WEBVTT - What Happens Inside the 5

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>advice Leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Paul Welcome to

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the love fest for Damian Pierce, also known as Fantasy

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I am Paul Charge and my co host

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>today or Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, guys, Damian

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Pierce wasn't available to come in and co host today. Sorry,

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's a good thing because we'd be spooning right

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>now if he did. That would be that's the level

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of regard. That's a weird thing to do. But you

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>never spoon with me. No, I like Damian Pierce more

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>than I like it. I have photo evidence that negates that.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It's uh. It's been a great start for this preseason.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna talk about all of the camps, all

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty two camps. What are the big stories from each

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of the teams. Will also talk about some of the

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>key things you need to know from what happens inside

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line. We'll answer three tough questions. We'll

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about the vacated targets from around the league and

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>identify our blacklist players that we will not draft. Not

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say never draft, but there's a point

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>at which I would be grudgingly chacked my guys. But

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like four rounds after they're gonna go. Yeah, it's

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's always ADP centric. It's based on that and no

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>small part. Let's let's start our tour around the training

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>camps with the Panthers. Yeah, not much here. Baker Mayfield

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>won the job. There's a little bit of talk of Higgins,

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>who has good chemistry from with Baker in camp and

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>also because he was with Cleveland with Baker Mayfield, that

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>he might be a guy that gets in a in

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>some decent rotation snaps. Only in your probably twenty four

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>round leagues are you're gonna worry about that though? Um

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>At Let's go to the Raiders. Kenyan Drake was cut

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this week. Josh Jacobs now controls the backfield with Brandon Bolden,

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ameer Abdula, and Zamir White. I'll do for some sort

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of role. I want nobody except for Jacobs, just because

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he has more of the goal line role.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>But also Darren Waller hurt again with an undisclosed injury.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh McDaniels is noncommittal on Waller's availability for Week one.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>A couple of weeks ago identified Darren Wallers outside of

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the safe tight ends that we talked, I think there's

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>three safe tight ends. That's it. The Packers starters did

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>not play on Thursday night, but I'll just mention this.

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's love continues to look very inconsistent. I don't think

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they've got really any kind of viable answer there. Romeo

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Adobbs played briefly on Thursday, didn't do much. I'll note

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that all the presumed starters did not play, and that

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>means you're presumed starting wide receivers are Alan Lazard, Sammy Watkins,

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and Randall Cobbs. And Watkins and cob are going undrafted

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in many leagues, and these are starting wide receivers and

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.559
<v Speaker 1>an Aaron Rodgers led offense. Let's go to the Washington Commanders.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh Ron Rivera says Gibson will be the primary kick returner,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>but the reporters still also expect Gibson to lead the

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>backfield and touches. He's really really slipping. I'm probably not

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>drafting to unless he gets down into the eight to

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>ten rounds. It should be noted though he did do

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>some kick return work in practice and stuff last year too,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we just didn't know about it. Let's go to the

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills man Zack Boss and James Cook both looked

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty good in the second preseason games. So we've got

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a singletary Moss Cook triple headed backfield yuck, and O J.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Howard as a cut candidate. Yeah, that wouldn't surprise me.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Not a triple backfield, no bueno fantasy. Let's go to

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. Wherever you've got Damian Pierce ranked, it's too

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>low in the preseason. You're looking for rookies who display

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>traits that will translate into the regular season against full

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>time defensive starters, and Pierce looks special. The burst, the footwork, decisiveness,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>goal line carries. We believe in catch, although he has

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have been used that way so far. Lovey Smith during

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the game on Thursday night, said quote, we are a

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>running team. Yeah, it's game on, baby pet Hamilton's there.

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Damian Pierce, Uh, if you want him, you're gonna have

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to go fourth round, third round to get Damian Pierce,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.559
<v Speaker 1>who I believe at this point is moved to roughly

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>number one among rookie running backs. All right, let's go

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Yeah, so for the Buccaneers,

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Brady's back with the team. That that whole drama thing

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is over. But the bigger news is their old line

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is sitting on three offensive line injuries. Two of them

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss most of the season. Third probably be back

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>by week one, but we're not sure yet. But that's

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that's some huge hits to that line. I remember they

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>lost two players in the offseason, want to retirement one

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to free agency. All right, let's go to the Cleveland Browns.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Jacoby Brissette officially your starter for the first eleven weeks.

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Josh Rosen is the other quarterback on

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>roster right now, and he looked awful in that last

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>preseason game for the Colts. Your kicker. We don't do

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of kicker talking on the show. Rod Regal

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Blanketship contender Jake Verity to win the kicking job. Um,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that he's not a deep field goal threat,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but he kicks indoors and he's on a good offense.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Presumably good offense. He's got the best name among all

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the kickers and regal Blanketship. Yeah, that's great song called

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>blanket Ship by a band called Dive d I I V. Also,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>he also plays with legos and goes into train camp

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on like those wheelie shoes and stuff. He also wears

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>his glasses. He's like one of the only players who

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>wears glasses on the field with your kicker. Why not?

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe we're up with the Lions. Scott not much here.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Williams sent to the reserve list. Not really a

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>surprise though, because he wasn't expected back to late October

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>at the earliest. Anyway, jets Zack Wilson's status won't be

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 1>updated until likely after Labor Day. Denzel Mims has requested

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a trade. Breece Hall hasn't quite flashed and enough to

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>steal the backfield from Michael Carter and Tevin Coleman. If

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you're drafting Hall, don't plan on starting him for the

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>first few weeks at least that it might be like

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a Jonathan Taylor Marlon Max situation, or at Adrian Peace

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and Chester Taylor situation. The talent should have went out eventually,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, he's Roger Craig's cousin. I mean, he's

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>got some talent there in the bloodlines. For the Chiefs

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night, Juju Smith Schuster still getting over injury,

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't play. Uh Skymore got the start with the

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>first team offense. They targeted one one down deep throw,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but otherwise mostly just return work. Ronald Jones got first

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>team reps, which was interesting. He ran hard, but almost

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>entirely between the tackles, and it's what he has been

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a cut candidate all camp my theory as they are

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to trying to put him out there for a

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>seventh compick, good luck, Yeah, exactly. Um. For those who

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>invested in Isaiah Pacheco, he was the third back in

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the game, but did get some first team work. It's

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>increasingly unclear what Pachenko's playing time might be, and I

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>still I think there's some real risk and drafting him.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll see though. Uh. Seahawks Scott uh sounds like Pete

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Carroll and the Seahawks are gonna play super flex this

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>year for the team, They're good, They're gonna they're gonna

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have both Drew Lock and Judo Smith's quarterbacks. Really, the

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>truth is there's there's still no Carter back decision made.

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It's still up in the air and no timetable for

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ken Walker to return from his hurtnea surgery. They had

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>previously hoped week one. Now it's sounding like not. Let's

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>go to the Broncos. Matt not a ton going on

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in Denver, but tackle Tom Compton was placed on the pup,

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>meaning he'll miss the first month of the season for

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the rams Um. We don't do a lot of backup

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>tight end talk, but let me mention Kendall Blanton got

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>released in a surprise. Remember at the end of last year,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he got a bunch of reps when Tyler he was

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on and he looked pretty good and then they caught him.

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And this puts Higbie into a position for a pretty

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>sizeable snap count because the guys behind him are just

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>zero threat Bryson Hopkins and Roger Carter. You know if

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you are if you sleft tight end deeply enough, Tyler

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Higbee back on the radar, Let's go to the Eagles.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Scott Slime Sanders still dealing with that hammy issue has

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>been for weeks now and now Week one is starting

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to be in doubt. That's that's not a good sign.

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Slime Sanders. That's his nickname, Miles Sanders. I didn't know

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that it might be. I don't know that's his nickname

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for a while though, I had never heard that, And honestly,

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty impressed on myself right now for having figured

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>out on the fly. Yeah, that's pretty good. Scott plays

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with them in a league, by the way, probably, but

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I play that bet everyone pay with During this show,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins Matt Jalen Waddle has an undisclosed injury and

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>has done little more than stretching with the team over

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the last week. We've still got plenty of time, but

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's worth watching for the Vikings tight end Irv Smith

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>returning to practice, adding some hope that he's gonna be

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>ready for Week one because it's a thumb injury, though

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not catching passes, just doing individual drills. Vikings are

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>prove their backup quarterback situation, acquiring Nick Mullins this week,

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>which adds some safety to the whole offense and the

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota receivers specifically. And continue to watch the backup runners.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>We've said this for most of the past three shows.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Can A want Ty Chandler as they could eat into

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Madison's role as the primary backup to Dalvin Cook

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Scott, Yeah, big one here. They lost Tyron

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Smith on their old line who used to be a

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>beast and still has been good for the last few years. Um,

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just a big blow for that old line. Uh.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The other news is Gallup is going to avoid the pups,

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so they're hoping he'll be ready sometime in the first

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>four weeks. Clearly with that news, and Jerry Jones said

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the team is still gonna run through Zeke, but Paulard

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be involved. And Dak Brescott mentioned Poulard

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as a pass catcher, so maybe maybe Paula will be

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty flexworthy for you. He was last year. New England

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Matt Damien Harris left practice with this week, also

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>with an undisclosed injury. He won't play in the preseason finale.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Things are shrouded in mystery in New England always with

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>their running backs. But in my mind right now, I

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>draft Romande Ramandre Stevenson above Damien Harris right now for

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the last two or three weeks, that is where I

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think it flipped. Like last week, they're pretty close on

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>ADP depending on where you are. Some some to have

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Harris higher still, but yeah, for the Saints, Jameis Winston

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>declared himself ready to start Week one. He's recovering both

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>from an a c L injury from last year and

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a foot injury from this preseason. Michael Thomas has got

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a hamstring injury. He's missed several days of practice, but

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>presumed ready for the opener. How about the Giants Scott

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so Colin Johnson, who is set to take some starter

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>snaps towards Achilles uh Darius Tony has both knee and

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injuries. He's dealing with. Ricky Seels Jones goes to

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>injured reserve Sterling Shepard was activated, but he's coming back

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>from an achilles and and I'm not sure Kenny Golladay

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>even exists anymore. So it is se Quon Barkley and

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Bellinger season in New Has there been a fall

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>from grace any faster than Kenny Golladays? Mean two years ago,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he it looked like he was one of the ten

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>best receivers in the league. I don't know Michael Thomas

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>has something to say about that. You know, it's a

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>good point. We'll see how this year goes. But at

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>least Mike Daniel Belinger is a nice tight end sneaky sleeper. Honestly,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that's true. At least Thomas and they both have had

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>injury issues, but Thomas has been unable to play. Let's

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>go to the Titans next man. It's just kind of

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver room kind of shaking out. Robert Woods

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>looks like the pure top wide receiver by a long shot. There,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>trail On Burke's finally back on the field though. That's good.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Westbrook Keen is listed as the starting slot wide receiver.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>But the sneaky wanted to keep an eye on is

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Phillips, who's flashed all the way throughout camp and

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 1>he's returning punts really well. Mitch Robiski was named the

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>starter for the Steelers, although that designation may not last

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>all that long. Can you pick? It look very good

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the previous uh preseason game, and the Steelers are

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>at Cincinnati in week one. It's easy to imagine at

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Steelers get drubbed in week one and that might

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>be and that maybe that might be the So right now,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>name the starter and then it could be what it's yep,

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>there we go. Uh, your handcuffed? Naji Harris, by the way,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>may not be Benny Snell. Keep an eye on Jalen

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Warring about a lot of a lot of extra work.

