WEBVTT - Digging Back Into Digg

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? So, just last Friday, we published a

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff classic episode called the Dig Story, and I

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, I should probably do a very quick update

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on what's been going on with Dig since twenty seventeen,

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>except you know me, I don't do quick updates because

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm a chatty Cathy. So we're gonna do that. We're

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna do an update on what's been happening with Dig

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>since twenty seventeen. But first I want to go back

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and talk over kind of what happened with Dig in

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the first place, just in case you didn't listen to

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the original episode or the classic that published on Friday,

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>so that you're not totally in the dark. So Dig

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>originally law lunched in late two thousand and four, and

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it was essentially a news aggregator site. Dig started off

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>as a site where users, the visitors, the members of

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>DIG would be able to share links to stuff that

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>they thought was useful or cool or entertaining or you

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>know whatever, and It was a site that was all

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about discovery and sharing discovery. So search engines are great, right, Like,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>if you are looking for something specific, then you can

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>go to a search engine and you can find a

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>link to something that answers your specific question. That's fantastic.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But what if you're just in the mood to you know,

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>browse and to see what's going on specifically, like what's

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what's more important right now today? What is happening? What

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't really know what you wanted to see

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or read, you just knew that you wanted something, Then

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a site like dig or Reddit, which launched not long

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>after Dig did and was Dig's big competitor, a site

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like that could be a huge help. So Dig really

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on the recent and the timely. They really were

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>hyper focused on things like tech and gaming and sports

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and news, that kind of stuff like that was really

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>where they were focusing. Sharing a link on Dig then

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gave the entire community the opportunity to weigh in on

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>whether they thought that particular story was important or not.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So if folks thought it was interesting or important and

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they had a Dig account, they could boost the story

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>up the page ranking. This was called digging, an article,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and if an article received enough digs, it would get

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>promoted to the front page of Dig, which in turn

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was being called the front page of the Internet. If

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the community thought the story was lame or that, you know,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was already represented within Dig, whatever that might be,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you could vote it down. This was called burying an article.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>The philosophy behind Dig was that the community determined what

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff on the Internet was actually worth looking at. It

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 1>was giving power to the people. Now, none of that

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>would matter unless people actually used Dig. If it had

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>never attracted users, then it just would have been a

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>curiosity and nothing more. But it actually did attract quite

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a few users. People began to flock to the site

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and use it a lot, so their participation would ultimately

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>end up having a larger impact on the web in general.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Because if you had a piece that showed up on

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Dig's front page, that could mean a significant boost traffic

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as people checked out, you know, they click on the

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>article and go to your site. So Dig could end

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>up being really influential. There was this thing called the

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Dig effect that was a big deal when Dig was,

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, in its heyday, but just a couple of

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>years after launching the site, one of the co founders,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Rose, who was a personality really at that time.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>He was on tech TV and had a show, a

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast that he launched called Dignation The Pretty Famous Dude.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>He started to encounter a frustrating experience because there were

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>some companies that were interested in purchasing Dig, and Rose

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>was like, yeah, I don't mind the idea of selling

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>it because he really liked creating stuff and getting it going.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But he was less interested in just sticking around forever. Right,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>He liked the creative process. But he couldn't just sell

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Dig and then move on to something else because Dig

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>had a board of directors who ultimately had the authority

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of that decision about whether or not to sell a company,

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and the board was convinced that the incoming offers, such

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as one from news Corp. News Corps, which had famously

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>purchased MySpace, just undervalued the company. So news Corp's offer

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was said to be somewhere around sixty million dollars, but

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the board director said, no, that's way too low. We

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>need to have a much higher offer before we will

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>consider selling. So Rose couldn't sell to news Corp. He

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just had to sort of sit back and continue working

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.679
<v Speaker 1>on the site. Reportedly, he became less interested in doing

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that over his time at DIG, so he thought it

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>would have been better to cash out and created a

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>new project, but he was beholden to the board. By

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, there was a much larger deal

