WEBVTT - Giving Thanks to Obsolete Tech

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Get in Touch with Technology was tex Stuff from dot com.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everyone, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and I as actar, is joining us once again so

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that we can continue our discussion about obsolete technology. The

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>list of obsolete tech that showed up on an article

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that was that Web Designer depot. This was a listener request.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I asked, how are you doing? I'm doing very well.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>How are you very well? It's almost as if we

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't just stop recording a previous episode seconds ago and

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>started it up again, as it's almost just like that.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just yeah, I'm having a weird sense of deja vu. Yeah,

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>me too. Something. Maybe it's just the continuous voo since

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not really deja At any rate. It is a

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>great band. I listened to them all the time. I

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think they cover in excess. They are pretty good. Yeah,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw them on the voo. At any rate, we're

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking more about more obsolete technology. We had

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a previous discussion where we went through list the list

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>item by item, and we started debating and discussing whether

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or not the the things that were on there in

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>fact belong on a list of obsolete tech. Some of

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>them we certainly think do belong there, and some of

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>them we were a little you know, we questioned whether

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or not they belonged on that list. So let's continue.

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>The first one for this episode is the idea of

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>a huge mainframe computer, which I think we can say

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is pretty obsolete. Yeah, I'm just thinking like the idea

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of one computer that's that large. Today you'd be thinking

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of just server racks, lots and lots of servers and

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they're acting as one computer. So if you want to

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>get technical, is it a well know, it is that

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really a main frame? But it's a giant cluster of

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a machine. Yeah, exactly like IBM S Watson is a

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>good example. It's got thousands of processors, and if you

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>ever look at the actual physical um compute, it's really

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a collection of of server like computers that are all

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>network together that act as a single entity, like you

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>were saying, I asked, But it's not just one gigantic

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>machine that takes up the entire floor of a building.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, Back in those days, mainframes had components like

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>vacuum tubes that were necessary because the transistor hadn't been

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 1>invented or miniaturized yet, and today, in the era of miniaturization,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we no longer have to rely on those antiquated huge systems. Also,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like the old mainframe days, a lot of those machines

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>used a time sharing function, which, for the listeners out

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>there who aren't familiar with this type of computing, time

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sharing essentially meant that there might be multiple terminals all

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hooked up to the same computer, but at any given moment,

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the computer would only be working on one set of

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>calculations for from one terminal, and everyone else would be waiting. However,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>most computer as we're moving at such an incredible speed

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that it almost felt like you were having you know, continuous,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a continuous experience as you worked on the the computer.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It didn't feel like you were actually only getting us

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a segment of time each time, at least if it

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was a significantly fast computer. So both of those things

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are no longer really the case these days, so I

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>agree that it should be considered obsolete. Although we still

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have huge computers like supercomputers are still obviously a thing,

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's still a real drive for computer scientists to

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>make the next fastest computer. Yeah, but they're not typically

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this one giant monolith, these clusters of machines that work together.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I do wish kind of that there could be one

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's just a giant monolithic computer. That's how they built it,

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Like it was just this incredibly fast computer that's in

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a single form factor, sort of like deep Lot in

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the Hitchracker's Guide to the Galaxy. But wishing does not

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>make it so, So you're right, you should just buy

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like thirty or forty servers and then put their parts

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>inside of a refrigerator and make your own main frame.

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Just call it a mainframe. I might have to figure

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>out a really good cooling system. Perhaps I'll keep the

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>refrigerator working as a refrigerator in order to make sure

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that the servers don't overheat. How's that not a thing yet?

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>If that's not a thing, that should be a thing,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>A refrigerator that doubles as a server rack. Heck, yeah,

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>patent pending Strickland Actor Enterprises. You heard it from us first.

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, then we have typewriters. I as, do

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what a typewriter is? I do know what

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>a typewriter is. It's that thing you'd use before you

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>had a word processor, And uh my dad would type

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>all the time. So I remember hearing that little flax

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>wax wax wax noise, which sounded more like a metal

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>key smacking a piece of rubber, that rubber roller. And

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>then when do you have the more automated version where

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you can hit backspace And he would like remove the

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>whole word. That sound echoes in my mind. But yeah,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>back back in the old days, the typewriter, that's the noise.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>If you have an iPhone when you start typing on it,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the noise it's emulating. Yeah, you have no idea

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking to. Skewomorphism is what that's called, where

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>we take something that has been obsolete and apply it

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to new technology just for really aesthetic purposes. Uh. Yeah.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>The typewriter chases its roots all the way back to

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the eighteenth century, all the way back to the seventeen hundreds.

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But really you're talking about the eighteen hundreds before standardization

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>came in, and the early twentieth century before it really

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>became popular. So while there were predecessors to the modern

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>typewriter all the way back in the late seventeen hundreds,

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't until the nineteen hundreds that we really selled

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on a foreign factor that that was popular rised throughout

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the world. And those early models were purely mechanical. UH

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they worked. You know, you had a system of levers

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and and uh a little pivot systems where you pressed

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>down a key and it would cause a a arm

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>holding a letter to come up strike a ribbon that

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>had ink on it against a piece of paper and

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that would be what would leave the letter there. You

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>would also usually have a system where the ribbon itself

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>would get pulled by just a tiny amount, so that

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>way you wouldn't consistently be hitting the same part of

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the ribbon. Obviously, if you did that, you would very

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly run out of ink on that spot. Although there

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>were some typewriters where you had to actually physically reapply

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>ink to the ribbon. Um Also you had to worry

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>about those little typing arms getting tangled up with each

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>other and some of the older ones. I had a

