WEBVTT - 2020 ACC Conference Preview

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hull. That for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Edith Steak is that woo woom? And Dan and Tie

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the solid verbal boys and girls. My

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>name is Ty Hildebrand, joining me as always over there

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago Land, the one the only mister Dan Rubinstein, Sir,

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>how are you?

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm good, Ty. I'm using a resistance band right now.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 2>This is one hundred percent true. If you saw the risk, all, yeah,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I've got resistance. I'm doing some curls with resistance bands.

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Why well, I've been on the go for quite some time,

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and this is the easiest way when you don't have

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>a gym, when you don't have weights available to you.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>It's I don't know if it's an next best thing,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's a thing that you can do to work

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>on your tone, on your muscles and tie. I'm just

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 2>staying ready. I don't know what the next few months

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>has in store for the college well season, but I

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 2>am staying ready. I'm staying vigilant. I'm keeping my muscle

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>tone mediocre because if it slips anywhere beneath that. I

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to expect. We have a show to do.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 2>There's college football coming up. We're previewing teams. I am

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 2>staying ready. Okay, that's all I can.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>This is at least half the plot from over the top.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>This is I'm looking pretty good right now, Okay, which

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 2>I guess the ACC is as well, right, looking pretty good?

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Right? Yeah, that's what we call a segue here in

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the business, and by business we mean the industry. We're

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking about all things ACC football tonight,

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>if you can believe it. We did a big twelve

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>preview a couple weeks ago, and then things kind of

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>got wacky and went sideways and we weren't sure which

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>direction all this was going to head. But the last

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>here we are welcome to September. We're going to do

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>our best to make it a September to remember Daniel,

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to talk all things ACC. And then

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday we're going to talk all things SEC. And

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>then I believe if memory serves, next weekend, the weekend

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>after Labor Day, is when we're going to actually have

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 1>some Power five games that we can start discussing here,

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>so I'm getting ready for that. We've got all sorts

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of news that we're going to get through. It's been

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>very busy, very active, as you might expect. If you've

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>just popped onto Twitter or turned on ESPN for any

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>length of time, you know that there's a lot breaking

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in and around the college football world, which we can

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>try to dabble into here without going too much into

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the nitty gritty because we do have fifteen teams to

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>discuss here on the podcast.

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I've been looking at social media less and I gotta

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 2>tell you, Ty, it's pretty amazing. It's pretty incredible, both

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>as relates to college football and world events and just

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>people in general. I could not recommend it more. But yeah,

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I looked at it today and it seemed to be

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 2>going in a number of different directions as it relates

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>to another conference. But I don't know what's going to

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>pop up on social media as we record this show.

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 2>It tends to change as we record shows. But I

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think too much about the Wake Forest defense and

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the Boston College offense and the Miami coaching situation. I

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>don't think, actually I shouldn't say that about Miami. That

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>changes sometimes on a time. I don't think a lot's

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 2>going to change about those specific things as we record,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>so I'm grateful for.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>That as am I don't forget. If you like the show,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get more of our stuff, you

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>can always subscribe. Go to solidverbal dot com. You can

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>find all of our links there where you can subscribe

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on Apple and Google and spotify' s Ditch your Tune

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and all the usual hotspots any podcasting app you can

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>find us on. Also follow us on social that's on Instagram,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, on Facebook, go to the subreddit at solidverbal

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>dot reddit dot com. And if you haven't already going

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>out to our website soliverb dot com, sign up for

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>our newsletter. It's free. We won't spam you. We do

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>have things to discuss and we're very excited about but

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned on that front. Just sign up for the newsletter.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You'll be the first to be notified. If you really

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like the show and you want to do us a

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>m Solid Dan now you can give us a five

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>star review if you really like the show. It's not

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>required to listen, but as I've been saying here, every

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit does.

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Help, and if you if you find yourself listening to

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 2>a number of our shows and you're not subscribed. Just

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>slap that subscribe button. Makes it easier for you, makes

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 2>it easier for us.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Shall we get to the breaking news. Let's do it, Dan,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we have breaking news. Maybe boo boo boop. Yeah, maybe

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>is right. So this whole Big Ten saga around college

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>football is just weird and nuts and truly presents as

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ten being left at its own alter in

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a way, they pulled the plug on the season. The

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Pac twelve was very quick to follow suit, and then

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, no one else did, and that leaves us

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in this very precarious spot that we're in now, where

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems there's a lot of public pressure, there's some

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>political pressure to maybe revisit that approach and see if

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the season can get off to an earlier start than

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that January February timeframe that we've been kicking around. Perhaps Thanksgiving.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Some reports coming out today it could be even sooner

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>than that. So let's go through that, Dan, if you

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>don't mind. We had a presidential tweet earlier today. There

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>was also supposedly a call between the President and the

0:05:54.640 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>commissioner of the Big Ten, Kevin Warren. The speculation was

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps the federal government would ship been some resources.

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The president said that the league was quote on the

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one yard line after the conversation that they had earlier

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday. Those reports have been refuted by many Big

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Ten sources. Dennis Dodd from CBS Sports still calling it

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a quote long shot. I've seen that reporting elsewhere as well,

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>at least that time of recording, which is about five

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>o'clock on Tuesday evening. The other bit that came out

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>regarding the Big Ten is this purported vote. Now, remember

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>before we didn't know if there was a vote, what

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the deal was with that vote supposedly now and this is,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, as a direct result of that lawsuit

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>filed by the eight Nebraska players, which I kind of dismissed,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting to get this kind of information, even

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's as a result of a lawsuit that may

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not go anywhere. What they found was that Big Ten

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>presidents and chancellor has voted eleven to three to cancel

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty fall season. That, of course, is due

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to concerns with the ongoing pandemic. The three teams that

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>voted to play were Nebraska, Iowa and Ohio state Big

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Ten by laws do require that at least sixty percent

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or nine of the league's presidents and chancellor's vote in

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>favor of postponing or you know, making any kind of

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>decision here. So a lot to unpack. We've got politics

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>interfering now to some extent with with sports. That's just

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>where we're at. We'll see if that moves the needle

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in one direction or another. And now we do have

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>some clarity around the actual vote that did take place

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to postpone the fall season. Dan any reaction

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to any of the stuff that I just talked about

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>regarding the Big Ten.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, other conferences canceled their seasons as well,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 2>but I guess it was the Big Ten whose coaches

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and players and parents have been the most vote cool

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and perhaps fans as well because of the size of

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>some of the programs in the Big Ten, let's say.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 2>But I just sort of think it's wishful thinking and

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>political posturing, because I mean, eleven three is like, I

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>don't know, when Taiwan plays Norway in the Little League

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>World Series, it's kind of a no doubt vote. This

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>is not a tipping one. Way or the other, and

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>perhaps new information and new testing capabilities has swayed some

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>of the eleven back towards the three direction, But I

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>don't think we've seen any credible reporting to that sort

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of backs up that sentiment right now, So it seems

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 2>like it's wishful thinking, it's political posturing, and the Big

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>ten won't be playing anytime soon. I saw a good

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>tweet from John Wilner, who covers the PAC twelve for

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>the San Jose Mercury News. I believe he said it's

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 2>foolish to think like a fan, to think like a coach,

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 2>to think like a player, to think like an ad

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 2>when trying to figure out how and when schools that

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 2>have canceled or postponed college football will go back to it.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>It only makes a difference to think like a president

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>or chancellor and the things that they are waging, which

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 2>you and I couldn't possibly do, and I couldn't possibly

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 2>think like a president or chancellor, just in the things

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>that come across their desk and the things that they're weighing.

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's important to keep in mind because

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>athletic directors are not in charge. Coaches are not in charge.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Parents are not in charge. Players are not in charge.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 2>It's important to remember who ultimately signs a number of

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 2>these checks. And so I don't see anything dramatically changing

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>our current reality, whether or not you agree with it

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 2>or not. I don't see anything happening that will change

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 2>our reality.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, just to circle back to something I said

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>on the last episode, we have now officially entered into

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the territory where we've got fans making stuff up and

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sources of sources. This is the sources of friends who

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are interns. And you know not that that stuff isn't

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>fun to muse over. I've enjoyed myself, but when it

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to actually trying to get the story right, just

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of smoke here, a lot of steam on

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the story. My guess is it's not the last we've

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>heard of it. At last check, the Big Ten was

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what its plan was going to

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>be moving forward. So we'll do our best to try

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and keep you up to date with that as news breaks,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But at least the time of recording a little bit

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>more information, nothing concrete with regard to where the Big

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Ten is headed next.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Are you saying you can't track a pandemic on flight aware?

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you are I am saying, pushing to

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 2>all of our listens, I said, okay, I'm just writing

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>this town.

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of concrete plans, the SEC on CBS has released

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty twenty TV schedule. Hey, okay, they're going to

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>try and play. It is exciting, right, I walk me

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>through it. We've got an album, a Georgia game on

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>TV and LSU Alabama game in prime time. They only

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>selected six games. Now they follow a workflow to figure

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>out what the other games are going to be. But

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the ones that we're announced here Saturday, September twenty sixth,

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got Mississippi State at LSU. Good game. Game to

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>start with the following week, on October the third, we've

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>got A and M at Alabama. Could be a fun game.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>A couple weeks later in mid October, on the seventeenth,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>at eight pm, Georgia at Alabama. That's going to be

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a bigin. I'll watch it, ty, I will as well. Uh.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Two weeks later on Halloween. Oh, this is new math

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>for me. So I see eight pm. That's eight pm Eastern.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 2>So this is a seven pm.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Seven pm for you.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Master God's country yep.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Three point thirty on Halloween. LSU at Auburn h Saturday

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>November seventh at three thirty in Jacksonville, Florida versus Georgia,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the Big Cocktail Party and cocktail party. They they've always

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>called it that, the Big Cocktail Party, the world's largest

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>outdoor cocktail party. For those of you playing the home game. Yeah.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And then Saturday, November fourteenth, at six pm Eastern time,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it is Alabama at LSU. That's the last regular season

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>game that they've announced. Of course, the SEC Championship would

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>be weeks later mid December, mid to late December. That

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>game will be covered by CBS, and it's played in Atlanta.

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Did you see, and I know you didn't put this

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 2>in our little document, did you see that Fox is

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 2>taking big noon Saturday. And I think it's going from

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 2>one to two hours.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, less football, more.

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Robstone crofton Meer, No, No, I'm just saying more robstone and

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Urban Meyer and Matt Lioner, Reggie Bush, I think Brady

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Quinn maybe. And I have to imagine they sold a

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of ads that need a place. Yeah, and suddenly

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>a two hour show is some sort of concession that

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 2>they needed a lot of Maybe I'm wrong about that, A.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Lot of goods going on in this college football season, correct,

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all right? Elsewhere, speaking of the SEC, we'll stay with

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Jamar Chase and Tyler Shelvin, two standouts for ls You

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>both have now opted out of the twenty twenty season.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Shelvin eligible for the twenty twenty one draft as a

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>red shirt junior. Jamar Chase, you could argue he's the

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>best receiver in the country. He confirmed earlier this week

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to opt out, and then Shelvin

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>followed suits. This is a pretty big blow for an

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>LSU squad that was already down a bunch of their

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>key contributors from a year ago. It's Joe Burrow, It's

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards, Hilaire, you know, I mean, you can go

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on and on here. They lose their top two wideouts.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of turnover here. LSU was still well stocked.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be a very good football team. But

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's tough to go from a once in

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a generation type season and experience all this attrition and

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>then just expect to kind of carry on as usual.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably going to be something of a

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>step back.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I have only read the sort of very generic stories

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>about Jamar Chase deciding to opt out of the season.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I have not looked at message boards or people who

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>might be in more in the know what they're hearing

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>from sources of sources. I wonder why the timing was

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>what it was because we see know Micah Parsons and

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Rashad Bateman and all these players have been opting out

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 2>well in advance of when camp would have started, the

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 2>season would have started, and now Jamar Chase doing it now.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why his timing was different. If it's

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>just more thought, more consideration, unhappy perhaps with LSU. I

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>have no reason to say that i'mhappy with LSU in

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the way they've they've dealt with everything in a new world.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 2>But it is curious that the timing because it sort

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 2>of came out of nowhere, at least for me.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and also how about UCF. UCF has had ten

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>players opt out, Dariel Mack, some key defensive players. Yeah,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>so this means that Dylan Gabriel is going to be

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the unquestioned starter at quarterback going into the season. Dariel

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Mack was going to provide some depth there because Mackenzie

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Milton is still recovering from his horrible injury. And on

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side, you've got a cornerback Tay Gowan, a

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>junior defensive tackle, and Kelly Davis, two projected starters who

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are opting out. So you know, UCF's one of the

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>better group of five schools. There's no denying that they

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>may or may not have won a national championship a

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, depending on your point of view.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing that I think we find pretty

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>consistent all throughout the group of five is depth is

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>always a concern, always a concern. To lose this many

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>players is a big deal. So we'll see what it

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>means for the UCF season moving forward, but definitely something

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to watch.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this would have been a UCF team led

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>by a really strong defense, and not that they it

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>won't still be strong, but yeah, this might be the

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>best group of five school in the country. We'll see,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, that's a significant blow.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You're correct. And the final bit of news that I

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have here, we have two starting quarterback announcements, neither of

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>which is all that big a surprise for Oklahoma. Spencer Rattler,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>former top recruit for the Oklahoma Sooners, comes in with

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>very high regard. This is interesting because, as we said

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on our Big twelve previews show, Lincoln Riley's always been

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in the situation where he's been inheriting a previous quarterback

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or dealing with the transfer. So now we've got Spencer Ratler,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this is his first home grown quarterback at Oklahoma, we'll

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>see how he does. And at Florida State we got

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>James Blackman, who we're going to talk a little bit

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>about on tonight's show is preview. All things acc no

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>big surprise, and I think there's a chance he could

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>be challenged for that spot at some point in the

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>near future, but at least to start the season, it's

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be Blackman.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.719
<v Speaker 2>He's a red shirt junior, I believe. And also, no

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 2>matter what happens this fall, the NCAA is going to

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>be forgiving about eligibility with players. So there's a good

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>chance I'll have three to four more children before James

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Blackman out of college football. It's incredible, I really and

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>we can get to this. I really hope he finishes

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 2>his college football career better than it seems to have started.

