WEBVTT - Ep24 "What does drug withdrawal have in common with heartbreak?"

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Why do you still feel the waves after you get

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>off a boat and when you get off the treadmill

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at the gym. Why does everything seem to be flowing

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>past you faster? What does heartbreak have in common with

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>drug withdrawal? And why after you stare at a waterfall

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>for a while, do the rocks on the side seem

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to be crawling upward? Why did people in the nineteen

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>eighties think their book pages had some color red in them,

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>but no one thought that before or after the eighties?

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And what does any of this have to do with

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the great philosopher Aristotle watching a horse stuck in the river?

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman. I'm a

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientist and author at Stanford and in these episodes we

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>sail deeply into our three pound universe to understand why

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and how our lives look the way they do. Today's

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>episode is about the way the brain readjusts its circuitry

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on really fast timescales, and why your brain is constantly

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>doing this. In the nineteen eighties, tens of thousands of

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.839
<v Speaker 1>people began to notice something really weird when they looked

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>at a floppy disk envelope with the black and white

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>IBM logo on the front, the letters IBM seemed to

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have a red tint, And the same thing happened when

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>people looked at pages in a book, the text seemed

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like it was shaded red. Now, if that's not weird enough,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>check this out. This only happened in the nineteen eighties.

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>People didn't perceive a red tint before or after this decade.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So what was changing about brains during that window. I'll

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you the answer. But to understand this, we're first

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>going to step back even further in history, twenty four

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred years further to Aristotle. Now, Aristotle, as you know,

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is a philosopher and a polymath whose intellectual interests were boundless.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>He wrote about essentially every subject you could imagine. But

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we're coming to Aristotle not because of something he wrote,

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but instead because he was insightful enough to pause and

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>notice when something didn't make sense. What happened is that

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>someone was trying to cross a fast flowing river on

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>his horse, and the horse got stuck halfway in the river.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So Aristotle, along with some other people, ended up watching

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this rescue operation. The way you might have a bunch

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of people looking at a car crash nowadays. So you

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have all these Greeks all standing there in their togas,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>talking and chatting and watching the horse in the fast

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>flowing river. Now most of the people were presumably just

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about stuff that made no difference to history. But

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Aristotle stood at the side of the river intently watching

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this horse. Now Here was the key about Aristotle, a

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>general characteristic that made him so famous to history. He

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was a good observer. He paid attention. He noticed when

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>things were unusual, and when he found something, he would

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>sink his teeth into the problem and wouldn't let go.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And what he noticed here was something that possibly the

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>others did too, but they ignored it, and they didn't

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>think any further on it. What he noticed is that

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>once the horse got unstuck and the man made it

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to the shore, and Aristotle looked away, he noticed that

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>everything on the land, the rocks, the huts, the trees,

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>everything seemed to be drifting, and they all seemed to

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>be moving in the opposite direction of the river. Now

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you may have seen something like this too. The easiest

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>way to experience Aristotle's confusion and delight is to stare

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>at a waterfall and after you keep your eyes locked

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on it for a while, look over to the rocks

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the waterfall, and the rocks appear

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to be moving upward. Now, this illusion that he first

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>made note of twenty four hundred years ago has come

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to be known as the motion after effect. Why does

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it happen. The activity of particular neurons in your visual

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 1>cortex represents downward motion, and the activity of other neurons

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>represents upward motion. And they're always locked in battle, and

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the time the competition is evenly pitched, and

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>they evenly inhibit each other, and as a result, the

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>world appears to you to be moving neither up nor down. So,

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 1>given this, a popular explanation for the motion after effect

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is fatigue. By staring at the downward motion of the waterfall,

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you burn up a good deal of energy in your

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>downward coating neurons, and now their vigor is temporarily depleted.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So the battle tips in favor of the upward encoding neurons,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and as a result of this unbalanced activity, you perceive

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>that the rocks are climbing upward. You have this net

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>movement upward. Now, this fatigue hypothesis is very appealing in

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>its simplicity, but it's wrong. Why because it can't explain

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>some critical facts about the illusion. So imagine you watch

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the downward waterfall for a while and then you close