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>an antique typewriter where that would happen. If you typed

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>faster than a certain speed, it would start to get

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>locked up, which was frustrating. Uh IBM would introduce sort

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the golf ball style typewriter. The and had all

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the letters on a round structure, and that was the

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one that had a very distinct sound when you were

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>type it just kind of um uh you know, the

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>clackty clack was replaced by a sort of sound as

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you were typing with those. And word processors came along

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of typewriters and word processors were sort of

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>combo things. But word processors allowed you to, uh to

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to create your documents uh in an electronic format before

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>converting it to a physical format. Um. I actually had

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to use typewriters quite a bit in my early career

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with a consulting firm because we had all these different

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>forms that we didn't have electronic versions for. We just

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>had physical forms and you had to put it through

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>into a typewriter and type things out on it. Uh.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you went to law school, right, I as, did

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you ever have to use a typewriter in that respect? No?

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But when in law schools like the let's see the

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, so we had computers and printers and things

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and the PDF. Uh we could always use a PDF

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to fill out things. But yeah, I didn't have to

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>use it in school very often, but I do. You

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just reminded me how if you wanted to spy on somebody,

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you could just take the ribbon that was used and

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you can read the words because it was it's clearly

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>printed on there. Because there's this ribbon of text, and

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.559
<v Speaker 1>you can basically find anything you wanted to. I always

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>said that was really fascinating when he came to like

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this evidence as being left behind constantly. Oh yeah, yeah.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>If you were using a typewriter, then you were leaving

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a record of exactly what you were typing. It would

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>also allow people to see what a terrible typist you were,

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>true and see all these mistakes that they they totally

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hit that backspace button for this one. Uh yeah. The

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>backspace button often would use some sort of liquid paper

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>type substance in order to cover up whatever it was

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you just type. Since you could type a new word

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in its place, it wasn't exactly undetectable. You could always

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>tell when you would get a sheet of type paper

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>where someone had to hit the backspace quite a bit.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You can just peel it off if you wanted to

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>see the original letter. And the other thing was if

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember right effectively the the type, I would remember

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>what you had just typed. So if you're going to, like,

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 1>let's say, do type to T by accident, just the

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>white ribbon would come up and the tea would hit again.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So you just had this perfect space T, the white

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>one over the black one. So it's pretty visible if

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you knew what you're looking at. Yeah, So so not

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>not flawless. And eventually printers became inexpensive enough and computers

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>became popular enough that the typewriter largely disappeared. You can

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>still find it in some offices. I know that there are,

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, medical facilities that still have typewriters. There's still

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>some companies like consulting firms or whatever. Any any company

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that's using documentation where they don't necessarily keep an electronic

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>version on hand, they still have a typewriter, but they

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>tend to be the oddity these days, not something that

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is commonly a you know, necessary piece of equipment in

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>your average office. So I agree that it belongs on

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the obsolete list, at least here in the United States.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>There are probably some other parts of the world where

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>typewriters are still a very important piece of technology, but

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>not so much. Here there's definitely obsolete. But again, one

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of those another one of those fascinating pieces of machinery.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>When you when you were talking about them being purely mechanical,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>when you see the leavers moving, when you see the

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>arms hitting the ribbon, it's actually quite a feat of

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>engineering considering what it was. It's like this movable type setup.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, so we're gonna have this easy way to

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>print if I just punch these keys. Just a cool

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit of history. Yeah, I think it's It's one

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of those things that kind of hearkens back to the

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>aesthetics of steam punk in a way. It's this idea

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of intricate, purely mechanical technology where it doesn't have the

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of sterile electronic approach. I think that's what a

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, you know, why a lot of people

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>find steampunks so appealing is that it has this kind

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the hall, the working moving pieces. It

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gives it a character that that electronics tend to lack. So, uh, yeah,

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I definitely agree with you there. How about the next one.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Dial up modems? Oh man, uh, definitely obsolete. And if

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>you're using a dial up modem, you probably want to upgrade,

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>is I hope you would? Because they are it can

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>be finicky I had I remember my bad modem. Yeah,

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I had one of those, and I was I was

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>dialing into a o L back then was actually was

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>AOL because I remember they had like five phone numbers

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for their servers. And then you dial in and hear

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that noise, you connect, and then you're like, mom, no,

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>don't touch the phone. Don't know, mom, and then you'd

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>be disconnected. Right, those are the old days, And the

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>same thing happened to me whenever I would try and

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>call into BBS. Is to the point where I think

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we finally got a separate phone line just for the computer,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>so that way we didn't have to worry about it anymore.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the dial up modems much slower data transfer

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>rates than any other format. Uh. And also that is

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>where that distinctive sound comes in, that weird statick e

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>uh pinging, buzzing noise that whenever I see it on

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie or television show, I think, where when is

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this supposed to be set? There was actually we talked

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>about in our last episode. UH. An episode of the

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:40.119
<v Speaker 1>popular series Sleepy Hollow recently had characters access the Internet

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>through a dial up modem, and I thought, really, Sleepy

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Hollow is I mean I realized they've got a an

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century, uh, former British Revolution soldier walking around, But

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>are they really that far behind the times where people

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>still have dial up? Um? But it does have that

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>distinctive sound. It's one of those that you can kind

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of tell the generation someone belongs to, because if they

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that sound is, then you know, all right,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So I can subtract ten years from the age I

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>thought you were because you never encountered this noise, whereas

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>those of us at a certain age are very familiar

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>with it. And it just hearkens back that time where

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could connect to the to some sort

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of network service and you would try and download things

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and even a basic text document would take time to

