WEBVTT - Take Shelter with Matt Singer, Lone Star with Michael Phillips

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited. Regal Unlimited is

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the all you can watch movie subscription pass that pays

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for itself in just two visits. See any standard two

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>D movie anytime, with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Save on tickets,

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Save on snacks. Members get ten percent off all non

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>alcoholic concession items. Sign up now in the Regal app

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or at rgmovies dot com Slash Unlimited.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 2>You're not interested in armed? Now? No, Look, we're going

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to do this thing. We're going to have a.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Conversation from Chicago. This is film Spotting. I'm Adam Kempinar.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 3>So we hoped when we started planning this that maybe

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>being a Chicago guy, we could get Michael Shannon to

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 3>come be here at film Spotting Fest. And you know, instead,

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 3>he's off touring the country doing rim songs. And that

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 3>was impossible. So we got the next best thing, Matt

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.919
<v Speaker 3>Singer as Michael Shannon. Back in March, we celebrated twenty

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>years of the show with Film Spotting Fest, a three

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 3>day film festival with screenings, a special guest critic, Matt

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Singer yes, cosplaying as Hawaiian shirt wearing Michael Shannon joined

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 3>us for a post screening chat about Jeff Nichols Take Shelter.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>That conversation, plus Michael Phillips and I revisit John Sales

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Lone Star, which turns thirty in the new year. That

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 3>more ahead on film Spotting. Welcome to Film Spotting and

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Happy New Year everyone. We're still on holiday break, but

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't mean we don't have some fresh audio for you.

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Next week, Josh and I will return with a review

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of Marty Supreme. I'm being told that Josh may also

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>have a defense of Avatar, Fire and Ash. There may

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 3>also be a quick roundup of other movies we've caught

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 3>up with since we record ordered our epic Top ten

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Films of twenty twenty five show. Later on in this

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 3>week's show, you'll hear Michael Phillips and I in conversation

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 3>about John sales great nineteen ninety six film Low and

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Star that was recorded after a screening of the film

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>back in November as part of the City of Chicago's

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 3>fiftieth anniversary celebration of Ciskel and Ebert. Such a thrill

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to be part of that, but First, we're going to

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>go back to March of twenty twenty five and Film

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Spotting Fest, our three day celebration of twenty years of

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>this show. Over that March weekend, we hosted screening of

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 3>six films at two of Chicago's finest cinemas, the historic

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Music Box Theater on the city's North side and the

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Genes Ciskel Film Center Downtown. Special guests joined us for

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 3>all six screenings, and over the past nine months we've

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>shared the audio from all of those conversations, including director

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Johnson talking about his debut film, Brick Coganata talking

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 3>about his debut film, Columbus critics Danas Stevens, Alison will More,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 3>and Scott Tobias On respectively, Statuget Rays pather Ponchali, Sean

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Baker's Tangerine, and Richard Linklater's Before Sunrise. That leaves us

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>with just one film and one special guest left. We've

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>been saving it up. Matt Singer, the Screen Crush critic

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 3>and author of Opposable Thumbs, How Ciskel and Ebert change

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>movies Forever. We've got a little theme going on this show.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 3>He joined me for a screening of and a very

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 3>personal conversation about Jeff nichols twenty eleven film Take Shelter.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>The film stars Nichols regular Michael Shannon as a man

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 3>experiencing frightening apocalyptic visions who goes to extreme ends to

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 3>keep his family safe. Jessica Chastain plays his wife, their

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>young daughter, whose death is played by Tova Stewart from

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 3>March earlier this year. Here is that conversation, which starts

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 3>with me explaining why Matt is dressed as Michael Shannon.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Matt said, if he promised on social media, if you

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>follow him, that if this event sells out and the

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 3>place seems pretty packed to me, that he would would

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>wear a special outfit.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 4>And indeed, you if.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 5>You google Michael Shannon red carpet, the first thing you

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 5>will see is him dressed on a red carpet. He

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 5>didn't have pictures of himself on his I had that

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 5>made special for you guys. But uh, that was what

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 5>I said I would dress in that. So I did

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 5>my best.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 6>As best I could. And here you are, well, such

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 6>a great comedy. I felt like we should really embrace

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 6>lighten things up.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, uh, I'm gonna take these off because I literally

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 5>I cannot see without my glasses, but that was part

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 5>of the look.

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Make sure you google and so you see I'm not well.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't like that you've already broken character.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 6>But sorry.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Sorry.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 4>The met singer I know commits to the bit.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well this is yeah, this is a lot of commitment.

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Come on, you're right, fair enough.

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 3>So let's start, Matt, as we have been throughout the day,

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 3>a little bit with you before we talk about the film,

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 3>our relationship to you, why you are here at Film

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Spotting Fest. You were one of the first guests we

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>had in mind, and that goes back to the fact

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>that I think you were the first, let's say, national

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>media outlet to have anything to say about Film Spotting

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 3>then Cinecast.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 4>This was just a few months in.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if iTunes it even launched yet, but

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 3>we'd been doing the show for a little bit, and

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you just reached out to us

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 3>one day and said I'm either gonna do this or

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I just did it. But you did a feature about

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 3>this on IFC News, like a sixty second hit, and

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I remember very vividly how you explained there's this new

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>thing called podcasts in your announcer TV guy voice that

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 3>you have. So what was your recollection of discovering I

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 3>guess us discovering podcasting why you felt like it was

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 3>worth doing a story and I FC news about.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, what I remember about that is, yeah, Apple had

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 6>started the iTunes store.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 5>That was what the impetus was, like, there's this new

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 5>thing called podcasts, and.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 6>I forget how I found out about.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 5>Maybe it was covered in something else whereas like there's

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 5>even ones about movies and yours was included. And as

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 5>someone who loved Cisco and eBird and conversations about movies

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 5>going back to when I was a kid, I was like,

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 5>this is fabulous. And at the time I was working

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 5>for IFC and we were always we were doing basically

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 5>at the time, IFC did not have commercials, and so

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 5>my job was to create news that would kind of

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 5>interstitials between the movies, because the movies would air, you know,

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 5>like uncut with no brakes, but then they would show

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 5>to space things out and sometimes they were sponsored, so

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 5>they were basically were commercials. They were secret commercials. So

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 5>I we would come up with ideas and I pitched one.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 5>I think honestly what it was was maybe Ebert and

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Roper had started a podcast, but it was just the

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 5>audio version of the show, and I think we did

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 5>something about just like you know, you were sort of

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 5>the David versus the Goliath of Ebert and Roper, that

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 5>they were the bad guys, which is very ironic how

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 5>things turned out later.

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 6>But yeah, that was the impetus for that.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I don't remember emailing you about it, but at

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 5>some point we did start chatting. I remember seeing it

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 5>and that's where our friendship. I was wearing this in

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 5>the spot. Ironically, there's just a weird coincidence.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 6>So let's talk.

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>About Take Shelter and why you were the good candidate.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 3>You were a good candidate to talk about this movie

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 3>with us. Back in twenty eleven, we already said it.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Josh had it as his number five film of the year.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 3>It was my number two film of the year. You

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>had it at number one.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Guy.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 6>You guys blew it, we blew it.

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>I had this little Terrence Malick movie called The Tree

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>of Life, So did you know Josh did as well.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 3>But you went all in on Jeff Nichols and this film.

