WEBVTT - How E-Commerce Is Changing Commercial Real Estate

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. We

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are broadcasting live from the Eisner Amper Global Leaders in

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Real Estate Summit. It's in partnership with a Global form

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>and we are in the Latti New York Palace in

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Midtown Manhattan. And who knows more about real estate in

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>New York and really around the world. I don't know

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>who except Larry Silverstein. He is the chairman of Silverstein

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Properties and he joins us now. So seeing thanks very

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. You know, I was looking

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at the background. I'm wondering if you know, when you

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>first started out in real estate from Brooklyn with your father,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>did you never imagine that you'd be building four seasons

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>properties and the World Trade Center and all these buildings

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Did you ever imagine that this is

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what real estate would become? Never in a million years,

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it was beyond beyond, beyond visualization. What brought you into

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the industry, what made what attracted you to it? Well,

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw a I saw something that that seemed exciting,

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and at the early stages I functioned as a real

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>estate broker. But it became obvious to me that the

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>money wasn't in brokerage at that time, it was much

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>more in ownership. And so with time I said, be

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>decided somehow we had again moved moved towards owning real

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>estate and ultimately developing real estate. And that's where we

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are today, Mr Self Furstein. I want to talk about

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the World Trade Center site. I know that you had

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a lease in the World Trade Towers ninety year lease

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>right ahead of September eleventh, and then after that you've

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>devoted yourself to really rebuilding the site. Um, and the

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>tower that now has become really headquarters for media, for

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>modern media in some ways. Um, where is that? How

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>how well occupied is that? And um? What do you

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>envision for that whole region going forward? Well, first of all,

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we've least about six six plus million feet of space

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in the buildings down there, and there's more to go. Um.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And certainly media is a very significant occupant of space

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in that part of the world. Media technology the tammy,

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the tammy areas um and so it's a finance is

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 1>still there, but is not the dominant factor in Lower

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan today as it was not very long ago. I

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>don't think of media though, is having the same degree

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>of money as finance. Uh. We see media companies going

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at a business left and right, So I have to wonder, uh,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, what the sustainability of this trend is, and uh,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>what your optimism is that there could be more businesses

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that come either to New York, saying Amazon coming to

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the tower, which I'm sure you would be excited about,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>or others. Given the high cost and uh, some of

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the challenges to the industry. You know, the high cost

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is certainly there. But one of the things that you

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>can do when you're building new buildings is building too

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>those buildings the latest in technology and provide for tremendous

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>dentification of real estate, so you could put more bodies,

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>more people into the same square footage that then existed

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago. And so the the economics of new construction,

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>while it may sound more expensive, is actually becoming much

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>more efficient and less expensive for square foot of occupied space.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the biggest mistake that people who want to get

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>into real estate make. I think they consistently underestimate the

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of capital required to do more money than you

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think invariable. That like a story for life though, well

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly children, right indeed, But you know, one of the

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>thing I wanted to mention is the negotiating prowers because

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>you're you were not the you were not the selected

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>as the person to take on World Trade Center, Right,

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that was correct? How did that happen? Well, the winning

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bidder UH was a public company and they ran into

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of problems when it came to negotiating at

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>lease with the Port authority. Port authority asked to do

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>certain things, which is a public company that had difficulty doing. UH,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>as a private entrepreneur, had no difficulty with at all,

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and so it just became a question of time until

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>they realized it was not going to work. They dropped out,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we came along and closed it. So right

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>now we're broadcasting from midtown, but I know they you

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>yourself are moving from midtown UH to downtown, and that

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder, especially as I pass empty storefronts, do

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that the shot that that this sort of

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>tide has shifted from midtown and that downtown will see

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>an even bigger resurgence. You know, we're we're in an

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>era where um e commerce is playing an increasingly important role,

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and so people are buying more today online than they

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have had before. UM. I think it's I think what

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see is a is a diminution in the

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>number of branch stores UM than we've had in the past. UM.