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Falcons. Scott Kyle Pitts was inducted

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>into the Pro Football Hall of Fames week after a

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty two yard catch as a wide receiver. In fact,

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it was so good that the Falcons cut fellow wide

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>receivers Torontowe Allison and autumn Tate Bengals Joe Burrow increasing

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>practice activity after getting his appendix removed a few weeks ago,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that's good news. Jeff Wilson gives the appearance of being

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the backup behind Elijah Mitchell. Got all the first team

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>run on Thursday. Trey Lance played, showed some scrambling ability

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and improvisational skills, but really wasn't asked to do a lot.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 1>And I learned and I not I did not realize this.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo not allowed to practice with the team. He's

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>doing his own practices on a separate field, presumably because

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't want him to learn secrets about the team

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll get traded and wanted they don't want

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>him injured. They don't want anything to happen. So yeah,

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>very that's very bizarre. The one year there's no major

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>preseason injuries too. Yeah, well, now Jim Patrick would like

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>to have but yes, almost not. I'll just go to

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. Uh. You know, Benjiman seems to have separated

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>himself and is likely to be the backup to James Conner.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>That role had had some fantasy value with Chase Edmunds

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>last year. People thought it'd be Darrell Williams, but now

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he appears to be a cut candidate. Wow, all right,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>let's let's hit the Jaguars man. Trevor Lawrence targeted christ

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>In Kirk eight times in preseason game number two. That's

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>an insane amount of targets to receive in a little

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>less than half of play. He could be in line

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>for a lot this year. Also, James Robinson targeting Week

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one for his return to play, so that backfield is

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>getting murky, and it is getting a little bit murky.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Robinson is gonna be a factor, but

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll find out that Ravens Gus Edwards went on the

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>pup list and will miss at least the first month

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Mike Davis is your very possible Week

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one starting running back. Going undrafted in virtually all fantasy leagues,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis could be your starter there. JK. Dobbins is

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>trending towards availability, but probably not a workhorse role in

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>week one. And then last thing that I need to

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>mention because we've put this guy on your radar three

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Isaiah likely continuing to blow minds. Backup tight end,

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth round rookie, maybe not even really a tight end

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>when you look at him, he's he's a hundred like

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>higher thirty five. I changed what I said. There's not

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>three safe tight ends. There's Mark Andrews, there's Pits, There's

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey and Isaiah likely Isaiah likely. They're gonna Ligne.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no competition on what there's no white outs on

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this team outside of Bateman. They're gonna, like Isaiah likely

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>likely their number two wide receiver. I'm not I'm not

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that's out of the question. By the end of

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the year, Isaiah likely could be the deep facto number

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>two receiver, like Kyle Pitts is a receiver in Atlanta, alright, Sure,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Final two teams, Chicago Bears, Scott You just in case

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>people heard about Khalil Herbert Gain injured last week going

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>off on a cart. He was back at practice the

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>next day. It was a total non issue. Just in

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>case you heard about that, all right. And lastly the

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Chargers. Lots of minor camp injuries for the

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>second tier Chargers. Donald Parham has a hamstring, Favorite Palmer

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>concussion protocol, Isaiah Spiller ankle injury. Oh, there's a lot

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of interesting guys that are riding the find. It looks

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like those starters in l A are going to be

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>ready to go. Though. I love Josh Palmer had the huge,

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the huge, had the huge game preseason game last week.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm still very much on board. It's just a concussion.

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>They're they're not big deals. Put some dirt on that concussion.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right. When we come back, what's happening inside the

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>five will tell you about the easiest touchdowns your fantasy

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>team can get. When we return to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchie and Guillotine Leagues dot Com.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Matt Harrison with you as well. Next

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>two segments devoted to one of my favorite preseason topics,

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens inside the five yard line? Last year there

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>were almost six hundred touchdowns from inside the five yard line.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the part where you always make us guessing.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>And I was gonna I was gonna be prepared this

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>year and very close. There's These are the easy touchdowns

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that can propel your fantasy team when you need somebody

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>to score from distance, Like let's look, get Miles Sanders,

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>who has to score from distance or just not score

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>at all. Well, and then sometimes they just don't score

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>it all, as opposed to Boston Scott, who you know,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>picks up these easy touchdowns and they end up scoring giants,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so end up scoring the same fantasy points. By the way,

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I demand that every time Scott's on the show and

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Boston Scott is mentioned, you do a Boston accent. Demand

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this say chowder. No, I can't even say it with

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>an accent. By the way. You know, so we're from

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>where I'm from, you know, up on the Minnesota Iron

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Rage on the border of Canada, where you got Canadian

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>plus Minnesota. We don't have I don't have any access

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>up there. They do. We're gonna go through every team,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>tell you the one thing you need to know about

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>that team's predilections inside the five yard line. And we

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>begin with the Panthers. Scott, Yeah, yeah, based on last year.

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I can go based on last year,

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>because the Panthers ran it with Newton and uh Sam

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald early in the season. If you remember, he was

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>running the ball near the goal line constantly. They ran

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>ten times and scored seven times inside the five. Very good.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Baker's run ten times in his career inside the five,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not really a thing he does. In fact, he's

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>got several kneel downs inside the five. That role is

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 1>going to McCaffrey, who back in his full nineteen year

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>he had twenty of the two attempt inside the five.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be all McCaffrey. It'll almost certainly be McCaffrey there,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even as a receiver inside the five. The Panthers

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>only through it last year nine times inside the five

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:14.239
<v Speaker 1>years how many times? Nine times? Let me mention this,

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it every year. When you do this segment,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at an ideal conversion rate on on touchdown

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>scored on plays that start inside the five is about

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty the great You know, the really good effective players

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are at about a fifty percent conversion rate. If you're

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>running back with ten carries from inside the five, you'd

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like to see about five touchnowns. So I just want

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to put that out there. Since you brought it up, Matt,

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the raider. Last year, Josh Jacobs took

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteen carries inside the five and scored seven times, So

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>just above that fifty percent mark. That was pretty good.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh McDaniels is the new UH coach in Las Vegas.

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>His Patriots offense featured one of the heaviest run attacks

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in the league from inside the five last year, so

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Josh Acops might be in a good spot

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to convert a lot of touchdowns this year. People aren't

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about him very much. I aren't talking about him,

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but this is the kind of data we love from

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. The Packers former receiver Davante Adams, he

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>leaves behind the most receptions, most targets, and most touchdowns

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>since So ask yourself this, what are the will the

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Packers do without Davante Adams? Will they just ask somebody

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>else to fill that role, could be um or do

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they start running the ball more. This is never, This

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>is not. For years, it's been a team that runs

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>much inside the five. They've thrown a lot more. Maybe

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>there will be some extra opportunity for Aaron Jones and

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a J. Dillon. Let's go to the Washington commanders. What's

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>happening inside the five? So Washington passed the ball ten

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>times inside the five last year to wide receivers and

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. One completion brutal, So hopefully they run it more.

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>They read it twenty three times last year with just

0:20:55.960 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Gibson alone. He had of their rush attempts in side

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the five, he only converted a third of him though,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that feels like it's below Um, I'm gonna go check over. Yeah. So,

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>so are you saying Brian Robinson right now? Without saying

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Robinson. I like the fact they ran it twenty

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>three times inside the five last year, and if Brian

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Robinson has that role and a better conversion rate, And

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying you're not really you're not saying I

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't believe Yes, yes, depending down on this, Yes, and

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Brian Robinson, Yes, that should be good. Matt. What's happening

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Buffalo Bills? Inside the five, it's kind of

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a mess. Uh. Devin Singletary and Josh Allen tied for

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the most rushing attempts for the infrared zone for the

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>bills of seven apiece. Singletary converted four touchdowns. Allen had three,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, so that's not bad. Zack Moss but

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>also had five carries for three scores. So this is

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a true committee approach in the five that makes Buffalo

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>even worse on the running back spectrum for me. You

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>know who not in a committee for carries inside the

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>five for Buffalo Josh Allen. Well I mentioned him too,

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's like right in the third of all of them.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, well, that's great for Josh Allen because

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're starting for other reasons too. For the Texans, Houston

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>ranked last in passes and passing touchdowns and Rex burkehead

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>led the entire team in touchdowns from inside the five

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with two. Massive Pierce is going to do that in

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Week one exactly yet. Have you noticed We've managed to

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>work in Damian Pierce's name now four times in two

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>segments and I don't even played the league with him

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>or anything. That's the amazing part. Scott Tell me about

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks inside the five yard line. So I just

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned how Washington passed it ten times with only one

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>completion the Bucks. Tom Brady on his own had eighteen

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns inside the five yards. Yeah, that feels like

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they all went to Mike Evans. I will say, Mike

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Kevin six grong uh twice break three times. Howard caught

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>his loan target for everybody. Everybody was got. You know, um,

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>there's there's believed crazily not a lot of running going on.

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So you want the past the fasting options in the

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Bucks because that they get the inside the five options.

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>They're all going for a discount now because everybody's weirded

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>out about the Bucks. Right Cleveland, what's happening inside the five?

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Man Nick Chubb missed three games last year, but still

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>recorded of the team's rushing attempts from inside the five.

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt didn't get a lot of carries, but notably

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>de Ernest Johnson went to for two like that inside

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the five on rushing attempts and touchdowns. Also, Amari Cooper,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he scored three times on three targets

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>inside the five last year for the Cowboys. So Cooper

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of my favorite sleep wildly efficient inside the five?

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Are the Cleveland Browns this year as a whole team. Yeah.

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And also if you think that you know when everything

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>shakes out in the teams, these teams all make their

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>cuts in the coming week. If you think that Kareem

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunt is not going to be on the Browns, you

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>should be drafting backup running backs either Dearness Johnson or Ford.

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think it'd be Johnson first, But those guys,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>there's some great these your last pick of your draft

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>scenarios where you could have the new Kareem Hunt. Sure,

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Colts. Jonathan Taylor's thirty rushes thirty

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five was twelve more than anybody else.

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>In Taylor's two seasons. The Colts have run the ball

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy times from inside the five yard line, number one

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in the league. That's why he's going first five touchdowns

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because if not, I don't want him on my Exactly

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he's out. Let's go to the Detroit Lions. What's happening

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>inside the five? Scott uh Detroit Lions, Jamal Williams and

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift actually almost completely split the inside the five touches.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're drafting Swift for his touchdowns as

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>much as you are his receptions and total yards. But

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I did fund interesting point. Tight ends are generally pretty

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent for the most part, especially the lower you

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>go in the rankings. T J. Hawkinson did not have

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a single target inside the five last year. That's so dumb. Yeah,

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>he's a big guy, he's six. It feels it feels

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like they need to correct that. They really do. I'm

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that they do. Let's go to the Let's

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>go to the Jets. What are they doing inside the five?

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing anything because they didn't make it there.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year. In thirteen games, Zach Wilson only threw the

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>ball eight times from inside the five. He did throw

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on four of those eight. Uh. He only

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>ran six times from inside the five and scored three touchdowns.

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But they only had twenty seven rushing attempts as a

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>team from inside the five. That's less than Jonathan Taylor

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had himself. Yes, that is correct for the Chiefs, and

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think people when you think of Tyreek Hell, I

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>think sixty yard lasers coming off the arm of Patrick

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and him sprinting into the end zone. But it

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>turns out he leaves behind the team high eleven targets

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five. Since there's no wide receiver currently

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>on the Chief's roster that has more than three targets

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in their life from inside the five, there is a void.

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I want you to take that nugget right there and

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>hold that nugget for when we get to the Dolphins.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, good, we'll we'll, we'll nugget ties of that Seahawks.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>What's happening inside the five? Scott, Yeah, Matt was just

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about a lack of the Jets making inside the five.