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been rocky and he's had to work through a lot.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>So we wish him well and we'll get to some

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of our deeper in some cases darker Florida State thoughts

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>here momentary? All right, anything further that you have on

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>your radar?

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I everything is such a bummer.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about fun, good football things, all.

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, So I've got sounds that I could play. Why

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>don't we play this one as we get into all

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>things ACC kind of gives that aura of mystique of mystery. Right,

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel generally speaking about the ACC? I

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>know you did a ton of research. Yep. One thing

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that jumped out at me if I could start this

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is probably the best quarterback conference in college football. Uh yeah.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Seems like a down here for the SEC and at

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the top. It's interesting. I think in the Big Twelve,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 2>if you look at what we presume Spencer Rattler to

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>be what we know, Sam Ellinger to be what we know,

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Brock Purty to be a good chunk of the time,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the Big Twelve is pretty interesting. We don't

0:18:58.280 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 2>know health of Texas Tech. I'm not going to go

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 2>through everybody, but yeah, in terms of proven commodities and

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 2>experience and having a good sense of what these guys

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>can and can't do. I think the upside is pretty

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 2>pretty nice. Any other thoughts, it's fascinating underneath the top

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 2>team and a half I guess in Clemson and Notre

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Dame just the I don't know if it's the middle

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>class this year that seems to be everywhere, but the

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 2>upper middle class to me is the fascinating part of

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the conference. There are chunks of teams that are interesting,

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>like North Carolina and Florida State and Louisville and Miami,

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 2>and then there are sort of pseudo rebuilding situations I

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 2>guess still like Florida State in Miami, but also Virginius

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 2>or retooling their identity on offense after Wally's derbyax own

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Perkins do everything guy under center moves on. So no,

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I think there are there are interesting elements that are

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 2>a little bit different because we've had We've had some

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 2>teams bottom out after some recent successes like Syracuse and

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 2>NC State and then teams like Wake Forest in Boston

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>College seeing if new guys either on the field or

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>on the sidelines will make some sort of appreciable difference

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>or are they just going to be that sort of

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 2>consistent element to the conference.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, Dan, it is America's Conference of Champions, is it? Oh?

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Parre you the ACC and let's start at

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the very top. Let's talk about Clemson. Let me ask

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you a hypothetical. Actually, i'll play this sound again. Why not? Yeah? If?

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's it? If that's bolded, italicized with little asterisks

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>around it. Whatever you I can't even say it right.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a slab seraph situation going on? Whatever you're into. Yeah,

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 2>IF is doing a lot of work here. But if

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 2>an ACC team is gonna beat the Clemson Tigers, is

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 2>it more likely in your view to be because of

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 2>the situation they have up front basically a new offensive line, yeah,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 2>or a largely new full time secondary or is there

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 2>something else?

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that I missed? But where do you stand on that?

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Where is the weakness that could be exploited by again,

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a hypothetical ACC opponent?

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>We should agree that we either are or are not

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about the broader universe of things that

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 2>can happen to football teams, coaches and players.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, you're asking, are we or are we not

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>permitted to talk about a potential outbreak at right Clemson,

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they already had that one, didn't they.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there were positive tests and outbreaks both with students.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I haven't heard a lot about Clemson recently, which I'm

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 2>very happy about. Anytime there is an outbreak and then

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't hear anything that's good, that means there's no

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 2>horrible news happening on a campus. So I'm happy for that.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>So if we're going to agree that every team is

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 2>susceptible in a way that they never are in twenty twenty,

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 2>just because of circumstances that are new to this world,

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>if we're only talking about what where is a team

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 2>like Clemson most susceptible, and as it relates to on

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 2>field things, I think it's the secondary. I think it's

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the secondary. For this reason, Trevor Lawrence, behind an average

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>offensive line, is going to be excellent even with the

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>loss of Justin Ross. He has Traves Etn next to him,

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 2>He has a slew of receivers that are going to

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 2>be developed really well. As it seems every receiver at

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Clemson is because of Dabo Sweeney's pass and his ability

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to hire really good receiving minds, so I'm not really

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 2>all that worried about the offensive line. They've also recruited good,

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 2>They've recruited well there, so I don't think that's going

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 2>to be a big issue. Especially with the defenses. I

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 2>guess outside of Notre Dame that they're going to be

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 2>playing not a lot of scary defenses. The thing, I'm

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 2>going to go back to what you said about the

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks in the conference that to me is interesting. I

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't actually mention Virginia Tech was talking about interesting teams,

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and that's my fault because I think the Hokies are fascinating,

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>especially with how they looked with Hendon Hooker who took

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 2>over as full time quarterback last year. So between what

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Florida State could look like on offense by November, what

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>we think Virginia Tech can look like on offense, and

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 2>both of those games are on the road, what we

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 2>know about Dearic King with hopefully better offense, with Reht

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Lashley running things with some SMU DNA now populating his brain.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the secondary, which has always been very very

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 2>good under Brent Venables, which loses, I mean do on

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 2>every position group lost. Isaiah Simmons for Clemson. He was

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 2>all over the place. But other key elements to this

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Clemson secondary. I think that's the interesting thing because it

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't take much to break a couple of big plays

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>when you have good quarterbacks and interesting receivers, which I

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 2>think is a group that populates the acc.

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So if I had to.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Choose between those two things, I'm gonna say the secondary.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 2>We don't have killers up front for Clemson. Even though

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 2>they've recruited those killers, they're not established there yet. So

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say the secondary. With the I would

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>say high floor of some quarterbacks they face in the

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 2>back half of their schedule.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Interesting do you think.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 2>Andy and Book and I in book Ian Book is

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 2>one of those pretty good quarterbacks who has hung with

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and or beaten some decent teams.

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there anyone on the schedule you look at him

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and you say, I think they can actually exploit both

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.959
<v Speaker 1>in one game. They're good enough up front, but they

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>can get some pressure on Trevor Lawrence, maybe change the

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>rhythm there. Don't know if it's gonna matter because again

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>it's Trevor Lawrence, but can exploit that potential weakness and

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>also can blow the lid off the defense and attack

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the backside of that Clemson secondary.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 2>There's no sure thing because I think part a the

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 2>former is Notre Dame, but I worry about the latter

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 2>with Ian Book downfield, because that that's what you need.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 2>That's what we've seen Notre Dame try to do unsuccessfully

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>against Clemson and Brent Venables. So Notre Dame is as

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 2>close as it gets on that schedule, just because of

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 2>the depth that they've built up and I like Clark

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Lee as a defensive mind and how they've recruited on

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 2>defense and the proven elements to that defense. But offensively,

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>that's the big issue for me with Notre Dame. So

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 2>if they can ugly that game up, they can win

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>a twenty to seventeen game. I just don't think they

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>can win a thirty four to twenty seven game.

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's fair Dan completely.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So I think that's my answer. I mean, I

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you have any strong opinions about Clemson

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 2>this year, but they're one of the least interesting teams

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 2>to me about the ACC because we just know everything already.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we know a lot about Clemson, don't we. We

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>really do.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, Amani Rodgers will be really interesting now

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 2>that he's going to be the full time number one

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 2>option out wide for Trevor Lawrence. I saw an article

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that was really fun about how he's doing yoga now,

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 2>so he's more flexible than I think you had in mind.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Ti Amari Rodgers now getting the Brian Kelly treatment from

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the press.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Great, Yeah, did I say, Imani Amari?

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, Now, I mean I I'll just go back

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to what I said on the previous episode. They're a

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>minus three fifty favorite to win the ACC championship and yeah,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the next closest would be Notre Dame at five to one,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's about right.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 2>Frankly, Yeah, I mean, Clemson's going to be populated with

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 2>special players and no other team in the conference can

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 2>say it to the Tigers extent.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Where should we go next?

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I think we should just transition easily to Notre Dame.

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, hit me.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 2>So the thing that's interesting to me about Notre Dame,

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I suppose, is the Tom Tommy Reese tomoment. Tommy tom

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Tommy Yeah, Tom Tommy rees is interesting to me because

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame has had a good, pretty good, sometimes really

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>good offense these past few years, and it generally goes

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 2>through stretches. You have sophomore Deshaun Kaiser year and it's

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty five fifteen. You have the first half of twenty

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 2>seventeen with Josh Adams dragging you know, Brandon Wimbush and

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 2>some okay receivers forward and a great offensive line doing

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the same. And then the past couple of years it's

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>been more efficient than it has been big play, which

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 2>has worked largely for Notre Dame, but I don't think

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 2>that aligns with their top, top level goals. So to

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 2>you with what you're reading, with what you're seeing, what

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 2>is what is the new element?

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>What is the twist?

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 2>What is the line squeeze about tom Tommy Rees? That's

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be different.

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>First off, we're going to talk about Tommy Rees. We

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>need to bring back the resis. I'm happy that we

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>can bring this back into our lexicon. Yeah, let me

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>let me step back from that for a second. Just

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge something up front. This is an extraordinary year for

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame football. They have joined a conference at autam necessity.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>But if I said it once, I've said it a

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand times Now I am so curious to see if

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this leads to any change of heart in longer term

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>around independence. If nothing else, it's one of those interesting

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 1>quirks that we've been foreshadowing now through the course of

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. But Notre Dame in a conference they step

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>in now, I think you're right to bring them up

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>after Clemson. That's where they fall in the official Vegas odds.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>They probably are the next best team in the conference.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And this question around Tommy Rees is frankly a very

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>very good one. It's something that I've been trying to

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>figure out the answer to all off season. The truth

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>here is that Reees steps into a pretty good situation.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the first time and Brian Kelly's eleven year tenure

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that he'll have a three year starter at quarterback. That's

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. Yeah, all five starters are back along

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line. They even bring back a sixth guy,

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a rotation guy, so there's there's some depth there. There's

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experience. That's a great starting point. Job

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Number one is assembling the passing game in a way

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that is far less predictable, and it's not going to

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be easy. Their top four pass catchers are all gone,

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Chase Claypool's not going to be out there like jumping

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the stadium making circus catches. So you know,

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the passing game look like? That's where I go

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>first with Reese. What can you do?

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 2>This is col Comet gone, cole Comet's gone? Okay? Do

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 2>they have another six to eight dependable tight end waiting?

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Tommy Tremble, Oh good name.

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Not six to eight. But they've got options. They've always

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>got options at tight end. The wide receiving core, though,

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is a real unknown quantity, a lot of potential, but

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we just we don't know. We've got guys who are

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>all similarly built in Brayden, Lenzay and Lawrence Key's the

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>third all in the five ten, five eleven, anywhere from

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>one seventy five to one ninety range. Explosiveness is I

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>think something you look for out of a guy like

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a Brayden, Lindsay who was there Morgan?

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, they've.

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Also got to transfer in and Bennett, I'm gonna screw

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this up. Skearonic, scaronic something like that. Yeah, from Northwestern

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Big Kids six four more of a possession guy. So

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiving core to me is is where I

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>think Reecee can do the most work. The most complementary

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>thing I can say about the other skill position at

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>running back is that there are good options or good options.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So Reese will have guys to work with. And I

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like Jafar Armstrong, but he's been snake bitten, and so

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is Jamiir Smith, and who knows about Chris Tyree the freshman.

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>They have options, right. It's kind of the same deal

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>as the wide receiver room. Maybe more known quantities there

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>at running back, but it's just like he's got to

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to assemble these pieces here and get

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this offense humming in a way that I think is

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a little less predictable. You used to be able to

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>call the players with Chip. It was getting to that

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>point now with Reese. Hopefully he can spread the defense

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit more, use some of that speed

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>more to his advantage, and see if maybe we can

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>get more pop out of that passing game.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Here's what I want to know, ty and I don't

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 2>know how closely you are tracking this every day. Are

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>there stories coming out to the effect of, this isn't

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>your grandpappies, Tom Reese, This isn't your Grandpappy ian Book.

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 2>You guys are not gonna believe the bombs that he

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 2>is throwing downfield. We're talking laser left, laser right.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>He is gonna turn some let me head, let me

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>say this. If you go through and read just about

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>every preview, a lot of folks are chirping about how

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>efficient ian Book was, and truly, if you look at

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>his back half of the season, the numbers were incredible. Yeah,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>dodible numbers is a very good college quarterback, so you

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>can't take that away from him. But it does strike

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>me as perhaps a little bit of a trojan horse

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that I've watched him throw the deep ball,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and if he doesn't have a big guy who can

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>go up and get it, a little bit of an

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>issue there.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame is still waiting to see if ian Buck

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 2>can be both a gentleman in the streets and a

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 2>freak in the sheets.

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's right. Okay, otherwise though, I'll you know,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>just move quick through defense. I'm low key really pumped

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. Not a lot of big household names, but

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they're very experienced, they're very solid, with good depth. They're

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>flushed with guys who have a lot of upside the

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>name I am watching up front. I'm gonna screw this one.

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm right too, Adao, Gunda g He's really shown great

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>improvement in his time at Notre Dame. I think he's

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>poised for an even bigger year off the edge. So

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the line as a hole is very solid. Secondary is

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be the concern. But whenever you've got Kyle

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton back there, he kind of covers up a lot

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of sins.

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Great.

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't see more than two losses on the schedule.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Clemson and maybe a North Carolina or Louisville,

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but should be fine with Louisville. Yeah, should be a

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>very good year for Notre Dame.

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's reasonable.

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I left a lot out too. Okay.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 2>By the way, as you were talking about it's a

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>huge year for Notre Dame because they've joined a conference.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>They've long been fiercely independent, all I could think about

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 2>was a trailer for a rom com in my head,

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 2>like from a nineties like he said he was going

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to be a bachelor forever until and here we are

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 2>in the intel face.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's move back to the Atlantic, and let's talk about Louisville. Okay,

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>well their story in twenty nineteen. Oh, this is so dramatic.

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I love this. Sorry, I'm sorry for all of the

0:33:56.080 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>good of an explosive passing offense, all of the bad, yeah,

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the defense. What is the biggest reason you have

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>now is we move a year forward that the defense

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>can hold up its end of the bargain this fall

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>at least sometimes not all the time. But is the

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>defense gonna make them less of a half team? I

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>think so.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think dramatically so because it's it's still Scott

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Saderfield and his staff inheriting players. And you need really

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 2>good players to have a really good defense. And or

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you need pretty good players in a lot of time

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 2>with a coach and a system in terminology to put

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>forth a really good defense.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you know.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>The great news is what you talked about is that

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the offense is going to score points against basically this

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 2>entire schedule. We love Mikhael Cunningham, We love to to

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 2>at Well and Des Fitzpatrick. You know, probably a very

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 2>top line duo of receivers in the ACC. They can

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 2>run the ball. They have a couple of pieces big

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the literal big pieces to replace on the offensive line,

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 2>namely McKai Beckton, the left tackle, the enormous left tackle.

