1
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:09,760
Speaker 1: From Bloomberg News and iHeartRadio. It's the Big Tick. I'm

2
00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:14,720
Speaker 1: west Kosova today Why some US states are loosening child

3
00:00:14,840 --> 00:00:28,400
Speaker 1: labor laws. For quite some time now, owners of retail stores,

4
00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:32,680
Speaker 1: fast food joints and restaurants, and other businesses have complained

5
00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:36,160
Speaker 1: that the tight labor market means they can't find enough

6
00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:39,560
Speaker 1: people willing to work for the low pay and often

7
00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:43,720
Speaker 1: poor benefits these kinds of jobs sometimes offer. Now, several

8
00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:48,440
Speaker 1: US states are responding by easing up on child labor laws.

9
00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:52,880
Speaker 1: Laws intended to protect teenagers by limiting the hours employers

10
00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:56,000
Speaker 1: can schedule them to work and the kinds of jobs

11
00:00:56,080 --> 00:00:59,480
Speaker 1: they can hire them to do. Tuesday afternoon, Governor sanders

12
00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:01,720
Speaker 1: Son House Bill fourteen ten into law.

13
00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:05,039
Speaker 2: House Bill fourteen ten relates to the work permit that

14
00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:08,120
Speaker 2: is required for an individual under sixteen years of age

15
00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:09,480
Speaker 2: when they want to get a job.

16
00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:12,640
Speaker 3: Kids under sixteen would be able to work six hours

17
00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:15,440
Speaker 3: a day instead of four, and sixteen and seventeen year

18
00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:18,040
Speaker 3: olds would be able to work the same hours as adults.

19
00:01:18,319 --> 00:01:22,040
Speaker 3: Jessica Dunker with the Iowa Restaurants Association argues those changes

20
00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:24,480
Speaker 3: will help businesses and Iowa teens.

21
00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:28,640
Speaker 1: This has been controversial, to say the least, but it's

22
00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,480
Speaker 1: not the first time we've seen political pressure to put

23
00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:33,120
Speaker 1: young people back to work.

24
00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:36,840
Speaker 2: The issue of child labor was way more contentious historically

25
00:01:36,959 --> 00:01:38,800
Speaker 2: than most people realize.

26
00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:42,160
Speaker 1: That's historian doctor Betsy Woods. She's written a book about

27
00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:45,280
Speaker 1: child labor in America, and I talk with her a

28
00:01:45,319 --> 00:01:49,240
Speaker 1: bit later in the show. First reporters Rebecca Rainey and

29
00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:52,600
Speaker 1: Chris Marr tell us where this is happening and how

30
00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:57,640
Speaker 1: it's playing out. Chris was starting to see several states

31
00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,559
Speaker 1: passing these laws that are loosening restrictions on child labor.

32
00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:01,640
Speaker 1: What exactly is happening.

33
00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:04,200
Speaker 4: A lot of the bills are along the lines of

34
00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:07,680
Speaker 4: letting fourteen and fifteen year olds work later hours on

35
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:11,880
Speaker 4: a school night, or eliminating a special work permit requirement

36
00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:14,480
Speaker 4: for workers under sixteen. And that's the bill that we

37
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:18,359
Speaker 4: saw Arkansas actually pass and the governor sign a few

38
00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:18,920
Speaker 4: weeks ago.

39
00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:20,200
Speaker 1: There's at least.

40
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:22,880
Speaker 4: One bill out there in Iowa that's maybe a little

41
00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:25,840
Speaker 4: broader and more concerning from the sort of child safety

42
00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:28,840
Speaker 4: advocates perspective, and that bill would loosen a lot of

43
00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:32,959
Speaker 4: different kinds of child labor restrictions. Do things like let

44
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:37,640
Speaker 4: teenage apprentices work certain manufacturing and warehouse jobs and lessen

45
00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:42,800
Speaker 4: the potential liability for businesses if an underage worker is injured,

46
00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:46,720
Speaker 4: and let sixteen and seventeen year olds serve alcohol, which

47
00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:49,720
Speaker 4: is normally reserved for workers who are eighteen and up.

48
00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:52,440
Speaker 4: So that's probably the one that has gotten the most

49
00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:55,840
Speaker 4: attention from folks that are concerned about child safety in

50
00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:56,480
Speaker 4: the workplace.

51
00:02:57,080 --> 00:03:00,840
Speaker 1: And some of these bills also allow so kids to

52
00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:04,400
Speaker 1: work late night shifts, is that right, and work in

53
00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:07,760
Speaker 1: industries that are considered to be more dangerous than kids

54
00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:08,960
Speaker 1: are usually allowed to work in.

55
00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,240
Speaker 4: The Iowa bill is really the one that changes which

56
00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:15,679
Speaker 4: industries kids are allowed to work in, and that's one

57
00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:18,160
Speaker 4: that has moved through the state Senate, still waiting for

58
00:03:18,200 --> 00:03:21,600
Speaker 4: a final state House vote, although that could come any day.

59
00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:24,320
Speaker 4: There was another bill in Minnesota that would let I

60
00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:27,360
Speaker 4: think sixteen and seventeen year olds work in construction, probably

61
00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,200
Speaker 4: less likely to pass this year since that's a Republican

62
00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:32,880
Speaker 4: sponsored bill and a Democratic majority legislature.

