1 00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:20,320 Speaker 1: What is Up? 2 00:00:20,320 --> 00:00:22,640 Speaker 2: Mets fans, Welcome back to another episode of the Mets 3 00:00:22,760 --> 00:00:27,480 Speaker 2: Up Podcast recur Now recurring guests Lance Prasdowski joining us 4 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:29,880 Speaker 2: to talk about not just Mets pitching in general, but 5 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 2: also some Mets pitching prospects. We've got a bunch of 6 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:35,280 Speaker 2: names that we're going to go through in today's episode. 7 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:37,600 Speaker 2: We hope you guys are excited to listen and watch. Remember, 8 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:39,559 Speaker 2: if you're over on YouTube, subscribe to the Mets Up 9 00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:42,519 Speaker 2: Podcast YouTube channel. Go subscribe to Lances channel as well. 10 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,080 Speaker 2: Approaching ten thousand subscribers, we need to get them over there. 11 00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:47,280 Speaker 2: If you want pitching content, there's nobody better on the 12 00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:50,120 Speaker 2: internet right now, especially on YouTube. So makesure you are subscribed. 13 00:00:50,120 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 2: There'll be a link in the description. And yeah, let's 14 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:54,360 Speaker 2: get going into this. So the Mets have made a 15 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:55,840 Speaker 2: lot of moves. I guess we could start with the 16 00:00:56,240 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 2: guys on the major league roster right now, and then 17 00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:01,120 Speaker 2: we'll get a little bit deeper into those prospects. But 18 00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:04,000 Speaker 2: one of the big names that people are most interested 19 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:06,520 Speaker 2: in talking about this offseason has been Clay Holmes, because 20 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:08,120 Speaker 2: the Mets are going to be attempting to turn him 21 00:01:08,160 --> 00:01:10,800 Speaker 2: into a starting Pitcher would love to hear your thoughts 22 00:01:10,840 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 2: about that idea and whether you think he actually can 23 00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 2: maybe stick there. 24 00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 1: I thought you're gonna say Griffin canningerim on, he's not 25 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:20,360 Speaker 1: excited about Rick Griffin Canning. Yeah, I think that this 26 00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:23,640 Speaker 1: was an interesting conversion candidate. I made a video a 27 00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:26,480 Speaker 1: bit ago about Holmes and Hoffman specifically, just because those 28 00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 1: were the obviously rumor guys that I thought had a 29 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:30,720 Speaker 1: shot at it. I think when you approach it from 30 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:33,200 Speaker 1: a data perspective, you're basically looking at, does this guy 31 00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:37,399 Speaker 1: have some semblance of command relative to starters in Major 32 00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 1: League Baseball that could hold up? And how deep is 33 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:41,720 Speaker 1: the mix. I think the hesitancy that a lot of 34 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 1: people had with Holmes specifically was that he's a sinker guy. 35 00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:47,360 Speaker 1: Sinkers usually work versus same handed hitters, don't often work 36 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:50,400 Speaker 1: as well versus oppo handed hitters. So a lot of people, 37 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 1: I think were hesitanting to assume that this guy would 38 00:01:53,040 --> 00:01:55,040 Speaker 1: be able to throw one hundred and forty innings and post, 39 00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:57,840 Speaker 1: you know, sub forty r as a starter. But there's 40 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 1: like a quirk of that oppo handed sinker thing that 41 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 1: you get to if you're like a Logan web style 42 00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:05,200 Speaker 1: where if you have enough like drop on your sinker, 43 00:02:05,240 --> 00:02:08,080 Speaker 1: it'll actually work to the opposite handedness. Now Holmes doesn't 44 00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:11,320 Speaker 1: have drop, but he's such a weird release guy how 45 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:14,040 Speaker 1: high he releases the ball that I think he has 46 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:17,720 Speaker 1: the perception of drop to get him to allow you know, 47 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:20,200 Speaker 1: thirty forty percent of that sinker to left handed hitters 48 00:02:20,240 --> 00:02:22,400 Speaker 1: and not have a massive issue, you know. I think 49 00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:24,799 Speaker 1: he's gonna the for seing more. We'll see if they 50 00:02:25,200 --> 00:02:27,560 Speaker 1: add in some other funky pitch developed the change up 51 00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,600 Speaker 1: to help against lefties. But I think I'm cautiably optimistic. 52 00:02:30,600 --> 00:02:32,480 Speaker 1: I don't think he's like starting a playoff game for 53 00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:35,280 Speaker 1: the Mets, but I think that he's a good starter 54 00:02:35,440 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 1: for I don't know, twenty starts, twenty five, and then 55 00:02:38,320 --> 00:02:39,679 Speaker 1: maybe they convert him back to the pen and he 56 00:02:39,720 --> 00:02:43,000 Speaker 1: looks great in the postseason. I've always been a Holmes fan. 57 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:45,240 Speaker 1: I would say, I don't think I ever really understood 58 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:47,679 Speaker 1: much of the hate coming from the Yankee fans about him. 59 00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:49,920 Speaker 1: I guess I kind of understanding. He blew some saves 60 00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 1: here and there, and he never was like a lockdown 61 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:54,919 Speaker 1: glass a style closer, but He's not that kind of pitcher, 62 00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 1: So I like this. They got to go for some upside. 63 00:02:57,040 --> 00:02:58,440 Speaker 1: They spent so much money on Soto, you got to 64 00:02:58,520 --> 00:03:00,960 Speaker 1: kind of piece together and have funk rotation. I think 65 00:03:00,960 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 1: Holmes fits. 66 00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:02,239 Speaker 2: Yeah. 67 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:03,360 Speaker 3: To give you a lot of credit because you were 68 00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:04,840 Speaker 3: one of the first people, I feel like, who was 69 00:03:04,919 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 3: banging this drunk for Clay Holmes to wind up as 70 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:09,119 Speaker 3: a starting pitcher of this offseason. You mentioned the fact 71 00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:11,040 Speaker 3: that maybe he does something funky like a change up. 72 00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:14,760 Speaker 3: What about Clay Holmes's approach? Has our mangled anything about 73 00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:16,440 Speaker 3: him to make you think a change up as possible? 74 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:18,840 Speaker 3: And if any reason, why hasn't that been something he's 75 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 3: been able to develop so far. 76 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:24,000 Speaker 1: I don't know if it was like totally necessary as 77 00:03:24,040 --> 00:03:26,320 Speaker 1: a reliever, I feel like a reliever a lot of times. 78 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:28,440 Speaker 1: I think some teams like the Twins are starting to 79 00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:30,640 Speaker 1: push into deeper mixes for relievers. You see this with 80 00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:33,040 Speaker 1: like a Griffin Jacks, who's another guy who's I don't 81 00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 1: think is going to convert this offseason to a starter, 82 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:37,320 Speaker 1: but has been speculated in that realm of like Okay, 83 00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 1: who's got command and a deep mix and can battle 84 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:42,680 Speaker 1: both handedness, that maybe has the workload we could push 85 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:44,280 Speaker 1: up to get to one hundred twenty ins, because that's 86 00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: obviously where there's more value from a you know, value 87 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:50,119 Speaker 1: over replacement perspective, from a picture perspective. But but yeah, 88 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 1: I think I think that we've gotten on the point 89 00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 1: with seam orientation understanding which you could bucket into this 90 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:57,880 Speaker 1: giant glob of like seam shifted away seem effects stuff 91 00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: that basically most guys can get to some decent kind 92 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 1: of change up, even if it's just like a chase 93 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 1: change up that has a bunch of vert that drops 94 00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:09,560 Speaker 1: off of fastball. Obviously, like the best change up some 95 00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:11,839 Speaker 1: baseball are from guys who've thrown him for a long 96 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:15,400 Speaker 1: time and can command them and et cetera. But I 97 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:18,600 Speaker 1: just think if you're looking for something more armside drop 98 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:20,880 Speaker 1: for swing and miss that isn't a sinker to opposite 99 00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:22,680 Speaker 1: handed hairs because the leftis is probably gonna be more 100 00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:25,000 Speaker 1: of his problem, then that's like an obvious route to go. 101 00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:27,760 Speaker 1: I actually don't have too much experience like hands on, 102 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:31,960 Speaker 1: I'm trying to get more polished with understanding what orientations 103 00:04:31,960 --> 00:04:33,640 Speaker 1: to go to, whether to go change up or split 104 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:36,480 Speaker 1: some of those characteristics. It's probably better to ask like 105 00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:38,880 Speaker 1: someone who's actually hands on with athletes all the time. 106 00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 1: But I definitely have talked to people who are like, yeah, 107 00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:42,760 Speaker 1: I could get most guys throw some kind of change 108 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:44,599 Speaker 1: up now, you know, even if it's just a two 109 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:46,440 Speaker 1: strike chase pitch, And I think that could be valuable 110 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:47,279 Speaker 1: for a guy like Holmes. 111 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:49,720 Speaker 2: Now for a guy like Griffin Canning, a lot of 112 00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 2: Mets fans are not particularly excited that they signed. 113 00:04:52,920 --> 00:04:54,480 Speaker 1: I'm excited about that, Okay, yeah, so. 114 00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:56,599 Speaker 2: There it is, because statistically last year was one of 115 00:04:56,600 --> 00:04:59,200 Speaker 2: the worst pitchers in baseball, if not the worst. Yeah, 116 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:01,080 Speaker 2: he was horrible, But we also know he's coming from 117 00:05:01,080 --> 00:05:03,320 Speaker 2: the Angels organization which just had a really hard time 118 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,040 Speaker 2: develop and pitching. Even like their first round picks over 119 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:09,240 Speaker 2: the last few year with Redeptmers and Sam Bachman, guys 120 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 2: just haven't really lived up to the hype. So what 121 00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:13,880 Speaker 2: what is making you excite about Griffin Cannon That can 122 00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:16,120 Speaker 2: maybe give the Mets fans at home a little bit 123 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:18,320 Speaker 2: of like a deep breath of like, okay, this isn't insane. 