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>access because the data transfer speeds were so slow. Yeah,

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and you basically back then, I mean you think animated

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>gifts were annoying. Now, back then it was forever for

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>them to load, and you would see like, you know,

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Felix the cat going back and forth, and you knew, uh,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like the sites would be done by college students or

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>something because they have like the team one lines in

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>their dorms and you'd sign in to get to this

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>page because you want to really know everything about the Beatles,

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>because you know know anything about him yet, so you

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>want to read about him. And then you hear the

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>MIDI playing after about like what maybe my I'd say,

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a good minute of loading and then this music scares

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of you because you do not expect

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it back then. Uh So, yeah, it was. It was

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely a different world with dial up modems incredibly slow.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>That one was fifty six k that was like the

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>fastest you could go on dial up, and it was like,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this is amazing that water than this. Yeah, that reminds

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>me of when everything back in those days where you

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>would look at the specs of a computer and you

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>would just say, man, this is way more than I need.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I will never require all the horsepower, slash, storage, slash

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever that this machine has. It just kind of quate

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>because now my my my phone dwarfs all of those specs.

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of storage, speaking of you know, data storage,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ZIP drives are on the list, which was a product

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>from a company called i Omega and zip drives, well,

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I think we have to cover the

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of floppy drives in the first place. Floppy drives

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are different from hard drives, and that these were portable

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>storage media that used a magnetic storage to to save

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>your work on a computer, and you would end up

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>putting it into a drive and save your work, and

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>then you could take the disc out and go to

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a different computer that had the exact same programs as

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the first one and pull that work back up. Obviously,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>if it didn't have the exact same programs as the

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>computer that you used in the first place, it didn't

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>do you any good to have the storage because there

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't an Internet yet for you to go and get

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that program um. But zip drives were supposed to be

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a solution because floppy drives had a limitation on how

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>much data they can hold. So for example, the three

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half inch disc, which although it was a

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>floppy disc was uh in hard plastic five and it

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>was a five and a quarter that was the one

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that was physically very floppy. Yes, uh this the floppy.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>The term floppy really confused people. I remember my dad

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>coming home one day. He was teaching a word processing

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>course at college. He was he's a professor, and he

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>taught this word processing course and it was like an

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>adult education course, and he says, yeah, people just don't

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>get it. I was explained to everyone that the five

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and a quarter inch discs were called floppy disks, and

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one of my students immediately folded his in half and

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>put it into his pocket. Uh. Yeah, don't do that

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is the moral of that story. But yeah, even the

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>three and a half inch disk, despite the fact that

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was rigid, was in fact a floppy disk. It could

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>only hold one point four four megabytes. Later on you

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>could get some that could hold two point eight eight

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>megabytes megabytes. That's that was considered a lot of storage

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. So it's like for for some

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of framework reference, like I think an MP three

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like two and a half minute song is at least

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>i'd say could be three to four megabytes. That's on

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the small side. So that's one song could maybe fit,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>or like maybe like thirty pictures if you were getting

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>JPEGs back then. Well, I recorded an hour long podcast

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>with a friend of mine last night, and it was

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it was about a megabyte per minute, So that's about

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a sixty megabyte UM file that came out of it.

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>So that would mean I would need somewhere around between

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 1>fifty and sixty three and a half inch discs. If

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I were able to somehow divide that file up into

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>into equal chunks and be able to save it in

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful way, it would take fifty to sixty of

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>these disks to do it. Now, zip discs were supposed

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to be the next step. It was. It was a

0:17:55.840 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a high storage medium compared to the three and a

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>half or five and a quarter five and a cord

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>could hold even less than a three and a half

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>could the zip discs could hold. Depending upon the type,

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you had one fifty or seven hundred fifty megabytes, so

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>significantly more than what these other discs could have. But

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it came out pretty late in the game, and there

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was something else right on the horizon as the zip

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>drive came out that completely negated it, and that was

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the rewriteable c D, the rewriteable compact disc. When combat

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>disks first came out, they were read only. I mean,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that was that. And there were a lot of reasons

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>for that, pretty much the same reasons you encounter for

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>any kind of medium when it first come out. The

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>established powers that be don't want you to be able

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to write to that medium because they're afraid it means

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna steal all their stuff, right, So same things

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>true with DVD s, same things true with Blu ray

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>samething's true with the even VCRs and the vhs. They

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to allow that to be a writeable technology

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time. So CDs when they did

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>come out, they were able to hold a lot more data.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They were actually eventually priced lower on a cost per

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>megabyte basis, and once you could have more data on

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a CD at a lower cost than it would be

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for a comparable number of ZIP discs, it was game over. Uh.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>And what I thought was really funny is that PC

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>world named the zip disc the fifteen worst product of

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 1>all time in two thousand and six, but then in

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven, PC world said it was the twenty

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>third best tech product of all time. So what what

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>is it, I as, is the best or the worst?

