Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Shawan Hannity Radio Show podcast. Valentine's bouquets come in
Speaker 1: all shapes and prices, But how do you know which
Speaker 1: one's best when there's so many out there to choose from?
Speaker 1: For me, it's simple. One eight hundred flowers dot com
Speaker 1: is my Valentine's Day go to, And you know what,
Speaker 1: I always send roses, sometimes paying, sometimes red, sometimes yellow,
Speaker 1: sometimes multi colored. And you know what, you always get
Speaker 1: a great deal at one eight hundred flowers. And if
Speaker 1: you order early for Valentine's Day, you can get twenty
Speaker 1: four multi cold roses only, or upgrade to twenty four
Speaker 1: romantic red roses for just ten bucks more and unbelievable
Speaker 1: Valentine's Day offer from one eight hundred flowers dot com.
Speaker 1: Now these gorgeous bouquets of red or multi colored roses.
Speaker 1: It's the perfect Valentine's Day. Surprised that she is guaranteed
Speaker 1: to love when it comes to Valentine's don't settle for
Speaker 1: anything less than my rose authority one eight hundred flowers
Speaker 1: dot com now to order twenty four multi colored roses
Speaker 1: or upgrade to twenty four red roses for ten bucks more.
Speaker 1: Just go to one eight hundred Flowers dot com slash
Speaker 1: Hannity Order today Flowers dot com slash Hannity. Hi, gladuate
Speaker 1: with us right down our toll free telephone number at
Speaker 1: eight hundred down down today after it's drop of six
Speaker 1: sixties six an ominous number, I guess from Friday. Um,
Speaker 1: you know I'm watching them actually brought in Anderson Cooper
Speaker 1: for their big coverage of the Dow going down. Um. Look,
Speaker 1: the Dow had gone up what eight plus nine thousand
Speaker 1: points since President Trump was elected. It's called an adjustment.
Speaker 1: It's an Look, this is why I don't like the dow.
Speaker 1: This is why I don't like people. Winners start taking
Speaker 1: their winnings and it's a lot like gambling. Now it's
Speaker 1: down a thousand as it goes from here. You know,
Speaker 1: this is the problem with Wall Street people, people that
Speaker 1: don't know what. I'll give you an example. Everybody that
Speaker 1: started getting into bitcoin like last week and last month.
Speaker 1: In the last two months and three months, you know,
Speaker 1: everyone's like, I gotta get in a bit. I'm like,
Speaker 1: I was heard about bitcoin when it was next to nothing.
Speaker 1: It's when you finally hear about it. You got to
Speaker 1: not believe the If you're going to invest, just be
Speaker 1: smart anything that you put in stocks. This is the
Speaker 1: standard rule of my my guys over at gen Hunseler
Speaker 1: down in Georgia. If you're going to invest in the market,
Speaker 1: you've gotta you can't be investing money you're gonna need
Speaker 1: in the next ten years. You invest money because over
Speaker 1: the course of time you're gonna see appreciation slowly but surely,
Speaker 1: with the EBB and flow, the ups and downs, the
Speaker 1: swings as they go along. But you know, when you
Speaker 1: have such a large percentage of uh of an increase,
Speaker 1: there's gonna be in bound to be an adjustment as
Speaker 1: it was what crawling towards twenty seven thousand, Now it's
Speaker 1: down one thousand, forty two anyway, so this will be
Speaker 1: a part of the correcting process. I don't think that
Speaker 1: much of it, and it's not the biggest news story
Speaker 1: of the day, in case your interest did um. The
Speaker 1: response to the House Intel Committee memo is as predictable
Speaker 1: as the day is long. Here's where we are today.
Speaker 1: There is a new memo out. I haven't noticed anybody
Speaker 1: in the news media following it today and it too,
Speaker 1: like the House Intel memo of Devin Newness is blockbuster.
Speaker 1: We also have have discovered the dossier author Christopher Steele
Speaker 1: wrote another anti Trump memo that was fed info by
Speaker 1: Clinton connected contacts UH and the Obama State Department. We're
Speaker 1: gonna give you all the details of that coming up
Speaker 1: in a few minutes as well. Now, I told you
Speaker 1: on Friday that this is only the beginning. Now, the
Speaker 1: first memo came from the House Intel Committee and it
Speaker 1: was released on Friday. Well, now we have another memo
Speaker 1: released by the Senate Intelligence Committee, and that includes Charles
Speaker 1: Astley is the chairman, and the and and Lindsey Graham
Speaker 1: also on this memo, and we have new developments on that.
Speaker 1: We've also identified who the visa judge is in this
Speaker 1: particular case. And we've got new information from Sarah Carter,
Speaker 1: who's going to join us in the course of the
Speaker 1: program here today. And I watched as little TV as possible.
Speaker 1: I don't even watch it. One of the good things
Speaker 1: is I actually get a service that gives me so
Speaker 1: I don't have to see these people because I don't
Speaker 1: like most of the people in the mainstream media anyway,
Speaker 1: and their egos are so fragile. Down you want me
Speaker 1: to keep going with us? Down? People? Are you know
Speaker 1: what happens? Then the dag goes down to thousand, everyone
Speaker 1: starts panicking and I still still now bick do it now?
Speaker 1: Still still? Soll let's go hurry up. I'm not a
Speaker 1: big investor in the stock market. How many years have
Speaker 1: I said on this program, Linda? How many years have
Speaker 1: I said on this program that I am not a
Speaker 1: big stock market person because I don't like this. If
Speaker 1: you want me to talk, yes, I wanted you to.
Speaker 1: I don't want to interrupt your flow. You're in a
Speaker 1: great flow. Okay. Are you done being angry? Are you
Speaker 1: sure said you gave up your hate list and you're starting?
Speaker 1: I owe you money from the super Bowl? Just yes,
Speaker 1: many many years. I've been saying it for years, many
Speaker 1: many years, many many many many for like an eternity.
Speaker 1: Al right, down here we go, rocky, very long time,
Speaker 1: doom and gloom. It was just below I was making
Speaker 1: a slight recovery. You're not supposed to get in the
Speaker 1: stock market unless you are prepared to stay the course.
Speaker 1: You must course, you must be ready for the EBB
Speaker 1: and flow. That's correct, and I've been saying that forever,
Speaker 1: You're welcome. All Right, So, last Friday, this story breaks
Speaker 1: about the memo and the House Intelligence Committee, and what
Speaker 1: did we learn last Friday? We learned some things that
Speaker 1: raises real, real legitimacy and legality issues involving the d
Speaker 1: o J and the FBI and their interactions with the
Speaker 1: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, and a real breakdown of what
Speaker 1: the legal process established that are designed to protect the
Speaker 1: American people from fi abuses now FISA. Just to break
Speaker 1: it down simply, is is your government spying on you?
Speaker 1: And the secret Court they've got to be able to
Speaker 1: present information that is compelling and overwhelming enough so and
Speaker 1: probable cause that you are involved in something that is
Speaker 1: a danger to the United States of America. Very high bar.
Speaker 1: By the way, going after Carter Page, who doesn't even
Speaker 1: work for the Trump campaign is ridiculous at the time,
Speaker 1: but we'll put that aside. Now. The amazing thing in
Speaker 1: this that we learned on Friday, the dossier compiled by
Speaker 1: the former m I six guy Christopher Steele in the
Speaker 1: memo last week, we learned that he was desperate that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump not get elected and passionate about him not
Speaker 1: being president. We also learned that neither in the initial
Speaker 1: application for the FISER warrant in October, nor any of
Speaker 1: the renewals it was renewed every ninety days. You after
Speaker 1: renew it three times, did he ever disclose that it
Speaker 1: was at the bottom of the chain it was the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign in the d n C and a political
Speaker 1: party funding Steele's efforts. And remember we also learned that
Speaker 1: Deputy Director McCabe testified before the committee in December, no
Speaker 1: surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISA court
Speaker 1: without the Steel Dossier information. And then we also learned
Speaker 1: a few other things. Remember in the hearings, we found
Speaker 1: out that Glenn Simpson fusing GPS, Glenn Simpson never verified
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele's information. And then we find out that they
Speaker 1: never disclosed to the judge that it was the Clinton campaign. Now,
Speaker 1: remember the money was funneled Clinton campaign through a law firm.
Speaker 1: The law firm funnels at the Fusion GP. Yes, then
Speaker 1: they funnel it to so Christopher Steele whatever they're paying
Speaker 1: him in here. Now, the initial application, you know, doesn't
Speaker 1: name Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, who was paid for by
Speaker 1: US law firm Perkins Coy representing the d n C,
Speaker 1: representing the Clinton campaign. The application does not mention that
Speaker 1: Steele was ultimately working on behalf of them paid for
Speaker 1: by the Clinton campaign in the d n C. Now
Speaker 1: there's a big deal today, Well let's release the Democrats arguments.
Speaker 1: I know for a fact and people that have actually
Speaker 1: read this, and I never give my sources away that
Speaker 1: in fact, it was only a footnote. They never mentioned
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele. They never mentioned that. I'm sorry, they never
Speaker 1: mentioned mentioned the Clinton campaign. Pain for all of this,
Speaker 1: it might have a political taint to it. A footnote. No,
Speaker 1: this was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton, her
Speaker 1: campaign and the d n C US finances she controlled.
Speaker 1: So the initial application, you know, was working for a
Speaker 1: named US person, doesn't name Fusion GPN, doesn't name Glenn Simpson,
Speaker 1: doesn't tell the whole Steer story that the guy to
Speaker 1: put the dossier together, that it was an un verified dossier.
Speaker 1: So you have an opposition party candidate in an election
Speaker 1: year funding you know, a dossier on the opposition party
Speaker 1: and getting a warrant now to spy on that campaign
Speaker 1: and an incoming president. That's what we learned and they
Speaker 1: used deceptively. They use an article by Yahoo News and
Speaker 1: Michael Iakov that came from the same source, Christopher Steele.
Speaker 1: In other words, they're acting as though they're two independent,
Speaker 1: corroborating sources when it was only one. That is, that
Speaker 1: is a fraud before the fires a court, and it's
Speaker 1: a fraud to get a warrant to spy on an
Speaker 1: opposition party, and it's a fraud on the court so
Speaker 1: they can spy and literally undermine an incoming president. Now
Speaker 1: there's more information about this. Remember before and after Steele
Speaker 1: was terminated, well, he still continued contact with the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice, and they had jorney Deputy Attorney General Bruce Or,
Speaker 1: a senior d J official who worked closely with UH
Speaker 1: deputies Yates and Rosenstein. And shortly after the election, the
Speaker 1: FBI began interviewing or documenting his communications with Steele, including Steals,
Speaker 1: you know, being desperate that Donald Trump not get elected.
Speaker 1: At the same time, Bruce or his wife was employed
Speaker 1: by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of that
Speaker 1: op research that was never verified on Trump, and Or
Speaker 1: then gave the FBI all of his wife's op research
Speaker 1: paid for by Clinton. In the d n C, but
Speaker 1: they never told the judge this, And then of course
Speaker 1: the Deputy Director Andrew McCabe testifying that no surveillance weren't
Speaker 1: would have been sought from the FISA court without the
Speaker 1: Steele dossier. Well, now we've got a new memo today,
Speaker 1: and this one comes from Charles Grassley's committee, and he
Speaker 1: goes into great detail teaching us things. For example, it's,
Speaker 1: as you know, Christopher Steele hired by Fusion GPS to
Speaker 1: gather information about the links between Russia and Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and pursuing too that business arrangement. Steele get this prepared
Speaker 1: a series of documents styled as intelligence reports, some of
Speaker 1: which were later compiled into a dossier and published by
Speaker 1: BuzzFeed in January of On the face of the dossier,
Speaker 1: it appears Mr Steele gathered much of his information from
Speaker 1: Russian government sources inside of Russia, and according to the
Speaker 1: law firm Perkins Coy, Mr Steele's dossier related efforts were
Speaker 1: funded through Fusion GPS by the law firm on behalf
Speaker 1: of the d n C and the Clinton campaign. So
Speaker 1: they're paying and it was unverified. Now, the fact that
Speaker 1: you're so thick headed by the way that was only
Speaker 1: down eight now things are better, getting better. It was
Speaker 1: down to much. No, it's recovery. You gotta put the
Speaker 1: happy music in happy days to hear again. Now. We
Speaker 1: also learn in this new memo that is released today
Speaker 1: that um it appears in litigation that Mr Steele was
Speaker 1: involved in Great Britain that either he lied to the
Speaker 1: FBI or the British Court on the classified documents reviewed
Speaker 1: by the committee containing materially false statements. A lot of
Speaker 1: this is redacted, so I can't give you all the information.
Speaker 1: In response to the Committee's inquiries, the Chairman and ranking
Speaker 1: member received a briefing uh from then FBI Director James Comey,
Speaker 1: then they redacted it. Similarly, in June of the FBI
Speaker 1: Director Comy testified publicly before the Senate Committee on Intelligence
Speaker 1: that he had brief President Elect Trump on the dossiers
Speaker 1: allegations in January. This is when he did it at
Speaker 1: Trump Tower, and Comey described it as salacious and unverified.