124 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:20,560 Speaker 1: Well, one of my favorite things to do every off 125 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:22,919 Speaker 1: season to look at the prior year's worst pitchers. I 126 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:26,039 Speaker 1: have this theory that I've talked to major league coaches 127 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:30,080 Speaker 1: and minor league coaches about that terrible pitchers are better 128 00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 1: to work with from like a let's get better standpoint 129 00:05:32,400 --> 00:05:35,320 Speaker 1: than guys who are like mediocre average, where the guy's 130 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: mediocre average maybe doesn't think he needs to do a 131 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:39,880 Speaker 1: lot to sustain his job. When reality the league adjusts 132 00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:42,479 Speaker 1: back and then he's really bad. But that's honestly the 133 00:05:42,520 --> 00:05:45,120 Speaker 1: case of Canning probably between like twenty one, twenty two 134 00:05:45,160 --> 00:05:47,000 Speaker 1: and twenty three, where he was like I'm okay, I'm okay, 135 00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:48,719 Speaker 1: and then the league was like you are bad. He 136 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:50,640 Speaker 1: was like, I am bad. Need to adjust out. So 137 00:05:51,200 --> 00:05:53,360 Speaker 1: I love those guys. I actually have a video coming 138 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 1: out today I on a YouTube channel that is in 139 00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:57,840 Speaker 1: this idea of let's look at the worst pitchers in 140 00:05:57,880 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 1: baseball and try to pick out some that have some improved. 141 00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: I cheated a little. I have like Justin ber Lander 142 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:04,520 Speaker 1: in there going to the Giants, But Griffith Canning's on 143 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:06,240 Speaker 1: that list, so I talk about him a bit. The 144 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:08,680 Speaker 1: key thing with him is one I don't think then 145 00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:11,120 Speaker 1: Angels are particularly good on the pitching side, so I 146 00:06:11,320 --> 00:06:13,880 Speaker 1: like looking at you know, the Angels and Marlins. Marlins 147 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:15,960 Speaker 1: just turned over a bunch of pitching staff. But like 148 00:06:16,120 --> 00:06:18,040 Speaker 1: the guys who were on the Marlins in this last 149 00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 1: couple of years, when you are trying to target a 150 00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:24,400 Speaker 1: guy that is bad has bad peripherals, maybe he has 151 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:26,760 Speaker 1: like one decent pitch and two decent pitches, but you 152 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:29,200 Speaker 1: can't see a path to success. I like looking at 153 00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:32,040 Speaker 1: teams where they just turned over staff. So that's where 154 00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:33,719 Speaker 1: I go, like to Marlins, to the Marlins and some 155 00:06:33,720 --> 00:06:35,720 Speaker 1: of those guys. But with the Angels, it's the same idea. 156 00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:37,600 Speaker 1: They're not particularly great from the pitching side, so when 157 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:39,400 Speaker 1: they go to a Sharper Org, I think the Mets 158 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:40,920 Speaker 1: are on the up and up on the pitching side. 159 00:06:41,120 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: I just think they're gonna make smart changes. The obvious 160 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 1: thing for Canning was on the last game of the season, 161 00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:48,040 Speaker 1: if you look at his slider, he started throwing a sweeper, 162 00:06:48,080 --> 00:06:49,720 Speaker 1: and it's a really good sweeper and you can throw 163 00:06:49,760 --> 00:06:51,920 Speaker 1: them the majority of his career, and the Mets are 164 00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:54,000 Speaker 1: definitely pro sweeper. From some of the minor league names 165 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:55,320 Speaker 1: we'll talk about, they have a lot of these guys 166 00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:57,160 Speaker 1: that rip nasty sweepers that are gonna great out well 167 00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:00,440 Speaker 1: and stuff models, which is because they're hard and be 168 00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:03,200 Speaker 1: sweep a lot and they're gonna crush righties. And his 169 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:05,520 Speaker 1: was strong, like some guys break up sweepers, and it's like, 170 00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:07,240 Speaker 1: all right, that's an average sweeper, and we're running into 171 00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:09,360 Speaker 1: the situation where a lot of average sweepers are kind 172 00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:12,360 Speaker 1: of getting aren't as valuable. I would say we've seen 173 00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 1: some deterioration in terms of chase against them in the 174 00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:17,400 Speaker 1: aggregate when you look from twenty one to twenty two 175 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:19,880 Speaker 1: until now twenty four ish. But when you have a 176 00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 1: good sweeper like Cannings was like eighty five to eighty 177 00:07:22,440 --> 00:07:25,000 Speaker 1: seven with a little bit under twelve inches a horizontal, 178 00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 1: but that's like it's gonna grate out as a plus sweeper. 179 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 1: So I like that pitch. I think they're gonna rip 180 00:07:29,360 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 1: that a ton. I'll spoil some of my video and 181 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:33,560 Speaker 1: say my crazy hot take on him because I don't 182 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:35,560 Speaker 1: think he's gonna start a ton or I kind of 183 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:37,200 Speaker 1: was like, okay, if he starts, I see a path 184 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 1: because he's got a couple of decent breaking balls. But 185 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 1: I kind of love him as this reliever that never 186 00:07:41,520 --> 00:07:44,679 Speaker 1: throws his fastball, And I'm not talking like cut fastball uses. 187 00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:47,560 Speaker 1: I'm saying like stop throwing like Jacob Judith, a four 188 00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:50,720 Speaker 1: pitch exactly become like a give me, give me this 189 00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:53,480 Speaker 1: slider tweener pitch that he throws, which he actually commands 190 00:07:53,480 --> 00:07:56,040 Speaker 1: better than his fastball. That's your strike pitch, early count, 191 00:07:56,240 --> 00:07:59,000 Speaker 1: and then you go sweeper curveball, change off that and 192 00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:00,760 Speaker 1: you could crush either head in a hitter, and you 193 00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:04,760 Speaker 1: become just like this matchup proof bullpen demon type guy 194 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:06,640 Speaker 1: that maybe gets in the ninety innings if he needs 195 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:08,960 Speaker 1: his spot start occasionally unless they call up like a 196 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:11,720 Speaker 1: Sprout or someone along those lines. But but I'm kind 197 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:13,440 Speaker 1: of in Uncanning. I don't know, I get I get 198 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:16,320 Speaker 1: kind of like excited about these terrible pictures because when 199 00:08:16,320 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 1: you when you get a call on one of these 200 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:19,680 Speaker 1: guys where it's like, oh that guy posted a four 201 00:08:19,760 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 1: after having like a five to five, it's like I 202 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:25,240 Speaker 1: was on it. Well you're going for everyone else? That's fun, yeah, right, 203 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:27,480 Speaker 1: Like I've seen these sleepers like Ryan Pepio. It's like 204 00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:30,640 Speaker 1: Peppeo is a fantastic picture. Like what is sleepy about 205 00:08:30,840 --> 00:08:33,679 Speaker 1: Griffin Canning is a sleeper. That is a sleeper because 206 00:08:33,800 --> 00:08:36,040 Speaker 1: everyone is asleep on him, and I can imagine a 207 00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:37,880 Speaker 1: small step forward that would make him relevant. 208 00:08:37,880 --> 00:08:39,160 Speaker 2: I mean even if you look at again, like last 209 00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:42,160 Speaker 2: year Severino Mania, like we're coming off of horrendous years. 210 00:08:42,160 --> 00:08:44,000 Speaker 2: They were some of the worst pictures and that Mets 211 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:45,000 Speaker 2: we turned them around. 212 00:08:45,080 --> 00:08:48,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a great point. Saverina got paid. No, say 213 00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 1: it's a great point. I think you get cases of 214 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:51,800 Speaker 1: this every year, and that was my point. Like the 215 00:08:51,840 --> 00:08:53,760 Speaker 1: first time that it made me think of this was 216 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:56,560 Speaker 1: going back to like twenty eighteen to nineteen with Cordon Burns, 217 00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:59,640 Speaker 1: and then I believe that prior season was Gielito from 218 00:08:59,720 --> 00:09:01,840 Speaker 1: eighteen to nineteen, seventeen to eighteen. I made mixing up 219 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: the years where he was like literally the worst pitcher 220 00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:05,800 Speaker 1: in baseball and then he put up a five more 221 00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 1: season and got sidevotes. The same thing happened with Corten Burns. 222 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:10,679 Speaker 1: Like this happens more than people think. And obviously it's 223 00:09:10,679 --> 00:09:12,640 Speaker 1: not like ten of ten, it's more like one of ten. 224 00:09:12,800 --> 00:09:14,360 Speaker 1: But when you hit that one of ten, it's very 225 00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 1: relevant to make that change. 226 00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:17,520 Speaker 3: And something else that's cool about Canning is that, yeah, 227 00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:19,000 Speaker 3: he was the worst pitcher in baseball. The whole reason 228 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 3: he was able to become the worst pitcher in baseball 229 00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:22,719 Speaker 3: stistically was that, for the first time his career, he 230 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:24,240 Speaker 3: threw more than one hundred third of the innings. He 231 00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 3: was healthy for the first time ever. So, Griffin Canning's, 232 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:28,600 Speaker 3: in a normal offseason, you're gonna work with the Mets. 233 00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:30,280 Speaker 3: You mentioned the fact that you feel like now the 234 00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:32,959 Speaker 3: Mets are on the open up pitching development. Q tell 235 00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:35,040 Speaker 3: us why you think that is from an outside perspective. 