63
00:03:32,960 --> 00:03:36,440
Speaker 1: Now, Rebecca, what does the federal law say about what

64
00:03:36,600 --> 00:03:38,160
Speaker 1: kids can and can't do?

65
00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:42,920
Speaker 5: That's actually something really interesting. Some of these bills will

66
00:03:43,000 --> 00:03:45,840
Speaker 5: run a foul of federal labor law. And so what

67
00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:51,960
Speaker 5: that means is basically, states are telling employers to follow

68
00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:55,080
Speaker 5: rules that are weaker than those at the federal level,

69
00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:59,080
Speaker 5: meaning that while state enforcers may not come in and police,

70
00:03:59,640 --> 00:04:02,680
Speaker 5: you know, the rules, it's going to be up to

71
00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:06,240
Speaker 5: the federal government itself to make sure that those employers

72
00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:09,440
Speaker 5: are following the rules. And that goes into a whole

73
00:04:09,480 --> 00:04:13,480
Speaker 5: other issue of where the federal government's agency that's required

74
00:04:13,520 --> 00:04:18,039
Speaker 5: to police these issues is extremely underfunded and understaffed. But

75
00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:20,919
Speaker 5: just to go back to some of the federal rules

76
00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:24,919
Speaker 5: so that we're reminded, so the US Labor departments Wage

77
00:04:24,920 --> 00:04:27,560
Speaker 5: an Hour Division is the subagency that is in charge

78
00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:31,679
Speaker 5: of enforcing all sorts of laws under the Fair Labor

79
00:04:31,720 --> 00:04:37,080
Speaker 5: Standards Act, which includes prohibitions on the kinds of jobs

80
00:04:37,120 --> 00:04:40,560
Speaker 5: and work that kids can do. All sorts of federal

81
00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:44,679
Speaker 5: limits set to protect kids, especially fourteen and fifteen year olds,

82
00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:49,360
Speaker 5: from working in dangerous conditions. Child labor laws usually specifically

83
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:53,320
Speaker 5: limit where kids can work, what types of jobs they

84
00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:56,200
Speaker 5: can do, and the hours that they can work. Usually

85
00:04:56,240 --> 00:04:59,560
Speaker 5: fourteen and fifteen year olds have more restrictions when it

86
00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:02,000
Speaker 5: comes to hours. Some things that may be surprising for

87
00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:05,280
Speaker 5: folks is that it's illegal for fourteen and fifteen year

88
00:05:05,320 --> 00:05:08,159
Speaker 5: olds to work more than three hours on a school

89
00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:11,640
Speaker 5: day or past seven pm on a school day that

90
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,440
Speaker 5: includes Fridays, and during the summer they are allowed to

91
00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:19,200
Speaker 5: work after nine pm. But you know, again, some of

92
00:05:19,240 --> 00:05:23,320
Speaker 5: these time limits may not be very obvious. Also, when

93
00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:27,120
Speaker 5: I talk about places that kids shouldn't be in, for example,

94
00:05:27,279 --> 00:05:31,880
Speaker 5: there's just something that they call hazardous occupation orders that say, okay,

95
00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:35,839
Speaker 5: kids can't work with certain types of dangerous machinery. For example,

96
00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:39,839
Speaker 5: kids aren't supposed to be in manufacturing facilities or in

97
00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:43,640
Speaker 5: meatpacking plants where there's these large pieces of equipment that

98
00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:48,279
Speaker 5: could tip over that could potentially harm them, even things

99
00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:52,279
Speaker 5: like meat slicers. We also recently saw a case brought

100
00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:54,719
Speaker 5: by the Wage an Hour Division involving a fast food

101
00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:57,800
Speaker 5: chain where a kid was working with a deep fryer

102
00:05:58,200 --> 00:05:59,760
Speaker 5: and suffered from deep frier burns.

103
00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:06,360
Speaker 1: Chris, how is it that state laws can violate a

104
00:06:06,400 --> 00:06:07,560
Speaker 1: federal law? Why is that a lot?

105
00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:12,599
Speaker 4: That's a good question. It's not really allowed, but some

106
00:06:12,640 --> 00:06:14,560
Speaker 4: states will try to do it anyway. And I guess

107
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:16,479
Speaker 4: we see this on a lot of different areas of

108
00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:19,680
Speaker 4: policy where states will maybe try to push the envelope.

109
00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:23,279
Speaker 4: So basically what would happen there is federal law would

110
00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:28,120
Speaker 4: override the state. There would be a few businesses, some

111
00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:30,920
Speaker 4: very small businesses, that are not covered by the Fair

112
00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:34,520
Speaker 4: Labor Standards Act, which is the federal law, and so

113
00:06:34,760 --> 00:06:37,200
Speaker 4: in that case they would revert to the state law,

114
00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:40,440
Speaker 4: and those businesses actually could have the fourteen and fifteen

115
00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:43,520
Speaker 4: year olds working until nine. But another piece of this

116
00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:47,080
Speaker 4: that we've heard in our reporting is that some of

117
00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:50,200
Speaker 4: this may be strategic on the part of business and

118
00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:53,600
Speaker 4: industry groups that want to be able to have more

119
00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:58,240
Speaker 4: younger workers in their restaurants and retail jobs, for example,

120
00:06:58,600 --> 00:07:00,440
Speaker 4: with the goal of saying, hey, if we get out

121
00:07:00,440 --> 00:07:02,640
Speaker 4: there and maybe we can get five or ten states

122
00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:06,920
Speaker 4: to pass these looser restrictions, then we could use that

123
00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:10,640
Speaker 4: as leverage to kind of pressure Congress, maybe not this Congress,

124
00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:13,480
Speaker 4: maybe a future Congress, to say, hey, why don't we

125
00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:16,280
Speaker 4: do the same thing at the federal level and actually

126
00:07:16,280 --> 00:07:17,680
Speaker 4: relax those federal laws.