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that was in the works between Dig and Google. Now,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the rumor was that Google offered to acquire Dig for

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the princely sum of two hundred million dollars, so it

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>looked like maybe the Bard directors had been right right,

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like they had said sixty millions too low, and then

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years later the offer's two hundred million. However,

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that deal never actually happened. Negotiations fell apart for one

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>reason or another, perhaps a whole bunch of different reasons,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>and Google did not go through with the deal. In

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty ten, Dig tackled an ambitious and drastic redesign known

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as DIG Version four. Reportedly, Kevin Rose made a huge

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>number of changes as part of a venture capital funding round,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and upon launch, this rollout was a disaster. The redesign

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>went from the very foundation of how Dig worked, like

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>even the actual technology that powered everything was changed, and

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the changes went all the way through to user interface

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and experience, and it turned out that not only did

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it get rid of a lot of stuff that DIG

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>users valued, it was not ready for deployment when it

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>went live because people started to encounter frustrating glitches while

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>interacting with the new design. The whole website would crash

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly throughout the day when the site was working, which

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was never a guarantee. Users were very upset to see

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>historic features just missing from the experience, so, for example,

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the option to bury a post was gone. Perhaps more

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>upsetting was the fact that this new version of dig

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>would allow news sites to automatically submit articles to DIG,

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>so instead of everything being user generated and user submitted,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>now the news agencies could actually submit stuff themselves directly

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to dig. It no longer was in the community's hands.

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>There was also a lot of complaints, although I never

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>found like any real strong corroborating evidence, but there were

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of complaints that some power users at DIG

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>had a disproportionate amount of control of what could be

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>seen and what would not make it to the front page,

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and that meant the community as a whole found itself

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>unable to really get stuff seen on the main page,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>so it was very disheartening. Alexis Ohanian, one of the

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>co founders of Reddit, you know, the big competitor to Dig,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>actually published an open letter to Kevin Rose saying that

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the new features in version four suggested that the team

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>had allowed investors to really weigh in on what should

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and should not be part of the platform, and that

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than listening to the community and responding to what

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the community wanted, the site was listening to the money,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and that that in turn was alienating Dig's users. And

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that, you know, a lot of what

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he was saying was right, because a ton of Dig

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>users abandoned Dig. Many of them actually migrated on over

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to Reddit. But that's another story, because Reddit itself has

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>had its own ups and downs, including a very tumultuous

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. Anyway, the various co founders of Dig

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>started to leave the company over time. By twenty eleven,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Rose was bouncing from the company as well. Lots

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>of users had Traffic was dr being precipitously. It was bad. Meanwhile,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>social platforms like Facebook and Twitter were also growing rapidly

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and taking over some of the functions that Dig had

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>performed because now folks could create a profile on a

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>system that prioritized communities and networks, at least that's what

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they claimed to do. Then they could share stuff with

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>their friends on these platforms, So it was social first

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and then content second. Kind of approach you could argue

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Dig was maybe you know, content and social together, or

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe even content first, social second. But the point is

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Dig was seeing other sites drink its milkshake. On top

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of all that, other companies were poaching talent from Dig.

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Post company hired more than a dozen of

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>digs site engineers, for example, so it was pretty clear

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Dig was on borrow time. In twenty twelve, Dig would

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of of get sold for parts. Different parts of

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Dig were sold off to other companies, but the site

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>itself and the underlying tech and the ip of what

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>made dig dig ended up going to a company called

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Beta Works, and the price tag had dropped from that

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>theoretical high of two hundred million dollars with Google to

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a much less grandiose half million. Don't get me wrong,

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>half a million dollars is a lot of money, It

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't measure up to some of the earlier offers.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>DIG had turned away in its history. I should also

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>add there's some dispute about that five hundred thousand dollars

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sales price. That's what everyone reported, just about everyone anyway,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but tech crunches Frederick Lardinois reported that the actual deal

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>was considerably larger and included not just cash but also