236 00:09:35,040 --> 00:09:37,280 Speaker 3: From the inside, we were fully drinking the kool aid. 237 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:40,240 Speaker 3: We're all in the Mets pitcher lab. Hefner Jaeger's also 238 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:41,760 Speaker 3: wanted to maybe if you can't touch on the new 239 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 3: higher Desu Jochelle from the Yankees. Oh yeah, I see 240 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:45,599 Speaker 3: all the best guys from the Yankees. But what what 241 00:09:45,720 --> 00:09:47,520 Speaker 3: from the outside makes you think the Mets pitching is 242 00:09:47,559 --> 00:09:48,199 Speaker 3: on the up and up? 243 00:09:49,480 --> 00:09:50,880 Speaker 1: I mean, it's just a matter of looking at some 244 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:52,560 Speaker 1: of the stuff in the minor leagues and looking at 245 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:54,440 Speaker 1: the pitchers honestly, like a good way to do it 246 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:56,559 Speaker 1: is literally the exercise that it did before. Hobbinham's pot 247 00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:58,400 Speaker 1: of looking at like the top six seven arms and 248 00:09:58,480 --> 00:10:00,960 Speaker 1: just seeing what they're building. Lot of high vlo it's 249 00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 1: a lot of two playing fastballs. There's a lot of 250 00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:05,800 Speaker 1: deep mixes, which I really really like from young pitchers. 251 00:10:05,840 --> 00:10:07,320 Speaker 1: I did a video on that as well, and just 252 00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:10,319 Speaker 1: like expanding reponshire early allowing you to become a higher 253 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,240 Speaker 1: probability starting pitcher long term. But I just think they're 254 00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:16,840 Speaker 1: making sharp decisions from a velocity perspective, stuff perspective, et cetera. 255 00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:18,360 Speaker 1: It could just come down to the simple as stuff. 256 00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:20,680 Speaker 1: And I'm biased as well, like when you hire people 257 00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 1: that I've had communication with, like a Yeager's and a 258 00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,720 Speaker 1: Desi and have had conversations with and they're good people 259 00:10:25,800 --> 00:10:27,840 Speaker 1: and they're sharp, and they've taught me something like I'm 260 00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: definitely gonna lean in that direction. So maybe it's a 261 00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:32,880 Speaker 1: little more anecdotal, but I think it's I think they're 262 00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:35,520 Speaker 1: signaling the fact that DESI made a lateral move to 263 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:37,400 Speaker 1: go to the Mets, you know, like that is a 264 00:10:37,400 --> 00:10:38,840 Speaker 1: little bit surprising, and a lot of the times what 265 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:41,360 Speaker 1: happens in this stuff is like these lateral moves get 266 00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:43,920 Speaker 1: blocked from an interviewing perspective. So what the team has 267 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 1: to do is then you know, just straight off for 268 00:10:46,160 --> 00:10:48,280 Speaker 1: the guy without talking to him. You know, I don't 269 00:10:48,280 --> 00:10:49,760 Speaker 1: know if this happened with DESI I know what happened 270 00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:51,560 Speaker 1: with a couple other like assistant pitching coach kind of 271 00:10:51,600 --> 00:10:54,839 Speaker 1: swaps this season, and that was a surprising one to 272 00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:56,560 Speaker 1: me because like Yane's in the great spot, he had 273 00:10:56,559 --> 00:10:58,840 Speaker 1: a lot of autonomy. I definitely know that he helped 274 00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:00,680 Speaker 1: out with a lot of their like NONS tools, which 275 00:11:00,679 --> 00:11:02,439 Speaker 1: goes back to this like seamshifted wake thing that a 276 00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:05,240 Speaker 1: lot of teams are on and understanding. I think the 277 00:11:05,240 --> 00:11:07,120 Speaker 1: Mets are very littered in that sense of being able 278 00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:09,959 Speaker 1: to get guys two different shapes to help versus different handedness. 279 00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:12,880 Speaker 1: They push V low and I'm in. I'm in on 280 00:11:12,960 --> 00:11:14,520 Speaker 1: just a lot of the arms that they have in 281 00:11:14,559 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 1: the minors, and I think it's reflected in the prospect lists. 282 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:19,319 Speaker 4: Hey, Valentine's Day is coming up, and we have the 283 00:11:19,400 --> 00:11:22,000 Speaker 4: recommendation for you to check out right now. Don't wait, 284 00:11:22,040 --> 00:11:24,839 Speaker 4: it's one eight hundred flowers dot com. This year, we're 285 00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:27,160 Speaker 4: partnering with one eight hundred Flowers to make sure you're 286 00:11:27,160 --> 00:11:30,480 Speaker 4: a Valentine's Legend with an exclusive offer for the ft fam. 287 00:11:30,600 --> 00:11:34,160 Speaker 4: It's double the roses for free. When you buy one dozen, 288 00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 4: they're gonna double your bouquet to two dozen roses. It's 289 00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 4: the perfect way to wow her without breaking the bank. 290 00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:43,640 Speaker 4: One eight hundred Flowers always delivers. Let them dominate this holiday. 291 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:44,679 Speaker 4: It's what they do best. 292 00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:46,880 Speaker 1: Think about everyone in your fam that deserves some love. 293 00:11:46,920 --> 00:11:49,200 Speaker 1: On Valentine's Day, I sent a bouquet to my daughter 294 00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:51,320 Speaker 1: at college and it lit up her day. I also 295 00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:53,640 Speaker 1: added an awesome base to the order for so she's 296 00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:54,280 Speaker 1: got it all. 297 00:11:54,440 --> 00:11:57,080 Speaker 4: All roses from one eight hundred Flowers are picked at 298 00:11:57,080 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 4: their peak, cared for every step of the way, and 299 00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:03,320 Speaker 4: shipped rash to ensure lasting beauty. Don't wait think ahead 300 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:05,320 Speaker 4: this year. Make it easy and get that deal right now. 301 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 4: When you order one dozen, they'll double the rose bouquet 302 00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:11,480 Speaker 4: for free. That's the ft deals that we're always looking 303 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,480 Speaker 4: out for. Go to one eight hundred flowers dot com 304 00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 4: slash ft that's one eight hundred flowers dot com slash. 305 00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 1: F t. 306 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:22,520 Speaker 2: All right, so let's talk about some of those arms. 307 00:12:22,520 --> 00:12:22,720 Speaker 1: Now. 308 00:12:22,720 --> 00:12:25,560 Speaker 2: We got Brandon Sprote that's the big one. That's the 309 00:12:25,559 --> 00:12:28,400 Speaker 2: one everybody's waiting for. A lot of hype around him. 310 00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:31,040 Speaker 2: How do you feel about Brandon Sprout as a pitching prospect. 311 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:33,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'd say it was, like, honestly, first off, I 312 00:12:33,920 --> 00:12:35,800 Speaker 1: thought his name was Sprout for like a hear some 313 00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:37,880 Speaker 1: grad I'm glad that I now know it's Sprout, so 314 00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:41,040 Speaker 1: I don't look like an idiot saying sprout. But yeah, 315 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:44,120 Speaker 1: he's he pounds the zone. I'm a little more skeptical 316 00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: in the fastball shape here, I think than other people. 317 00:12:45,880 --> 00:12:48,440 Speaker 1: I know, Eric Long and Hagen in Baseball Perspectives just 318 00:12:48,480 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: released their top one on one and he's I think 319 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 1: he was top fifty ish right around there, like the 320 00:12:52,440 --> 00:12:55,960 Speaker 1: top couple. Yeah, yeah, like top five pitching prospect in baseball. 321 00:12:56,360 --> 00:13:00,280 Speaker 1: For me, I don't think he's templated at as like 322 00:13:00,280 --> 00:13:02,680 Speaker 1: a top five pitching prospect in baseball. I view him 323 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:05,240 Speaker 1: a little bit more almost more like Brandon fought from 324 00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:09,160 Speaker 1: the d Backs, where it's like really pound zone. You 325 00:13:09,200 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 1: look at his maps, everything is centered and it's worked 326 00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:14,880 Speaker 1: for a pretty good amount of time because his stuff's 327 00:13:14,920 --> 00:13:17,880 Speaker 1: really good. It's hard. But the fastball in particular, I 328 00:13:17,920 --> 00:13:19,559 Speaker 1: am a little bit a little bit hesitant on in 329 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:21,160 Speaker 1: terms of some of the shape regression we Shaw when 330 00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:24,160 Speaker 1: he jumped up to triple A. It's not a good 331 00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:26,480 Speaker 1: carry pitch. As we'll talk like Jonah Tong just has 332 00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:30,160 Speaker 1: a really fun fastball. He's trying to get you to 333 00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:33,600 Speaker 1: other weapons in his mix, which are the slider, the sweeper, 334 00:13:33,600 --> 00:13:35,760 Speaker 1: off at, the change up, et cetera. Like that is 335 00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:37,480 Speaker 1: his goal is the goal with a lot of these 336 00:13:37,480 --> 00:13:40,640 Speaker 1: guys that don't have like great fastball. So while he's 337 00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:42,400 Speaker 1: been able to kind of just rip that thing by 338 00:13:42,920 --> 00:13:46,680 Speaker 1: double A and low and lower than that hitters, I 339 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:48,520 Speaker 1: am not like totally sold in this guy being like 340 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:51,240 Speaker 1: a top rotation type. I like him more as like 341 00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:53,439 Speaker 1: a horse middle, which is where I think like the 342 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:56,240 Speaker 1: fought comp makes sense because I don't think a lot 343 00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:58,800 Speaker 1: of people view him as like an ace. You know, 344 00:13:58,880 --> 00:14:00,800 Speaker 1: he was terrible his first too, and then he bounced 345 00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:03,040 Speaker 1: back pretty nice last year. I think people are probably 346 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 1: in the middle line him like he's a valuable starting pitcher, 347 00:14:05,080 --> 00:14:07,400 Speaker 1: he's under control. People like him, but they don't view 348 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:09,600 Speaker 1: hims like a top rotation teche. I think that's where 349 00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:11,400 Speaker 1: I come down on Sproat. I know other people have 350 00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:14,280 Speaker 1: different opinions here, and if you're ranking him on the 351 00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:17,319 Speaker 1: top forty top five pitching prospect in baseball purely because 352 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:20,040 Speaker 1: he's stable. I get that, Like, I totally understand that, 353 00:14:20,040 --> 00:14:22,240 Speaker 1: like pitching prospects are really volata. I think I lean 354 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 1: more towards like the guys like the Noah Schultze's of 355 00:14:25,200 --> 00:14:26,960 Speaker 1: the world, some of these guys where it's like you 356 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:30,760 Speaker 1: get unique outlier traits alongside that v low and better 357 00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:33,840 Speaker 1: shapes than a sprout from a fastball perspective specifically, and 358 00:14:33,880 --> 00:14:36,440 Speaker 1: then it's like, Okay, I'll buy into that, Whereas like Sproud, 359 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:38,880 Speaker 1: I view more as like gonna have a major league 360 00:14:38,960 --> 00:14:41,160 Speaker 1: role and make impact. But is this guy like starting 361 00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 1: game one of the Mets CS or World Series run 362 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:47,760 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty seven. No, but he's in pitching Game 363 00:14:47,760 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 1: three and he's he give you five inning, six innings 364 00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:51,560 Speaker 1: and it's good. Like, yeah, I'm cool with that. So 365 00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:53,600 Speaker 1: I guess I'm I just temper my expectations a little 366 00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:55,440 Speaker 1: bit more where I think he's like a major leaguer. 