Speaker 1: Here's the problem. In October of it was Comey signed
Speaker 1: off on the FISA warrant. So he's basically saying to
Speaker 1: Trump thing that it's salacious and unverified. But you can't
Speaker 1: produce to a pis a court anything that's unverified or
Speaker 1: salacious that has as we now know, Russian lines paid
Speaker 1: for by Clinton and by the d n C. It
Speaker 1: gets complicated, and there's evidence suggesting this is in the
Speaker 1: Senate report that Steel materially misled the FBI about a
Speaker 1: key aspect of the dossier efforts, which pairs on his credibility.
Speaker 1: And then it goes on to say, with public reports
Speaker 1: and followings, information of terms obtained by the committee and
Speaker 1: witness interviews and the course of the investigation, that Steele
Speaker 1: provided dossier information to a number of media organizations prior
Speaker 1: to you know, when they first put out the PISA
Speaker 1: call and it Steel sworn court filings and litigation in London.
Speaker 1: He admitted he gave off the record briefings to journalists
Speaker 1: so called journalists about the pre election memorandum. In other words,
Speaker 1: just like Glenn Simpson said he was. Simpson admitted that
Speaker 1: he was collaborating with the Clinton campaign to give dossier
Speaker 1: information to the press. And then they tell exactly who
Speaker 1: it is. They talk about, Oh shocking, The Washington Post
Speaker 1: and the New York Times and Yahoo News and the
Speaker 1: New Yorker and CNN fake news. You understand this is
Speaker 1: beyond the pale. We have two memos and another dossier.
Speaker 1: We had the first memo from Friday, a memo today.
Speaker 1: I'll give you more of the details when we get back.
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter is gonna break this down for you, and
Speaker 1: we also will check in with Greg Jarrett, Sydney Powell
Speaker 1: and Herschel Walker stops by today as we continue by
Speaker 1: the way down down A thousand will continue one Shawn
Speaker 1: toll free telephone numbers. Alright, I know this is now
Speaker 1: getting confusing, all right, Dows made a pretty significant recovery.
Speaker 1: Dow is now down eight eighteen forty. I mean, you
Speaker 1: watch this stuff and you guys are going insane in there.
Speaker 1: You're like watching it every second doesn't mean a thing
Speaker 1: to you because you're not in the process of getting
Speaker 1: your retirement accounts out. I understand why. You know, everybody's
Speaker 1: all happy when everything up. What do you think what
Speaker 1: goes up doesn't come down? You know how many times
Speaker 1: have I said in investments, it's something I want to
Speaker 1: feel it, I want to be able to touch it,
Speaker 1: I want to know I own it. I just feel
Speaker 1: very differently about because I I personally have this feeling
Speaker 1: that Wall Street is a little bit rigged. In other words,
Speaker 1: the people that work there that have all the inner
Speaker 1: knowings in are going on. Now, there are some people
Speaker 1: that do real, genuine research and then they figure out, Okay,
Speaker 1: this stock is gonna go up, or that stock is
Speaker 1: gonna go up, or I believe that this category of
Speaker 1: investment is going to be great in the future. Like
Speaker 1: if I had a guess right now, I would say
Speaker 1: I like oil because I think moving America towards energy independence.
Speaker 1: But on the other hand, and you got to think
Speaker 1: it through, Well, if we bring more product on the market,
Speaker 1: supplying demand, criss cross and dictate the price, you got
Speaker 1: a think through it. But maybe those companies that get
Speaker 1: the oil, maybe those companies that get the coal, maybe
Speaker 1: those companies that are involved in natural gas production and fracking.
Speaker 1: Now that might be a good investment, at least on
Speaker 1: paper in my mind. Now, you know what, the last
Speaker 1: thing I'm gonna do is called my financial guy and
Speaker 1: go I think you should put X dollars in this.
Speaker 1: It's not how I I operate. I just urge a
Speaker 1: lot of you Just be careful. Money is too hard
Speaker 1: to come by by the way that was making a
Speaker 1: big recovery down quick break. We'll come back and we'll continue.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna explain this new memo. I'll explain what's in
Speaker 1: the Democrats memo, which really isn't anything. And then we
Speaker 1: have a new dossier that nobody knew about. Straight ahead
Speaker 1: all right till the top of the hours watching somebody
Speaker 1: on with Chip and I actually believe I should have
Speaker 1: wrote his name down. Is it's very counterintuitive what's happening now?
Speaker 1: I think his analysis was dead on because the Obama
Speaker 1: economy was so weak all of these years. We had
Speaker 1: just artificially cheap money. Now what's cheap money cheap money?
Speaker 1: Cheap money is when you can borrow at ridiculously low rates.
Speaker 1: The era of cheap money at some point has to
Speaker 1: come to an end. And the government is artificially the
Speaker 1: Fed is artificially kept the price of money down and
Speaker 1: uh in the price of borrowing down. And now that's
Speaker 1: gonna come to an end. And if in many ways
Speaker 1: it represents Ashley Webster's name in many ways, um, it's
Speaker 1: a sign of the strength of the economy more than
Speaker 1: anything else. I'll give you an example of this. You
Speaker 1: know it looks like, you know, Wall Street hit their
Speaker 1: bumped today, but we could be on the verge of
Speaker 1: long and long expected correction t as normal. Main Street,
Speaker 1: on the other hand, is moving right along. The Atlanta
Speaker 1: Fed today is predicting GDP growth for the first quarter,
Speaker 1: not three which Obama never had a single year of
Speaker 1: three GDP growth, the only president in history, and by
Speaker 1: the way, not four percent. The Atlanta Fete is predicting
Speaker 1: five percent GDP growth five point four to be exact,
Speaker 1: which would be you know, spectacular. It's Reagan style growth.
Speaker 1: So I think the underpinnings of the economy are so
Speaker 1: strong now that the adjustment is coming because I think
Speaker 1: a lot of people understand that cheap money uh is
Speaker 1: no longer going to be available, but there will be
Speaker 1: more money available ironically for investments and so on and
Speaker 1: so forth. By the way, the only thing that means
Speaker 1: to you, if the only advice I would have for you,
Speaker 1: um is I would suggest to all of you that
Speaker 1: if you haven't locked in your mortgage rate at a
Speaker 1: low rate yet, you better do it because that's gonna
Speaker 1: you know, that's not gonna come to an end soon.
Speaker 1: Um Now, let me explain what this new memo is
Speaker 1: from the State from this is from Chuck Grassley's committee.
Speaker 1: You gotta understand another thing too, and I want to
Speaker 1: get this information out. There's going to be a series
Speaker 1: of other memos. As a matter of fact, we're expecting
Speaker 1: somewhere in the neighborhood of five more memos from the
Speaker 1: House Intel Committee alone. Five. In other words, the you know,
Speaker 1: it looks like Friday's bombshell, Today's Senate bombshell released to
Speaker 1: the House Intelligence Committee is only the tip of the iceberg. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Republican sources close to Newness say that he's assured them
Speaker 1: that there's much more to come. And anyway, the Intelligence
Speaker 1: Chair and his team have told members and associates that
Speaker 1: they found other examples of politically motivated wrongdoing across various agencies,
Speaker 1: including the FBI, the Broader Justice Department, and the State Department. Now,
Speaker 1: Republicans close to Noonat say there could be as many
Speaker 1: as five additional memos and reports on wrongdoing. I remember,
Speaker 1: you can't go to a FISA court and give a
Speaker 1: FISA court what is essentially an opposite Asian party bought
Speaker 1: and paid for dossier, unverified, proven now to be full
Speaker 1: of Russian lies as a premise to get a warrant
Speaker 1: on an opposition party in the lead up to an election,
Speaker 1: and then to spy on an incoming president elect. Republicans
Speaker 1: close to Newness now Nuness will be on Hannity tonight.
Speaker 1: They say there could be as many as five more
Speaker 1: of these memos or reports of wrongdoing, and this is
Speaker 1: only the first step, and what is a lot more
Speaker 1: to come. Our Republican briefed on Newness's investigation, said there
Speaker 1: are several areas of concern where federal agencies use government
Speaker 1: resources to try and create a narrative and influence the election,
Speaker 1: and some have suggested coordination with Hillary Clinton operatives, said
Speaker 1: Blumenthal and Cody Shearer to back up the false narrative,
Speaker 1: which I'm getting to in a second here, And Newness
Speaker 1: ended at what's coming next in an interview Friday with
Speaker 1: Brett Bear, and I'll ask him about this tonight because
Speaker 1: Bear asked Newness it more memos are coming out, and
Speaker 1: he said, yes, so this can This just completes phase one.
Speaker 1: This completes the FISA abuse portion of the investigation. And
Speaker 1: then he said, we're in the middle of what I
Speaker 1: call phase two of our investigation, which involves other departments,
Speaker 1: specifically the State Department, and some involvement that they had
Speaker 1: in this names. You're gonna hear a lot of should
Speaker 1: not surprise you. Bill and Hillary Clinton, in other words,
Speaker 1: Sid Bloomenthal and controversial activists Cody's Share. The Guardian has
Speaker 1: also reported the FBI reviewed the second Trump Russian dossier
Speaker 1: with Share and ally of Bill Clinton's White House back
Speaker 1: in the nineties. Believe a Reins by the way, Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton's closest aid for more than a decade decades said, oh,
Speaker 1: you never heard a Share. I don't think that's true.
Speaker 1: And uh, I've heard of Share. Hillary Clinton's longtime spokesman
Speaker 1: certainly knows who the guy is. I don't believe that.
Speaker 1: Now Here's what we're beginning to see in this next
Speaker 1: part out released by the Senate today. You got a
Speaker 1: top Obama Justice Department official whose wife work for Fusion GPS,
Speaker 1: Bruce or Nelly or and was paid for by Fusion
Speaker 1: GPS to dig up dirt on Donald Trump. Fusion GPS
Speaker 1: is anti Trump project was paid for by both the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign and the d n C. I think about that,
Speaker 1: Just like Andrew McCabe's wife is getting fundraising help from
Speaker 1: the Clinton's best friend, Terry mcculoff. Anyway, as Nellie Or's husband,
Speaker 1: top Obama Justice official, Bruce Or direct directly benefited from
Speaker 1: his wife's Fusion GPS income, doesn't that race staggering questions
Speaker 1: about whether or not Mr Or accepted Clinton campaign cash
Speaker 1: in exchange for helping derail the President's election, just like
Speaker 1: you know, what was what was Andrew McCabe thinking when
Speaker 1: his wife is getting seven grand an astronomical amount of
Speaker 1: money from the Clinton's closest Ally, now, the Dailey Caller
Speaker 1: had a piece under a contract from the Clinton campaign.
Speaker 1: Fusion GPS is firm is paying the wife of senior
Speaker 1: Department of Justice official as part of their efforts to
Speaker 1: gather op research on Trump, and then he's bringing it
Speaker 1: in visa v the the FBI. Unbelievable, you know, knowledge
Speaker 1: of this relationship has raised a lot of questions, which
Speaker 1: it should have to the extent you know, to which
Speaker 1: the firm may have paid for heightened access to the
Speaker 1: criminal justice system, and whether they would have hired Nelly
Speaker 1: absent dispousal connection. Anyway, Declassified memos said that Bruce Or
Speaker 1: his wife was employed by Fusion GPS assisting in the
Speaker 1: cultivation of this op research which turned out to be false,
Speaker 1: which led to a FISA warrant against Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: then you've got Bruce Or meeting with Christopher Steele both
Speaker 1: before and after the election and then reporting back to
Speaker 1: the FBI. And he's using his wife's research to give
Speaker 1: to the FBI. This doesn't sound a little too incestuous
Speaker 1: to you. And the money sweetened the pot for the
Speaker 1: oars personally made it easier for Fusion GPS to get
Speaker 1: the dossier to be used before the court if they
Speaker 1: made payment to Bruce Or's wife. Anyway, this is pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Now Fox News is now reporting and Sarah Carter will
Speaker 1: delve deeper into this in the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: That's certain Clinton associates, and that's the term being used
Speaker 1: by two top Republicans in the Senate Judiciary Committee. This
Speaker 1: is memo to the one that came out earlier today
Speaker 1: in the Senate and Chuck Grassley's memo that to Clinton
Speaker 1: associates were involved in feeding anti Trump information to Trump
Speaker 1: dossier author Christopher Steele. Now, and those if those Clinton
Speaker 1: associates are who we think they are, you know that
Speaker 1: would be you know, the same henchman and enforcers who
Speaker 1: Hillary used to cover up, you know, during the height
Speaker 1: of impeachment and and everything else, and people involved in
Speaker 1: you know, going out there and with the Bimbo eruption
Speaker 1: days for crying out loud. You know, this whole deep
Speaker 1: state scandal is about to get very ugly because the
Speaker 1: Clinton associates were feeding allegations to former British spy Christopher Steele.