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>your eyes tightly, say, for three hours you close your eyes.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>When you reopen your eyes, you'll see the rocks crawling upward.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And what that tells us is it's not about a

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>temporary energy depletion in neurons. There's something deeper going on here.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And here's what that deeper thing is is the illusion

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>comes about not because of passive fatigue, but instead because

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of an active recalibration in your brain. Your visual system

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is exposed to continuous downward motion, and after a while

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to assume this is the new normal. At first,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>downward motion is dramatic information to your brain, but after

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a while of staring, you receive no new information from

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>downwardness here. So, as far as your brain is concerned,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the new reality, a world that flows more

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>down than up. So your visual system carefully rebalances its

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>expectations to mirror the world to expect more downward than

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>upward activity. Now, when you look away from the waterfall

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and toward the cliff side. This recalibrated set point becomes

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>obvious because now rocks and trees are flowing upward toward

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>the sky. Your set point has shifted. In other words,

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what counts as standing still has shifted. Why well, your

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>brain always wants to set up a ground truth so

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that it can be better at detecting change. In this case,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>when your visual field is filled with the site of

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the waterfall, your brain is working to subtract off all

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that downward motion. All that downward motion is no longer

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>informative in the way that it was, and so the

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>circuitry it adjusts itself so that it can be maximumly

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to new information. Now, if you watch for it

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the way Aristotle would, you'll see that this kind of

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>recalibration happens to you all the time. Think about when

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you're on a small boat on the ocean. You are

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>rocking with the waves for a while, and then when

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you get off the boat, the land seems to be

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>rocking for a while. It feels as though you're still

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>on the water. Now you may have thought about it

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this way, Hey, my body thinks it's still on the water.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>What you're actually feeling is a negative image of the

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>water's motion. And you may have noticed this sort of

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>illusion if you're a runner. So here's what normally happens.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Your body sends motor commands to the legs. It says, okay,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>move fast, and correlated with your running is a visual

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sensation where the visual world is flowing by your eyes

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>as a result. But when you run on a treadmill

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at the gym, your brain is sending the same signals

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to your legs. Run fast, but now your visual system

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get the world flowing past. Instead, you're looking at

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the gym wall in front of you the whole time.

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So now when you step off, you experience the treadmill illusion.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>With each step you take toward the locker room, the

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>world seems to stream by at a faster pace. It

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>looks as though you're moving forward more quickly than you

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>really are. Why does it happen Because your brain has

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>an expectation about how the act of moving your legs

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>should translate to the flow of the visual scene past

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>your eyes, and now after the treadmill, it's had to

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>adjust that relationship. So now there's an after effect. This

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is just like with Aristotle's horse or the waterfall or

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that you're still rocking after you get off

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the boat. Your brain is readjusting its expectations about the world.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>In the case of the treadmill, it's how the active

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>moving your legs should translate to the flow of the

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>visual scene past your eyes, and when you go back

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to the normal world, there's an after effect. As another example,

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you've surely noticed color after effects. If you stare at

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a red dot for a little while and then you

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>look somewhere else and blink, you'll see the dot, but

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>now it looks green. Or if you stare at something

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>bright yellow for a little while and then you look away,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you'll see the opposite color blue. And these types of

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>color after effects can be surprisingly sophisticated. So consider something

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>called the McCullough after effect, named after the researcher Celeste McCulloch,

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>who discovered this in the nineteen sixties. So really get this.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I want you to imagine a bunch of black and

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>white lines like black white, black white, black white. Now

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>imagine a group of these that are horizontal and a

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>separate group of these that are vertical. Now, this can't

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>just be imagined as an illusion, but has to be

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>looked at to work. So please find a picture of

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>these lines on eagleman dot com Slash podcast to go

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>over there and take a look at this. Okay, So

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>look farther down the page and you'll see lines that

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>look the same as these black and white lines, but

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>now they're colored. The horizontal lines are green and the

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>vertical lines are red. And what I want you to

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>do is stare at these colored lines for a bit,

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like a few minutes. The green lines go side side,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the red lines go up and down. Now go back

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to the original black and white lines and you'll see

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>something amazing. You'll see that the spaces between the black