127
00:07:18,320 --> 00:07:22,240
Speaker 5: There's plenty of ways for people to get around these

128
00:07:22,280 --> 00:07:27,520
Speaker 5: federal rules when states weaken these laws. While the Feds

129
00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:30,320
Speaker 5: may be able to come in and target some of

130
00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:32,239
Speaker 5: these larger businesses that aren't exempt.

131
00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:34,760
Speaker 1: There's also a whole patchwork.

132
00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:36,240
Speaker 5: Of exemptions that they have to navigate through.

133
00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:40,360
Speaker 1: You mentioned, Chris that industries are pushing for this. What

134
00:07:40,520 --> 00:07:45,320
Speaker 1: industries in particular want to be able to hire younger kids.

135
00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:48,960
Speaker 4: With the Iowa bill in particular, there were some state

136
00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:53,400
Speaker 4: retail and restaurant associations that were advocating for it. There

137
00:07:53,480 --> 00:07:56,600
Speaker 4: was actually a federal bill proposed last year in the

138
00:07:56,640 --> 00:08:01,120
Speaker 4: previous Congress that would do similar things along the lines

139
00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:04,080
Speaker 4: of letting teenagers work later hours on school nights and

140
00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:07,080
Speaker 4: work more hours during the week during the school year,

141
00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:10,280
Speaker 4: and in that case it was advocated by the National

142
00:08:10,280 --> 00:08:13,480
Speaker 4: Restaurant Association. I think a lot of it is pushed

143
00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:16,480
Speaker 4: by restaurant in retail, but certainly not just that. The

144
00:08:16,520 --> 00:08:21,000
Speaker 4: Ohio bill is advocated by the National Federation of Independent Business,

145
00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:24,640
Speaker 4: which is a small business advocacy group that spans all

146
00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:25,520
Speaker 4: different industries.

147
00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:29,080
Speaker 1: Rebecca, I suppose it's no coincidence that some of the

148
00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:30,720
Speaker 1: industry is pushing for this are the ones that are

149
00:08:30,760 --> 00:08:36,040
Speaker 1: having trouble finding people willing to work these low wage

150
00:08:36,120 --> 00:08:39,960
Speaker 1: jobs in a tight labor market, and are thinking that

151
00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:42,840
Speaker 1: teenagers are a good way to fill in.

152
00:08:43,640 --> 00:08:45,640
Speaker 5: When we read some of these stories, even the most

153
00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:50,000
Speaker 5: egregious cases, a lot of these kids say they want

154
00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:54,160
Speaker 5: to be working. Sometimes kids don't have any other choice

155
00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:57,720
Speaker 5: but to help feed their family in addition to going

156
00:08:57,760 --> 00:09:03,920
Speaker 5: to school. So there's lots of layers to why this

157
00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:07,760
Speaker 5: is happening. I think when it comes to the labor

158
00:09:07,800 --> 00:09:12,040
Speaker 5: market question, a lot of unions and labor advocates will

159
00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:15,160
Speaker 5: say that if companies are struggling to find workers, they

160
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:19,760
Speaker 5: should raise wages. But as we all know, with inflation,

161
00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:24,000
Speaker 5: it's not always easy for a company to be willing

162
00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:26,440
Speaker 5: to sacrifice the bottom line in that way.

163
00:09:26,920 --> 00:09:30,320
Speaker 4: You know, we've seen some pretty egregious violations reported, like

164
00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:34,959
Speaker 4: this case of the Packers Sanitation company that had kids

165
00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:38,160
Speaker 4: going in and cleaning meat packing plants and ended up

166
00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:40,839
Speaker 4: facing a one and a half million dollar fine from

167
00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:43,720
Speaker 4: the Labor Department for that. And I think it's going

168
00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:46,040
Speaker 4: to be interesting to watch going forward whether we might

169
00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:50,800
Speaker 4: see some response from states in the other direction, maybe

170
00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:53,920
Speaker 4: not this year, maybe in future legislative sessions, but to

171
00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:58,280
Speaker 4: strengthen their own enforcement efforts around child labor violations.

172
00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:03,840
Speaker 1: And I should say Packers Sanitation Services says they have

173
00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:07,880
Speaker 1: a zero tolerance policy against employing anyone under the age

174
00:10:07,880 --> 00:10:10,319
Speaker 1: of eighteen, and they say they're fully committed to working

175
00:10:10,440 --> 00:10:13,280
Speaker 1: with the Department of Labor to make additional improvements to

176
00:10:13,520 --> 00:10:17,720
Speaker 1: enforce that prohibition. When we come back why it's not

177
00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:30,120
Speaker 1: always easy to police child labor laws, Chris, Is this

178
00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:34,000
Speaker 1: something that's happening more in red states and blue states

179
00:10:34,240 --> 00:10:37,200
Speaker 1: or is this a trend that's happening around the country

180
00:10:37,360 --> 00:10:39,280
Speaker 1: no matter who's running a state.