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the best things that ever came

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>out for computing. And here's why. Right, Like you were saying,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we had these one point four four megabyte discs. When

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I it in line to get Windows ninety five upgrade,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I had thirteen floppy disks given to me in this box, right,

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, okay, I wish one day there

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>was the ability to have a lot of data on

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a small disc, and the ZIF discs were about the

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>same size as the three and a half inch disc,

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a little thicker when it came to the the I

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>guess the height dimension. I don't know. I want to

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>say that. So it was in a very familiar format. Uh,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>there was. It was so popular to the point where

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a number of computer manufacturers were including internal zipped drives

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>in their computers. There was this click of death that

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>would happen after a while. You just say this this click,

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and you knew your disc was fried. It's over. You're

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>not getting anything out of this. One of the bigger

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>problems with CDs being writable and rewriteable was there was

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this giant nightmare of C D R C D plus

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>are minus are like, there's like this plus and minus

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:03.239
<v Speaker 1>r W. There wasn't enough of this bizarre incompatibility with

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>rewritable discs because you'd have a proper drive that matched

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a proper disc, and unlike a ZIP disc, which only

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>fit in a ZIP drive, you could get the wrong

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of optical media in the CD burners. So I

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>think that prolonged the life of the zip disc to

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the point where two D fifty megabyte version and then

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a seven D fifty megabyte version showed up. But in

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the interim these things were pretty much everywhere. I remember,

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like there was an actual use for the parallel port

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't a printer. That was so excited about that,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Um it was. I thought it was a really great

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>way to have portable programs. I used to have. I

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>used to run like Claire's Office on it. Where's Clara's works?

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember this program? I know of it. I never used it. Actually,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>it was the zip disc was fast enough to run programs,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>so in my limited hard drive space I would just

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be swapping out disks zip discs with different programs way

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>back in the day before hard drive media, Like, I mean,

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>hard drives were really expensive back then, So this was

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. It was pretty freaking awesome. Uh

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I Omega probably wishes it had one, but CDR CDs

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>had to win because they were just so cheap. Technology

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>became so low cost. Well. I also one other thing

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't think to mention when you were talking

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about how the CD did have some drawbacks. The other one,

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, was just the right speed. The early writeable

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>c D s, the right speed was pretty slow, and

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so it would take a really long time to burn

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a CD. And uh, I remember, like this could be

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a big issue if you happened to be say let's

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>say that you are a musician and you wanted to

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and just sort of produce just enough CDs

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna go play a show, and you want

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to have something for people who like your music to

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>take home with them, and you wanna, you know, create

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>some copies of c d's. You know, it could take

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a long time to burn a significant number and and

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be even though the c D medium ended up getting

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty cheap, the actual production of it could be a

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>real pain in the in the neck. So I think

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that probably also helped for a while. It took a

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>while for those right speeds to get fast enough and

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not be prohibitively expensive for it to be something effective.

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Like if you had all the time in the world, sure,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it's no big deal, but if you wanted to produce

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff in a short amount of time,

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a that was a big drawback. Hilariously, UH

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>c ds and NED CD drives used to have likeliest

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to boast giant graphics like four eight x read speed

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and four x burn speed. I can't remember the last

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>time I've actually seen a drive that had any boastful

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>words on it, because they're almost optical media is so

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>dated that no one's using it because they got SD

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>cards and everything. It's just so it was such a

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>different world and houselow those things were burned just such

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. It is kind of funny to

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>think that, even though it's not on the list, optical

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>media could almost be on a warning system for this

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>because the solid state media has really taken over to

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a large extent. Now that we've seen solid state prices

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>continue to drop, it they're still going to have to

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>drop for a solid state hard drive to be uh,

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, to be something that the average person is

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>going to go and buy as opposed to a spinning

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hard drive, because it does add a pretty significant chunk

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of change to a bottom line price of a of

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a machine. But when it gets to the point where

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's negligible, it'll be really interesting to see if optical

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>media sticks around, you know, how much longer it sticks around,

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or if it ends up fading into you know joining

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the same list. Um, how about tape drives. We just

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about the zip drives. Let's go even further back,

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>shall we. I remember having an old computer that one

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the accessories you could get was a cassette drive, Like

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you could get a cassette drive that would allow you

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to run programs from cassette or to save data onto cassette.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>But we didn't have that because we had a even

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>newer technology, the five and a quarter inch disk drive.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>But but that was definitely something that was part of

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the home computer system for a while, where tape drives

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that were either real to reel or cassette based depending

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>upon the model, although real too real was really something

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>you saw more in like research institutions and stuff, and

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>less for the home market. But I think it is

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty safe to say that the tape drive is obsolete. Definitely, Absolutely.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The tape drive was a great way, very cheap back

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>up tapes were very low cost. He was incredibly slow,

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but the capacities were just enormous. At one point it

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was like the pretty much the only way you could

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>back up your real PC unless you wanted to break

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it out, like you was saying, with lots and lots

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of but definitely obsolete. I don't know anybody who is

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>actively backing up their company with tape drives. Yeah, the

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the last company I worked for before health Stuff Works.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Actually no two companies back um many many years ago

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>they were using tape drives to do backups of their system.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Then I expect that these days they used a totally

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>different methodology. And we've seen a lot of different technologies

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>come into play that have replaced the tape drive. Just

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>cloud storage being able to essentially outsource your backups to

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>some sort of large company like like Amazon is a

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>great example where you could have your backup stored in

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the cloud. Uh. Thus, even if you had some sort

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of catastrophic failure of the equipment in your office, you

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>could still have access to the data that that equipment

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>had generated. Um. You know that that is pretty much

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>negated the need or any sort of tape deck h

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And as for the home market, obviously there's not really

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>any point to it anymore. In fact, that this also

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>illustrates something else and another issue with obsolete technology, which

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is that the stuff that we create one day is

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to be accessible to us because we will

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer be relying on those same methods to produce

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the the work, to save the work, and to access

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the work. And this is a real issue. This is

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that people talk about when they say,

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you can't just assume that a hundred years into the

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>future will have the same sort of access to the

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff we're creating today, because the technology will be significantly

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>different and will either be incompatible or the media that

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we're using today won't last long enough for that data

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to be accessible into the future. That's really an actual

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>problem that engineers and scientists and researchers look into. How