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and white horizontal lines now look reddish, and the spaces

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>between the black and white vertical lines look greenish. This

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is the McCullock effect. You gotta try this for yourself.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It's really worthwhile. Now why does it happen. It's because

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>when you stared at the colored lines, your brain said, hey, wait,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for some strange reason, everything horizontal is appearing green to

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>me and everything vertical is looking red to me. But

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>those features shouldn't really be correlated, and so it adjusts

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>itself to cancel out this strange relationship. Going on, and

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the black and white lines again,

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the after effect. The horizontal lines were being

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>internally shifted in your brain towards the opposite color red,

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and the vertical lines toward green. And again, I just

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear, this has nothing to do with fatigue,

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>because in nineteen seventy five, two researchers showed that if

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you stare at these red and green lines for fifteen minutes,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the after effect can last three and a half months.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So your brain is always doing an active recalibration of

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the world out there. And this active recalibration is why

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties many people began to see the

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>text in the books appearing to have a red tint

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>because at that time the population had just begun to

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>use computer monitors to do word processing. And as some

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of you remember, unlike modern monitors, these early monitors only

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 1>displayed one color green, and so you typed a bunch

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of lines of text on the screen and it looked

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>like horizontal lines of green on a black background. So

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>people would say there at these horizontal green rows for

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hours at a time, all day while they were doing

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>their computer work. And so when they picked up a book,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the horizontal lines of black and white text were shaded

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>with the complementary color red. It was the McCullock effect.

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Their brains were adjusting to a world of horizontal green lines,

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and their reality changed accordingly. Now I mentioned that the

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>computer users in the nineteen eighties also experienced this illusion

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>when they looked at the IBM logo emblazoned on the

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>front of the floppy disk sleeve. If any of you

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>remember the old IBM logo, it's the three letters spelled

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>out of horizontal lines, as though you're looking at IBM

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>put through a egg slicer, And so the logo, just

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like the horizontal lines in the book, looked tinged with red,

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and designers at IBM were flummixed about this because they

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>had definitely not printed they're black and white design with

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>any red in it, and yet everyone was insisting that

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they had. So all these after effects teach us something wild.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Even though you just open your eyes and look around

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the world and assume you're just seeing reality out there,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in fact, your brain is doing massive work behind the scenes.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It's always recalibrating itself on the fly to try to

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>improve what it's seeing, to try to get rid of

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>information that doesn't matter, so it can surface the information

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that does matter. And this active recalibration of the world

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that's happening behind the scenes. This applies to everything. How

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>much motion is in the world, how stable the ground is,

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>whether vision flows past us when we move our legs,

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>whether lions are infused with color. None of the stuff

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.479
<v Speaker 1>is decided in our genetics. It's all calibrated by our experience.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Now I want to take this concept of adaptation one

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>level deeper. I want to introduce the concept that your

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>brain is making things invisible if they are expected. So

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>take this as an example. Let's say you take a

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>yellow ping pong ball and you cut it exactly in half,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and you lay one hemisphere over each eye, and what

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll see is the whole world is an even blanket

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of yellow color. But within a few moments you don't

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>see any color at all. It's as though you're blind.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Your visual system just assumes that the world has become yellower,

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and so it adapts so that you'll be sensitive to

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>other changes. So you should try this. You can find

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>any sort of totally featureless scene that's entirely one color

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and fill your eyes with it. Like walk up to

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a wall that's entirely painted red. Walk up real close.

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Your eyes are filled with red, and you'll see the

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>color will quickly drain away to neutral. Your brain says, hey,

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no more information here. I expect this color, So

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to adjust things so that becomes invisible and

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you something else. The scene doesn't even have

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to be featureless for things to fade away. So in

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen oh four, a Swiss physician named Ignos Troxler noticed

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>something really stunning, which is, if you stare at a

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>central point in the middle of a bunch of blobs

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of color, all the busyness in the periphery, all those

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>blobs will eventually disappear. I have an example of this

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on eagleman dot com slash podcast. Check it out. It's

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>really amazing. What you do is you keep your gaze

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>fixed right in the middle of the picture, and you'll

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>see there's all these smooth blobs of color, and within