Speaker 1: Oh so, I guess we could trust Sydney Blumenthal. What
Speaker 1: are you two looking at? You're up to something, texting
Speaker 1: something to each other. I can tell what all right anyway,
Speaker 1: But Sydney Blumenthal now is involved in this. There's never
Speaker 1: anything good coming out of that. So the Senate Just
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley Lindsey Graham had asked the
Speaker 1: Justice Department in January to investigate Steel based on evidence
Speaker 1: they say suggests that he lied to the FBI about
Speaker 1: his contacts with the media or the FBI misrepresented Steele statements.
Speaker 1: The lawmakers are now asking the FBI for an emergency
Speaker 1: review of their criminal referrals so it can be made
Speaker 1: public with limited redactions. As a ton of redactions in
Speaker 1: this memo because the memo from Grassley and Graham, which
Speaker 1: is now public for the first time, provides insight into
Speaker 1: steel circle of contacts during that time. But anyway, it says,
Speaker 1: the memo states that Steele had received information that came
Speaker 1: from a foreign subsource who was in touch with redacted,
Speaker 1: a contact redacted, a friend of the Clintons who passed
Speaker 1: it to redact it. Now Sarah Carter is reporting, and
Speaker 1: we'll get more information from her at the top of
Speaker 1: the Hour that it could be Jonathan Winner and in fact,
Speaker 1: said Vicious Blumenthal that are part of the redacted people
Speaker 1: in all of this. So we'll get that information sooner
Speaker 1: than later when we started the top of the Hour.
Speaker 1: But it's pretty troubling enough that the Clinton campaign funded
Speaker 1: Steals work, but now we're discovering that these Clinton associates
Speaker 1: were contemporaneously feeding Steel allegations. You know, did they feed
Speaker 1: the Russian hooker story for example? What part did they
Speaker 1: play in all of this. I'd like to know when
Speaker 1: a said Vicious going to be put under oath one
Speaker 1: or other people that were involved in this gonna be
Speaker 1: put under oath. Anyway, they're feeding Steel allegations. We know
Speaker 1: it's unproven, we know it's not verified, all in a
Speaker 1: in an effort to feed the deep state from within
Speaker 1: the Clinton campaign. Clinton's buying and paying for it. Why
Speaker 1: not have her closest friends and associates feeding false information
Speaker 1: to the guy that hates Trump that's writing it. And
Speaker 1: don't worry the people of Fusion GPS. They said they
Speaker 1: never looked into the veracity of it, but then it
Speaker 1: was still used to obtain a FISA warrant to spy
Speaker 1: on an opposition campaign. By the way, rightly Newness has
Speaker 1: blasted Adam Shift. Adam Shift he now has he is
Speaker 1: auditioning for his show on MSNBC and anyway, apparently, Devin
Speaker 1: Nonas said today there's nearly a hundred leaks by Democrats
Speaker 1: on the House Intelligence Committee related to the Russia investigation.
Speaker 1: And after President Trump blasted Adam Schiff in a morning tweet,
Speaker 1: Newness and Shift his outset. Shift is out there spreading
Speaker 1: the false narrative about him and Republicans coordinating with the
Speaker 1: White House. That never happened. Now, it is interesting that
Speaker 1: I have information about the Democratic Memo, but I couldn't
Speaker 1: get any information about the Republican memo that should give
Speaker 1: you a little hint into who my sources are. And
Speaker 1: I'm told that in the Democratic memo they don't dispute
Speaker 1: in any way. And this is the big part of
Speaker 1: this whole thing. They know that this was bought and
Speaker 1: paid for. They never They can't prove any truth to
Speaker 1: the dossier, but they never told the judge in this
Speaker 1: case that it was paid for by Clinton and the
Speaker 1: d n C and it was funneled through a law firm.
Speaker 1: The closest they got to that is a footnote that says, well,
Speaker 1: there might have been a political taint to some of this.
Speaker 1: But the problem is the FBI knew at the time.
Speaker 1: They absolutely a percent new that this was Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: bought and paid for, and they knew it wasn't verified.
Speaker 1: Remember pack in January, long after this warrant was issued
Speaker 1: and Comey signing off on it. It's the same Comy
Speaker 1: that goes to Donald Trump at Trump Tower and says
Speaker 1: it's delacious and unverified. Why didn't they tell the court
Speaker 1: that when they were obtaining the warrant. Peter King says
Speaker 1: that there's more evidence that Hillary colluded with Russia than
Speaker 1: Trump did. He's right. Anyway, he's the former Homeland Security
Speaker 1: Committee chairman, and he said there's more evidence that Hillary
Speaker 1: colluded with Russia then there is against Donald Trump. He says,
Speaker 1: I've been involved with this now for eighteen months. I
Speaker 1: have not seen a single bit of evidence of any
Speaker 1: collusion at all between the Trump campaign and Russia. He said,
Speaker 1: there's more of a possibility of the Russians being involved
Speaker 1: in the Hillary Clinton campaign. So many Russians have paid
Speaker 1: money to build Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. That begins
Speaker 1: to now begin to hit home doesn't it. By the way,
Speaker 1: nice of CNN to hire Homey's ex assistant. Unbelievable. Of
Speaker 1: course they want to be in the inner circle, don't
Speaker 1: that They also hired who do they Clapper? Who's the
Speaker 1: other guy? Clapper Um, the other intelligence as this guy
Speaker 1: I beens with a B no b B b um.
Speaker 1: I don't know he's involved in this stuff too. That's
Speaker 1: Allly Case said. Look, I know this gets hard and
Speaker 1: gets confusing because now we have the memo that came
Speaker 1: out on Friday, and we have a memo that came
Speaker 1: out today. Then we have four more memo, most at
Speaker 1: least coming from the House Intelligence Committee. Then We've got
Speaker 1: information of a new dossier today. And by the way,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's approval rating is holding steady at forty nine.
Speaker 1: And I've got to believe at the end of this,
Speaker 1: I want to know who's gonna go. Who's gonna go
Speaker 1: to the FISA judge, Judge Rudolph contraris is his name.
Speaker 1: Who's gonna go to him and ask him if he
Speaker 1: feels he was lied to her they purposely misrepresented uh
Speaker 1: to him in an attempt to get a FISA warrant.
Speaker 1: Because if I'm the judge in that case, I am
Speaker 1: one piste off judge. And you know what you don't
Speaker 1: want to do in life is piss off a judge.
Speaker 1: It's a bad idea. Yeah, and what about the Flynn recusal?
Speaker 1: It's another good point nine for one. Shaun is our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program, and uh, let's see. Oh, so we
Speaker 1: have Sarah Carter, She's got new information coming up at
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Then we'll check in with
Speaker 1: Sydney Fowell and Greg Arratic going to join us. We
Speaker 1: have an amazing Hannity tonight. Just keeping this information straight.
Speaker 1: As a full time job, all right, so we have
Speaker 1: the first memo Friday. Now we've got the Senate memo today.
Speaker 1: Democrats want their rebuttal memo released. I'm told it does
Speaker 1: nothing to justify the position that was taken. Other words,
Speaker 1: they don't they they can't even say, oh, we we
Speaker 1: told the court that it was funded by Hillary and
Speaker 1: by Democrats. Uh, they can't say that all it is
Speaker 1: is a footnote. Well, there might be a political tinge
Speaker 1: to that. And nobody has disputed the FBI saying that
Speaker 1: everything in the Republican memo is true. If they if
Speaker 1: they look, if they want, I say, go in redact
Speaker 1: things that need to be redacted about sources and methods,
Speaker 1: and then let the American people dig into it all themselves.
Speaker 1: You know, they say, well, Devin Newness didn't read it. Well,
Speaker 1: he wasn't the one that was appointed to read it.
Speaker 1: That was Tray Gouty, because he's a lawyer, a trained lawyer. Alright,
Speaker 1: One Shawn Sarah Carter has two articles out all of this.
Speaker 1: You'll break it down for us, including the Clinton connection. Right,
Speaker 1: Jared Sydney Powell joined us and the one and only
Speaker 1: Herschel Walker will check in with us today as we
Speaker 1: continue the Shawn Hannity Show. Glad you're with us one
Speaker 1: Shawn is our number. Well, the chairman is wrong. Now
Speaker 1: the chairman also hasn't read the underline materials. But for example,
Speaker 1: the argument that the Yahoo News article was circular reporting
Speaker 1: because it was based on something Christopher Steele said, that's
Speaker 1: not what the article was cited for. And if you
Speaker 1: read the application you would know that's not what the
Speaker 1: article was cited for. But the whole point here is
Speaker 1: not to be accurate. The point is to be misleading. Um.
Speaker 1: The Democrats didn't even get to read the memo until
Speaker 1: minutes before it was voted out to the House. If
Speaker 1: they were truly interested in getting to the truth, that's
Speaker 1: not the process that they would use. Instead, they used
Speaker 1: a vehicle that has never been used before in the
Speaker 1: history of the House to release this very one sided memorandum.
Speaker 1: Uh in terms of enemy Cabe, like the memorandum itself,
Speaker 1: they cherry picked selectively in what he said. Now, while
Speaker 1: I can't go into the specifics of his testimony, I
Speaker 1: can tell you what he said was you have to
Speaker 1: look at the five application as a cohesive whole. All
Speaker 1: the parts are important, and the suggestion that the chairman
Speaker 1: makes there and others on the committee had made also
Speaker 1: that the entire dossier was included in This is just
Speaker 1: playing false and the court was notified political actor was involved,
Speaker 1: and that's part of the misleading nature of the fives application. No,
Speaker 1: the only misleading part of all of this is what
Speaker 1: Adam Shift just said. Welcome back, glad you with us
Speaker 1: eight nine one. Shawn is at free telephone number. All right,
Speaker 1: So we have the House Intel memo which came out
Speaker 1: on Friday. Now we have the memorandum from the Senate
Speaker 1: and that would be Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham's memo,
Speaker 1: and that adds a lot of light to what we learned.
Speaker 1: Then we got this ten page rebuttal memo if you will,
Speaker 1: coming out of Adam Shift in company. What I have
Speaker 1: been told by people in the know, and I can
Speaker 1: confirm this now, is that when they talk about identifying
Speaker 1: to the five is a court specifically whether or not
Speaker 1: there were political actors, they totally downplayed it. The FBI
Speaker 1: knew at the time that the people paying for this
Speaker 1: or Hillary Clinton and the d n C, and they
Speaker 1: only added a minor footnote that there may have been
Speaker 1: some political actors involved, but they knew otherwise, they knew
Speaker 1: who the actors were. It's it's beyond deceptive, along with
Speaker 1: everything else. All right, here to a basically go over
Speaker 1: all of this these new developments with a Sarah Carter, Uh, Sarah,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the program. So now we have another memo,
Speaker 1: this one from the Senate. I've been reading it with
Speaker 1: a fine tooth comb. There's a lot of redacted material
Speaker 1: in here, but it does raise a lot of new
Speaker 1: information for us. What is your take? It raises significant information, Sean,
Speaker 1: because what it states is that there was this other
Speaker 1: dossier floating around, other information within the State Department, that
Speaker 1: persons in the State Department we're actually involved in collecting
Speaker 1: politically motivated information on President Trump then you know, and
Speaker 1: the campaign, uh, and then President elect Trump. So here
Speaker 1: you have another set another set of information pouring in
Speaker 1: to the State Department then being funneled back to Christopher
Speaker 1: Steel from members closely associated with Hillary Clinton. What I
Speaker 1: can tell you is this, it is true. Cody Sheer,
Speaker 1: I have been able to confirm he was a former
Speaker 1: journalist who went to work for the Clinton's in the nineties.
Speaker 1: He is very partisan was involved in this. What's even
Speaker 1: more interesting is that Jonathan Winner, who is with the
Speaker 1: Libya Desk at the State Department, and this is important.