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And so retail will adjust um to this reality just

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>as they've always adjusted in the past. They're going through

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>some more difficult times now they'll figure it out. Well.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But what does that mean for all the commercial real estate?

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for all the storefronts that have

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>been empty? I think with time rents and some of

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>those shops will come down. Some of those locations will

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>come down. I think that the locations might find themselves

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>being used differently. We see food today uh far far

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>greater dependability on a need for food, and so you

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>see you see restaurants popping up all over the place.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And the truth of matter is younger people, for some reason,

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>they don't like to cook any more. They like to

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>eat it will give you a few reasons. And so

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>uh you find we find restaurants uh increasing in frequency

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and presence, uh, and so many cases those shops will

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>will be replaced by food of one type or another,

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and so fast food lots, so fast food, so forth,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>different types of foods. It's a it's a fascination. You'll

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>have that uptown as well as downtown. They'll certainly seeing

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it downtown. There's no question of that. Based on what

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know or have heard about the President's efforts for

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a tax reform, what can you tell us about your

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>views on tax reform and is it necessary? And what

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>would it do if indeed we do get some kind

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of tax reform? Well, Uh, it's it's totally premature uh

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to opine on the ramifications of this thing,

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because you don't know what state, what status it's going

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to have. Uh. You're needing far more definition of a

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>most specificity uh than you can't than we have today

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to give you a concrete answer to

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that question. So you don't you don't even pay attention

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to the noise. It's there's a lot of noise at

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>this point. Uh. It will become more more less symbolic

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and more meaningful as the days go forward real quickly.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, from a foreign investment standpoint, how concerned are

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you about curbs on China money leaving the country and

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>what that would do to us real estate. Well, there's

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly a diminution on the amount of money that can

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.679
<v Speaker 1>come out of China into America. But at the same time,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>there's such vast amounts of wealth has been created around

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the world, So much of that wealth is coming to

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>America as a safe haven. And so the first place

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>finds itself is usually New York and then it starts

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>fanning out to a Jamaica urban centers around the country.

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're gonna do just find here. Larry Silverstein,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.239
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Larry Silverstein's chairman

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of Silverstein Properties, incorporated in New York City, and he

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is a lion of the real estate industry, certainly in

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>New York as well as around the world. I want

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to turn our attention to uh real estate, in particular

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the security around that real estate in a place like

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>New York City. And here to join us is Governor

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>David Patterson, the former governor of New York. So I'd

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>love to to get your sense on the cost of

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>some of these anti terrorism measures that are being increasingly

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>taken in New York City and from your perspective, whether

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they have been uh ashiant to adequately protect us. Well,

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about that in a session and

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>my colleague Jeff Murdler, who was one of my appointees

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Port Authority, talked about the fact that the

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>new one World Trade Center, the first seven floors don't

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have any people on it. They're concentric layers of concrete,

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and that um the reinforcements dwarf what existed on Towers

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>one and two at the World Trade Center uh years ago.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>These are massive amounts of money and extra billion dollars

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was spent just on security alone at the World Trade

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Center and is now being replicated uh at you know

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>other edifices that are being developed around the city. Can

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I just play Devil's Advocate for for just a moment,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because all of this security, while at the macro level,

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>we understand that it may be necessary, but it is

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in a sense non productive spending. In other words, it's

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>concrete as you just describe, it's many layers of security

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time that we have municipalities going bust.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So is there a contrast between what we are securing,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>which seems to be deteriorating in some cases, and the

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of money that is being spent on security services. Uh,

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a brilliant question. It's a sacrifice in many

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>respects what we're finding. Let's think about it. Two years

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ago in France there was an attack on a restaurant,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and then, uh, one month after that, in December of

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:46.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen, there was an attack on a holiday party

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that was actually in a in a you know, regular

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>office building, So terrorists could read a lot of havoc,

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but not even going near the World trades. And they

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>can do it in the subway system. There's no way

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we could secure seven miles of track in the New

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>York City subway system. So your point is very well taken.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But I guess psychologically, if there was another attack on

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the major buildings, the Empire State Building or

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Madison Square Garden, on one of these places, the person

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody would say is why didn't someone do something about it?