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>about ten seconds, if you're keeping your eyes still, all

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>these surrounding blobs just start to disappear into the background,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and soon you are looking at what appears to be

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>a blank page. Now this is wild, and if you

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>move your eyes around just a bit, all these blobs

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>come back into your consciousness. This illusion is called the

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Troxlur effect, and what it demonstrates is that if there's

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a blob of something in your peripheral vision that is

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not changing at all, it will evaporate from your perception. Now,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>what is going on here? The answer is that your

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>visual system is always seeking motion and change. Something that's

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>fixed and none changing doesn't really matter, and it quickly

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes invisible. Good information is expected to update, and things

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that don't change get ignored by the system. So what

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>prevents your kitchen, your workplace from becoming like a Troxler

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>illusion with all the motionless features disappearing. Well, First, most

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of the world is made up of hard edges, not blobs,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and those are easier for your visual system to hang onto.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's a deeper reason, although you're not generally aware

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. Your eyes are constantly jumping and jiggling around.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So just observe a friend's eyeballs. You'll notice that her

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs are making about three rapid jumps every second of

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>her waking life. These are called thecods. Bang bang bang bang, bang,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you watch even more closely, you'll find that

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in between the big jumps, her eyes are constantly performing

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>these little micro jitters. They're called microsucods. Bang. Now, is

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>something wrong with your friend's eyes? No, these rapid movements,

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>both the big and the small. What they're doing is

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they're keeping the image on the retina fresh totally unconsciously,

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>her eyes are working to maintain a constantly changing image.

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do they bother. It's because any image that remains

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fixed on one position on the retina will become invisible.

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's how to prove this to yourself. If you wear

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>contact lenses, take a marker and draw a small shape

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>on the front of your contact right in the middle.

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>When you put the contact back in place on your eye,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>you'll see something there, but it won't last long. It

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>rapidly fades to invisibility. Now, this phenomenon underscores the fundamental

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 1>fact that brains care about change. Just like with the

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Troxler effect, features that don't change yield little information about

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the world. All the important information comes from things in flux. Now,

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have contact lenses, don't worry, because you're

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>already performing a similar experiment without knowing it. So you

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>have blood vessels that sit on top of your retina

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>at the back of your eye, and these blood vessels

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>should be seen superimposed on top of everything you look

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at because they're smack in front of your photoreceptors. But

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>these blood vessels are totally invisible to your perception. Just

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>like the drawing on your contact lens. These blood vessels

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>are fixed in position with respect to your retina, So

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>no matter how much your eyes move, they can't refresh

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the image of these blood vessels. Even though the vessels

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>interpose themselves between you and the world, they perceptually disappear.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like a magic trick. Now you might have noticed

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a flash of these vessels when the eye doctor shines

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the pen light in your eyes. Boom, there they are.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>In this situation, the beam of light can cause the

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>vessel to cast a shadow at an unusual angle, and

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>your visual system suddenly takes notice something unexpected has just

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>occurred at the retina, and that's the only time you

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>witness this massive network that obstructs your view. If you

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen this before, pause this podcast. Go into a

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>dark room and shine a beam of light in your eye.

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>From an angle, you'll see the blood vessels appear in

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>front of you. Just note that your visual system will

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>adapt fairly quickly, so the trick is to keep moving

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the light to different angles to maintain the image. So

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>this strategy of ignoring the unchanging keeps your brain poised

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to detect anything that moves or shifts or transforms at

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 1>the extreme. This is how reptile visual systems work. A

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>reptile can't see you if you stand still because they

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>only register change. They don't bother with position, and such

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a system is perfectly sufficient. Reptiles have been surviving and

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>thriving for tens of millions of years. You probably remember

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the scene in Jurassic Park where they say don't move.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>The dinosaurs can't see you if you don't move. Well,

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this is why reptiles ignore anything that does not change.