367 00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:58,000 Speaker 1: I'm just not totally sold in this fastball working long 368 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 1: term to make him like an elite, elite starting pitcher. 369 00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:02,960 Speaker 3: Where do you have the seesaw between velocity and a 370 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:04,720 Speaker 3: fastball and shape on a fastball, because one of the 371 00:15:04,760 --> 00:15:07,000 Speaker 3: things that holds back Fought specifically is that fastball is 372 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:08,480 Speaker 3: a lot more cut that ride. It doesn't have much 373 00:15:08,560 --> 00:15:10,240 Speaker 3: rye at all. Yeah, he doesn't really often get it 374 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:12,040 Speaker 3: to the ninety five range. He never really touches ninety 375 00:15:12,040 --> 00:15:14,440 Speaker 3: six range where I sprot at times his min Ley 376 00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:16,320 Speaker 3: crew has been able to sit there. So again, I 377 00:15:16,360 --> 00:15:18,320 Speaker 3: don't think he'll be able to sit there forever. But 378 00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:21,160 Speaker 3: where where do you have the value between shape and 379 00:15:21,280 --> 00:15:23,840 Speaker 3: velocity for a picture like Sproke the great point? 380 00:15:23,880 --> 00:15:25,440 Speaker 1: I introspect about this a lot when I look at 381 00:15:25,480 --> 00:15:27,760 Speaker 1: things because like one of the things that I know, 382 00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:31,960 Speaker 1: like Robert Stock I believe, yeah cup too Red Sox, 383 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:34,080 Speaker 1: and like I remember him and Kyle Body a driveline 384 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:36,840 Speaker 1: had a conversation on Twitter about how and as you 385 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:40,720 Speaker 1: throw harder, there's like some biomechanical element that literally like 386 00:15:40,800 --> 00:15:45,080 Speaker 1: prevents you from creating great shape. So it's like this 387 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:46,480 Speaker 1: is why you look at a lot of like really 388 00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:48,920 Speaker 1: hard fastballs and baseball and you're likeah, that shape's not 389 00:15:48,960 --> 00:15:50,640 Speaker 1: that good, you know. It's like it's kind of two 390 00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:52,880 Speaker 1: playing doesn't have above average very relative to the slot. 391 00:15:53,040 --> 00:15:54,840 Speaker 1: It runs the little sort of work versus rieties. He 392 00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:57,280 Speaker 1: needs a sinker, et cetera. You know, like it's almost 393 00:15:57,320 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 1: like to some Paul Skein's problem when he was coming 394 00:15:59,200 --> 00:16:02,280 Speaker 1: out of college, everyone was like bad fastball, and it's like, yeah, 395 00:16:02,280 --> 00:16:05,080 Speaker 1: but like velocity can buffer against bad fastball shape. So 396 00:16:05,120 --> 00:16:07,480 Speaker 1: your point on fought to Sproat is a good one 397 00:16:07,480 --> 00:16:09,440 Speaker 1: in terms of like, Okay, I had three ticks there. 398 00:16:09,480 --> 00:16:11,920 Speaker 1: I'm much more confident in that fastball working. I think 399 00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:14,720 Speaker 1: the thing that I would prefer to see is like 400 00:16:14,760 --> 00:16:16,600 Speaker 1: I definitely want villa first. So if you're telling me, like, 401 00:16:16,600 --> 00:16:19,720 Speaker 1: bounce the scale out, I'll take Villa. But you it's 402 00:16:19,760 --> 00:16:22,320 Speaker 1: like it's a sliding scale. So how bad is this shape? 403 00:16:22,320 --> 00:16:25,880 Speaker 1: You know? Is it? Like? Uh? Like I Max Meyer 404 00:16:25,960 --> 00:16:28,000 Speaker 1: is a good example, right Minnesota kid had a banger 405 00:16:28,040 --> 00:16:30,080 Speaker 1: slider's entire career in Minnesota, and then he jumps at 406 00:16:30,120 --> 00:16:32,400 Speaker 1: the majors, gets crushed, you know, and it's like, Okay, 407 00:16:32,480 --> 00:16:34,520 Speaker 1: that guy's got a bad fastball. Like he cuts it 408 00:16:34,560 --> 00:16:37,000 Speaker 1: a bit, it's not cutting enough. He just throws it 409 00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:38,440 Speaker 1: over the middle of the plate and he throws ninety 410 00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:40,520 Speaker 1: three to ninety four. It's like, given that guy three ticks, 411 00:16:40,520 --> 00:16:42,400 Speaker 1: and like, maybe we could get that shape a little better. 412 00:16:43,600 --> 00:16:46,880 Speaker 1: So I lean towards the velocity side. But I think 413 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:49,440 Speaker 1: what we run into is like we're seeing a lot 414 00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:51,880 Speaker 1: at the major league level, guys are zoning on fastball 415 00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:55,040 Speaker 1: so much as hitters and crushing them that you almost 416 00:16:55,040 --> 00:16:56,800 Speaker 1: have to like make the shape slightly better or throw 417 00:16:56,840 --> 00:16:58,880 Speaker 1: harder and then throw the pitch less, and it becomes 418 00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:01,120 Speaker 1: a matter of like situation, how are you using that 419 00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:03,600 Speaker 1: fastball to get the most life out of it, so 420 00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:06,720 Speaker 1: to speak. So I unfortunately don't have his usage up 421 00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:08,240 Speaker 1: right here, but I think he was throwing around like 422 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:10,280 Speaker 1: forty five to fifty percent. He was pretty fastball heavy 423 00:17:10,480 --> 00:17:13,240 Speaker 1: in the minors, I believe, and I think that's gonna 424 00:17:13,240 --> 00:17:15,480 Speaker 1: come down. It's just like the nature of the beast, 425 00:17:15,560 --> 00:17:16,920 Speaker 1: Like you can zone that thing and get it by 426 00:17:16,960 --> 00:17:19,320 Speaker 1: double a hitters. But the villo's good. But because the 427 00:17:19,359 --> 00:17:21,000 Speaker 1: shape is more average to me, I think it's gonna 428 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:23,639 Speaker 1: grad out probably above average and stuff models, but I 429 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,320 Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprised if that pitch slightly underperforms. Again, I 430 00:17:26,400 --> 00:17:27,840 Speaker 1: view him and more as a guy that is like 431 00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:30,159 Speaker 1: trying to punch you to everything that is deep in 432 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:32,399 Speaker 1: his mix, so we're gonna maybe run in some problems 433 00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:34,720 Speaker 1: where he's like worse behind in count than the average 434 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:36,800 Speaker 1: pitcher in baseball because like maybe he tries to go 435 00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:39,600 Speaker 1: back to the fastball and it's like ninety six flat 436 00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:41,640 Speaker 1: of shape even though it's armside, that's gonna get crushed 437 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:41,879 Speaker 1: by life. 438 00:17:42,119 --> 00:17:43,520 Speaker 2: I mean that would make sense to he did struggle 439 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:45,000 Speaker 2: at Triple A and you are just gonna get a 440 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:47,879 Speaker 2: different quality of hitter at that level rather than double A, 441 00:17:47,920 --> 00:17:50,560 Speaker 2: where that Vello could really just be the riding force. 442 00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:53,720 Speaker 2: There another guy in the Mets org that's really got 443 00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:55,320 Speaker 2: some helium right now, Joonah Tom. 444 00:17:55,840 --> 00:17:57,200 Speaker 1: He's this guy's so much healing. 445 00:17:57,240 --> 00:18:00,479 Speaker 2: He's such a like interesting prospect because he kind of 446 00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:03,040 Speaker 2: came out of note like everyone knew this could be 447 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:05,600 Speaker 2: something that was happening. But his rise last year was 448 00:18:05,680 --> 00:18:08,639 Speaker 2: meteoric in terms of as a pitching prospect. Where now 449 00:18:08,800 --> 00:18:10,560 Speaker 2: there's some lists that have him inside the top one 450 00:18:10,640 --> 00:18:13,440 Speaker 2: hundred prospects and he was someone who's relatively unknown. What 451 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,959 Speaker 2: is it about Jonah Tongu that makes him so enticing 452 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 2: as a prospect. 453 00:18:18,359 --> 00:18:23,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, the fastball shap's great here, and that is really it. 454 00:18:23,080 --> 00:18:24,959 Speaker 1: It's a tough one. I feel like I don't know. 455 00:18:25,040 --> 00:18:27,720 Speaker 1: I'll admit when I in this industry, like I'll build 456 00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:29,600 Speaker 1: my list preseason, I'll do an update in season in 457 00:18:29,640 --> 00:18:31,639 Speaker 1: terms of my top pitching prospects. I throw it up 458 00:18:31,640 --> 00:18:33,880 Speaker 1: on my substack. I pulled in some advanced data and stuff, 459 00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:35,680 Speaker 1: and a lot of the time, like when I missed 460 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:38,520 Speaker 1: somebody like a Tom or even Sproke, I don't think 461 00:18:38,560 --> 00:18:40,480 Speaker 1: I ranked broke last year, and then this year I 462 00:18:40,520 --> 00:18:42,200 Speaker 1: was like, oh man, I can't believe I missed this guy. 463 00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:45,080 Speaker 1: I tend to like become a little overly critical of 464 00:18:45,119 --> 00:18:47,159 Speaker 1: them to try to like defend my list. So like, 465 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:49,159 Speaker 1: I think I'm slightly down on sprot relative to the 466 00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:51,280 Speaker 1: market on my list and Tongue I didn't rank in 467 00:18:51,320 --> 00:18:52,919 Speaker 1: my top forty, which I will now correct in this 468 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:54,720 Speaker 1: coming season. But I was like a little bit off 469 00:18:54,800 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 1: him because what we were running into it early last year, 470 00:18:57,680 --> 00:19:00,240 Speaker 1: in mid last year when he started to ascend, is 471 00:19:00,280 --> 00:19:03,000 Speaker 1: that tong reminds me so much of like a Taj Bradley, 472 00:19:03,880 --> 00:19:07,720 Speaker 1: where it's a huge carry fastball. One of the problems 473 00:19:07,720 --> 00:19:10,080 Speaker 1: with guys this is like the blight of stuff models, 474 00:19:10,119 --> 00:19:11,880 Speaker 1: stuff models will love this pitch, Like, this is gonna 475 00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:13,840 Speaker 1: be a plus plus fastball. It's probably gonna grade Like 476 00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:16,160 Speaker 1: one of the top ten is fifteen. If he holds 477 00:19:16,160 --> 00:19:18,640 Speaker 1: a shape as he has sensed and uses major league ball, 478 00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:20,520 Speaker 1: which is a quirk I won't get into, but minor 479 00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:22,399 Speaker 1: league ball is slightly different than the ball use a 480 00:19:22,440 --> 00:19:24,480 Speaker 1: triple A in the majors, so like you get some 481 00:19:24,520 --> 00:19:27,640 Speaker 1: shape regression. So he's popping twenty inches of vert from 482 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:29,920 Speaker 1: a six foot release at ninety three yesh, right now, 483 00:19:30,280 --> 00:19:32,480 Speaker 1: Like if that comes down to nineteen eighteen and a half, 484 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:34,919 Speaker 1: I won't be totally surprised. It's just a byproduct of 485 00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:37,840 Speaker 1: how the lower level balls are just different than the 486 00:19:37,840 --> 00:19:39,600 Speaker 1: major league balls. And it's really annoying from a data 487 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:42,000 Speaker 1: perspective when you're building models because it's like it doesn't 488 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:44,720 Speaker 1: happen to SPRO because SPRO was like I think fifteen 489 00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 1: and ten, fifteen and eleven in double A are below, So 490 00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:49,000 Speaker 1: that's fifteen inches a vert and eleven arm side. It's 491 00:19:49,000 --> 00:19:51,440 Speaker 1: about average vert but more armside than your average fastball. 