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Why was it your number one back in twenty eleven.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 5>I genuinely believe this is like one of the great

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 5>movies of my lifetime, and hopefully this does not.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm not making fun of this movie. I'm

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 6>making fun of my myself and being silly.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 5>But this is almost like a defense mechanism because talking

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 5>about this movie exposes all of the realities of my life,

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 5>which is that to me, this is like the best

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 5>movie ever made about living with anxiety. I know, I

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 5>look like a really cool and put together person, but

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 5>the reality is that, like, you know, the the that

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 5>I relate to this character on a on a level

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 5>that is almost too personal to talk about, you know,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 5>like there isn't like a history of schizophrena in my family,

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 5>but there is a history of really intense anxiety and

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:53.119
<v Speaker 5>this idea of fear, you know, as this almost crippling

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 5>force in your life that can take hold of you

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 5>and is almost more dangerous and more insidious and more

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 5>threatening than whatever it is you're afraid of. I think

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 5>this movie communicates that idea in a way that is

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 5>better than hours of therapy that I have taken. Like,

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 5>I think I got more out of this movie than

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 5>I have talking to certain therapists in my life and

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm not saying that like facetiously. I genuinely mean that,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 5>like there is like a I don't know this movie.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, you could describe it as a scary or

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 5>you know, certainly moments that are in it are disturbing, scary, horrifying,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 5>But I almost find something kind of like uplifting about

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 5>the ending in a weird in a very weird way.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 5>I admit that is strange, but I genuinely find something

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 5>almost hopeful and therapeutic about the end of this movie.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, I thought we might build to the ending,

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 3>but maybe we should just dive into the ending.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 4>What do you say, should we talk about it?

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>You open the door, okay, Matt, the story, the storm seller,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the storm celler door. Yeah, let's see what will be

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 3>reveal the other side on the other side, shine the

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 3>light on us. Just tell us your your thoughts on

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 3>it and it has your take on the ending changed

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>it all over the years if you as you've thought

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 3>about this film.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm curious first, like, because I know people do

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 5>like this is it is the sort of ending that

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 5>encourages debate, and so I'm curious to like, do people

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 5>in the audience think that this is really happening. What

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 5>is the end of the movie? Is that, like an

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.359
<v Speaker 5>are we to take that as a literal? The apocalypse

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 5>or whatever it is.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Is upon them?

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Some people feel that way a couple of hands, Oh, okay,

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 5>you can it's all right. Look, I shared my deepest

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 5>personal issues.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 6>You can raise your hand at a question, okay.

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 5>And then how many people think that it's, uh, you know,

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 5>this is another dream, or it's it's we're not supposed

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 5>to take it literally. It's okay, maybe it's maybe more,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 5>but it's there's a So to me, like, I feel

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 5>like the answer, whatever you feel is is correct for

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 5>you obviously. And I love what Ryan Johnson said yesterday

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 5>about like, you know, like film criticism is like a

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 5>documentary of a person's experience of a movie.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 6>I love that.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 5>I thought that was really lovely. So whatever you feel

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 5>is wonderful. But for me, it's like the answer is irrelevant,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Like they're like the debate is irrelevant.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 6>Like to me, the thing that matters is that he's not.

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.599
<v Speaker 5>Afraid, and he and his and his and and the

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 5>Jessica chests, same character sees it too, the daughter sees

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 5>it too, and that whatever is going to happen. They're

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 5>gonna face it together, and he's and it and they

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 5>are a like, you know, visually, they are a cohesive unit.

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 5>And so to me, that is like where you find

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 5>like the hopefulness in this movie, because again, like you

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 5>can live, you can literally put yourself in a stormshell

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 5>storm celler and put on a gas mask and just say,

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm just it's too scary out there, something bad is

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 5>out there or whatever the phrase is to use you,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm afraid something bad is coming.

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 6>Well, there always is something bad right coming, right.

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 5>So it's not a matter of that, it's a matter

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 5>of are you going you know, like, are you going

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 5>to stay in a storm seller? I can't say that

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 5>phrase apparently, storm seller, are you going to stay down there?

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 6>Or are you going to live your life?

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? No, I think that's a great take.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>And going back to the show and when we discussed

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>it, it was actually Dana Stevens, who was on film spotting

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>at the time when we reviewed it, filling in as

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 3>a guest host. And I don't think we necessarily talked

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>about it ahead of time or planned to get into

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the ending, but it was also one of those things

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 3>where you kind of felt like you had to, and

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I only had really one line in my notes, but

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>then we devoted some bonus content to it and ended

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 3>up unpacking it a little bit, and it was a

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 3>discussion that seemed to be helpful for some listeners who

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 3>were in a state of kind of going okay, this

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of feels like Jeff Nichols just unraveled everything we saw,

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and I ultimately agree with you, Matt. I think I'll

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>just take a harder line, though, and say that I

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 3>don't think there's any reason to believe, based on the

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 3>previous one hundred plus minutes, that the vision at the

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 3>end is anything but another vision. Just the reality of

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 3>the movie suggests that it is another vision, another hallucination,

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>another nightmare. But what matters is exactly what you said.

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 3>And it goes back. It goes back to a couple

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of lines in the film, and one in particular, when

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 3>he finally comes clean with his wife at the table,

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>he says, I need you to believe me. But even

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 3>more pointed, remember when they're driving home and he's got

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>both of them in the car in the back and

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 3>a lot of activity is happening and he's getting unnerved,

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and he says is anybody seeing this and the whole film,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>nobody else has seen it, whether it's Shay Wegm or

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 3>anyone else.

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 4>This is all happening to him.

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 3>This is his experience, and it feels as if he's

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>completely alone in it, and he's he's he's building it

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 3>that way. He won't let her in, he won't let

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 3>other people in. And so what matters, as you said, Matt,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 3>at the end, is the fact that they both see it.

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 4>She sees it, they she nods at him. That's what

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 4>really matters.

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 3>And we understand that they as a couple are moving

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>forward and it's going to get harder. As the doctor says,

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>before it gets better, it's going to be harder. And

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>that's what I think for me that image suggests. But

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 3>at least they're finally they're on the same page. They are,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 3>they are in agreement that they're going to fight this together.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Your mother was diagnosed with paranoids in her thirties, I

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 2>thought before wanderings.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 3>No, it's been telling me how straying Curtis has been

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 3>acting ly.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Is anyone seeing this? Tell people what you've been doing?

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I know, I'm sorry you friends.

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 6>The other the other thing that I would say.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Is important about the ending that I don't always see

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 5>talked about, is you know the whole movie is about

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 5>uncertainty again, fear, anxiety, and so much of the movie

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 5>it's bouncing between reality and hallucination or dream or whatever

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 5>you want to call it. And so many times in

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 5>the movie does this so beautifully where it constantly is

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 5>messing with you, the audience member, Are we awake or

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 5>are we hallucinating?

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Or are is it?

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 5>The whole movie and that ending, leaving you with a

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 5>question of is this real or is this not? Puts

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 5>you into the position of that character this whole movie,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 5>the whole movie. He's asking himself, is anyone seeing this?

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 6>Am I going crazy? Am I hallucinating? Is you know?

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Leaving you in that state is a way is like

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 5>an almost like an empathetic gesture.

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 6>It allows you to feel what this character has.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Been feeling for the whole movie.

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I agree, and I'll use that word feeling here as well.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 3>He says that to her, right, he says, it's a feeling.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>He's trying to describe what he's going for, and it's

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 3>very hard thing for him to articulate because it is

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>a feeling. And I think at the end, even though

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 3>we have that conversation, the preceding conversation with the doctor,

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 3>and the doctor explains this is he's gonna have to

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>commit to treatment. He might be away from the family

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 3>for a little bit. If the movie ends with the

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 3>big reveal being him hit. He comes outside and the

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 3>light shines and he sees it and he says it's fine.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>After an entire film with him saying what, I'm all right,

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I got it, I'm fine, it's fine. I'm not and

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 3>at the end he finally says it's fine, and it

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 3>actually is fine for the first time, it's fine. If

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 3>it ended there, I think we'd all kind of walk

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>out of the theater feeling like, Yeah, everything's gonna be great.

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>They're right, they're they're finally gonna move forward, their their

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 3>marriage is stronger, they're they're communicating better.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna get treatment. We can walk out and feel

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 4>great about the ending.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 3>And Jeff Nichol says, no, I need you to leave

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 3>with the feeling like this isn't over.

0:16:58.280 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 4>This is an over by a long shot, right.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 5>And again that's very true of anxiety, you know, like,

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 5>at least as I have experienced it.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 6>You have these.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 5>Periods where you are extremely that or heightened, or you're

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 5>having these really intent panic attacks, and then.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, hopefully you get maybe get it under control.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 6>But it doesn't go like there is no magical solution.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 5>You know, Like he has that scene where he's like,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 5>I need you to tell me what I need to take.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Get it under to get it under control, fix.