181
00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:43,120
Speaker 4: I think a lot of the proposals we're seeing that

182
00:10:43,160 --> 00:10:47,760
Speaker 4: would relax child labor restrictions do tend to be in

183
00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:54,480
Speaker 4: red states Republican majority legislatures Iowa, Arkansas, Ohio, among others.

184
00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:57,720
Speaker 1: How exactly are these laws enforced? What is the federal

185
00:10:57,760 --> 00:11:00,079
Speaker 1: government supposed to do, what are the states supposed to do,

186
00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:02,040
Speaker 1: and what are businesses supposed to do?

187
00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:07,400
Speaker 5: When it comes to actually going and slapping someone on

188
00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:10,640
Speaker 5: the wrist for a violation, people will send complaints into

189
00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:14,400
Speaker 5: the agency, or they would see it during an investigation.

190
00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:19,640
Speaker 5: Perhaps they were referred by another federal agency. Like in meatpacking,

191
00:11:19,679 --> 00:11:22,600
Speaker 5: for example, there's a lot of food safety inspectors who

192
00:11:22,679 --> 00:11:25,240
Speaker 5: will be in there more often than the Department of Labor.

193
00:11:25,720 --> 00:11:28,200
Speaker 5: If someone is in the door, sometimes they can say, Hey,

194
00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:30,880
Speaker 5: that person looks really young and maybe they shouldn't be

195
00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:33,440
Speaker 5: working here. I'm gonna let the Wage hour Division know.

196
00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:37,960
Speaker 5: But the problem is the wage in our division is

197
00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:43,160
Speaker 5: extremely understaffed and underfunded. The last time I checked with

198
00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:45,840
Speaker 5: the agency, they said they had seven hundred and ninety

199
00:11:45,880 --> 00:11:50,600
Speaker 5: four investigators to cover more than nine point eight million

200
00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:54,760
Speaker 5: workplaces in the United States. So a lot of times

201
00:11:55,080 --> 00:12:00,440
Speaker 5: these investigations happen when a catastrophe happens. You know the

202
00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:03,000
Speaker 5: case that we saw with packer sanitation and the children

203
00:12:03,040 --> 00:12:07,000
Speaker 5: working overnight in the meatpacking plants. It was teachers who said,

204
00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:09,559
Speaker 5: we have kids who are falling asleep in class, are

205
00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:13,440
Speaker 5: not showing up to school. Sometimes not until the violation

206
00:12:13,679 --> 00:12:17,000
Speaker 5: happens that the federal government gets itself in the door.

207
00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:22,600
Speaker 4: Unfortunately, states can and do sometimes do their own enforcement

208
00:12:22,640 --> 00:12:27,160
Speaker 4: around child labor violations. But how robust that labor enforcement

209
00:12:27,240 --> 00:12:30,000
Speaker 4: is at the state level varies pretty widely from state

210
00:12:30,040 --> 00:12:33,400
Speaker 4: to state and even then across the board. As with

211
00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:38,280
Speaker 4: the federal agency, the state agencies are chronically underfunded, and

212
00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:41,360
Speaker 4: even the funding and positions that are available. A lot

213
00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:44,480
Speaker 4: of states had trouble keeping those filled and have continued

214
00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:47,840
Speaker 4: having trouble filling them since the pandemic. I would just

215
00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:51,480
Speaker 4: add on the earlier question about red states and blue states.

216
00:12:52,320 --> 00:12:55,040
Speaker 4: It was interesting to see that Arkansas, in addition to

217
00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:58,199
Speaker 4: the bill to eliminate work permits, came back a few

218
00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:01,160
Speaker 4: weeks later and enacted a separate build to increase the

219
00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:04,959
Speaker 4: penalties for child labor violations. It's a case where the

220
00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:07,040
Speaker 4: state sort of went both ways this year.

221
00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:12,559
Speaker 1: In the case of say Arkansas, where the governors or

222
00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:15,120
Speaker 1: Hockey Sanders made a big point of saying, we're no

223
00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:19,600
Speaker 1: longer going to require you to provide proof of someone's age.

224
00:13:20,040 --> 00:13:22,800
Speaker 1: Does that kind of send a message to employers that

225
00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:25,120
Speaker 1: are not really going to be looking so closely at this.

226
00:13:25,880 --> 00:13:27,680
Speaker 4: And that's the point that I think a lot of

227
00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:31,800
Speaker 4: sort of child safety and labor advocates made about that bill.

228
00:13:32,520 --> 00:13:34,240
Speaker 4: You know, the supporters of the bill said, well, this

229
00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:36,560
Speaker 4: is just paperwork. We're just getting rid of some government

230
00:13:36,640 --> 00:13:39,240
Speaker 4: or red tape. If teenagers want to work and their

231
00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:41,400
Speaker 4: parents are okay with them working, why should they have

232
00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:44,280
Speaker 4: to fill out more paperwork from the government. But the

233
00:13:44,280 --> 00:13:46,840
Speaker 4: advocates on the other side said, well, this is a check,

234
00:13:46,920 --> 00:13:49,920
Speaker 4: This is a way of having some proof that we

235
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:52,840
Speaker 4: know how old this person is, we know what they're

236
00:13:52,840 --> 00:13:54,800
Speaker 4: allowed to do on the job and what they're not

237
00:13:54,840 --> 00:13:57,000
Speaker 4: allowed to do, and how late they're allowed to work.