Speaker 1: He's on the Libya desk, he still works there right now,
Speaker 1: was also involved and connected to Christopher Steele and the
Speaker 1: State Department during this information overload. I don't know if
Speaker 1: you remember, but I recently wrote a story on Sydney
Speaker 1: Blumenthal and remember, ah, yeah, so I wrote a story
Speaker 1: about Sydney Bluementhal and how Sydney Bluementhal was connected to
Speaker 1: the dossier. When you look at this and talking to
Speaker 1: the sources that I've been speaking with, Jonathan Winner on
Speaker 1: the Libya Desk, Sydney Bluementhal sending emails to Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: and being actually asked by then Secretary of State Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton very intense and very poignant questions on Libya. He
Speaker 1: was directly involved in Libya. Also, then you have Christopher Steele,
Speaker 1: the Western Intelligence official. Now a lot of people speculate,
Speaker 1: and we haven't been able to prove this yet, that
Speaker 1: the Western intelligence official in a lot of the emails
Speaker 1: that Hillary Clinton actually got from Sydney Bluementhal, was that
Speaker 1: he was actually referring to Christopher Steel. So now we
Speaker 1: see all of these connections and all of these players
Speaker 1: involved in the same purpose, which appears to be a
Speaker 1: very partisan and a very direct attack on what they
Speaker 1: thought then was the incoming you know, president of the
Speaker 1: United States, President Trump, and they went after him prior
Speaker 1: to the election and even after the election by members
Speaker 1: of the Obana. By the way, as if you go
Speaker 1: to the Grassley memo and we'll put all of this
Speaker 1: up on the screen tonight, it actually says talking about
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele, hired by Fusion GPS, and his purpose to
Speaker 1: gather information about the links between Russia and then presidential
Speaker 1: candidate Donald Trump. You know, this is when we get
Speaker 1: into the hookers and all these other ridiculous stories. Again,
Speaker 1: none of this was verified, as was in the House
Speaker 1: Intelligence memo that came out on Friday. But then it
Speaker 1: goes on to say, and they've got new information that
Speaker 1: Steele gathered much of his information which we already knew,
Speaker 1: but to put emphasis on this from Russian government sources
Speaker 1: inside of Russia. So in other words, it's really Hillary
Speaker 1: and the d n C paying Fusion GPS, paying Steele
Speaker 1: to get Russian government sources to influence the election and
Speaker 1: at least misinformed the American people, and then it gets
Speaker 1: used to get the FIS warrant. That's correct. And so
Speaker 1: when you look at the evidence on its face, and
Speaker 1: this goes back to them trying to find collusion between
Speaker 1: Trump and Russia. There was no evidence. And yet they
Speaker 1: have not been able to show one small bit of
Speaker 1: surmountable evidence of any connection between a collusion between Trump
Speaker 1: and Russia. But here you have overwhelming evidence that they
Speaker 1: used the Russians to build a dossier against President Trump
Speaker 1: and his campaign. So the evidence is overwhelmed. Why do
Speaker 1: you call it a second dossier or a second memo?
Speaker 1: Because what it was was a second memo apparently put
Speaker 1: together by Cody Sheer based on foreign intelligence sources which
Speaker 1: people believed to be Russian and foreign Western intelligence. Was
Speaker 1: this also given to the FISA court, was also given
Speaker 1: to the FISER court to get the warrant or we
Speaker 1: don't know that yet. That's what we don't know yet.
Speaker 1: We don't know yet. What we do know is that
Speaker 1: the second dossier was certainly leaked parts of that dossier
Speaker 1: to the media. So remember this, This is the reason
Speaker 1: why Senator Grassley is so up in arms over Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele and sent a criminal referral because Christopher Steele, while
Speaker 1: he was working apparently with the FBI and giving the
Speaker 1: FBI information that was in his dossier, was also leaking
Speaker 1: to the media and this was the disinformation campaign. Now,
Speaker 1: the FBI then decided not to pay him. According to
Speaker 1: my sources, they were getting ready to pay him over
Speaker 1: fifty dollars for his information, but then they found out
Speaker 1: he was leaking. That was in the House Intel memo.
Speaker 1: Let me go to another part of this. There was
Speaker 1: substantial evidence, this is in the Grassley memo, that Steele
Speaker 1: materially misled the FBI about a key aspect of his
Speaker 1: dossier efforts, one which bears on his credibility. So you know,
Speaker 1: the FBI knew all of these connections, they knew where
Speaker 1: the money was coming from. And go back to the first,
Speaker 1: the first FISA warrant attempt when they used the original dossier,
Speaker 1: that they purposely didn't tell the court in spite of
Speaker 1: what the tent page memo suggests. They just put a
Speaker 1: footnote because they know that they never mentioned this was
Speaker 1: paid for, bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton. They
Speaker 1: just said as a disclosed which should have been had
Speaker 1: to be disclosed. Yea. And what about what McCabe and
Speaker 1: what McCabe said, Apparently I've had five people corroborate is
Speaker 1: that McCabe did say we wouldn't have even sought the
Speaker 1: FISA warrant without the dossier, that is correct. I have
Speaker 1: spoken to sources as well who have emphatically stated that
Speaker 1: during the closed door hearing, and maybe we'll get an
Speaker 1: opportunity to see this, maybe we will get to see
Speaker 1: the testimony of McCabe that during that closed door hearing,
Speaker 1: cabe was specifically asked about the Steel Dossier and the
Speaker 1: use of the Steel Dossier in order to obtain the
Speaker 1: FISA warrant, and he made it very clear that without
Speaker 1: the Steal dossier they would have not been able to
Speaker 1: obtain the Let's go back to Charles grass Les memo
Speaker 1: which came out today and it talks about the new
Speaker 1: information obtained by the committee witness interviews and the course
Speaker 1: of their investigation indicated that Mr Steele provided dossier information
Speaker 1: to quote numerous media organizations prior to the the attempt
Speaker 1: to get the visor warrant, and in Steel sworn court
Speaker 1: filings and litigation in London. He admitted that he gave
Speaker 1: off the record briefings to a small number of journalists
Speaker 1: about the pre election memoranda UH. In other words, in
Speaker 1: a sworn filing, he stated that journalists from the New
Speaker 1: York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, Michael Lizza Coop
Speaker 1: which his article was leaked by Steele. That becomes a
Speaker 1: part of, you know, the original attempt to get or
Speaker 1: the second attempt to get the visor UH warrant against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Um. They were all briefed about all of this,
Speaker 1: and we learned in testimony from Glenn Simpson. Let's not
Speaker 1: forget that he was coordinating getting this information out with Steele.
Speaker 1: He was coordinating with the Clinton campaign to advance their propaganda. Well,
Speaker 1: and that's what that is exactly what Glenn Simpson has
Speaker 1: done in the past. Remember Glenn Simpson, and a lot
Speaker 1: of people forget this, but Glenn Simpson was working actually
Speaker 1: with the Russians Prebazon Holdings and others, was working with
Speaker 1: the Russians in order to fight against the US law,
Speaker 1: the Magnitsky Act. So in effect, this is something that's
Speaker 1: a pattern for Glenn Simpson. He would leak stories to
Speaker 1: his friends in the press. He would try to send
Speaker 1: out disinformation to change the way people fell, to sway
Speaker 1: public opinion on specific issues. One that I just brought
Speaker 1: up the Magnitsky Act, which was the ire This is,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is but there's two levels of deception here.
Speaker 1: Level of deception. One is it is Hillary Clinton bought
Speaker 1: and fade for but it's hidden through oh, fusion GPS,
Speaker 1: hidden through quote the law firm. Oh they didn't pay
Speaker 1: steal after all, Then let's not mention to the FISA
Speaker 1: quarters really paying for all this. And then the next
Speaker 1: level of Steel is trying to take his phony Russian
Speaker 1: lies to manipulate the minds of the American people to
Speaker 1: rig that election. And then on top of it, then
Speaker 1: it's used to spy an opposition candidate in an election year.
Speaker 1: This is getting scary. It's getting very scary. And you
Speaker 1: can see Steele's extraordinary bias in the memo. I mean,
Speaker 1: he told Bruce or that he did not want to
Speaker 1: see President Trump elected. So Christopher Steel himself was extraordinarily biased.
Speaker 1: He was not looking for information as an unbiased intelligence
Speaker 1: officer just collecting data. He was looking for whatever he
Speaker 1: could get his hands on to implicate Trump in in
Speaker 1: in the most outrageous story. Here's one other thing right now,
Speaker 1: as far as the president, in the grass Lely memo memorandum,
Speaker 1: the new one, Mr Steele admitted he received and included
Speaker 1: in it unsolicited and unverified allegations. I mean, so he's
Speaker 1: admitting he's he's just basically I'll just make it up
Speaker 1: and put it out there, or he's admitting he's just
Speaker 1: taking disinformation from the Russian and he doesn't care. As
Speaker 1: he said, he had a political agenda that he wanted
Speaker 1: to fulfill and that was not sound like a good
Speaker 1: intelligence officer. To me, that sounds like a political operative.
Speaker 1: It sounds like a paid for political hack hit man.
Speaker 1: Absolutely all right, one Shawn told free telephone number. As
Speaker 1: we continue to unpeel this onion, it's getting more bizarre
Speaker 1: by the day. We've got Greg Jarrett, Sydney Powell coming
Speaker 1: up at the bottom of the hour, will have all
Speaker 1: of this on Hannity tonight. Nobody else in the media
Speaker 1: is reporting what we have today. I've been watching all day.
Speaker 1: Nobody has it. Nobody knows what's in the Democratic tempage
Speaker 1: nonsense response. Nobody, nobody seems even want to care about
Speaker 1: these these blockbuster developments inside of the Grassle memorandum, a
Speaker 1: second dossier. All right, we'll get to all of this.
Speaker 1: Sean is our number, and as we continue with Sarah Carter,
Speaker 1: Fox News Investigative reporter. Okay, so now we have the
Speaker 1: second memos coming out, and then we've got the Democrats.
Speaker 1: They're they're dying to push out their rebuttal memo to
Speaker 1: the Newness memo, but I've already got enough briefing on
Speaker 1: it that there's no they're there at all and they
Speaker 1: cannot refute either, McCabe saying, well, we wouldn't have had
Speaker 1: the FISA warrant without the dossier. Now we have from
Speaker 1: the Grassley memo. Oh yeah, they knew that, even Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele knew that the dossier was unverified. And also, which
Speaker 1: I think is a very important point, Um, they knew
Speaker 1: when they went to the FISA court that in fact,
Speaker 1: Hillary was the source of all of this funding source
Speaker 1: and they never told the court that. Well, and they're
Speaker 1: going to continue to try to parseward words and um
Speaker 1: push at their agenda despite the facts. But I think
Speaker 1: as long as the American public gets the facts, they
Speaker 1: won't be able to overcome it. I'll give you one example.
Speaker 1: You know, Representative Adam Schiff has been out there in
Speaker 1: the media. You played a clip of it saying that
Speaker 1: the Chairman Chairman Nunia has never bothered to go read
Speaker 1: the underlying materials. He says it over and over again.
Speaker 1: It becomes a talking point of the Democrats. What they
Speaker 1: failed to tell the American public was that in the
Speaker 1: January twenty letter um the Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd
Speaker 1: specifically states that only two people, two ranking members of
Speaker 1: the committee, were allowed to see the five application documents.
Speaker 1: The committee decided to let Trey Goudy review all of
Speaker 1: the documents because he has a legal background and is
Speaker 1: able to discern what's in those PHIS applications and shift
Speaker 1: with the other member. Each member was allowed to bring
Speaker 1: only two people with them to conduct this review, so
Speaker 1: nobody else was allowed to review these documents. And remember,
Speaker 1: they spent nearly a year fighting the Department of john
Speaker 1: and then they fought to the last minute. Rod rosensteained
Speaker 1: begging not to release them. What do we know about
Speaker 1: Judge Rodolphe Contreras. Yes, and I mean, look, we need
Speaker 1: to hear from the five s that judge. We can't
Speaker 1: make assumptions because looking at from what we're reading in
Speaker 1: the memo, in the memo itself, we are under the
Speaker 1: impression based on what the committee has said, that the
Speaker 1: judge was not well informed. So we don't know. And remember, Sean,
Speaker 1: a lot of these five applications, because they are so
Speaker 1: detailed and they require so much work, are automatically just
Speaker 1: given a green light. I gotta let you go. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: we just we have so much to get to. Uh.
Speaker 1: Sarah will join us tonight on Hannity on the Fox
Speaker 1: News Channel. I can't believe the media is ignoring what
Speaker 1: is now another bombshell memo. They just kind of trying
Speaker 1: to ignore it because it wasn't publicized the way the
Speaker 1: House Intel one was all right, we'll take a break,
Speaker 1: we'll come back one. Shawn Sydney Powell, Greg Jarrett will
Speaker 1: get there. Take next and then yeah, football legend herschel
Speaker 1: Walker is going to join us. Looking forward to that
Speaker 1: straight ahead. Jeffrey, you've read the memo. What do you
Speaker 1: think it might the FBI be in trouble. No. I
Speaker 1: think this is an absolute disgrace. I think this is
Speaker 1: a dark day in American history. This is an embarrassment
Speaker 1: the Republican Party and it's and the enablers of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party, basically with President Hannity over at Fox News
Speaker 1: hyped this thing into the sky. The first rule of
Speaker 1: politics is always under promise, over deliver. They turned this
Speaker 1: into something where they had people believing that today you
Speaker 1: would see Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Jim Comey, Susan Rice
Speaker 1: marched off in handcuffs, and instead you've got people laughing
Speaker 1: at at at Devin na Is like he's Tommy Wise. Oh,
Speaker 1: this is an absurdity. This thing is is the weakest
Speaker 1: sauce I could have imagined for those of us at
Speaker 1: a certain age. And we remember the big nothing burger
Speaker 1: of Horaldo and al Capone Safe, and so this memo
Speaker 1: is like al Capounds Safe and Hiralgo. It's a big nothing.