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>do you ensure that we have a continuation of our

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>our knowledge from one media to the next, or one

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>medium to the next. I should say um, because you

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>never know what will be inaccessible tomorrow. Well, thankfully, because

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>of the great historical documentary saved by the Bell, we

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>know that if you bury a VHS yearbook and you

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>leave it there for twenty five years, there will be

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a VCR in the principle's office later on to watch it.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So that that problem has been solved. Jonathan oh Well,

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I am happy to hear that Zack has a looked

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>out for us. It was Zach right. Well, well, Zach

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was on the VHS tape the future future blonde kid

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>who looked just like Zach in the same set of

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>racially diverse group of friends there. Uh. They also were

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>very very happy that the same principle had a VCR attached.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You're totally right there. If you're going to leave, this

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is just here's here's a tip that nobody ever needs.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna leave something in a time capsule, make

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>sure you have the reader of the media of llable

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with instructions with all the cables, because otherwise it's kind

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of pointless. This just reminds me of my tape drive,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which was also made by Omega, that I wanted to

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>use it later on, where I had to get a

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, scuzzy to USB adapter because yeah,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you just because I needed the data. Not really, I

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't really need the data, but I thought I did

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>back then, So there you go. Okay, Well, how about

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>slide projectors, Yeah, that's absolutely I mean, who's getting slides made? Right?

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Where would you go to process it? There? I'm sure

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>there are only a few places in the United States

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>where that are actually still processing film for slides. I mean,

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, digital projection is so common. I mean, we

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we've one of the things we've seen at the past

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>few c s s are these pico projectors where you

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>can just have a projector that fits inside your pocket

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and you take it out and connected to even something

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like a smartphone and be able to project a large

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>screen version of whatever it is you want to see.

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>There's very little reason why you would need a slide

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>projector unless you were doing it as really like an

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>art installation, like it's your specifically doing it as part

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of the experience of whatever it is you're trying to convey.

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Another one of those great devices. Again, watch mad Men

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want to see basically a lot of this

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff we talked about in these two episodes. If you

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>watch mad Men, you're gonna see a lot of these,

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like what's the typewriter look like? What

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>does this sound like? Yeah, it's slide projector. One of

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the best episodes of mad Men called the Carousel. But

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I always wanted one of these things when I was

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.959
<v Speaker 1>a kid because to the projectors in general fascinated me

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid, because of this idea of

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>having an unlimited screen size, because all you needed was

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this one box and it wasn't that big and it

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that heavy because we had CRT s back then,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>uh that you can project this giant image, but then

0:30:56.320 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you'd always have the in the horrifying slide shows this

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is our family vacation, which now takes place over Facebook

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or on somebody just showing you their pictures on their phone, like, hey,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the eight six pictures I took what I visited,

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the salt quarry exactly here, here are pictures.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna necessarily give you context, or I will

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>give you more context than you ever wanted to know,

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and I expect you to sit here and be prisoner

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>until I'm done. It was a lot easier with slide

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>projectors really because it was just impolite to stand up

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>off someone's couch and say I'm leaving now, but or

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd have the image projected on you. That's the worst part,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>right right. Yeah. The other thing about slide projectors, I

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>remember two things really. The carousel slides there were. This

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>just takes me back to my elementary school days because

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what we would use to look at, like science slides.

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember tons of classes where we used a slide projector,

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and I remember the carouselfs were prone to two things.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>One was that you would have actually have a slide

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>get jammed, so it would stop the entire presentation while

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the teacher tried to fix the jam, and often that

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>would even mean removing the carousel, which would require us

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to again find our way back to the proper slide

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so that we could continue on our journey of education.

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And the second was that invariably at least one slide

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>would be loaded either backwards or upside down, so you

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would either get text that was flipped or you would

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>more likely see something from the point of view of

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>someone in Australia. And uh, while that definitely added levity

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to the classroom, it certainly wasn't the most effective means

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of getting information across the students. Extremely extremely antiquated and

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely obsolete. Yes, however, I will say that that backwards

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>image we still see a remnant of that today with

0:32:55.920 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>people who take selfies using a phone where it flips

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the image so it acts like a mirror, and then

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you end up getting these backwards T shirts and things.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw a lot of that. We're recording this the

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>same week in the United States as there was an election.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So I saw a lot of my friends post selfies

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of them wearing the I have voted uh sticker, But

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the sticker was backwards because we were using that specific

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>mode to take the photo. So I'm glad that that

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>still lives. Like, even if it's not a physical slide,

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we can still send people images that have been flipped

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a d eighty degrees. Yeah, we have. We have the

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of jammed images. It's like when a slide doesn't

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>load in the slide show, when you're trying to go

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in Facebook and you're going into the next image, like,

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>why isn't it a loading jammed? It's yeah, and then

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to click on the picture or whatever. Yeah,

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you're right. Our our lives are still just as miserable.

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just we've got a different means of producing the problems. Now, Um,

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we've already talked about floppy disks, so we'll skip that one.

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But the Polaroid cameras made up the last item on

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the original list. And Uh, if you're talking about cameras

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that are made by Polaroid, that's misleading because that company

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is still making cameras. They're still making digital cameras. They're

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>even still making instant film cameras, are at least what

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they call instant film cameras. Some of those instant film

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>cameras are technically not instant film. It's a digital camera

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>with its own printer, so it prints the image as

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>opposed to captures it on film that then develops. Uh.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>But they do still have an instant film camera called

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the p I C the Pick three hundred that takes

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>instant film. So it's actually still a thing. And in fact,

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason why this is on the obsolete

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>list is that for a long time it looked like

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Polaroid was just going to get out of that game entirely.