238
00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:00,600
Speaker 4: So yeah, I think that's a concern for the safety

239
00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,560
Speaker 4: advocates that yeah, maybe it does send that message that

240
00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:06,040
Speaker 4: the state's not really going to be watching that closely.

241
00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:10,480
Speaker 1: Rebecca. Let's say everyone's doing their job the way they're

242
00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:14,679
Speaker 1: supposed to do and federal inspectors with a Wage an

243
00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:18,760
Speaker 1: Hour's Division or a state investigator finds out that there's

244
00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:21,960
Speaker 1: a child labor violation. What happens from there?

245
00:14:23,400 --> 00:14:26,320
Speaker 5: I know on the federal level, it would start an

246
00:14:26,400 --> 00:14:30,120
Speaker 5: investigation by the Wage an Hour Division. They would audit

247
00:14:30,280 --> 00:14:35,720
Speaker 5: their books, request how they sought proof of age, how

248
00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:37,920
Speaker 5: long this person had been working for them, also so

249
00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:41,840
Speaker 5: that they can calculate potential penalties, that sort of thing.

250
00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:45,280
Speaker 5: There's different levels of violations that could be found as well.

251
00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:49,080
Speaker 5: If a company is found to be willfully violating the

252
00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:53,480
Speaker 5: law is very aware if they've had previous violations, the

253
00:14:53,520 --> 00:14:55,840
Speaker 5: penalties that they can face can be much higher.

254
00:14:56,760 --> 00:14:58,280
Speaker 1: What are the penalties, like what does this.

255
00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:00,960
Speaker 5: So this is an issue the Apartment of Labor and

256
00:15:01,000 --> 00:15:06,400
Speaker 5: the Biden administration has said is making their enforcement abilities

257
00:15:06,600 --> 00:15:11,600
Speaker 5: harder because the maximum civil monetary penalty for a child

258
00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:15,400
Speaker 5: labor violation right now is a little over fifteen thousand

259
00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:19,160
Speaker 5: dollars per child, which you know, officials believe is just

260
00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:21,800
Speaker 5: not enough of a deterrent. And that's something that the

261
00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:25,840
Speaker 5: Biden administration has requested Congress change. They want not only

262
00:15:25,920 --> 00:15:29,280
Speaker 5: more funding for their enforcement, but they also want them

263
00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:32,600
Speaker 5: to pass legislation to increase these monetary penalty amounts.

264
00:15:34,640 --> 00:15:38,840
Speaker 1: Chris, what is the argument that people in favor of

265
00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:40,920
Speaker 1: listening to these laws are making?

266
00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:46,720
Speaker 4: Business groups and mostly but not entirely Republican lawmakers sort

267
00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:49,760
Speaker 4: of make the argument that work experience is valuable and

268
00:15:49,840 --> 00:15:52,560
Speaker 4: if a fifteen year old wants to work a few

269
00:15:52,560 --> 00:15:55,720
Speaker 4: hours on a school night, you know, scooping popcorn at

270
00:15:55,760 --> 00:15:59,200
Speaker 4: the movie theater or whatever it might be, that's valuable

271
00:15:59,240 --> 00:16:01,240
Speaker 4: life experience. It's a way to earn a little money.

272
00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:05,520
Speaker 4: Presumably they're there with their parents' permission, although not every

273
00:16:05,520 --> 00:16:09,160
Speaker 4: state requires that. There's documentation of that. And some of

274
00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:10,920
Speaker 4: these folks have said to me Hey, look, this is

275
00:16:10,960 --> 00:16:14,640
Speaker 4: not really fair that we're sort of getting lumped in

276
00:16:14,720 --> 00:16:19,280
Speaker 4: with this case of kids cleaning meat packing plants using

277
00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:21,880
Speaker 4: caustic chemicals. You know, this is not the kind of

278
00:16:21,880 --> 00:16:24,880
Speaker 4: thing we're advocating for. We agree that that's wrong and

279
00:16:24,920 --> 00:16:28,080
Speaker 4: that's illegal, and those companies should face penalties for it.

280
00:16:28,640 --> 00:16:31,600
Speaker 4: But we're talking about, you know, letting teenagers work until

281
00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:35,600
Speaker 4: nine pm or sort of cutting out the permit application

282
00:16:35,760 --> 00:16:39,800
Speaker 4: process for teenagers who want to work, and so parental

283
00:16:39,880 --> 00:16:43,080
Speaker 4: rights is a piece of that too. In Arkansas in particular,

284
00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:45,640
Speaker 4: where the legislature enacted this law to get rid of

285
00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:49,560
Speaker 4: the work permit requirement, state lawmakers pointed out, look, if

286
00:16:49,920 --> 00:16:51,800
Speaker 4: parents want to let their kids work, and the kids

287
00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:55,120
Speaker 4: want to work, then why should the state be in

288
00:16:55,160 --> 00:16:57,360
Speaker 4: the way to sort of put up this additional red

289
00:16:57,400 --> 00:16:58,840
Speaker 4: tape and say, well, you have to go through this

290
00:16:58,880 --> 00:17:00,160
Speaker 4: permitting process.