Speaker 1: I think that would go beyond what what what Jeffrey
Speaker 1: just said, and I think I mean it's it's pretty
Speaker 1: much a dud. I mean, Sean Hannity on Fox News
Speaker 1: has been sort of uh flogging this idea that this
Speaker 1: document was going to be bigger than water deg This
Speaker 1: is not the destroy Trump, Hate Trump liberal left wing
Speaker 1: group think media, glad you're with us. Right down our
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number. It's eight nine for one, Shawn,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: I know this gets complicated. It's really simple, but it
Speaker 1: gets complicated on some levels. It sounds complicated. And then
Speaker 1: you've got everybody in the media wanting to, you know,
Speaker 1: muddy the waters and come up the waters a little bit.
Speaker 1: You know. The the level of fury that exists in
Speaker 1: the media towards people like myself and others that were
Speaker 1: in the forefront of breaking these stories. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: like they're dripping anger, hoping one thing we get wrong.
Speaker 1: They've been wrong for an entire year, pushing a phony
Speaker 1: narrative with no evidence, and now we've got not one memo. Well,
Speaker 1: now today we have a second memo, and we find
Speaker 1: out there's a second dossier, if you will, you know,
Speaker 1: we got a House memorandum came out Friday, we got
Speaker 1: the Senate memorandum came out today, which we just went
Speaker 1: through with Sarah Carter. And then we find out that
Speaker 1: there really was a second dossier. In other words, dossier
Speaker 1: author Steele wrote an anti Trump memo that was fed
Speaker 1: Now we've got Clinton connections involved in in all of this,
Speaker 1: you know, as as Sarah just laid out here from
Speaker 1: this guy Jonathan Winners and and said, vicious Blumenthal is
Speaker 1: back in the mix. I've known for some time now
Speaker 1: that he he he has his fingerprints over this and
Speaker 1: it's never pretty. Not a nice human being. And uh
Speaker 1: so we're in that aspect in in all of this.
Speaker 1: And Adam Schiff and all these Democrats are lying. They
Speaker 1: went on TV from Friday on out all weekend long saying, well,
Speaker 1: because of course we told the there was a political connection.
Speaker 1: Now the FBI knew Clinton bought and paid for it.
Speaker 1: They knew it, and a footnote at the end of
Speaker 1: the application that well, there may be a little political
Speaker 1: taint to some of this, just so the court knows. No,
Speaker 1: that's not the same as saying Hillary Clinton, the other
Speaker 1: candidate and the d n C paid for the entire thing,
Speaker 1: and then it's didn't. They didn't say it was unverified either,
Speaker 1: and they used all of it for McCabe to say
Speaker 1: that there is no warrant without the dossier. You can say, no,
Speaker 1: we don't know the mind of the judge, but the
Speaker 1: judge certainly had to be impacted by it, because otherwise,
Speaker 1: how can you say, no dossier, no FISA warrant, And
Speaker 1: that's fired Deputy FBI Director McCabe, And it's it's it
Speaker 1: seems like a lot to take in. You know, I
Speaker 1: have so many friends in the FBI. I want to
Speaker 1: address them. You know, I remember, as a Catholic when
Speaker 1: the whole church Mala station scandal was coming out, I
Speaker 1: was just disgusted. And I'll be honest, I I I'm
Speaker 1: I consider myself a Christian. I believe in the Catholic Mass.
Speaker 1: You know, there is evil waiting like all around us.
Speaker 1: Every single day evil happens. And the fact that it
Speaker 1: went so high up in the hierarchy that it institutionally
Speaker 1: became a massive cover up and I couldn't go back.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean I've met some wonderful priests in my life,
Speaker 1: people that really have dedicated their lives to God, much
Speaker 1: better people than I can ever be in life. They're
Speaker 1: wonderful people. They shouldn't be tainted by the actions of
Speaker 1: a few, or actions of maybe even many. This is
Speaker 1: in no way, in my mind, is my impression of
Speaker 1: special agents and FBI. I've always admired them. I come
Speaker 1: from a home of law enforcement. My mom was a
Speaker 1: prison guard. For crying out loud, that's pretty law enforcement ish,
Speaker 1: you know. My dad worked in family court as the
Speaker 1: in probation. I loved the police. I nearly became a
Speaker 1: cop myself. I've never I rarely talked about I was.
Speaker 1: I took the NYPD test, then I took the physical.
Speaker 1: Somehow I even passed the psychological and I was appointed
Speaker 1: to the academy. But about a week before I said,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure I want to do this yet. I
Speaker 1: was working my way in and out of college. I
Speaker 1: was kind of lost at that point in my life,
Speaker 1: not sure what I wanted to do. I had no
Speaker 1: idea i'd ever get into radio. I just knew at
Speaker 1: that point I love radio, but I had no thought
Speaker 1: that I'd ever get into it. I love these guys,
Speaker 1: and the FBI had cousins in the FBI at a
Speaker 1: number of cousins. A matter of fact, you'd see these
Speaker 1: cousins and they never look the same on any given day.
Speaker 1: They'd have beards, they'd had they'd be dressed like bums.
Speaker 1: I mean, you'd never think these are special agents. But
Speaker 1: these guys all put their lives on the line to
Speaker 1: make our community safer, and they're they're dealing with the
Speaker 1: worst of the worst. They're dealing with the mob, they're
Speaker 1: dealing with drug dealers, they're dealing with terrorists, They're dealing
Speaker 1: with the worst of the worst. I'm not one of
Speaker 1: these broad brush people. But with that said, when you
Speaker 1: have the highest level of people and we can count them,
Speaker 1: it's probably at most a dozen fifteen people involved. That
Speaker 1: doesn't represent the FBI, that doesn't represent the Department of Justice. Fully,
Speaker 1: that's not representative of the intelligence community and those that
Speaker 1: respect and honor the powerful tools of intelligence we give them.
Speaker 1: In this case, you had people that had a political agenda.
Speaker 1: We're so high up the chain, thought that they could
Speaker 1: influence a U S election because they thought they knew better.
Speaker 1: And their arrogance is spectacular to me. And then the
Speaker 1: threats that well, they'll get you six ways in Sunday,
Speaker 1: and oh, we'll win. Don't worry, we'll win. We've been
Speaker 1: around longer than Donald Trump. What does that mean the
Speaker 1: FBI wins? Is this a fight? Is this a contest?
Speaker 1: Is this a sporting event for you? It's about the
Speaker 1: Constitution and the presidency all right, let's get to our
Speaker 1: busy telephones here as we say hi to Della Is
Speaker 1: in Oklahoma. Dela, Hi, how are you? Glad you called?
Speaker 1: Thanks for taking my caution on. How are you doing?
Speaker 1: I'm great? How are you? It's very well. I got
Speaker 1: a question about Christopher Steele. Okay, I'm listening. Okay, everybody's
Speaker 1: making a big deal about the comments that was in
Speaker 1: quotes that he was desperate that Trump not be elected
Speaker 1: and passionate about him not becoming the president. The Steel
Speaker 1: isn't even a US citizen and he's a brit Why
Speaker 1: was it so important to him personally that Trump not
Speaker 1: be elected? Well, one day maybe we'll get the answer
Speaker 1: to that, but we do know this. I mean, he
Speaker 1: was pretty passionate about remember he said he was he
Speaker 1: was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected, and he
Speaker 1: was passionate about him not being president. That's why, you know.
Speaker 1: For for all of his unverified, salacious information, unproven some up,
Speaker 1: many much of which proven false, bought and paid for
Speaker 1: by the Hillary campaign, fed to a corrupt news media,
Speaker 1: and nobody's asking questions, then used as the basis to
Speaker 1: get a warrant to spy on a campaign and a
Speaker 1: president elect, and then it keeps getting reauthorized. I'd like
Speaker 1: to know why they reauthorized that Carter page was it
Speaker 1: wasn't even a part of the Trump campaign at this time, exactly,
Speaker 1: you know I and I'm telling you what it is
Speaker 1: when we get to the bottom of this, that we
Speaker 1: are gonna see a coordinated effort of some people that
Speaker 1: thought they knew better and thought they they had whatever
Speaker 1: some superior knowledge, and that they knew better than the
Speaker 1: American people on who they wanted to be president, and
Speaker 1: they worked on that person's behalf. Similarly, you know when
Speaker 1: when you give Hillary Clinton a pass for known felonies
Speaker 1: mishandling classified information, destroying classified information, destroying subpoena documents and emails, uh,
Speaker 1: and going so far obstructing justice by a bleach bit,
Speaker 1: acid wash, busting apart hard drives and and or or
Speaker 1: devices and blackberries. Let me tell you something, that's a
Speaker 1: lot of effort to obstruct justice there and if any
Speaker 1: of us did any of these things, we would be
Speaker 1: put in jail and we probably never get out anyway.
Speaker 1: Good called Della, thank you. Uh. Let's say hi to
Speaker 1: Jack is in New Joysey. What's happening, Jack? How are you,
Speaker 1: my brother? Hey Sean? Thanks him. This this ficy court.
Speaker 1: This is the United States of America. This is not
Speaker 1: a Banana Republic. And why aren't these judges coming forward
Speaker 1: and clear this thing up right now? This culfortability obviously
Speaker 1: at the highest levels of our government. Uh, this is
Speaker 1: a constitutional issue for god six, Why is on the
Speaker 1: Fiser courts stepping forward and straighten this thing out? Well?
Speaker 1: The Fiser courts by their very design, And this was
Speaker 1: the fear of Rampaul and a lot of people. We
Speaker 1: now know the identity of the Visor judge. We know
Speaker 1: a little bit about him. His name is Judge Rudolph
Speaker 1: Kntreris is his name. And Uh, anyway, he's responsible for
Speaker 1: issuing the Fiser warrant. And he was appointed to the
Speaker 1: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by Chief Justice Roberts in the
Speaker 1: midst of the election. He was sworn in May nine,
Speaker 1: and he would go on to issue the authorization to
Speaker 1: spy on Carter Page. And the Page wasn't a part
Speaker 1: of the Trump campaign at that point, and I don't
Speaker 1: think he was ever paid by the campaign. Um, I'd
Speaker 1: like to hear. I'd like to hear from the guy.
Speaker 1: I think I think he was like to, I think
Speaker 1: it was purposely mid misled and that's a crime. If
Speaker 1: that's the case, Shawn, Okay, then there culpability at the
Speaker 1: highest levels of our government and they need to pay
Speaker 1: the price. I cannot disagree with you one bit. And
Speaker 1: the thing is is, you know, you watch the media.
Speaker 1: They're now so angry at me for being right. They
Speaker 1: can't stand that they were wrong, that there never was
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion. But it's the biggest story in their lifetime,
Speaker 1: and it's right before their very eyes if they just
Speaker 1: opened them. But in fact, you know, the media is
Speaker 1: now so corrupt that they are nothing but an extension
Speaker 1: but the radical left wing Democratic Party's agenda. Truth doesn't
Speaker 1: matter anymore. Media is dead, It's very Journalism is dead.
Speaker 1: There are a few remaining people out there. And how
Speaker 1: ironic we do more journalism on this show and on
Speaker 1: Hannity of the TV Show than these people ever dreamed of.
Speaker 1: All they do is live in an echo chamber and
Speaker 1: regurgitate back to each other the same talking points. It's
Speaker 1: pretty weak, al right. Eight nine one, Shawn Tolfrey telephone
Speaker 1: number right back to our phones. Chris is in Alabama,
Speaker 1: what's up, Chris? How are you well? Mr Hannityum, thank
Speaker 1: you for taking my call. I was curious. I've been
Speaker 1: in the army for twenty four years in a fairly
Speaker 1: strong conservative and I'm having a hard time understanding what's
Speaker 1: the big deal about the fights and memo really is.
Speaker 1: I've gone through when I've read it, Okay, it just
Speaker 1: seems like it's more information that's been Let me give
Speaker 1: you the you want me to give you the Well,
Speaker 1: it's not propaganda is because I even know it's in
Speaker 1: the tempage memo that's supposed to come out. I have
Speaker 1: my sources, which I'll never reveal. But if if you
Speaker 1: have an application for a FISA warrant and in part
Speaker 1: the information is based on a bought and paid for
Speaker 1: opposition party dossier, a dossier that was never verified, and
Speaker 1: you're not telling the court that key information. Now, let's
Speaker 1: let's let's let's make this attempt at a warrant again.
Speaker 1: It's you, and let's say that your worst enemy in
Speaker 1: the entire world is funding opposition research that's full of
Speaker 1: salacious lies about you. And then that information is brought
Speaker 1: to a court but they never say where the funding
Speaker 1: for that for that opposition research comes from. They never
Speaker 1: say to the judge that it isn't verified either. You're
Speaker 1: gonna tell me you think that's fair? Is that the
Speaker 1: United States of America to you? Oh, absolutely not. I
Speaker 1: guess so there's the information that's it. I realized that.