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks had nine pass attempts nine times and only

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>thirteen Russians pimps inside the five. That they were scoring

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>more from distance, that's you know they were. Tyler Lockett

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>was there was that, and actually so was for a shot.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Penny ripped off a bunch of long runs at the

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly so not a lot of inside the five

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff and pretty pretty split up between all the players too. Matt,

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>let's go with the Broncos inside the five. Scott kind

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of stole my thunder talking about the Seahawks because Russell Wilson.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>He only threw the balls six times from inside the

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>five last year. The other three went to Geno Smith.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a shockingly low number. But head coach Nathaniel Hackett

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>comes from the Packers Street and Aaron Rodgers through the

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>ball twenty seven times last year from inside the five.

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>That was the fourth most in the NFL. We got

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to see a shift for Russell Wilson inside the five.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>UM I would think Courtland Sutton would be You're the

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>big beneficiary, biggest beneficiary from extra short passes or a

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>pick play near the end zone to Jerry Judy, just

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know in the Super Bowl that likes those.

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>That still hurts for a lot of people. Let's go

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Rams inside the five. The Rams had the

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>league's lowest run ratio thirty five per cent, and if

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>my math is correct, that means they passed six Cooper

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>cup lad all receivers in targets and touchdowns from inside

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line last year. Very effective at that.

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's going to change because it worked

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. But keep this as another reason to potentially

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>avoid cam Akers. Darrell Henderson not only and we'll talk

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>more about this light now that they're hurt right now,

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 1>which is another factor. We don't even know what they got,

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>but another reason to show some caution on those guys, Eagles.

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>What's happening inside the five? Scott? The Eagles only passed

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the ball fifteen times inside the five. Half of them

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>were to Earth's well, not exactly half, because fifteen doesn't

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. Seven. It was only there through six weeks, yes,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>seven to earths. In those six weeks. Uh, they ran

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball, however, forty three times. They run a lot

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>when they're getting close. And who was doing that running? Yeah,

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>don't get too excited because about a third of that

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>was Jalen Hurts, which is exciting. That's exciting for Jalen Hurts.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Um Miles Sanders only saw six of those forty three.

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I moved Jalen Hurts to quarterback too, was trying to

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.239
<v Speaker 1>get him to say Boston Scott and took him right

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>before you and league, thank you, note that, appreciate that.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Uh Dolphins, Matt, what's happening inside the five

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>yard line? Remember that nugget about Tyreek Hill. We're bringing

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it right, yes to His completion percentage from inside the

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>five was eighty two percent. He was nine of eleven

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for eight touchdowns from the infrared zone last year. That's

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the highest completion percentage in the league among quarterbacks through

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>at least ten passes from inside the five. The to

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a Tyreek connection inside the five might be scfinitely warming

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>up to it. Absolutely last team from inside the five

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that will do in this segment. We'll do more next segment.

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Vikings had the worst rushing conversion rate of any team

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>just of all runs resulted in touchdowns last year. We

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>think if Dalvin Cook as being a maestro near the stripe,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>he struggled a lot. Vikings offensive line looks better this year,

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he'll get better. But Kevin O'Connell has mentioned

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>earlier from the rams where they ran the ball that

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they had the lowest run percentage. There's some sneaky downside

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>with Dalvin near the strip that fantasy owners need to

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be aware of. When we come back, we will continue

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>with deep dive data on team trends from inside the

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>five yard line. It's Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back to

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the show. Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchi and Scott Fish

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison with you plenty going on at Guillotine

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Leagues dot com. As you probably already know, the way

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the Guillotine League works, start with eighteen teams because there's

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen weeks in the season. Instead of any head to head,

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the low scoring team each week gets cut and their

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>entire roster goes the waiver wire, where it's total pandemonium

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for all the rest of us. As we bid on

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>an entire roster of players, all you have to do

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is not finish last. You don't have to be the best,

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just don't be the worst in any given week. Last

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>team standing wins the whole thing. Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Are there any like Guillotine Leagues live events coming up?

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this week? Chart Why thank you for asking. For

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>those in the greater Minneapolis St. Paul area, we will

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be doing live guillotine drafts at Big Bore Barbecue and

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Hanover best Barbecue in town. Will be just building leagues

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>right there. Um yeah, we'll follow my Twitter account for

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>more information on that at Paul Charchi in on Wednesday

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is that no waits Tuesday Tuesday Big Bore. You can

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>go on Wednesday too and just get some good good

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>smoked meat, delicious scrub and go every day, unpaid endorsement,

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>unpaid endorsement except for Monday. Don't go there closed. It's

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a good point. I've done that by accident. We're talking

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about what happens inside the five yard line, and we've

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>already gone through roughly how off of the NFL teams

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>giving you inside as to what happens near the stripe.

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go with the Dallas Cowboys, Scott. Really it was

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a pretty even run pass split for the Cowboys. But

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of note, Zekiel Elliott had eighteen opportunities inside the five.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Nobody else on the team, not a single player had

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>more than three outside of him, and he scored. It's

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>very safe. On those eighteen plays, he scored nine times,

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nine times times. That's that's that we're looking for. Mary

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Cooper went, that's still going to be his role, still

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be his role. Patriots are always fascinating inside the five.

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Traditionally a way run, heavier team, even when Tom Brady

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was there than people ever thought. Yeah, Damien Harris had

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the third most rushing attempts in the NFL last year

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>from inside the five with fourteen, also had the third

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>most rushing scores from that area. He scored nine times,

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't say nine times nine time on that conversion rate,

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that's very good, fantastic. The Saints ranked twenty in rushes

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and thirty first in rushing conversion percentage into touchdowns. Alvin

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Kamara converted just two of eleven Russia attempts, and this

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive line got worse in the off season with the

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>loss of Tarrant Armstead, who was awesome. So while we're

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>still I think generally pretty high on Alvin Kamara, particularly

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues, and he had been good inside the five

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the year before, you know, just be aware that this

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is uh, this is a factor that one game against

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings might have all of his numbers might have

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>two years ago that might have been the case. Let's

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>go to the Giants. What's happening inside the five? Scott

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the Seahawks, the Giants only had twenty four plays

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>inside the five and not a single player had more

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>than one receiving touchdown inside the five. Not a single

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>player had more than one rushing touchdown inside the five.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Year It's actually been the same story pretty much for

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the last two years. So we have to go back

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to Barkley's rookie season, where he had eighteen attempts and

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>dominated that area. You hope that it returns to that

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>now that he's healthy. Let's hope. So Tennessee Titans, they're interesting.

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>They are interesting, right, Ryan Tannehill. Let's the league? Yeah,

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in quarterback rushing touchdowns from inside the five with seven.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He scored seven touchdowns on seven rushing attempts. That's one conversion.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope he does it again. I love that little

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>jump ball flip thing he does every touchdown he runs it.

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>How about this? He scored on four or five rushing

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>attempts from inside the five and two of two from

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen So the last three years he scored touchdowns thirteen

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>times on fourteen carries from inside the five. Three percent

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>conversion for Ryan. I imagine a lot of people are going, well,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he did it last year because Derrick Henry was out,

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 1>but he sprinkled him in his whole career. That's why

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>he get a lot of them early. He doesn't well,

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry is in there because they're all focused on

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry, and he can just prance in undetected. He

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can fall forward for every yards is what I hear

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you Titans. That was the Titans. Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry,

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>here we go, Steve. Remember the Titans Naji Harris only

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>converted four of eleven attempts and the Steelers were second

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to last in run ratio. He told you the Rams

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>were last. Steelers were second to last. This is a

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>terrible offensive line and it remains terrible. This is Pro

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>football focus is bottom ranked offensive line. Nazi Harris has

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to work for every touchdown, even the easy ones from

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>inside the five yard line. I think that's safe to

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>say a measure of caution. Atlanta Falcons. What's happening inside

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the five? Scott? Yeah, this this one was pretty evenly

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>split between Patterson and Mike Davis, Matt Ryan through at

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>nineteen times that we got we got Mariota there. Now

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a completely different situation with a

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>mobile quarterback who we've already seen run one in in

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. Here. Um, I don't love really anything

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>inside the for the Falcons, to be honest, Tyler Algier,

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he's built for it. And I played a league with him.

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course you do. I played. No, you took until

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the What are we about the I'm just gonna play

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>this every time, Scott Seper Bowl Baby, We're in the

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>sleeper Bowl. You need a better Robbie. We need a

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>better cow like a ding bell. Yeah, that's on that

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>next week. My minions work on it. I wish I

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 1>had minions. Cincinnati Bengals, Matt what's happening inside the five years?

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon took seventy of the Bengals carries inside the

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>five last year. That was the third highest percentage for

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a team for any runner in the league. So he

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just gets the lion share of all another Tiger share.

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess I love Joe Mixon more than way more

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>than most people do. And I'll mention this every other

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>running back who got carries and they're only like two

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>all year where games mix and missed. If he's on

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the field, he gets the carrots. Bet Next, this is

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a shocking stat from inside the five. George Kittles played

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>sixties seven career games, not just inside the five. They

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>let him play it on the whole field. Um sixties

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>seven games. Think about all the drives that he's been

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on the field for they've targeted him. They targeted him

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just ten times in his entire career from inside the five,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and just once last year for George Kittle maybe he's

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>too good of a blocker. They they like to have

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>him block in that spot, but he has been throughout

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan's entire time with George Kittle, which is Kittle's

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>whole career. They don't throw to him, And to me,

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting that caps his value because Titans get so many

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the short touchdowns typically. I think that's a very

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a factor to keep in mind. Scott.

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Arizona Cardinals inside the five, nine

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>runs passes pretty evenly split. But James Conner got eighteen

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of those run over those twenty nine run intaps and

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>scored on ten of them. I think that's still his

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>role this year and that that is over the charge.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>So you know, alright, I did the man, thank you

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that that does work out calculation Jaguars inside the five

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>man Marvin Jones Jr. Oh targeted inside the five the

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 1>second most in the NFL, only behind Cooper Cup eight

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 1>targets in the five, but he only caught three balls

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>for two scores. She needs to play Xavier Rhodes more

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because he'd score more. Ravens. Many people believe Lamar Jackson

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>steals touchdown runs up close, but he's only run ten

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>times over the last two years from inside the five

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>yard line, whereas their running backs ran forty times. So

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 1>that would not believe, that would not be the case.

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>We don't we want a part of the forty And

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it's gonna be J. K. Dobbins in time.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Just a matter of when a couple of teams left

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears inside the five man, that's Scott, Sorry Scott. Uh.

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>They only passed the ball nine times. I keep trying

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to find these working the segment around this. But Montgomery alone,

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery alone had thirteen carries, scoring on six of them,

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which is under But that's that's decent. If you're getting

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of volume, it's fine in Chicago. That's a

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's amazing. Last team inside the five, the Los

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Chargers, no player threw more passes from inside the

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>five than justin air Bear with thirty two. Wow this

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>conversion percentage that was shockingly low around thirty. Yeah. He

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was also number five in the NFL among quarterbacks for

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts inside the five with six. By the way,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams and Keenan Allen each finished in the top

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>five for targets inside the five amongst wide receivers last year,

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>so they got there a lot. They didn't convert all

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the time, but they got there a lot and there

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of targets. So I want to ask

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you about some low end quarterbacks and tell me if

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:18.399
<v Speaker 1>you see some upside in these players, beginning with Mac

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Jones in New England. Do you believe there is upside

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond what we saw last year from Mac Jones. I

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>just want to give a one weird answer. I mean

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it's his second his second year in the league, so

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you gotta expect, you know, and you've seen the pictures,

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Like the guy's been a workout warrior. He's in like ridiculous.