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 6>To fix this.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 5>And the answer is not, there isn't The answer is

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 5>there is no answer. The answer is learning to accept

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 5>it and to and to live with it a little more,

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 5>maybe without building you know, spent getting a home loan

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 5>and building a storm shehelf.

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 6>I can't say storm, cellar, what is rot?

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 3>That's sorry the moment where you know, I mean, right

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>from the beginning, it's it's ominous, right. It opens on

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 3>him standing outside in the rain and he's seeing it

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 3>come down. But when Shay Wigan, when his friend says

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 3>to him, basically, you have a perfect life. You're a

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 3>good man, you have a good life. We know what

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>this could be foreshadowing, you know, and and the fact

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 3>that he he is.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 4>A good man. We see that he on the job.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't want to stop early, right, just because it

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>looks like it might be rain Like. He seems to

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 3>be a man of integrity and honesty, and he is

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 3>trying to do everything he can for his family. But

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 3>as you've said, in the end, bad things are going

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 3>to come for you.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 4>Anyway.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>You can be a good man, You can do everything right,

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 3>you can, you know, And these are modest ambitions that

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 3>these characters have. They want to they want to be

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>able to go to the beach house on vacation maybe

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 3>once a year. They want to pay all their bills.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 3>They want their daughter to be able to hear that.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 3>That's about it. But there's just this this fear, this

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>this spear, as you said, that's hanging over him the

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 3>entire time.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you mentioned the daughter, and I what I I had.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 5>I saw this movie when a K I had my

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 5>number one. I may not have seen it again until

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 5>a week ago when I rewatched it getting ready for

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 5>this and then watching it here again today, and really

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 5>in those two new viewings, really struck by how wonderfully

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 5>the daughter fits into the one of the other themes

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 5>of this movie, which is communication and the struggle to

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 5>communicate with their daughter, and how important that is, and

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 5>how his fears about that again connect to his mental struggles,

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 5>but also again his struggle to communicate with everyone. And

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.239
<v Speaker 5>there's so much about this movie and about anxiety that

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 5>is his reaction to it is to I mean, maybe

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 5>this is too much symbolism or reading too much in

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 5>but the idea that he's a construction worker and he

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 5>spends his life building things, and then we watch him

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 5>in this movie begin to build walls around his issues.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 5>He builds a fence, a pen for the dog. The

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 5>dog is scary. I'm going to put the dog in

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 5>a cage and that will solve my fear. Oh there's

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 5>more fear now, I'm worried about this. I'm going to build.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 5>He literally puts up walls, you know. He builds a

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 5>storm cellar and then he goes into it, you know.

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 6>And and so.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 5>He he is trying to solve the problem by just

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 5>closing it off. I'm gonna I'm gonna seal this thing in.

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna bury it way down deep in the ground,

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 5>you know. I mean, And that's something I joke about

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 5>with my wife, is like, you know, I'm gonna just

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm just gonna bury it, bury it way down deep

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 5>and that's like he almost literally tries to do.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 6>That in this movie and finds out spoiler alert that never.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Word, it doesn't work.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 3>So a couple days ago, as we were doing our

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 3>final prep for this, we're on a call with producer

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 3>Sam and he says, you know, at festivals, there always

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 3>ends up being connections that developed between films, and I

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>wonder what they'll be. And of course we probably should

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 3>have known that because unlike most film festivals, we've seen

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 3>all these movies before and we probably could have planned those.

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Connections, but we did not.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 3>And here I am, and I'm thinking about Brick last

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 3>night and Ryan Johnson talking about Brendan and we're having

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the conversation about his type of masculinity and how did

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>he describe him as self righteous? What's more self righteous

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 3>than Michael Shannon in that scene right where he finally

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>goes off on all the other people in his community.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 3>But also I don't remember the exact lines, but how

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 3>does Brendan describe the way he loves Emily? For those

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 3>of you who are there, he says, I love you.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 3>This is how I show my love. I have to

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 3>protect you, right, And this is what we're getting here

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 3>with Michael Shannon's character as well. But I think also

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 3>we just watched Father Ponchali and to your point about walls,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 3>we have a mother in that film who is trying

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the entire movie to get her walls actually fortified. Literally,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 3>she needs the walls fortified to try to protect her family. Unfortunately,

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 3>she is actually alone. She's unnecessarily alone her husband in

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 3>this case, the father is kind of mia.

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately for most of.

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 3>The film, he is unnecessarily building up these walls, right, yeah, I.

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 6>Mean I get.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's funny because I'm like, I never again

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 5>watching it the first time, I don't know that I

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 5>noticed any of these things. But even this, this this

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 5>idea of the walls that he's and the structures he's

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 5>building to contain and hide and protect himself. I mean

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 5>it's sort of again obvious. But the ending, the ending

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 5>is opening opening a door literally being open you know,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 5>uh it all it kind of fits together in that

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 5>beautiful way that that you know, and and that the

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 5>that Jessica Chesstain's character.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 6>It says him, you have to do this.

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 5>I could open I could, I could open the door,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 5>but that wouldn't solve the problem. You have to open it,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 5>you have to be open perhaps and uh and that

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 5>and so you have that and what and what a

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 5>powerful ending that is, which is literally just that that

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 5>that being the the moment. I think a movie that

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 5>has these huge apocalyptic visions and that you're you know,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 5>they I remember the I remember the first time I

0:22:56.200 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 5>saw it being so talk about anxiety, like when they

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 5>go in there for the first time and you don't

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 5>know how that scene is going to resolve. I remember

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 5>just really like being really white knuckled watching that. Just

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 5>the amount of tension that they get out of that

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 5>sequence that ends in such a sort of simple way,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 5>I think is just brilliant filmmaking.

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, that was vulnerable, So I'll be a little vulnerable, right,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 3>We've got to be honest, Like I have had probably,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>oh gosh, ten to twenty at least moments like he

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 3>has in the film at Night, where you have a

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 3>panic attack where you wake up in the middle of

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the night, scare your wife half to death because you

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 3>feel like you can't bread, you feel like you're choking

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 3>on something, you feel completely over.

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 4>You actually do think you're.

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>In my case, choking on something that has happened many

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 3>times dozens of times in my life, right, so.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I can relate in a lot of ways to this character.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 3>And I mentioned earlier the top five things we learned

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>from the movies we did an episode four hundred, I

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 3>think I want to share this just because it underscores,

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, what we're talking about with this. It's themes

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 3>of communication and vulnerability and honesty. The scene for me

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 3>that I talked about an episode four hundred, I think

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 3>is so important is when he wakes up that one

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 3>morning after having a panic attack, and he has wept

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 3>the bed right. And if you think about all of

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 3>us in the room, if something like that happened to you,

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>how many of you and let's assume just like in

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 3>this case, he's got a loving, supportive wife. If he

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 3>said to her, if he was honest with her and said,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what happened, but look at the sheets,

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 3>she would say, well, we maybe need to get you

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 3>in to see a doctor, and we need to try

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 3>and address this, and let's clean the sheets. But because

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 3>of his shame, because of the fear of what he thinks,

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 3>this is going to lead to the fear that they're

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 3>going to think that he's losing control. And he's not

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 3>fulfilling his duties as husband and father, and just I

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 3>think too, the shame of that masculine sort of shame

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 3>and that pride.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 4>He what does he do?

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 3>He hides it, He doesn't he want her to come

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>over next to him, and he goes and washes the

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 3>sheets and puts the bed back together in private. I

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>wonder how many of us would do the exact same thing,

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 3>even if we even if we think we're in a

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 3>really healthy relationship and we could be as honest as

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 3>we want with each other, in that moment, wouldn't you

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 3>also feel a little bit of shame? Wouldn't you want

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 3>to probably cover it up? That's that's the kind of

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 3>questions I think Jeff Nichols is really getting at and

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 3>exploring in this film and why it feels very personal,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think why many of us can have that

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 3>personal connection to it.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I know.

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 5>And you know, one of the other sort of personal

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 5>reactions I had this time was when I it's is

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 5>it twenty ten?