Speaker 1: But my issue is that it appears from this memo
Speaker 1: that they haven't really put out where their sources are.
Speaker 1: They haven't really said where they're getting this proof. To me,
Speaker 1: it just seems like they just rum Actually the proof well,
Speaker 1: you know, the point is, it's like unpeeling layers of
Speaker 1: an onion. But anyway, in the initial application, remember this
Speaker 1: was a summary. Remember I've also said this is only
Speaker 1: ten cent of what's coming. But in the initial application
Speaker 1: or any of the renewals, did they ever disclosed the
Speaker 1: role of the d n C funding Clinton campaignund funding
Speaker 1: opposition research. They never disclosed that it was never verified.
Speaker 1: And by the way, even Glenn Simpson said it wasn't
Speaker 1: verified himself when he went before the Senate Select Committee
Speaker 1: on Intelligence. He said he didn't know. He never looked
Speaker 1: into the verification of veracity of it. And it turns
Speaker 1: out that it's full of Russian lies because we know that,
Speaker 1: in fact, Christopher Steele uses Russian sources for everything. So
Speaker 1: basically basically comes down to this. Hillary Clinton's twelve million
Speaker 1: dollars with the d n C that she's controlling funnels
Speaker 1: to this money through a law firm hiring Fusion GPS,
Speaker 1: hiring Christopher Steele. Christopher Steele has an agenda. We have
Speaker 1: unverified information making its way into a FISA court and
Speaker 1: being presented before a judge, and it's all being done
Speaker 1: to spy on an opposition candidate in an election year
Speaker 1: and then undermine an incoming president. This goes to the
Speaker 1: highest levels of power in our country. You know, the
Speaker 1: elections are supposed to be about eve the people. It's
Speaker 1: not supposed to be about the few chosen hierarchy that
Speaker 1: think they know better than us. Okay, thank you very much.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. Very welcome. I bust you alright, quick
Speaker 1: break right back. We'll continue a lot more coming up
Speaker 1: on the other side. This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: They think there are grounds for a second Special Counsel,
Speaker 1: because I don't. I'm not a big fan of special council,
Speaker 1: but I see no other remedy. And that's why six
Speaker 1: months ago Mark Meadows, myself and several others we called
Speaker 1: for a second special counsel. Then I think now more
Speaker 1: than ever it is certainly warranted. The one thing I
Speaker 1: always say, though, is don't have to be someone from
Speaker 1: Washington like Muller and his team all the Washington insiders
Speaker 1: have it be a judge of retired federal judge from
Speaker 1: somewhere in the middle of the country, some somewhere outside
Speaker 1: the swamp. Haven't put together a team, then go do
Speaker 1: the investigation, and then whatever conclusion they reached. I think
Speaker 1: there's a much better chance that the American people will
Speaker 1: accept that conclusion if it's someone from d C. If
Speaker 1: it's Mueller who tries to expand, I think that's a problem.
Speaker 1: If it's if it's Attorney General Sessions who's recue used himself,
Speaker 1: I think that's a problem. So I see no other
Speaker 1: remedy but his second special counsel. I never felt that
Speaker 1: I was involved in something nefarious the whole way through,
Speaker 1: from the beginning to the end. So you can understand
Speaker 1: the frustration of the President when he's told he's not
Speaker 1: an investigation. I think you know the story of Andrew
Speaker 1: McCabe that walked into my office, shut my door and
Speaker 1: basically told me that the New York Times story that
Speaker 1: was in the paper that first came out in February
Speaker 1: that said there are constant, constant contacts between the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign and the Russians. With the door closed, looked at
Speaker 1: me and said, I want you to know that this
Speaker 1: story right here is total b s. It's overstated and
Speaker 1: it's not true. This is the deputy director of the FB.
Speaker 1: I didn't know who he was. It's the middle of February,
Speaker 1: and so everyone's in the everyone's in this world where
Speaker 1: we're being told one thing and sort of operating in
Speaker 1: this other world of constant of Russian by the media.
Speaker 1: Congressman Gaudy said, they now have concerns about the State Department.
Speaker 1: Do you serve there until recently? Do you know what
Speaker 1: he's talking about? I don't. I look forward to to
Speaker 1: hearing what he's talking about. I will tell you, though, Margaret,
Speaker 1: that during the Ukraine crisis in two thousand, fourteen and fifteen,
Speaker 1: Chris Steele had a number of commercial clients who were
Speaker 1: asking him for reports on what was going on in Russia,
Speaker 1: what was going on in Ukraine, what was going on
Speaker 1: between them. Chris had a friend at the State Department,
Speaker 1: and he offered us that reporting free so that we
Speaker 1: could also benefit from it. It was one of you know,
Speaker 1: hundreds of sources that we were using to try to
Speaker 1: understand what was going on. Uh. Then in the middle
Speaker 1: of July, when he was doing this other work and
Speaker 1: became concerned the dossier, the dossier, he passed UH two
Speaker 1: to four pages of short points of what he was finding,
Speaker 1: and our immediate reaction to that was, this is not
Speaker 1: in our ProView, This needs to go to the SBI.
Speaker 1: A lot of breaking news today, YEAD. The dossier author
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele, wrote another anti Trump memo that he was
Speaker 1: feeding to the gullible in the news media and in
Speaker 1: fact was fed in fed information by Clinton connected contacts,
Speaker 1: which Sarah Carter just laid out UH in the last
Speaker 1: half hour of this program. Here so understand, we have
Speaker 1: the first memo that came out on Friday, This is
Speaker 1: the memo from the House Intelligence Committee, and with it,
Speaker 1: while we learned a lot of information that is extremely troubling,
Speaker 1: not the least of which is that to obtain this
Speaker 1: FISA warrant that it was never disclosed to the FISA
Speaker 1: judge in this particular case, that there was Clinton d
Speaker 1: n C funding or any party campaign funding involved in
Speaker 1: Steele's efforts. And what they thought they cleverly did is
Speaker 1: they put in there as apparently as a footnote in
Speaker 1: the FISA application, Oh, there might be some political connection
Speaker 1: of some kind. No, they knew. The FBI absolutely knew
Speaker 1: at the time that, in fact this was funded by
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton and the d n C. Matter of fact,
Speaker 1: twelve million dollars worth of funding, so they had a
Speaker 1: lot of funding. And don't forget that Glenn Simpson, you know,
Speaker 1: mentioned and this was before the House Intel Committee when
Speaker 1: he testified that he was trying to coordinate getting this
Speaker 1: unfverified information out to the news media anyway he can.
Speaker 1: Now we have a second memo that actually describes in detail.
Speaker 1: This is the Grassley memo that came out this morning,
Speaker 1: describes in detail how Christopher Steele was pushing this to
Speaker 1: everybody in the media on behalf of Clinton. And we
Speaker 1: can't forget that he has a big anti Trump bias.
Speaker 1: He was quote desperate that Donald Trump not get elected,
Speaker 1: was passionate about him not being president. And on top
Speaker 1: of this, then we also have the issue and the
Speaker 1: problems of the FBI knowing that this was only in
Speaker 1: its infancy in terms of being verified. Well, that's a
Speaker 1: big problem. And then or you got you know, in
Speaker 1: the case of Bruce Or Deputy Senior d o J
Speaker 1: official worked closely with Sally Yates and later Rosenstein, and
Speaker 1: shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing or documenting
Speaker 1: his communications with Steele, and Steele admitted to or his
Speaker 1: feelings about the president which were very negative. And during
Speaker 1: the same time period, Or his wife was employed by
Speaker 1: Fusion Gps and she was active in assisting and cultivating
Speaker 1: the research that nobody verified that was then used for
Speaker 1: a FISA warrant against Well then a candidate Trump and
Speaker 1: later an incoming administration. And according to the head of
Speaker 1: the FBI's Counterintelligence Division, the corroboration of the Steel dossier
Speaker 1: was in its infancy, so they never had verified it.
Speaker 1: So they're giving a court something that's not verified. They're
Speaker 1: not telling the court who's paying for it. They did
Speaker 1: pay for it different levels layers deep. Yeah, Clinton and
Speaker 1: the d n C paid for it, but then they
Speaker 1: paid Fusion GPS that hired Christopher Steele, and they funneled
Speaker 1: the money through a law firm. Both the d n
Speaker 1: C and Hillary's campaign using the same law firm. I
Speaker 1: know this gets a little bit complicated, but it's not.
Speaker 1: But the corruption is pretty clear for everybody to see.
Speaker 1: The deception before a fight as a judge is breathtaking,
Speaker 1: to be honest, and at some point I got to
Speaker 1: imagine this judge is gonna come out, and this judge
Speaker 1: is gonna be pretty piste off on a lot of levels.
Speaker 1: Joining us now with their reaction, we have Greg Jarrett,
Speaker 1: Fox News legal analyst and Sydney Powell, federal appellate attorney,
Speaker 1: former federal prosecutor, author of the book License to Lie,
Speaker 1: Exposing corruption in the Department of Justice. I want to
Speaker 1: set one thing straight. I talked to an FBI buddy
Speaker 1: of mine, a special agent friend of mine, this weekend,
Speaker 1: and I said, what's the feeling among the rank and file?
Speaker 1: Remember this case was taken away from rank and file.
Speaker 1: The Hillary email service can remember it was given special
Speaker 1: a special category, and then they wrote the exhoneration before
Speaker 1: the investigation. I said, did you ever know a case
Speaker 1: for that happens? And he laughed at me. He's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're serious. You know, really, that's not how things were,
Speaker 1: and even said, we don't know up until the last
Speaker 1: person we interview. Last person we interview may open up
Speaker 1: a whole new you know, area of investigation. You don't
Speaker 1: write an exoneration before investigation. Said, um, we're hitting you know,
Speaker 1: people like Comey and Rosenstein and these people really hard
Speaker 1: because I think what they did is is to basically
Speaker 1: try to influence an election in a major way and
Speaker 1: really undermine our democratic system. And he goes The sad
Speaker 1: part for him and his fellow agents is that, you know,
Speaker 1: they have such great honor and integrity within the FBI.
Speaker 1: They love their jobs. And they said, no, this is
Speaker 1: gonna hurt our agency because of the actions of a few.
Speaker 1: And I said, in terms of the minds of the
Speaker 1: American people, I said, no, that wouldn't be fair. You know,
Speaker 1: you have one bad priest or one bad preacher or
Speaker 1: one bad cop. Doesn't make all cops, preachers and pastors bad.
Speaker 1: I said, we have a few bad actors here, but
Speaker 1: that does not represent the rank and file in any way,
Speaker 1: or the rank and file in the intelligence community anyway.
Speaker 1: Have you had a chance yet to read the second memoranda.
Speaker 1: And now it looks like we have a second memo
Speaker 1: that was prepared for Christopher Steele. Yeah. You know, there
Speaker 1: are a total of sixteen different UH dossiers that compose
Speaker 1: the final product and um and all of them are
Speaker 1: on their face a fabrication. They're you know, they're quite
Speaker 1: laughable when you read them, because they're based on romor
Speaker 1: in hearsay and innuendo and speculation and no direct evidence.
Speaker 1: And the fact remains that even if it was the
Speaker 1: dossier that got the FBI's attention, that's not legally sufficient
Speaker 1: under the law to launch a criminal probe of anybody,
Speaker 1: much less a political un I am told that they
Speaker 1: would have you believe that it was the Papadopoulos conversation
Speaker 1: in London. Well, that's not sufficient either, and neither is
Speaker 1: the Trump Tower meeting with the Russian lawyer. None of
Speaker 1: these things justify under the law launching a criminal probe
Speaker 1: of Trump. But they never tell it. They never told
Speaker 1: the court. And this is even in the ten page
Speaker 1: Democratic memo. My sources are very clear they never explained
Speaker 1: where the money came from. They never explained that this
Speaker 1: was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton. Any judge
Speaker 1: that would have had a profound impact on them. Uh,
Speaker 1: and they tried. It was a fraud on the court. Sean,
Speaker 1: it was an absolute fraud on the court, and it
Speaker 1: was obstruction of justice by the seat. Okay, So then
Speaker 1: let me ask probably any number of other federal offenses too.
Speaker 1: Let's call it the Papadopoulos pretense. Explain why that wouldn't
Speaker 1: be legitimate, because apparently the Democrats talk about, no, this
Speaker 1: really began with Papadopoulos. Well, they're they're just grasping at straws.