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>He like came in baby face and like baby fat

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Now he's got some deep, real muscle on

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>him and stuff. Uh. I can see improvement over last year,

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>but I still haven't pushed him up over like QB

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or anything. He's still in that back end of

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>your QB two's in super flex and he's like a

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me player. In the season, I

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>can see him being better than last year. I just

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they run the ball so much there especially down near

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the strike. Well, a team that won't. How about Marcus Mariota,

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah right, How is there some sneaky upside to

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota? I think both Mariota and later in the season,

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>once the Falcons are completely out of it, Ridder because

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they are going to get I'm sure they're going to

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>get him in eventually to to see what he's got.

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, just because of the rushing upside alone, we

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we see what that rushing does to to these quarterbacks.

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We've almost hit the point where if your quarterback doesn't

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, you almost have to be Aaron Rodgers

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Brady to crack the top five s eight.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Here's the guy that the low end quarterback that I

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that I kind of like. It's Daniel Jones. He gets

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>gets an absolutely new offensive system. And by the way,

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a system that melds the Buffalo Bills in Brian

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Table and the Kansas City Chiefs in Mike Kafka. Let's

0:41:56.400 --> 0:42:00.800
<v Speaker 1>put two offenses together. Here's my only problem. Who's catching

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball? Like? That's probably yeah, maybe Cadarius Tony if

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he can stay healthy. I think they like one Dale

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Robinson quite a bit. I mean, they still got the

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>old sterling shepherd mare. Maybe that's it. Maybe they just

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>cobble it together. And his stats are two yards and

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. But you're never going to trust any of them.

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you another low one quarterback that I'm

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>intrigued by. Do you believe there's some upside to Jared Goff? Absolutely,

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about it a little bit on the show before.

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 1>He's got the best offensive line he's ever had. He's

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>probably got as good of weapons, maybe not as good

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a weapons. I mean he had Cooper Cup and sorry

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift and amand Wrestling Brow. I'll put up there

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>with everybody. Yeah, I know you love it. T J. Hawkinson,

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Williams when he gets back, d J. CHARKI like

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot so worthplace schedule. Yeah, there there's there's upside

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for Jared Goff. I think there's some sneak. The downside

0:42:56.680 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for Jared goffs he loses his job if he cannot

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>perform arm in this. I don't know. I've watched his

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.320
<v Speaker 1>backups on Hard Knocks. I don't think he loses his job.

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>That is probably true. Hard Knocks compelling, best season of

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Card Knocks in alright, last quarterback with some potentially sneaky

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>upside Jamis Winston. Oh yeah, I mean that that's he

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>has more upside than any of the players we've listed

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to this point, between Landry and Michael Thomas. If he

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>returns to form and Crystal streaking down the sidelines, Yeah,

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he's easily if we get chucked the ball up yolo

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>ball Jamis Winston tons offside their tons. We didn't. We

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't get yolo style Winston last year, which which maybe

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton kept him under wraps. But he's still He's

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>still throw fourteen touchdowns in seven games, but that's clumped right.

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>He had like five in Week one, like zero zero

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>one one and then four and then zero one. Maybe

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that evens out this year. Crystal Lovey is going to

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 1>bring steep speed to that position that they didn't have before,

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that blends well with Jamis Winston's yolo passing

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>stylings it's got referred to. Hopefully that'll be the case.

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You can find some you can find some sneaky upside

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>very late in your draft at quarterback position. When we

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>come back our number two Fantasy Football Weekly, we will

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>be able to go through three tough questions. You can

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>try to go three and oh, as I Pepper my

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>co host with questions. Also, you can download my cheat

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sheet for free at Guillotine leagues dot com. Our number

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>two available. Coming up next Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 1>our number two Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charge and Matt

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and Scott Fish with you. Matt's Shock Fantasy. Yes,

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? Uh, Lots of new cheat sheets and updates

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>every week. Vulture is the good promo code for fifteen

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars off a season long membership over at Shock Fantasy.

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>This a game we call three tough Questions. I will pepper,

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>my co host, with three questions. You can play along,

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>try to go three and oh. Tough question number one,

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>which wide receiver will lead the league in receptions? Matt, alright,

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So to me, I think you need two elements for

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 1>this to happen. A quarterback who throws the ball a

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>ton like thirty five times a game or more, and

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.359
<v Speaker 1>there are only eight quarterbacks who did that last year.

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And a wide receiver corps that has one wide receiver

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that's vastly more talented than the rest. In my mind,

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>there's two situations that fit this bill number one Jars,

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this is my wrong answer. Okay, wrong answer. Christian Kirk Wow, Okay,

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not my answer. But Lawrence threw the ball over

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>six hundred times last year, and I think Kirk will

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>average at least ten targets per game, nearly half of

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>those attempts by Lawrence. We're on target to right. I

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to surprise the heck out of people

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>this year. I I really like Christian and Kirk a lot.

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>But the correct answer is Ceedee. Lamb of the Cowboys

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>dack through the ball five ninety six times last year.

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I bet Fish is going to tell you about all

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the vacated targets in Dallas next segments, so I won't

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>step on his touchdown call. But Lamb is looking at

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>only an injured Michael Gallup and a rookie Jalen Tolbert

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>his competition for wide receiver targets. He's about to go crazy, Scott,

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:26.320
<v Speaker 1>which wide receiver will lead the league in receptions? Yeah?

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I uh, I thought about Lamb. I thought about Justin

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson because but what to turn me away from Justin

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson is just there's a lot of other weapons that

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>which passes there, I'm gonna get super lazy here, and

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going right back to Cooper Cup. I'm going right

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>back to Cooper Cup because I don't think a lot

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>changes in that offense. If anything, that's probably the right answer.

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>If if cam Akers returns back to form, sure he's

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna take some work, but also the offense is gonna

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>move better. So I'm sticking with Cooper Cup. He had

0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like twenty nine more targets than anyone else last year.

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's pretend you are Dak Prescott in a typical game

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>from anywhere in this schedule. You drop back to pass.

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 1>You look across the middle. Here's Michael Gallup dragging one

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>leg behind him. You look to the right, there's rookie

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Toilbert running the wrong route and he just stepped

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds. You look to the side, and I think,

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>when can I get you checked down to Dalton Schultz

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and told right there. You look left and there's Seedee Lamb,

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the best receivers in the league, open by

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>three yards. Why three yards, you might ask, And how

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>do I know that he's opened by three yards? Because

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 1>according to next Gen stats, Ceedee Lamb's average separation per

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>attempt was three yards. It's an easy decision on where

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to send that ball. And that's that. In addition to

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>everything Matt said, is why Ceedee Lamb is going to

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>lead the league in recepts. Tough question number two. The

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>player who can score fifteen touchdowns that nobody is talking

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>about is who? And by the way, before we go

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>any further, I need to mention, are you doing this

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 1>because the answers dam Piers Harris, don't tell me. Welcome

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to Damien Tierce Weekly. When we asked a variation of

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this question last preseason, somebody told you Damian Harris was

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the right answering, and we'll continue with that alright. The

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.399
<v Speaker 1>player can score fifteen touch ones that nobody is talking

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:44.479
<v Speaker 1>about is who. Scott Man, He's in the conversation here too.

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Damian Harris scored fifteen last year. They run a ton

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>inside the five um the other options. James Conner is

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have the same role in Arizona. The offense

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:59.080
<v Speaker 1>should be a little better. Cooper Cup had sixteen last year.

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>He's he's got the possibility. You might knowing you, you

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>might even think it's Adam Thealan who had ten touchdowns

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 1>in eleven games. The offense is, you know, a full

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>healthy year plus a better offense, more past heavy offense.

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I could see you going tricky and going that route.

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with someone that is actually talked about

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit um in the US, but but not

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot, not a lot for fifteen touchdowns. It's the

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>other back for New England. Aside Damien Harrison Damien Harris,

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Romandre Stevenson. I can tell you I was in

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a charity draft the other night with Darren Waller at

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Gary Barnage and John Carlos standon. When Jack Carlos Stanton

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>took uh took Romandre Stevenson. I mentioned how they had

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight runs a fifteen plus yards. They led the league.

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>They've been tops in the league over the last seven

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 1>years in runs inside the five yard line. He's gonna

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>have a larger role, especially in the past game, and

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a bigger, bodied bully back. Then Damian Harris is

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he had five last year. I think he can. I

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>think he can take it up to fifteen this year.

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's possible. Answer. Yeah, the guy John Carlos

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>set drafted it did that draft the player who can

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 1>score fifteen touchdowns that nobody is talking about Matt So.

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I was in my home league auction last night with

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>George Clooney, Ryan Reynolds. Listeners actually like this. I don't

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable doing it, but I think it's funny. Scott's

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>serious though I'm not. I'm serious about those players. But obviously,

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but but Ryan Reynolds, George Clooney, Brad pitt none of

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.720
<v Speaker 1>them were talking about James Conner. Um. He has virtually

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 1>no competition for touches in that backfield. The Cardinals running

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>back group tally twenty one touchdowns last year, and eighteen

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of them went to Connor. Plus Chase Edmonds is gone,

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so it makes Connor even more of a focal point.

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 1>He's the only show in town in that running game.

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And James Conner is the correct answer. I did text Brian.

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's Kyle Pitts though it's kind of that's

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:03.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen touchdowns and be talking about it. The correct answer

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is Adam feeling you didn't cover half the league in

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>your answer. I covered four people. I was like, not

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>get credit for that, because this is going to be

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>as well off. I already counted him as a wide

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>receiver over the past two seasons. Regular listeners know this

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>because I've thrown this stat out over the over well,

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 1>even going back through the off season shows a Fantasy

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly over the past two seasons, Adam Feeland is

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the highest touchdown percentage and passes thrown from inside the

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 1>ten yard line and the five yard line, and only

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams has as a receiver has more total touchdowns

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 1>on plays that start from inside the ten last year,

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 1>and you alluded to this very saliently, Scott he Adam

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Theeland was healthy for eleven games, ten touchdowns till eleven games.

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Nobody seems to remember that had he continued on that pace,

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>he would have been the highest scoring wide. You've got

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen touchdowns, tied with Cooper Cup regression my tail last year.

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, now's a point nine touchdowns per game clip.

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And this team, as we described earlier in this show,

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.839
<v Speaker 1>should be throwing the ball more under Kevin O'Connell than

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 1>they were, and up close inside the five yard line,

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they should be throwing the ball more under Kevern O'Connell

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>than they did with Mike Zimmer. I think this is uh.

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I think Adam feeling. We're gonna get the hopefully we

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>get the full healthy season. He's the player that could

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 1>hit fifteen touchdowns that nobody's talking about. Tough question number three,

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Which version of cor Darryl Patterson? Are we going to

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>get the pre Thanksgiving League winner we saw last year

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>or the post Thanksgiving turkey that we that ended fantasy

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 1>seasons Across the board? We begin with Matt It's weird,

0:52:53.600 --> 0:52:57.719
<v Speaker 1>but when Cordaryl Patterson has fewer touches, he scores more touchdowns.

0:52:58.640 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>He scored eleven total touch downs last year, seven of

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>which came in games where he carried the ball nine

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>times or less nine times nine times. That's not very

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>many carries for him, so you'd think that the Falcon

0:53:11.680 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 1>staff noticed this and he did wear down as the

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>season rolled on. That's why they brought in Damian Williams,

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they brought in rookie Tyler l Gear

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of the running game. So I

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to use him more as a weapon

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this year instead of our strict running back keeping him

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 1>in the six to eight carry range five to six

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>reception range. That should make him more effective as a player.