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 6>Twenty eleven?

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Is when the movie twenty eleven?

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 6>So I was not.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 5>I was married, but I wasn't a dad then and

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 5>now I have I have two kids, so that adds

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 5>an extra an extra wrinkle of fun. I guess, let's say,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 5>to watching this movie is to and having kids really

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 5>does add that level of anxiety. You know you were

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 5>talking before about like their extremely modest ambitions and goals

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 5>and like the things that he wants to protect.

0:25:58.640 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 6>And that's it.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 5>I told again, that's another thing that I think is

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 5>so beautiful about the movie is that idea of.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 6>I don't have a lot, but what I have is great,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 6>this is all I need. I just don't want anything

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 6>bad to happen. I don't want anything to jeopardize that.

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 6>And I think that as.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 5>A father, I can really sadly relate to that you

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 5>know that you know and and and I think again

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 5>that the movie really it taps into such a beautiful

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 5>personal way of expressing all of those ideas that you know,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 5>Like seeing it now, I had an even more intense

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 5>reaction to even knowing you know. As I said, like

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 5>I find the the ending to be somewhat hopeful and

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 5>kind of optimistic in a weird way therapeutic, but just

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 5>experiencing that aspect of it now, it just adds another

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 5>fun wrinkle of tension and anxiety.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, Matt Singer added a fun wrinkle to film spotting Fest.

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much Matt Singer for being here, Thank

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 3>you for sharing your thoughts on the film that was.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Film critic Matt Singer and me at the Film spotting

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Fest screening of Jeff Nichols.

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Take shelter.

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 3>For more Film spotting Fest conversations, you can go to

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 3>filmspottingfest dot com or listen wherever you get your podcasts.

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.479
<v Speaker 4>How do you live well?

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 6>I live with the conference of I believe in myself,

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 6>the money will follow.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 4>And what do you plan to do if this whole

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 4>dream of yours doesn't work?

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 7>At it doesn't even enter my consciousness.

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 3>Before we get to our conversation about Lone Star, a

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 3>couple of quick notes. We do have a lot planned

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 3>for January here on Film spotting Next week we'll have

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a review of Christmas Day release Marty Supreme, along with

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Josh talking about Avatar Fire and Ash. Yes, I think

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 3>I am going to sit that one out. We do

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 3>expect to have a couple of more recent releases in

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 3>the mix as well. The following week it's our twenty

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty five wrap party. That's where we share our favorite

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 3>scenes and moments of the twenty twenty five movie year,

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 3>and then later in the month it's our twenty twenty

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 3>six movie preview. We've got our Oscar nomination reactions, and maybe,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>well it's not a maybe, we've got it on the calendar.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 3>We actually have a Sacred Cow conversation already planned for

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Paul Thomas Anderson's One Battle After Another. Yes, the film

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty five. We've got it on the docket

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.959
<v Speaker 3>for early twenty twenty six to already revisit reflect on

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 3>that film before we completely close the book on this

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 3>past year, on that rap party show. In a couple

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 3>of weeks, we will announce the winner of the Film

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 3>Spotting Golden Brick Award, our favorite film by a new

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 3>or emerging director. You get to help choose the winner

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 3>of that award, and you could do that by voting

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 3>in the Film Spotting Poll, which is available now at

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>film spotting dot Net. The twenty twenty five Brick nominees

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 3>are Julian Glanders Animated Boys Go to Jupiter, which is

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 3>available now vod. The film whose title explains it all,

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Grand Theft Hamlet that's available via Movie and You Can Act,

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 3>says that via Amazon Prime the David osit directed documentary Predators,

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 3>which is available via Paramount Plus Eva. Victor is Sorry Baby,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 3>that's streaming on HBO Max and available via other VOD platforms.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 3>And finally, another documentary being distributed locally or by our

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 3>local distributor, Music Box Films, Charlie Shackleton's Zodiac Killer Project.

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Now that is one that may be a little bit

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 3>harder to see, but you have some time to vote.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Your vote actually is in due until I think our

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 3>deadline's going to be Sunday, January eleventh, and Zodiac Killer

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Project comes out on VOD. You can see it digitally

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 3>starting January six So if you want to do all

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 3>your homework, make sure you've seen all five of these,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>and hey, Zodiac Killer Project is a good one, make

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 3>sure that you make time for it. January sixth is

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.479
<v Speaker 3>when that movie comes out. You can vote in that

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>poll and leave a comment at Film Spotting.

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 7>I thought it was important to acknowledge the new modes

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 7>that the Ciskel and Ebert format is taking in new

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 7>media spaces as we celebrate their fiftieth anniversary. And I

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 7>thought that Adam and Film Spotting were the perfect example

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 7>of this.

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 3>That was Alex Vasquez from the Chicago Film Office. This fall,

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Chicago Film and the Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs celebrated

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 3>fifty years of Ciskel and Ebert with some special film

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 3>screenings and events, including a film they invited us to host,

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 3>and I got to pick. That was what was so

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 3>wonderful about this. Alex gave me a call said, do

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 3>you have any ideas on what you might want to screen?

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 3>And John sales nineteen ninety six film Lone Star was

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 3>one of the first movies that came to mine. As

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>you will hear me explain shortly in the post screening conversation.

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Lone Star is set on the US Mexico border and

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 3>stars Chris Cooper as a small town sheriff, Sam Dead's

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 3>who starts unearthing long buried secrets after the remains of

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 3>a former sheriff are discovered, a former share who disappeared

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 3>under mysterious circumstances. Mysterious circumstances that may have involved Sam's

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 3>father Buddy, played by a very young Matthew McConaughey. The

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 3>disappeared sheriff He's played by Chris Christofferson. Elizabeth Tania also

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 3>stars sheriff Deed sheff.

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Ded is dad, honey, He's just sheaff Julie.

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 7>We found a body out by Fort McKenzie yesterday.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>He got any idea who might have put him there?

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 2>The hell of a time to bring up old business

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that badge and didn't come out of a cereal box,

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 2>started figging holes in this county. Don't telling him what

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 2>will come up? Be too so did you? I Won'll

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>find out one way or the other.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 3>With Josh overseas, I invited Michael Phillips to join me

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 3>for the screening and that conversation Michael Phillips, everybody, Hey, folks, Hey,

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 3>you got them?

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Hi Michael.

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering if everybody out there is really processing the

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 3>ending of the film. We might, yeah, forget it. We

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 3>might need to give them another minute or two. But

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I did want to explain my choice of this film,

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 3>and maybe we can talk about the context in which

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 3>you saw Lone Star for the first time. So June

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety six is when this film came out. I

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 3>would have been home for the summer right before my

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 3>senior year of college, sleeping on my parents' couch because

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have a bedroom anymore.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 4>And this is before I.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Had written any film reviews or taken any film studies

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 3>classes or film production classes. My liberal arts school didn't

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 3>have any film classes. I knew I wanted to do

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 3>something in film though at this point, and I was

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 3>watching at the movies religiously. I saw this review. I

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 3>heard them talking about John Sales. I didn't know anything

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 3>about John Sales. The movie looked fascinating. I wanted to

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 3>see this film, and of course it was not playing

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 3>at my little two screen movie theater in my small town,

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 3>and I was so I started scanning the Des Moines

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Register because we had to look at newspapers. Then I'm

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 3>dating myself. The Internet was fledgling at this point, so

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm scanning the Des Moines Register constantly to see is

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 3>this going to come to Des Moines? Am I going

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 3>to get to see Lone Star? I have to see

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>this movie, And finally it did. It might have been

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 3>like two months after it came out, maybe even three,

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 3>but I eventually did see this movie.

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>So wait, it wasn't the streaming the week after it

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:33.719
<v Speaker 2>opened in the theaters.