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Governor Patterson, I wonder if you could enlighten us about

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's underappreciated. How many potential threats have been thwarted

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to New York City and how many threats you're aware

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of that were imminent that didn't happen. I'm aware of

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>about of UH for every one UH situation had happened. Friends,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when I was governor, there was a bombing um on Street. UH.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It didn't it wasn't effective. But what had occurred. But

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I told the group this morning that I was told

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there would be an attack on the New York subway

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>system during the Thanksgiving holidays in two thousand and eight.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know what. My staff came in my office

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>today before Thanksgiving and they were all looking down, they

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>were glum. I thought, oh my god, we've got another

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>September eleven situation. And it turned out they wanted to

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>tell me about the attack in Mumbai when they blew

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>up the hotel and in India, and um, it was

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a horrible situation, terrible tragedy. We sent supplies from New

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>York State. I felt guilty of others, but I was

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>relieved that New York had been spared. They are all

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>types of threats that we never know about. We have

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to thank our New York City Police Department, the state

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>police in our national government for their successes. Can you

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>just speak a little bit about the threat the fiscal

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>threat to states and municipalities. We've got a potential bankruptcy

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>right now at Hartford, Connecticut. Yeah, it's overwhelming. UM. There

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was the little uh city Pritchard, Alabama. There was the

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>municipality in near Orange County in California. UM, we are going, uh,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We're uh. Governments are spending more and then they had

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to because of all types of myriad problems that exist

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>now that then existed before. There's no doubt about that.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And we're going hopelessly back into debt and I hope

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not another prelude uh to a government crisis like

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we sew in two thousand and eight. Do you think

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that's possible? I mean, from leaving out finance, I think

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just from a government perspective, the amount of debt that's

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>being run up by cities and states is incredible. Right

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>here in in in New York. At one time, about

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, the m T A was the fifth

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>largest debt or in the country. California was number one,

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>New York State, New York City with two and three,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts number four and then the m t A. It's

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>as if they are a state, and so the point

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is that, um um, we don't manage money right the

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>way we should. Well, I want to thank you for

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>your service to the state and to the country. Former

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Governor of New York David Patterson joining us here at

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Global leaders in Real Estate Summit for Eisener Emper

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and partnership with I Global Form. You're listening to Bloomberg.

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We are broadcasting live from the Eisener Emper Global leaders

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in Real Estate Summit. It's in partnership with I A

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Global Forum, and we're broadcasting from the New York Palace

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Hotel in Midtown Manhattan. Joining us now is really our

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>host for the whole morning. I want to appreciate it.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Charlie Weinstein. He is the chief

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>executive of Eisener Emperor. Thank you for having us, Thank

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you for having thank you for covering us this morning.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And good morning Lace and him. Great to be great

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to be be here. You know. One of the time

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if we could just jump right in. I

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>want to understand a little bit more about the Center

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for Family Business Excellence, because I think that many people

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>who either own companies or are equity holders in either

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>private companies or in real estate deals. This is something

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're trying to build for them. Center for Family

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Business Excellence is um a new initiative that we've started

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at the firm. Lisa Stewart is the executive and our

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>firm who's responsible for family uh, family businesses, and family business.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Center for Family Business Excellence really has its focus on

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that family owned businesses and privately held companies

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have on succession, planning and transition, and Lisa has been

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>doing this for twenty years. We're very excited to be

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>able to bring this initiative to our clients, and especially

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in the real estate industry where family owned real estate

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>provides a challenge for leadership trains issue. You know, as

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we were talking before this segment, one thing that struck

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>me was that the main topic of the day is

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhat different than I thought it would be. I thought

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be about taxes, frankly because of the tax

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plan that was released by President Trump, but it sounds

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like that's not the that's not the case. In fact,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it's actually the technological revolution that's kind of underpinning the

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>real estate market right now? Can you give us a

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of what that is? Absolutely? And so it's very

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting because we are a leading accounting and advisory firm,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but even eisener Amper has morphed into a technology focused

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>term and that's impacting real estate in so many ways.