291
00:16:59,760 --> 00:17:03,080
Speaker 1: To do it, Rebecca, so far, we're seeing this happen

292
00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:05,720
Speaker 1: in really just a handful of states. When you look

293
00:17:05,800 --> 00:17:07,800
Speaker 1: down the road, you cover this all the time, what

294
00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:09,399
Speaker 1: do you see. Do you think that we're going to

295
00:17:09,480 --> 00:17:11,840
Speaker 1: start to see this expand I.

296
00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:16,359
Speaker 5: Would say no, and that is because the heightened scrutiny.

297
00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:20,199
Speaker 5: We have seen of these types of cases when it

298
00:17:20,280 --> 00:17:24,480
Speaker 5: comes to various child labor violations, But when it comes

299
00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:31,000
Speaker 5: to Congress actually moving in this direction of loosening laws,

300
00:17:31,400 --> 00:17:34,879
Speaker 5: I would predict that we would see things go actually

301
00:17:34,880 --> 00:17:38,479
Speaker 5: in the opposite direction, more protective of children if there

302
00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:42,960
Speaker 5: were any policy changes in DC. However, we do have

303
00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:46,199
Speaker 5: an election coming up, and there's always the potential for

304
00:17:46,240 --> 00:17:48,879
Speaker 5: things to change, the makeup in Congress to change, So,

305
00:17:49,560 --> 00:17:52,480
Speaker 5: you know, I think Chris is right in saying that

306
00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:56,280
Speaker 5: states are maybe planning the seeds for a future administration

307
00:17:56,359 --> 00:17:59,840
Speaker 5: of future Congress to consider something like this, especially with

308
00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:01,600
Speaker 5: the state of the economy as it is.

309
00:18:02,359 --> 00:18:05,400
Speaker 1: Rebecca, Chris, thanks so much for coming on the show.

310
00:18:05,600 --> 00:18:08,520
Speaker 1: Thanks for having us, Thanks for having me when we

311
00:18:08,560 --> 00:18:11,159
Speaker 1: come back. The push to peel back child labor laws

312
00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:23,679
Speaker 1: is history repeating itself. Of course, we have heard this

313
00:18:23,760 --> 00:18:27,720
Speaker 1: story before, as doctor Betsy Wood can tell you. In fact,

314
00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:30,520
Speaker 1: she's gonna tell us. She is the author of Upon

315
00:18:30,600 --> 00:18:34,320
Speaker 1: the Altar of Work, Child Labor, and the Rise of

316
00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:37,879
Speaker 1: American Sectionalism, Doctor Wood, I think a lot of people

317
00:18:37,880 --> 00:18:41,680
Speaker 1: have been surprised by the sudden rise of these child

318
00:18:41,720 --> 00:18:45,719
Speaker 1: labor laws that are going into fact in different states

319
00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:49,520
Speaker 1: because for a long time the question about children working

320
00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:53,160
Speaker 1: had been settled, that it was something we didn't want.

321
00:18:54,280 --> 00:18:56,800
Speaker 2: I know, it seems that way, and I empathize with

322
00:18:56,840 --> 00:19:01,880
Speaker 2: the perspective. From an historical standpoint, isn't as surprising, and

323
00:19:01,920 --> 00:19:05,359
Speaker 2: that's simply because the issue of child labor was way

324
00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:09,840
Speaker 2: more contentious historically than most people realize. I think the

325
00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:13,440
Speaker 2: common assumption might be that child labor existed a long

326
00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:17,280
Speaker 2: time ago. Everyone knows that it was really awful, especially

327
00:19:17,320 --> 00:19:20,840
Speaker 2: in dangerous working conditions or in factories and coal mines

328
00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:23,800
Speaker 2: and things like that, and that the country came together

329
00:19:23,960 --> 00:19:28,680
Speaker 2: and realized that this wasn't okay and abolished it. That's

330
00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:32,160
Speaker 2: not really true. You know. What really happened is more

331
00:19:32,240 --> 00:19:35,639
Speaker 2: of a decades long battle that lasted for about one

332
00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:38,240
Speaker 2: hundred years, and I think I should say extends into

333
00:19:38,240 --> 00:19:42,040
Speaker 2: the present day. It wasn't over with the nineteen thirty

334
00:19:42,080 --> 00:19:45,000
Speaker 2: eight passage of the Federal Labor Standards Act that did

335
00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:48,320
Speaker 2: give us our first federal child labor law. The first

336
00:19:48,320 --> 00:19:50,840
Speaker 2: attempt at a federal child labor law was back in

337
00:19:50,960 --> 00:19:53,720
Speaker 2: nineteen o six and it failed, and there was another

338
00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:57,879
Speaker 2: attempt in nineteen sixteen. That also, I wouldn't say they failed.

339
00:19:57,880 --> 00:19:59,920
Speaker 2: It's more that the Supreme Court decided they weren't constant,

340
00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:03,320
Speaker 2: and there were just contentious battles where you know, parents

341
00:20:03,400 --> 00:20:06,120
Speaker 2: would take these laws to court and say this violated

342
00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:09,040
Speaker 2: their rights as parents, and the Supreme Court would agree

343
00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:13,240
Speaker 2: with them. I think the larger point is the issue

344
00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:17,960
Speaker 2: of child labor has always tapped into bigger debates in

345
00:20:18,040 --> 00:20:20,960
Speaker 2: American society, and I think that we're seeing that being

346
00:20:21,040 --> 00:20:25,000
Speaker 2: revived again today in a way that I would say

347
00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:28,240
Speaker 2: is kind of consistent with what has happened in the past.