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:37.719
<v Speaker 3>No, no streaming. I do remember too, being intrigued by

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 3>the fact that I don't think I had seen Dazed

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and Confused at this point. Somehow I missed it when

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 3>it came out. That was like Matthew McConaughey's first role.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 3>But A Time to Kill had come out, or came

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 3>out just a month after this movie, and it had

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 3>been promoted. It was a big movie of the John

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Grisham novel, so i'd seen ads for that constantly. I

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 3>think I saw that before saw Lone Star. And what's funny,

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 3>of course, is that that's the big breakout McConaughey role,

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and Chris Cooper's in that movie and he's a supporting character.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 3>And I remember being I don't know, just kind of

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.479
<v Speaker 3>surprised by the fact that it's so funny to see

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 3>this little movie and Chris Cooper's the big star and

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Matthew McConaughey's in the supporting role. But I did finally

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 3>get to see Lone Star, and it turns out Roger

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and jan were right. I thought it was a masterpiece,

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think i'd seen it. Somehow i'd seen

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the entire film until last night prepping for this and

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 3>then watching it again now holds up beautifully. At least

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I felt that it did. So how about you, when

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 3>did you see Lone Star? What did you bring to it?

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So you again you what year in college were you.

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 4>I would have been right before my senior year, so I.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Was in fourth grade. So that makes you no, No,

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 2>it's but I did for Rogeriebert. There's a piece running

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 2>soon about a similar sort of Ebert and Cisco force

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of influence in my movie going life, where when I

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>was second or thirty year of college, this little film

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 2>called My Dinner with Andrei came out and that was

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 2>in eighty one, I think, And yeah, so it's we're

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 2>half a generation issue apart on everything on that, Yeah,

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 2>I saw I saw a Lone Star as a as

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 2>a civilian. This was at a period of my life

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 2>when I was writing about theater, which was about half

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 2>my career, and seeing it again, and it had been

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>a similar spread of time since since the second watch,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 2>and I'm very happy to see it again, not just

0:35:52.760 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 2>because it's politically, sociologically just historically relevant in ways that

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 2>I wish it weren't. In a way what we're going

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 2>through now, I don't even know what writer directors who

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 2>want to write truthfully and from the heart about what

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 2>they see happening in their country now, what we're going

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 2>to see in another few years, I hope, I hope something.

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 2>I really don't want it to be nothing. It's not

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 2>just that I think watching this now, it's the thing

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 2>that really hits me is that there's a word. I

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 2>caught an adjective that one sort of grousy critic, and

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember which one it was. It wasn't Siskel

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 2>or Ebert, obviously, but a critic who was sort of

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 2>hot and cold on John Sales use the word civilized

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to describe sort of the tone, the approach, and the

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 2>whole kind of humanist outlook here. And it was sort

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 2>of meant to be kind of a mixed assessment. And

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 2>now seeing this tonight, I can only really see the

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 2>value in it. And also just the craft of this writer.

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 2>The fact that in his writing career is fascinating. I mean,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 2>he wrote all this, really some of it really entertaining

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 2>trash for Roger Corman, everything from Piranha to I think

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 2>uncredited work on some Corman films, including I think Black Mama,

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>White Mama, which we see playing at the drive in

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 2>in that scene and the flashback, and the fact that

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 2>he could actually juggle successfully eighteen or so. It's eighteen

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 2>credited actors on the open credits, So I think basically

0:37:55.400 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 2>eighteen substantial roles without seeming crazy overpacked to me, and

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 2>without its seeming ginned up for melodrama every second. God knows,

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, and and Sales knows what kind of filmmaker

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 2>he is. He knows that he's a guy that will

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 2>never be grabby enough for a big audience, for a

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 2>big box office boom. You know. He just he cannot

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 2>change his temperament, which is interesting coming out of the

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 2>career he coming out of the writing career he with Korman,

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 2>which is all just like can we you know, just

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.399
<v Speaker 2>throw the trash at the screen, make an entertaining, make

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>it cheap. But I mean, look at all the great

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 2>people that came out of working with Corman, everyone from

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan demidev Scor says, and here we have John Sales.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, that's the writing is what really Yeah, a

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 2>lot alone the acting, but that's a different story. That's

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 2>a yeah, yeah, I think the writing.

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Of course, you saw the clip from Ciskel Niehburg Gene

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 3>talked about that, and I agree. I think if this

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 3>was a film that just gave us the kind of

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 3>murder mystery Charlie Wade storyline and introduced us to a

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 3>few of these characters. You know, we met we met

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 3>Big Oh, and we understood a little bit about his

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 3>backstory because we need to because he ends up being

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 3>a major player in this mystery. It would have been

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 3>fairly satisfying. But the fact that we get I think

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Alex's word was tapestry. I mean the fact that we

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 3>get all of these characters. And there are a lot

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 3>of movies, Michael, that try to pull that off, that

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 3>to try to weave together all these different characters give

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 3>us the big ensemble, and they never they never really

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 3>have the depth I think that this movie has. And

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 3>what you notice, I think is John Sales does a

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 3>really good job of giving every character at least one

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 3>scene where they get to do something that isn't just

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 3>their introduction and then the thing they have to do

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 3>for the plot. You know, they have a scene where

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 3>we get to just even with a character like Enrique,

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 3>who we meet him early in the film when he

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 3>delivers some food to the table with Hollis, and then

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 3>of course at the end where he shows up at

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Mercedes house. But in addition to the other scenes where

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 3>we see him planning the river crossing, he's waiting outside

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 3>and he sees her car and he tells her how

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 3>nice of a car she has. We just get to

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 3>know a little bit about him in terms of his

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 3>personality and a sense of kind of his aspirations. And

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 3>every character has a moment like that, even even as

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 3>subtle as the Texas Ranger we meet Ben Wetzel.

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 2>He's just the love that guy. He's so good and

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're talking about the guy who comes to

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean that. It's like I've never seen less acting

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 2>in my life.

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I know, And it's very subtle.

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 6>He's there to.

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Deliver information right to move the story forward, but Sales

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 3>gives him that great story about Charlie Wade walking into

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 3>his dad's hardware store and saying that he winked at

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 3>me and I wet my pants. That gives that character

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 3>some dimension. I'll give you another one when he goes

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 3>to meet with with Roderick's widow and just the fact

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 3>that she's not just sitting on her porch waiting to

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 3>deliver answers to his questions. She's playing the game boy right,

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 3>and there too, it's emerging of the past and present,

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 3>this older woman playing with this game boy. But it

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 3>it just gives her something to do and to joke

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 3>around about, beyond just again serving the story. Every character

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 3>has something like that. We get to see, we get

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 3>to see how they interact with each other and a

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 3>sense of their interiority beyond just what they're doing there

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 3>to serve the plot. Yeah, I suppose, I suppose if

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 3>you have a car wait, you're disagreeing.

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 2>With no, no, no, not yet less than.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 4>Usual, This would be appropriate if he was.

0:41:56.080 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean there are there are at times when when

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 2>you're sort of aware of of of exactly what you're

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 2>saying that you're not getting. You're not you're not. It's

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 2>not plot forward in that way. It's plenty ploty, you know.

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a couple of reversals that you know,

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 2>we can argue about, you know, the value over whatever.

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But Sales is a big fan of Raymond Chandler as

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people, right, and who's a guy, you know,

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Philip Marlow, you know, l a crime all that, and

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 2>plot was very busy in a in a Philip Marlow

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:38.399
<v Speaker 2>mystery without really being as important as anything else going on.

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what's Chandler was really into. It was just

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 2>this weird sort of like, you know, kind of organism

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 2>that was l A that he that he got to

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>know in the thirties and forties, in the fifties, although

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I think they lived in La Joya for a time.