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And so if you think one way in particular would

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>be blockchain. And so what's coming in blockchain is going

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a tremendous impact on title and ownership, mortgage recording, um,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.359
<v Speaker 1>all of these things that perhaps were impacted in the

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>meltdown in two thousand and eight, those are going to

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>be impacted in a big way by blockchains. So when

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you say impacted, does this mean that there's going to

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>be more profits or sort of a fewer costs attached

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to purchasing a home with a mortgage or does that

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that it's just going other places? I mean, what's

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the significance of this for buyers of real estate? To me,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the significance is transparency. And when you have transparency, you

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>have more effective and efficient markets, and we will see

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the lowering of risk and we will see more investment

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars come into this sector as risk gets lowered. All right, now,

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I know you wanted to move away from taxes, but

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm just gonna have to focus you there

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>because I know, for example, that you are one of

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the attendees at the White House at a Business Council

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>meeting with President Donald Trump, and of course taxes is

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in the headlines right now. What if you could speak

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about this idea of succession planning and the estate tax

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for businesses and then maybe just segue if you can

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>into the whole then thirty one exchange uh business, because

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that may be on the chopping block at least that's

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>according to some people in Washington. Well, so a state

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 1>tax if and there are very few details out yet

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of tax reform and what impact it's going

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to have, Uh, the state tax will go away, and

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>so that will change, um if if the proposals are

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>filled in the way that that they're spoken about now,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a state tax will go away. That will have a

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>significant significant impact on succession planning for families especially, And

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>so we're looking forward to more details coming out and

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we will see some changes in the estate tax.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Um In terms of specifics, ten thirty one exchanges limitations

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on business interest deductions, all of these things are going

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to have a major impact. It's a little bit uncertain

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point if they're actually going to go through.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's here, what's your expectation. You look skeptical. Um,

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe that will have tax reform, but uh, interest

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>groups are lobbying already. I think the plan is to

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>keep details light until the proposal is ready to be

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>voted on interest groups so hard at work. Well, I'm

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>wondering from the mortgage interest deduction standpoint, whether you think

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially be on the chopping block. Certainly sounds

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as though they're going to keep it for individuals, but

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>business interest deductions sound like they're going to be limited.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, that will have an impact

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>on corporate real estate and real estate investment. In other words,

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>commercial property values could deteriorate pretty rapidly. Absolutely. Is there

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a misnomer about the industry that people do deals for

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>tax reasons? I mean, is taxes a secondary issue or

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the primary? I'd like to think tax planning is your friend,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a component of every aspect of deal

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>making in real estate, and savvy real estate investors take

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the opportunities in the tax code as it

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>stands today. UM, it'll be interesting to see with tax reform,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if we have tax reform, what those opportunities will be

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward. That's our business. Charlie Weinstein, thank you so

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us and for having us here today.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Weinstein's chief executive officer of Eisner Amper, which is

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>based in New York and facing a pretty rapidly changing

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>landscape for at least the underbelly of the real estate industry.

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>As so many industries are facing disruption from technological advances.

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>The bond market is experiencing a bit of a sell off,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>at least the US government bond market. You are seeing, uh,

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the risk your markets rally a little bit.