492 00:19:51,560 --> 00:19:54,120 Speaker 1: He gets up to triple a small sample, he's down 493 00:19:54,160 --> 00:19:57,080 Speaker 1: to like fourteen and ten, and like that's objectively where shape. 494 00:19:57,080 --> 00:19:58,520 Speaker 1: So it's like, if I'm looking at him in double 495 00:19:58,560 --> 00:20:01,240 Speaker 1: A and going I have to like think, Okay, is 496 00:20:01,240 --> 00:20:03,439 Speaker 1: he gonna hold this sixteen and ten shape as he 497 00:20:03,440 --> 00:20:05,960 Speaker 1: gets to the majors? If not, then like I don't 498 00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:08,120 Speaker 1: necessarily mean we're gonna work, you know. So that's why 499 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:10,440 Speaker 1: I'm I don't mean to rip BP. I love a 500 00:20:10,480 --> 00:20:12,520 Speaker 1: lot of their work, but they ranked a lot of 501 00:20:12,560 --> 00:20:15,960 Speaker 1: guys aggressively that are low like Travis Sikora and Jackson Ferris, 502 00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 1: who are lower level pitchers who I think have okay 503 00:20:19,520 --> 00:20:22,840 Speaker 1: stuff but have great results. And I just wonder where 504 00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:25,040 Speaker 1: these guys start to maybe slightly regress as they jump 505 00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:26,639 Speaker 1: up and use major league balls and stuff. So that's 506 00:20:26,640 --> 00:20:29,080 Speaker 1: why I want the guys with really good movement. So 507 00:20:29,119 --> 00:20:31,359 Speaker 1: going back to Tong to some extent, I think I 508 00:20:31,400 --> 00:20:33,720 Speaker 1: buy that, like, even with some proggression is forcing, this 509 00:20:33,760 --> 00:20:36,399 Speaker 1: guy's still gonna have a great fastball. The problem that 510 00:20:36,720 --> 00:20:38,840 Speaker 1: I'm going in a giant circle or so hanging with me. 511 00:20:39,119 --> 00:20:41,280 Speaker 1: The problem with really good fastball shape like this is 512 00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:43,639 Speaker 1: that when you're behind the ball really well and you 513 00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:47,000 Speaker 1: create this carry, you're generally limited in what other pitches 514 00:20:47,040 --> 00:20:49,840 Speaker 1: you can compile and turn and like create. This was 515 00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:51,959 Speaker 1: Todds Bradley's problem for a while because his slider has 516 00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:53,560 Speaker 1: been all over the place the last couple of years. 517 00:20:53,760 --> 00:20:56,000 Speaker 1: They finally got into like a weird split change thing 518 00:20:56,040 --> 00:20:59,240 Speaker 1: that's working. But Tong to me, slider and change up 519 00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:02,199 Speaker 1: just at kind of fine because he's so behind the ball, 520 00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:04,040 Speaker 1: like you just watched just google like a YouTube highlight 521 00:21:04,119 --> 00:21:06,280 Speaker 1: or whatever of him. He like tilts. He almost reminds 522 00:21:06,320 --> 00:21:07,959 Speaker 1: me a literally like Linsey Come. But his arm is 523 00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:10,679 Speaker 1: like up and because he's a little shorter, he's got 524 00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:13,320 Speaker 1: good extension. He pulls that down to a reasonable release 525 00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:15,080 Speaker 1: height such that he's carrying this ball from such a 526 00:21:15,119 --> 00:21:18,399 Speaker 1: little slide. It works, but I struggle a little bit 527 00:21:18,440 --> 00:21:23,119 Speaker 1: to envision, like the current tong the mix he has 528 00:21:23,200 --> 00:21:24,399 Speaker 1: is not gonna be the mix he has when he's 529 00:21:24,400 --> 00:21:26,240 Speaker 1: a major leaguer. There's gonna be some tweaks on the slide. 530 00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:28,159 Speaker 1: There's gonna be some tweaks on the change up. I 531 00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:30,320 Speaker 1: think the slide the curveball's fine, but it pops way 532 00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:32,600 Speaker 1: too much off the fastball line. Like I just think 533 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:33,879 Speaker 1: it's really rare for a guy to be like on 534 00:21:34,000 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: fastball curveball in the majors. It's like, I think, here's 535 00:21:36,359 --> 00:21:38,600 Speaker 1: mostly can I dat and figure that out out a hand, 536 00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:41,760 Speaker 1: unless you're like Adam Wainwright or something. So I just 537 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:44,600 Speaker 1: think you're not in like final form tong yet. But again, 538 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:47,320 Speaker 1: the basis of the fastball shape here literally a best 539 00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:50,320 Speaker 1: pitch in this organization, it's probably the tong fastball. So 540 00:21:50,359 --> 00:21:53,359 Speaker 1: I get why everyone's excited about him. I just I 541 00:21:53,400 --> 00:21:55,719 Speaker 1: guess in my my Devil's advocate window, I'm just like, 542 00:21:55,800 --> 00:21:58,159 Speaker 1: I've seen this before with some guys where it's like 543 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:00,000 Speaker 1: great fastball, and then it's like it takes this guy 544 00:22:00,040 --> 00:22:01,720 Speaker 1: two to three years to figure out a slider and 545 00:22:01,760 --> 00:22:03,560 Speaker 1: a change up and he has heavy platoons splits in 546 00:22:03,560 --> 00:22:06,120 Speaker 1: one direction because one of those pitches comes before the other. 547 00:22:06,480 --> 00:22:09,399 Speaker 1: So I'm gonna rank if I had to like rank it, obviously, 548 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:10,879 Speaker 1: I think most people have Sprot one, So I'll go 549 00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:12,400 Speaker 1: Sprot one. In terms of picture in the system, I'll 550 00:22:12,440 --> 00:22:15,359 Speaker 1: go tong To purely on the fastball. But they're very 551 00:22:15,400 --> 00:22:17,840 Speaker 1: different pictures to me, Like Sprot is like I'm gonna 552 00:22:17,840 --> 00:22:20,399 Speaker 1: get you away from the fastball and pound you in 553 00:22:20,440 --> 00:22:22,680 Speaker 1: the zone, and Tongue is like a little weary on 554 00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:24,679 Speaker 1: the command. And I think a lot of success is 555 00:22:24,680 --> 00:22:26,199 Speaker 1: literally just from guys being like I don't know what 556 00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:28,160 Speaker 1: the heck that was, Like I don't see twenty verd 557 00:22:28,160 --> 00:22:30,560 Speaker 1: at ninety four from a six release much, so like 558 00:22:30,560 --> 00:22:32,960 Speaker 1: I'm just gonna swing at it and what it's over, 559 00:22:33,040 --> 00:22:36,879 Speaker 1: my bad, I'm screwed, you know. So they're very different pictures, 560 00:22:36,960 --> 00:22:38,800 Speaker 1: is all I'll say. And it's funny because like most 561 00:22:38,800 --> 00:22:40,960 Speaker 1: of the guys in this org with the Mets kind 562 00:22:40,960 --> 00:22:43,800 Speaker 1: of look like sprot where it's like two plainy fastball 563 00:22:43,800 --> 00:22:46,800 Speaker 1: and a big mix off that in Vela, where tongue 564 00:22:46,840 --> 00:22:49,440 Speaker 1: is like very different. Tongue is like almost like a 565 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:52,240 Speaker 1: raised picture to some extent where it's like vert fastball 566 00:22:52,240 --> 00:22:54,520 Speaker 1: and slider. So I went on a huge rant there, 567 00:22:54,680 --> 00:22:58,119 Speaker 1: but it's fascinating to me partially because like I just 568 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:00,440 Speaker 1: think there's there's going to be like bumps in the 569 00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:02,119 Speaker 1: road along the way. The guy is not just gonna 570 00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:04,359 Speaker 1: come up and be like the thing of things, unless 571 00:23:04,359 --> 00:23:06,280 Speaker 1: we find out he's got a new split grip or something. 572 00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:08,960 Speaker 1: But like I'm convinced there's gonna be some development here 573 00:23:08,960 --> 00:23:10,920 Speaker 1: that's like, oh I changed this and now all of 574 00:23:10,920 --> 00:23:12,600 Speaker 1: a sudden, I got like really good vert on like 575 00:23:12,720 --> 00:23:14,639 Speaker 1: change and it works versus lefties, and that was my 576 00:23:14,640 --> 00:23:17,080 Speaker 1: problem a whole time. So but I'm following him closely. 577 00:23:17,119 --> 00:23:21,000 Speaker 2: For sure, Mets fans are gonna be so mad. They're 578 00:23:21,040 --> 00:23:22,600 Speaker 2: gonna be so mad. You're saying all this. 579 00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:25,119 Speaker 1: It doesn't make sense much. Come on here and go 580 00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:25,439 Speaker 1: like this. 581 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:27,600 Speaker 3: No you don't want We don't give. 582 00:23:27,440 --> 00:23:30,320 Speaker 1: You the works here, and you're even more in on 583 00:23:30,359 --> 00:23:30,640 Speaker 1: the guy. 584 00:23:30,720 --> 00:23:32,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, this is what we want, the honesty, the truth, 585 00:23:32,480 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 3: and something with a guy at the time. I have 586 00:23:34,119 --> 00:23:36,639 Speaker 3: another Sea Saw question for you. He is such an 587 00:23:36,680 --> 00:23:39,600 Speaker 3: extreme case in terms of his arm action's release in 588 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:42,480 Speaker 3: his fastball. Is there a world where you give some 589 00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 3: of that backs you can build more things off of 590 00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:47,240 Speaker 3: a first particular pitch, or is it so good and 591 00:23:47,280 --> 00:23:49,600 Speaker 3: so special that you just don't disrupt it. I've heard, 592 00:23:49,840 --> 00:23:51,760 Speaker 3: I think I've heard Kyle Harrison. I want to say 593 00:23:51,760 --> 00:23:53,359 Speaker 3: talk about this that it's been very hard for him 594 00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:55,680 Speaker 3: to build pitches because he's another guy who has such 595 00:23:55,680 --> 00:23:58,600 Speaker 3: a high armsot and high high happy fastball. 596 00:23:58,760 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it is it. I don't think i'd move 597 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:07,119 Speaker 1: his It's it's a great question. Though I feel like 598 00:24:07,160 --> 00:24:09,159 Speaker 1: I I remember watching a top from Brian Banister, who 599 00:24:09,200 --> 00:24:10,960 Speaker 1: is now in the pitting department with the White Sox, 600 00:24:11,400 --> 00:24:14,880 Speaker 1: and he talked about how, like most guys he's coached, 601 00:24:15,040 --> 00:24:17,000 Speaker 1: that he's had like big break a breakthroughs with like 602 00:24:17,040 --> 00:24:19,240 Speaker 1: a loadan web and such, even like an Eric Fetti, 603 00:24:19,480 --> 00:24:22,000 Speaker 1: I don't believe worked with Banister. Maybe work with Banister specifically, 604 00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:24,560 Speaker 1: but at least worked in a similar mold to Web. 605 00:24:24,880 --> 00:24:27,159 Speaker 1: Most of these guys like lower slots, you know, like 606 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:29,400 Speaker 1: lowering slots to gets guy more comfortable with stays in planing, 607 00:24:29,480 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 1: rotation better. You know, the fast one might regrets a 608 00:24:31,600 --> 00:24:33,239 Speaker 1: little bit, but it allows them to open up, like 609 00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:35,600 Speaker 1: you know, we'll flip this changeup group, get you more depth, 610 00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:37,000 Speaker 1: and then you got a nasty sweeper. That is the 611 00:24:37,040 --> 00:24:42,199 Speaker 1: Eric Fetty model essentially. With Tom, he's so vertical that 612 00:24:42,359 --> 00:24:44,760 Speaker 1: like I don't think you can drop him, you know, 613 00:24:45,520 --> 00:24:47,159 Speaker 1: it's like you're dropping him from here to like here. 614 00:24:47,240 --> 00:24:49,439 Speaker 1: Let's be like Robert Stock, like Roberts. I'm bringing up 615 00:24:49,480 --> 00:24:51,080 Speaker 1: Robert Stock two times in the podcasts, who had that 616 00:24:51,119 --> 00:24:53,159 Speaker 1: on the on the Bengal card. But he like he 617 00:24:53,240 --> 00:24:55,119 Speaker 1: posted a video the other day where he like showed 618 00:24:55,200 --> 00:24:57,440 Speaker 1: he was more vert and now he's like pure side 619 00:24:57,480 --> 00:24:59,840 Speaker 1: side on and he's throwing like these these demon sinkers 620 00:24:59,880 --> 00:25:03,000 Speaker 1: at ninety six and stuff, and like that's a massive change. 621 00:25:03,040 --> 00:25:05,600 Speaker 1: You know. I just don't think you dropped tongue slot 622 00:25:05,640 --> 00:25:07,320 Speaker 1: because of how good the fastball is. I think the 623 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:11,399 Speaker 1: outcomes for him are like you become there's another guy 624 00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:13,080 Speaker 1: I'm gonna comp to, like Pete Fairbanks in here, but 625 00:25:13,160 --> 00:25:14,879 Speaker 1: you could become kind of like a Pete Fairbanks e 626 00:25:15,000 --> 00:25:17,320 Speaker 1: reliever or it's like you push the vlow higher for him. 627 00:25:17,400 --> 00:25:19,159 Speaker 1: You know, he sits maybe ninety five ninety six, and 628 00:25:19,200 --> 00:25:21,600 Speaker 1: it's just like Robert Swartz is a good one. Maybe 629 00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:23,159 Speaker 1: you know, it's like such a good fastpek throw. I 630 00:25:23,200 --> 00:25:24,840 Speaker 1: thinks seventy percent of the time he's a good reliever. 