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Anybody know La Joya? The to Chandler wrote one grade

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 2>line on that's his hand. He just he just said, ayah,

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it's nothing but a climate, That's what he said. But

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I think what what Sales is doing here in Lone

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Star is is kind of attribute to something like Tandler,

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 2>because it's like he more than I will say this,

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 2>more than a lot of his movies. I think Sales

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 2>does seem activated by being on location really really down

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 2>where we're talking about, I mean fictionalized you know, names

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 2>of the towns, but that that just feels like it's

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot of the work we need done and

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the actors kind of filling from there. You just you

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 2>can tell it's And in terms of the writing too,

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:44.399
<v Speaker 2>you know this whole business about algorithmic writing where Netflix people,

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're doing just rogic for Netflix, uh, you know,

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:53.879
<v Speaker 2>the note is always given that you have to as

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 2>a writer. You have to reiterate the stupid single one

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 2>idea plot over and over, or assuming people are texting

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 2>while they're watching, they're not really looking, so you have

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 2>to you know, you can't, you know, and that I

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 2>meanes Sales would be running a hardware store today if

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 2>you had to put up on that stuff here, right, yeah,

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the screenplay, dialogue is usually I don't know,

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I'd put it maybe fourth on the list of things

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 3>that criteria for a great screenplay.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 4>But there are some really good lines here. We got

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 4>a great laugh out of it, the.

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Great zinger when the character I think it's Mikey who says, yeah,

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 3>it's always heartwarming to see a prejudice defeated by a

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 3>deeper prejudice. Come on, that's a good line. But the

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 3>writing may be the standout here. But where I think

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 3>Lone Star might be a standout in sales career. And

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I've seen almost all of his films, but it's been

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 3>a long time since I've seen a lot of sales films,

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if someone.

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:52.439
<v Speaker 4>Can talk to me after if they've they've seen these films.

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 3>More recently, he's he's known as maybe the godfather of

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 3>American independent cinema. You go back to a film like

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Return of the Sacaca seven is often a film that's

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 3>pointed too as the film that launched that movement and

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the focus. A lot of times, Michael is on independent

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 3>in that two word phrase independent filmmaker, not so much

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 3>on the filmmaking. He's not a filmmaker that's known for

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 3>being ostentatious. He's never trying to draw a lot of

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 3>attention to what he's doing with the camera. But when

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 3>you think about this movie, and when you do think

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 3>about it in the context of a Western, it makes

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 3>me think a little bit of a filmmaker like Howard Hawks,

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 3>who was another filmmaker who didn't move the camera a

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 3>whole lot, but was always well regarded for being a

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 3>guy who knew where to place the camera, always knew

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 3>where to put it in exactly the place it needed

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 3>to be. And when I watch Lone Star, I feel

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 3>like sales one. He knows exactly where to put the camera.

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 3>But then he also does some interesting things with the

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 3>camera here, especially in those flashbacks.

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:01.839
<v Speaker 2>The scene that's that's what I want to talk about.

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 3>The scene at the end before we even get to

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the kind of editing and the trick of going between

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 3>past and president, which I want to get to. I

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 3>just needed some of the staging and the blocking of

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 3>using some of those low angle shots when he needs

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 3>to to emphasize the authority and the intensity, the intimidation

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 3>of Charlie Wade cutting in just on a close up

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 3>when he needs to really to amp up a scene,

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 3>the canted angle, he'll go to a tilted shot there

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 3>at the end when when Sam walks in and we're

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 3>going to get finally the truth revealed, and especially with

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 3>otis young. Otis there at the end right looking up

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 3>at at at Charlie Wade. There, there's some really effective

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 3>subtle uses of the camera in addition to the great

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 3>editing tea.

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it took. I mean Sales never had a lot

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 2>of money, even when he had bigger budgets for him.

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean this was a somewhat larger budget. And I

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 2>think part of that is you can't really set up

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 2>complicated fluid what is you know, medium length takes quickly.

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 2>You cannot set those up and rehearse them. It takes

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 2>it takes half a day to and and you're looking

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 2>at days like shooting schedules like nineteen days and a

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of his pictures twenty three. I mean, I'm amazing

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 2>that he got anything done, you know with that, But

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.879
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, what I really love about about the potential

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 2>narrative moments of like no, wait, who what you know?

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a little of that here and there,

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 2>which is almost entirely solved in my in my view,

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:41.800
<v Speaker 2>by that ideas simple as as can be and not original,

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 2>but really beautifully sort of layered in look at let's

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 2>let's do the flashbacks in this way this time, meaning

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, for maximum clarity and also just sort of

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a poetic touch that does not to me seem like

0:47:57.080 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a like a tick or a gimmick where you just

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, you have an actual without a break person

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 2>in the presence talking about something, shift over here to

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the bar, and then there's a quick shuffle we don't

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 2>see behind. Okay, we'll remove this stuff, and then okay,

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 2>younger so and so is there forty years earlier. And

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:21.240
<v Speaker 2>that's a very kind of subliminally satisfying way of handling

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 2>flashbacks for maximum clarity and something just a little different

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 2>for him, absolutely that was his I mean, there aren't

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 2>that many camera moments, aha moments with sales in his

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 2>entire career, and that might be wonderful. It was like

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.280
<v Speaker 2>that beautiful, very simple idea, nicely done it.

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 4>And as cinematic as it is.

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 3>I wonder, especially with your theater criticis's background, I wonder

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 3>if you thought it was theatrical, because it made me

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 3>think about moments on the stage where you might have

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 3>something on the front of the stage, characters acting, and

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 3>then they'll lights out on them and the spotlight to

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 3>someone back here, and it might even be characters from

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 3>their past or a future moment or something like that,

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 3>where you're shifting to another part of the stage and

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 3>it feels like that sometimes here. Even though it also

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 3>is based on what makes it effective is the way

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 3>they're hiding cuts effectively, right, I mean, this is based

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 3>on the fact that the camera is moving, and I

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 3>think in almost every instance, if not every instance, there

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 3>is a cut somewhere there to make it seamless. And

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the reason why beyond I think just being inherently satisfying.

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:33.279
<v Speaker 3>If you think about this film thematically, right, this is

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 3>a place, these are characters.

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 4>This is a story where.

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 3>The present and the past cannot be separated from each other.

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Everybody is at every moment haunted by their past, and

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 3>some are doing whatever they can to try to move

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 3>past it, but they can't, and some, by the end

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 3>of the film, we see them making efforts to, like

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 3>in the case of Delmore and and his father, right,

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 3>there is some attempts at reconciliation and change, and even

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:09.839
<v Speaker 3>Mercedes moves forward a little bit and we see her

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 3>helping those characters at the end.

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 4>But they can't be separated.

0:50:15.560 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to use a phrase that the bartender

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 3>uses in the film sales. I think is exploring in

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 3>this film this idea of lines of demarcation, right, And

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 3>if you can't have that separation, if there is no

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 3>line of demarcation between the past and present, then there

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 3>can't be a line of demarcation in the editing either.

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 3>There can't be that clear cut, There can't be that

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 3>clear separation between the past and present. It has to

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 3>be seamless, and we need to feel like the past

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and present are constantly in dialogue with each other, and

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the.

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Editing pulls that off.

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 3>And what I especially love Michael is then we get

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a moment where the past and present are literally in

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 3>dialogue with each other when they're by the river, right,

0:50:56.280 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 3>because then Chris Cooper actually answers his own question and says,

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 3>is knee neither right? Right?

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:04.720
<v Speaker 2>This is this is the it's it's the two themes

0:51:04.760 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of formed the right, the two streams into the

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 2>river where it's like a past and president, you know,

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 2>the ghosts of the past. How much can we deny

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and without or bury him or keeping Barry without going

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 2>crazy as a as a what a son, a family,

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:21.839
<v Speaker 2>a society, all of it, it's all there in this

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in the story. And it's just just the eternal golf,

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:31.839
<v Speaker 2>as Shaw said, George Burnshaw, the eternal golf between parents

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and children. And the Brits and and other other countries

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 2>always thought look down on American drama a little bit,

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 2>saying the usual you know, family family stuff about the

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 2>classet falls is in the closet, because of course that

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't happen in England. You know nobody, but you know,

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 2>it's it's the great quote from Falkner, right. I think

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 2>it was originally Requiem for a none. You know, the

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 2>past is never dead, it's not even past. And that

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 2>was in fifty one he wrote that, And then I

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 2>mean O'Neil gen O'Neil long Day's journeying tonight off on

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the great play about about the past just not able

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to you know, you cannot shake it, you cannot bury it.

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 2>The past is, the present is, and it's the future too.