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 2>But what I would look for from this Louisville defense

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 2>as a sign of improvement. They're not just going to

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>have all conference players at every level of the defense overnight.

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 2>What I would look for is can they get off

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the field on third down more often? Can they turn

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.919
<v Speaker 2>sixes into threes in the red zone? And the good

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 2>news if you're looking for evidence proof, whatever, but a

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 2>small sample size is Brian Brown, the defensive coordinator for

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Louisville in his year as Scott Saderfield's defensive coordinator app

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 2>State in twenty eighteen, led a defense to amazing results situationally,

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>both in the red zone and on third down. And

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 2>so Louisville was truly truly heinous situationally and on giving

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>up big plays, everything that a defense could do poorly

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen. Louisville defense basically did I think Lynn

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Bowden still running in that just shellacking from Kentucky. I

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 2>think they'll be more comfortable. And it's not just the

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>players learning the system more. It's Brian Brown, the defensive

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 2>coordinator self scouting, seeing what he did wrong, what he

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 2>can fix, how he can better use his players. And

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 2>if it goes from taking a forty percent I think

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 2>they're at forty percent third down conversion rate the defensively

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to thirty five percent to thirty four percent something like that.

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 2>That adds up because the longer a bad defense is

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 2>on the field, the more likely it is they're just

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 2>going to give up a touchdown. But if they can

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 2>figure out ways to get crafty and get off the

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 2>field after only giving up two or three short first

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 2>downs whatever, that's a big difference maker. To give the

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>offense the more wiggle room, to give the offense a

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 2>better field. That's that's where to look for Louisville, going

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 2>from truly bad to just at times.

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is one of the more experienced teams entering

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the two twenty season. Seventy nine percent returning production on offense,

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven percent returning production on defense. But the defense

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is the real concern. One ten in scoring defense last year,

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twentieth in yards per carry aloud, and

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>ninety fifth in quarterback rating allowed. They they just need

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to shore that up a little bit. If they can

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>shore up their defense a little bit and if they

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can get just like marginal improvement along their offensive line,

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that would make this football team way, way better.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 2>And the good news is Mikhail Cunningham is probably one

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 2>of the five best quarterbacks in college football, especially with

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the limited number of Power five teams.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike, Hell, yeah, so that can cover up for a lot.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I like Louisville. I don't know how much yet, but

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot out of Mikail Cunningham down the stretch

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>last year. The stat that I saw from our friend

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>over at Pick six Previews, he pointed out that just

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>given the threshol holds for officially qualifying as the leader

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in a stat category, and you know, it can be

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a little bit weird about who qualifies and who doesn't.

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But if he had thrown, if Michael Cunningham had thrown

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>just one more pass, he would have officially qualified as

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the number two quarterback in the nation in terms of

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback rating and number one in the nation in terms

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of yards per attempt. It's one more pass, It's all

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he would have needed.

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Miami and pitt and back to back weeks early on,

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 2>and then Notre Dame on the road, and then both

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Florida State and Virginia Tech at home, followed by Virginia

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and then they close out the schedule in I'm not

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 2>going to say a nice way, but it could be

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 2>a rougher landing Syracuse Boston College Wake, and they missed Clemson,

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:44.760
<v Speaker 2>So good for Lowville.

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going next?

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh? I guess we should go to another threat. I

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 2>see them as a threat. I don't know how big

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.919
<v Speaker 2>of a threat, but I want to talk about Virginia Tech.

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, the Hokies.

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 2>The Hokies, because I really do like Hendon Hooker and

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 2>what they looked like when he was healthy last year

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 2>he missed a little bit of time, but when he

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 2>became the guy in Blacksburg, they became really impressive. The

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 2>strange thing about Virginia Tech was the defense. Even with

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Bud Foster and his swan song of a final season,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 2>they were sort of all over the place in uncharacteristic fashion.

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So are you.

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Looking at a new defensive coordinator as a big trouble

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 2>y question or are you looking at as you know what?

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It was time?

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.760
<v Speaker 2>It was time for a new brain on that sidelines,

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to get inside the lunchbox of Virginia Tech defense. Where

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 2>do you lean that in terms of a change on

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 2>defense and what it means for Virginia Tech.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the operative question, right. Yeah, Bud Foster had

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>been there in some capacity since NIKE eighty seven. Justin

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Fuente called him the greatest, the greatest defensive coordinator in

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the history of college football, and you know, I mean

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>he's up there. He's very influential.

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>To answer your question here, I guess I'm a little

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of both. I'm a little concerned. I'm also on

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the side of Fuente needing to get kind of like

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the last remnant of the Beamer era out just to

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of move the program forward more in his own image. Now,

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the caveat here is that Justin Hamilton takes over, and

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a young guy, he's thirty seven, but

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>he was a Bud Foster understudy, promoted from he was

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 1>promoted from within. Yeah, so I think you're going to

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of the same stuff out there. The

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 1>other thing that I point out is they also brought

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in Tracy Clays from Wazoo. Before that, he was with Minnesota,

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a really good defensive coach who I think we both

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like a lot. He's going to help because the assistants

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>around Bud Foster at the time, they are all gone

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>now too, so they bring in Tracy Clays to help

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Justin Hamilton. Out Look, most of the team is back here, Dan.

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It does hurt that Caleb Farley, probably the best returning

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>defensive back in the ACC before he opted out, is

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously not going to be on the team, So that

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I think is gonna leave a mark. But the back

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>seven still pretty loaded. The linebacking corps is entirely intact.

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got questions about the defensive line, but I really

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>feel like there is a high floor for this team

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>on defense. Let's go back to Hendon Hooker though, ok

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.919
<v Speaker 1>a second, I'm okay with the defense. I think they're

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be fine. It might take a little bit for

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Justin Hamilton to find his groove, but enough back there

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think they're gonna be okay. Okay. Hendon Hooker

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>had such an impact when he took over in late September.

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Remember last year was supposed to be a cutoff of

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the Ryan Willis album, Right, we're all excited about Ryan Willis. Okay,

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But the tech offense after Hendon Hooker got in there

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was fourteen points better the difference good number points. That's

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of freaking points. The difference was his mobility.

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.760
<v Speaker 1>It just it like added another layer to that offense,

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more zone Reid stuff. They found a way to keep

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the defense off balance. A lot of design power runs

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>too for the quarterback because he's a big kid, like

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>he's out there trucking guys. So him coming in added

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a new dimension to this offense. It certainly gave Virginia

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Tech a different angle to play things on the offensive side.

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think now as we move forward, after Hooker

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>had that year, you take into account a running back

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>room that is that is also very interesting. Now, they

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>had de Sean mccleae leave early for the NFL, and

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like Kishan King was going to be the

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>heir apparent. But Tech, playing the same game as everyone else,

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>goes out and they pick up two transfers, one of

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which is Khalil Herbert from Kansas, the other of which

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is Raheem Blackshear from Rutgers, who just today was given

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>immediate eligibility. And so now suddenly we've got King in there,

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got Herbert, and we've got black Shear. Different kinds

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of running backs right, like Herbert's more power, black Sheear's

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>smaller and more nimble. We've also got a guy like

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a Marco Lee who transferred in a big kid. I

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>only bring all this up because Tech has this long

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>tradition of having a good rushing attack, and it feels

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like an eternity since we had anything dependable back there.

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I am so curious to see now, knowing that Hendon

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Hooker had a good year, that he's mobile, that you

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>can do different stuff with him. You've got different kinds

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of running backs now. I would be very curious to

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:08.240
<v Speaker 1>see if the new look Virginia Tech team with Hendon

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Hooker finds a way to utilize that. I know that

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously Justin Falente made his mark as like this guy

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>who likes to air it out. But he suddenly has

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback who can do things with his legs in

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a really powerful way, and with the depth that they

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have at running back. I don't know. I'm just very curious.

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I might be more interested in both of the Virginia

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>teams this year in twenty twenty than any other teams

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in the ACC.

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Two running backs have gone over a thousand yards in

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the last decade for Virginia Tech. Now the game has

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>evolved to the point where what you can do through

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the air seems to be more important, and how you

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>use a running back in a versatile way is where

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>football is right now. I did not realize it got

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 2>so awful in the backfield in terms of consistent production.

0:44:54.680 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Trevon McMillan and David will Seevid Wilson, yep, mister backflip himself.

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 2>So it'd be nice for Hendon Hooker to keep defenses

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 2>honest in a way that not a lot of recent

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 2>And we've had some some I think pretty decent Virginia

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Tech quarterbacks in recent years. I mean Logan Thomas had

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 2>his moments, and I know I'm forgetting somebody who was

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Who's the JC guy from just a couple of years ago.

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Josh Jackson came in, but now I'm forgetting

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 2>his name and he left too early. But draw Evans,

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 2>draw Evans. So I'm excited that I think Hendon Hooker

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 2>gives them a higher ceiling than they've had at his

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 2>absolute best. So I'm excited to see where this leads.

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that Braxton Burmeister is on this roster too?

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I did know that, but he did not get immediate eligibility.

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe. No, the the final point here in

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech, I love the way the schedule sets up

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for him. It's sort of like a banger's only ACC slate,

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's space.

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a nice schedule.

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It's spaced out of a way that's not too crazy,

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Like they're at North Carolina and then they got three

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks before they're at Louisville in a couple weeks before

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they come home against Miami, and then like three more

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks until they're home against Clemson. The close out the year.

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>From a scheduling standpoint, that's about as good as you're

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.439
<v Speaker 1>going to get with four games, all of which should

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>be pretty tough games.

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they miss what Notre Dame and Florida State. Yeah,

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:23.320
<v Speaker 2>I believe in terms of the huge now ACC programs,

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 2>at least for now. So Yeah, the spacing is really nice.

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 2>The fact that they'll have an entire season before Clemson,

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 2>and they get Clemson in Lane Stadium, it's wonderful.

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's stick with Florida State since you mentioned the Knowles. Yeah, Okay,

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a storied program, Dan, and it is not

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>lost on any of us that since Jimbo left it

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>has very much been in flux. I have to ask

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the question, how much deeper do the Florida State issues

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>run than, you know, just the offense. Like Mike Norvel,

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:05.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive guy coming in, I think we all expect at

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:07.359
<v Speaker 1>some point in his tenure he's going to be able

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to quote unquote fix it and make it better. But

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we're in year one change in the system. How much

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>more meat is there on the bone beyond just whatever

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he can do and gobble up. In terms of offense,

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot happening. There's a lot happening because it

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean the defense. For all the talent they've recruited

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on all three levels, the linebackers have been pretty bad.

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the secondary in terms of guys with

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 1>high level expectations, have fully worked out to where I

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>think Florida State fans and Florida State coaches of multiple

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:48.360
<v Speaker 1>staffs have expected them to. The defensive lines interesting. Marvin

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Wilson is a name that I think a lot of

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>people know. He anchors the line. I think he's expected

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to be on a national level, appreciated, and he's like

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a preseason All American or something. I think the defensive

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>line will be pretty good. I think the defense will

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be more improved. The big issue with Florida State, it

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 1>seems from the outside from AFAR, is just that day

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to day organization and paying attention to detail that the

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Willy Taggart era and the Willy Taggart staff, they were

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there to recruit and generate excitement, but the unexciting stuff

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is what helps you win championships or what gets you

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to eight and then ten wins, and so that was

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>what was lacking. And by all accounts, Mike Norvella and

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>his staff have been a lot more dependable and organized

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and detail oriented than the previous staff or whatever the

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the Jimbo era look like. So that's good.

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Communication at times has not been great, at least that's

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what it seems publicly between the coaches and players, but

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully all of that is getting fixed for the season.

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I think they will be improved. They're going to it's

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>not as even though Memphis looked like a much more

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 1>modern offense there were pro style concepts. It's not going

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to be as what at Gulf Coast quick screens and

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>RPO stuff, and there's going to be a lot of

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>RPO stuff in this offense, but I think it's a

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more pro style than at least I was anticipating.

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:14.719
<v Speaker 1>So James Blackman should be put in a position where

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he's able to have the scheme open up receivers for him,

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>where he's not gonna have to throw receivers open or

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>get it the ball into tight windows, things like that.

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>But as I've mentioned before, I'm at a certain point. Guy.

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a lot of James Blackman, and what the

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 2>James Blackman experience is is there are times when he

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 2>looks really good. It generally tends to be against not

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 2>so good competition and against the better teams and the

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 2>bigger situations, he becomes less dependable. Throws that he should

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 2>be completing by now downfield he doesn't. So will it you?

0:49:57.080 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Will it be a Mike Norvell. Kenny Dillingham is the

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 2>young offense coordinator. He was born in twenty ten, Taie,

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 2>did you know that about Florida State twenty ten? He

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 2>is ten years old. So he was at Auburn last

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 2>year but was not calling plays for the Tigers. So

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 2>he has a really good reputation in the coaching world

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 2>as being a boy Wonder. So hopefully that combination of

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 2>prior success and just a fresh start with I think

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 2>their fourth offensive coordinator in four years means something. There's

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more consistency and just the terminology sings

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 2>in quickly. He was named the starter. I think he

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 2>will improve. I think he is a quarterback with a

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 2>pretty low ceiling. That's my concern. No, cam akers now

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 2>to help them in the run game. They've recruited fine,

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 2>not amazingly well these past couple of years.

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I am.

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 2>I am confident by the end of the year will

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 2>have a concept of what Florida State can be, but

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 2>not what they are, what they want.

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>To be, or what they want to be, you know.

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're right to say that recruiting has been fine,

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but it has trended downward the last three seasons and

0:51:13.200 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it needs to start trending back up. I think if

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 1>they want to start getting on that path. You know,

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.800
<v Speaker 1>from a really high level, it's offensive line and quarterback.

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are the big Those are the big issues on

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>offense that Mike Norvel needs to try and come and fix.