631 00:25:25,160 --> 00:25:28,600 Speaker 1: But there's gonna be more like the reliever risk on 632 00:25:28,640 --> 00:25:31,200 Speaker 1: a lot of these guys, like for you first three 633 00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:33,760 Speaker 1: here spro tongue and Tidwell like the reliever risk for 634 00:25:33,760 --> 00:25:37,119 Speaker 1: Tong's eyes in my opinion. So but he's gonna be 635 00:25:37,119 --> 00:25:38,320 Speaker 1: a good reliever. So it's one of those things like 636 00:25:38,359 --> 00:25:42,119 Speaker 1: do you want tid is it Tidwell? I hope it's Tidwell. Yeah, Twell, Yeah, Tidwell. 637 00:25:42,440 --> 00:25:45,399 Speaker 1: Tidwell is like a five who likes kind of boring. 638 00:25:46,359 --> 00:25:47,840 Speaker 1: I don't mean to like poo poo him, he's just 639 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:50,440 Speaker 1: like it is what it is, like, he's he's an 640 00:25:50,560 --> 00:25:53,840 Speaker 1: organizational starter to me, and he's in this like Savale 641 00:25:53,960 --> 00:25:56,159 Speaker 1: Michael is type mold where it's like that's your awesome 642 00:25:56,160 --> 00:25:57,800 Speaker 1: outcome is to get him to that. But he's a 643 00:25:57,840 --> 00:26:00,000 Speaker 1: little more generic on the fastball release because he's higher up, 644 00:26:00,320 --> 00:26:02,040 Speaker 1: So like I think that guy starts. I don't think 645 00:26:02,040 --> 00:26:04,600 Speaker 1: that gould be as strong as a reliever in my opinion, 646 00:26:04,760 --> 00:26:07,160 Speaker 1: so he's probably like a five org starter. Four five 647 00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:09,560 Speaker 1: tong is like the upside of a three to two 648 00:26:10,040 --> 00:26:12,560 Speaker 1: with like a leverage reliever. And then Sproude is like 649 00:26:12,800 --> 00:26:16,199 Speaker 1: you're locked in three ish type in my opinion. So 650 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:18,560 Speaker 1: there's like very different gradations on some of these guys 651 00:26:18,560 --> 00:26:19,000 Speaker 1: in that sort. 652 00:26:19,000 --> 00:26:21,560 Speaker 2: When you think about Noel McLean, because he's another like 653 00:26:21,640 --> 00:26:24,639 Speaker 2: weird guy like it. We saw him in the spring 654 00:26:24,640 --> 00:26:26,919 Speaker 2: breakout game and me and James were like, whoa, Like 655 00:26:26,960 --> 00:26:29,840 Speaker 2: the numbers were gaudy, the spin rates were crazy, and 656 00:26:29,880 --> 00:26:32,679 Speaker 2: this guy who still has not had a full season 657 00:26:32,880 --> 00:26:34,800 Speaker 2: just being a picture only this upcoming year will be 658 00:26:34,840 --> 00:26:37,320 Speaker 2: the first time he does it. What can Mets fans 659 00:26:37,359 --> 00:26:39,080 Speaker 2: look for with a guy like Noel McLean. 660 00:26:40,119 --> 00:26:42,760 Speaker 1: He's got a ton of spin. He's got like three 661 00:26:42,760 --> 00:26:45,240 Speaker 1: thousand rpm plus on a sweeper, which is just great. 662 00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:48,199 Speaker 1: And I think that that's what you lean into a 663 00:26:48,200 --> 00:26:50,520 Speaker 1: director of pitching in another organization. Tell me, like, if 664 00:26:50,600 --> 00:26:53,720 Speaker 1: your guy strength is throwing like high spin, hard breaking balls, 665 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:56,679 Speaker 1: then you should be throwing like three to four different 666 00:26:56,760 --> 00:26:58,719 Speaker 1: kinds of those breaking balls and throwing them as much 667 00:26:58,760 --> 00:27:01,159 Speaker 1: as possible. And I think that makes a lot of 668 00:27:01,160 --> 00:27:02,840 Speaker 1: sense for a guy like him. But I also like 669 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:04,840 Speaker 1: the fact, again to the point of liking the Mets 670 00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:07,040 Speaker 1: org like they've diversified the mix on a lot of 671 00:27:07,040 --> 00:27:08,320 Speaker 1: these guys. There's a lot of guys that like a 672 00:27:08,400 --> 00:27:11,399 Speaker 1: ball up below that throwing change ups and mixing in 673 00:27:11,440 --> 00:27:14,320 Speaker 1: like second sliders. Like they're kind of doing what we're 674 00:27:14,320 --> 00:27:15,840 Speaker 1: seeing at the major league level in terms of like 675 00:27:15,880 --> 00:27:17,919 Speaker 1: everyone adding a tween er slider where it's like the 676 00:27:17,920 --> 00:27:20,520 Speaker 1: Clay Holmes like exactly exactly like he had this weird 677 00:27:20,560 --> 00:27:22,800 Speaker 1: tweener slider started throwing a sweeteer became really good, and 678 00:27:22,800 --> 00:27:24,880 Speaker 1: then he kind of added back to this in terms 679 00:27:24,920 --> 00:27:27,320 Speaker 1: of usage this like depth tweener slider, but most of 680 00:27:27,320 --> 00:27:28,760 Speaker 1: the time it's tag as the cutter. You watch it, 681 00:27:28,760 --> 00:27:30,399 Speaker 1: it's probably a cutter, but to me it has so 682 00:27:30,480 --> 00:27:32,480 Speaker 1: much drop it's more a slider. So I like that 683 00:27:32,520 --> 00:27:35,960 Speaker 1: they've really expanded McLean's mix in that respect. I struggle 684 00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:38,680 Speaker 1: sometimes with these guys that just don't have a lot 685 00:27:38,680 --> 00:27:40,560 Speaker 1: of reps because I think if I was in like 686 00:27:40,560 --> 00:27:42,520 Speaker 1: a front office or something, I've probably lean more on 687 00:27:42,560 --> 00:27:44,440 Speaker 1: my scouts for guys like that, where it's like, where 688 00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:45,920 Speaker 1: do you see his body going over time? Where's the 689 00:27:45,960 --> 00:27:48,480 Speaker 1: makeup in terms of his like adaptability. He's not pitched 690 00:27:48,520 --> 00:27:51,639 Speaker 1: for a while, so like, I see the potential for 691 00:27:51,880 --> 00:27:54,199 Speaker 1: like an awesome upswing, and he's got the raw tools 692 00:27:54,200 --> 00:27:57,239 Speaker 1: for it. But I'm not great at I would say, Man, 693 00:27:57,280 --> 00:27:59,240 Speaker 1: I'm just not great at projecting these guys who don't 694 00:27:59,240 --> 00:28:01,840 Speaker 1: have like a ton of in under the belt. Robbie 695 00:28:01,840 --> 00:28:03,600 Speaker 1: Snelling's no one that comes to mind who got traded 696 00:28:03,640 --> 00:28:05,640 Speaker 1: from the Posas to the Marlins to go into pitching 697 00:28:05,680 --> 00:28:07,959 Speaker 1: prospect bucket here. But he's another one where it's like 698 00:28:08,240 --> 00:28:10,240 Speaker 1: kind of fun left. He doesn't really throw hard. Nothing 699 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:12,160 Speaker 1: shapewise looks great, but it's like everyone's just like he's 700 00:28:12,200 --> 00:28:14,840 Speaker 1: young and he's athletic, and it's like, okay, Like I 701 00:28:14,840 --> 00:28:16,760 Speaker 1: don't know how much that matters, but at least McLean. 702 00:28:16,800 --> 00:28:18,840 Speaker 1: I think the positive McClean is like it's a deep 703 00:28:18,920 --> 00:28:21,080 Speaker 1: mix already. I know there's not a ton of strikes there, 704 00:28:21,119 --> 00:28:24,240 Speaker 1: but like the breakers look great. The worst outcome for 705 00:28:24,320 --> 00:28:26,480 Speaker 1: him is like he's like some power reliever, yeah, which 706 00:28:26,520 --> 00:28:28,639 Speaker 1: is like a banger sweeper, and maybe he's like almost 707 00:28:28,680 --> 00:28:30,560 Speaker 1: like a Clay Holmsey type guy where it's like you 708 00:28:30,680 --> 00:28:32,720 Speaker 1: just rip that sweeper. He becomes like a decent righty 709 00:28:32,800 --> 00:28:34,520 Speaker 1: killer in the pen and then I don't know, maybe 710 00:28:34,520 --> 00:28:36,680 Speaker 1: he flips into a starting role because again the mix 711 00:28:36,760 --> 00:28:38,959 Speaker 1: is deep enough where I like the idea of all 712 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:41,080 Speaker 1: these Mets guys just like pushing as starters for as 713 00:28:41,120 --> 00:28:43,640 Speaker 1: long as possible, and then whatever happens down the road 714 00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:45,560 Speaker 1: happens down the road. You know they would to Colin 715 00:28:45,600 --> 00:28:47,040 Speaker 1: wants to go out and buy two other starters, then 716 00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:49,400 Speaker 1: you have these excess and as you see with the Dodgers, 717 00:28:49,400 --> 00:28:50,680 Speaker 1: like I don't think that's an issue at all, no, 718 00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:53,360 Speaker 1: like that Dodgers team is terrifying from a matchup standpoint 719 00:28:53,360 --> 00:28:55,400 Speaker 1: if can get into the playoffs of like when they 720 00:28:55,400 --> 00:28:56,760 Speaker 1: get a start, like I don't know, let's look at 721 00:28:56,760 --> 00:28:58,239 Speaker 1: your line up and so he suck most against that's 722 00:28:58,280 --> 00:28:59,760 Speaker 1: what we're gonna start, you know, like. 723 00:29:00,400 --> 00:29:02,320 Speaker 3: Yeah we clean with that sweeper always has reminded me 724 00:29:02,320 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 3: a little bit of Matt Brash. But like if you 725 00:29:03,600 --> 00:29:05,280 Speaker 3: put on forty pounds and grew a beard, then like 726 00:29:05,320 --> 00:29:07,440 Speaker 3: grew out long like rockstar hair, because that's just it 727 00:29:07,480 --> 00:29:09,160 Speaker 3: becomes like that good of a pitch. I feel like 728 00:29:09,800 --> 00:29:11,600 Speaker 3: the pitch like that is like what we can carry you. 729 00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:13,000 Speaker 3: But we we spent a lot of time not talking 730 00:29:13,000 --> 00:29:15,760 Speaker 3: about this top tier of Mets pitching prospects. I'm gonna 731 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:17,600 Speaker 3: get little deeper now. I want to spifically talk about 732 00:29:17,680 --> 00:29:20,000 Speaker 3: last year's mess draft class because they drafted a ton 733 00:29:20,040 --> 00:29:22,200 Speaker 3: of pictures and a ton of pictures out of college 734 00:29:22,240 --> 00:29:24,560 Speaker 3: in the mid rounds. We know the draft is your specialty. 735 00:29:24,560 --> 00:29:26,760 Speaker 3: You were on LB network last year covering it and 736 00:29:26,800 --> 00:29:28,480 Speaker 3: the Met second round pick was someone who. 737 00:29:28,320 --> 00:29:31,160 Speaker 2: You what breaking news? Jesse Winker back to the Mets. 738 00:29:31,440 --> 00:29:34,000 Speaker 2: What Jesse Winker back to the Mets breaking news on 739 00:29:34,000 --> 00:29:34,960 Speaker 2: the podcast live. 740 00:29:35,560 --> 00:29:37,000 Speaker 3: That's amazing, all right, good jobs. 741 00:29:37,280 --> 00:29:39,840 Speaker 1: Yeah that I'll go to interview you guys now, is 742 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,000 Speaker 1: that a good I've been on the Winker market too much. 743 00:29:42,200 --> 00:29:44,040 Speaker 2: I'm happy for it, and it just it really does 744 00:29:44,080 --> 00:29:45,840 Speaker 2: just put a little more pressure on Peede a Lonzo, 745 00:29:45,840 --> 00:29:47,880 Speaker 2: which I love. I love squeezing them for everything that's 746 00:29:47,920 --> 00:29:48,480 Speaker 2: gone right now. 747 00:29:48,720 --> 00:29:50,120 Speaker 3: It's gonna be so funny when this comes out in 748 00:29:50,120 --> 00:29:51,440 Speaker 3: like a week and a half and we're like breaking 749 00:29:51,520 --> 00:29:53,200 Speaker 3: news Jesse Winker. 750 00:29:53,560 --> 00:29:54,160 Speaker 1: That's awesome. 751 00:29:54,320 --> 00:29:56,680 Speaker 3: But some guy I remember seeing you get like physically 752 00:29:56,840 --> 00:30:01,400 Speaker 3: visibly excited about on television was Duke's picture Johnson Santuche. Yeah, 753 00:30:01,440 --> 00:30:03,239 Speaker 3: so tell us what you like the best Antucci and 754 00:30:03,560 --> 00:30:04,760 Speaker 3: just what do you think about him as a pitcher? 755 00:30:05,640 --> 00:30:07,880 Speaker 1: So yeah, So, like I wouldn't say the draft is 756 00:30:07,880 --> 00:30:10,320 Speaker 1: my my expertise, so to speak, I will admit that, 757 00:30:10,400 --> 00:30:13,239 Speaker 1: like I definitely I was actually a little surprised when 758 00:30:13,240 --> 00:30:14,520 Speaker 1: they asked me to do the draft because like, I 759 00:30:14,520 --> 00:30:18,240 Speaker 1: don't have a ton of draft experience. So I spent 760 00:30:18,440 --> 00:30:21,320 Speaker 1: like a ton of time learning everything about college baseball. 761 00:30:21,680 --> 00:30:23,400 Speaker 1: Of course, of like three months when I got told 762 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:24,760 Speaker 1: I was gonna do this because I was like, man, 763 00:30:24,920 --> 00:30:26,920 Speaker 1: the last thing I want is like going on air 764 00:30:27,000 --> 00:30:29,280 Speaker 1: and saying something really dumb about an organization and stuff 765 00:30:29,440 --> 00:30:31,959 Speaker 1: or like not knowing conferences, et cetera, et cetera. So 766 00:30:32,640 --> 00:30:35,280 Speaker 1: I I definitely like polished up. I thought I got 767 00:30:35,320 --> 00:30:37,960 Speaker 1: to it a reasonable level, and also into this realized that, 768 00:30:38,040 --> 00:30:40,000 Speaker 1: like my strength is just analyzing pitching. And I talked 769 00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:42,480 Speaker 1: to enough people in different orgs about this stuff, but 770 00:30:42,520 --> 00:30:44,760 Speaker 1: also ran into issues with the ball in college and 771 00:30:44,840 --> 00:30:47,840 Speaker 1: like park adjustments and all things, and like asking different 772 00:30:47,920 --> 00:30:49,720 Speaker 1: organs about like what what their shape was in this 773 00:30:49,720 --> 00:30:51,240 Speaker 1: guy's fastball. No, oh yeah, we don't have that shape, 774 00:30:51,240 --> 00:30:52,960 Speaker 1: but all we have this and it's like, oh my god. 775 00:30:53,000 --> 00:30:54,360 Speaker 1: And at the end of the day, everyone's like, just 776 00:30:54,360 --> 00:30:57,560 Speaker 1: look for like spin capacity and weird release characteristics and results. 