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But the nostalgia for the instant film photo demanded that

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 1>there be a product to fulfill that desire. So this

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is an example of something that people weren't ready to

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>let love. I think, yeah, I think this might be

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with the turntables kind of thing that like this is

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>this still exists. There's a set number of people want

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to use this. There's a very long documentary on Polaroid's

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>final years. I believe it's on Netflix currently, which I

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>tried to watch, but the amount of sentimentality was so great. Uh,

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so much emotion of people crying because people are printing

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>out pictures. I had to turn it off. But when

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Polaro cameras, I loved it when I

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, and you know, you would try to

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>shake the thing and you try to see the image developed.

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>That was a really cool idea. And then when you

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>find out the science behind and how it works, how

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this this thing was being developed right in this this box,

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that was insane because it just seemed like, oh wait,

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that's how it stuff, that's how it works. It's not

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. But to know more about it as

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm older, it's pretty cool. But do you see yourself

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>going out and buying a Polaroid instant film camera instant

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>camera because it's not film. I I don't see myself

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>going out and buying any cameras at all anymore. Because

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>now I've gotten to the point where I used to

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be one of those guys who I like the standalone

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 1>devices that were dedicated to doing one thing because usually

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>they did that one thing really really well. And the

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff like smartphones could do lots of stuff, but they

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't tend to do all of it really well. It

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just did it okay. But now smartphones, either the smartphones

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>have gotten to a level of quality that I am

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>now happy with, or my standards have dropped enough where

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't care anymore. But either way, it's the same destination. Now,

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone for me acts as everything. It's my camera,

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it's my MP three player, It's the way I access

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>streaming media. It's the way I text people or interact

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with social media. Once in a blue moon, it's the

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>way I talk to someone because I hardly ever make

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>phone calls anymore. But yeah, so I don't see myself

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>going out and getting an instant film camera. How about you?

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you? Are you nostalgic enough where that's something you

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you need to have in your life. I am. I'm

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>probably more likely to find a way to hack a

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Kindled for it to display my images on like a

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on like a loop. Then I would be a candidate

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to get a Polaroid instant camera, because for me, the

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 1>coolest thing about printed photography is that requires no power source.

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't glow at night when you leave the room

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>like a digital picture frame. So but I'm probably gonna

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>hack together a solution of a digital picture frame that

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>uses the inc then I would probably get this polaroid thing.

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to bother with instant film because it's

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just not it's not it's just I'm not that sentimental

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to that. Well. Plus, I mean you

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>would have to go on and buy refills of it, right,

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the other thing is that you can't

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just offload the pictures and then make space that you

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>can take more pictures. You actually have to physically replace

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the medium because it runs out. So that's

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>also a hassle. And like you can't you just can't

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>shoot a thousand photos. Like however, you can't like like

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not have a burst mode on Polaroid. Okay, there's

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.879
<v Speaker 1>no burst mode. You take the shot once and then

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>it spits it out and you better you have to wait,

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>So you better make sure whatever subject you have, which

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>better be a bowl of fruit that's not moving, that's

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be fine or very still subject because it's not

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly like that friendly unless your dog sits nicely and

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is trained not like mine, or or you Also, you

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>should know you do not have to shake it on

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>like the song. You do not need to shake a

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 1>polaroid picture. Let's develop that great hymn. I remember that. Yeah, Well,

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that wraps up the list that was online. We have

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a few more that we were just going to mention,

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>uh from our own experience. My first one was the

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>capacitance electronic disk. Did you did you ever see these?

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what this is? I looked it up

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because I saw it on your list of things and

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually have seen them. Turns out they look like

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>giant floppy disks. Yeah, yeah, they I thought of them

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:16.439
<v Speaker 1>as being about the size of a vinyl album record cover, right,

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>except made out of a semi rigid plastic um and

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there was actually a disc on the inside of it

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't see because it would it would get

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>pulled out when you put the whole case into like

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially a cartridge into a player, and then it

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>would remove the disk and play it. It's called a

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>capacitance electronic disc because it actually had a physical needle

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>that would read the disk through electronic capacitance. So it's

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of in between a vinyl album that uses a

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>physical needle and a laser disc, which uses an optical

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>laser to read information. It was kind of like in

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>between those. It was less expensive than the laser disc.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It's also less expensive, I think, than VHS tapes were originally,

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>but you couldn't write to them. You can only read.

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It was read only, and each side of a capacitans

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>electronic disc could hold about an hour's worth of material.

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So you would watch a movie and halfway through the

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>film it would stop, and you'd have to eject the cartridge,

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>flip it over, and put it back in to watch

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it. To this day, I can remember

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>precisely where our copy of Indiana Jones and the Raiders

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Lost Arc stopped. It stopped right after Sala

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>says they're digging in the wrong place. Then the video

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>would stop. I'd have to turn the disc over and

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>and watch the rest of Raiders. So it left a

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>lasting impression on me. Ultimately, it did not succeed in

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the market. It went obsolute pretty quickly. In fact, you

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>might even argue that the word obsolete isn't accurate because

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it never rose to prominence. So perhaps obsolete is giving

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>it too much credit. But I have a soft spot

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in my heart for that particular piece of technology. I

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't had the same experience as you so, I I

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know how that would be growing up, well, uh,

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it was a magical time, I as. Uh. As for

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>other types of obsolete technology, I'm just gonna lump a

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 1>bunch of these together and mention the ones that kind

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of thought sort of might fit obsolete, Like a lot

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of those ports, like the parallel ports you were mentioning,