0:51:27.320 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>The defense should be fine, should be loaded, but there

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on at Florida State. It's not

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>an easy job. It does extend off the field as well,

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>so we wish Mike Norvel well, but it's it's a

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>big rebuild in some sense of the word and not

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so much in others. Correct.

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's gonna take time.

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Where you want to go next?

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. I guess what. I'm interested in Miami.

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 2>I am for sure interested in Miami because I have

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 2>fond memories of Derek King. They are rivals with Florida State.

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 2>At times they looked kind of fun last year, and

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 2>at times they look like they were nightmare bad and

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 2>forgot the rules of football. So, as far as you

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 2>can tell in Miami right now.

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Is is is it.

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 2>One side of the ball saving the other or both sides?

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you anticipate being equal contributors to hypothetical success?

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me start here. That's that's the question. You

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.840
<v Speaker 1>got the right questions. Okay, as a whole, I really

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>like Manny Diaz. I want this to work for him.

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He's Miami guy. What but it says, I know this

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is Brandon breaking news play. It was his dad the mayor.

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>His dad may have been the mayor even though he

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:51.479
<v Speaker 1>went to Florida State. This is a team that went

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 1>six and seventy year ago. Yeah, a good defense, a

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>shaky offense. I don't think any of that was unexpected.

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:03.439
<v Speaker 1>What got me, though, is that this team quit. They

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>quit down the stretch. They beat Louisville by four touchdowns

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much packed it in three straight bad losses

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 1>to close out the year. I'm talking if I you

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Duke and Louisiana Tech. Do you remember talking about LA

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Tech in the bowl game? You remember that conversation. I

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>remember you and I were looking at this and we're thinking,

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what the point spread is, Miami quit,

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we gotta go LA Tech outright? We did. They won

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the game fourteen to nothing. Louisiana Tech did. I don't

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:38.319
<v Speaker 1>like it when it seems like a team quits, so

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:40.880
<v Speaker 1>forgive me if I'm skeptical that anything is going to

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote work.

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't like it when team scored zero, literally no points. Well,

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 2>that too, I don't like that either.

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if we zoom in on the offense this season,

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the right move that they went out

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and got rhtt Lashley.

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Why is that?

0:53:58.600 --> 0:54:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's why I think it's the right move because

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of the combination between Lashly and their new transfer Deeric King.

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Deeric King is a near perfect fit for that offense.

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:14.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's think of Cam Newton, Let's think of Nick

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Marshall at Auburn. That's like kind of a prototype for

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what you might be able to expect here in terms

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of steaming, in terms of scheme, in terms of scheme.

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I think I think this is a

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>good combo in order to make that offense better. If

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:36.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, it's gonna be much faster, tempo, much more

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:40.200
<v Speaker 1>exciting than the stuff that Danny's enos was doing last year.

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Bigger picture, like, if Rhet Lashley can help build Miami

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:50.800
<v Speaker 1>into the South Florida Auburn, that'd be amazing, That'd be incredible. Okay,

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the offense is gonna be better than last year.

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>My problem is that the only other player I like

0:54:56.040 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on this offense is the tight end. Brevin Joe is

0:54:58.840 --> 0:54:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the tight end Brevin Jordan.

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I just don't know about Ratt Lashley.

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I feel like if I were to hang out with

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Gosling and Brad Pitt doesn't make me any better looking.

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 2>What he is specifically responsible for doing with SMU and Auburn.

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 2>I know he's a Gus guy. I think he played

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:21.320
<v Speaker 2>quarterback for Gus in high school.

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:22.480
<v Speaker 1>He did.

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like it's some of the Gus pixie

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.160
<v Speaker 2>dusts and maybe a little bit of Sunny Dyke's pixie

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 2>dust that's propelling his contract and opportunities forward.

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think I'm not sure I fully

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 1>see it. I think it's totally fair to come down

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on that side of the fence, and I share your skepticism.

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I do think that for the scheme that we know

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Lashley likes to run, Dearick King's a good fit for that.

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>My skepticism is less rooted in what we think of

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>him as a coordinator and more with the atmospherics of

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the offense all right. Outside of Brevin Jordan, the line

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>last year was young and terrible and they gave up

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:01.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty sacks.

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Most of those guys are back, but are they going

0:56:04.960 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to get better? I don't know. I'm inclined to say yes,

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think we're looking at like a quantum

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:13.800
<v Speaker 1>leap forward here, not with a new offense being installed

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:15.759
<v Speaker 1>amid a freaking pandemic.

0:56:15.960 --> 0:56:18.120
<v Speaker 2>It's I was gonna say, it's very rare with line

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 2>play where you talk about a line being atrocious and

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 2>then fast forward a year and say they're pretty good.

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean we talked about that with Penn State.

0:56:27.800 --> 0:56:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I remember the other thing.

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 1>DJ Dallas is gone.

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Can Cameron Harris step in and be the bell cow?

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Can he get two hundred carries a year?

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Does he get his own offensive line?

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Does he get a new one?

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I he as good as a backup, But I you know,

0:56:45.680 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and then what's the receiving corps? Like, I don't know.

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of guys who have potential, but

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:53.759
<v Speaker 1>there's no one that you look at the roster and

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:56.479
<v Speaker 1>you say, Aha, that's the guy. That's the guy who's

0:56:56.520 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be the playmaker. So you know, there's reason

0:57:01.000 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to like the offense. I think. I do think that

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the Deeric King ANDRHT Lashley Combo is good. But I

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>do worry about the supporting cast. Defensively, they you know,

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they lost guys to the NFL. Maybe not a top

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 1>ten defense this year, but at worst case it's like

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>top twenty five. Maybe we're splitting hairs. I just I

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of confidence in that partnership between Manny

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Diaz and Blake Baker, their defensive coordinator. That said, it

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is a huge deal that Gregory was so opted out.

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's a guy he led the ACC fifteen and a

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 1>half sacks as a red shirt freshman, obviously projected as

0:57:43.760 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a first rounder in the upcoming draft. He pulled the

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>plug back at the beginning of August. So you know,

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I think still the defense is going to be the

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball leading the charge here. For as

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>much as we talk about Deeric King transferring in, don't

0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:03.280
<v Speaker 1>let it distract you from what Miami did on defense

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in the transfer market here too high profile transfers, we're

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going to say yeah, yeah, Quincy Roche from Temple and

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>also Jalen Phillips coming in from UCLA Rashe had fourteen

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sacks last year and number Yeah. Phillips is a former

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>number one overall recruit from a couple of years ago.

0:58:21.640 --> 0:58:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Sat out last year after surgery. But I think the

0:58:24.320 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>pass rush will be really good. They got a couple

0:58:27.160 --> 0:58:29.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that are gone on in the linebacking corps and

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary. But I think they're going to figure

0:58:31.360 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it out because the track record sort of speaks for itself,

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:38.200
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of words there. I am decidedly mixed

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on where I feel Miami comes down this year. It

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is definitively an ACC bangers only schedule. It is at Louisville.

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It is Florida State, at Clemson, at Virginia Tech, and

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, No Notre Dame. If I'm counting on an

0:58:56.320 --> 0:59:00.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven game slate, I say anywhere from even in four

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>up to nine and two.

0:59:03.720 --> 0:59:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Really, yeah, wow, I did learn Shack Quarterman. It's finally gone.

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Holy hell, that dude was so good for so long.

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Good for the Canes. Yeah, I mean at Clemson is

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 2>never going to be a treat and they follow it

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 2>up with Pitton Virginia whatever your opinions are of them.

0:59:22.320 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's spaced out pretty well, so I'm good

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:27.080
<v Speaker 2>with their schedule. I want to I want to jump

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:30.680
<v Speaker 2>over to your side of things here, Dan, Okay, can

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 2>you tell me what the hell happened to NC State?

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:37.720
<v Speaker 1>No? What? Yeah? I kind of can usually a pretty

0:59:37.760 --> 0:59:45.040
<v Speaker 1>competitive program and last year they just they weren't. Has

0:59:45.160 --> 0:59:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the pixie dust of being pretty good evaporated in in Raleigh, Like,

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:54.240
<v Speaker 1>what what the hell is going on with the wolf

0:59:54.320 --> 0:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Pack man.

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I made an alarming discovery. NC

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:02.720
<v Speaker 2>State was much in the way Louisville was in the

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:05.800
<v Speaker 2>final season of Bobby Patrino. I think they were the

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>worst team against the spread over twenty nineteen, where basically

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Vegas couldn't believe how bad NC State was. They keep

1:00:15.840 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>they kept giving them reasonable amounts of points, and teams

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>just kept shredding them. They finished two to ten against

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the spread in twenty nineteen, so it wasn't quite where

1:00:27.600 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I forget if it was like a one and eleven

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>and zero to twelve somewhere along there for Louisville and

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Petrinos last season, where just you can make money betting

1:00:35.120 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 2>against them. Okay, Vegas has always underestimated how bad certain

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>teams are, and last year was NC State. They were

1:00:41.960 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>beat up in a number of places. Quarterback didn't work out,

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>defense certainly didn't work out. They replaced a ton of coaches,

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>so obviously there were there were issues within the facility

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>in terms of communication, what they wanted to do. It

1:00:54.600 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>just everything like degenerated into a mess. I don't know

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>if that was an Eli Drinkwitz thing where he was

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:04.320
<v Speaker 2>somebody who kind of held together that offense in impressive fashion,

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and when he left to take over at APP State

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and now of course Maszoo, that things fell apart. My

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:13.560
<v Speaker 2>issue with where NC State goes from here is they

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>hired a gentleman to run the offense that is generally

1:01:17.480 --> 1:01:21.439
<v Speaker 2>and recently been fired when offenses haven't worked out. That's

1:01:21.560 --> 1:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Tim Beck.

1:01:22.440 --> 1:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Can't lift arm or speak normal. Right. We've talked about

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the beck Meyer syndrome here correct many times.

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I just when you are making wholesale changes to reverse

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>a slide, I think you got to go with somebody

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>who's going to energize your team with recent success and

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>an interesting way of doing things. And I'm pretty positive

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Tim Beck must be a great guy because he just

1:01:55.120 --> 1:02:00.040
<v Speaker 2>keeps getting hired for impressive positions. But it does it

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:03.840
<v Speaker 2>seem like the guy to take your program to a

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:08.439
<v Speaker 2>new place. And that's what concerns me. I know there's

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>a young quarterback there that they feel pretty good about,

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>and there are a couple pieces on defense, but it's

1:02:14.400 --> 1:02:18.959
<v Speaker 2>even hard to point to that. I just think this

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>is it's hard to say, beginning of the end for

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Dave Dorn. But when we see wholesale collapses. It's very

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>unusual to see. Okay, that was a one year blip

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and we're back to being and this is a normal

1:02:34.680 --> 1:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>math year eight and four, nine and three type team. Now,

1:02:37.680 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe they get Bowl eligible again, but it feels like

1:02:40.280 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>we are on the downslope of the Dave Dorn experience

1:02:44.040 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 2>in Raleigh.

1:02:45.080 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of alliteration there. But was it downside

1:02:48.960 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of Dave Dorian? Yeah, oh, okay, I didn't even realize

1:02:52.080 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it the downslope, So.

1:02:55.760 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>It's it was a snake bit year. So I'm willing

1:02:58.240 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to believe in some sort of reversal, But I am

1:03:02.200 --> 1:03:04.640
<v Speaker 2>not a I'm not a Tim Beck believer in terms

1:03:04.680 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>of getting a team back to a respectable bowl with

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>their offense and not having the talent of a you know,

1:03:12.240 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State or Texas to to bail you out of situations.

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me stay in the great state of

1:03:18.680 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina here and ask about another team. Okay, Wake Forest,

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk wake You know, Dave Clawson has I

1:03:28.200 --> 1:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>think rightfully earned the respect of many around the world

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of college football because he's done a pretty good job

1:03:33.600 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>at Wake Forest. He's taken them to four straight bowl games.

1:03:37.600 --> 1:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The program is definitely more consistent than it was before

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he got there. He's been really good at developing talent,

1:03:46.360 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>apparently also writing up potential plans for a spring season

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>before ye before you know, the ACC decided it was

1:03:54.800 --> 1:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>going to forge ahead here in the fall.

1:03:56.960 --> 1:03:57.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he and Jeff Brohm.

1:03:58.640 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there a reason to believe that this year is

1:04:01.600 --> 1:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be any different, like noticeably better or worse

1:04:05.080 --> 1:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this fall? Because I'm looking at this roster, I'm seeing

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a complete rebuild on offense. I'm thinking there has to

1:04:11.480 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be a step back. They obviously lose Jamie Newman, who's

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>transferring out and presumed to be the starter at Georgia,

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Like where's Clawson at now? As we get into the

1:04:23.160 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>weird twenty twenty season before.

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Us Yeah, not to mention Sage Surrat, the All American

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:31.640
<v Speaker 2>receiver who was so so good before he got hurt

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>last year. He opts out and is deciding not to

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:36.720
<v Speaker 2>play this season as he recovers from injury and prepares

1:04:36.760 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>for the NFL. I like Wake Forest. So they return

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a bunch on defense that's highlighted by one of my

1:04:42.880 --> 1:04:46.080
<v Speaker 2>absolute favorite names in college football, and Boogie Basham Carlos

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Sashim but Boogie Basham for those who know, fantastic ed rusher,

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>just really really strong. And they lost a couple of

1:04:54.640 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>key players on defense that where rotation guys are started.

1:04:57.840 --> 1:05:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Who's the other end opposite him? It was Kid carn

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>But offensively, I like Donovan Green a lot. He came in.

1:05:04.240 --> 1:05:06.600
<v Speaker 2>He was a four star receiver and he played a

1:05:06.600 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>few games at the end of last year and definitely

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:12.720
<v Speaker 2>just look like a game breaking type receiver. They're fortunate

1:05:12.760 --> 1:05:15.080
<v Speaker 2>that Sam Hartman, who was hurt, he is back. Even

1:05:15.080 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 2>with the loss of Jamie Newman, Sam Hartman steps back

1:05:17.800 --> 1:05:20.880
<v Speaker 2>into the starting quarterback role. I think they're gonna be fine.