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Mark Branch, chief strategist at

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Hilltop Securities in Bloomberg Profit for our Bloomberg view site

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>up Mark, thank you so much for joining us, and

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with should we care about this

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>selloff in the bond market or will this just be

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a buying opportunity like all of the other small blips

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>upward in bond yields. I think it's a buying opportunity. Lisa.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The technically the lines in the sand or to sixteen

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and two thirty two were right at the high level

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of the support resistance line at two point three to

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>eight as we speak. And I think the our yields

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, even though we're the largest economy,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the strongest economy, or so much higher than European yields,

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as long as the central banks keep printing money, which

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they are way more than the fetters talking about cutting back,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll stay low. Well, Mark ran if you

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>if you'd stay low, what happens in December if the

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve raises interest rates, I think the yield curve

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>just flattens further. We've seen a huge flattening over the

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. As you know, phim better than anybody, and

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa, you both know that how many people have

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>come into the media we're going to have three to

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>yield on the tenure and it just has not taken place,

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't expect it to anytime soon. Well, you know,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that one change in the equation could be

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a tax plan, and President Trump did unveil his proposal yesterday,

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>at least the outline um and there's some speculation that

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the sell off that we're seeing is an expectation that

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the federal deficit will deepen. Therefore, even if we don't

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>see the growth, we will see uh, some inflationary pressures,

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>or at least we'll see that the US is becoming

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>less credit worthy. How much do you buy into that argument? Um,

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no question so that the cause of the markets

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell off the last few days has been the

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>president's tax plan. I do not think the country's going

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to become less credit worthy. It just depends on how

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>much growth you think we're going to see from lower

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>taxes to upset this and uh, I think the growth

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>will there will be growth, and you know what the

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>number is is very difficult to tell, but I think

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the offset for the tax cuts. And also, of

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>course people will have more money to spend, which should

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>be a positive for the economy. Mark, can you tell

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about demand from institutional clients right now?

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>What are they looking for? Yeah, the institution, the big

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>institutional clients and Ideal with quite a number of them

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>directly are outside of the box, if you will, out

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of the box. But what they're looking for, they're they're

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>not getting enough yield and traditional public investments, and most

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of them were doing privates in the debt market, or

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 1>private equity or real estate. They're doing all kinds of

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>things to try to lock in yield because they cannot

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>get it in the public debt markets. Well, you talk

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>about locking in yield, does that lock in their money

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because of limited liquidity in many of these investments. Well,

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these big institutions, especially the life insurance companies,

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>don't need much liquidity. There. You have a longer time

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>horizon and the yield that they're getting the cash flow

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is much more important to them than uh liquidity. So Mark,

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>you are saying that, Um, there sort of seems to

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>be this tense balance here between a commentative monetary policy

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>globally as well as your expectation that the tax proposal

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>would potentially increase growth in thus inflation and thus potentially

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>longer term yield being higher. I'm just wondering what's the

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>range here, what's the lowest that the tenure treasury could

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>go in your opinion in this environment, and what's the

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>highest that the yield could go. Well, you know, it

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>depends on external factors such as North Korea blowing some

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>jetting in America out of the sky. You'd see it

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>two yielding about three minutes uh. Short of something going

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>very wrong, you're probably looking at a two oh six

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on the low side and two fifty two or so

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>to fifty three on the high side. I do not

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>think that there's any way given the amount of money

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that the central banks are printing. The issue here, Lee says,

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to follow the money. The fat is talking

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>about a very minor cutback uh in their balance sheet,

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>while at the same time, the eleven central banks of

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the world, according to Bloomberg Dad or now about twenty

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>one point four trillion in assets and it's growing at

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about three million a month. So as long as the

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>central banks globally or adding keep adding money to the system,

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to see any big reversal and yields.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, just quickly mark Grant once again. December

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>rate increase from the Federal Reserve. Yes, I don't think so.

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're gonna look at the economy and

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>stand pad though I'm certainly in the minority opinion. We'll

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>have to see what happens. Thank you very much more,

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Our chief a strategist from Hilltop Securities He's based in

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for La Florida. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramowits one before the podcast. You

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>can always catch up worldwide on Bloomberg radioh