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:36.839
<v Speaker 1>So I'll be optimistic and say it's the pre Thanksgiving

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>cord Errol, but in true reality it's probably somewhere right

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. So your answer, I'm wishy washy. I'm

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. I'm gonna go with the optimistic winning previous

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But I but I don't fully believe in my answer.

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't. I only got two choices, Well, goad this.

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it'd be easier with only two choices? Well,

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the third choice would be the middle one.

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like if there's a grade between an A

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and a bat, which there's not a B plus which

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>version of Cordale Patterson are we gonna get Scott the

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 1>pre Thanksgiving league winner or the post Thanksgiving turkey who

0:54:14.719 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>ended fantasy seasons. Yeah, I think it's gonna be a

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 1>lot closer to the to the post Thanksgiving He was

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>just too efficient to just too fantasy high scoring in

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the first half UM, and they went away from it.

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:32.200
<v Speaker 1>They went away from it because either it wasn't working

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 1>or they just couldn't do it anymore. They brought in

0:54:35.080 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>players to take up the running back snaps. They brought

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in a new wide receiver. UM. They brought in running

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks that can do other things. I don't think he

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:45.279
<v Speaker 1>has the same role. I do think that they'll try

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to use him efficient efficiently and have some corderyal chicanery

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 1>going on, you know, like some trick plays and stuff,

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and get him involved in some ways. But I cannot

0:54:54.719 --> 0:54:56.840
<v Speaker 1>see him. I think that first half of that season

0:54:56.920 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>might be his best fantasy stretch his career. Will ask Scott,

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>can you like be real about the stop since you're

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in a league with Tyler Algier and he's like your

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>best friend. Because like you do you text, you're not realistic,

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so you're on a yes, you're gonna get pre or

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you down the turkey side of this, I'm not trusting

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty one year old part time Cordarrel Patterson. The audio

0:55:24.040 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>response is for the correct you just wanted to hit

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the turkey. I love hitting the turkey, but it's Cordarrell

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Patterson odd Thanksgiving. That's right, you only get him Thanksgiving Day.

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh pre Thanksgiving, you forget how good he was. Pre Thanksgiving,

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Cordarrell Patterson was averaging one total yards and point nine

0:55:47.480 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game that was scored Darryl Patterson. That was unbelievable,

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:54.239
<v Speaker 1>but The workload proved to be too much for Patterson,

0:55:54.480 --> 0:55:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and it all tailed off hard. Even though the workload

0:55:56.840 --> 0:55:59.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't change that much for him after Thanksgiving, the output

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>change dramatically. He averaged after Thanksgiving fifty fewer yards per game,

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a full yard per carry fewer, and he only scored

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>two times the entire rest of the season. Cordarrell fell

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>off the clip. They know that they have to limit

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>his usage and therefore, on modest what's probably gonna be

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:24.960
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten touches a game, That is it. Corderyl

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Patterson had touches. You can only do so much when

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you're getting the ball seven times a game, eight times

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a game. It's hard to it's hard to be impactful

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 1>as a running back. We'll see maybe they don't play

0:56:40.360 --> 0:56:42.920
<v Speaker 1>him as a running back, Maybe they don't play anybody

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:45.279
<v Speaker 1>in the right position. In Atlanta. When we come back,

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the blacklist. Players we will not draft, well maybe

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:54.840
<v Speaker 1>not never, but not anywhere near where they're getting drafted.

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Will identify quarterbacks, running back, so wide receiver, tight ends

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we will not draft. The blacklist. Coming up next on

0:57:02.160 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charchy

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and Scott Fish, Matt Harrison with you. This is a

0:57:33.440 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 1>segment we do every preseason called the Blacklist. These our

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 1>blacklist players that we will not draft. Now, when I

0:57:41.640 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 1>say we I'm gonna give up, I'm gonna give my players,

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna give yours. That's unique to you. Other people,

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we may not agree with each other. This

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is your own personal blacklist of players you will not draft.

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 1>We begin to the quarterback position, Matt, who is your blacklist?

0:57:56.480 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback Kyler Murray. Um, here's my issue with Kyler. For

0:58:00.520 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, he's been one of the hottest

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in the game first September and October. Then he

0:58:05.640 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>gets some undisclosed injury and falls apart over the final

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>month of the season. Or maybe he's playing call of

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 1>duty on a double experience points weekend. Who knows, uh?

0:58:15.000 --> 0:58:17.240
<v Speaker 1>In your fantasy playoffs is when you need studs though,

0:58:17.280 --> 0:58:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and here's an illumination of this. In Kyler's first eight

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:23.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks of each of his three pro seasons, his average

0:58:23.240 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>stat line is two seventy six passing yards, one point

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 1>eight touchdowns, forty two rushing yards, and point six rushing

0:58:31.160 --> 0:58:34.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game. That's a really good quarterback. Then in

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 1>his final five games of each of his three pro season,

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that drops to two thirty seven passing yards, one point

0:58:41.600 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown passes, thirty four rushing yards, and he's only

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 1>scored twice in December or January in his career, zero

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 1>point one three rushing touchdowns per game. Last time we

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>saw Kyler Murray was that disastrous playoff game. It's been

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit hard to shake that. So for whatever reason,

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>he can't hold up to a full season. Maybe it's

0:59:01.240 --> 0:59:04.000
<v Speaker 1>his body style or how he plays, he just can't

0:59:04.040 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>hold up to a full season, and I'm not taking

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 1>him in the fifth or sixth round. Yeah. Actually, I

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that really tracks with you know, a couple of

0:59:11.320 --> 0:59:13.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago, he had the shoulder injury about mid season.

0:59:13.920 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Last year, had an injury about mid season, miss a

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of games. So that kind of does hold up

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that he gets injured, you know, somewhere from I mean,

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you can draft him and enjoy him for September and October,

0:59:24.560 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but trade him in week four or five ankle last

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 1>year or four or five pretty early when you were

0:59:29.440 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about going downhill in December, trade him for trade

0:59:32.240 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>him for Justin air Bear in week four or five.

0:59:35.040 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That's more fun. Your blacklist quarterback, Scott, I'm going to

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:40.160
<v Speaker 1>rust Wilson, and this is the guy I think I

0:59:40.240 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 1>might have even said on the segment last year because

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season for several years now

0:59:46.680 --> 0:59:50.439
<v Speaker 1>he has almost just completely disappeared. And it happened again

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 1>last year. Last year, from the week four through the

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:57.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the season, he topped two fifty yards once

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and totes not that much. Not that NFL. He had

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>five sub two hundred days. He had a few goose

1:00:05.480 --> 1:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>egg days for touchdowns. He just doesn't seem to doesn't

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>seem to have good end of seasons. Now, you notice

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>he changed teams. He changed teams. Here's where I'm going.

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>He changed teams. I actually really like Sutting this year,

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Judy is a little over priced for me.

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have Sutton Um. But my biggest problem is

1:00:23.840 --> 1:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going to QB seven or QB eight off the

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:28.439
<v Speaker 1>board when I can get Cousins or car or Trey

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Lance or something a fault even even right now, where

1:00:32.000 --> 1:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Wilson is going to full two and a half rounds later,

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you can get Brady or Dac. It's his price tag.

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, for that possible risk and his price tag.

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback that's on my blacklist is Chicago quarterback Justin Fields.

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>To this point through the preseason, he doesn't look any

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>different than the inaccurate, scattered player that we saw last year.

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe these new offense, the new offense and the new

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>coaches will pay off at some point, but how long

1:00:58.080 --> 1:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>does that take? And how long do I gotta wait?

1:01:00.520 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And then this offensive line? Oh my gosh, it's bad.

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's so bad. You know, they're they're they've got four

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>new starters. They're trying to find a new home for

1:01:09.880 --> 1:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>last year's second round picked Tevin Jenkins, and they can't

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out a spot he can play. They ranked thirty

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>one by Pro Football Focus and offensive line for this year,

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's incredibly generous. It is to think the actual

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>subway Turnstiles might do better as an offensive line than

1:01:24.800 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>what they currently cemented into it. Like, yeah, it's weird

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch a football game and watch a quarterback and

1:01:30.800 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>be like I feel bad for you, Like I really

1:01:34.200 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>feel bad. You're going to be counting on Justin Fields

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to basically fran Tarkent in his way. That's it. It's

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be at least they have one of the

1:01:45.880 --> 1:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>most star studded deepest receiver corpse, thank God, exactly, I'm

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not I I can't. I understand the rushing potential that

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>any quarterback who can run like Justin Fields is going

1:01:56.720 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to give you big rushing output days, but just the

1:01:59.320 --> 1:02:01.439
<v Speaker 1>rest of its so is functionally. I'm worried he's gonna

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>have some bad, bad games. Justin Fields my blacklist quarterback.

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the running back position, Matt who is

1:02:07.840 --> 1:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>your blacklist runner? I have Travis e t N here,

1:02:11.800 --> 1:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he's coming back from a Liz Frank injury. James Robinson

1:02:15.760 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously coming back from Achilles. You have to take e

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>t N in the early third round. Twenty nine point eight.

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Is his a DP right now? Yeahs head coach has

1:02:25.720 --> 1:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>never had a bell cow though. Either that's the problem.

1:02:28.560 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles went a long time with Doug Peterson operating

1:02:32.240 --> 1:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with two to three backs in the backfield. We have

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>no track record to believe that it's going to be

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>his backfield alone or at least and then charges favorite

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>player in the whole league besides Damian Pierce, of course,

1:02:45.120 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is Snooper Loop Connor. Uh. He's in play for goal

1:02:49.240 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>line touches. I think this is messy all year, and

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't draft messy at the top of the third round.

1:02:55.560 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Your your blacklist, quarterback, Scott, it was you this time?

1:03:00.600 --> 1:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh my running back Miles recollection of turning my mic off.

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I don't know how that happened. That

1:03:06.160 --> 1:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was me ran over to the other side on the

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>on the judge back here the camera, Miles Sanders. Actually,

1:03:18.560 --> 1:03:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I could have gone with David Montgomery for those same

1:03:20.440 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>offensive line issues that not at his a DP. Miles,

1:03:24.920 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not done his bears as a group, We're definitely not.

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Forget the fact that he isn't even fully healthy and

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been splitting work this preseason, and forget the fact

1:03:36.160 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that he even tells you not to draft him in

1:03:38.880 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good sign. Actually, don't forget either of

1:03:45.240 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>those things. Lean on both of those things. He also

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>barely gets the rushing attempts inside the five we noted.

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Out of forty three Russia to him, he got six.

1:03:54.440 --> 1:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't even get that work. His pass catching, he

1:03:57.360 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>caught fifty balls his first year. He hasn't tough thirty cents.

1:04:01.000 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>The thirty isn't even a high high bar for us

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>started running back in the NFL. That's really low. I

1:04:06.400 --> 1:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>can't trust him with anything again. That's Miles Sanders, your

1:04:09.840 --> 1:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Blacklist player, sixth round, sixth round ADP for a guy

1:04:13.680 --> 1:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'll give you a fourth round ADP I'm not touching.