777 00:30:57,760 --> 00:31:00,000 Speaker 1: And I was like, that's like the most boring stuff ever. 778 00:31:00,120 --> 00:31:02,360 Speaker 1: Like I'm unlocked on all this weird shape stuff all 779 00:31:02,400 --> 00:31:03,760 Speaker 1: the time of the miners, and you're telling me just 780 00:31:03,800 --> 00:31:06,200 Speaker 1: to like look for twenty eight hundred rpm sliders that 781 00:31:06,320 --> 00:31:08,920 Speaker 1: are getting swing. Mess. It's like that seems easy. But anyways, 782 00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:12,840 Speaker 1: that's oversimplification. But Saint Tucci was a well regarded prospects 783 00:31:12,840 --> 00:31:14,800 Speaker 1: for a period of time, kind of had it down 784 00:31:14,800 --> 00:31:17,560 Speaker 1: to her last year, couldn't find his own strike problems, 785 00:31:17,560 --> 00:31:20,000 Speaker 1: et cetera. End of the year, I think either he 786 00:31:20,000 --> 00:31:22,040 Speaker 1: made a mechanical adjustment or moved on the rubber. I'm 787 00:31:22,040 --> 00:31:24,080 Speaker 1: mixing up which of those it was. But he did 788 00:31:24,120 --> 00:31:26,479 Speaker 1: something differently, and in his final like couple starts, there 789 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:29,400 Speaker 1: was like flashes of like twenty twenty two threes command 790 00:31:29,400 --> 00:31:32,280 Speaker 1: that made him more relevant of pitching prospect, and instead 791 00:31:32,320 --> 00:31:33,560 Speaker 1: he was kind of at where he was at, and 792 00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:36,000 Speaker 1: he fell really hard in the draft. I think he's 793 00:31:36,040 --> 00:31:38,640 Speaker 1: interesting because I really like the slider here. This thing 794 00:31:38,680 --> 00:31:42,360 Speaker 1: is like kind of invisible. It's really platoon neutral. Workers 795 00:31:42,560 --> 00:31:44,320 Speaker 1: left his hand right, He's for him. In college at Duke, 796 00:31:45,040 --> 00:31:47,760 Speaker 1: he just really got He's just he didn't perform well, 797 00:31:47,800 --> 00:31:49,440 Speaker 1: so like there was no way people were gonna juice 798 00:31:49,480 --> 00:31:52,160 Speaker 1: him up in the draft, like Durangelo Santcha and Treya 799 00:31:52,200 --> 00:31:54,800 Speaker 1: Savage threw so well, Chase Burns, all these other guys 800 00:31:55,000 --> 00:31:56,760 Speaker 1: that like there was no way Santucci was gonna be 801 00:31:56,760 --> 00:31:59,720 Speaker 1: able to eclipse any of those guys. But entering last 802 00:32:00,200 --> 00:32:03,280 Speaker 1: baseball season, like there was more talk of Santucci than 803 00:32:03,320 --> 00:32:04,920 Speaker 1: there was of some of these other guys, maybe not 804 00:32:05,160 --> 00:32:07,400 Speaker 1: Chee Burns, et cetera. But like he was up there 805 00:32:07,440 --> 00:32:09,560 Speaker 1: with those, he didn't perform to the point where people 806 00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:11,360 Speaker 1: were sold on him. And this is where he runs 807 00:32:11,400 --> 00:32:13,000 Speaker 1: an interesting thing on the pitching on that side where 808 00:32:13,000 --> 00:32:15,320 Speaker 1: it's like, okay, like this guy wasn't great, but like 809 00:32:15,440 --> 00:32:17,640 Speaker 1: we see these subtle adjustments here, like let's get him 810 00:32:17,680 --> 00:32:19,960 Speaker 1: back to twenty three. You know, we'd have some track 811 00:32:20,040 --> 00:32:22,640 Speaker 1: record of success, but he just didn't have it right now. 812 00:32:22,680 --> 00:32:24,880 Speaker 1: So like how confident are we getting back to that point? 813 00:32:25,120 --> 00:32:27,160 Speaker 1: And for him it's really the slider, Like I had 814 00:32:27,160 --> 00:32:29,680 Speaker 1: a from a shape comp I don't. I don't go 815 00:32:29,800 --> 00:32:31,840 Speaker 1: like pure results, who's gonna be comp? I go more 816 00:32:31,840 --> 00:32:33,520 Speaker 1: like what is he throwing ways? It looked like reminds 817 00:32:33,560 --> 00:32:35,960 Speaker 1: me there like Andrew Heaney and specifically when he was 818 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:38,440 Speaker 1: with the Dodgers in terms of this bullet lefty slider 819 00:32:38,560 --> 00:32:40,800 Speaker 1: not big sweet that works really well. It was kind 820 00:32:40,800 --> 00:32:42,760 Speaker 1: of like invisible down into rities and also worked for 821 00:32:42,800 --> 00:32:44,960 Speaker 1: as his lefties. Saint Ducie's slider reminds me from a 822 00:32:44,960 --> 00:32:47,440 Speaker 1: shape perspective a lot of that pitch. It's not super hard. 823 00:32:47,680 --> 00:32:49,240 Speaker 1: So I don't think like stuff malls are gonna love 824 00:32:49,320 --> 00:32:51,720 Speaker 1: this thing, but like he's had results on this thing 825 00:32:51,760 --> 00:32:54,120 Speaker 1: for so long that I struggle to see how it's 826 00:32:54,120 --> 00:32:57,240 Speaker 1: not gonna be successful in the majors. I'm unsure on 827 00:32:57,360 --> 00:32:59,720 Speaker 1: role here. Is obviously some upside if they can get 828 00:32:59,760 --> 00:33:02,360 Speaker 1: him in more, we'll see, Like who the guy? Who 829 00:33:02,440 --> 00:33:04,640 Speaker 1: the guy I'm thinking of, George Clausen straight in from 830 00:33:04,680 --> 00:33:06,520 Speaker 1: the Philly City Angels. This dude has like one of 831 00:33:06,560 --> 00:33:09,360 Speaker 1: the more fun sliders in Miri League Baseball. But you 832 00:33:09,440 --> 00:33:11,000 Speaker 1: go back to like Jim Kwis is a good friend 833 00:33:11,040 --> 00:33:14,560 Speaker 1: for MV Pipeline, and that dude at the combine he 834 00:33:14,600 --> 00:33:16,720 Speaker 1: threw a combine pen in twenty three. I want to 835 00:33:16,720 --> 00:33:20,120 Speaker 1: say it was just literally looked like he was a 836 00:33:20,200 --> 00:33:22,320 Speaker 1: fourteen year old high school kid who couldn't find his 837 00:33:22,360 --> 00:33:25,280 Speaker 1: own and like he legitimately was so bad. And then 838 00:33:25,360 --> 00:33:28,760 Speaker 1: like last year, it was like, is that he's finding 839 00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:31,280 Speaker 1: the zone and it's like he's not walking anybody. So 840 00:33:31,360 --> 00:33:34,080 Speaker 1: like these things can turn really quickly, So I don't 841 00:33:34,080 --> 00:33:36,000 Speaker 1: mind the Mets bet here that like the slider is 842 00:33:36,000 --> 00:33:38,080 Speaker 1: really good, the fastball isn't terrible. He sits ninety four. 843 00:33:38,160 --> 00:33:40,040 Speaker 1: You know, we'll see if they get to kick a 844 00:33:40,120 --> 00:33:42,080 Speaker 1: villo or they just move towards another kind of pitch 845 00:33:42,160 --> 00:33:44,520 Speaker 1: or something. But I just think the slider's good enough, 846 00:33:44,520 --> 00:33:46,200 Speaker 1: and they're taking a gambler. They could play around with 847 00:33:46,240 --> 00:33:49,040 Speaker 1: something command whis to get him his zone. So yeah, 848 00:33:49,280 --> 00:33:50,680 Speaker 1: I like him. I think he's a He was a 849 00:33:50,680 --> 00:33:52,400 Speaker 1: good pick at the value of the Ottoma for sure. 850 00:33:54,160 --> 00:33:56,160 Speaker 2: Talking about a VLO, guy got to bring up our boy, 851 00:33:56,240 --> 00:33:58,520 Speaker 2: Ryan Lambert had him on the pod earlier in the year, 852 00:33:59,520 --> 00:34:01,920 Speaker 2: just to create human on and off the field. Guy 853 00:34:01,960 --> 00:34:06,560 Speaker 2: eight one hundred eggs. He raw eggs. He just drink drinking. 854 00:34:07,640 --> 00:34:10,520 Speaker 2: It's insane what he was going through. But the fun 855 00:34:10,520 --> 00:34:12,680 Speaker 2: thing about him is he throws one hundred and one 856 00:34:12,680 --> 00:34:15,080 Speaker 2: miles an hour. He throws absolute gas. And we know 857 00:34:15,160 --> 00:34:17,960 Speaker 2: from talking with him that the Mets are really getting 858 00:34:18,000 --> 00:34:19,960 Speaker 2: creative with him on the development side. They're doing a 859 00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:22,640 Speaker 2: lot of the similar stuff that Paul Skins has been doing. 860 00:34:22,719 --> 00:34:24,480 Speaker 2: They're trying to get him to learn a splinker. Like, 861 00:34:24,640 --> 00:34:26,080 Speaker 2: there's a lot of things going on there. So how 862 00:34:26,120 --> 00:34:28,000 Speaker 2: do you what do you think about Ryan Lambert? 863 00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:31,319 Speaker 1: Is there anything you got? Yeah? So his agent is 864 00:34:31,320 --> 00:34:33,880 Speaker 1: this guy Mike Zimmerman, who it sounds like, you know, 865 00:34:34,000 --> 00:34:36,239 Speaker 1: Mark and I met at the Combined. Great dude, Like 866 00:34:36,400 --> 00:34:38,640 Speaker 1: just enjoy chatt baseball with him. It's really tapped in. 867 00:34:38,880 --> 00:34:42,520 Speaker 1: He hit Lambert and I'm like, sometimes you get agents 868 00:34:42,600 --> 00:34:45,600 Speaker 1: and Mike didn't do specifically, but they'll like pump you guys. 869 00:34:45,840 --> 00:34:48,240 Speaker 1: It's like, you know, like you know, he's probably probably 870 00:34:48,280 --> 00:34:50,000 Speaker 1: like five to ten round. You know, I'm not entirely shut. 871 00:34:50,040 --> 00:34:51,719 Speaker 1: It's like, man, I get I'm in the first two 872 00:34:51,800 --> 00:34:53,279 Speaker 1: rounds of the draft. Like if this guy doesn't have 873 00:34:53,320 --> 00:34:55,759 Speaker 1: a shot to go too then like I'm not gonna 874 00:34:55,760 --> 00:34:58,040 Speaker 1: prep on him too much. But he told me about 875 00:34:58,120 --> 00:35:00,839 Speaker 1: Lambert and the thing that like sometimes we'll send you 876 00:35:00,880 --> 00:35:03,160 Speaker 1: like individual track man pitches. People do this all the time, 877 00:35:03,200 --> 00:35:04,680 Speaker 1: and it's like, well you get that thing, and it's like, okay, 878 00:35:04,680 --> 00:35:07,200 Speaker 1: controlled environment, not a major league baseball. That's why he's 879 00:35:07,239 --> 00:35:09,440 Speaker 1: ninety four twenty five inches of vertical break. No when 880 00:35:09,440 --> 00:35:11,319 Speaker 1: baseball's gonna throw the twenty five inches of vertical break. 881 00:35:11,400 --> 00:35:13,239 Speaker 1: But Lambert, those things he said me and were a 882 00:35:13,280 --> 00:35:15,400 Speaker 1: little more interesting because he was like ninety seven plus 883 00:35:15,640 --> 00:35:17,640 Speaker 1: and he had some vert and I was like, hmm, 884 00:35:17,760 --> 00:35:20,600 Speaker 1: even if that's controlled environment, this guy's ninety seven with 885 00:35:20,680 --> 00:35:23,560 Speaker 1: like twenty vert like I think maybe even if he 886 00:35:23,600 --> 00:35:25,920 Speaker 1: falls to like eighteen ish, that's great that average and 887 00:35:25,960 --> 00:35:28,080 Speaker 1: major League Baseball for an average release types around like 888 00:35:28,120 --> 00:35:31,120 Speaker 1: sixteen inches or so fifteen point eight. So I was like, Okay, 889 00:35:31,120 --> 00:35:33,080 Speaker 1: I'm intrigued here because like you're telling me, like Villa 890 00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:34,799 Speaker 1: with shape is not something you run into a lot. 891 00:35:35,040 --> 00:35:36,640 Speaker 1: And then in the small sample I saw, I believe 892 00:35:36,640 --> 00:35:38,680 Speaker 1: it was down at saying Lucy like he was twenty 893 00:35:38,760 --> 00:35:42,040 Speaker 1: vertict ninety eight like that is that's pretty rare, Like 894 00:35:42,160 --> 00:35:43,839 Speaker 1: you don't run into this a lot. And again, even 895 00:35:43,840 --> 00:35:45,600 Speaker 1: if we assume some regression here as he jumps up 896 00:35:45,600 --> 00:35:48,279 Speaker 1: and uses the Major League Baseball like I like like 897 00:35:48,280 --> 00:35:51,400 Speaker 1: a p. Fairbanks style comp here where it's it's probably 898 00:35:51,480 --> 00:35:53,560 Speaker 1: more reliever. We'll see again if he starts, the'll push him, 899 00:35:53,560 --> 00:35:55,880 Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. That's not my perviewed judge, ye 900 00:35:56,040 --> 00:35:57,719 Speaker 1: what they want to do workload wise and stuff. But 901 00:35:58,239 --> 00:35:59,840 Speaker 1: it's a really good fastball, like this thing is. 902 00:35:59,880 --> 00:36:00,000 Speaker 3: Now. 903 00:36:00,400 --> 00:36:01,880 Speaker 1: The one thing I did notice, and I haven't texted 904 00:36:01,880 --> 00:36:03,960 Speaker 1: Mike about this, is that in the small amount of data, 905 00:36:04,040 --> 00:36:06,560 Speaker 1: I saw he's to me, I thought he was tipping 906 00:36:06,560 --> 00:36:08,799 Speaker 1: his slider because like a lot of the time you'll 907 00:36:08,800 --> 00:36:10,440 Speaker 1: see small release differentials and a lot of the time 908 00:36:10,480 --> 00:36:13,719 Speaker 1: I don't think that really matters. But like Lambert was 909 00:36:13,880 --> 00:36:17,200 Speaker 1: dropping verdict dropping and moving out horizontally like a good amount. 