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I as a lot of those have largely been rendered

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:33.919
<v Speaker 1>obsolete by USB ports. USB has really taken over, and

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 1>so we don't really necessarily need all those other ones

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>these days. In fact, it's been a lot of time

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>since I've bought any technology that required me to plug

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.720
<v Speaker 1>something else in. It's almost all, you know, just plug

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and play with the USB these days. There still are

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>some out there. It's not I don't mean to suggest

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're all uh USB, that's not the case, but

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a large number of them are answering machines. Also, because

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>now we've got things like digital voice mail. UH MP

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>three players I think are fading away because again we

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have devices like smartphones that allow us to either stream

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>music or store it natively on a device, so there's

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>less need for a dedicated MP three player. UM. The

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>analog television broadcasts. We mentioned that in the last episode

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that transition from analog to digital because a huge headache.

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Back in two thousand nine, there was a lot of

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 1>confusion about whether or not you would still be able

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch TV and who needed to have a an

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>adapter and who didn't need to have an adapter. Uh

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>were you covering technology back at that time? Yeah, I was,

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was very into this back then, and I

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>believe it got delayed for a lot of months, maybe

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>even a year. I can't remember how long the delay was,

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>but I would. I found it just amazing that people

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>were confused because the amount of advertising that was done

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.399
<v Speaker 1>about this transition, this change that's gonna happen, It's going

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It was like, it's gonna be the set

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>date and it was pushed off by three So you

0:43:00.400 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 1>should have been up to date at that point, but

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you weren't. A lot of people weren't. Um. I just

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>couldn't believe how many people were left in the dark.

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, the transition caused so many issues

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>when it came to just being able to receive a signal,

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because when it was analog, if you were far enough away,

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd get a signal, but it'd be very weak and

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you get kind of snowy kind of stuff going on,

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ghost thing going on with the images.

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So but you would get something, but with the transition,

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you either got the signal or you've got nothing. And

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so the the blacked out version of this added to

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that these waves didn't travel as far through

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:40.760
<v Speaker 1>buildings that it was a huge problem for a while.

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like with the with the years have gone by,

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that's been alleviated by different positioning of

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>towers and things so that you can get a place

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like New York City where I am, you can still

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>get signal because for a while, if you were like

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong side of the building, you were not

0:43:57.080 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>getting like fox, and that's been now fixed. So it

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 1>was it was a very interesting time that I thought

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>would have gone a lot worse. I think the government

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>had this program as well where you could get a

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 1>converter box for a set, and I think it was

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like fifty less than that if you wanted to steal

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>use your old TV and um. It was. It was

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>an interesting time and I don't think a lot of

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>people remember anymore because it's a lot of people were

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on cable at that point, so it didn't affect them

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:26.760
<v Speaker 1>directly because they were still using their boxes, right. I uh.

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember covering this as well and seeing the confusion

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that was around it. One of our first Tech Stuff

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>podcasts was about this very topic. Chris Poulette and I

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>did a topic about it to talk about who needed

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it and who didn't, because there was a lot of confusion.

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Even for people who just had cable television. They were

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>wondering if they needed to have some sort of converter box,

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and there were there were some manufacturers that were kind

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of preying on ignorance at the time too, in order

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to sell devices that weren't needed to customers who who

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:00.080
<v Speaker 1>were fine where they were. But I'm glad that I

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>finally went through. Also, it's an interesting entry on the

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.479
<v Speaker 1>list because unlike a lot of the other ones where

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the obsolescence came about as just the fact that people

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>moved on to other technologies, this one was a forced obsolescence.

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>There was no choice in the matter. It wasn't that

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>people necessarily moved on to something else. It was that

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that thing no longer was supported. Yeah, that was It

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was a good time now we got not nice beautiful

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>multi caast channels. You can get to four point one,

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>four point two, all these other things. We have all

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the airwaves freed up for things like wireless communication, which

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>makes it a lot nicer. Right, and then you have

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 1>your own entry down here too. Right. Yeah, it's my

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>favorite piece of obstlity technology is the UMPC. This was

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>an initiative by Microsoft and I believe it Intel at

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the time. It was a geez. I don't remember how

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>many years ago it was, but it was a while ago.

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I'd say at least maybe eight years ago. The UMPC

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>was the Ultramobile PC. It was a tiny, full fledged

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>computer that was about the size of a Sega game

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>gear if you if you want to actually have a

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>size comparison, or think of a really really fat seven

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>inch tablet, because it was a pretty hefty device and

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you have this touch screen in the middle. Some devices

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>gopsed to have on screen keyboards only where you could

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just tap and you'd get like the semi circular keys

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on the left and right so you can do thumb typing,

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 1>or you get a more traditional keyboard that would come

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:25.399
<v Speaker 1>up kind of like a tablet today has or phone has,

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and this was way ahead of its time because they

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>were cramming in like pretty much laptop processors in these

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:36.879
<v Speaker 1>devices with like a six inch screen with a full

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>operating system, and so you would get like two or

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>three hours of battery life and it was about a

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 1>grand or so. So it's very expensive. And for me,

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I've always had this dream of being able to just

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 1>have one device, one computer that I can carry with

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 1>me anywhere I go and then crazily enough like come

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>home and dock it. And that's what the thing is

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. And it didn't take off because of

0:46:57.800 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things I mentioned, the battery life,

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the price, and it's just it's just couldn't do it.

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you have experiences with you and PCs? I, uh,

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>only only tangentially. I never owned one. I had read

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the drawbacks and I never got into it.