1:05:20.960 --> 1:05:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's going to be appreciably better or

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>worse because they've reached the point where they identify pretty

1:05:26.440 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>good players at most positions. They're soundly coached. I mean, essentially,

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>what we're talking about is Dave Clawson gets his tires rotated,

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:36.920
<v Speaker 2>he gets his oil changed, he puts air in his tires,

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:40.280
<v Speaker 2>he vacuums his car. He's not gonna have the fastest

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 2>automobile in the world, but it's dependable tie it's not

1:05:44.200 --> 1:05:47.720
<v Speaker 2>going to break down. And with where wake has been

1:05:48.160 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>pre Clawson. The fact that you have a coach who's

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:54.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna get his tires rotated and his oil changed, it's

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:57.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty great. It's boring, and that's sort of what I

1:05:57.120 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>talked about with Florida State, where the Willie era infuse

1:06:01.480 --> 1:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the program with excitement and they're back and it's the

1:06:04.200 --> 1:06:07.960
<v Speaker 2>old Florida State whatever. Wake Forest is just they're getting

1:06:08.000 --> 1:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>off the field on third down.

1:06:09.200 --> 1:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Ty, that's pretty good.

1:06:11.280 --> 1:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>It's they're not great in the red zone, but they're

1:06:13.440 --> 1:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>doing little things consistently well. That if your program We've

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>talked about this with Utah, but I think Utah is

1:06:19.040 --> 1:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>a better program and a better team than wake Forest.

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:25.800
<v Speaker 2>If your program is deficient in one to three ways,

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a pretty good chance wake Forest is going to

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>beat you. And that's amazing. It's amazing to have in

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Winston Salem. So no, I don't think it's gonna be

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>all that different, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

1:06:37.680 --> 1:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I would point out that wake Forest opens up its

1:06:40.600 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>season at home. Yeah, that's good. Clempson Tigers dan Ah.

1:06:45.960 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>That is one pm on September the twelfth, so not

1:06:50.120 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Labor Day weekend, but the weekend after Currently Clemson is

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>checking in with a thirty one and a half point

1:06:57.920 --> 1:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>line here on the road. It's a lot of points.

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>You'll have to listen next week as we preview that game,

1:07:04.080 --> 1:07:05.439
<v Speaker 2>or whenever we preview that game.

1:07:05.520 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I'm already looking at some picks here that

1:07:07.400 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like, but we'll get to that. We

1:07:09.160 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>won't have as many games of preview next week. It's okay,

1:07:11.680 --> 1:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you could probably get through all of them.

1:07:16.720 --> 1:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Where do you want to go next?

1:07:17.560 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>So you tell me, ty, I want to go back

1:07:19.720 --> 1:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to the great state of North Carolina, and I want

1:07:21.280 --> 1:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Duke and I want to talk about

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina.

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, North Carolina to me, I don't know. Just tell

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:33.280
<v Speaker 2>me about their rotation linebackers real quick. Just run through

1:07:34.000 --> 1:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>when to expect substitutions.

1:07:36.320 --> 1:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I know. I mean, if you want to talk about

1:07:40.200 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Chaz Surrat, you already know that I went through the

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>universal Charlie to Chaz conversion here. But he's chuckles.

1:07:46.280 --> 1:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>You gotta remember that, you two. Mac Brown, I think

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>he definitely out shown my expectations. And Sam Howell, I

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>mean immediately was really fun and ended the season. Really,

1:08:00.520 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it was what Temple that North Carolina shredded

1:08:03.200 --> 1:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>in the bowl game. So what is Yr two? What's reasonable?

1:08:06.840 --> 1:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>What are stretch goals? Tie?

1:08:09.160 --> 1:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a corporate term stretch goal for the Heel.

1:08:13.160 --> 1:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Give me some stretch goals and some realistic ones.

1:08:15.600 --> 1:08:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean seven and six in Mac Brown's second

1:08:20.560 --> 1:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>first year in Chapel Hill with a big bull win

1:08:23.800 --> 1:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>over Temple. They didn't just exceed expectations, they cleared the

1:08:27.760 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>bar by about eight feet. So this was a very

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>successful opening or second opening stanza for Mac Brown coming

1:08:36.280 --> 1:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>back home to North Carolina. You know. So because of that,

1:08:40.280 --> 1:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the concept of what's realistic and what's not realistic, all

1:08:43.680 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of goes out the window here. The truth

1:08:46.280 --> 1:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is there are four big games on the schedule, Virginia

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech at Florida State, home against Notre Dame, and on

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the road at Miami. Is it possible that they win

1:08:56.720 --> 1:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>all four of those? I don't know. I would say

1:09:01.120 --> 1:09:04.599
<v Speaker 1>probably not, But this is a good team with a

1:09:04.640 --> 1:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>lot coming back. If they win all four, they're going

1:09:07.320 --> 1:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ten and zer and they're playing Clemson for the ACC

1:09:09.439 --> 1:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>title game. Yeah. Again, likely, I don't know, but a possibility.

1:09:14.400 --> 1:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Shore I could envision a world of which that is possible,

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Sam Howe.

1:09:19.880 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Did you just hear my son by the way, I did. Okay, good,

1:09:23.040 --> 1:09:23.719
<v Speaker 2>leave that in there.

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I will. Yeah.

1:09:25.080 --> 1:09:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Now he has a lot of North Carolina thoughts, but

1:09:26.800 --> 1:09:27.559
<v Speaker 2>he's too young.

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam Howe was a true freshman and had an unbelievable

1:09:32.320 --> 1:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>breakout campaign through for thirty eight touchdowns and thirty six

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:40.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards. Basically, everybody is back eighty seven percent returning

1:09:40.800 --> 1:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>production on this offense, including their one thousand yard back

1:09:45.000 --> 1:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Michael Carter, two one thousand yard receivers in Daz Newsome

1:09:49.960 --> 1:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and Diami Brown. If there is a better named wide

1:09:53.400 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver duo in college football, I'd love to hear it. Okay,

1:09:57.840 --> 1:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the entire receiver room is back, not just the those

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:03.519
<v Speaker 1>two guys. That is all in addition to five of

1:10:03.560 --> 1:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>their seven guys on the O line coming back as well.

1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the twenty fifth best offense a year ago.

1:10:10.880 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>By default, just with the very nature of the talent

1:10:14.240 --> 1:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>coming back. It has to get better. And that's not

1:10:18.080 --> 1:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>just because there are fewer teams this fall, but it

1:10:20.920 --> 1:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>has to improve I think by default because of that

1:10:24.240 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>experience factor.

1:10:25.800 --> 1:10:29.679
<v Speaker 2>So I'm excited, Okay, I mean, they've recruited really well

1:10:29.760 --> 1:10:32.759
<v Speaker 2>they have me background has done an exceptional job recruiting

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>what they just pulled off the number one corner the

1:10:35.840 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>country for an upcoming class.

1:10:37.240 --> 1:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Tony Grimes, Yeah, Tony.

1:10:38.800 --> 1:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Grimes, that's right. So they're going to keep improving. There's

1:10:45.200 --> 1:10:48.840
<v Speaker 2>still some spillover, certainly from the Fedora era when things

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:50.400
<v Speaker 2>got a little bit ugly on defense, but they were

1:10:50.439 --> 1:10:52.680
<v Speaker 2>still competitive at the end there by the way you

1:10:52.680 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>were mentioning the offense and the improvement and the explosive

1:10:55.439 --> 1:10:57.479
<v Speaker 2>factor of their offense. Can I ask you a question

1:10:57.560 --> 1:10:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that's going to that might take you off guard a

1:10:59.600 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

1:11:00.000 --> 1:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's pretty much your role on this shit is it.

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Does Phil Longo, their offensive coordinator, does he follow you

1:11:06.160 --> 1:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter?

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know? Okay, does he follow you? Would know?

1:11:11.840 --> 1:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have no idea he did. I don't know

1:11:14.840 --> 1:11:17.759
<v Speaker 2>if he still does. But the reason I'm questioning it

1:11:17.800 --> 1:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>is because if he follows you, and if you work

1:11:21.040 --> 1:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>in some fashion in college football, he will DM you.

1:11:24.680 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 2>And and it's not weird or personal or anything like that.

1:11:29.520 --> 1:11:34.240
<v Speaker 2>It's he just shares excitement about North Carolina football and

1:11:34.280 --> 1:11:38.280
<v Speaker 2>shares social media graphics. Okay, And so I'll be sitting

1:11:38.280 --> 1:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter one, you know, a random afternoon follow you July.

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:44.639
<v Speaker 2>At least at some point he did. I can check

1:11:44.680 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and see if he still does. I don't think he does,

1:11:46.080 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>because I haven't gotten dms from him anymore. But I'll

1:11:49.160 --> 1:11:51.960
<v Speaker 2>get a DM and it's and it's basically, this is

1:11:52.000 --> 1:11:53.960
<v Speaker 2>what it looks like to my eyes or what it

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>sounds like to my eyes. Oh yeah, North Carolina Football

1:11:57.320 --> 1:12:02.200
<v Speaker 2>fourteen days away, old brother, feel it a little macho man,

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Randy Savage there.

1:12:03.280 --> 1:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Didn't know if the little goes into that, But I

1:12:06.280 --> 1:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>love I.

1:12:06.920 --> 1:12:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Just he's marketing.

1:12:08.520 --> 1:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I like it a lot.

1:12:09.800 --> 1:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>But it's really funny to get a DM that's like,

1:12:12.040 --> 1:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>oh my gosh, brother, it's North Carolina tarial football.

1:12:16.160 --> 1:12:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe it's He's a good offensive coordinator? Man?

1:12:20.720 --> 1:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>He is, he really is. He's got the air raid background.

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think in year two what will

1:12:27.280 --> 1:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting little wrinkle to follow is him working

1:12:31.240 --> 1:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in all sorts of other stuff with the depth that

1:12:34.880 --> 1:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he has across the board. Like, just because he's got

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the air raid background doesn't mean he necessarily is gonna

1:12:40.040 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>run all air raid. He's kind of good at varying

1:12:43.200 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that approach and using the personnel, and he's got it

1:12:46.000 --> 1:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, frankly, so I'm excited about that. Defensively, this

1:12:50.720 --> 1:12:53.599
<v Speaker 1>is a team led by our boy, Chas Serrat, converted

1:12:53.680 --> 1:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback led the team in tackles in his first year

1:12:57.280 --> 1:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as a defender in his first year. Can you believe it?

1:13:02.560 --> 1:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready. Yeah, I just he's so good.

1:13:05.920 --> 1:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I love this.

1:13:06.439 --> 1:13:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's the Joel Lanning. We need converted

1:13:09.040 --> 1:13:11.439
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks to linebacker every season.

1:13:11.680 --> 1:13:12.599
<v Speaker 1>If we are.

1:13:13.080 --> 1:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Not mentioning a quarterback converted to linebacker, please alert us

1:13:17.320 --> 1:13:19.439
<v Speaker 2>to this, because we honor each and every one of them.

1:13:19.680 --> 1:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>The real question on defense is up front. I like

1:13:22.200 --> 1:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Jay Bateman, but he runs a three man front. They're

1:13:25.240 --> 1:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>losing two good ones. He's going to need some youth

1:13:27.720 --> 1:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to step up and plug that gap. So the question

1:13:30.800 --> 1:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for me is upfront. I think you could probably run

1:13:32.920 --> 1:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on UNC this year. But to answer your question, it's

1:13:36.240 --> 1:13:39.479
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say what is realistic in year two. Again,

1:13:39.520 --> 1:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I could invent a weird reality in a very weird

1:13:43.360 --> 1:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>year where UNC manages to go ten and zero and

1:13:46.360 --> 1:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>play Clemson for the title. I don't think that's likely,

1:13:49.439 --> 1:13:53.639
<v Speaker 1>but I do think North Carolina playing Clemson for the title.

1:13:53.880 --> 1:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Phil Longo, thank you, thank you. I'm excited

1:13:57.120 --> 1:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>about you and see, though not excited for Notre Dame

1:13:59.360 --> 1:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to play un see, I do you in chap Lell

1:14:02.160 --> 1:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>but yaw.

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Sam Howell is one of the very most exciting parts

1:14:08.320 --> 1:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>of college football moving forward. For sure's every reason if

1:14:11.240 --> 1:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>you have a young, exciting quarterback, life is amazing. Here

1:14:16.960 --> 1:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>what the final record ends up as being, there's only

1:14:20.040 --> 1:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>fourteen teams that can say that or whatever the number is.

1:14:22.840 --> 1:14:25.799
<v Speaker 2>So North Carolina, let's watch.

1:14:25.600 --> 1:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Them, Let's watch so. I think they are headed in

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. I do worry about their rival Duke though, Okay,

1:14:32.920 --> 1:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tell me why I do. I do worry A really

1:14:37.040 --> 1:14:42.559
<v Speaker 1>bad second half of the year last year, five and

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>seven I think was the record. I think we'll know

1:14:47.120 --> 1:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>more after the season if.

1:14:49.240 --> 1:14:51.519
<v Speaker 2>We lost I think five of their final six.

1:14:51.680 --> 1:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not a good A very very poor way to

1:14:54.720 --> 1:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>close out the year. And it's I think you look

1:14:57.960 --> 1:15:00.439
<v Speaker 1>at the at the team, you look at the program,

1:15:00.479 --> 1:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you wonder which direction are things going? I think we

1:15:03.680 --> 1:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>got a wait to hear here. You know. Cutcliffe, David

1:15:07.200 --> 1:15:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Cutcliffe has gone to a Bowl six of the last

1:15:09.640 --> 1:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>eight seasons. He's obviously done a good job raising the

1:15:13.240 --> 1:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>profile of Duke football. It does feel a little bit though,

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:20.599
<v Speaker 1>like the peak of the mountain for them came back

1:15:20.640 --> 1:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in twenty thirteen when they won the Coastal Division. So

1:15:25.080 --> 1:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a great here.

1:15:26.720 --> 1:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's take a quick look. And I don't

1:15:29.760 --> 1:15:33.679
<v Speaker 2>think you're necessarily wrong. They either lost big or tiny,

1:15:34.200 --> 1:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>and they didn't lose medium. In twenty nineteen. They lost

1:15:38.000 --> 1:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>by nearly forty to Alabama. They lost by three to

1:15:40.960 --> 1:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>pit No, not a huge shame in that, in a

1:15:43.320 --> 1:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>very strange game. They lost by a bunch too. Division

1:15:47.200 --> 1:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>champ Virginia. Okay, not amazing. This wasn't a killer Virginia team,

1:15:50.920 --> 1:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>But that's fine. This was not a bad Virginia team.