348
00:20:29,040 --> 00:20:31,800
Speaker 1: And what is that consistency, What is the argument now?

349
00:20:32,320 --> 00:20:35,760
Speaker 2: To step back a little bit, business interests have always

350
00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:39,240
Speaker 2: sort of been at the heart of public debates over

351
00:20:39,400 --> 00:20:44,240
Speaker 2: child labors. So in the past, you had textile mills

352
00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:47,760
Speaker 2: in the South really relying on child labor in large

353
00:20:47,800 --> 00:20:51,280
Speaker 2: numbers when the South was just starting to be industrialized,

354
00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:54,199
Speaker 2: and so their arguments were that this was good for

355
00:20:54,240 --> 00:20:57,840
Speaker 2: the economy. Their arguments were that they were uplifting these

356
00:20:57,920 --> 00:21:00,399
Speaker 2: children and their families and giving them financial opportunity unities.

357
00:21:00,760 --> 00:21:03,679
Speaker 2: There were arguments about the moral value of labor, that

358
00:21:03,720 --> 00:21:07,080
Speaker 2: it teaches children important moral lessons that will help them

359
00:21:07,119 --> 00:21:10,560
Speaker 2: in life. And then there was a very effective argument

360
00:21:10,880 --> 00:21:14,879
Speaker 2: about parental rights that if there are disagreements about this

361
00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:17,680
Speaker 2: labor and how it affects children and what children need,

362
00:21:17,880 --> 00:21:20,040
Speaker 2: who should be the one deciding Should it be the

363
00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:22,720
Speaker 2: government that decides this or should it be parents that

364
00:21:22,800 --> 00:21:25,560
Speaker 2: decide this? And so the argument over parental rights is

365
00:21:25,680 --> 00:21:30,080
Speaker 2: ultimately the one that business interest, I think realized was

366
00:21:30,320 --> 00:21:35,120
Speaker 2: very effective in kind of pushing this framing of the issue.

367
00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:37,600
Speaker 2: That is the argument that was used back then, and

368
00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:41,880
Speaker 2: very strikingly I have seen that again today. It's similar

369
00:21:41,920 --> 00:21:43,600
Speaker 2: in a lot of ways. Not exactly because there's a

370
00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:45,879
Speaker 2: whole different framework in the nineteenth century, of course, but

371
00:21:45,920 --> 00:21:48,680
Speaker 2: I do see some resonances with the past.

372
00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:50,679
Speaker 1: Well, I think a lot of people listening to this

373
00:21:50,800 --> 00:21:53,840
Speaker 1: podcast had jobs when they were teenagers. I did. I

374
00:21:53,840 --> 00:21:56,360
Speaker 1: had my first job at McDonald's when I was fifteen,

375
00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,280
Speaker 1: and you know, it was a real character building exercise.

376
00:21:59,320 --> 00:22:01,159
Speaker 1: I liked the Arnie the extra money.

377
00:22:02,080 --> 00:22:03,880
Speaker 2: That is kind of what the Fair Labor Standards Act

378
00:22:03,960 --> 00:22:06,720
Speaker 2: was trying to accomplish in a way, was is this

379
00:22:07,119 --> 00:22:10,760
Speaker 2: labor appropriate? And so, for example, there's an emphasis on

380
00:22:11,080 --> 00:22:14,040
Speaker 2: dangerous occupations. There's an emphasis on what is the type

381
00:22:14,040 --> 00:22:16,879
Speaker 2: of labor that children are doing? You know, is it

382
00:22:16,960 --> 00:22:20,080
Speaker 2: something furthering, like when you're talking about your experience and

383
00:22:20,359 --> 00:22:22,800
Speaker 2: working at McDonald's. You know, this could be something that

384
00:22:23,200 --> 00:22:26,320
Speaker 2: the number of hours didn't interfere with the other pursuits

385
00:22:26,440 --> 00:22:28,919
Speaker 2: in your life and could have complimented what you were doing.

386
00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:31,200
Speaker 2: And so, you know, I think there is nuance there,

387
00:22:31,280 --> 00:22:34,200
Speaker 2: and I think what's happening now is just surprising because

388
00:22:34,480 --> 00:22:38,199
Speaker 2: it's a kind of aggressive attempt at rolling back protections

389
00:22:38,200 --> 00:22:40,200
Speaker 2: that haven't been touched in a long time.

390
00:22:40,840 --> 00:22:42,680
Speaker 1: These laws are coming up at a time when there's

391
00:22:42,680 --> 00:22:45,959
Speaker 1: a tight labor market, a lot of places are looking

392
00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:48,600
Speaker 1: for people to work in There's this big debate about

393
00:22:48,600 --> 00:22:50,760
Speaker 1: whether there's really a labor shortage or if there's just

394
00:22:50,800 --> 00:22:53,520
Speaker 1: a shortage of people willing to work those kinds of

395
00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:57,119
Speaker 1: jobs for low wages anymore when they have other opportunities.

396
00:22:57,200 --> 00:23:00,800
Speaker 1: And so now there's this idea that teenagers will do

397
00:23:00,840 --> 00:23:03,359
Speaker 1: those jobs and that you can pay them a lower wage.