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>They were also really expensive, um, and so they were

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of out of my price range. They were there

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 1>were enough drawbacks where I couldn't see them being that useful.

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I liked where it was going, and I thought that

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that was gonna be an entire like line of technology

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that we would see improve over time and continual continue

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of things like mantorization, battery improvement, that

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. I really thought that's where things were

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>going to head, and then sort of I think cloud

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>computing took a lot of the the need for that out.

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, as as you started to offload the actual

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>processing onto other UH platforms, you didn't need to have

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a device that could do it itself. You had all

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>these other things that could do the work for you.

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You just need a device to be able to access

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. And so I think that was a large

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>part of why this never really took off. It wasn't

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 1>just the drawbacks, which I think you could eventually engineer

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>your way around, or at least try and create as

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>efficient a system as possible so that it was still useful.

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>It was that it largely became mood. I still I

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think the drawbacks were just gigantic when it came to

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:26.720
<v Speaker 1>using a it was a full fledged desktop operating system

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that you're using on a very small screen, so it

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't exactly optimized. I know, Windows XP they did have

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a tablet edition that's I believe was running on the

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>number of these devices, so it was capable of being

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>worked with with the stylus, but a lot of the

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>work you would want to do on a desktop computer

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want to do on a device like this.

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And like you're saying, with the engineering, we've seen a

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:52.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of things happen where like smartphones now are optimized

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.439
<v Speaker 1>applications that made those things seem like they were going

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>they would move fast, and if you had a desktop

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>computer versus a UMPC, you would know what it was

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like for this application to run fast. And there was

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pain when it came to this idea

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of trying to be productive on this small device. I

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think the smartphone is the successor in some kind of

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>way to the UMPC because it does prettty much everything

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you want, and with the larger screens that are happening

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and multitasking on Android phones, like I mean actual like

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>windowed multitasking, that's so close to this thing that I

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted where you can compare it with the Bluetooth keyboard

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and you can just prop this up and you can

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:35.839
<v Speaker 1>use it as a full fledged machine. Uh. But yeah,

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the UNPC was one of Microsoft's early initiatives that failed.

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They were ahead of a lot of things, including tablet

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:46.320
<v Speaker 1>PC's the first gen of that was really awesome. But yeah, Microsoft,

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever they're doing, pay attention to them, because the way ahead,

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to them. And then wait a couple of

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>years for Apple to do it and then go out

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and buy it exactly and then Microsoft try to copy

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it again. But then again there is this. As we're

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>recording this, there's a lot of news about Windows ten

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and basically you're gonna have a full flas desktop operating

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 1>system in your phone and Windows phone and the apps

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are gonna run cross platform. So maybe I will get

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.840
<v Speaker 1>my wish where where I can just dock a phone

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and use it as a computer, although I don't know

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:17.879
<v Speaker 1>if I need to do that anymore. Now we we've

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>seen we've seen some implementations of that technology over the

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.239
<v Speaker 1>last few years of people trying to do that, and

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 1>each of them were you know, you could see where

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the promise was, but it never quite clicked properly. I

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.480
<v Speaker 1>remember seeing the the smartphones that were uh, you know,

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you would plug it into a docking station and you

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>could even uh have a larger display running so that

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>you you could look at a larger display, use a

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>separate keyboard. But it's all running off the processor of

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone. But you know, we never got to an

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 1>implementation that really met the needs and the price point

0:50:56.560 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for the consumer, so maybe we'll see it. That was

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the Motoral Matrix. I think that was like one of

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the first ones that that allowed this. Yeah, and I remember,

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like I was drooling over a patent application that Apple

0:51:08.960 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>had where you could just pop an iPod into your

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>computer and that would make it your computer like a

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 1>giant cartridge. I'm like, that's brilliant, But that never happened obviously,

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's these The future for me is kind of

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like what do your talk about everything being cloud based,

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:26.320
<v Speaker 1>being able to log in and have all your settings,

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a chromebook experience. That's getting closer to

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this kind of every computers your computer, as opposed to

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I carry my little device, right Yeah, yeah, I agree. Well,

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this was a great discussion about technology that doesn't matter anymore.

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that we could have this conversation. I S

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:49.239
<v Speaker 1>For all of my fans out there who want to

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 1>follow the stuff you do, where do they find you?

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I suggest Twitter dot com, slash I S that's I

0:51:55.360 --> 0:51:58.479
<v Speaker 1>y a z as in Zebra. I got on Twitter early,

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.399
<v Speaker 1>so I still have that use your name, even though

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a very famous musician who goes by the same name,

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and if you're writing to him and you you're just

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 1>hearing this podcast and you find out there's another i As.

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I had the name first, and h that's that's that's

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a stage name born by the way, so it's even

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:16.160
<v Speaker 1>weirder that he picked it. So they want to follow

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:17.840
<v Speaker 1>me in my ramblings. Go to Twitter. We're go to

0:52:17.840 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 1>see that dot com. I do stuff there. It's kind

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of a well known place seeing that dot com. Lots

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of product reviews and how twos and news all in

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one fantastic site. Thank you so much, i As, and

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you guys for listening. If you want to get

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in touch with me, let me know what sort of

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>topics you want me to cover in the future, if

0:52:37.120 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 1>there are any guests you want me to have on

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>the show, or just anything along those lines. Send me

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a message. My email is tech Stuff at how stuff

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Drop me a line on Facebook, Twitter,

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.239
<v Speaker 1>or Tumbler. The handle at all three of those is

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 1>text stuff H s W. And we'll talk to you

0:52:53.480 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>again really soon for more on this and thousands of

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>other topics, is it how stuff works? Dot com, m