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>equity in the company, and so the value was much

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>higher than what reports had suggested. In that same article,

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he pointed out that Dig's annual ad revenue was likely

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>more than half a million dollars a year, so it

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really make sense to sell the company for half

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars. But then again, Vox dot com reported

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that Dig ran its entire service off of servers that

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>were on premises. You know, it wasn't a cloud based

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>company at that point, so it was really before cloud

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>competing had made it less expensive to run huge websites. Like,

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>if your website had a fairly modest user base, then

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you probably wouldn't be seeing enormous bills per month. But

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for Dig, because of how popular it was, Vox estimated

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that it would cost a quarter million dollars a month

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>just to keep the site running. So then you're like, well,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>even if your your revenue is more than half a

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, If your monthly costs are two hundred and

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars, you're in trouble unless you're making significantly

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>more than half a million dollars a year. But whatever

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the scope of the deal, however much it ended up

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>being under Beta Works, DIG would relaunch in the summer

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twelve with an entirely different approach to content.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So instead of having users determine what material would make

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>up the front page, DIG featured an editorially curated front page. So,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in other words, DIG determined what went on Dig, not

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>users that were still like scoring systems in place and

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, but the fundamental operation of DIG

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>had totally transformed. Now that's pretty much where I left

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>off in that twenty seventeen episode. At that time, DIG

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was still under the ownership of Beta Works, the company.

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Beta Works typically focuses on startups that are at the

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>earliest stages of development. So Beta Works looks out for

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting projects and then provides what's called seed stage funding,

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the initial money that a startup needs in

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>order to kind of coalesce from an idea into something real.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Seed money helped startups do things like attract the right

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>talent and put together the earliest plans for how the

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>company will actually operate. To take over Dig was a

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit outside the wheelhouse for that kind of company, though,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it, Beta Works mary Dig with a

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>socially driven news web app it had in development called

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>news dot Me. One thing Beta Works did have under

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>its belt was the service bit dot l y, the

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>URL shortener. That's another episode. It also helped develop tweet Deck,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>which Twitter would ultimately purchase, but again that's a matter

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>for another episode. The heyday of Dig was over at

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this point, and finding news articles and stuff from the

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Beta Works era of Dig isn't that easy because people

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>had moved on. Reddit absorbed a ton of digs community,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and the new Dig was largely viewed as just another

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>web based news site. So really, in that stretch between

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve and two eighteen, there aren't that many news

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>items about Dig. But then things would change. I'll explain

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>more after we take this quick break. Okay, So, like

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I said before the break, between twenty twelve and twenty eighteen,

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you didn't see that many news stories about Dig. It

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>just seemed to be performing like a basic web page

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that had news items on it, most of which were

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>either written by an internal editorial team or were connecting

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to external news sources. So the next big bit of

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Dig's history that I have to share happened. In early

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>spring twenty eighteen, Dig announced that it was shutting down

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it's OURSS reader tool. So for those of y'all who

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>are not familiar with RSS, it stayed for really Simple Syndication,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it stands for RDF Site Summary. RDF in

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>turn stands for Resource Description Framework. There's actually disagreement on

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what RSS stands for, but really the initialism doesn't matter.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>RSS allows for the distribution of web updates or Internet

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>content in general to lots of other stuff. So what

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>does that actually mean? Well, let's take an example with podcasts.

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>How does your podcast app, whichever one you use, how

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>does it know when there is a new episode of

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the shows that you subscribe to. Well, podcasts published to

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a platform, and each podcast has an RSS feed associated

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with it, your podcatching service checks for updates to the

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>various RSS feeds out there all the shows that you

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to. So let's say that you subscribe to tech stuff,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it does a check to see is there a new

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff episode? If there has not been an update

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>since the last time it did this check, nothing changes you,

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>no notifications, nothing like that. If when it checks the

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>RSS link and it finds an update, finds out there's

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>been a new episode added to the feed, your podcasting