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>So let's return to the waterfall illusion. Why doesn't your

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>visual system shift so much that the waterfall is perceived

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as standing still. Well, first, there might be limits to

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the recalibration. It simply can't recalibrate enough to subtract off

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the massive motion of the falls. But I think there's

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>another possibility, which is that you haven't watched the waterfall

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for long enough, and if you did, it would eventually

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>recalibrate all the way. How long might that take? Two

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>months of steering at the waterfall two years. In theory,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>if you were to watch for a long enough time,

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>then the short term changes in your visual system would

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>eventually to longer lasting changes, leading eventually to changes at

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the deepest levels of the system. So ever present background

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>motion would become invisible to us. And this leads to

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a crazy speculation that I made in my book Live Wire.

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, but logically sound. Are parts of the world

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>invisible to us that should be obvious. Imagine there was

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>something like a cosmic rainfall that had existed your entire life.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It would be completely invisible to you because you've never

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>seen otherwise. So your visual system would have set the

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>downward motion as it's zero point. If the cosmic rain

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>suddenly stopped, it would seem as though the whole world

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>were suddenly moving upward. We would believe that something had

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just appeared ascending rain, even though the real rain had

0:23:55.880 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>just ended. And this situation could happen in any sensory channel.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Imagine the beat beep of a cosmic alarm clock with

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>no snooze button all the time, all throughout the cosmos

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>bee beep beep. If it were totally regular, you wouldn't

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>hear it because your brain would have adapted to it.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>If the cosmic alarm suddenly ceased, everyone would hear a

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>great beat, beat, beat, but we would have no idea

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>that we were experiencing the after effect with the external

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sound totally inside our heads. Successful adaptation makes regularities invisible.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So we've been talking about these illusions as the results

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of adaptation, but there's actually the other way to look

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at this. These illusions result from prediction. So if you

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>subtract away the downward motion of the waterfall or the

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>rocking of the boat, or the drawing on your contact lens,

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that is equivalent to predicting its continued existence. In other words,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>when brain circuitry adjusts, it's making a guess about what

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the world is likely to be in the next moment.

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 1>It stops talking about news that is expected to continue.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So think again about your retinal blood vessels. They are

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>perceptually invisible because your visual system predicts them away. It

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>knows they are going to be there, so it ignores them.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>It's only if those expectations are violated, like when a

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>light shines in from a strange angle that your brain

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>spends any energy on representing that data. Your brain doesn't

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>want to pay the energy car of spiking neurons, so

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the goal is to reconfigure the network to waste as

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>little power as possible. If a pattern streams in that's

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>predictable or even partially guessable, the system saves energy by

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>structuring itself around that input, so it is not to

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>be surprised by it. If your brain is quieter, that

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>means there are fewer violations of expectations. Things in the

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>outside world are going approximately as forecast. In other words,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>an energy conscious brain wants to predict away everything possible

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so it can save its energy for just representing the unexpected.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Silence is golden. So although many neuroscientists think of activity

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in neurons as the representation of things in the world,

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it may turn out that spikes are the unpredicted, energy

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>expensive part. The representation of something totally expected would be

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing but a hush falling over the neuronal forest. The

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>system makes adjustments only when it gets surprised. If your

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>brain thinks that all bricks weigh the same amount, and

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>then you attempt to pick up a brick made of lead.

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>The violation of your expectation causes cascades of changes to

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with this new turn of events. But in contrast,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>if everything is successfully predicted, there's no need to change anything.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>For these reasons. When you first look at the Troxler picture,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you notice the blobs, and when you first put in

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the contact lens you detect the drawn on shape. But

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>after a short time, your brain adjusts itself. It's no

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>longer surprised. Let me give you another example of the

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>brain predicting things away. So I talked in a previous

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>episode about the neosensory wristband, which converts sounds into patterns

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of vibration on the skin, and deaf people wear the wristband,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and with time they can start to hear the world

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>through the signals that get to their brain via the skin.

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in learning more, that was episode twelve.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>But the point I want to make here is what

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>happens when a hearing person first puts on the wristband.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>They always react with surprise when they're feeling all the

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds of the world, and they say WHOA, this thing

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is picking up on my own voice. They're always startled

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>by that because it seems like they shouldn't be registering

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>their own speech. But of course, your ears pick up

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>on your voice all the time. It's typically the loudest

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>voice in your conversations because your own mouth is the

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>closest one to your ears. But because you can perfectly

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>predict your own vocalizations, you hardly hear your own voice.