1:15:53.360 --> 1:15:57.800
<v Speaker 2>They lost by a field goal at North Carolina. That's respectable.

1:15:57.840 --> 1:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>They held down the North Carolina offense, got shelled by

1:16:00.840 --> 1:16:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame. They got shelled by QS. That's when I'm like, Eh,

1:16:04.680 --> 1:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>that shouldn't that shouldn't happen twenty nineteen anyway, and they

1:16:08.120 --> 1:16:10.559
<v Speaker 2>lost by twelve, which I guess is medium, to Wake Forest.

1:16:10.560 --> 1:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>But there's no real shame in that. And you talk

1:16:12.760 --> 1:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>about their disastrous into their season the downslope. David Cutcliffe

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:22.360
<v Speaker 2>alliteration that disaster of a twenty nineteen was still ten

1:16:22.360 --> 1:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>points better than Miami, still ten points better than back

1:16:27.240 --> 1:16:27.639
<v Speaker 2>half of.

1:16:27.560 --> 1:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The season Miami.

1:16:28.400 --> 1:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>To give you any indication of where the Canes were

1:16:30.360 --> 1:16:33.040
<v Speaker 2>in November, yeah, I you.

1:16:33.000 --> 1:16:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Know, that's all. It'll be interesting. Chase Bryce comes over

1:16:36.720 --> 1:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>from Clemson. You may remember that name. Deon Jackson is

1:16:41.240 --> 1:16:43.639
<v Speaker 1>back at running back along with Britton Brown, who comes

1:16:43.680 --> 1:16:47.439
<v Speaker 1>over from UCLA. May recall his name from Westwood. Three

1:16:47.520 --> 1:16:51.639
<v Speaker 1>linemen are back, Devery Hamilton comes over from Stanford. Pretty

1:16:51.680 --> 1:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>much all the receivers are back. So the offense I

1:16:54.920 --> 1:16:57.519
<v Speaker 1>think should step forward. It's a question of how much.

1:16:58.160 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Last year. I don't think there's much room a step

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>back time. No, well, right, that's the point. Last year

1:17:03.520 --> 1:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>one hundredth in points per play, one twenty five in

1:17:07.560 --> 1:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>yards per place. So they have to get better. Their

1:17:10.400 --> 1:17:14.519
<v Speaker 1>passing and rushing numbers were just dreadful. I know it

1:17:14.560 --> 1:17:16.599
<v Speaker 1>may take some time to break in a new quarterback,

1:17:16.640 --> 1:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but there's just there's enough back that if there isn't

1:17:18.760 --> 1:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a jump forward, then it's a deeper problem than personnel.

1:17:22.640 --> 1:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me. Then we'll have the answer to this question

1:17:24.720 --> 1:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of which direction is a program headed. Interestingly enough for Duke.

1:17:29.640 --> 1:17:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Is Daniel Jones good in the NFL? By the way

1:17:32.920 --> 1:17:33.719
<v Speaker 2>I think track?

1:17:34.080 --> 1:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I think second half of the year last year,

1:17:39.320 --> 1:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Danny dim he's dying like he's a top twenty four

1:17:44.479 --> 1:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>NFL quarterback for sure. Okay, that's good for sure. The

1:17:49.600 --> 1:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting bit about Duke is that the defense should lead

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the charge. I saw a quote that they're looking to

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>run an aggressive attacking defense, which, of.

1:17:57.920 --> 1:18:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Course, yeah, well it was a pretty good The defense

1:18:00.439 --> 1:18:01.679
<v Speaker 2>last year was not the issue.

1:18:01.760 --> 1:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was They're gonna blitz the crap out of you.

1:18:03.720 --> 1:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna play tight, They're gonna hope you make a mistake.

1:18:06.680 --> 1:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>There is a risk reward element to that, and I'd

1:18:09.760 --> 1:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>refer you to the latter half of last season if

1:18:11.920 --> 1:18:14.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to take a look at the risks. But

1:18:14.680 --> 1:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the defense should be pretty solid. There's a lot back

1:18:17.280 --> 1:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>secondaries loaded. They are currently listed as a nineteen and

1:18:21.800 --> 1:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a half point dog on the road at Notre Dame

1:18:25.120 --> 1:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>September the twelfth.

1:18:26.120 --> 1:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Just FYI, how do you feel about that?

1:18:29.520 --> 1:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty good about Notre Dame. Okay, pretty good. Yeah,

1:18:34.200 --> 1:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope for Duke's sake.

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, whenever you watch David Cutcliffe in one of

1:18:37.760 --> 1:18:40.880
<v Speaker 2>those coaches Room broadcast at the National Championship of the playoff,

1:18:40.880 --> 1:18:43.080
<v Speaker 2>he always comes across as very impressive. All of his

1:18:43.120 --> 1:18:45.400
<v Speaker 2>peers seem to love him, all of his former quarterbacks

1:18:45.439 --> 1:18:48.559
<v Speaker 2>seem to love him. It'd be nice if Duke were

1:18:48.600 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 2>able to be more competitive and say, Okay, they're not

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:54.040
<v Speaker 2>nearly as talented as Team X, Y or Z, but

1:18:54.120 --> 1:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>they're scheming guys open, they're running interesting looks, and they

1:18:57.280 --> 1:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>just keep moving the ball down the field. It'd be

1:18:59.360 --> 1:19:01.519
<v Speaker 2>nice to have that Duke again like they like they

1:19:01.520 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 2>were able to manage a few years ago.

1:19:04.280 --> 1:19:07.519
<v Speaker 1>So I believe we each have two teams left. And

1:19:08.040 --> 1:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>let me start with Boston College for you. Okay, they

1:19:12.320 --> 1:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bring over Jeff Haffley, who did a good job at

1:19:14.200 --> 1:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State. What is what is the most how do

1:19:18.360 --> 1:19:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to phrase this? What what is the most

1:19:21.840 --> 1:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like notable improvement or what's what's the biggest point of optimism.

1:19:26.960 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's say in year one of the Halfley era, as

1:19:30.080 --> 1:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>he comes over.

1:19:34.479 --> 1:19:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Frank Signetti turned Bill Stull into a stud very briefly

1:19:39.760 --> 1:19:45.559
<v Speaker 2>in Western PA that may or may not have something

1:19:45.600 --> 1:19:50.280
<v Speaker 2>to do with having Deon Lewis. Yeah, two thousand and nine,

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:54.120
<v Speaker 2>going from Pep down into the Well. It was the

1:19:54.479 --> 1:19:57.719
<v Speaker 2>young Dan and Tye entered year two of the Solid

1:19:57.760 --> 1:20:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Verbal podcast. Jonathan Ball was a matchup Nightmare Sea Crap.

1:20:04.840 --> 1:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So the point of optimism is Jeff Hafley is another

1:20:08.240 --> 1:20:12.959
<v Speaker 2>one of those types who seems to be universally beloved

1:20:13.040 --> 1:20:16.400
<v Speaker 2>in terms of his intelligence, his personality, his effects on players.

1:20:16.439 --> 1:20:18.080
<v Speaker 2>He saw what he did with the Ohio State defense

1:20:18.160 --> 1:20:20.680
<v Speaker 2>last year and certainly had more to work with with

1:20:20.760 --> 1:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State's roster than Boston colleges. But I saw a

1:20:25.040 --> 1:20:27.759
<v Speaker 2>lot of people seem to like his hires, that there's

1:20:28.200 --> 1:20:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a good mix of steadier, veteran type assistance and younger,

1:20:32.000 --> 1:20:36.240
<v Speaker 2>up and coming guys. I think his defense will largely

1:20:36.280 --> 1:20:41.000
<v Speaker 2>be okay, even though Boston College weirdly enough. I mean,

1:20:41.080 --> 1:20:44.439
<v Speaker 2>they lose what aj Dillon from the offensive side of

1:20:44.439 --> 1:20:47.479
<v Speaker 2>the ball, but on defense is where they kind of

1:20:47.560 --> 1:20:49.519
<v Speaker 2>ended up as a nightmare, and Jeff Hafley I think

1:20:49.560 --> 1:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>will get things organized. I know he's the head coach now,

1:20:53.360 --> 1:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>he's not the defensive coordinator, but I think his defensive

1:20:56.040 --> 1:20:59.880
<v Speaker 2>background will help to diagnose issues from last year. Die

1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:01.880
<v Speaker 2>knows where they need to recruit better. I don't think,

1:21:02.520 --> 1:21:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean a team like Boston College should not be

1:21:04.400 --> 1:21:08.000
<v Speaker 2>evaluated on what they do with this very strange condensed

1:21:08.040 --> 1:21:11.439
<v Speaker 2>schedule with you know, not having proper time to warm

1:21:11.520 --> 1:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>up and camp is different to no non conference in

1:21:13.800 --> 1:21:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the way that teams are used to in Power five conferences.

1:21:17.040 --> 1:21:22.160
<v Speaker 2>So I am optimistic that the smart minds Jeff Hafley

1:21:22.160 --> 1:21:24.799
<v Speaker 2>has brought in. You know, a couple of interesting receivers

1:21:24.840 --> 1:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>are back, and I think they're gonna be fine. I

1:21:28.040 --> 1:21:32.160
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to be an adjustment year. So my optimism,

1:21:32.600 --> 1:21:35.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, with anything beyond three and seven or something

1:21:35.560 --> 1:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>for Boston College isn't really there. But I think there's

1:21:38.080 --> 1:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna be nuggets. I think there will be nuggets where

1:21:39.960 --> 1:21:44.000
<v Speaker 2>they're going to threaten teams. They were competitive last year,

1:21:44.320 --> 1:21:46.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, even as they lost games, I think what

1:21:46.200 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>they had they battled it out with Florida State, they

1:21:48.280 --> 1:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>battled it out and beat pitt on the road, and

1:21:51.800 --> 1:21:54.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, they got shellacked by Clemson, but that's fine.

1:21:54.520 --> 1:21:57.120
<v Speaker 2>They beat a couple of teams they should have, like

1:21:57.240 --> 1:22:00.160
<v Speaker 2>NC State and Rutgers. They'll be fine. I think it

1:22:00.280 --> 1:22:02.160
<v Speaker 2>was what Anthony Brown had a really nice game against

1:22:02.200 --> 1:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Virginia Tech and he's gone to Oregon, which I don't

1:22:05.040 --> 1:22:09.360
<v Speaker 2>know what that means moving forward, but it's going to

1:22:09.400 --> 1:22:11.640
<v Speaker 2>take some time. It's going to take some time. But

1:22:11.720 --> 1:22:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I think my optimism lies and the ability for Jeff

1:22:14.439 --> 1:22:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Hafley to get the infrastructure right in Chestnut Hill and

1:22:19.720 --> 1:22:24.599
<v Speaker 2>move this team back to eventually a five hundred type team,

1:22:25.080 --> 1:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>and then, you know, in a normal universe, maybe like

1:22:29.320 --> 1:22:31.640
<v Speaker 2>an eight and four type year, if everything clicks and

1:22:31.680 --> 1:22:34.679
<v Speaker 2>he recruits a really interesting quarterback and the defense gets

1:22:34.680 --> 1:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>back to where it was, you know in the past

1:22:36.840 --> 1:22:38.280
<v Speaker 2>few years before twenty nineteen.

1:22:38.560 --> 1:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, a lot of young guys played last year.

1:22:40.840 --> 1:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It seems like he could come in and make a mark.

1:22:43.240 --> 1:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And offensively, I don't think they're going to be led

1:22:46.160 --> 1:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>by offense per se. But it's a good line. They've got,

1:22:50.160 --> 1:22:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I think, a decent running back room, good wide outs,

1:22:52.880 --> 1:22:55.519
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like the cupboard is bear here. He's

1:22:55.520 --> 1:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have, I think, a lot to work with.

1:22:57.920 --> 1:23:01.880
<v Speaker 2>And they put so much aj Dillon, which I understand,

1:23:02.080 --> 1:23:04.000
<v Speaker 2>but it'll be nice to spread it around a little

1:23:04.000 --> 1:23:05.880
<v Speaker 2>bit more hopefully all.

1:23:05.920 --> 1:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, and let me close out I guess your Atlantic

1:23:10.120 --> 1:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>coverage by asking about the Syracuse Orange. Now, if they're

1:23:14.400 --> 1:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>going to bounce back to where they were in that

1:23:17.520 --> 1:23:22.479
<v Speaker 1>enchanted twenty eighteen season short of the egg that they

1:23:22.720 --> 1:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, laid in Yankee Stadium, right, what is going

1:23:26.760 --> 1:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to get him there? What will be the driving force

1:23:29.360 --> 1:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>behind that?

1:23:33.320 --> 1:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a new defense. So they switched with

1:23:35.920 --> 1:23:38.759
<v Speaker 2>three three five. By the way, they hired a defensive

1:23:38.760 --> 1:23:41.679
<v Speaker 2>coordinator with San Diego State experience in that three three five.

1:23:41.760 --> 1:23:43.280
<v Speaker 2>He then took the I think his name is Zach

1:23:43.320 --> 1:23:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Arnette took the Mississippi State job, and they said, oh no,

1:23:47.479 --> 1:23:49.360
<v Speaker 2>we still want a San Diego State guy, and they

1:23:49.439 --> 1:23:52.719
<v Speaker 2>hired I think it was ASU's Tony whiteback's coach. Tony

1:23:52.720 --> 1:23:55.680
<v Speaker 2>White was previously at San Diego State. They need that

1:23:55.760 --> 1:23:59.599
<v Speaker 2>as tech blood in the Carrier Dome. It's probably going

1:23:59.640 --> 1:24:01.559
<v Speaker 2>to be the defense it is. You mean, we talked

1:24:01.560 --> 1:24:04.640
<v Speaker 2>about quarterbacks and the depth of at least decent quarterbacks

1:24:04.640 --> 1:24:07.000
<v Speaker 2>in the conference. I don't know how quickly they can

1:24:07.040 --> 1:24:11.679
<v Speaker 2>come together with you know, switching defensive schemes and losing

1:24:11.720 --> 1:24:15.080
<v Speaker 2>what they did on defense, especially up front.

1:24:15.000 --> 1:24:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's my question, you know, the whole.