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>app will say, Hey, there's a brand new episode of

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that show you like, so you can listen to it

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>whenever you like. RSS tech led to the development of

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>RSS readers, So these tools let you subscribe to various

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sources and you can view updates to those websites within

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the reader itself. So instead of physically navigating to like

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a dozen different websites that you like in order to

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just see if anything's new. Let's say that you know

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you typically visit four different news sites, a couple of

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>gaming sites. Maybe you visit I don't know, let's say

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a financial site and you do all these and

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>those are typically the ones you go to. Instead of

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>going to each of those individually and looking to see

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if there are any updates, you could use an RSS

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>reader that would just list out in chronological order reverse

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>chronological order, typically what the latest headlines are from the

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>various sources, and they would usually let you organize these

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>in various ways, so you could put all of your

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sports relaid stuff in one place, you know, all of

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>your gaming stuff in another place, et cetera, and you

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>could just go through and look for headlines that caught

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>your interest. And you don't have to go to each

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>website individually just to see what the updates are. You

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>consolidate everything into a single view. It's incredibly useful. But

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>by twenty eighteen, the glory of the RSS reader days

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>was well in the past. A lot of companies that

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>had previously offered RSS readers had since shut them down.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>For instance, Google shut down Google Reader way back in

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty. There are still folks out there today, a

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>decade later who are sore about that. I'm one of them. Honestly,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>RSS readers really made it useful to get a quick

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>look at news, and there still are some out there.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say that they don't exist anymore,

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but some of the biggest ones have long since gone away. Anyway,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Dig had maintained its own RSS reader tool, and it

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was fittingly enough called dig Reader, but in March twenty eighteen,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Dig announced that the feature would end on March twenty sixth.

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Molly Mchughotharinger dot com posted a full article about this

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and lamented the fact that it was the latest in

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a long string of setbacks for people who just wanted

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to view web updates chronologically or reverse chronologically.

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>MCEU pointed out that a lot of platforms were leaning

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>harder and harder on algorithms to determine what a user

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>would actually see, and that these algorithms valued engagement and

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sharing over quality. This internment, we were getting a lot

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>more junk, fake stuff, and misinformation put in front of us,

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>things that would grab our attention but not necessarily reflect reality.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>That probably sounds familiar, right because we we've been talking

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>about that for a couple of years a lot, But

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>this was way back in twenty eighteen. It just hasn't

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten any better. MCEW expressed sadness that yet another RSS

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>reader was going the way of the DODO, because it

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>marked another example of how it was growing increasingly hard

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for an individual to curate their own web experience. Instead,

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the various platforms out there, particularly social networks, were taking

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>over that task for us and dictating to us what

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>we would see as opposed to letting us say, Hey,

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm really just interested in reading information from these sources

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>because I feel those sources are really reliable, so I

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just want to see those Those options were going away anyway.

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Just one month later after they shut down dig Reader,

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>even bigger news came out of dig. Beta Works sold

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>off a majority steak in DIG to another company called

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>buy sell Ads. It would not be a total acquisition.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Beta Works CEO John Borthwick indicated that Dig's previous shareholders,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>including Beta Works itself, would retain some steak in DIG.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>The actual details of the deal remained private. So to

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this day, I have no clue how much buy sell

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Ads spent in order to get a majority steak. I

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what level that majority steak is, right,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what percentage of dig i sell ads owns,

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>but what the heck is buy sell Ads. That all

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>started with a guy named Todd Garland. He got his

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>start as a web designer, and he found that the

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>part he liked the least about creating web pages or

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>administering web pages was the whole process of securing ads

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for web pages to help generate revenue. He found that

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>entire process to be slow and frustrating and overly complicated,

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and he thought, what if you could build some software

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to automate as much of that process as you possibly can,

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to make it faster and simpler for the end users.