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't notice it your brain is predicting it away.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Or take this example, when people wear the wristband, they're

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>struck by the volume of other predictable sounds that they

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>normally pay no attention to because they're the ones who

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>create the sounds, like flushing the toilet or closing the

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>door behind them, or their own footsteps. It's not that

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>your auditory system doesn't register these sounds, but instead it's

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that you actively predict them away. So you flush the

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>toilet or close the door or walk and these things

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>don't sound particularly loud to you, but it becomes obvious

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're wearing the wristband. You can't believe how loud

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>these events are because your brain has not yet learned

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to predict the signals coming up your arm, so your

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>brain actively recalibrates because that allows it to burn less energy.

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's an even deeper principle at work here in

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the darkness of your skull. You your brain is striving

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to build an internal model of the outside world. When

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you walk around your house, you don't pay any attention

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to the environment because you already have a good model

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. In contrast, when you're driving in a foreign

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>city you're trying to find a way to a particular hotel,

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you're forced to look around at everything, the street signs,

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the store naims, the building numbers because you don't already

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have a good model of what to expect. So how

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>do you build up a good internal model? What is

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the neural technology that allows you to zoom in on

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>those data points that don't match your expectation while ignoring

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>everything else that's already counted for. We call this attention.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>You pay attention to the unexpected bang, or the unforeseen

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>brush on your skin, or the surprising movement in your periphery.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Attending allows you to put your high resolution sensors on

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the problem and figure out how to incorporate it into

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>your model. Ah that's just the lawnmower. Ah, that's the kitten. Ah,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the housefly. Your model is now updated. In contrast,

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't pay any attention to the feeling of the

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>shoe on your left foot, because you already have an

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>internal model of it, and that model is consistently predicting

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're receiving, at least until you get a pebble

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in your shoe that draws your attention because suddenly the

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>model calls for an update. The difference between predictions and

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>outcomes is the key to understanding a strange property of learning,

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that if you're predicting something perfectly, your brain

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need a change. Further so, say you learn that

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the ding of your phone predicts that you just got

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a text message. Your brain will quickly learn the relationship

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>between those two, in large part because of the relevance

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of text messages to your social life. Then let's say

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>your phone gets a software update, and as a consequence,

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the arrival of the text message is now signaled by

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a ding plus a vibration. It turns out that your

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>brain won't train up on the vibration. This is an

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>effect known as blocking. Your brain already knows that the

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ding predicts the text, so it has no need to

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>learn about something new. If your phone merely vibrates without

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the ding, your brain won't know the meaning of that queue.

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It has learned nothing about that. This phenomenon of blocking

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>makes sense when we understand that changes in the brain

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>happen only when there's a difference between what was expected

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and what actually happened. So having an internal model of

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the world allows us to make predictions and quickly detect

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>when we're wrong, which tells us where to attend and

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>how to update things. And this sort of system, by

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, is becoming interesting to engineers thinking about the

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>future of machinery. Several companies are starting to work on

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>devices that operate this way, from tractors to airplanes. An

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>internal model of the world allows a machine to make

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>its best guesses about the events that are expected to unfold,

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and when events are consistent with the predictions of the

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>machine's algorithm, nothing has to change, and it's only when

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the inputs go off script that the software needs to

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to update the machines model. Okay, so now

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've talked about all the ways that your system adapts,

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it will now be easy to understand how drugs modify

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>nervous systems. When you consume a drug, that changes the

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>number of receptors for that drug in the brain to

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>such an extent that you can look at a brain

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>after a person has died and determine his addictions by

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>gauging his molecular changes. This is why people become desensitized

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>or tolerant to a drug. The brain comes to predict

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the presence of the drug. It adapts its receptor expression

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so it can maintain a stable equilibrium when it receives

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the next hit. In a physical literal way, the brain

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to expect the drug to be there. The biological

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>details have calibrated themselves accordingly, and because the system now

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>predicts a certain amount to be present, more of the

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>drug is needed to achieve the original high. This recalibration

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the basis of the ugly symptoms of drug withdrawal.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The more the brain is adapted to the drug, the

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>harder the fall is when the drug is taken away

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with draw All symptoms vary by a drug, from sweating

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 1>to shakes to depression, but what they all have in

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>common is a powerful absence of something that was anticipated.