Speaker 1: There was nothing about the Papadopolis conversation. I mean, he
Speaker 1: was just a hanger on at the farthest length to
Speaker 1: the campaign, trying to ingratiate himself with anybody and everybody
Speaker 1: who I was around the campaign, I never heard of
Speaker 1: a Papadopolos. You know, for the year and a half
Speaker 1: I was there. I think about what the FBI had here,
Speaker 1: An unidentified person in Moscow tells a professor he has
Speaker 1: dirt on Hillary. Professor tells Papadopolis, he tells an Australian
Speaker 1: diplomat who tells the FBI. And forget the fact that
Speaker 1: the professor has denied he ever had the discussion. You know,
Speaker 1: this is a chain of chatter. It could have been
Speaker 1: a liar, an exaggerated We'll go back to this again,
Speaker 1: explained Papadoppolos, because this goes to the heart of the
Speaker 1: democratic response, if you will. Uh so, you have somebody
Speaker 1: that nobody's ever heard from. The President doesn't know. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I was up to my eyeballs in this campaign.
Speaker 1: I know everybody in the campaign never heard of the guy.
Speaker 1: So he is he gets his source from who, Well,
Speaker 1: he gets it from a London professor or professor in
Speaker 1: London who got it from some unknown, unidentified person in Moscow.
Speaker 1: I thing gets passed along to Australian diplomat by the
Speaker 1: name of Downer, who then two months later, when he
Speaker 1: hears about hacked emails, he says, oh, maybe there's some correlation.
Speaker 1: I'll tell the FBI. And according to the New York
Speaker 1: Times and the New York Times, was completely used by
Speaker 1: people in the FBI and the Department of Justice who
Speaker 1: were trying to now after the fact, conjure out of
Speaker 1: thin air some justification for their criminal probe of Trump
Speaker 1: other than the dossier, because they know if it comes
Speaker 1: out that it was the dossier. It's an illegal probe, alright,
Speaker 1: So they've got absolutely nothing, absolutely nothing. If they had anything,
Speaker 1: we would have heard the corroboration by now. They never
Speaker 1: corroborated anything. All right. Let's go to the the the
Speaker 1: Grassley memo that came out because at one point, they
Speaker 1: say Steele gathered much of his information from government sources
Speaker 1: inside of Russia. And according to the law firm Perkins Coy,
Speaker 1: Mr Steele's dossier related efforts were funded through Fusion GPS
Speaker 1: by that law firm on behalf of the d n
Speaker 1: C in the Clinton campaign. Now, if it's only put
Speaker 1: in a FISA warrant as a footnote and doesn't mention that,
Speaker 1: all it says is it might have political taintings of
Speaker 1: some kind. But the FBI knew otherwise. They knew it
Speaker 1: was Clinton that funded it. Isn't that lying to a
Speaker 1: court to obtain a warrant? Yes? Absolutely, any any respectable
Speaker 1: judge in this country would be absolutely livid. What about
Speaker 1: the timeline information like that? Alright? So we even worse
Speaker 1: Sewan because Carter Page had left the Trumpet campaign to
Speaker 1: whatever extent he had anything to do with it in
Speaker 1: the first place. He wasn't involved by the time they
Speaker 1: got the first warrant. That's unbelievable. So in the in
Speaker 1: the Grassley memo that he put out today, Greg says
Speaker 1: that look look at the timeline. The FBI director in
Speaker 1: juneen testified publicly that the to the Senate Select Committee
Speaker 1: on Intelligence he'd brief President elect Trump on the dossier allegations,
Speaker 1: and he said then they were salacious and unverified. Well,
Speaker 1: wasn't he the guy that was arguing in fact that
Speaker 1: they were verified and signing off on this. Going to
Speaker 1: the fis a court to be used. In part, when
Speaker 1: you sign off on that, you are vouching for its credibility,
Speaker 1: its reliability to a federal judge. Uh. To sign off
Speaker 1: on a warrant to surveil to spy on an opposition
Speaker 1: campaign and an incoming president, it's even bigger. And you
Speaker 1: sign that under penalty of perjury. So an omission of
Speaker 1: a material fact like that is the equivalent of a law.
Speaker 1: It's perjury and it could be abusive power. Also under
Speaker 1: the federal statutes. Wow Sydney went away in on it.
Speaker 1: I think it's clearly obstruction of justice under Section fifteen
Speaker 1: twelve and it's definitely false statements. All right, we'll take
Speaker 1: a word and we'll take a break. We'll come back
Speaker 1: more with Sydney Powell, more with Greg Jarrett on the
Speaker 1: other side. Right as we continue, Sydney Powell and Greg
Speaker 1: Jarrett are with us. Did you guys see this. Remember
Speaker 1: a while back it was Chucky Schumer goes out and
Speaker 1: Chucky Schumer says, you better not mess with the Intel community.
Speaker 1: Messed with the Intel Committee community. They got six ways
Speaker 1: and Sunday to get back at you, you got the
Speaker 1: CNN guy Phil Muddy said, well, the FBI's ticked at
Speaker 1: Trump over you know, all of this, and and but
Speaker 1: they're gonna win in the end because they've been around
Speaker 1: a lot longer than Trump. Doesn't that sound like a threat?
Speaker 1: And uh, it does. And you know, honestly, I don't
Speaker 1: think Phil Mudd knows what he's talking to. I don't
Speaker 1: really think he's talking to the same people I'm talking to.
Speaker 1: I talked to four former FBI guys in the last
Speaker 1: three days, and they tell me that the rank and
Speaker 1: file is upset not at Trump, not at the Intel Committee.
Speaker 1: They're upset at the high ranking partisan officials who launched
Speaker 1: a fabricated in false probe and got caught, and they're
Speaker 1: disappointed in their own leadership. Those are the villains, all right.
Speaker 1: I really appreciate both of you. Will have a lot
Speaker 1: more breaking tonight on Hannity. Uh. And the news media
Speaker 1: literally think that what Adam Schiff and company is putting
Speaker 1: out there actually answers questions it does not. And now
Speaker 1: we have the second memo on top of the second dossier,
Speaker 1: a lot more information at the top of the hour. Also,
Speaker 1: herschel Walker is going to be joining us. Uh. You
Speaker 1: don't want to miss that. He, by the way, is
Speaker 1: a big m m A guy. We'll get his thoughts
Speaker 1: on the game yesterday, A much more hey game yesterday. Uh.
Speaker 1: For those of you that don't know, Linda grew up
Speaker 1: in Philly, so she was all excited. I lost a
Speaker 1: bunch of money, which I will be paying tomorrow. I
Speaker 1: didn't stop by the bank today. I pay off my debts.
Speaker 1: One of the greatest football players of all time is
Speaker 1: with us on our Newsmaker line, and I hear he's
Speaker 1: into mmmm dying to hear about that. Herschel Walkers. He's
Speaker 1: a Heisman Trophy winner back with the University at Georgia
Speaker 1: and if you remember, he played for Donald Trump's New
Speaker 1: Jersey Generals at the US Football League, and then he
Speaker 1: also played for the Cowboys and Vikings, later the Giants.
Speaker 1: How are you, sir, I'm doing well. How are you
Speaker 1: doing today? I'm doing great. I've been a fan of
Speaker 1: yours forever. One of the greatest athletes of all times
Speaker 1: and all time. And if you ever put your rushing
Speaker 1: numbers in the USFL with the NFL, you're in the
Speaker 1: top ten among all NFL running backs. A pretty amazing
Speaker 1: career and a Heisman Trophy to boot. Oh yes, I
Speaker 1: tell you, I've been very fortunate. I think I've had
Speaker 1: great coaching and great players and and uh, it's it's
Speaker 1: been wonderful. I've had a great time. What do you
Speaker 1: make everything that's been going on with the concussions in
Speaker 1: in the NFL and some of these players and all
Speaker 1: the headshots that they were taking. There was one Patriot
Speaker 1: that blindsided with a helmet to helmet shot yesterday. It
Speaker 1: wasn't on purpose, but I mean, how many times has
Speaker 1: your bell been run like that? Really badly? You know,
Speaker 1: it's been wrong, It's been wronging a couple of times,
Speaker 1: so I don't think it's been wrong. The guy was
Speaker 1: wrung yesterday. I think I was very fortunate. But at
Speaker 1: the same time, I think the NFL is trying and
Speaker 1: they're trying hard to get a hand on it. But
Speaker 1: at the same time, I think also you gotta have
Speaker 1: the right uh, I think the right tools and the
Speaker 1: right professional to dot know. So a concussion compared to
Speaker 1: other things, because you know guys that are retired, some
Speaker 1: of those guys, I'm a saying that they've had a concussion.
Speaker 1: That's the reason certain things that are happening in our lives.
Speaker 1: And I don't think all that is true. I think
Speaker 1: the concussion of a big, big part, But also I
Speaker 1: think there's other problems also that I think we gotta
Speaker 1: acknowledge that is going on. Yeah, No, I think that
Speaker 1: we are, and I think we're making improvements. Look, things
Speaker 1: were different. I ride my bicycle now and I see
Speaker 1: everybody else riding a bicycle with a helmet on. I mean,
Speaker 1: when I grew up, I was I was big into
Speaker 1: ice hockey. I played a lot of ice hockey as
Speaker 1: a kid, and we didn't wear helmets, and you know,
Speaker 1: I wanted to be Bobby Clark and he didn't have
Speaker 1: any teeth, and uh, you know, it's just a different
Speaker 1: time and error then. But I think if we have
Speaker 1: the ability to I love this because it's a warrior sport.
Speaker 1: You've got people, you know, trying to kill each other
Speaker 1: and and the best team is gonna come out on top.
Speaker 1: And it's it's both mental toughness and physical toughness on
Speaker 1: top of it. That's why I love the sports so much. Well,
Speaker 1: you're right, I think it's it's a tough sport and
Speaker 1: I think there's a lot of I think companies now
Speaker 1: he is trying to come out with Betty equipment that
Speaker 1: can help protect the players. And at the same time
Speaker 1: players are getting bigger, they're getting fastest, or the collision
Speaker 1: is a lot tougher then my time then when I
Speaker 1: was playing. But I think we also got to have
Speaker 1: the right tools to dot knows wus a concussion and
Speaker 1: we have for guys had a concussion, how long it
Speaker 1: takes for him to come back. I think that's one
Speaker 1: of the most important thing right there. Well, look, any
Speaker 1: time you're taking multiple hits to the skull like that,
Speaker 1: you know you run the risk that literally a brain
Speaker 1: begins to separate from the skull and then it becomes
Speaker 1: very you know, it's like it's like getting into an
Speaker 1: auto accident. I think I read the average player like
Speaker 1: had many high collision crashes or the equivalent thereof over
Speaker 1: the course of their career, so it's pretty severe. What
Speaker 1: do you think of the game yesterday? I thought it
Speaker 1: was a great game. I thought it was a great game.
Speaker 1: And if you hear some of the things I said
Speaker 1: earlier on, I thought, phil it will win the game.
Speaker 1: You know. I think my hat was always off to
Speaker 1: the Patriots because they are very well coached, the great
Speaker 1: people in the front office. But I thought, feel it
Speaker 1: it was their time. I thought that the peeling was
Speaker 1: gonna play, and they played and they didn't give up.
Speaker 1: You know, when it came down to where Brady could
Speaker 1: win the game, you didn't see the defense of Philadelphy
Speaker 1: give up. That just shows are tough people there and
Speaker 1: feeling that's the way, you know, I played in philip
Speaker 1: There's some tough people there. There's some great people there,
Speaker 1: and I tell you what, they're not gonna give up.
Speaker 1: And and I was happy to see it, you know,
Speaker 1: I was happy for Philadelphia. Yeah, it's great. Listen, they
Speaker 1: had one one for everyone hates Brady because the you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, the guy's one enough that to the average feeling,
Speaker 1: and they don't like. I didn't think that the flake
Speaker 1: Gate was such a big deal, but uh I read
Speaker 1: that you're into m m A. Now is that true?
Speaker 1: That is true. I've had a couple of fights and
Speaker 1: and I've been working with BELOTOI as well Scott Coker
Speaker 1: uh as ambassador doing things with Belati and you know,
Speaker 1: I've told people I would fight one more. I love
Speaker 1: this sport. I've been in mar Shalts for over forty
Speaker 1: years now. Wow, I look, I'm only in like my
Speaker 1: sixth year. And it's a it's sort of an eclectic blend.
Speaker 1: I know you have it with You're a fifth degree
Speaker 1: black belt in taekwondo, um and you've you've done other
Speaker 1: things too. Didn't you once compete as an Olympic Pop's letter.
Speaker 1: I did? Uh? You know one of the things that
Speaker 1: I tell people is herschel Walker is an athlete. You know.
Speaker 1: I think sometimes people get quoted as being a football player.
Speaker 1: You know, I ran a trick with some of the
Speaker 1: fastest guys in the wall. Uh. Yeah, I've done a
Speaker 1: lot of things. And the reason I've done that is
Speaker 1: I tried to tell all the young peopa there, guys,
Speaker 1: don't just pigeonhold yourself to one sport. Do a lot
Speaker 1: of different things. Find out what you're good at and
Speaker 1: that's what you want to go to wars. I don't
Speaker 1: think if you want to be a football player, maybe
Speaker 1: you're not a football player. Maybe you're a tennis player.