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>What if you could remove all those hurdles that typically

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>exist and through software, just make it a much less

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>painful experience. To that end, he built buy sell ads

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so that from say a web page standpoint, a publisher standpoint,

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a web admin wouldn't have to do anything other than

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps set a rate, you know, say like, all right,

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this is how much I will charge an advertiser to

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>make use of the real estate on my web page.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And then that person would just wait to see which

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 1>ad requests get sent to them through this service and

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>then approve or deny from there, and that would get

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>things going. On the advertiser side. All they had to

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>do was determine if the ad rate made sense, Like

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>if they said, well, does it make sense for us

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay this much? Are we going to get enough

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>traffic for that to be a good investment? And if so,

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>then they could say, all right, well we will. We're

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in including this particular publisher as part of our

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>ad campaign, and that would be it. At least that

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>was the idea. I'll come back to buy sell ads

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>because the reputation of that company is a little up

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in the air as far as I can tell, although

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from extremely limited information, so keep all that in mind.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, Buy sell ads seemed like it was

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an odd fit to purchase a majority share in an

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>online media company, But then you could also argue that

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Beta Works was a weird fit, and Beta Works had

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>done it way back in twenty twelve. However, when you

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>really start to think about it, I argue the buy

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.479
<v Speaker 1>sell ads acquisition makes a little more sense because an

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>ad company does serve two sets of customers. Right. You've

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>got your advertisers, who want to get ads in front

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of people, preferably people who are more likely going to

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>act on the ad than otherwise. And then you've got

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>your publishers, the people who have real estate to offer

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that they want to monetize on their sites or to

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>generate revenue. A company like buy sell ads has to

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>satisfy both groups, right. They have to satisfy both the

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>advertisers and the publishers, and by gaining majority ownership of

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a publisher, because that's what dig is at this point.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a publisher. It's not an aggregator anymore, not really. Well,

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that means that buy sell ads now has a platform

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>where it can actively test out new strategies. It can

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>deploy new approaches to matching ads to content. It can

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>look and see which of these are working well and

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>which ones don't like, which ones are generating more click

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>through which ones are not, and using that as like

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a testing ground, it can then perhaps deploy strategies across

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>larger groups of customers. In addition to that, it also

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this is something that Todd Garland has actually said, Buy

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>sell ads can try and design a publication platform strategy

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that in theory maximizes the publisher's ability to monetize their site.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And then once they have figured out that strategy, they

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>can then license that to other publishers. So, in other words,

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>they come up with a process that other publishers can follow,

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and by paying buy sell ads, they'll say, here's how

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you do it, and just work with us, and we'll

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we match you with advertisers that are

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>going to make the best use of your platform, and

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 1>everyone's happy. The advertisers get their ads acted on by

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a larger audience, you get a bigger payout because of

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the ad revenue coming in, and we all get rich. However,

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>buy sell ads. Purchasing dig made some folks feel anxious

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is probably too big a word, because at this point

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>dig it really wasn't in the spotlight anymore. It wasn't

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>really in the mind share of your average netizin if

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I am to use outdated terminology. So that being said,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>people were still thinking, well, it might not be a

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>great relationship for an ad company to purchase a media company.

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>That almost seems like a conflict of interests right. You

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>can definitely see how an ad company might change the

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>media company so that it just is a vehicle for

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>delivering ads, similar to how the algorithm really just wants

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to get as much engagement as possible. There's the fear

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that an ad company would turn a media company into

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just a way to display as many ads as possible.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The site had reportedly actually kind of made a slight

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>recovery over the years after the disaster that was the

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>dig version four rollout. It wasn't anything close to what

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it was in its heyday, but it was doing better

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>than it had been, so there was this question of

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>would this mean that DIG would lose what little momentum

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it grab back post Beta Works acquisition. Well, there's not

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a ton of information out there about this, but Kaylee

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Barber of Digit Day did cite some unnamed former Dig

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>employees who explained what happened in the wake of this

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>acquisition deal. This was in an article that was titled

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>ad tech companies have stopped innovating Why Buy sell Ads

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is buying up media brands? So it wasn't just about