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 2>We all try to lie out of that, but life

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 2>will not let us. And that's that's sales from the

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 2>beginning of Mister Calucus seven. You know, how can you

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 2>resolve your sort of counterculture revolutionary recent past with your

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 2>complacent present? Even brother who's seen brother from another planet here? Really,

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I love that film. I just resaw that, and that

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean that begins with that first. I mean, I

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 2>defy anybody not to stick with that movie past the

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 2>first five minutes because this opening where this Interstellar you know,

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 2>played by Joel.

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Moore Morton from The Colonel, The.

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Colonel, Yeah, lands and he ends up H's just fun

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 2>to find your landing right by the statue in the

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 2>in the in the river, and and he's sort of

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 2>flooded with this sort of supernatural ability to hear and

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 2>imagine voices of the past in Ellis Island. You know,

0:53:14.040 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 2>he's over there and it's just like, Wow, he never

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 2>really shook this theme, you know, He's just found ways

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:23.919
<v Speaker 2>over decades of filmmaking to revisit it, and he never

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you on Loan Star. I don't think

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Sales ever made a better mosaic film, you know, and

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:31.920
<v Speaker 2>he made a lot of them, I.

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Believe it or not.

0:53:32.560 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 3>We're actually already pretty much at twenty minutes, so we

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of have to wrap this up. So that's the yeah,

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 3>all right, all right, let's go. Yeah, he's he's given

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:44.879
<v Speaker 3>us that we can keep talking sign you know that's

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 3>dangerous with film spotting, though, Alex.

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 2>This means we can keep talking right when you.

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Do there you can just talk from the well, maybe

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 3>we can get to the ending of the film a

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 3>little bit and not just the twist necessarily, though we

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:01.399
<v Speaker 3>can talk about that too, or the double twists if

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 3>you will.

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 4>But what on these.

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Rewatches, having now watched it back to back nights as

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 3>we both have, what what surprised you?

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:10.360
<v Speaker 2>If anything?

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 4>What did you discover on rewatch?

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's and this is where I really would

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:17.960
<v Speaker 2>love to hear after I speak very briefly to this,

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I just how many great small, medium size, not just

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 2>not just scenes has written, but performances there are.

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 4>In this.

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 2>And how my my occasional struggle with John Sale's work

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 2>not less so here than almost any film about whether

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 2>or not the motor is if the motor's a little

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:48.280
<v Speaker 2>less than I want sometimes in terms of the story narrative.

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 2>But all that seems to be kind of solved by

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the next moment when I realized good line, good act,

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 2>good casting, you know, like I mean, that's a you know,

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like I would you know, look, we

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of movies in a year. I mean,

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:07.880
<v Speaker 2>you after five in a row where that doesn't have either,

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, you just start thinking there was a time

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 2>when it was a little easier to find something that

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 2>really was like well written, you know, whether it's for

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you or not, or whether it's taking on something interesting

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>that happens to be have this weird, sort of unfortunate,

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 2>sinister layer of relevance to today. You know, it's but the

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:27.839
<v Speaker 2>damn thing holds together, you know. So who I mean,

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:29.839
<v Speaker 2>who's for the first timer? Is I'd like to hear

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 2>from any any one or two first time viewers of

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 2>this thing right back right there.

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:40.800
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna give them a mic. What would you like, Michael,

0:55:40.880 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 3>what was that? What would you like to hear them

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 3>chime in on?

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just say just what they what they felt

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 2>about the first few, Like let's let's hear what you thought.

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I I feel like it's very interesting, especially now

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.439
<v Speaker 8>with like Paul Thomas Anderson like putting out another film

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:56.959
<v Speaker 8>like one battle after another, and like seeing a lot

0:55:57.000 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 8>of like Magnolia in this movie, which is like a

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:04.279
<v Speaker 8>very interesting thing, and like again with that idea of

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 8>like the past not being through with you, kind of

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:10.040
<v Speaker 8>that famous quote by William H. Macy in that movie,

0:56:10.080 --> 0:56:13.640
<v Speaker 8>and just kind of like seeing these like small independent

0:56:13.680 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 8>things really like channeling up in the nineties and some

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:19.280
<v Speaker 8>of them getting lost. And I'm really grateful for highlighting

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 8>this because I've never heard of this movie orgon sales before.

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 8>Wonderful what's your name?

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Thank you? Now? No, thank you.

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm so glad you said that, because as Michael was

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:30.720
<v Speaker 3>talking and using some of those quotes, I was thinking

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 3>of that line and I couldn't place it. I had

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 3>that in my head and it's that Magnolia, that Magnolia line.

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 3>I did want to talk about the surprise for me

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:43.120
<v Speaker 3>one of them was that as well, just thinking about

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:46.560
<v Speaker 3>like Ron Canada as as Otis I love watching in

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:50.319
<v Speaker 3>this film, and Jill Morton, but Elizabeth Pania who who

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:53.759
<v Speaker 3>sadly passed away cancer, and I think twenty fourteenth just

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:57.840
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have a false moment at all ever in this film.

0:56:58.040 --> 0:57:00.760
<v Speaker 3>But then I will say about about the ending, Michael,

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I think the first time I saw this film, I

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:09.919
<v Speaker 3>was so busy processing it, the revelation and the ramifications

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 3>of it, that I didn't really think about how perfectly

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:16.919
<v Speaker 3>it does tie together all of these ideas we're talking

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:19.920
<v Speaker 3>about about the past in present. And she says a

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 3>line about starting from scratch, which is echoing something that

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 3>said earlier in the film, right between between Otis and

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Chet his grandson, where he says that his dad says,

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 3>you start, you start from scratch when you're born. And

0:57:36.440 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 3>so this is that that whole concept of are you

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:45.240
<v Speaker 3>able to or are you someone who can separate yourself

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 3>from your past? Are you exactly who you create yourself

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 3>to be or are you a product of your environment

0:57:52.200 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 3>and your heritage? Can you carve out your own legacy?

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:56.479
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think.

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think sales the great thing about sales as

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 3>a filmmaker is he's not setting a line of demarcation.

0:58:03.320 --> 0:58:05.480
<v Speaker 3>He's not a simple enough writer or filmmaker to say

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 3>it is one or the other. He's challenging all of those.

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:12.480
<v Speaker 3>He's challenging that idea. He wants to think about that concept.

0:58:12.640 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 3>And at the end, at the end, she's saying, we

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 3>are for the sake of our relationship and happiness, we

0:58:19.800 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 3>are going to pretend that the life before doesn't matter.

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:27.200
<v Speaker 3>We are going to try to start from scratch. And

0:58:27.840 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 3>just on that point about lines of demarcation, the character

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the private right who when they're talking with the colonel,

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:38.440
<v Speaker 3>she mentions that she wants to stay in the army

0:58:38.960 --> 0:58:40.360
<v Speaker 3>and why does she want to stay in the army,

0:58:40.400 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 3>And it's because the world outside is chaos. She likes

0:58:43.880 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 3>having the rules. She needs the lines drawn right and

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 3>he understands that. But back to the ending, they are

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 3>going to try to move forward in their way, and

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:58.160
<v Speaker 3>that line forget the Alamo is kind of the It

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:00.120
<v Speaker 3>is so great because it's kind of the movie a

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 3>nutshell in terms of this idea of men.

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Look that also, that's enough, that's the other moment of

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it really inspired I mean, you know it's

0:59:06.880 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 2>in writing the credits. He edited, you know, it's written,

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 2>directed and edited by sales, right, it's and that's a

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 2>really astute final thirty seconds to have that line not

0:59:18.080 --> 0:59:22.600
<v Speaker 2>hammered with a close up. Just say it, you believe it,

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Say it like it just bought it. It's a thought.

0:59:25.440 --> 0:59:27.480
<v Speaker 2>And then it goes camera goes back to a different chat,

0:59:27.920 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, forty feet further back and then further back

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:34.560
<v Speaker 2>cut boom. You know that's that's that's where you know,

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that's right. He's a really good editor too. You know,

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:39.600
<v Speaker 2>look here, I'd love to hear one more first time

0:59:39.640 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 2>or his reaction, just and just quick briefly, my name

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 2>is John.