1:04:16.400 --> 1:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's the Rams running back Cam Akers. And I've

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>said it several times in the show. I'm gonna keep

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>keep mentioning it. No NFL running back has ever returned

1:04:22.880 --> 1:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to productivity after suffering Achilles injury. I hope Cam Akers

1:04:26.240 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is the first one. I hope he makes history and

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>becomes that guy. But I'm not risking my fourth round

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>pick on history happening. The more likely scenario here is

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that Acres is less effective than he used to be

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>from this injury, and he's sharing time with Darrell Henderson

1:04:40.960 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>effectively all year, and has mentioned earlier in the show,

1:04:44.680 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Sean McVeigh had last year's second lowest run rate inside

1:04:48.160 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the five. You can't even necessarily be assured of getting many,

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>if any of the inside the five easy touchdowns from

1:04:54.520 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Cam Acres, my blacklist runner. Let's go to the wide

1:04:58.040 --> 1:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver position. Matt, who have you black listed? I remember

1:05:01.040 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>going back to a state fair show and like and

1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Charch said, has anybody ever regretted drafting Michael Thomas? Oh? Yeah, yeah,

1:05:12.360 --> 1:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not drafting him anymore. It's never an easy feeling

1:05:15.760 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>taking a guy who hasn't played in two years. The

1:05:18.440 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>last time he caught a touchdown pass, it was from

1:05:21.120 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees. It was that playoff game where the slime

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>was coming into the end zone, the first Nickel Sanders

1:05:29.360 --> 1:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, Yeah, exactly, Okay, missed a huge chunk

1:05:32.640 --> 1:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of injuries, took all one off with an ankle injuries,

1:05:36.200 --> 1:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>already dinged up in camp with a hamstring injury, and

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he's going at the end of the fifth round. Right now.

1:05:41.960 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's say he does play. Who says he vibes with

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Winston at all? Why would Chris olav or Jarvis

1:05:49.280 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Landry not be Winston's preferred target. The ceiling can't be

1:05:52.720 --> 1:05:55.439
<v Speaker 1>as high as twenty season. It probably can't be half

1:05:55.480 --> 1:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of that record breaking year. And the floor is that

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you get absolutely nothing of Michael Thomas this year that

1:06:03.320 --> 1:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you could nothing. I don't think it's just I don't

1:06:05.800 --> 1:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's quite as low as you do. But hopefully

1:06:07.960 --> 1:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully well. We want him, we want him to be healthy.

1:06:10.400 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We want Michael Thomas to do well. Your blacklist wide receiver, Yeah, yeah,

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>mine's one. Mine's actually we we've been listening off guys

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that are going more in the early rounds and we

1:06:19.960 --> 1:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>hate their ad EPs. Mine I'm going with is going

1:06:22.960 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the eleventh round, and it's I just don't really

1:06:25.480 --> 1:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>feel he's draftable at all. It's Christian Watson for the Packers.

1:06:28.720 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We've mentioned earlier in the show that the starters right

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>now are Eleanor's Art, Sammy Watkins, and Randall Cobb, and

1:06:34.160 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>all the talk in camp is Romeo Dubbs and Christian Watson.

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Watson has been hurt on the tape. I thought he

1:06:40.400 --> 1:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>was a beast in college, but like he seemed like

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a very hit and miss prospect he could easily bust.

1:06:46.240 --> 1:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't even, I don't even I thought that there

1:06:48.360 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was a chance he could be the Packers wide receiver one.

1:06:50.600 --> 1:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how much he gets on the field now,

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>with the reports that they're gonna run a lot of

1:06:54.360 --> 1:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one with Aaron Jones and Dylan on the field

1:06:57.280 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and less wide receivers on the field. I don't know

1:06:59.640 --> 1:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>where he even get snaps. I don't know why he's

1:07:01.760 --> 1:07:04.959
<v Speaker 1>being drafted. To be honest with Watkins, timetable is next

1:07:05.040 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>year in all probability Watson, excuse me, yes, I just

1:07:09.200 --> 1:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>don't see it for this year. I don't. I don't

1:07:10.720 --> 1:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's draftable even Moore. My blacklist wide receiver is

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Chicago wide receiver Darnell Mooney. If I if I didn't

1:07:16.760 --> 1:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like justin Fields and his passing moments ago, you can

1:07:19.440 --> 1:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine I can't back his receiver. Even Darnell Mooney coming

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>off a good season. You know, I think he's a

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>good players. As a special player, he's a good player,

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think he's got too much to overcome here,

1:07:29.320 --> 1:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>including drawing top coverage by opposing defenses on every down.

1:07:34.440 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson was there before to at least even out

1:07:37.320 --> 1:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>some of that. Now with him gone, defenses just have

1:07:40.120 --> 1:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to take away Darnell Mooney. There's nobody left to pass

1:07:42.200 --> 1:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>two in this offense, and the old line is not

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>going to give fields time for Mooney to get open

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>or deep. I don't hate Darnell Mooney, but at his

1:07:50.840 --> 1:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>average draft position, I can get Adam Feeling, who as

1:07:53.480 --> 1:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we already described as fifteen touched out upside. That's our guy,

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so we are not touching. I'm not uh touching Darnell Mooney.

1:08:01.720 --> 1:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>You definitely don't hate him. You were one of the

1:08:04.120 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>early ones I was. I've got him on a variety

1:08:07.200 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of teams, Dynasty teams from last year. Okay, let's go

1:08:11.400 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>back to uh the tight end position. Blacklist tight ends, man,

1:08:15.040 --> 1:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to Chicago, because I'm not drafting Cole

1:08:17.840 --> 1:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>comment at all this year. I'm mostly piggybacking on charges

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:24.639
<v Speaker 1>take on Fields and Mooney here, but this just could

1:08:24.680 --> 1:08:28.439
<v Speaker 1>be a legendarily bad offense. Fields might not survive bying

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this offensive line. And if he doesn't, do you feel

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>confident in Trevor Simeon or Nathan Peterman getting Cole Commit

1:08:35.439 --> 1:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball? And speaking of offensive, this line is so

1:08:38.360 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>bad that you might have to think that Commit might

1:08:41.520 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>be forced to stay in and block more than anyone wants.

1:08:45.200 --> 1:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's getting tough to take any Bears this year. I'm

1:08:47.400 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>dropping Commet down further down my cheat sheet. Alright, your

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>blacklist tight end Scott actually kind of committing. There's reasons

1:08:56.080 --> 1:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to like him because he's one of the only options,

1:08:58.360 --> 1:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>but that team is so bad that it doesn't matter.

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be twenty to thirty past attempts. It's got

1:09:04.280 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to go somewhere right to the ground that could be

1:09:07.120 --> 1:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>could be uh tight end. I'm going with t J Hockenson.

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned it before. He he didn't have a single

1:09:13.120 --> 1:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>target in the red zone last year. But this is

1:09:14.680 --> 1:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a pure a DP play. Um he is going. He

1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is going like as the sixth or so tight end

1:09:21.479 --> 1:09:23.759
<v Speaker 1>off the board. He's going in the same exact range

1:09:24.000 --> 1:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>as Dalton Schultz, who we talked about last week. We

1:09:26.880 --> 1:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think he's got a hundred plus targets. M zach Ertz

1:09:31.880 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>even going around after him way safer. And then then

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>there's some late round tight end stabs you can take. Um,

1:09:38.360 --> 1:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he's just gonna fight with Swift and Almron even when

1:09:40.960 --> 1:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like he those were those guys were out or not

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>productive last year. Hawkinson wasn't a very reliable tight end

1:09:47.760 --> 1:09:52.519
<v Speaker 1>even even win Swift exactly so with them healthy and

1:09:52.600 --> 1:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>d J Charkinell, I just I just can't do it

1:09:54.880 --> 1:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>all right. My blacklist tight end is Dawson Knox. A

1:09:58.760 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent eight end is extremely dangerous. Look at Robert

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Tonyan is exhibit A from last year. At this time

1:10:05.680 --> 1:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, he was coming up from eleven touchdown season.

1:10:08.680 --> 1:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>We're like, well, okay, he'll regress a bit, but I'm

1:10:10.800 --> 1:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>still gonna get like, you know what, eight touchdowns on

1:10:13.040 --> 1:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a Tony and you got one. Granted he went, he

1:10:16.880 --> 1:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>had an a c L mid season and then hand

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>from the average play on one hand and one leg,

1:10:26.080 --> 1:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the average non touchdown game from Dawson Knox two and

1:10:29.400 --> 1:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a half catches for twenty nine yards. That's five PPR

1:10:32.240 --> 1:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>points and that is how you get chopped in a

1:10:34.200 --> 1:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>guillotine league. Right there, Dawson Knox my blacklist tight end.

1:10:39.400 --> 1:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, final segment, we'll talk through vacated

1:10:42.800 --> 1:10:46.519
<v Speaker 1>targets and identify our favorite sleepers for this week. Final

1:10:46.560 --> 1:11:14.879
<v Speaker 1>segment Fantasy Football Weekly. Coming up next final segment, Fantasy

1:11:14.880 --> 1:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Paul Charchy and Scott Fish Matt Harrison with

1:11:17.880 --> 1:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much to do a Guillotine leagues dot com.

1:11:20.400 --> 1:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>That includes downloading my cheat sheet for free guillotine leagues

1:11:24.240 --> 1:11:26.519
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Maybe you want to play with friends, We've

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>got private leagues for Guillotine leagues Guillotine leagues dot Com.

1:11:29.840 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also join a public contest to play against

1:11:32.400 --> 1:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>others for cash prizes. You can even try Zombie Mode,

1:11:36.120 --> 1:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the new exciting way to play in a Guillotine league

1:11:39.280 --> 1:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>where you never are out of the action. You get

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to play all year long and Zombie mode, instead of

1:11:44.280 --> 1:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>getting chopped, you turn into a zombie trying to take

1:11:46.400 --> 1:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>down the surviving humans. Tons of fun new way to

1:11:49.160 --> 1:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>play Zombie modeyoteen league dot com. And lastly, high Stakes

1:11:54.000 --> 1:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>super Chop. You want to play with thousands of dollars

1:11:56.880 --> 1:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the high Stakes super Chop Leagues at guillotine leagues dot com.

1:12:00.920 --> 1:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, gentlemen, let's dive into our final segment. We

1:12:03.840 --> 1:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>always do our sleepers. Let's let's start there with our

1:12:08.800 --> 1:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Sleepers of the week. We do one of them every week.

1:12:13.000 --> 1:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin with Let's go to Matt first, d j

1:12:17.560 --> 1:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>chark Wicky Wicky. Uh he's lost big chunks of the

1:12:21.520 --> 1:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>last two seasons with injury and by being in Jacksonville. Uh.

1:12:26.000 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Not that relocating from the Detroit of Florida to the

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Detroit of the United States is much better the actual dijazz,

1:12:33.120 --> 1:12:37.759
<v Speaker 1>But here we go. Um. Detroit's got a top five

1:12:37.880 --> 1:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>offensive line this year. The lines of good weapons all

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>around with Chark, Swift, amanros St Brown, T J. Hockenson, etcetera.

1:12:46.160 --> 1:12:49.759
<v Speaker 1>When Jamison Williams returns, that makes that offense even stronger.