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Buy sell Ads and Dig. There was also a discussion

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>about another outlay called Pando, but it was had a

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of Dig in it. This article published back on

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>October twenty ninth, twenty nineteen, so it's a few years

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>old now, and according to those unnamed former Dig employees,

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the technology team at DIG was essentially let go upon

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion of this deal, So the whole tech team

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at Dig is gone. Some of them would actually end

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>up being hired on by a blockchain focused journalism marketplace

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that was called Civil. Unfortunately for them, Civil would give

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>up the ghost two years later in twenty twenty. It

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>shut down after the leadership team at Civil determined that

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the business was just not sustainable, particularly in the wake

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of a massive decline in the blockchain slash crypto industry.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>By sell Ads reportedly absorbed the DIG sales team and

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the business side of the staff into its own operations,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>so they essentially said, all right, we're going to bring

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you in as buy sell Ads team members, not specifically

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>DIG team members. Out of the editorial staff, things were

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty rough. Within a year of the deal being announced,

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a general manager, two full time original content editors, and

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a video editor were all laid off from DIG. Others

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>who had been working in an editorial capacity left on

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>their own, and when Barbera wrote her article for digitay

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty nineteen, she said the entire editorial staff

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>at dig at that point consisted of five full time

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>employees and one part time staff member. That was essentially

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what was left of dig. Okay, We're going to take

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>another quick break. When I come back, I'll wrap up

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this update on what's been going on with dig Okay,

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're back. Uh. I was talking about how Digg's

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>staff was whittled down after the acquisition when Bisellads bought

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a majority stake in the company. But as for DIG itself.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It still exists. Dig dot com is a website you

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>can go and you can visit it. The site posts

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>new art articles on a regular basis. I checked. I

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was making sure because I mean, sometimes you go to

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>these things and you're like, oh, there's a ton of

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>articles here, and then you click through and you're like, oh,

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this was posted like eighteen months ago. That's not the

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>case with Dig. There are a lot of new articles

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on the various categories that Dig covers, which includes again

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff like news and gaming and sports. Based on the

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>bylines that I saw, to me, at least, it looks

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like there's a pretty small editorial staff in place. There.

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>There might be a couple of freelancers who write for Dig,

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but mostly I'm just seeing the same names pop up

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. It also looks to me that

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they are mostly referencing news items that are posted elsewhere,

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like maybe it's a press release, or in some cases

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they're referencing a news article that went on some other

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>media outlet. That is not to cast shade on them, right,

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're doing a bad job because they're

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>going to other news sites and saying this article over

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>here says blah blah blah. Lots of outlets out there

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>do this. Business Insider does this all the time. You'll

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>go there and they'll say, like Reuter's Reports or Fast

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Company Reports or whatever. I also can't imagine that any

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of the staff on Dig's editorial group has an opportunity

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to do any sort of investigative journalism. I don't think

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that they have the time to do that, because from

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what I see, it looks like a lot of them

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are posting multiple articles per day, and at that level

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of output, you don't have time to do things like

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>take extra steps and really do investigative work. It's just

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>impossible if you have an output quota that you need

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to meet. Clearly, Dig does not resemble what it used

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to be when it was first launched, not by a

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>long shot. But that raises another question, how is it

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>doing as far as performance goes. That's a great question.

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's also a question that's very hard to answer, largely

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>because third party web traffic analytics are not what I

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>would call accurate or even reliable. So let me give

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you a pair of examples supposedly about DIG. This kind

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of illustrates why it's hard to get insight into how

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>well a website is doing unless you have direct access

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to internal analytics. So if I search for digs web

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>traffic analytics on like Google and I pull up a

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of different firms, I can get very different information.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And in fact I did do this, So one of

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the companies I looked at was sem Rush sem Rush,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and using sem Rush, I'm told that the most recent

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>number of monthly visitors to dig dot com was eight

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>point nine million. That that was for like August. Eight

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>point nine million monthly users isn't terrible, it is still