398
00:23:03,840 --> 00:23:06,199
Speaker 2: This conversation could just as well have been happening in

399
00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:10,399
Speaker 2: the nineteen thirties, because during the Great Depression, you know,

400
00:23:10,480 --> 00:23:14,440
Speaker 2: the idea that jobs should be going any available jobs

401
00:23:14,520 --> 00:23:18,159
Speaker 2: should be going to children or to youth just started

402
00:23:18,160 --> 00:23:22,000
Speaker 2: to make no sense, and people were basically more likely

403
00:23:22,119 --> 00:23:25,360
Speaker 2: to say, well, in this instance, we need to make

404
00:23:25,400 --> 00:23:29,600
Speaker 2: sure that all available jobs that are full time, full

405
00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:33,320
Speaker 2: time employment need to be going to adult workers that

406
00:23:33,480 --> 00:23:38,399
Speaker 2: need these jobs. And so that moment actually really helped

407
00:23:38,440 --> 00:23:42,360
Speaker 2: the cause a lot in getting people to support federal

408
00:23:42,480 --> 00:23:45,480
Speaker 2: legislation to in child labor and for the Supreme Court

409
00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:49,359
Speaker 2: to finally go along with the constitutionality of this legislation.

410
00:23:51,760 --> 00:23:53,639
Speaker 1: As somebody who spends a lot of time looking in

411
00:23:53,640 --> 00:23:55,960
Speaker 1: the past, I'm and ask you to look into the future.

412
00:23:56,400 --> 00:23:58,960
Speaker 1: Do you think that this will gain kind of acceptance

413
00:23:59,000 --> 00:23:59,800
Speaker 1: and popularity.

414
00:24:00,280 --> 00:24:02,080
Speaker 2: Well, I don't know how good my crystal ball is,

415
00:24:02,280 --> 00:24:05,000
Speaker 2: but I would say I don't think we should ever

416
00:24:05,520 --> 00:24:08,720
Speaker 2: assume that we settled that and that one that's in

417
00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:11,480
Speaker 2: the dustbin of history. I don't think that we can

418
00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:14,960
Speaker 2: ever do that, really, even with something like this, Especially

419
00:24:14,960 --> 00:24:18,600
Speaker 2: maybe with something like this, My take would be typically

420
00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:23,640
Speaker 2: the side of protecting children from dangerous occupations and from

421
00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:27,919
Speaker 2: harmful labor tends to win. I think that that would

422
00:24:28,119 --> 00:24:30,360
Speaker 2: be the case, But I don't think that the opposition

423
00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:35,000
Speaker 2: should be underestimated anyway, because they have successfully managed to

424
00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:40,199
Speaker 2: defeat or weakend child labor laws in American history in

425
00:24:40,280 --> 00:24:43,760
Speaker 2: ways that are surprising. They were able to prevent a

426
00:24:43,840 --> 00:24:46,920
Speaker 2: child labor in the nineteen twenties that had very widespread

427
00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:50,840
Speaker 2: popular support that everyone thought was going to pass, and

428
00:24:51,359 --> 00:24:55,360
Speaker 2: it didn't because this opposition was very organized and very

429
00:24:55,400 --> 00:24:59,159
Speaker 2: effective in being able to rally just ordinary citizens on

430
00:24:59,200 --> 00:25:02,240
Speaker 2: the basis of of the government takeover of the family

431
00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:06,280
Speaker 2: and that parental rights are going to be interfered with.

432
00:25:06,920 --> 00:25:09,760
Speaker 2: So these kind of fear based arguments can be really,

433
00:25:10,240 --> 00:25:12,960
Speaker 2: really powerful. So I don't know, I guess I'm going

434
00:25:13,040 --> 00:25:14,600
Speaker 2: to say I'm fifty to fifty.

435
00:25:14,359 --> 00:25:18,200
Speaker 1: On it, Doctor Betsy would thanks so much for talking

436
00:25:18,240 --> 00:25:18,800
Speaker 1: with me today.

437
00:25:18,920 --> 00:25:20,360
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for having me.

438
00:25:21,400 --> 00:25:23,320
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to us here at The Big Take.

439
00:25:23,359 --> 00:25:26,920
Speaker 1: It's a daily podcast from Bloomberg and iHeartRadio. For more

440
00:25:26,920 --> 00:25:31,040
Speaker 1: shows from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

441
00:25:31,080 --> 00:25:33,800
Speaker 1: wherever you listen, and we'd love to hear from you.

442
00:25:33,880 --> 00:25:37,320
Speaker 1: Email us questions or comments to Big Take at Bloomberg

443
00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:40,919
Speaker 1: dot Net. The supervising producer of The Big Take is

444
00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:45,440
Speaker 1: Vicky Virgalina. Our senior producer is Catherine Fink. Rebecca Shasson

445
00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:50,320
Speaker 1: is our producer. Our associate producer is Sam Gobauer. Raphael M.

446
00:25:50,320 --> 00:25:53,959
Speaker 1: Seeley is our engineer. Our original music was composed by

447
00:25:54,040 --> 00:25:57,760
Speaker 1: Leo Sidrin. I'm West Kasova. We'll be back tomorrow with

448
00:25:57,880 --> 00:26:07,000
Speaker 1: another big take. Pun Ban pup, punt, bun bun bokar