910 00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:19,120 Speaker 1: Like if you look at a release point plot, like 911 00:36:19,360 --> 00:36:21,920 Speaker 1: the pitches are separate between the slider and the fastball, 912 00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:24,480 Speaker 1: so in the same vein of like a Jonah Tong 913 00:36:24,719 --> 00:36:26,960 Speaker 1: Tongu's not tipping, but in the same vein like if 914 00:36:27,000 --> 00:36:28,919 Speaker 1: they're playing with a splnker and some other things. There's 915 00:36:28,960 --> 00:36:31,600 Speaker 1: gonna be another pitch shape here in this mix that 916 00:36:31,640 --> 00:36:35,160 Speaker 1: gets him to being relevant, you know, with the fastball alone, 917 00:36:35,360 --> 00:36:37,879 Speaker 1: Like I I like him as a reliever, Like maybe 918 00:36:37,960 --> 00:36:39,760 Speaker 1: I'll say I project him as a reliever just because 919 00:36:40,000 --> 00:36:42,759 Speaker 1: not you get with that vert is really strong. So 920 00:36:42,840 --> 00:36:44,840 Speaker 1: I'm I'm very intrigued by him. He might be like 921 00:36:44,880 --> 00:36:47,839 Speaker 1: a high rise late. Occasionally we run into like fun 922 00:36:47,920 --> 00:36:50,640 Speaker 1: relief prospects like Ben Joyce. But I remember, like Ken 923 00:36:50,680 --> 00:36:53,000 Speaker 1: Giles back in the day with the Phillies, a gradach prospect. 924 00:36:53,080 --> 00:36:54,680 Speaker 1: There's there's usually a few of these guys where it's 925 00:36:54,680 --> 00:36:56,759 Speaker 1: like Nah, he's a reliever, but like it's so good 926 00:36:56,760 --> 00:36:58,400 Speaker 1: that we might make him like a top one fifty, 927 00:36:58,440 --> 00:37:01,400 Speaker 1: top one hundred guy. Yeah, And I wonder whether Lambert 928 00:37:01,400 --> 00:37:02,799 Speaker 1: had like an outside shot of that. I think that'd 929 00:37:02,840 --> 00:37:04,000 Speaker 1: be a really good outcome for him, totally. 930 00:37:04,000 --> 00:37:05,680 Speaker 3: And he was a closer at Oklahoma, and we talked 931 00:37:05,680 --> 00:37:08,359 Speaker 3: to him. He exactly he relished in the closer role. 932 00:37:08,440 --> 00:37:10,799 Speaker 3: He loved being like he told us that he left great. 933 00:37:11,320 --> 00:37:13,279 Speaker 3: He coomes zen and get into the game and just 934 00:37:13,280 --> 00:37:15,239 Speaker 3: have like pure serenity and just strike killers out. 935 00:37:15,239 --> 00:37:18,239 Speaker 1: He's like, he really liked that. I don't even want 936 00:37:18,280 --> 00:37:18,640 Speaker 1: him to start. 937 00:37:18,719 --> 00:37:21,200 Speaker 3: Yes, close, But another guy I like in this draft. 938 00:37:21,239 --> 00:37:23,560 Speaker 3: Probably one of my favorite picks the Mets made was 939 00:37:23,840 --> 00:37:26,120 Speaker 3: Nate Dome at the Mississippi State, partially just because the 940 00:37:26,160 --> 00:37:27,719 Speaker 3: Mets every single year find a way to take a 941 00:37:27,719 --> 00:37:30,279 Speaker 3: Misissippi State Bulldog. It's happened. It's happened six times and 942 00:37:30,320 --> 00:37:32,760 Speaker 3: seven years, which is ridiculous. But he had a fastball 943 00:37:32,840 --> 00:37:34,480 Speaker 3: up to ninety nine miles an hour. He had the 944 00:37:34,520 --> 00:37:36,480 Speaker 3: fourth highest strikeout to walk ratio in Division One. 945 00:37:36,520 --> 00:37:37,080 Speaker 1: But he got hurt. 946 00:37:37,120 --> 00:37:38,960 Speaker 3: He missed a lot of the season. So is there 947 00:37:39,040 --> 00:37:41,520 Speaker 3: anything that you know about Dome, like about Dome, because 948 00:37:41,520 --> 00:37:43,279 Speaker 3: he kind of fits this mold that we're talking about 949 00:37:43,320 --> 00:37:45,279 Speaker 3: where you get someone who's a little bit down and 950 00:37:45,320 --> 00:37:46,319 Speaker 3: then bring him up a little bit. 951 00:37:47,200 --> 00:37:48,600 Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, Dom was a guy that I know the 952 00:37:48,640 --> 00:37:52,239 Speaker 1: Dodgers were on to some extent to hear that he's fantastic. 953 00:37:52,320 --> 00:37:54,359 Speaker 1: So yeah, and he was like I texted. I remember 954 00:37:54,360 --> 00:37:56,560 Speaker 1: texting someone in that organ just going like, could you 955 00:37:56,600 --> 00:37:58,440 Speaker 1: miss that you wanted? I love asking that question to 956 00:37:58,480 --> 00:38:00,319 Speaker 1: people who work on the draft because it's like then 957 00:38:00,400 --> 00:38:03,360 Speaker 1: you see, like, ooh, you got five he says, so 958 00:38:03,400 --> 00:38:05,040 Speaker 1: and said, will send me five names, and it's like, 959 00:38:05,280 --> 00:38:06,919 Speaker 1: or eave them go to one team and he's like, yeah, 960 00:38:06,960 --> 00:38:09,640 Speaker 1: screw that. They're using the same thing, you know, from 961 00:38:09,680 --> 00:38:12,560 Speaker 1: a model, projection standpoint whatever. But but yeah, I mean 962 00:38:12,600 --> 00:38:15,279 Speaker 1: there's a lot of the spot. I've had people say 963 00:38:15,280 --> 00:38:18,600 Speaker 1: like the spawn of Andrew Friedman, like Andrew, Yeah, the 964 00:38:18,640 --> 00:38:20,719 Speaker 1: prison of Baseball offs with the doctors, Like He's had 965 00:38:20,719 --> 00:38:23,600 Speaker 1: these disciples just like trickle out throughout baseball. And I 966 00:38:23,600 --> 00:38:25,360 Speaker 1: imagine there's some people in the Mets org from that 967 00:38:25,400 --> 00:38:28,200 Speaker 1: tree and the philosophy state the same. And I think 968 00:38:28,239 --> 00:38:30,239 Speaker 1: a lot of teams are starting to target very similar things. 969 00:38:30,880 --> 00:38:33,799 Speaker 1: Dom is like interesting because I just think he had 970 00:38:33,800 --> 00:38:37,280 Speaker 1: like reasonable fastball traits, Like you're looking for above average extension, 971 00:38:37,320 --> 00:38:39,439 Speaker 1: below average release, and then you're looking for some vert, 972 00:38:39,440 --> 00:38:41,640 Speaker 1: and he's got that. He's sat ninety four eighty five 973 00:38:41,680 --> 00:38:43,600 Speaker 1: mile prow slider eighty seven sat on the change of 974 00:38:43,600 --> 00:38:45,600 Speaker 1: an eighty mile prower curve to the data I had 975 00:38:45,640 --> 00:38:48,239 Speaker 1: on him. For me, the big carrying trade here is 976 00:38:48,320 --> 00:38:50,600 Speaker 1: just like it's an interesting fastball shape where it's like, okay, 977 00:38:51,000 --> 00:38:53,480 Speaker 1: hold the shape, you know progressed it was too playing again, 978 00:38:53,520 --> 00:38:55,280 Speaker 1: which is in this met sphere that seems like everything 979 00:38:55,320 --> 00:38:57,400 Speaker 1: is a little more arms side with some vert. So 980 00:38:57,520 --> 00:38:59,560 Speaker 1: I imagine they're gonna expand the mix out probably give 981 00:38:59,600 --> 00:39:02,680 Speaker 1: him some big breaking ball through a lot of strikes, 982 00:39:02,960 --> 00:39:04,880 Speaker 1: even though this most recent year I thought some of 983 00:39:04,880 --> 00:39:06,279 Speaker 1: his own date was pretty good, even though I think 984 00:39:06,280 --> 00:39:08,480 Speaker 1: he wasn't particularly strong from a walkstampoint, which is always 985 00:39:08,480 --> 00:39:10,560 Speaker 1: a weird disconnect to me of like, okay, were you 986 00:39:10,640 --> 00:39:12,919 Speaker 1: just like falling behind guys and giving yourself no shot 987 00:39:12,960 --> 00:39:14,960 Speaker 1: and then when you're competitive you're actually able to own it. 988 00:39:15,040 --> 00:39:17,480 Speaker 1: So he's just got some like baseline traits that I 989 00:39:17,480 --> 00:39:19,480 Speaker 1: think are good to work with. And it seems like 990 00:39:19,520 --> 00:39:21,640 Speaker 1: the Mets are good at iding Matt, So I don't 991 00:39:21,640 --> 00:39:23,319 Speaker 1: have anything super hard there. I don't have like this 992 00:39:23,719 --> 00:39:25,520 Speaker 1: stuff of like liking him as much as Santucci, but 993 00:39:25,840 --> 00:39:27,080 Speaker 1: you know, if the Dodgers were on him and some 994 00:39:27,080 --> 00:39:29,120 Speaker 1: other teams were on him, and like the fastball shape 995 00:39:29,120 --> 00:39:30,840 Speaker 1: looks good, he's got a pair of breaking balls that 996 00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:33,719 Speaker 1: are decent. Like, yeah, I'm totally fine with being happy 997 00:39:33,760 --> 00:39:42,759 Speaker 1: with that pick. Yeah, two guys that you guys threw 998 00:39:42,840 --> 00:39:44,799 Speaker 1: to me. I forgot his first name. I feel I 999 00:39:44,920 --> 00:39:47,600 Speaker 1: apologize Lamfinger. He don't know what his first name is, 1000 00:39:47,640 --> 00:39:51,560 Speaker 1: Ethan Lamfner. This dude's shapes were weird. He everything he 1001 00:39:51,640 --> 00:39:53,160 Speaker 1: threw just lifted. So if you look at like a 1002 00:39:53,160 --> 00:39:55,440 Speaker 1: pitch plot, I know I'm learned out here, but like 1003 00:39:55,640 --> 00:39:59,360 Speaker 1: when you get drop on things that's like curveballs, depth, sliders, 1004 00:39:59,400 --> 00:40:02,000 Speaker 1: depth sweepers, et cetera. Everything, And his pitch plot was 1005 00:40:02,040 --> 00:40:04,279 Speaker 1: like above seven or eight inches. And I was like 1006 00:40:04,360 --> 00:40:07,160 Speaker 1: very confused because I expected him to be almost like 1007 00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:10,200 Speaker 1: a like a low arm submariner where everything's coming up. 1008 00:40:10,360 --> 00:40:13,080 Speaker 1: So it's impossible for like a Tyler Rogers to create depth. 1009 00:40:13,239 --> 00:40:15,400 Speaker 1: He's like he's throwing up so like that makes a 1010 00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:17,600 Speaker 1: lot of sense. Everything's verty for him, so to speak. 1011 00:40:17,840 --> 00:40:19,680 Speaker 1: And Lantherner had the same effect where it's like the 1012 00:40:19,719 --> 00:40:22,319 Speaker 1: cutter he was up here, the sweeper was like ten 1013 00:40:22,440 --> 00:40:24,520 Speaker 1: and ten. It was like really weird, and the fastball 1014 00:40:24,600 --> 00:40:26,120 Speaker 1: is kind of weird. And I was like, I don't 1015 00:40:26,200 --> 00:40:28,720 Speaker 1: understand why this guy can't create depth on anything he throws. 1016 00:40:28,760 --> 00:40:31,719 Speaker 1: And his throw, like you watch him throw wasn't as 1017 00:40:31,719 --> 00:40:34,399 Speaker 1: wacky as I thought it would be. So I've been 1018 00:40:34,400 --> 00:40:35,680 Speaker 1: meaning to send a text to someone in the Mets 1019 00:40:35,760 --> 00:40:37,520 Speaker 1: org about this and just be like what is going 1020 00:40:37,560 --> 00:40:39,600 Speaker 1: on there? Like is there's something about how his hands 1021 00:40:39,600 --> 00:40:41,600 Speaker 1: working to the ball that's just causing him to get 1022 00:40:41,600 --> 00:40:44,480 Speaker 1: behind everything? But I'm cool with that, Like I just 1023 00:40:44,520 --> 00:40:46,120 Speaker 1: like weird dudes like that, And I mean I think 1024 00:40:46,120 --> 00:40:48,239 Speaker 1: I have him sitting. Yeah, so I had him ninety 1025 00:40:48,280 --> 00:40:50,400 Speaker 1: six on the fastball ninety two and the cutter sweeper 1026 00:40:50,480 --> 00:40:53,200 Speaker 1: change too and everything, but again everything was lifted, so 1027 00:40:53,280 --> 00:40:55,000 Speaker 1: like I don't really know what that means from like 1028 00:40:55,040 --> 00:40:57,040 Speaker 1: a how are you going to a fair versus various 1029 00:40:57,080 --> 00:41:00,680 Speaker 1: handedness stuff hitter, But I'm intrigued the fact that like 1030 00:41:00,760 --> 00:41:02,440 Speaker 1: I see a lot of pitchplots and I look at 1031 00:41:02,440 --> 00:41:04,719 Speaker 1: the stuff for analyzing pictures and like, I don't see 1032 00:41:04,719 --> 00:41:07,480 Speaker 1: a lot of that a ton, So I'm in, like, 1033 00:41:07,520 --> 00:41:09,120 Speaker 1: I'm just curious, Like he's got to putting the radar 1034 00:41:09,120 --> 00:41:10,400 Speaker 1: and be like, let me see what he's doing, you know, 1035 00:41:10,520 --> 00:41:12,520 Speaker 1: like is everything still really wacky with how he throws 1036 00:41:12,520 --> 00:41:15,200 Speaker 1: and how are the results? Small sample on him too specifically, 1037 00:41:15,239 --> 00:41:17,520 Speaker 1: which I always run into on these lower level guys, 1038 00:41:17,520 --> 00:41:20,160 Speaker 1: So I can't like be super confident and oh he 1039 00:41:20,239 --> 00:41:22,239 Speaker 1: needs to do this versus left he's better, et cetera. 1040 00:41:22,320 --> 00:41:26,080 Speaker 1: But release characteristics seem good thrown hard and just weird shapes. 1041 00:41:26,640 --> 00:41:28,960 Speaker 3: It's it's gonna be a real shame if somebody clips 1042 00:41:28,960 --> 00:41:30,640 Speaker 3: that that clip of you right there and saying I 1043 00:41:30,680 --> 00:41:32,600 Speaker 3: just like weird dudes, It's gonna be real, real horrible. 1044 00:41:32,640 --> 00:41:34,000 Speaker 3: So if someone takes how that puts out. 1045 00:41:34,160 --> 00:41:35,920 Speaker 1: That's gonna be a brand killer Jo. 1046 00:41:37,080 --> 00:41:39,040 Speaker 3: But Mark, I love anything else for Lance if don't 1047 00:41:39,040 --> 00:41:39,600 Speaker 3: have anything else. 1048 00:41:43,080 --> 00:41:54,319 Speaker 1: Yeah, that was awesome. Yeah, yeah, pushing stuffstack in YouTube specifically, Yeah, 1049 00:41:54,400 --> 00:41:57,000 Speaker 1: Lance birero Z should pop up same, Lance Birozi dot 1050 00:41:57,000 --> 00:41:59,440 Speaker 1: subsack dot com. I do picture notes in season. I 1051 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:00,920 Speaker 1: also do props the clists in there. If you want 1052 00:42:00,920 --> 00:42:02,520 Speaker 1: to pay a little money, throw me some cash and 1053 00:42:02,600 --> 00:42:05,120 Speaker 1: YouTube stuff is fun. Definitely getting like pretty heavy with 1054 00:42:05,160 --> 00:42:06,440 Speaker 1: a lot of my topics, but I've been trying to 1055 00:42:06,440 --> 00:42:08,200 Speaker 1: trying to grow and be a little more generic, so 1056 00:42:08,480 --> 00:42:11,120 Speaker 1: hopefully I could appease the masses. Well, so satisfying to 1057 00:42:11,160 --> 00:42:12,000 Speaker 1: people who want. 1058 00:42:11,800 --> 00:42:15,279 Speaker 3: To talk about keep the keeps the best. 1059 00:42:15,760 --> 00:42:16,279 Speaker 1: It's so good. 1060 00:42:17,800 --> 00:42:20,400 Speaker 2: Make check out Lance's stuff in the description and go 1061 00:42:20,480 --> 00:42:22,759 Speaker 2: check out his YouTube channel. Lance thanks again for joining us, 1062 00:42:22,880 --> 00:42:24,640 Speaker 2: and we will catch you guys on the next episode. 1063 00:42:24,640 --> 00:42:26,080 Speaker 3: Peace Out, peace Out guys.