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I suggested in my book Live Wire that this understanding

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of neural predictions also gives us an understanding of heartbreak.

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is because the people that you love become

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 1>part of you, not just metaphorically but physically. You absorb

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>people into your internal model of the world. Your brain

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>refashions itself around the expectation of their presence. So after

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the breakup with a lover, or the death of a friend,

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:50.919
<v Speaker 1>or the loss of a parent, the sudden absence represents

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a major departure from homeostasis. As Khalil Jabraun put it

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in the prophet quote and ever has a bin that

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>In this way, your brain becomes like a negative image

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of everyone you've ever come in contact with. Your lovers,

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>your friends, your parents. They fill in their expected shapes,

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and just like feeling the waves after you've departed the

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>boat or craving the drug when it's not there, so

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>your brain calls for the people in your life to

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be there. And when someone moves away or rejects you,

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or dies, your brain struggles with its thwarted expectations. Slowly

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>through time, it has to readjust to a world without

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that person. Now I want to cover one more thing

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in today's episode, which is how your brain knows how

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to adjust. And I suggest it in Live Wire that

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a very simple but surprise strategy underlying all this.

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And to understand this, consider something like phototropism in plants.

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>This is where plants capture maximum light by constantly adjusting

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>their position. So if you watch a plant growing in

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>fast motion, you'll see that it doesn't grow straight towards

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the light source. Instead, it overshoots its trajectory by a

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit, then it undershoots by a bit, and back

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and forth. It's not a pre planned mission. It's a

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>spastic dance with constant correction. And by the way, you

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>find something similar in the strategy that bacteria use to

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>find food. When they're searching for the center of a

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>food source, like a bit of sugar that's fallen on

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen counter, they make their way to the sugar

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>by employing three elegantly simple rules. One randomly selected direction

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and move in a straight line. Two if things are

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>getting better, keep going. Three if things are getting worse,

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>randomly change directions by tumbling. In other words, the strategy

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is to lock down the approach when conditions are improving

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and dump it when it's not working. By this simple policy,

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a bacterium can quickly and efficiently work its way to

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the densest point of the food source. So I've proposed

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's a similar principle at work in the brain.

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Instead of working its way towards maximizing sunlight or food,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 1>it works towards maximizing information. And I call this strategy infotropism.

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>The hypothesis suggests that neural circuitry constantly shifts to maximize

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the amount of information it can extract from the world.

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So consider what we've heard in some of the previous episodes.

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>We saw the way the brain comes to figure out

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>its sensory organs, its eyes and ears and nose and fingertips.

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>When you're a baby, you don't know what those data

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>streams mean, and your brain figures it out with experience.

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And we saw the way a brain comes to learn

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>how to control a body, no matter if that body

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 1>possesses fins or legs or robotic arms, whatever the case.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>The brain fine tunes its circuitry to maximize data it

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 1>streams from the world. So this fine tuning is helped

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>along by rewards, which cause broadcasts throughout the circuitry to

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>announce that something worked. In this way, with a minimum

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of preprogramming, the system works out how to optimize its

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 1>interaction with the world. Or Another example is that your

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>brain will adjust to whatever language you're exposed to as

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a baby, such that you can hear those sounds, but

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you lose the ability to distinguish other sounds and other languages.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>This is all infotropism at work. Baby's brains adjust to

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>maximize the data that matters around them. On a longer

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>time scale, when a person goes blind, other senses take

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>over the visual cortex, and in an upcoming episode we'll

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>learn how neurons actually pull this off, but for now,

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>note that we can interpret this takeover as in photropism.

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>The brain is maximizing its resources so that it can

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>best interpret whatever data flows in. And just think about

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Mecullic effect with the horizontal and vertical colored lines.