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of what digsaw back in its glory days,

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and sam Rush ranks the site as being eleven two

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and twenty seven by web traffic in the world or

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight hundred nineteenth in the United States. Further, it

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>says the average person who's visitingdig dot com sticks around

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for around eight and a half minutes per visit, and

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that there is a bounce rate of fifty six point

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>h four percent, which means slightly more than half of

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the people who visit dig navigate away immediately. Like they

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>come to dig dot com, they take a look and

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>then they go somewhere else, and that the other slightly

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>less than half are the ones who are sticking around

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and apparently spending eight and a half minutes on the site.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But let's say we hop over to a competing web

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>analytics service called similar web. Well, then we get some

0:33:56.280 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very different information. So similar web marks the bounce straight

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>at fifty four point one seven percent. Now that's actually

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn close to sem rush, right. Sem Rush said

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty six point oh four. Similar web says fifty four

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>point one point seven. That's close enough where you could say, oh,

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>there's probably some margin of error that accounts for this discrepancy.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not too bad. But sem rush says the most

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>recent monthly analytics had eight point nine million visitors. Similar

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>web says, no, no, no, it's four point one million visitors.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>That's less than half of what sem rush said. That

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>is a huge discrepancy. There's no margin of error that's

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna say greater than fifty percent. You do be useless

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to use the tool. If there's a greater than fifty

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>percent margin of error, why use the tool at all?

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>You don't have any idea what the real answer is. So, yeah,

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>four point one million monthly visitors, according to one web

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>analytics site and eight point nine million. According to another

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>these do not line up. Moreover, sam Rush said the

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>average person would stick around for eight and a half minutes, right, Well,

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>similar Web says no, no, no, it's two and a

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>half minutes. So again huge discrepancy here. So you see,

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't really draw any conclusions about how dig is

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>doing as far as performance and web traffic goes. I

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>can't even say with any confidence that the site gets

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between four million and nine million visitors per month,

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>because when you've got a discrepancy that that's big, how

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>can you draw any conclusion whatsoever. I do think it

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is safe to say that whatever dig is seeing in

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>monthly traffic, it is not close to what it was

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>before the disastrous rollout of dig version four. I also

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that I would get back to saying something about

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>buy sell ads. Now, before I get into any of this,

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>there's some disclaimers I need to make. I have to

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>stress the information I saw is based off a a

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>very very small number of reviews for the company from

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>supposed customers of buy sell ads. And we should also

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>remember that the people who are most likely to post

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>ads are the ones who have had a negative experience.

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>It is much more rare for someone who had a

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>positive experience to just say that everything went smoothly, unless

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it was a truly positive experience, in which case then

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they might leave a review. So I don't want this

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to come across as anything close to a definitive overview

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of buy sell Ads. What I will say is the

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>trust Pilot score for buy sell ads is in the gutter.

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It is at one point nine out of a possible five.

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Ninety three percent of the reviews are one star. But

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>again this is for a very very small number of reviews.

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.439
<v Speaker 1>There are just fourteen reviews on trust Pilot about buy

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>sell Ads. The reviews do reference similar complaints. So on

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the publisher side, one review claimed that they signed up

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for service with bisell ads, received a notification about an

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>advertiser wanting to post an AD to the site, and

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>so they then approved the ad. Like that's how it works, right.

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Buysell ads matches advertisers to the sites, says they're offering

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to publish an AD on your site, yay or nay,

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and this person said yay. Then they said that they

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>saw by sell ads had been canceling some of the

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon ad deals that they had agreed on this

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>ad deal. The ad maybe ran for a while, but

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 1>then got canceled early on, and the reason sited was fraud.