1:12:50.600 --> 1:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Chark will never ever see a double team this season

1:12:53.760 --> 1:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at all. His last healthy season with Gardner Minshew as

1:12:57.280 --> 1:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback, he put up over a thousand yard and

1:13:00.160 --> 1:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>eight scores. And in fact, in his career he scored

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on ten percent of his career catches. So

1:13:06.760 --> 1:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>if he has I don't know, ninety catches this year,

1:13:09.680 --> 1:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>he's going to score nine times. You could have picked

1:13:13.560 --> 1:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a number. But but let's say scores he gets sixty

1:13:18.000 --> 1:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>catches this year. I think that's reasonable. Do you have

1:13:20.080 --> 1:13:22.599
<v Speaker 1>six touchdowns? They have six touchdowns and that's a that's

1:13:22.600 --> 1:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a player that you can play in some weeks. Absolutely,

1:13:25.680 --> 1:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, d J. Chark first sleeper Scott. Yeah, I

1:13:30.040 --> 1:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>like going bottom of the barrel, last pick of your

1:13:32.320 --> 1:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>drafted It did last week enough for you? No, No,

1:13:36.479 --> 1:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not, he's not. In previous years, I did stuff

1:13:40.439 --> 1:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>more in the mid teens that you know, they had

1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>good a better hit rate. But I like, I like

1:13:44.960 --> 1:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>these bottom of the barrel ones. I'm going with Kyle Phillips,

1:13:49.520 --> 1:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee's slot receiver who has looked unstoppable in camp. He's

1:13:54.800 --> 1:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking everybody's ankles literally, all the DBS, Slider the bones style,

1:14:02.080 --> 1:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>shattering the bones in preseason games, broken ankles for the

1:14:05.800 --> 1:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>dvs on coaches. Watch the tape they break. I just

1:14:09.360 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>broke my left ankle, hawking about Actually you would sprain

1:14:14.200 --> 1:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that is totally true. Yes, but he's got that slot

1:14:17.320 --> 1:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>roll uh slot rolled down. It's his job. He's the

1:14:21.000 --> 1:14:24.559
<v Speaker 1>starter and uh. They the Tennessee Titans passed to the

1:14:24.600 --> 1:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>slot at one of the highest rates in the NFL

1:14:26.920 --> 1:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. Obviously, last year they had a J. Brown

1:14:28.800 --> 1:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>playing this um. But he's there, slot guy. And if

1:14:32.840 --> 1:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't, if he doesn't pan out, you can drop him.

1:14:35.040 --> 1:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't care. It's your last pick. It's your absolute

1:14:37.160 --> 1:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>last pick of the draft. Kyle Phillips Kyle Phillips ankle

1:14:41.120 --> 1:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>breaker for the Tennessee type, chattering and you need to

1:14:43.920 --> 1:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>keep him away from you. I really very dangerous, great brain,

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible ankles. You know, I think great. It might get

1:14:55.000 --> 1:14:56.719
<v Speaker 1>a little strong. I mean I was gonna be nice.

1:14:57.720 --> 1:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I do wear a great Scott shirt from Time's Back

1:15:00.320 --> 1:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to the future one Houston quarterback Davis Mills. You guys

1:15:04.000 --> 1:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>know how I feel about him. Um, and part of

1:15:06.160 --> 1:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to the draft. I liked him in

1:15:07.880 --> 1:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the draft passing californ I don't get at some point,

1:15:15.160 --> 1:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you just your eye test goes this guy belongs in

1:15:17.640 --> 1:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. If you watch Davis Mills, and I don't

1:15:19.880 --> 1:15:23.479
<v Speaker 1>blame if you didn't watch much of the Texans last season. Uh,

1:15:23.680 --> 1:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Davis Mills repeatedly passed the eye test as an NFL

1:15:27.400 --> 1:15:30.559
<v Speaker 1>caliber quarterback. There's no doubt Houston knows it. They didn't

1:15:30.600 --> 1:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>make any move at quarterback. They're going forward with Davis

1:15:33.160 --> 1:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Mills as as as I believe they should. His stats

1:15:36.320 --> 1:15:39.519
<v Speaker 1>weren't like mind blowing, but I bet they were way

1:15:39.600 --> 1:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>better than you thought they were. Last year. From Week

1:15:43.560 --> 1:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>five forward, Davis Mills average game two hundred forty five yards,

1:15:50.439 --> 1:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty good. One and a half passing touchdowns

1:15:54.120 --> 1:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>per game, also pretty good if you were to just

1:15:56.920 --> 1:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>expand that to the full season, because obviously didn't start

1:15:59.160 --> 1:16:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the year they at Tirod Taylor. There. That puts Davis

1:16:02.880 --> 1:16:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Mills last year as a rookie on a four thousand

1:16:05.960 --> 1:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>yard passing season in twenty three touchdowns that would have

1:16:08.720 --> 1:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>made him quarterback seventeen last year. Davis Mills going off

1:16:14.320 --> 1:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the board right now is quarterback twenty nine. He was seventeen.

1:16:18.160 --> 1:16:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Is a rookie he started. I'm kind of utterly shocked

1:16:21.920 --> 1:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the charge that you are so on the Davis Mills

1:16:24.880 --> 1:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>train when your least favorite offensive coordinator, maybe of all time,

1:16:30.160 --> 1:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Poop Hamilton's that's his offensive coordinator. I'm I want to

1:16:34.000 --> 1:16:38.559
<v Speaker 1>believe he ruined Andrew Lucky? How can he How can

1:16:38.560 --> 1:16:41.479
<v Speaker 1>he make Davis Mills successful? If he ruined Andrew Luck?

1:16:42.240 --> 1:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Are we Texans fans in this? I was on Niko

1:16:46.960 --> 1:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>CON's all. I wouldn't shut up about him last year.

1:16:49.200 --> 1:16:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Brian had him as his sleeper. And now like nicknamed

1:16:51.560 --> 1:16:55.599
<v Speaker 1>him or something. You're you're you're you know, we're all

1:16:55.640 --> 1:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in on Damian Pierce. But you were really early on

1:16:57.760 --> 1:17:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Damian pre draft. Yes, you were in on Davis Mills

1:17:00.680 --> 1:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. I wanted the Vikings the draft him last year.

1:17:02.920 --> 1:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Like are and we always think Brandon Cooks is under it?

1:17:06.040 --> 1:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Are we Texans fans we think we are? We are?

1:17:10.640 --> 1:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm buying low. I'm buying on the dip.

1:17:13.479 --> 1:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's like, I don't, I don't. I don't think that.

1:17:16.479 --> 1:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a dip there. I think I

1:17:18.320 --> 1:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>think they world is coming with you, guys. Jordan is

1:17:23.120 --> 1:17:30.519
<v Speaker 1>also every single player. What about Chris Cotton? Just drafted Texans?

1:17:30.720 --> 1:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris for the three times a year he hits charge

1:17:32.880 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>will tell you what will Texan stack? All the way.

1:17:35.760 --> 1:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of reasons to believe Davis Mills will

1:17:38.360 --> 1:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be better in his sophomore year. Better coaching staff, right,

1:17:42.320 --> 1:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be one of them, including Abe Hamilton's Yeah,

1:17:48.080 --> 1:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>let's hope that's the case. Good lord, But he did

1:17:50.200 --> 1:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for Justin Air Bear. You do something for justin Air Bear?

1:17:55.320 --> 1:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Did he really? I think if he was good. If

1:17:58.560 --> 1:18:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Davis Mills was good on pace for a four thousand

1:18:01.640 --> 1:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>yards season with twenty three touchdowns as a rookie, let's

1:18:04.439 --> 1:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just put him at a slight increase about thirty yards

1:18:07.000 --> 1:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a game and about point three touchdowns better per game

1:18:11.880 --> 1:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. Now he's sitting at hundred yards twenty eight touchdowns,

1:18:16.479 --> 1:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's quarterback twelve. If he's going to average out

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to quarterback twelve and you're in a twelve team league,

1:18:21.280 --> 1:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>half of his games. He belongs as a starter in

1:18:23.720 --> 1:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the as a starter, and he's going off the board

1:18:26.800 --> 1:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback twenty nine Davis Mills another, think about it,

1:18:32.240 --> 1:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>pick two hundred thirty three of your draft. You know,

1:18:34.240 --> 1:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I take it all back. Pep Hamilton's did have a

1:18:36.960 --> 1:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>career win loss record of three and two in the

1:18:39.920 --> 1:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>XFL as the head coach of the DC. Don't you

1:18:42.800 --> 1:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>forget it? Yeah, I take it all back. What was

1:18:45.720 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the d C? The DC defenders almost as bad as Commanders,

1:18:51.560 --> 1:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>honestly couldn't that terrible team. But we don't have to

1:18:54.840 --> 1:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>get sidetracked on that. Scott is Texans much better, like

1:18:59.600 --> 1:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>if it Minnesota, Minnesotans like that is pretty weird. But

1:19:04.240 --> 1:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a legacy name, right, so I'll give it. I'll

1:19:06.760 --> 1:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>grant them. Hughston was trying to Huston was trying to

1:19:09.479 --> 1:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>get the grandpa's who remember the original Texans and didn't

1:19:15.360 --> 1:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>then become Cowboys fans in the seventies and eighties when

1:19:17.920 --> 1:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys rolled up all of those Super Bowls and nineties.

1:19:20.680 --> 1:19:23.599
<v Speaker 1>So I think that was it was a very slim group. Honestly,

1:19:23.640 --> 1:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what you do when you when that demo of

1:19:27.880 --> 1:19:32.479
<v Speaker 1>like the seventy nine year old guys, we gotta get them. Yes, Okay,

1:19:32.600 --> 1:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about vacated targets, Scott. How about let's just

1:19:35.720 --> 1:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>go right back to the Texans. Tex we're gonna talk

1:19:38.040 --> 1:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna talk about vacated targets and touches, this

1:19:41.439 --> 1:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is in targets exactly. But they got rid of two

1:19:44.360 --> 1:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred got rid of They just threw about the door

1:19:46.640 --> 1:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty carries and sixty two running back targets. Wow,

1:19:51.360 --> 1:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that's over three hundred by my math. And I'm struggling

1:19:55.200 --> 1:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to figure out who can pick up the majority of

1:19:58.040 --> 1:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that work? Who who would it be? Who could pick

1:20:01.360 --> 1:20:06.559
<v Speaker 1>up the majority of three hundred potential running back? That

1:20:06.560 --> 1:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>could Beams. I'll mention this. They haven't shown it yet

1:20:11.120 --> 1:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. Dude can catch and that's the part

1:20:14.280 --> 1:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of his upside that everybody's he's a good runner. I

1:20:17.600 --> 1:20:22.759
<v Speaker 1>will say, you watched the film, he he catches decently downfield, etcetera.

1:20:22.760 --> 1:20:25.599
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have a lot of catches, but he can catch. Yes,

1:20:26.200 --> 1:20:28.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a lot of rushes in Florida at Florida either,

1:20:28.600 --> 1:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>which is mind boggling things. I think they probably misused

1:20:31.240 --> 1:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>him there, but that's just me. So the team that

1:20:33.880 --> 1:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>lost the most targets last year the Tennessee Titans. Obviously,

1:20:38.040 --> 1:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>with the trade of A. J. Brown and other people leaving,

1:20:41.760 --> 1:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they brought in Trailing Burks is going to take up

1:20:43.880 --> 1:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount of that. They brought in Kyle Phillips,

1:20:46.240 --> 1:20:51.519
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna take He's got, He's gonna take up a

1:20:51.520 --> 1:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of that. But honestly, I feel like that target

1:20:54.360 --> 1:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>number is a little high. This is one of the

1:20:56.400 --> 1:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons that I don't love vacated targets at times. But

1:20:59.640 --> 1:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that three it was so high because Derrick Henry went

1:21:04.080 --> 1:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>out and they were they were passing in the second

1:21:08.520 --> 1:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>especially a lot of passes to guys like Hillyard and

1:21:10.880 --> 1:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff that just won't happen this year. But even if

1:21:14.280 --> 1:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you tamp that down, Trailing Burke's and Kyle Phillips and

1:21:17.760 --> 1:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods should be splitting a pretty decent chunk of targets.

1:21:21.240 --> 1:21:23.559
<v Speaker 1>I love that you used the word tamp Thank you. Yes,

1:21:23.720 --> 1:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you never hear people use that. I love it because

1:21:25.840 --> 1:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>because nobody smokes a pipe anymore. One was the last

1:21:28.640 --> 1:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>time you saw anybody smoke a pipe, and traditionally the tamp.

