speaker 1: don't want us to have religion, they don't want us
Speaker 1: to act family. Those are bonds that the Marxists have
Speaker 1: been trying to break for one hundred years. They want
Speaker 1: us to beat the hold into the state. And they're Marxist.
Speaker 1: Here's what's so pot problematic and so dangerous about Marxism.
Speaker 1: Over the last hundred eight years of Marxism, there have
Speaker 1: been one hundred million people have died. And so these democrats, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, these these these never Trump Republicans, these liberals
Speaker 1: who you know, we think that once they go after Trump,
Speaker 1: they're going to stop. They're crazy. They're gonna they're gonna
Speaker 1: go after Trump. They're gonna go after the Santists, They're
Speaker 1: gonna go after Nicki Hailey. They're going to go after
Speaker 1: every single Republican, They're going to go after the Democrats.
Speaker 1: They're going to go after so many people that there's
Speaker 1: not any people there are There are not any people left. No,
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think this stops with you know,
Speaker 1: and we already saw that, right, I mean, we saw
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice label good parents as domestic terrorists.
Speaker 1: I mean, we saw them go after pro life Catholics, arrest,
Speaker 1: you know, people in front of their their kids. So
Speaker 1: this doesn't stop with Trump. He has previously said that
Speaker 1: he's you know, they're not trying to get to him,
Speaker 1: They're trying to get to us. And it's true, and
Speaker 1: that's you know, the direction that we are heading in.
Speaker 1: Is there any way to put the genie back in
Speaker 1: the bottle? Is there any way to get the rule
Speaker 1: of law back in this country? I mean, is there
Speaker 1: anything we can do? Well, there are two things we
Speaker 1: can do. We need to We need to elect Republicans
Speaker 1: at every level. There's there's a state Supreme Court race
Speaker 1: in Wisconsin coming up that will determine the control of
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court there, whether it's conservative four to three
Speaker 1: or liberal four to three. And that's going to decide
Speaker 1: whether people have the right to speak to worship, you know,
Speaker 1: to associate. That's a race up that to keep and
Speaker 1: bear offers to protect your families and yourselves. That's an
Speaker 1: important race. But people need to go out and vote.
Speaker 1: And I really do think these Republican ags and dais
Speaker 1: and prosecutors need to give Democrats to a healthy dose
Speaker 1: of their own medicine. The only way you're going to
Speaker 1: stop this is by indicting Democrats for their real crimes.
Speaker 1: There's I mean, there's smoking gun evidence in the form
Speaker 1: of subpoena bank records from House Oversight Committee Chairman James
Speaker 1: Comer that the Bidens took at least a million dollars
Speaker 1: from the CCP just on those deals that he's looking
Speaker 1: at there, they took a hell of a lot more
Speaker 1: than that. There is smoking gun evidence that President Biden
Speaker 1: is compromised, corrupted by these illegal deals in China and Ukraine,
Speaker 1: the two most problematic areas in the world right now,
Speaker 1: with Russia and China, and we're going to turn a
Speaker 1: blind eye of that. We're going to turn to blind
Speaker 1: eye to clear corruption of the Bide family, compromise of
Speaker 1: the Biden family. We're going to turn a blind eye
Speaker 1: to Catholic churches, pro life, pro life, crisis pregnancy centers,
Speaker 1: even Supreme Court justices and their families being terrorized by
Speaker 1: these abortion activists. But we're going to go after Christians
Speaker 1: praying outside of abortion clinics. It's unlike you talked about that.
Speaker 1: We talked about the parents of Loudoin County being the
Speaker 1: garden stick in the FBI after them. We have a weaponized,
Speaker 1: politicized or recognized justice system at every level. This is
Speaker 1: not sustainable as a country. Our country is going to
Speaker 1: fall apart unless we do something about this now. And
Speaker 1: that means getting out and voting. That means Republican prosecutors
Speaker 1: fighting back at It means House Republicans on the Judiciary
Speaker 1: Committee and the Weaponization Committee really ramping up their efforts.
Speaker 1: Like Davis, I totally agree with everything you just laid out,
Speaker 1: and you know, just pray for the country, Just pray
Speaker 1: for the direction we're heading, and just pray that people
Speaker 1: get brave and we can get our country back. Appreciate
Speaker 1: your time. Thanks so much for breaking this all down
Speaker 1: for us. We truly appreciate it. I always love having
Speaker 1: you on and just appreciate your time. That it's Mike
Speaker 1: Davis breaking down the Trump indictment and what it means
Speaker 1: for the country. You know, we know it's not good.
Speaker 1: Pray for the country and pray that people get brave
Speaker 1: out there and that you know, we can turn this
Speaker 1: thing around. UM. I want to thank you guys for
Speaker 1: listening to the show every Monday and Thursday, but you
Speaker 1: can listen throughout the week. Please leave us a review
Speaker 1: on Apple Podcast, give us a reading. I want to
Speaker 1: thank John Cassio, my producer, for putting the show together.
Speaker 1: Until next time,