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 9>The one thing that really stuck out to me, first

0:59:47.320 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 9>of all, how relevant all this stuff with the with

0:59:49.760 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 9>the immigrants are. It was just incredible. But it's the genre,

0:59:55.720 --> 0:59:58.920
<v Speaker 9>like I couldn't for the life of me place it.

0:59:59.040 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 9>Like I kept thinking was falling into a Western, and

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 9>then all of a sudden I was in a romance

1:00:03.400 --> 1:00:06.640
<v Speaker 9>and then I was in a history and like what

1:00:06.640 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 9>what what do you guys say about about that genre

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 9>of this film?

1:00:12.040 --> 1:00:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean the beauty of it, Yeah, I mean it

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, you could get fancy and call it a

1:00:18.640 --> 1:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, like a neo Western noir. But he's made

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, he has come back often far more than

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>to a detective genre, or he's done sales. Is always

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>gravitated toward Westerns of different types and often border related.

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>He's filmed both sides of the border, and he has

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 2>He's done a lot of TV work, some of it's

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 2>been Westerns. I think that's where I think he's compelled

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.439
<v Speaker 2>to find out, how do we get beneath this sort

1:00:48.480 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 2>of old mythic easy black hat white hat thing, uh

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and just get into some issues that are worth talking about,

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>digging into, you know, just just sort of the racial

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 2>anime and prejudice and you know, politics, all of it.

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, why not? I mean he does it with

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:09.680
<v Speaker 2>plenty of modern days, things like City of Hope. Everyone's

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>seen that similar kind of mosaic structure. But this is

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:15.920
<v Speaker 2>very satisfying. I think that this one, this film, you

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:17.919
<v Speaker 2>saw the better film. You know, if we've seen City

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>of Hope, we wouldn't have be half as good a discussion.

1:01:21.240 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 4>So just a couple of things to close on.

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Food for thought, Michael, you can see if you think

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm crazy here or not? Just a few things I

1:01:29.960 --> 1:01:33.840
<v Speaker 3>noted tonight maybe an example of what I'm trying to

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 3>argue that Sales is potentially theorizing here this idea of

1:01:39.880 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 3>not separating purely from the past, but a path forward

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>with the past in mind. The very opening of the film,

1:01:48.080 --> 1:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>what what do we find out that the characters, those

1:01:50.960 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>two characters are doing. He he makes art out of

1:01:55.160 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>old bullets, right, old bullets are transforming them into something new.

1:02:03.960 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 3>The I love the fact that and we get a

1:02:07.080 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>great line at the end, right. I love the fact

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 3>that everybody says this idea of myths. Everybody keeps repeating

1:02:12.840 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 3>your mother was a saint, right, just like with Buddy.

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>It's just so easy for everybody to just keep repeating

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the same line over and over again. It almost becomes

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 3>meaningless because that's that's just what they know. And they

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:27.120
<v Speaker 3>just keep falling falling back on that. Okay, the drive

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 3>in the fact that it ends at the drive in,

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that we get a flashback earlier at

1:02:32.800 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 3>the drive in where they're they're they're dragged out of

1:02:35.720 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the car, right, and she even makes a comment about

1:02:39.320 --> 1:02:42.480
<v Speaker 3>when does the picture start? And I think I'm going

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:45.360
<v Speaker 3>to argue that Sales is being a little tricky there

1:02:45.400 --> 1:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>that like, the old story is over, the old picture

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 3>has ended, and the new picture gets to move forward. Right,

1:02:54.600 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>that story has ended, the drive in is not showing

1:02:56.600 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 3>that movie anymore, right, and they get to start a

1:02:59.000 --> 1:03:01.480
<v Speaker 3>new one. And then here's my last thing. And I

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>did notice this last night, and here again in that

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:07.680
<v Speaker 3>very first flashback, when Hollis is telling.

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:08.360
<v Speaker 4>The story of.

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Charlie Wade and Buddy Deeds, he the story ends with

1:03:17.240 --> 1:03:21.479
<v Speaker 3>Buddy saying as Charlie Wade exits with Hollis, it ends

1:03:21.520 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 3>with Buddy saying, unomas servesa por right, And then we

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 3>come out of the flashback with Hollis saying that line.

1:03:33.120 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Hollis is telling them that that's what Buddy said. But

1:03:37.280 --> 1:03:41.640
<v Speaker 3>at that point Buddy is very clearly not I'm sorry.

1:03:41.720 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Hollis is very clearly in the past, not in the

1:03:45.200 --> 1:03:49.720
<v Speaker 3>bar Hollis as the the way Sales has shot it,

1:03:50.280 --> 1:03:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Hollis in the past would not have heard him say

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that line. So is that the myth making and we

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>that's that's a sign sales Is is sneakily showing us

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 3>that Hollis doesn't really know the whole truth, because he's

1:04:06.440 --> 1:04:08.760
<v Speaker 3>fabricating that because he would have never heard that.

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Or did Sales just make a.

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Mistake or was it connutier.

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:15.000
<v Speaker 6>I don't know who'd for thought.

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Excellent questions and a good audience. Thank you, and a

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:20.360
<v Speaker 2>great please you veramiliar movie here.

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thank you Alex and the Department of Cultural Affairs.

1:04:23.920 --> 1:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>This is so much fun. Thank you for coming out

1:04:26.960 --> 1:04:29.560
<v Speaker 3>from this past November. That was me and Michael Phillips

1:04:29.600 --> 1:04:32.959
<v Speaker 3>in conversation about John Sales great nineteen ninety six film

1:04:33.000 --> 1:04:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Lone Star. It followed a screening of the film that

1:04:35.880 --> 1:04:39.120
<v Speaker 3>was part of the City of Chicago's fiftieth anniversary celebration

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:43.560
<v Speaker 3>of Siskel and Ebert. My thanks to Alex Vasquez everyone

1:04:43.560 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 3>in the Chicago Film Office and the Department of Cultural

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Affairs for inviting me and inviting Film Spotting to be

1:04:49.320 --> 1:04:53.120
<v Speaker 3>part of that celebration. That is our show. You can

1:04:53.160 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 3>find me and Film Spotting on Instagram, Facebook, letterboxed of

1:04:57.000 --> 1:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>course YouTube where you can watch our video episodes. All

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:04.160
<v Speaker 3>of those platforms. You can find us at film Spotting.

1:05:04.320 --> 1:05:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Josh is at Larsen on film. Film Spotting is independently

1:05:08.200 --> 1:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>produced and listener supported. You can support us by joining

1:05:11.120 --> 1:05:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the film Spotting Family at film spottingfamily dot com. You

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 3>get to listen early in AD free, plus you get

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:20.160
<v Speaker 3>a weekly newsletter, monthly bonus episodes, and access to the

1:05:20.360 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>entire show archive. You can also get merch by visiting

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:31.640
<v Speaker 3>film spotting dot net slash shop, t shirts, stickers, magnets, hoodies,

1:05:31.920 --> 1:05:35.840
<v Speaker 3>you name it all there film spotting dot Net slash shop.

1:05:36.800 --> 1:05:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Deso and Sam

1:05:39.640 --> 1:05:42.840
<v Speaker 3>van Holgren. Without Sam and Goldenjoe, this show wouldn't go.

1:05:43.280 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar and special thanks to

1:05:46.880 --> 1:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>everyone at WBEZ Chicago. More information is available at wbez

1:05:52.800 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>dot org for film Spotting, I'm Adam Kempinar. Thanks for listening.

1:05:57.360 --> 1:06:00.360
<v Speaker 8>This conversation can serve no purpose any more.

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:08.920
<v Speaker 6>The fine.

1:06:10.080 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting Family

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:15.680
<v Speaker 3>at film spotting family dot com and get access to

1:06:15.800 --> 1:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>AD free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and,

1:06:19.400 --> 1:06:21.680
<v Speaker 3>for the first time, all in one place, the entire

1:06:21.960 --> 1:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>film Spotting archive going back to two thousand and five.

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 3>That's a film Spotting Family dot com.

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Panically