1:21:32.920 --> 1:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The only tamping I know of is with pipe smokers

1:21:36.360 --> 1:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>tamping down their tobacco. I stilling about regular pipes. One

1:21:40.600 --> 1:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Sherlock Holmes style. I still say champion at

1:21:43.160 --> 1:21:47.559
<v Speaker 1>the bit too, instead of chomping, champion, thank yourectly. It's

1:21:47.600 --> 1:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>one of my pet peeps. It's champing, thank you, chomping,

1:21:50.600 --> 1:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you you champ at the bit exact charge. I

1:21:53.680 --> 1:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think you should take up pipe smoking as a hobby.

1:21:56.720 --> 1:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Really you want to give me cancer? Well, I think

1:22:00.040 --> 1:22:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Matt honestly, with getting orange pipe with the glasses, an

1:22:04.840 --> 1:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>copy a corn cob pipe called church in corn cop pipe.

1:22:09.760 --> 1:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I like three or four years ago I saw a

1:22:12.160 --> 1:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>guy driving with a pipe in his mouth. But that's

1:22:15.760 --> 1:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the last time. I can't. I don't, I can't. I

1:22:18.320 --> 1:22:20.559
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Twenty years I've seen one guy with a

1:22:20.560 --> 1:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>pipe never Uh. Some other notable ones. The packers lost

1:22:24.800 --> 1:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>two four targets, mostly Davante Adams, but also you know

1:22:28.680 --> 1:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>st Brown and Mbs and everybody. A lot of players left.

1:22:32.479 --> 1:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Um the clear winner of that is Alan Lazard. He

1:22:35.200 --> 1:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>him in his six five frame. UH should be able

1:22:38.120 --> 1:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to you know, take take up a lot of that

1:22:40.280 --> 1:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and believe it or not, Lizard actually started to hit

1:22:43.400 --> 1:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>last season. He had a five game stretch where he

1:22:46.920 --> 1:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>had five touchdowns and nearly three yards near the end

1:22:50.160 --> 1:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of the season. There it kind of started to take

1:22:52.360 --> 1:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>off for him. Then Alan Lazard scored a touchdown on

1:22:55.720 --> 1:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>tent of his receptions last year. It's pretty good. That's

1:23:00.360 --> 1:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>really good. I get this feeling we're gonna be having

1:23:03.439 --> 1:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a show around like week three, We're like, who do

1:23:05.920 --> 1:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you really regret you didn't draft? And we're all gonna

1:23:09.160 --> 1:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>be like, we have I passed on alimis Art four times?

1:23:12.960 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That didn't I have Wait, I'm over No, I have

1:23:17.160 --> 1:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>way too much of it. That's because A. J. Dillon

1:23:19.160 --> 1:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>who was in your league told you all about him.

1:23:21.320 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>He did not. I should have asked, Why didn't I ask?

1:23:24.080 --> 1:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He did? Drest he did? Draft? Uh Ellen Lazard any

1:23:27.439 --> 1:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers so a little biased. They lost thirty six

1:23:31.800 --> 1:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of their inside the tent targets as well, with

1:23:34.120 --> 1:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the big bodies of LAZARDE Dubbs. That's that's kind of nice.

1:23:38.080 --> 1:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Over to the Chiefs. The Chiefs lost the most targets. Yeah,

1:23:43.040 --> 1:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the most targets. Yeah, I was combining targets and touches

1:23:46.040 --> 1:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for a second, but yeah, they lost the most targets.

1:23:48.960 --> 1:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Two sixty five wide receiver targets alone, UM a lot

1:23:53.840 --> 1:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. I honestly think it's going to be replaced

1:23:56.200 --> 1:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>with Jujuice Mith Schuster. Not obviously two sixty five, but

1:23:59.800 --> 1:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>he has been the talk at camp. He's been going

1:24:01.680 --> 1:24:04.519
<v Speaker 1>deep and we're just a couple of years removed from

1:24:04.640 --> 1:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>two years in a row where he's in the hundred

1:24:06.479 --> 1:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty target range. He can be a volume guy. He

1:24:09.120 --> 1:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>can be a volume guy. He didn't score a lot

1:24:10.840 --> 1:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns in that because he was more of a

1:24:12.760 --> 1:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>slot guy and they had other weapons. They don't have

1:24:14.960 --> 1:24:17.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other weapons. If we end the season

1:24:17.520 --> 1:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and Juju Smith Schuster is a hundred fifty plus target guy,

1:24:21.200 --> 1:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be shocked. I wouldn't be shocked if he

1:24:23.360 --> 1:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>jumps right back into that top twelve wide receiver range.

1:24:26.720 --> 1:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm imagining it's like Week three and we're doing Fantasy

1:24:29.680 --> 1:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>football weekly and we're saying to ourselves, I passed on

1:24:33.720 --> 1:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Schuster four times, how did you receive this? Tyreek Hill left?

1:24:37.560 --> 1:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>We got Juju Smith Schuster who we've looked at for

1:24:39.600 --> 1:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. But forget that his first

1:24:41.840 --> 1:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>two years in the league he was absolutely ridiculous and

1:24:44.280 --> 1:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely high volume. And now he's the number one guy

1:24:46.720 --> 1:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for Patrick Holmes. Yeah, unless more turns out to be

1:24:50.120 --> 1:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this is turning into a could be wrong guy for

1:24:53.160 --> 1:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers and Patrick Mahomes. What are you say? Is right? Yeah,

1:24:58.000 --> 1:25:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they're they're also boring ones like the rad has lost

1:25:00.360 --> 1:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eighty nine wide receiver targets and he's

1:25:05.360 --> 1:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get That's what I put He's gonna get one

1:25:08.280 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of those targets that were replaced on that one. Um.

1:25:14.680 --> 1:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Another one I find interesting is the Chiefs lost fifty

1:25:19.000 --> 1:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>seven running back targets and a hundred and fifty seven

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>running back carries. That is a lot of works. Isn't

1:25:27.360 --> 1:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>getting all that? Oh No, he's no, your kids serious,

1:25:31.000 --> 1:25:33.759
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to add two hundred and fourteen touches

1:25:33.840 --> 1:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to his UM. But here's the thing, Jet McKinnon, I

1:25:38.280 --> 1:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he holds up. He's thirty one years old,

1:25:40.720 --> 1:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not. He looked great in small doses in the playoffs.

1:25:45.120 --> 1:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he holds up. We got a seventh

1:25:47.280 --> 1:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>round rookie in Isaiah Pacheco, who I actually really really like.

1:25:51.320 --> 1:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>We got Ronald Jones, who seems to be a cut candidate,

1:25:53.960 --> 1:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>despite you know, the loose usage in the last preseason game.

1:25:57.040 --> 1:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think in the seventh eighth round where c H

1:25:59.920 --> 1:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is going, we might be undervaluing what kind of volume

1:26:04.120 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he might actually get because he is the clear cut

1:26:07.320 --> 1:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>number one running back there. He's going at a discount

1:26:10.120 --> 1:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll never buy. You know. Clyde Edwards A Layer was

1:26:12.200 --> 1:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a his rookie year when he got drafted in the

1:26:15.280 --> 1:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>first round. Ever, he's very excited. Totally misread this. You

1:26:18.880 --> 1:26:22.519
<v Speaker 1>know this my eating crow. We misread was the pass

1:26:22.560 --> 1:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>catching going away. Yeah, that's where he did in college, right,

1:26:25.240 --> 1:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And I thought he was sitting on like fifty receptions,

1:26:28.000 --> 1:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty receptions, seventy receptions. We thought he was gonna be

1:26:30.360 --> 1:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Austin Neckler. Did none of that panned out? First rounder

1:26:33.120 --> 1:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. Then Clyde Edwards A Layer dropped to

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>what like the fourth round last year. Now, if you

1:26:38.320 --> 1:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>want to me and get him seventh round, say, feels

1:26:41.200 --> 1:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like the price is finally right on Clyde Edwards A Layer,

1:26:46.520 --> 1:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>all Right, any other VACA, vacated targets, vacated carries you

1:26:50.120 --> 1:26:52.719
<v Speaker 1>want to discuss, guy, I think the most obvious ones

1:26:52.760 --> 1:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>are ones like the Falcons who are are right near

1:26:55.800 --> 1:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the top of the league in targets they lost and

1:26:58.640 --> 1:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>carries they lost. It's pretty clear what's happening there. It's

1:27:01.960 --> 1:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Drake Lennon taking over the Ridley role. It's

1:27:04.400 --> 1:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Pits expanding at the running back role. Patterson,

1:27:08.840 --> 1:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we've already talked, we don't think it's going to be him.

1:27:11.120 --> 1:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So right now, where Damian Williams is going and Tyler

1:27:14.400 --> 1:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are going in in in drafts, there's two hundred plus

1:27:19.439 --> 1:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>touches to the running back position that are just gone

1:27:22.280 --> 1:27:24.679
<v Speaker 1>from last year, and we've already said Cordarrell Patterson probably

1:27:24.760 --> 1:27:27.599
<v Speaker 1>isn't taking it. No, we know, we know Damian Williams

1:27:27.640 --> 1:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is kind of just a guy. Yeah, That's why I

1:27:29.880 --> 1:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like Tyler l Jeer just, you know, because maybe it

1:27:32.120 --> 1:27:34.839
<v Speaker 1>turns out he's really good. Once again, he drafted himself.

1:27:35.040 --> 1:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>He believes in himself. He's close to the situation personally. Now,

1:27:41.080 --> 1:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>when did he draft himself? I think it was at

1:27:44.880 --> 1:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a fair value. I think it was like twelve rounder,

1:27:48.120 --> 1:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and so he didn't take himself in the first round,

1:27:49.880 --> 1:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just stuff like because I'm me. No, No, he checked

1:27:53.200 --> 1:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>out a DP, he knew about where he did. He

1:27:57.320 --> 1:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>give himself a reason he might have given himself around,

1:28:00.560 --> 1:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gave himself a reach out. Scott Fish on Fantasy Football

1:28:04.240 --> 1:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Weekly clip that. Yeah, thank you for listening, everybody. If

1:28:07.680 --> 1:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you're listening over the air, know that if you miss

1:28:09.320 --> 1:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>any part of the show. This is also a podcast.

1:28:11.200 --> 1:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to podcast, know that you can find

1:28:13.000 --> 1:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>this over the air on many local sports talk radio stations.

1:28:16.640 --> 1:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, get my cheat sheet for free Guillotine

1:28:19.520 --> 1:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Leagues dot com. Encourage you to check that out along

1:28:22.240 --> 1:28:24.519
<v Speaker 1>with maybe a private league of public league of super

1:28:24.560 --> 1:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>chap league. Guillotine Leagues dot com for all of your

1:28:27.760 --> 1:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>help on the fastest growing, most fun way to play

1:28:31.240 --> 1:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>season long fantasy football Guillotine Leagues dot com. Uh, we'll

1:28:35.040 --> 1:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>be back next week. More Fantasy Football Weekly of Cards

1:28:37.680 --> 1:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>are here every week. We'll talk to you than everybody.

1:28:40.200 --> 1:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the hottest drafting part of the season. So fun

1:28:45.800 --> 1:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>lively draft coming up. All right, it's it's Christmas for

1:28:48.880 --> 1:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners right now. So we find out what our

1:28:51.000 --> 1:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>players are gonna be like for this year. Talk to

1:28:53.080 --> 1:28:59.559
<v Speaker 1>your week, everybody, Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is a

1:28:59.560 --> 1:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>production of I heart Radio. For more podcasts from my

1:29:02.320 --> 1:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:29:05.600 --> 1:29:07.599
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.