1:24:17.439 --> 1:24:19.719
<v Speaker 2>And not having a real fall camp.

1:24:20.040 --> 1:24:22.559
<v Speaker 1>The whole purpose of this defense is to try and

1:24:22.680 --> 1:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>utilize more speed, and I like that for Syracuse. I

1:24:26.320 --> 1:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good move for Dino Babers. It's just

1:24:29.920 --> 1:24:32.479
<v Speaker 1>not the easiest defense to put in place, and it's

1:24:32.560 --> 1:24:34.479
<v Speaker 1>going to take a little bit of time to click.

1:24:35.000 --> 1:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>How quickly it clicks is is I think very operative here.

1:24:39.160 --> 1:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So I don't. I don't know. I like it longer term,

1:24:42.920 --> 1:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but in a weird year where there's less time to

1:24:45.120 --> 1:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>prepare and it's harder to prepare and install new schemes,

1:24:48.160 --> 1:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I wonder, I really do.

1:24:51.320 --> 1:24:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just I think they've got a problem problem.

1:24:54.000 --> 1:24:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Like we've mentioned before, I think Tommy DeVito might be okay,

1:24:59.200 --> 1:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>but from what we we saw Eric Dungee another do

1:25:01.720 --> 1:25:05.560
<v Speaker 2>everything type. There's a reason he had to do everything

1:25:05.880 --> 1:25:11.240
<v Speaker 2>because he was not consistently surrounded by huge threats. There

1:25:11.240 --> 1:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>were guys here and there, games here and there, But

1:25:16.400 --> 1:25:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. The offensive line was an issue last year,

1:25:18.760 --> 1:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>so you can point to that there are guys. They've

1:25:22.840 --> 1:25:28.160
<v Speaker 2>retained guys, But when you don't have obvious okay, this

1:25:28.240 --> 1:25:30.479
<v Speaker 2>guy's back and he is going to be an issue

1:25:30.720 --> 1:25:33.599
<v Speaker 2>for acc secondary so he's be an issue for fronts

1:25:33.640 --> 1:25:35.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to tackle him in the running game.

1:25:35.160 --> 1:25:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Whatever.

1:25:36.080 --> 1:25:40.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a problem. And when you mix that with the attrition,

1:25:40.680 --> 1:25:45.599
<v Speaker 2>the natural attrition, and the changes on defense, it just

1:25:45.600 --> 1:25:48.880
<v Speaker 2>feels like a recipe for twenty twenty one.

1:25:49.439 --> 1:25:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, that's all. We've got three teams left,

1:25:55.439 --> 1:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>all right on the coastal side. I want to start

1:25:58.120 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>with your pit Panthers. I know you have questions about

1:26:00.400 --> 1:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the Pitt Panthers. Dan give me one of them or

1:26:04.520 --> 1:26:06.559
<v Speaker 1>that's pot of care. I did a lot of research on.

1:26:06.520 --> 1:26:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Pitt on Pitt. I didn't love the Mark Whipple higher.

1:26:14.520 --> 1:26:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I had never really seen anything interesting for Mark Whipple

1:26:18.960 --> 1:26:24.400
<v Speaker 2>offenses that that might just be a me thing. Can

1:26:24.520 --> 1:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>can they sprinkle a little bit of contribution dust into

1:26:29.120 --> 1:26:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the air to help out this defense or are we

1:26:32.200 --> 1:26:35.360
<v Speaker 2>talking about, well they better win thirteen to ten type

1:26:35.400 --> 1:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>year for the Panthers.

1:26:37.160 --> 1:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been I've been workshopping some sort of like cool

1:26:39.840 --> 1:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Whipple thing, but you have not earned that ty No.

1:26:44.439 --> 1:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's hard when your offense is one O

1:26:47.960 --> 1:26:53.479
<v Speaker 1>nine in the sp plus. They need Bill Stoll. It's hard,

1:26:53.800 --> 1:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's This was an epic half team last year. One

1:26:56.439 --> 1:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>nine in offense according to the sp plus twelve on

1:27:02.400 --> 1:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side, led very much by defense. Still a

1:27:06.680 --> 1:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>seven to five regular season. This is a team that

1:27:10.160 --> 1:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>gave up only seventeen to Penn State sixteen to Miami.

1:27:13.960 --> 1:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>They lost both those games, but look, with just a

1:27:17.400 --> 1:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>marginally better offense, they could have been a nine to

1:27:20.280 --> 1:27:23.519
<v Speaker 1>three team in the regular season, which is crazy. So

1:27:23.560 --> 1:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the question is what happened? What happened to this offense? Well,

1:27:28.240 --> 1:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that they were shifting from more of

1:27:31.040 --> 1:27:35.599
<v Speaker 1>a run heavy system to a pass heavy system. Like

1:27:35.640 --> 1:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Mark Whipple likes to run. Sometimes you have the horses, Dan,

1:27:40.080 --> 1:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you don't. Sometimes it takes a while to click, and.

1:27:44.800 --> 1:27:47.679
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a greeting card. Sometimes I know horses.

1:27:47.720 --> 1:27:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you don't. Mock condolence.

1:27:49.880 --> 1:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>That was the story of Pitt's offensive transition last year.

1:27:53.800 --> 1:27:56.559
<v Speaker 1>It has to get better this year, it has to

1:27:56.600 --> 1:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>get There's enough of a returning cast here to make

1:28:00.400 --> 1:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>me confident that it has to get better. Will it

1:28:02.920 --> 1:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>be fixed? You know his fixes in the eye of

1:28:06.600 --> 1:28:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the beholder, right, Yeah, But they've got some veteran leadership

1:28:10.479 --> 1:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>out wide with Taser mac aj and Vincent Davis are

1:28:15.040 --> 1:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield, and potentially some production from their freshmen

1:28:21.040 --> 1:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Israel Abana Kanda, which is a great name, pretty good,

1:28:24.960 --> 1:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>good job. The line should be okay, and Kenny Pickett

1:28:28.040 --> 1:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is back for year eighteen. Who knew. I think their

1:28:32.080 --> 1:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>offense has got to get better. It just has to.

1:28:34.880 --> 1:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>My only question on defense is the linebacker position. Otherwise,

1:28:40.120 --> 1:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the best defenses in the nation.

1:28:42.800 --> 1:28:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Really strong defense.

1:28:43.800 --> 1:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>It really is.

1:28:44.680 --> 1:28:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Really good secondary. They're gonna be led by defense. This

1:28:48.560 --> 1:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is what folks were waiting for with Paton Ardoozy to

1:28:50.960 --> 1:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>build this defense up. He's gonna have it this year.

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:56.439
<v Speaker 1>The defense is gonna keep him in games. They just

1:28:56.520 --> 1:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>need the offense to I think share some of that burn.

1:29:00.920 --> 1:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>From a scheduling standpoint, here's what I think we're looking at.

1:29:05.680 --> 1:29:08.519
<v Speaker 1>We've got two pots of games. We've got the tougher

1:29:08.560 --> 1:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>games against Louisville and on the road at Miami Notre Dame,

1:29:13.000 --> 1:29:15.639
<v Speaker 1>on the road at Florida State, Virginia Tech at Clemson.

1:29:15.760 --> 1:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Six games there, they're very tough. And then the flip side,

1:29:19.760 --> 1:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we've got games against Syracuse, NC State, Boston College and

1:29:23.160 --> 1:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech. Then there's a non con game that I

1:29:26.640 --> 1:29:30.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't list here, But let's say this. Pitt's gonna lose

1:29:30.720 --> 1:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those dumb ones, aren't they. Of course, they're

1:29:33.760 --> 1:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose a dumb one, and they're probably gonna go

1:29:37.280 --> 1:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>something like two and four, three and three against the

1:29:40.400 --> 1:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>tougher part of their schedule, and that's gonna make them

1:29:44.800 --> 1:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>six and five, seven and four.

1:29:46.920 --> 1:29:48.640
<v Speaker 2>They have America's team, Austin.

1:29:48.400 --> 1:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>P Austin, pH We saw lose to Central Arkansas. Correct,

1:29:53.320 --> 1:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think this is gonna be a

1:29:56.160 --> 1:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>pit team. It's very good on defense, they have to

1:29:58.080 --> 1:30:00.479
<v Speaker 1>improve on offense. They're still gonna lose that game that

1:30:00.479 --> 1:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they lose every year. They're still going to knock off

1:30:02.720 --> 1:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody that they shouldn't and they're going to go six

1:30:05.240 --> 1:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and five or seven and four wearing the hottest uniforms

1:30:10.160 --> 1:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>city forums for sure. I love them, love them. Yeah,

1:30:15.960 --> 1:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where a mountain pit. Okay, let's move forward. Let's

1:30:20.040 --> 1:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>move forward. We've got Virginia and Georgia Tech left where

1:30:22.960 --> 1:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to go?

1:30:24.040 --> 1:30:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Weirdly, Georgia Tech is more interesting to me. Yes, I agree,

1:30:28.280 --> 1:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>even though Virginia had a really nice season, and I

1:30:31.120 --> 1:30:33.679
<v Speaker 2>was actually surrounded by Virginia fans down in South Florida

1:30:34.240 --> 1:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>in late December ahead of the Orange Bowl. But so

1:30:37.640 --> 1:30:40.760
<v Speaker 2>everybody going into last year felt, Okay, Jeff Collins, this

1:30:40.800 --> 1:30:43.000
<v Speaker 2>is a year zero situation. They had such a specific

1:30:43.000 --> 1:30:45.679
<v Speaker 2>offensive scheme. He is switching things up and this year

1:30:45.720 --> 1:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>is just a transition year. This is just it's not

1:30:49.120 --> 1:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>a time for stretch goals.

1:30:50.439 --> 1:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Ty No.

1:30:51.760 --> 1:30:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Year two, after a pretty impressive recruiting class. By the way,

1:30:56.960 --> 1:31:02.479
<v Speaker 2>is also strange for Georgia Tech. Given everything surrounding Georgia Tech. Sure,

1:31:03.520 --> 1:31:07.519
<v Speaker 2>what to you if everything is reasonable and healthy and

1:31:07.560 --> 1:31:10.759
<v Speaker 2>everything like that for Georgia Tech, what is an interesting

1:31:10.800 --> 1:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>reason to watch Georgia Tech in terms of more clarity

1:31:15.439 --> 1:31:16.000
<v Speaker 2>than what they wanted?

1:31:16.200 --> 1:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>No, that's a good way to put it. Three and nine.

1:31:18.080 --> 1:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Last year they did beat Miami, but who didn't.

1:31:21.600 --> 1:31:23.599
<v Speaker 2>But what a stranch year.

1:31:25.160 --> 1:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Year two is when you start to see the sun

1:31:27.520 --> 1:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>peek out from behind the clouds. Okay, I think a

1:31:30.880 --> 1:31:32.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of Tech fans knew what they were in for

1:31:33.760 --> 1:31:37.519
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. The theme for Tech this year is

1:31:37.560 --> 1:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>returning production seventy four percent on offense, ninety four percent

1:31:42.280 --> 1:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on defense last year. The coach has played a lot

1:31:45.280 --> 1:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of young guys. They moved them around. They were trying

1:31:47.200 --> 1:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to plug gaps just seeing who could play where. This

1:31:50.479 --> 1:31:52.479
<v Speaker 1>is at the same time that they were obviously moving

1:31:52.520 --> 1:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>away from the flexbone. So the passing offense was predictably terrible. Again,

1:31:57.960 --> 1:32:00.439
<v Speaker 1>none of this was unexpected. Paul Johnson ran the ball

1:32:00.439 --> 1:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty six percent of the time. Last year Tech only

1:32:04.080 --> 1:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>ran at thirty eight percent of the time, so a

1:32:05.960 --> 1:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty big swing about fifty percent in the other direction.

1:32:10.080 --> 1:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The other theme that I think is going to become

1:32:12.080 --> 1:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a trend here is recruiting. And you alluded to it

1:32:14.439 --> 1:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in the question. Yeah.

1:32:16.040 --> 1:32:17.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're recruiting to a big city in the South.

1:32:17.960 --> 1:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a good place to be, even though it's a

1:32:20.120 --> 1:32:22.240
<v Speaker 2>private school in a little bit of a different situation

1:32:22.360 --> 1:32:24.439
<v Speaker 2>than some other Southeastern powers.

1:32:24.479 --> 1:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And Jeff Collins is selling it hard. He is selling

1:32:28.120 --> 1:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta hard, great city, He's from Atlanta. He's selling it

1:32:32.000 --> 1:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>as a destination, which I think is really smart. The

1:32:35.479 --> 1:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>early returns were there twenty sixth best recruiting class in

1:32:39.880 --> 1:32:42.519
<v Speaker 1>the nation at the end of last cycle. He is

1:32:42.600 --> 1:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>going to build something down there. And I think we're

1:32:45.840 --> 1:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>going to see some of those freshmen step up and

1:32:48.000 --> 1:32:50.479
<v Speaker 1>be part of the movement. And if you're a Tech fan,

1:32:50.600 --> 1:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>great things to come. They're starting there, they're stripping this

1:32:53.840 --> 1:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>thing down to the studs starting over, and Jeff Collins

1:32:58.080 --> 1:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who's got a lot of passion not

1:33:00.320 --> 1:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>just for college football, but for the area. He knows

1:33:02.720 --> 1:33:06.599
<v Speaker 1>how to recruit that area. And I'm excited about that. Now,

1:33:07.080 --> 1:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, again you have to temper that excitement with

1:33:10.400 --> 1:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what I think are realistic expectations. They are still going

1:33:14.920 --> 1:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>through this transition. James Graham came in. He was the

1:33:18.120 --> 1:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who won the job last season. But Jeff Simms,

1:33:23.920 --> 1:33:26.439
<v Speaker 1>he's a four star. He could get some looks. All

1:33:26.479 --> 1:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the receivers are back, yeah, Jalen Camp and also they

1:33:30.360 --> 1:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>got Marquez Ezard, who you might remember from Miami. He

1:33:33.120 --> 1:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was a prize recruit down there. So you know, it's

1:33:35.920 --> 1:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be this transition type thing for

1:33:39.160 --> 1:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech. But it's not going to be short on optimism.

1:33:42.200 --> 1:33:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to have the team playing very hard.