Speaker 1: And me play tennis. Go that's a great sport as well.
Speaker 1: And you know that's what I've always dined. I never
Speaker 1: classified myself I as a great football player. But I
Speaker 1: can't say I think I'm a great athlete because you
Speaker 1: are a great athlete. But you know what, you know
Speaker 1: what happens. I mean for the kids that are to
Speaker 1: get good in any sport. And it's a big push
Speaker 1: for college scholarships in every sport. You know, at some
Speaker 1: point you got to make a decision and go all
Speaker 1: in on one because the competition is so severe. And
Speaker 1: with my kids it's the same thing. Um, do you
Speaker 1: really do still about two thousand push ups to day?
Speaker 1: Ups a day? I do. I'm doing about push ups,
Speaker 1: about thirty or five sit ups, and and you know,
Speaker 1: I tell people that The reason I'm doing it is
Speaker 1: not to impressing anyone. I do it because I'm still
Speaker 1: competing and I'm not a weightlifting you know, you have
Speaker 1: guys I benjing men's pressing five hundred pounds and all
Speaker 1: that stuff, and and I don't do that. I don't
Speaker 1: do I do my isometrics and uh. And I'm still
Speaker 1: competed on a on a world circuit. But I tell
Speaker 1: people this was so funny. It works for hershel Walker.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's gonna work for me. But you
Speaker 1: gotta believe in what you do. If you don't believe
Speaker 1: in it, it's not gonna work. Listen, I think I'm
Speaker 1: doing a lot when I do. I do at least
Speaker 1: a hundred push ups a day, and I do at
Speaker 1: least a hundred or more set ups a day. And
Speaker 1: I trained five days a week for about an hour,
Speaker 1: hour and a half. And what I do is a
Speaker 1: little different. It's an eclectic blend of tempo and problem
Speaker 1: of goa and jiu jitsu. It's basically street martial arts
Speaker 1: at self defense. I do firearm blade training and stick training.
Speaker 1: We do a lot of different things, and I I
Speaker 1: love it. I don't lift either, I do more bands
Speaker 1: because I got a bum shoulder and a bum elbow. Um.
Speaker 1: But well, that's good. I think that's great. I think
Speaker 1: one of the things that people forget about is lifting
Speaker 1: weights are good for you, but at the same time,
Speaker 1: you want to have flexibility. Don't give you flexibility with
Speaker 1: your bills straight. And that's what I've been trying to
Speaker 1: tell people all the time. You're stronger when you have
Speaker 1: flexibilities and muscle, not when you're bulking that muscle. Look
Speaker 1: I I'm I'm fifty six years old. I'm not looking
Speaker 1: to you know, look great on the beach. That day
Speaker 1: has passed a long time ago, uh for me. But
Speaker 1: I'll tell you this, if I didn't start doing this
Speaker 1: six years ago, I can I can only imagine what
Speaker 1: I look like today. You know, I was, I was
Speaker 1: always a good athlete, but I never bulked up. For
Speaker 1: the first time in my life, I'm building like serious
Speaker 1: muscle just by doing those types of that type of
Speaker 1: work and that type of training. It is a lot
Speaker 1: of core building, and it's a lot of you know,
Speaker 1: for an older guy, do a lot of work on
Speaker 1: the heavy bag, a lot of work grappling, which you
Speaker 1: know is exhausting, um, and it's got me in great shape. Well,
Speaker 1: I think you're You're like an example that I've been
Speaker 1: talking about with a lot of people. You know everyone,
Speaker 1: I'm the fat old guy that that changed my life around.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah. Well, and at the same time, you
Speaker 1: know you're not using that excuse as you're getting out
Speaker 1: doing it. So you work hard. You know, I've seen
Speaker 1: your show and you work at stream the hard, but
Speaker 1: you're still working out. You're still doing the things you
Speaker 1: need to do to get to feel better. And I
Speaker 1: guarantee you have more energy. You have absolutely energy, and
Speaker 1: you feel better. And that's why I try to tell
Speaker 1: people sometimes working out it's just not about getting in shape,
Speaker 1: but it makes you feel better. Your health is better.
Speaker 1: So I look that you're not kicking our soccer ball.
Speaker 1: There there are days I wake up I'm like, I
Speaker 1: don't feel like doing it today, But you feel better
Speaker 1: after you've done it. Also the discipline of doing it.
Speaker 1: And the third thing is is I'm mentally tougher because
Speaker 1: of it. I mean, I feel you feel better, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you do. You really do feel better. I mean, I
Speaker 1: I know I feel better about myself. Look, I never
Speaker 1: want to ever have to use what I know against anybody.
Speaker 1: But I feel confident in my skills. You know that
Speaker 1: that I can defend myself and and defend my family
Speaker 1: and defend my friends. Well, you know, people don't know.
Speaker 1: You know, I grew up overweight. I was a fat
Speaker 1: letter kid. I started at a speech impediment. But I
Speaker 1: was very fortunate that I had a high food coach
Speaker 1: that took me and he started working me out and
Speaker 1: be calling him working me out, making me feel better
Speaker 1: about herschel Walker. I became valid toward my class. I
Speaker 1: got all these scholarships to go to college and stuff,
Speaker 1: and and that's what I tell people. Sometimes working out
Speaker 1: make you feel good about who you are, and I
Speaker 1: think that's the most important thing. I think today people
Speaker 1: are not sure what they want to do and what
Speaker 1: they want to feel. Like everyone want to be Stephan Curry,
Speaker 1: but they don't want to pay the price to do it.
Speaker 1: And you have to pay the price if you want
Speaker 1: to do that. Isn't that the big you know a
Speaker 1: little secret in anything that you do that you've got
Speaker 1: to work at it. Like I've never felt like I'm
Speaker 1: the most talented radio or TV guy, But I think
Speaker 1: I work harder than anybody. And I do all my
Speaker 1: work behind the scenes. I mean when it comes showtime,
Speaker 1: well that's the easy part of what I do. To
Speaker 1: be honest, well, I tell people that all the time.
Speaker 1: I tell you kids, you know, you can't make the
Speaker 1: hundreds in your classroom and not study. You've got to
Speaker 1: go to the library. You have to study. You have
Speaker 1: to sacrifice. You know, you can't be going out if
Speaker 1: you want to be an athlete, you can't be going
Speaker 1: out party and all the time. You have to put
Speaker 1: your your your craft in by going out tright to say,
Speaker 1: you know, I've done hundreds of thousands of millions of
Speaker 1: push ups. You know, people think that I just do it.
Speaker 1: I said, guys, I'll do it because I'm competing and
Speaker 1: I want to win. Now, I'm tired of thinking that
Speaker 1: everyone's supposed to get a ball because they strike out
Speaker 1: and to make him feel good. You know, this is
Speaker 1: a tough. Life is tough, and you got to realize
Speaker 1: instead of getting a ball for striking out, go to
Speaker 1: the bed cage, work on practice them, because that's how
Speaker 1: you're gonna get better. By giving things to people all
Speaker 1: the time. I think it's hurt in this societyst So
Speaker 1: why why why is it that you're Because some people
Speaker 1: are self motivated like you, and I would argue many
Speaker 1: ways in my life I'm self motivated and extremely competitive.
Speaker 1: You know what, when did you notice you had this
Speaker 1: quality and that it was different from the guys say
Speaker 1: that you were playing with. Maybe they were even people
Speaker 1: more talented than you. I don't know, but but they
Speaker 1: didn't want to work at their talent. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: I got beat up when I was in the eighth grade.
Speaker 1: I got beat up by this kid and it was
Speaker 1: funny because I remember going home and I said, no more.
Speaker 1: I said, what what would happen? Now? Is no one
Speaker 1: w ever out work personal worker. You know, you maybe
Speaker 1: have more talent, you may have more skills at it,
Speaker 1: but I can guarantee you want out work me because
Speaker 1: I will work. I don't care what it's to be.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna out well. And because of my work at it,
Speaker 1: I don't think you can ever beat me in a
Speaker 1: thing that I set out to do in It's awesome.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna work at it. Such good advice for everybody.
Speaker 1: By the way, I want to thank you. I know
Speaker 1: you're a huge advocate for the U S Military and
Speaker 1: first responders, and and I know you've been all around
Speaker 1: the world speaking for those who serve, and you recently
Speaker 1: partnered with Rocky Ridge Trucks and you're launching and a
Speaker 1: giveaway contest that's gonna giveaway. And I have the picture
Speaker 1: of it in my in my in front of me.
Speaker 1: Here it's a hand painted, completely American made eighteen Chevy Silverado.
Speaker 1: It's fourth eighty grand. Uh. You're gonna give what to
Speaker 1: a US veteran or first responder and the winner is
Speaker 1: going to be announced in March. How do you enter
Speaker 1: the contest? Well, not just the US veteran, but we're
Speaker 1: also given it to an active memory as well that
Speaker 1: we hope to give away more than just this one.
Speaker 1: But you can enter the contest by going to rocket
Speaker 1: Ridge Guild dot com and register your name, or you
Speaker 1: can read for anyone you know that has been in
Speaker 1: the US military are active in another terry. And we're
Speaker 1: gonna have a selection in March win this truck. But
Speaker 1: that's not all I do for the military. A lot
Speaker 1: of people don't know I'm at a base once a
Speaker 1: month all over the world, and I mean a program
Speaker 1: that we treat almost five thousand soldiers a year. And
Speaker 1: the reason I do that is because of them. We're
Speaker 1: the best country in the world because of our United
Speaker 1: States military. And I'm sick and tired of even our
Speaker 1: Congress forgetting about them, and because I said, the reason
Speaker 1: where the condor we are because our military is on
Speaker 1: that world for us every night and every day, doing
Speaker 1: great things for us. But they're the ones that sacrifice
Speaker 1: for all of us. What was it like your experience
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump when you played for his team? Well,
Speaker 1: I love Donald, and it's sad to me that, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't think a good part of the Congress is
Speaker 1: not uh, you know in Donald's corner. You know, he
Speaker 1: wanted this election fars square, you know, through election system
Speaker 1: that we put in place, and I think they should
Speaker 1: have given give him an opportunity to govern. Right now,
Speaker 1: this country was made on laying or orders and right
Speaker 1: now I cannot believe some of the people in our
Speaker 1: Congress are not going by what they created. And it's
Speaker 1: sad because I know he's a good man. I know
Speaker 1: he's not a racist, that he's trying to do what
Speaker 1: he can do, but he can't do it when you
Speaker 1: have people uh trying to fight him at every every
Speaker 1: every place. And what's said about that he's not just
Speaker 1: having to fight against North Korea, having to fight against
Speaker 1: all these other countries isis he's got to fight against
Speaker 1: people in our Congress. They didn't want to get they
Speaker 1: didn't want to give him one day. They've been underminding
Speaker 1: him from day one. Herschel Listen, it's an honor for
Speaker 1: me to talk to you. Um, if you want, you
Speaker 1: can give out the website again and we'll put it
Speaker 1: up on our website, Hannity dot com. And it's free
Speaker 1: to register for the for the Silverado. Everything that's free.
Speaker 1: Just go to Rocket Ridge Guild dot com and read
Speaker 1: her to win a nineteen two dollar and eighteen Silverado,
Speaker 1: a beautiful truck. And I just wanted to thank you
Speaker 1: to all our first responder when something happened, they show up,
Speaker 1: military veterans and our active members, because uh, thank you
Speaker 1: for giving me the trivite to have that freedom of
Speaker 1: speech that everybody's been talking about right now. But also
Speaker 1: I want to use that freedom of speech to thank
Speaker 1: them for everything that they're doing. Amen, Rocky Ridge Gives
Speaker 1: dot Com. I'll link at to Hannity dot com Herschel's
Speaker 1: in honor to get to know you. Can't wait to
Speaker 1: meet in person. I'm a big fan and uh, I
Speaker 1: hope you'll come back again. We really appreciate you. Ben
Speaker 1: Willis Hey, thank you for having me on. And I
Speaker 1: must say I'm a big fan as well of yours.
Speaker 1: I've watched you uh at night now with everything going
Speaker 1: on with McBeth so close to Donald and I'm crazy
Speaker 1: for all the great things you're doing for him and
Speaker 1: saying the truth. You're saying the truth and that's what counts.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. Herschel means a lot coming from you.
Speaker 1: Really does have been a fan for many, many years.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir. At Hannity Tonight nineties on the Fox
Speaker 1: News Channel. Now we have a second memo and the
Speaker 1: Democrat rebuttal which is meaningless. Sarah Carter breaking new news
Speaker 1: on the new memo and the Clinton's involvement, Also the
Speaker 1: great one, Mark Levin, Gregg Jarrett, Pam Bandi, Sebasta Ging Gorka,
Speaker 1: Tom Fitton, and much more Hannity News you won't get
Speaker 1: anywhere else on the Fox News Channel. We'll see you
Speaker 1: tonight at nine and we will see you back here tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being with us