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Your visual system works to separate the dimensions of color

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and orientation because it's trying to maximize information from the world,

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and so accordingly, it doesn't want to mix together these

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>separable measures. So although the effect is typically viewed as

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>simply a fun visual illusion. The work happens under the

0:40:56.160 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>hood for a deeper reason. If something were causing a

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>tinge to appear on lines, like some strange overhead lighting

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>or something wrong with your optics, your brain would reorganize

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>itself to take care of this, canceling out this weird relationship,

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and by doing so, it would maximize your capacity to

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>extract information about colors and orientations separately. By separating two

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>dimensions that statistically should be unyoked, your brain can best

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>gather information from the world. Here's a cool example of

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>infotropism at the level of neurons, the retina in your eye,

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the set of photoreceptors the back of your eye captures

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the light of the world and tells the brain what

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it's seeing out there. But it reads the world differently

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in the day and in the night. So in bright

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>daylight there are plenty of photons to capture, and so

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 1>each photoreceptor just takes care of its own tiny dot

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of the scene, and this gives nice and high resolution.

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But at night it's a different story. There are few

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.919
<v Speaker 1>photons to be captured, and so now the important job

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of the retina is to detect that something was there,

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>even if it can't tell that with high resolution. So

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at night, the photoreceptors do their work very differently. Essentially,

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>they join forces with their neighbors. They change the details

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of their internal molecular cascades so they can link arms

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with one another. Now they're operating as a team, they

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>can detect much lower levels of light, they can detect

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>fewer photons out there. So what we have here is

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful and sophisticated strategy that has the retina operate

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>differently as the light levels go up or down. When

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's bright out, the system achieves high spatial resolution, and

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>when it's dark, photoreceptors pool together to have a better

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>chance to catch photons, which results in vision that's more

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to dim light but blurrier in resolution. You've surely

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>noticed this at nighttime when you can't quite make out

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>what something is out there, whereas it would be easy

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in the daytime. So the point here is that your eyes,

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>your retinas, put enormous work into shifting themselves around to

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>maximize information that matters whether the photons are plentiful or

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they're rare. The retina optimizes itself to get useful data.

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>In the day, it captures the most detail so that

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it can spot the rabbit at the distance. In dim light,

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it shifts to higher sensitivity to capture whatever's out there

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with lower detail, capturing the shadowy essence of the jaguar

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>lurking in the gloom. Mother Nature figured out not only

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>how to build an eye, but also how to adjust

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>its circuitry on the fly, so it can operate well

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 1>in different contexts, all to make the best use of

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what's available. It is infotropic. Just like the plant seeks light,

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the retina seeks data, and more generally, as we've seen

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, the brain is always seeking information. It

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>constantly adjusts its circuitry to maximize the data it can

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>draw from the world. So if you're staring at a waterfall,

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it discounts the downward motion so it can be sensitive

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to other things. If you put on yellow sunglasses, your

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>brain discounts that shift in color so that it can

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be more sensitive to other information. And you can detect

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this shift when you take off the sunglasses and you

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:48.439
<v Speaker 1>have a big blue color after effect. So to wrap up,

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this episode plugs into the big picture we've been talking

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about in many episodes, and we'll see in many more,

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>which is that the brain is locked in silence and darkness,

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and its job is to build an internal model of

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the outside world. And what we're seeing a little more

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly now is that its internal model is really there

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to make predictions. If the world proceeds as expected, the

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>brain saves energy. So when the world changes, let's say,

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>becoming a place with lots of downward motion or yellow

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>light or something, the brain adjusts to match it so

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that it can be maximumly positioned to gather new information

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that's unexpected. So these after effect illusions seem funny and

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>may be trivial, but they're actually a powerful way for

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>us to reveal this constant adaptation that your brain is doing.

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of many episodes coming up, we're going

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to see how fundamentally the brain is a prediction machine,

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and that is the driving engine behind its constant self reconfiguration.

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>By modeling the state of the world, the brain reshapes

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:02.840
<v Speaker 1>itself to have good expectation and therefore to be maximally

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to the unexpected. Go to Eagleman dot com slash

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 1>podcast for more information and to find further reading. Send

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>me an email at podcasts at eagleman dot com with

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>questions or discussions, and I'll be making an episode soon

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in which I address those. Until next time, I'm David Eagleman,

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and this is Inner Cosmos.