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Then they found out that their entire site was removed

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>from buy sell ads marketplace because it quote unquote attracts fraud. Now,

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>if we assume that this is an honest review, which

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is a big assumption already, this obviously raises flags because

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it was by sell Ads that was sending the ad

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>offers to the public sure in the first place. So presumably,

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>if there are any issues with fraud, Buy sell ads

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>should have an obligation to find that out and prevent

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it from getting to this stage. If the publisher is

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>just approving opportunities that buy sell ads is presenting to them,

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>how is the publisher responsible for the ads if those

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>ads are actually fraudulent. But again, this is all assuming

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the review itself is honest. Other reviews came in from

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the advertising side, with several people saying they had engaged

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.959
<v Speaker 1>buy sell ads to place ads in various campaigns, only

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to find the campaign account shut down after a short

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 1>amount of time, and then they were trying desperately to

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>get a refund on the ad campaign because the campaign

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>would be shut down prematurely, their own account would get

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>shut down, and yet they would have been charged for

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the service. And the ads often mentioned that getting in

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:01.399
<v Speaker 1>touch with customer service at buy sell ads was practically impossible.

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>But again, this is just fourteen reviews. That is far

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>too small a number to even remotely call it a

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>sample size, and it could very well be that none

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of those reviews are entirely honest or accurate, or even

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>remotely so I think it's only fair to point out

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that if you were to go to a site like

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>G two dot com, there are just twelve reviews for

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>by sell ads there. But those twelve reviews create an

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>aggregate score of three point eight out of five, which

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't stellar, but it's way better than one point nine

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at trust pilot. Right. So again, a lot of the

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>reviews that are on G two dot com are actually

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>four or five star reviews. There's one was like a

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>no star review which brought the average down, and in fact,

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it may have been one of the same

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>people who left a review over at trust pilot. So

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't make any real conclusion about by sell ads.

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>There's just too little data. There's no way to tell

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>whether or not people like it or don't like it.

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>There's just not that much information, and part of that,

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is because it's still a relatively small company.

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's the update on Dig and its current corporate overlord.

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I think about Dig the same way I think about MySpace,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>because technically there is still a site that's still Dig,

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't remotely resemble what it used to be,

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>and it has a fraction of the mind share that

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it once commanded. Like, I don't think people talk about

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Dig anymore unless they're like, hey, do you remember when

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone was using dig? That's the context they use that in.

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go so far to say that Dig's grave

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>has been dug, because trust me, there's no shortage of

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>articles out there that have a similar pun to them.

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But I will say Dig is not even close to

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what it used to be, and I have no reason

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to expect that to change in the foreseeable future. Maybe

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>there'll be another change in ownership of Dig in the

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>future that brings it back to this more democratized approach

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>as what Dig was when it first launched. But unless

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do that and also find a way to

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>generate revenue so that you know you could pay for

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. It may be a non starter because

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if the only thing you can do is seek out

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>endless rounds of venture capital funding, sooner or later that

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>gravy train is going to come to an end and

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll be really stuck. I think a lot of Dig's

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>problems actually came out of the fact that the company

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>was looking for ways to monetize in a way that

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>would be sustainable, and unfortunately a lot of those ways

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>were in conflict with the very features that the community valued,

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and that was really a problem. We've see this over

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and over. Right. Twitter is the same way we saw

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot with Twitter, where the things that people valued

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter were things that weren't easily monetizable, and the

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>ways to monetize Twitter were things that rubbed people the

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong way. And that's continuing today as Twitter has transformed

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>into x. So. Yeah, not an unusual story when it

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to web startups. Anyway. That's the update on Dig.

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Not much else I can say of any real substance.

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I would love to learn more about it, and maybe

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll reach out to some of the people who are,

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, apparently writing articles for Dig just to kind

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of get an idea of what it's like, because you know,

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it could very well be that everyone there is incredibly happy.

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Based upon the output, I would imagine it's got to

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be pretty stressful. I remember when I was writing an

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>article a day and how that was really putting a

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>large stress on me. I mean, I do a podcast

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>a day pretty much here, and that is pretty stressful.

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine doing multiple ones a day. That would

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be pretty tough. Anyway, that's the update. I hope you

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>are all well, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.