1:33:45.200 --> 1:33:49.439
<v Speaker 1>The schedule's brutal. It is, it's brutally. They went three

1:33:49.520 --> 1:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and nine a year ago. Don't be surprised that they

1:33:51.400 --> 1:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>go two and nine this year. Their non con game

1:33:54.439 --> 1:33:59.719
<v Speaker 1>is against UCF, which is different now given the news,

1:33:59.760 --> 1:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but I still think you Stf's going to beat them

1:34:02.560 --> 1:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>there on the road at FSU. They've got Louisville, Clemson,

1:34:06.000 --> 1:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame, pitt in a road game against Miami, So

1:34:08.840 --> 1:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's their works cut out for them here. It's still

1:34:14.200 --> 1:34:16.519
<v Speaker 1>still part of this transition, but I think we're going

1:34:16.600 --> 1:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to see more signs to be enthusiastic about moving forward

1:34:20.320 --> 1:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in year two. And I'm excited about Georgia Tech.

1:34:22.200 --> 1:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Games were a blast to watch last year and read

1:34:24.080 --> 1:34:25.960
<v Speaker 2>about last year because it was like, all right, this

1:34:26.120 --> 1:34:30.080
<v Speaker 2>linebacker is usually a midfielder for the soccer team, this

1:34:30.240 --> 1:34:36.000
<v Speaker 2>quarterback curler from Norway. They just needed to fill it

1:34:36.000 --> 1:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>with somebody. Yeah, And so as they populate players in

1:34:40.160 --> 1:34:43.160
<v Speaker 2>offenses and defenses with guys who should be playing in

1:34:43.200 --> 1:34:45.960
<v Speaker 2>certain places, I imagine Georgia Tech is just going to.

1:34:45.960 --> 1:34:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Get full on, better, full on better, one more team here.

1:34:49.680 --> 1:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>On the Marathon preview of America's Conference of.

1:34:55.040 --> 1:35:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Champions Austin, p Now Virginia, I said that I compared

1:35:01.680 --> 1:35:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Perkins to Wally Zerbiak, which is a very stupid

1:35:04.080 --> 1:35:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and silly reference, but it's accurate because he had to

1:35:07.680 --> 1:35:09.880
<v Speaker 2>do everything in the same way Wally Zerbiak had to

1:35:09.920 --> 1:35:11.639
<v Speaker 2>do everything as a college basketball player.

1:35:13.840 --> 1:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Are there is there?

1:35:15.439 --> 1:35:17.679
<v Speaker 2>We're I guess we're big on optimism now right. We're

1:35:17.680 --> 1:35:19.640
<v Speaker 2>always talking about teams and like, how what can they

1:35:19.680 --> 1:35:21.280
<v Speaker 2>need to get better? We want we're rooting for you.

1:35:21.520 --> 1:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>There's enough going wrong in the world. Let's let's look

1:35:24.200 --> 1:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that's here.

1:35:25.760 --> 1:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, walk me through the post Bryce Perkins whole situation.

1:35:32.439 --> 1:35:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just walk me through.

1:35:35.720 --> 1:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Just let's take a stroll through the streets of Charlottesville.

1:35:39.160 --> 1:35:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's grab an enchilada the Continental Divide and tell me

1:35:45.040 --> 1:35:47.960
<v Speaker 2>what just a a post Perkins world looks like.

1:35:48.080 --> 1:35:51.519
<v Speaker 1>And let's grab a libation and toast friend of the

1:35:51.520 --> 1:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>show Bronkleman and haul while we're there. Could we that's true?

1:35:54.560 --> 1:35:57.479
<v Speaker 1>This is a nine Daniel Beats enthusiast, A nine win

1:35:57.600 --> 1:36:01.519
<v Speaker 1>team last year played for the conference championship. They were

1:36:01.560 --> 1:36:04.559
<v Speaker 1>predictably killed by Clemson, and they didn't play a great

1:36:04.560 --> 1:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>game in the Orange Bowl either against Florida. But whatever,

1:36:07.320 --> 1:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they have gotten better. Each of Bronco's four seasons in Charlottesville,

1:36:12.040 --> 1:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and now we're at this moment where I think we

1:36:14.120 --> 1:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>find out how good he really is. They lose some

1:36:17.680 --> 1:36:21.439
<v Speaker 1>headliners from a year ago, including Bryce Perkins, but they

1:36:21.479 --> 1:36:25.240
<v Speaker 1>actually return most of their team, which is low key

1:36:25.360 --> 1:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>something to be pumped about, and I think that will

1:36:28.040 --> 1:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>offset any kind of major regression. Still probably a step

1:36:31.360 --> 1:36:34.360
<v Speaker 1>back year, okay, but there's enough coming back this year

1:36:34.400 --> 1:36:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that it should it should temper it a little bit.

1:36:36.560 --> 1:36:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's kind of the theme here as

1:36:39.720 --> 1:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we look at at Virginia headlining losses but still reason

1:36:45.360 --> 1:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for optimism. Bryce Perkins owns a school record for offensive yardage,

1:36:50.720 --> 1:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so his graduation, that's going to get the headlines. But

1:36:55.200 --> 1:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the new starter, Brendan Armstrong Broncos, comparing him to Taysom Hill,

1:37:00.080 --> 1:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>who is really going to BYU even better in the pros. Yeah, so,

1:37:03.520 --> 1:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, bad thing, but a good thing to kind

1:37:06.120 --> 1:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of offset it. Another one offensive line entirely back from

1:37:10.680 --> 1:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. Okay, not bad, but receivers are gone.

1:37:15.800 --> 1:37:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But receivers are gone, but all the running backs are back,

1:37:18.320 --> 1:37:23.400
<v Speaker 1>so there's a kiis sure. Yeah. So there's just a

1:37:23.439 --> 1:37:25.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of it offsets, I think, and the same deal

1:37:25.520 --> 1:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on defense really. Bryce Hall's gone from the secondary, but

1:37:28.320 --> 1:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone else is back. Jordan Mack has gone at linebacker,

1:37:31.520 --> 1:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>but everyone else is back. They were killed by injuries

1:37:35.840 --> 1:37:38.479
<v Speaker 1>in the back half of last season, but all the

1:37:38.560 --> 1:37:41.280
<v Speaker 1>younger guys got time, which should help him this season.

1:37:41.360 --> 1:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, what's the what's the next chapter look like?

1:37:44.400 --> 1:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Does the offense take a step back? Probably,

1:37:48.200 --> 1:37:50.599
<v Speaker 1>But I just think it's worth mentioning that this offense

1:37:50.640 --> 1:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>has been extremely adaptable since Bronco got there. He's very

1:37:54.439 --> 1:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>good at playing to his strengths. He doesn't lock in

1:37:56.960 --> 1:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on any particular scheme. He just kind of goes with

1:38:00.200 --> 1:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what works. I think they'll be more run heavy this year.

1:38:03.400 --> 1:38:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna try and use Burnan Armstrong's versatility. Defensively,

1:38:08.479 --> 1:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Perkins wasn't going both ways last year, so defensively

1:38:11.800 --> 1:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll be fine. I like Virginia more than I think most.

1:38:16.680 --> 1:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll be okay. A step back is coming.

1:38:20.120 --> 1:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The schedules not doing them any favors at all. First

1:38:24.240 --> 1:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>two games on the road at Tech at Clemson. They're

1:38:27.479 --> 1:38:29.720
<v Speaker 1>also at Miami. They've got a game against You and

1:38:29.840 --> 1:38:32.760
<v Speaker 1>C and Louisville and all those games are back to

1:38:32.760 --> 1:38:33.639
<v Speaker 1>back later in the year.

1:38:33.720 --> 1:38:36.479
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that the middle chunk of their year it's brutal,

1:38:36.600 --> 1:38:40.640
<v Speaker 2>is rough with Clemson and Wake on the road. We

1:38:40.720 --> 1:38:43.320
<v Speaker 2>got Wake and Miami on the road North Carolina following

1:38:43.360 --> 1:38:48.679
<v Speaker 2>that right before Louisville's that stretch October and into early November.

1:38:48.880 --> 1:38:49.400
<v Speaker 2>That's tough.

1:38:49.960 --> 1:38:52.599
<v Speaker 1>The depth is not there yet, but it is getting

1:38:52.640 --> 1:38:55.639
<v Speaker 1>there with each recruiting cycle. It is a slow burn

1:38:56.560 --> 1:39:00.720
<v Speaker 1>at Virginia. H I do expect the step back. I

1:39:00.840 --> 1:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't think it's going to be as much regression

1:39:03.200 --> 1:39:04.639
<v Speaker 1>as I've seen many predict.

1:39:05.600 --> 1:39:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I should correct myself A Lama Dai Zachias was two

1:39:08.400 --> 1:39:11.000
<v Speaker 2>years ago because my internal clock time.

1:39:11.080 --> 1:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>But always in our hearts now where it used.

1:39:13.520 --> 1:39:15.439
<v Speaker 2>To be, always in our hearts for sure. Last year

1:39:15.520 --> 1:39:20.479
<v Speaker 2>was a Joe red here. I like Virginia. I think

1:39:20.479 --> 1:39:22.519
<v Speaker 2>they've gotten to it. They're secretly getting to a really

1:39:22.600 --> 1:39:24.880
<v Speaker 2>nice place. You mentioned the depth thing. Obviously they're just

1:39:24.960 --> 1:39:27.960
<v Speaker 2>not going to fully get to where the powers in

1:39:28.000 --> 1:39:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the conference are, but they're cruising at a nice altitude

1:39:31.200 --> 1:39:33.760
<v Speaker 2>right now, and so it's been cool to see because

1:39:33.800 --> 1:39:36.280
<v Speaker 2>that's a I wouldn't say it's a difficult place to win,

1:39:36.360 --> 1:39:39.040
<v Speaker 2>but it's not an easy place to win. So I

1:39:39.120 --> 1:39:41.320
<v Speaker 2>like seeing the who succeed I do the.

1:39:41.640 --> 1:39:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Dinger just went off in the plane. You could take

1:39:43.760 --> 1:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>off your seatbelt, you can walk around the cabin. You

1:39:48.600 --> 1:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about too much unexpected turbulence, a

1:39:51.439 --> 1:39:55.679
<v Speaker 1>few bumps. But yeah, they're doing an okay job down there.

1:39:55.760 --> 1:39:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Dan, that's it, Virginia Tech, that's great.

1:39:58.640 --> 1:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Marathon show complete?

1:40:02.200 --> 1:40:04.120
<v Speaker 2>What are we gonna do? If the ACC keeps adding

1:40:04.120 --> 1:40:06.880
<v Speaker 2>more to what are we gonna do?

1:40:06.960 --> 1:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>These shows are wearing me out right in solid verbal

1:40:10.920 --> 1:40:13.479
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com, let us know your thoughts on

1:40:13.520 --> 1:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the ACC. You put a lot into this show. We're

1:40:16.400 --> 1:40:20.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna do the sec on Friday, so please tune in.

1:40:20.479 --> 1:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Please to subscribe. Tell your friends, your family, your former lovers, whoever,

1:40:26.280 --> 1:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>tell them all.

1:40:27.000 --> 1:40:29.599
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Do you talk to any of your former lovers?

1:40:29.640 --> 1:40:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Ty No? Do you have any of them contacted you?

1:40:34.320 --> 1:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>No? I mean no, no.

1:40:36.880 --> 1:40:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you're probably unforgettable.

1:40:39.280 --> 1:40:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Well doesn't mean they talk to me.

1:40:42.240 --> 1:40:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've been in communication with any former

1:40:45.800 --> 1:40:49.360
<v Speaker 2>dalliance's tie now. I'm just I'm a one woman man.

1:40:49.439 --> 1:40:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Tye and That's just how it has to be as mine.

1:40:52.360 --> 1:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Follow along on social media Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, go to

1:41:00.680 --> 1:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the website Soliverble dot com for all the deats on

1:41:02.880 --> 1:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>how to subscribe. If you like the show, if you

1:41:05.200 --> 1:41:07.519
<v Speaker 1>like what we're doing, we will be here all throughout

1:41:07.520 --> 1:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the season, whatever format that takes on, subscribe to the show. Apple.

1:41:12.840 --> 1:41:14.479
<v Speaker 2>Can I make a request as we close out the

1:41:14.520 --> 1:41:17.479
<v Speaker 2>acc preview, please, can we get you posting on the

1:41:17.520 --> 1:41:18.600
<v Speaker 2>gram a little more me?

1:41:18.880 --> 1:41:20.559
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I took a bunch of pictures of

1:41:20.560 --> 1:41:22.559
<v Speaker 1>my ALMASI people want to see.

1:41:22.600 --> 1:41:25.240
<v Speaker 2>People want to see that, the bts of the tie

1:41:25.320 --> 1:41:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Hildenbrandt lifestyle.

1:41:26.680 --> 1:41:29.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll post, I'll post my omelets.

1:41:29.520 --> 1:41:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Where should people be following you me? Hilden brand Is

1:41:33.080 --> 1:41:35.639
<v Speaker 2>that just one word? Tye Hildenbrandt, just your name.

1:41:35.720 --> 1:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>That's why the H, the E, N, B, R, A

1:41:38.439 --> 1:41:40.599
<v Speaker 1>and D T. Yeah. I think you've got a lot

1:41:40.640 --> 1:41:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to show to the world. I don't post a lot lately.

1:41:43.400 --> 1:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You've got a dog, you cook, you've got a house.

1:41:47.120 --> 1:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I know I have other things going, but when I tweet,

1:41:50.800 --> 1:41:52.559
<v Speaker 1>when I post, it's worth it. I promise.

1:41:52.680 --> 1:41:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I think you got to op it up. You gotta

1:41:53.880 --> 1:41:55.640
<v Speaker 2>step up the game as the season's going. Show you

1:41:55.800 --> 1:41:57.800
<v Speaker 2>your watch set up, all right.

1:41:57.840 --> 1:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I got to go be a parent, Go be a

1:41:59.479 --> 1:42:02.800
<v Speaker 1>parent for that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein,

1:42:02.840 --> 1:42:05.599
<v Speaker 1>for myself, Tie Hilton Brand, thank you for bearing with

1:42:05.680 --> 1:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>us on this marathon show America's Conference of Champions. We

1:42:10.000 --> 1:42:12.439
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you all on Friday. In the meantimes

1:42:12.479 --> 1:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>day summer Peace,